In the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "In the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon"

Transcription

1 In the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Multnomah ASBESTOS WORKERS PHILADELPHIA PENSION FUND and W. DONALD WYBERT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated Plaintiffs, v. WILLIAM C. McCORMICK, MICHAEL D. BURGER, KIRBY A. DYESS, DONALD D. JOBE, GEORGE H. KERCKHOVE, WILLIAM W. LATTIN, ROBERT C. STRANDBERG, and FRANCIS YUEN, Defendants. X X C.A. No C.A. No Notice of Settlement of Class Action, of Fairness Hearing, and of Right to Appear TO ALL PERSONS WHO HELD ANY MERIX CORPORATION COMMON STOCK CONTINUOUSLY FROM OCTOBER 6, 2009 THROUGH AND INCLUDING FEBRUARY 16, ALL NOMINEES WHO WERE HOLDERS OF MERIX COMMON STOCK CONTINUOUSLY FROM OCTOBER 6, 2009 THROUGH AND INCLUDING FEBRUARY 16, 2010, ARE REQUIRED TO SEND THIS NOTICE TO THE BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF THAT STOCK NO LATER THAN 10 DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE. ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS NOTICE MAY BE OBTAINED FROM In re Merix Corp. Shareholder Litigation c/o Heffler, Radetich & Saitta L.L.P Market Street, Suite 1700 Philadelphia, PA Telephone The purpose of this Notice ( Notice ) is to inform you of a proposed settlement (the Settlement ) between William C. McCormick, Michael D. Burger, Kirby A. Dyess, Donald D. Jobe, George H. Kerckhove, William W. Lattin, Robert C. Strandberg, and Francis Yuen, defendants in this class action ( Defendants ), and Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Pension Fund and W. Donald Wybert, plaintiffs in this class action ( Plaintiffs ). A hearing will be held in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Multnomah County ( Court ) to consider the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the proposed Settlement. Your legal rights may be affected by this Notice and the proceedings in this litigation, whether you act or do not act. You should read this Notice carefully. Submit a Proof of Claim to Receive Compensation Your Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement You will receive compensation if you submit a timely and valid proof of claim and have not previously opted out of the Class. Your claims against Defendants will be released. Elect Not to Receive Compensation Object If you do not wish to receive any share of the Settlement proceeds, then do nothing, in which case you will receive no consideration and will be bound by all terms of the Settlement. If you opted out of the Class on or prior to June 25, 2011 you are not eligible to participate in or object to the Settlement in any event, and are not bound by its terms. If you wish to share in the Settlement but object to its terms, write to the Court about any objection you have to the Settlement. You may, but are not required to, appear at the Settlement hearing. These options are explained further herein. Questions? Call Toll Free, or Visit

2 Important Dates Deadline to Submit a Proof of Claim February 8, 2012 Deadline to Object October 27, 2011 Date of Final Approval Hearing November 10, 2011 Basic Information 1. What Is The Lawsuit About? The litigation is a class action filed by Plaintiffs on behalf of persons or entities that held any Merix Corporation ( Merix ) common stock continuously from October 6, 2009 through and including February 16, 2010, the date of the closing of the merger of Merix and Viasystems Group, Inc., ( Viasystems ). Defendants were directors of Merix at the time of the Merger. Plaintiffs Consolidated Amended Complaint ( CAC ) alleges that Defendants breached their fiduciary duties of loyalty, good faith and full disclosure to the shareholders of Merix in connection with the sale of Merix to Viasystems (the Merger ). Defendants deny any and all wrongdoing and maintain that they committed no breach of any duty owing to Merix shareholders and exercised in good faith their reasonable business judgment in recommending and approving the merger of Merix with Viasystems Group, Inc. 2. Who Is Included In The Settlement? The Court directed that, for purposes of the proposed settlement, the Class includes All persons or entities that held Merix common stock continuously from October 6, 2009 through the consummation of the merger on February 16, 2010 (the Class ). Excluded from the Class as defined are defendants named herein and any person, firm, trust, corporation or other entity controlled by or affiliated with any Defendant and holders of Merix common stock who were also bondholders of Merix. Any person who previously elected to opt-out of the Class on or before June 25, 2011, is excluded from participating in, receiving the benefits of or objecting to the Settlement. 3. What Does The Settlement Provide? In exchange for the Settlement and dismissal of the Action, Defendants, after any final approval, shall pay or cause to be paid $1,500,000 into a Settlement fund, with interest earned thereupon, to be divided among all eligible Class Members with recognized claims on a pro-rata basis, after plaintiffs administrative costs incurred in connection with the settlement, attorneys fees, expenses, costs of litigation, and all other administrative costs awarded by the Court, are paid. 4. Reasons for the Settlement Because of the risks associated with continuing to litigate and proceeding to trial, there was a danger Plaintiffs would not have prevailed on any of their claims, in which case the Class would receive nothing. The amount of damages suffered by the Class was and continues to be challenged by Defendants. Had the Action gone to trial, Defendants would have asserted that they had not breached any fiduciary duty to the Class, that the merger consideration and process was fair and that in any event, Class Members suffered no damages. In favoring settlement, Plaintiffs also considered the uncertainty of the following legal issues, among others, underlying the allegations in the litigation Whether Defendants breached a duty to maximize shareholder value with respect to the Merger; Whether Defendants complied with or violated the duties of good faith, loyalty, and/or candor with respect to the Merger; Whether any breaches of fiduciary duty by Defendants with respect to the Merger caused Merix shareholders to suffer monetary damages, and the specific amounts that would compensate shareholders for such damages; Whether Defendants Proxy dated January 4, 2010, included any material misrepresentations and/or failed to disclose material information regarding the Merger; Whether Plaintiffs suffered damages as a result of any alleged misconduct by Defendants; and Whether a jury would determine that the price accepted by Defendants fell within a reasonable range of potential valuations and thus, Plaintiffs suffered no damages. Questions? Call Toll Free, or Visit 2

3 The Court did not decide in favor of Plaintiffs or Defendants. Instead, both sides agreed to a settlement. In this manner, they avoid the risks and costs of a trial and lengthly appeals, and Class Members will receive compensation. Plaintiffs and their attorneys believe the settlement is in the best interests of all Class Members. Defendants in this Action, while continuing to deny all allegations of wrongdoing and liability whatsoever, recognize the expense, risks and uncertain outcome of litigation and appeals, especially in a complex action such as this, and wish to avoid the risks and costs associated with future litigation. 5. Who Are The Lawyers Representing Members of the Class? The Court has ordered that Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, 600 West Broadway, Suite 900, San Diego, CA 92101; Finkelstein Thompson LLP, 100 Bush St., Suite 1450, San Francisco, CA 94104; and Justine Fischer, Attorney at Law, 720 SW Washington Street, Suite 750, Portland, OR 97205, will represent all Class Members. These lawyers are called Class Counsel. Any fees awarded to Class Counsel shall be paid from the common settlement fund into which Defendants shall pay or cause to be paid the sum of $1,500,000 (the Settlement Fund ) and only after any approval by the Court. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense. 6. Attorneys Fees and Expenses Sought. Class Counsel will apply to the Court for an award of attorneys fees not to exceed 30% of the gross Settlement Fund, plus interest thereon, and for reimbursements of costs and expenses not to exceed $215, Plaintiffs will also apply to the Court for a service award to Class representative plaintiff W. Donald Wybert not to exceed $5,000 for his time and expense in prosecuting the litigation; and for costs arising from or in connection with the administration of the Settlement and taxes paid in connection with administration of the Settlement Fund. The attorneys fees and expenses will be the only payment to Class Counsel for their efforts in achieving this Settlement and for their risk in undertaking this representation on a wholly contingent basis. Participating in the Settlement 7. How do I Participate in the Settlement? To qualify for a payment, you must send in a Proof of Claim in the form accompanying this Notice. Read the instructions carefully, fill out the Proof of Claim form, include all the documents the form asks for, sign it, and mail it postmarked no later than February 8, 2012 to In re Merix Corp. Shareholder Litigation c/o Heffler, Radetich & Saitta LLP 1515 Market Street, Suite 1700 Philadelphia, PA Additionally, if you do not file a Proof of Claim form, you will remain a member of the Class, and if the Settlement is ultimately approved by the Court, you will release all claims you might have against Defendants in connection with the issues in this case and all of the Court s orders will apply to legally bind you. If you already have litigation pending against Defendants associated with the merger of Merix and Viasystems, you should speak to your lawyer about this notice. Excluding Yourself from the Settlement 8. How does the Settlement affect persons who have already excluded themselves from the Class? On May 12, 2011, the Notice of Pendency of Class Action was issued to Class Members, which informed Class Members who wished to be excluded from the Class to mail a written request for exclusion postmarked on or before June 25, Such persons or entities who properly requested exclusion by this date will not be entitled to share in the benefits of any judgment or settlement, nor will they be bound by any settlement or judgment, and cannot object to the Settlement at the Settlement Hearing. Any persons who timely elected to be excluded from the Class, may pursue, at their own expense, whatever legal rights they may have. 9. How do I exclude myself from the proposed Settlement? If you did not exclude yourself from the Class but nevertheless do not wish to share in the settlement, then you need not do anything and will remain a Class Member bound by the terms of the Settlement, without receiving any pro-rata distribution from the net Settlement proceeds. Questions? Call Toll Free, or Visit 3

4 Objecting to the Settlement 10. How do I Object to the Settlement? If you are a Class Member who did not opt out of the Class by June 25, 2011, you can object to the terms of the Settlement or to Class Counsel s application for an award of fees and/or expenses. The Court will only consider your views if you file a proper objection within the deadline identified and according to the following procedures. To object, you must send a signed letter or other court submission stating you object to the proposed settlement in Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Pension Fund and W. Donald Wybert individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. William C. McCormick, et al., C.A. No and C.A. No to the following on or before October 27, 2011 COURT Clerk of the Court Circuit Court of the State of Oregon County of Multnomah 1021 SW Fourth Avenue Portland, OR CLASS COUNSEL Samuel M. Ward Barrack, Rodos & Bacine 600 West Broadway, Suite 900 San Diego, CA Mark Punzalan Finkelstein Thompson, LLP 100 Bush Street, Suite 1450 San Francisco, CA Justine Fischer Attorney at Law 720 Washington St., Ste. 750 Portland, OR DEFENDANTS COUNSEL James E. Burns, Jr. Richard Gallagher, Jr. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA Your letter must state the amount of shares of Merix common stock you owned continuously from October 6, 2009 through and including February 16, 2010, and should include your name, address, daytime telephone number, and signature. You cannot object by telephone or . You do not need to go to the Final Settlement Hearing to have your written objection considered by the Court. However, any objector may appear in person or arrange, at that objector s expense, for a lawyer to represent the objector at the Final Settlement Hearing provided that objector has complied with the procedures set forth in this Notice for filing and serving a notice of intent to appear. The Final Approval Hearing The Court will hold a hearing to decide whether to approve the proposed Settlement and to award attorneys fees and reimbursement of costs and expenses. You may attend and you may ask to speak, but you do not have to. If you decide to travel to the Final Settlement Hearing, it will be at your own expense. 11. When and Where Will The Court Decide to Approve the Settlement? The Court will hold a Final Settlement Hearing at 900 a.m. on November 10, 2011, in the courtroom of the Honorable Jerome LaBarre at Courtroom 702, Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Multnomah, 1021 SW Fourth Avenue, Portland, OR At this hearing, the Court will consider whether the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and will consider the application of Class Counsel for attorneys fees and reimbursement of costs and expenses. The Court will take into consideration any written objections filed in accordance with the instructions in this Notice. The Court may also listen to people who have properly indicated, within the deadline identified above, of October 27, 2011 an intention to speak at the hearing, but decisions regarding the conduct of the hearing will be made by the Court. At or after the hearing, the Court will decide whether to approve the Settlement and request for attorneys fees and reimbursement of costs and expenses. You should be aware that the Court may change the date and time of the Final Settlement Hearing. Thus, if you want to come to the hearing, you should check with Class Counsel before coming to make sure that the date and/or time has not changed. Questions? Call Toll Free, or Visit 4

5 12. May I Speak At The Hearing? If you object to the settlement, you may ask the Court for permission to speak at the Final Settlement Hearing. To do so, you must include within your objection a statement that it is your intent to appear at the Final Settlement Hearing. You cannot speak at the Final Settlement Hearing if you have excluded yourself from the Class or if you have not provided written notice of your intention to speak at the Final Settlement Hearing by the deadline identified. 13. Further Information. Further information regarding the Action and this Notice may be obtained by contacting any of the following contacting Class Counsel Samuel M. Ward Barrack, Rodos & Bacine 600 West Broadway, Suite 900 San Diego, CA Telephone (619) Mark Punzalan Finkelstein Thompson LLP 100 Bush St., Suite 1450 San Francisco, CA Telephone (415) Justine Fischer Attorney at Law 720 Washington St., Ste. 750 Portland, OR Telephone (503) DO NOT TELEPHONE THE COURT REGARDING THIS NOTICE. DATED September 1, 2011 BY ORDER OF THE COURT CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH Questions? Call Toll Free, or Visit 5

6 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 6

7 In the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Multnomah ASBESTOS WORKERS PHILADELPHIA PENSION FUND and W. DONALD WYBERT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated Plaintiffs, v. WILLIAM C. McCORMICK, MICHAEL D. BURGER, KIRBY A. DYESS, DONALD D. JOBE, GEORGE H. KERCKHOVE, WILLIAM W. LATTIN, ROBERT C. STRANDBERG, and FRANCIS YUEN, Defendants. X X GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS C.A. No C.A. No To recover as a member of the Class based on the Settlement preliminarily approved by the Court on August 24, 2011, in the above captioned consolidated action ( Action ), you must complete and sign this Proof of Claim where indicated and timely submit it to the Claims Administrator. If you fail to submit a properly addressed Proof of Claim (as set forth in Paragraph 4 below) your claim may be rejected and you may be precluded from any settlement fund recovery pursuant to the settlement on behalf of the Class with the Defendants. 2. CLASS MEMBERS DO NOT HAVE TO PERFORM ANY INDIVIDUAL DAMAGES CALCULATIONS. ALL CAL- CULATIONS WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR BASED ON THE PURCHASE AND SALE TRANSACTION INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CLASS MEMBERS ON THE PROOF OF CLAIM FORM. 3. Your Proof of Claim must be verified by the Claims Administrator and approved by the Court before you can share in the proceeds of the Settlement of the Action. 4. YOU MUST MAIL YOUR COMPLETED AND SIGNED PROOF OF CLAIM POSTMARKED ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 8, 2012, ADDRESSED AS FOLLOWS In re Merix Corporation Shareholders Litigation c/o Heffler, Radetich & Saitta LLP 1515 Market Street, Suite 1700 Philadelphia, PA If you are a member of the Class and you did not timely request exclusion, you are bound by the terms of the Judgment entered in the Action whether or not you submit a Proof of Claim. 6. If you did NOT continuously hold any common stock of Merix Corporation during the period from October 6, 2009 through consummation of the merger with Viasystems Group, Inc., on February 16, 2010, you are not a member of the Class and should NOT submit a Proof of Claim. CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION 1. If you purchased Merix common stock and held the certificate(s) in your name, you are the beneficial purchaser as well as the record purchaser. If, however, you purchased Merix common stock and the certificate(s) were registered in the name of a third party, such as a nominee or brokerage firm, you are the beneficial purchaser and the third party is the record purchaser. 2. Use Part I of this form (entitled Claimant Identification ) to identify each purchaser of record, if different from the beneficial purchaser, of Merix common stock which forms the basis of this claim. 3. All joint purchasers must sign this claim. Executors, administrators, guardians, conservators and trustees must complete and sign this claim on behalf of persons represented by them and their authority must accompany this claim and their titles or capacities must be stated. The social security (or taxpayer identification) number and telephone number of the beneficial owner may be used in verifying the claim. Failure to provide the foregoing information could delay verification of your claim or result in rejection of the claim. 7

8 CLAIM FORM 1. Use Part II of this form (entitled Schedule of Transactions in Merix Common Stock ) to supply all required details of your transaction(s) in Merix common stock. If you need more space or additional schedules, attach separate sheets giving all of the required information in substantially the same format. Sign and print or type your name on each additional sheet. 2. Provide all requested information for all of your purchases of Merix common stock which took place on or before October 6, 2009 and which shares were held through the consummation of the merger transaction with Viasystems Group, Inc on February 16, Failure to report all such transactions may result in the rejection of your claim. 3. List each transaction separately and in chronological order, by trade date, beginning with the earliest. You must accurately provide the month, day and year of each transaction you list. 4. Brokerage commissions and transfer taxes paid by you in connection with your purchase of Merix common stock should be included in computing the total purchase price. 5. BROKERS CONFIRMATIONS, MONTHLY STATEMENTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTATION OF ALL OF YOUR TRANSACTIONS IN, AND OWNERSHIP OF, MERIX COMMON STOCK MUST BE ATTACHED TO YOUR CLAIM. FAILURE TO PROVIDE THIS DOCUMENTATION COULD DELAY VERIFICATION OF YOUR CLAIM AND RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR CLAIM. 6. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING ANY PART OF THE CLAIM FORM YOU SHOULD CONTACT COUNSEL FOR THE PLAINTIFF BARRACK, RODOS & BACINE SAMUEL M. WARD 600 West Broadway, Suite 900 San Diego, CA (619) or JUSTINE FISCHER Attorney at Law 720 Washington St., Ste. 750 Portland, OR (503) or FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON, LLP MARK PUNZALAN 100 Bush Street, Suite 1450 San Francisco, CA (415) or HEFFLER, RADETICH & SAITTA LLP CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION 1515 Market Street, Suite 1700 Philadelphia, PA Telephone

9 In the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Multnomah Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Pension Fund and W. Donald Wybert v. William C. Mccormick,et al. PART I CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION Proof of Claim Please Type or Print MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN FEBRUARY 8, Beneficial Owner s Name (First, Middle, Last) Joint Beneficial Owner s Name (First, Middle, Last) If you are a bank or other institution filing on behalf of a third-party, and an account number is needed to identify the claimant for your records, indicate account number here. Attn Street Address City 12 State Zip or Postal Code Foreign Province Foreign Country Check here if your preferred method of communication with the Claims Administrator is via Area Code Telephone No. (day) Area Code Telephone No. (evening) Social Security Number (for individuals) OR Employer Identification Number (for estates, trusts, corporations, etc.) 13 Check one 1 Individual/Sole Proprietor 1 Joint Owners 1 Pension Plan 1 Corporation-Executor 1 Partnership 1 Trust 1 IRA 1 Other Name of Purchaser of Record (if different from Beneficial Owner listed above) 9

10 PART II SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN MERIX COMMON STOCK A) NUMBER OF SHARES OF MERIX COMMON STOCK HELD AT THE CLOSE OF TRADING ON OCTOBER 6, 2009 (must be documented). B) PURCHASES OF MERIX COMMON STOCK FROM OCTOBER 7, 2009 THROUGH FEBRUARY 16, 2010 Date(s) of Purchase (List Chronologically) (Month / Day / Year) Number of Shares of Common Stock Purchased Purchase Price Per Share of Common Stock Total Cost (including commissions, taxes, and fees) Total Shares Purchased C) SALES OF MERIX COMMON STOCK FROM OCTOBER 7, 2009 THROUGH FEBRUARY 16, 2010 Date(s) of Sale (List Chronologically) (Month / Day / Year) Number of Shares of Common Stock Sold Sale Price Per Share of Common Stock Total Cost (including commissions, taxes, and fees) Total Shares Sold D) NUMBER OF SHARES OF MERIX COMMON STOCK HELD AT THE CLOSE OF TRADING ON FEBRUARY 16, 2010 (must be documented). If you require additional space, attach extra schedules in the same format as above. Sign and print your name on each additional page. (Type or print your name here) (Sign your name here) Date 10

11 Submission to Jurisdiction of Court and Acknowledgments I submit this Proof of Claim under the Order of the Court. I also submit to the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Multnomah with respect to my claim as a Class Member. I further acknowledge that I am bound by and subject to the terms of the Judgment entered in the Action. I agree to furnish additional information to Class Counsel or the Claims Administrator to support this claim if required to do so. I have not submitted any other claim covering the same purchases of Merix common stock held continuously from October 6, 2009 through the consummation of the Merger on February 16, 2010, and know of no other person having done so on my behalf. I hereby warrant and represent that I have not assigned or transferred or purported to assign or transfer, voluntarily or involuntarily, any claim covered by this Claim Form or any portion thereof. I (we) certify that I am (we are) NOT subject to backup withholding under the provisions of Section 3406(a)(1)(c) of the Internal Revenue Code. Note If you have been notified by the Internal Revenue Service that you are subject to backup withholding, please strike out the language that you are not subject to backup withholding in the certification above. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of that the foregoing information supplied by the undersigned is true and correct and that this Proof of Claim was executed this day of 2011 in. (City, State) (Sign your name here) (Type or Print your name here) Joint Owner (Sign your name here) (Type or Print your name here) (Capacity of persons signing, e.g., Beneficial Purchaser, Executor or Administrator) Reminder Checklist 1. Please sign the above declaration. 2. Remember to attach supporting documentation and maintain a copy of all documentation submitted. 3. Do not send original stock certificates. 4. If you move, please send us your new address. 5. If you desire an acknowledgment of receipt of your claim form, please send it Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested. 6. Keep a copy of your Proof of Claim form for your records. ACCURATE CLAIMS PROCESSING TAKES A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE. 11

12 In re Merix Corporation Shareholders Litigation c/o Heffler, Radetich & Saitta LLP 1515 Market Street, Suite 1700 Philadelphia, PA Please Forward First Class Mail Please Forward Important Legal Notice

IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS

IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS FAIRFIELD GREENWICH SECURITIES LITIGATION C/O RUST CONSULTING, INC. P.O. BOX 2874 FARIBAULT, MN 55021-8674 IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PASHA S.

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

PROOF OF CLAIM IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA PROOF OF CLAIM IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA WILLIAM DEAN, individually, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 14-cv-00376 DFW/JSM

More information

I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA In re ACE LIMITED SECURITIES LITIGATION ) MDL No. 1675 ) CLASS ACTION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 1. To recover as a

More information

The St. Paul Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation. c/o The Garden City Group, Inc.

The St. Paul Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation. c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Must be Postmarked No Later Than September 12, 2004 PART I: CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION Claim Number: Control Number: The St. Paul Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM. Blitz v. AgFeed Industries, Inc. c/o Claims Administrator PO Box 3207 Portland, OR 97208-3207 Tel: 800-625-7675

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM. Blitz v. AgFeed Industries, Inc. c/o Claims Administrator PO Box 3207 Portland, OR 97208-3207 Tel: 800-625-7675 Blitz v. AgFeed Industries, Inc. c/o Claims Administrator PO Box 3207 Portland, OR 97208-3207 A. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS & INFORMATION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM 1. You are urged to read carefully the

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM In re Bank of New York Mellon Corp. Securities Action c/o Epiq Systems, Claims Administrator P.O. Box 3410 Portland, OR 97208-3410 Toll Free Number: (877) 819-9774 Settlement Website: www.bnymfxsecuritieslitigation.com

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 04 Civ. 8141 (JES) PROOF OF CLAIM GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 1. To receive

More information

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE: SATYAM COMPUTER SERVICES LTD. SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 09-MD-2027-BSJ PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE TO BE ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE A SHARE OF

More information

In re CRM Holdings, Ltd. Securities Litigation c/o GCG P.O. Box 10129 Dublin, OH 43017-3129 Toll-Free: 1 (844) 322-8246

In re CRM Holdings, Ltd. Securities Litigation c/o GCG P.O. Box 10129 Dublin, OH 43017-3129 Toll-Free: 1 (844) 322-8246 Must be Postmarked No Later Than March 18, 2015 In re CRM Holdings, Ltd Securities Litigation c/o GCG PO Box 10129 Dublin, OH 43017-3129 Toll-Free: 1 (844) 322-8246 CRH *P-CRH-POC/1* Control No: Claim

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Address: City:

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Address: City: Deadline For Submission: May 27, 2005 Toll Free: PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE PPI *P-PPIF-APOC/1* STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim Number: Control Number: WRITE ANY NAME AND ADDRESS CORRECTIONS BELOW OR IF THERE

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE YOU MUST COMPLETE THIS CLAIM FORM AND SUBMIT IT BY NOVEMBER 23, 2013 TO BE ELIGIBLE TO SHARE IN THE SETTLEMENT.

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE YOU MUST COMPLETE THIS CLAIM FORM AND SUBMIT IT BY NOVEMBER 23, 2013 TO BE ELIGIBLE TO SHARE IN THE SETTLEMENT. MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 23, 2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION Grant Barfuss, et al, v. DGSE Companies, Inc., et al. No. 12 Civ. 3664 (JJB) ECF

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM A. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS & INFORMATION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM 1. You are urged to read carefully the accompanying Notice of Pendency of Class Action and Proposed Settlement, Settlement Fairness

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE Must Be Postmarked No Later Than November 6, 2015 In re Delcath Systems, Inc Securities Litigation c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10189 Dublin, OH 43017-3189 1-888-470-0243 wwwdelcathsecuritieslitigationcom

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE Deadline for Submission: April 22, 2015 Uni Pixel, Inc. Litigation c/o Strategic Claims Services P.O. Box 230 600 N. Jackson St., Ste. 3 Media, PA 19063 Tel.: 866 274 4004 Fax: 610 565 7985 info@strategicclaims.net

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------- In re WORLDSPACE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ---------------------------------------------------------------- x UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE DYP Securities Litigation 600 N. Jackson St., Ste. 3 Tel.: 866-274-4004 Fax: 610-565-7985 info@strategicclaims.net PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE Deadline for Submission: October 9, 2013 IF YOU PURCHASED OR

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 28, 2015 In re Tower Group International, Ltd. Securities Litigation c/o A.B. Data, Ltd. P.O. Box 170500 Milwaukee, WI 53217-8091 1-800-328-6074 www.towersecuritiessettlement.com

More information

*MFGLOBAL* For Official Use Only

*MFGLOBAL* For Official Use Only UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MICHAEL RUBIN, Plaintiff, v. MF GLOBAL, LTD., et al., Defendants. Case No. 08 Civ. 2233 (VM) PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE *MFGLOBAL* For Official

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM In re Merck & Co., Inc. Vioxx Securities Litigation c/o Epiq Systems P.O. Box 6659 Portland, OR 97228-6659 Toll Free Number: (866) 752-0067 Settlement Website: www.merckvioxxsecuritieslitigation.com Email:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION In re MiMedx Group, Inc. Securities Litigation Civil Action No 1:13-cv-03074 Hon. Thomas W. Thrash CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

In re Weatherford International Securities Litigation c/o GCG P.O. Box 10038 Dublin, OH 43017-6638 1-877-900-6750 PROOF OF CLAIM FORM

In re Weatherford International Securities Litigation c/o GCG P.O. Box 10038 Dublin, OH 43017-6638 1-877-900-6750 PROOF OF CLAIM FORM Must be Postmarked No Later Than August 19, 2014 In re Weatherford International Securities Litigation c/o GCG PO Box 10038 Dublin, OH 43017-6638 1-877-900-6750 WFD *P-WFD-POC/1* Claim Number: Control

More information

Case3:12-cv-05980-CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12

Case3:12-cv-05980-CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12 Case:-cv-00-CRB Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 0 IN RE HP SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: All Actions MASTER

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Aliano et al. v. Templeton Rye Spirits, LLC, Case No. 2014-CH-15667 (Cir. Ct. Cook Cnty., Ill.) IF YOU PURCHASED TEMPLETON RYE WHISKEY FROM JANUARY 1, 2006 TO

More information

Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 FILED 2015 May-27 AM 10:35 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Master File No. 3:10-cv-02502-CAB-DHB CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Master File No. 3:10-cv-02502-CAB-DHB CLASS ACTION CONSTRUCTION WORKERS PENSION TRUST FUND LAKE COUNTY AND VICINITY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. GENOPTIX, INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Hoover v. Hi Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc. Case No. EDCV 13 00097 JGB (OPx) If you purchased a product manufactured by Hi Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc., called Nasal Ease

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:06-cv-02674-DLR CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:06-cv-02674-DLR CLASS ACTION TEAMSTERS LOCAL 617 PENSION AND WELFARE FUNDS, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. APOLLO GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION In re CELERA CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION No. 5:10-cv-02604-EJD(HRL CLASS ACTION NOTICE

More information

Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Webb v. Allstate Insurance Company Case No. 37-2013-00077708

Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Webb v. Allstate Insurance Company Case No. 37-2013-00077708 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Webb v. Allstate Insurance Company Case No. 37-2013-00077708 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation. This is not a lawsuit against

More information

Freedman v. Weatherford International Ltd., et al. c/o GCG P.O. Box 10177 Dublin, OH 43017-3177 1-855-382-6459 PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

Freedman v. Weatherford International Ltd., et al. c/o GCG P.O. Box 10177 Dublin, OH 43017-3177 1-855-382-6459 PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE Must be Postmarked or Received No Later Than December 9, 2015 Freedman v Weatherford International Ltd, et al c/o GCG PO Box 10177 Dublin, OH 43017-3177 1-855-382-6459 WFR *P-WFR-POC/1* Claim Number: Control

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM Must be Postmarked No Later Than December 3, 2015 In re MF Global Holdings Limited Securities Litigation c/o Garden City Group, LLC P.O. Box 10164 Dublin, OH 43017-3164 1-877-940-5045 www.mfglobalsecuritiesclassaction.com

More information

A federal court has authorized this notice.

A federal court has authorized this notice. United States District Court Central District of California James Rose, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiffs, vs. DEER CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC., YING HE, YUEHUA IA, ZONGSHU

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, ss SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION JAMES MAGIDSON and CHRISTOPHER MILLSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE 0:10-cv-00851-SRN-TNL Document 437 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS.

More information

EXHIBIT C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

EXHIBIT C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA EXHIBIT C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If you are not a California resident and you purchased Kashi All Natural / 100% Natural /Nothing Artificial Products between May 3, 2008

More information

1. What is this lawsuit about? 2. 4. What are the numbers from which AmeriCredit may have dialed Class Members? 2

1. What is this lawsuit about? 2. 4. What are the numbers from which AmeriCredit may have dialed Class Members? 2 Newman v. AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc., 11cv3041-DMS-BLM (S.D. Cal.) United States District Court Southern District of California [www.newmanamericreditsettlement.com] Frequently Asked Questions

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : CLASS ACTION TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION x In re IMMUCOR, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To Civil Action No. 105-cv-02276-WSD CLASS ACTION ALL ACTIONS.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION RONALD C. BETTEN and ESTHER LAFA, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Case No. CV13-02885-CBM-(FFMx)

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRICAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. DENNIS ALTER, et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you paid money to Microsoft for an MSN account established in your name at a Best Buy store, never logged

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA GABRIEL JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1-09-CV-146501 CLASS ACTION Judge:

More information

Representative or Custodian Name (if different from Beneficial Owner(s) listed above)

Representative or Custodian Name (if different from Beneficial Owner(s) listed above) Oppenheimer Rochester Funds Securities Litigation Toll Free Number: (877) 273-9532 Claims Administrator Website: www.oppenheimersettlement.com P.O. Box 3518 Email: info@oppenheimersettlement.com Portland,

More information

United States District Court, District of Minnesota. Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM

United States District Court, District of Minnesota. Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM United States District Court, District of Minnesota Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING A court

More information

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Class Action Lawsuit:

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Class Action Lawsuit: Circuit Court For The 13 th Judicial Circuit In And For Hillsborough County, Florida If you provided health care treatment or services to people insured by United Services Automobile Association, USAA

More information

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you owned, occupied and/or resided within residential property located within the Class Addresses on June 5-6,

More information

If you purchased Gogo Inflight Internet service, you may be entitled to benefits from a class action settlement.

If you purchased Gogo Inflight Internet service, you may be entitled to benefits from a class action settlement. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK If you purchased Gogo Inflight Internet service, you may be entitled to benefits from a class action settlement. A court authorized

More information

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If you are a subscriber of Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and you, or your dependent, have been diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder, you could receive

More information

Submit a Valid Claim Form Deadline: February 12, 2016 Ask to be excluded Deadline: November 24, 2015. Object Deadline: November 24, 2015

Submit a Valid Claim Form Deadline: February 12, 2016 Ask to be excluded Deadline: November 24, 2015. Object Deadline: November 24, 2015 NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles IF FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE APPLIED DEPRECIATION WHEN CALCULATING A PAYMENT MADE TO YOU ON A PROPERTY LOSS INSURANCE CLAIM,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE MARGERY ROBERTSON, et al., On Behalf of Themselves Master Case No. 793247 and All Others Similarly Situated, (Consolidated with 793468 and 795190

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Ilya Zaydenberg v. Crocs Retail, Inc., et al. Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BC554214; Christopher S. DuRee, et al. v.

More information

If You Paid Overdraft Fees to M&T Bank, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

If You Paid Overdraft Fees to M&T Bank, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If You Paid Overdraft Fees to M&T Bank, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. A federal court authorized this

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Mirkarimi v. Nevada Property 1 LLC dba The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas S.D. Cal. Case No. 12-cv-02160-BTM (DHB)

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Mirkarimi v. Nevada Property 1 LLC dba The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas S.D. Cal. Case No. 12-cv-02160-BTM (DHB) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Mirkarimi v. Nevada Property 1 LLC dba The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas S.D. Cal. Case No. 12-cv-02160-BTM (DHB) PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. THIS NOTICE CONTAINS IMPORTANT

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Case :0-cv-0-DLR Document Filed 0// Page of 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Local Teamsters Pension and Welfare Funds, et al., v. Plaintiffs, Apollo Group Incorporated,

More information

IF YOU PURCHASED ORGANIX BRAND HAIR CARE OR SKIN CARE PRODUCTS YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO A CASH PAYMENT

IF YOU PURCHASED ORGANIX BRAND HAIR CARE OR SKIN CARE PRODUCTS YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO A CASH PAYMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IF YOU PURCHASED ORGANIX BRAND HAIR CARE OR SKIN CARE PRODUCTS YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO A CASH PAYMENT THIS NOTICE AFFECTS YOUR RIGHTS. A Federal

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. A Settlement will provide $19,560.00

More information

Case 1:09-cv-03701-JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : EXHIBIT A

Case 1:09-cv-03701-JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : EXHIBIT A Case 109-cv-03701-JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x FORT WORTH EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. DAVID HIMBER V. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC. CASE NO.: 09 Civ.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. DAVID HIMBER V. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC. CASE NO.: 09 Civ. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAVID HIMBER V. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC. CASE NO.: 09 Civ. 4143 (SJF) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT All persons who received

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. ED-CV-08-01249-GW(JCx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. ED-CV-08-01249-GW(JCx) CLASS ACTION MARCELO CUNHA, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, HANSEN NATURAL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN

More information

If You Used a 0% Check On Your Capital One Credit Card, You May Be Entitled To Cash From A Class Action Settlement

If You Used a 0% Check On Your Capital One Credit Card, You May Be Entitled To Cash From A Class Action Settlement LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA If You Used a 0% Check On Your Capital One Credit Card, You May Be Entitled To Cash From A Class Action Settlement

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS If you are a current or former installation technician of Cable Communications, Inc. and worked in Oregon, please read this Notice carefully.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CITY OF LAKELAND EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN

More information

If You Paid Overdraft Fees to Capital One, Hibernia, or North Fork, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

If You Paid Overdraft Fees to Capital One, Hibernia, or North Fork, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If You Paid Overdraft Fees to Capital One, Hibernia, or North Fork, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. A

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. 2:08-md-01919-MJP. Lead Case No. C07-1874 MJP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. 2:08-md-01919-MJP. Lead Case No. C07-1874 MJP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE IN RE WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE AND ERISA LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ERISA Action No. 2:08-md-01919-MJP

More information

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a proposed class settlement (the Class Settlement ) of the above entitled purported

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a proposed class settlement (the Class Settlement ) of the above entitled purported LEGAL NOTICE: If you worked for PLS Financial Solutions of California, Inc. (formerly Payday Loan Store of California, Inc.) or PLS Check Cashers of California, Inc. as an hourly paid or non exempt employee

More information

U.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

U.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT U.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT If you are or were employed by U.S. BANK, N.A. as an In-Store Banker 1, In-Store Banker 2, Senior In-Store Banker 1, and/or Senior In-Store Banker 2 at In-Store

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RANDY ROMERO; ET AL., Plaintiff, v. GROWLIFE, INC.; ET AL, Master File No. CV14 3015 CAS(JEMx) CLASS ACTION Hon. Christina A. Snyder Defendants.

More information

Notice of Class Action Lawsuit and Proposed Settlement. You May be Entitled to Receive a Settlement Payment.

Notice of Class Action Lawsuit and Proposed Settlement. You May be Entitled to Receive a Settlement Payment. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Notice of Class Action Lawsuit and Proposed Settlement. You May be Entitled to Receive a Settlement Payment. A federal court authorized this

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE TESCO PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION Case: 14 Civ. 8495-RMB NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TO: ALL PERSONS WHO PURCHASED

More information

REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION FROM SETTLEMENT. JENKINS V. GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE GREATER EAST BAY, INC., Alameda County Superior Court Case No.

REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION FROM SETTLEMENT. JENKINS V. GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE GREATER EAST BAY, INC., Alameda County Superior Court Case No. JENKINS V GOODWILL SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR C/O RUST CONSULTING, INC. - 4347 PO BOX 2396 FARIBAULT, MN 55021-9096 IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS *Barcode39* -

More information

JPM FAIR FUND CLAIM FORM

JPM FAIR FUND CLAIM FORM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION JPM FAIR FUND CLAIM FORM Claim Forms may be submitted online by visiting the JPMorgan Chase Non Disclosure Fair Fund ( JPM Fair Fund ) website:

More information

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COURT

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COURT LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COURT IF YOU USED A CHECK PROVIDED BY CAPITAL ONE TO TRANSFER A BALANCE ON YOUR CAPITAL ONE CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT IN APRIL OR MAY 2009, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER

More information

Your legal rights are affected whether you act or don t act. Please read this Notice carefully.

Your legal rights are affected whether you act or don t act. Please read this Notice carefully. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you are the original owner of certain MacBook or MacBook Pro computers and/or you purchased a standalone 60W or 85W MagSafe power adapter

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Anthony Abbott, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lockheed Martin Corp., et al., Defendants. Case No. 06-cv-701 Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan NOTICE OF CLASS

More information

If You Paid Overdraft Fees on Debit Card Transactions to Bank of America, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

If You Paid Overdraft Fees on Debit Card Transactions to Bank of America, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA If You Paid Overdraft Fees on Debit Card Transactions to Bank of America, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE IN RE REGIONS MORGAN KEEGAN ERISA LITIGATION This Document Relates to: In re Regions Morgan Keegan ERISA Litig., No. 2:08-cv-2192-SHM-dvk Case

More information

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

United States District Court for the Northern District of California United States District Court for the Northern District of California If You Purchased a Tour from Viator between October 16, 2008 and June 7, 2014 that Was Advertised as Discounted with No Text Describing

More information

Case: 1:13-cv-02115 Document #: 66 Filed: 06/12/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:662

Case: 1:13-cv-02115 Document #: 66 Filed: 06/12/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:662 Case: 1:13-cv-02115 Document #: 66 Filed: 06/12/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:662 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK CORPORATION SECURITIES

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT TO: All persons who are domiciled or reside in the United States or its territories and whose

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Patricia Buzenes v. Nuvell Financial Services LLC, et al. Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC407366 The Court ordered this Notice This is not a solicitation from a lawyer and You are not being

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JULIO TARDIO, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 12-cv-06619-JGK NEW ORIENTAL EDUCATION

More information

LEGAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

LEGAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT LEGAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT The Records of Trina Turk reflect that you may be part of the proposed FACTA and/or Song Beverly Settlement Classes described as follows: All individuals

More information

Case No. CV-08-00810 R NOTICE TO CLASS OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Case No. CV-08-00810 R NOTICE TO CLASS OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEPHEN STETSON, SHANE LAVIGNE, CHRISTINE LEIGH BROWN-ROBERTS, VALENTIN YUI KARPENKO, and JAKE JEREMIAH FATHY, individually and on behalf of

More information

EXHIBIT A Proposed Notice UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN You have been identified as a member of a class which has been the subject of a settlement. This settlement may

More information

If You Were Sent a Text Message from The Western Union Company, You May Be Entitled to a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

If You Were Sent a Text Message from The Western Union Company, You May Be Entitled to a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS If You Were Sent a Text Message from The Western Union Company, You May Be Entitled to a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. A federal

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SILVERSTRAND INVESTMENTS, SAFRON CAPITAL CORPORATION, and BRIARWOOD INVESTMENTS, INC., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated,

More information

LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS LAWSUIT: The only way to potentially receive money from this Settlement.

LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS LAWSUIT: The only way to potentially receive money from this Settlement. LEGAL NOTICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Individuals Whose Minnesota Driver s License Records Were Accessed for Illegitimate Reasons May Benefit from a Class Action Settlement.

More information

Superior Court of Cobb County, State of Georgia In re Cobb EMC Class Action, Case No. 10:100353-48 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Superior Court of Cobb County, State of Georgia In re Cobb EMC Class Action, Case No. 10:100353-48 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court of Cobb County, State of Georgia In re Cobb EMC Class Action, Case No. 10:100353-48 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT A Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation.

More information

Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND HEARING A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. If you paid an

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Roger Krueger, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc., et al., Defendants. Case No. 11-cv-2781 Judge Susan Richard Nelson NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION

More information

A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Michael Wilkins and Kenneth Mills v. HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A. and HSBC Card Services Inc., United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Case No. 14-cv-190 If automated calls were directed

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO JOHN B. BLYLER AND MALCOLM J. CORSE, on behalf Case No. C 97 0332 BLW of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. WILLIAM J. AGEE,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT If you purchased products from U.S. Foodservice, Inc. (now known as US Foods, Inc.) under a cost-plus arrangement between 1998 and 2005, you

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION READ CAREFULLY AND DO NOT DISCARD

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION READ CAREFULLY AND DO NOT DISCARD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION READ CAREFULLY AND DO

More information

Case3:12-cv-01377-SI Document89-1 Filed10/09/13 Page1 of 12. A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

Case3:12-cv-01377-SI Document89-1 Filed10/09/13 Page1 of 12. A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. If you are a current or former owner or lessee of

More information

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Clark v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., Case No.: 3:13-cv-0485-JM-JMA Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action A settlement

More information

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE AND THE ENCLOSED CLAIM FORM CAREFULLY

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE AND THE ENCLOSED CLAIM FORM CAREFULLY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING If You Are a Washington Health Care Provider or a Washington PIP Insured of a USAA Company, and Your Health Care Bills Were Reduced Based on an

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If you received a call from or on behalf of Los Angeles Times Communications LLC, you could be entitled to benefits under a class

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS If you are the current or former Plan Administrator of an employee pension benefits plan covered by the Employee Retirement Income

More information

If you received a Washington Mutual Home Loan

If you received a Washington Mutual Home Loan EXHIBIT C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LEGAL NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Spears, et al. v. First American eappraiseit, Case No. 5-08-CV-00868 (RMW) If you received

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING MYSPINE, PS, a Washington professional services corporation; BODY RECOVERY CLINIC LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company; and YAROSLAV KUTSY, Plaintiffs,

More information