Section 546(e) a Key Protection. Legal Update December 11, 2014
|
|
- Esther Antonia Washington
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Legal Update December 11, 2014 United States Court of Appeals for Second Circuit Holds that Section 546(e) Safe Harbor Protects from Avoidance Transfers of Fictitious Profits in Connection with Madoff Ponzi Scheme In In re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC ( Madoff ), 1 the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reaffirmed its broad and literal interpretation of section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code, which provides a safe harbor for transfers made in connection with a securities contract that might otherwise be attacked as preferences or fraudulent transfers. The Second Circuit held that the section 546(e) safe harbor prohibited the trustee (the Trustee ) in Madoff s liquidation proceeding under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 ( SIPA ) from clawing back transfers of fictitious profits under state fraudulent transfer law made applicable in the SIPA proceeding by section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. The fictitious profits had been transferred to customers in connection with the now infamous Ponzi scheme perpetrated by Bernard Madoff. In so holding, the Second Circuit found that transfers of fictitious profits pursuant to account and other brokerage agreements were protected transfers because they were made in connection with a securities contract and were also settlement payments, even though no actual securities trades were effected for the benefit of transferee customers by the brokerdealer that operated as a Ponzi scheme. The decision is the latest in a string of decisions from the Second Circuit that broadly construe the section 546(e) safe harbor in accordance with the statute s plain language. Section 546(e) a Key Protection Designed to minimize systemic risk in the financial markets, section 546 of the Bankruptcy Code contains safe harbors that limit a trustee s power to avoid certain transfers made by, to or for the benefit of certain identified financial market participants in connection with various types of financial transactions. These transactions include margin or settlement payments, securities contracts, swap agreements, forward contracts, repurchase agreements and commodity contracts. Section 546(e) protects margin payments, settlement payments and transfers in connection with securities contracts, forward contracts and commodity contracts made by, to or for the benefit of parties such as stockbrokers and financial institutions from avoidance by the trustee as preferences or fraudulent conveyances (whether under the Bankruptcy Code or under state law), except for actual fraudulent transfers under section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code. 2 Section 546(e) s financial contract safe harbors have been steadily expanded to embrace more transactions. Courts, including the Second Circuit, interpreting section 546(e), have acknowledged the breadth of the coverage of this safe harbor and have largely applied the plain language of the provision to broadly immunize
2 enumerated transactions from avoidance even where the transactions at issue arguably did not impact the financial markets. By way of example, in Enron Creditors Recovery Corp. v. ALFA, S.A.B. de C.V. ( Enron ), 3 the Second Circuit applied the plain meaning of section 546(e) and held that payments made to redeem commercial paper early were nonavoidable settlement payments under section 546(e) and rejected the notion that the safe harbor should be limited because the transactions at issue did not involve a financial intermediary that took title to the transacted securities and thus did not implicate the risks that prompted Congress to enact the safe harbor. Along the same lines, in In re Quebecor World (USA) Inc,. 4 the Second Circuit similarly applied a plain meaning approach to find that transfers under a Note Purchase Agreement to a financial institution acting as a conduit were transfers in connection with a securities contract made by or to a financial institution and thus protected by the section 546(e) safe harbor. Two other cases involving the interpretation of the scope of the section 546(e) safe harbor In re Tribune Litigation (Case No ) and Whyte v. Barclays Bank PLC (Case No ) are currently pending before the Second Circuit. The Decision In Madoff, the trustee appointed to oversee the SIPA liquidation of Bernard Madoff s fund ( BLMIS ) sought to avoid transfers of fictitious profits to investors in connection with Madoff s Ponzi scheme as fraudulent transfers. Certain of BLMIS customers sought to defend against avoidance on the ground that the transfers were protected by the safe harbor provision of section 546(e). The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the District Court ) ruled that such transfers made after two years prior to the commencement of Madoff s SIPA liquidation proceeding were not voidable as fraudulent transfers due to the applicability of section 546(e) s safe harbor. The Trustee appealed such decision to the Second Circuit, which affirmed the holding of the District Court that section 546(e) s safe harbor exempted the transfers at issue from avoidance. The Second Circuit s decision deals primarily with the broad definition of securities contract in the Bankruptcy Code and the expansive application of the safe harbor to any transfer made in connection with language of section 546(e). Guided by these two broad concepts, the Second Circuit had no difficulty in reaching its conclusion that the safe harbor applied. The defendants argued that section 546(e) prohibited the Trustee from clawing back their distributions because the payments were made by a stockbroker in connection with a securities contract or, alternatively, because they were settlement payments made by a stockbroker. The defense relied on a suite of documents, including a Customer Agreement, which authorized BLMIS to open or maintain one or more accounts, a Trading Authorization, which appointed BLMIS to be the customer s agent to buy, sell and trade securities, and an Option Agreement, which authorized BLMIS to engage in options trading for the customer s account (collectively, the Account Documents ). The Second Circuit concluded that the Account Documents constituted a securities contract based on the types of agreements broadly described in the definition of securities contract, which is found in section 741(7) of the Bankruptcy Code: section 741(7)(A)(x) (Account Documents were master agreements providing for the purchase, sale, or loan of a security); section 741(7)(A)(xi) (Account Documents qualified as any guarantee or reimbursement obligation by or to a stockbroker due to BLMIS obligation to reimburse its customers upon request upon withdrawal from their accounts); and section 741(7)(vii) (Account Documents fell within the scope of any other agreement that is similar to a contract for the purchase, sale or loan of a security (emphasis added)). 2 Mayer Brown United States Court of Appeals for Second Circuit Holds that Section 546(e) Safe Harbor Protects
3 Additionally, the court noted that the transfers at issue could not have been possible but for the relationship created by these agreements. The Trustee argued that the Account Documents did not constitute a securities contract because (i) BLMIS never initiated, executed, completed or settled any securities transactions; (ii) the Account Documents never identified the specific terms of any securities transactions; and (iii) the Account Documents never expressly obligated BLMIS to carry out any specific transactions but merely authorized BLMIS to effect securities transactions. The Second Circuit acknowledged that the Trustee s observations were correct, but rejected these arguments in turn and found that the Account Documents created a securities contract as defined in section 741 of the Bankruptcy Code. First, the Second Circuit found that section 546(e) does not require an actual purchase or sale of a security. Rather, the transfer need only be broadly related to a securities contract and not an actual securities transaction. The fact that BLMIS breached its obligations under the Account Documents did not vitiate the existence of those documents as a securities contract. Moreover, the Second Circuit found that the interpretation of the section 546(e) safe harbor espoused by the Trustee to require an actual securities transaction would risk the very sort of market disruption Congress was concerned with when enacting the provision, given that the defendant-customers of BLMIS had every reason to believe that BLMIS was engaged in actual securities transactions. Second, the Second Circuit rejected the notion that the Account Documents were not securities contracts because they did not specify terms of securities transactions such as security, issuer, quantity or price. The court found that the language of section 546(e) imposes no such requirement and likewise found that the breadth of the definition of securities contract indicates that Congress intended no such requirement. Third, the Second Circuit rejected the Trustee s argument that the Account Documents were not securities contracts because they merely authorized, but did not obligate, BLMIS to effect securities transactions for customers. The Second Circuit found that the definition of securities contract is not so limited, and that it encompasses the relationship created by the Account Documents. Specifically, the definition includes not only the enumerated types of contracts identified in section 741, but also any other agreement that is similar to a contract for the purchase, sale or loan of a security. 5 As the court noted, [f]ew words in the English language are as expansive as any and similar. Once the Second Circuit concluded that the Account Documents constituted a securities contract, it had little difficulty concluding that the transfers to customers were made in connection with the securities contract. Relying on a plain language interpretation, the court viewed in connection with as a transfer related to or associated with the securities contract. Having concluded that the agreements constituted a securities contract, the Second Circuit quickly concluded that customer withdrawals from their accounts came within the scope of the safe harbor as being in connection with the Account Documents. The court noted that its conclusion was congruent with the broad interpretation of the in connection with a purchase or sale of any security requirement of Rule 10b-5 in the context of federal securities laws. In rejecting the Trustee s argument that applying section 546(e) in the context of a Ponzi scheme would give legal effect to Madoff s fraud, and that Ponzi scheme payments by definition are not in connection with a securities contract, the Second Circuit noted that [s]ection 546(e) sets a low bar for the required relationship between the securities contract and the transfer sought to be avoided. Payments made in connection with a Ponzi scheme may be made in connection with a securities contract, albeit one that has been breached. 3 Mayer Brown United States Court of Appeals for Second Circuit Holds that Section 546(e) Safe Harbor Protects
4 Alternatively, the Second Circuit held that the transfers were also protected under section 546(e) because they were settlement payments made by a stockbroker. Here the Second Circuit again rejected the Trustee s argument that there were no settlement payments because BLMIS never engaged in actual securities trading. Relying on its decision in Enron, the Second Circuit held that the Bankruptcy Code definition of settlement payment should be broadly construed to apply to the transfer of cash or securities to complete a securities transaction. The Second Circuit agreed with the District Court that, because the customer granted BLMIS discretion to liquidate securities in the customer s account to the extent needed to implement the customer s sell orders or withdrawal requests, each transfer in respect of such an order was a settlement payment. In closing, the Second Circuit rejected the Trustee s contention that the court s holding was inconsistent with its prior decision interpreting how to calculate the net equity claim of a customer under SIPA. 6 The Second Circuit reasoned that (i) section 546(e) is found in the Bankruptcy Code and not SIPA and was not an issue in its prior decision regarding the computation of a customer s claim and (ii) section 546(e) represents the careful balance Congress has struck between the need for an equitable result for the debtor and the need for finality, which the Second Circuit felt obligated to respect. Implications While the Bankruptcy Code safe harbors have come under attack from various commentators in recent years, Madoff demonstrates that the Second Circuit will continue to interpret section 546(e) in accordance with its literal language. This decision should provide comfort to recipients of transfers made in connection with actual or purported securities transactions. The decision does not address whether there is any room to deny application of the section 546(e) safe harbor for transfers where the transferee is actually aware of the fraudulent Ponzi scheme and that no actual securities transactions were being effected. The District Court had previously ruled that section 546(e) would not apply in such an instance, even with respect to actual fraudulent transfer claims outside of the Bankruptcy Code s two-year reach-back period under section 548(a)(1)(A). For more information about this topic, please contact any of the following lawyers. Brian Trust btrust@mayerbrown.com Joel Moss jmoss@mayerbrown.com Richard Ziegler rziegler@mayerbrown.com Endnotes bk(L) (2d Cir. December 8, 2014). 2 Section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code allows a trustee to avoid transfers made with the actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors within two years of the petition date. Section 544 of the Bankruptcy Code allows a trustee to bring state law fraudulent conveyance and fraudulent transfer actions for the benefit of the estate. As under section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code, transfers made with the intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors can also be avoided under state fraudulent conveyance and fraudulent transfer laws. The statute of limitations on such claims vary by state but can be considerably longer than the two-year reach-back period under section 548(a)(1)(A). Therefore, the Trustee in Madoff was generally not able to rely on the exception to non-avoidance under section 546(e) with respect to state law actual fraudulent conveyances and transfers that occurred more than two years prior to the commencement of Madoff s SIPA liquidation proceeding F.3d 329 (2d Cir. 2011). 4 Mayer Brown United States Court of Appeals for Second Circuit Holds that Section 546(e) Safe Harbor Protects
5 4 719 F.3d 94 (2d Cir. 2013) U.S.C. 741(7)(A)(i), (vii) (emphases in opinion). 6 In re BLMIS, 654 F.3d 229 (2d Cir. 2011) (rejecting notion that customer s net equity claim should be determined according to fictitious account statements and holding that, in the context of a Ponzi scheme, a customer s net equity claim must be calculated according to its actual net investment in the customer s securities accounts). Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization advising many of the world s largest companies, including a significant portion of the Fortune 100, FTSE 100, DAX and Hang Seng Index companies and more than half of the world s largest banks. Our legal services include banking and finance; corporate and securities; litigation and dispute resolution; antitrust and competition; US Supreme Court and appellate matters; employment and benefits; environmental; financial services regulatory & enforcement; government and global trade; intellectual property; real estate; tax; restructuring, bankruptcy and insolvency; and wealth management. Please visit our web site for comprehensive contact information for all Mayer Brown offices. Any advice expressed herein as to tax matters was neither written nor intended by Mayer Brown LLP to be used and cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed under US tax law. If any person uses or refers to any such tax advice in promoting, marketing or recommending a partnership or other entity, investment plan or arrangement to any taxpayer, then (i) the advice was written to support the promotion or marketing (by a person other than Mayer Brown LLP) of that transaction or matter, and (ii) such taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer s particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor. Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the Mayer Brown Practices ). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe-Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC ); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated legal practices in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. Mayer Brown Consulting (Singapore) Pte. Ltd and its subsidiary, which are affiliated with Mayer Brown, provide customs and trade advisory and consultancy services, not legal services. Mayer Brown and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions. This publication provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest to our clients and friends. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved. 5 Mayer Brown United States Court of Appeals for Second Circuit Holds that Section 546(e) Safe Harbor Protects
Lehman Bankruptcy Court Addresses Scope of the Bankruptcy Code s Safe Harbor for Liquidation, Termination and Acceleration of Swap Agreements
Legal Update January 9, 2014 Lehman Bankruptcy Court Addresses Scope of the Bankruptcy Code s Safe Harbor for Liquidation, Termination and Acceleration of Swap Agreements In Michigan State Housing Development
More informationProtecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015: Effects on Taxation of Investment in US Real Estate
Legal Update December 21, 2015 Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015: Effects on Taxation of Investment in On December 18, 2015, Congress passed and President Obama signed into law the Protecting
More informationOut-of-the-Money: The IRS Designates Basket Options as Listed Transactions and Transactions of Interest
Legal Update July 24, 2015 Out-of-the-Money: The IRS Designates Basket Options as Listed Transactions and It s been a long hard road for barrier options. In 2010, the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS
More informationIRS Provides Guidance on Beginning of Construction for Renewable Energy Projects
Legal Update April 16, 2013 IRS Provides Guidance on Beginning of Construction for Renewable Energy Projects On April 15, 2013, the US Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) released Notice 2013-29 1 (the
More informationIRS Issues Revised Guidance on Form W-2 Reporting Requirements for Costs of Employer Group Health Coverage
Legal Update January 23, 2012 IRS Issues Revised Guidance on Form W-2 Reporting Requirements for The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA) requires employers to report the aggregate
More informationSpring 2015 reforms: the new DC flexibilities
Spring 2015 reforms: the new DC flexibilities THE REFORMS AT A GLANCE y Until April 2015, members usually faced serious tax penalties if they did not spend at least 75% of their DC pots on an annuity meeting
More informationPension Scheme Funding in Germany. Private Investment Funds Practice Discussion Papers
Pension Scheme Funding has become a must for corporates in the German marketplace. The need to optimize investment of pension assets means there are far-reaching opportunities for financial institutions.
More informationLong-Expected Omnibus HIPAA Rule Implements Significant Privacy and Security Regulations for Entities and Business Associates
Legal Update February 11, 2013 Long-Expected Omnibus HIPAA Rule Implements Significant Privacy and Security Regulations for Entities and Business Associates On January 17, 2013, the Department of Health
More informationPerspectives on Cybersecurity and Its Legal Implications
Survey Results 2015 Perspectives on Cybersecurity and Its Legal Implications a 2015 survey of corporate executives The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a non-regulatory agency of
More informationAddressing UBTI Concerns in Capital Call Subscription Credit Facilities
Legal Update November 2012 Addressing UBTI Concerns in Capital Call Subscription Credit Facilities A subscription credit facility (a Facility), also frequently referred to as a capital call facility, is
More informationNew York State Department of Financial Services Proposes a BitLicense Regulatory Framework for Virtual Currency Businesses
Legal Update August 6, 2014 New York State Department of Financial Services Proposes a BitLicense Regulatory Framework for Virtual Currency Businesses The New York State Department of Financial Services
More informationRare Bird Sightings: Recent Developments Address Distressed Obligation Issues Faced by REMICs
Article Rare Bird Sightings: Recent Developments Address Distressed Obligation Issues Faced by REMICs By Russell Nance, Erin Gladney and Mark Leeds For more than 30 years, tax practitioners working with
More informationCapital Commitment Subscription Facilities and the Proposed Liquidity Coverage Ratio
Legal Update December 20, 2013 Capital Commitment Subscription Facilities and the Proposed Liquidity Coverage Ratio On November 29, 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB), the
More informationInformation Disclosure on the Securities Market
3 Legal Update Banking & Finance Construction & Engineering Corporate & Securities Vietnam 06 July 2012 Information Disclosure on the Securities Market Summary On 5 April 2012, the Ministry of Finance
More informationStockbroker Defense Shields Ponzi-Scheme Broker Fees and Commissions From Avoidance. November/December 2013. Dara R. Levinson Mark G.
Stockbroker Defense Shields Ponzi-Scheme Broker Fees and Commissions From Avoidance November/December 2013 Dara R. Levinson Mark G. Douglas In Grayson Consulting, Inc. v. Wachovia Securities, LLC (In re
More informationTERMINATION PAYMENTS AND INTERNATIONALLY MOBILE EMPLOYEES
Article A similar version of this article first appeared in tax Journal, 18 November 2013 TERMINATION PAYMENTS AND INTERNATIONALLY By James Hill Speed Read: The taxation of termination payments paid to
More informationGiving Third Parties Contractual Rights The New Rules
Legal Update Hong Kong 3 June 2015 Giving Third Parties Contractual Rights The New Rules Hong Kong s Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Ordinance No.17 of 2014 (the Ordinance ) was passed in December
More informationVietnam s Insurance Market: An Overview January 2014
Legal Update Insurance Vietnam 29 January 2014 Vietnam s Insurance Market: An Overview January 2014 1. Introduction Vietnam started liberalising its insurance market by allowing foreign insurers to participate
More informationMajor Changes Introduced by the New Companies Ordinance Companies Limited by Guarantee 1
Major s Introduced by the New Companies Ordinance Companies Limited by Guarantee 1 1. Abolition of Memorandum of Association Memorandum of Association is abolished for all local companies. Current provisions
More informationAbusive Practices In Consumer Finance Industry
Legal Update February 12, 2015 The US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau s Abusive Standard Early Lessons The Dodd-Frank Act granted the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) the authority
More informationThe Evolution of the Settlement Payment Defense? Tianja Samuel, J.D. Candidate 2013
2012 Volume IV No. 22 The Evolution of the Settlement Payment Defense? Tianja Samuel, J.D. Candidate 2013 Cite as: The Evolution of the Settlement Payment Defense?, 4 ST. JOHN S BANKR. RESEARCH LIBR. NO.
More informationMajor Changes Introduced by the New Companies Ordinance Private and Public Companies 1
Major s Introduced by the New Companies Ordinance Private and Public Companies 1 1. Abolition of Memorandum of Association Memorandum of Association is abolished for all local companies. Current provisions
More informationIntellectual Property & Data Protection 2015: Legal developments you need to know about
Intellectual Property & Data Protection 2015: Legal developments you need to know about Welcome This is a short guide to some of the key legal developments for intellectual property and data protection
More informationGood faith is there a new implied duty in English contract law?
Legal Update July 2013 Good faith is there a new implied duty in English contract law? Background English law does not currently recognise a universal implied duty on contracting parties to perform their
More informationA Quick Start Guide to EMIR: What you need to do and when
Legal Update January 2013 A Quick Start Guide to EMIR: What you need to do and when On 19 December 2012 the Commission adopted the majority of the subordinate legislation necessary to implement Regulation
More informationChina s New Trademark Law Introduces Key Changes
Legal Update Intellectual Property Mainland China 13 September 2013 China s New Trademark Law Introduces Key Changes The PRC government passed a decision to amend the PRC Trademark Law on 30 August 2013.
More informationCorporate Real Estate. Introduction to Mayer Brown s UK Corporate Real Estate Capabilities
2015 Corporate Real Estate Introduction to Mayer Brown s UK Corporate Real Estate Capabilities Contents Page About Mayer Brown 1 The UK Real Estate Group Overview 3 Corporate Real Estate 5 Examples of
More informationInsurance in Asia We I W d e I e d n e t n if t y. W y e C. W o e C m o m m it m. W it e A. W c e A h c i h ev e e v. e
Insurance in Asia We Identify. We Commit. We Achieve. Insurance Law Firm of the Year Asian Legal Business Awards 2010, 2011, 2013 and 2014 Hong Kong Law Firm of the Year Asian Legal Business Awards 2002-2005,
More informationEarly Reactions to the US Department of Labor s Fiduciary Re-Proposal
Legal Update July 17, 2015 Early Reactions to the US Department of Labor s Fiduciary Re-Proposal The US Department of Labor s long-anticipated proposed amendment to regulations defining investment advice
More informationCrossing Borders New Guidance on the Transfer of Personal Data outside Hong Kong
Legal Update Privacy & Security Hong Kong 20 January 2015 Crossing Borders New Guidance on the Transfer of Personal Data outside Hong Kong Section 33 of the Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance
More informationPayment System Override Deems Transaction Not Ordinary
Payment System Override Deems Transaction Not Ordinary Ames Merchandising Corp. v. Cellmark Paper Inc. (In re Ames Dept. Stores, Inc.), 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 969 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 28, 2011) In Ames Merchandising
More informationProperty Can Be Recovered from Subsequent Transferee Without First Avoiding Fraudulent Transfer to Initial Recipient. September/October 2005
Property Can Be Recovered from Subsequent Transferee Without First Avoiding Fraudulent Transfer to Initial Recipient September/October 2005 Robert E. Krebs The power of a bankruptcy trustee or a chapter
More informationInsolvency Litigation and Related
Insolvency Litigation and Related Strategic t Concerns US, European and Asian Considerations David Allen Partner London Jean Marie Atamian Partner New York Jan Kraayvanger Partner Frankfurt +44 20 3130
More informationIn the Wake of Collapse: Approaches to Ponzi Scheme Litigation
KIRKLAND ALERT February 2009 In the Wake of Collapse: Approaches to Ponzi Scheme Litigation Upon the inevitable collapse of any Ponzi scheme, investors, financial institutions and others even the innocent
More informationFDIC Adopts Interim Rule on Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
Financial Services Regulatory & Enforcement, Global Financial Markets Initiative update FDIC Adopts Interim Rule on Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program October 24, 2008 On October 23, 2008, the Federal
More informationBeginner s Glossary to Fund Finance
Article Beginner s Glossary to Fund Finance By Kristin M. Rylko, 1 Zachary K. Barnett 2 and Mark C. Dempsey 3 Kristin M. Rylko Chicago +1 312 701 7613 krylko@mayerbrown.com Zachary K. Barnett Chicago +1
More informationDisconnected: The Telephone Consumer Protection Act at 25 Years Old
Legal Update March 28, 2016 Disconnected: The Telephone Consumer Protection Act at 25 Years Old The Telephone Consumer Protection Act ( TCPA or Act ) has become fertile ground for plaintiffs seeking to
More informationFinancial Services Alert
April 2008 Authors: Robert T. Honeywell 212.536.4863 robert.honeywell@klgates.com Anthony R. G. Nolan 212.536.4843 anthony.nolan@klgates.com Donald W. Smith 202.778.9079 donald.smith@klgates.com Robert
More informationJurisdiction and Venue in Chapter 15 Selected Issues
Jurisdiction and Venue in Chapter 15 Selected Issues Prepared by: Jeanne P. Darcey Sullivan & Worcester LLP Boston, MA jdarcey@sandw.com October 8, 2013 Please visit us on our website at www.sandw.com
More informationThe Treatment of Mortgage Loan Repurchase Agreements in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
March 2008 / Issue 5 In this issue A legal update from echert s Finance and Real Estate Group p1 Mortgage Loan Repurchase Agreements p2 p3 p4 p5 Safe Harbor and Related Bankruptcy Code Provisions Factual
More informationIn re Fairfield Sentry Ltd., et al., 2011 WL 1998376 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. May 23, 2011).
May 31, 2011 New York Bankruptcy Court Holds That Bankruptcy Code s Two-Year Extension of Time to Bring Actions Applies to Foreign Representatives in Chapter 15 Cases Section 108 of the Bankruptcy Code
More informationNavigating The 546(e) Safe Harbor Provision
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Navigating The 546(e) Safe Harbor Provision Law360,
More informationUS Bank Regulators Propose Net Stable Funding Ratio Rule to Enhance Financial System Resiliency
Legal Update May 5, 2016 US Bank Regulators Propose Net Stable Funding Ratio Rule to Enhance Financial System Resiliency The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Office of the Comptroller of the
More informationCase 13-09004-CL7 Filed 11/06/13 Entered 11/06/13 16:38:19 Doc 66 Pg. 1 of 6
Case 13-09004-CL7 Filed 11/06/13 Entered 11/06/13 16:38:19 Doc 66 Pg. 1 of 6 November 6, 2013 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 325 West "F" Street, San Diego, California 92101-6991
More informationEleventh Circuit in TOUSA Reinstates Bankruptcy Court Ruling
May 2012 Eleventh Circuit in TOUSA Reinstates Bankruptcy Court Ruling BY RICHARD E. FARLEY, JESSE H. AUSTIN, III & JOHN F. HILSON Lenders Who Are Refinanced With Proceeds of New Debt Secured by Liens on
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION In re: ) Chapter 7 Liquidation ) marchfirst, INC., et al., ) CASE NO. 01 B 24742 ) (Substantively Consolidated)
More informationGerman Insolvency Law is geared towards liquidation of the debtor insolvency plan procedures are only applied in exceptional cases.
German Insolvency Law is geared towards liquidation of the debtor insolvency plan procedures are only applied in exceptional cases. German Insolvency Law German insolvency law is governed by a comprehensive
More informationDistrict Court Upholds Extraterritorial Enforcement of the Automatic Stay and Injunction Barring Foreign Creditor's Lawsuit
May 10, 2012 District Court Upholds Extraterritorial Enforcement of the Automatic Stay and Injunction Barring Foreign Creditor's Lawsuit Section 541(a) of the Bankruptcy Code creates a worldwide estate
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: Jointly Administered Case No. 01-42530-H4-11 Metals USA, Inc., et al., Case Nos. 01-42530-H4-11 through 01-42574-H4-11
More informationGerman Insolvency Law
October 2014 German Insolvency Law an overview. German insolvency law is governed by a comprehensive Insolvency Code which entered into force on January 1, 1999 and has been amended from time to time,
More informationCASE 0:05-cv-00809-DWF Document 16 Filed 09/06/05 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:05-cv-00809-DWF Document 16 Filed 09/06/05 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Timothy D. Moratzka, Civil No. 05-809 (DWF) Appellant, v. Senior Cottages of America, LLC,
More informationMEMORANDUM-DECISION AND
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------- In re: TOUGHER INDUSTRIES, INC., Case No. 06-12960 Chapter 11(Main Case) Debtor.
More informationAVOIDING FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS
AVOIDING FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS 2002 Vedder, Price, Kaufman & Kammholz. All rights reserved. I. INTRODUCTION The delightful quality of fraud lies in its infinite variety. 1 The concept of a fraudulent transfer
More informationREAL ESTATE ISSUES IN DIVORCE CASES. Steven L. Raynor Raynor Law Office, P.C. 211 Fifth Street, NE Charlottesville, VA 22902
REAL ESTATE ISSUES IN DIVORCE CASES by Steven L. Raynor Raynor Law Office, P.C. 211 Fifth Street, NE Charlottesville, VA 22902 I. Introduction It is typical for divorce attorneys to oversee the transfer
More informationUS Treasury Department Issues Guidance on Energy Grants In Lieu of Tax Credits
Energy Update July 10, 2009 US Treasury Department Issues Guidance on Energy Grants In Lieu of Tax Credits On July 9, 2009, the US Treasury Department (Treasury) issued long-awaited guidance on grants
More informationAnthony Pijerov Associate (Charlotte)
01 Sailing Without A Headwind: Structured Lending Market Embraces Bankruptcy Safe-Harbor Provisions J.R. Smith Partner (Tokyo/Richmond) Anthony Pijerov Associate (Charlotte) Justin Paget Associate (Richmond)
More information08-01789-brl Doc 4602 Filed 12/21/11 Entered 12/21/11 10:44:02 Main Document Pg 1 of 7
Pg 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff-Applicant, Adv. Pro. No. 08-1789 (BRL) SIPA Liquidation (Substantively Consolidated)
More informationEquity Incentive Plans Extending US- and UK-based Plans Across the Pond
Equity Incentive Plans Extending US- and UK-based Plans Across the Pond Andrew Stanger Partner +44 20 3130 3934 astanger@mayerbrown.com James C. Williams Partner +1 312 701 8139 jcwilliams@mayerbrown.com
More informationSEC Receivers v. Bankruptcy Trustees: Liquidation by Instinct or Rule
SEC Receivers v. Bankruptcy Trustees: Liquidation by Instinct or Rule Written by: Marcus F. Salitore Jackson Walker LLP; Dallas, Texas msalitore@jw.com Civil complaints filed by the Division of Enforcement
More informationLeveraging Supply Chain Finance to Optimize Value
Leveraging Supply Chain Finance to Optimize Value Brad Peterson +1 312 701 8568 bpeterson@mayerbrown.com Massimo Capretta +1 312 701 8152 mcapretta@mayerbrown.com David A. Ciancuillo +1 312 701 7258 dciancuillo@mayerbrown.com
More informationCamouflaged Collateral: "All Asset" Liens May Not Include Proceeds of D&O Insurance Policies in Bankruptcy
Camouflaged Collateral: "All Asset" Liens May Not Include Proceeds of D&O Insurance Policies in Bankruptcy Article contributed by Lawrence V. Gelber and James T. Bentley of Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP As
More informationAdvanced Bankruptcy for Bankers. Candace C. Carlyon, Esq. www.sheacarlyon.com
Advanced Bankruptcy for Bankers Candace C. Carlyon, Esq. www.sheacarlyon.com 1 Pre Bankruptcy Review loan files, confirm collateral security, obtain as much information as possible Consider timing of remedies
More informationRep. Scott Garrett Statement for the Record Accompanying Re introduction of the Equitable Treatment of Investors Act
Rep. Scott Garrett Statement for the Record Accompanying Re introduction of the Equitable Treatment of Investors Act Late in the 111 th Congress, I introduced, with co sponsors, Mr. King of New York and
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 15-611 In the Supreme Court of the United States FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES
More informationSupreme Court Clarifies Statute of Limitations Applicable to False Claims Act Whistleblower Suits Against Government Contractors
Supreme Court Clarifies Statute of Limitations Applicable to False Claims Act Whistleblower Suits Against Government Contractors In Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., et al. v. United States ex rel.
More information[DISCUSSION DRAFT] H. R. ll
F:\JH\BKCY0\SUBCHAPV_00.XML TH CONGRESS D SESSION [DISCUSSION DRAFT] H. R. ll To amend title of the United States Code in order to facilitate the resolution of an insolvent financial institution in bankruptcy.
More information13-22840-rdd Doc 1181 Filed 08/10/15 Entered 08/10/15 11:09:58 Main Document Pg 1 of 7
Pg 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x In re: Chapter 11 SOUND SHORE MEDICAL CENTER OF WESTCHESTER, et al.
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO In Re: ) ) CHIEF JUDGE RICHARD L. SPEER Paul I. Hickman ) ) Debtor(s) ) ) (Related Case: 00-31579) Paul Hickman ) ) Plaintiff(s) ) ) v.
More informationPRIME BROKERAGE CLEARANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT SIA FORM 151
Legent Clearing Account Number PRIME BROKERAGE CLEARANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT SIA FORM 151 1 LC12 07/05 Customer Agreement for Prime Brokerage Clearance Services: Customer Name: Account Number: This Agreement
More informationASBESTOS CLAIMS AND LITIGATION
ASBESTOS CLAIMS AND LITIGATION PFIZER, INC. V. LAW OFFICES OF PETER G. ANGELOS CASE ANALYSIS: PARENT COMPANYASBESTOS LIABILITY July, 2013 ALRA Group Members http://alragroup.com / I. Introduction (F. Grey
More informationThird Circuit Approves Use of Escrow Agreements Funded by Acquirers to Pay Junior Creditors Before Senior Creditors
Alert Third Circuit Approves Use of Escrow Agreements Funded by Acquirers to Pay Junior Creditors Before Senior Creditors September 21, 2015 An asset purchaser s payments into segregated accounts for the
More information11-02790-mg Doc 5733 Filed 01/31/13 Entered 01/31/13 17:00:05 Main Document Pg 1 of 11. Debtor.
Pg 1 of 11 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: MF GLOBAL INC., Case No. 11-2790 (MG) SIPA Debtor. MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING MOTION TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT BETWEEN MF GLOBAL
More informationRestructuring, Bankruptcy & Insolvency in Asia
Restructuring, Bankruptcy & Insolvency in Asia Mayer Brown JSM has one of the most respected Restructuring, Bankruptcy & Insolvency teams in Asia, and is one of only a few law firms in the region with
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION IN RE: * * [Debtor s Name] * (***-**-last four digits of SSN) * Case No. - [Joint Debtor s Name, if any * Chapter 13 (***-**-last
More informationAndrew R. Turner Conner & Winters, LLP 4000 One Williams Center Tulsa, Oklahoma 74172-0148 (918) 586-8972, fax (918) 586-8672 aturner@cwlaw.
THIRD CIRCUIT CONCLUSIVELY ANSWERS QUESTION WHETHER POST-PETITION PAYMENTS ON PRE-PETITION DEBT REDUCE A CREDITOR S SUBSEQUENT NEW VALUE PREFERENCE DEFENSE Andrew R. Turner Conner & Winters, LLP 4000 One
More informationTHIS MATTER having been presented to the Court upon the joint motion ( Motion ) of
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Applicant, Adv. Pro. No. 08-1789 (BRL) SIPA Liquidation v. BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION. v. AP No. 08-70044 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
Document Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION IN RE: DENISE L. EVANS, Case No. 08-71204-CMS-07 Debtor. PREMIER SELF STORAGE, LLC., Plaintiff,
More informationRecent Noteworthy Securitization Case In re Doctors Hospital of Hyde Park, Inc. 2013 WL 5524696 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2013)
Client Alert Current Issues Relevant to Our Clients Recent Noteworthy Securitization Case In re Doctors Hospital of Hyde Park, Inc. 2013 WL 5524696 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2013) October 23, 2013 Introduction
More informationDetermining Tax Liability Under Section 505(a) of the Bankruptcy Code
Determining Tax Liability Under Section 505(a) of the Bankruptcy Code Section 505(a) of the Bankruptcy Code (the Code ) provides the means by which a debtor or trustee in bankruptcy may seek a determination
More informationDOGPATCH CAPITAL WeALTH & InvesTmenT management
DOGPATCH CAPITAL Wealth & Investment Management INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT Dogpatch Capital LLC ( Advisor ), an investment Advisor domiciled in the State of California, agrees to act as an investment
More informationDelaware District Court Affirms Bankruptcy Court Ruling that Private Equity Fund Is Not Liable for WARN Act Liability of Its Portfolio Company
Delaware District Court Affirms Bankruptcy Court Ruling that Private Equity Fund Is Not Liable for WARN Act Liability of Its Portfolio Company Brian M. Resnick, Michelle M. McGreal and Stephen Dominick
More informationINTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE TECHNICAL ADVICE MEMORANDUM
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE TECHNICAL ADVICE MEMORANDUM Number: 201321019 Release Date: 5/24/2013 Index (UIL) No: 61.22-00 CASE-MIS No: TAM-135686-12 Date: February 12, 2013 Chief, Appeals
More informationCase 1:06-cv-22273-SH Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/07 13:02:36 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:06-cv-22273-SH Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/07 13:02:36 Page 1 LAWRENCE KATT, M.D., individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More information2/26/2014 FRA Unpublished
Sale free and clear of liens U.S.C (f)(), (), and () Clear Channel, 1 BR (th Cir. BAP 0) Clayton Smith and Cristle Smith, Case No. 1-1-tmr //1 FRA Unpublished The Trustee sought authority to sell real
More informationInsurance in Bankruptcy
Fear of Losing D&O Insurance in Bankruptcy Is Overblown B y P a t r i c i a J. V i l l a r e a l a n d D o u g l a s R. C o l e he typical D&O insurance policy covers not only a company s directors and
More informationNo principle of federal jurisprudence has proved more. efficacious than the final judgment rule, by which a district
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------x IRVING H. PICARD, : : Plaintiff, : : 11 Civ. 3605 (JSR) -v- : : SAUL B. KATZ, et al., : OPINION AND ORDER :
More informationGuide to Investing in Real Estate in the PRC
Guide to Investing in Real Estate in the PRC China Business Law Award Winner: Construction & Real Estate China Business Law Journal (2013) Asia Law Firm of the Year (Transactions) Global PERE Awards (2013)
More informationSecurities Litigation
Securities Litigation Alert July 2009 Eleventh Circuit Affirms Bar Order, in Connection with Partial Settlement of Class Action, Extinguishing Non-Settling Former CEO Defendant s Contractual Rights to
More information2015 Outlook: Data Privacy and Security in the United States, the European Union and Hong Kong
2015 Outlook: Data Privacy and Security in the United States, the European Union and Companies and organizations face an ever-expanding set of statutes and regulations regarding consumer privacy, data
More informationSETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT
SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT This Settlement and Release Agreement ( Settlement and Release ) is entered into on October 31, 2007, by and between Refco Inc. and certain of its affiliates that were
More informationCase 2:11-cv-08607-R -DTB Document 13 Filed 11/18/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:355 EXHIBIT A
Case 2:11-cv-08607-R -DTB Document 13 Filed 11/18/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:355 EXHIBIT A Case 2:11-cv-08607-R -DTB Document 13 Filed 11/18/11 Page 2 of 7 Page ID #:356 David Zaro Partner Los Angeles Office
More informationSummary of Mexico s Production-Sharing Contract Terms for Shallow Water Areas
Legal Update January 13, 2015 Summary of Mexico s Production-Sharing Contract Terms for Shallow Water Areas The Mexican National Hydrocarbons Commission (CNH) has published the model production-sharing
More informationThe Requirements for Recognition under Chapter 15
One Debtor, Multiple Countries: A Discussion of Recent Developments in Cross-Border Insolvency Proceedings & Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code By: Lawrence C. Gottlieb Michael Klein Robert Winning Abstract
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 10-3272. In re: JOHN W. HOWARD, Debtor. ROBERT O. LAMPL, Appellant
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 10-3272 In re: JOHN W. HOWARD, Debtor NOT PRECEDENTIAL ROBERT O. LAMPL, Appellant VANASKIE, Circuit Judge. On Appeal from the United States District
More informationGuide on How to Invest in Real Estate in Hong Kong
Guide on How to Invest in Real Estate in Hong Kong Mayer Brown JSM... 9 times a winner of Real Estate Law Firm of the Year, by Asian Legal Business Awards Table of Content 1. How are ownership rights
More informationBank & Lender Liability
Bank & Lender Liability Andrews Litigation Reporter VOLUME 15 h ISSUE 5 h july 20, 2009 Expert Analysis Bank Failures and the Rights of the FDIC Against Bank Holding Companies A Performance Guaranty Is
More informationHow To Defend A Tax Claim In Bankruptcy Court
Forum Shopping and Limitations on Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction John D. Snethen Section Chief, Tax Litigation Office of the Attorney General of Indiana 1 Bankruptcy Background What is Forum Shopping? Taxpayer
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals No. 13-1186 For the Seventh Circuit IN RE: JAMES G. HERMAN, Debtor-Appellee. APPEAL OF: JOHN P. MILLER Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
More informationBankruptcy Filing and Federal Employment Taxes. Bad investments, too great an assumption of risk, circumstances beyond their control.
I. What causes someone to file for bankruptcy? Bad investments, too great an assumption of risk, circumstances beyond their control. II. The options A. Individuals Chapter 7, Chapter 11, i Chapter 13 B.
More informationNegotiation Skills. RIBA Future Leaders Course. Chris Fellowes Sean Hummerstone Peter Parten Partner Associate Trainee. May 2012
Negotiation Skills RIBA Future Leaders Course May 2012 Chris Fellowes Sean Hummerstone Peter Parten Partner Associate Trainee Mayer Brown is a global legal services organisation comprising legal practices
More information