Member of the PREMIS Task Force
|
|
- Rosalyn Black
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Using PREMIS to support preservation of digital assets at Yale Yale University Integrated Access Council [2 nd ] Preservation Metadata Task Force 2006 October 2006 Member of the PREMIS Task Force Matthew Beacom, Metadata Librarian, Library Catalog Dept. (Co-chair) Reed Beaman, Associate Director for Biodiversity Informatics, Peabody Museum Lee Faulkner, Media Director, Digital Media Center for the Arts David Gewirtz, Project Manager, Library Projects, ITS Kevin Glick, Electronic Records Archivist, Library Manuscripts and Archives Rebekah Irwin, Catalog Librarian for Digital Projects, Beinecke Library (Co-chair) Edward Kairiss, Director, Instructional Computing Instructional Technology, ITS Daniel Lee, E-Publishing/Internet Marketing Manager, Yale University Press Youn Noh, Digital Resources Catalog Librarian, Library Catalog Dept. George Ouellette, Senior Programmer Analyst, Library ILTS Thomas Raich, Associate Director, Information Technology, Art Gallery David Walls, Preservation Librarian, Library Preservation Dept. Background In March 2006, the Yale University Library Integrated Access Council accepted the recommendation of its first Preservation Metadata Task Force to adopt the PREMIS model as the basis for preservation metadata for its digital information assets. 1 As a practical next step toward implementation of PREMIS-based preservation metadata, a second task force was charged in April 2006 to investigate, develop, and propose a metadata element set and usage guidelines based on the PREMIS model. The scope of PREMIS is limited to metadata that supports preservation activities. PREMIS-based metadata is only one part of a larger package of metadata needed to support the use and re-use of digital assets held within a repository. Other metadata standards complement PREMIS. Additional metadata for digital information objects would include, for example, MARCXML or MODS for descriptive metadata that supports discovery of information objects, NISO MIX for technical metadata that describes the physical characteristics of images, and METS to contain or wrap together combinations of metadata types for transmission between applications or repositories. PREMIS is part of a set of metadata tools with which Yale can manage its digital assets, provide for retention and re-use for the long term, and build information services for the Yale community and the world. In our discussions and analysis of using PREMIS at Yale, two of our most critical concerns have been effectiveness and cost. To be of value, the proposed element set and guidelines must both support the preservation of digital information assets at Yale and meet the practical needs of digital asset administrators. Administrators need to weigh the cost and effectiveness of generating and storing additional technical and 1 Recommendation to Adopt PREMIS as a Preservation Metadata Model for the Yale University Library (1/12/06) [PDF, 11 p.] Yale University / Preservation Metadata Task Force Using PREMIS to support preservation of digital assets at Yale / 1-1
2 preservation metadata, taking into account the stability of the format, the value of the object, and obligations to third parties. PREMIS is designed to be an effective and inexpensive implementable tool that provides the metadata or information needed to preserve digital information assets for the long term. 2 To that end, the PREMIS elements are designed to be information that is collected through automated or semi-automated processes. No PREMIS element should require manual input per digital object. Although they may not be fully automated across every application, they can certainly be semiautomated. The process to create or capture preservation metadata should be economically sustainable. Costs also may arise from developing the automated tools needed to create or capture preservation metadata and the policies to support their use. For example, the base profile has only a tiny number of elements that are required, but each element requires work to develop tools and policies. Yale would need to do this development quickly and efficiently, or the result could be a protracted development phase. Measuring the effectiveness of PREMIS metadata needs to be based on experience with the performance of the metadata in actual instances of use. Preservation of digital information assets is new. Trials using PREMIS are now underway around the world. Two of our recommendations below address the need to engage with peers implementing and evaluating PREMIS while beginning to use PREMIS locally in an experimental evaluative spirit. There is, as well, a third related and critical issue that must be considered with effectiveness and cost. That concern may be thought of as relevance. In short, all digital assets at Yale may not warrant an application of metadata suitable for longterm preservation. Although administrators of digital asset collections need guidelines for application and use of preservation metadata at Yale, these guidelines must be relevant to a wide range of digital asset collections. For example, administrators of e- records in a university archive may have a different obligation for long term preservation than do administrators of digital surrogates of items in museum and library collections, or administrators of e-reserve course materials. The range of digital asset collections at Yale requires an adaptable framework for determining the appropriate degree of preservation responsibility per collection, repository, or administrative unit. PREMIS cannot make policy decisions. PREMIS cannot provide guidance on appropriate levels of responsibility for preservation of Yale s digital assets. However, PREMIS can supply a critical piece of the digital preservation infrastructure at Yale. It is a building block well-suited to Yale s wide ranging digital asset collections and systems implementations. What is needed is a larger policy framework for applying the PREMIS model at Yale. 2 Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata: Final Report of the PREMIS Working Group [PDF:3.2MB / 237p.] Yale University / Preservation Metadata Task Force Using PREMIS to support preservation of digital assets at Yale / 1-2
3 Recognizing this diversity of needs among digital asset administrators, we understand that there is no one size fits all approach to preservation metadata. The library and its peers at Yale need to develop policies to determine when to apply PREMIS. The task force recommends that Yale develop a small set of preservation metadata profiles for distinct yet relatively generic levels of obligation for preservation of digital assets. The profiles would guide appropriate use of PREMIS across a continuum of obligation. administrators would review semantic units in PREMIS to insure that they are capturing the information needed to extend a base profile or abbreviate a full profile to their domain-specific profiles. Between the extremes of a base profile or a full profile, the library and its peers at Yale need to develop a set of profiles that relate preservation policies with appropriate metadata requirements. Development of such profiles will depend on a number of policy decisions made by various organizational units at Yale, such as the library, the gallery, natural history museum, and ITS. The staff developing these profiles should be experienced in preservation activities, digital information technology, and metadata services. These profiles should be generic or neutral with respect to specific information systems implementation. Two levels are immediately apparent, a base level and a full level. Two Profiles Base profile. This profile would provide guidance to creators and aggregators of digital information assets on what elements they should generate or capture as they create or ingest digital information assets. The base profile could thus be used across many digital asset collections at Yale. The base profile, proposed in this report, is a sub-set of the full PREMIS profile that is the main body of this report, and it is intended to be temporary until the library and its peers at Yale have developed digital preservation policies. The Base Profile is presented here. The base profile is intended to apply to objects of all formats. The base profile provides a means of identifying and tracking objects. Small errors and inconsistencies can easily make these functions nontrivial. 3 In order for a repository to scale, basic tracking mechanisms need to work. The base profile may be supplemented incrementally with global updates once Yale-wide preservation policies have been established and communities within the university have developed their own domain-specific profiles. 3 Shirky, C. (2005, December). AIHT: conceptual issues from practical tests. D-Lib Magazine, 11 (2). Retrieved September 29, 2006, from Yale University / Preservation Metadata Task Force Using PREMIS to support preservation of digital assets at Yale / 1-3
4 PREMIS Base Profile The Object Characteristics category records technical properties such as size and format that are applicable to all or most digital formats. In order to insure the fixity of a digital object, i.e. to certify that an object has not been altered in an unauthorized way, two Message Digests, or fixity checks, should be performed automatically by the repository upon ingest and at a later time. The Message Digest Algorithm defines the specific algorithm used. The Message Digest is the output value that can be stored and compared in future fixity checks. 1. objectidentifier objectidentifiertype objectidentifiervalue 2. objectcharacteristics fixity messagedigestalgorithm messagedigest format formatdesignation 2.2.1a. formatname 2.2.1b. formatversion The Format and Format Designation categories accurately and automatically identify file formats upon ingest into a repository. Format Name designates the file format, e.g. Adobe PDF Format Version records the version of the format named in formatname, e.g. 6.0 An Object Identifier should be automatically created by the repository system at the time of ingest. The object identifier serves as the repository's primary identifier in order to insure that identifiers are unique and usable by the repository. Until a repository for long-term preservation is established, creators should assign their own unique identifiers to digital materials intended for longterm preservation. The Object Identifier Type designates the domain within which the object identifier is unique. The Object Identifier Value designates the value of the objectidentifier. Yale University / Preservation Metadata Task Force Using PREMIS to support preservation of digital assets at Yale / 1-4
5 Full profile. This profile would provide guidance to administrators of digital information assets acting as trusted custodians of material deemed to be of long-term value. The full profile is a draft that needs to be fine-tuned through experience with actual instances of use at Yale. We can only go so far based on documents, theories, and the experience others are beginning to have. Experience using PREMIS will determine which elements in the PREMIS model are necessary at Yale. For an illustration of how the full profile may be applied to a particular thing, see the accompanying example that is based on material from the digitization of slide images from the Classics Dept. The full profile is represented in the accompanying spreadsheet that describes the PREMIS model element by element, providing rationale, usage guidelines, and estimates of obligation for each element. Yale University / Preservation Metadata Task Force Using PREMIS to support preservation of digital assets at Yale / 1-5
6 Recommendations Taking action on preservation metadata at Yale will be complex because Yale is a complex organization. The following recommendations call for developing a coherent, sustained effort to preserve digital information assets at Yale by beginning (largely) with the library. Yale can use its library to prototype solutions for policy, technology and processes. The actions for the library named below should be undertaken as the first step in a larger process to successfully guide and support the creation, acquisition, use and preservation of digital information assets at Yale. Experiment with and evaluate PREMIS metadata in use at Yale. o Action: Include PREMIS as part of the Yale University Library VITAL Fedora implementation and to make preliminary report in June 2007 to update IAC on progress. Participate in the PREMIS Implementers Group to work collaboratively with other PREMIS implementers, such as the Library of Congress, the National Library of Australia and Stanford University. o Action: Assign staff involved with the VITAL/Fedora implementation of PREMIS and the library s Digital Preservation Committee to participate in the PREMIS Implementers Group. The implementation group will update IAC in June 2007 on the status of Yale s participation. Establish a coherent policy framework and governance structures for the preservation of digital information assets at Yale. o Action: Digital Preservation Committee (DPC) to develop digital preservation policies for Yale University Library and to make a preliminary report to IAC in June 2007 o Action: Digital Landscape Committee to develop digital preservation policies for Yale University. o Action: IAC and Yale University Library to support use of the base preservation metadata profile throughout Yale by providing critical services to users. Objective: establish persistent naming services for digital assets in Library by June Objective: establish validation services for digital assets in Library by June Objective: establish fixity check services for digital assets in Library by June Yale University / Preservation Metadata Task Force Using PREMIS to support preservation of digital assets at Yale / 1-6
7 Guide to the full profile in the accompanying spreadsheet The PREMIS data dictionary has 22 metadata semantic units or data elements (19 contain nested sub-elements) divided across four types of entities: Object, Event, Agent, and Rights. The body of the evaluation addresses each element and nested sub-element in the PREMIS data dictionary. The full preservation metadata profile is contained in an Excel spreadsheet. All the PREMIS semantic units are broken out as individual elements and sub-units across the four types of PREMIS entities: Object, Event, Agent, Rights. For each element and sub-elements, we suggest a responsible agent, indicate whether the data is likely to be automatically or manually supplied, provide a rationale for the use of the element and, give usage guidelines, and note any applicable data constraints on the value for each element or sub-element. Additionally, we note the applicable object category to which the element can be applied and state the level at which the element is nested within the matrix of PREMIS semantic units. Each of these aspects is explained in more detail below. Semantic Unit: the PREMIS name for the elements used in this evaluation. (PREMIS): the level of obligation assigned in the PREMIS Data Dictionary. Possible values are Mandatory and. (Yale Full Profile): the level of obligation assigned by this group for the full profile. These assignments of obligation are our current best guess and are likely to be adjusted after further experience is gained with use. Possible values are Mandatory,,, and. Responsibility: an indication of who is obliged to provide the metadata. The possible choices are the creator of the digital asset, the repository that is accepting the digital asset, or the submitter. For some elements, more than one responsible party may be designated. Flexibility in designating responsibility is required for at least the following reasons: (1) parties may assume joint responsibility for the generation of certain elements, (2) a repository may assume responsibility for metadata not provided by the creator or submitter if the object is of high value, or (3) designation of responsibility may depend upon relationships among the parties (e.g., if the repository is a client of the creator). Generation: an indication of how the data for this element can be supplied; the only choices indicated here are automated, semi-automated, or manual. Semi-automated processes include use of default settings, batch processes, and templates. Rationale: a brief statement declaring the value of the element to the repository (what functionality the repository gains by knowing this information). Yale University / Preservation Metadata Task Force Using PREMIS to support preservation of digital assets at Yale / 1-7
8 Usage notes: es on best practices for using the element. This may be a rich target for comments as usage may depend greatly on the goals of the administrative unit and the implemented environment of any given repository. Data Constraint: Any constraint on the data, such as integer, controlled vocabulary, container, none. Repeatability: Possible values are repeatable or not repeatable. The value applies to all object categories to which the element is applicable unless stated otherwise. Applicable Object Categories: Indicates which PREMIS model object entities the element can be applied to ( File, and Bitstream). Each PREMIS semantic unit has defined object categories. Some may be applied to all, other to just one of the object categories. Parent: The parent element named is the container closest to the element being described. Yale University / Preservation Metadata Task Force Using PREMIS to support preservation of digital assets at Yale / 1-8
9 Object Entity Semantic Unit (PREMIS) objectidentifier Mandatory Mandatory objectidentifiertype Mandatory Mandatory (Yale Full Profile) Responsibility Generation Rationale Usage es Needed to identify objects and to relate them to other objects, events, and rights. Designates the domain in which the objectidentifier is unique. Data constraint Repeatability Combination of type and value should be globally unique. Container Repeatable Use identifier automatically created by the repository as the primary identifier. Implement a handle system for use as the primary identifier within the repository, and use this value: handle. The handle syntax should include a substring for the collection and sequential suffixes to indicate structural or derivative relationships among objects (e.g., yale.dp/ydc where dp indicates the repository, ydc indicates the collection, and 001 indicates that the object is the original object submitted to the repository). Vocabulary repeatable objectidenifiervalue Mandatory Mandatory Designates the value of the objectidentifier. None repeatable Applicable Object Categories Parent File, Bitstream Object Entity File, Bitstream objectidentifier File, Bitstream objectidentifier preservationlevel Mandatory objectcategory Mandatory Mandatory objectcharacteristics Mandatory Mandatory See components. Use a controlled vocabulary. Assign at the repository or institution level rather than at the object level. Determine according to one or more of the following factors: cultural value, uniqueness, preservability, costs, etc. (e.g., Rutgers Libraries uses two different sets of values: (1) high, medium, low, or none and (2) full, or bitstream). Associate each value for preservationlevel with a profile that designates which semantic units are mandatory and how their values Allows a range of local policies and practices to be should be recorded. Profiles for higher preservation applied differentially to objects or collections within the levels would have more stringent requirements. repository. Requires policy decision by DPC. Vocabulary repeatable For repositories concerned with not only bit-level preservation, but also maintaining usable versions of intellectual entities over time, permits designation of significant properties of one or more sets of digital objects that make up an intellectual entity. Needed to describe such characteristics as See composition level, fixity, size, format, significant components. properties, and inhibitors. Use these values: File, Bitstream. Vocabulary repeatable File Object Entity File, Bitstream Object Entity Used to record technical properties. Format-specific properties are out of scope for PREMIS. Container Repeatable File, Bitstream Object Entity compositionlevel Mandatory Mandatory fixity Mandatory messagedigestalgorithm Mandatory Mandatory Needed to decode or unbundle the object if it is compressed or encrypted. Needed to guarantee object authenticity. Needed to understand the digest value. Supply value even when object is uncompressed and Nonnegative unencrpyted, e.g., assign 0 for base level, 1 for compressed file, 2 for compressed and encrypted file. integer repeatable File, Bitstream objectcharacteristics Investigate cost to generate and maintain message digests calculated by one or more algorithms. The PREMIS Data Dictionary recommends using two or more message digests calculated by different algorithms. Requires policy decision by DPC. Container Repeatable File, Bitstream objectcharacteristics Use registry. Until a global registry becomes available, create and maintain a local registry of encryption algorithms by type: hash algorithms, symmetric algorithms, asymmetric algorithms. Use entries in the hash algorithm registry to populate this semantic unit. Requires policy decision by DPC. Vocabulary repeatable File, Bitstream fixity Yale University / Preservation Metadata Task Force / Using PREMIS to support preservation of digital assets at Yale / 2-1
10 Object Entity Semantic Unit (PREMIS) messagedigest Mandatory Mandatory messagedigestoriginator size Mandatory (Yale Full Profile) Responsibility Generation Rationale Usage es format Mandatory Mandatory See components. formatdesignation Mandatory formatname Mandatory Mandatory fomatversion Mandatory Data constraint Repeatability Applicable Object Categories Required for comparison with value obtained in previous or subsequent fixity checks. None repeatable File, Bitstream fixity Used to validate authenticity of message digests. Record in Object entity or in Event entity. None repeatable File, Bitstream fixity Needed for server administration, planning, etc. formatregistry Mandatory formatregistryname Mandatory Mandatory formatregistrykey Mandatory Mandatory Needed to identify format unambiguously and consistently. Record value obtained from format validation performed during ingest. Use bytes as unit of measurement. Parent Nonnegative integer repeatable File, Bitstream objectcharacteristics Record by value in formatdesignation or by reference in formatregistry. Requires policy decision by DPC. Container repeatable File, Bitstream objectcharacteristics Needed to record name and version of the object format. Use a controlled vocabulary. Container repeatable File, Bitstream format Needed to identify format by name. Needed to specify version of the format type. Vocabulary repeatable File, Bitstream formatdesignation Vocabulary repeatable File, Bitstream formatdesignation Identifies source of format information. Entry for format in registry may provide additional information about the Identify appropriate global registry or develop local format. registry. See Usage es for creatingapplication. Container Repeatable File, Bitstream format Needed to reference the registry by name, URI, etc. Use formal name, local name, or URI consistently. Requires policy decision by DPC. None repeatable File, Bitstream formatregistry Needed to uniquely cite the entry in the register. Requires policy decision by DPC. None repeatable File, Bitstream formatregistry formatregistryrole significantproperties inhibitors Mandatory Indicates type of information provided by registry (e.g., specification, validation), if more than one is used. Requires policy decision by DPC. Used to record properties a repository plans to preserve. See Needed to decrypt files or bypass other protections, components. e.g., passwords. Develop a local controlled vocabulary identifying properties, attributes, or features of objects. Investigate designation of significant properties by profile, e.g., a profile for records might include signatureinformation. None Repeatable Vocabulary repeatable File, Bitstream formatregistry File, Bitstream objectcharacteristics See proposed change < changes.html> Inhibitors may not be detected when a file is parsed. If applicable, require in Submission Information Package (SIP). Container Repeatable File, Bitstream objectcharacteristics inhibitortype Mandatory Mandatory Needed to identify the inhibitor method employed on the object. Use registry. Until a global registry becomes available, create and maintain a local registry of encryption algorithms by type: hash algorithms, symmetric algorithms, asymmetric algorithms. If encryption is used, use entries in the symmetric algorithm subregistry to populate this semantic unit. If password protection is used, use this value: password protection. Requires policy decision by DPC. Vocabulary repeatable File, Bitstream inhibitors Yale University / Preservation Metadata Task Force / Using PREMIS to support preservation of digital assets at Yale / 2-2
11 Object Entity Semantic Unit (PREMIS) inhibitortarget Mandatory inhibitorkey Mandatory (Yale Full Profile) Responsibility Generation Rationale Usage es Needed to identify the content or function is inhibited. Use a controlled vocabulary. Needed to override the inhibitor. Data constraint Repeatability Applicable Object Categories Parent Vocabulary Repeatable File, Bitstream inhibitors Integrate storage of keys with university-wide Public Key Infrastructure (PKI). None repeatable File, Bitstream inhibitors creatingapplication Mandatory creatingapplicationname Mandatory creatingapplicationversion Mandatory datecreatedbyapplication originalname Use registry. Until a global format registry becomes available, create and maintain a local registry of file formats with information, by function (create, render, The creating application may have an effect on identify, validate, etc.), on compatible software. For software and hardware compatibility even if the format each application, provide a standard name, version, is known (cf., Web pages created with Microsoft Front vendor, and system requirements. Use this registry to Page vs. Web pages created with Dreamweaver), which, in turn, is likely to affect migration. populate creatingapplication. Requires policy decision by DPC. Container Repeatable Vocabulary repeatable Compatibility may be specific to versions. None repeatable Used to relate a submitted object and to a derivative object held by the repository. Express dates in the extended format with hyphens. Express times in UTC (Coordinated Universal Time) with the UTC designator ("Z"). ISO 8601 repeatable File, Bitstream Object Entity File, Bitstream creatingapplication File, Bitstream creatingapplication File, Bitstream creatingapplication Use the file name designated in the Submission Information Package (SIP). None repeatable File Object Entity storage contentlocation Mandatory Used to describe the location of two or more bit-wise identical copies of an object, directly under the repository's control, that have the same objectidentifier and are managed as a unit by the repository. Container Repeatable File, Bitstream Object Entity If a handle system is implemented, contentlocation is implicit in objectidentifier. Container repeatable File, Bitstream storage contentlocationtype Mandatory If a handle system is implemented, contentlocationtype is identical to objectidentifiertype. Vocabulary repeatable File, Bitstream contentlocation contentlocationvalue storagemedium Mandatory Mandatory If a handle system is implemented, the information needed to resolve handles to file locations is implicit in the handle system. Documentation for the handle system should be stored by the repository but does not need to be recorded in the metadata for each object. None repeatable File, Bitstream contentlocation Implicit. Determined by repository architecture. Vocabulary repeatable File storage environment Mandatory See components. environmentcharacteristic Used to describe dependent files and hardware/software combinations required to render or See interact with content. Applies to Representation and File, i.e., if the repository has made a commitment to preserve usable versions of intellectual entities over time. May be omitted if the repository is only Record information on functions supported by hardware and software in a registry, not in the metadata for each object. See Usage es for creatingapplication. Record information on dependent components. responsible for bit-level preservation. files in the metadata for each object. Container Repeatable Used to distinguish levels of functionality provided by hardware/software combinations if more than one combination supports a particular purpose. Vocabulary repeatable File, Bitstream Object Entity File, Bitstream environment Yale University / Preservation Metadata Task Force / Using PREMIS to support preservation of digital assets at Yale / 2-3
12 Object Entity Semantic Unit environmentpurpose environmente (PREMIS) (Yale Full Profile) Responsibility Generation Rationale Usage es dependency Mandatory dependencyname Mandatory dependencyidentifier Mandatory dependencyidentifiertype Mandatory Mandatory dependencyidentifiervalue Mandatory Mandatory software swname swversion swtype swotherinformation swdependency Mandatory Mandatory Manual Used to designate how an object may be manipulated using a particular combination of software and hardware. Data constraint Repeatability Vocabulary Repeatable Used to provide information on the environment that cannot be recorded elsewhere. None Repeatable Needed for complex objects that depend on other objects. Use for non-executable components of an object, e.g., a font, style sheet, or schema. Do not use for software or hardware. Container Repeatable Clarifies nature of dependency if not made apparent by the dependencyidentifier. None Repeatable Identifies a dependent object. Use objectidentifier of dependent object. Container Repeatable Designates the domain in which the dependencyidentifier is unique. Vocabulary repeatable Designates the value of the dependencyidentifier. None repeatable The software needed to render the object Software can be inferred from creatingapplication and does not need to recorded in the metadata for each object. See Usage es for creatingapplication. Container Repeatable Needed to identify the manufacturer and name of software product. None repeatable Needed to identify the version number of the software product. Needed to identify the role of the software product e.g., operating system, renderer, driver, etc. None Repeatable (File); Repeatable ( Bitstream) Vocabulary repeatable Used to describe additional requirements or instructions related to the software product. None Repeatable Used to identify and additonal software needed by that in swname. None Repeatable Applicable Object Categories Parent File, Bitstream environment File, Bitstream environment File, Bitstream environment File, Bitstream dependency File, Bitstream dependency File, Bitstream dependencyidentifier File, Bitstream dependencyidentifier File, Bitstream environment File, Bitstream software File, Bitstream software File, Bitstream software File, Bitstream software File, Bitstream software hardware The hardware needed to render or use the object Hardware can be inferred from creatingapplication and does not need to be recorded in the metadata for each object. See Usage es for creatingapplication. Container Repeatable File, Bitstream environment hwname Mandatory Needed to identify the manufacturer, model and version of hardware product. None repeatable File, Bitstream hardware hwtype Mandatory Needed to identify the class or category of the hardware. Vocabulary repeatable File, Bitstream hardware hwotherinformation Used to describe additional requirements or instructions related to the hardware product. None Repeatable File, Bitstream hardware Yale University / Preservation Metadata Task Force / Using PREMIS to support preservation of digital assets at Yale / 2-4
13 Object Entity Semantic Unit (PREMIS) signatureinformation signatureinformationencoding Mandatory Mandatory signer (Yale Full Profile) Responsibility Generation Rationale Usage es See Used to confirm the origin and integrity of objects components. signed by the repository. Used to record encoding of signaturevalue and keyinformation. Needed to determine who created the signature. Data constraint Repeatability Applicable Object Categories Parent Do not use to record information about digital signatures that authenticate agents; use the Event Entity instead. Container Repeatable File, Bitstream Object Entity Use registry. Vocabulary repeatable File, Bitstream signatureinformation Use the name provided in the Submission Information Package (SIP). None repeatable File, Bitstream signatureinformation Use registry. Create and maintain a local registry of encryption algorithms by type: hash algorithms, symmetric algorithms, asymmetric algorithms. Use entries in the asymmetric algorithm registry and hash algorithm registry to populate signaturemethod. Record the encryption algorithm for the signature first (the asymmetric algorithm), followed by a hyphen, followed by the hash algorithm, e.g., DSA-SHA1. signaturemethod Mandatory Mandatory Needed for signature encryption and validation. Requires policy decision by DPC. Vocabulary repeatable File, Bitstream signatureinformation signaturevalue Mandatory Mandatory The value of the digital signature None repeatable File, Bitstream signatureinformation signaturevalidationrules Mandatory Mandatory Used to maintain documentation on signature algorithms, canonicalization algorithms, transform algorithms, etc. signatureproperties Used to verify the authenticity of the signature. keyinformation keytype Mandatory Mandatory keyvalue Mandatory Mandatory Used to record information about the signer's public key, for comparison with the and verifiation of the digital signature. Used to record the encryption algorithm or certification method for authenticating the signer's public key. keyverificationinformation Additional information used to verify the signer's key relationship Mandatory relationshiptype Mandatory Mandatory relationshipsubtype Mandatory Mandatory May be a pointer to external documentation. See < Requires policy decision by DPC. None repeatable File, Bitstream signatureinformation Define suitably granular structure for time of signature generation, serial number of cryptographic hardware used, etc., as needed. Requires policy decision by DPC. None Repeatable File, Bitstream signatureinformation See proposed change at < Container repeatable File, Bitstream signatureinformation Use registry. Requires policy decision by DPC. Vocabulary repeatable File, Bitstream keyinformation The value of the signer's public key is needed for comparison with the signature. None repeatable File, Bitstream keyinformation May be used to record information about certificates, etc. If possible, use keytype instead. Requires policy decision by DPC. None repeatable File, Bitstream keyinformation See components. Needed to represent relationships between objects. Record all relevant relationships. Container Repeatable Structural or derivational relationship between objects Develop a local controlled vocabulary of relationships. Describes the role of each object in the relationship. Include in a local controlled vocabulary of relationships. Vocabulary repeatable Vocabulary repeatable relatedobjectidentification Mandatory Mandatory Identifies related objects. Use objectidentifier of related resource. Container Repeatable relatedobjectidentificationtype Mandatory Mandatory Designates the domain in which the relatedobjectidentification is unique. Vocabulary repeatable File, Bitstream Object Entity File, Bitstream relationship File, Bitstream relationship File, Bitstream relationship File, Bitstream relatedobjectidentification Yale University / Preservation Metadata Task Force / Using PREMIS to support preservation of digital assets at Yale / 2-5
14 Object Entity Semantic Unit (PREMIS) (Yale Full Profile) Responsibility Generation Rationale Usage es Data constraint Repeatability relatedobjectidentifiervalue Mandatory Mandatory Designates the value of the relatedobjectidentification. None repeatable relatedobjectsequence Mandatory Mandatory Needed to know the order of components or files. relatedeventidentification Mandatory Mandatory relatedeventidentifiertype Mandatory Mandatory If there is only one related object, assign the value 0 (zero). If objects are unordered, assign each the same value. None repeatable Used to identify an event that relates the object to a second object, e.g., migration. Use eventidentifier of related event. Container Repeatable Designates the domain in which the relatedeventidentification is unique. relatedeventidentifiervalue Mandatory Mandatory Designates the value of the relatedeventidentifier relatedeventsequence Mandatory Needed to know the order of events. linkingeventidentifier Mandatory linkingeventidentifiertype Mandatory Mandatory Vocabulary repeatable Vocabulary repeatable If there is only one related event, assign the value 0 (zero). If events are unordered, assign each the same value. None repeatable Used to identify an event that does not result in the creation of a second object, e.g., validation. Use eventidentifier of linking event. Container Repeatable Designates the domain in which the linkingeventidentifier is unique. linkingeventidentifiervalue Mandatory Mandatory Designates the value of the linkingeventidentifier. linkingintellectualentityidentifier linkingintellectualentitytype Mandatory Mandatory linkingintellectualentityvalue Mandatory Mandatory Vocabulary repeatable Vocabulary repeatable Use to identify an object whose content is related to the object designated by the objectidentifier. Used to link an object to another object or collection ly, use to identify a metadata record for the that represents the same intellectual entity or a related object designated by the objectidentifier. Requires intellectual entity. policy decision by DPC. Container Repeatable Designates the domain in which the linkingintellectualentityidentifier is unique. Vocabulary repeatable Designates the value of the linkingintellectualentityidentifier. None repeatable linkingpermissionstatementidentifier Used to link an object to a permission statement. Use permissionstatementidentifier. Container Repeatable linkingpermissionstatementidentifiertype Mandatory Mandatory linkingpermissionstatementidentifiervalue Mandatory Mandatory Designates the domain in which the linkingpermissionstatementidentifier is unique. Vocabulary repeatable Designates the value of the linkingpermissionstatementidentifer. None repeatable Applicable Object Categories Parent File, Bitstream relatedobjectidentification File, Bitstream relatedobjectidentification File, Bitstream relationship File, Bitstream relatedeventidentification File, Bitstream relatedeventidentification File, Bitstream relatedeventidentification File, Bitstream Object Entity File, Bitstream linkingeventidentifier File, Bitstream linkingeventidentifier File, Bitstream Object Entity File, Bitstream linkingintellectualentityidentifier File, Bitstream linkingintellectualentityidentifier File, Bitstream Object Entity File, Bitstream linkingpermissionstatementidentifier File, Bitstream linkingpermissionstatementidentifier Yale University / Preservation Metadata Task Force / Using PREMIS to support preservation of digital assets at Yale / 2-6
15 Event Entity Semantic Unit (PREMIS) eventidentifier Mandatory Mandatory (Yale Full Profile) Responsibility Generation Rationale Usage es Data constraint Repeatability Parent Needed to identify events and to relate them to objects and agents. None repeatable Event Entity Use identifiers automatically created by the repository. If information needs to be recorded on events outside the repository, use a registry of repositories. (Each eventidentifiertype Mandatory Mandatory Designates the domain in which the eventidentifier is unique. repository is likely to implement its own numbering system for events.) None repeatable eventidentifier eventidentifiervalue Mandatory Mandatory Designates the value of the eventidentifier. None repeatable eventidentifier eventtype Mandatory Mandatory Semi-automated Used to categorize events that affect the preservation of digital objects. limited to preservation treatments. eventdatetime Mandatory Mandatory Required for digital provenance. Manual Develop local controlled vocabulary of event types. Requires policy decision by DPC. Vocabulary repeatable Event Entity Express dates in the extended format with hyphens. Express times in UTC (Coordinated Universal Time) with the UTC designator ("Z"). ISO 8601 repeatable Event Entity Additional information about an event; not intended to be machine processible None repeatable Event Entity eventdetail Machine-processible information about event eventoutcomeinformation Mandatory See components. outcomes None Repeatable Event Entity Develop local controlled vocabulary of event eventoutcome Mandatory Coded representation of the outcome of an event outcomes. Requires policy decision by DPC. Vocabulary repeatable eventoutcomeinformation Detailed description of the outcome of an event; may Establish guidelines for what to record for each event eventoutcomedetail Semi-automated be used to record or to point to event logs type. Requires policy decision by DPC. None repeatable eventoutcomeinformation linkingagentidentifer Mandatory Required for digital provenance. Use agentidentifier. None Repeatable Event Entity Designates the domain in which the agentidentifier is linkingagentidentifertype Mandatory Mandatory unique. Vocabulary repeatable linkingagentidentifier linkingagentidentifiervalue Mandatory Mandatory Designates the value of the agentidentifier. None repeatable linkingagentidentifier Used to disambiguate agent role if more than one agent is associated with an event or if the role of the linkingagentrole agent is not evident from the eventtype. Vocabulary Repeatable linkingagentidentifier linkingobjectidentifier Mandatory Required for digital provenance. Use objectidentifier. None Repeatable Event Entity Designates the domain in which the objectidentifier is linkingobjectidentifiertype Mandatory Mandatory unique. Vocabulary repeatable linkingobjectidentifier linkingobjectidentifiervalue Mandatory Mandatory Designates the value of the objectidentifier. None repeatable linkingobjectidentifier Yale University / Preservation Metadata Task Force / Using PREMIS to support preservation of digital assets at Yale / 2-7
16 Agent Entity Semantic Unit (PREMIS) (Yale Full Profile) Responsibility Generation Rationale Usage es Data constraint Repeatability Parent Needed to identify agents, to relate them to events, and to designate their permissions. Create a local registry; create a registry for external agents as needed. For the local registry, use Yale University netids and integrate with CAS. None Repeatable Agent Entity agentidentifier Mandatory Mandatory Designates the domain in which the agentidentifier is agentidentifiertype Mandatory Mandatory unique. Vocabulary repeatable agentidentifier agentidentifiervalue Mandatory Mandatory Designates the value of the agentidentifier. None repeatable agentidentifier agentname agenttype The agent may not be known by his/her agentidentifier. Record the agent's name in the event that the agent's CAS account does not persist over the lifetime of objects related to events in which the agent played a role. None Repeatable Agent Entity High-level characterization of the type of agent, useful for filtering, etc. Develop a local controlled vocabulary of agent types. Vocabulary repeatable Agent Entity Yale University / Preservation Metadata Task Force / Using PREMIS to support preservation of digital assets at Yale / 2-8
17 Rights Entity Semantic Unit (PREMIS) (Yale Full Profile) Responsibility Generation Rationale Usage es Data constraint Repeatability Parent permissionstatement Mandatory permissionstatementidentifier Mandatory Mandatory Contains all other semantic units in the Rights Entity. Used to designate the rights of agents with respect to objects held by the repository. If a permissionstatement is not provided, then a linkingpermissionstatementidentifier is not provided in the Object Entity. Investigate objects or collections, if any, for which a permissionstatement is required and those for which permissions may be set by institutionwide policy. Container Repeatable Rights Entity Needed to provide unique identifer for permission statement so that it can be related to obects, agents and events. Container repeatable permissionstatement permissionstatementidentifiertype Mandatory Mandatory Designates domain in which the permissionstatementidentifier is unique. Consider rights management standards informed by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Also, see JISC. Digital Rights Management: Final Report < Vocabulary repeatable permissionstatementidentifier permissionstatementidentifiervalue Mandatory Mandatory Designates value of the permissionstatementidentifier. None repeatable permissionstatementidentifier Investigate the appropriate level for designating linkingobject Mandatory Mandatory Identifies the object(s) related to the permission statement. permissions, e.g., by object, file type, agent, or collection. None Repeatable permissionstatement grantingagent Identifies the agent granting permission. Use agentidentifier. None Repeatable permissionstatement grantingagreement, Refers to a document or contract recording the granting of permission. grantingagreementidentification Identifies the agreement that grants permissions. For objects or collections for which a permissionstatement is required, include a grantingagreement in the Submission Information Package (SIP). None repeatable permissionstatement If a permissionstatement is required, ingest the Submission Information Package (SIP) and use the objectidentifier of the SIP. None repeatable grantingagreement grantingagreementinformation, Text describing the agreement If a permissionstatement is required, optionally paraphrase or quote the text of the grantingagreement provided in the Submission Information Package (SIP). None repeatable grantingagreement permissiongranted Mandatory Mandatory Identifies the allowed actions per permission. None Repeatable permissionstatement act Mandatory Mandatory Details the actions that are allowed. Develop a local controlled vocabulary of acceptable acts. ly, define a single controlled vocabulary for eventtype and act. Vocabulary repeatable permissiongranted Identifies the limits on actions (e.g., the number of Include any restrictions in a local controlled vocabulary restriction copies that can be made). of acceptable acts. None Repeatable permissiongranted termofgrant Mandatory Mandatory Declares the term of the grant. None repeatable permissiongranted startdate Mandatory Mandatory Needed to know the start of term. Record if term of permissions is time bounded. The datatype of this semantic unit is xs:date, which has year, month, and day properties, plus an optional timezone-valued timezone property. Express as a nontimezoned value in the extended format: YYYY- MM-DD. Year, month, and day are required. ISO 8601 repeatable termofgrant Yale University / Preservation Metadata Task Force / Using PREMIS to support preservation of digital assets at Yale / 2-9
18 Rights Entity enddate Mandatory Mandatory Needed to know end of term. Record if term of permissions is time bounded. The datatype of this semantic unit is xs:date, which has year, month, and day properties, plus an optional timezone-valued timezone property. Express as a nontimezoned value in the extended format: YYYY- MM-DD. Year, month, and day are required. ISO 8601 repeatable termofgrant permissione Provides additional information on permissions. Use only if information cannot be recorded elsewhere. None Repeatable permissiongranted Yale University / Preservation Metadata Task Force / Using PREMIS to support preservation of digital assets at Yale / 2-10
Understanding PREMIS
Library of Congress Network Development and MARC Standards Office Understanding PREMIS Authored By: Priscilla Caplan Date: February 1, 2009 Copyright 2009 The Library of Congress, except within the U.S.A.
More informationUse of the Data Dictionary: PREMIS Examples. Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata: Final Report of the PREMIS Working Group
Use of the Data Dictionary: PREMIS Examples This excerpt from Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata: Final Report of the PREMIS Working Group Contains Section 3. It does not include the final report
More informationDigital Preservation Metadata and Improvements to PREMIS in Version 3.0. Angela Dappert University of Portsmouth
Digital Preservation Metadata and Improvements to PREMIS in Version 3.0 Angela Dappert University of Portsmouth Agenda Digital preservation metadata Why is it needed and what does it look like? PREMIS
More informationManaging and Transforming Digital Forensics Metadata for Digital Collections
Managing and Transforming Digital Forensics Metadata for Digital Collections Kam Woods, Alexandra Chassanoff, Christopher A. Lee University of North Carolina - School of Library and Information Science
More informationData Dictionary. semantic repeatability obligation creation d. object identifier bitstream rationale definition sem
preservation repository object identifier bitstream ratio definition semantic repeatability obligation crea Data Dictionary digital object management systems value metadata pr tion repository object identifier
More informationArchives Ready To the AIPs Transmission. PREMIS Implementation Fair. Reminding the ipres2010 Presentation
FONDAZIONE RINASCIMENTO DIGITALE Foundation promoted by Ente Cassa di Risparmio of Florence 7th International Conference on Preservation of Digital Objects (ipres2010) September 19-24, 2010, Vienna, Austria
More informationPREMIS. Contents: version 2.0. March 2008
PREMIS Contents: version 2.0 March 2008 Acknowledgments Introduction Background The PREMIS Data Model General Topics Implementation Considerations The PREMIS Data Dictionary Version 2.0 Special Topics
More informationDigital Preservation Metadata
Digital Preservation Metadata Angela Dappert The British Library, Planets, PREMIS EC Barcelona March 2009 Some of the slides on PREMIS are based on slides by Priscilla Caplan, Florida Center for Library
More informationFixity Checks: Checksums, Message Digests and Digital Signatures Audrey Novak, ILTS Digital Preservation Committee November 2006
Fixity Checks: Checksums, Message Digests and Digital Signatures Audrey Novak, ILTS Digital Preservation Committee November 2006 Introduction: Fixity, in preservation terms, means that the digital object
More informationAHDS Digital Preservation Glossary
AHDS Digital Preservation Glossary Final version prepared by Raivo Ruusalepp Estonian Business Archives, Ltd. January 2003 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...1 2. PROVENANCE AND FORMAT...1 3. SCOPE AND
More informationAN INVESTIGATION INTO METADATA FOR LONG-LIVED GEOSPATIAL DATA FORMATS
AN INVESTIGATION INTO METADATA FOR LONG-LIVED GEOSPATIAL DATA FORMATS Prepared for the National Geospatial Digital Archive project and funded by the National Digital Information and Infrastructure Preservation
More informationADRI. Digital Record Export Standard. ADRI-2007-01-v1.0. ADRI Submission Information Package (ASIP)
ADRI Digital Record Export Standard ADRI Submission Information Package (ASIP) ADRI-2007-01-v1.0 Version 1.0 31 July 2007 Digital Record Export Standard 2 Copyright 2007, Further copies of this document
More informationFunctional Requirements for Digital Asset Management Project version 3.0 11/30/2006
/30/2006 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 2 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 = required; 2 = optional; 3 = not required functional requirements Discovery tools available to end-users:
More informationQueensland recordkeeping metadata standard and guideline
Queensland recordkeeping metadata standard and guideline June 2012 Version 1.1 Queensland State Archives Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts Document details Security
More informationTechNote 0006: Digital Signatures in PDF/A-1
TechNote 0006: Digital Signatures in PDF/A-1 Digital signatures are primarily used to check the integrity of the signed part of the document. They also can be used to authenticate the signer s identity
More informationDigital Preservation. OAIS Reference Model
Digital Preservation OAIS Reference Model Stephan Strodl, Andreas Rauber Institut für Softwaretechnik und Interaktive Systeme TU Wien http://www.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/dp Aim OAIS model Understanding the functionality
More informationNorth Carolina Digital Preservation Policy. April 2014
North Carolina Digital Preservation Policy April 2014 North Carolina Digital Preservation Policy Page 1 Executive Summary The North Carolina Digital Preservation Policy (Policy) governs the operation,
More informationDigital Preservation Guidance Note: Selecting File Formats for Long-Term Preservation
Digital Preservation Guidance Note: 1 Selecting File Formats for Long-Term Preservation Document Control Author: Adrian Brown, Head of Digital Preservation Research Document Reference: Issue: 2 DPGN-01
More information1 Building a metadata schema where to start 1
1 Building a metadata schema where to start 1 1.1 Introduction Purpose Metadata has been defined as data describing the context, content and structure of records and their management through time 2. It
More informationChapter 5: The DAITSS Archiving Process
Chapter 5: The DAITSS Archiving Process Topics covered in this chapter: A brief glossary of terms relevant to this chapter Specifications for Submission Information Packages (SIPs) DAITSS archiving workflow
More informationETSI TS 102 778 V1.1.1 (2009-04) Technical Specification
TS 102 778 V1.1.1 (2009-04) Technical Specification Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); PDF Advanced Electronic Signature Profiles; CMS Profile based on ISO 32000-1 2 TS 102 778 V1.1.1 (2009-04)
More informationMETADATA STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES RELEVANT TO DIGITAL AUDIO
This chart provides a quick overview of metadata standards and guidelines that are in use with digital audio, including metadata used to describe the content of the files; metadata used to describe properties
More informationBest Practices for Structural Metadata Version 1 Yale University Library June 1, 2008
Best Practices for Structural Metadata Version 1 Yale University Library June 1, 2008 Background The Digital Production and Integration Program (DPIP) is sponsoring the development of documentation outlining
More informationSystem Requirements for Archiving Electronic Records PROS 99/007 Specification 1. Public Record Office Victoria
System Requirements for Archiving Electronic Records PROS 99/007 Specification 1 Public Record Office Victoria Version 1.0 April 2000 PROS 99/007 Specification 1: System Requirements for Archiving Electronic
More informationThe Rutgers Workflow Management System. Workflow Management System Defined. The New Jersey Digital Highway
The Rutgers Workflow Management System Mary Beth Weber Cataloging and Metadata Services Rutgers University Libraries Presented at the 2007 LITA National Forum Denver, Colorado Workflow Management System
More informationTechnical Description. DigitalSign 3.1. State of the art legally valid electronic signature. The best, most secure and complete software for
Technical Description DigitalSign 3.1 State of the art legally valid electronic signature The best, most secure and complete software for Adding digital signatures to any document, in conformance with
More informationDIGITAL RIGHTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR MULTIMEDIA FILES
DIGITAL RIGHTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR MULTIMEDIA FILES Saiprasad Dhumal * Prof. K.K. Joshi Prof Sowmiya Raksha VJTI, Mumbai. VJTI, Mumbai VJTI, Mumbai. Abstract piracy of digital content is a one of the
More informationInteragency Science Working Group. National Archives and Records Administration
Interagency Science Working Group 1 National Archives and Records Administration Establishing Trustworthy Digital Repositories: A Discussion Guide Based on the ISO Open Archival Information System (OAIS)
More informationSHared Access Research Ecosystem (SHARE)
SHared Access Research Ecosystem (SHARE) June 7, 2013 DRAFT Association of American Universities (AAU) Association of Public and Land-grant Universities (APLU) Association of Research Libraries (ARL) This
More informationCipherShare Features and Benefits
CipherShare s and CipherShare s and Security End-to-end Encryption Need-to-Know: Challenge / Response Authentication Transitive Trust Consistent Security Password and Key Recovery Temporary Application
More informationBradford Scholars Digital Preservation Policy
DIGITAL PRESERVATION The value of the research outputs produced by staff and research students at the University of Bradford cannot be over emphasised in demonstrating the scientific, societal and economic
More informationDigital Project Planning & Management Basics
Cataloging for the 21st Century Course 5 Trainee Manual Prepared by Mary S. Woodley California State University, Northridge For The Library of Congress And the Association for Library Collections & Technical
More informationCarol Chou. version 1.1, June 2006 supercedes version 1.0, May 2006
Guidelines for Creating Archival Quality PDF Files Carol Chou version 1.1, June 2006 supercedes version 1.0, May 2006 This document provides guidelines for creating preservation-quality PDF files. It is
More information[MS-SSP]: Intellectual Property Rights Notice for Open Specifications Documentation
[MS-SSP]: Intellectual Property Rights Notice for Open Specifications Documentation Technical Documentation. Microsoft publishes Open Specifications documentation for protocols, file formats, languages,
More informationKey Management Interoperability Protocol (KMIP)
(KMIP) Addressing the Need for Standardization in Enterprise Key Management Version 1.0, May 20, 2009 Copyright 2009 by the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS).
More informationThe PIRUS Code of Practice for recording and reporting usage at the individual article level
PIRUS A COUNTER Standard The PIRUS Code of Practice for recording and reporting usage at the individual article level (Note: this draft is for public consultation only and is not yet ready for full implementation)
More informationSystem Center Configuration Manager
System Center Configuration Manager Software Update Management Guide Friday, 26 February 2010 Version 1.0.0.0 Baseline Prepared by Microsoft Copyright This document and/or software ( this Content ) has
More informationFollow up Information. Caring for Digital Materials: Metadata, finding aids, and digital asset management. Danielle Cunniff Plumer, instructor
Follow up Information Caring for Digital Materials: Metadata, finding aids, and digital asset management Danielle Cunniff Plumer, instructor Caveat: In the Q&A below, I generally discuss tools for Windows
More informationEvaluating File Formats for Long-term Preservation
Evaluating File Formats for Long-term Preservation Abstract Judith Rog, Caroline van Wijk National Library of the Netherlands; The Hague, The Netherlands judith.rog@kb.nl, caroline.vanwijk@kb.nl National
More informationDocument Management Getting Started Guide
Document Management Getting Started Guide Version: 6.6.x Written by: Product Documentation, R&D Date: February 2011 ImageNow and CaptureNow are registered trademarks of Perceptive Software, Inc. All other
More informationSP 800-130 A Framework for Designing Cryptographic Key Management Systems. 5/25/2012 Lunch and Learn Scott Shorter
SP 800-130 A Framework for Designing Cryptographic Key Management Systems 5/25/2012 Lunch and Learn Scott Shorter Topics Follows the Sections of SP 800-130 draft 2: Introduction Framework Basics Goals
More informationWorking with the British Library and DataCite Institutional Case Studies
Working with the British Library and DataCite Institutional Case Studies Contents The Archaeology Data Service Working with the British Library and DataCite: Institutional Case Studies The following case
More informationManagement of Official Records in a Business System
GPO Box 2343 ADELAIDE SA 5001 Tel (08) 8204 8773 Fax (08) 8204 8777 DX:467 srsarecordsmanagement@sa.gov.au www.archives.sa.gov.au Management of Official Records in a Business System October 2011 Version
More informationCLARIN-NL Third Call: Closed Call
CLARIN-NL Third Call: Closed Call CLARIN-NL launches in its third call a Closed Call for project proposals. This called is only open for researchers who have been explicitly invited to submit a project
More informationDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE EXTERNAL CERTIFICATION AUTHORITY MASTER TEST PLAN VERSION 1.0
DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY JOINT INTEROPERABILITY TEST COMMAND FORT HUACHUCA, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE EXTERNAL CERTIFICATION AUTHORITY MASTER TEST PLAN VERSION 1.0
More information2009 ikeep Ltd, Morgenstrasse 129, CH-3018 Bern, Switzerland (www.ikeep.com, info@ikeep.com)
CSP CHRONOS Compliance statement for ISO 14721:2003 (Open Archival Information System Reference Model) 2009 ikeep Ltd, Morgenstrasse 129, CH-3018 Bern, Switzerland (www.ikeep.com, info@ikeep.com) The international
More informationEx Libris Rosetta: A Digital Preservation System Product Description
Ex Libris Rosetta: A Digital Preservation System Product Description CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION The information herein is the property of Ex Libris Ltd. or its affiliates and any misuse or abuse will result
More informationFlorida Digital Archive (FDA) Policy and Procedures Guide
Florida Digital Archive (FDA) Policy and Procedures Guide Version 3.0, May, 2011 Last reviewed May, 2010 without updates superseded versions: version 2.5, April 2009 version 2.4, August 2007 version 2.3,
More informationAdding Robust Digital Asset Management to Oracle s Storage Archive Manager (SAM)
Adding Robust Digital Asset Management to Oracle s Storage Archive Manager (SAM) Oracle's Sun Storage Archive Manager (SAM) self-protecting file system software reduces operating costs by providing data
More informationThe challenges of becoming a Trusted Digital Repository
The challenges of becoming a Trusted Digital Repository Annemieke de Jong is Preservation Officer at the Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision (NISV) in Hilversum. She is responsible for setting out
More informationResponse to Invitation to Tender: requirements and feasibility study on preservation of e-prints
Response to Invitation to Tender: requirements and feasibility study on preservation of e-prints A proposal to the JISC from the Arts and Humanities Data Service and the University of Nottingham, Project
More informationInformation Management
G i Information Management Information Management Planning March 2005 Produced by Information Management Branch Open Government Service Alberta 3 rd Floor, Commerce Place 10155 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta,
More informationNEMA Standards Publication PS 3 Supplement 41. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Digital Signatures
NEMA Standards Publication PS 3 Supplement 1 Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Digital Signatures Status: Final Text Sep 001 Prepared by DICOM Standards Committee, Working Group 1
More informationKey Management Interoperability Protocol (KMIP)
www.oasis-open.org Management Interoperability Protocol (KMIP) Storage Developer s Introduction SNIA Fall 2009 Gordon Arnold, garnold@us.ibm.com Chair, Storage Security Industry Forum 1 2009 Insert Copyright
More informationThe Impact of 21 CFR Part 11 on Product Development
The Impact of 21 CFR Part 11 on Product Development Product development has become an increasingly critical factor in highly-regulated life sciences industries. Biotechnology, medical device, and pharmaceutical
More informationEntrust Managed Services PKI. Getting started with digital certificates and Entrust Managed Services PKI. Document issue: 1.0
Entrust Managed Services PKI Getting started with digital certificates and Entrust Managed Services PKI Document issue: 1.0 Date of issue: May 2009 Copyright 2009 Entrust. All rights reserved. Entrust
More informationHP ProtectTools Embedded Security Guide
HP ProtectTools Embedded Security Guide Document Part Number: 364876-001 May 2004 This guide provides instructions for using the software that allows you to configure settings for the HP ProtectTools Embedded
More informationNetwork FAX Driver. Operation Guide
Network FAX Driver Operation Guide About this Operation Guide This Operation Guide explains the settings for the Network FAX driver as well as the procedures that are required in order to use the Network
More informationSecurity Digital Certificate Manager
System i Security Digital Certificate Manager Version 5 Release 4 System i Security Digital Certificate Manager Version 5 Release 4 Note Before using this information and the product it supports, be sure
More informationDigital Library Content and Course Management Systems: Issues of Interoperation
Digital Library Content and Course Management Systems: Issues of Interoperation Report of a study group funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Co-Chairs: Dale Flecker, Associate Director for Planning
More informationDigital Rights Management
The term Digital Rights Management - DRM - has its origins in the combined efforts of some vendors, their marketing staff and some other industry analysts in the late 1990s [1]. It is a breakthrough in
More informationINTEGRATING RECORDS SYSTEMS WITH DIGITAL ARCHIVES CURRENT STATUS AND WAY FORWARD
INTEGRATING RECORDS SYSTEMS WITH DIGITAL ARCHIVES CURRENT STATUS AND WAY FORWARD National Archives of Estonia Kuldar As National Archives of Sweden Karin Bredenberg University of Portsmouth Janet Delve
More informationSTORRE: Stirling Online Research Repository Policy for etheses
STORRE: Stirling Online Research Repository Policy for etheses Contents Content and Collection Policies Definition of Repository Structure Content Guidelines Submission Process Copyright and Licenses Metadata
More informationHow To Manage Your Digital Assets On A Computer Or Tablet Device
In This Presentation: What are DAMS? Terms Why use DAMS? DAMS vs. CMS How do DAMS work? Key functions of DAMS DAMS and records management DAMS and DIRKS Examples of DAMS Questions Resources What are DAMS?
More informationAuthoring Within a Content Management System. The Content Management Story
Authoring Within a Content Management System The Content Management Story Learning Goals Understand the roots of content management Define the concept of content Describe what a content management system
More informationBest Archiving Practice Guidance
Best Archiving Practice Guidance This document has been published under the auspices of the EU Telematics Implementation Group - electronic submissions (TIGes) Please note that this document has been published
More informationDSpace: An Institutional Repository from the MIT Libraries and Hewlett Packard Laboratories
DSpace: An Institutional Repository from the MIT Libraries and Hewlett Packard Laboratories MacKenzie Smith, Associate Director for Technology Massachusetts Institute of Technology Libraries, Cambridge,
More informationCapacity Plan. Template. Version X.x October 11, 2012
Template Version X.x October 11, 2012 This is an integral part of infrastructure and deployment planning. It supports the goal of optimum provisioning of resources and services by aligning them to business
More informationArchival Data Format Requirements
Archival Data Format Requirements July 2004 The Royal Library, Copenhagen, Denmark The State and University Library, Århus, Denmark Main author: Steen S. Christensen The Royal Library Postbox 2149 1016
More informationThe use of file validation tools in the University of St Andrews digital archive for research data
The use of file validation tools in the University of St Andrews digital archive for research data Swithun Crowe Application Developer (Arts and Humanities Computing Projects) University of St Andrews
More informationPDF Signer User Manual
PDF Signer User Manual Introduction The main function of PDF Signer is to sign PDF documents using X.509 digital certificates. Using this product you can quickly sign multiple PDF files (bulk sign) by
More informationCREATING OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS WORKSHOP AT THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL PKP SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING CONFERENCE. Workshop Agenda. Planning for a new journal
CREATING OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS WORKSHOP AT THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL PKP SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING CONFERENCE David J Solomon, PhD Michigan State University Caroline Sutton, MSSc, PhD Co-Action Publishing Workshop
More informationETL-EXTRACT, TRANSFORM & LOAD TESTING
ETL-EXTRACT, TRANSFORM & LOAD TESTING Rajesh Popli Manager (Quality), Nagarro Software Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon, INDIA rajesh.popli@nagarro.com ABSTRACT Data is most important part in any organization. Data
More informationOracle WebCenter Content
Oracle WebCenter Content 21 CFR Part 11 Certification Kim Hutchings US Data Management Phone: 888-231-0816 Email: khutchings@usdatamanagement.com Introduction In May 2011, US Data Management (USDM) was
More informationDigital Preservation: the need for an open source digital archival and preservation system for small to medium sized collections,
Digital Preservation: the need for an open source digital archival and preservation system for small to medium sized collections, Kevin Bradley ABSTRACT: Though the solution to all of the problems of digital
More informationCaring for Digital Materials
Caring for Digital Materials Describe it so you can find it: Metadata, finding aids, and digital asset management Danielle Cunniff Plumer danielle@dcplumer.com Series Goals 1. Participants will have a
More informationMultiple electronic signatures on multiple documents
Multiple electronic signatures on multiple documents Antonio Lioy and Gianluca Ramunno Politecnico di Torino Dip. di Automatica e Informatica Torino (Italy) e-mail: lioy@polito.it, ramunno@polito.it web
More informationSecurity Digital Certificate Manager
IBM i Security Digital Certificate Manager 7.1 IBM i Security Digital Certificate Manager 7.1 Note Before using this information and the product it supports, be sure to read the information in Notices,
More informationDigital Signatures in a PDF
This document describes how digital signatures are represented in a PDF document and what signature-related features the PDF language supports. Adobe Reader and Acrobat have implemented all of PDF s features
More informationOverview of NDNP Technical Specifications
Overview of NDNP Technical Specifications and Philosophy Digitization from preservation microfilm print negatives (2n) provides the most cost-efficient approach for large-scale digitization Distributed
More informationSecurity. 2014 Yokogawa Users Group Conference & Exhibition Copyright Yokogawa Electric Corporation Sept. 9-11, 2014 Houston, TX - 1 -
Security - 1 - OPC UA - Security Security Access control Wide adoption of OPC SCADA & DCS Embedded devices Performance Internet Scalability MES Firewalls ERP Communication between distributed systems OPC
More informationService Oriented Architecture
Service Oriented Architecture Charlie Abela Department of Artificial Intelligence charlie.abela@um.edu.mt Last Lecture Web Ontology Language Problems? CSA 3210 Service Oriented Architecture 2 Lecture Outline
More informationTERRITORY RECORDS OFFICE BUSINESS SYSTEMS AND DIGITAL RECORDKEEPING FUNCTIONALITY ASSESSMENT TOOL
TERRITORY RECORDS OFFICE BUSINESS SYSTEMS AND DIGITAL RECORDKEEPING FUNCTIONALITY ASSESSMENT TOOL INTRODUCTION WHAT IS A RECORD? AS ISO 15489-2002 Records Management defines a record as information created,
More informationStandard Recommended Practice extensible Markup Language (XML) for the Interchange of Document Images and Related Metadata
Standard for Information and Image Management Standard Recommended Practice extensible Markup Language (XML) for the Interchange of Document Images and Related Metadata Association for Information and
More information21 CFR Part 11 White Paper
21 CFR Part 11 White Paper Version V8.00 SR1 ProLeiT AG Einsteinstrasse 8, D-91074 Herzogenaurach, Germany Phone: +49 (0) 9132 777-0 Fax: +49 (0) 9132 777-150 E-Mail: info@proleit.com Internet: http://www.proleit.com
More informationINFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION RECORDS MANAGEMENT PART 1: GENERAL IRISH STANDARD I.S. ISO 15489-1:2004. Price Code
IRISH STANDARD I.S. ISO 15489-1:2004 ICS 01.140.20 INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION RECORDS MANAGEMENT PART 1: GENERAL National Standards Authority of Ireland Glasnevin, Dublin 9 Ireland Tel: +353 1 807 3800
More informationUsing etoken for SSL Web Authentication. SSL V3.0 Overview
Using etoken for SSL Web Authentication Lesson 12 April 2004 etoken Certification Course SSL V3.0 Overview Secure Sockets Layer protocol, version 3.0 Provides communication privacy over the internet. Prevents
More information05.0 Application Development
Number 5.0 Policy Owner Information Security and Technology Policy Application Development Effective 01/01/2014 Last Revision 12/30/2013 Department of Innovation and Technology 5. Application Development
More informationMapping the Technical Dependencies of Information Assets
Mapping the Technical Dependencies of Information Assets This guidance relates to: Stage 1: Plan for action Stage 2: Define your digital continuity requirements Stage 3: Assess and manage risks to digital
More informationSQL Server Master Data Services A Point of View
SQL Server Master Data Services A Point of View SUBRAHMANYA V SENIOR CONSULTANT SUBRAHMANYA.VENKATAGIRI@WIPRO.COM Abstract Is Microsoft s Master Data Services an answer for low cost MDM solution? Will
More informationAppendix N INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) YOUTH APPRENTICESHIP WEB & DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS PATHWAY WEB & DIGITAL MEDIA UNIT UNIT 6
Appendix N INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) YOUTH APPRENTICESHIP WEB & DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS PATHWAY WEB & DIGITAL MEDIA UNIT UNIT 6 Web & Digital Communications Pathway: (Unit 6) PAGE 1 OF 12 Unit 6: Pathway
More informationChapter 434-662 WAC PRESERVATION OF ELECTRONIC PUBLIC RECORDS
Chapter 434-662 WAC PRESERVATION OF ELECTRONIC PUBLIC RECORDS WAC 434-662-010 Purpose. Pursuant to the provisions of chapters 40.14 and 42.56 RCW, and RCW 43.105.250, the rules contained in this chapter
More information21 CFR Part 11 Implementation Spectrum ES
21 CFR Part 11 Implementation Spectrum ES INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY T E C H N I C A L N O T E Introduction Compliance with 21 CFR Part 11 is mandatory for pharmaceutical companies and their suppliers to sell
More informationData Warehouses in the Path from Databases to Archives
Data Warehouses in the Path from Databases to Archives Gabriel David FEUP / INESC-Porto This position paper describes a research idea submitted for funding at the Portuguese Research Agency. Introduction
More informationDigital Signing Specification
Digital Signing Specification Product: EVM-CR Feature: Digital File Signatures Support to: Defense Cost and Resource Center Contract No: W91WAW-08-D-0031/0008 Tecolote Research, Inc. Date: 07/08/2013 Document
More informationFaut-il des cyberarchivistes, et quel doit être leur profil professionnel?
Faut-il des cyberarchivistes, et quel doit être leur profil professionnel? Jean-Daniel Zeller To cite this version: Jean-Daniel Zeller. Faut-il des cyberarchivistes, et quel doit être leur profil professionnel?.
More informationDDI Lifecycle: Moving Forward Status of the Development of DDI 4. Joachim Wackerow Technical Committee, DDI Alliance
DDI Lifecycle: Moving Forward Status of the Development of DDI 4 Joachim Wackerow Technical Committee, DDI Alliance Should I Wait for DDI 4? No! DDI Lifecycle 4 is a long development process DDI Lifecycle
More informationCollege Archives Digital Preservation Policy. Created: October 2007 Last Updated: December 2012
College Archives Digital Preservation Policy Created: October 2007 Last Updated: December 2012 Introduction The Columbia College Chicago Archives Digital Preservation Policy establishes a framework to
More informationProblem Statement. Jonathan Huang Aditya Devarakonda. Overview
Jonathan Huang Aditya Devarakonda Problem Statement Overview Automated job schedulers have been extensively studied and implemented in large clusters and supercomputers. However, many of these clusters
More information