The Benefit of Information Technology in Managing Outcomes Focused Curriculum Development Across Related Degree Programs
|
|
- Collin Craig
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Benefit of Information Technology in Managing Outcomes Focused Curriculum Development Across Related Degree Programs Brian R. von Konsky, Allan Loh, Mike Robey, Susan J. Gribble, Jim Ivins, David Cooper Curtin University of Technology Department of Computing GPO Box U1987, Perth 6845, Western Australia Abstract This paper describes an interactive, web-based tool that provides access to an Outcomes Database for managing an Outcomes Focused curriculum plan. The approach provides a rapid way to involve subject specialists, course controllers, curriculum designers and educational consultants in the curriculum design and review process. The Outcomes Database is used to capture the relationships between units (i.e. subjects), Unit Learning Outcomes, Course Learning Outcomes, Generic Graduate Attributes and assessments. This is undertaken across courses (i.e. undergraduate degree programs) sharing common units in Information Technology, Computer Science, and Software Engineering. Automatically generated database reports that show how units contribute to the development of the generic graduate attributes are compared to those derived manually on a unit-by-unit basis. Preliminary experience with this IT-based approach demonstrates that automatically generated database reports effectively highlight areas requiring further attention during subsequent curriculum development iterations. The tools and approach described here show how the Outcomes Database can assist in making the transition from an existing program to one using an Outcomes Focused approach. Keywords: Database, Outcomes Focused Education 1 Introduction In an Outcomes Focused approach to teaching and learning, educators place emphasis on measuring the attainment of student learning outcomes, taking a holistic approach to the design of an integrated curriculum. Effectively, this focuses attention on what students learn as a result of their participation in a program of study, rather than on the progression of topics taught in individual subjects. Increasingly, such an approach is a requirement for professional accreditation (Bell, 2000; Engineers Australia, 1996). Copyright 2006, Australian Computer Society, Inc. This paper appeared at the Eighth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2006), Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, January Conferences in Research in Practice in Information Technology, Vol. 52. Denise Tolhurst and Samuel Mann Eds. Reproduction for academic, not-for profit purposes permitted provided this text is included. The transition to the Outcomes Focused approach presents many challenges to curriculum designers, who may be designing new degree programs or adapting existing programs. These challenges include the following: identifying appropriate learning outcomes and effective means to demonstrate their attainment; managing the definition of learning outcomes shared by multiple units and across related degree programs; demonstrating that students have attained key competencies prior to entering a given profession (e.g. the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK) for graduates of Software Engineering Programs or Computing Curriculum 2001 in the case of Computer Science and Information Technology programs) (IEEE 2004; IEEE and ACM 2001); communicating the criteria used in assessing and reporting performance to students and their parents; managing limited resources and minimising the negative impact on students when making the transition from an existing program to one using the Outcomes Focused paradigm; and involving relevant stakeholders in the curriculum design and review processes, including curriculum designers, domain experts, university management, educational consultants, internal review and approval committees, lecturers, tutors, and accreditation panels. Perhaps most significantly, inter-relationships between units in courses that share common outcomes defined at different levels of generalisation make designing and managing an Outcomes Focused approach to education inherently complex. This paper describes an interactive, on-line Outcomes Database developed to assist curriculum designers in addressing these challenges. 2 Theoretical Framework The goal of an Outcomes Focused approach to education is to articulate and measure what students are expected to know, be able to do, and be like as a result of their learning. These expectations are expressed in terms of outcomes that take the form of descriptive statements
2 about the learning to be demonstrated by students. Learning outcome statements, however, may be expressed at different levels of generality from broad and general to more specific and highly detailed. Irrespective of the level of generality, outcome statements describe the skills, knowledge and values that students should be able to demonstrate at the end of a planned teaching-learning process. The outcome statements do not specify what should be in the curriculum. Instead, they describe the result of successful student participation in the teaching-learning process. Structuring outcome layers can provide a framework for a comprehensive curriculum design that includes common outcomes and subjects for related degree programs. More importantly, an integrated curriculum design and the means by which outcomes will be measured become possible within the context of such a framework. The Outcomes Database described in this paper uses four layers of generality: Generic Graduate Attributes Course Learning Outcomes Unit Learning Outcomes Assessment Rubrics These are described in detail below. Generic Graduate Attributes describe broad characteristics that can be demonstrated by all graduates from an institution, or by graduates who will become eligible for membership in the professional society responsible for accrediting related degree programs. Barrie (2004) states that: "[b]roadly speaking, generic graduate attributes in Australia have come to be accepted as being the skills, knowledge and abilities of university graduates, beyond disciplinary content knowledge, which are applicable to a range of contexts. It is intended that university students acquire these qualities as one of the outcomes of successfully completing any undergraduate degree at university." For example, Engineers Australia have identified 10 Generic Graduate Attributes (Engineers Australia, 1999). Additionally, all future graduates of professional engineering programs accredited by Engineers Australia must demonstrate attainment of over 80 competency performance indicators to qualify for stage 1 status as a professional engineer (Bradley, 2005). That there are so many performance indicators suggests that Information Technology (IT) infrastructure and tools to manage learning outcomes and track performance indicators will become essential in the accreditation of Australian engineering programs. Generic Graduate Attribute statements by themselves do not provide a comprehensive framework for developing an integrated curriculum with measurable outcomes that can be tied to these performance indicators. In our approach, such a framework is facilitated by the Outcomes Database, in which Course Learning Outcomes further elaborate the Generic Graduate Attributes, but in the context of a given degree program. Unit Learning Outcomes are then defined for individual units, and are mapped to appropriate Course Learning Outcomes. The rubrics used to assess the level to which individual Unit Learning Outcomes have been attained are also stored in the database. Once it can be shown that a Unit Learning Outcome has been attained, by inference the associated Course Learning Outcomes and Generic Graduate Attributes have also been attained. Adding to the complexity of a layered outcome focused curriculum, related degree programs often share common required units. For example, Software Engineering programs are sometimes regarded as a Computer Science specialisation. In other cases, Software Engineering students share common units with Electrical, Civil, and Mechanical Engineering students (Parnas, 1999). In these cases, Unit Learning Outcomes must be defined that are compatible with the Course Learning Outcomes from the related degree programs. This can complicate curriculum design when using an Outcomes Focused approach, particularly when degree programs cross the administrative and faculty jurisdictions used to design, review and approve the curriculum. This suggests that the effective use of IT may help to improve collaboration both within and between university departments. Moreover, practical experience at the University of Queensland has shown that the use of IT for outcomes focused course design can foster pedagogical change and encourage university-wide communication and collaboration amongst curriculum designers (Jolly and Humphries, 2002). Other software-based tools are available to help educators develop program curriculum, including the content and assessment instruments associated with individual subjects (Botev et al. 2005; Ong and Shepherd, 2002; Marshall 2005). However, these tools are for broader course management purposes and by themselves are not outcomes focused. This paper addresses this need by describing an IT-based approach for managing the complex relationships found in an outcomes focused curriculum plan that uses layered outcome statements. Our approach manages the inherent complexity using a database and convenient on-line tools. It is suitable for planning, reviewing, and implementing multiple degree programs that share common subjects, and facilitating collaboration amongst designers, reviewers, and other stakeholders. Describing this approach is the principal contribution of this paper. 3 Development of the Outcomes Database The Outcomes Database described in this paper is depicted in Figure 1. It was developed to manage the introduction of Outcomes Focused Education in the Department of Computing at an Australian university offering three-year BSc (Computer Science) and
3 Generic Graduate Attributes Course Learning Outcomes Unit Learning Outcome 1 Unit Learning Outcome 2 Unit Learning Outcome n Unit Learning Outcome 1- Criterion 1 Unit Learning Outcome 1- Criterion 2 Unit Learning Outcome 1 - Criterion n Criteria Significance (%) Assessment Item Figure 1. Database relationships between Generic Graduate Attributes, Course Learning Outcomes, Unit Learning Outcomes, and assessments. BSc (Information Technology) degrees and a four-year BEng (Software Engineering) degree. These programs share common units and hence common Unit and Course Learning Outcomes. Each program also contains unique units with distinct Unit Learning Outcomes, resulting in Course Outcomes that differentiate each degree. Additionally, the BEng (Software Engineering) program shares a Common First Year in Engineering with all other engineering specialisations. In the nomenclature of our institution, degree programs are called courses and individual subjects are called units. 3.1 The Outcomes Database The Engineers Australia Generic Graduate Attributes developed by a given unit were manually identified during a workshop involving all academic staff from the Department of Computing. Since 2001, this has been manually reviewed on a regular basis. Justification for the claim that a given unit contributes to the development of a Generic Graduate Attribute is included in all unit outlines distributed to students during the first class meeting in any given semester. The manual mapping between units in Department of Computing courses and the Generic Graduate Attributes was undertaken prior to the conception of the Outcomes Database and the identification of Course Learning Outcomes. The justification for the manual identification of this relationship included teaching pedagogies and methods not directly related to the Course Learning Outcomes that were identified later. During 2004, the Department Teaching and Learning Committee developed Course Learning Outcomes for each of the three undergraduate courses offered by the Department. These Course Learning Outcomes were entered into a web-accessible MySQL database to foster dialogue amongst committee members, educational consultants, and other stakeholders. As of February 2005, the Outcomes Database contained Unit Learning Outcomes for all units offered by the Department of Computing. It also captured the relationships between each Unit Learning Outcome and the Course Learning Outcomes for those courses in which the unit is a core requirement, and indirectly to the Generic Graduate Attributes. These relationships are illustrated in the shaded area in Figure 1. As of February 2005, the Outcomes Database contained 10 Generic Graduate Attributes defined by Engineers Australia, supplemented by 3 Generic Graduate Attributes defined by the Department of Computing. All 13 of these were related in the database to 9 similar Generic Attributes defined by the University. Each of the 20 Course Learning Outcomes for the 3 courses offered by the Department of Computing were mapped to the Generic Graduate Attributes. Of the 20 Course Learning Outcomes, 7 were common to all 3 courses, 2 were common to the BSc(CS) and BSc(IT) programs, 1 was common to the BEng(SE) and BSc(CS) programs, 3 were unique to BSc(CS), 2 were unique to BSc(IT), and 5 were unique to BEng(SE). There were a total of 269 Unit Learning Outcomes mapped to Course Learning Outcomes for 57 units. The Outcomes Database was motivated by the observation that an efficient and automated mechanism for managing the scope and complexity of a layered outcome focused framework was necessary. This is particularly important because a small change in any one part of the outcome structure can have a ripple effect, impacting many other parts. With the Outcomes Database, any change is automatically propagated throughout the framework, and automatically generated database reports. Beginning in July 2005, the Outcomes Database is being populated with data capturing the relationship between each Unit Learning Outcome, the criteria used to assess the level of outcome attainment, and the percentage significance of each assessment criterion to the overall mark in the unit. Experience has shown that each Unit Learning Outcome usually has around 4 assessment criteria. By the time that the database is fully populated with these rubrics, it is estimated that there will be around 1076 individual criterion that must be tracked for each student.
4 Figure 2. A portion of the Course Learning Outcome Report for the BSc (Information Technology) program. Figure 3. A portion the Generic Graduate Attribute Report showing the contribution of units in Semester 1, Year 3 of the BEng (Software Engineering) degree program to the Generic Graduate Attributes. 3.2 Data Entry and Reports As local domain experts, individual Unit Controllers developed Unit Learning Outcomes for their units and identified the associated relationship to an appropriate Course Learning Outcome. Unit Controllers then entered this information into the database. Data entry was achieved using a secure, web-based Graphical User Interface (GUI) that directly communicates with the Outcomes Database. When adding or modifying a Unit Learning Outcome, Unit Controllers enter the text of the Unit Learning Outcome, possibly embedding Hypertext Mark-up Language (HTML) tags for formatting purposes. This enables verbs from Bloom's Taxonomy (Anderson et al., 2001) to be emboldened, and allows the use of italics or underlining for emphasis of other keywords when the outcome is presented in a web browser. The corresponding Course Learning Outcome must also be specified at this time from a list of potential choices automatically presented in the GUI by the Outcomes Database. Potential alternatives are in the set given by the intersection of Course Learning Outcomes for the courses in which the unit is a core requirement. The implication is that Unit Learning Outcomes may only be mapped to Course Learning Outcomes that are common to all courses for which the unit is a required unit. The course structure for each degree program is also stored in the database. This makes it possible to automatically generate a report showing those courses for which a unit is a core requirement, and the program year and semester in which it is taught. The curriculum committee used this report when developing the initial set of Course Learning Outcomes in an attempt to ensure a reasonable set of common outcomes for shared units. An alternative but equally practical use for this report is for resource planning purposes. That is, the report can be used when planning staffing allocations that will meet the requirements of the various course structures and also facilitate the mid-year intake of students into the various programs. The Unit Learning Outcomes Report shows the number of outcomes defined for each unit. This enabled reviewers to monitor which units were being modified and potentially ready for inspection, based on the assumption that units generally have 4 to 6 Unit Learning Outcomes. It also made it possible to identify those Unit Controllers who were struggling to enter data and might require assistance, or who were not complying with requests for data entry. Generally speaking, however, Unit Controllers were quick to adopt the system once asked to do so. The Course Learning Outcome report automatically shows the outcomes that are common to each degree program. It also shows the units that contribute to each Course Learning Outcome for each course. A portion of this report for the BSc(IT) program is shown in Figure 2.
5 A Generic Graduate Attributes report can also be generated for each degree program. This report shows Generic Graduate Attributes developed by each unit in the context of a given course structure, based on the relationships defined in the database between Unit Learning Outcomes, Course Learning Outcomes and Generic Graduate Attributes. For example, Figure 3 shows a portion of the Generic Graduate Attributes Report depicting the attributes developed by units in the first semester of year three for students enrolled in the BEng (Software Engineering) program. Columns a through j in the figure correspond to the 10 Generic Graduate Attributes defined by Engineers Australia. Columns k through m correspond to additional attributes identified by the Department of Computing. The format of the Generic Graduate Attributes report conforms to the standard presentation style used in recent accreditation documents submitted by the Faculty of Engineering and Computing at the authors institution. The Outcomes Database also maps the rubrics used to assess outcome attainment to the corresponding Unit Learning Outcome and the contribution of related assessment criteria to the final mark. Figure 4 shows an example for a first year, first semester programming unit. It is an important feature of the database that these relationships are automatically maintained, such that if any Unit Learning Outcome, criterion, or assessment weighting were to change, this report would be automatically updated the next time it was displayed. 4 Iterative Curriculum Development Although the process of developing an Outcomes Focused approach began with Generic Graduate Attributes from Engineers Australia and later Course Learning Outcomes defined by the Department curriculum committee, the first iteration was essentially conducted in a bottom-up fashion. Effectively, the existing programs were revised utilising the new Outcomes Focused approach by identifying appropriate Unit Learning Outcomes for each unit and then directly mapping these to the Course Learning Outcomes and indirectly to the Generic Graduate Attributes. It was realised that several iterations would be required, during which Course Learning Outcomes would gradually be refined. The process would then be repeated until a good fit was found, meeting the objectives of the various programs and conforming to the requirements of our institution and accrediting bodies. This iterative process is still underway and the results reported here are preliminary. However, the Outcomes Database has proven to be indispensable for this iterative approach. In part, this is because the various automatically generated reports highlight aspects of the curriculum plan that require attention during subsequent iterations. Aspects of the curriculum plan that require attention are generally obvious from the various database reports, and include the following scenarios. The appropriate Course Learning Outcome is not in the common set for those courses in which the unit is a core requirement. Sometimes this becomes apparent in the Course Learning Outcome report when there are Course Learning Outcomes that are not listed as being addressed by any unit, and when an outcome exists that would otherwise be appropriate. This is because the appropriate outcome is not included in the set of potential choices presented by the database in the GUI because the Course Learning Outcome is not shared by all courses for which the unit is a core requirement. Sometimes, the Course Learning Outcomes report reveals that a given Unit Learning Outcome is mapped to an inappropriate Course Learning Outcome. For example, this is the case for Mathematics 115 and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists 101 in Course Learning Outcome #1 of Figure 2. The Course Learning Outcome is too specific and is really more appropriate as a Unit Learning Outcome. This is sometimes apparent in the Course Learning Outcome Report when there is only one unit that maps to a given Course Learning Outcome, and/or the Course Learning Outcome simply restates the Unit Learning Outcome. A single Course Learning Outcome covers too many topics in a manner that does not facilitate sharing common outcomes across courses. An example would be those cases in which a subset of common outcomes are included with other more specific skills in a single Course Learning Outcome in a way that excludes other courses which do not include that skill. In this case, the common outcomes need to be restated for the other course. A Unit Learning Outcome has not been associated with a Course Learning Outcome, possibly because none are appropriate. This is sometimes apparent in the Generic Graduate Attributes report when a unit is shown to contribute to none of the attributes. 5 Comparison to Manual Mappings The automatically generated Generic Graduate Attributes Report, a portion of which is shown in Figure 3, was compared to a similar report produced manually. Initial versions of the manually produced report were written during a 2001 workshop involving all members of the academic staff from the Department of Computing. The manually generated report has been updated frequently since that time. The report gives the justification for claims that stated Generic Graduate Attributes are developed in a given unit. This information is also included in unit outlines distributed to students during the first class meeting each semester.
6 Figure 4. Assessment criteria used to measure the attainment of Unit Learning Outcomes in a first year, first semester programming unit, as stored in the Outcomes Database.
7 The manually generated report was produced prior to the time that Course Learning Outcomes were identified and was not necessarily tied directly to assessments. As a result of the comparison, significant discrepancies between the automatically and manually generated versions of the Generic Graduate Attributes report were found to exist. These discrepancies generally occurred when a pedagogical approach or learning experience not directly associated with an assessment was used as justifications for the claim. With hindsight, the cause of this inconsistency seems somewhat obvious, although at the onset of this exercise it was not. However, it becomes readily apparent when the manual and automatic reports are compared. Such a comparison is useful in highlighting those learning experiences that are not directly assessed. For example, the unit outline for one unit lists a Generic Graduate Attribute (bold) and makes the claim that this attribute is addressed in the unit (italics) as shown below: "Expectation of the need to undertake lifelong learning and the capacity to do so. Case-studies and journal articles from the software engineering literature are required reading for this subject. This experience is meant to foster good professional habits, and to demonstrate the importance of remaining current in ones discipline by reading the professional literature." Data contained within the journal articles are used by students to complete practical worksheets. However, these worksheets are not directly assessed but are intended to be preliminary learning experiences upon which later assessed work is based. Whether students actually read the journal articles in question is not directly or indirectly assessed. They are only asked to use the data contained within the articles when completing the worksheets. In this case, the automatically generated report has revealed that the justification for claiming that this Generic Graduate Attribute is addressed is weak because it is not directly associated with an assessed Unit Learning Outcome. The unit outline for the unit also provides this example: "Understanding of the ethical responsibilities of the professional software engineer with respect to maintaining a high level of product quality. The Codes of Conduct for the Australian Computer Society (ACS) and Institution of Engineers Australia (IEAust) are presented in this unit. The ethical duty of Software Engineers to produce quality products that conform to a given specification, meet customer expectations, and are fit for a given purpose is discussed in detail." Examples from Burnmeister (2000) are discussed during class to highlight how the Australian Computer Society (ACS) Code of Ethics might be applied in various hypothetical scenarios. Nevertheless, this material is not directly assessed in this unit. Dook et al. (2005) argue that it may not be necessary to directly assess every outcome. They write: "... a discussion about ethical issues may be purposely raised in a tutorial or laboratory session, but there may be no attempt to formally assess whether or not students have achieved the outcome 'appraisal of ethical issues related to the subject matter'. The discussing itself may serve the important purposes of raising pertinent questions for ongoing reflection and consideration." This suggests that it is reasonable to claim that a nonassessed learning experience contributes to the development of a Generic Graduate Attribute in some circumstances. 6 Future Work As a result of these observations, a future version of the Outcomes Database is planned that will contain an additional table to capture the relationships between nonassessed learning experiences and the Generic Graduate Attributes. With this minor modification, once the assessment portion of the database depicted in Figure 1 is fully populated (late 2005), it will be possible to automatically generate an expanded Generic Graduate Attributes report showing the following for each unit in a given course: the specific assessment items that contribute to the development of Generic Graduate Attributes; the percentage contribution of each assessment to the overall mark and the rubric used to determine the level to which it has been achieved; and non-assessed learning experiences that contribute to development of the Generic Graduate Attributes. It is also interesting to note that data contained in the Outcomes Database includes much of the information communicated to students in unit outlines, including the unit name, Unit Learning Outcomes, and assessment details. This suggests that unit outlines can be automatically generated from information stored in the database. Doing so has the potential to reduce the staff overhead required to maintain unit outlines while ensuring consistency of presentation. The unit syllabus is also contained in the Outcomes Database for the convenience of curriculum designers and reviewers. It is also usually contained in unit outlines and the on-line University Handbook. Consequently, syllabus data are currently replicated in redundant locations on the University network. A Content Management System that serves as a middleware broker between information sources and sinks is the next logical step in the use and management of learning outcomes, assessments, and related documents.
8 In particular, a Content Management system could: ensure that each data item is stored in one location only; eliminate the need for redundant data entry and the human overhead associated with it; cater to the different data formats and information sources used by different lecturers and departments while providing links to related items (e.g. marks in spreadsheets and the percentage contribution of that assessment to the final mark as stored in the Outcomes Database); provide for the flexible creation of new document types from distributed information sources; ensure the consistency of data presentation in documents that are generated on-the-fly from the required information sources; facilitate data approval and change management. In collaboration with a Content Management System and other information sources on the network, the Outcomes Database could provide information to the following data sinks. Unit Outline Generator- producing unit outlines from data stored in the Outcomes Database and other locations on the University network. Student Portfolio System- storing samples of student work and demonstrating attainment of outcomes stored in the Outcomes Database. Time Management System- managing due dates and expected effort for each assessment stored in the Outcomes Database. 7 Conclusions The Outcomes Database provides an effective means to manage complexity during the transition to an Outcomes Focused approach to curriculum design and review. In particular, automatically generated reports highlight those places where outcomes statements and their relationships to other parts of the curriculum design require further work during subsequent iterations. As an on-line, web-based system, the Outcomes Database promotes collaboration between stakeholders, including Unit Controllers, Managers, and members of curriculum review committees. In its present form, the Outcomes Database has been invaluable in managing the complex relationships amongst units and courses in a department offering several related undergraduate degrees. When combined with the planned Content Management System, the Outcomes Database will be able to provide outcomes information to a broader set of applications for use by both students and staff. This will enhance the quality and consistency of learning experiences and provide a measurable means for defining and archiving attainment of learning outcomes. 8 References Anderson, LW. Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruiskshank, KA., Mayer, R.E, Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J, and Wittrock, M.C. (eds.) (2001): A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Addison-Wesley Longman, ISBN Barrie, S. (2004): A research-based approach to generic graduate attributes policy, Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3): Bell, T.D. (2000): Proven skills: the new yardstick for schools, IEEE Spectrum, 37(9): Botev, C., Chao, H., Chao, T. Cheng, Y. (2005): Supporting Workflow in a Course Management System, ACM SIGCSE 05, pp Bradley, A. (2005): Engineers Australia National Generic Competency Standards - Stage 1 Competency Standard for Professional Engineers, Document No. P05. Engineers Australia Accreditation Board. Burmeister, O.K. (2000): Applying the ACS Code of Ethics, Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology, 32(2): Dook, J., Thompson, E., McNamara, B., Hepburn, N., and Baird, C. (2005): Outcomes Based Education and Assessment at UWA, Accessed 17 August 2005, ation_and_assessment_at_uwa. Engineers Australia (1996): Changing the Culture: Engineering Education into the Future, ISBN Engineers Australia (1999): The Manual for the Accreditation of Professional Engineering Programs, Revised 7 October IEEE and ACM (2001): Computer Curricula 2001: Computer Science, Final Report, December 15, 2001, Joint Task Force on Computer Curricula, IEEE Computer Society and the ACM. IEEE (2004): Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge, 2004 Version, SWEBOK, Abran, A., Bourque, P., Dupuis, R., and Tripp, L.L. (eds.) ISBN Jolly, L., and Humphries, J. (2003): Using an Electronic Tool to Encourage Pedagogical Change, Proceedings of AaeE Conference, 29, September-1 October Marshall University (2005):Comparison of Online Course Delivery Software Products, accessed 27 Oct. 2005, son.html. Ong, S.S. and Shepherd,, J. (2002): WebCMS: A Webbased Course Management System,. Workshop on Databases and Expert Systems Applications, pp Parnas, D.L (1999): Software Engineering Programs are not Computer Science Programs, IEEE Software, 16(6):19-30.
The Importance of Ethics and Professional Accountability in Computer Training
Engaging Undergraduates in Discussions about Ethics in Computing Brian R. von Konsky Jim Ivins Susan J. Gribble Curtin University of Technology Department of Computing Software Engineering Education Research
More informationDeveloping a Sustainable Assessment Plan for EAC-ABET Accreditation
Eleventh LACCEI Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology (LACCEI 2013) Innovation in Engineering, Technology and Education for Competitiveness and Prosperity August 14-16,
More informationUSING BLOOM S TAXONOMY TO PROMOTE HIGHER LEVEL THINKING AND LEARNING IN INTRODUCTORY ACCOUNTING COURSES. Maureen K. Flores, Ed. D
USING BLOOM S TAXONOMY TO PROMOTE HIGHER LEVEL THINKING AND LEARNING IN INTRODUCTORY ACCOUNTING COURSES Maureen K. Flores, Ed. D School of Accountancy Sorrell College of Business Troy University Troy,
More informationEvaluating Software Inspection Cognition Levels Using Bloom s Taxonomy
Evaluating Software Inspection Cognition Levels Using Bloom s Taxonomy David A. McMeekin, Brian R. von Konsky, Elizabeth Chang, David J.A. Cooper Digital Ecosystems and Business Intelligence Institute,
More informationExperiences in Implementing a Postgraduate Engineering Management Program
Experiences in Implementing a Postgraduate Engineering Management David Thorpe University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland thorped@usq.edu.au Robert Fulcher University of Southern Queensland,
More informationHow To Accredit A Psychology Program At The University Of Melbourne
1 APAC Accreditation Assessment Summary Report Higher Education Provider Name of the Psychology Academic Organisational Unit (AOU) University of Melbourne Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences Date
More informationRemote laboratories: enhancing accredited engineering degree programs
Remote laboratories: enhancing accredited engineering degree programs Euan Lindsay Curtin University, Perth, Australia e.lindsay@curtin.edu.au Ben Stumpers Curtin University, Perth, Australia b.stumpers@curtin.edu.au
More informationRESTRICTED. Professional Accreditation Handbook For Computer Science Programmes
Professional Accreditation Handbook For Computer Science Programmes Revised by authority of the Accreditation Committee for Computer Science Programmes as of August 2014 CONTENTS 1. FRAMEWORK FOR ACCREDITATION
More informationSTAGE 1 COMPETENCY STANDARD FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
STAGE 1 STANDARD FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ROLE DESCRIPTION - THE MATURE, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER The following characterises the senior practice role that the mature, Professional Engineer may be expected
More informationDEFINING, TEACHING AND ASSESSING LIFELONG LEARNING SKILLS
DEFINING, TEACHING AND ASSESSING LIFELONG LEARNING SKILLS Nikos J. Mourtos Abstract - Lifelong learning skills have always been important in any education and work setting. However, ABET EC recently put
More informationGuide to Writing MBA Program and Course Learning Outcomes and Assessment that Align with QFEmirates Level 9 Descriptors
Guide to Writing MBA Program and Course Learning Outcomes and Assessment that Align with QFEmirates Level 9 Descriptors Commission for Academic Accreditation United Arab Emirates May 2015 1 Contents Part
More informationProgramme Specification (Undergraduate) Date amended: 28 August 2015
Programme Specification (Undergraduate) Date amended: 28 August 2015 1. Programme Title(s) and UCAS code(s): BSc Mathematics and Actuarial Science (including year in industry option) 2. Awarding body or
More informationINTERNATIONAL STUDENT PERFORMANCE IN THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPONENT OF THE ENGINEERING DEGREE
INTERNATIONAL STUDENT PERFORMANCE IN THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPONENT OF THE ENGINEERING DEGREE Dr Brad Stappenbelt Faculty of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics The University of Western Australia
More informationDrafting Program Educational Objectives for Undergraduate Engineering Degree Programs
Drafting Program Educational Objectives for Undergraduate Engineering Degree Programs Ramakrishnan Sundaram Gannon University, sundaram@gannon.edu Abstract - This paper outlines the process to draft Program
More informationCREATING LEARNING OUTCOMES
CREATING LEARNING OUTCOMES What Are Student Learning Outcomes? Learning outcomes are statements of the knowledge, skills and abilities individual students should possess and can demonstrate upon completion
More informationElectronic Engineering Technology Program Exit Examination as an ABET and Self-Assessment Tool
Electronic Engineering Technology Program Exit Examination as an ABET and Self-Assessment Tool Graham Thomas, Ph.D. Texas Southern University Shahryar Darayan, Ph.D. Texas Southern University Abstract
More informationIT SPIRAL: A Case Study in Scalable Software Engineering Education
22nd Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training IT SPIRAL: A Case Study in Scalable Software Engineering Education Michael Barker, Katsuro Inoue Nara Institute of Science and Technology,
More informationFaculty of Health & Human Sciences School of Psychology
Faculty of Health & Human Sciences School of Psychology Programme Specification for Psychology Undergraduate Programmes BSc (Hons) Psychology BSc (Hons) Psychology major with approved minor subjects Each
More informationUNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION Programme Title: HNC in Applied Technologies Awarding Body: Teaching Institutions: Staffordshire University Barnsley College Shrewsbury College of Arts and Technology
More informationBringing Real-life Practice in Software Project Management Training Through a Simulation-based Serious Game
Bringing Real-life Practice in Software Project Management Training Through a Simulation-based Serious Game Alejandro Calderón and Mercedes Ruiz Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University
More informationProcedures for Assessment and Accreditation of Medical Schools by the Australian Medical Council 2011
Australian Medical Council Limited Procedures for Assessment and Accreditation of Medical Schools by the Australian Medical Council 2011 Medical School Accreditation Committee These procedures were approved
More informationHonours Degree (top-up) Computing Abbreviated Programme Specification Containing Both Core + Supplementary Information
Honours Degree (top-up) Computing Abbreviated Programme Specification Containing Both Core + Supplementary Information 1 Awarding Institution / body: Lancaster University 2a Teaching institution: University
More informationProgramme Specification and Curriculum Map for BSc Honours Computing, Graphics and Games
Programme Specification and Curriculum Map for BSc Honours Computing, Graphics and Games 1. Programme title BSc Honours Computing, Graphics and Games 2. Awarding institution Middlesex University 3. Teaching
More informationRESTRICTED. Professional Accreditation Handbook (Engineering Degrees)
RESTRICTED Professional Accreditation Handbook (Engineering Degrees) Revised by authority of the Accreditation Board as of February 2013 CONTENTS 1. PROFESSIONAL ACCREDITATION 1.1 Introduction...4 1.2
More informationMC-MGMTACT Master of Management (Accounting)
MC-MGMTACT Master of Management (Accounting) Year and Campus: 2016 - Parkville CRICOS Code: Fees Information: Level: Duration & Credit Coordinator: 064499E Subject EFTSL, Level, Discipline & Census Date,
More informationMC-TEACHEC Master of Teaching (Early Childhood)
MC-TEACHEC Master of Teaching (Early Childhood) Year and Campus: 2016 - Parkville CRICOS Code: Fees Information: Level: Duration & Credit Coordinator: 061226K Subject EFTSL, Level, Discipline & Census
More informationAPAC Accreditation Assessment Summary Report
APAC Accreditation Assessment Summary Report Higher Education Provider University of Western Australia, School of Psychology Date of Determination 15 April 2013 Standards Version June 2010 ver 10 Programs
More informationCapability Development through Project Management guided principles. and Agile Values. Abstract
Capability Development through Project Management guided principles and Agile Values Theme: Human Capital for Redefining India Key words: ABET; PMBOK; ACM code of ethics; Agile Abstract IT and ITeS Organizations
More informationDe Montfort University. Course Template
De Montfort University Course Template 1. Basic information Course Name: Software Engineering Course Code: CC103A Level (UG, PG): Undergraduate Academic Period: 2014 Faculty: Faculty of Technology Department:
More informationDeveloping a Department-Wide Learning Assessment Program
Developing a Department-Wide Learning Assessment Program Timothy L. Skvarenina 1 Session T1A Abstract - During the last several years, the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools (NCA) shifted
More informationA review of bioinformatics degrees in Australia Sonia Cattley Date received (in revised form): 28th May 2004
Dr Sonia Cattley is the Education Officer at ANGIS and is charged with training scientists in workshops around Australia with the application of bioinformatics tools to their own areas of research. Keywords:
More informationProgramme Specification
Hertfordshire Business School Title of Programme: Programme Code: MSc Marketing BSMSCMK Programme Specification This programme specification is relevant to students entering: 01 September 2015 Associate
More information2014 2015 one year courses cosmetic and fragrance marketing & management
2014 2015 one year courses cosmetic and fragrance marketing & management undergraduate programmes one year course cosmetic and fragrance marketing & management 02 Brief descriptive summary Over the past
More informationThe SWEBOK Initiative and Software Measurement Intentions
The SWEBOK Initiative and Software Measurement Intentions Abstract ALAIN ABRAN Executive Co-editor, SWEBOK Project Pierre Bourque, Robert Dupuis (Co-editors) Articulating a body of knowledge is an essential
More informationContinuous Course Improvement, Enhancements, & Modifications: Control & Tracking
Continuous Course Improvement, Enhancements, & Modifications: Control & Tracking Vickie Booth Georgia WebBSIT Vickie@GAWebBSIT.org Larry Booth Clayton State University LarryBooth@clayton.edu Fred Hartfield
More informationA SYSTEMATIC APPROACH FOR DEFINING AND ASSESSING PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES AND OUTCOMES
A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH FOR DEFINING AND ASSESSING PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES AND OUTCOMES Nikos J. Mourtos 1 Abstract The USA Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology adopted recently a new
More informationUniversity of Melbourne. Learning outcomes for Masters (Coursework) and Masters (Extended) programs
University of Melbourne Learning outcomes for Masters (Coursework) and Masters (Extended) programs Purpose The purpose of this paper is to set out some principles for articulating the learning outcomes
More informationUNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION Programme Title: Awarding Body: Teaching Institution: Final Awards: Intermediate Awards: Mode of Study: UCAS Codes: QAA Subject Benchmarks: JACS Code: Forensic Investigation
More informationMC-MGMTHRE Master of Management (Human Resources)
MC-MGMTHRE Master of Management (Human Resources) Year and Campus: 2016 - Parkville CRICOS Code: Fees Information: Level: Duration & Credit Coordinator: 064496G Subject EFTSL, Level, Discipline & Census
More informationBA (Hons) Accountancy and Financial Management - Kaplan Higher Education Institute/Academy (Singapore)
BA (Hons) Accountancy and Financial Management - Kaplan Higher Education Institute/Academy (Singapore) Programme Specification Primary Purpose: Course management, monitoring and quality assurance. Secondary
More informationNottingham Trent University Course Specification
Nottingham Trent University Course Specification 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Basic Course Information Awarding Institution: School/Campus: Final Award, Course Title and Modes of Study: Normal Duration: UCAS Code: Nottingham
More informationAN ANALYSIS OF THE CURRICULUM COMPONENTS OF COMPUTER FORENSICS UNDERGRADUATE COURSES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
AN ANALYSIS OF THE CURRICULUM COMPONENTS OF COMPUTER FORENSICS UNDERGRADUATE COURSES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM Paula Thomas Faculty of Advanced Technology, University of Glamorgan 2 CF37 1DL, Pontypridd pthomas@glam.ac.uk
More informationGlobal Workforce Development Projects in Software Engineering
Architecture today Global Workforce Development Projects in Software Engineering Art Pyster, Stevens Institute of Technology Mark Ardis, Stevens Institute of Technology Dennis Frailey, Raytheon and Southern
More informationHenley Business School at Univ of Reading. Henley Business School Board of Studies for
BSc Finance and Business Management For students entering Part 1 in 2014/5 Awarding Institution: Teaching Institution: Relevant QAA subject Benchmarking group(s): Faculty: Programme length: Date of specification:
More informationDate of specification: January 2005
1 MSc Real Estate Appraisal (Flexible Masters Programme) Awarding Institution: Teaching Institution: Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences Programme Director: Board of Studies: Accreditation: The University
More information5. Formally register for INS299 for the number of semester hours indicated on your contract.
HONORS INDEPENDENT STUDY GUIDELINES: According to the Lake Land College catalog course description, independent study is designed to permit the student to pursue a course of study not typically available
More informationProcedures for the Conduct of Graded Assessment in a Competency- Based Framework
PROCEDURE Procedures for the Conduct of Graded Assessment in a Competency- Based Framework Operational Schools & Colleges Responsibility Related Policy Management of Results PROCEDURE STATEMENT Intent
More informationCompetencies of BSc and MSc programmes in Electrical engineering and student portfolios
C:\Ton\DELTA00Mouthaan.doc 0 oktober 00 Competencies of BSc and MSc programmes in Electrical engineering and student portfolios Ton J.Mouthaan, R.W. Brink, H.Vos University of Twente, fac. of EE, The Netherlands
More informationNottingham Trent University Course Specification
Nottingham Trent University Course Specification Basic Course Information 1. Awarding Institution: Nottingham Trent University 2. School/Campus: Science & Technology, Clifton campus 3. Final Award, Course
More informationBusiness Services (Administration) Curriculum Framework
Business Services (Administration) Curriculum Framework Stage 6 Syllabus Part A for implementation from 2000 Business Services Office Administration (120 indicative hours) Business Services Office Administration
More informationThe Role of Modelling in Teaching Formal Methods for Software Engineering
The Role of Modelling in Teaching Formal Methods for Software Engineering A. J. Cowling Department of Computer Science University of Sheffield Sheffield, England A.Cowling@dcs.shef.ac.uk Abstract. This
More informationProgramme Specification and Curriculum Map for BSc (Hons) Computer Forensics
Programme Specification and Curriculum Map for BSc (Hons) Computer Forensics 1. Programme title Computer Forensics 2. Awarding institution Middlesex University 3. Teaching institution 4. Programme accredited
More informationA Comparison of Computer Science and Software Engineering Programmes in English Universities
A Comparison of Computer Science and Software Engineering Programmes in English Universities Farid Meziane and Sunil Vadera School of Computing, Science and Engineering University of Salford, Salford M5
More informationMSc Geographical Information Systems
MSc Geographical Information Systems Programme Specification Primary Purpose: Course management, monitoring and quality assurance. Secondary Purpose: Detailed information for students, staff and employers.
More informationUNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION Programme Title: Awarding Body: Teaching Institution: Final Awards: BSc(Hons) Aeronautical Technology Staffordshire University Staffordshire University BSc(Hons) Aeronautical
More informationTemplate for Departmental Report for Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities Self Study (The most critical information is in Italic)
Template for Departmental Report for Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities Self Study (The most critical information is in Italic) Standard One: Mission and Goals, Planning and Effectiveness
More informationENGINEERING ACCREDITATION COUNCIL MALAYSIA
ENGINEERING ACCREDITATION COUNCIL MALAYSIA ENGINEERING PROGRAMME ACCREDITATION MANUAL 1. INTRODUCTION The Board of Engineers Malaysia (BEM) registers graduates and professional engineers under the Registration
More informationHenley Business School. Henley Business School at Univ of Reading. Henley Business School Board of Studies for
BA Accounting and Business For students entering Part 1 in 2014/5 Awarding Institution: Teaching Institution: Relevant QAA subject Benchmarking group(s): Faculty: Programme length: Date of specification:
More informationAbstraction in Computer Science & Software Engineering: A Pedagogical Perspective
Orit Hazzan's Column Abstraction in Computer Science & Software Engineering: A Pedagogical Perspective This column is coauthored with Jeff Kramer, Department of Computing, Imperial College, London ABSTRACT
More informationNext Steps for the IBSA VET Capability Framework. Options Paper prepared for IBSA
Next Steps for the IBSA VET Capability Framework Options Paper prepared for IBSA October 2012 Contents Introduction... 1 Mapping the Capability Framework to TAE10 units and qualifications... 3 At Level
More informationISSUES AFFECTING POWER ENGINEERING UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION IN AUSTRALIA
ISSUES AFFECTING POWER ENGINEERING UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION IN AUSTRALIA D.A. Robinson and V.J. Gosbell Integral Energy Power Quality Centre University of Wollongong Abstract Recent changes to the electric
More informationCourse Specification MSc Accounting 2016-17 (MSACT)
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY Course Specification MSc Accounting 2016-17 (MSACT) Our courses undergo a process of review periodically, in addition to annual review and enhancement. Course Specifications are
More informationInteractive Web-based Teaching for Computing in an Engineering Degree*
Int. J. Engng Ed. Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 358±364, 1999 0949-149X/91 $3.00+0.00 Printed in Great Britain. # 1999 TEMPUS Publications. Interactive Web-based Teaching for Computing in an Engineering Degree*
More informationPROGRAMME SPECIFICATION University Certificate Psychology. Valid from September 2012. Faculty of Education, Health and Sciences -1 -
Faculty of Education, Health and Sciences PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION University Certificate Valid from September 2012-1 - www.derby.ac.uk/ehs CONTENTS SECTION ONE: GENERAL INFORMATION... 1 SECTION TWO: OVERVIEW
More informationHenley Business School. Henley Business School at Univ of Reading. Henley Business School Board of Studies for
BA Accounting and Business For students entering Part 1 in 2012/3 Awarding Institution: Teaching Institution: Relevant QAA subject Benchmarking group(s): Faculty: Programme length: Date of specification:
More informationIntroductory Programming Languages at Australian Universities at the Beginning of the Twenty First Century M. de Raadt and R.
Introductory Programming Languages at Australian Universities at the Beginning of the Twenty First Century M. de Raadt and R. Watson Department of Mathematics and Computing University of Southern Queensland
More informationThe Engineering Hubs and Spokes project: Institutional cooperation in educational design and delivery
The Engineering Hubs and Spokes project: Institutional cooperation in educational design and delivery Kim Blackmore, Paul Compston & Lauren Kane College of Engineering and Computer Science Australian National
More informationREGULATIONS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION (MSc[ITE]) *
260 REGULATIONS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION (MSc[ITE]) * (See also General Regulations) Any publication based on work approved for a higher degree should
More informationREGISTRATION CRITERIA FOR CFP BOARD REGISTERED PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION CRITERIA FOR CFP BOARD REGISTERED PROGRAMS Registration Criteria for CFP Board Registered Programs (Updated March, 2013) The following section contains the financial planning program registration
More informationHow To Improve Your Knowledge Of Psychology
I. Introduction History Assessment Report Applied Psychology Program 2011-2012 The Department of Humanities and Social Sciences added the Bachelor of Science in Applied Psychology in 1997. The program
More informationStatements of Learning for Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)
Statements of Learning for Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) ISBN-13: 978-1-86366-633-6 ISBN-10: 1 86366 633 8 SCIS order number: 1291673 Full bibliographic details are available from Curriculum
More informationThe Impact of Changes to Finance-Major Assessment Structures on Student Engagement and Success
International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 2012, Volume 24, Number 1, 122-127 http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/ ISSN 1812-9129 The Impact of Changes to Finance-Major Assessment Structures
More informationUNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
UNDRGRADUAT PROGRAMM SPCIFICATION Programme Title: Awarding Body: Institution: Final Awards: Intermediate Awards: Mode of Study UCAS Codes: Forensic Science Staffordshire University Staffordshire University
More informationRESTRICTED. Professional Accreditation Handbook (Engineering Degrees)
Professional Accreditation Handbook (Engineering Degrees) Revised by authority of the Accreditation Board as of 28 October 2003 CONTENTS 1. PROFESSIONAL ACCREDITATION 1.1 Introduction...4 1.2 Accreditation
More informationUSING DIRECTED ONLINE TUTORIALS FOR TEACHING ENGINEERING STATISTICS
USING DIRECTED ONLINE TUTORIALS FOR TEACHING ENGINEERING STATISTICS Richard J. School of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, Australia richard.wilson@uq.edu.au Since 2006, an internet
More informationLEARNING SPATIAL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS CONCEPTS
LEARNING SPATIAL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS CONCEPTS Mark Shortis, Frank Leahy, Cliff Ogleby, Allison Kealy And Fiona Ellis Department of Geomatics, University of Melbourne Key words: learning, spatial geometry,
More informationPROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION 4.1 Course Record Information Name and level of final & intermediate Awards Awarding Body Location of Delivery Mode of Study MSc in Advanced Software Engineering Postgraduate Diploma
More informationA Design Paradigm in Undergraduate Electrical Engineering Curriculum
A Design Paradigm in Undergraduate Electrical Engineering Curriculum Habib Rahman Saint Louis University Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering McDonnell Douglas Hall, 3450 Lindell Boulevard
More informationBSc Management with Information Technology For students entering Part 1 in 2015/6. Henley Business School at Univ of Reading
BSc Management with Information Technology For students entering Part 1 in 2015/6 Awarding Institution: Teaching Institution: Relevant QAA subject Benchmarking group(s): Faculty: Programme length: Date
More informationNational Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment. National Qualifications Framework for Higher Education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment National Qualifications Framework for Higher Education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia May, 2009 National Qualifications Framework for Higher
More informationEducating professional software engineers: pathways and progress in the Australian experience
Edith Cowan University Research Online ECU Publications 2001 Educating professional software engineers: pathways and progress in the Australian experience Rick Duley Edith Cowan University David Veal Edith
More informationOutcome-Based Teaching and Learning in Computer Science Education at Sub-degree Level
Outcome-Based Teaching and Learning in Computer Science Education at Sub-degree Level Gary K. W. Wong, Student Member, IEEE, Member, ACM and H. Y. Cheung Abstract Computer Science is recognized as a young
More informationEducation about and for S u s ta i n a b i l i t y i n A u s t r a l i a n B u s i n e s s
Education about and for S u s ta i n a b i l i t y i n A u s t r a l i a n B u s i n e s s Schools STAGE 3 An action research program EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The full report explores the outcomes and discusses
More information3. DESIGNING PROJECTS FOR LEARNING
3. DESIGNING PROJECTS FOR LEARNING Ivan Gibson NUI, Galway INTRODUCTION This chapter aims to provide an introduction to the essential characteristics of designing projects for learning. The approach I
More informationBA Management and Business (3 year) For students entering Part 1 in 2011/2. Henley Business School at Univ of Reading
BA Management and Business (3 year) For students entering Part 1 in 2011/2 Awarding Institution: Teaching Institution: Relevant QAA subject Benchmarking group(s): Faculty: Programme length: Date of specification:
More information2015 2016 one year courses digital image creation for luxury brands
2015 2016 one year courses digital image creation for luxury brands undergraduate programmes one year course digital image creation for luxury brands 02 Brief descriptive summary Over the past 78 years
More informationThank you for the opportunity to testify. My name is Michale McComis and I am the
, Executive Director, Accrediting Commission of Career Schools and Colleges Before the On The Department of Education Inspector General s Review of Standards for Program Length in Higher Education Thank
More informationMSc Financial Risk and Investment Analysis
School of Business, Management and Economics Department of Business and Management MSc Financial Risk and Investment Analysis Course Handbook 2013/14 2013 Entry Table of Contents School of Business, Management
More informationGraduate Profiles for University of Otago Postgraduate Research Degrees
Graduate Profiles for University of Otago Postgraduate Research Degrees Background This paper contains the generic graduate profiles approved by the Board of Graduate Studies in April 2015 for Honours,
More informationHenley Business School at Univ of Reading. Henley Business School Board of Studies for
BSc in Accounting and Finance For students entering Part 1 in 2014/5 Awarding Institution: Teaching Institution: Relevant QAA subject Benchmarking group(s): Faculty: Programme length: Date of specification:
More informationNottingham Trent University Course Specification
Nottingham Trent University Course Specification Basic Course Information 1. Awarding Institution: Nottingham Trent University 2. School/Campus: Nottingham Business School/City 3. Final Award, Course Title
More informationHow To Write A Standards Based Lesson Plan
Center for Pre-College Programs New Jersey Institute of Technology Cloud Computing Workshop Standards-Based Lesson Planning Howard Kimmel Kimmel@adm.njit.edu John Carpinelli Carpinelli@adm.njit.edu and
More informationAccreditation of Monash University Software Engineering (MUSE) Program
Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology Volume 4, 2007 Accreditation of Monash University Software Engineering (MUSE) Program Sita Ramakrishnan Clayton School of IT, Faculty of IT, Monash
More informationBSc Management with Information Technology For students entering Part 1 in 2012/3. Henley Business School at Univ of Reading
BSc Management with Information Technology For students entering Part 1 in 2012/3 Awarding Institution: Teaching Institution: Relevant QAA subject Benchmarking group(s): Faculty: Programme length: Date
More informationLOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY
LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY Programme Specification Computer Science Please note: This specification provides a concise summary of the main features of the programme and the learning outcomes that a typical
More informationUsing GSwE2009 in the Creation and Modification of Graduate Software Engineering Programs and Related Curricula
Using GSwE2009 in the Creation and Modification of Graduate Software Engineering Programs and Related Curricula Mark Ardis Stevens Institute of Technology Hoboken, NJ, USA mark.ardis@stevens.edu Lucia
More informationHenley Business School at Univ of Reading. Henley Business School Board of Studies for
BA Business and Management For students entering Part 1 in 2013/4 Awarding Institution: Teaching Institution: Relevant QAA subject Benchmarking group(s): Faculty: Programme length: Date of specification:
More informationCASE STUDY. JUNIATA COLLEGE Assessing Global Learning: Lessons from the Field BY JENIFER CUSHMAN, JUNIATA COLLEGE
CASE STUDY JUNIATA COLLEGE Assessing Global Learning: Lessons from the Field BY JENIFER CUSHMAN, JUNIATA COLLEGE Reproduction is strictly prohibited without written permission of the author. 2013 Jenifer
More informationENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCE ASSESSMENT REPORT 2009-2010 The Environmental Health Science (EHS) Program at East Central University is one of 30 accredited undergraduate environmental health programs in
More informationREVISED GRID FOR MICRO LEVEL APPROACH
Cover sheet Country: Sector: Level: United Kingdom Bank EQF Level: 6 IT NQF Level: 6 Institution (private/state): Name of the study program : Duration (in years/months): University (state) BSc Computer
More information