Latham & Watkins Litigation Department Intellectual Property Litigation Practice
|
|
- Dorcas Clementine Sanders
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Number August 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department Intellectual Property Litigation Practice L Oréal v. ebay: The Court of Justice of the European Union Tightens Liability of Online Marketplace Operators The CJEU Judgment of July 12, 2011 (C-324/09) and its Possible Effects in the UK, Germany and France Internet Service Providers (ISPs) will have to be prepared for assuming more liability with respect to third party infringements in the future, including injunctions imposed against them, and take steps to curb future infringements. The long awaited decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in L Oréal v. ebay was handed down last month. The CJEU followed its brand-owner friendly approach by further tightening the liability of online marketplace operators, while at the same time strengthening brand owners rights. In doing so, the Court made it clear that trademark owners must be accorded effective measures to protect their trademarks. The only good news for online operators such as auction sites is that the Court (following its earlier decision in Google France 1 ) confirmed that online operators do not use a trade mark by merely allowing its customers to market goods with third party trade marks on its platform. Nevertheless, the Court found that online marketplace operators may be responsible for trademark infringements carried out by users on their platform if they played an active role in facilitating the infringing conduct (provided of course, secondary infringement provisions exist in the relevant jurisdiction). Even where the operator has not played an active role, the Court held that national courts should have powers to impose effective measures against the service provider, not only to prevent existing infringements, but also, more controversially, to prevent future infringements on the marketplace. The precise circumstances and the factors that will guide liability for advertisers and online operators have once again been left to the member states to determine. The effects of the judgment under national jurisdictions will therefore in many aspects depend on how the national courts interpret and implement this judgment. What is clear however, is that marketplace operators will have to assume more responsibility to prevent infringements on their platform. This is likely to have wide ranging impact on all online operators and Internet Service Providers (ISPs). Background The judgment of the Court follows a request for a preliminary ruling by the English High Court, concerning proceedings in which L Oréal complained that ebay was liable for certain trademark infringements committed by the users of its platform. 2 The key issue concerned liability for keyword advertising, such as Google Adwords. These types of advertisements have been contentious because advertisers are Latham & Watkins operates worldwide as a limited liability partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (USA) with affiliated limited liability partnerships conducting the practice in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Singapore and an affiliated partnership conducting the practice in Hong Kong and Japan. Latham & Watkins practices in Saudi Arabia in association with the Law Office of Mohammed A. Al-Sheikh. Under New York s Code of Professional Responsibility, portions of this communication contain attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each representation. Please direct all inquiries regarding our conduct under New York s Disciplinary Rules to Latham & Watkins LLP, 885 Third Avenue, New York, NY , Phone: Copyright 2011 Latham & Watkins. All Rights Reserved.
2 able to select registered trademarks of their competitors as keywords to prompt advertisements for its goods and services. The English High Court was unable to decide whether ebay was liable for certain keyword advertising or for trademark infringements carried out by the users of its marketplace and referred various questions to the CJEU. Moreover, the Court sought guidance as to whether brand owners could legitimately prevent the offering for sale of testers, product samples and the resale of goods without their original packaging in view of the established European exhaustion of rights principles. Sales Without the Brand Owner s Consent; Testers, Dramming Products and Resales: No Exhaustion of Rights The first issue that the Court considered was whether brand owners are entitled to prevent the sale of product testers, dramming products (products which are not intended for commercial supply) and the resale of goods that have already been put onto the market, without their original packaging. The key legislative provisions are found in Art. 7 of the Trademark Directive (no. 89/104) 3 and Art. 13 of the Trademark Regulation (no. 40/94). 4 These provisions essentially provide that a brand owner s rights are exhausted after goods bearing the relevant trademark are put into the European market with the brand owner s consent. The Court held that the trademark owner is generally entitled to oppose the sale of testers and dramming products. This is because the Court found that these products had not been put onto the market by the brand owner. The Court also held that a trademark owner may oppose the resale of goods that have already been put onto the market without their original packaging, if important information such as the identity of the manufacturer or the person responsible for marketing the product was missing or in circumstances where the resale could affect the origin function 5 of the trademark or the supply could damage the mark s reputation. The Court confirmed that EU trade mark law will apply to trade marked products offered for sale from a non-eu state where the offer for sale is targeted at consumers in an EU state covered by the mark; it is however, not necessary that the products have been put on the market in such territories. Keyword Advertising The Court also made some important findings regarding keyword advertising following on from its decisions last year in Google France 6 and the Portakabin 7 cases. These findings are likely to also have significant implications for the pending decision in the Interflora 8 case, which is due to be handed down shortly. The Court confirmed the key finding of the Google France decision that the selection of keywords by the advertiser to trigger the display of advertisements is use in the course of trade of the mark within the meaning of the trademark directive and trademark regulation. The key issue though was whether a trademark owner is entitled to prevent ebay from keyword advertising, if the resultant sponsored link leads the user directly to advertisements or offers of sale of products by ebay s users on ebay s marketplace platform. The Court held that the trademark owner is indeed entitled to prevent ebay from such advertising, if the advertising does not enable reasonably well-informed and reasonably observant internet users or enables them only with difficulty to ascertain whether the goods concerned originate from the proprietor or from an undertaking economically linked to that proprietor, or from a third party. 9 It did not matter that sponsored link advertisements were concerned with the sale of products by ebay s customers. This finding essentially means that online service providers could be held responsible for advertisements of users of the marketplace, if the advertising does not clearly show that the offered goods do not originate from the trademark owner. 2 Number August 2011
3 The Court also went on to say that keyword advertising which serves to promote ebay s own services i.e., its online marketplace could only constitute trademark infringement, if the marks selected as keywords are trademarks with a reputation. This is due to the fact that the goods and services in question are not similar (ebay provides a marketplace and L Oréal offers products such as cosmetics) and therefore liability has to be established under the famous marks provisions of the trademark directive and trademark regulation. 10 Liability Exemptions for Host Providers The other principal area of the case concerned the liability of online marketplace operators for infringements committed on their platform. In this respect, two distinct issues arise. The first is whether an online marketplace operator can be held primarily liable for the trade mark infringements that occur on its platform. The second, and perhaps more controversial issue, is whether, and to what extent, online marketplace operators can be held secondarily liable for the conduct of its users. On the first issue, the Court followed its decision in Google France 11 in holding that merely by providing a service that enabled its customers to display on the ebay platform products with third party trade marks ebay did not itself use the relevant trademark. The trade mark use is made by the sellers (i.e., ebay s customers) alone. The extent to which secondary liability can be imposed on ebay (for instance under accessorial or secondary liability provisions) is a matter for national law. However, in this case, the Court had to consider the extent to which the liability of operators such as ebay was limited by the requirements of the e-commerce Directive 12 which restricts the liability of service providers in relation to the hosting of information provided by the recipients of its services. The Court noted that the general exemption of secondary liability in the e-commerce Directive only applies to service providers that have acted neutrally by providing a merely technical and automatic processing of the data. However, where the service provider has played an active role of such a kind as to give it knowledge of, or control over, those data, it would not be subject to the general exemption. 13 Even though the Court once again left it to the national courts to examine the circumstances that would give rise to liability, it specified at least some conditions under which a provider must be considered not to have played a neutral role : This includes situations where the operator has provided assistance which entails, in particular, optimizing the presentation of the offers for sale in question or promoting those offers. Although the Court did not ultimately decide the issue in respect of ebay, it did observe that ebay processes the data entered by customer sellers, the sales take place in accordance with ebay s terms and in some cases, ebay also provides assistance intended to optimize or promote certain offers. These observations suggest that the Court considers that operators such as ebay would generally fall outside of the exemption. What is more, even if the online provider plays a neutral role (and is therefore, subject to the exception under the e-commerce Directive), it would not be exempt from liability if: a) It had actual knowledge of illegal activity b) It is aware of facts or circumstances from which the illegal activity or information is apparent c) Having obtained such knowledge or awareness, fails to act expeditiously to remove or disable access to this information Even though these insights are not new (they are stated in Art. 14 of the Directive no. 2000/31/EC) the decision provides some clarity by explaining that the standard of duty required is that of a diligent economic operator and that the relevant awareness can arise as a result of an investigation undertaken at the online operator s own initiative or due to being notified of an infringement. 3 Number August 2011
4 Once again, this appears to put the onus right back on online operators such as ebay and indicates that its current brand owner driven notice and take down system, VERO, may not sufficiently absolve it from liability. Hosting auction and product sales sites will have to engage in a higher degree of self policing in the future, especially with respect to the offer for sale of well known or famous brands. Imposition of Preventive Measures Against Online Operators The Court held that national courts must be able to issue orders against online service providers to take measures that contribute not only to bringing to an end existing infringements, but also to prevent future infringements. This is a significant finding and opens up the possibility of brand owners being able to obtain relief directly against online operators, including ISPs. The Court however warned that orders against online providers must be effective, proportionate, dissuasive and must not create barriers to legitimate trade. While the scope of these requirements has been left to the national courts to define, the Court nevertheless clarified the kind of measures that can be imposed on online service providers. Importantly, the Court said that any relief that required online providers to actively monitor all the data of each of their customers, or otherwise provided for blanket bans on trademarked goods, was not permissible. Nevertheless, the marketplace operator may be ordered by means of an injunction to suspend repeated perpetrators in order to prevent future infringements. Further, the operator may be ordered to adjust its platform to make it easier to identify its customer-sellers, especially if the infringer is acting in the course of trade and not privately. The main conclusion is that host sites will have to know their customers much better in the future, not permitting customers to hide behind anonymous pseudonyms, and requiring proper disclosure of the sellers identity. While this is already a legal requirement under Article 6 of the e-commerce Directive (2000/31/EC), it is not enforced. In order to protect themselves, website hosts and ISPs may need to know their clients, and disclose their identity in order to help avoid liability for the sale of infringing goods. It would be ironic, but predictable that it could become as difficult to open an account to sell goods on an auction site without proper identity checks as it is to open a bank account or instruct a lawyer in the EU. Potential Effects Under National Jurisdictions National jurisdictions already have clarified some of the aspects that are discussed in the present judgment, or show a clear direction towards some of the points discussed. United Kingdom UK courts are likely to require substantive proof that the relevant keyword advertising damages the origin function of the mark before finding advertisers liable. This is particularly the case where the keyword corresponding to the trademark does not appear on the advertisement itself. In certain cases, a link between the keyword and the trademark owner may be easier to make out than others; for instance, in the Interflora 14 case, there was evidence before the UK High Court that M&S keyword advertisements had created a false impression that M&S was part of Interflora s flower business network. If this type of link can be established on the evidence, UK courts will likely have no hesitation in holding advertisers liable. The decision means that the UK courts now have significant latitude in determining the circumstances where an online operator can be said to have played an active role. The existing UK case law on authorization and accessorial liability suggests that mere enablement, assistance or even encouragement by the economic operator is unlikely to be enough; 4 Number August 2011
5 something more will probably be required for instance, by reason of the relationship between the online operator and its customers or because of the degree of control the online operator exercises over the content of any advertisement. Nevertheless, given the requirement that the seller should be clearly named, the days where online operators could hear, see or speak no evil are probably now over. Operators will now probably be required to be more transparent about identifying its users and in certain cases, may need to take steps to counter infringing conduct on their own volition where illegality, or a pattern of illegality, is likely or has occurred. Germany The German Federal Court of Justice (FCJ) recently clarified the conditions under which keyword advertising (Adwords) does not violate the origin function of the trademark: 15 According to the FCJ, it does not constitute a trademark infringement under the aspect of use of an identical mark, if (i) the advertisement is displayed in a separate section of the website that bears the heading advertisements, (ii) the advertisement itself does not contain the protected sign nor make any reference to the trademark owner and (iii) the domain mentioned in the advertisement points to the advertiser and therefore indicates an origin of the advertised products that is different from the owner of the trademark. In contrast, a recent judgment of the Braunschweig Court of Appeal seems to impose stricter rules on advertisers as regards keyword advertising: 16 The court held that even where (i) the advertisement is displayed in a separate part of the search results page and where (ii) the advertisement does not make any reference to the protected trademark, the Internet user would not be able to ascertain the origin of the advertised goods and services, due to the vagueness 17 of the provided information. The Internet user would expect the trademark owner and the entity standing behind the advertisement to be economically linked. The fact that the selection of keywords can be based on automatic suggestions provided by Google 18 does not exempt advertisers from liability, at least not under rules of secondary liability. With this judgment, the Braunschweig Court of Appeal may have gone too far. Not surprisingly, the appeal to the Federal Court of Justice is pending. The decision of the Federal Court is expected with curiosity. France French Courts determination of ebay s liability has so far lacked consistency. As a matter of example, in a lawsuit brought by L Oréal for trademark infringement and tort, the Paris Civil Court determined on May 13, that ebay played a neutral role in connection with the sale of products by third parties via its auction service and should thus benefit from the exemption regime for hosting providers. Interestingly, the court considered that providing assistance to the sale by optimizing the presentation of the offers was no sign that ebay was playing an active role. It is doubtful that such a conclusion might be reached again today after the CJEU s decision. The Paris Civil Court further held that measures carried out by ebay to prevent infringement were indispensable but deferred to the parties to collaborate closely for determining them. By contrast, in a lawsuit brought by Hermès, the Reims Court of Appeal on July 20, 2010 refused the benefit of the exemption regime to ebay on the ground that its role would go beyond a mere neutral and technical role. 20 The court went on to say that ebay had made use of the Hermès trademarks and should be found liable for primary infringement. Although none of these ebay decisions reached the French Supreme Court level, the French 5 Number August 2011
6 Supreme Court issued its first decision on the exemption regime for hosting providers on February 17, The Court made it clear that a provider should be granted the benefit of this regime to the extent that it neither determines nor selects in any manner the content that it hosts. The Court however made no ruling on the preventive measures that could be taken. What Does This Mean for Online Marketplace and Service Providers? The position of online marketplace and service providers has been tightened: Takedown services that rely exclusively on the brand owner to identify and notify the online operators of trademark infringements may not in all cases absolve the online operator from liability. For instance, there may be circumstances where the illegal activity is so rampant, that the online operator may need to take action on its own volition. Online service providers should get ready for taking up more responsibility when it comes to the protection of third party rights. This is particularly so where the online service provider is actively involved in the services it offers to its users. A potential battle ground may centre around the anonymity of vendors which in the past has provided cover, but which may not do so in the future. Host sites are likely to have to know their customers better than they do today. Online providers will have to be prepared for assuming more liability, including injunctions imposed against them and take steps to curb future infringing conduct. What Does This Mean for Brand Owners? The judgment strengthens the position of brand owners: Brand owners can oppose the offer and sale of products, if these are not covered by their consent, namely goods not meant to be sold in the EU/EEA including grey goods and parallel imports, testers and dramming products as well as unboxed goods. Brand owners are entitled to prevent advertisers (including online service providers) from keyword advertising if the advertisement does not unequivocally indicate that the offered goods do not originate from the trademark owner. Brand owners will be able to enforce their position more easily, especially when it comes to the imposition of court measures directly against online providers. 6 Number August 2011
7 Endnotes 1 CJEU, Judgment of March 23, 2010, C-236, 237 and 238/08; also see Client Alert of April 1, See judgment of England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) of May 22, 2009, L Oreal SA & Ors v. ebay International AG & Ors, [2009] EWHC 1094 (Ch). 3 Now replaced by Directive no. 2008/95/EC. 4 Now replaced by Regulation no. 207/2009/EC. 5 One of the essential functions of a trademark is to identify the commercial source or origin of products or services. This is commonly referred to as the origin function of the trademark. 6 See above, endnote no CJEU, Judgment of July 8, 2010, C-558/08. 8 CJEU, C-323/09. 9 In this regard, the Court has applied the rationale of its Google and Google France decision of March 23, Art. 5 (2) of Directive no. 89/104, Art. 9 (1) (c) of Regulation no. 40/ See above, endnote no Directive no. 2000/31/EC. 13 Recitals 114 and 120 of Judgment C-324/09; the Court explicitly refers to the Google and Google France decisions of March 23, 2010 (C-236, 237 and 238/08). 14 See above, endnote no. 8. you have any questions about this Client Alert, please contact one of the authors listed below or the Latham attorney with whom you normally consult: Indra Bhattacharya indradeep.bhattacharya@lw.com London Gabriele Wunsch gabriele.wunsch@lw.com Germany Myria Saarinen myria.saarinen@lw.com Paris Laurence J. Cohen larry.cohen@lw.com London 15 FCJ, I ZR 125/07, Judgment of January 13, U 113/08, Judgment of November 24, The case concerned the question of likelihood of confusion by use of a similar mark, not an identical mark. However, in both cases, the question of infringement of the origin function arises according to the jurisprudence of the CJEU. 17 The criterion of vagueness is based on the CJEU judgment of March 25, 2010 BergSpechte (C-278/08). 18 Google s broad match function. 19 Tribunal de Grande Instance of Paris, 3rd Chamber, 3rd Section, available at 20 Cour d appel of Reims, 1st Chamber, Civil Section, available at 21 Cour de cassation, Civ. 1, No , , , available at 7 Number August 2011
8 Client Alert is published by Latham & Watkins as a news reporting service to clients and other friends. The information contained in this publication should not be construed as legal advice. Should further analysis or explanation of the subject matter be required, please contact the attorney with whom you normally consult. A complete list of our Client Alerts can be found on our website at If you wish to update your contact details or customise the information you receive from Latham & Watkins, please visit to subscribe to our global client mailings program. Abu Dhabi Barcelona Beijing Boston Brussels Chicago Doha Dubai Frankfurt Hamburg Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Madrid Milan Moscow Munich New Jersey New York Orange County Paris Riyadh* Rome San Diego San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Washington, D.C. * In association with the Law Office of Mohammed A. Al-Sheikh 8 Number August 2011
Latham & Watkins Litigation Antitrust & Competition
Number 1040 9 June 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Antitrust & Competition New Antitrust Rules for the Motor Vehicle Sector Challenges Ahead for Car Manufacturers, Dealers, Spare Parts Suppliers
More informationClient Alert. New Treasury Regulations Put Issuers at Increased Risk for Cancellation of Indebtedness Income in Debt-for-Debt Exchanges.
Number 1399 September 20, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department New Treasury Regulations Put Issuers at Increased Risk for Cancellation of Indebtedness Income in Debt-for-Debt Exchanges In
More informationClient Alert. New Treasury Regulations Make it Easier to Issue Tack-On Bonds or Loans. But New FATCA Regulations Add Complexity.
Number 1417 October 6, 2015 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate & Tax Departments New Treasury Regulations Make it Easier to Issue Tack-On Bonds or Loans But New FATCA Regulations Add Complexity The
More informationClient Alert. Accountants and Auditors as SEC Whistleblowers. Categories of Persons Eligible or Not Eligible for SEC Whistleblower Awards
Number 1462 February 5, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department Accountants and Auditors as SEC Whistleblowers Nearly every public company and financial industry firm subject to the enforcement
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate Department
Number 833 March 16, 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Contracting Models for Systems Integration Projects to Meet the Challenges of ehealth A careful selection of the contracting
More informationLatham & Watkins Health Care Practice
Number 928 September 9, 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Health Care Practice Violation of this rule will be treated by the FTC as an unfair or deceptive act in violation of the Federal Trade Commission
More informationClient Alert. The Impact of CDS on Restructurings. Influence of CDS Holders Truvo and SEAT. Carrying out a restructuring of
Number 1152 24 February 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department The Impact of CDS on Restructurings Carrying out a restructuring of obligations against which CDS has been issued can be extremely
More informationClient Alert. Online Gambling: Is Now the Time to Enter the German Market? The current legal framework in 15 out of the 16 German States
Number 1299 1 March 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Online Gambling: Is Now the Time to Enter the German Market? Providers may consider taking the opportunity in Schleswig- Holstein
More informationClient Alert. Proposed Revisions to Regulations for Eagle Take Permits Hold Promise of Greater Take Authorization for Renewable Energy Developers
Number 1361 July 9, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Environmental, Land & Resources Department Proposed Revisions to Regulations for Eagle Take Permits Hold Promise of Greater Take Authorization for
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate Department
Number 990 February 23, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department New Regulations Issued to Implement Incentives for Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records The CMS and ONC regulations
More informationLatham & Watkins Finance Department. Amended Bankruptcy Rule 2019: Clarity and Confusion?
Number 1261 December 1, 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department... a failure of an entity, group or committee to comply with Amended Rule 2019 could cause serious repercussions... the court
More informationAirfreight: Major Defeat for the European Commission
CLIENT PUBLICATION Antitrust 3 December 015 Airfreight: Major Defeat for the European Commission The General Court annulled the airfreight decision adopted in November 010 by which the European Commission
More informationAuthors: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: A Guide for State and Local Governments
Latham & Watkins LLP As of February 2009 Authors: Stuart S. Kurlander +1.202.637.2169 Edward W. Correia +1.202.637.2220 Gabriel K. Bell* +1.202.637.2227 www.lw.com Copyright 2009 Latham & Watkins. All
More informationClient Alert. IRS Targets Colleges and Universities in New Compliance Initiative. Background. Matters Under Review
Number 754 October 20, 2008 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department IRS Targets Colleges and Universities in New Compliance Initiative The US colleges and universities in receipt of a compliance questionnaire
More informationLatham & Watkins Benefits & Compensation Practice
Number 758 30 October 2008 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Benefits & Compensation Practice Underwater Options in the UK Can We Throw Them a Lifeline? Companies incorporated in the United Kingdom which are
More informationClient Alert. Overview. Background. The Treasury Determination adds to a growing body of law applicable to foreign exchange derivatives.
Number 1468 February 13, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Regulation of Foreign Currency Transactions: The Intersection of the Treasury Determination, Swaps Regulation and the Retail
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation Department
Number 592 April 23, 2007 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department Japanese Authorities Amend Consumer Products Safety Law to Require Manufacturers, Importers and Retailers to Disclose Accident
More informationChina Publishes Draft Rules on Protection of Information Network Dissemination Rights
China Publishes Draft Rules on Protection of Information Network Dissemination Rights 1 China Publishes Draft Rules on Protection of Information Network Dissemination Rights On 22 April, 2012, the Supreme
More informationInvestment Treaty Arbitration: A Primer
Latham & Watkins International Arbitration Practice Number 1563 July 29, 2013 Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Primer International investors enjoy varying degrees of protection and opportunities to seek
More informationLatham & Watkins Finance and Restructuring & Insolvency Practice Groups
Number 1009 5 April 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance and Restructuring & Insolvency Practice Groups Coeur Défense Safeguard Proceedings: Landmark Court of Appeal Decision on Creditors Rights
More informationClient Alert. After the Fiscal Cliff: Credit Facilities for Emerging Companies What to Look for at the Term Sheet Stage
Number 1475 February 25, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance and Corporate Departments After the Fiscal Cliff: Credit Facilities for Emerging Companies What to Look for at the Term Sheet Stage As
More informationINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY IP LAW AND LINKING AND SEARCH ENGINES J A R L E R O A R S Æ B Ø EXHAUSTION PRINCIPLE (MOVED FRO LAST LECTURE) Article 7 Exhaustion of the rights conferred
More informationECTA 35th Annual Conference, Dubrovnik 24 June 2016. Mr Justice Richard Arnold
Infringement under Article 10(2)(a) Trade Marks Directive (Recast)/ Article 9(2)(a) European Union Trade Mark Regulation and effect on the functions of the trade mark ECTA 35th Annual Conference, Dubrovnik
More informationJUDGMENT ON THE SPANISH TAX LEASE SYSTEM
JUDGMENT ON THE SPANISH TAX LEASE SYSTEM CASE T-719/13 PYMAR / COMMISSION Contents 1. Background 2. Judgment of the GCEU of 17 December 2015 in Case T- 719/13, PYMAR / Commission 3. Effects of the Judgment
More informationIRS Proposes Significant Changes to Rules for Allocating
Latham & Watkins Tax Department Number 1644 February 6, 2014 IRS Proposes Significant Changes to Rules for Allocating Partnership Liabilities Proposed Regulations seek to curtail perceived abuses, including
More informationInsurance claims and losses in Spain. Procedural aspects of the Spanish legal system
Insurance claims and losses in Spain. Procedural aspects of the Spanish legal system Further information If you would like further information, please contact a person mentioned below or the person with
More informationNew Disciplinary and Grievance Rules
March 2009 / Special Alert A legal update from Dechert s Employment Law Group New Disciplinary and Grievance Rules d Introduction The Employment Act 2008, which comes into effect on 6 April 2009, repeals
More informationClient Alert. The purpose of Form PF is to provide federal regulators with data to aid in monitoring systemic risks to the US financial markets.
Number 1472 February 20, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Form PF Reference Guide Registered investment advisers who have not previously filed Form PF should be preparing to file
More informationConnecting to Remote Desktop Services on an ipad
Connecting to Remote Desktop Services on an ipad Remote Access To connect to Remote Desktop Services (RDS) on an ipad: Download and install Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and PocketCloud Configure
More informationEmployee monitoring in France. January 2010. Contents. Legal Framework 1
Employee monitoring in France January 2010 Contents Legal Framework 1 Principal situations where an individual's privacy is restricted in the workplace 1 Potential disciplinary sanctions applied to employees
More informationPeter Montanaro, Head, Delegated Authorities
market bulletin Ref: Y4535 Title Purpose Type From Master Policies & Group Schemes To provide updated guidance on worldwide master policies and group schemes written at Lloyd s and to notify the market
More informationAuthors: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: A Guide for State and Local Governments
Latham & Watkins LLP As of February 2009 Authors: Stuart S. Kurlander +1.202.637.2169 Edward W. Correia +1.202.637.2220 Gabriel K. Bell* +1.202.637.2227 www.lw.com Copyright 2009 Latham & Watkins. All
More informationThe Final Municipal Advisor Rule: Navigating the Minefield
Latham & Watkins Financial Institutions Regulatory Practice Number 1614 November 22, 2013 The Final Municipal Advisor Rule: Navigating the Minefield While the final rule narrows the scope and reach of
More informationLatham & Watkins Finance Department. A New Era of Financial Regulation: Dodd-Frank Act to Become Law
Number 1057 July 20, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department A New Era of Financial Regulation: Dodd-Frank Act to Become Law Although the Act makes many notable changes to the system of financial
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate Department. The Codification of GAAP. Be Careful What You Wish For
Number 949 October 28, 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department The Codification of GAAP... the benefits of the Codification are capable of outweighing the inconveniences associated with
More informationCloud Computing: A Primer on Legal Issues, Including Privacy and Data Security Concerns. Privacy and Information Management Practice / Washington, DC
Cloud Computing: A Primer on Legal Issues, Including Privacy and Data Security Concerns Privacy and Information Management Practice / Washington, DC Disclaimer THIS PRESENTATION IS TO ASSIST IN A GENERAL
More informationIP & IT Bytes. Copyright: website-blocking order against internet service providers
June 2015 IP & IT Bytes First published in the June 2015 issue of PLC Magazine and reproduced with the kind permission of the publishers. Subscription enquiries 020 7202 1200. Copyright: website-blocking
More informationIntellectual property in the cloud. May 2013. www.allenovery.com
Intellectual property in the cloud May 2013 2 Intellectual property in the cloud May 2013 Allen & Overy LLP 2013 3 Intellectual property in the cloud While market research firms consistently predict spectacular
More informationLiberating the Power of Service The right of establishment The case of lawyers
Liberating the Power of Service The right of establishment The case of lawyers Second Bruges European Business Conference College of Europe Jacques Derenne, Partner, Hogan Lovells, Brussels Associate Professor,
More informationLiberating the Power of Service The right of establishment The case of lawyers. Second Bruges European Business Conference College of Europe
Liberating the Power of Service The right of establishment The case of lawyers Second Bruges European Business Conference College of Europe Jacques Derenne, Partner, Hogan Lovells, Brussels Associate Professor,
More informationArticleReprint With our compliments
ArticleReprint With our compliments HIPAA Issues in Health Care Transactions By W. Andrew H. Gantt, III, and Anthony B. Casarona Reprinted from CCH, Inc. CCH Health Care Compliance Letter Volume 8, Issue
More informationClient Alert. Finders and the Issuer s Exemption : The SEC Sheds New Light on an Old Subject
Number 1503 April 24, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Finders and the Issuer s Exemption : The SEC Sheds New Light on an Old Subject there are serious consequences for acting as
More informationLoan Trading under LMA Documentation A Guide for Traders and In-house Counsel
Loan Trading under LMA Documentation A Guide for Traders and In-house Counsel 2 Further information If you would like further information on any aspect of this note, please contact a person mentioned below
More informationVAT recovery and pension schemes: Where are we now?
VAT recovery and pension schemes: Where are we now? Speed read HMRC s policy on reclaiming VAT on investment management and other costs remains under review in the light of two recent decisions from the
More informationLuxembourg Doing deals in the Grand Duchy, an English lawyer's perspective
Luxembourg Doing deals in the Grand Duchy, an English lawyer's perspective Tom Whelan (Partner, Hogan Lovells International LLP) Erin Anderson (Senior Associate, Hogan Lovells International LLP), Camille
More information2013 Update: Healthcare Regulation in the United Arab Emirates
2013 Update: Healthcare Regulation in the United Arab Emirates The healthcare industry continues to develop in the UAE with new world class projects and more elaborated policies and regulations. Introduction
More informationFinancial services regulation in Australia
Financial services regulation in Australia FEBRUARY What you need to know Financial services regulation in Australia February 2016 1 What you need to know Key points Do you do business in Australia or
More informationSupported by. World Trademark Review. Anti-counterfeiting. Poland. Contributing firm Patpol Patent & Trademark Attorneys.
Supported by World Trademark Review Anti-counterfeiting 2012 Poland Contributing firm A Global Guide Poland Contributing firm Authors Jaromir Piwowar and Bartek Kochlewski Legal framework Rights holders
More informationThinking Ahead: Breaking Down FINRA s Revised Proposed Fixed-Income Research Rule
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ADVISORY & FINANCIAL REGULATORY CLIENT PUBLICATION March 2013 Thinking Ahead: Breaking Down FINRA s Revised Proposed Fixed-Income Research Rule If you wish to receive more information
More informationRegulatory Implications of New Products and Services in the Australian Electricity Market
2 March 2015 Practice Group: Energy Regulatory Implications of New Products and Services in the Australian Australia Energy Alert By Jenny Mee and Larissa Hauser The Energy Market Reform Working Group
More informationNew York State Labor Law Amendments Affecting Proof in Pay Discrimination Cases and Employer Policies Concerning Wage Disclosure
New York State Labor Law Amendments Affecting Proof in Pay Discrimination Cases and Employer Policies Concerning Wage Disclosure Amendments Alter Burden of Proof in Gender-Based Pay Cases and Bar Employer
More informationRecognition. Awards & Top Trademark Law Firm World Trademark Review 1000, 2011-2016. U.S. Trademark Case of the Year: In re Bose
Trademark With a heavyweight reputation and a national reach across the market (World Trademark Review 1000), Fish & Richardson is among the top trademark firms in the United States. Our practice includes
More informationHazardous substances. Our capabilities in Paris
Hazardous substances Our capabilities in Paris 2013 Hogan Lovells - Hazardous substances: Our capabilities in Paris i Contents Our expertise in relation to hazardous substances 1 Sophisticated advice
More informationBrand Management Services
Brand Management Services About Bird & Bird Since 1898 Bird & Bird has led the way in protecting the ideas that have made some of the world s greatest brands successful. It s the firm s excellence in client
More informationDECONSTRUCTING GOOGLE: JOINED CASES C-236/08 TO C- 238/08 ( GOOGLE FRANCE )
DECONSTRUCTING GOOGLE: JOINED CASES C-236/08 TO C- 238/08 ( GOOGLE FRANCE ) or is google responsible for potential trademark infringement comitted via its adword service? Ernesto Cebollero, Alicante 17th
More informationKeyword Advertising: A European perspective
JUNI 2009 Keyword Advertising: A European perspective Seite 1/6 The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has recently delivered its judgment in the long awaited keyword advertising case Interflora
More informationHow To Allow Sports Wagering In New Jersey
November 2014 This article originally appeared in World Sports Law Report Volume 12 Issue 11, November 2014. Betting: New Jersey s Attempts to Allow Sports Betting By Linda J. Shorey, Anthony R. Holtzman
More informationGlobal investigations: what employers need to know about investigating employees
Global investigations: what employers need to know about investigating employees Plan carefully to minimise riskbe su Given increasing globalisation, multinational companies are facing new levels of risk.
More informationEuropean Commission Probes Member States Tax Rulings Systems
SEPTEMBER 17, 2013 clearygottlieb.com European Commission Probes Member States Tax Rulings Systems On September 11, 2013, the European Commission ( the Commission ) launched a State aid investigation by
More informationFraudulent Insurance Claims A Mucky Present and a Murky Future
Fraudulent Insurance Claims A Mucky Present and a Murky Future Dan Screene, Senior Associate Insurance Litigation Practice Group London 12 February 2013 The fraud epidemic Economic landscape Losses to
More informationThe Telephone Consumer Protection Act: Compliance Developments and What to Expect in 2015
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act: Compliance Developments and What to Expect in 2015 November 2014 Mark W. Brennan, Partner Overview Overview of the TCPA Recent Developments Issues to Watch What You
More informationOIG Provides Guidance on Internet Advertising Under the Anti-Kickback Law
NUMBER 230 FROM THE LATHAM & WATKINS HEALTH CARE PRACTICE GROUP BULLETIN NO. 230 OCTOBER 25, 2002 OIG Provides Guidance on Internet Advertising Under the Anti-Kickback Law This Advisory Opinion offers
More informationFINRA and MSRB Issue Guidance on Best Execution Obligations in Equity, Options and Fixed Income Markets
DECEMBER 9, 2015 SIDLEY UPDATE FINRA and MSRB Issue Guidance on Best Execution Obligations in Equity, Options and Fixed Income Markets Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) and the Municipal
More informationCombating Contributory Infringement on the Internet
Page 1 of 5 May 1, 2014 Vol. 69 No. 9 Back to Bulletin Main Page Susan M. Kayser and Lucy J. Wheatley, Jones Day, Washington, D.C., USA Chiang Ling Li, Jones Day, Hong Kong SAR, China Marc Groebl and Gregor
More informationHong Kong Enacts a Statutory Disclosure Regime
Statutory Obligation for Hong Kong-Listed Corporations to Disclose Price Sensitive Information Becoming Effective on January 1, 2013 SUMMARY With effect from January 1, 2013, Hong Kong will implement a
More information10 Facts About the Affordable Care Act and Worker Classification
Latham & Watkins Tax Controversy Practice Number 1611 November 18, 2013 10 Facts About the Affordable Care Act and Worker Classification Businesses subject to the Affordable Care Act s shared responsibility
More informationWorking and ordinarily working in the UK
Financial institutions Energy Infrastructure, mining and commodities Transport Technology and innovation Life sciences and healthcare Working and ordinarily working in the UK Briefing January 2015 Introduction
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation Department
Number 1250 November 1, 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department The United States Attorney and Attorney General Enter the Foreign Exchange Transaction Controversy Not only does the suit
More informationCyber security: A major issue for Australian business
Cyber Security: A major issue for Australian business: February 2016 1 Cyber security: A major issue for Australian business Contents Introduction and background Is your industry particularly vulnerable
More informationUK OFT Investigation into Health Markets
MARCH 23, 2011 EU LIFE SCIENCES UPDATE UK OFT Investigation into Health Markets Executive Summary On 10 March 2011, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) formally launched a market study into private healthcare.
More informationEU regulatory framework for e-commerce
EU regulatory framework for e-commerce WTO Workshop Geneva, 18 th June 2013 Denis Sparas European Commission Directorate General for Internal Market and Services Outline E-commerce Directive E-commerce
More informationPRESENTATION OVERVIEW. Trademark Infringement Cases in the U.S. and Europe involving ebay, Inc.
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW 1 Trademark Infringement Cases in the U.S. and Europe involving ebay, Inc. Presented by: Austin Renfroe Howrey LLP What constitutes trademark infringement? Applicable EU law ebay
More informationPURSUANT TO GBL 684(1), EXEMPTION REQUEST FOR AN UNREGISTERED U.S
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL INVESTOR PROTECTION BUREAU 120 BROADWAY, NEW YORK, NY 10271 PHONE (212) 416-8236 WWW.AG.NY.GOV DIVISION OF ECONOMIC
More informationAnalysis - the worldwide reach of FATCA
January 2012 Analysis - the worldwide reach of FATCA This article was first published in the Tax Journal in July 2011 SPEED READ Recent US legislation effectively makes non-us banks and non US financial
More informationUAE Investment Funds Regulation implemented
UAE Investment Funds Regulation implemented beginning of the end for the tolerated practice? 1 Briefing note August 2012 UAE Investment Funds Regulation implemented The UAE Securities and Commodities Authority
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation Department
Number 737 August 11, 2008 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department US Congress Passes Landmark Product Safety Legislation Manufacturers, importers, distributors and retailers of consumer products
More informationTransparency in the context of Secondary Markets Bond Trading
MiFID II Transparency in the context of Secondary Markets Bond Trading February 2015 Latham & Watkins operates worldwide as a limited liability partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware
More informationUDRP extension beyond the domain name
UDRP extension beyond the domain name UDRP-like alternative dispute resolution remedies should be made available for a broader range of IP violations. Lawrence Nodine Partner Ballard Spahr LLP, Atlanta
More informationLocal expertise & multinational deals & fresh ingredients & brand innovations & added value in regulation & from raw materials to consumer products &
& Food and Beverage Local expertise & multinational deals & fresh ingredients & brand innovations & added value in regulation & from raw materials to consumer products & a good nose for business Our International
More informationHandling disciplinary and grievance issues
Handling disciplinary and grievance issues Further information If you would like further information on any aspect of handling disciplinary and grievance issues please contact a person mentioned below
More informationThe Affordable Care Act s Employer Mandate: Guidance for Educational Organizations
March 4, 2014 Practice Group(s): Employee Benefits Benefits, ESOPs, and Executive Compensation The Affordable Care Act s Employer Mandate: Guidance for Educational By Lynne Shore Wakefield and Emily D.
More informationCalifornia Supreme Court Issues Ruling in Brinker Clarifying Employers Duty to Provide Meal and Rest Breaks to Hourly Employees
APRIL 13, 2012 CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT & LABOR UPDATE California Supreme Court Issues Ruling in Brinker Clarifying Employers Duty to Provide Meal and Rest Breaks to Hourly Employees In one of the most anticipated
More informationCFTC Issues Guidance, Exemptions In Advance of SEF Rule Compliance Date
Latham & Watkins Derivatives Practice Number 1594 October 17, 2013 CFTC Issues Guidance, Exemptions In Advance of SEF Rule Compliance Date Staff responds to industry concerns and confusion surrounding
More informationItalian Tax Reform. New legislation on abuse of law and statute of limitations. Abuse of law and tax avoidance. Introduction
27 August 2015 Practice Group(s): Tax Italian Tax Reform New legislation on abuse of law and statute of limitations By Vittorio Salvadori di Wiesenhoff The Italian Government has recently approved a new
More informationPassive infrastructure sharing
Passive infrastructure sharing 2 Why sharing? Passive infrastructure sharing started with mobile phone towers. Mobile network operators allowed each other to hang antennas on their mast sites, resulting
More informationChina's new national security law creates more insecurity for foreign businesses
China's new national security law creates more insecurity for foreign businesses Contents Overview 1 JULY Broad definition of national security 1 Expanded national security review regime 1 NSR in relation
More informationJune 22, 2016. Gerald S. Sachs, Of Counsel. 2016 Paul Hastings LLP. geraldsachs@paulhastings.com (202) 551-1975
Current trends and priorities of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), including recent enforcement activity and its small dollar lending proposed regulation June 22, 2016 Gerald S. Sachs, Of
More informationSelection and Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures The Role of Outside Consultants Janice Hogan, Partner, Hogan Lovells LLP
Selection and Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures The Role of Outside Consultants Janice Hogan, Partner, Hogan Lovells LLP Tuesday, November 27, 2012 Key Topics for Consultants Selection of Instruments
More informationNew Illinois Ethics Rules on Lawyers Reporting Up Responsibilities
New Illinois Ethics Rules on Lawyers Reporting Up Responsibilities August 13, 2009 Boston Brussels Chicago Düsseldorf Houston London Los Angeles Miami Milan Munich New York Orange County Rome San Diego
More informationDr. Paul P. Polanski PREVENTIVE MEASURES TO BE TAKEN BY DILIGENT HOSTING SERVICE PROVIDERS IN THE LIGHT OF L OREAL V EBAY RULING
. 1 Dr. Paul P. Polanski, polanski@kozminski.edu.pl Kozminski University ABSTRACT. The present contribution discusses the latest ruling of the European Court of Justice in the case of L Oreal v ebay, which
More informationMerger Control Issues and Private Equity Transactions
Merger Control Issues and Private Equity Transactions Further information If you would like further information on any aspect of Merger Control and Private Equity Transactions please contact a person mentioned
More informationCOMMENTARY. Issue JONES DAY
July 2012 JONES DAY COMMENTARY The Ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in IP TRANSLATOR : More Questions than Answers On June 19, 2012, the Court of Justice of the European Union ( CJEU
More informationIran Sanctions Relief and Further EU Regulatory Developments in 2016
January 2016 Practice Group: Antitrust, Competition & Trade Regulation Iran Sanctions Relief and Further EU Regulatory By Philip Torbøl, Raminta Dereskeviciute, Alessandro Di Mario and Daniel L. Clyne
More informationFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REGULATORY UPDATE
OCTOBER 19, 2009 FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS REGULATORY UPDATE The Financial Institutions Regulatory Practice Group of Sidley Austin LLP The Financial Institutions Regulatory Practice group offers counseling,
More informationEU Competition Law. Article 101 and Article 102. January 2010. Contents
EU Competition Law January 2010 Contents Article 101 The requirements of Article 101(1) Exemptions under Article 101(3) Article 102 Dominant position Abuse of a dominant position Procedural issues Competition
More informationChina IT Law and Practice
China IT Law and Practice Henry Chen MWE China Law Offices Licensed in the PRC and the New York State of the U.S. Commissioner of the Economic Committee of All China Lawyers' Association Secretary-General
More informationFinal text for the Amended EU Regulation on Insolvency proceedings
Final text for the Amended EU Regulation on Insolvency proceedings 1 Briefing note December 2014 Final text for the Amended EU Regulation on Insolvency proceedings The process to update and extend the
More informationReferral fees, referral arrangements and fee sharing
Referral fees, referral arrangements and fee sharing This response to the consultation is prepared by Carter Law LLP. Our experience spans the RTA/PI sector and as such, any criminal advocacy questions
More informationGroundbreaking Legislation on Property Tax and Sales Tax Exemptions for Illinois Hospitals
Groundbreaking Legislation on Property Tax and Sales Tax Exemptions for Illinois Hospitals June 14, 2012 Boston Brussels Chicago Düsseldorf Frankfurt Houston London Los Angeles Miami Milan Munich New York
More informationSOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT IN RUSSIA: KEY LEGAL ISSUES
SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT IN RUSSIA: KEY LEGAL ISSUES presenters Brian Zimbler Anastasia Dergacheva May 31, 2016 2016 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Summary Commercial Background Employment Law Intellectual Property
More information