Navigating The 546(e) Safe Harbor Provision
|
|
- Horace Griffin Eaton
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY Phone: Fax: Navigating The 546(e) Safe Harbor Provision Law360, New York (December 19, 2012, 5:15 PM ET) -- Navigating section 546(e), one of the Bankruptcy Code s safe harbor provisions, requires a delicate balance of academics and practical reality. While there is scant case law directly on point, courts have provided important guidance and, generally, will defer to industry norms in determining whether agreements are forward contracts and immune from avoidance. A recent decision by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals MBS Management Services Inc. v. MXEnergy Electric Inc. further defines the contours of section 546(e) and offers lessons that may help companies prevent certain transfers from being clawed back. Statutory Background In adding section 546(e) to the Bankruptcy Code, Congress determined that certain protections are necessary to prevent the insolvency of one commodity or security firm from spreading to other firms and possibl[y] threatening the collapse of the affected market. [1] These amendments were meant to clarify and, in some instances, broaden the commodities market protections and to ensure that, in the case of the commodities trading industry, the contractual right to liquidate a commodities contract or forward contract may not be stayed, avoided, or limited in any bankruptcy proceeding brought under Title 11. [2] Section 546(e) provides forward contract merchants with a complete defense to avoidance claims brought by a trustee, providing, in pertinent part, that: the trustee[3] may not avoid a transfer that is a settlement payment, as defined in section 101 or 741 of this title, made by or to (or for the benefit of) a forward contract merchant in connection with a forward contract... that is made before the commencement of the case. [4] To qualify for this protection, the transfer recipient must demonstrate the following elements: One of the parties to the transaction must be a forward contract merchant; The transfers must have been made in connection with forward contracts; and The transfers must be considered settlement payments. In turn, the Bankruptcy Code contains the following relevant definitions: Forward contract: A contract for the purchase, sale, or transfer of a commodity or any similar good which is presently or in the future becomes the subject of dealing in the forward contract trade with a maturity date more than two days after the date the contract is entered into.[5] Forward contract merchant: An entity the business of which consists in whole or in part of entering into forward contracts as or with merchants in a commodity or any similar good,
2 article, service, right, or interest which is presently or in the future becomes the subject of dealing in the forward contract trade.[6] Settlement payment: A preliminary settlement payment, a partial settlement payment, an interim settlement payment, a settlement payment on account, a final settlement payment, a net settlement payment, or any other similar payment commonly used in the forward contract trade.[7] State of the Case Law Although section 546(e) is nearly 30 years old, few cases have meaningfully analyzed it, creating uncertainty regarding which transactions fall within the reach of 546(e) s safeguard. Recently, in MXEnergy, the Fifth Circuit considered whether section 546(e) protected payments for electricity provided under a requirements contract from avoidance as preferences.[8] In the underlying contract, the debtor s counterparty agreed to supply electricity to several apartment complexes managed by the debtor. The trustee sought to avoid a payment made to the counterparty by the debtor within the preference period, arguing that the contract was not a forward contract for the purposes of the safe harbor, because it did not specify either the quantity of electricity to be purchased or the date the electricity would be delivered on. The Fifth Circuit rejected this logic, finding that the plain language of the Bankruptcy Code draws no distinction between financial forward contracts and ordinary purchase and sale forward contracts. Overall, the case law provides important guidance: Actual delivery is expected. Forward contracts, as opposed to commodity contracts, are agreements in which the physical delivery of the subject commodity is actually expected by the parties. Purely financial contracts that do not contemplate an exchange of goods are not typically considered to be forward contracts. Thus, normal purchase and sale contracts are within the purview of section 101(25)(A) where such contracts concern the future delivery of goods that are the subject of trading in the forward contract market.[9] Future delivery is key. Forward contracts for purposes of section 546(e) and section 101(25)(A), which mature (or contemplate delivery) more than two days after execution of the contract, are specifically distinguishable from spot purchase agreements which are commonly used contracts that contemplate same-day or next-day delivery of the specified commodities.[10] However, simply because a maturity date is not specified in the agreement does not categorically exempt the contract from protection under section 546(e).[11] In MXEnergy, the Fifth Circuit held that the statutory requirements were satisfied so long as no delivery was scheduled to occur within the two day window after the contract s execution.[12] Most courts agree that fixed price and quantity terms are not required to satisfy the definition of forward contract. At least one court has required that, to be considered a forward contract, an agreement must contain fixed price (not a reference price but an actual fixed dollar amount) and quantity terms.[13] In so ruling, the court analyzed the legislative history behind section 546(e), and noted that Congress intended to reach transactions that were risk-shifting in nature, including hedging against the risk of possible fluctuations in the commodities market. Other courts, including MXEnergy, have disagreed, holding that fixed price and quantity terms are not required, so long as the contract fits within the general definition set forth in the statute or otherwise follows industry guidelines.[14] Delaware s Bankruptcy Court has referred to a U.S. Department of Energy definition of a forward contract that provides that the price may be fixed or determined by formula at the time of delivery [15] as well as the CFTC definition,
3 which does not require fixed price or quantity terms. The CFTC has stated that [t]erms may be more personalized than is the case with standardized futures contracts... A price may be agreed upon in advance, or there may be agreement that the price will be determined at the time of delivery. Settlement payment is intended to be interpreted broadly. The Bankruptcy Code broadly defines settlement payment to include a settlement payment on account, a final settlement payment, a net settlement payment, or any other similar payment commonly used in the forward contract trade. [16] In describing just how broadly settlement payment is defined, the Third Circuit has stated that it includes transfers which are normally regarded as part of the settlement process, whether they occur on the trade date, the scheduled settlement day, or any other date in the settlement process for the particular type of transaction at hand. [17] While outside the context of forward contracts, in its well-publicized Enron Creditors Recovery Corp. v. Alfa SAB de C.V. decision, the Second Circuit ruled that settlement payment should be construed broadly, rejecting arguments that (i) the payment at issue must be a type of transfer commonly used in the securities industry; (ii) the payment must involve the transfer of title of a security; and (iii) the transfer at issue must involve the participation of a financial intermediary.[18] Practical Tips Regarding Section 546(e) Companies should consider the following steps to increase the likelihood that at-risk transfers will be exempted from avoidance under section 546(e). 1. Follow the Industry In conducting a section 546(e) analysis, courts often analyze real world market practices and procedures to determine whether a party is considered to be a forward contract merchant, a contract is a forward contract and a payment is a settlement payment. Given the Bankruptcy Code s absence of specific criteria, courts do not take a one size fits all approach to the definition of forward contracts.[19] Courts also have referenced CFTC guidelines and other industry definitions. The CFTC uniformly states that the distinguishing characteristic of a forward contract is that the parties expect to make actual delivery of the commodity with reasonable frequency. The CFTC has identified the following additional common features of forward contracts as follows: (a) they are entered into for commercial purposes related to the business of a producer, processor, fabricator, refiner or merchandiser; (b) the parties to such contracts are commercial entities capable of making and receiving delivery; (c) the terms are individually negotiated; (d) the contracts cannot be assigned without the counterparty s consent; and (e) no clearinghouse, variation margining or settlement system is involved.[20] 2. Watch the Statute While industry practices are important, courts are nonetheless bound by the statutory language governing safe harbor provisions e.g., even if the industry considers a certain contract to be a forward contract, if that contract does not have a maturity date more than two days after the date the contract was entered into a court will have a difficult time finding that the transfers are protected under section 546(e). 3. Names and Labels Matter Companies should pay attention to the forms they use in connection with forward contract transactions to ensure that they do not undermine a potential safe harbor defense. For example, labeling a contract a spot purchase agreement or including provisions in a contract that are inconsistent with rulings regarding the definition of forward contract may create problems when invoking section 546(e).
4 4. Timing Matters Although courts have broadly construed the definition of settlement payment, it is worth noting that several courts have found that where the payment is made on a significantly delinquent basis, the nature of the transfer may arguably transform a settlement payment to a delinquent obligation, and the transferee may, in turn, be considered to be a debt collector rather than a forward contract merchant for purposes of that particular transfer.[21] Relevant considerations include whether the parties entered into a debt work-out agreement, if there was litigation regarding a claim, or other collection efforts.[22] Accordingly, companies should carefully maintain their records regarding invoicing, collection efforts and correspondence concerning any late payments. 5. Internal Coordination To the extent practicable, companies operating in the commodities industry should foster communication and coordination among business groups to ensure consistency of their descriptions of various types of contracts, including forward contracts and spot purchase contracts. It is also advisable to review standard boilerplate forms in light of the relevant safe harbor rulings. MXEnergy and the other cases interpreting the safe harbor of section 546(e) provide companies with important guidance to help minimize the likelihood of an avoidance action following the bankruptcy of a counterparty. Even if a company believes that its counterparties are financially sound, the commodities business can be volatile and, as recent history has taught us, fortunes can quickly change. Taking the time to review a company s contracts can increase the chances of successfully invoking section 546(e). --By Ari M. Berman, Alexandra S. Kelly and Lance A. Mulhern, Vinson & Elkins LLP Ari Berman is a partner with Vinson & Elkins in the firm's New York office. Alexandra Kelly and Lance Mulhern are both associates in the firm's New York office. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the firm, its clients, or Portfolio Media Inc., or any of its or their respective affiliates. This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice. [1] H.R. REP. No , at 1 (1982), U.S. Code Cong. & Admin. News 1982, p [2] H.R. REP. No , at 2 (1982), U.S. Code Cong. & Admin. News 1982, pp [3] Williams v. Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. (In re Olympic Natural Gas Co.), 294 F.3d 737, 740 (5th Cir. 2002) (citing 11 U.S.C. 546(e)). [4] 11 U.S.C. 546(e). [5] 11 U.S.C. 101(25)(A) (emphasis added). [6] 11 U.S.C. 101(26). [7] 11 U.S.C. 101(51A). [8] MBS Management Services, Inc. v. MXEnergy Electric Inc. (5th Cir. Aug. 2, 2012). [9] See MXEnergy at *6-7; In re Borden Chemicals & Plastics Operating Ltd. P ship, 336 B.R. 214 (Bankr.
5 D. Del. 2006); In re Olympic Natural Gas Co., 294 F.3d 737, 741 (5th Cir. 2002) (citing Nagel v. ADM Investor Servs., Inc., 217 F.3d 436, 441 (7th Cir. 2000)) (when eventual delivery of commodity is reasonably assured, contract is a forward); CFTC v. Co Petro Marketing Group, Inc., 680 F.2d 573, 579 (9th Cir. 1982) (forward contract is predicated upon the expectation that delivery of the actual commodity by the seller to the original contracting buyer will occur in the future ); Grain Land Coop v. Kar Kim Farms, Inc., 199 F.3d 983, 990 (8th Cir. 1999) ( [I]t is the contemplation of physical delivery of the subject commodity that is the hallmark of an unregulated cash-forward contract. ). [10] See Borden, 336 B.R. at 224. [11] See MXEnergy at *6. [12] Id. [13] See Hutson v. M.J. Soffe Co. (In re Nat l Gas Distribs.), 412 B.R. 758, (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 2009). [14] See, e.g., MXEnergy, at *5 (finding that fixed price and quantity terms are not required because neither 546(e) nor 101(25)(A) contains such requirements); Borden, 336 B.R. at 217 (finding that the contracts at issue, which were priced based on a reference to an index and were swing contracts which feature variable quantities, were forward); McKittrick v. Nat l Fuel Mktg., No. ADV , 2011 WL at *1 (Bankr. D. Or. May 25, 2011) (finding that fixed price, quantity and performance dates are not required for a finding that an agreement is a forward contract). [15] Borden, 336 B.R. at 216 (citation omitted) [16] 11 U.S.C. 101(51A); see In re Resorts Int'l, Inc., 181 F.3d 505, 515 (3d Cir. 1999). [17] Bevill, Bresler & Schulman Asset Mgmt. Corp. v. Spencer Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 878 F.2d 742, 752 (3d Cir. 1989). [18] Enron Creditors Recovery Corp. v. Alfa, S.A.B. de C.V., 651 F.3d 329, 339 (2d Cir. 2011). [19] The Fifth Circuit echoed this in MXEnergy, by stating that because forward contracts are individually negotiated and not exchange-traded, the Bankruptcy Code reasonably forewent encumbering the definition with technical requirements. MXEnergy at *7. [20] By way of comparison, the Department of Energy defines a forward contract as an agreement between two parties to buy (sell) a specified quality and quantity of a good at an agreed date in the future at a fixed price or at a price determined by formula at the time of delivery to the location specified in the contract. [21] See Newhouse v. Tex. E. Transmission Corp., (In re Aurora Natural Gas) 316 B.R. 481, 484 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2004). [22] GPR Holdings, L.L.C. v. Duke Energy Trading & Mrktg., LLC, Bankr. No SAF-11, SAF-7, Adv. No WL , at *4 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. May 27, 2005). All Content , Portfolio Media, Inc.
BP Canada Energy Marketing Corp. (`BP Canada"), by and through its counsel,
James S. Carr Eric. R. Wilson KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 101 Park Avenue New York, New York 10178 Tel: 212-808-7800 Fax: 212-808-7897 A ttorneys for BP Canada Energy Marketing Corp. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY
More informationThe Evolution of the Settlement Payment Defense? Tianja Samuel, J.D. Candidate 2013
2012 Volume IV No. 22 The Evolution of the Settlement Payment Defense? Tianja Samuel, J.D. Candidate 2013 Cite as: The Evolution of the Settlement Payment Defense?, 4 ST. JOHN S BANKR. RESEARCH LIBR. NO.
More informationAnthony Pijerov Associate (Charlotte)
01 Sailing Without A Headwind: Structured Lending Market Embraces Bankruptcy Safe-Harbor Provisions J.R. Smith Partner (Tokyo/Richmond) Anthony Pijerov Associate (Charlotte) Justin Paget Associate (Richmond)
More informationStockbroker Defense Shields Ponzi-Scheme Broker Fees and Commissions From Avoidance. November/December 2013. Dara R. Levinson Mark G.
Stockbroker Defense Shields Ponzi-Scheme Broker Fees and Commissions From Avoidance November/December 2013 Dara R. Levinson Mark G. Douglas In Grayson Consulting, Inc. v. Wachovia Securities, LLC (In re
More informationContracts for Commodities: Forward Contract or Commodity Contract
Contracts for Commodities: Forward Contract or Commodity Contract Peter Ruggero and Richard J. Corbi I. INTRODUCTION The recent opinion issued by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals In re National Gas
More informationInsurance in Bankruptcy
Fear of Losing D&O Insurance in Bankruptcy Is Overblown B y P a t r i c i a J. V i l l a r e a l a n d D o u g l a s R. C o l e he typical D&O insurance policy covers not only a company s directors and
More information11th Circ. Sows Doubt Over Insolvent Bank Tax Refunds
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com 11th Circ. Sows Doubt Over Insolvent Bank Tax Refunds
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION In re: ) Chapter 7 Liquidation ) marchfirst, INC., et al., ) CASE NO. 01 B 24742 ) (Substantively Consolidated)
More informationThe Treatment of Mortgage Loan Repurchase Agreements in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
March 2008 / Issue 5 In this issue A legal update from echert s Finance and Real Estate Group p1 Mortgage Loan Repurchase Agreements p2 p3 p4 p5 Safe Harbor and Related Bankruptcy Code Provisions Factual
More informationMEMORANDUM-DECISION AND
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------- In re: TOUGHER INDUSTRIES, INC., Case No. 06-12960 Chapter 11(Main Case) Debtor.
More informationPayment System Override Deems Transaction Not Ordinary
Payment System Override Deems Transaction Not Ordinary Ames Merchandising Corp. v. Cellmark Paper Inc. (In re Ames Dept. Stores, Inc.), 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 969 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 28, 2011) In Ames Merchandising
More informationAndrew R. Turner Conner & Winters, LLP 4000 One Williams Center Tulsa, Oklahoma 74172-0148 (918) 586-8972, fax (918) 586-8672 aturner@cwlaw.
THIRD CIRCUIT CONCLUSIVELY ANSWERS QUESTION WHETHER POST-PETITION PAYMENTS ON PRE-PETITION DEBT REDUCE A CREDITOR S SUBSEQUENT NEW VALUE PREFERENCE DEFENSE Andrew R. Turner Conner & Winters, LLP 4000 One
More informationThe Safe Harbor Provided for Settlement Payments by Section 546(e)
The Safe Harbor Provided for Settlement Payments by Section 546(e) George V. Utlik and Schuyler G. Carroll I. Introduction II. The Legislative History A. The Legislative History and Historical Background
More informationThe Fate of Anti-Assignment Clauses After Bankruptcy
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com The Fate of Anti-Assignment Clauses After Bankruptcy
More informationThe SemCrude Bankruptcy's Many Lessons For Energy Traders
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com The SemCrude Bankruptcy's Many Lessons For Energy
More informationIn 2005, sections of the Bankruptcy Code concerning repurchase
Delaware Bankruptcy Court Issues Opinion of First Impression With Respect To Repo Agreement RICHARD CHESLEY, KEITH MILLER AND KIMBERLY NEWMARCH A recent decision in the American Home Mortgage bankruptcy
More informationCase 6:05-bk-03360-KSJ Doc 24 Filed 09/26/05 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 6:05-bk-03360-KSJ Doc 24 Filed 09/26/05 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION In re JOHN DORGAN, MARYANN DORGAN, Debtors. Case No. 6:05-bk-03360-KSJ
More informationThe purchaser of a tax lien is the holder of a tax claim under 11 U.S.C. 511(a) Andrew Reardon, J.D. Candidate 2015
2014 Volume VI No. 26 The purchaser of a tax lien is the holder of a tax claim under 11 U.S.C. 511(a) Andrew Reardon, J.D. Candidate 2015 Cite as: The purchaser of a tax lien is the holder of a tax claim
More informationJurisdiction and Venue in Chapter 15 Selected Issues
Jurisdiction and Venue in Chapter 15 Selected Issues Prepared by: Jeanne P. Darcey Sullivan & Worcester LLP Boston, MA jdarcey@sandw.com October 8, 2013 Please visit us on our website at www.sandw.com
More informationVacating a Judgment under Rule 60(b)(4): A Review of the Espinosa Decision
In This Issue Volume 7, Number 6 / June 2010 Vacating a Judgment under Rule 60(b)(4): A Review of the Espinosa Decision Tax Claims in Transnational Insolvencies: A "Revenue Rule" Approach ABI's 17th Annual
More informationDIEBOLD and the Not so Beautiful: Transferee Liability Trumps Tax Shelter
DIEBOLD and the Not so Beautiful: Transferee Liability Trumps Tax Shelter By Dana L. Mark and Jeffrey A. Galant Authors Bios: DANA L. MARK, a tax and estate planning lawyer, is Special Counsel at McCarter
More informationNatural Gas Exchange Inc. ("NGX") Canadian Insolvency Law
Natural Gas Exchange Inc. ("NGX") Canadian Insolvency Law Would NGX's Counterparty's Agreement (the "CPA") and Specific Transactions carried out thereunder ("Transactions"), be considered to be "eligible
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED March 3, 2016 No. 15-11188 In re: AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES, INCORPORATED;
More informationSecond Circuit Holds That the Bankruptcy Code s Debtor Eligibility Requirements Apply in a Foreign Proceeding Under Chapter 15
January 3, 2014 Second Circuit Holds That the Bankruptcy Code s Debtor Eligibility Requirements Apply in a Foreign Proceeding Under Chapter 15 In Drawbridge Special Opportunities Fund LP v. Barnet (In
More informationCase 1:12-cv-06677-JSR Document 77 Filed 09/16/14 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:12-cv-06677-JSR Document 77 Filed 09/16/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------x EDWARD ZYBURO, on behalf of himself and all
More informationDECISION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AVOID BUSINESS PROPERTY MORTGAGE DEFICIENCY JUDICIAL LIEN
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------X In re: Case No.: 14-75142-ast Deborah Shea and Daniel Shea, Chapter 7 Debtors. ----------------------------------------------------------X
More informationNonstatutory Insiders Under Bankruptcy Code 101(31): An Arm s-length Test Is Not a Proper Test
Nonstatutory Insiders Under Bankruptcy Code 101(31): An Arm s-length Test Is Not a Proper Test Gr a n t L. Ca rt w r i g h t On July 15, 2008, the Tenth Circuit in In re U.S. Medical, Inc. became one of
More informationForeign Representative Alert: Chapter 15 Gap Period Relief Subject to Preliminary Injunction Standard. September/October 2013
Foreign Representative Alert: Chapter 15 Gap Period Relief Subject to Preliminary Injunction Standard September/October 2013 Veerle Roovers Mark G. Douglas Unlike in cases filed under other chapters of
More informationCase 8:09-bk-11551-MGW Doc 53 Filed 07/30/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:09-bk-11551-MGW Doc 53 Filed 07/30/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION IN RE: Randy L. Jones, Case No. 8:09-bk-11551-MGW Chapter 13 Debtor. /
More informationCase 09-12724 Doc 42 Filed 02/24/10 Entered 02/24/10 15:46:02 Main Document Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: CASE NO. LENA L. BOUDREAUX 09-12724 SECTION A DEBTOR CHAPTER 13 REASONS FOR DECISION This matter came before the Court on
More informationDespite A Very High Income, Chapter 7 Debtor s May Succeed. Pamela Frederick, J.D. Candidate 2016
Despite A Very High Income, Chapter 7 Debtor s May Succeed 2015 Volume VII No. 9 Despite A Very High Income, Chapter 7 Debtor s May Succeed Pamela Frederick, J.D. Candidate 2016 Cite as: Despite A Very
More information'Ordinary Course Of Business' In Debt Agreements
Portfolio Media, Inc. 860 Broadway, 6 th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com 'Ordinary Course Of Business' In Debt Agreements
More informationDetermining Tax Liability Under Section 505(a) of the Bankruptcy Code
Determining Tax Liability Under Section 505(a) of the Bankruptcy Code Section 505(a) of the Bankruptcy Code (the Code ) provides the means by which a debtor or trustee in bankruptcy may seek a determination
More informationCase Law on Trustee Compensation Continues to Evolve After BAPCPA by
Case Law on Trustee Compensation Continues to Evolve After BAPCPA by Doreen Solomon, Assistant Director Carrie Weinfeld, Trial Attorney Office of Review and Oversight Before the enactment of the Bankruptcy
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Chapter 11 EVERGREEN SOLAR, INC., Case No. 11-12590 (MFW Debtor. Jointly Administered U.S. BANK N.A., Plaintiff, v. Adv. No. 13-50486
More informationCase: 13-1251 Document: 22 Filed: 02/05/2014 Page: 1 of 9 ORDERED PUBLISHED UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT
0 0 Case: - Document: Filed: 0/0/0 Page: of ORDERED PUBLISHED UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: BAP No. AZ---DPaKu ROBERT G. DALE, JR. and Bk. No. :-bk-0-gbn KATHY ANN
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. In re Case No. 07-27105 JAMES L. BORK and MICHELLE M. BORK, Chapter 7 Debtors.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN In re Case No. 07-27105 JAMES L. BORK and MICHELLE M. BORK, Chapter 7 Debtors. 1 MEMORANDUM DECISION ON TRUSTEE S OBJECTION TO EXEMPTION This
More informationIdentifying Defenses Arising From A Plaintiff's Bankruptcy
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Identifying Defenses Arising From A Plaintiff's Bankruptcy
More informationLosing The Bid: Philadelphia Newspapers Sale Dispute
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Losing The Bid: Philadelphia Newspapers Sale Dispute
More informationMarch 12, 1999 UIL #9999.98-00. MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRICT COUNSEL (KENTUCKY-TENNESSEE) Attention: Martha J. Weber, Senior Attorney
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Number: 199924006 Release Date: 6/18/1999 CC:EL:GL:Br3 GL-611262-98 March 12, 1999 UIL #9999.98-00 MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRICT COUNSEL (KENTUCKY-TENNESSEE) Attention: Martha J. Weber,
More informationINSURANCE POLICIES. by Bankruptcy Code Section 541. That section provides, in pertinent part:
BANKING LAW JOURNAL by Bankruptcy Code Section 541. That section provides, in pertinent part: The commencement of a case under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title creates an estate. Such estate is comprised
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: ) Chapter 11 ) L.I.S. CUSTOM DESIGNS, INC. ) Case No. 15-70662 (LAS) ) ) Debtor. ) RESPONSE OF THE PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
More informationThe Effect of Conversion on a Post-Petition Lender s Superpriority Claim over a Chapter 7 Trustee s Post-Conversion Administrative Expense Claim
2014 Volume VI No. 14 The Effect of Conversion on a Post-Petition Lender s Superpriority Claim over a Chapter 7 Trustee s Post-Conversion Administrative Expense Claim Michael Foster, J.D. Candidate 2015
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: * BONNIE LEE WHETSTINE, * Chapter 7 Debtor * * Case No.: 1-05-bk-10057MDF BONNIE LEE WHETSTINE, * Movant * * v. * MOTION
More informationTips to Help Prevent Selective Rejection in Sale-Leasebacks
Tips to Help Prevent Selective Rejection in Sale-Leasebacks Law360, New York (October 30, 2014, 2:19 PM ET) -- In a sale-leaseback transaction, a company owning real property sells that property to a buyer
More informationAVOIDING FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS
AVOIDING FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS 2002 Vedder, Price, Kaufman & Kammholz. All rights reserved. I. INTRODUCTION The delightful quality of fraud lies in its infinite variety. 1 The concept of a fraudulent transfer
More informationF I L E D March 12, 2012
Case: 11-40377 Document: 00511784972 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/12/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D March 12, 2012 Lyle
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI IN RE: ) ) KEVIN DEAN STOVER and ) Case No. 05-43103 SHERRIE ANN STOVER, ) ) Debtors. ) ORDER GRANTING THE CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
More informationShort. Home mortgage lenders have
Short Home mortgage lenders have long enjoyed favorable treatment under the Bankruptcy Code. 11 U.S.C. 101 1440 (2000). In a delicate balancing act to protect consumers, Congress excepted home mortgages
More informationSHORT SALES BY BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEES: AN EVOLVING TREND. by Jeffrey L. Smoot
Jeffrey L. Smoot Oles Morrison Rinker & Baker LLP 701 Pike Street, Suite 1700 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 623-3427 smoot@oles.com SHORT SALES BY BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEES: AN EVOLVING TREND by Jeffrey L. Smoot The
More informationBOSTON BAR ASSOCIATION ETHICS COMMITTEE OPINION 2008-01: BANKRUPTCY PRO BONO INITIATIVE SUMMARY
BOSTON BAR ASSOCIATION ETHICS COMMITTEE OPINION 2008-01: BANKRUPTCY PRO BONO INITIATIVE SUMMARY The Ethics Committee of the Boston Bar Association has been asked to analyze a pro bono initiative (the Pro
More informationSeries LLCs, the UCC, and the Bankruptcy Code A Series of Unfortunate Events?
Series LLCs, the UCC, and the Bankruptcy Code A Series of Unfortunate Events? No r m a n M. Pow e l l Norman M. Powell is a partner in the Delaware law firm of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, where
More informationPUBLISHED IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 06 day of January, 2011. ROBERT E. NUGENT UNITED STATES CHIEF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE PUBLISHED IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS IN RE: VINCENT R. McMULLEN,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND at Baltimore * * MEMORANDUM OPINION
Entered: April 11, 2007 Date signed April 11, 2007 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND at Baltimore In Re: * MELVIN WATSON ARETHA WATSON Debtors * * Case No. 06-11948DK *
More informationCase 15-10952-KJC Doc 826 Filed 08/21/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.
Case 15-10952-KJC Doc 826 Filed 08/21/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: CORINTHIAN COLLEGES, INC., ET AL., Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 15-10952 (KJC)
More informationFifth Circuit Establishes Appropriate Till Analysis in Chapter 11 Proceedings
March 2013 Fifth Circuit Establishes Appropriate Till Analysis in Chapter 11 Proceedings On March 1, 2013, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Texas Grand Prairie
More information2/26/2014 FRA Unpublished
Sale free and clear of liens U.S.C (f)(), (), and () Clear Channel, 1 BR (th Cir. BAP 0) Clayton Smith and Cristle Smith, Case No. 1-1-tmr //1 FRA Unpublished The Trustee sought authority to sell real
More information15-11804-mg Doc 34 Filed 10/28/15 Entered 10/28/15 08:59:29 Main Document Pg 1 of 7. Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding.
Pg 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: BERAU CAPITAL RESOURCES PTE LTD, FOR PUBLICATION Chapter 15 Case No. 15-11804 (MG) Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding. A P P E
More informationCase 11-13028 Doc 701 Filed 01/26/15 Entered 01/26/15 15:43:47 Main Document Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: CASE NO. VIRGIN OFFSHORE U.S.A., INC 11-13028 SECTION A DEBTORS CHAPTER 11 OPINION The hearing on the Third and Final Application
More informationLehman Bankruptcy Court Addresses Scope of the Bankruptcy Code s Safe Harbor for Liquidation, Termination and Acceleration of Swap Agreements
Legal Update January 9, 2014 Lehman Bankruptcy Court Addresses Scope of the Bankruptcy Code s Safe Harbor for Liquidation, Termination and Acceleration of Swap Agreements In Michigan State Housing Development
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2014 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus
More informationGorman v. Birts, Civil Action No. 1:12cv427 (LMB/TCB), 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107811 (E.D. Va. Aug. 1, 2012)
Fourth Circuit Note: The Fourth Circuit has issued no bankruptcy appellate decisions in August 2012 other than per curiam opinions affirming the district court without discussion (see first entry). Tyler
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. In re Case No. 13-23483 JANICE RENEE PUGH, Chapter 13 Debtor.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN In re Case No. 13-23483 JANICE RENEE PUGH, Chapter 13 Debtor. MEMORANDUM DECISION ON DEBTOR S OBJECTION TO INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE S MOTION
More informationTHE RETIREMENT PLAN EXEMPTION
THE RETIREMENT PLAN EXEMPTION Michael St. James 1 I. The Statute A. California Code of Civil Procedure 704.115 establishes an exemption for the assets of a private retirement plan. The definition of a
More informationFinancial Services Alert
April 2008 Authors: Robert T. Honeywell 212.536.4863 robert.honeywell@klgates.com Anthony R. G. Nolan 212.536.4843 anthony.nolan@klgates.com Donald W. Smith 202.778.9079 donald.smith@klgates.com Robert
More informationDistrict Court Upholds Extraterritorial Enforcement of the Automatic Stay and Injunction Barring Foreign Creditor's Lawsuit
May 10, 2012 District Court Upholds Extraterritorial Enforcement of the Automatic Stay and Injunction Barring Foreign Creditor's Lawsuit Section 541(a) of the Bankruptcy Code creates a worldwide estate
More informationInsurance and the Personal Injury Stay Movant
Insurance and the Personal Injury Stay Movant When determining whether to grant a personal injury claimant relief from the automatic stay, the court should not give consideration to the wishes of the debtor
More informationAkerAlert. The American Home Mortgage Case and Repurchase Agreements. Finance Law ADVERTISEMENT. march 20, 2008
AkerAlert Finance Law march 20, 2008 The American Home Mortgage Case and Repurchase Agreements By Jules Cohen, Esq. and Milton Vescovacci, Esq. In the field of mortgage warehouse lending, repurchase agreements
More informationMEMORANDUM. Select Group Requirement for ERISA Top Hat Plans
MEMORANDUM Select Group Requirement for ERISA Top Hat Plans November 27, 2007 We discuss below how the courts and Department of Labor ("DOL") have interpreted the ERISA requirement that participation in
More informationIn re Dean, 359 B.R. 218 (Bkrtcy.C.D.Ill. 2006)
Page 1 of 7 In re Dean, 359 B.R. 218 (Bkrtcy.C.D.Ill. 2006) Page 218 359 B.R. 218 (Bkrtcy.C.D.Ill. 2006) In re Richard B. Dean and Brenda S. DEAN, Debtors. Richard B. Dean and Brenda S. Dean, Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 11-35165-sgj7 Doc 45 Filed 09/22/11 Entered 09/22/11 18:33:47 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9
Document Page 1 of 9 Gerrit M. Pronske State Bar No. 16351640 Rakhee V. Patel State Bar No. 00797213 Melanie P. Goolsby State Bar No. 24059841 PRONSKE & PATEL, P.C. 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 5350 Dallas,
More informationBankruptcy Courts Power to Recharacterize Debt Claims as Equity. David Saponara, J.D. Candidate 2013
2012 Volume IV No. 23 Bankruptcy Courts Power to Recharacterize Debt Claims as Equity David Saponara, J.D. Candidate 2013 Cite as: Bankruptcy Courts Power to Recharacterize Debt Claims as Equity, 4 ST.
More informationLegislative Update Recent Amendments to the Commodity Exchange Act
Legislative Update Recent Amendments to the Commodity Exchange Act Distributed by: The Securities and Futures Regulation Group July 2008 One Atlantic Center, Suite 2300 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta,
More informationCase 10-32200 Document 33 Filed in TXSB on 04/21/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 10-32200 Document 33 Filed in TXSB on 04/21/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ENTERED 04/21/2010 ) IN RE ) ) SOUTHWEST GUARANTY,
More informationPUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT. Debtors. No. 09-2238
PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit April 12, 2011 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court RONALD HUGH STANDIFERD; BETTY ANN STANDIFERD,
More informationProperty Tax Certificate Claims: Do You Need to Object?
Property Tax Certificate Claims: Do You Need to Object? In the twelve largest counties in Ohio, delinquent property taxes can be sold to tax certificate buyers. Outside of bankruptcy, those buyers can
More informationCase 13-13087-KG Doc 483 Filed 01/17/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 13-13087-KG Doc 483 Filed 01/17/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re ) Chapter 11 ) FISKER AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS, INC., et al., ) ) Case No. 13-13087(KG)
More informationHow To Find Out If A Bankruptcy Attorney Is Disinterested
Case 13-04639-8-RDD Doc 68 Filed 11/04/13 Entered 11/04/13 16:14:55 Page 1 of 7 SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 4 day of November, 2013. Randy D. Doub United States Bankruptcy Judge IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY
More informationTexas Common Carriers May Soon Be Running In Circles
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Texas Common Carriers May Soon Be Running In Circles
More informationSwaps and the Bankruptcy Code
Swaps and the Bankruptcy Code Brett A. Axelrod and Gordon Goolsby of Fox Rothschild LLP On September 15, 2008, the Dow Jones Industrial Average suffered its largest one day market drop since September
More informationMore Fact than Fiction: The Supreme Court Interprets the Means Test
More Fact than Fiction: The Supreme Court Interprets the Means Test Contributing Editor: Mark A. Redmiles Executive Office for U.S. Trustees Washington, D.C. 1 In 2005, Congress enacted the Bankruptcy
More informationProperty Can Be Recovered from Subsequent Transferee Without First Avoiding Fraudulent Transfer to Initial Recipient. September/October 2005
Property Can Be Recovered from Subsequent Transferee Without First Avoiding Fraudulent Transfer to Initial Recipient September/October 2005 Robert E. Krebs The power of a bankruptcy trustee or a chapter
More informationHedge Fund. Bankruptcy. The LAW REPORT. Overview of Chapter 15. The definitive source of actionable intelligence on fund law and regulation
hedge LAW REPORT fund law and regulation Bankruptcy Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code Presents Litigation Risks and Liability for Creditors, Counterparties, Service Providers and Others Doing Business
More informationWHAT TO SAY WHEN YOUR PROOF OF CLAIM IS FILED AFTER THE BAR DATE 1
WHAT TO SAY WHEN YOUR PROOF OF CLAIM IS FILED AFTER THE BAR DATE 1 Bradley R. Hightower United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Alabama Law Clerk to the Honorable Margaret A. Mahoney What
More informationIs Your Retainer Safe?: How In re Two Gales Ensures that Bankruptcy Professionals Keep their Retainer Fees. Jonathan Abramovitz, J.D.
2012 Volume IV No. 1 Is Your Retainer Safe?: How In re Two Gales Ensures that Bankruptcy Professionals Keep their Retainer Fees Jonathan Abramovitz, J.D. Candidate 2013 Cite as: Is Your Retainer Safe?:
More informationAn Updated Analysis of Recent Postpetition Attorney s Fees Post-Travelers Decisions
An Updated Analysis of Recent Postpetition Attorney s Fees Post-Travelers Decisions Richard J. Corbi Author s Note: Similar issues, analysis, and case arguments appear in my earlier article: Update: Postpetition
More informationCase:14-04744-BKT11 Doc#:67 Filed:10/09/14 Entered:10/09/14 15:14:42 Document Page 1 of 7
Case:-0-BKT Doc#: Filed:0/0/ Entered:0/0/ :: Document Page of IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 0 IN RE: CASE NO. -0 Chapter TRIPLE A & R CAPITAL INVESTMENT, INC Debtor(s)
More informationThe Requirements for Recognition under Chapter 15
One Debtor, Multiple Countries: A Discussion of Recent Developments in Cross-Border Insolvency Proceedings & Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code By: Lawrence C. Gottlieb Michael Klein Robert Winning Abstract
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES DIVISION
Case :-ap-0-nb Doc Filed 0// Entered 0// :: Desc Main Document Page of UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES DIVISION FILED & ENTERED AUG CLERK U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MEMORANDUM OPINION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION In re: ) Case No. 04 B 26948 ) VICTOR AND LINDA WILSON, ) Chapter 13 ) Debtors. ) Judge Pamela S. Hollis MEMORANDUM OPINION
More informationWebinar Series. MF Global Current Status and
Webinar Series MF Global Current Status and Claims Process What Former Customers Should Be Doing to Optimize Recovery Prospects Presented by George P. Angelich Arent Fox LLP Washington, DC New York, NY
More informationSELF-EXECUTING DISCHARGE EXCEPTION MAY SAVE $2.3 BILLION WHISTLEBLOWER SUIT AGAINST REORGANIZED DEBTOR
April 17, 2014 SELF-EXECUTING DISCHARGE EXCEPTION MAY SAVE $2.3 BILLION WHISTLEBLOWER SUIT AGAINST REORGANIZED DEBTOR In a matter of first impression, the United States District Court for the Southern
More informationcauses of actions based on Travelers own tortious conduct and not directly related to the Manville insurance policies.[12]
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com The Significance Of Travelers V. Bailey Law360,
More informationMEMORANDUM DECISION STRIKING DEBTOR S CHAPTER 7 PETITION FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 11 U.S.C. 109(h)(1)
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK POUGHKEEPSIE DIVISION ---------------------------------------------------------x In re: ANTHONY J. RIOS, FOR PUBLICATION Chapter 7 Case No.
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA In Re JUDITH D. KRAUSE Case No. 02-15031-MAM-7 Debtor ORDER SUSTAINING TRUSTEE S OBJECTION TO DEBTOR S EXEMPTION OF ACCOUNTS UNLESS DEBTOR AMENDS
More informationSection 362(c)(3): Does It Terminate The Entire Automatic Stay? Michael Aryeh, J.D. Candidate 2015
2014 Volume VI No. 2 Section 362(c)(3): Does It Terminate The Entire Automatic Stay? Michael Aryeh, J.D. Candidate 2015 Cite as: Section 362(c)(3): Does It Terminate The Entire Automatic Stay?, 6 ST. JOHN
More informationWhen Bankruptcy May Strike Your Customer, Supplier, or Contractual Counter-Party: Maximizing Your Creditor Rights and Remedies and Minimizing Risks
When Bankruptcy May Strike Your Customer, Supplier, or Contractual Counter-Party: Maximizing Your Creditor Rights and Remedies and Minimizing Risks David McKee, Metaldyne Corporation Jill L. Murch, Foley
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COCRT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) Pursuant to a family court order, William Benjamin
FOR PUBLICATION ENTERED 'a&- os FILED AUG 2 6 2005 CLERK, U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DlSTRl OF CALIFORNIA BY /t3 DEPUTY UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COCRT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re Case No.
More informationParties frequently choose limited liability companies
Limited Liability Companies and the Bankruptcy Code This Practice Note from our website highlights potential bankruptcy and insolvency issues that parties and their counsel should consider when forming
More informationWhen Is It Appropriate To Disallow An Allowed Claim? By Geraldine E. Ponto and David N. Crapo
When Is It Appropriate To Disallow An Allowed Claim? By Geraldine E. Ponto and David N. Crapo Time-honored principles concerning the allowance of claims are breached when the strictures of Section 502(d)
More information