Teva and Its Potential Impact on Patent Litigation
|
|
- Rebecca Atkinson
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 January 28, 2015 Practice Group(s): IP Litigation IP Procurement and Portfolio Management Teva and Its Potential Impact on Patent Litigation By Michael J. Abernathy, Suzanne E. Konrad, Rebecca M. Cavin Case Summary The Supreme Court recently handed down its 7-2 opinion in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. 1 The case involved a Federal Circuit review of a district court s determination that Teva s patent claims were not indefinite with respect to the phrase molecular weight. 2 During trial, the District Court construed the phrase molecular weight by considering expert declarations from both parties relating to different ways to calculate a molecular weight, and how the specification supported or conflicted with each of the ways to calculate molecular weight. The District Court credited Teva s expert declaration at the expense of Sandoz s expert declaration. 3 The Federal Circuit reviewed the District Court construction (and its subsidiary finding crediting Teva s expert declaration testimony) de novo. On the same evidence as the District Court, the Federal Circuit reached an opposite conclusion it reversed the District Court s claim construction and found the claims indefinite regarding how molecular weight was calculated. 4 Teva appealed, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari on the following question: Whether a district court s factual finding in support of its construction of a patent claim term may be reviewed de novo, as the Federal Circuit requires (and as the panel explicitly did in this case), or only for clear error, as Rule 52(a) requires. 5 In vacating and remanding to the Federal Circuit, the Supreme Court held that, when reviewing a district court s resolution of subsidiary factual matters made in the course of its construction of a patent claim, the Federal Circuit must apply a clear error, not a de novo, standard of review. 6 However, the Court limited the clear error standard of review to subsidiary factual matters related to extrinsic evidence. 7 The majority was careful to maintain the status of the ultimate claim construction as a question of law, and stated that for construction issues that are resolved solely on the intrinsic evidence (the patent claims, specification, and prosecution history), de novo review still applies. 8 The majority based its holding primarily on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a)(6), which provides a clear command that courts of appeals must not set aside a district court s 1 Case No , available at Justice Breyer authored the majority opinion and was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion and was joined by Justice Alito. 2 Teva Pharms. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., No , Slip Opinion Syllabus at 1. 3 Teva, Slip. Op. at 2-3 and Id. at Case No , Petition for Writ of Certiorari, filed January 16, 2014 at i, GRANTED March 31, Teva, Slip Op. at and Id. at Id.
2 [f]indings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. 9 The majority reasoned that the rule provides little room for exceptions, and that, in any event, no convincing grounds exist for making an exception in the context of claim construction. After discrediting the idea that Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U. S. 370 (1996), created such an exception, the majority cited pre-federal Circuit caselaw from the Second Circuit that applied the clearly erroneous standard to underlying factual questions regarding how one of skill in the art understood a claim term. 10 The majority also noted that practical considerations favored a clear error review, citing the trial court s familiarity with the technical aspects of the case rather than reading a bare written record. 11 The majority then addressed the arguments from Sandoz and the dissenting Justices. In particular, Sandoz (and the Federal Circuit) argued that separating factual from legal questions would be difficult in the context of claim construction and having a single standard would be simpler and provide more uniformity. 12 The majority disagreed that difficulty was a compelling reason to ignore Rule 52(a)(6), noting that courts frequently parse factual and legal questions, and that even the single de novo standard has brought complexities. 13 With respect to uniformity, the majority noted that a divergence of opinion on fact or the ultimate claim construction should only occur occasionally, and that subsidiary fact finding is unlikely to loom large in the universe of litigated claim construction. 14 In response to the dissent, the majority quickly dismissed the concept that there are no factual determinations in claim construction, citing its Markman decision, the question presented (which assumes factual determinations), Sandoz s concession that factual determinations are made, and the posture of the Teva case itself. 15 The majority also rejected the dissent s argument that patents are analogous to statutes because: 1) the type, length, and manner of public consideration before enacting a statute or awarding a patent are meaningfully distinct, and 2) the Supreme Court has never previously compared patents claims to a statute, instead analogizing patents to written contracts or deeds. 16 The majority also provides some guidance on how to implement the fact/law distinction in practice, holding that, in cases where a district court needs to look beyond the intrinsic evidence and consult disputed extrinsic evidence (such as expert testimony), its findings on the extrinsic evidence are entitled to a clearly erroneous review. 17 This is true even when 9 Id. at 4 (citing Anderson v. Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 574 (1985) and FRCP 52(a)(6)). 10 Id. at Id. at 7-8. Although this point generally has some persuasive value, the authors of this article were surprised that the opinion did not mention the fact that the expert analysis at issue in this case was not based on live testimony, but rather on expert declarations. As Sandoz pointed out at oral argument, in the case of merely paper expert submissions, the appellate court and the trial court would seem to be in the same position with regard to their ability to weigh the evidence and make credibility determinations. 12 Id. at Id. 14 Id. at 9-10 (citing Markman, 517 U. S. at ). 15 Id. at 10. The point raised by the dissenting opinion is, in actuality, more subtle. The dissent argues that factual findings made during claim construction are not findings of fact under the Federal Rule, not that there are no factual determinations at all. Teva, Dissent Slip Op. at Teva, Slip Op. at 11. The dissent argues that patents are more like statutes, in that they are governmental dispositions that bind the general public, and less like contracts and deeds, which are specific and only govern the parties to the written instrument. The dissent thus reasons that the factual determinations made in construing patent claims should be treated the way factual determinations in statutory interpretation are treated with de novo review. Teva, Dissent Slip Op. at The dissent also noted that the majority s ruling is likely to cause problems with uniformity and costly and meritless... collateral litigation over the line between fact and law. Id. at Id. at
3 these factual matters are nearly dispositive of the ultimate legal question of the proper meaning of a term. 18 Nevertheless, the ultimate construction of a term is still a legal question, reviewed de novo on appeal. 19 Also, where only intrinsic evidence is necessary for claim construction, all of the district court s findings will be reviewed de novo, as they were prior to the Supreme Court s Teva opinion. 20 After setting out the proper standard of review, the majority applied its holding to the central issue of the trial court s decision to credit Teva s expert declaration at the expense of Sandoz s expert declaration. 21 The majority vacated and remanded this factual question, as well as two others, for reevaluation by the Federal Circuit under a clearly erroneous standard. 22 Implications of Teva on the Federal Circuit and District Courts Teva may not have a significant effect on how the Federal Circuit handles claim construction appeals. First, the Supreme Court did not state generally that claim construction is reviewed de novo. Instead, the Court reiterated the well-settled principle that the ultimate issue of claim construction is a question of law reviewed de novo, and held that only factual determinations arising from extrinsic evidence (i.e., credibility determinations regarding experts) are reviewed for clear error. 23 The Court specifically held that the interpretation of intrinsic evidence, such as the patent and prosecution history, is solely a question of law reviewed de novo. 24 Second, a court need not rely on extrinsic evidence, and such evidence cannot be used to contradict a claim construction dictated by the intrinsic evidence. 25 Therefore, if the Federal Circuit wants to review a particular claim construction de novo, it seems that Teva may have left the door open for the Federal Circuit to review the intrinsic evidence de novo and state that there is no need to consult extrinsic evidence to make the ultimate determination of claim construction. As such, it remains to be seen whether the Teva case will have any impact on the frequency or manner in which the Federal Circuit reviews claim construction decisions on appeal. On the other hand, Teva is likely to have an impact on how district courts construe patent claims. In order to avoid being overturned on appeal, judges may try to ensure that their claim construction decisions are based on factual determinations. As a result, district court judges may rely much more heavily on extrinsic evidence, specifically credibility determinations regarding experts, when issuing their Markman decisions. 18 Id. 19 Id. 20 See id. 21 Id. at Id. 23 Id. at 1 and Id. at Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, (Fed. Cir. 2003). 3
4 Effects of Teva on Litigation Practice Regardless of how the courts choose to apply Teva, this decision will have a significant and immediate impact on litigation practice. Both patent owners and accused infringers are likely to consider relying much more heavily on extrinsic evidence to ensure that the claim construction issued by the district court is robust on appellate review. In the Teva case, the Supreme Court expressly held out crediting one expert over another as an example of a factual determination that would be subject to clear error review on appeal. 26 Therefore, the authors of this article predict that it will become commonplace to secure an expert early on in litigation for purposes of a Markman declaration. Litigants should think strategically about whether an expert is desirable, particularly in cases where a party believes it has a strong claim construction case based on the intrinsic record. Moreover, the authors expect there will be significant pre-markman motion practice to strike expert declarations that parties feel are inappropriate. Furthermore, appellants will need to carefully frame the issues on appeal. For example, in Teva, the issue was framed as a factual one. Therefore, the Federal Circuit will have to review the trial court s determination regarding expert opinions for clear error. However, since the Supreme Court specifically left the ultimate question of claim construction, as well as determinations regarding the intrinsic evidence, as legal issues subject to de novo review, it will be important for appellants to frame the claim construction issues as legal ones based on intrinsic evidence in order to obtain a de novo standard of review on appeal. Conversely, respondents that want to keep the district court s claim construction will need to try to push the claim construction analysis toward a review of extrinsic evidence and, thus, obtain a clear error standard of review. Conclusion Although the Teva holding is not a sweeping rewrite of claim construction law, the Supreme Court did clarify that claim construction is a matter of law that can be based on factual determinations. 27 In order to overturn a judge s resolution of an underlying factual dispute, the Federal Circuit must find clear error. 28 Therefore, the Federal Circuit can no longer disregard district court claim constructions as a matter of course and must give deference to district courts at least with respect to underlying factual findings. However, whether the Teva holding will alter the way the Federal Circuit treats district court claim constructions remains to be seen. The Federal Circuit s intent will likely be evinced over the next several months through not only its decision on remand of the Teva case but also subsequent claim construction decisions. 26 Teva, Slip Op. at Id. at Id. at 5-7 and 11. 4
5 Authors: Michael J. Abernathy Suzanne E. Konrad Rebecca M. Cavin Anchorage Austin Beijing Berlin Boston Brisbane Brussels Charleston Charlotte Chicago Dallas Doha Dubai Fort Worth Frankfurt Harrisburg Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Melbourne Miami Milan Moscow Newark New York Orange County Palo Alto Paris Perth Pittsburgh Portland Raleigh Research Triangle Park San Francisco São Paulo Seattle Seoul Shanghai Singapore Spokane Sydney Taipei Tokyo Warsaw Washington, D.C. Wilmington K&L Gates comprises more than 2,000 lawyers globally who practice in fully integrated offices located on five continents. The firm represents leading multinational corporations, growth and middle-market companies, capital markets participants and entrepreneurs in every major industry group as well as public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations and individuals. For more information about K&L Gates or its locations, practices and registrations, visit This publication is for informational purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be used or relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting a lawyer K&L Gates LLP. All Rights Reserved. 5
Australian National Electricity Rules Adopt a More 'Cost Reflective' Approach to Network Pricing
23 December 2014 Practice Group(s): Energy, Infrastructure and Resources Renewable Energy Climate Change and Sustainability Australian National Electricity Rules Adopt a More 'Cost Reflective' Australia
More informationItalian Tax Reform. New legislation on abuse of law and statute of limitations. Abuse of law and tax avoidance. Introduction
27 August 2015 Practice Group(s): Tax Italian Tax Reform New legislation on abuse of law and statute of limitations By Vittorio Salvadori di Wiesenhoff The Italian Government has recently approved a new
More informationHow To Allow Sports Wagering In New Jersey
November 2014 This article originally appeared in World Sports Law Report Volume 12 Issue 11, November 2014. Betting: New Jersey s Attempts to Allow Sports Betting By Linda J. Shorey, Anthony R. Holtzman
More informationSEC Staff Addresses Third-Party Endorsements of Investment Advisers on Social Media Websites
April 2014 Practice Groups: Investment Management, Hedge Funds and Alternative Investments Private Equity SEC Staff Addresses Third-Party Endorsements of By Michael W. McGrath and Sonia R. Gioseffi On
More informationFederal Court Enjoins Texas Medical Board from Enforcing More Stringent Telemedicine Rules
June 2015 Practice Group(s): Health Care Federal Court Enjoins Texas Medical Board from Enforcing More Stringent By Edward L. Vishnevetsky, Richard P. Church and Leah D Aurora Richardson On April 10, 2015,
More informationLaunch of Mutual Recognition of Funds Between Mainland China and Hong Kong
June 2015 Practice Group: Investment Management, Hedge Funds and Alternative Investments Launch of Mutual Recognition of Funds Between Mainland China and Hong Kong By Choo Lye Tan On 22 May 2015, the Securities
More informationRemoval of Credit Ratings References
August 2014 Practice Groups: Investment Management, Hedge Funds and Alternative Investments Broker-Dealer Removal of Credit Ratings References By Michael S. Caccese, Clair E. Pagnano, Rita Rubin, and George
More informationBackground. 9 September 2015. Practice Groups: Investment Management, Hedge Funds and Alternative Investments Broker-Dealer Finance
9 September 2015 Practice Groups: Investment Management, Hedge Funds and Alternative Investments Broker-Dealer Finance Cybersecurity Update: National Futures Association Proposes Cybersecurity Guidance
More informationBackground: November 26, 2013
November 26, 2013 Practice Groups: Financial Institutions and Services Litigation; Consumer Financial Services; Commercial Disputes; Global Government Solutions For more news and developments related to
More informationNinth Circuit Opinion May Open Litigation Doors Most Thought Closed
March 2015 Practice Group: Investment Management Ninth Circuit Opinion May Open Litigation Doors Most By Jeffrey B. Maletta, Mark P. Goshko, Scott E. Waxman, Clair E. Pagnano, Nicholas G. Terris, and Joel
More informationDOE Announces Fundamental Shift in LNG Export Authorization Policy
5 June 2014 Practice Groups: Liquefied Natural Gas Oil & Gas Energy, Infrastructure and Resources Energy DOE Announces Fundamental Shift in LNG Export Authorization Policy By David L. Wochner, Sandra E.
More informationHealth Care Entities Get Clarity from FCC on Telephone Communications
10 August 2015 Practice Group(s): Health Care Telecom, Media and Technology Health Care Entities Get Clarity from FCC on Telephone Communications By Martin L. Stern, Samuel R. Castic, Ryan J. Severson
More informationThe Affordable Care Act s Employer Mandate: Guidance for Educational Organizations
March 4, 2014 Practice Group(s): Employee Benefits Benefits, ESOPs, and Executive Compensation The Affordable Care Act s Employer Mandate: Guidance for Educational By Lynne Shore Wakefield and Emily D.
More informationFive Takeaways from the First Cyber Insurance Case
21 May 2015 Practice Groups: Insurance Coverage Cyber Law and Cybersecurity This article was first published by Law360 on May 18, 2015. Five Takeaways from the First Cyber Insurance Case By Roberta D.
More informationHow Can the Automotive Industry Strengthen Its Regulatory Compliance Process and Reduce Its Compliance Risks?
September 29, 2015 Practice Groups: Regulatory Compliance Internal Investigations Government Investigations White Collar Crime/Criminal Defense Public Policy and Law Environmental, Land and Natural Resources
More informationIMO Industries Tackles New Jersey Law on Host of Insurance Coverage Issues
13 October 2014 Practice Groups: Insurance Coverage Toxic Tort IMO Industries Tackles New Jersey Law on Host of Insurance Coverage Issues New Jersey Insurance Coverage and Toxic Tort Alert By Donald W.
More informationIran Sanctions Relief and Further EU Regulatory Developments in 2016
January 2016 Practice Group: Antitrust, Competition & Trade Regulation Iran Sanctions Relief and Further EU Regulatory By Philip Torbøl, Raminta Dereskeviciute, Alessandro Di Mario and Daniel L. Clyne
More informationPayday Loans Under Attack: The CFPB's New Rule Could Dramatically Affect High-Cost, Short-Term Lending
6 June 2016 Practice Groups: Financial Institutions and Services Litigation Consumer Financial Services Commercial Disputes Class Action Litigation Defense Payday Loans Under Attack: The CFPB's New Rule
More informationRegulatory Implications of New Products and Services in the Australian Electricity Market
2 March 2015 Practice Group: Energy Regulatory Implications of New Products and Services in the Australian Australia Energy Alert By Jenny Mee and Larissa Hauser The Energy Market Reform Working Group
More informationBeyond Credit Reporting: The Extension of Potential Class Action Liability to Employers under the Fair Credit Reporting Act
April 7, 2014 Practice Groups: Financial Institutions and Services Litigation Commercial Disputes Labor, Employment and Workplace Safety Consumer Financial Services Beyond Credit Reporting: The Extension
More informationEnvironment, Health And Safety. Ensuring Your Company s European Operations are Compliant with New EU Regulations and Enforcement Measures
Environment, Health And Safety Ensuring Your Company s European Operations are Compliant with New EU Regulations and Enforcement Measures WHAT IS THE THREAT TO YOUR COMPANY S COMPLIANCE RECORD AND GOOD
More information2014 Amendments Affecting Delaware Alternative Entities and the Contractual Statute of Limitations
August 2014 Practice Groups: Corporate/M&A Private Equity 2014 Amendments Affecting Delaware Alternative Entities By Scott E. Waxman, Eric N. Feldman, Nicholas I. Froio, Andrew Skouvakis, Zachary L. Sager
More informationMaximizing Insurance Recovery for the Tianjin Port Explosions
20 August 2015 Practice Group: Insurance Coverage Maximizing Insurance Recovery for the Tianjin Port By David F. McGonigle, Roberta D. Anderson, and Justin T. Waddell On Wednesday, August 12, 2015, two
More informationThe Calm Before the Storm Is the Time to Consider. Insurance Coverage. Part Two of a Two-Part Article. Look Out for Potential Causation Issues
February 6, 2014 Practice Group: Insurance Coverage The text of this article was first published in the February 2014 issue of the Insurance Coverage Law Bulletin. The Calm Before the Storm Is the Time
More informationSocial Media - 10 Fundamental Questions All Businesses Consider
January 2015 Practice Group(s): Corporate/ M&A Technology Transactions Social Media: 10 Fundamental Questions All Businesses Should Consider About Their Online Presence By Holly K. Towle, Kendra H. Nickel-Nguy
More informationCMS Announces the Next Generation of Accountable Care Organizations Aimed at Increased Risk Sharing and Program Sustainability
April 2015 Practice Group: Health Care CMS Announces the Next Generation of Accountable Care Organizations Aimed at Increased Risk Sharing and Program Sustainability By Richard P. Church, Steven G. Pine,
More informationCybersecurity Risk Factors: Five Tips to Consider When Any Public Company Might be The Next Target
10 February 2014 Practice Groups: Capital Markets Insurance Coverage The text of this article was first published by Law360 on February 10, 2014. Cybersecurity Risk Factors: Five Tips to Consider When
More informationNYAG Issues Cease-and-Desist Letters to DFS Sites
13 November 2015 Practice Groups: Government Enforcement Betting & Gaming Consumer Financial Services Global Government Solutions Accepting Daily Fantasy Sports Payments and Proceeds May Be Unlawful: New
More informationTaxes and Politics Collide in New IRS Guidelines for 501(c)(4) Organizations: IRS Proposes to Restrict Political Activities of Some Non-Profits
December 11, 2013 Practice Groups: Public Policy and Law; Tax; Tax-Exempt Organizations/ Nonprofit Institutions; Global Government Solutions Taxes and Politics Collide in New IRS Guidelines for 501(c)(4)
More informationBoard Responsibilities Under SEC s Money Market Fund Reforms
August 2014 Practice Group: Investment Management, Hedge Funds and Alternative Investments Board Responsibilities Under SEC s Money Market Fund By Diane E. Ambler, Craig A. Ruckman On July 23, 2014, the
More informationSEC Announces First Distribution in Guise Case
September 29, 2015 Practice Groups: Investment Management, Hedge Funds and Alternative Investments Broker-Dealer Government Enforcement SEC Announces First Distribution in Guise Case By Arthur C. Delibert,
More informationNIST Unveils Preliminary Cybersecurity Framework
November 25, 2013 Practice Group: Cyber Law and Cybersecurity NIST Unveils Preliminary Cybersecurity Framework By Roberta D. Anderson On October 22, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
More informationCMS RELEASES FINAL MEDICARE SHARED SAVINGS PROGRAM RULE
June 2015 Practice Group(s): Health Care CMS RELEASES FINAL MEDICARE SHARED SAVINGS PROGRAM RULE Health Care Alert By Richard P. Church, Steven G. Pine, Jon S. Zucker, Trevor P. Presler On June 9, 2015,
More informationBenefits and Compensation Alert
April 2, 2010 Authors: Mary Turk-Meena mary.turk-meena@klgates.com +1.704.331.7590 Lynne S. Wakefield lynne.wakefield@klgates.com +1.704.331.7578 Emily D. Zimmer emily.zimmer@klgates.com +1.704.331.7405
More informationThe Limited Liability Company and the Bankruptcy Code
March 4, 2013 Practice Groups: Restructuring & Bankruptcy Corporate/M&A Finance The Limited Liability Company and the Bankruptcy Code By David A. Murdoch This K&L Gates Legal Insight highlights certain
More informationTreasury Department Issues Cybersecurity Checklist for Financial Institutions: What Might Apply to Your Financial Services Company?
14 December 2015 Practice Groups: Government Enforcement Global Government Solutions Cyber Law and Cybersecurity Treasury Department Issues Cybersecurity Checklist for Financial Institutions: What Might
More informationSupreme Court Decision Affirming Judicial Right to Review EEOC Actions
Supreme Court Decision Affirming Judicial Right to Review EEOC Actions The Supreme Court Holds That EEOC s Conciliation Efforts Are Subject to Judicial Review, Albeit Narrow SUMMARY A unanimous Supreme
More informationESTABLISHING A BUSINESS PRESENCE IN DUBAI
ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS PRESENCE IN DUBAI This guide, written by K&L Gates lawyers, includes a high level overview of the legal and regulatory environment for establishing a business presence in Dubai,
More informationIn re Cuozzo Speed Technologies: Federal Circuit Decides Appeal Jurisdiction and Standard of Review Issues for AIA Reviews
CLIENT MEMORANDUM In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies: Federal Circuit Decides Appeal Jurisdiction and Standard of Review February 5, 2015 AUTHORS Michael W. Johnson Tara L. Thieme THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT HOLDS
More informationCalifornia Supreme Court Issues Ruling in Brinker Clarifying Employers Duty to Provide Meal and Rest Breaks to Hourly Employees
APRIL 13, 2012 CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT & LABOR UPDATE California Supreme Court Issues Ruling in Brinker Clarifying Employers Duty to Provide Meal and Rest Breaks to Hourly Employees In one of the most anticipated
More informationSupreme Court Clarifies Statute of Limitations Applicable to False Claims Act Whistleblower Suits Against Government Contractors
Supreme Court Clarifies Statute of Limitations Applicable to False Claims Act Whistleblower Suits Against Government Contractors In Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., et al. v. United States ex rel.
More informationACCOUNTANTS LIABILITY UPDATE
JULY 14, 2010 ACCOUNTANTS LIABILITY UPDATE Accountants Liability Practice With highly skilled and experienced lawyers in Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco and Washington, D.C., we are able
More informationPerez v. Mortgage Bankers Association
Supreme Court Holds that Agencies Can Amend or Repeal Interpretive Rules Without Notice-and-Comment Procedures SUMMARY The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday held that agencies are not required to follow notice-and-comment
More informationBy Andrew C. Glass, Gregory N. Blase, Jennifer J. Nagle, Jeremy M. McLaughlin, and Matthew N. Lowe
January 22, 2016 Practice Groups: Consumer Financial Services Commercial Disputes Class Action Litigation Defense Financial Institution and Services Litigation Global Government Solutions For more news
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Appellant v. GOOGLE, INC., Appellee 2014-1351 Appeal from the United States Patent
More informationSarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Provision
U.S. Supreme Court Significantly Expands Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Provision to Include Employees of Non-Public Contractors and Subcontractors of Public Companies SUMMARY In Lawson v. FMR LLC, No. 12-3
More informationU.S. SEC Proposes Liquidity Risk Management Programs, Optional Swing Pricing, and Liquidity Reporting for Mutual Funds and Certain ETFs
October 2015 Practice Group: Investment Management, Hedge Funds and Alternative Investments Global Government Solutions U.S. SEC Proposes Liquidity Risk Management Programs, Optional Swing Pricing, and
More informationSeptember Edition of Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery
SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 E-DISCOVERY UPDATE September Edition of Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery This update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues:
More informationApril 2, 2015 CLIENT MEMORANDUM AUTHORS. Thomas J. Meloro Kim A. Walker Meghan Hungate
CLIENT MEMORANDUM Supreme Court s Decision in B&B Hardware v. Hargis Finds That TTAB Rulings Can Have a Preclusive Effect on Later Federal Court Trademark Infringement Proceedings April 2, 2015 AUTHORS
More informationINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY UPDATE
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY UPDATE May 2007 1 Hogan & Hartson LLP INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY UPDATE Supreme Court Holds That 35 U.S.C. 271(f) Does Not Apply To Golden Master Disks In a decision handed down April
More informationBetting & Gaming/Tax-Exempt Organizations Alert
Betting & Gaming/Tax-Exempt Organizations Alert October 2010 Authors: Robert A. Lawton robert.lawton@klgates.com +1.717.231.4549 Cordelia A. Glenn Grabiak cordelia.grabiak@klgates.com +1.412.355.6701 Marsha
More informationEqual Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.: Religious Accommodation in the Workplace
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.: Supreme Court Clarifies that an Employer Can Be Liable for Failing To Accommodate a Religious Practice that the Employer Suspects,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2014 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus
More informationFive Steps To Data Breach Coverage For Card Issuer Liability
20 April 2015 Practice Groups: Insurance Coverage Cyber Law and Cybersecurity This article was first published by Law360 on April 17, 2015. Five Steps To Data Breach Coverage For Card Issuer By Roberta
More informationAre Questions Of Fact Being Overlooked In Software Cases?
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Are Questions Of Fact Being Overlooked In Software
More informationDodd-Frank Whistleblower Provision
Second Circuit, Disagreeing with Fifth Circuit, Defers to SEC s Interpretation of Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Definition and Holds That Internal Whistleblowers Are Entitled to Pursue Dodd-Frank Retaliation
More informationDOL Re-Proposes Rule to make Brokers, Others ERISA Fiduciaries
April 2015 Practice Groups: Investment Management, Hedge Funds and Alternative Investments ERISA Labor, Employment and Workplace Safety Public Policy and Law DOL Re-Proposes Rule to make Brokers, Others
More informationFinance Alert. New Rules on Short Selling and Derivative Transactions in Germany. Introduction. Prohibition of Short Selling
30 July 2010 Authors: Dr. Christian Büche christian.bueche@klgates.com T +49.69.94.51.96.365 Dr. Wilhelm Hartung wilhelm.hartung@klgates.com T +49.30.22.00.29.220 K&L Gates includes lawyers practicing
More informationFILED November 18, 2014 released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2014 Term No. 11-1503 FILED November 18, 2014 released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA RE: PETITION
More informationSecurities Law Considerations in Online and. Marketplace Lending
February 2016 Practice Groups: Securitization and Structured Finance Debt Capital Markets Marketplace Investment Management FinTech Securities Law Considerations in Online and Marketplace By Anthony R.
More informationTax Court Addresses Implied Waiver of the Attorney-Client Privilege
Tax Court Addresses Implied Waiver of the Attorney-Client Privilege The Tax Court Holds That Raising Good-Faith and State-of-Mind Defenses to Accuracy-Related Penalties Could Result in an Implied Waiver
More informationPrivate Securities Fraud Claims Under Section 10(b) Based on False or Misleading Statements
Private Securities Fraud Claims Under Section 10(b) Based on False or Misleading Statements U.S. Supreme Court Holds that Private Actions May Be Brought Only Against Parties With Ultimate Authority Over
More informationSOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT IN RUSSIA: KEY LEGAL ISSUES
SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT IN RUSSIA: KEY LEGAL ISSUES presenters Brian Zimbler Anastasia Dergacheva May 31, 2016 2016 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Summary Commercial Background Employment Law Intellectual Property
More informationNo. 13-854 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 13-854 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA NEUROSCIENCE, INC., AND YEDA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD., Petitioners,
More informationBrother Can You Spare $8.9 Billion? Making Sense of SEC Civil Money Penalties
February 11, 2014 Practice Groups: Government Enforcement; Securities Enforcement; Global Government Solutions Brother Can You Spare $8.9 Billion? By: Jon Eisenberg If you or your company has ever been
More informationFourteenth Court of Appeals
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied, Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction, and Opinion filed August 20, 2009. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-08-00925-CV ATLAS GULF-COAST, INC. D/B/A ATLAS
More informationIn Win for CFPB, Federal Court Clarifies Scope of Substantial Assistance and Service Provider Provisions of Dodd-Frank Act
September 8, 2015 Practice Group(s): Consumer Financial Services Government Enforcement Global Government Solutions For more news and developments related to consumer financial products and services, please
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MATTHEW PRICHARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; IBM LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, Defendants-Appellees.
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit JRS MANAGEMENT, Appellant v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Appellee 2014-1834 Appeal from the Civilian
More informationK&L Gates Emerging Payment Systems
K&L Gates Emerging Payment Systems Emerging payment systems are a mixture of existing and developing systems, players, markets, infrastructures and technologies. Their evolution is occurring within a maze
More informationPlan Sponsor Basics Webinar Series Issues for 401(k) Plan Sponsors with Employer Stock Investment Funds
Plan Sponsor Basics Webinar Series Issues for 401(k) Plan Sponsors with Employer Stock Investment Funds Webinar 5 of 5 November 4, 2014 www.morganlewis.com Presenters: Lisa H. Barton Jeremy P. Blumenfeld
More informationKing v. Burwell: Supreme Court Rules that ACA Tax Subsidies Are Available Through Federal Exchanges
If you have questions, please contact your regular Groom attorney or one of the attorneys listed below: Jon W. Breyfogle jbreyfogle@groom.com (202) 861-6641 Lisa M. Campbell lcampbell@groom.com (202) 861-6612
More informationFOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 15 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 15 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 26th day of February, 2008, are as follows: PER CURIAM: 2007-CC-1091 FREY PLUMBING
More informationCASE 0:05-cv-01578-JMR-JJG Document 59 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 05-CV-1578(JMR/JJG)
CASE 0:05-cv-01578-JMR-JJG Document 59 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 05-CV-1578(JMR/JJG) State of Minnesota ) ) v. ) ORDER ) Robert B. Beale, Rebecca S.
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT LOUIS A. FIORE and JEAN H. FIORE, Appellants, v. Case No. 2D14-1872
More informationSEC s Final Rules for Implementing Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Provisions: Important Implications for Covered Entities. May 25, 2011
SEC s Final Rules for Implementing Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Provisions: Important Implications for Covered Entities May 25, 2011 Today, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) voted
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Filed 4/11/13 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BATTAGLIA ENTERPRISES, INC., D063076 Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. MARK TROXLER, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit October 28, 2015 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court
More informationISO's Newly-Filed Data Breach Exclusions Provide Yet Another Reason To Consider "Cyber" Insurance
September 26, 2013 The text of this article was first published by Law360 on September 23, 2013. ISO's Newly-Filed Data Breach Exclusions Provide Yet Another Reason To Consider "Cyber" Insurance By Roberta
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals No. 13-1186 For the Seventh Circuit IN RE: JAMES G. HERMAN, Debtor-Appellee. APPEAL OF: JOHN P. MILLER Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
More informationGlobal Real Estate Outlook
Global Real Estate Outlook August 2014 The Hierarchy of Economic Performance, 2014-2015 China Indonesia India Poland South Korea Turkey Australia Mexico United Kingdom Sweden United States Canada South
More informationCourt Addresses (Again!) Employee Stock Option Expenses for Transfer Pricing Purposes
Court Addresses (Again!) Employee Stock Option Expenses for Transfer Pricing Purposes Ninth Circuit Reverses Itself and Holds that the Arm s-length Standard Controls in Determining if Employee Stock Option
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 14-3109 Sprint Communications Company, L.P. lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. 1 Elizabeth S. Jacobs; Geri D. Huser; Nick Wagner, in
More informationChange Management Implementation
Change Management Implementation George Neiport October 13, 2011 Pittsburgh Local Interest Group LIG Name goes here History, Performance & Lessons Learned Agenda K&L Gates LLP review Change Management
More information01/ 02/ 03/ 04/ 05/ Beyond borders Deloitte Discovery April 23 rd 2015 Cyprus 1 Going beyond borders to move our clients ahead Deloitte Discovery Services - Deloitte Legal 2 The Deloitte
More informationJUDGMENT ON THE SPANISH TAX LEASE SYSTEM
JUDGMENT ON THE SPANISH TAX LEASE SYSTEM CASE T-719/13 PYMAR / COMMISSION Contents 1. Background 2. Judgment of the GCEU of 17 December 2015 in Case T- 719/13, PYMAR / Commission 3. Effects of the Judgment
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit SITE UPDATE SOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CBS CORP., JASONS DELI CORP, TICKETMASTER ENTERTAINMENT,
More informationIn The NO. 14-99-00657-CV. HARRIS COUNTY, Appellant. JOHNNY NASH, Appellee
Reversed and Rendered Opinion filed May 18, 2000. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-99-00657-CV HARRIS COUNTY, Appellant V. JOHNNY NASH, Appellee On Appeal from the 189 th District Court Harris
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Respondent, APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PIMA COUNTY
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO STATE OF ARIZONA, Petitioner/Appellant, HON. CHARLES SHIPMAN, Judge of the Green Valley Justice Court, in and of the County of Pima, v. and THOMAS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-000-l-blm Document 0 Filed 0 Page of 0 0 IN RE: ELEAZAR SALAZAR, Debtor, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. ELEAZAR SALAZAR, Appellant, Appellee. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More informationPatent Reform: What MedTech Companies Need to Know
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW WWW.GTLAW.COM Patent Reform: What MedTech Companies Need to Know David J. Dykeman, Esq. Patent Attorney & Shareholder Greenberg Traurig, LLP Boston, MA (617) 310-6009
More informationLawyers Weigh In On High Court Claim Construction Ruling
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Lawyers Weigh In On High Court Claim Construction
More informationCRITICAL THINKING AT THE CRITICAL TIME CONSTRUCTION SOLUTIONS
CRITICAL THINKING AT THE CRITICAL TIME CONSTRUCTION SOLUTIONS Table of Contents 1 ABOUT FTI CONSULTING 2 CHALLENGES OVERCOME 3 OUR EXPERTISE 4 PROJECT TYPES 5 OUR TEAM ii FTI Consulting, Inc. CONSTRUCTION
More informationFILED December 18, 2015 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate Court, IL
NOTICE This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2015 IL App (4th 150340-U NO. 4-15-0340
More informationFinancial services regulation in Australia
Financial services regulation in Australia FEBRUARY What you need to know Financial services regulation in Australia February 2016 1 What you need to know Key points Do you do business in Australia or
More informationInterpretation of Statutory Registration Requirements for Swap Execution Facilities and Security-Based Swap Execution Facilities
SKADDEN. ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER 6< FLOM LLP 1440 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005-2111 FIRM/AFTILIATE OFFICES BOSTON CHICAGO TEL: (202) 371-7000 HOUSTON FAX: (202) 393-5760 LOS ANGELES NEW YORK
More informationMarketing and Branding in Recruitment. Robert Wegenek Squire Patton Boggs (UK) LLP
Marketing and Branding in Recruitment Robert Wegenek Squire Patton Boggs (UK) LLP MARKETING AND BRANDING IN RECRUITMENT B2B and B2C Branding, taglines, slogans Above the line : advertising in traditional
More informationThe CFPB Weighs in on Marketing Services Agreements
October 2, 2014 Practice Groups: Consumer Financial Services; Global Government Solutions For more news and developments related to consumer financial products and services, please visit our Consumer Financial
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2013 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus
More information