1 Hot Topics in TCPA Litigation Materials prepared 6/26/2013
2 Joann Needleman Admitted: PA, NJ Law & Politics Magazine Top 50 Female Lawyers in Pennsylvania President Elect, National Association of Retail Collection Attorneys Panelist in the FTC CFPB S Life of a Debt Roundtable held June 2013 in Washington.
3 Don Maurice Admitted: DC, NY, NJ Don is peer rated AV by Martindale Hubbell, the worldwide guide to lawyers. He has been recognized by Law & Politics Magazine as a New Jersey Super Lawyer in Bankruptcy & Debtor/Creditor Law and as a Corporate Counsel Super Lawyer. His firm has been named a Go to Law Firm for the Top 500 Companies, and a Go to Financial Law Firm by Corporate Counsel Magazine/ALM Publications
4 This information is not intended to be legal advice and may not be used as legal advice. Legal advice must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. Every effort has been made to assure this information is up to date. It is not intended to be a full and exhaustive explanation of the law in any area, however, nor should it be used to replace the advice of your own legal counsel.
5 Background on The Telephone Consumer Protection Act The Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 ( TCPA ), 47 U.S.C. 227
6 Our Focus Today Is on the prohibition on making any call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called party) using any automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice to any telephone number assigned to a paging service, cellular telephone service, specialized mobile radio service, or other radio common carrier service, or any service for which the called party is charged for the call; TCPA, 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(1)(A)(iii)
7 Our Focus Today Informational Calls debt collection Telemarketing Calls sale of a product or service
8 Hot Topic 1 ATDS [E]quipment which has the capacity (A) to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and (B) to dial such numbers. TCPA, 47 U.S.C. 227(a)(1)
9 Hot Topic 1 ATDS Generally The Ninth Circuit has said "[a] system need not actually store, produce, or call randomly or sequentially generated telephone numbers, it need only have the capacity to do it." Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., 569 F.3d 946, 951 (9th Cir. 2009). The court left the issue of defining capacity to dial to the District Court on remand. The matter settled and the District Court did not reach the issue.
10 Hot Topic 1 ATDS Predictive Dialer Predictive Dialers can be an ATDS because they have the capacity to dial [telephone] numbers without human intervention FCC Declaratory Ruling, at 13. Meyer v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC, 707 F.3d 1036, 1043 (9th Cir. 2012) Soppet v. Enhanced Recovery Co., LLC, 679 F.3d 637 (7th Cir. 2012)
11 Hot Topic 1 ATDS Predictive Dialer It could not be more clear that any predictive dialer must have the required capacity (even if unused) set out in the statute to qualify as an ATDS. In Re: Midland Credit Management, Inc., Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation, No. :11 md MMA MDD (S.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2013)
12 Hot Topic 1 ATDS Predictive Dialer FCC Action Because FCC found that predictive dialers are an ATDS, defendants cannot challenge that ruling in a federal district court. Instead they must petition the FCC for reconsideration. Griffith v. Consumer Portfolio Serv., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91231, **9 11 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 16, 2011).
13 Hot Topic 1 ATDS Generally GroupMe Petition Seeks a ruling that the term capacity under section 227(a)(1) of the TCPA refers only to equipment that, at the time of use, could, in fact, have employed the functionality described in the TCPA without human intervention and without first being technologically altered.
14 Hot Topic 1 ATDS Predictive Dialer Communication Innovators Petition whether predictive dialers that lack the statutorily required ability to store, produce, and dial random or sequential numbers are automatic telephone dialing systems ( autodialers ) under the TCPA. met with FCC on June 7, 2013 These non telemarketing calls must be made to wireless telephone numbers in order to reach increasingly large segments of the population. CI s Notice of Ex Parte Presentation June 11, 2013
15 Hot Topic 1 ATDS Predictive Dialer Professional Association for Customer Engagement Petition July 11, 2012 Requests that the FCC to rule that a predictive dialer only constitutes an ATDS if it has the capacity to store or produce telephone numbers to be called using a random or sequential number generator and to provide a definition for random or sequential number generator.
16 Hot Topic 1 ATDS Preview Dialer Nelson v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (W.D. Wis. Mar. 8, 2013) opinion vacated June 7, 2013 Regardless whether preview dialing falls outside the scope of 227(a)(1) and the FCC's order, I agree with plaintiff that defendant's argument is another red herring. Under both the statute and the order, the question is not how the defendant made a particular call, but whether the system it used had the "capacity" to make automated calls.
17 Hot Topic 2 Prior Express Consent Debt Collection Residential telephone lines exempt Cellphones must have prior express consent for ATDS or prerecorded message In re Rules & Regulations Implementing the Tel. CPA of 1991, 27 FCC Rcd 1830 (F.C.C. 2012) FCC Declaratory Ruling, , 23 F.C.C.R. 559, 11 (Adopted Dec. 28, 2007, Released Jan. 2008) (the 2008 FCC Declaratory Ruling ).
18 Hot Topic 2 Prior Express Consent Pursuant to the FCC ruling [23 FCC Rcd. 559, 565 (Jan. 4, 2008)], prior express consent is consent to call a particular telephone number in connection with a particular debt that is given before the call in question is placed. Meyer v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC, 707 F.3d 1036, 1042 (9th Cir. 2012) Providing a cellphone number is not enough Mais v. Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (S.D. Fla. May 8, 2013)
19 Hot Topic 2 Prior Express Consent Knowingly providing cellphone number to entity initiating the call/text Saunders v. NCO Fin. Sys., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2012) Balthazor v. Cent. Credit Servs., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (S.D. Fla. Dec. 27, 2012) Nigro v. Mercantile Adjustment Bureau, LLC, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 11, 2013) Roberts v. Paypal, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (N.D. Cal. May 30, 2013) O'Connor v. Diversified Consultants, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (E.D. Mo. May 28, 2013)
20 Hot Topic 2 Prior Express Consent Knowingly providing cellphone number to entity initiating the call/text is not sufficient Mais v. Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (S.D. Fla. May 8, 2013) Lusskin v. Seminole Comedy, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (S.D. Fla. June 19, 2013) (same Judge as in Mais) Leckler v. Cashcall, Inc., 554 F. Supp. 2d 1025 (N.D. Cal. 2008) vacated at 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (N.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2008)
21 Hot Topic 2 Prior Express Consent Knowingly providing cellphone number to entity initiating the call/text is not sufficient Mais v. Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (S.D. Fla. May 8, 2013) Lusskin v. Seminole Comedy, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (S.D. Fla. June 19, 2013) (same Judge as in Mais) Leckler v. Cashcall, Inc., 554 F. Supp. 2d 1025 (N.D. Cal. 2008) vacated at 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (N.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2008)
22 Hot Topic 2 Prior Express Consent We encourage creditors to include language on credit applications and other documents informing the consumer that, by providing a wireless telephone number, the consumer consents to receiving autodialed and prerecorded message calls from the creditor or its third party debt collector at that number FCC Declaratory Ruling, 23 FCC Rcd 559, 565 (F.C.C. 2007) n37
23 Hot Topic 2 Prior Express Consent Revocation Gager v. Dell Financial Services, LLC, No. 3:11 CV 2115, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73752, 2012 WL (W.D. Pa. May 29, 2012); Saunders v. NCO Fin. Sys., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2012).
24 Hot Topic 2 Prior Express Consent Wrong Number Soppet v. Enhanced Recovery Co., LLC, 679 F.3d 637 (7th Cir. Ill. 2012)
25 Hot Topic 3 Vicarious Liability Strictly Liable Martin v. Cellco P'ship, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS , at **4 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 18, 2012) citing Soppet v. Enhanced Recovery Co., LLC, 679 F.3d 637, 642 (7th Cir. 2012) (in dicta) Jamison v. First Credit Servs., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (N.D. Ill. Mar. 28, 2013)
26 Hot Topic 3 Vicarious Liability Agency Principles Applied Versteeg v. Bennett, DeLoney & Noyes, P.C., 775 F. Supp. 2d 1316, 1321 (D. Wyo. 2011)(corporate officer personally liable because he was directly involved in the process). Thomas v. Taco Bell Corp., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS , at **11 12 (C.D. Cal. June 25, 2012). In re DISH Network, LLC, 2013 FCC LEXIS 2057 (F.C.C. May 9, 2013)(while addressing facts in telemarketing, there is possible application to debt collection calls).
Recent Developments in TCPA Litigation April 5, 2013 Aaron Van Oort Eileen Hunter Erin Hoffman Why Pay Attention To The TCPA? 2 TCPA Arithmetic: Banks More Debtors + More Cell Phones + $500-$1500 Statutory
2nd Annual Venable Advertising Law Symposium Minding Your TCPAs Ellen Traupman Berge, Venable LLP Agenda TCPA Overview Focus on Calls/Texts to Cell Phones Non-Marketing Calls: The Prior Express Consent
Telemarketing, E-mail, and Text Message Marketing: Tips to Avoid Lawsuits LeadsCouncil December 11, 2012 2 pm 3 pm ET Webinar Ari N. Rothman, Esq., Co-Presenter Molly T. Cusson, Esq., Co-Presenter Jonathan
Case 1:12-cv-06677-JSR Document 77 Filed 09/16/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------x EDWARD ZYBURO, on behalf of himself and all
A TCPA FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY: WHY TCPA LAWSUITS ARE ON THE RISE AND WHAT THE FCC SHOULD DO ABOUT IT Monica Desai, Ryan King, Maria Wolvin, Maxine Martin Abstract: Litigation related to the Telephone Consumer
So What if You Didn't Touch That Dial? Avoiding Liability under the TCPA September 12, 2013 Alan S. Kaplinsky, Practice Leader Consumer Financial Services 215.864.8544 firstname.lastname@example.org Martin
Maybe You Can t Hear Me Now: Autodialer Restrictions Child support programs across the county are considering various new technologies to enhance collections and services. The federal Office of Child Support
Telephone Consumer Protection Act Basics, Washington D.C. 2015 Keith J. Keogh KEOGH LAW, LTD. Alexander Burke BURKE LAW OFFICES, LLC OVERVIEW OF THE TCPA Junk Faxes Autodialed calls Text Message Ads Pre-Records
Walker v. Transworld Systems, Inc. Doc. 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION NEVADA WALKER, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 8:14-cv-588-T-30MAP TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant.
Compliance Outlook: TCPA AFSA's webinar will discuss recent Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) litigation and the TCPA regulations that went into effect in October. The webinar will provide an overview
2:14-cv-02081-RMG Date Filed 05/29/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA MARK FITZHENRY, individually and on behalf of a class of all persons
Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. Torrey GRAGG, on his own behalf and on behalf of similarly situated persons, Plaintiff, v. ORANGE
Mobile Marketing Regulatory Compliance Lurking Dangers and Cautionary Tales Andrew Lorentz Ronnie London Ken Payson Overview Overview of regulatory regime Less-obvious compliance issues Potentially significant
MEMORANDUM DATE: August 26, 2008 RE: Express Consent Requirement for Delivery of Recorded Messages The following sets forth the individual state and federal requirements regarding express consent for the
Case :-cv-00-mjp Document 0 Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 KENNETH WRIGHT, CASE NO. C- MJP v. Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT S MOTION TO
The Ninth Circuit Holds That Text Messages Are Subject to a Telemarketing Law By Gonzalo E. Mon Gonzalo E. Mon is an attorney in Kelley Drye & Warren s advertising and marketing law practice. He can be
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. In the Matter of ) ) ) Rules and Regulations Implementing the ) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 ) CG Docket No. 02-278 ) Petition
DISCLAIMER Two important things to note: The materials in this Presentation are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. These materials are intended, but not promised
Molnar et al v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc. Doc. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 JEFFREY MOLNAR, ET AL., v. NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, Defendant.
Case: 1:10-cv-02697 Document #: 65 Filed: 08/16/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:659 10-2697.111-RSK August 16, 2011 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ROSLYN
CASE 0:14-cv-00062-PAM-JSM Document 26 Filed 06/09/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Caleb Trainor and Isaac Trainor, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
Case:-cv-00-RS Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JASMINDA WEBB, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff,
Case 113-cv-11944 Document 1 Filed 08/13/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Robert Pegg, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, Collecto,
Can I Text My Customer? Recent FCC Rulings Under the TCPA Jonathan Thessin, Senior Counsel American Bankers Association aba.com 1-800-BANKERS Background The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) prohibits
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) Rules and Regulations Implementing ) CG Docket No. 02-278 the Telephone Consumer Protection ) Act of 1991 ) Comments
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act: Compliance Developments and What to Expect in 2015 November 2014 Mark W. Brennan, Partner Overview Overview of the TCPA Recent Developments Issues to Watch What You
Telephone Consumer Protection Act Advocacy Update 2014 National Council of Higher Education Resources (NCHER) Knowledge Symposium November 4, 2014 Jason Goldman Senior Telecommunications Policy Counsel
Case 1:12-cv-01369-JG-VMS Document 37 Filed 10/02/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 341 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FOR ONLINE PUBLICATION TODD C. BANK, MEMORANDUM Plaintiff, AND ORDER
C H A M B E R O F C O M M E R C E O F T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A W I L L I A M L. K O V A C S S E N I O R V I C E P R E S I D E N T E N V I R O N M E N T, T E C H N O L O G Y & R E
Page 1 JOSEPH B. MURPHY, an individual, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff -- Appellant, versus DCI BIOLOGICALS ORLANDO, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, DCI BIOLOGICALS,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRIAN GLAUSER, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiff, No. C - PJH 1 1 1 1 1 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 email@example.com New TCPA Order Holds Few Bright Spots For Businesses
Update on TCPA Requirements for Text Messages and Best Practices ESPC Annual Meeting September 9, 2015 Heather Zachary Agenda Background on the Telephone Consumer Protection Act Past TCPA Orders by the
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON RONALD A. MARRON (SBN 10) firstname.lastname@example.org ALEXIS WOOD (SBN 000) email@example.com KAS GALLUCCI (SBN 0) firstname.lastname@example.org
USCA Case #15-1211 Document #1566940 Filed: 08/10/2015 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ACA INTERNATIONAL, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Case
NOTE HIJACKED CONSENT: DEBT COLLECTION AND THE TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT Michael A. DeNiro INTRODUCTION: A DEBTOR S LAMENT... 493 I. THE TCPA AND PRIOR EXPRESS CONSENT IN THE DEBT COLLECTION CONTEXT...
To the Point: TCPA Clarity and Questions Published by insidearm.com an imprint of the ia Institute 6010 Executive Blvd, Suite 802, Rockville, Maryland, 20850 email@example.com 240.499.3834 www.insidearm.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN LENNETT GENSEL, Plaintiff, -vs- Case No. 13-C-1196 PERFORMANT TECHNOLOGIES, Inc., Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER On January 28, 2015, the Court
Case 0:12-cv-62173-RNS Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2013 Page 1 of 5 BRET L. LUSSKIN, JR., vs. Plaintiff, SEMINOLE COMEDY, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 Request of ACA International for Clarification
Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 19 Filed: 02/28/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:193 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS IN RE CAPITAL ONE TELEPHONE CONSUMER LITIGATION ACT
Case 0:15-cv-62026-JIC Document 113 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/28/2016 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 15-62026-CIV-COHN/SELTZER S. RYAN STRAUSS, v. Plaintiff,
Case 114-cv-10006-WGY Document 1 Filed 01/02/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Anthony Clark, v. Plaintiff, Living Scriptures, Inc.; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants.
1 Client Update FCC Both Eases and Tightens TCPA Rules NEW YORK Matthew L. Biben firstname.lastname@example.org Courtney M. Dankworth email@example.com Steven S. Michaels firstname.lastname@example.org Harriet
CLIENT MEMORANDUM From: West Corporation Re: New Federal Communication Commission Rule for Autodialed and Prerecorded Message Telemarketing Calls and Abandoned Call Provisions Date: February 17, 2012 Federal
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act Recent Developments in Litigation, Regulation and Insurance Coverage June 13, 2013 Presenters Henry Pietrkowski Partner Chicago +1 312 207 3904 email@example.com
MANUAL DIALING: NEW ORDER, NEW TECH Mike Meyer Rozanne Andersen Rip Harris Disclaimer Disclaimer: Ontario Systems is a technology company and provides this presentation solely for general informational
Case 2:14-cv-02060-CAS-CW Document 52 Filed 12/17/15 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:768 Present: The Honorable CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE CONNIE LEE Not Present N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
Case :-cv-00-bas-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JORDAN MARKS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Plaintiff, CRUNCH
Recent Developments in Wage and Hour Cases, Fair Credit Reporting Act Cases, Telephone Consumer Protection Act Cases and Tag-Along Patent Class Actions Michael Best & Friedrich LLP Litigation Seminar December
2:15-cv-00201-DCN Date Filed 01/15/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT C O U R T DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION LINDA KENZIK, individually and on behalf of others
Case 114-cv-02018-AKH Document 33 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------- X ARACELI KING, Plaintiff,
Ifrah Law Whitepaper On the Line Consenting To A New Way Of Lead Generation Under The TCPA IfrahLaw Hands-on Counsel, Gloves-off Litigation PREPARED BY: Rachel Hirsch 1717 Pennsylvania Ave, N.W., Suite
(Previously published in The Legal Intelligencer, November 8, 2011) New Cost Guidelines for E-Discovery by Peter Vaira In a recent case in the Eastern District, Judge Legrome Davis upheld court costs of
Case 0:13-cv-61747-RSR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 0:13-cv-61747-RSR KURT S. SOTO, an individual, on behalf
Case 1:09-cv-02264 Document 60 Filed 12/16/09 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ALAN DONNELLY, on behalf of himself ) and others similarly
Case 9:13-cv-80670-DPG Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2013 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 9:13-cv-80670-KAM AJA DE LOS SANTOS, an individual, on
Wrong Number: Hot Topics In TCPA Compliance & Litigation Yaron Dori Covington & Burling LLP Nancy Thomas Morrison & Foerster LLP Julie O Neill Morrison & Foerster LLP International Association of Privacy
Regulatory Impact on Agencies & How They Affect You, The Client Regulatory Impact on Agencies & How They Affect You, The Client Presented By: Thomas Perrotta, V.P. Collections & Compliance, CCCO Presentation
Case 1:15-cv-13004-GAO Document 1 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS KEITH MATHEWS On behalf of himself and Others similarly situated Plaintiff, Case
USCA Case #15-1211 Document #1566940 Filed: 08/10/2015 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ACA INTERNATIONAL, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Case
Case: 1:10-cv-00117 Document #: 114 Filed: 11/08/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1538 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BRIANNA GREENE, on behalf of ) herself and others
Debt Collection Industry Update: Recent Regulatory Changes and the Shift to Emerging Technologies William S. Weinstein, Esq. Weinstein, Pinson & Riley, P.S. 2001 Western Avenue, Suite 400 Seattle, Washington
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A TCPA Class Actions: Pursuing or Defending Claims Following the FCC's New Robocalls Order Navigating Issues of Consent, Strict Liability, Ascertainability,
Case: 1:13-cv-07149 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/04/13 Page 1 of 25 PageID #:1 LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP Jonathan D. Selbin (pro hac vice to be filed) Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Douglas I. Cuthbertson
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 15a0201p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT STEPHEN M. HILL, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, HOMEWARD
Intellectual Property Technology Law Journal & ELECTRONICALLY REPRINTED FROM OCTOBER 2014 The Telephone Consumer Protection Act: Privacy Legislation Gone Awry? By Paul F. Corcoran, Marc J. Rachman, and
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. A settlement will provide a $4,500,000 fund from which claims
NOTICE AND FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ( FAQ ) NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IN RE: MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT LITIGATION United States District Court
Telephone Consumer Protection Act for Nonprofits The Telephone Consumer Protection Act ( TCPA ) was enacted in 1991 and codified in Section 227 of the Communications Act of 1934. The FCC adopted updated
1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRIAN CONNELLY and KEITH MERRITT, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. HILTON GRAND VACATIONS COMPANY,
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re Petition of the Tax Claim Bureau of Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania, to Sell Free and Clear the Property of Estate of Anna S. Rowley, her heirs and assigns
Case 9:13-cv-80670-DPG Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/23/2013 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 9:13-cv-80670-KAM AJA DE LOS SANTOS, an individual,
2016 TCPA Texting Rules TCPA Texting Rules Every Car Dealership Needs to Know advantage txt. - Providing your customers the communication options they demand. Today s reality regarding real time communication
United States District Court for the Northern District of California IF YOU RECEIVED A NON-EMERGENCY MORTGAGE OR CREDIT CARD DEFAULT SERVICING CALL OR TEXT ON YOUR CELLULAR TELEPHONE FROM BANK OF AMERICA
Case: 13-14008 Date Filed: 09/29/2014 Page: 1 of 32 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 13-14008 D.C. Docket No. 0:11-cv-61936-RNS MARK S. MAIS, on behalf of himself
Case: 1:16-cv-02787 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/03/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CARY WOLOVICK, individually and on behalf
Case 6:12-cv-01459-CEH-KRS Document 20 Filed 11/21/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID 96 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION JOSEPH B. MURPHY, an individual, on behalf of himself
Case: 1:11-cv-05886 Document #: 84 Filed: 08/10/12 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:533 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION NICHOLAS MARTIN and DAVID MACK, )