Negotiating Good Health Conference
|
|
- Candace Boyd
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Negotiating Good Health Conference Dimitra Dubrow Principal, Medical Negligence Department Maurice Blackburn Lawyers 29 November 2013 Presentation title
2 2
3 3
4 Identification of Doctors at Risk of Recurrent Complaints: A National Study of Healthcare Complaints in Australia, BMJ Quality and Safety 1 July 2013 Vol. 22 No Study looked at just under 19,000 healthcare complaints lodged against doctors with State and Territory Health Commissions. Findings included: 61% complaints about clinical aspects of care; treatment (41%) diagnosis (16%) and (8%) medications Nearly a quarter of complaints were about communication including attitude or manner of doctors (15%) quality or amount of information provided (6%). 3% of practicing doctors accounted for 49% of all complaints. 1% of doctors accounted for 25% of all complaints. 4
5 Frequent flyer doctors failing in their provision of patient care. More to be done to identify and address problem doctors through regulatory or other means to protect against repeat offenders. Anecdotally, we also receive clusters of enquiries about particular doctors or hospitals. 5
6 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare s report on medical indemnity claims for presented data based on reserves being allocated by insurers more new claims in the private sector (1,700) then the public sector (1,300). The figures show that: 10% incurred no cost at all; 26% involved a cost under $10,000.00; 29% closed for between $10, and $100,000.00; 25% closed for between $100, and $500,000.00; 10% closed for $500, or more. If successful, quantum very low and for many no payment made at all. 6
7 The top specialties involved in claims were: General practice non procedural 11.8%; Emergency medicine 9%; General surgery 8.4%; Orthopaedic surgery 5.5%; Obstetrics and gynaecology 4.6%; General nursing 4.1%; and General practice procedure 3.4%. 7
8 Case Selection Many enquiries received daily about medical treatment concerns. Enquiries screened and most not pursued. Must apply case selection criteria. Judgement calls being made from the outset. Decision whether to pursue or investigate critical. Claims time and resource intensive. Refer people we cannot assist to appropriate body, eg. Health Services Commission. 8
9 What is a Medical Negligence Claim? Claim for damages for physical or psychiatric injury against a health service provider based in negligence and/or contract. Negligence or breach of contract may be an act or failure to act. Damages can be awarded for: o o Non economic loss (general damages/pain and suffering); Economic loss (special damages, medical and other expenses/loss of earnings). Claims based on: o Common Law; and o Wrongs Act
10 What is Medical Negligence? Occurs when treatment provided by a health service provider falls below a reasonable standard. Mistake or error of judgment not enough. Need to show fault or want of reasonable care Difference of professional opinion as to diagnosis and treatment will not negligence. Unsuccessful treatment or patient suffering risk or complication of treatment not negligence. 10
11 What do we have to prove? Breach of the duty to take reasonable care/negligent treatment provided; and Breach/negligent treatment caused injury; and Injury is assessed as a significant injury (to recover general damages). 11
12 Negligence A doctor or health service provider will be found to have breached their duty of care if the treatment and/or advice provided fell below a reasonable standard of care. Standard of care expected is that of the ordinary skilled person exercising and professing to have that special skill (Rogers v. Whittaker 1992) Standard not lowered if person is inexperienced ie. First day on the job. Section 58, Wrongs Act 1958: the standard expected of persons holding out as possessing a particular skill is to be determined by reference to what could reasonably be expected of a person possessing that skill and the relevant circumstances as at the date of the alleged negligence and not a later date. 12
13 Courts will look at expert evidence, protocols and guidelines and statutory obligations in deciding negligence. Section 59, Wrongs Act 1958: A professional is not negligent in providing a professional service, if they acted in a manner consistent with peer professional opinion. Peer professional opinion is satisfied if the professional has behaved in a way which was widely accepted in Australia by a significant number of respected practitioners in the field as competent practice in the circumstances. Courts can disregard peer professional opinion if it is unreasonable. Acts as a defence so if found negligent, the defendant can go on to establish that treatment was widely accepted amongst their professional peers and not be liable. 13
14 Grinham v Tabro Meats; VWA v Murray [2012] VSC 491 WorkCover Claim - recovery action by Victorian WorkCover Authority against general practitioner. Worker at an abattoir not immunised against Q Fever - contracts disease. Attended doctor s clinic for immunisation in Immunisation not performed because not tested negative to virus. Told to come back in a months time. Patient did not come back and went on to contract Q Fever. Doctor not negligent in failing to recall patient. Court confirmed section 59 acts as a defence. But how does a doctor prove that they acted in a way that was widely accepted by a significant number of practitioners in Australia at that time? Court said at its highest the expert evidence in the case supported inference that competent practice in Victoria but no further. 14
15 Negligent hospital care cases Wang v Central Sydney Area Health Service [2000] NSWSC 515. Patient was taken by friends to hospital emergency department with head injury. Examined by a nurse who decided immediate treatment not needed. Patient seated in waiting area where he could be observed. Later, patient s friends told different nurse patient s condition dangerous and needed to see a doctor soon. Nurse said emergency department busy and patient needed to wait. When asked whether could be taken to another hospital nurse said they could do whatever they wanted. Patient left waiting room and went to a doctor at a medical clinic who told him to return to hospital. Patient went home and during night convulsed and vomited. Suffered permanent brain damage. 15
16 Court found: Hospital not negligent for not seeing patient earlier or giving priority; Negligent for failing to persuade the patient to stay until they were treated by a doctor. 16
17 Sherry v Australasian Conference Association (t/as Sydney Adventist Hospital) [2006] NSWSC 75 Case about post operative care and monitoring after cardiac procedure Patient in intensive care unit developed chest pain Diagnosed as haemothorax (blood in pleural cavity). Before drains inserted, patient suffered cardiac arrest and died. Cause of death was massive intrathoracic haemorrhage. Court found: Delay in diagnosing the haemorrhage despite signs hours earlier. Hospital did not have adequate medical cover in its intensive care unit and had breached guidelines in relation to this. 17
18 Failure to follow up Doctors/health service providers can be liable for failing to follow up their patients. Usually, in context of test being performed and doctor failing to follow up results. Grinham - example of case involving follow up. Guiding principle - consideration of the seriousness of the outcome for the patient should follow up not occur. Failures in communication constant themes and failure to follow up are subset of such cases. 18
19 Kite v Malycha (1998) 71 SASR 321. Fine needle biopsy of a breast lump sent for pathology testing. Test results faxed to doctor s rooms - hard copy not sent. Patient told to call later in the day for result and make a follow up appointment but did not. Doctor did not realise biopsy report not received and did not contact the patient. Biopsy result highly suspicious for underlying cancer. Doctor found negligent for not having system in place for checking when test results received and acting on them. Sometimes findings of contributory negligence made.ie, patient themselves found to have contributed to injury because of failure to follow advice of doctor. Issues around patient autonomy, responsibility for own health care and resources required to provide appropriate follow up. Gives rise to factual disputes as to advice given about follow up arrangement. 19
20 Major challenge for hospitals treating so many patients, with diverse staff and limited resources. But essential part of patient care. 20
21 Causation Causation hotly contested. Difficult to establish a causal link between a breach of duty and an injury Need to disentangle which part of the injury or medical condition is part of the person s overall medical condition or was going to happen anyway and which is the result of poor care. Plaintiff has to establish, on the balance of probabilities, that their injury was caused by the negligence or breach of duty of the defendant. Compensation only paid for injury which can be established has, on the balance of probabilities, resulted from the negligent care. 21
22 Have to show that but for the negligence would not have suffered injury (factual causation). Also need to go further and prove that it is appropriate for the defendant to be found liable. This is where value judgements and policy considerations come into play. A recent court decision shows just how hard proving causation can be for a Plaintiff. King v Western Sydney Health Network [2013] NSWCA 162 Claim brought against Blacktown Hospital for failing to offer varicellazoster immunoglubulin vaccine (VCIG) to pregnant woman who had been exposed to the chicken pox virus. Woman went on to develop chicken pox and the virus was transferred to the baby which developed foetal varicella syndrome (FVS) leading to severe physical and cognitive impairments. Claim pursued by the mother on behalf of infant daughter. 22
23 Claim was that chicken pox would most likely have been avoided had VZIG been given which in turn would have avoided FVS developing. Epidemiological study found that the VZIG injection prevented infection in 54% of women given the injection within three days after exposure. Even though more than 50% probability, judge said it needed to be adjusted to take into account the dosage of VZIG given in Australia and the percentage of cases which resulted in no infection even where VZIG injection not given. Scientific evidence established only a possibility of preventing infection and not a probability. So hospital negligent for failing to administer the VZIG injection but only exposed the plaintiff s mother to a risk to which she was already exposed. Evidence did not support that she would have avoided contracting chicken pox if the injection had been administered. 23
24 Loss of Chance Tabet v Gett (2010) 240 CLR 537 High Court said a Plaintiff cannot succeed in establishing causation by proving that the defendant s negligence resulted in them losing the chance of a better outcome. Progressive illness or cancer cases, time is of the essence and earlier diagnosis leads to a more favourable outcome, but sometimes hard to pinpoint what the difference to the outcome is as a result of the delay. Sometimes it is because of the defendant s negligence that the difference can t be established. For example, GP not referring a patient for a CT scan which would have a shown a tumour and this is reason why a comparison with diagnosis at earlier time cannot be made. In Tabet v Gett High Court said if loss of a chance recognised this would lower the standard of proof for causation and damage: ie need to prove, on the balance of probabilities that the Defendant s acts or omissions caused the Plaintiff s damage. 24
25 But courts have been prepared to find in favour of causation even where the best the Plaintiff could prove was an increase in the risk of developing metastatic spread of cancer. Sydney South West Area v Stamoulis [2009] NSWCA month delayed diagnosis of breast cancer as a result of radiologist failing to properly interpret a mammogram. At diagnosis cancer spread to the lymph nodes and metastasised to the lungs and brain. Earlier diagnosis would have resulted in 62% chance of avoiding metastatic spread. Because of delay, the chance of avoiding metastatic spread dropped to 58%. 25
26 Really need to be able to obtain causation evidence which identifies in what way the outcome for the Plaintiff would have been different. Need to show more than that the outcome would have been better or injury less severe with appropriate care. Experts need to pinpoint the injuries or parts of the disease process which, on the balance of probabilities, would have been avoided with reasonable care. 26
27 Failure to Warn Special category of case relates to obligation of a doctor and professional to warn of material risks. Relates to individual patient autonomy and the need to make decisions about own treatment and bodies. There have been again a number of important High Court decisions dealing with failure to warn. In the case of Rogers, the High Court said a risk was material where: A reasonable person in the patient s position if warned of the risk would be likely to attach significance to it or if the medical practitioner is or should be reasonable aware that the particular patient, if warned of the risk, would be likely to attach significance to it. 27
28 Need to warn of a risk is greater the more elective and discretionary the procedure is. In an emergency situation, need to warn of risks is greatly reduced if not non existent. For a plaintiff to be successful in a claim based on failure to warn, they need to establish the following: The person was not advised adequately or at all about the material risks of a procedure or treatment. The material risk eventuated. The person would not have had the treatment if properly advised of the risk. 28
29 Also, Section 56 says: Where there is an allegation that there has been a failure to warn, the Plaintiff bears the burden of proving on the balance of probabilities that they were no aware of the risk or information. So, if not told of the risk by the person who was actually treating you but you found out about it through Google or someone else, another practitioner, then you cannot argue that you were not aware of the risk. Essential that patients be given comprehensive information about the treatment they are about to undergo and that they be warned of any potential risks general and specific to them. Claims based on failure to warn are very difficult for Plaintiff. 29
30 Vast improvement in amount of information provided to patients since the High Court cases of Rogers v. Whittaker and Chapel v. Hart which really laid down the law. Doctors now acutely aware of their obligations to provide patients with meaningful advice about risks. Not enough to just provide patients with a document like the relevant College s information on a procedure or a consent form signed by the patient. A doctor or health care professional needs to actually satisfy themselves that the person has understood the risks. Best defence for a doctor or other health service provider is to have comprehensive contemporaneous records outlining the advice provided. 30
31 Wallace v Kam [2013] HCA 19 Patient underwent spinal surgery for a disc protrusion. Suffered complication of bilateral femoral neurapraxia (temporary nerve damage). Another risk, which did not eventuate, was spinal cord damage resulting in paralysis. Surgeon did not advise the Plaintiff of any of the risks associated with the procedure. Plaintiff claimed that would not have undergone the surgery if told about the risks. Therefore, plaintiff would not have suffered neurapraxia because would not have had surgery if warned of the risk of spinal cord damage. But found would have had surgery if told about neurapraxia, so court found that the failure to warn did not cause the injury. Case shows that to succeed in a failure to warn case, a Plaintiff needs to show that the risk about which advice needs to be given must be the same risk which eventuates. 31
32 Contributory Negligence In some cases, patients themselves have been found to have contributed to their own injury and so a finding of contributory negligence is made. These cases include: Patient does not have an x-ray performed following referral; Not attending a specialist appointment which has been arranged when the patient is aware of the seriousness of the situation; Being non-compliant with instructions; Patient fails to give important information which would have affected the outcome. A finding of contributory negligence can completely defeat the claim. ie damages reduced by 100%. 32
33 Who will be sued? Vicarious liability : an employer, including a hospital, must indemnify employees for wrongs done during their employment. Issue is, what is the scope of the employment. Hospital also has a non-delegable duty of care so liability may extend to cover the negligent acts of a person who is not an employee. Where medical negligence occurs in: i) Public hospital: claim brought against hospital only (as hospital vicariously liable for employee acting within scope of employment); ii) Private hospital: claim brought against hospital for negligence of their staff and against individual doctor engaged by the patient. 33
34 When a person dies Claim can be brought where a person has died as a result of negligent medical treatment. Claim for loss of dependency associated with loss of income and services. Claim for damages for psychiatric injury by a parent, relative or person in a close relationship with the deceased. Needs to have either witnessed at the scene the person being killed, injured or put in danger or be in a close relationship with the victim. Need significant injury to recover damages for pain and suffering unless loss of a foetus or the loss of a child as a result of injury at time of birth. 34
35 Coronial investigation or inquest may take place into the circumstances surrounding the death. Reportable death includes one: That occurs during or following medical procedure where the death is or maybe causally related to it; and Where the death appears to have been unexpected, unnatural or violent. Inquisitorial fact finding process, not about apportioning blame. Legal representation. Can t use Coroners process to base a civil claim. Media. 35
36 Coronial Case Treatment by a hospital involving neonatal death. First pregnancy conceived following IVF treatment overseas. Due date 20 August 2007 Antenatal care provided by a major metropolitan hospital 23 August 2007 presentation to emergency department of hospital with period like pains, vaginal bleeding and headache Urine test positive for leucocytes protein ketones and blood Contractions twice every 10 minutes CTG normal 27 August 2007 attendance at pregnancy clinic CTG normal; 36
37 Amniotic fluid 5.2; Fetal dopplers show low resistance blood flow in umbilical arteries and low pulsatility index in the middle cerebral artery; 30 August days overdue admitted for induction of labour; 0845 hours CTG trace abnormal; Waters broken, thick meconium liquor; Caesarean section baby born in poor condition, APGAR scores two at one minute and two at five minutes; MRI scan shows severe brain injury; Baby dies as a result of hypoxic brain injury in the setting of meconium aspiration syndrome. 37
38 Coroner found: Supervision of CTG trace and timing of the response on 30 August inadequate. Unclear whether hypoxic injury would have been avoided with earlier intervention on 30 August. On 27 August should have been either increased fetal monitoring or delivery discharge inappropriate in mother conceiving by IVF after prolonged infertility. Had there been increased fetal monitoring on 27 August then deterioration would have been identified and steps taken to deliver the baby and death would have most likely been prevented. Failure in increase fetal monitoring on 27 August or proceed to delivery within 48 hours contributed to the death. 38
39 Damages Damages can be awarded for: Non economic loss (pain and suffering); and/or Economic loss (loss of earnings, nursing and attendant care, medical expenses and allied health therapies, housing, vehicle modifications and equipment). Damages cannot be recovered for pain and suffering (non economic loss) unless there is a significant injury. This is a physical injury of more than 5% under the American Medical Association Guides (Chapter 4) or more than 10% whole person impairment for a psychiatric injury under the Guides to the Evaluation of Psychiatric Impairment for Clinicians. Some injuries deemed to be significant injury, for example, loss of a foetus or a breast. 39
40 Damages for pain and suffering capped at around $482,000. There is a formula for yearly increases of the amount by reference to the consumer price index. Loss of earnings claim capped at three times the average weekly earnings of Victorian employees. Damages for gratuitous attendant care can only be claimed if the care is required for six hours or more per week or for more than six months or more. 40
41 Time Limits Adults - three years from date action discoverable Children and people under a disability - six years from date action discoverable Or 12 years from date of act/ommission (whichever is earliest) Discoverability defined as date knew or ought to have known all of the following: The fact that the injury occurred; and The fact that the injury was caused by the fault of the Defendant; and The fact that the injury was serious enough to justify bringing an action. 41
42 Personal Injury
Today I will discuss medical negligence following a number of recent high profile cases and inquests.
Tipp FM Legal Slot 29 th May 2012 Medical Negligence John M. Lynch, Principal Today I will discuss medical negligence following a number of recent high profile cases and inquests. Firstly, what is Medical
More informationMEDICAL NEGLIGENCE ANNUAL CASE REVIEW MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE 2009/2010. Ian Butcher, barrister 1
MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE ANNUAL CASE REVIEW MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE 2009/2010 Ian Butcher, barrister 1 GETT V TABET (2010) 265 ALR 227 No damages for loss of chance for personal injury following negligence Need for
More informationClinical Negligence: A guide to making a claim
: A guide to making a claim 2 Our guide to making a clinical negligence claim At Kingsley Napley, our guiding principle is to provide you with a dedicated client service and we aim to make the claims process
More informationLegal Action / Claiming Compensation in Scotland
Legal Action / Claiming Compensation in Scotland This help sheet explains your legal rights if you have been injured as a result of medical treatment and the steps involved in seeking compensation through
More informationIn order to prove negligence the Claimant must establish the following:
Introduction A wealth of law exists to provide compensation to people who have suffered injuries, both physical and psychological, following an accident. This fact sheet provides a very brief guide to
More information, FOCUS ON CAUSATION. The hospital did not serve any expert medical evidence 'liabilty The "plaintiff submitted that but for the hospital's
, FOCUS ON CAUSATION.,~.t~'! ì I ',' medical negligence cases where causation has been considered and discusses why the plaintiffs succeeded or failed in respect of This article proving focuses legal on
More informationGreek/Australian International Legal and Medical Conference 2015. "Developments in the law relating to medical negligence in the last 30 years"
Greek/Australian International Legal and Medical Conference 2015 Monday, 1 June 2015 "Developments in the law relating to medical negligence in the last 30 years" The Hon Justice Susan Kiefel AC High Court
More informationWhich of the following do you think could be liable to pay compensation?
ACTIVITY 3 A patient is admitted into an NHS trust hospital for surgery to repair a hernia. Unfortunately, by mistake, a swab is left inside the patient who has to return to theatre for a second operation.
More informationPERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS
PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS Frequently Asked Questions 1. Can I make a claim? If you have been injured because of the fault of someone else, you can claim financial compensation through the courts. The dependants
More information15 TH EUROPE PACIFIC CONFERENCE
15 TH EUROPE PACIFIC CONFERENCE Cortina D Ampezzo Italy 9-16 January 2011 Update On Medical Negligence With Particular Reference To The Recent High Court Decision In Tabet v. Gett Christopher T. Barry
More informationMedical Negligence. A client s guide
Medical Negligence A client s guide What is medical negligence? This note is intended to give you a broad outline about medical negligence (sometimes called clinical negligence) cases. It is not a substitute
More informationMAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE NSW
MAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE NSW 02 MAURICE BLACKBURN YOU RE WORTH FIGHTING FOR. If you are hurt, injured, or are facing an unfair situation, you and your family shouldn t have to suffer.
More informationMAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE SOUTH AUSTRALIA
MAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE SOUTH AUSTRALIA 02 MAURICE BLACKBURN YOU RE WORTH FIGHTING FOR. If you are hurt, injured, or are facing an unfair situation, you and your family shouldn t have
More informationProject title. The true cost of Clinical Negligence? Rachel Brown. Date Month 2014 17 November 2015. Slater and Gordon Limited 2014
Project title The true cost of Clinical Negligence? Date Month 2014 17 November 2015 Rachel Brown 1 The true cost of clinical negligence? To a patient: pain, suffering, loss of amenity. Loss of life, independence,
More informationThere are many different types of cancer and sometimes cancer is diagnosed when in fact you are not suffering from the disease at all.
About Cancer Cancer is a disease where there is a disturbance in the normal pattern of cell replacement. The cells mutate and become abnormal or grow uncontrollably. Not all tumours are cancerous (i.e.
More informationINJURY LAW ALERT WINTER 2006/2007 ISSUE WHAT IS MEDICAL MALPRACTICE?
INJURY LAW ALERT WINTER 2006/2007 ISSUE WHAT IS MEDICAL MALPRACTICE? Medical malpractice is a broad term used to describe a number of different kinds of lawsuits brought against doctors and hospitals.
More informationQueensland. Workers Compensation and Rehabilitation and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2010
Queensland Workers Compensation and Rehabilitation and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2010 Queensland Workers Compensation and Rehabilitation and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2010 Contents Page
More informationGADSBY WICKS SOLICITORS EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS
EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS Affidavit: After the event litigation insurance: Application notice: Bar Council: Barrister: Basic Charges: Before the Event Legal Expenses Insurance: Bill of costs: Bolam test:
More informationQueensland. Workers Compensation and Rehabilitation and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2010
Queensland Workers Compensation and Rehabilitation and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2010 Act No. 24 of 2010 Queensland Workers Compensation and Rehabilitation and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2010
More informationMedical Negligence Fact Sheet
Medical Negligence Fact Sheet An essential guide to Medical Negligence claims Every day, countless people are treated by doctors, nurses, dentists and other medical professionals. Fortunately, the standard
More informationLAWYERS New South Wales & Victoria. A transport accident is an incident directly caused by a motor car or motor vehicle, a railway train, or a tram.
LAWYERS New South Wales & Victoria Transport Accident Commission (TAC) Claims FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS What is a transport accident? A transport accident is an incident directly caused by a motor car
More informationPROF. M H CASSIMJEE HEAD OF DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY MEDICINE, P M BURG METROPOLITAN HOSPITAL COMPLEX & MIDLANDS REGION
PROF. M H CASSIMJEE HEAD OF DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY MEDICINE, P M BURG METROPOLITAN HOSPITAL COMPLEX & MIDLANDS REGION QUALITY IMPROVEMENT AND RISK MANAGEMENT Estimated that medical errors 8 th leading cause
More informationMEDICAL MALPRACTICE FACT BOOK
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE FACT BOOK - 1 - Firm Profile For over a decade, The Law Offices of Bruce M. Robinson have been dedicated to protecting the rights of victims who have been injured by the negligent and
More informationWelcome to our Clinical Negligence Service
CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE Welcome to our Clinical Negligence Service What is Clinical Negligence? This is proving that the standard of care received from a health care professional fell below that of a reasonably
More informationYour Guide to Pursuing a Personal Injury Claim
Your Guide to Pursuing a Personal Injury Claim 2 Contents Introduction... 3 Important things that you must do... 3 In The Beginning... 4 Mitigating your loss... 4 Time limits... 4 Who can claim?... 4 Whose
More informationInformation. Considering a clinical negligence claim. What gives rise to a clinical negligence claim? What about the issue of causation?
Information You are asking advice from Thomson Snell & Passmore about a possible clinical negligence claim. Such claims are complex and it would greatly assist your understanding of the issues if you read
More informationGOVERNMENT PROPOSALS FOR REFORM OF LEGAL CLAIMS AGAINST THE NHS A BRIEFING FROM THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS (APIL)
Association of Personal Injury Lawyers GOVERNMENT PROPOSALS FOR REFORM OF LEGAL CLAIMS AGAINST THE NHS A BRIEFING FROM THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS (APIL) CONTENTS Introduction 3 5 ways for
More informationVICTORIAN TRANSPORT ACCIDENT CLAIMS - A GUIDE TO YOUR ENTITLEMENTS
VICTORIAN TRANSPORT ACCIDENT CLAIMS - A GUIDE TO YOUR ENTITLEMENTS This guide includes the following: What is a transport accident? Who is the TAC? How do I make a claim? When will I know if my claim has
More informationClinical negligence. Grounds
Clinical negligence Clinical negligence occurs when the care or treatment the Claimant received from a health service provider was below the standard that is expected. This test was established in the
More informationStep-by-step guide to pursuing a medical negligence claim
Step-by-step guide to pursuing a medical negligence claim Suffering from medical negligence can be a painful and distressing experience for anyone. This short guide offers some advice to help people thinking
More informationAPPENDIX B: RECOMMENDATIONS TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON A NATIONALLY CONSISTENT BASIS
APPENDIX B: RECOMMENDATIONS TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON A NATIONALLY CONSISTENT BASIS Implementation of the Panel's Recommendations A national response Recommendation 1 The Panel's recommendations should be incorporated
More informationClinical Negligence. Investigating Your Claim
www.lees.co.uk Clinical Negligence Investigating Your Claim Lees Solicitors LLP 44/45 Hamilton Square Birkenhead Wirral CH41 5AR Tel: 0151 647 9381 Fax: 0151 649 0124 e-mail: newclaim@lees.co.uk 1 The
More informationFACT PATTERN ONE. The following facts are based on the case of Bedard v. Martyn [2009] A.J. No. 308
FACT PATTERN ONE The following facts are based on the case of Bedard v. Martyn [2009] A.J. No. 308 The infant plaintiff developed a large blood clot in his brain at some time either before or during the
More informationNEGLIGENCE BY DOCTORS AND OTHER HEALTH PROFESSIONALS A GUIDE TO YOUR ENTITLEMENTS
NEGLIGENCE BY DOCTORS AND OTHER HEALTH PROFESSIONALS A GUIDE TO YOUR ENTITLEMENTS This guide includes the following: Adverse outcomes contrasted with negligent outcomes. What is negligence? If my treatment
More informationNelton Forsythe instructed by Forsythe and Forsythe for the claimant
[2012] JMSC Civ 85 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA CIVIL DIVISION CLAIM NO. 2007 HCV 05051 BETWEEN PAULA WHYTE CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FIRST DEFENDANT AND SOUTH EAST REGIONAL HEALTH
More informationClinical Indemnity Scheme
Clinical Indemnity Scheme Obstetric Forum Farmleigh 11 th February 2014 Obstetric Litigation The Role of the Clinical Indemnity Scheme Ita Guilfoyle Solicitor/Clinical Claims Manager Clinical Indemnity
More informationChickenpox in pregnancy: what you need to know
Chickenpox in pregnancy: what you need to know First published December 2003 Revised edition published November 2008 What is chickenpox? Chickenpox is a very infectious illness caused by a virus called
More informationMAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS ROAD ACCIDENT INJURIES SOUTH AUSTRALIA
MAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS ROAD ACCIDENT INJURIES SOUTH AUSTRALIA 02 MAURICE BLACKBURN YOU RE WORTH FIGHTING FOR. If you are hurt, injured, or are facing an unfair situation, you and your family shouldn
More informationMesothelioma Making a Claim
Mesothelioma Making a Claim INJURY & NEGLIGENCE SPECIALISTS Injury & Negligence Nothing short of excellent Quote about Pannone part of Slater & Gordon, from Mr G. Essex WELCOME TO PANNONE PART OF SLATER
More informationLimitation of Liability
Limitation of Liability Submission to the Attorney-General (Western Australia) July 2000 The Institution of Engineers, Australia Institution of Engineers, Australia 11 National Circuit, Barton, ACT, 2604
More informationIn Queensland and Western Australia, there is no qualification that the peer professional opinion must be widely accepted in Australia.
PEER PROFESSIONAL OPINION ITS IMPACT ON MEDICAL CLAIMS By Sarah Vallance Following the release of the Final Report of the Review of the Law of Negligence in September 2002 (the Ipp Report), all Australian
More informationMedical injuries under national dis ability care and s upport s chemes. Jonathan Cohen, Linda Satchwell and Adrian Gould Taylor Fry Pty Ltd
Medical injuries under national dis ability care and s upport s chemes Jonathan Cohen, Linda Satchwell and Adrian Gould Taylor Fry Pty Ltd B ackground October 2006: NSW Lifetime care and support scheme
More informationCEPU Representatives Guidelines Australia Post Workers Compensation
CEPU Representatives Guidelines Australia Post Workers Compensation Introduction This Union Representatives Guide provides information on the following rights and entitlements of workers' compensation
More informationTipsheet 11 Hired-In Labour
Tipsheet 11 Hired-In Labour Client version May 2009 Updated January 2011 Contracts for labour hire what are the insurance issues when using hired in workers? What is hired in labour? Under a labour hire
More informationLEGAL SUMMARY. The plaintiff instituted action on behalf of her minor child (A) against the defendant for
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy In the matter between: LUNGILE NTSELE Plaintiff
More informationMAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE ACT
MAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE ACT 02 MAURICE BLACKBURN YOU RE WORTH FIGHTING FOR. If you are hurt, injured, or are facing an unfair situation, you and your family shouldn t have to suffer.
More informationMEDICO/LEGAL ASSOCIATION ALICE SPRINGS 2002 MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE
MEDICO/LEGAL ASSOCIATION ALICE SPRINGS 2002 MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE The World Changes In considering what some have called the crisis in medical negligence we need to bear in mind that there has been a large
More informationChapter 4 Crimes (Review)
Chapter 4 Crimes (Review) On a separate sheet of paper, write down the answer to the following Q s; if you do not know the answer, write down the Q. 1. What is a crime? 2. There are elements of a crime.
More informationHow To Settle A Car Accident In The Uk
PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM GUIDE PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM GUIDE This booklet has been produced by D.J. Synnott Solicitors to give our clients an understanding of the personal injury compensation
More informationLIMITATION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS ACT
LIMITATION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS ACT CHAPTER 7:09 Act 36 of 1997 Amended by 2 of 2000 Current Authorised Pages Pages Authorised (inclusive) by L.R.O. 1 18.. L.R.O. 2 Chap. 7:09 Limitation of Certain Actions
More informationGuide to Claims against General Practitioners (GPs)
Patients often build up a relationship of trust with their GP over a number of years. It can be devastating when a GP fails in his or her duty to a patient. Our medical negligence solicitors understand
More informationSUBMISSION OF THE LAW SOCIETY S WORKING PARTY TO THE LEGCO LEGAL AFFAIRS PANEL REGARDING THE OPERATIONS OF RECOVERY AGENTS IN HONG KONG
LC Paper No. CB(2)517/05-06(01) SUBMISSION OF THE LAW SOCIETY S WORKING PARTY TO THE LEGCO LEGAL AFFAIRS PANEL REGARDING THE OPERATIONS OF RECOVERY AGENTS IN HONG KONG 1. This is a submission of the Recovery
More informationA CLIENT GUIDE TO CLAIMING DAMAGES FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE
A CLIENT GUIDE TO CLAIMING DAMAGES FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE 1. INTRODUCTION Making a claim for damages (compensation) for clinical negligence can be a worrying and stressful experience. We recognise that
More informationCivil Liability Amendment (Personal Responsibility) Bill 2002
Passed by both Houses New South Wales Civil Liability Amendment (Personal Responsibility) Bill 2002 Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Amendment of Civil Liability Act 2002 No 22 2 4 Consequential
More informationDetermining Whether Medical Causation Is Established
Determining Whether Medical Causation Is Established February 2010 By H. Thomas Watson Using Statistical Analysis To prove medical malpractice liability, the plaintiff must establish through competent
More informationFacts About Landscape LINIC privacy
1 MEDICAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE HIGHLY REGULATED RETAIL PRODUCT COMPULSORY FEATURES INCLUDE: Ø MIN $20M ANY ONE AND ANNUAL LIMIT Ø UNDERWRITING RESPONSES LIMITED Ø CIVIL LIABILITY COVER EXTENSIVE GOVERNMENT
More informationPersonal Injury Law: Minnesota Medical Malpractice
Personal Injury Law: Minnesota Medical Malpractice Medical Malpractice Terms Statutes of Limitations Minnesota Medical Malpractice Laws Medical malpractice includes many forms of liability producing conduct
More informationAsbestos Brochure. Jim Wyatt - jwyatt@hamers.com Stephen Ball - sball@hamers.com. Freephone: 0800 591 999. www.hamers.com
Jim Wyatt - jwyatt@hamers.com Stephen Ball - sball@hamers.com Freephone: 0800 591 999 5 Earls Court, Priory Park East, Hull, HU4 7DY Tel: 01482 326666 Fax: 01482 324432 Aspect Court, 47 Park Square East,
More informationMedical Negligence. A client s guide. head and shoulders above the rest in terms of skills, experience and quality. The Legal 500
www.personalinjury.ffw.com Freephone 0800 358 3848 www.personalinjury.ffw.com Freephone 0800 358 3848 Medical Negligence A client s guide head and shoulders above the rest in terms of skills, experience
More informationCROSS HEALTH CARE BOUNDARIES MATERNITY CLINICAL GUIDELINE
CROSS HEALTH CARE BOUNDARIES MATERNITY CLINICAL GUIDELINE Title of Guideline (must include the word Guideline (not protocol, policy, procedure etc) Obstetric Early Warning Score Guideline Implementation
More informationB U R T & D A V I E S PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS TAC COMMON LAW CLAIMS -
TAC COMMON LAW CLAIMS - DEFENCES In a common law damages claim, the person who brings the claim is called the Plaintiff. The person against who the claim is brought is called the Defendant. For the Plaintiff
More informationCase study analysis. Chair: Dr Liz Mullins Senior Risk Consultant, Avant
Case study analysis Chair: Dr Liz Mullins Senior Risk Consultant, Avant Panel members -- Dr Craig Lilienthal -- Kerrie Chambers HWL Ebsworth Lawyers -- Bill Madden Slater and Gordon Cases for discussion
More informationClinical Negligence: A guide to making a claim
: 3 At Kingsley Napley, the first thing we do is listen to your account of the events or treatment that caused your injury. We will then advise you on what we think is the best course of action for your
More informationQUESTION NO. 3. Amendment to Titles 1 and 3 of the Nevada Revised Statutes. CONDENSATION (ballot question)
QUESTION NO. 3 Amendment to Titles 1 and 3 of the Nevada Revised Statutes CONDENSATION (ballot question) Shall Title 1 of the Nevada Revised Statutes governing attorneys, and Title 3 of the Nevada Revised
More informationMotor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Resolution) Act 2007 No 95
New South Wales Motor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Amendment of Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 No 41 2 4 Amendment of other
More informationWORKPLACE ACCIDENT CLAIMS A GUIDE TO YOUR ENTITLEMENTS
WORKPLACE ACCIDENT CLAIMS A GUIDE TO YOUR ENTITLEMENTS This guide includes the following: Who is a worker? What is the Victorian WorkCover Authority? Who can make a WorkCover claim. When is employment
More informationDNV Healthcare Maternity Quality and Risk Forum
DNV Healthcare Maternity Quality and Risk Forum Alison Bartholomew Director of Business Development, Baby Lifeline Training Ltd December 2013 - London Ensuring the healthiest outcome possible from pregnancy
More informationClaiming Compensation for Birth Injuries.
Clinical Negligence: Claiming Compensation for Birth Injuries. T H O M P S O N S F A C T S H E E T About birth injury Compensation Types of birth injury cases where compensation may be possible How to
More informationMAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS ROAD ACCIDENT INJURIES / MVA WESTERN AUSTRALIA
MAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS ROAD ACCIDENT INJURIES / MVA WESTERN AUSTRALIA 02 MAURICE BLACKBURN YOU RE WORTH FIGHTING FOR. If you are hurt, injured, or are facing an unfair situation, you and your family
More informationMAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS WORKERS COMPENSATION ACT
MAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS WORKERS COMPENSATION ACT 02 MAURICE BLACKBURN YOU RE WORTH FIGHTING FOR. If you are hurt, injured, or are facing an unfair situation, you and your family shouldn t have to suffer.
More informationPERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS
PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS Frequently Asked Questions 1. Can I make a claim? If you have been injured because of the fault of someone else, you can claim financial compensation through the courts. 2. Who can
More informationDUTY OF CARE MEL5_96589_1 (W97)
DUTY OF CARE Rose Raniolo Senior Associate Minter Ellison Lawyers Level 23 525 Collins Street MELBOURNE VIC 3000 Phone: (03) 8608 2571 Fax: (03) 8608 1223 Introduction A duty of care is a duty to take
More informationEar Infections Chickenpox chickenpox
Ear Chickenpox Infections chickenpox Chickenpox Chickenpox is a common, very contagious viral infection that over 90% of people get during childhood unless they have been immunised. After an infection,
More informationHow to make a personal injury claim
A publication by Cute Injury How to make a personal injury claim A CLEAR AND CONCISE GUIDE TO THE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS PROCESS We provide professional and impartial advice from the outset and throughout
More informationBrain Injuries INJURY & NEGLIGENCE SPECIALISTS
Brain Injuries INJURY & NEGLIGENCE SPECIALISTS Injury & Negligence At all times they put my interests first and gave excellent advice. Client interviewed for Chambers (Independent Legal Guide) WELCOME
More informationHamers S O L I C I T O R S. Jim Wyatt jwyatt@hamers.com. Freephone: 0800 591 999. 5 Earls Court, Priory Park, East, Hull HU4 7DY
Hamers S O L I C I T O R S Jim Wyatt jwyatt@hamers.com Freephone: 0800 591 999 5 Earls Court, Priory Park, East, Hull HU4 7DY Tel: 01482 326666 Fax: 01482 324432 www.hamers.com Hamers Solicitors LP is
More informationGuide to Brain Injury
CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE BRAIN INJURY Guide to Brain Injury 2 Many victims of brain injury do experience life-long and life-changing symptoms and need rehabilitation, care and support to help re-build their
More informationCausation for nursing
Causation for nursing Abstract This article considers the application of the tests of factual and legal causation to cases of medical negligence. It is argued that in light of the recent development of
More informationMedical Negligence. A guide for clients. The team provides a first class service at all levels of experience. The Legal 500
www.ffw.com/personalinjury Freephone 0800 358 3848 www.ffw.com/personalinjury Freephone 0800 358 3848 Medical Negligence A guide for clients The team provides a first class service at all levels of experience.
More informationPolicy Wording. Medical Indemnity Master Insurance Policy. Policy Number PHPMI2015V1 Issued to clients of VMIA
Policy Wording Medical Indemnity Master Insurance Policy Policy Number PHPMI2015V1 Issued to clients of VMIA For the period 30 June 2015 to 30 June 2016 Contents Medical Indemnity Master Insurance Policy...
More informationPERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS BILL 2002
1 PERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS BILL 2002 EXPLANATORY NOTES General Outline Purpose of legislation The main purpose of this Act is to facilitate the ongoing affordability of insurance through appropriate
More informationTHE FIRTH V SUTTON DECISIONS
THE FIRTH V SUTTON DECISIONS Introduction In professional negligence proceedings against a solicitor, the court s aim is to determine what amount of money would put the plaintiff in the position he would
More informationBrain Cancer. This reference summary will help you understand how brain tumors are diagnosed and what options are available to treat them.
Brain Cancer Introduction Brain tumors are not rare. Thousands of people are diagnosed every year with tumors of the brain and the rest of the nervous system. The diagnosis and treatment of brain tumors
More informationHip Transplant Detailed Study
Hip Transplant Detailed Study INTRODUCTION This case involves four patients who underwent hip replacements with a "metal-on-metal" device designed and manufactured by "Replacement Manufacturer." The patients
More informationMAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS WORKCOVER SOUTH AUSTRALIA
MAURICE BLACKBURN LAWYERS WORKCOVER SOUTH AUSTRALIA 02 MAURICE BLACKBURN YOU RE WORTH FIGHTING FOR. If you are hurt, injured, or are facing an unfair situation, you and your family shouldn t have to suffer.
More informationPLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 19, 2009. It is intended for information and reference purposes only.
More informationMedicolegal Problems Facing Breast Radiologists: How to Avoid Them
Medicolegal Problems Facing Breast Radiologists: How to Avoid Them Dr Philip Zack Medicolegal Adviser Brighton - British Society of Breast Radiology Conference 10/11/2014 Total number of reported CNST
More informationFrequently Asked Questions: Compulsory Third-Party Insurance in the ACT
Frequently Asked Questions: Compulsory Third-Party Insurance in the ACT Who can claim? A CTP personal injury claim form may be lodged by: any person who has sustained personal injury as a result of a motor
More informationPSA Screening for Prostate Cancer Information for Care Providers
All men should know they are having a PSA test and be informed of the implications prior to testing. This booklet was created to help primary care providers offer men information about the risks and benefits
More informationCAUSATION UNDER THE CLA
CAUSATION UNDER THE CLA Causation under the Civil Liability Act Introduction Over the years the courts have toyed with the concept of causation, and how it should be determined. Following the Ipp report
More informationA GUIDE FOR PEOPLE INJURED IN A MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT
A GUIDE FOR PEOPLE INJURED IN A MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CONTENTS General information 02 Early payment of expenses 03 The Accident Notification Form (ANF) 03 Who can make a claim Other driver or owner at
More informationProject LINNAEUS. A classification system for adverse events in healthcare ESQH
Project LINNAEUS A classification system for adverse events in healthcare ESQH Carl Linnaeus The son of a Lutheran pastor, the Swedish botanist and physician Carl Linnaeus (1707-1778) is known as the father
More informationThe Changing Landscape
The Changing Landscape and J a r r o d M a l o n e, J D jmalone@hallrender.com WHAT WE WILL TALK ABOUT TODAY Medical and legal issues for physicians best practices Reducing liability Medical Malpractice
More informationPLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of these regulations, please see the Table of Regulations.
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this regulation, current to February 12, 2011. It is intended for information and reference purposes
More informationAnalysis of cases reviewed by the Clinical Risk Team at the State Claims Agency
SCA Analysis of cases reviewed by the Clinical Risk Team at the State Claims Agency Cases settled and resolved in 0 Anne Marie Oglesby Contents Introduction... Breakdown of Closed Claims Outcomes... Incident
More informationYour Guide to Asbestos Related Disease Claims
Your Guide to Asbestos Related Disease Claims www.colemans-ctts.co.uk enquiries@colemans-ctts.co.uk 100 Talbot Road, Stretford, Manchester M16 0PG 1-3 Union Street, Kingston-Upon-Thames, Surrey KT1 1RP
More informationLEGALWISE SEMINARS Perth, 13 May 2009. Geoffrey Hancy. BJuris (Hons) LLB (Hons) BEc LLM Email: geoff@hancy.net Web: www.hancy.net
LEGALWISE SEMINARS Perth, 13 May 2009 MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE DUTY OF CARE OF MEDICAL PRACTITIONER Geoffrey Hancy BJuris (Hons) LLB (Hons) BEc LLM Email: geoff@hancy.net Web: www.hancy.net Introduction 1 I
More informationA death in the workplace
Office of Fair and Safe Work Queensland A death in the workplace A guide for family and friends A death in the workplace a guide for families and friends Page 1 of 13 The State of Queensland Department
More informationClearly hardworking and dedicated
Romilly Cummerson Year called 1998 romilly.cummerson@39essex.com Clearly hardworking and dedicated The Legal 500 2014 Romilly is an established insurance practitioner, specialising in clinical negligence,
More information