Telemarketing, , and Text Message Marketing: Tips to Avoid Lawsuits
|
|
|
- Joan Ellis
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Telemarketing, , and Text Message Marketing: Tips to Avoid Lawsuits LeadsCouncil December 11, pm 3 pm ET Webinar Ari N. Rothman, Esq., Co-Presenter Molly T. Cusson, Esq., Co-Presenter Jonathan L. Pompan, Esq., Moderator Venable LLP, Washington, DC 1
2 Agenda marketing: the CAN-SPAM Act, California Business & Professions Code, Other State Laws Telephone Consumer Protection Act ( TCPA ) Telemarketing Sales Rule (the TSR ) Questions and Answers This presentation is not intended to provide legal advice or opinion and should not be relied on as such. Legal advice can only be provided in response to a specific fact situation.
3 Marketing: CAN SPAM Act and Other State Laws What laws apply? CAN SPAM, 15 U.S.C et seq. Enforced by the FTC Applies to commercial s Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code Other state laws
4 CAN SPAM: Falsified Header Penalties To materially falsify a header means it is: altered or concealed in a manner that would impair the ability of a recipient of the message or others to identify, locate, or respond to a person who initiated the electronic mail message or to investigate the alleged violation. 18 U.S.C. 1037(d)(2). Subject to criminal penalties Fines Up to five years in prison
5 From Line and Domain Name Don t use a domain name by proxy + generic from line Do use either a descriptive from line OR a traceable, identifiable domain name
6 California Law: Bus. & Prof. Code Unlawful to send advertisements containing certain falsified or misrepresented header information, including subject lines Balsam v. Trancos, 203 Cal. App. 4th 1083 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012) Strict liability Hypertouch, Inc. v. ValueClick, Inc., 192 Cal. App. 4th 805 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)
7 Marketing Compliance Do not use false or misleading header information. Do not use deceptive subject lines. Identify the message as an ad. Provide a valid postal address. Tell recipients how to opt out of receiving future . Honor opt-out requests promptly. opt-out mechanism must be able to process opt-out requests for at least 30 days after you send your message. must honor a recipient s opt-out request within 10 business days. Monitor what others are doing on your behalf. If you hire another company to handle your marketing, both the company whose product is promoted in the message and the company that actually sends the message may be held legally responsible.
8 The Telephone Consumer Protection Act ( TCPA ) 47 U.S.C. 227 Enforced by the FCC Regulates robocalls, text messages, and fax advertisements
9 Elements of a TCPA Violation For calls and texts to cell phones: any call, including texts (Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., 569 F.3d 946, 955 (9th Cir. 2009)) through an automatic telephone dialing system without the prior express consent of the called party For calls to residential phone lines: any telephone call using an artificial or prerecorded voice without the prior express consent of the called party For faxes: an unsolicited advertisement through a fax machine, computer, or other device from a sender without an established business relationship with recipient
10 Damages Actual monetary loss or $500 AND $1500 if the party willfully or knowingly violated the TCPA
11 Frequently Litigated Statutory Terms automatic telephone dialing system prior express consent established business relationship
12 Automatic Telephone Dialing System Broad definition Equipment that has the capacity to: Store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and Dial such numbers 47 U.S.C. 227(a)(1)(A)-(B)
13 Autodialer Allegations of characteristics of an autodialed call may be sufficient to allege use of an automatic telephone dialing system. See Connelly v. Hilton Grant Vacations Co., LLC, No. 12cv599, 2012 WL , at *4 (S.D. Cal. June 11, 2012) (denying motion to dismiss). Not autodialer Circumstantial evidence of mass texting, without more, is insufficient to allege use of an automatic telephone dialing system. Buslepp v. Improv Miami, Inc., No CIV-Cohn/Seltzer, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS , at *5-7 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 16, 2012). Unclear Internet-to-phone technology: does it fall within the definition of an autodialer? See Revolution Messaging, LLC Petition for Expedited Declaratory Ruling, CG Docket No (filed Jan. 19, 2012, reply comments due Dec. 10, 2012)
14 Prior Express Consent Prior express consent is [c]onsent that is clearly and unmistakably stated. Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., 569 F.3d 946, 955 (9th Cir. 2009).
15 What does prior express consent mean? A consumer s voluntary provision of her telephone number? Compare Pinkard v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 3:12cv02902, 2010 WL , at *4 (N.D. Ala. Nov. 9, 2012), With Connelly v. Hilton Grant Vacations Co., LLC, No. 12cv599, 2012 WL , at *4 (S.D. Cal. June 11, 2012)
16 TCPA Regulations Change The FCC s recent rulemaking now require[s] prior express written consent for all telephone calls using and automatic telephone dialing system. (emphasis added) OMB approved the rule on October 16, Express written consent will be required after October 16, Consent via electronic signatures: E-Sign compliance
17 Establish Business Relationship ( EBR ) a prior or existing relationship formed by a voluntary twoway communication between a person or entity and a business or residential subscriber with or without an exchange of consideration, on the basis of an inquiry, application, purchase or transaction by the business or residential subscriber regarding products or services offered by such person or entity, which relationship has not been previously terminated by either party 47 C.F.R (f)(5) Does not extend to affiliates Rules and Regulations Implementing the TCPA of 1991: Junk Fax Protection Act of 2005, 2006 FCC LEXIS 1713
18 Liability Under the TCPA Direct liability: Persons or entities who physically make the calls in the method proscribed by the statute Vicarious liability: Persons or entities in an agency relationship with the party that made the calls E.g., advertisers, affiliate networks, other intermediaries Plaintiff must show that the entity that made the calls acted as an agent of the defendant. Thomas v. Taco Bell Corp., No. SACV , 2012 WL , at *4 (C.D. Cal. June 25, 2012).
19 Vicarious Liability Under the TCPA Vicarious liability claim fails if plaintiff lacks evidence that: defendant directed or supervised the manner and means of the text message campaign, defendant created or developed the text message, or defendant played any role in the decision to distribute the message by way of blast text. Thomas, 2012 WL , at *4 Recent trend? reluctance to expand scope of TCPA liability to defendants who didn t themselves send the unsolicited advertisements?
20 TCPA Class Action Issues Arbitration clauses State law prohibition on class actions Statutory standing Rule 23(a) requirements
21 TCPA Compliance Confirm: landline or cell phone number? Have an immediate opt-out provision after January 14, 2013 Obtain written consent after October 16, 2013 Maintain records of all consents Make sure disclosures aren t false and misleading Clarifications regarding control over the method and means of marketing in affiliate contracts Quick response to violations Compliance with DNC
22 Recent FTC Action FTC is attacking illegal robocalls on all fronts David Vladeck, Director of the FTC s Bureau of Consumer Protection FTC Robocall Challenge: public challenge to create a solution to block illegal commercial robocalls on landlines and cell phones $50,000 cash prize
23 Telemarketing Sales Rule ( TSR ) 15 U.S.C ; 16 C.F.R to Enforced by FTC Applies to any plan, program, or campaign to sell goods and services through interstate phone calls
24 TSR Key Provisions Requires disclosure of specific information Prohibits misrepresentations Limits when telemarketers may call consumers Requires transmission of caller ID Prohibits abandoned outbound calls, subject to safe harbor Prohibits unauthorized billing Sets payment restrictions for the sale of certain goods and services Requires that some business records be kept for two years
25 TSR Key Amendments Established business relationship to Do-Not-Call ( DNC ) provisions Consumer may give express written permission to receive calls, even if consumer appears on DNC list Enhances disclosure requirements applicable to negative options Requires caller ID, and if made available by the telephone company, the telemarketer s name Prohibits abandoning outbound telephone calls, subject to safe harbor Prohibits calls that deliver prerecorded messages, unless the seller has the recipient s prior written and signed agreement to receive such calls Requires prerecorded messages to include opt-out
26 The Established Business Relationship Exception A company may call a consumer with whom it has an established business relationship even if the consumer's number is on the DNC Registry. But according to the FTC: [t]elephone calls from telemarketers to phone numbers provided by lead generators generally do not fall within the established business relationship exception
27 TSR Compliance Policies and procedures to ensure compliance with DNC regulations Obtain express written permission to receive calls from consumers on the DNC registry Obtain express written permission to deliver prerecorded messages Retain records of all consents Provide telephone numbers for purposes of caller ID Include opt-out provisions Note: Additional rules apply when collecting payment information and selling goods online
28 Questions and Answers Jonathan L. Pompan, Esq. t Ari N. Rothman, Esq. t Molly T. Cusson, Esq. t
NCHER Winter Legal Meeting TCPA Litigation Update. Robert G. Cameron [email protected]
NCHER Winter Legal Meeting TCPA Litigation Update Robert G. Cameron [email protected] Overall Litigation Trend Do not do indirectly what is prohibited directly. Consumer protection statutes are being
How To Get A Phone Call From A Telemarketing Company
CLIENT MEMORANDUM From: West Corporation Re: New Federal Communication Commission Rule for Autodialed and Prerecorded Message Telemarketing Calls and Abandoned Call Provisions Date: February 17, 2012 Federal
Recent Developments in TCPA Litigation. April 5, 2013 Aaron Van Oort Eileen Hunter Erin Hoffman
Recent Developments in TCPA Litigation April 5, 2013 Aaron Van Oort Eileen Hunter Erin Hoffman Why Pay Attention To The TCPA? 2 TCPA Arithmetic: Banks More Debtors + More Cell Phones + $500-$1500 Statutory
2nd Annual Venable Advertising Law Symposium. Minding Your TCPAs. Ellen Traupman Berge, Venable LLP. 2015 Venable LLP
2nd Annual Venable Advertising Law Symposium Minding Your TCPAs Ellen Traupman Berge, Venable LLP Agenda TCPA Overview Focus on Calls/Texts to Cell Phones Non-Marketing Calls: The Prior Express Consent
Wrong Number: Hot Topics In TCPA Compliance & Litigation
Wrong Number: Hot Topics In TCPA Compliance & Litigation Yaron Dori Covington & Burling LLP Nancy Thomas Morrison & Foerster LLP Julie O Neill Morrison & Foerster LLP International Association of Privacy
How To Get A Cell Phone Number From A Cell Number On A Credit Card
Hot Topics in TCPA Litigation Materials prepared 6/26/2013 Joann Needleman [email protected] Twitter: @jneedleman Admitted: PA, NJ Law & Politics Magazine Top 50 Female Lawyers in Pennsylvania President
Update on TCPA Requirements for Text Messages and Best Practices
Update on TCPA Requirements for Text Messages and Best Practices ESPC Annual Meeting September 9, 2015 Heather Zachary Agenda Background on the Telephone Consumer Protection Act Past TCPA Orders by the
FCC PROVIDES ADDITIONAL CLARITY ABOUT RULES UNDER THE TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT
August 3, 2015 FCC PROVIDES ADDITIONAL CLARITY ABOUT RULES UNDER THE TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT The Issue: On July 10, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) released an order addressing a
Can I Text My Customer? Recent FCC Rulings Under the TCPA. Jonathan Thessin, Senior Counsel American Bankers Association
Can I Text My Customer? Recent FCC Rulings Under the TCPA Jonathan Thessin, Senior Counsel American Bankers Association aba.com 1-800-BANKERS Background The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) prohibits
Mobile Marketing Regulatory Compliance Lurking Dangers and Cautionary Tales. Andrew Lorentz Ronnie London Ken Payson
Mobile Marketing Regulatory Compliance Lurking Dangers and Cautionary Tales Andrew Lorentz Ronnie London Ken Payson Overview Overview of regulatory regime Less-obvious compliance issues Potentially significant
DISCLAIMER. Two important things to note: Thanks for your Cooperation!
DISCLAIMER Two important things to note: The materials in this Presentation are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. These materials are intended, but not promised
Email and Text Message Campaigns. Justine Young Gottshall Partner, InfoLawGroup
2012 Email and Text Message Campaigns Justine Young Gottshall Partner, InfoLawGroup What s the Risk? Effective and active marketing area This makes it a target for litigation and enforcement action Consumer
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DECLARATORY RULING
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Westfax, Inc. Petition for Consideration and Clarification Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act Recent Developments in Litigation, Regulation and Insurance Coverage June 13, 2013 Presenters Henry Pietrkowski Partner Chicago +1 312 207 3904 [email protected]
TCPA AND WIRELESS MARKETING AT THE FCC, THE FTC, AND IN THE COURTS. William B. Baker Wiley Rein LLP September 19, 2014 San Jose
TCPA AND WIRELESS MARKETING AT THE FCC, THE FTC, AND IN THE COURTS William B. Baker Wiley Rein LLP September 19, 2014 San Jose Why You Should Care Hundreds of lawsuits Hundreds of $millions in payouts
Telephone Consumer Protections Act (TCPA)
Telephone Consumer Protections Act (TCPA) Guideline for Aspect customers on the latest FCC Report and Order Serge Hyppolite, VP, Sales Development October 8, 2013 Disclaimer The purpose of this document
TCPA. The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. 227), regulations promulgated at 47 CFR 64.1200. Jackson Lewis P.C. www.jacksonlewis.
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. 227), regulations promulgated at 47 CFR 64.1200 TCPA www.jacksonlewis.com ABOUT JACKSON LEWIS Founded in 1958, Jackson Lewis is dedicated to representing
On the Line Consenting To A New Way Of Lead Generation Under The TCPA
Ifrah Law Whitepaper On the Line Consenting To A New Way Of Lead Generation Under The TCPA IfrahLaw Hands-on Counsel, Gloves-off Litigation PREPARED BY: Rachel Hirsch 1717 Pennsylvania Ave, N.W., Suite
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Guide for Contact Centers
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Guide for Contact Centers September 2013 Sponsored By: - 1 - DMG Consulting LLC 2013 DMG Consulting LLC. All rights reserved. This Report is protected by United
Telephone Consumer Protection Act - Current Issues
Recent Developments and New Challenges Under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act COHEAO Mid-Year Conference Mark W. Brennan July 29, 2013 Overview Background on the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DECLARATORY RULING
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 Request of ACA International for Clarification
2:15-cv-00201-DCN Date Filed 01/15/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 22
2:15-cv-00201-DCN Date Filed 01/15/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT C O U R T DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION LINDA KENZIK, individually and on behalf of others
Privacy, Data Collection and Information Management Practice Team November 13, 2003
Overview of Current Anti-Spam Regulations Privacy, Data Collection and Information Management Practice Team The proliferation of unsolicited commercial e-mail, more commonly known as spam, has prompted
FEDERAL TELEMARKETING AND OUTBOUND CALLING COMPLIANCE GUIDE. October 2013
FEDERAL TELEMARKETING AND OUTBOUND CALLING COMPLIANCE GUIDE October 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 3 II. TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT REQUIREMENTS... 4 III. TELEMARKETING SALES RULE REQUIREMENTS...
Case 1:12-cv-06677-JSR Document 77 Filed 09/16/14 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:12-cv-06677-JSR Document 77 Filed 09/16/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------x EDWARD ZYBURO, on behalf of himself and all
New Federal Regulation of Tax Resolution, Tax Negotiation and Tax Settlement Services: FTC Telemarketing Sales Rule
New Federal Regulation of Tax Resolution, Tax Negotiation and Tax Settlement Services: FTC Telemarketing Sales Rule October 5, 2010, 3:00 4:00 pm ET Jonathan L. Pompan, Esq. Venable LLP, Washington, D.C.
Current Legal and Regulatory Issues Facing Lead Generation Advertising and Marketing
Current Legal and Regulatory Issues Facing Lead Generation Advertising and Marketing LeadsCouncil October 23, 2012, 3 pm 4 pm ET Webinar Jonathan L. Pompan, Esq. Alexandra Megaris, Esq. Venable LLP, Washington,
Authenticated Caller ID Plus Regulatory Changes
Authenticated Caller ID Plus Regulatory Changes By Vincent A. Lucas, Ph.D. Presented to the FTC Robocall Challenge This paper provides solutions to two problems faced in the enforcement of the Telephone
MEMORANDUM. Express Consent Requirement for Delivery of Recorded Messages
MEMORANDUM DATE: August 26, 2008 RE: Express Consent Requirement for Delivery of Recorded Messages The following sets forth the individual state and federal requirements regarding express consent for the
The Ninth Circuit Holds That Text Messages Are Subject to a Telemarketing Law
The Ninth Circuit Holds That Text Messages Are Subject to a Telemarketing Law By Gonzalo E. Mon Gonzalo E. Mon is an attorney in Kelley Drye & Warren s advertising and marketing law practice. He can be
Federal Regulations on Advertising:
Federal Regulations on Advertising: Phone, Fax, or E-mail By Jordan B. Hansell 700 Walnut, Suite 1600 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 Telephone: 515-283-8166 Facsimile: 515-283-8018 [email protected] Disclaimer
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Protecting the public and your company
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Protecting the public and your company About AnswerNet AnswerNet is the largest privately held telemessaging company in the world and a fullservice provider
Biennial Report to Congress
Biennial Report to Congress Under the Do Not Call Registry Fee Extension Act of 2007 FY 2014 and 2015 Federal Trade Commission December 2015 I. Report Overview Do-Not-Call Registry Fee Extension Act of
HIPAA and TCPA Intersection: Navigating Healthcare Call Exemption, Landline/Cell Phone Distinction, Scope of Consent
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A HIPAA and TCPA Intersection: Navigating Healthcare Call Exemption, Landline/Cell Phone Distinction, Scope of Consent THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV14-2060-CAS(CWx) Date December 17, 2015
Case 2:14-cv-02060-CAS-CW Document 52 Filed 12/17/15 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:768 Present: The Honorable CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE CONNIE LEE Not Present N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
OVERVIEW OF THE TCPA
Telephone Consumer Protection Act Basics, Washington D.C. 2015 Keith J. Keogh KEOGH LAW, LTD. Alexander Burke BURKE LAW OFFICES, LLC OVERVIEW OF THE TCPA Junk Faxes Autodialed calls Text Message Ads Pre-Records
Do-Not-Call Q&A Pennsylvania Law/Federal Rules
Do-Not-Call Q&A Pennsylvania Law/Federal Rules The Pennsylvania Telemarketer Registration Act, ( Pennsylvania Act ), as amended, applies to telephone solicitation and marketing activities performed by
A TCPA FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY: WHY TCPA LAWSUITS ARE ON THE RISE AND WHAT THE FCC SHOULD DO ABOUT IT
A TCPA FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY: WHY TCPA LAWSUITS ARE ON THE RISE AND WHAT THE FCC SHOULD DO ABOUT IT Monica Desai, Ryan King, Maria Wolvin, Maxine Martin Abstract: Litigation related to the Telephone Consumer
Compliance Outlook: TCPA
Compliance Outlook: TCPA AFSA's webinar will discuss recent Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) litigation and the TCPA regulations that went into effect in October. The webinar will provide an overview
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act: Compliance Developments and What to Expect in 2015
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act: Compliance Developments and What to Expect in 2015 November 2014 Mark W. Brennan, Partner Overview Overview of the TCPA Recent Developments Issues to Watch What You
1. The Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Hello. Here at MailChimp, we only allow you to send SMS messages through our SMS app, Gather. Since we're dipping our toe into the SMS-messaging pool, we wanted to give you some information about SMS rules.
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 ) ) ) ) ) CITATION AND ORDER PRERECORDED MESSAGE VIOLATIONS
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Dialing Services, LLC File No.: EB-TCD-12-00001812 CITATION AND ORDER PRERECORDED MESSAGE VIOLATIONS Adopted: March 15,
TCPA Compliance: Perspectives on Current Technology Options
TCPA Compliance: Perspectives on Current Technology Options David Kaminski Attorney Carlson & Messer LLP Anita Tolani Attorney Weinberg, Jacobs & Tolani LLP Table of Contents Introduction... 3 1: Companies
The Telephone Consumer Protection (TCPA): Consumer Protection Controlled Business Mayhem
The Telephone Consumer Protection (TCPA): Consumer Protection Controlled Business Mayhem The Telephone Consumer Protection Act is surrounded by a plethora of fear, loathing, confusion and a seemingly never
13-25a-101. Title. This chapter is known as the "Telephone and Facsimile Solicitation Act."
13-25a-101. Title. This chapter is known as the "Telephone and Facsimile Solicitation Act." Enacted by Chapter 26, 1996 General Session 13-25a-102. Definitions. As used in this chapter: (1) "Advertisement"
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) REPORT AND ORDER. Adopted: February 15, 2012 Released: February 15, 2012
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 ) ) ) ) CG Docket No. 02-278 REPORT
SUMMARY OF PUBLIC LAW 108-187 THE CAN-SPAM ACT OF 2003
SUMMARY OF PUBLIC LAW 108-187 THE CAN-SPAM ACT OF 2003 On December 16, 2003, President Bush signed into law the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. CAN-SPAM stands for "Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiffs, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Defendant.
CASE 0:14-cv-00062-PAM-JSM Document 26 Filed 06/09/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Caleb Trainor and Isaac Trainor, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. Plaintiff 2:14-cv-2081-RMG. Case No. vs. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
2:14-cv-02081-RMG Date Filed 05/29/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA MARK FITZHENRY, individually and on behalf of a class of all persons
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
United States District Court for the Northern District of California IF YOU RECEIVED A NON-EMERGENCY MORTGAGE OR CREDIT CARD DEFAULT SERVICING CALL OR TEXT ON YOUR CELLULAR TELEPHONE FROM BANK OF AMERICA
Case 2:14-cv-00421-MJP Document 40 Filed 01/06/15 Page 1 of 6
Case :-cv-00-mjp Document 0 Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 KENNETH WRIGHT, CASE NO. C- MJP v. Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT S MOTION TO
Evolving Legal and Regulatory Landscape for Lead Generation
Evolving Legal and Regulatory Landscape for Lead Generation LeadsCon 2012 February 27, 2012 The Mirage Resort & Casino, Las Vegas, NV Jonathan L. Pompan, Esq. Venable LLP, Washington, DC 1 IMPORTANT INFORMATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division JONATHAN F. OLIN Deputy Assistant Attorney General MICHAEL S. BLUME Director,
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C.
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. In the Matter of ) ) ) Rules and Regulations Implementing the ) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 ) CG Docket No. 02-278 ) Petition
Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Nonprofits
Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Nonprofits The Telephone Consumer Protection Act ( TCPA ) was enacted in 1991 and codified in Section 227 of the Communications Act of 1934. The FCC adopted updated
CAN-SPAM Policy & Data Verification Guide
BIZ SERVICE PROVIDER CAN-SPAM Compliance & Data Verification Policy Document BSP CAN-SPAM Policy & Data Verification Guide BSP Page 1 of 5 Version 8.1 Effective Date; May 2015 BIZ SERVICE PROVIDER I. Summary
Dialing for Dollars What You Don t Know about the Telemarketing Consumer
Dialing for Dollars What You Don t Know about the Telemarketing Consumer Protection Act, Telemarketing Sales Rule and the Fair Debt Collection Act Could Cost Your Clients a Fortune Dialing for Dollars
Suggested National Do-Not-Call Registry Policy
Purpose: The federal regulations issued by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulate telephone solicitation activities performed by REALTORS. The State and Federal laws apply to all telephones,
Ready, Set, Text! Best Practices for. Texting Compliantly. Wednesday, May 4, 2016 Riverwalk South
Ready, Set, Text! Best Practices for Texting Compliantly Wednesday, May 4, 2016 Riverwalk South John F. Possumato, Esq Automotive Mobile Solutions LLC [email protected] Call or Text 856 577 2763 Text
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) Rules and Regulations Implementing ) CG Docket No. 02-278 the Telephone Consumer Protection ) Act of 1991 ) Comments
Case 9:13-cv-80670-DPG Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2013 Page 1 of 8
Case 9:13-cv-80670-DPG Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2013 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 9:13-cv-80670-KAM AJA DE LOS SANTOS, an individual, on
Arthur Rotatori, McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC Jason Romrell, LeadsMarket.com Dustin Alonzo, McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC. #LEND360 LEND360.
Arthur Rotatori, McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC Jason Romrell, LeadsMarket.com Dustin Alonzo, McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC #LEND360 LEND360.org Overview of Federal, State & Industry Regula9on Federal Trade Commission
Calling All Cell Phones With Express Permission. June 24 th, 2014
Calling All Cell Phones With Express Permission June 24 th, 2014 Kenlyn T. Gretz President and CEO of Law360, New York (May07, 2014, 8:55PM ET Tenet Healthcare Corp. and its debt collection subsidiary
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Rules and Regulations Implementing the ) CG Docket No. 02-278 Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 ) ) REPLY
Case 1:12-cv-01369-JG-VMS Document 37 Filed 10/02/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 341. TODD C. BANK, MEMORANDUM Plaintiff, AND ORDER - versus - 12-cv-1369
Case 1:12-cv-01369-JG-VMS Document 37 Filed 10/02/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 341 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FOR ONLINE PUBLICATION TODD C. BANK, MEMORANDUM Plaintiff, AND ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Molnar et al v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc. Doc. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 JEFFREY MOLNAR, ET AL., v. NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, Defendant.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. A settlement will provide a $4,500,000 fund from which claims
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. Case No. :
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION PAUL BARRETT, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, Case No. : CLASS ACTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON RONALD A. MARRON (SBN 10) [email protected] ALEXIS WOOD (SBN 000) [email protected] KAS GALLUCCI (SBN 0) [email protected]
Case 0:13-cv-61747-RSR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 9
Case 0:13-cv-61747-RSR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 0:13-cv-61747-RSR KURT S. SOTO, an individual, on behalf
Case: 1:15-cv-05781 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/15 Page 1 of 21 PageID #:1
Case: 1:15-cv-05781 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/15 Page 1 of 21 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, and ) ) STATE OF
Case 6:14-cv-00008-JA-DAB Document 53 Filed 02/25/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 1974
Case 6:14-cv-00008-JA-DAB Document 53 Filed 02/25/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 1974 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, and STATE OF FLORIDA,
(1) The term automatic telephone dialing system means equipment which has the capacity
Telephone Consumer Protection Act 47 U.S.C. 227 SEC. 227. [47 U.S.C. 227] RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT (a) DEFINITIONS. As used in this section (1) The term automatic telephone dialing
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE I. INTRODUCTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 1 1 BENNETT HASELTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. QUICKEN LOANS, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. C0-RSL FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21
Case 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 0:15-cv-60423-WJZ FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, STATES
WiFiAccessCode: LEADSPEDIA Follow at #leadscon Thursday, 4:00 4:45PM
WiFiAccessCode: LEADSPEDIA Follow at #leadscon Thursday, 4:00 4:45PM Staying Current with Consumer Protection: Practical Lessons from Recent Enforcement Actions MODERATOR: Jonathan Pompan, Partner, Venable
United States District Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRIAN GLAUSER, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiff, No. C - PJH 1 1 1 1 1 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY
