1 (This is a lecture James Rachels gave at a conference in Cape Town, South Africa, in August of It has never been published.) Do Animals Have Moral Standing? James Rachels 1. Introduction In 1875, the anti-vivisection agitation came to a boil in England. Public meetings were held, petitions were circulated, bills were introduced in parliament, and scientists were thrown on the defensive. The most distinguished, and most beloved, scientist of the day was Charles Darwin. People wanted to know what he thought, but he found it difficult to answer. He wrote to one correspondent, You ask about my opinion on vivisection. I quite agree that it is justifiable for real investigations on physiology; but not for mere damnable and detestable curiosity. It is a subject which makes me sick with horror, so I will not say another word about it, else I shall not sleep tonight. At times, we are told, visitors to the Darwin home were forbidden to bring up the subject. Darwin was never able to resolve his inner conflict.
2 2 Eventually, the controversy subsided, to be renewed 100 years later. The modern animal-rights movement began almost exactly 100 years after Darwin s letter. People take extreme positions. Some believe that we simply should not do experiments on animals. They think that animals have rights, and that rights are inviolable. There is a distinguished philosophical advocate of this view, Tom Regan. Others take quite the opposite view and say that, where animals are concerned, we can do whatever we like. But many thoughtful people want a middle ground. They find themselves in Darwin s position. When we think of all the good that has come from animal experimentation, it seems necessary and indispensable. But when we think of how the animals have suffered, it seems horrible. What would a middle ground look like? If we reject the idea of inviolable rights, and we also reject the idea that we can do anything we want, the alternative is that we have to do a balancing act, balancing the good that might come from the research against the harm done to the animals.
3 3 We are now in the process of learning to do this balancing. In the United States, one of the conspicuous results of the modern animal-rights movement is that research facilities funded by the federal government are now required and they have been required for several years to have animal use committees to monitor the experiments and (theoretically, at least) make sure that the animals are treated as decently as possible, given the requirements of the research. The practical result of doing this balancing will be a great reduction in the use of animals in laboratories. It would mean that our treatment of animals would be more like our treatment of humans. [ASIDE: The researchers themselves, at least the ones I know, are not too happy with this. My own university s medical research center has a full-time employee whose job it is to defend the researchers from the criticisms of the animal activists.] 2. The Idea of Moral Standing I said I was going to discuss Darwin s conflict. Actually, I want to focus on one issue connected with it the question of the moral standing of animals. The concept of standing is, of course, borrowed from the law. You have standing in a court of law if you have the right to be recognized and have
4 4 your claims heard. You have moral standing if, from a moral point of view, you have claims that must be heard if your interests constitute morally good reasons why you may, or may not, be treated in certain ways. People have moral standing. Does anything else? Some environmentalists have argued that trees should have moral standing. This is not quite as silly as it sounds. It just means that the welfare of trees (and other elements of the ecosystem) should be taken into account when we decide what to do and what policies to adopt. And this should be done independently of whether it helps or hurts human beings we should be concerned to protect the trees for their own sakes. If we said that animals have moral standing, it would mean (similarly) that their interests would count, from a moral point of view. And their interests would count for their own sakes. This is contrary to the dominant tradition, which says that we should avoid cruelty to animals only because, if we do not, there may be bad consequences for people. (Aquinas, Kant) So, do animals have moral standing? 3. The Personhood Approach A familiar pattern:
5 5 The strategy seems to be this: We begin with a group of assumptions. Persons have moral standing. Normal human beings are persons. Other beings may or may not be persons. Then we ask what it takes to be a person, and we come up with a criterion what is it that makes us the distinctive sort of being that we are? and the answer usually has something to do with self-consciousness. Then we conclude that nonhuman animals aren t persons but have some sort of lesser status. And then we say that, because of all this, humans have full moral rights and other animals have less than full moral rights. I believe this is a poor way to approach our subject. For one thing, it assumes that whatever makes us the sort of beings that we are = what gives us moral standing = what makes it wrong to mistreat us and this seems wrong. But I will not argue directly against The Personhood Approach. There s a bog here. Sometimes, rather than continuing to debate in the familiar way, it s better to back up and start over and then say: look, this
6 6 other way of thinking is more illuminating and it doesn t get up bogged down in all those non-issues like what is a person and what is selfconsciousness? James W. Walters, What is a Person? An Ethical Exploration (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1997). Walters defines personhood in terms of self-consciousness, and then says self-consciousness is the capacity to be aware of one s distinctive self as a relatively autonomous being among other such selves. (26) This capacity, he says, is both necessary and sufficient for personhood, and for maximal moral standing. (2) Nonhuman animals do have this status. 4. The Criteria of Moral Standing The two most commonly defended views are: Rational, autonomous agents have moral standing. Philosophers who say this generally hold that animals do not have full moral standing, although they might concede that animals have some sort of lesser moral status.
7 7 Motivation for this view: it picks out an especially noble human characteristic a characteristic that makes us sort of wonderful, not just mere animals and says that is the basis of our moral standing. That s why we matter! Sentient beings (capable of feeling pain) have moral standing. Philosophers who say this believe that animals have full moral status. And the argument between these two views is, at least in part, an argument about whether animals have rights. I do not want to take sides in this argument. Instead I want to suggest that there is something wrong with the way the issues are being framed. We are interested in understanding how people (or animals) may be treated. But there is no one characteristic whether it is rationality, sentience, or anything else that is relevant to the whole range of ways in which people (or animals) may be treated. Let me explain why this is important. Rationality and Autonomy Humans, it is said, have moral standing because they are rational, autonomous agents. Humans can guide their own conduct according to their own conceptions of what ought to be done.
8 8 Does the fact that someone is a rational autonomous agent make a difference in how he should be treated? Certainly it may. For such a being, the selfdirection of his own life is a great good, valued not only for its instrumental worth but for its own sake. Thus paternalistic interference may be seen as an evil. To take a simple example: a woman might have a certain conception of how she wants to live her life. This conception might involve taking risks that we think are foolish. We might therefore try to change her mind; we might call attention to the risks and argue that they are not worth it. But suppose she will not heed our warnings: are we then justified in forcibly preventing her from living her life as she chooses? It may be argued that we are not justified, for she is, after all, a rational, autonomous agent. It is different for someone who is not a fully rational being--a small child, for example. Then we feel justified in interfering with his conduct, to prevent him from harming himself. The fact that the child is not (yet, anyway) a fully rational agent justifies us in treating him differently than we would treat someone who is a fully rational agent. But once we understand why being a rational agent makes a difference in how one may be treated, in those cases in which it does make a difference, it becomes clear that possession of this quality is not always relevant. Whether a difference is relevant depends on the kind of treatment that is in question. When the issue is paternalistic interference, it is relevant to note
9 9 whether the individual whose behavior might be coerced is a rational agent. Suppose, however, that what is in question is not paternalistic interference, but something else. Suppose, for example, the question is whether to admit someone to this university. Jones is not admitted because he can t read. Now, the fact that Jones is or is not an autonomous agent has nothing to do with the decision. What is important is the fact that he can t read. Or suppose the question is whether to prescribe penicillin. Now, what is important is whether the person has an infection. Suppose we said only those who can read have moral standing or only those susceptible to infection have moral standing. That would make just as much sense. The plain fact is that different capacities figure into explanations of how people may be treated, depending on what sort of treatment is at issue. What does all this imply about nonhuman animals? It s all right to coerce an animal, for its own good, because it is not an autonomous being.
10 10 It s all right to exclude chimps from university classes, because they can t read. Appropriate veterinary medical treatment may be given to animals, because they are vulnerable to diseases (and their not being autonomous, and not being able to read, has nothing to do with it). Suppose (what is probably impossible) that an unusually gifted chimpanzee learned to read and speak English. And suppose he eventually was able to converse about science, literature, and morals. Finally he expresses a desire to attend university classes. Pain Animals may not be autonomous, and they may not be able to read, but they can suffer pain. And that, of course, is what worries us about many uses of animals in research. Does the fact that doing something would cause pain to an animal constitute a reason against doing it? (A reason of moral weight?) Of course. This brings animals well within the boundaries of the moral community. Does it make any difference to this if the animal isn t an autonomous being? Of course not.
11 11 Philosophical friends of animals have frequently made this point, and in order to circumscribe the boundaries of the moral community, they have expressed a variety of opinions about how far sensitivity to pain extends. Some say: down to the level of shrimps Some say: probably insects can t feel pain What we need, however, is more empirical information. (In the old days, before Darwin, animals were regarded as mere animated machines, on philosophico-religious grounds. Now the pendulum has swung the other way, often on ideological grounds.) Here s the question we need answered: Is the experience of pain something that is well-nigh universal among complex species, or is it something that occurs in only some species (as, for example, echo-location in bats is peculiar to them)? From Daniel Dennett, Brainstorms (Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 1998), p. 346: In an elegant paper, Peter Gärdenfors (1996) points out why a snake can t think of a mouse. It seems that a snake does not have a central representation of a mouse but relies solely on transduced information. The snake exploits three
12 12 different sensory systems in relation to prey, like a mouse. To strike the mouse, the snake uses its visual system (or thermal sensors). When struck, the mouse normally does not die immediately, but runs away for some distance. To locate the mouse, once the prey has been struck, the snake uses its sense of smell. The search behavior is exclusively wired to this modality. Even if the mouse happens to die right in front of the eyes of the snake, it will still follow the smell trace of the mouse in order to find it. This unimodality is particularly evident in snakes like boas and pythons, where the prey often is held fast in the coils of the snake s body, when it e.g. hangs from a branch. Despite the fact that the snake must have ample proprioceptory information about the location of the prey it holds, it searches stochastically for it, all around, only with the help of the olfactory sense organs. (Sjölander, 1993, p. 3) Finally, after the mouse has been located, the snake must find its head in order to swallow it. This could obviously be done with the aid of smell or sight, but in snakes this process uses only tactile information. Thus the snake uses three separate modalities to catch and eat a mouse. So snakes can t think of mice. Can they feel pain? Is there an organized snakey self there that feels pain and minds it?
13 13 Anyway, snakes are not our close kin. The closer a species is to us, the more confidence we can feel. Mammals can feel pain. 5. Conclusion Darwin again: Darwin was anxious to oppose the idea that animals are mere animated machines, and in making the point was willing to attribute a broad range of psychological capacities to animals. They experience not only pleasure and pain, but terror, suspicion, and fear. They sulk. They love their children. They can be kind, jealous, self-complacent, and proud. They are curious. There is no fundamental difference, he said, between man and the higher mammals in their mental faculties. That is why the thought of vivisection bothered him so much. He realized that, to the extent that nonhumans are similar to humans, they should be treated similarly. The view that I have sketched is, I think, Darwinian. It does not elevate some one human characteristic to a place of supreme importance in determining moral status.
14 14 Instead, it sees a complex pattern of similarities and differences between species (and among individuals within species!) and treatments appropriate to those similarities and differences. Our treatment of humans and other animals should be sensitive to the pattern of similarities and differences that exist between them. When there is a difference that justifies treating them differently, we may; but when there is no such difference, we may not. On this view, moral rules are not indexed to species there is not one set of rules for humans, one for nonhumans. The rule against causing pain is not a rule against causing pain to humans. Three Questions: Does this mean we must treat animals in the same way we treat humans? No, not even all people should be treated alike. Do animals have moral standing? Yes, but this simply means that it is objectionable to treat them in certain ways, and that the explanation of why it is objectionable has to do with their own welfare.
15 15 Finally, there is the perennial question, But where do you draw the line? Must we avoid killing cockroaches? There is no one line to be drawn, unless we wish to be arbitrary. Bibliography James W. Walters, What is a Person? An Ethical Exploration (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1997). Daniel Dennett, Brainstorms (Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 1998), p Gärdenfors, P., Cued and detached representations in animal cognition, Behavioral Processes 35 (1996), 263. Sjölander, S. Some cognitive breakthroughs in the evolution of cognition and consciousness, and their impact on the biology of language, Evolution and Cognition 3 (1993), 1-10.
In Defense of Kantian Moral Theory University of California, Berkeley In this paper, I will argue that Kant provides us with a plausible account of morality. To show that, I will first offer a major criticism
Michael Lacewing Kant s deontological ethics DEONTOLOGY Deontologists believe that morality is a matter of duty. We have moral duties to do things which it is right to do and moral duties not to do things
NOÛS 43:4 (2009) 776 785 Critical Study David Benatar. Better Never To Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006) ELIZABETH HARMAN Princeton University In this
"Is There a Need for a New Environmental Ethic?" Richard Routley old and prevailing ethics do deal with man's relationship to nature but in that view the only moral obligation concerns the effects on other
Divine Command Theory 1. Divine Command Theory: This is the view that rightness stems from God s commands: That is, an action is right if God commands it, and wrong if He forbids it. On this view, morality
Moral Theory What makes things right or wrong? Consider: Moral Disagreement We have disagreements about right and wrong, about how people ought or ought not act. When we do, we (sometimes!) reason with
Active and Passive Euthanasia by James Rachels (1975) Abstract The traditional distinction between active and passive euthanasia requires critical analysis. The conventional doctrine is that there is such
Omnipotence & prayer Today, we ll be discussing two theological paradoxes: paradoxes arising from the idea of an omnipotent being, and paradoxes arising from the religious practice of prayer. So far, in
Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals G. J. Mattey Winter, 2015/ Philosophy 1 The Division of Philosophical Labor Kant generally endorses the ancient Greek division of philosophy into
Professor Tim Schallert Director, Behavioral Neuroscience program Department of Psychology University of Texas Austin, Texas September 24, 1997 Dear Dr. Schallert: It has come to our attention that the
Perspectives on Computer Intelligence Can computers think? In attempt to make sense of this question Alan Turing, John Searle and Daniel Dennett put fourth varying arguments in the discussion surrounding
Honours programme in Philosophy Honours Programme in Philosophy The Honours Programme in Philosophy offers students a broad and in-depth introduction to the main areas of Western philosophy and the philosophy
Michael Lacewing Mill s harm principle THE PRINCIPLE In On Liberty, Mill argues for one very simple principle, as entitled to govern absolutely the dealings of society with the individual in the way of
Chapter 15 Social Contract 15.1 Homework Readings EMP 10, RTD 6, SLB 15 Study Questions : 1. What would be our lives in a state of nature according to Hobbes? 2. What are the four basic facts about the
First-Degree Würde: A Means to What End?! An Examination of Human Dignity and Moral Status in Kantian Ethics and Utilitarianism!! Kantian Ethics!! In Chapter 10 of his famous book Leviathan, philosopher
Vivisection: Feeling Our Way Ahead? R. G. Frey Bowling Green State University In his paper "Lab Animals and The Art of Empathy", David Thomas presents his case against animal experimentation. That case
Locke s psychological theory of personal identity phil 20208 Jeff Speaks October 3, 2006 1 Identity, diversity, and kinds............................. 1 2 Personal identity...................................
L ARCHE ONTARIO REGION MANUAL FOR HELPING PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES CHOOSE AN ATTORNEY FOR PERSONAL CARE This booklet s purpose is to provide information. It is not legal advice, and should
Frances Kamm, Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research: A Moral Defense University of San Diego Lawrence M. Hinman, Ph.D. Director, The Values Institute 2/8/2006 Lawrence M. Hinman 1 Source Originally published
The Paradox of Epicurus (~300BC) God and the Problem of Evil Notes from and 1. Either God wants to abolish evil and cannot, or God can abolish evil and does want to. 2. If God wants to abolish evil and
Consumer Report The 6 Critical Questions to Ask BEFORE Hiring a Personal Injury Attorney Provided by: Heiting & Irwin Attorneys At Law 5885 Brockton Avenue Riverside, CA 92506 (951) 682-6400 http://heitingandirwin.com
1 MILL ON JUSTICE: CHAPTER 5 of UTILITARIANISM Lecture Notes Dick Arneson Philosophy 13 Fall, 2004 Some people hold that utilitarianism is incompatible with justice and objectionable for that reason. Utilitarianism
p T h e L a s t L e a f IN A SMALL PART OF THE CITY WEST OF Washington Square, the streets have gone wild. They turn in different directions. They are broken into small pieces called places. One street
Introduction Effective Marketing Strategies for the Development of a Successful Law Practice By Henry J Chang Law schools typically teach law students how to perform legal analysis but really teach them
Aquinas Third Way Last time we had arrived at the following provisional interpretation of Aquinas second way: 1. 2. 3. 4. At least one thing has an efficient cause. Every causal chain must either be circular,
[This essay originally appeared in the Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd edition, ed. Lawrence Becker and Charlotte Becker (New York: Routledge, 2001), vol. 2, pp. 947-50.] Killing And Letting Die Is it worse
Parents recording social workers - A guidance note for parents and professionals The Transparency Project December 2015 www.transparencyproject.org.uk firstname.lastname@example.org (Charity Registration
Migrant Workers and Workers Compensation What You Should Know What are workers compensation benefits? Workers compensation benefits are available to people who are hurt at work in Ontario, including migrant
ON EXTERNAL OBJECTS By Immanuel Kant From Critique of Pure Reason (1781) General Observations on The Transcendental Aesthetic To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to explain, as clearly as possible,
Religious Studies (Short Course) Revision Religion and Animal Rights How to use this presentation The first part of this presentation (blue headings) will give you brief information, religious viewpoints
February 17, 2010 Sheela Vardey, HO III Lynn Tran, 2 nd year Neonatology Fellow Objectives To define ethics and introduce how it applies to clinical medicine To discuss the fundamental principles of ethics
Michael Lacewing Descartes arguments for distinguishing mind and body THE KNOWLEDGE ARGUMENT In Meditation II, having argued that he knows he thinks, Descartes then asks what kind of thing he is. Discussions
The Bach Flower Research Programme electronic library Masonic lecture Edward Bach Masonic lecture Masonic lecture Edward Bach Bibliographical information First published by: Not known Date: 1936 ISBN None
Article Pictorial Power of Attorney Concerning Personal Care Booklet Adapted with permission from http://www.aging-and-disability.org L ARCHE ONTARIO REGION This booklet s purpose is to provide information.
Medical Malpractice VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS INTRODUCTION: Tell the jurors that this is a very big and a very important case. Do a SHORT summary of the case and the damages we are seeking. This summary should
Who Is an Addict? Most of us do not have to think twice about this question. We know! Our whole life and thinking was centered in drugs in one form or another the getting and using and finding ways and
CASE STUDY JAMES TUTTLE VS. LAKELAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE Patrick Horn, Claremont Graduate University Ryan Robinson, Utah Valley State College In the case of James Tuttle and Lakeland Community College in
General Problem Swinburne Why God Allows Evil Why would an omnipotent, perfectly good God allow evil to exist? If there is not an adequate theodicy, then the existence of evil is evidence against the existence
Florida Poly Retreat 2006 Practical Jealousy Management Part 1: On the Nature of Jealousy Jealousy is an unusual emotion in that it is an emotion rooted in other emotions. Often, the root of jealousy lies
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: Richard Raatzsch: The Apologetics of Evil is published by Princeton University Press and copyrighted, 2009, by Princeton University Press. All rights reserved. No part of this book may
BIBLE STUDY (Genesis 2:15-17; 3:1-18) What s This Passage All About? The book of Genesis is about beginnings the beginning of the world, the beginning of humankind, and the beginning of our relationship
Philosophy 110W: Introduction to Philosophy Spring 2011 Hamilton College Russell Marcus Class 13 - March 2 Locke s Theory of the Self I. Body and Soul We have discussed two accounts of personal identity:
Module 4 Introduction to Animal Welfare Ethics Questions 1. Briefly describe what the term speciesism means. (2 marks) Speciesism is the discrimination against or exploitation of certain animal species
Sorensen on Unknowable Obligations Theodore Sider Utilitas 7 (1995): 273 9 1. Access principles Vagueness in the phrase can know aside, the principle of Access An act is obligatory only if its agent can
Appendix D: The Monty Hall Controversy Appendix D: The Monty Hall Controversy - Page 1 Let's Make a Deal Prepared by Rich Williams, Spring 1991 Last Modified Fall, 2004 You are playing Let's Make a Deal
How can you help? A B It s hard to know what to do when you know or suspect that a friend or family member is living with violence. How do I know what is the right thing to do? Should I say something or
Change Cycle Change often involves a process. The Bible describes five significant stages of change that are important to understand. They include Rebellion, Realization, Remorse, Repentance, and Restoration.
1 But Then They Are Told Michael Gorman School of Philosophy The Catholic University of America Washington, D.C. 20064 email@example.com The argument I want to discuss appears at the very end of the passage,
The argument from evil Our topic today is the argument from evil. This is by far the most important argument for the conclusion that God does not exist. The aim of at least the simplest form of this argument
Descartes Meditations Module 3 AQA Meditation I Things which can be called into Doubt Descartes rejects all his beliefs about the external world because they are doubtful and he wants to find a foundation
12 Step Worksheet Questions STEP 1 We admitted we were powerless over alcohol that our lives had become unmanageable. The first time I took a drink I knew it wasn't for me. Every time I drank I got drunk
Perspectives in Philosophy Rene Descartes Descartes Philosophy is the search for certainty the search to know, for yourself, what is really true and really false to know which beliefs are reliable. However,
Of Mice and Men: Equality and Animals* Peter Vallentyne (University of Missouri-Columbia) Originally published in Journal of Ethics 9 (2005): 403-433. Reprinted, with slight revisions, in Egalitarianism:
Terry Price focus on the ethical theories and practices of the cognitive account. The author argues that leaders that even put their own interests aside may not be ethically successful. Thus, volitional
Whiplash 1 Matthew 16:21-28 (NRSV) From that time on, Jesus began to show his disciples that he must go to Jerusalem and undergo great suffering at the hands of the elders and chief priests and scribes,
Moral Theory What makes things right or wrong? What rules should society follow? What principles determine how we ought to interact with other people? Social Justice: What makes for a just society? John
Descartes Fourth Meditation On human error Descartes begins the fourth Meditation with a review of what he has learned so far. He began his search for certainty by questioning the veracity of his own senses.
Michael Lacewing Substance dualism A substance is traditionally understood as an entity, a thing, that does not depend on another entity in order to exist. Substance dualism holds that there are two fundamentally
Michael Lacewing Personal identity: Physical and psychological continuity theories A FIRST DISTINCTION In order to understand what is at issue in personal identity, it is important to distinguish between
TOP 10 MOST COMMON MISTAKES MADE IN HANDLING YOUR OWN INJURY CLAIM More times than not, your personal injury claim will be a battle with an insurance company. A highly trained adjuster will be assigned
Ethical Theories A comparison of the three main branches of normative ethics Three main Ethical Approaches Three main approaches to normative ethics: Virtue ethics (ethics of character) Consequentialism
"God's Wisdom Revealed to All (Ephesians 3:7-20) by Rev. Jackie Stoneman Paul begins this chapter by reminding the Ephesians that he is in fact a prisoner. Because he has been preaching to the Gospel especially
Penultimate Draft Final Version published in Encyclopedia of Environmental Ethics and Philosophy, Vol. 1 (Detroit, MI: Gale Cengage Learning, 2008). Ethical Extensionism 1 Ethical extensionism is an approach
LEARNING OUTCOMES FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY MAJOR Goal 1. Knowledge Base of Psychology Demonstrate familiarity with the major concepts, theoretical perspectives, empirical findings, and historical trends in psychology.
Philosophical Perspectives, 23, Ethics, 2009 I LL BE GLAD I DID IT REASONING AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF FUTURE DESIRES Elizabeth Harman Princeton University I. Two Puzzles We use I ll be glad I did it reasoning
ϕ Copyright 2009 ISSN 1062-6239 ISBN 0-9753949-7-7 No part of this magazine may be reproduced without permission from the publishers. Published annually. is a student organization of Harvard College. ETHICS
I ought never to act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law. What does Kant mean by this, and does it give the right kind of guidance when we are choosing
#2 Claims and Reasons 1 Argument Mapping 2: Claims and Reasons We ll start with the very basics here, so be patient. It becomes far more challenging when we apply these basic rules to real arguments, as
Does rationality consist in responding correctly to reasons? John Broome Journal of Moral Philosophy, 4 (2007), pp. 349 74. 1. Rationality and responding to reasons Some philosophers think that rationality
Written by: Jennifer A. Young www.bestonlinepsychics.net Page 1 Table of Contents Chapter Title Page 01 Consulting a Psychic 03 02 Why Should You Consult a Psychic? 04 03 What Is a Psychic? 05 04 Choosing
Voir Dire in Domestic Violence Cases By Sarah M. Buel, Co-Director, University of Texas School of Law Domestic Violence Clinic Voir dire provides the opportunity to educate jurors while probing for bias,
Oderberg on Animal Rights 1 6 Oderberg on Animal Rights Keith Burgess-Jackson In recent years, a number of prominent philosophers, including David Oderberg, have denied that animals have rights. Unfortunately
TM Green RGB break down: R-15 G-156 B-0 Trading Tips Autochartist Trading Tips VOL. 2 Chapter 1 PLAN YOUR TRADING STRATEGY AND FOLLOW IT In baseball, my theory is to strive for consistency, not to worry
QUESTION 60 An Angel's Love or Affection We next have to consider the act of the will, which is love, i.e., affection (amor sive dilectio). For every act of an appetitive power stems from love, i.e., affection.
activity 5 Is there life on other worlds? purpose Is there life on other worlds? People have pondered this question since ancient times. But now, for the first time in human history, advances in the biological
IMMANUEL KANT S ETHICAL THEORY RIGHTS AND DUTIES DR. DAVE YOUNT, MESA COMMUNITY COLLEGE I. IMMANUEL KANT (1724-1804) A. THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE: The categorical imperative is the way in which you determine
Artificial intelligence PHILOSOPHY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Prof.Dr John-Jules Meyer Dr Menno Lievers Artificial Intelligence is the science of making machines do things that would require intelligence
Boonin on the Future-Like-Ours Argument against Abortion Pedro Galvão Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa David Boonin s recent book 1 is an impressively deep and detailed attempt to establish
BASIC PRAYER Watch Video 1, Anytime, Anywhere. SESSION ONE TALKING WITH YOUR FATHER As you grow as a Christian, prayer will become an important part of your everyday life. Jesus Himself often prayed. The
apter 1 1 Am I experiencing I didn t see myself as an abused woman. The only images I had came from television. I thought of abused women as weak, quiet and less educated women who were battered and bruised.
Ethics Term Paper, Part III Prepared by Alan Soskel The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research The ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research will be explored in this paper. I present a utilitarian argument
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.