UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE"

Transcription

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE IN RE REGIONS MORGAN KEEGAN ERISA LITIGATION This Document Relates to: In re Regions Morgan Keegan ERISA Litig., No. 2:08-cv-2192-SHM-dvk Case No. 2:09-md SHM NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF ERISA CLASS ACTION LITIGATION, SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING, AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES, REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES AND PROPOSED NAMED PLAINTIFFS CASE CONTRIBUTION AWARDS (Customer Plans Settlement Subclass Notice) Based on records maintained by Regions Financial Corporation ( Regions ), it appears that the [INSERT PLAN NAME] ( Your Plan ) is a member of the proposed Customer Plans Settlement Subclass in the above-captioned Class Action (the Action ) which asserts claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ( ERISA ). This Notice provides important information with respect to the Action and a proposed class action settlement (the Settlement ) that has been preliminarily approved by the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee (the Court ). The Settlement applies to a proposed Settlement Subclass of ERISA Customer Plans (the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass ), including Your Plan, which consists of all employee benefit plans governed by Part 4 of Title I of ERISA as to which Regions Bank, whether in its own name or doing business as Regions Morgan Keegan Trust, either (i) provided trustee, custodial, investment management or investment advisory services or (ii) otherwise provided access to a platform of investments, and had any assets invested in any one of the RMK Bond Funds during the period from November 9, 2006 through July 29, 2008 inclusive (the Customer Plans Subclass Period ). Excluded from the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass are the Customer Plans that previously signed agreements releasing one or more of the Defendants from claims encompassed by the Released Claims. The RMK Bond Funds include the RMK Advantage Income Fund; RMK High Income Fund; RMK Multi-Sector High Income Fund; RMK Strategic Income Fund; RMK Select High Income Fund; RMK Select Intermediate Bond Fund; and RMK Select Short Term Bond Fund. The Customer Plans Settlement Subclass does not include any employee benefit plan sponsored by Regions Financial Corporation or any present or former subsidiary or affiliate. IF YOU HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT YOU DO NOT HAVE TO TAKE ANY ACTION IN ORDER FOR YOUR PLAN TO PARTICIPATE IN THE SETTLEMENT AND RECEIVE ANY PAYMENT TO WHICH IT IS ENTITLED UNDER THE SETTLEMENT. IF YOU DISAPPROVE OF ANY ASPECT OF THE SETTLEMENT, YOU MAY OBJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURES DESCRIBED BELOW. YOUR PLAN MAY ALSO REQUEST TO EXCLUDE ITSELF FROM THE CUSTOMER PLANS SETTLEMENT SUBCLASS AND THE SETTLEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURES DESCRIBED BELOW. IMPORTANT INSTRUCTION FOR PLAN FIDUCIARIES: IF YOU ARE A FIDUCIARY OF YOUR PLAN, YOU ARE DIRECTED BY THE COURT TO FURNISH THE TEXT OF THE SUMMARY NOTICE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT TO YOUR PLAN S PARTICIPANTS, BENEFICIARIES, AND OTHER FIDUCIARIES NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 7, YOU MAY DO THIS BY ANY METHOD CUSTOMARILY USED TO COMMUNICATE WITH YOUR PLAN S PARTICIPANTS, BENEFICIARIES, AND OTHER FIDUCIARIES ABOUT YOUR PLAN, INCLUDING, IF APPLICABLE, POSTING A COPY OF THE SUMMARY NOTICE ON YOUR PLAN S WEBSITE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING PROVIDING THE SUMMARY NOTICE TO YOUR PLAN S PARTICIPANTS, BENEFICIARIES, AND OTHER FIDUCIARIES, PLEASE CONTACT PLAINTIFFS CO-LEAD COUNSEL LISTED BELOW IN RESPONSE TO QUESTION 14. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. A FEDERAL COURT AUTHORIZED THIS NOTICE. THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION. YOU HAVE NOT BEEN SUED

2 This notice advises you of a proposed settlement of a class action lawsuit brought by Named Plaintiffs that include James K. Smith, II, both as a participant of, and on behalf of, the Keith Smith Company Inc. Employee Profit Sharing Plan, the Briscoe Production Company Employees Retirement Plan (the Representative Customer Plans ), and C. Fred Daniels solely in his capacity as the court-appointed Trustee ad Litem of trusts for the two Representative Customer Plans. Named Plaintiffs and Defendants are referred to as the Parties. Other capitalized terms used in this Notice and not defined in it have the meaning assigned to them in the Settlement Agreement. The Court has preliminarily approved the Settlement and has scheduled a hearing to evaluate the fairness and adequacy of the Settlement. At the hearing, the Court will consider the Named Plaintiffs requests for final approval of the Settlement, for class certification, for approval of the Plan of Allocation, for an award of attorneys fees, litigation expenses, and for Case Contribution Awards for the Named Plaintiffs. The hearing has been scheduled for December 15, 2014, at 9:00 am in Courtroom 2 of the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Clifford Davis/Odell Horton Federal Building, 167 North Main Street, 11th Floor, Memphis, Tennessee The terms of the Settlement are contained in the Class Action Settlement Agreement ( Settlement Agreement ), a copy of which is available at You can also obtain a copy of the Settlement Agreement and information about the Settlement by contacting (877) (toll free) or ing Please do not contact the Court, Regions, or counsel for Defendants. They will not be able to answer your questions. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND COMPLETELY. IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THE CUSTOMER PLANS SETTLEMENT SUBCLASS, THE SETTLEMENT WILL AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS. YOU ARE NOT BEING SUED, YOU DO NOT HAVE TO APPEAR IN COURT, AND YOU DO NOT HAVE TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY IN THIS CASE

3 SUMMARY OF ACTIONS YOU MAY TAKE IN THE SETTLEMENT NO ACTION IS NECESSARY FOR YOUR PLAN TO RECEIVE PAYMENT. YOUR PLAN (ACTING THROUGH ITS PLAN FIDUCIARIES) MAY ASK TO BE EXCLUDED FROM THE SETTLEMENT ( OPT-OUT OF THE CLASS) (Opt-outs must be postmarked by October 31, 2014 and received by November 7, 2014.) YOU CAN OBJECT (Objections must be filed with the Court and received by the lawyers no later than October 28, 2014.) YOU CAN GO TO THE HEARING ON DECEMBER 15, If the Settlement is approved by the Court, Your Plan is not required to do anything to receive a payment. Your Plan s allocable portion of the Class Settlement Amount will be calculated as part of the implementation of the Settlement. If Your Plan did not receive this Notice by mail and you believe you should have, please contact the Claims Administrator at (877) (toll free) or to ensure that Your Plan s current address is entered into the database that will be used to distribute money from the Settlement. A fiduciary of Your Plan may file, on behalf of Your Plan, a written request to exclude Your Plan ( opt-out ) from the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass and the Settlement. The procedure for excluding or opting-out Your Plan from the Settlement is described in response to Question 10 below. Opting out is the only option under which Your Plan, its fiduciaries, participants, or beneficiaries, could be permitted to bring their own separate lawsuit against the Defendants or any of the other Defendant Releasees asserting any claims that would be released by the Settlement. However, if Your Plan excludes itself from the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass, it will not participate in the Settlement and will not receive any portion of the recovery to which it would otherwise be entitled under the Settlement. If you wish to object to any part of the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, the request for attorneys fees and expenses, or the Named Plaintiff Case Contribution Awards, you can write to the Court, Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel, and Defendants Counsel to explain why you do not like the Settlement, as set forth in the response to Question 14. You may (but do not have to) attend the Fairness Hearing even if you do not file a written objection. You will only be allowed to speak at the Fairness Hearing, however, if you both: (a) submit a written objection to the Settlement to the Court and the lawyers identified below before the Courtapproved deadline, as set forth in the response to Question 14, and (b) submit a written Notice of Intent to Appear at Fairness Hearing to the Court and the lawyers identified below before the Court-approved deadline as set forth in response to Question 18. Copies of some of the relevant documents filed with the Court are available at or by contacting (877) or - 3 -

4 WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT... 4 BASIC INFORMATION Why is this Notice being provided? What is the lawsuit about? What has happened so far? Why is this case a class action? Why is there a Settlement? How do I know whether my Plan is part of the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass? What does the Settlement provide? How much will my Plan get? How can my Plan get its portion of the recovery? When can my Plan expect to receive its payment?... 8 EXCLUDING YOUR PLAN FROM THE SETTLEMENT Can a Customer Plan opt-out of the Settlement? What is the procedure for opting-out? What is the effect of opting-out?... 9 THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU Does my Plan have a lawyer in the case? How will the lawyers be paid?... 9 OBJECTING TO THE SETTLEMENT OR THE ATTORNEYS FEES How do I tell the Court if I don t like the Settlement What is the difference between objecting and opting out of the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass? THE COURT S FAIRNESS HEARING When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the Settlement? Do I have to come to the hearing? May I speak at the hearing? IF YOU DO NOTHING What happens if I do nothing at all? THE COURT EXPRESSES NO OPINION ABOUT THE MERITS OF THE ACTION Is the Court taking a position on this case? GETTING MORE INFORMATION How do I get more information? SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT A Qualified Settlement Fund has been established consisting of $22.5 million (the Class Settlement Amount ) to settle all Released Claims against all Defendants. As explained in the Settlement Agreement, the share of the Class Settlement Amount allocated to settlement of the claims asserted by the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass is % (approximately $2.4 million) ( Customer Plans Settlement Subclass Amount ). Information about the three other Settlement Subclasses included in the Settlement is available at The Settlement Subclass Amounts, which will consist of the Class Settlement Amount minus certain amounts described in the Settlement Agreement, including Courtapproved attorneys fees, litigation expenses, Case Contribution Awards to Named Plaintiffs, and costs of administering the Settlement, will be allocated among the Settlement Subclasses in accordance with Section of the Settlement Agreement and the Plan of Allocation to be approved by the Court. (See Question 7 below for details about the Plans of Allocation.) YOUR PLAN HAS ALREADY BEEN DETERMINED BY THE PARTIES TO BE A MEMBER OF THE PROPOSED CUSTOMER PLANS SETTLEMENT SUBCLASS. Claims asserted by three In-House Plans Settlement Subclasses (which involve Plans sponsored by Regions Financial Corporation) are also at issue in the Action and will be settled under the Settlement Agreement as well. A separate Notice applies to the In-House Plans Settlement Subclasses. As with any lawsuit, the Parties would face an uncertain outcome if the Action were not settled. Continued litigation of the Action could result in a verdict greater or less than the recovery under the Settlement Agreement, or in no recovery at all. This Action has been highly contested from the outset. Named Plaintiffs and Defendants have disagreed about whether - 4 -

5 Defendants did anything wrong, and they do not agree on the amount that would be recoverable if the case were tried. Defendants, among other things: (1) have denied, and continue to deny, all allegations asserted in the Action; (2) have denied, and continue to deny, any wrongdoing or liability whatsoever; (3) believe that they acted at all times reasonably, prudently and lawfully with respect to the Plans, their participants and beneficiaries, and the Settlement Subclasses, including the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass; (4) would assert certain other defenses if the Settlement is not consummated; and (5) are entering into the Settlement solely to avoid the cost, disruption, and uncertainty of litigation. Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel will ask the Court for an order awarding them fees not in excess of 30% of the Class Settlement Amount, plus reimbursement of expenses. The two Representative Customer Plans identified above will share in the allocation of the money paid to the Customer Plans on the same basis and to the same extent as all other members of the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass, except that, in addition, Named Plaintiffs will apply to the Court for a Case Contribution Award of up to $10, each. Any Case Contribution Award granted to Named Plaintiffs by the Court will be payable from the proceeds of the Settlement. C. Fred Daniels as the court-appointed Trustee ad Litem of trusts for the two Representative Plans will not seek a Case Contribution Award or an award of attorneys fees. 1. Why is this Notice being provided? BASIC INFORMATION The Court has directed that this Notice be sent to the Customer Plans because they have a right to know about the proposed Settlement with Defendants (including Regions) before the Court decides whether to approve the Settlement. If the Court approves the Settlement, and any related objections and appeals are favorably resolved, the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass Amount will be allocated among the Customer Plans according to a Court-approved Plan of Allocation, and the Customer Plans and the fiduciaries, participants and beneficiaries of such Customer Plans, will release Regions and the other Defendant Releasees as more fully defined in the Settlement Agreement from all Released Claims, as set forth in the Settlement Agreement. This Notice explains the Action, the Settlement, the legal rights of the Customer Plans and their fiduciaries, participants and beneficiaries, what benefits are available under the Settlement, who is eligible for them, and how payment will be made to the Customer Plans. The purpose of this Notice is to inform you of a hearing ( Fairness Hearing ) to be held by the Court to consider the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the proposed Settlement and to consider the application of Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel for attorneys fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses as well as an application for Case Contribution Awards to Named Plaintiffs. Another purpose of this Notice is to explain how Your Plan can exclude itself from (opt-out of) the Settlement and how you can object to the Settlement, the application of Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel for attorneys fees and expenses, or the application for Case Contribution Awards to Named Plaintiffs. The Fairness Hearing will be held at 9:00 am on December 15, 2014, before the Honorable Samuel H. Mays, Jr. of the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, in the Clifford Davis/Odell Horton Federal Building, 167 North Main Street, 11th Floor, Memphis, Tennessee 38103, to determine: (a) Whether the Settlement should be approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate; (b) Whether the Action should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the terms of the Settlement; (c) Whether this Notice and the way it was disseminated constituted proper notice and met all applicable legal requirements; (d) Whether the Settlement Subclasses should be certified for the purposes of settlement only and whether Interim Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel should be appointed as Plaintiffs Co-Lead (Class) Counsel for the Settlement Subclasses; (e) Whether the application for attorneys fees and expenses filed by Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel should be approved; and (f) Whether the application for Case Contribution Awards for Named Plaintiffs should be approved. If the Court approves the Settlement, payment to the Settlement Subclasses will be made after all related appeals, if any, are favorably resolved. It is hard to tell whether such appeals, if any, will be favorably resolved, and resolving them can take time, perhaps more than a year. Please be patient

6 2. What is the lawsuit about? What has happened so far? With respect to the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass, Named Plaintiffs allege that Defendants were fiduciaries of the Customer Plans and violated fiduciary duties under the ERISA by allowing the Customer Plans to invest or remain invested in the RMK Bond Funds when they were allegedly unsuitable and imprudent investments for the Customer Plans. Named Plaintiffs further allege that Defendants violated ERISA by failing to adequately monitor appointees, by failing to provide information pertinent to the RMK Bond Funds to other fiduciaries, by failing to provide participants with complete and accurate information about the RMK Bond Funds, by failing to monitor the performance of other fiduciaries or otherwise prevent or remedy breaches of duty by other fiduciaries, and by knowingly participating in the breaches. Named Plaintiffs sought to recover from Defendants the losses that the Customer Plans suffered when the value of the RMK Bond Funds declined during the Customer Plans Subclass Period. Defendants deny that they have any liability to the Customer Plans, their fiduciaries, participants or beneficiaries, and deny that Named Plaintiffs, the Customer Plans, and the Customer Plans participants and beneficiaries have suffered any losses attributable to Defendants actions. Additional and different claims are asserted on behalf of the In-House Plans Settlement Subclasses. Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel have conducted an extensive investigation of the facts and claims in this Action, including of the alleged losses suffered by the Customer Plans as a result of the breaches of fiduciary duty alleged in the Action. Through that investigation and through discovery of additional information in the Action, Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel have obtained documents and materials governing the Customer Plans, Regions Securities and Exchange Commission filings, press releases, public statements, news articles and other publications. Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel have reviewed and analyzed these materials and thousands of documents and electronically stored information produced by Defendants and conclude that the Settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate and in the best interest of the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass. The Court denied Defendants first motions to dismiss the Complaint. Plaintiffs filed amended and supplemental complaints, including the Third Amended Complaint. Defendants motions to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint were denied by the Court as to certain claims and remained pending as to others at the time of Settlement. This Settlement is the product of intensive, arm s-length negotiations between Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel and Defendants Counsel, during which the terms of the Settlement were extensively debated and negotiated. The Settlement should not be construed or seen as evidence of or an admission or concession on the part of any Defendant with respect to any claim or of any fault or liability or wrongdoing or damage whatsoever, or any infirmity or weakness in the defenses that Defendants have asserted. 3. Why is this case a class action? In a class action, one or more plaintiffs, called Named Plaintiffs, sue on behalf of people who have similar claims. With respect to the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass, the individuals on whose behalf Named Plaintiffs are suing are members of a class of certain fiduciaries, participants, beneficiaries, and former fiduciaries, participants, and beneficiaries of the Customer Plans. Here, there are four Subclasses, of which the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass is one, because there are different types of claims at issue. 4. Why is there a Settlement? In reaching the Settlement, the Parties have avoided the cost, time and risk associated with a trial. As with any litigation, Named Plaintiffs would face an uncertain outcome if this Action proceeded, including the risk of losing on appeal or at trial. On the one hand, pursuing the case against Defendants could result in a verdict offering relief greater than this Settlement. On the other hand, continuing the case against Defendants could result in a verdict for less money than Named Plaintiffs have obtained in this Settlement, or even no recovery at all. Based on these risks and an evaluation of the particular risks presented by this case, Named Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs Co-lead Counsel believe the Settlement is in the best interests of the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass

7 5. How do I know whether my Plan is part of the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass? The Court has preliminarily certified this case to proceed as a class action for purposes of Settlement. The Customer Plans Settlement Subclass consists of all employee benefit plans governed by Part 4 of Title I of ERISA for which Regions Bank, whether in its own name or doing business as Regions Morgan Keegan Trust, either (i) provided trustee, custodial, investment management or investment advisory services or (ii) otherwise provided access to a platform of investments, and had any assets invested in any one of the RMK Bond Funds during the period from November 9, 2006 through July 29, 2008 inclusive (the Customer Plans Subclass Period ). Excluded from the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass are the Customer Plans that previously signed agreements releasing one or more of the Defendants from claims encompassed by the Released Claims. The Customer Plans Settlement Subclass does not include any employee benefit plan sponsored by Regions Financial Corporation or any present or former subsidiary or affiliate. If Your Plan is a member of the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass, Your Plan s share of the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass Amount, if any, will be determined in accordance with the Court-approved Plan of Allocation, described in the response to Question 7 below. 6. What does the Settlement provide? The Settlement Agreement provides for the payment of $22.5 million (the Class Settlement Amount ) into a Qualified Settlement Fund. As explained in the Settlement Agreement, % of the Class Settlement Amount (approximately $2.4 million) will be allocated to the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass and % of this payment will be allocated to the three In-House Plans Settlement Subclasses, which are also being settled under the Settlement Agreement. The Class Settlement Amount (including interest, but after payment of certain amounts described in the Settlement Agreement, including Court-approved attorneys fees and litigation expenses, Named Plaintiff Case Contribution Awards, taxes, and costs related to administration of the Settlement) will be allocated to the subclasses, including to the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass, according to Section of the Settlement Agreement and the Plan of Allocation. The portion paid to the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass is referred to as the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass Amount. In exchange for the settlement payment and other consideration, all Customer Plans Settlement Subclass members and anyone claiming through them will fully release all Defendant Releasees from all Released Claims, and will be barred from bringing any Released Claim against any Defendant Releasee. The specific Defendant Releasees are identified in the Settlement Agreement; generally they are Defendants and certain affiliated or otherwise related persons and entities. The Released Claims, as specifically defined in the Settlement Agreement and only summarized here, generally include, subject to certain limitations set forth in the Settlement Agreement, all claims asserted in the Action, as well as any claims that could have been asserted by or on behalf of Customer Plans Settlement Subclass members which arise from, out of, or in connection with any of the acts, omissions, facts, matters, transactions, or occurrences that are alleged, referred to, described, or mentioned in the Complaint. This means that Customer Plans Settlement Subclass members will not have the right to sue the Defendant Releasees for any such Released Claims if the Settlement is approved. The Released Claims do not include claims to enforce the settlement or the claims asserted in: In re Regions Morgan Keegan Open-End Mutual Fund Litigation, Case No. 2: SHM-dkv; In re Regions Morgan Keegan Closed-End Fund Litigation, Case No. 2:07-cv SHM-dkv; Landers et al. v. Morgan Asset Management, Inc. et al., 2:08-cv SHM; and In re Helios Closed-End Funds Derivative Litigation, 2:11-cv SHM, which are separate lawsuits and which are not affected by this Settlement. Similarly, any rights of Customer Plans Settlement Subclass members to receive payments or distributions from the SEC Fair Fund are not Released Claims and are not affected by the Settlement. However, Settlement Subclass members shall not be entitled to recover more than 100% of their losses

8 7. How much will my Plan get? Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel have submitted the Plan of Allocation to the Court for approval by the Court at or after the Fairness Hearing. The Plan of Allocation for the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass Amount, which may be obtained at or by contacting (877) or describes how the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass Amount will be distributed to Customer Plan Accounts. For the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass, the Plan of Allocation generally provides that each Customer Plan Account s share of the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass Amount will be calculated in proportion to its Net Bond Fund Losses. The Plan of Allocation provides that, at a minimum, each Customer Plan Account will be allocated $ The Claims Administrator will calculate each Customer Plan Account s Net Bond Fund Loss by: (i) taking the market value of the Customer Plan Account s investments in the RMK Bond Funds at the beginning of the Customer Plans Subclass Period (i.e., on November 9, 2006); (ii) adding the purchase price or market value of any additional shares of the RMK Bond Funds that were purchased or otherwise acquired by the Customer Plan Account during the Subclass Period; (iii) subtracting the dollar amounts received by or credited to the Customer Plan Account as a result of any dispositions (e.g., sales, redemptions, transfers, etc.) of shares of the RMK Bond Funds during the Subclass Period; (iv) subtracting the market value of the Customer Plan Account s investments in RMK Bond Funds at the end of the Subclass Period (i.e., on July 29, 2008); (v) subtracting the dollar amount of any payment from the States Fund to the Customer Plan Account; and (vi) subtracting $100. The Claims Administrator will assign each Customer Plan Account a Net Bond Fund Loss Percentage determined by dividing the sum of all Customer Plan Accounts Net Bond Fund Losses into each Customer Plan Account s individual Net Bond Fund Loss. Each Customer Plan Account s share of the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass Amount will be equal to $ plus the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass Amount (less fees and expenses) multiplied by the Customer Plan Account s Net Bond Fund Loss Percentage. The Claims Administrator will perform all calculations and determine whether Your Plan is entitled to a share of the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass Amount and, if so, Your Plan s allocated share. Defendants and, where applicable, the Trustee ad Litem, will provide the Claims Administrator with their available Plan records so you do not need to be concerned if you no longer have your Plan account statements. 8. How can my Plan get its portion of the recovery? Neither you nor Your Plan need to file a claim. Your Plan s allocated share, if any, will be distributed to Your Plan. 9. When can my Plan expect to receive payment? Payment is conditioned on several things, including the Court s approval of the Settlement and that approval becoming a Final Order and no longer subject to any appeals. Depending on the court process, distribution could take many months or more than a year; please be patient. Allocation and distribution within Your Plan of the amount Your Plan receives from the Settlement, if any, is to be decided solely by Your Plan and is not addressed or determined by the Settlement Agreement or Plan of Allocation in this Action

9 10. Can a Customer Plan opt-out of the Settlement? What is the procedure for opting out? Under the Settlement a fiduciary of a Customer Plan may cause that Customer Plan to exclude itself ( opt-out ) from the Settlement. To do so, a Plan fiduciary must send a letter signed by the fiduciary or an authorized representative of a Plan fiduciary clearly manifesting an intent that the Customer Plan be excluded from the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass. The letter must include the full legal name of the Plan, the name, telephone number and address of the Plan fiduciary or other duly authorized representative of the Plan fiduciary executing the opt-out request on behalf of a Customer Plan. The written opt-out request must also state the title or position of each person submitting the exclusion request on behalf of a Customer Plan, and include a statement that the person(s) executing the request is authorized to do so on behalf of the Customer Plan. The Plan fiduciaries for a Customer Plan should be identified in the documents establishing and governing the Plan. Often, the employer (Plan sponsor) is the Plan Administrator and is, therefore, a fiduciary. Questions concerning identification of Plan fiduciaries who can exercise the right of a Customer Plan to exclude itself ( opt-out ) from the Settlement can be directed to Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel (see response to Question 14 below). Any requests for exclusion must be mailed by First Class Mail (preferably by Certified First Class Mail, Return Receipt Requested) postmarked no later than October 31, 2014 and received by November 7, 2014 by the Claims Administrator at the following address: Regions Morgan Keegan ERISA Settlement c/o GCG P.O. Box Seattle, WA What is the Effect of Opting Out? Any Customer Plan that opts out-of the Settlement will not receive any share of the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass Amount, or any other proceeds under the Settlement. Further, any Customer Plan that opts-out of the Settlement will not be bound by the provisions of the Settlement that prevent any Customer Plan from pursuing a legal proceeding against the Defendant Releasees on any of the Released Claims. Therefore, if a Customer Plan s fiduciaries would prefer to bring their own suit against Defendants for any of the Released Claims instead of having that Customer Plan receive its pro rata share of the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass Amount a Plan fiduciary must submit a request to opt-out of the Settlement on behalf of the Plan. 12. Does my Plan have a lawyer in the case? THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU Yes. The Court thas appointed the law firms of Keller Rohrback L.L.P. and Feinstein Doyle Payne & Kravec, LLC as Interim Co-Lead Counsel for the Named Plaintiffs, the Customer Plans, and the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass. Your Plan will not be charged directly by these lawyers. If Your Plan wants to be represented by its own lawyer, Your Plan may hire one at its own expense. If Your Plan does hire its own attorney, the attorney must both effect service of a Notice of Appearance on counsel listed in the answer to Question 14 below and file the Notice of Appearance with the Court no later than November 14, To speak at the Fairness Hearing, you or Your Plan s attorney must file a Notice of Intent to Appear at Fairness Hearing as explained below in Question How will the lawyers be paid? Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel will apply for an award of attorneys fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses. The application for attorneys fees will not exceed 30% of the Class Settlement Amount. Any award of fees and additional expenses will be paid from the Class Settlement Amount prior to allocation and payment to the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass. The written application for fees and expenses, together with the application for Case Contribution Awards to Named Plaintiffs, will be filed on September 23, 2014, and the Court will consider this application at the Fairness Hearing. A copy of the application will be available at Any objection to the application for attorneys fees and litigation expenses must be BOTH (a) filed with the Clerk of the Court c/o the address listed below in response to Question 14, and (b) received by all of the counsel listed below in response to Question 14 by no later than October 28, To date Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel have not received any payment for their services in prosecuting this Action on behalf of the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass, nor have counsel been reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses. The fee requested by Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel would compensate them for their efforts in achieving the Settlement for the benefit of the Settlement Subclasses and for their risk in undertaking this representation on a contingent basis. The Court will determine the actual amount of any award

10 OBJECTING TO THE SETTLEMENT, THE ATTORNEYS FEES, OR THE CASE CONTRIBUTION AWARDS 14. How do I tell the Court if I don t like the Settlement? As a fiduciary of a Customer Plan, or a participant or beneficiary of a Customer Plan, you may object to the Settlement if you do not like any part of it. To object, you must send a letter or other written statement saying that you object to the Settlement, the application for an award of attorneys fees and expenses, and/or the Case Contribution Awards in In Re Regions Morgan Keegan ERISA Litigation, No. 2:08-cv-2192-SHM-dvk. Such written objections must: (a) state all the supporting bases and reasons for the objections; (b) set forth the basis of your membership in the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass; (c) describe any witnesses, documents and any other evidence of any kind that you may wish to present at the Fairness Hearing in connection with such objections; and (d) provide a summary description of the substance of any testimony that you may wish to offer yourself or through any witnesses in support of your objections. Along with the information set forth in items (a) through (d), be sure that your objection includes your name, address, telephone number, and signature. Any written objection, together with all required supporting documents, must be BOTH (a) filed with the Clerk of the Court c/o of the address listed below, and (b) received by upon all of the counsel listed below, by no later than October 28, To speak at the Fairness Hearing, you or Your Plan s attorney must also file a Notice of Intent to Appear at Fairness Hearing as explained below in response to Question 18. All written objections must be received by the Clerk of the Court and the lawyers listed below by October 28, 2014: CLERK OF THE COURT United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Clifford Davis/Odell Horton Federal Building 167 North Main Street Memphis, Tennessee Re: 2:08-cv-2192-SHM-dvk PLAINTIFFS CO-LEAD COUNSEL: Derek W. Loeser KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P Third Avenue Suite 3200 Seattle, WA Ellen Doyle FEINSTEIN DOYLE PAYNE & KRAVEC, LLC 1705 Allegheny Building 429 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, PA COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS: Michael J. Prame GROOM LAW GROUP, CHARTERED 1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 1200 Washington, DC William B. Wahlheim, Jr. MAYNARD COOPER & GALE, P.C th Avenue N. Suite 2400 Birmingham, AL What is the difference between objecting and opting-out of the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass? Objecting is simply telling the Court that you disapprove of some aspect of the Settlement. You can object only if Your Plan stays in the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass. If a Customer Plan opts-out of the Subclass, it will no longer be part of the Subclass or participate in the Settlement. UNLESS OTHERWISE ORDERED BY THE COURT, ANY SETTLEMENT SUBCLASS MEMBER WHO DOES NOT OBJECT IN THE MANNER DESCRIBED ABOVE WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE WAIVED ANY OBJECTION AND SHALL BE FOREVER FORECLOSED FROM OBJECTING TO THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND THE APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES AND CASE CONTRIBUTION AWARDS

11 THE COURT S FAIRNESS HEARING 16. When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the Settlement? The Court will hold a Fairness Hearing at 9:00 am on December 15, 2014, in Courtroom 2 of the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Clifford Davis/Odell Horton Federal Building, 167 North Memphis Street, 11th Floor, Memphis, Tennessee IF YOU DO NOT WISH TO OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OR THE APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES AND CASE CONTRIBUTION AWARDS, YOU DO NOT NEED TO ATTEND THE FAIRNESS HEARING. At the hearing, the Court will consider whether the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. If there are objections, the Court will consider them. After the Fairness Hearing, the Court will decide whether to approve the Settlement and certify the Settlement Subclasses. The Court will also consider the motions for attorneys fees and expenses and Case Contribution Awards to Named Plaintiffs, as well as the proposed Plan of Allocation. We do not know how long these decisions will take. You should be aware that the Court may change the date and time of the Fairness Hearing without further notice to the Class. If you plan to attend the Fairness Hearing, you should confirm the date and time with Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel. 17. Do I have to come to the hearing? No, but you are welcome to come at your own expense. If you submit a written objection, you do not have to come to Court to talk about it. As long as your written objection is filed and received on time, it will be before the Court when the Court considers whether to approve the Settlement. You may also have your own lawyer at your own expense attend the Fairness Hearing, but such attendance is not mandatory. 18. May I speak at the hearing? You or Your Plan s attorney may speak at the Fairness Hearing and explain (i) why you think the proposed Settlement of this Action should not be approved as fair, reasonable and adequate; (ii) why you think that a judgment and order granting final approval of the Settlement should not be entered; and/or (iii) why any requested application for an award of attorneys fees and expenses and Case Contribution Awards should not be granted in whole or in part; if you timely: (a) file your objection with the Court in writing and (b) ask the Court for permission to speak by sending a letter or other paper called a Notice of Intent to Appear at Fairness Hearing in In Re Regions MorganKeegan ERISA Litigation, No. 2:08-cv SHM-dvk. The Notice of Intent to Appear must be BOTH (a) received by the attorneys listed in the response to Question No. 14 above no later than November 14, 2014, and (b) filed with the Clerk of the Court at the address listed in the response to Question No. 14 no later than November 14, Be sure to include your name, address, telephone number, and signature, and, if applicable, the name, address and phone number of Your Plan s attorney. Any objector or objector s attorney who does not timely file and serve a Notice of Intent to Appear in accordance with this paragraph will not be permitted to speak at the Fairness Hearing, except for good cause shown. 19. What happens if I do nothing at all? IF YOU DO NOTHING If you do nothing and you are a Customer Plans Settlement Subclass member, you will participate in the Settlement as described in this Notice if the Settlement is approved, and you will be deemed to have released all Released Claims against all of the Defendant Releasees. THE COURT EXPRESSES NO OPINION ABOUT THE MERITS OF THE ACTION 20. Is the Court taking a position on this case? No. By authorizing this Notice to be sent to the Customer Plans in the Customer Plans Settlement Subclass, the Court expresses no opinion on the merits of the parties claims or defenses

12 21. How do I get more information? GETTING MORE INFORMATION This Notice summarizes the proposed Settlement. Full details about the Settlement are in the Settlement Agreement. You may obtain copies of the Settlement Agreement, as well as copies of the motion seeking preliminary approval of the Settlement Agreement and the Preliminary Approval Order, at Settlement Agreement or by contacting (877) or DATED: June 23, Please Do Not Call the Court with Questions about the Settlement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE IN RE REGIONS MORGAN KEEGAN ERISA LITIGATION This Document Relates to: In re Regions Morgan Keegan ERISA Litig., No. 2:08-cv-2192-SHM-dvk Case

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. 2:08-md-01919-MJP. Lead Case No. C07-1874 MJP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. 2:08-md-01919-MJP. Lead Case No. C07-1874 MJP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE IN RE WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE AND ERISA LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ERISA Action No. 2:08-md-01919-MJP

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Roger Krueger, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc., et al., Defendants. Case No. 11-cv-2781 Judge Susan Richard Nelson NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION

More information

Notice of Class Action Lawsuit and Proposed Settlement. You May be Entitled to Receive a Settlement Payment.

Notice of Class Action Lawsuit and Proposed Settlement. You May be Entitled to Receive a Settlement Payment. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Notice of Class Action Lawsuit and Proposed Settlement. You May be Entitled to Receive a Settlement Payment. A federal court authorized this

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION READ CAREFULLY AND DO NOT DISCARD

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION READ CAREFULLY AND DO NOT DISCARD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION READ CAREFULLY AND DO

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Anthony Abbott, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lockheed Martin Corp., et al., Defendants. Case No. 06-cv-701 Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan NOTICE OF CLASS

More information

Superior Court of Cobb County, State of Georgia In re Cobb EMC Class Action, Case No. 10:100353-48 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Superior Court of Cobb County, State of Georgia In re Cobb EMC Class Action, Case No. 10:100353-48 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court of Cobb County, State of Georgia In re Cobb EMC Class Action, Case No. 10:100353-48 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT A Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JULIO TARDIO, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 12-cv-06619-JGK NEW ORIENTAL EDUCATION

More information

EXHIBIT A Proposed Notice UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN You have been identified as a member of a class which has been the subject of a settlement. This settlement may

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS If you are the current or former Plan Administrator of an employee pension benefits plan covered by the Employee Retirement Income

More information

FILE A CLAIM EXCLUDE YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT DO NOTHING OBJECT TO THE SETTLEMENT ATTEND THE HEARING

FILE A CLAIM EXCLUDE YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT DO NOTHING OBJECT TO THE SETTLEMENT ATTEND THE HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Your Personal ID # is Your Access Code is If you made a workers compensation claim in South Carolina under an AIG

More information

Submit a Valid Claim Form Deadline: February 12, 2016 Ask to be excluded Deadline: November 24, 2015. Object Deadline: November 24, 2015

Submit a Valid Claim Form Deadline: February 12, 2016 Ask to be excluded Deadline: November 24, 2015. Object Deadline: November 24, 2015 NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles IF FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE APPLIED DEPRECIATION WHEN CALCULATING A PAYMENT MADE TO YOU ON A PROPERTY LOSS INSURANCE CLAIM,

More information

LEGAL NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENTS

LEGAL NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN LEGAL NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENTS If you were employed as a Registered Nurse by a hospital in the Detroit area between December

More information

If you received a Washington Mutual Home Loan

If you received a Washington Mutual Home Loan EXHIBIT C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LEGAL NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Spears, et al. v. First American eappraiseit, Case No. 5-08-CV-00868 (RMW) If you received

More information

United States District Court, District of Minnesota. Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM

United States District Court, District of Minnesota. Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM United States District Court, District of Minnesota Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING A court

More information

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE AND THE ENCLOSED CLAIM FORM CAREFULLY

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE AND THE ENCLOSED CLAIM FORM CAREFULLY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING If You Are a Washington Health Care Provider or a Washington PIP Insured of a USAA Company, and Your Health Care Bills Were Reduced Based on an

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, ss SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION JAMES MAGIDSON and CHRISTOPHER MILLSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs,

More information

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COURT

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COURT LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COURT IF YOU USED A CHECK PROVIDED BY CAPITAL ONE TO TRANSFER A BALANCE ON YOUR CAPITAL ONE CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT IN APRIL OR MAY 2009, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IF YOU WORKED AS AN ENTERTAINER FOR RICK S CABARET IN NEW YORK, YOU COULD GET A PAYMENT FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. A federal

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON In re Classmates.com Consolidated Litigation, Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON In re Classmates.com Consolidated Litigation, Case No. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON In re Classmates.com Consolidated Litigation, Case No. 09-cv-0045-RAJ NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT TO: ALL MEMBERS OF THE

More information

Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND HEARING A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. If you paid an

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA GABRIEL JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1-09-CV-146501 CLASS ACTION Judge:

More information

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If you are a subscriber of Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and you, or your dependent, have been diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder, you could receive

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. A Settlement will provide $19,560.00

More information

If you purchased Gogo Inflight Internet service, you may be entitled to benefits from a class action settlement.

If you purchased Gogo Inflight Internet service, you may be entitled to benefits from a class action settlement. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK If you purchased Gogo Inflight Internet service, you may be entitled to benefits from a class action settlement. A court authorized

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------- In re WORLDSPACE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ---------------------------------------------------------------- x UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

You have been identified as a member of a Class which has been the subject of a settlement. This settlement may affect your rights.

You have been identified as a member of a Class which has been the subject of a settlement. This settlement may affect your rights. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN You have been identified as a member of a Class which has been the subject of a settlement. This settlement may affect your rights. This

More information

Notice of Class Action Settlement

Notice of Class Action Settlement IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION KOTA OF SARASOTA, INC. individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. DAVID HIMBER V. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC. CASE NO.: 09 Civ.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. DAVID HIMBER V. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC. CASE NO.: 09 Civ. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAVID HIMBER V. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC. CASE NO.: 09 Civ. 4143 (SJF) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT All persons who received

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION RONALD C. BETTEN and ESTHER LAFA, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Case No. CV13-02885-CBM-(FFMx)

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you paid money to Microsoft for an MSN account established in your name at a Best Buy store, never logged

More information

IF YOU PURCHASED ORGANIX BRAND HAIR CARE OR SKIN CARE PRODUCTS YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO A CASH PAYMENT

IF YOU PURCHASED ORGANIX BRAND HAIR CARE OR SKIN CARE PRODUCTS YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO A CASH PAYMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IF YOU PURCHASED ORGANIX BRAND HAIR CARE OR SKIN CARE PRODUCTS YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO A CASH PAYMENT THIS NOTICE AFFECTS YOUR RIGHTS. A Federal

More information

If You Paid Overdraft Fees to M&T Bank, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

If You Paid Overdraft Fees to M&T Bank, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If You Paid Overdraft Fees to M&T Bank, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. A federal court authorized this

More information

If You Paid Overdraft Fees on Debit Card Transactions to Bank of America, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

If You Paid Overdraft Fees on Debit Card Transactions to Bank of America, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA If You Paid Overdraft Fees on Debit Card Transactions to Bank of America, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:06-cv-02674-DLR CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:06-cv-02674-DLR CLASS ACTION TEAMSTERS LOCAL 617 PENSION AND WELFARE FUNDS, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. APOLLO GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT If you purchased products from U.S. Foodservice, Inc. (now known as US Foods, Inc.) under a cost-plus arrangement between 1998 and 2005, you

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IF YOU PURCHASED CERTAIN TOM S OF MAINE PRODUCTS YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO A CASH PAYMENT THIS NOTICE AFFECTS YOUR RIGHTS. A Federal Court

More information

A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Michael Wilkins and Kenneth Mills v. HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A. and HSBC Card Services Inc., United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Case No. 14-cv-190 If automated calls were directed

More information

Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA HOWARD L. HOWELL, Lead Plaintiff, ELLISA PANCOE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others

More information

You Could Get Money from a Class Action Settlement if You Paid for Medical Services at a Michigan Hospital from January 1, 2006 to June 23, 2014.

You Could Get Money from a Class Action Settlement if You Paid for Medical Services at a Michigan Hospital from January 1, 2006 to June 23, 2014. United States District Court For The Eastern District Of Michigan You Could Get Money from a Class Action Settlement if You Paid for Medical Services at a Michigan Hospital from January 1, 2006 to June

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Master File No. 3:10-cv-02502-CAB-DHB CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Master File No. 3:10-cv-02502-CAB-DHB CLASS ACTION CONSTRUCTION WORKERS PENSION TRUST FUND LAKE COUNTY AND VICINITY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. GENOPTIX, INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE: 2008 FANNIE MAE ERISA 09-CV-01350-PAC LITIGATION MDL No. 2013 NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MIGHT BE AFFECTED IF

More information

If You Purchased StarKist Tuna, You May Benefit From A Proposed Class Action Settlement

If You Purchased StarKist Tuna, You May Benefit From A Proposed Class Action Settlement United States District Court for the Northern District of California If You Purchased StarKist Tuna, You May Benefit From A Proposed Class Action Settlement A federal court authorized this notice. This

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------- --x : IN RE CANON INKJET PRINTER LITIGATION : No. 2:14-cv-3235-LDW-SIL : -----------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY If you bought Dreamfields Pasta you could get a cash payment from a class action settlement. (A federal court authorized this notice. This is

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Hoover v. Hi Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc. Case No. EDCV 13 00097 JGB (OPx) If you purchased a product manufactured by Hi Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc., called Nasal Ease

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION AND TRIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION AND TRIAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION AND TRIAL If you were employed as a Registered Nurse (and not solely as a Supervisory, Managerial,

More information

A court has authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. You are not being sued.

A court has authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. You are not being sued. MONTANA ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FLATHEAD COUNTY A court has authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. You are not being sued. If you are a Class Member, your legal rights

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. A settlement will provide a $4,500,000 fund from which claims

More information

If You Used a 0% Check On Your Capital One Credit Card, You May Be Entitled To Cash From A Class Action Settlement

If You Used a 0% Check On Your Capital One Credit Card, You May Be Entitled To Cash From A Class Action Settlement LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA If You Used a 0% Check On Your Capital One Credit Card, You May Be Entitled To Cash From A Class Action Settlement

More information

NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT Karen Washington v. Key Health Medical Solutions Inc. NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS! IF YOU

More information

Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Webb v. Allstate Insurance Company Case No. 37-2013-00077708

Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Webb v. Allstate Insurance Company Case No. 37-2013-00077708 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Webb v. Allstate Insurance Company Case No. 37-2013-00077708 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation. This is not a lawsuit against

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you paid a practice assessment to the American Psychological Association Practice Organization, you

More information

IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR DALLAS COUNTY

IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR DALLAS COUNTY IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR DALLAS COUNTY If you paid for food purchases between January 1, 2000 and August 1, 2014 at an Iowa-based prekindergarten, elementary school, middle school, or high school that,

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF INDIRECT PURCHASER CLASS ACTION WITH TIN INC. AND UNITED STATES GYPSUM

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF INDIRECT PURCHASER CLASS ACTION WITH TIN INC. AND UNITED STATES GYPSUM NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF INDIRECT PURCHASER CLASS ACTION WITH TIN INC. AND UNITED STATES GYPSUM TO: Indirect Purchasers of Wallboard This notice is being provided pursuant to an Order of the United

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you had a Straight Talk, Net10, Simple Mobile, or Telcel America Unlimited Mobile Service Plan, you may be entitled to a cash refund

More information

EXHIBIT C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

EXHIBIT C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA EXHIBIT C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If you are not a California resident and you purchased Kashi All Natural / 100% Natural /Nothing Artificial Products between May 3, 2008

More information

Your legal rights are affected whether you act or don t act. Please read this Notice carefully.

Your legal rights are affected whether you act or don t act. Please read this Notice carefully. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you are the original owner of certain MacBook or MacBook Pro computers and/or you purchased a standalone 60W or 85W MagSafe power adapter

More information

Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement and Fairness Hearing

Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement and Fairness Hearing Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement and Fairness Hearing Minor, et al. v. Congoleum Corporation United States District Court District Of New Jersey Case No.: 3:13-cv-07727-PGS-LHG This is a Notice

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Willisch v. Nationwide Insurance Company of America, Civil Litigation No. 09-5276-TJS Justice, II v. Nationwide Affinity Insurance

More information

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you owned, occupied and/or resided within residential property located within the Class Addresses on June 5-6,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If you received a call from or on behalf of Los Angeles Times Communications LLC, you could be entitled to benefits under a class

More information

Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368

Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368 Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ABBOTT, et al., ) ) No: 06-701-MJR-DGW

More information

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE If you took out an Orange Mortgage or Easy Orange Mortgage from ING Bank from October 1, 2005 to May 31, 2009, or

More information

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois IF AUTOMATED COLLECTION CALLS OR ACCOUNT INFORMATION CALLS OR TEXTS RELATING TO A CHASE CREDIT CARD OR BANK ACCOUNT WERE DIRECTED TO YOUR

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Aliano et al. v. Templeton Rye Spirits, LLC, Case No. 2014-CH-15667 (Cir. Ct. Cook Cnty., Ill.) IF YOU PURCHASED TEMPLETON RYE WHISKEY FROM JANUARY 1, 2006 TO

More information

If Allstate Paid You for an Automobile Bodily Injury Claim,

If Allstate Paid You for an Automobile Bodily Injury Claim, Class Notice of Proposed Settlement IN THE MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY If Allstate Paid You for an Automobile Bodily Injury Claim, You May Be Entitled to Money from a Proposed

More information

If You Paid for Vioxx Before October 1, 2004,

If You Paid for Vioxx Before October 1, 2004, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA If You Paid for Vioxx Before October 1, 2004, You May Be Able To Get Money Back A Federal Court authorized this Notice. It is not a solicitation

More information

Notice of Settlement

Notice of Settlement UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Notice of Settlement If you worked for Grande Cheese Company, a Proposed Class and Collective Action Settlement May Affect Your Rights. You May

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS If you are a current or former installation technician of Cable Communications, Inc. and worked in Oregon, please read this Notice carefully.

More information

Case3:12-cv-05980-CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12

Case3:12-cv-05980-CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12 Case:-cv-00-CRB Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 0 IN RE HP SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: All Actions MASTER

More information

If You Were Sent a Text Message from The Western Union Company, You May Be Entitled to a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

If You Were Sent a Text Message from The Western Union Company, You May Be Entitled to a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS If You Were Sent a Text Message from The Western Union Company, You May Be Entitled to a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. A federal

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRICAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. DENNIS ALTER, et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING This notice relates to the proposed settlement of a class and collective action lawsuit against First

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY STEPHEN TREWIN and JOSEPH FARHATT, On Behalf of Themselves And All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, vs. CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC., Defendant. Civ.

More information

If you purchased and/or used the Suave Professionals Keratin Infusion 30-Day Smoothing Kit, you could get a payment from a class action settlement.

If you purchased and/or used the Suave Professionals Keratin Infusion 30-Day Smoothing Kit, you could get a payment from a class action settlement. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION If you purchased and/or used the Suave Professionals Keratin Infusion 30-Day Smoothing Kit, you could get a payment

More information

A class action settlement involving Progressive automobile, motorcycle and recreational vehicle insurance may provide payments to those who qualify.

A class action settlement involving Progressive automobile, motorcycle and recreational vehicle insurance may provide payments to those who qualify. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF CREEK COUNTY, BRISTOW DIVISION, STATE OF OKLAHOMA A class action settlement involving Progressive automobile, motorcycle and recreational vehicle insurance may provide payments

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO If you initiated a money transfer in the United States with Western Union between January 1, 2001 and January 3, 2013 and your money transfer was not redeemed

More information

U.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

U.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT U.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT If you are or were employed by U.S. BANK, N.A. as an In-Store Banker 1, In-Store Banker 2, Senior In-Store Banker 1, and/or Senior In-Store Banker 2 at In-Store

More information

As a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled to receive money from a class action settlement.

As a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled to receive money from a class action settlement. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL Penaloza, et al., v. PPG Industries, Inc., Case No. BC471369 As a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled

More information

Case3:12-cv-01377-SI Document89-1 Filed10/09/13 Page1 of 12. A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

Case3:12-cv-01377-SI Document89-1 Filed10/09/13 Page1 of 12. A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. If you are a current or former owner or lessee of

More information

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

United States District Court for the Northern District of California United States District Court for the Northern District of California If You Purchased a Tour from Viator between October 16, 2008 and June 7, 2014 that Was Advertised as Discounted with No Text Describing

More information

SETTLEMENT CLASS NOTICE. A class action settlement involving homeowners insurance claims may provide payments to those who qualify.

SETTLEMENT CLASS NOTICE. A class action settlement involving homeowners insurance claims may provide payments to those who qualify. SETTLEMENT CLASS NOTICE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF INDEPENDENCE COUNTY, ARKANSAS A class action settlement involving homeowners insurance claims may provide payments to those who qualify. There is a class

More information

SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT. This notice explains the lawsuit, the settlement, your rights and the potential distribution of settlement funds.

SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT. This notice explains the lawsuit, the settlement, your rights and the potential distribution of settlement funds. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SOLANO Lori Davis, Michelle Smith and Paul Stockman, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public,

More information

Reasons for Settlement: Avoids the costs and risks associated with continued litigation, including the danger of no recovery.

Reasons for Settlement: Avoids the costs and risks associated with continued litigation, including the danger of no recovery. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x : IN RE: NEVSUN RESOURCES LTD. : Civil Action No. 12 Civ. 1845 (PGG) :

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT TO: All persons and entities which have paid the City of Ferndale (the City ) for water and sanitary sewage disposal services between January 22, 2008 and December

More information

LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS LAWSUIT: The only way to potentially receive money from this Settlement.

LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS LAWSUIT: The only way to potentially receive money from this Settlement. LEGAL NOTICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Individuals Whose Minnesota Driver s License Records Were Accessed for Illegitimate Reasons May Benefit from a Class Action Settlement.

More information

If You Purchased a Sinus Buster Product, You May Benefit From A Proposed Class Action Settlement

If You Purchased a Sinus Buster Product, You May Benefit From A Proposed Class Action Settlement THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE THE MATTERS DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY AFFECT SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF FAYETTE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA X EUGENIA REBAR-TRICH and MICHAEL TRICH, and DAVID PENICH, Plaintiffs, vs. NATIONWIDE AFFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, NATIONWIDE MUTUAL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT If you settled a personal injury or worker s compensation claim with Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IF YOU PURCHASED A VENUS LABORATORIES EARTH FRIENDLY PRODUCT YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO A CASH PAYMENT THIS NOTICE AFFECTS YOUR RIGHTS.

More information

EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT

EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT Case 12-30885-hdh7 Doc 72 Filed 11/22/13 Entered 11/22/13 11:07:32 Page 15 of 27 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT ALL PERSONS WHO PAID MONEY FOR A MEMBERSHIP IN LULLY S, INC. d/b/a THE RIGHT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : CLASS ACTION TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION x In re IMMUCOR, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To Civil Action No. 105-cv-02276-WSD CLASS ACTION ALL ACTIONS.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA If you live in the United States or its territories and purchased MacKeeper Software on or before July 8, 2015, a class action settlement

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION In re CELERA CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION No. 5:10-cv-02604-EJD(HRL CLASS ACTION NOTICE

More information

Case 4:08-cv-00507-RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10

Case 4:08-cv-00507-RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10 Case 4:08-cv-00507-RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION,etal., Plaintiffs, v. WELLSFARGO&CO.,and WELLSFARGOBANK,N.A.,

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT United States District Court for the District of North Dakota Southwestern Division A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. A class action

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION If you applied for credit from Haynes Furniture Company, Inc., were denied and agreed to accept a counter-offer of credit

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OF THE TRIAL COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-1083-C

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OF THE TRIAL COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-1083-C COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS WORCESTER, SS. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-1083-C ) PHILIPPE E. GUT AND GWEN PRATT GUT, ) on behalf of themselves and all ) others similarly

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT A FEDERAL COURT ORDERED THIS NOTICE. THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Soutter v. Equifax Information Services, LLC Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-107

More information