MOD Demand and Energy Data
|
|
|
- Rebecca Lambert
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A. Introduction 1. Title: Demand and Energy Data 2. Number: MOD Purpose: To provide authority for applicable entities to collect Demand, energy and related data to support reliability studies and assessments and to enumerate the responsibilities and obligations of requestors and respondents of that data. 4. Applicability: 4.1. Functional Entities: 5. Effective Date Planning Authority and Planning Coordinator (hereafter collectively referred to as the Planning Coordinator ) This proposed standard combines Planning Authority with Planning Coordinator in the list of applicable functional entities. The NERC Functional Model lists Planning Coordinator while the registration criteria list Planning Authority, and they are not yet synchronized. Until that occurs, the proposed standard applies to both Planning Authority and Planning Coordinator Transmission Planner Balancing Authority Resource Planner Load-Serving Entity Distribution Provider 5.1. See the MOD Implementation Plan. 6. Background: To ensure that various forms of historical and forecast Demand and energy data and information is available to the parties that perform reliability studies and assessments, authority is needed to collect the applicable data. The collection of Demand, Net Energy for Load and Demand Side Management data requires coordination and collaboration between Planning Authorities (Planning Coordinators), Transmission and Resource Planners, Load-Serving Entities and Distribution Providers. Ensuring that planners and operators have access to complete and accurate load forecasts as well as the supporting methods and assumptions used to develop these forecasts enhances the reliability of the Bulk Electric System. Consistent documenting and information sharing activities will also improve efficient planning practices and support the identification of needed system reinforcements. Furthermore, collection of actual Demand and Demand Side Management Page 1 of 11
2 performance during the prior year will allow for comparison to prior forecasts and further contribute to enhanced accuracy of load forecasting practices. Data provided under this standard is generally considered confidential by Planning Coordinators and Balancing Authorities receiving the data. Furthermore, data reported to a Regional Entity is subject to the confidentiality provisions in Section 1500 of the North American Electric Reliability Corporation Rules of Procedure and is typically aggregated with data of other functional entities in a non-attributable manner. While this standard allows for the sharing of data necessary to perform certain reliability studies and assessments, any data received under this standard for which an applicable entity has made a claim of confidentiality should be maintained as confidential by the receiving entity. B. Requirements and Measures R1. Each Planning Coordinator or Balancing Authority that identifies a need for the collection of Total Internal Demand, Net Energy for Load, and Demand Side Management data shall develop and issue a data request to the applicable entities in its area. The data request shall include: [Violation Risk Factor: Medium] [Time Horizon: Long-term Planning] 1.1. A list of Transmission Planners, Balancing Authorities, Load Serving Entities, and Distribution Providers that are required to provide the data ( Applicable Entities ) A timetable for providing the data. (A minimum of 30 calendar days must be allowed for responding to the request) A request to provide any or all of the following actual data, as necessary: Integrated hourly Demands in megawatts for the prior calendar year Monthly and annual integrated peak hour Demands in megawatts for the prior calendar year If the annual peak hour actual Demand varies due to weatherrelated conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity or wind speed), the Applicable Entity shall also provide the weather normalized annual peak hour actual Demand for the prior calendar year Monthly and annual Net Energy for Load in gigawatthours for the prior calendar year Monthly and annual peak hour controllable and dispatchable Demand Side Management under the control or supervision of the System Operator in megawatts for the prior calendar year. Three values shall be reported for each hour: 1) the committed megawatts (the amount under control or supervision), 2) the dispatched megawatts (the amount, if any, Page 2 of 11
3 activated for use by the System Operator), and 3) the realized megawatts (the amount of actual demand reduction) A request to provide any or all of the following forecast data, as necessary: Monthly peak hour forecast Total Internal Demands in megawatts for the next two calendar years Monthly forecast Net Energy for Load in gigawatthours for the next two calendar years Peak hour forecast Total Internal Demands (summer and winter) in megawatts for ten calendar years into the future Annual forecast Net Energy for Load in gigawatthours for ten calendar years into the future Total and available peak hour forecast of controllable and dispatchable Demand Side Management (summer and winter), in megawatts, under the control or supervision of the System Operator for ten calendar years into the future A request to provide any or all of the following summary explanations, as necessary,: The assumptions and methods used in the development of aggregated Peak Demand and Net Energy for Load forecasts The Demand and energy effects of controllable and dispatchable Demand Side Management under the control or supervision of the System Operator How Demand Side Management is addressed in the forecasts of its Peak Demand and annual Net Energy for Load How the controllable and dispatchable Demand Side Management forecast compares to actual controllable and dispatchable Demand Side Management for the prior calendar year and, if applicable, how the assumptions and methods for future forecasts were adjusted How the peak Demand forecast compares to actual Demand for the prior calendar year with due regard to any relevant weather-related variations (e.g., temperature, humidity, or wind speed) and, if applicable, how the assumptions and methods for future forecasts were adjusted. M1. The Planning Coordinator or Balancing Authority shall have a dated data request, either in hardcopy or electronic format, in accordance with Requirement R1. R2. Each Applicable Entity identified in a data request shall provide the data requested by its Planning Coordinator or Balancing Authority in accordance with the data request issued pursuant to Requirement R1. [Violation Risk Factor: Medium] [Time Horizon: Long-term Planning] Page 3 of 11
4 M2. Each Applicable Entity shall have evidence, such as dated s or dated transmittal letters that it provided the requested data in accordance with Requirement R2. R3. The Planning Coordinator or the Balancing Authority shall provide the data listed under Requirement R1 Parts 1.3 through 1.5 for their area to the applicable Regional Entity within 75 calendar days of receiving a request for such data, unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties. [Violation Risk Factor: Medium] [Time Horizon: Long-term Planning] M3. Each Planning Coordinator or Balancing Authority, shall have evidence, such as dated s or dated transmittal letters that it provided the data requested by the applicable Regional Entity in accordance with Requirement R3. R4. Any Applicable Entity shall, in response to a written request for the data included in parts of Requirement R1 from a Planning Coordinator, Balancing Authority, Transmission Planner or Resource Planner with a demonstrated need for such data in order to conduct reliability assessments of the Bulk Electric System, provide or otherwise make available that data to the requesting entity. This requirement does not modify an entity s obligation pursuant to Requirement R2 to respond to data requests issued by its Planning Coordinator or Balancing Authority pursuant to Requirement R1. Unless otherwise agreed upon, the Applicable Entity: [Violation Risk Factor: Medium] [Time Horizon: Long-term Planning] shall not be required to alter the format in which it maintains or uses the data; shall provide the requested data within 45 calendar days of the written request, subject to part 4.1 of this requirement; unless providing the requested data would conflict with the Applicable Entity s confidentiality, regulatory, or security requirements 4.1. If the Applicable Entity does not provide data requested because (1) the requesting entity did not demonstrate a reliability need for the data; or (2) providing the data would conflict with the Applicable Entity s confidentiality, regulatory, or security requirements, the Applicable Entity shall, within 30 calendar days of the written request, provide a written response to the requesting entity specifying the data that is not being provided and on what basis. M4. Each Applicable Entity identified in Requirement R4 shall have evidence such as dated s or dated transmittal letters that it provided the data requested or provided a written response specifying the data that is not being provided and the basis for not providing the data in accordance with Requirement R4. Page 4 of 11
5 C. Compliance 1. Compliance Monitoring Process 1.1. Compliance Enforcement Authority As defined in the NERC Rules of Procedure, Compliance Enforcement Authority means NERC or the Regional Entity in their respective roles of monitoring and enforcing compliance with the NERC Reliability Standards Evidence Retention The following evidence retention periods identify the period of time an entity is required to retain specific evidence to demonstrate compliance. For instances where the evidence retention period specified below is shorter than the time since the last audit, the Compliance Enforcement Authority may ask an entity to provide other evidence to show that it was compliant for the full time period since the last audit. The Applicable Entity shall keep data or evidence to show compliance with Requirements R1 through R4, and Measures M1 through M4, since the last audit, unless directed by its Compliance Enforcement Authority to retain specific evidence for a longer period of time as part of an investigation. If an Applicable Entity is found non-compliant, it shall keep information related to the non-compliance until mitigation is complete and approved, or for the time specified above, whichever is longer. The Compliance Enforcement Authority shall keep the last audit records and all requested and submitted subsequent audit records Compliance Monitoring and Assessment Processes: Compliance Audit Self-Certification Spot Checking Compliance Investigation Self-Reporting Complaint 1.4. Additional Compliance Information None Page 5 of 11
6 Table of Compliance Elements R # Time Horizon VRF Violation Severity Levels R1 R2 Long-term Planning Long-term Planning Medium Lower VSL Moderate VSL High VSL Severe VSL N/A Medium Requirement R1, failed to provide all of the data requested in through part Requirement R1, provided the data requested in Requirement R1, but N/A Requirement R1, failed to provide one of the requested items in through part Requirement R1, failed to provide one of the requested items in N/A Requirement R1, failed to provide two of the requested items in through part Requirement R1, failed to provide two of the requested items in The Planning Coordinator or Balancing Authority developed and issued a data request but failed to include either the entity(s) necessary to provide the data or the timetable for providing the data. as defined in the data request developed in Requirement R1, failed to provide three or more of the requested items in Requirement R1 part through part as defined in the data request developed in Requirement R1, failed to provide three or more of the requested items in Requirement R1 part through part Page 6 of 11
7 did so after the date indicated in the pursuant to 1.2 but prior to 6 days after the date indicated in the pursuant to through part Requirement R1, provided the data requested in Requirement R1, but did so 6 days after the date indicated in the pursuant to 1.2 but prior to 11 days after the date indicated in the pursuant to through part Requirement R1, provided the data requested in Requirement R1, but did so 11 days after the date indicated in the pursuant to 1.2 but prior to 15 days after the date indicated in the pursuant to 1.2. as defined in the data request developed in Requirement R1, failed to provide the data requested in the pursuant to Requirement R1 prior to 16 days after the date indicated in the pursuant to Requirement R1 part 1.2. R3 Long-term Planning Medium The Planning Coordinator or Balancing Authority, in response to a request by the Regional Entity, made available the data requested, but did so after 75 days The Planning Coordinator or Balancing Authority, in response to a request by the Regional Entity, made available the data requested, but did so after 80 days The Planning Coordinator or Balancing Authority, in response to a request by the Regional Entity, made available the data requested, but did so after 85 days The Planning Coordinator or Balancing Authority, in response to a request by the Regional Entity, failed to make available the data requested prior to 91 days Page 7 of 11
8 from the date of request but prior to 81 days from the date of the request. from the date of request but prior to 86 days from the date of the request. from the date of request but prior to 91 days from the date of the request. or more from the date of the request. R4 Long-term Planning Medium The Applicable Entity provided or otherwise made available the data to the requesting entity but did so after 45 days from the date of request but prior to 51 days from the date of the request The Applicable Entity that is not providing the data requested provided a written response specifying the data that is not being provided and on what basis but did so after 30 days of the written request but prior to 36 days of the written resquest. The Applicable Entity provided or otherwise made available the data to the requesting entity but did so after 50 days from the date of request but prior to 56 days from the date of the request The Applicable Entity that is not providing the data requested provided a written response specifying the data that is not being provided and on what basis but did so after 35 days of the written request but prior to 41 days of the written resquest. The Applicable Entity provided or otherwise made available the data to the requesting entity but did so after 55 days from the date of request but prior to 61 days from the date of the request The Applicable Entity that is not providing the data requested provided a written response specifying the data that is not being provided and on what basis but did so after 40 days of the written request but prior to 46 days of the written resquest. The Applicable Entity failed to provide or otherwise make available the data to the requesting entity within 60 days from the date of the request The Applicable Entity that is not providing the data requested failed to provide a written response specifying the data that is not being provided and on what basis within 45 days of the written resquest. Page 8 of 11
9 D. Regional Variances None. E. Interpretations None. F. Associated Documents None. Version History Version Date Action Change Tracking 1 May 6, 2014 Adopted by the NERC Board of Trustees 1 February 19, 2015 FERC order approving MOD November 5, February 18, 2016 Adopted by the NERC Board of Trustees FERC order approving MOD Docket No. RD Page 9 of 11
10 Application Guidelines Rationale During development of this standard, text boxes were embedded within the standard to explain the rationale for various parts of the standard. Upon BOT approval, the text from the rationale text boxes was moved to this section. Rationale for R1: Rationale for R1: To ensure that when Planning Coordinators (PCs) or Balancing Authorities (BAs) request data (R1), they identify the entities that must provide the data (Applicable Entity in part 1.1), the data to be provided (parts ) and the due dates (part 1.2) for the requested data. For , if the Demand does not vary due to weather-related conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity or wind speed), or the weather assumed in the forecast was the same as the actual weather, the weather normalized actual Demand will be the same as the actual demand reported for Otherwise the annual peak hour weather normalized actual Demand will be different from the actual demand reported for Balancing Authorities are included here to reflect a practice in the WECC Region where BAs are the entity that perform this requirement in lieu of the PC. Rationale for R2: This requirement will ensure that entities identified in Requirement R1, as responsible for providing data, provide the data in accordance with the details described in the data request developed in accordance with Requirement R1. In no event shall the Applicable Entity be required to provide data under this requirement that is outside the scope of parts of Requirement R1. Rationale for R3: This requirement will ensure that the Planning Coordinator or when applicable, the Balancing Authority, provides the data requested by the Regional Entity. Rationale for R4: This requirement will ensure that the Applicable Entity will make the data requested by the Planning Coordinator or Balancing Authority in Requirement R1 available to other applicable entities (Planning Coordinator, Balancing Authority, Transmission Planner or Resource Planner) unless providing the data would conflict with the Applicable Entity s confidentiality, regulatory, or security requirements. The sharing of documentation of the supporting methods and assumptions used to develop forecasts as well as information-sharing activities will improve the efficiency of planning practices and support the identification of needed system reinforcements. The obligation to share data under Requirement R4 does not supersede or otherwise modify any of the Applicable Entity s existing confidentiality obligations. For instance, if an entity is prohibited from providing any of the requested data pursuant to confidentiality provisions of an Open Access Transmission Tariff or a contractual arrangement, Requirement R4 does not Page 10 of 11
11 Application Guidelines require the Applicable Entity to provide the data to a requesting entity. Rather, under Part 4.1, the Applicable Entity must simply provide written notification to the requesting entity that it will not be providing the data and the basis for not providing the data. If the Applicable Entity is subject to confidentiality obligations that allow the Applicable Entity to share the data only if certain conditions are met, the Applicable Entity shall ensure that those conditions are met within the 45-day time period provided in Requirement R4, communicate with the requesting entity regarding an extension of the 45-day time period so as to meet all those conditions, or provide justification under Part 4.1 as to why those conditions cannot be met under the circumstances. Page 11 of 11
12 Enforcement Dates: Standard MOD Demand and Energy Data United States * F INFMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY * Standard Requirement Enforcement Date Inactive Date MOD All 10/01/2016 Printed On: January 09, 2017, 11:43 PM
A. Introduction. B. Requirements. Standard PER-005-1 System Personnel Training
A. Introduction 1. Title: System Personnel Training 2. Number: PER-005-1 3. Purpose: To ensure that System Operators performing real-time, reliability-related tasks on the North American Bulk Electric
4.1.1 Generator Owner 4.1.2 Transmission Owner that owns synchronous condenser(s)
A. Introduction 1. Title: Verification and Data Reporting of Generator Real and Reactive Power Capability and Synchronous Condenser Reactive Power Capability 2. Number: MOD-025-2 3. Purpose: To ensure
CIP 010 1 Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments
CIP 010 1 Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments A. Introduction 1. Title: Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments 2. Number:
CIP-003-5 Cyber Security Security Management Controls
A. Introduction 1. Title: Cyber Security Security Management Controls 2. Number: CIP-003-5 3. Purpose: To specify consistent and sustainable security management controls that establish responsibility and
CIP-010-2 Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments
CIP-010-2 Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments A. Introduction 1. Title: Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments 2. Number:
3. Purpose: To improve the reliability of the Bulk Electric System by requiring the reporting of events by Responsible Entities.
A. Introduction 1. Title: Event Reporting 2. Number: EOP-004-2 3. Purpose: To improve the reliability of the Bulk Electric System by requiring the reporting of events by Responsible Entities. 4. Applicability:
CIP-005-5 Cyber Security Electronic Security Perimeter(s)
A. Introduction 1. Title: Cyber Security Electronic Security Perimeter(s) 2. Number: CIP-005-5 3. Purpose: To manage electronic access to BES Cyber Systems by specifying a controlled Electronic Security
Standard CIP 004 3a Cyber Security Personnel and Training
A. Introduction 1. Title: Cyber Security Personnel & Training 2. Number: CIP-004-3a 3. Purpose: Standard CIP-004-3 requires that personnel having authorized cyber or authorized unescorted physical access
Standard CIP 007 3a Cyber Security Systems Security Management
A. Introduction 1. Title: Cyber Security Systems Security Management 2. Number: CIP-007-3a 3. Purpose: Standard CIP-007-3 requires Responsible Entities to define methods, processes, and procedures for
Standard CIP 007 3 Cyber Security Systems Security Management
A. Introduction 1. Title: Cyber Security Systems Security Management 2. Number: CIP-007-3 3. Purpose: Standard CIP-007-3 requires Responsible Entities to define methods, processes, and procedures for securing
The North American Electric Reliability Corporation ( NERC ) hereby submits
December 8, 2009 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Kirsten Walli, Board Secretary Ontario Energy Board P.O Box 2319 2300 Yonge Street Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4P 1E4 Re: North American Electric Reliability Corporation
North American Electric Reliability Corporation. Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Program. December 19, 2008
116-390 Village Boulevard Princeton, New Jersey 08540-5721 North American Electric Reliability Corporation Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Program December 19, 2008 APPENDIX 4C TO THE RULES OF PROCEDURE
NB Appendix CIP-004-5.1-NB-1 - Cyber Security Personnel & Training
This appendix establishes modifications to the FERC approved NERC standard CIP-004-5.1 for its specific application in New Brunswick. This appendix must be read with CIP-004-5.1 to determine a full understanding
NPCC Implementation of the NERC Compliance Monitoring And Enforcement Program (CMEP)
Northeast Power Coordinating Council, Inc. NPCC Implementation of the NERC Compliance Monitoring And CP-01 Rev.2 The NERC Rules of Procedure and the Regional Delegation Agreement are the overriding documents
Re: NERC Notice of Penalty regarding Pacific Gas and Electric Company FERC Docket No. NP10-_-000
f April 28, 2010 Ms. Kimberly Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Re: NERC Notice of Penalty regarding Pacific Gas and Electric Company FERC
MISO Annual Compliance Program Update
MISO Annual Compliance Program Update Corporate Governance & Strategic Planning Committee April 2013 Presented by Lori A. Spence 0 Table of Contents TOPIC SLIDES General Board Obligations 2 Board Compliance
Standard CIP 003 1 Cyber Security Security Management Controls
A. Introduction 1. Title: Cyber Security Security Management Controls 2. Number: CIP-003-1 3. Purpose: Standard CIP-003 requires that Responsible Entities have minimum security management controls in place
Implementation Plan for Version 5 CIP Cyber Security Standards
Implementation Plan for Version 5 CIP Cyber Security Standards April 10September 11, 2012 Prerequisite Approvals All Version 5 CIP Cyber Security Standards and the proposed additions, modifications, and
2016 Business Plan and Budget. Texas Reliability Entity, Inc. Approved by Texas RE Board of Directors. Date: May 21, 2015
2016 Business Plan and Texas Reliability Entity, Inc. Approved by Texas RE Board of Directors Date: May 21, 2015 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Introduction... 3 Section A 2016 Business Plan
Physical Security Reliability Standard Implementation
Physical Security Reliability Standard Implementation Tobias Whitney, Manager of CIP Compliance (NERC) Carl Herron, Physical Security Leader (NERC) NERC Sub-Committee Meeting New Orleans, Louisiana CIP-014
Assist Members in developing their own national arrangements through being able to draw on and hence benefit from the experience of other members;
Introduction IFIAR is an organization of independent audit regulators (hereinafter, audit regulators ). The organization s primary aim is to enable its Members to share information regarding the audit
PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTATION of FERC STANDARDS OF CONDUCT for OHIO VALLEY ELECTRIC CORPORATION AND INDIANA KENTUCKY ELECTRIC CORPORATION
PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTATION of FERC STANDARDS OF CONDUCT for OHIO VALLEY ELECTRIC CORPORATION AND INDIANA KENTUCKY ELECTRIC CORPORATION In accordance with Rule 358.7(d) of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Cyber Security Standards Update: Version 5
Cyber Security Standards Update: Version 5 January 17, 2013 Scott Mix, CISSP CIP Technical Manager Agenda Version 5 Impact Levels Format Features 2 RELIABILITY ACCOUNTABILITY CIP Standards Version 5 CIP
Item 8.1: Third Quarter 2013KPIs Update
Item 8.1: Third Quarter 2013KPIs Update Paula Feuerbacher Strategic Projects Senior Advisor Human Resources and Governance Committee ERCOT Public November 18, 2013 2013 3rd Quarter Reporting Period YTD
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Small Entity Compliance Guide Mandatory Reliability Standards (Order No. 693)
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Small Entity Compliance Guide Mandatory Reliability Standards (Order No. 693) This Guide is prepared in accordance with the requirements of section 212 of the Small
AFFILIATE RELATIONSHIPS CODE FOR ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTORS AND TRANSMITTERS
AFFILIATE RELATIONSHIPS CODE FOR ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTORS AND TRANSMITTERS ONTARIO ENERGY BOARD Revised May 16, 2008 (Originally issued on April 1, 1999) 1. GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS 1.1 Purpose
Standard conditions of the Electricity Distribution Licence
Gas and Electricity Markets Authority ELECTRICITY ACT 1989 Standard conditions of the Electricity Distribution Licence Statutory Consultation: 29 April 2008 SECTION A: STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR ALL ELECTRICITY
September 29, 2014. Docket No. ER14- -000 Amendment to CAISO FERC Electric Tariff to Eliminate Annual External Operations Review
California Independent System Operator Corporation September 29, 2014 The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 Re: California
Rules on Southern Companies Energy Auction Participation
Southern Company Services, Inc. First Revised Sheet No. 20B Superseding Original Sheet No. 20B Rules on Southern Companies Energy Auction Participation 1.0 Participation; Definitions 1.1 Southern Companies
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING THE INDEPENDENT ELECTRICITY SYSTEM OPERATOR THE NORTH AMERICAN ELECTRIC RELIABILITY CORPORATION
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE INDEPENDENT ELECTRICITY SYSTEM OPERATOR AND THE NORTH AMERICAN ELECTRIC RELIABILITY CORPORATION AND THE NORTHEAST POWER COORDINATING COUNCIL, CROSS-BORDER REGIONAL
Power System Operation Procedure: Short Term Projected Assessment of System Adequacy (ST PASA)
ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY ACT ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY (WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY MARKET) REGULATIONS 2004 WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY MARKET RULES Power System Operation Procedure: Short Term Projected Assessment of System
152 FERC 61,200 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. 18 CFR Part 40. [Docket No. RM15-8-000]
![152 FERC 61,200 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. 18 CFR Part 40. [Docket No. RM15-8-000]](/thumbs/24/2498246.jpg "152 FERC 61,200 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. 18 CFR Part 40. [Docket No. RM15-8-000]")
152 FERC 61,200 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 18 CFR Part 40 [Docket No. RM15-8-000] Relay Performance During Stable Power Swings Reliability Standard (Issued September
Duke Energy Progress Standards of Conduct Transmission Function Employee Job Titles and Job Descriptions 9/1/13
Duke Energy Progress Standards of Conduct Transmission Function Employee Job Titles and Job Descriptions 9/1/13 Transmission Operations & Planning Carolinas Power System Operations Director Power System
Program Guide for Risk-based Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Program. ERA-01 Rev. 1. NPCC Manager, Entity Risk Assessment
NPCC Entity Risk Assessment Program Guide for Risk-based Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Program ERA-01 Rev. 1 Process Owner: NPCC Manager, Entity Risk Assessment Effective Date: 03/02/2015 Table
Rules on Southern Companies Energy Auction Participation. 1.2.1 Available Capacity: See Section 1.3 of Appendix DA-1 and Section 1.3 of Appendix HA-1.
Rules on Southern Companies Energy Auction Participation 1.0 Participation; Definitions 1.1 Southern Companies shall participate in the Energy Auction in accordance with these Rules on Southern Companies
Compliance Open Webinar. Thursday, August 20th, 2015
Compliance Open Webinar Thursday, August 20th, 2015 2 Upcoming Events CIP Advanced Concepts September 9-10, 2015 Compliance Open Webinar September 17, 2015 WECC CIPUG/CUG October 13-15, 2015 Compliance
When this standard has received ballot approval, the text boxes will be moved to the Guidelines and Technical Basis section of the Standard.
CIP-002-5 Cyber Security BES Cyber System Categorization When this standard has received ballot approval, the text boxes will be moved to the Guidelines and Technical Basis section of the Standard. A.
134 FERC 61,226 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ON COMPLIANCE FILING. (Issued March 24, 2011)
134 FERC 61,226 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Jon Wellinghoff, Chairman; Marc Spitzer, Philip D. Moeller, John R. Norris, and Cheryl A. LaFleur. Southern
INSTITUTIONAL COMPLIANCE PLAN
INSTITUTIONAL COMPLIANCE PLAN Responsible Party: Board of Trustees Contact: Institutional Compliance Office Original Effective Date: 02/16/2012 Last Revised Date: 10/13/2014 Contents I. SCOPE OF THE PLAN...
MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY NANTUCKET ELECTRIC COMPANY NET METERING PROVISION
Sheet 1 Applicability The following tariff provisions shall be applicable to a Host Customer, as defined herein, that requests net metering services from the Distribution Company, with the exception of
d/b/a Energy Keepers, Inc. Operations Compliance Manager Negotiable depending on training, education, and experience
Position: Salary: Location: Employment Status: Supervised By: SXʷNQ EʔELS L SUW EČM / KSUKⱠIⱠMUMAⱠ ʾA K AⱠMUKWAʾITS, Incorporated d/b/a Energy Keepers, Inc. GENERAL SUMMARY Operations Compliance Manager
Standard conditions of the Electricity Distribution Licence
Gas and Electricity Markets Authority ELECTRICITY ACT 1989 Standard conditions of the Electricity Distribution Licence Standard conditions of the Electricity Distribution Licence 30 October 2015 SECTION
Updated November 20, 2015. Director, System Planning
Updated November 20, 2015 Job Descriptions Job Title Reports To Job Description SYSTEM PLANNING & SERVICES VP Compliance Manages the system planning and services staff. The director is responsible for
We are the regulator: Our job is to check whether hospitals, care homes and care services are meeting essential standards.
Inspection Report We are the regulator: Our job is to check whether hospitals, care homes and care services are meeting essential standards. Bury DCA United Response, City View Business Centre, 9 Long
Energy Efficiency Measurement & Verification
PJM Manual 18B: Energy Efficiency Measurement & Verification Revision: 02 Effective Date: 12/17/2015 Prepared by PJM Forward Market Operations PJM 2015 PJM 2008 Revision, Effective Date: i Table of Contents
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Electricity No. 4 North Carolina Fourth Revised Leaf No. 78 Superseding North Carolina Third Revised Leaf No.
AVAILABILTY (North Carolina only) Available on a limited and voluntary basis, at the Company s option to nonresidential customers receiving concurrent service from the Company on Schedule LGS, I, OPT-V
Transmission Function Employees Job Titles and Descriptions 18 C.F.R 358.7(f)(1)
Date of Last Change to the Provided Information August 27 th, 2015 Director, Transmission Operations The employee in this position is responsible for effectively managing the operation of FirstEnergy Utilities
BUSINESS ASSOCIATE PRIVACY AND SECURITY ADDENDUM RECITALS
BUSINESS ASSOCIATE PRIVACY AND SECURITY ADDENDUM This Business Associate Addendum ( Addendum ), effective, 20 ( Effective Date ), is entered into by and between University of Southern California, ( University
Audit-Ready SharePoint Applications
Audit-Ready SharePoint Applications Page 1 of 16 July 7, 2015 Table of Contents 1 Overview... 3 2 Company Background... 4 3 Audit-Ready SharePoint Applications... 4 3.1 Audit-Ready Compliance Dashboard...
Camera Use. Policy Statement and Purpose. Table of Contents
Camera Use Policy Type: Administrative Responsible Office: VCU Police Department Initial Policy Approved: 12/04/2015 Current Revision Approved: New Policy Statement and Purpose VCU is committed to enhancing
Job Descriptions. Job Title Reports To Job Description TRANSMISSION SERVICES Manager, Transmission Services. VP Compliance & Standards
Updated July 11, 2013 Job Descriptions Job Title Reports To Job Description TRANSMISSION SERVICES VP Compliance & Standards Develops strategy and business plans for efficient, safe, reliable, regulatorycompliant
Load Dispatcher (Class Code 5223) Task List
A. Load Dispatching, General Load Dispatcher (Class Code 5223) Task List 1. Prior to work shift speaks to Load Dispatcher(s), reviews hardcopy and computer logs, and looks at the dispatcher's diagram board
Demand Response Programs
Southern California Edison Demand Response Programs Join thousands of businesses that work with us to reduce peak electricity use when California needs it most. By participating in Demand Response programs,
HIPAA BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT
HIPAA BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT THIS BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT (hereinafter Agreement ) is between COVERED ENTITY NAME (hereinafter Covered Entity ) and BUSINESS ASSOCIATE NAME (hereinafter Business
108-C-215 CRITICAL PATH METHOD SCHEDULE. (Revised 03-24-10)
CRITICAL PATH METHOD SCHEDULE (Revised 03-24-10) The Standard Specifications are revised as follows: SECTION 108, BEGIN LINE 177, INSERT AS FOLLOWS: 108.04.1 Critical Path Method Schedule (a) General Requirements
March 25, 2015. Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426
March 25, 2015 Ms. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company 700 Louisiana Street, Suite 700 Houston,
Internal Quality Management System Audit Checklist (ISO9001:2015) Q# ISO 9001:2015 Clause Audit Question Audit Evidence 4 Context of the Organization
Internal Quality Management System Audit Checklist (ISO9001:2015) Q# ISO 9001:2015 Clause Audit Question Audit Evidence 4 Context of the Organization 4.1 Understanding the organization and its context
130 FERC 61,163 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION AND CONSENT AGREEMENT
130 FERC 61,163 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Jon Wellinghoff, Chairman; Marc Spitzer, Philip D. Moeller, and John R. Norris. Florida Blackout Docket
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Reliability Technical Conference Docket No. AD16-15-000 Prepared Statement of Mark Rothleder on behalf of the California Independent System
ERCOT Design and Implementation of Internal Controls and benefits for NERC CMEP/RAI
ERCOT Design and Implementation of Internal Controls and benefits for NERC CMEP/RAI Matt Mereness, ERCOT Compliance Director August 2015 Anfield Summit Outline of discussion ERCOT Background Business Case
NERC Cyber Security Standards
SANS January, 2008 Stan Johnson Manager of Situation Awareness and Infrastructure Security Stan.johnson@NERC.net 609-452-8060 Agenda History and Status of Applicable Entities Definitions High Level of
2016 ERCOT System Planning Long-Term Hourly Peak Demand and Energy Forecast December 31, 2015
2016 ERCOT System Planning Long-Term Hourly Peak Demand and Energy Forecast December 31, 2015 2015 Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. Long-Term Hourly Peak Demand and Energy
SBEL 26 ILLINOIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 100 100.170 TITLE 26: ELECTIONS CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS PART 100 CAMPAIGN FINANCING
TITLE 26: ELECTIONS CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS PART 100 CAMPAIGN FINANCING Section 100.10 Definitions 100.20 Official Forms 100.30 Forwarding of Documents (Repealed) 100.40 Vacancies in Office
BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT
BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT This Agreement ( Agreement ) is made and entered into this day of [Month], [Year] by and between [Business Name] ( Covered Entity ), [Type of Entity], whose business address
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. ) ) Reliability Technical Conference ) Docket No.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Reliability Technical Conference Docket No. AD14-9-000 REMARKS OF BRAD ALBERT GENERAL MANAGER, RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ARIZONA PUBLIC
New ISO-NE Return on Equity Rate Could Impact Future Transmission Decisions
RESEARCH North America Power and Utilities Energy Efficiency New ISO-NE Return on Equity Rate Could Impact Future Transmission Decisions Continued Transmission Investments Key to Electric Grid Reliability
COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT
Policy No. 48 General Subject: General Specific Subject: Identity Protection Act Date Approved: February 7, 2011 Date Revised: PURPOSE COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT The purpose of this policy is to establish
Schedule No. OGS-3-HOPU OPTIONAL LARGE GENERAL SERVICE - HIGH OFF-PEAK USE APPLICABLE
6100 Neil Road, Reno, Nevada 67th Revised PUCN Sheet No. 79 Tariff No. Electric No. 1 Cancelling 66th Revised PUCN Sheet No. 79 APPLICABLE This schedule is available as an option to Schedule No. GS-3 for
C. System Operations, Reliability Standards and Capacity Management
C. System Operations, Reliability Standards and Capacity Management 1. Demonstrate that the restructuring plan will maintain the standards and procedures for safety and reliability presently in effect
AUDIT COMMITTEE BEST PRACTICES CHECKLIST
AUDIT COMMITTEE BEST PRACTICES CHECKLIST General 1. Members have the appropriate predefined qualifications to meet the objectives of the audit committee s charter, including appropriate financial literacy.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Independent Market Monitor for PJM v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket No. EL14- -000 COMPLAINT AND MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
SUITABILITY IN ANNUITY TRANSACTIONS MODEL REGULATION
Model Regulation Service April 2010 SUITABILITY IN ANNUITY TRANSACTIONS MODEL REGULATION Table of Contents Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 7. Section 8. Section
ReliabilityFirst CIP Evidence List CIP-002 through CIP-009 are applicable to RC, BA, IA, TSP, TO, TOP, GO, GOP, LSE, NERC, & RE
R1 Provide Risk Based Assessment Methodology (RBAM) R1.1 Provide evidence that the RBAM includes both procedures and evaluation criteria, and that the evaluation criteria are riskbased R1.2 Provide evidence
sink asset load power pool ISO pool participant bids operating constraints ancillary service declarations
G1 DEFINITIONS In the ISO rules: acceptable operational reason means with respect to a source asset, any one or more of the following: i) a circumstance related to the operation of the generating asset
ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION LICENCE: STANDARD CONDITIONS
ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION LICENCE: STANDARD CONDITIONS Deleted: 7 Deleted: 5 Deleted: 7 Deleted: 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PART II. THE STANDARD CONDITIONS 7 SECTION A. INTERPRETATION, APPLICATION AND PAYMENTS
YANKEE GAS SERVICES COMPANY, DBA EVERSOURCE ENERGY. TRANSPORTATION RECEIPT SERVICE Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of 11 AVAILABILITY: Available to any Customer acting as its own supplier or approved Operator of gas supply (Operator) delivering gas supplies to a customer or Pool(s) of customers using Rates 03,
Closing the Gap Between Wholesale and Retail
Closing the Gap Between Wholesale and Retail Transactive Energy Workshop March 28-29 Robert B. Burke GWAC MEMBER & PRINCIPAL ANALYST ISO NEW ENGLAND INC. Disclaimer This presentation represents the thoughts
CIP-003-6 R2 BES Assets Containing Low Impact BCS. Lisa Wood, CISA, CBRA, CBRM Compliance Auditor Cyber Security
CIP-003-6 R2 BES Assets Containing Low Impact BCS Lisa Wood, CISA, CBRA, CBRM Compliance Auditor Cyber Security Slide 2 About Me Been with WECC for 5 years 1 ½ years as a Compliance Program Coordinator
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Coordination between Natural Gas and Electricity Markets Docket No. AD12-12-000 Prepared Statement of Brad Bouillon on behalf of
JOB DESCRIPTION. Resource & Capacity Planning Manager. Resource Planners. Resource &
JOB DESCRIPTION Job Title: Reporting To: Department(s)/Location: Senior Business Planner Resource & Capacity Planning Manager Central Resource Team, Cardonald Job Reference number (coded): 1. JOB PURPOSE
PROCEDURE. Ontario Technical Feasibility Exception PUBLIC. Issue 0.2 IESO_PRO_0680
PROCEDURE PUBLIC IESO_PRO_0680 Ontario Technical Feasibility Exception Issue 0.2 This procedure provides guidance to TFE applicants on the Ontario-adapted NERC Technical Feasibility Exception process.
TG 47-01. TRANSITIONAL GUIDELINES FOR ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 14001:2015 CERTIFICATION BODIES
TRANSITIONAL GUIDELINES FOR ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 14001:2015 CERTIFICATION BODIES Approved By: Senior Manager: Mpho Phaloane Created By: Field Manager: John Ndalamo Date of Approval:
ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY LLC
Tariff for Transmission Service Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC 1616 Woodall Rodgers Fwy Dallas, Texas 75202-1234 Contents Sheet: 1 Revision: Six Effective Date: May 30, 2014 Page 1 of 2 CONTENTS 1.0
Request for Proposals For Financial Advisor Services
Request for Proposals For Financial Advisor Services Finance Department Contents Section I Introduction 2 Section II Description of Village 2 Section III Debt Financing Plans 3 Section IV Scope of Services
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Joseph T. Kelliher, Chairman; Nora Mead Brownell, and Suedeen G. Kelly. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL. December 10, 2015
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL AUDIT SERVICES Sacramento Audit Region Joe Xavier Director California Department of Rehabilitation 721 Capitol Mall Sacramento, CA 95814
John Keel, CPA State Auditor. An Audit Report on Inspections of Compounding Pharmacies at the Board of Pharmacy. August 2015 Report No.
John Keel, CPA State Auditor An Audit Report on Inspections of Compounding Pharmacies at the Board of Pharmacy Report No. 15-039 An Audit Report on Inspections of Compounding Pharmacies at the Board of
Statement of Guidance: Outsourcing All Regulated Entities
Statement of Guidance: Outsourcing All Regulated Entities 1. STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES 1.1. 1.2. 1.3. 1.4. This Statement of Guidance ( Guidance ) is intended to provide guidance to regulated entities on
Before the Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 ) ) ) ) ) ) NBP RFI: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy
Before the Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 In the Matter of Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Empowering Consumers and the Smart Grid: Data Access, Third Party Use, and Privacy )
NV Energy ISO Energy Imbalance Market Economic Assessment
March 25, 2014 NV Energy ISO Energy Imbalance Market Economic Assessment NV Energy ISO Energy Imbalance Market Economic Assessment 2014 Copyright. All Rights Reserved. Energy and Environmental Economics,
Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) Date: /08/15 Type of measure: Subordinate Legislation Lead department or agency: Department for Social Development
Title: Charities accounts: independent examination and audit thresholds Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) Date: /08/15 Type of measure: Subordinate Legislation Lead department or agency: Department for
Title Insurance and Settlement Company Best Practices. www.alta.org/bestpractices
Title Insurance and Settlement Company Best Practices www.alta.org/bestpractices Forces at Work Regulatory Guidance to Lenders Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Created June 2011 CFPB was created by
NERC-CIP S MOST WANTED
WHITE PAPER NERC-CIP S MOST WANTED The Top Three Most Violated NERC-CIP Standards What you need to know to stay off the list. www.alertenterprise.com NERC-CIP s Most Wanted AlertEnterprise, Inc. White
TERMS OF REFERENCE OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE UNDER THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CHINA PETROLEUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION
TERMS OF REFERENCE OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE UNDER THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CHINA PETROLEUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION Chapter 1 General Provisions Article 1 These Terms of Reference (these Terms ) are established
per day per violation... GEnERAl InfoRMATIon
GEnERAl InfoRMATIon Congress recently gave the federal Energy Regulatory Commission ( ferc ) broad new civil authority for violations of the federal Power Act up to $1 million per day per violation...
Information Shield Solution Matrix for CIP Security Standards
Information Shield Solution Matrix for CIP Security Standards The following table illustrates how specific topic categories within ISO 27002 map to the cyber security requirements of the Mandatory Reliability
Procedure: Guidelines for a Breastfeeding Peer Counselor Program
Procedure: Volume: Nutrition Services/Breastfeeding Section: Breastfeeding Approval Date: 11.2012 Citation: Loving Support Model for Peer Counseling Revised Date: Purpose Definition of a Breastfeeding
Vendor Management: Who the CFPB is Watching and Who They Are Expecting You to be Watching
Vendor Management: Who the CFPB is Watching and Who They Are Expecting You to be Watching John Barnes 713.210.7441 jbarnes@bakerdonelson.com Jessica Hinkie 713.210.7405 jhinkie@bakerdonelson.com Kat Statman
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Technical Conference on Critical Infrastructure Protection Issues Identified in Order No. 791 Prepared Statement of Melanie Seader, Senior
Is It Possible to Charge Market-Based Pricing for Ancillary Services in a Non-ISO Market?
Is It Possible to Charge Market-Based Pricing for Ancillary Services in a Non-ISO Market? Regulation and Operating Reserves 33 rd Eastern Conference Center for Research in Regulated Industry Romkaew P.