1 EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 42(2), Copyright C 2007, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Is Direct Instruction an Answer to the Right Question? Deanna Kuhn Teachers College Columbia University Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) make a general case for the effectiveness of a teaching method direct instruction without reference to any context of what it is that is being taught by whom and to whom. In so doing, they bypass what is arguably the most pressing concern facing educators not how to teach students but what to teach them. An argument is made for the need to contemplate instructional methods within the broader context of instructional goals. Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) make a strong case for the efficacy, and hence desirability, of what is currently referred to as direct instruction, over its alternatives, at all age levels. If we want students to learn something, they claim, we will be most successful if we convey it to them in as explicit, direct, and highly scaffolded manner as possible. Kirschner et al. s position comprises two separable claims that direct instruction is effective and that other methods are ineffective. Each of these claims, I would maintain, is debatable, and some experimental evidence exists that fails to support them. In my own research, we have shown that direct instruction does not fare so well when one takes the long view, over time and transfer to new contexts (Dean & Kuhn, in press). On the other hand, well-controlled experimental studies have shown that students learning is enhanced when they have identified a question or a problem to address (Capon & Kuhn, 2004; Kuhn & Dean, 2005). Rather than pursue a detailed discussion of this evidence or contrasting evidence supporting Kirschner et al. s claims, here, instead, I would like to pursue a theme based on what I found most striking about Kirschner et al. s treatment of their topic the fact that nowhere in the article do they make any reference to what it is that a teacher might be seeking to teach and students undertaking to learn. Implicit in their presentation is the assumption that their claims about how best to teach and learn are universally applicable, irrespective of what is being taught to whom or why. Correspondence should be addressed to Deanna Kuhn, Box 119, Teachers College Columbia University, New York, NY COGNITION AND MOTIVATION This universalist stance of Kirschner et al. s article is especially striking as it stands in contrast to the contextualist perspective of the other articles that appear in the very same or an adjacent issue (Issues 1 and 2 of the 2006 volume) of this journal. The articles in issue 1 by Vansteenkiste, Lens, and Deci (2006); by Winne (2006); and by Boekaerts, DeKoning, and Vedder (2006); and the articles in issue 2 by Flum and Kaplan (2006) and by Hidi and Renninger (2006) all are devoted, explicitly or implicitly, to the topic of academic motivation. In contrast to an earlier time in which motivation was regarded strictly as an attribute of the learner, motivation theorists now focus directly on what the subject matter is that students may (or may not) have the motivation to learn and more specifically what the relation may be between a particular student s dispositions and the particular subject matter we would like that student to master. In other words, motivation resides not within the individual but in the interaction between individual and subject matter. As Winne captures nicely in a few words in his article in issue 1... learners see themselves as agents who make choices about how to construct knowledge (p. 9). The implications of this newer perspective on motivation extend broadly to children and adolescents development of self-regulation and identity formation, as well as to what they do in school. In their article, Flum and Kaplan underscore the need for the young child s natural curiosity to evolve into an active search for information and its examination and evaluation in a self-reflective manner. In their words, the focus of exploration is simultaneously on engaging in the academic
2 110 KUHN material as well as on the self: What does engagement in the content suggest with regard to who one is, what are one s values, and who does one want to become (2006, p. 106). They approvingly cite Nicholls (1989, 1992), who advocates the need for students to engage in spirited discussion of the nature and point of what they learn in school (1992, p. 280), an activity that requires explicit reflection and higher order thinking. Hidi and Renninger speak simply of the need for students to identify a reason to be interested, a crucial step in their coming to regulate their own interest. In a similar vein, Vansteenkiste et al. (2006) see coming to identify with the value of an activity as a crucial step in accepting regulation of the activity as one s own (p. 21). In addition to bringing subject matter into the equation, all of this points to the cognitivization of the construct of motivation from its historical origins as a dynamic, strictly affective construct (Bempechat & Drago-Severson, 1999; Kaplan & Maehr, 2002). Motivation theorists like Kaplan and Maehr now highlight the need to identify... pathways by which students can construct the meaning of achievement situations and the purposes that they can adopt for engagement and success in achievement tasks (2002, p. 138). The broad conclusion is that we need to focus our attention on what sense students are making of things if we hope to influence their behavior. In the school context, this means that key to predicting students performance is examining what it is that they are undertaking to learn in school, what they think it means, how they construe the meaning of this material in relation to themselves, and whether they can see it as worth learning none of which are easily accomplished tasks. How, then, can we reconcile this contemporary perspective with the stance taken by Kirschner et al. that the most pressing issue facing educators is identifying and implementing the most effective mode of instruction, irrespective of what the content to be learned may be? This is the anomaly that inspired the present article, and in what follows I seek to resolve it. To anticipate in a word, my argument is that the concerns of Kirschner et al., and a number of others who take a position similar to theirs, are misplaced and that the most pressing concern facing educators and challenge to educational reformers is not in fact how to teach students but rather what to teach them. In other words, whether or not they have a correct answer, Kirschner et al. do not address the most pressing question. WHAT DO WE WANT CHILDREN TO LEARN? The foundation for my argument is well laid by the motivation theorists cited above. David Olson (2003) in a recent book lays this foundation in even broader terms. It is students themselves, in the end, not teachers, he says, who decide what students will learn. A teacher cannot change a student s belief system or way of thinking unless the student wishes it to be changed. Hence, it is essential that we attend to what students think they are doing at school what sense the endeavor makes to them (Kuhn, 2005, in press). As the authors quoted above stress, for there to be any chance of long-term success, students must come to identify with the value of the activity and then accept[ing] regulation of the activity as one s own (Vansteenkiste et al., 2006, p. 21). They must embrace the activity to the extent of incorporating it as part of their present and future identity. If so, the crucial question becomes one of what kinds of activities can fulfill these demands. Kirschner et al. ignore the question. The assumption implicit in their article is that others will make the decision of what is to be learned and as educators their task is to identify the most efficient way in which this learning can be accomplished. The motivational theorists cited above recognize the importance of the question, but they assume that the answer is highly individualized. Every student must seek and find their own academic and personal interests and construct an identity around them, which will sustain engagement and aid in their pursuit. Educators can do no more than offer opportunities for exploration. In recent writing (Kuhn, 2005), I have proposed a broader, less individualistic answer to the question of what it is that children might learn, what kinds of activities would accomplish these learning goals, and why these educational goals are superior to others. Traditional answers to the question of what schools should teach children have become increasingly hard to justify. Beyond basic literacy and numeracy, it has become next to impossible to predict what kinds of knowledge people will need to thrive in the mid-21st century. Like knowledge acquisition, another traditional goal education for citizenship is far from straightforward to characterize or implement. Examples across the world illustrate the dangers of ideological teaching that narrows students perspectives to the point of accepting only their own right way of understanding human affairs. A resolution has been in the direction of undertaking to teach not simply knowledge itself but the skills of knowledge acquisition skills that will equip a new generation to learn what they need to know to adapt flexibly to continually changing and unpredictable circumstances (Anderson, Greeno, Reder, & Simon, 2000; Bereiter, 2002; Botstein, 1997; Kuhn, 2005; Noddings, 2006; Olson, 2003). A shift in focus from knowledge to skills by no means resolves the question of educational goals. But it does bring the challenge of defining goals to the forefront as one that is by no means resolved and demands our primary attention. Prescriptions like those of Kirschner et al., regarding how best to inculcate knowledge will not suffice, nor even get us very far, if questions remain unresolved regarding what knowledge to teach or even whether to teach knowledge at all. After examining possible alternatives, I make the case that the only defensible answer to the question of what we want schools to accomplish is that they should teach students to use their minds well, in school and beyond (Kuhn, 2005). The two broad sets of skills I identify as best serving
3 IS DIRECT INSTRUCTION AN ANSWER TO THE RIGHT QUESTION? 111 this purpose are the skills of inquiry and the skills of argument. These skills are education for life, not simply for more school (Anderson et al., 2000). They are essential preparation to equip a new generation to address the problems of the day. We have only a brief window of opportunity in children s lives to gain (or lose) their trust that the things we ask them to do in school are worth doing. Activities centered on inquiry and argument enable students to appreciate the power and utility of these skills as they practice them. They learn for themselves what they are good for, without having to be told, and become committed to them as tools for lifelong thinking and learning. IS THERE AN ALTERNATIVE TO LEARNING BY DOING? My purpose here is not to make a comprehensive case for inquiry and argument as goals of education. Space does not allow developing all the strands of the argument and I have done that elsewhere. Rather, my objective is to make explicit the implications of these claims with respect to a position like the one that has been advanced by Kirschner et al. and a number of others (Klahr & Nigam, 2004; Mayer, 2004). In addition to describing the positive attributes of direct instruction as the preferred instructional method, Kirschner et al. explain what s wrong with methods they regard under the broad umbrella of minimally guided instruction. Most well-known of these is the method that has come to be known as inquiry learning, and is now widely endorsed as a highly desirable, even essential, aspect of science curriculum. Engaging in scientific inquiry activities is mandated in US curriculum standards as an instructional goal beginning in the early grades and at every grade level thereafter through secondary school (National Research Council, 1996). Inquiry practices vary widely but are generally agreed to entail identifying a question, generating and analyzing evidence, interpreting the evidence vis-à-vis the question, and drawing conclusions. Kirschner et al. criticize such methods on two major grounds. The first is that they produce cognitive overload and unproductive search in problem-solving settings. In their place they advocate worked examples as the epitome of strongly guided instruction. These, they claim, make it explicit to the learner precisely what it is that needs to be learned and performed. But note the anomaly that confronts us at this point. If we agree that development of inquiry skills is a worthwhile educational goal, as I have argued and a majority of science educators agree, and we also accept Kirschner et al. s claims regarding the desirability of direct over inquiry methods of instruction, the following conclusion is unavoidable: Students should learn inquiry skills but they should not be involved in inquiry as an instructional method for mastering these skills. Engaging in inquiry, in other words, is not the most effective means of acquiring inquiry skills. In making their second criticism of minimally guided instruction, Kirschner et al. make it clear that they see no anomaly here. Advocates of inquiry methods, they claim, confuse practicing a discipline and teaching or learning that discipline (science, in this case). It is a mistake, they say, to assume that the pedagogic content of the learning experience is identical to the methods and processes (i.e., the epistemology) of the discipline being studied... (p. 84). There is no basis, they claim, for advocating... learning a discipline by experiencing the processes and procedures of the discipline (p. 78). It is notable that this extended discussion of science education methods by Kirschner et al. takes place without their ever once making a reference to what it is that students might or ought to be learning about science, a question that in the field of science education both theorists and practitioners have been grappling with for decades. Meanwhile, science educators have moved increasingly to the view that the most important thing children have to learn about science is to recognize science as a way of knowing the world, one that distinguishes it from other kinds of knowing and serves as a powerful tool for understanding (see Lehrer & Schauble, 2006, for review). Here the latest views of motivation theorists, which we visited earlier, come into play. It is students understanding of the use and purpose of what they are learning that is vital to their willingness to engage in learning it. Of course we want children to acquire some rudimentary understanding of the physical and biological world around them, but it is by now obvious that we can hope to impart only an arbitrary smattering of what there is to know in these complex and rapidly expanding scientific disciplines. And what is most likely to stay with students over the ensuing years is not the specifics but the overall nature of the enterprise and what sense it makes. Are scientific topics worth learning about, knowing about, or inquiring about any more deeply? And, as the motivation theorists highlight, another critical question: Am I someone who is competent to engage in such learning? How do such questions get answered? In the words of White and Frederiksen (2005),... students need to develop explicit cognitive models of capabilities needed for inquiry. Such models help students learn how to do inquiry, as well as to understand its nature and purpose (p. 212). In a word, students need to learn what it is scientists do and why they bother to do it. Students can develop that understanding only by engaging, in however rudimentary a way, in the practice of science. As for the claim that engaging in problem-solving produces cognitive overload, isn t problem-solving, often unstructured, exactly what students need to become equipped to do? Surely a steady diet of worked examples cannot possibly prepare today s students for what they will face in the 21st-century world.
4 112 KUHN INTELLECTUAL GOALS AND THE MEANS TO ACHIEVE THEM This article might be interpreted as perpetuating the either/or perspective of Kirschner et al. s article. I should therefore make a point of disclaiming it. I am not making a case against the opposition direct instruction and in favor of inquiry or problem-based or discovery learning the headings under which various constructivist methods get classified. Schwartz and Bransford and colleagues (Schwartz & Bransford, 1998; Schwartz & Martin, 2004) have for some time had it right in claiming that there is a place for both direct instruction and student-directed inquiry. The challenge is to get the balance and sequence right. And certainly the worked examples that Kirschner et al. emphasize have their place as well. As the other commentators (this issue) on Kirschner et al. s article highlight, good instruction is never without structure. Indeed, designing the structure of problem-based instructional activities may require the most complex and demanding instructional design of all. My argument here, then, is not for or against any instructional method. Rather, it is an argument for the need to contemplate instructional methods within the broader context of instructional goals. It is only in this context that it can be meaningful to do so. I have proposed here and elsewhere that the most defensible educational goals are those that pertain to mental self-management taking charge of one s own learning and coming to value learning and knowing and one s self as learner and knower (Kuhn, 2005; Kuhn & Park, 2005). If one accepts these as worthy educational goals, the instructional methods for best achieving them must be debated in the context of and in relation to these goals. These goals and methods must also be debated in the context of learners developing cognitive skills and understanding, broadly conceived. Particularly germane here is developing epistemological understanding (Hofer & Pintrich, 1997; 2002; Kuhn, Cheney, & Weinstock, 2000; Kuhn & Park, 2005). Consistent with all that has been said here regarding the importance of students meaning-making, students base their intellectual efforts on a foundation of understanding of what it means to know. Research on epistemological understanding has now grown to the extent that we know in broad terms the nature of a developmental progression that occurs from childhood to adolescence and into adulthood. This evolution in levels of understanding of the nature of knowing provides a foundation, indeed the rational base, that is needed for sustained intellectual engagement and the formation of personal intellectual goals (Kuhn & Park, 2005). Educators have long been concerned about whether students are motivated to learn and whether teachers know how to teach. Perhaps we are now at a point at which we should focus attention on what it is that students may be motivated to learn and why they wish to do so. What do they see as the value of this learning? Only then are we in a position to contemplate how best to help them achieve their goals. As for direct instruction, of course it has a place. Each young student does not need to reinvent knowledge from the ground up. The challenge is to formulate what we want direct instruction to be. In doing so, it is well to keep in mind that it is students who construct meaning from such instruction and decide what it is that they will learn. REFERENCES Anderson, J., Greeno, J., Reder, L., & Simon, H. (2000). Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher, 29(4), Bempechat, J., & Drago-Severson, E. (1999). Cross-national differences in academic achievement: Beyond etic conceptions of children s understandings. Review of Educational Research, 69, Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Boekaerts, M., de Koning, E., & Vedder, P. (2006). Goal-directed behavior and contextual factors in the classroom: An innovative approach to the study of multiple goals, Educational Psychologist, 41, Botstein, L. (1997). Jefferson s children: Education and the promise of American culture. New York: Doubleday. Capon, N., & Kuhn, D. (2004). What s so good about problem-based learning? Cognition and Instruction, 22, Dean, D., & Kuhn, D. (in press). Direct instruction vs. discovery: The long view. Science Education. Flum, H., & Kaplan, A. (2006). Exploratory orientation as an educational goal. Educational Psychologist, 41, Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development, Educational Psychologist, 41, Hofer, B., & Pintrich, P. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, Hofer, B., & Pintrich, P. (Eds.). (2002). Epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. (2002). Adolescents achievement goals: Situating motivation in socio-cultural contexts. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education: Vol. 2. Academic motivation of adolescents (pp ). Greenwich CT: Information Age. Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15, Kuhn, D. (2005).Education for thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Kuhn, D. (in press). How to produce a high-achieving child. Phi Delta Kappan. Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2005). Is developing scientific thinking all about learning to control variables? Psychological Science, 16, Kuhn, D. & Park, S. (2005). Epistemological understanding and intellectual values. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Scientific thinking and scientific literacy: Supporting development in learning contexts. In K. A. Renninger & I. Sigel (Vol. eds.), W. Damon & R. Lerner (Series eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. IV (6th ed., pp ). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist, 59, National Research Council (1996). The National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5 IS DIRECT INSTRUCTION AN ANSWER TO THE RIGHT QUESTION? 113 Nicholls, J. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Nicholls, J. (1992). Students as educational theorists. In D. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp ).Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Noddings, N. (2006). Critical lessons: What our schools should teach. New York: Cambridge University Press. Olson, D. (2003). Psychological theory and educational reform: How school remakes mind and society. New York: Cambridge University Press. Schwartz, D., & Bransford, J. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16, Schwartz, D., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22, Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41, Winne, P. (2006). How software technologies can improve research on learning and bolster school reform. Educational Psychologist, 41, White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (2005). A theoretical framework and approach for fostering metacognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 40,
Pedagogy and Motivation in Introductory Accounting Courses Abstract: Motivation is an integral part of the learning process.most studies in accounting that examine the effect of motivation in student learning
Engaging Students for Optimum Learning Online Informing the Design of Online Learning By the Principles of How People Learn What Is Engagement? As early as 1995, student engagement was "the latest buzzword
LEARNER-CENTERED PSYCHOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES: A Framework for School Reform & Redesign TABLE OF CONTENTS: Background Learner-Centered Principles Prepared by the Learner-Centered Principles Work Group of the
High School Psychology Kansas Course Code # 04254 The American Psychological Association defines Psychology as the study of the mind and behavior. The discipline embraces all aspects of the human experience
Vol.4, No.1. April 2014 pp. 17 21. Early years education: are young students intrinsically or extrinsically motivated towards school activities? A discussion about the effects of rewards on young children
Students Track Their Own Learning with SAS Data Notebook Lucy Kosturko SAS Institute, Inc. Lucy.Kosturko@sas.com Jennifer Sabourin SAS Institute, Inc. Jennifer.Sabourin@sas.com Scott McQuiggan SAS Institute,
Physics Teacher Education Program Web Site Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online 10/22/11 7:53 AM 1 Science teaching: Historical background There have been many influential philosophers of education
Education as Degrees and Certificates What is Undergraduate Education? K. P. Mohanan For many people, being educated means attending educational institutions and receiving certificates or degrees. This
Undergraduate Psychology Major Learning Goals and Outcomes i Goal 1: Knowledge Base of Psychology Demonstrate familiarity with the major concepts, theoretical perspectives, empirical findings, and historical
Guidelines for Integrative Core Curriculum Themes and Perspectives Designations The purpose of this document is to provide guidelines for faculty wishing to have new or existing courses carry Themes and
Educational Philosophy Direct explicit instruction and a standards based sequential curriculum will drive the educational philosophy of Prepa Tec. Instruction will be inquiry and investigation-based and
ABSTRACT Assessing a theoretical model on EFL college students Yu-Ping Chang Yu Da University, Taiwan This study aimed to (1) integrate relevant language learning models and theories, (2) construct a theoretical
Crosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the Equivalent in the Performance Based Principal Licensure Standards (current principal standards)
Master of Science in Education: Childhood and Special Education/Inclusive Education Dual Initial Certification Program Childhood 1-6 and Students with Disabilities 1-6 Program Overview The Master of Science
Values Go to School Booklet prepared by The Child Development Institute, Sarah Lawrence College, Bronxville, NY 10708 The Child Development Institute was established in 1987 to develop outreach programs
Research into competency models in arts education Paper presented at the BMBF Workshop International Perspectives of Research in Arts Education, Nov. 4 th and 5 th, 2013. Folkert Haanstra, Amsterdam School
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 42(2), 115 121 Copyright C 2007, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Why Minimally Guided Teaching Techniques Do Not Work: A Reply to Commentaries John Sweller School of Education
Arkansas Teaching Standards The Arkansas Department of Education has adopted the 2011 Model Core Teaching Standards developed by Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) to replace
The Links between Preschool Programs and School Completion Comments on Hauser-Cram 1, McDonald Connor and Morrison 2, and Ou and Reynolds Topic School completion KATHRYN R. WENTZEL, PhD University of Maryland,
DRAFT TJ PROGRAM OF STUDIES: AP PSYCHOLOGY COURSE DESCRIPTION AP Psychology engages students in a rigorous appraisal of many facets of our current understanding of psychology. The course is based on the
RUTGERS SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAM PRACTICUM HANDBOOK Introduction School Psychology is a general practice and health service provider specialty of professional psychology that is concerned with the science
Supporting English Language Learners English language learners are a richly heterogeneous group. The paths they take to acquire a new language and to adjust to their new environment are also varied and
Teacher Education Portfolio Guidelines and Rubric The Teacher Education Portfolio is developed throughout a s program. Most Teacher Education courses have a capstone project designed to meet the InTASC
THE ROLE OF INSTRUCTIONAL ASSESSMENT AND TEACHER ASSESSMENT PRACTICES Janet K. Pilcher University of West Florida Abstract Graue s (1993) description of instructional assessment endorses the social constructivist
PROGRAM OBJECTIVES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DEGREES OFFERED MASTER OF ARTS, EDUCATIONAL STUDIES (M.A.); MASTER OF ARTS, SCIENCE EDUCATION (M.S.); MASTER OF ARTS IN GERMAN WITH TEACHING LICENSURE (M.A.);
Teaching for Developmental Diversity: An Approach to Academic Language and Critical Thinking Jennifer Ouellette-Schramm For a successful transition into college, ABE learners will benefit from academic
Accreditation Resource Guide Ontario College of Teachers Ordre des enseignantes et des enseignants de l Ontario Message from the Registrar I am pleased to present the Accreditation Resource Guide, which
LEARNING Joseph Krajcik and Maria Varelas, Section Coeditors Direct Instruction vs. Discovery: The Long View DAVID DEAN JR., DEANNA KUHN Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA Received
Master of Arts Programs in the Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences Admission Requirements to the Education and Psychology Graduate Program The applicant must satisfy the standards for admission into
I.B. SPECIFIC TEACHING FIELDS Standards for Certification in Early Childhood Education [26.110-26.270] STANDARD 1 Curriculum The competent early childhood teacher understands and demonstrates the central
Colorado Professional Teaching Standards Standard I: Teachers demonstrate knowledge of the content they teach a. Teachers provide instruction that is aligned with the Colorado Academic Standards and their
Essays on Teaching Excellence Toward the Best in the Academy Volume 13, Number 1, 2001-02 A publication of The Professional & Organizational Development Network in Higher Education (www.podnetwork.org).
College of Psychology and Humanistic Studies (PHS) Curriculum Learning Goals and PsyD Program Learning Goals, Objectives and Competencies (GOCs) College of PHS Learning Goals PsyD Program Learning Goals
PRESERVICE PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR TEACHERS (graduate level): March 2009 INTRODUCTION The Professional Standards for Queensland Teachers underpin all stages of teachers professional learning throughout
PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND MEASURES The goals and directives for the psychology major are taken directly from the work of the Task Force on Undergraduate Psychology Major competencies
Master of Science in Education: Special Education/Inclusive Education Programs for Certified Teachers Program Overview The mission of the Special Education Program is to provide a quality educational experience
Key Components of Literacy Instruction The longer I write and read, the more I learn; writing and reading are lifelong apprenticeships --Donald M. Murray W e, in MPS, believe that effort creates ability.
Professional Standards for Teachers Guidelines for Professional Practice July 2005 Queensland the Smart State The State of Queensland (Department of Education) 2005 Copyright protects this publication.
Examining Motivation to Learn in Massive Open Online Courses Abeer Watted Technion Israel Institute of Technology Miri Barak Technion Israel Institute of Technology Abstract Massive open online courses
NSTA Position Statement: Early Childhood Science Education Introduction At an early age, all children have the capacity and propensity to observe, explore, and discover the world around them (NRC 2012).
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: A VISION FOR SAUDI SCIENCE TEACHERS Hiya Almazroa Pringcess Noura Bint Abdulrahman University, Saudi Arabia Abstract: Professional development is a significant mechanism for maintaining
INTRODUCTION TO PROJECT BASED LEARNING BEGIN WITH THE END IN MIND CRAFT THE DRIVING QUESTION PLAN THE ASSESSMENT MAP THE PROJECT MANAGE THE PROCESS INTRODUCTION TO PROJECT BASED LEARNING INTRODUCTION TO
LEARNING THEORIES Ausubel's Learning Theory David Paul Ausubel was an American psychologist whose most significant contribution to the fields of educational psychology, cognitive science, and science education.
Beauty and blended learning: E-learning in vocational programs Melanie Brown Waikato Institute of Technology This case study set out to discover how the provision of blended learning focussing on course
Masters of Reading Information Booklet College of Education Department of Teaching and Learning Bloomsburg University's Masters in Reading/Reading Certification degree program provides theoretical, analytical
Instructional Design Course 1 Running head: INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN COURSE Syllabus Response: EPSY 350: Instructional Design Cognition and Instruction Comprehensive Exam Anthony R. Artino Jr. University of
National Framework for Values Education in Australian Schools National Framework for Values Education in Australian Schools Commonwealth of Australia 2005 ISBN: 0 642 77496 X ISBN: 0 642 77497 8 (online
DOCTOR IN EDUCATION COURSE DESCRIPTIONS A. CORE COURSES NEDD 800 Professionalism, Ethics, and the Self This introductory core course will explore and interrogate ideas surrounding professionalism and professionalization.
Albemarle County Schools Teacher Performance Appraisal (TPA) Rubrics The Teacher Performance Appraisal includes performance rubrics designed to guide self-assessment and reflection based on professional
Psychology Learning Goals and Outcomes UNDERGRADUATE PSYCHOLOGY MAJOR LEARNING GOALS AND OUTCOMES: A Report (March 2002) American Psychological Association, Task Force Members: Jane S. Halonen, Drew C.
Nottingham Trent University Course Specification Basic Course Information 1. Awarding Institution: Nottingham Trent University 2. School/Campus: Nottingham Business School/City 3. Final Award, Course Title
Issues in Higher Education: Is the concept of a powerful learning environment useful? Lin Norton Dean of Learning and Teaching Professor of Pedagogical Research Liverpool Hope University HERODOT conference
Master of Arts, Counseling Psychology Course Descriptions Advanced Theories of Counseling & Intervention (3 credits) This course addresses the theoretical approaches used in counseling, therapy and intervention.
Why Teach Science Using an Inquiry Approach? Dr. Carl J. Wenning Physics Department Illinois State University Normal, Illinois USA Inquiry Teaching! Science teaching has suffered because science has been
Form 2B City University of Hong Kong Information on a Course offered by Department of Applied Social Sciences with effect from Semester A 2012/2013 Part I Course Title: Course Code: Course Duration: Educational
Teaching educational psychology with VITAL-based case studies: Going beyond psychological theories in context-specific case analyses Noriyuki Inoue University of San Diego Paper presented at the biennial
MASTER OF EDUCATION 1 MASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE (M.ED.) (845) 575-3028 firstname.lastname@example.org MISSION AND OBJECTIVES The Teacher Education programs offered by Marist College are integrally linked
LIFELONG E-LEARNING: A FOUNDATION FOR TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL SUCCESS L. Roger Yin, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, email@example.com Tena B. Crews, University of South Carolina, firstname.lastname@example.org
1 MINOR IN EDUCATION STUDIES Rationale The purpose of this minor is to provide NTU students with the opportunity to gain exposure to key developments in education and training as future professionals in
North Carolina School Library Media Coordinators Standards Every public school student will graduate from high school, globally competitive for work and postsecondary education and prepared for life in
APA 04 Proposal The effects of highly rated science curriculum on goal orientation engagement and learning Purpose The paper to be presented describes a study of goal orientation (Pintrich, 2000), engagement
1 Doctor of Education - Higher Education The University of Liverpool s Doctor of Education - Higher Education (EdD) is a professional doctoral programme focused on the latest practice, research, and leadership
247 REGULATIONS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF EDUCATION (MEd) (See also General Regulations) Any publication based on work approved for a higher degree should contain a reference to the effect that the work
Exploratory Activities in the Classroom A Cognitive Science Perspective Marci DeCaro, PhD Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Digit Span Activity How did your thinking change between the first
Competencies for Early Childhood Professionals Area II: Understanding Child Growth and Development Rationale: Child development is the foundation upon which early childhood practice is based. Because the
Research Into Practice READING Reading Instruction and Reading Achievement Among ELL Students Principles of ELL Reading Instruction Some very straightforward principles, directly supported by research,
Learning theories, stages and styles Key concepts - Learning theories: students as empty vessels waiting to be filled (behavioural learning); cognitive engagement (cognitive learning); active construction
Elementary MEd I. The Relationship of the Program with the Unit s Conceptual Framework Shaping Tomorrow: Ideas to Action The Early Elementary Education program for prospective elementary education candidates
LEARNING OUTCOMES FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY MAJOR Goal 1. Knowledge Base of Psychology Demonstrate familiarity with the major concepts, theoretical perspectives, empirical findings, and historical trends in psychology.
338 The University of North Carolina at Pembroke 2015-2016 Academic Catalog COURSES BIRTH TO KINDERGARTEN (ECE) ECE 2020. Foundations of Early Childhood (3 credits) This course is designed to introduce
STANDARDS FOR THE MASTER OF LIBRARY SCIENCE DEGREE/ SCHOOL LIBRARY MEDIA COORDINATOR LICENSE Note: The master of library science degree is an entry-level requirement for all North Carolina school library
BA Psychology (2014 2015) Program Information Point of Contact Marianna Linz (email@example.com) Support for University and College Missions Marshall University is a multi campus public university providing
Teacher Evaluation Missouri s Educator Evaluation System Teacher Evaluation Protocol Introduction Missouri s Educator Evaluation System was created and refined by hundreds of educators across the state.
Ana Uka Beder University Motivational Factors of Albanian Graduate Students Pursuing a Master Degree in Education Abstract This study explained the reasons why Albanian students decide to pursue graduate
EDUCATIONAL AND SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY: TWO SIDES OF THE SAME COIN? Franco Marini Department of Psychology, University of Cagliari, Italy Keywords: Action-research, application, culture, educational psychology,
Chapter 1 Educational Technology in the Science Classroom Glen Bull and Randy L. Bell Technology has transformed the way in which science is conducted. Almost every aspect of scientific exploration has
International education and student success: Developing a framework for the global educator Abstract Ebinepre Cocodia, PhD Garvan Institute, Sydney NSW 2010 Australia firstname.lastname@example.org This paper
SASPA Discussion Paper June 2015 Draft Educating in the 21st Century This paper captures the best work of current practitioners in South Australian secondary schools. These educational leaders understand
B E S T PRACTICES NEA RESEARCH BRIEF Learning and Teaching July 2006 This brief outlines nine leading research-based concepts that have served as a foundation for education reform. It compares existing
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN INITIAL TEACHER EDUCATION BENCHMARK INFORMATION ON THE STANDARD for INITIAL TEACHER EDUCATION IN SCOTLAND CONSULTATION DOCUMENT April 2000 This document has been produced under the
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MSc Developmental and Educational Psychology Awarding body: University College London Teaching Institutions: UCL Institute of Education Name of final award: Master of Science (MSc)
Running head: PERSONAL STATEMENT ON LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION 1 Personal Statement on Learning and Instruction Jay A. Bostwick IP&T 620 Principles of Learning PERSONAL STATEMENT ON LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION
LEVEL 1 LICENSURE PORTFOLIO Part I Purpose Principles to Be Addressed Required Documentation Directions Entry 1: Analyzing the School Counseling Environment Candidates analyze the school counseling environment
Designing for Children - With focus on Play + Learn The role of toys in early childhood Gayatri Menon, Faculty and Coordinator, Toy and Game design program, National Institute of Design,India, email@example.com,firstname.lastname@example.org