GLOBALG.A.P. Risk Assessment on Social Practice (GRASP)

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "GLOBALG.A.P. Risk Assessment on Social Practice (GRASP)"

Transcription

1 GLOBALG.A.P. Risk Assessment on Social Practice (GRASP) GRASP General Regulations V 1.1 Valid from: Mandatory from: English Version

2 GRASP General Regulations 1. THE GRASP MODULE WITHIN THE GLOBALG.A.P. SYSTEM 3 2. GRASP DOCUMENTS/TOOLS GRASP General Regulations GRASP Module - Control Points and Compliance Criteria GRASP Checklist GRASP Implementation Guideline GRASP National Interpretation Guidelines 5 3. DEFINITION OF TERMS 6 4. GRASP AUDITOR/INSPECTOR QUALIFICATION 6 5. GRASP ASSESSMENTS OF PRODUCER GROUPS (OPTION 2) 7 6. PRODUCE HANDLING 7 7. INTEGRITY PROGRAM 8 8. DECISION MAKING/GOVERNANCE 9 ANNEX I: PROCEDURES FOR THE APPROVAL OF GRASP NATIONAL INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES 10 ANNEX II: DATA USE 12 ANNEX III: TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE AUTHORIZED ACCESS TO THE GRASP RESULTS 13 GRASP General Regulations 2

3 1. The GRASP Module within the GLOBALG.A.P. System The abbreviation GRASP stands for GLOBALG.A.P. Risk Assessment on Social Practice. It is a voluntary module, consisting of 13 control points and compliance criteria. The GRASP Module focuses on the review of basic indicators of potential social risks on farms. GRASP is applied to assess the social situation in primary production. GRASP can only be implemented if a National Interpretation Guideline exists for the respective country. It helps farmers to address important social issues and build awareness at farm level. The GRASP Tools were developed in a public private partnership project between 2005 and 2010, involving various field trials and stakeholder consultations worldwide. Any producer (see definition of this term in 2.5) of primary agricultural products, whose production processes are certified against the GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) standard and/or the Plant Propagation Material (PPM) standard may apply for a GRASP Assessment through a GLOBALG.A.P. approved Certification Body. GRASP cannot be a standalone module, as it relies on and complements the Worker Health and Safety chapter of the GLOBALG.A.P. IFA standard or the Plant Propagation Material standard. However, if produce handling is included in the GLOBALG.A.P. Certification, GRASP is also applicable for the employees working in the produce handling facilities. GRASP does not fall under the ISO 65 accredited certification. The results of the GRASP Assessment will only be displayed in the GLOBALG.A.P. Database if there is a valid GLOBALG.A.P. IFA or PPM certificate. The results of the GRASP Assessment are only visible to database users that have the assigned user rights and that have signed the respective Terms of Reference with the GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat. GRASP Assessments can only be carried out by those GLOBALG.A.P. approved auditors and GRASP General Regulations 3

4 inspectors registered by an ISO 65 accredited Certification Body with GLOBALG.A.P. scope who have followed the specific training program for GRASP (see point 4). 2. GRASP Documents/Tools GRASP consists of a set of documents, which includes the: GRASP General Regulations GRASP Module (Control Points and Compliance Criteria) GRASP Checklist GRASP Implementation Guideline and GRASP National Interpretation Guidelines. The GRASP toolset provides information for the implementation and assessment of basic social criteria on those farms on which the GLOBALG.A.P. Standard has been implemented. Find below a description of the documents and their purpose of use. 2.1 GRASP General Regulations The General Regulations describe the basic steps and considerations relevant for the applicant producer to implement the GRASP Module, as well as the roles of and relationships between the producers, GLOBALG.A.P. and the Certification Bodies (CBs). 2.2 GRASP Module - Control Points and Compliance Criteria The GRASP Module is composed of Control Points and Compliance Criteria (CPCC) that shall be followed by the producer. As the GRASP Module is a voluntary module, there is no passing or failing the Module - only the level of compliance per control point is indicated in the GRASP Checklist. 2.3 GRASP Checklist Assessment and compliance to the GRASP Module is voluntary. However, a GRASP Assessment becomes only valid if the completed GRASP Checklist has been uploaded to the GLOBALG.A.P. Database and if the producer has a valid GLOBALG.A.P. IFA or PPM certification. During the assessment, the Control Points and Compliance Criteria serve as a headline. The assessment procedure follows the sub-control points listed in the GRASP Checklist and their proposed means of assessment. After assessing each sub-control point, a 5- level-rating gives a picture on the producers compliance to the control point. There is no mathematical correlation between the sub-points and the overall judgement on the control point. There is an overall rating for compliance for each Control Point: - Fully compliant; - Compliant, but some improvements needed; - Not compliant, but some step taken; - Not compliant; - Not applicable In cases of exception where a control point is not applicable, a clear written justification must be given under comments (i.e. for CPCC 9 when no children of employees are living on the farm). GRASP can become not applicable as a whole if the producer does not employ any workers (i.e. a family farm with no employees at any time of the year). During the assessment of the GRASP Module, all control points shall be assessed, all results GRASP General Regulations 4

5 documented by the approved auditor/inspector in the GRASP checklist and uploaded to the GLOBALG.A.P. Database. Data use rules are prescribed in Annex II. At the end of the assessment, non-compliances per control point shall be promptly brought to the applicantʼs attention in writing. This is a provisional report that can always be rectified afterwards if needed by the CB. The producer then has 28 days (or less as agreed by the producer and CB) from date of inspection/audit to rectify with corrective actions before the final assessment results are uploaded to the GLOBALG.A.P. Database. The CB shall upload the GRASP Checklist to the GLOBALG.A.P. Database within a maximum of 28 calendar days after closure of any outstanding non-compliances. It is recommended to give evidence (comments) for all control points assessed in all external and internal assessments. Comments and evidence, such as which document(s) were sampled etc., shall be site-specific and included in the checklist, showing that all the control points have been properly assessed. After the upload of the checklist to the GLOBALG.A.P. Database, the CB issues a proof of assessment to the producer. This proof of assessment is generated through the GLOBALG.A.P. Database. If the CB issues a proof of assessment that is not generated through the GLOBALG.A.P. Database, it must conform completely to the template in Annex III. The paper proof of assessment may only be issued based on the information available at that time in the GLOBALG.A.P. Database for that unique GLOBALG.A.P. Number (GGN). In case of Option 2, this proof of assessment also lists all members of the producer group. 2.4 GRASP Implementation Guideline The GRASP Implementation Guideline provides guidance for producers and producer group managers. The Implementation Guideline is not a normative, but a supportive document with examples and ideas on how to implement the GRASP Module. It explains how a social management system according to the GRASP Module can be established, and gives examples and recommendations on implementation steps. This document is a generic supporting document, addressing different kinds of producer settings. Template documents will likely have to be adjusted according to the specific situation on the farm and the legal requirements of the country. 2.5 GRASP National Interpretation Guidelines GRASP can be used only in a country where a GLOBALG.A.P.-approved National Interpretation Guideline exists. Any exception to that rule must be agreed by the GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat. The GRASP National Interpretation Guideline provides guidance to producers and assessors on the respective legal framework of the country/region. The development of a GRASP National Interpretation Guideline must be backed by a local stakeholder consultation and other existing local structures as the GLOBALG.A.P. National Technical Working Groups, in order to ensure transparency, its proper elaboration (and/or adaptation if necessary) and correct interpretation of the respective national legislation. It is important that the group developing the National Interpretation Guideline represents the main local stakeholders concerned, such as: producer organizations, Ministry of Labor, Ministry of Agriculture, labor unions, NGOs, etc. The GRASP Technical Committee finally approves the National Interpretation Guideline. The GRASP National Interpretations must be revised at least every 4 (four) years, or whenever necessary, by the GLOBALG.A.P. NTWG or by the responsible group (e.g. in case of changes in the national legislation of the country). More detail on the process of the development of GRASP National Interpretation Guidelines is provided in Annex I. GRASP General Regulations 5

6 3. Definition of Terms For the application of the GRASP Module, the terms below are defined as follows. These definitions apply to this and all other GRASP-related documents: Producer: A person (individual) or business (individual or producer group) with a registered legal entity owning the production, relevant to the scope of GRASP (certified to a GLOBALG.A.P. Standard), who has the legal responsibility for the products sold by that farming business. A GLOBALG.A.P. Number (GGN), as specified in the GLOBALG.A.P. IFA General Regulations V4.0 Part I Pt. 8.3, identifies each producer. A producer can apply for GRASP together with the GLOBALG.A.P. IFA audit following the application procedure set in the GLOBALG.A.P. General Regulations V4.0 Part I. Farm Management: The term farm management is used as being the one who is operationally responsible for the production and employees. The producer might employ the farm manager - in that case the person will also be treated as a normal employee. Employee: An employee is remunerated for the agricultural production services and/or production-related services (e.g. staff preparing meals for employees) he/she provides to a producer. This includes permanent, casual and seasonal workers as well as apprentices and subcontractors (hired labor) that are handling the product. It may exclude the core family members of the producer. In the case a producer has no employees during any time of the year, he has to provide an according self-declaration and GRASP becomes not applicable. Core family members: Core family members are defined as those relatives who are related in direct line to the producer (this does not apply for employed farm managers) and live in the same household as the producer. It may include parents, spouses, brothers/sisters and children, but does not include uncles, cousins or other relatives. Employees Representative: An employees representation facilitates the dialogue among the employees, but also between the employees and the management. Problems on the farm can easily be addressed, discussed and solved. Furthermore, the employees council or representative(s) can act as mediator in case of conflicts. Agreements with the employees representation will generally be well accepted within the workforce, as the representative(s) of the employees have negotiated the terms. Further clarifications can be found in the GRASP Implementation Guideline. 4. GRASP Auditor/Inspector Qualification Only approved GLOBALG.A.P. auditors and inspectors, who are working for a GLOBALG.A.P. approved and accredited CB, can assess the GRASP Module. In order to be approved for GRASP Assessments, auditors and inspectors need to have completed and passed the GLOBALG.A.P. and GRASP online training and test and have participated in a one-day GRASP Assessor training course provided by GLOBALG.A.P. Auditors and inspectors who have passed the one-day assessor training and not the online training or vice-versa, will receive the status provisionally approved. Within 6 months, they need to have completed both or they will lose the provisionally approved status and have to repeat the training. Furthermore, the auditor/inspector need to have an in-depth knowledge on the GRASP National Interpretation Guideline and the current national legislation of the respective country where he carries out a GRASP Assessment. Qualification and approval is per auditor/inspector not per Certification Body. Certification Bodies that have GRASP approved auditors/inspectors are listed on the GLOBALG.A.P. Website and the approved auditors/inspectors will be able to upload GRASP Checklists to the GLOBALG.A.P. Database. See: GLOBALG.A.P. IFA V4.0 GR, Part II, Appendix II.1: Internal Auditor and Inspector Qualifications and Responsibilities. GRASP General Regulations 6

7 5. GRASP Assessments of Producer Groups (Option 2) A producer group is a group of producers as defined in the GLOBALG.A.P. IFA V4.0 General Regulations Part II. All members of this producer group must be included in the internal quality management system (QMS) of the group. In order to simplify the introduction of GRASP, subgroups can be formed. All producer group members registered under one GGN shall be included in the GRASP Assessment within a maximum time frame of three years. The group must have a legal structure, contracts with each producer stating entry and exit requirements, stipulated suspensions, and agreement to comply with GRASP requirements for registered members. A list of all members of the producer group with the relevant registration status must be available. The producer group must have a management representative with ultimate responsibility. Only GLOBALG.A.P. IFA option 2 certified farmer groups could be assessed for GRASP as a group. A minimum of one internal inspection per annum of each registered producer within the producer group must be carried out by qualified internal producer group inspectors or subcontracted to an external verification body, different from the certification body responsible for the external inspections of the group. During the internal inspection, the internal inspector shall follow the basic principles for inspection following the ISO 65 requirements (i.e. sampling of records to achieve evidence of compliance). The results of the internal assessments shall be kept and summarized in the GRASP Internal Checklist for Producer Groups. NOTE: A GRASP self-assessment by each member of the group is only required if it is an internal requirement by the group, but it is not a GLOBALG.A.P. requirement. If a producer has no employees he/she has to state that in a self-declaration and GRASP becomes not applicable for him/her as a whole. In case that this producer forms part of a producer group, he must be included in the internal quality management system of the group assuring that in the case the producer employs someone, GRASP is implemented. The annual external assessment carried out by a CB checks on the functioning of the QMS (i.e. have all group members been internally assessed?) and conducts an external assessment with a sample (square root) of producer members registered for GRASP. The auditor/inspector shall assess the level of the implementation of the internal quality management system as described in Control Point PG1 in the GRASP CPCCs and check the plausibility of the internal inspection results. The GRASP result of the producer group is formed of the summary of the results from the internal inspections and the result of the PG1 question on the effectiveness of the quality management system. The resulting group checklist is then uploaded to the GLOBALG.A.P. Database and visible to all users with the assigned role: GRASP Observer. If the external assessment of the sample of producer group members reveals major differences between the results of the internal and external inspection, this must be mentioned in the checklist and the GRASP status of the producer group shall be set to Implausible in the GLOBALG.A.P. Database. Major differences would be any deviation indicating that there is a serious fraud in the internal inspection results. I.e.: The internal assessment results of a producer for question 1 states that the producer is fully compliant whilst the external inspection shows that only some steps are taken. If the CB detects such cases the producer group as a whole will be granted the status Implausible. In this case, the producer group needs to be re-assessed after a time frame of 3 months in order to lift the status if corrective actions have been taken. GRASP in Producer Groups (Option 2) 1. Internal Inspections: Use the GRASP Internal Checklist for Producer Groups to internally inspect all producer group members registered for GRASP. Keep the records of these inspections. Aggregate the results of the internal inspections in the GRASP Internal Checklist for Producer Groups, which can be downloaded from the GLOBALG.A.P. Website. GRASP General Regulations 7

8 2. External Inspections and Audit: Use the GRASP Checklist to assess the square root sample of the producer group members registered for GRASP. Compare the results of the sample external inspections with the results of the internal inspections. If there are major differences between the external and the internal assessment results, the status of the whole producer group and all producer group members registered for GRASP must be set to Implausible. In that case, no results of the internal inspections will be visible to database users with the status GRASP Observer. If the results of the internal and external inspections match, aggregate the results of the internal inspections in the GRASP Checklist for Producer Groups and complete the control point PG1 on the efficiency of the group s quality management system. 3. Upload of the results to the GLOBALG.A.P. Database: Upload the completed GRASP Option 2 Checklist (summary of the result of the internal producer inspections + PG 1) to the GLOBALG.A.P. Database. The results of the sample assessments do not need to be uploaded. 5.1 Internal Producer Group Inspector Qualifications (i) Inspectors will be able to inspect GRASP once factual evidence (as described below) of their qualifications and experience has been verified by the producer group. The GLOBALG.A.P. CB will audit compliance with the requirements as set out below during the external QMS audit. (ii) The relevant CB shall have a complete and current list of all the producer group s internal inspectors. The qualification of the internal inspectors shall be approved by the CBs during the external inspections Skills and Qualifications for Internal Producer Group Inspectors (i) One-day practical inspection course setting out basic principles of inspections (ii) Knowledge about and/or access to legal labor regulations (iii) Knowledge of the GRASP National Interpretation Guideline of the respective country (iv) Working language skills in the corresponding native/working language Key Tasks of Internal Producer Group Inspectors (i) Inspection of producers of the producer group to assess the compliance level against the GRASP Module. (ii) Timely and accurate report writing on these inspections. (iii) Inspectors cannot inspect their own work. 6. Produce Handling Where produce handling is included in the scope of the IFA certificate, GRASP also covers the produce handling facilities. During the external assessment performed by the CB, the pack house is assessed in addition to the sample of the producer group members. Pack house(s) are assessed separately and shall be covered by a separate GRASP Checklist. A producer s own pack house (also under Option 1) shall as well be covered in a separate GRASP Checklist. In such case, the final result of the GRASP Assessment is composed of the results of both production and produce handling. If findings differ, detailed explanations shall be given under remarks. 7. Integrity Program 7.1 The Certification Body authorises GLOBALG.A.P. to carry out integrity assessments on the Certification Body s premises and in the producers sites certified by Certification Body. 7.2 The Certification Body shall cooperate with GLOBALG.A.P. during Integrity Program activities. GRASP General Regulations 8

9 7.3 Before, during and after the integrity assessment, the Certification Body shall be granted access to any information, documents and sites relevant to complete the integrity assessment within the timeframe required by GLOBALG.A.P. 7.4 The Certification Body agrees that the result of the integrity assessment shall be brought to the Accreditation Body s - and where applicable - to the Benchmarked Scheme Owners attention. 7.5 The Certification Body accepts those sanctions (IFA V4.0 GR, Part II, 1.7) including fines and cost reimbursement obligation proposed by the Integrity Surveillance Committee and enforced by GLOBALG.A.P. 7.6 Appeal against cancellation follows the arbitration procedure described in the CB-License Agreement. 7.7 With prior agreement with the Accreditation Body, the Certification Body accepts that GLOBALG.A.P. may join the assessment team of the Accreditation Body during its assessment. 7.8 Assessment visits that are carried out on a routine basis by GLOBALG.A.P. and no costs for the Certification Bodies are generated. However, if during the routine assessment incidents are found that lead to follow-up assessment visits, GLOBALG.A.P. reserves the right to charge the Certification Body for these additional assessment visits. Where the total number of days for such follow-up assessment visit exceeds 3 days, a decision of the Integrity Surveillance Committee is needed. 7.9 Assessments that are carried out to investigate complaints received by GLOBALG.A.P. will be initially covered by GLOBALG.A.P. Where complaints are found to be valid, GLOBALG.A.P. reserves the right to charge the Certification Body all, or part of the investigation costs following the decision of the Integrity Surveillance Committee. 8. Decision Making/Governance Any decision on GRASP is under the final responsibility of the GLOBALG.A.P. Board. A Boardnominated GRASP Technical Committee is responsible for all technical issues concerning the GRASP CPCCs, the National Interpretation Guidelines and all other GRASP Tools. For further details see the Terms of Reference of the GRASP Technical Committee. GRASP General Regulations 9

10 Annex I: Procedures for the Approval of GRASP National Interpretation Guidelines 1. Preamble GRASP shall be used only in countries where there is a GLOBALG.A.P. approved National Interpretation Guideline. Any exception to this rule must be agreed by the GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat. The GRASP National Interpretation Guideline must provide guidance to implementers and assessors on the respective legal framework. GRASP National Interpretation Guidelines must have been discussed and backed up by local stakeholders. Round Tables or other local activities must exist (ownership of the National Interpretation Guideline). The National Interpretation Guidelines are approved and published by the GLOBALG.A.P. GRASP Technical Committee (TC). 2. Responsibilities In countries where there is a GLOBALG.A.P. National Technical Working Group, this working group shall be responsible to develop the GRASP National Interpretation Guideline. In countries where there is no GLOBALG.A.P. NTWG, the responsibility of the development of the National Interpretation Guideline must be with a GLOBALG.A.P. member company that signs up to be responsible for the development process. GLOBALG.A.P. reserves the right to change, update or withdraw the National Interpretation Guideline at any time, if necessary. The development and approval of the guidelines has to follow the defined minimum procedure (see point 3). The main goal of this procedure is to involve relevant local stakeholders and to ensure transparency of the development process. The GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat will, together with the GRASP TC, assess that the development of the GRASP National Interpretation Guideline followed this procedure. The GRASP TC finally approves the National Interpretation Guideline. 3. Approval Procedure of GRASP National Interpretation Guidelines 3.1 Information of GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat and Project Planning The GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat must be informed about the plan to develop a GRASP National Interpretation Guideline. The applicant must provide GLOBALG.A.P. with a project plan lining out the planned development process. The GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat has to agree to the proposed process and reserves the right to adapt it. The GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat informs the GRASP TC about all plans for developing National Interpretation Guidelines. 3.2 Preparation of Draft version of the National Interpretation Guideline A local labor law expert (or group of experts) shall draft a first version of the interpretation guideline, providing local interpretation for each of the 13 control points, where necessary. This interpretation shall not give examples for implementation but rather compile applicable regulations or collective bargaining agreements (e.g. minimum wage, links to resources). The DRAFT National Interpretation Guideline must be shared with the GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat before discussing it in the local stakeholder workshop. 3.3 Stakeholder Consultation This DRAFT National Interpretation Guideline shall then be presented to and discussed by a representative group of local stakeholders. The stakeholders shall include, if possible, representatives from the following interest groups: GRASP General Regulations 10

11 Civil society: e.g. consumer organizations, Non-Governmental Organizations Relevant labor unions (local, regional, different sectors) (Local) Government representatives (e.g. Ministry of Labour, Agriculture) Producers, producer organizations, export organizations GLOBALG.A.P. Retail and Food Service members Others A representative of the GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat must be informed and invited to the consultation. The representative may give input and advise on the process. The GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat informs the GRASP TC about all planned stakeholder consultation workshops. The goal of the stakeholder consultation is to reach consensus and to approve the document by the stakeholders. The stakeholder consultation should take place in a facilitated one-day workshop. The workshop and its results must be documented in a report and shared with all workshop participants. Where a physical stakeholder round table is not feasible, due to justifiable reasons (evidence must be provided to the GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat) there is the possibility to organize consultation by written correspondence. In that case, the initiator of the process must ensure transparency of this process to all relevant stakeholders. All comments received must be filed and made available on request. The main interest groups named above must provide their feedback to the National Interpretation Guideline. 3.4 Approval of the GRASP National Interpretation Guideline The revised GRASP Interpretation Guideline must be forwarded to the GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat. The documentation of steps one to three must be made available. The interpretation must be translated into English. The GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat will forward the developed National Interpretation Guideline to the GRASP Technical Committee for final approval and shall give feedback within four weeks to approve the Guideline or to require corrective actions. If corrective actions are required, approval will be given after completion of the document only. After approval by the GRASP Technical Committee, the National Interpretation Guideline is published on the GLOBALG.A.P. Website. All members and Certification Bodies are informed that the GRASP Module can from then on be assessed in the respective country. 3.5 Validity/Update of the Document The GRASP National Interpretation Guideline has a validity of maximum 4 years. It must be revised by the NTWG or another responsible organization according to the timing of the revision process of the GRASP Module. The revision of the National Interpretation Guideline must follow a certain procedure ensuring that local stakeholders have been informed and involved. GLOBALG.A.P. can withdraw or revise the National Interpretation Guidelines at any time on an individual point basis if global integrity of the standard is challenged. GRASP General Regulations 11

12 Annex II: Data Use The CB must record the following data and the GLOBALG.A.P. Database needs to be updated accordingly (as required in the current database manual): Company and Location information Responsible person(s) of the company data Product information This information shall be updated regularly whenever there is a change. It must be updated latest with the re-acceptance of GRASP as a product for the next certificate cycle and/or the recertification. The CB must provide the producer or producer group with a choice of four different data release levels, which will specify the data display to specified user groups in the database and the public for certificate validation: Unless indicated to the contrary by the producer or producer group, level (a) is automatically chosen: a. The GGN, registration no., scheme, version, option, CB, products and status, produce handling/processing declaration, number of producers (in Option 2), country of production and destination are available to the public. b. GLOBALG.A.P. members and other industry market participants with authorized database access are allowed to see producer or producer group s organization name, city and postal code and the proof of assessment including the following information: The GGN, Registration no., Version of GRASP Module, Certification Option, Certification Body, Upload Date, Name of Auditor/Inspector, Status: GRASP assessed, Produce handling/processing declaration, Number of producers covered by GRASP per product (in Option 2), Option 1/2: GRASP Results Summary, Results per Control Point - with remarks, For Option 2: As Annex II: GGNs of the producers. c. GLOBALG.A.P., the Certification Body and aggregator (if applicable), which the producer or producer group is working with, can use all data in the GLOBALG.A.P. Database for internal purposes and sanctioning procedures. The level of data visibility must be fixed and signed during registration with the CB. The producer or producer group is the data owner and is responsible to grant and determine the level of the rights for data access. The data owner, however, can transfer the responsibility to other users (e.g. the Certification Body, producer group or other data aggregator; as described in GLOBALG.A.P. IFA V4.0 GR Part I, 4.1). Therefore, a Certification Body, producer group or other data trustee can do the Database registration, if the producer or producer group has assigned them the according rights in writing. GRASP General Regulations 12

13 Annex III: Terms of Reference for the Authorized Access to the GRASP Results For GLOBALG.A.P. Database users with authorised database access for GRASP We hereby recognise the following GLOBALG.A.P. terms of reference for market participants that have access to the GRASP results in the GLOBALG.A.P. Database via a GLOBALG.A.P. service package. The purpose of these Terms of Reference is to assure a proper handling of information gathered during the GRASP Assessment and to define clearly the scope of GRASP and how the results can be interpreted and used to initiate continuous improvement regarding social practice in primary production. In addition, these Terms of Reference shall regulate the communication of GRASP Assessment results to the public. 1. The abbreviation GRASP stands for GLOBALG.A.P. Risk Assessment on Social Practice. 2. GRASP is a voluntary assessment module, consisting of a definite number of control points and compliance criteria for individual producers and one additional control point for producer groups. 3. GRASP is applied to assess social practice in primary production. It focuses on the review of basic indicators of potential social risks on farms. 4. GRASP shall only be applied once a National Interpretation Guideline has been published by GLOBALG.A.P. for the respective country. Any exception to that rule must be consulted with the GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat for approval. 5. The implementation of GRASP helps farmers to address important social issues and build awareness at farm level. This is the main aim of GRASP. 6. There is no passing or failing of the GRASP Module the assessment rather delivers basic indicators on the performance of the farms in terms of implemented procedures to comply with national/international regulations on labor issues. 7. The completion of a GRASP Assessment does not indicate that a producer fully complies with all control points the level of compliance requires an analysis on a case-by-case basis. 8. GRASP is not a social audit it is requiring the producers to keep documentation and to follow basic procedures regarding the management of their employees that form the basis of a social management system. Those documents and procedures are reviewed during the audit. 9. GRASP auditors/inspectors are requested to check the level of compliance to the GRASP requirements based on the GRASP Checklist that defines the minimum means of assessment. This approach limits GRASP to interviews with key responsible persons, inspections and document reviews. 10. To avoid miscommunication, all communication of GRASP shall be agreed beforehand with the GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat to assure that it follows these Terms of Reference. 11. The GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat will provide a GLOBALG.A.P. GRASP Service Package for users that have signed these Terms of Reference including a communication package, which they can use for communication purposes. 12. The term GRASP shall NOT appear on any product (This is in line with the use of the GLOBALG.A.P. trademark. See GLOBALG.A.P. General Regulations Integrated Farm Assurance V4.0 Part I, 8.1). 13. GRASP can only be assessed in combination with a GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance or plant propagation material certificate. We hereby declare our agreement to the above-mentioned Terms of Reference. GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat will grant our company access to the GLOBALG.A.P. Database and the GRASP Assessment results. Company: Company Representative Date/Place Signature GRASP General Regulations 13

14 Annex IV: GLOBALG.A.P. Risk Assessment on Social Practice Proof of Assessment CB Logo GGN: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Registration number of producer/ producer group (from CB) xxxxxx GLOBALG.A.P. RISK ASSESSMENT ON SOCIAL PRACTICE (GRASP) PROOF OF ASSESSMENT According to GRASP General Regulations V1.1 January 2011 Option X 1 Issued to Producer Group Pimiento del Sur Street, Place, Country The Annex contains details of the GRASP results (and the covered producer group members. 2 ) The Certification Body [Company Name] declares that the producer group mentioned on this proof has been assessed according to the GLOBALG.A.P. Risk Assessment on Social Practice Version 1.1 January GLOBALG.A.P.-certified products covered by GRASP 3 Products 8 Assessment Number 6 Produce Handling No. of GRASP assessed producers Total number of producers Product Yes Yes Product Yes No Total: Product fully assessed Assessment Result: Only for Option 2: Does the assessment of the Quality Management System of the Group show evidence of the correct implementation of GRASP for all producer group members? 4) Yes, fully compliant Date of Assessment: xx.xx.2011 Date of Upload: xx.xx.2011 Validity Date: xx.xx.2012 (depending on IFA certificate validity) Only for Option 1: 5) Yes, fully compliant Yes, some improvement needed Not compliant but some steps taken Not, compliant The actual status of this proof is always displayed at: GRASP General Regulations 14

15 GLOBALG.A.P. Risk Assessment on Social Practice (GRASP) ANNEX 1 for GGN xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Producers Group Members: Product(s) GLOBALG.A.P Number (GGN) Company/Producer Name and Address Product a xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Producer 1 Product n xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Producer n ANNEX 2 for GGN xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Checklist the completed GRASP Checklist Notes The proof of assessment shall be in English. You may add a second language in the proof Option (1-2) must always appear on the proof of assessment. Second part and the producer group members covered by GRASP only applicable for producer groups. Listing of products only applicable in case of Option 2 (producer group). In case of Option 1 the proof is not product-specific. Question shall only be entered, for Option 2 assessments (this ist he result of the GRASP Control Point for Producer Groups (PG1). For Option 1: the results of the GRASP Checklist will be displayed here. The color bars show the level of compliance to the GRASP control points (automatically generated out of the results per control point). Assessment Number is a number equivalent to the Certification Number it assessment number shall be printed on the paper certificate. It is a reference code to the certificate in the GLOBALG.A.P. Database per product and certificate cycle. The GLOBALG.A.P. Certificate Number is generated automatically in the system and consists of 5 digits, 5 letters and a suffix (#####-ABCDE-####). All changes to the certificate in a given certificate cycle are reflected in the suffix. 7 The completed GRASP Checklist must be available in the Annex 2. 8 The GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance or Plant Propagation Material Standard certified products that are covered by GRASP must be listed here. GRASP General Regulations 15

GLOBALGAP Risk Assessment on Social Practices (GRASP)

GLOBALGAP Risk Assessment on Social Practices (GRASP) GLOBALGAP Risk Assessment on Social Practices (GRASP) Checklist GRASP Assessment Result from the GRASP Project Document for public review until 26 March 2010 V 2.0 Feb 2010 English Version Producer: Signature:

More information

GLOBALG.A.P. RISK ASSESSMENT ON SOCIAL PRACTICE (GRASP)

GLOBALG.A.P. RISK ASSESSMENT ON SOCIAL PRACTICE (GRASP) GLOBALG.A.P. RISK ASSESSMENT ON SOCIAL PRACTICE (GRASP) GRASP Checklist Version 1.3 Checklist Individual Producer (Option 1) Valid from: 1 July 2015 Mandatory from: 1 October 2015 HOW TO USE THIS CHECKLIST

More information

General Regulations. Part Ⅱ - Quality Management System Rules ENGLISH VERSION 5.0

General Regulations. Part Ⅱ - Quality Management System Rules ENGLISH VERSION 5.0 General Regulations Part Ⅱ - Quality Management System Rules ENGLISH VERSION 5.0 VALID FROM: 1 JULY 2015 OBLIGATORY FROM: 1 JULY 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. LEGALITY, ADMINISTRATION AND STRUCTURE... 3 1.1

More information

Copyright, Language, and Version Notice The official language of this [Certification Protocol] is English. The current version of the [Certification

Copyright, Language, and Version Notice The official language of this [Certification Protocol] is English. The current version of the [Certification Copyright, Language, and Version Notice The official language of this [Certification Protocol] is English. The current version of the [Certification Protocol] is maintained on the Bonsucro website: www.bonsucro.com.

More information

GLOBALG.A.P. Risk-Assessment on Social Practice (GRASP)

GLOBALG.A.P. Risk-Assessment on Social Practice (GRASP) GLOBALG.A.P. Risk-Assessment on Social Practice (GRASP) GRASP Module Interpretation for Czech Republic V 1.3 Valid from: 01.07.2015 Mandatory from: 01.10.2015 English Version Developed by Czech Society

More information

UTZ Certified Certification Protocol

UTZ Certified Certification Protocol Version 3.0 (previous version 2.0 February 2010) Copies of this document are available for free in electronic format on the UTZ Certified Training Center website: http://www.utzcertified-trainingcenter.com

More information

LEAF Marque certification of. LEAF Producer Groups. Quality Management system requirements 2009

LEAF Marque certification of. LEAF Producer Groups. Quality Management system requirements 2009 LEAF Marque certification of LEAF Producer Groups Quality Management system requirements 2009 Valid from 1 st January 2009 The LEAF Marque scheme aims to give consumers confidence in the care farmers take

More information

AUDITOR GUIDELINES. Responsibilities Supporting Inputs. Receive AAA, Sign and return to IMS with audit report. Document Review required?

AUDITOR GUIDELINES. Responsibilities Supporting Inputs. Receive AAA, Sign and return to IMS with audit report. Document Review required? 1 Overview of Audit Process The flow chart below shows the overall process for auditors carrying out audits for IMS International. Stages within this process are detailed further in this document. Scheme

More information

OLB certification process for Forestry Companies GP01

OLB certification process for Forestry Companies GP01 OLB certification process for Forestry Companies GP01 Reference: GP01 OLB FC 1.2 version, 22/03/2013 Bureau Veritas Certification France 60 Général de Gaulle Avenue - 92046 Paris - La Défense Cedex - France

More information

TRANSPORT FOR LONDON (TfL) LOW EMISSIONS CERTIFICATE (LEC) GUIDANCE NOTES FOR THE COMPANY AUDIT PROCESS. LEC (Company Audit) Guidance Notes

TRANSPORT FOR LONDON (TfL) LOW EMISSIONS CERTIFICATE (LEC) GUIDANCE NOTES FOR THE COMPANY AUDIT PROCESS. LEC (Company Audit) Guidance Notes TRANSPORT FOR LONDON (TfL) LOW EMISSIONS CERTIFICATE (LEC) GUIDANCE NOTES FOR THE COMPANY AUDIT PROCESS LEC (Company Audit) Guidance Notes Glossary of Terms Transport for London (TfL) London Low Emission

More information

Certification Procedure of RSPO Supply Chain Audit

Certification Procedure of RSPO Supply Chain Audit : 1 of 19 Table of Contents 1. Purpose 2. Scope 3. Unit of Certification 3.1 Identity Preserved, Segregation, Mass Balance, 3.2. Book and Claim 4. Definitions 5. Responsibilities 5.1 Head of the Certification

More information

INFORMATION ON CHANGES IN CPCC AF, CB, F&V, FO, PPM, TE, AB, LB, PY and CROPS RULES IN IFA VERSION 5.0-2 Publication 1 st July 2016

INFORMATION ON CHANGES IN CPCC AF, CB, F&V, FO, PPM, TE, AB, LB, PY and CROPS RULES IN IFA VERSION 5.0-2 Publication 1 st July 2016 1. Background for Changes The main reason for issuing Version 5.0-2 was the amendment in Compliance Criteria of 4.1.2 of the Fruit and Vegetables module. In the first edition of V5.0 it was indicated that

More information

CHECKLIST ISO/IEC 17021:2011 Conformity Assessment Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certification of Management Systems

CHECKLIST ISO/IEC 17021:2011 Conformity Assessment Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certification of Management Systems Date(s) of Evaluation: CHECKLIST ISO/IEC 17021:2011 Conformity Assessment Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certification of Management Systems Assessor(s) & Observer(s): Organization: Area/Field

More information

TG 47-01. TRANSITIONAL GUIDELINES FOR ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 14001:2015 CERTIFICATION BODIES

TG 47-01. TRANSITIONAL GUIDELINES FOR ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 14001:2015 CERTIFICATION BODIES TRANSITIONAL GUIDELINES FOR ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 14001:2015 CERTIFICATION BODIES Approved By: Senior Manager: Mpho Phaloane Created By: Field Manager: John Ndalamo Date of Approval:

More information

Contact address: Global Food Safety Initiative Foundation c/o The Consumer Goods Forum 22/24 rue du Gouverneur Général Eboué 92130 Issy-les-Moulineaux

Contact address: Global Food Safety Initiative Foundation c/o The Consumer Goods Forum 22/24 rue du Gouverneur Général Eboué 92130 Issy-les-Moulineaux Version 6.3 Contact address: Global Food Safety Initiative Foundation c/o The Consumer Goods Forum 22/24 rue du Gouverneur Général Eboué 92130 Issy-les-Moulineaux France Secretariat email: gfsinfo@theconsumergoodsforum.com

More information

REQUIREMENTS FOR GAINING AND MAINTAINING ACCREDITATION SAAS CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 CERTIFICATION BODY...

REQUIREMENTS FOR GAINING AND MAINTAINING ACCREDITATION SAAS CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 CERTIFICATION BODY... SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY ACCREDITATION SERVICES REQUIREMENTS FOR GAINING AND MAINTAINING ACCREDITATION SAAS CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 CERTIFICATION BODY...4 2.0 AUDIT PROCESS:

More information

Presentation by BSI on the main changes to the IATF ISO/TS 16949 certification scheme

Presentation by BSI on the main changes to the IATF ISO/TS 16949 certification scheme Presentation by BSI on the main changes to the IATF ISO/TS 16949 certification scheme ISO/TS 16949 IATF Scheme rules 4 th edition areas that impact BSI Clients Copyright 2014 BSI. All rights reserved.

More information

FSSC 22000-Q. Certification module for food quality in compliance with ISO 9001:2008. Quality module REQUIREMENTS

FSSC 22000-Q. Certification module for food quality in compliance with ISO 9001:2008. Quality module REQUIREMENTS FSSC 22000-Q Certification module for food quality in compliance with ISO 9001:2008 Quality module REQUIREMENTS Foundation for Food Safety Certification Gorinchem, The Netherlands: 2015 Version Control

More information

FSSC 22000. Certification scheme for food safety systems in compliance with ISO 22000: 2005 and technical specifications for sector PRPs PART I

FSSC 22000. Certification scheme for food safety systems in compliance with ISO 22000: 2005 and technical specifications for sector PRPs PART I FSSC 22000 Certification scheme for food safety systems in compliance with ISO 22000: 2005 and technical specifications for sector PRPs PART I REQUIREMENTS FOR ORGANIZATIONS THAT REQUIRE CERTIFICATION

More information

CP14 ISSUE 5 DATED 1 st OCTOBER 2015 BINDT Audit Procedure Conformity Assessment and Certification/Verification of Management Systems

CP14 ISSUE 5 DATED 1 st OCTOBER 2015 BINDT Audit Procedure Conformity Assessment and Certification/Verification of Management Systems Certification Services Division Newton Building, St George s Avenue Northampton, NN2 6JB United Kingdom Tel: +44(0)1604-893-811. Fax: +44(0)1604-893-868. E-mail: pcn@bindt.org CP14 ISSUE 5 DATED 1 st OCTOBER

More information

INSTITUTE FOR TESTING AND CERTIFICATION, Inc.

INSTITUTE FOR TESTING AND CERTIFICATION, Inc. Manual for ITC Clients Certification of management systems according to international standards ISO 9001:2008,, ISO 13485:2003, ISO 14001:2004 BS OHSAS 18001:2007, ISO 22000:2005, and HACCP according to

More information

UK Aerospace Industry Controlled Other Party (ICOP) Auditor Authentication Scheme

UK Aerospace Industry Controlled Other Party (ICOP) Auditor Authentication Scheme How to apply for and maintain UK Aerospace Industry Controlled Other Party (ICOP) Auditor Authentication Scheme Contents 1. General information 2 2. IRCA Aerospace auditor authentication grades 3 3. Criteria

More information

Certification Process Requirements

Certification Process Requirements SAAS Certification Process Requirements SAAS Procedure 200 and ISO/IEC 17021 Social Accountability Accreditation Services, June 2010 Accreditation Process and Policies SAAS Normative Requirements SAAS

More information

EUROPEAN INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION COMPANY S.A.

EUROPEAN INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION COMPANY S.A. EUROPEAN INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION COMPANY S.A. 89 CHLOIS & LIKOVRISEOS STR. - 144 52 METAMORFOSI TEL: +30 210 6253927, 210 6252495 INTERNET SITE: www.eurocert.gr E-mail: eurocert@otenet.gr FAX: +30

More information

ISO/TS 16949:2002 Guidance Document

ISO/TS 16949:2002 Guidance Document ISO/TS 16949:2002 Guidance Document Introduction ISO/TS 16949:2009 emphasizes the development of a process oriented quality management system that provides for continual improvement, defect prevention,

More information

EA-6/02 M: 2013. EA Guidelines on the Use of EN 45 011 and ISO/IEC 17021 for Certification to EN ISO 3834. Publication Reference PURPOSE

EA-6/02 M: 2013. EA Guidelines on the Use of EN 45 011 and ISO/IEC 17021 for Certification to EN ISO 3834. Publication Reference PURPOSE Publication Reference EA-6/02 M: 2013 EA Guidelines on the Use of EN 45 011 and ISO/IEC 17021 for Certification to PURPOSE EN ISO 3834 The purpose of this document is to provide the basis for the harmonisation

More information

EA IAF/ILAC Guidance. on the Application of ISO/IEC 17020:1998

EA IAF/ILAC Guidance. on the Application of ISO/IEC 17020:1998 Publication Reference EA IAF/ILAC-A4: 2004 EA IAF/ILAC Guidance on the Application of ISO/IEC 17020:1998 PURPOSE This guidance document is for ISO/IEC 17020: General Criteria for the operation of various

More information

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) L 122/22 Official Journal of the European Union 11.5.2011 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 445/2011 of 10 May 2011 on a system of certification of entities in charge of maintenance for freight wagons and

More information

3 Terms and definitions 3.5 client organization whose management system is being audited for certification purposes

3 Terms and definitions 3.5 client organization whose management system is being audited for certification purposes 3 Terms and definitions 3.4 third-party certification audit audit carried out by an auditing organization independent of the client and the user, for the purpose of certifying the client's management system

More information

IAF Informative Document. Transition Planning Guidance for ISO 9001:2015. Issue 1 (IAF ID 9:2015)

IAF Informative Document. Transition Planning Guidance for ISO 9001:2015. Issue 1 (IAF ID 9:2015) IAF Informative Document Transition Planning Guidance for ISO 9001:2015 Issue 1 (IAF ID 9:2015) Issue 1 Transition Planning Guidance for ISO 9001:2015 Page 2 of 10 The (IAF) facilitates trade and supports

More information

Certification Process Requirements

Certification Process Requirements SAAS Certification Process Requirements SAAS Procedure 200 Social Accountability Accreditation Services, June 2010 Accreditation Process and Policies SAAS Normative Requirements SAAS maintains a set of

More information

IAF Mandatory Document. Witnessing Activities for the Accreditation of Management Systems Certification Bodies. Issue 1, Version 2 (IAF MD 17:2015)

IAF Mandatory Document. Witnessing Activities for the Accreditation of Management Systems Certification Bodies. Issue 1, Version 2 (IAF MD 17:2015) IAF Mandatory Document Witnessing Activities for the Accreditation of Management Systems Certification Bodies (IAF MD 17:2015) Witnessing Activities for the Accreditation Page 2 of 18 The (IAF) facilitates

More information

P-01 Certification Procedure for QMS, EMS, EnMS & OHSAS. Procedure. Application, Audit and Certification

P-01 Certification Procedure for QMS, EMS, EnMS & OHSAS. Procedure. Application, Audit and Certification Procedure Application, Audit and Certification Document No. P-01 Version 9.00 Date of Issue Nov 02, 2015 Reviewed & Approved by Name Designation Signature Date Kaushal Goyal Managing Director Nov 02, 2015

More information

Specific Conditions for the Assessment of Management System and Product Certifications

Specific Conditions for the Assessment of Management System and Product Certifications between DQS CFS GmbH, named DQS hereafter, with its contract partner, named client" hereafter. 1 Assessment of Management Systems and DQS assesses the client s management system, or parts thereof, with

More information

CONTROL PROCESS NATURAL ORIGIN AND ORGANIC CANDLES AND HOME FRAGRANCES

CONTROL PROCESS NATURAL ORIGIN AND ORGANIC CANDLES AND HOME FRAGRANCES TS004(GPA)v03en v25/11/2015 CONTROL PROCESS NATURAL ORIGIN AND ORGANIC CANDLES AND HOME FRAGRANCES The aim of the present document is to describe the key steps of the control process. This document is

More information

Structure of Presentation

Structure of Presentation GAP Training QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Girish Sarda Structure of Presentation Objective: To address various clauses of Quality Management System for group Certification (Option 2) as per Global GAP Standards

More information

EXAM PREPARATION GUIDE

EXAM PREPARATION GUIDE EXAM PREPARATION GUIDE PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor The objective of the Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor examination is to ensure that the candidate has the knowledge and the skills to

More information

Environmental Certification Services: Certification Manual for Green Squared SM Tile and Installation Material Sustainability

Environmental Certification Services: Certification Manual for Green Squared SM Tile and Installation Material Sustainability SCS Green Squared SM Certification Manual 2011. Scientific Certification Systems Environmental Certification Services: Certification Manual for Green Squared SM Tile and Installation Material Sustainability

More information

FAIR FOR LIFE SOCIAL & FAIR TRADE CERTIFICATION PROGRAMME. VERSION DECEMBER 2013 applicable from May 2014 onwards

FAIR FOR LIFE SOCIAL & FAIR TRADE CERTIFICATION PROGRAMME. VERSION DECEMBER 2013 applicable from May 2014 onwards FAIR FOR LIFE SOCIAL & FAIR TRADE CERTIFICATION PROGRAMME VERSION DECEMBER 2013 applicable from May 2014 onwards CONTROL MODULE 1: LABELLING AND CONTROL CRITERIA CONTROL MODULES OF THE FAIR FOR LIFE PROGRAMME

More information

WESTERN AUSTRALIA HEAVY VEHICLE ACCREDITATION SCHEME (WAHVAS) BUSINESS RULES (DRAFT)

WESTERN AUSTRALIA HEAVY VEHICLE ACCREDITATION SCHEME (WAHVAS) BUSINESS RULES (DRAFT) WESTERN AUSTRALIA HEAVY VEHICLE ACCREDITATION SCHEME (WAHVAS) BUSINESS RULES (DRAFT) June 2015 DRAFT v1.3 Remove on final Contents 1. BUSINESS RULES OVERVIEW 3 1.1 Purpose 3 1.2 Legal Status of the Business

More information

Audit of the control body through the monitoring of compliance with control plan. Measures for the irregularities

Audit of the control body through the monitoring of compliance with control plan. Measures for the irregularities Workshop on verification of compliance with product specification for PDO, PGI and TSG Audit of the control body through the monitoring of compliance with control plan Measures for the irregularities Viktorija

More information

Single Manufacturing Site with. Extended Manufacturing Site(s)

Single Manufacturing Site with. Extended Manufacturing Site(s) Single Manufacturing Site with Extended Manufacturing Site(s) 1 Content Background of Proposed Changes Solution: SI 13 SI 13 Key Terms and Phrases What is Included? What is Excluded? IATF Expectations

More information

Specific Conditions for the Assessment of Management Systems and Product Certifications

Specific Conditions for the Assessment of Management Systems and Product Certifications between DQS CFS GmbH, named DQS hereafter, with its contract partner, named the client" hereafter. 1 Assessment of Management Systems and DQS assesses the client s management system, or parts thereof,

More information

FAMI-QS Certification Rules for Operators. Rules for Operators

FAMI-QS Certification Rules for Operators. Rules for Operators Rules for Operators TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Application for certification and FAMI QS associate membership...2 2. Assessment of operators...3 2.1. Audit planning...3 2.2. Frequency of audits and re certification...5

More information

PRCP CE. Version 5.0 of 16 June 2013. Date of entry into force: 1 July 2013

PRCP CE. Version 5.0 of 16 June 2013. Date of entry into force: 1 July 2013 npo Founded by SECO and BBRI PARTICULAR RULES FOR THE CERTIFICATION OF PRODUCTS AND PRODUCTION CONTROL SYSTEMS WITHIN DE FRAMEWORK OF THE EUROPEAN CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS REGULATION N 305/2011 PRCP CE Version

More information

RSPO Rules on Market Communications and Claims

RSPO Rules on Market Communications and Claims RSPO Rules on Market Communications and Claims Public Consultation Standard 6 th March 2015 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Definitions... 5 3. Scope... 7 4. General corporate communications... 8 5. Business

More information

Certification Manual. Fair Trade USA V2.0 English Version. SCS Global Services Manual

Certification Manual. Fair Trade USA V2.0 English Version. SCS Global Services Manual SCS Global Services Manual Certification Manual Fair Trade USA V2.0 English Version 2000 Powell Street, Ste. 600, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA +1.510.452.8000 main +1.510.452.8001 fax www.scsglobalservices.com

More information

Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh

Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh The undersigned parties are committed to the goal of a safe and sustainable Bangladeshi Ready- Made Garment ("RMG") industry in which no worker needs to

More information

Frequently Asked Questions Concerning the Public Bidding and Prevailing Wage Requirements of New Jersey Charter Schools

Frequently Asked Questions Concerning the Public Bidding and Prevailing Wage Requirements of New Jersey Charter Schools Frequently Asked Questions Concerning the Public Bidding and Prevailing Wage Requirements of New Jersey Charter Schools 1. Are charter schools required to comply with New Jersey public bidding requirements

More information

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS For Federal Consulting Services: Washington D.C.-based

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS For Federal Consulting Services: Washington D.C.-based REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS For Federal Consulting Services: Washington D.C.-based The Nebraska State College System (NSCS) PO Box 94605 1115 K Street, Suite 102 Lincoln NE, 68509-4605 Release Date: September

More information

N110615 Version of 10 December 2013. Certification scheme for energy management systems according to ISO 50001 1

N110615 Version of 10 December 2013. Certification scheme for energy management systems according to ISO 50001 1 Certification scheme for Energy Management Systems according to ISO 50001 Certification scheme for energy management systems according to ISO 50001 1 Copyright SCCM All rights reserved. Nothing included

More information

WHAT MAKES YOUR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY SYSTEMS STANDARD BEST-IN-CLASS?

WHAT MAKES YOUR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY SYSTEMS STANDARD BEST-IN-CLASS? EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION COMPLIANCE REDUCED RISK REDUCED INCIDENTS FURTHER EXCELLENCE LABOUR CONDITIONS SAFETY HEALTH COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE WHAT MAKES YOUR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY SYSTEMS STANDARD

More information

RSPO Supply Chain Certification Systems

RSPO Supply Chain Certification Systems RSPO Supply Chain Certification Systems November 2009 Approved by RSPO Executive Board 5 November 2009 1 History of Document These RSPO Supply Chain Certification Systems are based on the outcome of the

More information

FSSC 22000. Certification scheme for food safety systems in compliance with ISO 22000: 2005 and technical specifications for sector PRPs PART II

FSSC 22000. Certification scheme for food safety systems in compliance with ISO 22000: 2005 and technical specifications for sector PRPs PART II FSSC 22000 Certification scheme for food safety systems in compliance with ISO 22000: 2005 and technical specifications for sector PRPs PART II REQUIREMENTS AND REGULATIONS FOR CERTIFICATION BODIES Foundation

More information

FSSC 22000. Certification scheme for food safety systems in compliance with ISO 22000: 2005 and technical specifications for sector PRPs PART II

FSSC 22000. Certification scheme for food safety systems in compliance with ISO 22000: 2005 and technical specifications for sector PRPs PART II FSSC 22000 Certification scheme for food safety systems in compliance with ISO 22000: 2005 and technical specifications for sector PRPs PART II REQUIREMENTS AND REGULATIONS FOR CERTIFICATION BODIES Foundation

More information

REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATION BODIES TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE OF APPLICANT ORGANIZATIONS TO THE MAGEN TZEDEK SERVICE MARK STANDARD

REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATION BODIES TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE OF APPLICANT ORGANIZATIONS TO THE MAGEN TZEDEK SERVICE MARK STANDARD REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATION BODIES TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE OF APPLICANT ORGANIZATIONS TO THE MAGEN TZEDEK SERVICE MARK STANDARD Foreword The Magen Tzedek Commission has established a standards and certification

More information

HKCAS Supplementary Criteria No. 8

HKCAS Supplementary Criteria No. 8 Page 1 of 12 HKCAS Supplementary Criteria No. 8 Accreditation Programme for Information Security Management System (ISMS) Certification 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 HKAS accreditation for information security management

More information

Management Systems Recognition Booklet

Management Systems Recognition Booklet Management Systems Recognition Booklet Page 1 of 15 Contents Revision History... 4 Related Documents... 4 1 Management Systems Recognition Booklet... 5 2 Accreditation Status... 5 3 The Recognition Process...

More information

SUCCESS FACTORS FOR OPTION 2 IMPLEMENTATION. VERSION DRAFT 1.0-Apr10. Valid from: 19 April 2010

SUCCESS FACTORS FOR OPTION 2 IMPLEMENTATION. VERSION DRAFT 1.0-Apr10. Valid from: 19 April 2010 GLOBALG.A.P. SUCCESS FACTORS FOR OPTION 2 IMPLEMENTATION VERSION DRAFT 1.0-Apr10 Valid from: 19 April 2010 Copyright: GLOBALGAP c/o FoodPLUS GmbH, Spichernstr. 55, 50672 Köln (Cologne) Germany Tel: +49-221-57993-25;

More information

Guide. Minister s Guide to Auditing for Building Surveyors. April 2014

Guide. Minister s Guide to Auditing for Building Surveyors. April 2014 Guide Minister s Guide to Auditing for Building Surveyors April 2014 Guide Minister s Guide to Auditing for Building Surveyors April 2014 Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure 136 North

More information

TRAINING PROVIDER AND EXAMINER CERTIFICATION SCHEME (TPECS) ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS

TRAINING PROVIDER AND EXAMINER CERTIFICATION SCHEME (TPECS) ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS TRAINING PROVIDER AND EXAMINER CERTIFICATION SCHEME (TPECS) ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS Exemplar Global International Training Certification Programs Exemplar Global is accredited by the Joint Accreditation

More information

General Conditions for the Certification of Management System

General Conditions for the Certification of Management System General Conditions for the Certification of Management System The National Standards Authority of Ireland, inc. (hereinafter referred to as NSAI) located at 20 Trafalgar Square Nashua, NH 03063 provides

More information

Chapter 3 - Additional rules for the certification program: Organic Production Methods (USDA NOP)

Chapter 3 - Additional rules for the certification program: Organic Production Methods (USDA NOP) Chapter 3 - Additional rules for the certification program: Organic Production Methods (USDA NOP) TABLE OF CONTENTS Article 3.1 Samples for USDA NOP... 2 Article 3.2 Classification of non-conformities

More information

RSPO Supply Chain Certification Systems. For accreditation and certification bodies

RSPO Supply Chain Certification Systems. For accreditation and certification bodies RSPO Supply Chain Certification Systems For accreditation and certification bodies Adopted by the RSPO Board of Governors on 21 November 2014 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Definitions... 5 3. Certification

More information

Nonconformities (NCs) and Observations (OBs)

Nonconformities (NCs) and Observations (OBs) Nonconformities (NCs) and Observations (OBs) ASI-GUI-20-106 Nonconformities (NCs) and Observation (OBs) v3.0 Approved by: ASI Managing Director Date of approval: 11 August 2010 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 1.1

More information

DECISIONS ADOPTED JOINTLY BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

DECISIONS ADOPTED JOINTLY BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL L 218/82 EN Official Journal of the European Union 13.8.2008 DECISIONS ADOPTED JOINTLY BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL DECISION No 768/2008/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of

More information

Procurement Performance Measurement System

Procurement Performance Measurement System Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Authority Procurement Performance Measurement System User's Guide August 2008 Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Authority Procurement Performance

More information

Fire Protection Industry Scheme Reference SP205 Part 1

Fire Protection Industry Scheme Reference SP205 Part 1 BAFE Scheme: SP205 Version 4(a): July 2015 Fire Protection Industry Scheme Reference SP205 Part 1 Life Safety Fire Risk Assessment BAFE (British Approvals for Fire Equipment) The Fire Service College,

More information

Certification criteria for. Food Safety Management Systems Auditor Conversion Training Course

Certification criteria for. Food Safety Management Systems Auditor Conversion Training Course Certification criteria for Food Safety Management Systems Auditor Conversion Training Course CONTENTS BACKGROUND TO THIS COURSE 1. INTRODUCTION 2. PRIOR KNOWLEDGE REQUIREMENT 3. LEARNING OBJECTIVES 4.

More information

Dutch Accreditation Council (RvA) Policy rule Nonconformities. Corrective action

Dutch Accreditation Council (RvA) Policy rule Nonconformities. Corrective action Dutch Accreditation Council (RvA) Policy rule Nonconformities and Corrective action Document code: RvA-BR004-UK Version 2, 23-1-2015 RvA policy guidelines describe the RvA rules and the policy on specific

More information

Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT Proposed Rule Public Comment Template

Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT Proposed Rule Public Comment Template Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT Proposed Rule Public Comment Template ONC Health IT Certification Program: Enhanced Oversight and Accountability Preface This document is meant to provide

More information

EXAM PREPARATION GUIDE

EXAM PREPARATION GUIDE EXAM PREPARATION GUIDE PECB Certified ISO 9001 Lead Auditor The objective of the Certified ISO 9001 Lead Auditor examination is to ensure that the candidate possesses the needed expertise to audit a Quality

More information

QUALITY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL INSPECTORATES

QUALITY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL INSPECTORATES PHARMACEUTICAL INSPECTION CONVENTION PHARMACEUTICAL INSPECTION CO-OPERATION SCHEME PI 002-3 25 September 2007 RECOMMENDATION ON QUALITY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL INSPECTORATES PIC/S September

More information

Foundation for Food Safety Certification

Foundation for Food Safety Certification FSSC 22000 Complaints Procedure This procedure describes how complaints related to the activities of the Foundation and operation of the FSSC 22000 Certification Scheme will be managed. In order that complaints

More information

Certification criteria for. Internal QMS Auditor Training Course

Certification criteria for. Internal QMS Auditor Training Course Certification criteria for Internal QMS Auditor Training Course CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. LEARNING OBJECTIVES 3. ENABLING OBJECTIVES KNOWLEDGE & SKILLS 4. TRAINING METHODS 5. COURSE CONTENT 6. COURSE

More information

Procedure PS-TNI-001 Information Security Management System Certification

Procedure PS-TNI-001 Information Security Management System Certification Table of Contents 1. Purpose 2. Scope 3. Definitions 4. Responsibilities 4.1 Head of the Certification Body 4.2 QM Manager / Management Representative 4.3 Auditors 4.4 Order Service 4.5 Certification Service

More information

Certification criteria for. Food Safety Management Systems Auditor/Lead Auditor Training Course

Certification criteria for. Food Safety Management Systems Auditor/Lead Auditor Training Course Certification criteria for Food Safety Management Systems Auditor/Lead Auditor Training Course CONTENTS BACKGROUND TO THIS COURSE 1. INTRODUCTION 2. PRIOR KNOWLEDGE REQUIREMENT 3. LEARNING OBJECTIVES 4.

More information

Internal Quality Assurance Arrangements

Internal Quality Assurance Arrangements National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Handbook for Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Saudi Arabia PART 2 Internal Quality Assurance Arrangements Version 2.0 Internal Quality

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS WHAT TYPE OF SITES CAN OR CANNOT BE CERTIFIED?

TABLE OF CONTENTS WHAT TYPE OF SITES CAN OR CANNOT BE CERTIFIED? TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 INTRODUCTION WHAT TYPE OF SITES CAN OR CANNOT BE CERTIFIED? WHAT PARTS OF THE PLANT CAN BE EXCLUDED AND WHAT IS THE IMPACT ON THE AUDIT DURATION? THE AUDIT PREPARATION

More information

Manual for ITC Clients

Manual for ITC Clients Manual for ITC Clients Certification of management systems according to international standards ISO 9001:2008, ISO 13485:2003, EN ISO 13485:2012, ISO 14001:2004,BS OHSAS 18001:2007, ISO 22000:2005. Validity

More information

Bawden Contracting Services Ltd Job Profile. Contracts Manager. Purpose of the Job

Bawden Contracting Services Ltd Job Profile. Contracts Manager. Purpose of the Job Contracts Manager Purpose of the Job As Contracts Manager you will manage all aspects of the Grounds Maintenance contracting business safely and efficiently, maximising profitability through the completion

More information

Appendix 1. This appendix is a proposed new module of the DFSA Rulebook. Therefore, the text is not underlined as it is all new text.

Appendix 1. This appendix is a proposed new module of the DFSA Rulebook. Therefore, the text is not underlined as it is all new text. Appendix 1 This appendix is a proposed new module of the DFSA Rulebook. Therefore, the text is not underlined as it is all new text. The DFSA Rulebook Auditor Module (AUD) PART 1 INTRODUCTION 1 APPLICATION

More information

Chain of Custody Standard

Chain of Custody Standard Responsible Supply of Fishmeal and Fish Oil Chain of Custody Standard A Tool for Voluntary Use in Markets for Products of Fishmeal and Fish oil Contents Page A Foreword... 3 B Principles of the Process.

More information

Abu Dhabi EHSMS Regulatory Framework (AD EHSMS RF)

Abu Dhabi EHSMS Regulatory Framework (AD EHSMS RF) Abu Dhabi EHSMS Regulatory Framework (AD EHSMS RF) Technical Guideline Audit and Inspection Version 2.0 February 2012 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Definitions... 3 3. Internal Audit... 3 3.1

More information

FOOD LAW ENFORCEMENT IN SCOTLAND

FOOD LAW ENFORCEMENT IN SCOTLAND FOOD LAW ENFORCEMENT IN SCOTLAND A Report on the Administrative and Enforcement Arrangements Prepared by: The Society of Chief Officers of Environmental Health in Scotland The Royal Environmental Health

More information

Welsh Government Response to the Report of the National Assembly for Wales Public Accounts Committee on Grant Management in Wales Final Report

Welsh Government Response to the Report of the National Assembly for Wales Public Accounts Committee on Grant Management in Wales Final Report Welsh Government Response to the Report of the National Assembly for Wales Public Accounts Committee on Grant Management in Wales Final Report The Welsh Government appreciates both the time and effort

More information

Marine Stewardship Council. Chain of Custody Certification Methodology

Marine Stewardship Council. Chain of Custody Certification Methodology Marine Stewardship Council Chain of Custody Certification Methodology Version 7, 1 July 2010 Copyright notice The Marine Stewardship Council Chain of Custody Certification Methodology and its content is

More information

Care service inspection report

Care service inspection report Care service inspection report Full inspection SSCN Social Care Housing Support Service Suite 3, Floor 2 ELS House 555 Gorgie Road Edinburgh Inspection completed on 03 May 2016 Service provided by: Support

More information

SCS FSC Chain-of-Custody Guidance for Certification of Multiple Sites

SCS FSC Chain-of-Custody Guidance for Certification of Multiple Sites 2000 Powell Street, Ste. 600 Emeryville, CA 94608 USA +1.510.452.8000 main +1.510.452.8001 fax www.scsglobalservices.com SCS FSC Chain-of-Custody Guidance for Certification of Multiple Sites Table of Contents

More information

www.transition-support.com

www.transition-support.com Can we include all products and services in the QMS but limit the scope of registration? According to ISO/TC 176/SC 2/N 524, organizations are not obliged to include all the products that it provides within

More information

QUALITY MANAGEMENT POLICY & PROCEDURES

QUALITY MANAGEMENT POLICY & PROCEDURES QUALITY MANAGEMENT POLICY & PROCEDURES Policy Statement Cotleigh Engineering Co. Limited specialises in the recruitment of engineering & technical personnel in the oil & energy, rail, civil engineering,

More information

Tender Evaluation and Contract Award

Tender Evaluation and Contract Award Brief 9 January 2011 Public Procurement Tender Evaluation and Contract Award C O N T E N T S Key principles governing the process of evaluation of tenders How does an evaluation panel operate? How does

More information

TCO Certified Self-assessment Questionnaire

TCO Certified Self-assessment Questionnaire ! TCO Certified Self-assessment Questionnaire A.7.2 Senior Management Representative, Socially Responsible Manufacturing Introduction: Completion of this Self-assessment Questionnaire is required under

More information

General Rules for the certification of Management Systems

General Rules for the certification of Management Systems General Rules for the certification of Management Systems Effective from 19/11/2015 RINA Via Corsica 12 16128 Genova - Italy tel. +39 010 53851 fax +39 010 5351000 website : www.rina.org Technical rules

More information

Registration must be carried out by a top executive or a number of executives having the power to commit the whole company in the EU.

Registration must be carried out by a top executive or a number of executives having the power to commit the whole company in the EU. Questions and answers 1- What is the purpose of The Initiative? Why are we doing this? The purpose of the Supply Chain Initiative is to promote fair business practices in the food supply chain as a basis

More information

GUIDE TO IMPLEMENTING A REGULATORY FOOD SAFETY AUDITOR SYSTEM

GUIDE TO IMPLEMENTING A REGULATORY FOOD SAFETY AUDITOR SYSTEM GUIDE TO IMPLEMENTING A REGULATORY FOOD SAFETY AUDITOR SYSTEM FEBRUARY 2016 2 Contents Introduction... 4 Scope and objectives... 5 Scope... 5 Objectives... 5 Responsibilities... 5 The role of the licensee

More information

Insurer audit manual

Insurer audit manual Insurer audit manual Disclaimer This publication may contain work health and safety and workers compensation information. It may include some of your obligations under the various legislations that WorkCover

More information

AUDIT CERTIFICATE GUIDANCE NOTES 6 TH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME

AUDIT CERTIFICATE GUIDANCE NOTES 6 TH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME AUDIT CERTIFICATE GUIDANCE NOTES 6 TH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME GUIDANCE NOTES FOR CONTRACTORS AND CERTIFYING ENTITIES MATERIALS PREPARED BY INTERDEPARTMENTAL AUDIT CERTIFICATE WORKING GROUP VERSION 1 APPROVED

More information

NABET Criteria for INFORMATION SECURITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (ISMS) Lead Auditor Training Courses

NABET Criteria for INFORMATION SECURITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (ISMS) Lead Auditor Training Courses NABET Criteria for INFORMATION SECURITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (ISMS) Lead Auditor Training Courses - 0 - Section 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 This auditor/lead auditor training course shall provide training for potential

More information

Processor Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs), for intra-group transfers of personal data to non EEA countries

Processor Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs), for intra-group transfers of personal data to non EEA countries Processor Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs), for intra-group transfers of personal data to non EEA countries Sopra HR Software as a Data Processor Sopra HR Software, 2014 / Ref. : 20141120-101114-m 1/32 1.

More information