IBM QRadar: Evidence of Value

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IBM QRadar: Evidence of Value"

Transcription

1 IBM QRadar: Evidence of Value Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC February 2014 Ponemon Institute Research Report

2 IBM QRadar: Evidence of Value Ponemon Institute: February 2014 Part 1. Introduction Ponemon Institute was engaged by IBM to conduct an independent validation study of its security incident event management (SIEM) solution termed QRadar. The purpose of this study was to better understand the elements of QRadar that deliver value to customers and users. Our study specifically focused on QRadar s product features and experience in enterprise deployment. Another objective of this research was to compare QRadar s value propositions to other marketleading providers of SIEM and network traffic intelligence solutions. 1 We independently conducted one-to-one confidential interviews with a learned group of 25 IT and IT security practitioners from larger-sized U.S. companies in seven industry sectors. By design, all participating interviewees were users of another SIEM solution and later switched to QRadar. Our interview script included 30 fix-formatted questions. Using a diagnostic interview technique, we probed to gain a deeper understanding about QRadar capabilities, benefits and overall value propositions. Following are the four focal points of our interviews. Rationale for selecting QRadar and switching from other SIEM providers Recent experiences in detecting and containing network traffic anomalies Experience in deploying QRadar across the enterprise Comparison of QRadar features to those of other SIEM providers Following are some of the most salient findings: According to respondents (a.k.a. interviewees), the top reasons for switching to QRadar are: (1) to reduce maintenance costs, (2) eliminate vendor support problems, (3) to respond to management mandate and (4) to solve interoperability issues. On average, companies spent $1.53 million on SIEM deployment across the enterprise computed for a three-year lifecycle. Of this total cost, 49 percent pertains to labor, 32 percent pertains to technology investments and 19 percent to costs incurred from external parties such as consultants and managed service providers (termed out-of-the pocket costs). The average time to implement QRadar was 5.5 months versus 15.2 months (nearly 3X) for other market-leading competitor solutions. Seventy-two percent of respondents say anomalous network traffic detection relative to total netflow increased or significantly increased after deploying QRadar. The top benefits realized by companies after deploying QRadar are decreases or significant decreases in the: (1) average time to detect compromises, (2) false positive rate, (3) average time to contain compromises and (4) duration of business disruption caused by cyber attacks. Fifty-six percent of respondents say their experience with QRadar exceeded expectations and 92 percent hold a positive or very positive impression of this SIEM solution. The estimated ROI for 25 cases in this report averages with a range of 11 to 66 percent. 1 Other marketing-leading SIEM providers include: HP (ArcSight), McAfee (Nitro), Splunk, LogRhythm and RSA (Netwitness). Ponemon Institute : Private & Confidential Document Page 1

3 Limitations There are inherent limitations to small sample size research that need to be carefully considered before drawing inferences from findings. The following items are specific limitations that are germane to most interview-based studies. Our findings are based on a sample of 25 individuals each asked to represent the view and experiences of their company. We recruited these individuals from a proprietary database consisting of IT or IT security practitioners who participated in prior studies. We acknowledge the possibility that individuals who did not participate are substantially different in terms of underlying beliefs, perceptions and experiences. By design, we recruited only those individuals who: (1) presently use QRadar and (2) had switched from another market-leading SIEM provider. We acknowledge that individuals who switched from QRadar to another SIEM provider would likely hold a less positive impression of QRadar. The quality of interview research is based on the integrity of confidential responses provided by respondents. While certain checks and balances were incorporated in our interview script, there is always the possibility that interviewees did not provide full or accurate responses. Ponemon Institute : Private & Confidential Document Page 2

4 Part 2. Respondents As noted in Figure 1, a majority of respondents hold positions at or above the director level within their organizations. Most respondents are IT security leaders within their respective companies. In total, nine individuals hold the CISO or equivalent job title. The average relevant experience is 16.5 years (median at 15.0 years). Figure 1: Position of respondents 12% 16% 32% Executive Director Manager Staff Figure 2 shows the headcount of participating organizations. As can be seen, the vast majority of respondents organizations have more than 5,000 full time equivalent employees. Figure 2: Headcount of participating companies 28% 4% 12% 16% 1,001 to 5,000 5,001 to 10,000 10,001 to 25,000 25,001 to 75,000 More than 75,000 Ponemon Institute : Private & Confidential Document Page 3

5 Figure 3 summarizes the primary industry sectors of participants organizations. The largest sectors are financial services, public sector and energy and utilities. Figure 3: Industry distribution of respondents organizations 8% 8% 12% 8% 24% Financial services Public/government Energy & utilities Healthcare Manufacturing Retail Services Figure 4 summarizes the length of time interviewees say their organizations have used QRadar. The largest segment says their organizations have three to five years of QRadar experience. Figure 4: Length of time respondents organizations used QRadar 8% 16% 44% 32% Less than 1 year 1 to 2 years 3 to 5 years More than 5 years Ponemon Institute : Private & Confidential Document Page 4

6 Figure 5 summarizes the former SIEM providers utilized by respondents companies before making the switch to IBM s QRadar product. Figure 5: Former SIEM providers before switching to QRadar 8% 12% 12% 16% 32% HP ArcSight McAfee Nitro RSA Netwitness Splunk LogRhythm Other Ponemon Institute : Private & Confidential Document Page 5

7 Part 3. Findings Figure 6 reports the perceptions of QRadar users concerning their former SIEM solution providers. As shown below, a majority of interviewees hold negative impressions of their former providers. Figure 6: QRadar user perceptions about former SIEM providers 50% 45% 35% 30% 25% 15% 10% 5% 0% 44% 28% 16% 12% 0% Very positive Positive Unsure Negative Very negative Figure 7 summarizes the main reasons for switching from prior SIEM provider to IBM s QRadar according to interviewees. The top reasons include maintenance cost, vendor support problems, management mandate and interoperability issues. Figure 7: Reasons for switching to QRadar Maintenance cost Vendor support problems Management mandate Interoperability issues 36% 36% Organizational changes 28% Complexity issues Performance issues 16% Other 12% Product cost Operating costs 8% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 25% 30% 35% 45% Ponemon Institute : Private & Confidential Document Page 6

8 Figure 8 reports the extrapolated average cost incurred by interviewees companies to deploy QRadar across the enterprise. Labor costs represent the highest spending level representing 49 percent of the total SIEM cost. Technology investments and out-of-pocket costs represent 32 and 19 percent, respectively. Out-of-pocket costs include payments to third parties including consultants, vendors and managed service providers. Figure 8: Extrapolated average cost spent on SIEM $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $- $493,200 $752,000 $288,000 Technology investment Labor costs Out-of-pocket costs Average extrapolated cost Figure 9 reports the extrapolated average length of time to fully implement SIEM across the enterprise measured in months. This chart compares the interviewees experience implementing their former SIEM solution to the QRadar implementation experience. Albeit only an estimate, the results suggest marked differences in the implementation experience (i.e., 3 X difference). Figure 9: Extrapolated average length of time (months) to implement SIEM QRadar Former SIEM Average months to implement SIEM across the enterprise Ponemon Institute : Private & Confidential Document Page 7

9 Figure 10 compares anomalous traffic detection rates between former SIEM providers and QRadar. As can be seen, 72 percent of interviewees say the detection rate has increased or significantly increased as a result of the switch to QRadar. In contrast, virtually no interviewee said the detection rate decreased after the switch to QRadar. Figure 10: Comparison of anomalous traffic detection relative to total netflow 50% 45% 35% 30% 25% 15% 10% 5% 0% 44% Significantly increased 28% 28% 0% 0% Increased No change Decreased Significantly decreased Anomalous traffic detected relative to total netflow Ponemon Institute : Private & Confidential Document Page 8

10 Figure 11 provides the QRadar experience according to nine normatively important attributes. Interviewees rated each attribute using a five-point scale ranging from significantly increased to significantly decreased. Please note that each percentage represents the significantly decreased and decreased response combined. The most salient findings concern the average time to detect compromises, false positive rates, average time to contain compromises and average duration of business disruptions caused by cyber attacks. According to many interviewees, all of these attributes either decreased or significantly decreased as a result of effective deployment of QRadar across the enterprise. Figure 11: Experience after deploying QRadar for nine attributes Percentage of interviewees that said each attribute either decreased or significantly decreased after the deployment of QRadar. Average time to detect compromises 80% False positive rates 80% Average time to contain compromises 64% Average duration of business disruption caused by cyber attacks 48% Non-compliance with policies, regulations and external standards 44% The total cost of downtime and business disruption caused by cyber attacks Average duration of IT downtime caused by cyber attacks 36% Frequency of data breach incidents 36% Frequency of denial of service attacks 28% 0% 10% 30% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Significantly decreased and decreased responses combined Ponemon Institute : Private & Confidential Document Page 9

11 Figure 12 provides very favorable results for QRadar. As can be seen, more than half of the interviewees rate their impression as very positive. In contrast, no interviewee provides a negative rating. Figure 12: Overall impressions of QRadar 60% 50% 52% 30% 10% 0% 8% 0% 0% Very positive Positive Unsure Negative Very negative Respondents' overall impressions of QRadar Figure 13 provides more favorable results for QRadar. Fifty-six percent of interviewees say QRadar exceeded their expectations. Another 36 percent say QRadar met expectations and only 8 percent say it did not meet expectations. Figure 13: Does QRadar meet expectations? 60% 56% 50% 36% 30% 10% 8% 0% Exceeds expectation Meets expectation Does not meet expectation Does QRadar meet your expectations? Ponemon Institute : Private & Confidential Document Page 10

12 Figure 14 reports the individuated return on investment (ROI) estimates for 25 QRadar users. The ROI calculated for each security technology category is defined as: (1) gains from the investment divided by (2) cost of investment (minus any residual value). We estimate a three-year life for all technology categories presented. Hence, investments are simply amortized over three years. The gains are the net present value of cost savings expected over the investment life. From this amount, we subtract conservative estimates for operations and maintenance cost each year. The net present value used the prime plus 2 percent discount rate per year. We also assume no (zero) residual value. As can be seen, ROI results vary considerably from a high of 66 percent to a low of 11 percent. The mean ROI for all cases is 40 percent, which is illustrated by the dotted line in the graph. Figure 14: ROI estimates for 25 cases 70% 66% 60% 50% 30% 10% 0% % ROI Average Figure 15 shows the average ROI estimates by organizational size ranges. As can be seen, all ranges especially companies with headcount between 5,001 and 10,000 employees experience very substantial average ROI. 2 Figure 15: ROI estimates by size (headcount) 60% 50% 30% 36% 48% 33% 36% 10% 0% 1,001 to 5,000 5,001 to 10,000 10,001 to 25,000 More than 25,000 Average ROI 2 Please note that ROI averages are computed from small subsamples of companies. Hence, care should be exercised when interpreting these results. Ponemon Institute : Private & Confidential Document Page 11

13 Figure 16 reports the individuated total cost of ownership (TCO) estimates for 25 QRadar users. Here again, TCO results vary considerably from a high of $3.80 million to a low of $.45 million. The dotted line represents the mean TCO for all cases, which is $1.53 million. Figure 16: TCO estimates for 25 cases $4,000,000 $3,800,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $- $450, TCO Average Figure 17 reports the TCO estimates by spending category and organizational size ranges. With the exception of out-of-pocket costs, this chart clearly shows that TCO is proportionally related to size. It also shows that labor cost relating to the installation, implementation and maintenance represents the largest cost component. 3 Figure 17: TCO estimates by size (headcount) and spending categories 000 omitted $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $- Technology Labor cost Out-of-pocket Total 1,001 to 5,000 $135 $275 $173 $583 5,001 to 10,000 $349 $445 $293 $1,087 10,001 to 25,000 $671 $914 $197 $1,783 More than 25,000 $900 $1,713 $550 $3,163 1,001 to 5,000 5,001 to 10,000 10,001 to 25,000 More than 25,000 3 Please note that TCO estimates are computed from small subsamples of companies. Hence, care should be exercised when interpreting these results. Ponemon Institute : Private & Confidential Document Page 12

14 Appendix 1: Diagnostic Interview Results Fieldwork completed in January 2014 Q1. What best describes your position level within the organization? Freq Pct% Executive 4 16% Director 10 Manager 8 32% Technician 3 12% Other 0 0% Q2. What best describes the full-time headcount of your global organization? Freq Pct% 1,001 to 5, % 5,001 to 10, ,001 to 25, % 25,001 to 75, % More than 75, % Q3. What best describes your organization s primary industry classification? Freq Pct% Financial services 6 24% Healthcare 3 12% Manufacturing 2 8% Public/government 5 Energy & utilities 5 Retail 2 8% Services 2 8% Other 0 0% Q5. Former SIEM technology provider Freq Pct% HP ArcSight 8 32% McAfee Nitro 5 Splunk 3 12% LogRhythm 3 12% RSA Netwitness 4 16% Other 2 8% Q6. Overall impression of your organization s former SIEM or network intelligence solutions Freq Pct% Very positive 0 0% Positive 3 12% Unsure 11 44% Negative 7 28% Very negative 4 16% Ponemon Institute : Private & Confidential Document Page 13

15 Q7. Reason for the change Freq Pct% Operating costs 2 8% Complexity issues 5 Limited functionality 12 48% Vendor support problems 10 Performance issues 4 16% Organizational changes 7 28% Maintenance cost 10 Interoperability issues 9 36% Product cost 2 8% Management mandate 9 36% Other 3 12% Total % Q8. Approximate length of time as a QRadar customer Freq Pct% Less than 1 year 4 16% 1 to 2 years 8 32% 3 to 5 years 11 44% More than 5 years 2 8% Q9. The total investment in SIEM technologies Freq Pct% Less than $100, % $100,000 to $200,000 5 $200,001 to $400,000 5 $400,001 to $600, % $600,001 to $800, % $800,001 to $1,000, % More than $1,000, % Q10. Fully loaded labor costs associated with the implementation and ongoing maintenance of the SIEM solutions: Freq Pct% Less than $100, % $100,000 to $200, % $200,001 to $400, % $400,001 to $600, % $600,001 to $800, % $800,001 to $1,000, % $1,000,001 to $1,500, % $1,500,001 to $2,000, % More than $2,000, % Q11. Out-of-pocket costs paid for services relating to SIEM installation and deployment throughout the enterprise Freq Pct% Less than $100,000 5 $100,000 to $200, % $200,001 to $400, % $400,001 to $600, % $600,001 to $800, % $800,001 to $1,000, % More than $1,000, % Ponemon Institute : Private & Confidential Document Page 14

16 Q12. Total time in months to install QRadar across the enterprise Freq Pct% Less than 1 month 2 8% 1 to 3 months 8 32% 4 to 6 months 7 28% 7 to 9 months 5 10 to 12 months 1 4% 13 to 15 months 0 0% 16 to 18 months 2 8% 19 to 21 months 0 0% 21 to 24 months 0 0% More than 24 months 0 0% Q13. Total time in months to install former SIEM across the enterprise Freq Pct% Less than 1 month 0 0% 1 to 3 months 2 8% 4 to 6 months 2 8% 7 to 9 months 5 44% 10 to 12 months 4 16% 13 to 15 months 3 12% 16 to 18 months 3 12% 19 to 21 months 0 0% 21 to 24 months 4 16% More than 24 months 2 8% Q14. Anomalous traffic detected relative to total netflow Freq Pct% Significantly increased 11 44% Increased 7 28% No change 7 28% Decreased 0 0% Significantly decreased 0 0% Q15. False positive rates Freq Pct% Increased 0 0% No change 5 Decreased 10 Significantly decreased 10 Q16. Average time to detect compromises Freq Pct% Increased 0 0% No change 5 Decreased 12 48% Significantly decreased 8 32% Q17. Average time to contain compromises Freq Pct% Increased 0 0% No change 9 36% Decreased 9 36% Significantly decreased 7 28% Ponemon Institute : Private & Confidential Document Page 15

17 Q18. Frequency of data breach incidents Freq Pct% Increased 1 4% No change 15 60% Decreased 5 Significantly decreased 4 16% Q19. Frequency of denial of service (DoS/DDoS) attacks Freq Pct% Increased 0 0% No change 18 72% Decreased 7 28% Significantly decreased 0 0% Q20. Average duration of IT downtime caused by cyber attacks Freq Pct% Increased 0 0% No change 16 64% Decreased 9 36% Significantly decreased 0 0% Q21. Average duration of business disruption caused by cyber attacks Freq Pct% Increased 0 0% No change 13 52% Decreased 10 Significantly decreased 2 8% Q22. The total cost of downtime and business disruption caused by cyber attacks Freq Pct% Increased 0 0% No change 15 60% Decreased 10 Significantly decreased 0 0% Q23. State of compliance with policies, regulations and external standards Freq Pct% Increased 11 44% No change 14 56% Decreased 0 0% Significantly decreased 0 0% Q24. Organizational reputation or brand Freq Pct% Increased 10 No change 15 60% Decreased 0 0% Significantly decreased 0 0% Ponemon Institute : Private & Confidential Document Page 16

18 Q25. Please record your overall impressions of QRadar Freq Pct% Very positive 13 52% Positive 10 Unsure 2 8% Negative 0 0% Very negative 0 0% Q26. Does QRadar meet your expectations? Freq Pct% Exceeds expectation 14 56% Meets expectation 9 36% Does not meet expectation 2 8% Following are 25 separately compiled ROI and TCO estimates for QRadar Case ROI TCO C1 18% $540,000 C2 52% $390,000 C3 58% $950,000 C4 49% $950,000 C5 44% $950,000 C6 66% $1,700,000 C7 58% $1,700,000 C8 65% $540,000 C9 $2,100,000 C10 31% $1,700,000 C11 32% $2,540,000 C12 $950,000 C13 32% $950,000 C14 61% $390,000 C15 35% $3,800,000 C16 54% $950,000 C17 $3,750,000 C18 37% $1,700,000 C19 49% $1,300,000 C20 25% $450,000 C21 11% $2,540,000 C22 51% $900,000 C23 21% $3,800,000 C24 18% $2,100,000 C25 36% $690,000 Average $1,533,200 Ponemon Institute : Private & Confidential Document Page 17

19 Please contact or call us at if you have any questions. Ponemon Institute Advancing Responsible Information Management Ponemon Institute is dedicated to independent research and education that advances responsible information and privacy management practices within business and government. Our mission is to conduct high quality, empirical studies on critical issues affecting the management and security of sensitive information about people and organizations. As a member of the Council of American Survey Research Organizations (CASRO), we uphold strict data confidentiality, privacy and ethical research standards. We do not collect any personally identifiable information from individuals (or company identifiable information in our business research). Furthermore, we have strict quality standards to ensure that subjects are not asked extraneous, irrelevant or improper questions. Ponemon Institute : Private & Confidential Document Page 18

IBM QRadar Security Intelligence: Evidence of Value

IBM QRadar Security Intelligence: Evidence of Value IBM QRadar Security Intelligence: Evidence of Value Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC February 2014 Ponemon Institute Research Report Background IBM QRadar: Evidence of Value Ponemon Institute:

More information

Compliance Cost Associated with the Storage of Unstructured Information

Compliance Cost Associated with the Storage of Unstructured Information Compliance Cost Associated with the Storage of Unstructured Information Sponsored by Novell Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: May 2011 Ponemon Institute Research Report

More information

The Cost of Malware Containment

The Cost of Malware Containment The Cost of Malware Containment Sponsored by Damballa Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: January 2015 Ponemon Institute Research Report The Cost of Malware Containment Ponemon

More information

The Billion Euro Lost Laptop Problem Benchmark study of European organizations

The Billion Euro Lost Laptop Problem Benchmark study of European organizations The Billion Euro Lost Laptop Problem Benchmark study of European organizations Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: April 2011 Ponemon Institute Research Report Part 1. Executive

More information

The Billion Dollar Lost Laptop Problem Benchmark study of U.S. organizations

The Billion Dollar Lost Laptop Problem Benchmark study of U.S. organizations The Billion Dollar Lost Laptop Problem Benchmark study of U.S. organizations Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: 30 September 2010 Ponemon Institute Research Report Part

More information

Understanding Security Complexity in 21 st Century IT Environments:

Understanding Security Complexity in 21 st Century IT Environments: Understanding Security Complexity in 21 st Century IT Environments: A study of IT practitioners in the US, UK, France, Japan & Germany Sponsored by Check Point Software Technologies Independently conducted

More information

Economic impact of privacy on online behavioral advertising

Economic impact of privacy on online behavioral advertising Benchmark study of Internet marketers and advertisers Independently Conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC April 30, 2010 Ponemon Institute Research Report Economic impact of privacy on online behavioral advertising

More information

Data Breach: The Cloud Multiplier Effect

Data Breach: The Cloud Multiplier Effect Data Breach: The Cloud Multiplier Effect Sponsored by Netskope Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: June 2014 Ponemon Institute Research Report Part 1. Introduction Data Breach:

More information

The Cost of Web Application Attacks

The Cost of Web Application Attacks The Cost of Web Application Attacks Sponsored by Akamai Technologies Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: May 2015 Ponemon Institute Research Report Part 1. Introduction The

More information

Is Your Company Ready for a Big Data Breach? Sponsored by Experian Data Breach Resolution

Is Your Company Ready for a Big Data Breach? Sponsored by Experian Data Breach Resolution Is Your Company Ready for a Big Data Breach? Sponsored by Experian Data Breach Resolution Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: March 2013 Ponemon Institute Research Report

More information

Is Your Company Ready for a Big Data Breach? Sponsored by Experian Data Breach Resolution

Is Your Company Ready for a Big Data Breach? Sponsored by Experian Data Breach Resolution Is Your Company Ready for a Big Data Breach? Sponsored by Experian Data Breach Resolution Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: April 2013 Ponemon Institute Research Report

More information

Risk & Innovation in Cybersecurity Investments. Sponsored by Lockheed Martin

Risk & Innovation in Cybersecurity Investments. Sponsored by Lockheed Martin Risk & Innovation in Cybersecurity Investments Sponsored by Lockheed Martin Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: April 2015 Ponemon Institute Research Report Part 1. Introduction

More information

Is Your Company Ready for a Big Data Breach?

Is Your Company Ready for a Big Data Breach? Is Your Company Ready for a Big Data Breach? The Second Annual Study on Data Breach Preparedness Sponsored by Experian Data Breach Resolution Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication

More information

The Importance of Cyber Threat Intelligence to a Strong Security Posture

The Importance of Cyber Threat Intelligence to a Strong Security Posture The Importance of Cyber Threat Intelligence to a Strong Security Posture Sponsored by Webroot Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: March 2015 Ponemon Institute Research Report

More information

Data Security in Development & Testing

Data Security in Development & Testing Data Security in Development & Testing Sponsored by Micro Focus Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: July 31, 2009 Ponemon Institute Research Report Data Security in Development

More information

Electronic Health Information at Risk: A Study of IT Practitioners

Electronic Health Information at Risk: A Study of IT Practitioners Electronic Health Information at Risk: A Study of IT Practitioners Sponsored by LogLogic Conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC October 15, 2009 Ponemon Institute Research Report Executive summary Electronic

More information

A Study of Retail Banks & DDoS Attacks

A Study of Retail Banks & DDoS Attacks A Study of Retail Banks & DDoS Attacks Sponsored by Corero Network Security Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: December 2012 Ponemon Institute Research Report A Study of

More information

The SQL Injection Threat Study

The SQL Injection Threat Study The SQL Injection Threat Study Sponsored by DB Networks Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: April 2014 1 The SQL Injection Threat Study Presented by Ponemon Institute, April

More information

Reputation Impact of a Data Breach U.S. Study of Executives & Managers

Reputation Impact of a Data Breach U.S. Study of Executives & Managers Reputation Impact of a Data Breach U.S. Study of Executives & Managers Sponsored by Experian Data Breach Resolution Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: November 2011 Ponemon

More information

The TCO of Software vs. Hardware-based Full Disk Encryption Summary

The TCO of Software vs. Hardware-based Full Disk Encryption Summary The TCO of vs. -based Full Disk Encryption Summary Sponsored by WinMagic Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: April 2013 Industry Co-Sponsors Ponemon Institute Research Report

More information

First Annual Cost of Cyber Crime Study Benchmark Study of U.S. Companies

First Annual Cost of Cyber Crime Study Benchmark Study of U.S. Companies First Annual Cost of Cyber Crime Study Benchmark Study of U.S. Companies Sponsored by ArcSight Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: July 2010 Ponemon Institute Research Report

More information

Managing Cyber Security as a Business Risk: Cyber Insurance in the Digital Age

Managing Cyber Security as a Business Risk: Cyber Insurance in the Digital Age Managing Cyber Security as a Business Risk: Cyber Insurance in the Digital Age Sponsored by Experian Data Breach Resolution Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: August 2013

More information

The State of Data Security Intelligence. Sponsored by Informatica. Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: April 2015

The State of Data Security Intelligence. Sponsored by Informatica. Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: April 2015 The State of Data Security Intelligence Sponsored by Informatica Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: April 2015 Ponemon Institute Research Report The State of Data Security

More information

How Single Sign-On Is Changing Healthcare A Study of IT Practitioners in Acute Care Hospitals in the United States

How Single Sign-On Is Changing Healthcare A Study of IT Practitioners in Acute Care Hospitals in the United States How Single Sign-On Is Changing Healthcare A Study of IT Practitioners in Acute Care Hospitals in the United States Sponsored by Imprivata Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date:

More information

Global Insights on Document Security

Global Insights on Document Security Global Insights on Document Security Sponsored by Adobe Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: June 2014 Ponemon Institute Research Report Global Insights on Document Security

More information

Security of Paper Records & Document Shredding. Sponsored by Cintas. Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: January 2014

Security of Paper Records & Document Shredding. Sponsored by Cintas. Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: January 2014 Security of Paper Records & Document Shredding Sponsored by Cintas Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: January 2014 Ponemon Institute Research Report Part 1. Introduction

More information

The Challenge of Preventing Browser-Borne Malware

The Challenge of Preventing Browser-Borne Malware The Challenge of Preventing Browser-Borne Malware Sponsored by Spikes Security Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: February 2015 Ponemon Institute Research Report Part 1.

More information

National Survey on Data Center Outages

National Survey on Data Center Outages National Survey on Data Center Outages Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: 30 September 2010 Part 1. Executive Summary National Survey on Data Center Outages Ponemon Institute,

More information

Second Annual Cost of Cyber Crime Study Benchmark Study of U.S. Companies

Second Annual Cost of Cyber Crime Study Benchmark Study of U.S. Companies Second Annual Cost of Cyber Crime Study Benchmark Study of U.S. Companies Sponsored by ArcSight, an HP Company Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: August 2011 Ponemon Institute

More information

Understaffed and at Risk: Today s IT Security Department. Sponsored by HP Enterprise Security

Understaffed and at Risk: Today s IT Security Department. Sponsored by HP Enterprise Security Understaffed and at Risk: Today s IT Security Department Sponsored by HP Enterprise Security Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: February 2014 Ponemon Institute Research

More information

2015 Cost of Data Breach Study: Canada

2015 Cost of Data Breach Study: Canada 2015 Cost of Data Breach Study: Canada Benchmark research sponsored by IBM Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC May 2015 Ponemon Institute Research Report 2015 1 Cost of Data Breach Study:

More information

2013 Cost of Cyber Crime Study: United States

2013 Cost of Cyber Crime Study: United States 2013 Cost of Cyber Crime Study: United States Sponsored by HP Enterprise Security Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: October 2013 Ponemon Institute Research Report Part

More information

2015 Cost of Cyber Crime Study: United States

2015 Cost of Cyber Crime Study: United States 2015 Cost of Cyber Crime Study: United States Sponsored by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: October 2015 Ponemon Institute Research Report 2015

More information

2013 Cost of Data Center Outages

2013 Cost of Data Center Outages 2013 Cost of Data Center Outages Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: December 2013 Part 1. Executive Summary 2013 Cost of Data Center Outages Ponemon Institute, December

More information

Security Metrics to Manage Change: Which Matter, Which Can Be Measured?

Security Metrics to Manage Change: Which Matter, Which Can Be Measured? Security Metrics to Manage Change: Which Matter, Which Can Be Measured? Sponsored by FireMon Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: April 2014 2 Security Metrics to Manage Change:

More information

2012 Application Security Gap Study: A Survey of IT Security & Developers

2012 Application Security Gap Study: A Survey of IT Security & Developers 2012 Application Gap Study: A Survey of IT & s Research sponsored by Innovation Independently Conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC March 2012 1 2012 Application Gap Study: A Survey of IT & s March 2012 Part

More information

Aftermath of a Data Breach Study

Aftermath of a Data Breach Study Aftermath of a Data Breach Study Sponsored by Experian Data Breach Resolution Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: January 2012 Ponemon Institute Research Report Aftermath

More information

Cost of Data Center Outages January 2016 Data Center Performance Benchmark Series

Cost of Data Center Outages January 2016 Data Center Performance Benchmark Series Cost of Data Center Outages January 2016 Data Center Performance Benchmark Series Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: January 2016 Cost of Data Center Outages Ponemon Institute,

More information

The Impact of Cybercrime on Business

The Impact of Cybercrime on Business The Impact of Cybercrime on Business Studies of IT practitioners in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Hong Kong and Brazil Sponsored by Check Point Software Technologies Independently conducted

More information

The Cost of Insecure Mobile Devices in the Workplace Sponsored by AT&T

The Cost of Insecure Mobile Devices in the Workplace Sponsored by AT&T The Cost of Insecure Mobile Devices in the Workplace! Sponsored by AT&T Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: March 2014 Part 1. Introduction The Cost of Insecure Mobile Devices

More information

The SQL Injection Threat & Recent Retail Breaches

The SQL Injection Threat & Recent Retail Breaches The SQL Injection Threat & Recent Retail Breaches Sponsored by DB Networks Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: June 2014 1 Part 1. Introduction The SQL Injection Threat &

More information

2015 Global Study on IT Security Spending & Investments

2015 Global Study on IT Security Spending & Investments 2015 Study on IT Security Spending & Investments Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: May 2015 Sponsored by Part 1. Introduction Security risks are pervasive and becoming

More information

Best Practices in Data Protection Survey of U.S. IT & IT Security Practitioners

Best Practices in Data Protection Survey of U.S. IT & IT Security Practitioners Best Practices in Data Protection Survey of U.S. IT & IT Security Practitioners Sponsored by McAfee Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: October 2011 Ponemon Institute Research.

More information

Perceptions about the Potential Expiration of The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA)

Perceptions about the Potential Expiration of The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) Perceptions about the Potential Expiration of The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) Sponsored by Property Casualty Insurers Association of America Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication

More information

Perceptions About Network Security Survey of IT & IT security practitioners in the U.S.

Perceptions About Network Security Survey of IT & IT security practitioners in the U.S. Perceptions About Network Security Survey of IT & IT security practitioners in the U.S. Sponsored by Juniper Networks Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: June 2011 Ponemon

More information

Achieving Security in Workplace File Sharing. Sponsored by Axway Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: January 2014

Achieving Security in Workplace File Sharing. Sponsored by Axway Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: January 2014 Achieving Security in Workplace File Sharing Sponsored by Axway Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: January 2014 Ponemon Institute Research Report Part 1. Introduction Achieving

More information

2012 Cost of Cyber Crime Study: Germany

2012 Cost of Cyber Crime Study: Germany 2012 Cost of Cyber Crime Study: Germany Sponsored by HP Enterprise Security Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: October 2012 Ponemon Institute Research Report Part 1. Executive

More information

How Single Sign-On Is Changing Healthcare: SSO Vendor Comparison

How Single Sign-On Is Changing Healthcare: SSO Vendor Comparison How Single Sign-On Is Changing Healthcare: SSO Vendor Comparison Sponsored by Imprivata Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: June 2011 Ponemon Institute Research Report How

More information

2015 Cost of Data Breach Study: United States

2015 Cost of Data Breach Study: United States 2015 Cost of Data Breach Study: United States Benchmark research sponsored by IBM Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC May 2015 Ponemon Institute Research Report 2015 1 Cost of Data Breach

More information

2016 Cost of Data Breach Study: Canada

2016 Cost of Data Breach Study: Canada 2016 Cost of Data Breach Study: Canada Benchmark research sponsored by IBM Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC June 2016 Ponemon Institute Research Report 2016 1 Cost of Data Breach Study:

More information

The economics of IT risk and reputation

The economics of IT risk and reputation Global Technology Services Research Report Risk Management The economics of IT risk and reputation What business continuity and IT security really mean to your organization Findings from the IBM Global

More information

Encryption in the Cloud

Encryption in the Cloud Encryption in the Cloud Who is responsible for data protection in the cloud? Sponsored by Thales e-security Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: July 2012 Ponemon Institute

More information

2014: A Year of Mega Breaches

2014: A Year of Mega Breaches 2014: A Year of Mega Breaches Sponsored by Identity Finder Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: January 2015 Ponemon Institute Research Report Part 1. Introduction 2014: A

More information

Leading Practices in Behavioral Advertising & Consumer Privacy Study of Internet Marketers and Advertisers

Leading Practices in Behavioral Advertising & Consumer Privacy Study of Internet Marketers and Advertisers Leading Practices in Behavioral Advertising & Consumer Privacy Study of Internet Marketers and Advertisers Independently Conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC February 2012 Leading Practices in Behavioral

More information

The Fraud Report: How Fake Users Are Impacting Business

The Fraud Report: How Fake Users Are Impacting Business The Fraud Report: How Fake Users Are Impacting Business Sponsored by TeleSign Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: November 2015 Ponemon Institute Research Report The Fraud

More information

The Unintentional Insider Risk in United States and German Organizations

The Unintentional Insider Risk in United States and German Organizations The Unintentional Insider Risk in United States and German Organizations Sponsored by Raytheon Websense Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: July 2015 2 Part 1. Introduction

More information

2014 Cost of Cyber Crime Study: United States

2014 Cost of Cyber Crime Study: United States 2014 Cost of Cyber Crime Study: United States Sponsored by HP Enterprise Security Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: October 2014 Ponemon Institute Research Report Part

More information

The Cyber Security Leap: From Laggard to Leader

The Cyber Security Leap: From Laggard to Leader The Cyber Security Leap: From Laggard to Leader Contents Introduction......... 3 Ready to leapfrog?......... 4 Key study findings......... 4 THEME 1: Innovation and strategy: separating the leapfrogs from

More information

APPLICATION SECURITY IN THE CHANGING RISK LANDSCAPE

APPLICATION SECURITY IN THE CHANGING RISK LANDSCAPE APPLICATION SECURITY IN THE CHANGING RISK LANDSCAPE INDEPENDENTLY CONDUCTED BY PONEMON INSTITUTE LLC, JULY 2016 Part 1. Introduction Ponemon Institute is pleased to present the results of Application Security

More information

Perceptions about Self-Encrypting Drives: A Study of IT Practitioners

Perceptions about Self-Encrypting Drives: A Study of IT Practitioners Perceptions about Self-Encrypting Drives: A Study of IT Practitioners Executive Summary Sponsored by Trusted Computing Group Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: April 2011

More information

The Imprivata Report on the Economic Impact of Inefficient Communications in Healthcare

The Imprivata Report on the Economic Impact of Inefficient Communications in Healthcare The Imprivata Report on the Economic Impact of Inefficient Communications in Healthcare Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: June 2014 Ponemon Institute Research Report The

More information

Final Document. Sponsored by. Symantec. 2011 Cost of Data Breach Study. United States

Final Document. Sponsored by. Symantec. 2011 Cost of Data Breach Study. United States Final Document Sponsored by Symantec 2011 Cost of Data Breach Study United States Benchmark Research Conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Report: March 2012 Ponemon Institute : Please do not share without

More information

Security of Cloud Computing Users A Study of Practitioners in the US & Europe

Security of Cloud Computing Users A Study of Practitioners in the US & Europe Security of Cloud Computing Users A Study of Practitioners in the US & Europe Sponsored by CA Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: 12 May 2010 Ponemon Institute Research Report

More information

Achieving Data Privacy in the Cloud

Achieving Data Privacy in the Cloud Achieving Data Privacy in the Cloud Study of Information Technology Privacy and Compliance of Small to Medium-Sized Organizations in germany Sponsored by microsoft Independently Conducted by Ponemon Institute

More information

What You Don t Know Will Hurt You: A Study of the Risk from Application Access and Usage

What You Don t Know Will Hurt You: A Study of the Risk from Application Access and Usage What You Don t Know Will Hurt You: A Study of the Risk from Application Access and Usage Sponsored by ObserveIT Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC June 2015 Ponemon Institute Research Report

More information

2013 Cost of Data Breach Study: Global Analysis

2013 Cost of Data Breach Study: Global Analysis 2013 Cost of Data Breach Study: Global Analysis Benchmark research sponsored by Symantec Independently Conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC May 2013 Ponemon Institute Research Report Part 1. Executive Summary

More information

Data Security in the Evolving Payments Ecosystem

Data Security in the Evolving Payments Ecosystem Data Security in the Evolving Payments Ecosystem Sponsored by Experian Data Breach Resolution Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: April 2015 Ponemon Institute Research Report

More information

Defining the Gap: The Cybersecurity Governance Study

Defining the Gap: The Cybersecurity Governance Study Defining the Gap: The Cybersecurity Governance Study Sponsored by Fidelis Cybersecurity Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: June 2015 Ponemon Institute Research Report Defining

More information

Exposing the Cybersecurity Cracks: A Global Perspective

Exposing the Cybersecurity Cracks: A Global Perspective Exposing the Cybersecurity Cracks: A Global Perspective Part I: Deficient, Disconnected & in the Dark Sponsored by Websense, Inc. Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: April

More information

Cyber Threat Intelligence: Has to Be a Better Way

Cyber Threat Intelligence: Has to Be a Better Way Exchanging Cyber Threat Intelligence: There Has to Be a Better Way Sponsored by IID Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: April 2014 Ponemon Institute Research Report Exchanging

More information

The TCO for Full Disk Encryption Studies in the US, UK, Germany & Japan

The TCO for Full Disk Encryption Studies in the US, UK, Germany & Japan The TCO for Full Disk Encryption Studies in the US, UK, Germany & Japan Sponsored by WinMagic Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: July 2012 Ponemon Institute Research Report

More information

2015 Global Megatrends in Cybersecurity

2015 Global Megatrends in Cybersecurity 2015 Global Megatrends in Cybersecurity Sponsored by Raytheon Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: February 2015 Ponemon Institute Research Report 2015 Global Megatrends in

More information

Privacy and Security in a Connected Life: A Study of US Consumers

Privacy and Security in a Connected Life: A Study of US Consumers Privacy and Security in a Connected Life: A Study of US Consumers Sponsored by Trend Micro Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: March 2015 Ponemon Institute Research Report

More information

The Security Impact of Mobile Device Use by Employees

The Security Impact of Mobile Device Use by Employees The Security Impact of Mobile Device Use by Employees Sponsored by Accellion Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: December 2014 Ponemon Institute Research Report The Security

More information

Security Effectiveness Framework Study

Security Effectiveness Framework Study Security Effectiveness Framework Study Is your organisation effective in managing its security operations? Sponsored by: HP Information Security, and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 31 July 2010

More information

2012 Cost of Cyber Crime Study: United States

2012 Cost of Cyber Crime Study: United States 2012 Cost of Cyber Crime Study: United States Sponsored by HP Enterprise Security Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: October 2012 Ponemon Institute Research Report Part

More information

2013 Cost of Data Breach Study: Global Analysis

2013 Cost of Data Breach Study: Global Analysis 2013 Cost of Data Breach Study: Global Analysis Benchmark research sponsored by Symantec Independently Conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC May 2013 Ponemon Institute Research Report Part 1. Executive Summary

More information

Analysis of the Global Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and Log Management (LM) Market All Information Becomes Actionable

Analysis of the Global Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and Log Management (LM) Market All Information Becomes Actionable Analysis of the Global Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and Log Management (LM) Market All Information Becomes Actionable April 2015 1 List of Exhibits Chart Slide Number Executive Summary

More information

Exposing the Cybersecurity Cracks: A Global Perspective

Exposing the Cybersecurity Cracks: A Global Perspective Exposing the Cybersecurity Cracks: A Global Perspective Part 2: Roadblocks, Refresh and Raising the Human Security IQ Sponsored by Websense Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication

More information

Final Document. Sponsored by. Symantec. 2011 Cost of Data Breach Study: Germany

Final Document. Sponsored by. Symantec. 2011 Cost of Data Breach Study: Germany Final Document Sponsored by Symantec 2011 Cost of Data Breach Study: Germany Benchmark Research Conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Report: March 2012 Ponemon Institute : Please do not share without express

More information

2013 Study on Data Center Outages

2013 Study on Data Center Outages 2013 Study on Data Center Outages Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: September 2013 2013 Study on Data Center Outages Ponemon Institute, September 2013 Part 1. Introduction

More information

The State of Data Centric Security

The State of Data Centric Security The State of Data Centric Security Sponsored by Informatica Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: June 2014 Ponemon Institute Research Report State of Data Centric Security

More information

2014 Cost of Data Breach Study: Global Analysis

2014 Cost of Data Breach Study: Global Analysis 2014 Cost of Data Breach Study: Global Analysis Benchmark research sponsored by IBM Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC May 2014 Ponemon Institute Research Report Part 1. Introduction 2014

More information

Efficacy of Emerging Network Security Technologies

Efficacy of Emerging Network Security Technologies Efficacy of Emerging Network Security Technologies Sponsored by Juniper Networks Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: February 2013 Ponemon Institute Research Report Part

More information

2013 Cost of Data Breach Study: United States

2013 Cost of Data Breach Study: United States 2013 Cost of Data Breach Study: United States Benchmark research sponsored by Symantec Independently Conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC May 2013 Ponemon Institute Research Report Part 1. Executive Summary

More information

Cyber Security on the Offense: A Study of IT Security Experts

Cyber Security on the Offense: A Study of IT Security Experts Cyber Security on the Offense: A Study of IT Security Experts Co-authored with Radware Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: November 2012 Ponemon Institute Research Report

More information

Security of Cloud Computing Users Study

Security of Cloud Computing Users Study Security of Cloud Computing Users Study Sponsored by CA Technologies Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute, LLC Publication Date: March 2013 Security of Cloud Computing Users Study March 2013 Part

More information

Global Survey on Social Media Risks Survey of IT & IT Security Practitioners

Global Survey on Social Media Risks Survey of IT & IT Security Practitioners 0 Global Survey on Social Media Risks Survey of IT & IT Security Practitioners Sponsored by Websense Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: September 2011 1 Global Survey on

More information

Enhancing Cybersecurity with Big Data: Challenges & Opportunities

Enhancing Cybersecurity with Big Data: Challenges & Opportunities Enhancing Cybersecurity with Big Data: Challenges & Opportunities Independently Conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Sponsored by Microsoft Corporation November 2014 CONTENTS 2 3 6 9 10 Introduction The

More information

Cloud Security: Getting It Right

Cloud Security: Getting It Right Cloud Security: Getting It Right Sponsored by Armor Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: October 2015 Ponemon Institute Research Report Cloud Security: Getting It Right Ponemon

More information

Third Annual Study: Is Your Company Ready for a Big Data Breach?

Third Annual Study: Is Your Company Ready for a Big Data Breach? Third Annual Study: Is Your Company Ready for a Big Data Breach? Sponsored by Experian Data Breach Resolution Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: October 2015 Ponemon Institute

More information

Privileged User Abuse & The Insider Threat

Privileged User Abuse & The Insider Threat Privileged User Abuse & The Insider Threat Commissioned by Raytheon Company Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: May 2014 1 Privileged User Abuse & The Insider Threat Ponemon

More information

A Benchmark Study of Multinational Organizations. Research Report. Independently Conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC

A Benchmark Study of Multinational Organizations. Research Report. Independently Conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC A Benchmark Study of Multinational Organizations Research Report Independently Conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC January 2011 $5,838,781 DIFFERENCE Compliance Cost $3,529,570 Non-Compliance Cost $9,368,351

More information

Threat Intelligence & Incident Response: A Study of U.S. & EMEA Organizations

Threat Intelligence & Incident Response: A Study of U.S. & EMEA Organizations Threat Intelligence & Incident Response: A Study of U.S. & EMEA Organizations Sponsored by AccessData Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: February 2014 Ponemon Institute

More information

A Benchmark Study of Multinational Organizations

A Benchmark Study of Multinational Organizations A Benchmark Study of Multinational Organizations Research Report Independently Conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC January 2011 The True Cost of Compliance Benchmark Study of Multinational Organizations

More information

The Security of Cloud Infrastructure Survey of U.S. IT and Compliance Practitioners

The Security of Cloud Infrastructure Survey of U.S. IT and Compliance Practitioners The Security of Cloud Infrastructure Survey of U.S. IT and Compliance Practitioners Sponsored by Vormetric Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: November 2011 Ponemon Institute

More information

Advanced Threats in Retail Companies: A Study of North America & EMEA

Advanced Threats in Retail Companies: A Study of North America & EMEA Advanced Threats in Companies: A Study of North America & EMEA Sponsored by Arbor Networks Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: May 2015 Ponemon Institute Research Report

More information

The TCO of Software vs. Hardware-based Full Disk Encryption

The TCO of Software vs. Hardware-based Full Disk Encryption The TCO of Software vs. Hardware-based Full Disk Encryption Sponsored by WinMagic Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: April 2013 Industry Co-Sponsors Ponemon Institute Research

More information

The Importance of Senior Executive Involvement in Breach Response

The Importance of Senior Executive Involvement in Breach Response The Importance of Senior Executive Involvement in Breach Response Sponsored by HP Enterprise Security Services Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: October 2014 The Importance

More information

Corporate Data: A Protected Asset or a Ticking Time Bomb?

Corporate Data: A Protected Asset or a Ticking Time Bomb? Corporate Data: A Protected Asset or a Ticking Time Bomb? Sponsored by Varonis Independently conducted by Ponemon Institute LLC Publication Date: December 2014 Ponemon Institute Research Report Corporate

More information