Gurcharan Singh Saran, Presiding Judicial Member. filed the present appeal against the order dated passed by

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Gurcharan Singh Saran, Presiding Judicial Member. filed the present appeal against the order dated passed by"

Transcription

1 2 nd Additional Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH First Appeal No of 2011 Date of institution: Date of Decision : New India Assurance Company Ltd., Sector 17, Chandigarh through its duly Authorised Officer...Appellant/OP No. 2 Versus 1. Shri Brahm Kumar son of Shri Jagat Ram, resident of Village Karimpur Chahwala, Tehsil Nawanshehar, District Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar...Respondent No.1/complainant 2. Punjab National Bank, Branch Office, Village Pojewal, Tehsil Balachaur, District Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, through its Branch Manager. Respondent No.2/OP No.1 Quorum:- Argued By:- First Appeal against the order dated passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar. Shri Gurcharan Singh Saran, Presiding Judicial Member Shri Piare Lal Garg, Member Shri Jasbir Singh Gill, Member For the appellant : Shri Vinod Gupta, Advocate For respondent No.1 : Sh. Sarju Puri, Advocate For respondent No.2 : Sh. Davinder Kumar, Advocate for Sh. Sandeep Jain, Advocate. Gurcharan Singh Saran, Presiding Judicial Member The appellant/op No.2(hereinafter called OP No.2 ) has filed the present appeal against the order dated passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Shaheed Bhagat

2 FIRST APPEAL NO OF Singh Nagar(hereinafter called the District Forum ) in consumer complaint No. 41 of The complainant-shri Brahm Kumar(hereinafter called the complainant ) has filed the complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short the C.P. Act ) on the allegations that he obtained loan of Rs. 1 lac from OP No. 1 for running his business of Bee Farming and Honey Bee frames, wooden bee hives with stand were insured with OP No. 2 through OP No. 1 and OP No. 2 issued cover note No towards the loss on account of theft and fire from to However, during the night of , 40 Beehive boxes with frames and stand were stolen from village Singhpur, Tehsil Balachaur by some unknown person. Complainant filed the complaint with the Police, who directed to investigate this case with FIR No. 22 dated P.S. Pojewal. The complainant informed regarding the loss to OP No. 2 alongwith all the documents. The complainant despite repeated requests and enquires was not given any satisfactory reply by OP No. 2 and the officials had been delaying the passing of the claim on one pretext or the other. The complainant had earlier filed the complaint but the same was withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one. When the complainant came to know that the claim has been repudiated by the opposite parties on the ground that the boxes had been moved from the place where they are kept earlier mentioned in the insurance cover note. However, the complainant had undergone the course of Bee Keeping and as per manual the Bee boxes after 2-3 months boxes have to be shifted and moved in order to get the maximum

3 FIRST APPEAL NO OF honey output. However, his claim has been wrongly repudiated by OP No. 2, therefore, OP No. 2 is liable to pay a sum of Rs. 1 lac on account of theft of articles referred above and sum of Rs. 50,000/- as damages for mental agony and suffering alongwith costs of litigation. 3. The complaint was contested by opposite party No. 1 and filed written reply taking preliminary objections that the complaint is not maintainable as another complaint filed by the complainant on the same cause of action was dismissed as withdrawn by the complainant on On merits, it has been submitted that as per the complaint, theft took place on but FIR No. 22 dated was registered, which is not humanly possible. It had further been stated that no permission was granted by the learned District Forum to file a fresh complaint. Allegations in the complaint are false, therefore, the complaint is liable to be dismissed. 4. Opposite party No. 2 in his written statement taking preliminary objections that the theft took place beyond the period not covered under the insurance cover; complaint is not maintainable; complainant has no cause of action as the complainant has failed to provide necessary information to the Surveyor and the claim of the complainant was repudiated on as there was breach of the terms and conditions of the insurance policy. On merits, it has been stated that FIR No. 22 dated was regard before theft took place is not covered because policy period was to The claim was rightly and legally repudiated as the complainant changed the place of Bee boxes without informing the OP No. 2 and no security measures have been taken to take care of

4 FIRST APPEAL NO OF the Bee boxes, therefore, there is no merit in the complaint and the same be dismissed. 5. The parties were allowed by the learned District Forum to lead their evidence. 6. In support of his allegations, the complainant had tendered into evidence Ex. CW-1/A his affidavit, Ex. C-1 copy of report given by SHO PS Pojewal, Ex. C-2 insurance policy, Ex. C-3 statement of Brahm Kumar, Ex. C-4 statement of Kashmiri Lal, Ex. C- 5 site plan, Exs. C-6 & 7 report of SHO, Ex. C-8 statement, Ex. C-9 Certificate, Ex. C-10 theory and Ex. C-11 to Ex. C-20 other documents. On the other hand, opposite party No. 1 had tendered into evidence affidavit of Malkiat singh, Senior Manager, PNB, Pojjewal Branch as Ex. RW-1/A. OP No. 2 had tendered into evidence affidavit of Ram Kishan, Sr. Divn. Manager Ex. RW-1/A, copy of insurance policy Ex. R-1, Police report Ex. R-2, non-traceable report Ex. R After going through the allegations in the complaint, written statements, evidence and documents on the record, the learned District Forum in the impugned order observed that the complainant brought on record report by SHO, P.S. Pojewal dated , insurance policy, copy of statement of Kashmiri Lal, site plan, report of SHO, certificate regarding the training in Bee Keeping, theory regarding Bee Keeping, certificate by Bakhsish Kumar, Sarpanch, statement of Ashok Kumar, Sarpanch of village Nanowal, statement of Kashmiri Lal, Member, Gram Panchayat Karimpur, bills dated and , insurance policy, statement of

5 FIRST APPEAL NO OF Jaspal alongith required documents. The complainant had reported the matter to the Police and the Police had given directions that this incident be investigated in FIR No. 22 dated He has further placed on record manual of Bee Keeping Ex. C-10 vide which to get the maximum Honey Bee, Bee Keeping boxes are required to be shifted to get the maximum Honey and ultimately, it was observed that the claim was wrongly repudiated and the complaint was allowed with the direction to OP No. 2 to pay Rs. 60,000/- to the complainant within 30 days from the receipt of copy of the order, failing which proceedings under Section 27 shall be initiated. 8. Feeling aggrieved with the order passed by the learned District Forum, the appellant/opposite party No. 2 has filed the present appeal. 9. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant Shri Vinod Gupta, Advocate and learned counsel for respondent No.1 Sh. Sarju Puri, Advocate, written arguments submitted by him and learned counsel for respondent No.2 Sh. Davinder Kumar, Advocate for Sh. Sandeep Jain, Advocate. 10. Appellant in the grounds of appeal has contended that at the time of lodging the complaint, complete documents were not provided. In case theft took place on then FIR No. 22 dated cannot be registered; with these facts, the learned District Forum has failed to appreciate the evidence on the record and wrongly allowed the complaint. 11. Firstly with regard to the report of theft and date of FIR, in case we go through the statement of Brahm Kumar, which is Ex. C-8

6 FIRST APPEAL NO OF has referred that Beehive were stolen from Village Singhpur on and it was found that offence under Section 379/411 is made out but it was ordered to investigate this matter with FIR No. 22 dated In case the order has been passed by the SHO with regard to investigate the case with FIR No. 22 dated , it can not be said that FIR was registered before the occurrence. Another point on the basis of which the claim of the complainant was repudiated was that he shifted the place of Bee Keeping. In case we go through the insurance policy placed on record as Ex. C-2, the address of complainant is mentioned as Brahm Kumar s/o Sh. Jagat Ram VPO Karimpur Chahwala and was further mentioned that stocks of all kinds Honey Bee frames and wooden beehives with frames and stands lying in the public premises are insured. It has been alleged that Beehives were shifted to village Singhpur. In case we go through the Policy, it has not been mentioned that Beehives are in Village Karimpur but it has been mentioned in the public premises, therefore, the public premises can be in village Singhpur. Moreover, the complainant has brought on the record the literature with regard to Bee Keeping and after going through this literature, Beehives are required to be shifted from one place to another place and accordingly, being an expert in the Bee Farming, Beehives were shifted at another nearby place, therefore, without any specific stipulation in the insurance policy where the Beehives were to be kept it can be said that the place was shifted by the complainant. Moreover, the counsel for the insurance company has not placed on the record anything that in case Beehives are shifted from one place

7 FIRST APPEAL NO OF to another then the claim of the complainant can be repudiated. Beehives boxes alongwith frames and stand were stolen and its report was given immediately to the Police Authority and it was upto the investigation agency to apprehend the thieves and to recover the property, in case the property of the complainant is insured, the opposite party is required to indemnify the complainant. In these circumstances, we are of the opinion that the findings so recorded by the learned District Forum are correct findings and we do not find any infirmity in the findings so recorded by the learned District Forum and affirm the same. 12. In view of the above discussion, we do not find any merit in the appeal and the same is dismissed with costs. The costs of the appeal is assessed as Rs. 3,000/ The arguments in this appeal were heard on and the order was reserved. Now the order be communicated to the parties as per rules. 14. The appellant had deposited an amount of Rs. 25,000/- with this Commission at the time of filing the appeal. This amount of Rs. 25,000/- with interest accrued thereon, if any, be remitted by the registry to respondent No. 1 by way of a crossed cheque/demand draft after the expiry of 45 days under intimation to the learned District Forum and to the appellant. 15. Remaining amount shall be paid by the appellant to respondent No. 1 within 30 days from the receipt of the copy of the order.

8 FIRST APPEAL NO OF The appeal could not be decided within the statutory period due to heavy pendency of Court cases. (Gurcharan Singh Saran) Presiding Judicial Member (Piare Lal Garg) Member August 29, as (Jasbir Singh Gill) Member

2 nd Appeal First Appeal No. 295 of 2013

2 nd Appeal First Appeal No. 295 of 2013 2 nd Additional Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH First Appeal No. 54 of 2013 Date of institution: 17.1.2013 Date of Decision: 20.1.2015 National

More information

This is an appeal filed by the appellant/complainant-avtar. Singh(hereinafter called the appellant ) against the order dated 2.4.

This is an appeal filed by the appellant/complainant-avtar. Singh(hereinafter called the appellant ) against the order dated 2.4. 2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH First Appeal No. 735 of 2008 Date of institution : 17.7.2008 Date of Decision : 31.1.2013 Avtar Singh

More information

Consumer Complaint No. 74 of 2009. Tajinder Kumar Taneja, S/o Late Sh. Ram Saran Dass, Opposite State

Consumer Complaint No. 74 of 2009. Tajinder Kumar Taneja, S/o Late Sh. Ram Saran Dass, Opposite State 2 nd Additional Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint No. 74 of 2009 Date of institution: 22.9.2009 Date of Decision: 1.11.2013

More information

2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SCO NO.3009-12, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH.

2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SCO NO.3009-12, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH. 2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SCO NO.3009-12, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.326 of 2004. Date of Institution: 24.03.2004. Date of Decision: 29.09.2010. Charanjit

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO.8463 OF 2014 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.26308 of 2013) Narinder Singh Appellant (s) Versus New

More information

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, S.C.O. NO. 3009-10, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.285 of 2003

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, S.C.O. NO. 3009-10, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.285 of 2003 STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, S.C.O. NO. 3009-10, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.285 of 2003 1. Kasturi Lal Khurana, son of Ram Lal, Date of institution : 11.3.2003 Date

More information

appellant ) against the order dated 29.07.2003 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Patiala (in short, the District Forum ), by

appellant ) against the order dated 29.07.2003 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Patiala (in short, the District Forum ), by 2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SCO NO.3009-12, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.1206 of 2003 Date of Institution: 15.09.2003. Date of Decision: 19.08.2010. Sucheta

More information

HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN CONSUMER CASES : BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, GOLAGHAT. Consumer Protection Case No. 2/2010.

HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN CONSUMER CASES : BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, GOLAGHAT. Consumer Protection Case No. 2/2010. HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN CONSUMER CASES : BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, Consumer Protection Case No. 2/2010. Mrs. Manju Gohain.... Complainant. Vs. 1. The General Manager, Bajaj Allianz

More information

Shri Inderjit Kaushik, Presiding Judicial Member. Shri Vinod Kumar Gupta, Member...

Shri Inderjit Kaushik, Presiding Judicial Member. Shri Vinod Kumar Gupta, Member... FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.1437 of 2008. Date of Institution: 12.12.2008. Date of Decision: 31.05.2013.

More information

FIRST APPEAL NO. 88 / 2009. 1. Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India Mall Road, Kanpur

FIRST APPEAL NO. 88 / 2009. 1. Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India Mall Road, Kanpur STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UTTARAKHAND DEHRADUN FIRST APPEAL NO. 88 / 2009 1. Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India Mall Road, Kanpur 2. Senior Divisional Manager, Life Insurance

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC/AT/A/2009/00422 dated 18-4-2009 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC/AT/A/2009/00422 dated 18-4-2009 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC/AT/A/2009/00422 dated 18-4-2009 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 19 Appellant: Respondent: Shri Suraj Prakash, United India Insurance Co. Decision Announced

More information

Procedure for consumer complaint at a Glance

Procedure for consumer complaint at a Glance Procedure for consumer complaint at a Glance 1.0 One may send a notice to the opposite party mentioning a time limit to settle the grievance though it is not compulsory. 2.0 Prepare a complaint with the

More information

Date of filing :27.04.2006 Date of order :06.04.2010 MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION,MUMBAI, CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

Date of filing :27.04.2006 Date of order :06.04.2010 MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION,MUMBAI, CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 1 Date of filing :27.04.2006 Date of order :06.04.2010 MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION,MUMBAI, CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPEAL NO. :839 OF 2006 IN COMPLAINT CASE NO.:256 OF

More information

IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, FIRST CLASS,GOLAGHAT

IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, FIRST CLASS,GOLAGHAT IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, FIRST CLASS,GOLAGHAT GR CASE NO: 1315/ 2012 U/S 380/457 IPC STATE -VERSUS- SRI NIGRU NAHAK...ACCUSED PERSON PRESENT : Smti Sorbani Bhattacharjee, AJS Judicial magistrate,

More information

2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH.

2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH. 2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.1585 of 2007. Date of Institution: 07.12.2007. Date of Decision: 19.09.2012. 1. Shri

More information

FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH.

FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH. FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.16 of 2009. Date of Institution: 06.01.2009. Date of Decision: 26.03.2013.

More information

H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA. First Appeal No: 256/2014. Date of Presentation: 17.07.2014. Date of Decision: 17.11.2014.

H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA. First Appeal No: 256/2014. Date of Presentation: 17.07.2014. Date of Decision: 17.11.2014. H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA. First Appeal No: 256/2014. Date of Presentation: 17.07.2014. Date of Decision: 17.11.2014. 1. Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company Limited, Regd.

More information

BEFORE JUSTICE (Retd.) MAHMOOD ALI KHAN SOLE ARBITRATOR. A.M. No. D-061 of 2011

BEFORE JUSTICE (Retd.) MAHMOOD ALI KHAN SOLE ARBITRATOR. A.M. No. D-061 of 2011 BEFORE JUSTICE (Retd.) MAHMOOD ALI KHAN SOLE ARBITRATOR A.M. No. D-061 of 2011 IN THE MATTER OF: Smt. Lalita Jain Constituent w/o Shri Vinod Kumar Jain 58, Krishna Marg Govind Nagar (East), Amer Road Jaipur

More information

IN THE COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR. M.A.C.T CASE No.28/2013. P A R T I E S. -Versus-

IN THE COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR. M.A.C.T CASE No.28/2013. P A R T I E S. -Versus- 1 IN THE COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR M.A.C.T CASE No.28/2013. P A R T I E S Smti Amarawati Gogoi. Claimant. -Versus- 1. Hemanta Sonowal. ( Driver of vehicle

More information

HIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar. In the Court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar.

HIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar. In the Court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar. Page 1 HIGH COURT FORM (J) 3 HEADING OF JUDGEMENT IN APPEAL. Dist. Cachar. In the Court of Addl. District Judge, Cachar, Silchar. Present :- Shri T.K.Bhattacharjee, A.J.S. Addl. District Judge, Cachar,Silchar.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Versus HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Versus HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA CRM-M-24864-2015 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM-M-24864-2015 Date of decision: December 02, 2015 Satnam Dilbagh Singh...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others...respondents

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act 1923. FAO No.268/2004 RESERVED ON : 13.03.2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act 1923. FAO No.268/2004 RESERVED ON : 13.03.2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 FAO No.268/2004 RESERVED ON : 13.03.2008 DATE OF DECISION 19.03.2008 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.... Through: Appellant

More information

CUSTOMER COMPENSATION POLICY

CUSTOMER COMPENSATION POLICY CUSTOMER COMPENSATION POLICY 1.1. 1.2. 1.3. 1.4. 1.4.1. 1.4.2. 1.4.3. 1.4.4. This Compensation Policy of the Bank is designed to cover all the incidences where the Bank is liable to make good any financial

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8155 OF 2014

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8155 OF 2014 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8155 OF 2014 Dhropadabai and Others Appellant(s) Versus M/s. Technocraft Toolings Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T Dipak

More information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION. Complainant : Shri R.K. Jain, 1512 B, Bhishm Pitamah Marg, Wazir Nagar, New Delhi 110 003.

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION. Complainant : Shri R.K. Jain, 1512 B, Bhishm Pitamah Marg, Wazir Nagar, New Delhi 110 003. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 Decision No. CIC/DS/C/2013/000559/SB Dated 07.04.2016 Complainant : Shri R.K. Jain, 1512 B, Bhishm

More information

In The Court Of Syed Maruf Ahmedali Presiding Officer District &Sessions Judge District Consumer Court Lahore.

In The Court Of Syed Maruf Ahmedali Presiding Officer District &Sessions Judge District Consumer Court Lahore. In The Court Of Syed Maruf Ahmedali Presiding Officer District &Sessions Judge District Consumer Court Lahore. Muhammad Saleem Sheikh V/S Vehicle Tracking Company. Order. The Complainant Muhammad Saleem

More information

IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE, NAGAON.

IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE, NAGAON. IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE, NAGAON. PRESENT : Smti. H. D. Bhuyan, District Judge, Nagaon. MONEY APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2011 This Money Appeal is directed against the Order & Judgment and decree dated 16-12-2010

More information

2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SCO NO.3009-12, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH.

2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SCO NO.3009-12, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH. 2 nd Bench STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SCO NO.3009-12, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No. 469 of 2005. Date of Institution: 23.03.2005. Date of Decision: 18.10.2010. Teja

More information

v/s. Western India Art Litho Works Pvt. Ltd.

v/s. Western India Art Litho Works Pvt. Ltd. 1 cp1096.2000 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO. 1096 of 2000 Solar Printing Inks v/s. Western India Art Litho Works Pvt. Ltd....Petitioner...Respondent

More information

N.I. case No. 15/09 U/S 138 of NI Act

N.I. case No. 15/09 U/S 138 of NI Act 1 IN THE COURT OF THE ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BARPETA. N.I. case No. 15/09 U/S 138 of NI Act Present : Md. Abdul Hakim, M.A.,LL.B., Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barpeta. Narayan Nath --- Complainant

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.9030 OF 2013 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.9030 OF 2013 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.9030 OF 2013 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 18323 OF 2008) STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS APPELLANTS VERSUS NAVIR

More information

IN THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL SONITPUR, TEZPUR. MAC Case No. 93 of 2010

IN THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL SONITPUR, TEZPUR. MAC Case No. 93 of 2010 IN THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL SONITPUR, TEZPUR. MAC Case No. 93 of 2010 Sri Raja Paul S/o Sri Bimal Paul Lamabari, PO and PS Mazbhat, District: Udalguri Assam. Claimant (1) Mr Aju Cheje S/o Tadik

More information

District : Lakhimpur. IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE : LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR.

District : Lakhimpur. IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE : LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR. 1 High Court Form No.(J)3. HEADING OF JUDGMENT IN THE APPEAL. District : Lakhimpur. IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE : LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR. PRESENT : Sri A.K.Das, District Judge, Lakhimpur, North

More information

258 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Versus. Mr. Charanjit Singh Bakshi, Addl. AG, Haryana.

258 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Versus. Mr. Charanjit Singh Bakshi, Addl. AG, Haryana. 258 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-6003 of 2015 Date of decision:march 10, 2015 Swati and others State of Haryana Versus... Petitioners... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE

More information

VICTIM COMPENSATION SCHEME

VICTIM COMPENSATION SCHEME VICTIM COMPENSATION SCHEME GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFIRS AND JUSTICE (HOME-IV BRANCH) NOTIFICATION The 8 December, 2011 No.5/154/2008-3H4/3597-In exercise of th powers conferred by section

More information

Sri Jyoti @ Homen Konwar.

Sri Jyoti @ Homen Konwar. 1 IN THE COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR M.A.C.T CASE No. 36 / 2012. P A R T I E S Sri Jyoti @ Homen Konwar. Claimant. -Versus- 1. Sri Trilochan Gogoi. (Owner -cum-

More information

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR. [Coram: Pramod Kumar AM and A.D. Jain JM]

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR. [Coram: Pramod Kumar AM and A.D. Jain JM] IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR [Coram: Pramod Kumar AM and A.D. Jain JM] I.T.A. No.90 /Asr/2015 Page 1 of 7 I.T.A. No.90/Asr /2015 Assessment year: 2013-14 Sibia Healthcare

More information

COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Appeal No. 44 OF 2013

COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Appeal No. 44 OF 2013 COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI Appeal No. 44 OF 2013 [Under Section 53-B of the Competition Act, 2002 against the Order dated 12.11.2013 passed by the Competition Commission of India in Combination

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of order: 04th February, 2008. CRL. M.C. 2504 of 2006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of order: 04th February, 2008. CRL. M.C. 2504 of 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DEFAMATION Date of order: 04th February, 2008. CRL. M.C. 2504 of 2006 NEMICHAND JAIN ALIAS CHANDRA SWAMI... Petitioner Through Mr. K.K. Sud, Sr.

More information

DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL::DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL::DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL::DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) Ref: MAC Case No.119 of 2011 Name of Parties: 1. Md. Abdul Rafique-----------------------------------------------Claimant

More information

IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL GOLAGHAT MACT CASE NO.124/2007

IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL GOLAGHAT MACT CASE NO.124/2007 Page 1 IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL GOLAGHAT Present: Smti. I. Barman Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, MACT CASE NO.124/2007 1. Smti. Maijani Bhuyan W/o Sri Amanat

More information

IN THE COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR. M.A.C.T CASE No.32/2012. P A R T I E S

IN THE COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR. M.A.C.T CASE No.32/2012. P A R T I E S 1 IN THE COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: LAKHIMPUR : AT NORTH LAKHIMPUR M.A.C.T CASE No.32/2012. P A R T I E S 1. Smti Lakhiprova Bora. 2. Sri Papu Bora. 3. Smti Bhagyalata Bora. Claimants. -Versus-

More information

RENT A MOTOR CYCLE SCHEME, 1997 1

RENT A MOTOR CYCLE SCHEME, 1997 1 RENT A MOTOR CYCLE SCHEME, 1997 1 In exercise of powers conferred by section 75 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (59 of 1988), Central Government hereby makes the following scheme for regulating the business

More information

IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, 3 RD MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BHUBANESWAR.

IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, 3 RD MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BHUBANESWAR. 1 IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, 3 RD MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BHUBANESWAR. PRRESENT:- Shri I.K. Das, LLB, Member, 3 rd MACT, Bhubaneswar. MACT Case No. 367 of 2003 Sarbeswar Pradhan, aged about 32

More information

JUDGMENT IN M.A.C. CASE NO. 374 OF 2009

JUDGMENT IN M.A.C. CASE NO. 374 OF 2009 IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL SONITPUR :: TEZPUR PRESENT : Sri A. Borthakur, Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Sonitpur, Tezpur JUDGMENT IN M.A.C. CASE NO. 374 OF 2009

More information

APPEAL TO THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

APPEAL TO THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL APPEAL TO THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Introduction The Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) is the first appellate authority and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) is the second appellate authority.

More information

TDS not deductible on freight chargers shown separately in Goods Purchase Bill

TDS not deductible on freight chargers shown separately in Goods Purchase Bill TDS not deductible on freight chargers shown separately in Goods Purchase Bill CIT v. Bhagwati Steels - (Punjab & Haryana HC) - In the instant case, it was held that the payment of freight charges by the

More information

IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL AT JORHAT

IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL AT JORHAT IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL AT JORHAT Present: Mr. P.K. Khanikar, B.Sc., LL.M., AJS Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, JORHAT. JUDGMENT IN M.A.C. CASE NO. 17 OF 2011

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 442 OF 2010. :Versus: J U D G M E N T

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 442 OF 2010. :Versus: J U D G M E N T 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 442 OF 2010 State of Madhya Pradesh Appellant :Versus: Anoop Singh Respondent J U D G M E N T Pinaki Chandra

More information

Dated this the 10 th day of July 2014. Before. Miscellaneous First Appeal No.21322/2008 (MV)

Dated this the 10 th day of July 2014. Before. Miscellaneous First Appeal No.21322/2008 (MV) : 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Dated this the 10 th day of July 2014 Before THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D. WAINGANKAR Miscellaneous First Appeal No.21322/2008 (MV) Between The United

More information

CR CASE NO: 346/ 2012 U/S 23/24 Contract Labour Act STATE VERSUS SRI A.MUNI SEKHAR...ACCUSED

CR CASE NO: 346/ 2012 U/S 23/24 Contract Labour Act STATE VERSUS SRI A.MUNI SEKHAR...ACCUSED DISTRICT: JORHAT IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), JORHAT CR CASE NO: 346/ 2012 U/S 23/24 Contract Labour Act STATE VERSUS SRI A.MUNI SEKHAR...ACCUSED PRESENT : SMTI. B. GOGOI, JUDICIAL

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT,1987 FAO No. 507/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 8th January, 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT,1987 FAO No. 507/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 8th January, 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT,1987 FAO No. 507/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 8th January, 2014 GURCHARAN SINGH & ORS. Through: Mr. N.K. Gupta, Advocate versus

More information

DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL::DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL::DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL::DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) Ref: MAC Case No.70 of 2011 Name of Parties: 1. Mustt. Manowara Begum--------------------------------------Claimant.

More information

06.3.2013 Mr. Amar Sana, Advocate for the appellant.

06.3.2013 Mr. Amar Sana, Advocate for the appellant. F.A.O.No.94 of 2013 1 F.A.O.No.94 of 2013 NIB Bank Limited Presiding Officer, District Consumer Court Sialkot etc. 06.3.2013 Mr. Amar Sana, Advocate for the appellant. Respondent No.2 Muhammad Asif Maqsood

More information

$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on: 18 th September, 2015. Versus

$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on: 18 th September, 2015. Versus $~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.No.460/2002 Judgment delivered on: 18 th September, 2015 BELA SHARDA Represented by: Versus... Appellant Mr.Samar Banal and Mr. Vinayak Mehrotra,

More information

TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT HARYANA, CHANDIGARH PUBLIC NOTICE RADIO CAB PERMITS

TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT HARYANA, CHANDIGARH PUBLIC NOTICE RADIO CAB PERMITS TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT HARYANA, CHANDIGARH PUBLIC NOTICE RADIO CAB PERMITS Transport Department, Haryana proposes to grant contract carriage permits to Radio Cabs in Gurgaon, Faridabad and Panchkula. The

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7373 OF 2005 STANTECH PROJECT ENGG. PVT. LTD.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7373 OF 2005 STANTECH PROJECT ENGG. PVT. LTD. 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7373 OF 2005 STANTECH PROJECT ENGG. PVT. LTD. APPELLANT NICCO CORPORATION LTD. VERSUS WITH RESPONDENT C.A.NO. 7374

More information

Civil Revision No.38/2007

Civil Revision No.38/2007 Civil Revision No.38/2007 12.5.2015 Shri Navneet Dubey, counsel for the applicant. Heard on admission. Vide judgment and decree dated 31.8.2005, Second Civil Judge, Class-II, Panna in civil suit No.1-B/2005

More information

Update. SARFAESI Rulings. Check at: http://india-financing.com/staff-publications.html for more write ups.

Update. SARFAESI Rulings. Check at: http://india-financing.com/staff-publications.html for more write ups. SARFAESI Rulings Prachi Narayan prachi@vinodkothari.com 7 th January, 2014 Check at: http://india-financing.com/staff-publications.html for more write ups. Copyright: This write up is the property of Vinod

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI SCHOOL EDUCATION ACT, 1973 Date: 1st May, 2013 W.P.(C) 8060/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI SCHOOL EDUCATION ACT, 1973 Date: 1st May, 2013 W.P.(C) 8060/2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI SCHOOL EDUCATION ACT, 1973 Date: 1st May, 2013 W.P.(C) 8060/2007 SATBIR SINGH & ANR Through Mr. Akash Tyagi, Adv.... Petitioners versus DELHI SIKH

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN AND. THE PRESIDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Defendant/ Respondent (BY COUNTERCLAIM)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN AND. THE PRESIDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Defendant/ Respondent (BY COUNTERCLAIM) TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL C.A. 101 of 2011 Claim No. CV 2006-00454 BETWEEN SHIROON MOHAMMED SAIHEED MOHAMMED NAIM MOHAMMED Appellants/ Claimants AND THE PRESIDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act. Date of Decision : December 03, 2008. WP(C) No.6406 of 2007.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act. Date of Decision : December 03, 2008. WP(C) No.6406 of 2007. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Workmen's Compensation Act Date of Decision : December 03, 2008 WP(C) No.6406 of 2007 Sh. Jawahar Singh. Petitioner Through : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya, Advocate

More information

Frequently Asked Questions on EPF.

Frequently Asked Questions on EPF. Frequently Asked Questions on EPF. Q1.Who are required to be enrolled to PF? Any person employed directly or indirectly by the establishment, working in or in connection with the establishment, including

More information

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10 OF 2016 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.27243 OF 2015)

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10 OF 2016 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.27243 OF 2015) REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10 OF 2016 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.27243 OF 2015) MALATI SARDAR PETITIONER VERSUS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

More information

DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL::DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL::DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) DISTRICT: DARRANG IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL::DARRANG::MANGALDAI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) Name of Parties: Ref: MAC Case No.74 of 2011 1. Mustt. Jamina Khatun----------------------------------------Claimant

More information

On behalf of the Respondents, Shri Sanjay Agarwal, CPIO was present at the NIC

On behalf of the Respondents, Shri Sanjay Agarwal, CPIO was present at the NIC Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. Right to Information Act 2005 Under Section (19) Date of hearing : 29th June 2016 Date of decision : 29th June 2016 Name of the Appellant : Shri Ramchandra

More information

BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: CACHAR: SILCHAR: ASSAM

BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: CACHAR: SILCHAR: ASSAM 1 BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL: CACHAR: SILCHAR: ASSAM Present: Shri B. Debnath, B.Com, LLM, AJS. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Silchar. JUDGMENT IN MAC CASE NO 1471 of 2012

More information

IN THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT

IN THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT IN THE COURT OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GOLAGHAT PRESENT: Smti. I. Barman, A.J.S. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Golaghat, Assam MAC CASE NO. 48/2010 (Under Section 166of the MV Act)

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 1940 of 2007 ------- Smt. Kavilash Devi, wife of late Lajit Mahto, resident of village Pipradih, P.O and P.S. Barkagaon, District Hazaribagh.... Petitioner

More information

COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL KAMRUP :: GUWAHATI Present :- Paran Kumar Phukan Member, MACT Kamrup, Guwahati MAC Case No.

COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL KAMRUP :: GUWAHATI Present :- Paran Kumar Phukan Member, MACT Kamrup, Guwahati MAC Case No. COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL KAMRUP :: GUWAHATI Present :- Paran Kumar Phukan Member, MACT Kamrup, Guwahati MAC Case No. 161/2010 1 Mrs Dipa Bora 2 Sri Moleswar Bora 3 Mrs Sarumai Bora 4 Miss

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Crl.M.C.1682/2008 & Crl.M.A.Nos. 6167/2008 & 12878/2008. Date of reserve : 21.04.2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Crl.M.C.1682/2008 & Crl.M.A.Nos. 6167/2008 & 12878/2008. Date of reserve : 21.04.2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Negotiable Instruments Act Crl.M.C.1682/2008 & Crl.M.A.Nos. 6167/2008 & 12878/2008 Date of reserve : 21.04.2009 Date of decision: 24.04.2009 M/s. Vijay

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR. MFA.No.3461/2011 A/W MFA.CROB.NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR. MFA.No.3461/2011 A/W MFA.CROB.NO. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 23 RD DAY OF JULY 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR MFA.No.3461/2011 A/W MFA.CROB.NO.122/2011 (MV) MFA.NO.3461/2011 BETWEEN: LOURDU

More information

RIGHTS & REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO CONSUMERS

RIGHTS & REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO CONSUMERS 4 RIGHTS & REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO CONSUMERS 4.0 INTRODUCTION Man is a social & rational animal. He has throughout his evolution tried to improve upon everything, he has laid his hands upon, anything which

More information

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PROVIDENCE, SC. DISTRICT COURT SIXTH DIVISION THOMAS A. PALANGIO D/B/A : CONSUMER AUTO SALES : : v. : A.A. No. 11-093 : DAVID M. SULLIVAN, TAX : ADMINISTRATOR

More information

DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURES DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE

DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURES DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE Date: 5 May 2015 Approved: 3 June 2015 Review date: 22 April 2018 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. NOTES OF GUIDANCE Counselling General Principles Investigation Minor Matters

More information

Respondents : Shipping Corporation of India Limited ORDER. This appeal earlier came up for hearing on 05.06.2013 when the Commission

Respondents : Shipping Corporation of India Limited ORDER. This appeal earlier came up for hearing on 05.06.2013 when the Commission Central Information Commission Room No. 305, 2nd Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26167931 Case No. November 12, 2013 Appellant : Shri

More information

BELIZE PROTECTION AGAINST SEXUAL HARASSMENT ACT CHAPTER 107 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000

BELIZE PROTECTION AGAINST SEXUAL HARASSMENT ACT CHAPTER 107 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 BELIZE PROTECTION AGAINST SEXUAL HARASSMENT ACT CHAPTER 107 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.10941-10942 OF 2013 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD...APPELLANT VERSUS WITH

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.10941-10942 OF 2013 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD...APPELLANT VERSUS WITH 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.10941-10942 OF 2013 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD....APPELLANT VERSUS HILLI MULTIPURPOSE COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD...RESPONDENT

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2004

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2004 'REPORTABLE' IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4494 OF 2004 M/S CHENNAI PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS LTD., CHENNAI... Appellant VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

More information

JUDGMENT 1). Mr. Rajesh Borpujari Rs. 8,00,000/- [Rupees Eight Lakhs] AS-03 F/4087 AS-05 B/2827 2). O.P. No-2, Sri Chandra Kanta Gogoi, AS-05 B/2827

JUDGMENT 1). Mr. Rajesh Borpujari Rs. 8,00,000/- [Rupees Eight Lakhs] AS-03 F/4087 AS-05 B/2827 2). O.P. No-2, Sri Chandra Kanta Gogoi, AS-05 B/2827 IN THE COURT OF THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL AT JORHAT Present: Mr. P.K. Khanikar, B.Sc., LL.M., AJS Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, JORHAT. JUDGMENT IN M.A.C. CASE NO. 09 OF 2011

More information

BEFORE THE HARYANA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION BAYS NO. 33-36, SECTOR 4, PANCHKULA-134112 - HARYANA

BEFORE THE HARYANA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION BAYS NO. 33-36, SECTOR 4, PANCHKULA-134112 - HARYANA BEFORE THE HARYANA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION BAYS NO. 33-36, SECTOR 4, PANCHKULA-134112 - HARYANA Quorum: Case No. HERC/PRO-51 of 2014 Date of hearing: 22.07.2014 Date of order : 22.07.2014 Shri

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT NORTHERN DISTRICT FRANK FODERA, SR.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT NORTHERN DISTRICT FRANK FODERA, SR. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT NORTHERN DISTRICT FRANK FODERA, SR. V. ARBELLA PROTECTION INSURANCE COMPANY NO. 15-ADMS-10012 In the WOBURN DIVISION: Justice:

More information

3 M/s Network Travels (Owner of above vehicle) Opp Parties

3 M/s Network Travels (Owner of above vehicle) Opp Parties 1 COURT OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL NO. I KAMRUP :: GUWAHATI Present :- B J Mahanta Member, MACT-I Kamrup, Guwahati MAC Case No. 872 of 2012 Sri Anil Prasad Claimant Versus 1 M/s New India Assurance

More information

Oriental Bank s Compensation Policy 2014-15

Oriental Bank s Compensation Policy 2014-15 Oriental Bank s Compensation Policy 2014-15 Introduction Compensation Policy of Bank is designed to cover areas relating to unauthorized debiting of account, payment of interest to customers for delay

More information

IN THE COURT OF SUB-DIVISIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE(M), GOHPUR PRESENT: SRI KAUSHIK KUMAR SHARMA S.D.J.M(M), GOHPUR GR: 378/11. U/S 457/323 of IPC

IN THE COURT OF SUB-DIVISIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE(M), GOHPUR PRESENT: SRI KAUSHIK KUMAR SHARMA S.D.J.M(M), GOHPUR GR: 378/11. U/S 457/323 of IPC 1 IN THE COURT OF SUB-DIVISIONAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE(M), GOHPUR PRESENT: SRI KAUSHIK KUMAR SHARMA S.D.J.M(M), GOHPUR GR: 378/11 U/S 457/323 of IPC STATE OF ASSAM PROSECUTION v. Sri Dhan Gogoi ACCUSED Ld.

More information

IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, AIZAWL DISTRICT, AIZAWL, MIZORAM.

IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, AIZAWL DISTRICT, AIZAWL, MIZORAM. IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, AIZAWL DISTRICT, AIZAWL, MIZORAM. Criminal Trial No.1952 /2011. U/s 293/509 IPC. Ref : Sairang-P/S. State of Mizoram.. Prosecution -Versus- Vanlalfawra

More information

IN THE COURT OFJUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, NAGAON. G R Case No: 1685 of 2009. State of Assam. Present : Dulumoni Das, JMFC, NAGAON

IN THE COURT OFJUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, NAGAON. G R Case No: 1685 of 2009. State of Assam. Present : Dulumoni Das, JMFC, NAGAON DISTRCT: NAGAON IN THE COURT OFJUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, NAGAON G R Case No: 1685 of 2009 State of Assam Vs Md. Rafiqul Sarkar.. Accused person Present : Dulumoni Das, JMFC, NAGAON Learned Advocates

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD O/TAXAP/937/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL No. 937 of 2013 ================================================================ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AHMEDABAD IV...Appellant(s)

More information

DELHI OMBUDSMAN CENTRE

DELHI OMBUDSMAN CENTRE Case No. GI/560/UII/10 In the matter of Shri. Shantanu Chatterjee Vs United India Ins. Company Ltd. AWARD DATED 5.10.2011 NON SETTLEMENT OF THEFT CLAIM 1. This is a complaint filed by Shri. Shantanu Chatterjee

More information

Bank Guarantees. What does Bank Guarantee mean?

Bank Guarantees. What does Bank Guarantee mean? Bank Guarantees. What does Bank Guarantee mean? A Contract of Guarantee is a contract to perform the promise or discharge of liability of a third person in case of his default. There are three parties

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 FAO 53/2012 Judgment delivered on: 14.03.2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 FAO 53/2012 Judgment delivered on: 14.03.2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, 1923 FAO 53/2012 Judgment delivered on: 14.03.2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD... Appellant Through : Mr D.D. Singh with Mr

More information

IN THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL SONITPUR: TEZPUR. MAC Case No. 147 of 2013

IN THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL SONITPUR: TEZPUR. MAC Case No. 147 of 2013 IN THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL SONITPUR: TEZPUR MAC Case No. 147 of 2013 Smti. Manjira Baruah D/o: Sri Prasanta Baruah R/o: Dhalaibil Center, P.O: Naharbari P.S.: Jamuguri Dist: Sonitpur, Assam...

More information

108th Session Judgment No. 2862

108th Session Judgment No. 2862 Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal 108th Session Judgment No. 2862 THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, Considering the complaint

More information

Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/002663. Appellant /Complainant : Shri B.B. Das Adhikary, Bhubaneswar

Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2012/002663. Appellant /Complainant : Shri B.B. Das Adhikary, Bhubaneswar Central Information Commission Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066 Telefax:011 26180532 & 011 26107254 website cic.gov.in Appellant /Complainant :

More information

***Repealed by Notification No. 11/LC/GN/2007/1406, w.e.f. 02.01.2007

***Repealed by Notification No. 11/LC/GN/2007/1406, w.e.f. 02.01.2007 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY PART -II - SECTION 3 - SUB SECTION (ii) PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA NOTIFICATION Mumbai, the 21st August 2003 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

More information

Settlement Commission

Settlement Commission Document No. 1.0.7.14-SC For departmental use only Detailed Study Report on Settlement Commission Prepared by Shri Harshal V Mete Shri Mukesh Kumar Shri Navneet Kaushal IRS (C&CE) Probationers 65th batch

More information

BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL : : TINSUKIA : : ASSAM. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, M.A.C.T. Case No.

BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL : : TINSUKIA : : ASSAM. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, M.A.C.T. Case No. BEFORE THE MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL : : TINSUKIA : : ASSAM District: Present: Smti A. Devee, Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, M.A.C.T. Case No. 66 of 2007 Smti Godhani Devi, W/o Sri

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. M No. 53424 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 12, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH. Crl. Misc. M No. 53424 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 12, 2013 Crl. Misc. M No. 53424 of 2007 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. M No. 53424 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 12, 2013 Central Bank of India and others...petitioners

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER. Decided on: 02nd March, 2015 MAC.APP. 38/2014 MAC.APP.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER. Decided on: 02nd March, 2015 MAC.APP. 38/2014 MAC.APP. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPENSATION MATTER Decided on: 02nd March, 2015 MAC.APP. 38/2014 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Mr.Pankaj Seth Gaur, Advocate.. Appellant versus

More information

OPERATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY SERVICE

OPERATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY SERVICE COMPENSATION POLICY OPERATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY SERVICE DEPARTMENT CENTRAL OFFICE, KARUR 639 002 COMPENSATION POLICY POLICY TITLE COMPENSATION POLICY FRAMED BY BOARD APPROVAL DATE OPERATIONS AND TECHNOLOGICAL

More information