1 Appreciative Inquiry: The Power of the Unconditional Positive Question James D. Ludema, Benedictine University David L. Cooperrider, Case Western Reserve University Frank J. Barrett, Naval Postgraduate School Appreciative Inquiry and the Power of the Positive Question Appreciative inquiry distinguishes itself from critical modes of action research by its deliberately affirmative assumptions about people, organizations, and relationships. It focuses on asking the unconditional positive question to ignite transformative dialogue and action within human systems. More than a technique, appreciative inquiry is a way of organizational life -- an intentional posture of continuous discovery, search, and inquiry into conceptions of life, joy, beauty, excellence, innovation, and freedom. Our experience suggests that human systems grow and construct their future realities in the direction of what they most persistently, actively, and collectively ask questions about. If, for example, our interest is in developing an organization that instills and nurtures enthusiasm, would it be better to do a low morale survey documenting the root causes of low morale and then try to intervene to fix the problem, or might it be more effective to mobilize a system-wide inquiry into moments of exceptional enthusiasm and then invite organization members to cocreate a future for their system that nurtures and supports even more enthusiasm? Appreciative inquiry is premised on the belief that it is much faster and more straight forward to go through the front door of enthusiasm. Going through the back door to study into low morale on the way to a future of enthusiasm is an unnecessary detour that simply makes no sense. As a method of organizational intervention, the underlying assumption of appreciative inquiry is that organizing is a possibility to be embraced. The phases include: (1) topic choice, (2) discovery, (3) dream, (4) design, and (5) destiny (see Figure I for a diagram of the appreciative inquiry 4-D model). Selecting a positive topic to explore is an essential starting point. Appreciative inquiry is based on the premise that organizations move in the direction of what they study. For example, when groups study human problems and conflicts, they often find that both the number and severity of these problems grow. In the same manner, when groups study high human ideals and achievements, such as peak experiences, best practices, and noble
2 accomplishments, these phenomena, too, tend to flourish. In this sense, topic choice is a fateful act. Based on the topics they choose to study, organizations enact and construct worlds of their own making that in turn act back on them. The purpose of the discovery phase is to search for, highlight, and illuminate those factors that give life to the organization, the "best of what is" in any given situation. Regardless of how few the moments of excellence, the task is to zero in on them and to discuss the factors and forces that made them possible. Valuing the best of what is opens the way to building a better future by dislodging the certainty of existing deficit constructions. By asking organizational members to focus, even if only for a moment, on the life-giving aspects of organizational life, appreciative inquiry creates enough uncertainty about the dominance of deficit vocabularies to allow organizational members to consider new possibilities. The second phase is to dream about what could be. As alternative voices enter the conversation, new ways of seeing and understanding the world begin to emerge. Because these perspectives have been cued by the asking of unconditional positive questions, the vocabularies used to describe and envision social and organizational reality are creative and constructive in the sense that they invite new, positive alternatives for organizing. By generating words, phrases, and stories that illustrate the organization at its best and paint a compelling picture of what the organization could and should become, the dream phase liberates organizational members from the constraining power of existing reified constructions and offers positive guiding images of the future. The third phase is to design the future through dialogue. It is a process of finding common ground by sharing discoveries and possibilities, dialoguing and debating, and finally getting to the point where everyone can say, "Yes this is an ideal or vision that we value and should aspire to. Let's make it happen." It is through dialogue that personal conversations evolve into organizational discourse and individual ideals becomes cooperative or shared visions for the future. The key to this phase is to create a deliberately inclusive and supportive context for conversation and interaction.
3 The final phase, destiny, is an invitation to construct the future through innovation and action. Appreciative inquiry accomplishes this by including ever-broadening circles of participants to join in the conversation. Each inquirer brings additional linguistic resources and helps to build a language that creates broader and deeper possibilities for action. Together, organizational members live into the systems they have designed in ways that translate their ideals into reality and their beliefs into practice. Figure I: Phases of Appreciative Inquiry The 4 D Model DISCOVERY Appreciating Best of What Is DESTINY Sustaining What Will Be POSITIVE TOPIC CHOICE DREAM Envisioning What Could Be DESIGN Co-Constructing What Should Be In the next section of this chapter, a case illustration is shared in which appreciative inquiry is used to transform the discourse between more than 120 non-governmental organizations (NGOs) worldwide. The case shows how the positive questions of appreciative inquiry can be used to release a virtual explosion of new vocabularies through which social and organizational innovations can be constructed. In the final section of the chapter, eight positive relational consequences of the appreciative approach are developed and a call is extended to the field of
4 action research to create a positive revolution of learning and change by experimenting with appreciative modes of inquiry yet to be discovered. Transforming Paternalism into Partnership The Case of the Global Inquiry The Global Relief and Development Organization (GRDO) is a non-governmental organization (NGO) based in the United States and Canada that works with about 120 partner organizations around the world. When we first began to work with GRDO, they came to us with the following story. We have, they said, a system of building and measuring organizational capacity that is the envy of virtually every Northern NGO that has seen it. The system allows us to evaluate the organizational capacity of our partner organizations every six months according to five key criteria: their governance, managerial, technical, financial, and networking capabilities. We then use this information to design interventions like training, consulting, systems improvements, finding new sources of funding, etc. to strengthen their capacity. We also use the data to rate them and make informed decisions about how much we want to invest in them, both in terms of human and financial capital. In many ways, it s a perfect system.and yet, many of our partner organizations and even our own staff do not like it. They consider it to be an imposition, and they find it tedious, irrelevant, and in some cases, demeaning. We want to do a worldwide appreciative inquiry to find out what s wrong with the system and fix it! It is important to point out that GRDO and its partners were entrapped in many embedded layers of deficit vocabularies (two of which we will mention here) that restricted their ability to accomplish their dreams. At the level of organizational architecture, GRDO s system for measuring organizational capacity was designed from a deficit perspective. It established a uniform global standard for a healthy organization and then evaluated partner organizations to discover the areas in which they were weak. Thus, the system itself created a context in which deficit vocabularies and negative blaming attributions dominated. GRDO and its partners were also entwined in a more complex and pervasive discourse of deficit that had to do with paternalism and dependency between the Northern and Southern worlds. GRDO harbored the implicit belief that its organizational knowledge was superior to that of its Southern partners because it was from the more advanced North. GRDO was also a source of
5 funding for its partner organizations and therefore felt it had to be in a policing or monitoring role when it came to money. Thus, it was virtually impossible for GRDO to see itself in the role of an equal partner and learner in the capacity building process. It simply did not have the vocabulary to describe itself in that way. Topic Choice Resolute in our conviction that the seeds of change are implicit in the very first question we ask, we tried to discover the deeper yearning contained in GRDO s problem statement. We asked something like, What do you really want from this process? When you explore your boldest hopes and highest aspirations, what is it that you ultimately want? Quickly their vision began to unfold. They said that they wanted to see a wildfire of organizational capacity building spread around the world in such a way that thousands of NGOs would be enabled to cooperate effectively with millions of marginalized communities to dramatically increase and sustain a dignified standard of living. They dreamed of an end to poverty and world hunger; social, political, and economic vibrancy; and the kinds of relationships between the Northern and Southern hemispheres that approached nothing short of global community. Based on this image of the future, we, along with GRDO and its partners, launched a three-year global appreciative inquiry into the topic of Best Practices of Organizational Capacity Building from Around the World (see Johnson & Ludema, 1997). The purpose of the inquiry was twofold: first, to learn from each other about how to build strong, healthy, vibrant NGOs; and second, to discover new ways to work together in a partnership of equals. The inquiry was designed to follow a customized 4-D appreciative inquiry process, allowing the positive voice and experience of all the participating organizations to shape the learning and the outcomes of the study. Discovery In the first year of the inquiry, the discovery phase was carried out. It began with the formation of a global design team that included representatives from all of the different regions engaged in the study East Africa, West Africa, Asia, Latin America, and North America. Once the design team was in place, large-group retreats that lasted four days were held in each of the regions to
6 familiarize GRDO and its partner organizations with appreciative inquiry, create an interview protocol, and launch the study. Appreciative inquiry asks two basic unconditional positive questions: 1. What in this particular setting or context makes organizing possible? What gives life to our organization and allows it to function at its best? 2. What are the possibilities, latent or expressed, that provide opportunities for even better (more effective and value-congruent) forms of organizing? Building on these two core questions, the inquiry participants developed variations on the following protocol as a guide for their inquiry: Appreciative Interview Protocol 1. Think of a time in your entire experience with your organization when you have felt most excited, most engaged, and most alive. What were the forces and factors that made it a great experience? What was it about you, others, and your organization that made it a peak experience for you? 2. What do you value most about yourself, your work, and your organization? 3. What are your organization's best practices (ways you manage, approaches, traditions)? 4. What are the unique aspects of your culture that most positively affect the spirit, vitality, and effectiveness of your organization and its work? 5. What is the core factor that "gives life" to your organization? 6. What are the three most important hopes you have to heighten the health and vitality of your organization for the future?
7 During the remainder of the year, each of the 120 partner organizations went back to its respective country and engaged in listening tours with members of the communities in which it worked. The inquiry was made as broadly participatory as possible. For example, in East Africa, 22 GRDO staff and members of 31 partner organizations were trained in appreciative inquiry at the first regional conference. They in turn used the same process with the 888 communities in which they work. An average of two people from each group attended each conference or workshop. Thus, in East Africa alone, over the course of the inquiry, as many as 1,800 voices were included in the conversation. The total number of participants worldwide is estimated to have reached as high as 5,000 persons. Dream In year two, the dream and design phases began. At the beginning of the year, a second round of large-group retreats was held between GRDO and its partners. The retreats provided a forum in which the organizations could share with each other the stories and best practices they discovered in their interviews with community members, articulate their dreams for the future, and begin to re-design their approach to building and measuring organizational capacity. For example, a woman from Senegal told of how she and friend started an initiative to combat the rampant spread of AIDS in their country. From the beginning it was an uphill battle. Government ministries denied there was a problem, Muslim and Christian clerics denounced their efforts publicly, organized prostitute rings threatened their lives, and they had no money. Five years after they began, however, they had made remarkable progress. They formed a board of supportive government, religious, medical, and community leaders; they equipped a staff of over forty women to provide AIDS and health education throughout the country; in collaboration with the government, they started a center for AIDS treatment and research; and they attracted an increasing amount of financial support from both domestic and international sources. When asked what were the forces and factors that made this exceptional growth possible, they highlighted six core ingredients: their own deep sense of call, the compelling sense of hope held by the victims of AIDS and their families, the unwavering support of key individuals and organizations, the unique gifts and contacts of their board, the dedication and skill of their staff, and the grace of God.
8 During the second regional conference in West Africa, this story was told and woven together with literally hundreds of other peak experience stories from Senegal, Mali, Niger, Guinea, Nigeria, and Sierra Leone. While all this was unfolding in West Africa, similar processes were under way in East Africa, Asia, Latin America, and North America. A virtual explosion of positive stories were being shared, and the way GRDO and its partners talked about themselves, each other, and their joint work was beginning to shift from a conversation of deficit to a conversation of possibility. Previously, GRDO and its partners rarely heard these compelling stories and rarely explored the core life-giving forces of their organizations, simply because they rarely asked the positive questions to elicit them. As they entered the dream phase, many organizations described their image of the future in metaphorical terms. A group from Honduras imagined its ideal organization as a winding river carrying with it nutrients of all kinds, thus bringing life and vitality to an entire region. In West Africa, the participants described their organizations as fruit trees deeply rooted in the soil of African culture and tradition. They identified eight essential capacities that serve as water, fertilizer, and sunlight to support the healthy development of their organizations in the unique cultural contexts of West Africa servant leadership, participatory management, organizational development, resource development, community empowerment, technical expertise, networking and partnership, and spiritual resilience. Then they began to wonder what would happen if these capacities were thriving to the fullest in their organizations. Design The design stage began as members started to explore systematically what kinds of social architecture would most powerfully translate their dreams and visions into day-to-day reality. Over the course of the second year of the inquiry, hundreds of gatherings took place worldwide in which participants developed a series of locally relevant provocative propositions that, based on their best experiences from the past and their highest hopes for the future, described their ideal organizational architecture. A provocative proposition is a statement that bridges the best of what is with what might be. These propositions, then, became the basis for a new, radically-dispersed and broadly-participatory system of organizational capacity building.
9 In collaboration with its neighbors and with GRDO staff, each community and each NGO participating in the study developed its own criteria and process for developing capacity in its unique local context. For example, in West Africa, provocative propositions of the ideal, similar to the example below, were developed for each of the eight essential capacities mentioned above. Provocative Proposition Networking and Partnership We are highly networked organizations, broadly and deeply. We have strong, supportive, mutual relationships with each other, other NGOs, our donors, government officials, and the communities where we work. We celebrate our similarities and differences, understand each other s values, respect each other s cultures, and learn as much as we can from one another. We admit our needs and contract to help each other grow. We deliberately solicit and rely on each other s input, and we support each other in serving other parts of the world. In every way possible we strive to compliment one another. It was also during this second year that GRDO s language began to shift around partnership as a result of listening to the voices of its partners. Midway through the year GRDO convened a Global Summit meeting at which representatives from each of the regional conferences convened to integrate learning at a global level. In his opening remarks, GRDO s CEO led with the following words that reflect the organization s change in perspective: Through the appreciative inquiry process we have begun to realize that of all the crucial characteristics of organizational capacity building, none is more important than the need for mutual partnership between organizations. Organizational capacity is essentially an interorganizational activity, a condition that occurs when organizations enter into mutually edifying relationships with one another to carry out their respective missions in the world more effectively. This kind of transformative growth and development flourishes most fully in relationships between equals. We hope you will help us discover the possibilities as we move forward. This is language that previously GRDO simply could not hear let alone articulate because they and their partners were locked into a form of deficit-based linguistic binary whose terms included our system of capacity building/not our system of capacity building. Within the conditions of the binary, good partners where those who used the system and bad partners were those who refused. It was not until GRDO and its partners began to inquire into the good, the beautiful, the better, and the best that this language of possibility, previously invisible, could spring into view and offer itself as a resource for the social construction of the future.
10 Destiny In year three, the delivery phase was launched. Because the restrictive grip of deficit vocabularies had been loosened and vocabularies of possibility had been unleashed, energy for action was immediately boosted within the system. People began to feel a sense of hope, excitement, cooperation and ownership about the future, and they began to unleash a veritable revolution of positive change and innovation. At the third round of large-group retreats these new initiatives were shared and a range of new joint activities were launched. While it is beyond the scope of this chapter to list all of the accomplishments, the following examples provide a flavor. An NGO in Bangaledesh, having gained a new appreciation for the importance of networking, invited community members and its funding agencies into its strategic planning process. As a result, it doubled its budget and more than quadrupled the number of families it served in less than two years. In East Africa, the NGO s that participated in the appreciative inquiry banded together to form an East Africa NGO network that would provide training, consultation, advocacy, and new sources of funding. A similar network was started in West Africa. On a global level, GRDO lunched a new initiative to link business entrepreneurs with NGOs to bring their products into the global economy. In its first two years, this initiative raised more than three million dollars and established over thirty relationships between groups of entrepreneurs and local NGOs. GRDO and its partner organizations have also begun to hold regular Organizational Summit meetings every three years to provide a forum for strengthening relationships, finding common ground around visions for the future, and jointly enacting agendas for change. GRDO radically redesigned its organization to support their new understanding of partnership. It moved to a team-based structure, reduced layers of hierarchy from nine to three, and formed regional teams to manage its operations. The new design has shifted the locus of power (and therefore control, learning, and innovation) from a central point in North America to multiple interdependent points through out the world. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, GRDO and its partners invented a new broadly participatory approach to organizational capacity building that far exceeded their expectations, and indeed their individual imaginations. As a result of this new system, more than 100 NGOs and thousands of communities have dramatically improved their capacity to increase and sustain a dignified standard of living.
11 Hundreds of social innovations similar to these emerged around the world as a result of the appreciative inquiry. But undoubtedly the most important result, and the one that enabled all the others, was the shift from vocabularies of deficit to conversations of possibility that was unlocked by the unconditional positive questions that guided the inquiry. The Relational Consequences of Appreciation This case illustration demonstrates how appreciative inquiry can be used as a positive mode of action research to dislodge reified vocabularies of human deficit and liberate the socially constructive potential of organizations and human communities. By unlocking existing deficit constructions, creating spaces for new voices and languages to emerge, and expanding circles of dialogue to build a supportive relational context, appreciative inquiry allows for the positive construction of social reality. There are at least five ways in which it makes this possible (see Table III for a summary of the relational consequences of appreciation). Releases Positive Conversation within the Organization Relational patterns in industrial-era hierarchies and bureaucracies are often held in place by problem-focused theories, assumptions, beliefs, and ideas that have been created and transmitted through language. The first and perhaps most important consequence of appreciative inquiry is that it releases an outpouring of new constructive conversations that refocus an organization s attention away from problems and toward hopeful, energizing possibilities. These positive conversations are crucial to the healthy evolution of healthy of organizations. One of the basic theorems of appreciative inquiry is that it is the image of the future that in fact guides what might be called the current behavior of any organization (Polak, 1973). Organizations exist, in the final analysis, because people who govern and maintain then share some sort of common discourse or projection about what the organization is, how it will function, and what it is likely to become (Cooperrider, 1990). By asking unconditionally positive questions, appreciative inquiry draws out and highlights hopeful and empowering stories, metaphors, dreams, wishes that embrace a spirit of vitality and potency musings that typically remain unexpressed or underexpressed in organizational conversation. These positive
12 questions allow organizational members to inquire into the realm of the possible, beyond the boundaries of problems as they present themselves in conventional terms, and prefigure the very future they later help to create. Builds an Ever-Expanding Web of Inclusion and Positive Relationships Appreciative inquiry is a collaborative effort to discover that which is healthy, successful, and positive in organizational life. By definition, such a project is a radically participatory approach, designed to include an ever-increasing number of voices in conversations that highlight strengths, assets, hopes, and dreams. Whereas the critical impulse attempts to undermine the knowledge claims of others, the act of appreciation leads to a heightened sensitivity to multiple ways of knowing and an acceptance of a wide array of diverse experiences (Kolb, 1984). It supports open, respectful, productive dialogue between seemingly incommensurable paradigms and encourages a posture of empathy rather than attack when confronting differing points of view. At the same time, momentum for change in any human system requires large amounts of positive affect and social bonding including experiences of hope, inspiration, and the sheer joy of creating with one another Our experience in a variety of change efforts leads us to one unmistakable and dramatic conclusion: the more positive the questions that guide an inquiry and shape a conversation, the stronger will be the relationships and the more long-lasting and effective will be the change. By inviting participants to inquire deeply into the best and most valued aspects of one another's life and work, appreciative inquiry immediately enriches understanding, deepens respect, and establishes strong relational bonds. Creates Self-Reinforcing Learning Communities As positive vocabularies multiply, people strengthen their capacity to put those possibilities into practice on an everyday basis. Organizational members develop increasingly textured and sophisticated vocabularies for doing things in new ways. Consider for a moment a young boy who aspires to be a basketball star. At an early age, he will have many ways to describe a poor shot a brick, a squib, a rainbow, or an air ball but few words other than good to describe a skillful shot. As he grows older and learns by watching the pros, listening to his coaches, talking
13 with his teammates, and monitoring his own successes, he develops an ever more textured and sophisticated vocabulary for describing a good shot. He discovers that balance, timing, elevation, extension, wrist action, focus, and follow through are all essential ingredients in shooting a good shot, and all this language opens up whole new worlds of possibility for him and for those around him. He now has new knowledge that will allow him to improve his own game, and he has an expanded capacity to see and encourage the positive strengths of others. In this sense, there is a self-reinforcing learning cycle that develops as positive vocabularies multiply and people are drawn into relationships where they are invited to discover, see, and affirm the good and the possible in each other. In a very direct way, our capacity to learn and to that learning to use in healthy ways is developed in and through language. As the richness of our positive vocabularies increase, we become ever more able to see and learn from the strengths and potential of others, and the capacity of the whole system is multiplied. Bolsters Democracy and Self-Organizing Throughout the System A third important consequence of appreciative inquiry is that it dynamically promotes egalitarian relationships. In our experience, as organization members inquire into the best of one another and dream about their hopes for the future, it inevitably leads to the creation of images of less hierarchy and more equalized power and decision making. People talk about values of respect, partnership, and coming to the table as equals. They talk about breaking down silos between functions, transcending traditional boundaries, and going directly to the source to build futures that matter. Never, in all of our years of learning with appreciative inquiry, have we ever seen a group dream of increased hierarchy, greater power distance between individuals, or more command and control in the system. Organizations that engage in appreciative inquiry increase their capacity for self-organizing by developing what can be called a system-wide collaborative competence (Barrett, 1995). By expanding dialogue about positive, innovative possibilities, equalizing relationships, promoting generative learning, and providing broad access to decision making and organization design, appreciative inquiry creates the conditions necessary for self-organizing to flourish. It is as though there is a direct and simultaneous link between the way we know and the kinds of
14 organizational forms we create. Each organizational form the rational bureaucracy and the selforganizing human system has also an underlying way of knowing that operates at a foundational level to provide a logic for its existence. Self-organizing systems characterized by equal distribution of power and self-management are marked by an epistemic stance of liberation, freedom, solidarity, and social construction, in which organizational members are released to co-create the worlds and realities in which they live. Similarly, they are distinguished by a deep appreciation for the miracle and mystery of organizational life, which allows members to create the future based on the strengths, assets, hopes and dreams that they cherish the most. It may well be, as we move into a new era of more egalitarian organizing, that appreciative modes of inquiry will be to self-organizing systems what deficit-based approaches to action research have long been to command and control bureaucracies. Provides a Reservoir of Strength and Unleashes a Positive Revolution of Change Just as the vocabularies of deficit of the critical social and organizational sciences contribute to broad cultural enfeeblement, so to the vocabularies of possibility and hope sparked by the unconditional positive questions of appreciative inquiry lead to organizational strengthening and widespread social imagination and invention. As organizations inquire ever more deeply into the forces and factors that give them life, they tap into a hidden reservoir of strengths that can be called the organization s positive core (Cooperrider & Whitney, 1999). This positive core is comprised of all the competencies, capacities, achievements, assets, best practices, values, traditions, wisdoms, inspired emotions that lie deep at the heart the organization. On the one hand, the positive core provides the organization with a reassuring sense of history, identity, and continuity that gives calming stability and guidance for decision-making in the midst of turbulence. On the other hand, it generates energy for action. In the same way that the nucleus of an atom generates enough electrical power to support an entire region of a country, an organization s positive core nourishes the human learning and inspiration needed for systemwide social innovation. The positive core is an organization s most potent renewable source of energy for change, free and accessible to all organizational members. Once an idea or initiative is connected to the positive core, it takes a quantum leap forward toward its eventual realization. Thus, the more an organization experiments with crafting and asking the unconditional positive
15 question, the more its conversations tap into its positive core, and the more a positive revolution of change (De Bono, 1992) is unleashed and liberated throughout the system. Table III: Summary of the Relational Consequences of Appreciation Releases Positive Conversation Within the Organization Unconditional positive questions ignite a virtual explosion of constructive conversations that refocus an organization s attention away from problems and toward hopeful, energizing possibilities Builds an Ever-Expanding Web of Inclusion and Positive Relationships An everincreasing number of voices are included in conversations that highlight strengths, assets, hopes, and dreams. Respect, understanding, and strong relational bonds are formed. Creates Self-Reinforcing Learning Communities As positive vocabularies multiply, people strengthen their capacity to put possibilities into practice. Organizational members learn increasingly sophisticated vocabularies for doing things in new ways. Bolsters Democracy and Self-Organizing Appreciative self-organizing systems are marked by an epistemic stance of liberation, freedom, solidarity, social construction, and a deep appreciation for the miracle and mystery of organizational life. Provides a Reservoir of Strength and Unleashes a Positive Revolution of Change The aim of appreciative inquiry is to discover the organization s positive core, which provides continuity, strength, and stability in the face of turbulence and is also the source of energy for positive innovation and change. Conclusion Ever since Descartes, the Western intellectual tradition has suffered from a form of epistemological schizophrenia (Popkin, 1979). Its intent of building knowledge to enhance the human condition is a noble one, yet its methodological starting point of doubt and negation undermines its constructive intent. Appreciative inquiry recognizes that inquiry and change are not truly separate moments, but are simultaneous. Inquiry is intervention, and the seeds of change that is, the things people think and talk about, the things people discover and learn, and the things that inform dialogue and inspire action are implicit in the very first questions we ask. In this light, it may well be, that as action researchers and as organizational leaders, the greatest gift that we can give to science, society, and humanity, is continuously to craft and to pose the unconditional positive question that allows whole systems to discover, amplify, and multiply the alignment of strengths in such a way that weaknesses and deficiencies become increasingly irrelevant.
16 References Barrett, F. J Creating appreciative learning cultures. Organization Dynamics, 24 (1), Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books (Doubleday). Brown, H. B Reconstructing social theory after the postmodern critique. In H. W. Simons and M. Billig (Eds.), After postmodernism: Reconstructing ideology critique. London: Sage Publications. Cooperrider, D. L. & Whitney, D Collaborating for change: Appreciative inquiry. San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler Communications. Cooperrider, D. L Positive image, positive action: The affirmative basis of organizing. In S. Srivastva, D. L. Cooperrider, and Assoc., Appreciative management and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In W. A. Pasmore & R. W. Woodman (eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. I). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. De Bono, E Handbook for the positive revolution. New York: Penguin Books. Freire, P Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed (translated by R. R. Barr). New York: Continuum. George, J International Relations and the Search for Thinking Space. International Studies Quarterly, 33, Gergen, K. J Toward transformation in social knowledge. New York: Springer-Verlag. Gergen, K. J. 1994a. The limits of pure critique. In H. W. Simons & M. Billig (eds.), After postmodernism: Reconstructing ideology critique. London: Sage Publications. Gergen, K. J. 1994b. Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Hartmann, H Psychoanalysis and moral values. New York: International Universities Press. Hazelrigg, H Claims of knowledge: On the labor of making found worlds. Tallahassee: The Florida State University Press.
17 Johnson, S. & Ludema, J. D Partnering to build and measure organizational capacity: Lessons from NGOs around the world. Grand Rapids, MI: CRC Pubs. Kolb, D. A Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Ludema, J. D., Wilmot, T. B., & Srivastva, S Organizational hope: Reaffirming the constructive task of social and organizational inquiry. Human Relations, 50(8), Marcus, G. E What comes (just) after post? The case of ethnography. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Masserman, J Psychoanalysis and human values. New York: Grune and Stratton. Polak, F The image of the future (translated and abridged by E. Boulding). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Popkin, R. H The history of scepticism: from Erasmus to Spinoza. Berkeley: University of California Press. Rorty, R Consequences of pragmatism (Essays: ). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Weick, K. E Affirmation as inquiry. Small Group Behavior, 13, Wollheim, R Art and its objects (second edition). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
WELCOME TO THE ORD SUMMIT Igniting Leadership at all Levels Working Together to Ensure the Earth s Vitality Pervasive Leadership Liberating Collaboration Engendering Trust To advocate human conversation
Training Terminology - Toolkit Appreciative Inquiry No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it. We must learn to see the world anew Albert Einsten Appreciative Inquiry
Leading Positive Performance: A Conversation about Appreciative Leadership Diana Whitney, Phd, Amanda Trosten-Bloom and Kae Rader This is a preprint of an article published in Performance Improvement journal,
What is Appreciative Inquiry? By Bliss Browne, Imagine Chicago Appreciative inquiry is an approach to organizational and community development that has been used successfully worldwide to cultivate hope,
Appreciative Inquiry: A Positive Approach to Change Edwin C. Thomas Introduction Maybe it is because we have just emerged from the midst of election season. Or perhaps it is the constant barrage of negative
50 Section 2: Facilitator Skills and Conversation Processes Appreciative Inquiry Appreciative Inquiry does not deny the existence of problems; rather, it invites people to inquire about and share the experiences
Strategic Planning with Appreciative Inquiry: Unleashing the Positive Potential to SOAR Catherine McKenna, Joanne Daykin, Bernard J Mohr, and Tony Silbert Catherine McKenna, Joanne Daykin, Bernard J Mohr
Our Journey with Positive Psychology and Appreciative Inquiry Rosanne Kerr, M.Ed. Bruce Gordon, Ph.D. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada Some Introductions Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed
Appreciative Inquiry & Evaluation: Strengths & Challenges David J. MacCoy, DMgt. Partner First Leadership Limited Ap-pre ci-ate, v., 1.valuing; the act of recognizing the best in people or the world around
College Quarterly Spring 2011 - Volume 14 Number 2 Home Contents An Interprofessional Approach to Business Planning: A Model of Collaboration By Cory Ross, Kathleen Alexander, Renata Gritsyuk, Arleen Morrin,
Organizational Change Inside and Out: The Impact of an Appreciative Inquiry Sherry Rockey, Vice President of EnCompass LLC, and Laverne Webb, CEO of EnCompass LLC CEO 1 A s it began its tenth year in 2003,
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION MISSION, VISION & STRATEGIC PRIORITIES Approved by SBA General Faculty (April 2012) Introduction In 1926, we embarked on a noble experiment the creation
Using Appreciative Inquiry to Build Evaluation Capacity Objectives Understand the basic principles of Appreciative Inquiry (AI) Understand the structures and processes in building evaluation capacity Experience
Appreciative Inquiry and Humble Inquiry: Strong Tools for Leadership Conversations Sondra Reis Laura Johansson Welcome Introductions The topic Why this is a critical area for leadership growth Agenda Opening
Leadership for Sustainable Change Certificate Personal to Planetary Transformation based on the principles of the Earth Charter Vernice Solimar, PhD As the world becomes increasingly interdependent and
IRC ARtICle SeRIeS Organization Development Primer: Theory and Practice of Large Group Interventions Brenda Barker Scott Faculty Queen s University IRC Published: June 2009 IRC Research Program irc.queensu.ca
A Broad View of Leadership Development prepared for the B C Educational Leadership Council by Bruce Beairsto, PhD This document provides a brief introduction to the broad view of distributed leadership
Our Core Beliefs 1 We are rooted in the Gospel above all else. From this experience of God in the person of Jesus and the Word of Scripture, all our core beliefs flow. We are formed by Ignatian Spirituality
ABRAHAM DALLAS, TX May 8, 2010 When a desire launches, often you stand in a place of discomfort because you don t know how. It doesn t feel good when desire is surrounded with belief and expectations and
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2007). The leadership challenge (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Reviewed by Chelsea Truesdell Introduction The Leadership Challenge serves as a resource for any
Leadership development is not about filling a gap but about igniting a field of inspired connection and action Ten propositions on transforming the current leadership development paradigm Paper prepared
What is Appreciative Inquiry? from A Positive Revolution in Change: Appreciative Inquiry by David L. Cooperrider and Diana Whitney. Ap-pre ci-ate, v., 1. valuing; the act of recognizing the best in people
Using Appreciative Inquiry (AI) for planning ODL An Experiential Workshop Nancy A. George, Ed.D., Educational Consultant NancyGeorge144@gmail.com ABSTRACT In situations of social conflict and organisational
SESSION MISSION: Enhancing Teamwork through h Appreciative Inquiry Tweet with the hashtag #tgconf We can expect more change to occur in our lifetimes than has occurred since the beginning of civilization
ILA Strategic Plan 2012 2017 If you practice, study, or teach leadership; If you seek a community of people who share your passion for leadership; We invite you to be a vital part of the continued growth
CHANGE MANAGEMENT IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS: USING APPRECIATIVE INQUIRY FOR GENERATIVE LEARNING Martha Mattare, Assistant Professor, Frostburg State University, Frostburg, MD ABSTRACT The author developed a model
AB Volvo, 405 08 Göteborg, Sweden Ref No 953810003, August 2009 The Volvo Way index Preface Our mission Customers first Customer focus Clear objectives Quality, safety, environmental care Continuous improvements
Coaching: bringing out the best Opinion piece Philip Brew Coaching: bringing out the best Philip Brew 1/6 Organisations need fully functioning human beings In today s demanding and complex environments,
UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT (CSTD) Contribution to the CSTD ten-year review of the implementation of WSIS outcomes Submitted by INTEL DISCLAIMER: The views presented
The Principal s Role in Successful Schools: Creating a Positive School Culture Shelly Habegger Positive school culture is the heart of improvement and growth in any building. The job description of a school
Co-Sensing I am whom we are. Co-Presencing Co-Creating Love is inviting other back to himself. Human value as life purpose. This process reflects the individual and collective experience of the group in
Exercise 1: Appreciative Inquiry (AI) A Team Building Process Appreciative Inquiry (AI) is an approach to organization change developed by Dr. David Cooperrider and his colleagues at the Weatherhead School
8 AI Version 2.0: New Models of Appreciative Inquiry in the Digital Age Lindsey N. Godwin and Soren Kaplan email@example.com and firstname.lastname@example.org In this article we explore four technology-enabled
BRIEF NOTES ON THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF ACTION RESEARCH Peter Reason and Kate McArdle Centre for Action Research in Professional Practice University of Bath In S. Becker & A. Bryman (Eds.)(2004), Understanding
Strategic Business and Operations Framework Understanding the Framework June 30, 2012 Table of Contents The Pathway to Success: The Strategic Business and Operations Framework... 3 What is the Strategic
Integral Methodological Pluralism in Educational Research Florida State University Paper presented at the Integral Theory Conference Mount Pleasant, California August, 2008 In education there are multiple
AITSL is funded by the Australian Government Australian Professional Standard for Principals July 2011 Formerly the National Professional Standard for Principals 2011 Education Services Australia as the
Dynamic Dialogue Practicum Being, Learning, Growing, Integrating as a Dialogue-Centered Community A 2 year communal learning experience, beginning March 16-19, 2015 Two years of practice to further develop
Case Study : Profiles in Leadership Will, Gaston, Mort and Kumi were appointed successively as Executive Directors of the UNFD. They exhibited radically different leadership styles., a researcher interested
The World Café Presents A quick reference guide for putting conversations to work Café Guidelines Conducting an exciting Café Conversation is not hard it s limited only by your imagination! The Café format
Certificate in Leadership and Management Excellence Training Europe - North America - Middle East - Asia - Africa Introduction This highly interactive seminar will allow you to examine yourself, and your
INTRODUCTION This Declaration, prepared within the framework of the Belgian Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, is addressed to the Member States of the Council of Europe,
APPRECIATIVE INQUIRY AS AN ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT TOOL by Charles F. Martinetz, PhD Appreciative inquiry can get you much better results than seeking out and solving problems. That s an interesting
Education Minnesota Full Capacity Locals Project Page - 1 The Full Capacity Locals Project: A Report for Education Minnesota Executive Summary Mobius, Inc.; Organization Development Consultants April 2002
Table of Contents Introduction...4 Meeting and Setting Goals...6 Week 1: The Great Human Questions...9 Week 2: Examining the Ways We Know...15 Week 3: The Christian Worldview...24 Appendix A: The Divine
Trustee Leadership Forum for Retirement Security Inaugural Meeting Summary On May 17-18, 2011, the Initiative for Responsible Investment hosted a meeting of laboraffiliated public and Taft-Hartley pension
Biblical Perspectives from God s Word Discovering and Capturing Your Destiny Pt. 2 Ken Birks, Pastor/Teacher I. Introductory Remarks. Every believer needs to discern their calling, because every believer
OUR WAY STRATEGY PLAN FOR THE FUTURE 2014 TO 2018 4 th Version March 2014 PREAMBLE: The YMCA empowers young people. The YMCA is deeply rooted in local communities. Young people are part of an untold story
IB position paper Holistic education: An interpretation for teachers in the IB programmes John Hare International International Baccalaureate Baccalaureate Organization Organization 2010 2010 1 Language
THE ROLE OF THE FACILITATOR What is a Meeting Facilitator? The facilitator is a guide or discussion leader for the group. The process of facilitation is a way of providing leadership without taking the
Asset Based Community Development Asset-Based Community Development/Asset Mapping Texas Healthy Start Alliance March 7, 2014 Copyright 2014 H. Daniels Duncan, Faculty Member ABCD Institute Hand, Head and
Moderator: Michael R. Halleran, Provost "Professional Programs in/and the Liberal Arts University January 25, 2010 Panel: Pamela Eddy, Associate Professor of Education Bill Geary, Associate Professor of
G.O.L.D. Gusties In Ongoing Leadership Development Thank you for taking a leadership role at Gustavus! Best of luck this year! 800 West College Avenue Saint Peter, MN 56082 gustavus.edu gustavus adolphus
NGO Policy Briefing Paper No.4, April 2001 For the NGO Sector Analysis Programme NGOS AND PARTNERSHIP This Policy Briefing Paper presents the findings from the first phase of INTRAC s research Promoting
Leadership at All Levels Presented to Avera Pace Conference by Veronnica J. Smith, FACHE May 2012 Who is a leader? What is Leadership? Where every employee does what it takes to help the organization reach
Managing Conflict: A Guide for Volunteer Boards Participating as a member of a board of directors of a non-profit or voluntary organization is one of the most important roles we can play in a democracy.
Arkansas Teaching Standards The Arkansas Department of Education has adopted the 2011 Model Core Teaching Standards developed by Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) to replace
A Sleeves up Approach 1 Managing Neck Deep: A Sleeves up Approach to Academic Leadership Bio: Jennifer Schardt, Faculty Chair Presentation Team: Jennifer Schardt is a full-time faculty member at Central
Appreciative Inquiry Tapping into the River of Positive Possibilities Herb Stevenson President & CEO The Cleveland Consulting Group, Inc. 9796 Cedar Road Novelty, Ohio 44072 440 338 1705 Http://ClevelandConsultingGroup.com
Team Building HR can provide you with support for building effective team work. Developing Effective Teams Model Typically we work with the leader or a smaller working group to determine what they would
Foundations S H A P I N G T H E M I N I S T RY O F C H R I S T I A N E D U C AT I O N I N Y O U R C O N G R E G AT I O N T he church of Jesus Christ cannot survive without the fundamental ministry of teaching.
VALUES What values do you bring to your understanding of leadership? Do you have strongly held convictions and beliefs that frame how you define a leader and how a leader influences a group or organization?
K 12 Paying Attention to LITERACY Six Foundational Principles for Improvement in Literacy, K 12 Focus on literacy. Build an understanding of effective literacy instruction. Design a responsive literacy
No.1 In this Issue Qualities of Quality: Understanding Excellence in Arts Education An ARTS EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE Series Qualities of Quality: Understanding Excellence in Arts Education is a research
Executive Summary of Mastering Business Growth & Change Made Easy by David Matteson & Jeff Hansen, June 2008 You stand at a crossroads. A new division of your company is about to be launched, and you need
Closing the Achievement Gap in East Lansing Public Schools Dorinda J. Carter Andrews, Ed.D. Associate Professor Department of Teacher Education Michigan State University 620 Farm Lane 358 Erickson Hall
Oakland Museum of California: Strategic Plan 2014-2019 Inspiring California s Future Context 2019 will mark the 50 th anniversary of the founding of the Oakland Museum of California. It is a particularly
Change Management in Higher Education: Using Model and Design Thinking to Develop Ideas that Work for your Institution By Michael P. Meotti Ed Policy Group Introduction Change and innovation are hot topics
University of New Mexico Undergraduate Programs Plan for Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes A. College, Department and Date 1. College: College of Arts and Sciences 2. Department: Philosophy 3. Date:
The New Leaders Transforming the art of leadership into the science of results By Daniel Goleman, Richard Boyatzio and Annie Mckee Great leadership works through emotions. When leaders drive emotions positively,
Leadership Case Study: Babcock University New Department Chair Leaders Dilemma by, Brandon Garber, BS Submitted to Robert Dibie, PhD. In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of V566: Executive Leadership
Leadership Training and Collaborative Governance Skills University Network for Collaborative Governance March 2, 2010 Cyndee Patterson The Lee Institute Vision: Collaboration builds strong communities.
Leadership Profile Georgia College & State University Dean of the College of Education This search is being assisted by: THE SEARCH FOR A DEAN OF THE COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AT GEORGIA COLLEGE Georgia College
Participant Manual CPC Certified Professional CoaCh training Program ICF Accredited Coach Training Program 142 Contact Learning Hours 110 3rd Avenue North, Suite 102 Certified Professional CoaCh training
Additional Qualification Course Guideline Special Education, Specialist Schedule D Teachers Qualifications Regulation April 2014 Ce document est disponible en français sous le titre Ligne directrice du
The Natural Step Canada Strategic Plan 2013-2017 Summary for www.naturalstep.ca 1 INTRODUCTION The Natural Step Canada is an entrepreneurial charity that delivers projects and programs based on our expertise
The Leader s Edge How Best Practices Programs Can Be Used Most Effectively to Support the Growth of Women Leaders The Leaders Edge research study completed in February, 2004 demonstrates the need for companies
A Blueprint for 21st Century Nursing Ethics: Report of the National Nursing Summit Executive Summary November 18, 2014 A Blueprint for 21st Century Nursing Ethics: Report of the National Nursing Summit
PERFORMANCE EXPECTATION 1: Vision, Mission, and Goals PERFORMANCE EXPECTATION 1: Vision, Mission, and Goals Education leaders ensure the achievement of all students by guiding the development and implementation
Financial Freedom: Three Steps to Creating and Enjoying the Wealth You Deserve What does financial freedom mean to you? Does it mean freedom from having to work, yet still being able to enjoy life without
28/04/2000, 3 P.m. FINAL The Dakar Framework for Action Education For All: Meeting our Collective Commitments Revised Final Draft World Education Forum Dakar, Senegal, 26-28 April 2000 1 1 The Dakar Framework
TL2: Transformative Learning and Transformative Leadership in Successful Cooperative Extension Staff Partnerships Nancy K. Franz Associate Professor of Youth Development University of Wisconsin Extension
Starting Up a Community Foundation, Governance and Organizational Development Shannon E. St. John My responsibility today is to talk with you about the how-to, the practical steps in starting a new community
Talent Development Lead Battle Creek, Michigan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The W.K. Kellogg Foundation (WKKF) founded in 1930 as an independent, private foundation by breakfast cereal pioneer, Will Keith Kellogg,
Plan 0 07 Mapping the Library for the Global Network University NYU DIVISION OF LIBRARIES Our Mission New York University Libraries is a global organization that advances learning, research, and scholarly