Risk Margins and Solvency II Peter England and Richard Millns
|
|
|
- Dwain Hines
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Risk Margins and Solvency II Peter England and Richard Millns GIRO conference and exhibition Liverpool, October 2011
2 Agenda Part 1 A quick re-cap from last year (and the year before) Part 2 Further thoughts Part 3 An example model Note: This presentation only considers risk margin calculations in respect of simulation-based internal models
3 A quick recap from last year (and the year before) Czernuszewicz, AJ, and England, PD (2009). The Ultimate and One-Year Views of Reserving Risk with Respect to Solvency and Risk Margins. GIRO presentation. England, PD, and McGuinness, A (2010). Solvency II Balance Sheets in Simulation-Based Capital Models. GIRO presentation.
4 DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Article 101 The Solvency Capital Requirement shall be calibrated so as to ensure that all quantifiable risks to which an insurance or reinsurance undertaking is exposed are taken into account. With respect to existing business, it shall cover unexpected losses. It shall correspond to the Value-at-Risk of the basic own funds of an insurance or reinsurance undertaking subject to a confidence level of 99.5% over a one-year period. So it seems straightforward to estimate the SCR using a simulationbased model: simply create a simulated distribution of the basic own funds over 1 year, than calculate the 99.5%. The devil is in the detail
5 A Projected Balance Sheet View From Article 101, the SCR is calculated from a distribution of net assets over a 1 year time horizon Opening Balance Sheet When projecting Balance Sheets for solvency, we have an opening balance sheet with expected outstanding liabilities Year 1 Balance Sheet The bulk of those liabilities are the reserves (provisions) set aside to pay unsettled claims that have arisen on policies sold in the past We then project one year forwards, simulating the payments that emerge in the year, and require a closing balance sheet, with (simulated) expected outstanding liabilities conditional on the payments in the year, together with the market value of assets at the end of the year A L t=0 A L t=1 Simulations 4
6 Solvency II Balance Sheet In the usual course of business Additional Capital { ORSA Capital Solvency Capital (SCR) { Minimum { Capital (MCR) Assets backing Liabilities } Risk Margin Discounted best estimate Marketconsistent value of Liabilities Assets Liabilities 5
7 Overall SCR GIRO 2009: Simulated Year 1 balance sheet options For each simulation Opening Balance Sheet Economic Basis? Discounted Liabilities (1 Yr View) with Risk Margins A Simulated Year 1 Balance Sheet using: Discounted Liabilities (1 Yr View) without Risk Margins B 99.5% applied to distribution of Net Assets gives excess capital required for the overall SCR, which is then tested against the Opening Capital Discounted Liabilities (Ultimate) without Risk Margins Undiscounted Liabilities (Ultimate) without Risk Margins C D
8 Simulated balance sheet definitions after 1 year? GIRO 2009: A convenient procedure Opening Balance Sheet without Risk Margins in the Liabilities For each simulation Simulated Year 1 Balance Sheet Discounted Liabilities (1 Yr View) without Risk Margin B Excess capital calculated using 99.5% applied to distribution of Net Assets This is used to calculate the overall SCR which is then tested against the opening capital using a Balance Sheet WITH Risk Margins in the Liabilities Under what assumptions can we use a balance sheet definition without risk margins in simulation based internal capital models for calculating the overall SCR?
9 Simulated balance sheet definitions after 1 year? GIRO 2010: Simplification 1 - Constant Risk Margin Opening Balance Sheet with Risk Margin For each simulation Simulated Year 1 Balance Sheet Discounted Liabilities (1 Yr View) with constant Risk Margin Excess capital calculated using 99.5% applied to distribution of Net Assets This is equivalent to Option B, but there is no need to add the opening risk margin back in. Using a constant risk margin appears to be analogous to the assumptions underlying the QIS 5 standard formula (that is, the change in the risk margin is not considered)
10 Simulated balance sheet definitions after 1 year? GIRO 2010: Simplification 2 - Proportional Risk Margin Opening Balance Sheet with Risk Margin For each simulation Simulated Year 1 Balance Sheet Discounted Liabilities (1 Yr View) with proportional Risk Margin GIRO 2010: We could devise more complicated alternatives based on proportions where the risk margin is different for each simulation, giving the appearance of a better solution
11 The Important Question When calculating risk margins, it is impossible to satisfy the Solvency II requirements without simulation on simulation, which is impracticable Simplifications must be made When calculating the opening SCR for the risk margin calculations When calculating future SCRs Simplifications must be made for risk margins for each simulation on the 1 year ahead balance sheet Assume a constant risk margin? Use a simple ratio method? What we don t know is: What methods will be approved? The question can only be answered by the regulators, so we asked the FSA 10
12 What the FSA has said so far * At present there is no definitive answer We don t want to give an answer that turns out to be wrong QIS 5 is not final: it is only a test Do something sensible and explain why it's sensible Worry more about the technical provisions; the risk margin will usually be a lot smaller Proportionality should be borne in mind * Reported at GIRO 2010
13 Do something sensible, and explain why it is sensible So, this presentation considers how to obtain an opening risk margin for a Solvency II balance sheet from a simulation-based internal model, and also how to allocate that to line-of-business at the same time in a consistent way. It also considers how to obtain simulated risk margins for the 1-year ahead balance sheet by line of business and in total, using the same outputs.
14 Solvency Capital Requirements Non-Life Companies Asset Risk: Movement in market value of assets Default Risk on assets, reinsurance and debtors Operational risk Overall Company SCR Premium & Reserve risk on existing obligations Premium risk on new business Catastrophe risk on existing obligations and new business 13
15 The Risk Margin The risk margin is designed to ensure that the value of technical provisions is sufficient for another insurer to take over and meet the insurance obligations It is calculated by determining the cost of providing an amount of eligible own funds equal to the SCR necessary to support the obligations over their lifetime Approach Establish net best estimate technical provisions at each point over the lifetime of the liabilities Estimate the appropriate corresponding SCR at each point Apply the cost-of-capital charge factor Discount and sum It is calculated at the portfolio level, net of reinsurance only The risk margin should take into account underwriting risk, reinsurer default risk, operational risk and unavoidable market risk In practice for most non-life insurers, market risk can be ignored 14
16 Solvency Capital Requirements: Non-Life Companies Asset Risk: Movement in market value of assets Default Risk on assets, reinsurance and debtors Operational risk Default Risk on reinsurance and debtors Operational risk (existing liabilities) Overall Company SCR SCRs for Opening Risk Margin Premium & Reserve risk on existing obligations Premium risk on new business Catastrophe risk on existing and new business Premium & Reserve risk on existing obligations Catastrophe risk on existing obligations only 15
17 Calculating the Risk Margin TP5.9 COCM = COC SCR t 0 RU. t+ 1 (1 + rt + 1) ( t) where COCM = risk margin for the whole business COC = cost of capital rate SCR RU (t) = the SCR for year t as calculated for the reference undertaking r t = risk-free rate for maturity t 16
18 Risk Margin Example Time Best- Estimate Reserve (SCR) Capital Capital Charge (assuming 6% CoC rate) Discounted Capital Charge (assuming flat 2% discount rate) Total (Risk Margin =)
19 Risk-Margin Granularity The risk margin assumes transfer of all business, hence it can allow for diversification between all reserve elements, including lines of business However, technical provisions need to be estimated at class level (own segmentation, or at least no higher than Solvency II LoB level) Hence we need to produce risk margin at this level Sum of class risk margins should equal the total risk margin So we need a way of allocating the overall risk margin to class 18
20 Calculating the Risk Margin by Line of Business Possible Simplification TP 5.28 where COCM lob SCR RU, lob lob =. SCR RU, lob (0) (0) COCM COCM lob = risk margin allocated to line of business SCR RU,lob (0) = SCR of the reference undertaking for line of business at t=0 COCM = risk margin for the whole business Notes: 1) The concept of an SCR by lob is a strange one, and appears to be a relic of QIS 4 2) Although it is not clear from the documentation, the SCRs should be in respect prior year reserves and legally incepted business only (but include an allowance for operational risk and reinsurance default risk). 3) Using this formula, there is no requirement for the sum of capital requirements across lobs to equal the total capital requirement 19
21 Requirements An overall SCR Requires a distribution of the basic own funds after 1 year A risk margin on the opening balance sheet Requires future SCRs in respect of the opening technical provisions only An allocation of the opening risk margin to LoB Requires opening SCRs by LoB (in respect of the opening technical provisions only), at the very least More robust methods require opening and future SCRs by LoB Simulated risk margins for the 1 year ahead balance sheet (for the overall SCR calculation Just use a constant? (analogous to the standard formula approach) Proportional to the simulated expected technical provisions at T=1? Based on a cost-of-capital approach using future SCRs by LoB? 20
22 Desirable characteristics of a suitable method For the opening overall risk margin calculation, SCRs at each future period should recognise the changing profile of the liabilities (i.e. short vs long tailed) Opening risk margins by class should be additive to the overall risk margin (i.e. the allocation should be automatic) Simulated risk margins at t=1, 2, should recognise new business written in the intervening periods (and the changing mix by class), and retain their additivity Simulated risk margins at t=1, 2, should take account the (simulated) yield curve at each period 21
23 The Opening Risk Margin
24 The Opening Risk Margin We require a risk margin for the opening balance sheet This requires SCRs in respect of the opening technical provisions, for all future years How should those be calculated? Using the standard formula? Using output from the internal model? If an internal model is used for the overall SCR then it seems to make sense to use the output available where possible 23
25 The Opening Risk Margin in Internal Models First produce a suitable risk profile in order to calculate the initial SCR This should include the profit(/loss) over one-year arising from: Prior year reserves and expenses Unexpired risk and expenses Legally obliged (but unincepted) business Operational risk, RI default, and unavoidable market risk (not usually material) 99.5% will give the opening SCR amount for the risk margin calculation Then calculate future SCRs: In proportion to the emergence of the (expected) reserves in each future year in aggregate? By LoB? 24
26 Risk Margin Future SCRs QIS 5 Options 1. Make a full calculation of all future SCRs without using simplifications. 2. Approximate the individual risks or sub-risks within some or all modules and submodules to be used for the calculation of future SCRs. 3. Approximate the whole SCR for each future year, e.g. by using a proportional approach. 4. Estimate all future SCRs at once, e.g. by using an approximation based on the duration approach. 5. Approximate the risk margin by calculating it as a percentage of the best estimate. 25
27 Future SCR Calculation An Approach (For the opening risk margin) 1. Take the one-year profit/(loss) distribution of the net technical result by class for the existing business only as described earlier 2. Calculate the expected outstanding cash-flows by class for this business at each year end as the business runs off 3. Approximate the distribution of the profit/loss of the net technical result by class in future year t in proportion to the ratio of the expected outstanding cash-flows by class in future year t divided by the value at t=0* 4. Calculate the 99.5th percentile loss amount of the distributions in 3. to give the standalone SCR run-off by class before diversification. Call this SCR(pre-div) RM (0,class,t) 5. Aggregate the loss distributions in each year t and calculate the 99.5th percentile to give the total SCR run-off over time. Call this SCR RM (0,t) 6. Due to diversification, SCR RM (0,t) will typically be less than the sum of SCR(pre-div) RM (0,class,t) across classes. Hence scale SCR RM (0,class,t), such that Sum class (SCR RM (0,class,t)) = SCR RM (0,t). Note: alternative allocation approaches are possible. 7. Calculate the risk margin using the cost-of-capital approach at the class and total level (it will be additive, and will take account of the changing profile of the liabilities at the total level). * In step 3 we could instead assume that the distribution scales in proportion to a function of the expected outstanding cash-flows e.g. square root Assumptions The coefficient of variation of the one-year distribution around the expected technical provision (or function thereof) is the same at each year in the run-off within a class of business (proportional proxy) The dependency between classes is the same at each point in the run-off 26
28 Example
29 Risk Margins in the 1-Year Ahead Balance Sheets (and beyond?)
30 A Projected Balance Sheet View Remember, from Article 101, the SCR is calculated from a distribution of net assets over a 1 year time horizon So when we project one-year forwards, in addition to the (simulated) expected outstanding liabilities conditional on the payments in the year, we also need a risk margin for each simulation, in respect of the outstanding liabilities at that time. Opening Balance Sheet Year 1 Balance Sheet Simulations A L t=0 A L t=1 29
31 Simulated balance sheet definitions after 1 year? Simplification 1: Constant Risk Margin Opening Balance Sheet with Risk Margin For each simulation Simulated Year 1 Balance Sheet Discounted Liabilities (1 Yr View) with constant Risk Margin Excess capital calculated using 99.5% applied to distribution of Net Assets This is equivalent to excluding the risk margin in the capital model, then adding the opening risk margin back in. Using a constant risk margin appears to be analogous to the assumptions underlying the QIS 5 standard formula (that is, the change in the risk margin is not considered) 30
32 Simulated balance sheet definitions after 1 year? GIRO 2010: Simplification 2 - Proportional Risk Margin Opening Balance Sheet with Risk Margin For each simulation Simulated Year 1 Balance Sheet Discounted Liabilities (1 Yr View) with proportional Risk Margin GIRO 2010: We could devise more complicated alternatives based on proportions where the risk margin is different for each simulation, giving the appearance of a better solution
33 Projection of the Risk Margin Options 1. Fixed risk margin (i.e. set closing risk margin equal to the opening value) 2. Risk margin based on expected best-estimate closing reserves 3. Risk margin based on the simulated best-estimate closing reserves For example, if the risk margin is set as a constant proportion of the reserves we would have: BE t = 0 RM t = 0 BE t = 1 RM t = 1 Opt 1 Opt 2 Opt 3 High Average Low In this presentation, we are proposing a more complicated variation of options 2 and 3. 32
34 Projection of the Risk Margin Project the risk margin to t=1,2,3 etc. by using results from the t=0 calculation and making some further assumptions: 1. From the opening risk margin calculations, express the SCRs by class as a proportion of the expected outstanding cash-flows for each year*, i.e. calculate SCR RM (0,class,t) / Expected Outstanding(0,t) 2. For the one-year ahead risk margins, approximate the SCRs by class by multiplying the expected outstanding cash-flows** at t=1 by the ratio calculated at step 1 3. Sum across classes to give the overall SCR RM (1,t) 4. Calculate the risk margin using the cost-of-capital approach at the class and total level, using the (simulated) risk-free yield curve at t=1 Assumptions The same assumptions as for the t=0 calculations, plus the following: The coefficient of variation of the one-year loss distribution (in each simulation) within a class at t=1 is the same as at t=0 The diversification between classes at each point in the run-off is the same at t=0 and t=1 * Again, in step 1 we could instead assume that the distribution scales in proportion to a function of the expected outstanding cash-flows e.g. square root ** Based on the stochastic or deterministic reserves at t=1 33
35 Example
36 Implementation in Internal Models For the SCRs for the risk margin calculation, there are two implementation options: 1. Put the plumbing into the internal model to allow the risk margin calculations to be performed simultaneously with full model runs Partition the net technical result from the full model into separate components for the existing obligations (including legally obliged business) and new business, making sensible assumptions in respect of catastrophe exposures, reinsurance and expenses 2. Use the existing internal model without modification, but perform additional runs just for the risk margin calculations Modify the inputs so the model relates to the existing obligations only (including legally obliged business) excluding new business, making sensible assumptions in respect of catastrophe exposures, reinsurance and expenses 35
37 Summary There are many complications associated with risk margins under Solvency II: Risk margins are required for the opening balance sheet, and for each simulation at the 1 year ahead position Although a diversified risk margin can now be calculated under QIS 5, there is still a requirement to allocate the risk margin to line of business (TP ) This requires an opening SCR, as well as future SCRs for the cost of capital method This presentation proposes a new approach to calculating the opening risk margin using outputs from an internal model, and also considers how the risk margins might then be calculated for each simulation at the 1 year ahead position. The approach is simple and has many desirable characteristics 36
38 Questions or comments? Expressions of individual views by members of The Actuarial Profession and its staff are encouraged. The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter. 37
CEIOPS-DOC-36/09. (former CP 42) October 2009
CEIOPS-DOC-36/09 Final CEIOPS Advice for Level 2 Implementing Measures on Solvency II: Technical Provisions Article 86 (d) Calculation of the Risk Margin (former CP 42) October 2009 CEIOPS e.v. Westhafenplatz
Market Value Margin: Practical calculations under the Solvency II Cost of Capital approach
March 2012 N 18 Market Value Margin: Practical calculations under the Solvency II Cost of Capital approach By Mouna Daya-Viossat Centre d'études actuarielles Winner of the French «Young Actuaries Prize»
1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
Solvency Assessment and Management: Pillar 1 - Sub Committee Capital Requirements Task Group Discussion Document 73 (v 2) Treatment of new business in SCR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As for the Solvency II Framework
Solvency II Technical Provisions under solvency II Detailed Guidance. March 2010
Solvency II Technical Provisions under solvency II Detailed Guidance March 2010 CONTACT DETAILS For technical queries: Henry Johnson, Market Reserving and Capital 020 7327 5235 [email protected]
Solvency II Technical Provisions under solvency II Detailed Guidance. March 2011 update
Solvency II Technical Provisions under solvency II Detailed Guidance March 2011 update CONTACT DETAILS For technical queries: Henry Johnson, Market Reserving & Capital 020 7327 5235 [email protected]
Quantitative Impact Study 1 (QIS1) Summary Report for Belgium. 21 March 2006
Quantitative Impact Study 1 (QIS1) Summary Report for Belgium 21 March 2006 1 Quantitative Impact Study 1 (QIS1) Summary Report for Belgium INTRODUCTORY REMARKS...4 1. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS...4 1.1. Market
SOLVENCY II HEALTH INSURANCE
2014 Solvency II Health SOLVENCY II HEALTH INSURANCE 1 Overview 1.1 Background and scope The current UK regulatory reporting regime is based on the EU Solvency I Directives. Although the latest of those
SOLVENCY II LIFE INSURANCE
SOLVENCY II LIFE INSURANCE 1 Overview 1.1 Background and scope The current UK regulatory reporting regime is based on the EU Solvency I Directives. Although the latest of those Directives was implemented
A Primer for Calculating the Swiss Solvency Test Cost of Capital for a Market Value Margin
A Primer for Calculating the Swiss Solvency Test Cost of Capital for a Market Value Margin 26. April 2006 Philipp Keller Federal Office of Private Insurance [email protected] 1. Introduction
Solvency Assessment and Management: Capital Requirements Discussion Document 58 (v 3) SCR Structure Credit and Counterparty Default Risk
Solvency Assessment and Management: Capital Requirements Discussion Document 58 (v 3) SCR Structure Credit and Counterparty Default Risk EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Solvency II allows for credit and counterparty
Guidelines on the valuation of technical provisions
EIOPA-BoS-14/166 EN Guidelines on the valuation of technical provisions EIOPA Westhafen Tower, Westhafenplatz 1-60327 Frankfurt Germany - Tel. + 49 69-951119-20; Fax. + 49 69-951119-19; email: [email protected]
BEL best estimate liability, deduced from the mean loss as a present value of mean loss,
Calculations of SCR, Technical Provisions, Market Value Margin (MVM) using the Cost of Capital method, for a one-year risk horizon, based on an ICRFS-Plus single composite model and associated forecast
SOLVENCY II HEALTH INSURANCE
2016 Solvency II Health SOLVENCY II HEALTH INSURANCE 1 Overview 1.1 Background and scope The key objectives of Solvency II were to increase the level of harmonisation of solvency regulation across Europe,
Market-Consistent Valuation of the Sponsor Covenant and its use in Risk-Based Capital Assessment. Craig Turnbull FIA
Market-Consistent Valuation of the Sponsor Covenant and its use in Risk-Based Capital Assessment Craig Turnbull FIA Background and Research Objectives 2 Background: DB Pensions and Risk + Aggregate deficits
Best Estimate of the Technical Provisions
Best Estimate of the Technical Provisions FSI Regional Seminar for Supervisors in Africa on Risk Based Supervision Mombasa, Kenya, 14-17 September 2010 Leigh McMahon BA FIAA GAICD Senior Manager, Diversified
Solvency II for Beginners 16.05.2013
Solvency II for Beginners 16.05.2013 Agenda Why has Solvency II been created? Structure of Solvency II The Solvency II Balance Sheet Pillar II & III Aspects Where are we now? Solvency II & Actuaries Why
Solvency II Introduction to Pillar 3. Friday 20 th May 2016
Solvency II Introduction to Pillar 3 Friday 20 th May 2016 Disclaimer The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter(s) and not necessarily of the Society of Actuaries in Ireland Introduction
Treatment of technical provisions under Solvency II
Treatment of technical provisions under Solvency II Quantitative methods, qualitative requirements and disclosure obligations Authors Martin Brosemer Dr. Susanne Lepschi Dr. Katja Lord Contact [email protected]
SOLVENCY II LIFE INSURANCE
2016 Solvency II Life SOLVENCY II LIFE INSURANCE 1 Overview 1.1 Background and scope The key objectives of Solvency II were to increase the level of harmonisation of solvency regulation across Europe,
International Financial Reporting for Insurers: IFRS and U.S. GAAP September 2009 Session 25: Solvency II vs. IFRS
International Financial Reporting for Insurers: IFRS and U.S. GAAP September 2009 Session 25: Solvency II vs. IFRS Simon Walpole Solvency II Simon Walpole Solvency II Agenda Introduction to Solvency II
CEIOPS-DOC-45/09. (former CP 53) October 2009
CEIOPS-DOC-45/09 CEIOPS Advice for Level 2 Implementing Measures on Solvency II: SCR standard formula - Article 111 (f) Operational Risk (former CP 53) October 2009 CEIOPS e.v. Westhafenplatz 1-60327 Frankfurt
Solvency 2 Preparatory Phase. Comparison with LTGA specifications. June 2014
Solvency 2 Preparatory Phase Comparison with LTGA specifications June 2014 Summary This document presents: An analysis of the main changes between the Technical Specifications of the Long Term Guarantee
An update on QIS5. Agenda 4/27/2010. Context, scope and timelines The draft Technical Specification Getting into gear Questions
A Closer Look at Solvency II Eleanor Beamond-Pepler, FSA An update on QIS5 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk Agenda Context, scope and timelines The draft Technical Specification Getting
Methodology. Discounting. MVM Methods
Methodology In this section, we describe the approaches taken to calculate the fair value of the insurance loss reserves for the companies, lines, and valuation dates in our study. We also describe a variety
THE INSURANCE BUSINESS (SOLVENCY) RULES 2015
THE INSURANCE BUSINESS (SOLVENCY) RULES 2015 Table of Contents Part 1 Introduction... 2 Part 2 Capital Adequacy... 4 Part 3 MCR... 7 Part 4 PCR... 10 Part 5 - Internal Model... 23 Part 6 Valuation... 34
Solvency II Standard Model for Health Insurance Business
Solvency II Standard Model for Health Insurance Business Hanno Reich KPMG AG, Germany kpmg Agenda 1. Solvency II Project 2. Future regulatory framework (Solvency II) 3. Calculation of Solvency Capital
Solvency II. PwC. *connected thinking. Internal models requirements and an example
Solvency II Internal models requirements and an example *connected thinking PwC Solvency II introduced the possibility to use an internal model to estimate solvency capital requirements (SCR) No cherry-picking
Preparing for ORSA - Some practical issues Speaker:
2013 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l actuaire désigné 2013 Session 13: Preparing for ORSA - Some practical issues Speaker: André Racine, Principal Eckler Ltd. Context of ORSA Agenda Place
Introduction to Solvency II
Introduction to Solvency II Tim Edwards Gavin Dunkerley 24 th September 2008 Introduction The primary purpose of this presentation is to explain what Solvency II is and why it is important We also hope
Insights. Understanding market value margins in options prices. September 2009. Background
Insights September 2009 Understanding market value margins in options prices John Hibbert [email protected] At the heart of the emerging Solvency II regulations is the idea that both assets and
Embedded Value Report
Embedded Value Report 2012 ACHMEA EMBEDDED VALUE REPORT 2012 Contents Management summary 3 Introduction 4 Embedded Value Results 5 Value Added by New Business 6 Analysis of Change 7 Sensitivities 9 Impact
Fifth Quantitative Impact Study of Solvency II (QIS5)
Fifth Quantitative Impact Study of Solvency II (QIS5) Guidance on the treatment of German accident insurance with guaranteed premium repayment in the solvency balance sheet of QIS5 Introduction The UBR
EIOPA technical specifications for Long-Term Guarantee Assessment. January 2013. Milliman Solvency II Update
EIOPA technical specifications for Long-Term Guarantee Assessment January 2013 The Long-Term Guarantee Assessment requires participating firms to test the application of the proposed package of measures
Matching Investment Strategies in General Insurance Is it Worth It? Aim of Presentation. Background 34TH ANNUAL GIRO CONVENTION
Matching Investment Strategies in General Insurance Is it Worth It? 34TH ANNUAL GIRO CONVENTION CELTIC MANOR RESORT, NEWPORT, WALES Aim of Presentation To answer a key question: What are the benefit of
Solvency II Standard Formula and NAIC Risk-Based Capital (RBC)
Solvency II Standard Formula and NAIC Risk-Based Capital (RBC) Report 3 of the CAS Risk-Based Capital (RBC) Research Working Parties Issued by the RBC Dependencies and Calibration Working Party (DCWP)
The package of measures to avoid artificial volatility and pro-cyclicality
The package of measures to avoid artificial volatility and pro-cyclicality Explanation of the measures and the need to include them in the Solvency II framework Contents 1. Key messages 2. Why the package
SOLVENCY II Level 2 Implementing Measures
SOLVENCY II Level 2 Implementing Measures Executive Summary Position After the Three Waves of Consultation Papers and the Quantitative Impact Study 5 Technical Specifications August 2010 The data and information
CEIOPS Preparatory Field Study for Life Insurance Firms. Summary Report
CEIOPS-FS-08/05 S CEIOPS Preparatory Field Study for Life Insurance Firms Summary Report 1 GENERAL OBSERVATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 1.1 Introduction CEIOPS has been asked to prepare advice for the European
Solvency II Pillar III Quantitative Reporting Templates (QRTs) Sinead Clarke, Eoin King 11 th December 2012
Solvency II Pillar III Quantitative Reporting Templates (QRTs) Sinead Clarke, Eoin King 11 th December 2012 Agenda Introduction and Background Summary of QRTs Reporting Timelines and Next Steps Questions
Revised Annexes to the Technical Specifications for the Solvency II valuation and Solvency Capital Requirements calculations (Part I)
EIOPA-DOC-12/467 21 December 2012 Revised Annexes to the Technical Specifications for the Solvency II valuation and Solvency Capital Requirements calculations (Part I) 1 TABLE OF CONTENT ANNEX A - DEFINITION
Micro Simulation Study of Life Insurance Business
Micro Simulation Study of Life Insurance Business Lauri Saraste, LocalTapiola Group, Finland Timo Salminen, Model IT, Finland Lasse Koskinen, Aalto University & Model IT, Finland Agenda Big Data is here!
CEIOPS-DOC-47/09. (former CP 55) October 2009
CEIOPS-DOC-47/09 Final CEIOPS Advice for Level 2 Implementing Measures on Solvency II: Article 130 Calculation of the MCR (former CP 55) October 2009 CEIOPS e.v. Westhafenplatz 1-60327 Frankfurt Germany
INVESTMENT FUNDS: Funds investments. KPMG Business DialogueS November 4 th 2011
INVESTMENT FUNDS: Impact of Solvency II Directive on Funds investments KPMG Business DialogueS November 4 th 2011 Map of the presentation Introduction The first consequences for asset managers and investors
Guidelines on ring-fenced funds
EIOPA-BoS-14/169 EN Guidelines on ring-fenced funds EIOPA Westhafen Tower, Westhafenplatz 1-60327 Frankfurt Germany - Tel. + 49 69-951119-20; Fax. + 49 69-951119-19; email: [email protected] site: https://eiopa.europa.eu/
LIFE INSURANCE CAPITAL FRAMEWORK STANDARD APPROACH
LIFE INSURANCE CAPITAL FRAMEWORK STANDARD APPROACH Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Process... 2 and Methodology... 3 Core Concepts... 3 Total Asset Requirement... 3 Solvency Buffer... 4 Framework Details...
CEIOPS-QIS5-06/10 6 September 2010
CEIOPS-QIS5-06/10 6 September 2010 Manual for the completion of the QIS5 spreadsheet (for solo undertakings) Please note that this manual is not part of the formal QIS5 documentation as issued by the European
The standard formula requires further adjustments
EIOPA publishes the results of the fifth quantitative impact study (QIS5) The standard formula requires further adjustments Authors Martin Brosemer Dr. Kathleen Ehrlich Dr. Norbert Kuschel Lars Moormann
Property Casualty Insurer Economic Capital using a VAR Model Thomas Conway and Mark McCluskey
Property Casualty Insurer Economic Capital using a VAR Model Thomas Conway and Mark McCluskey Concept The purpose of this paper is to build a bridge between the traditional methods of looking at financial
SCOR inform - April 2012. Life (re)insurance under Solvency II
SCOR inform - April 2012 Life (re)insurance under Solvency II Life (re)insurance under Solvency II Author Thorsten Keil SCOR Global Life Cologne Editor Bérangère Mainguy Tel: +33 (0)1 58 44 70 00 Fax:
ORSA for Dummies. Institute of Risk Management Solvency II Group April 17th 2012. Peter Taylor
ORSA for Dummies Institute of Risk Management Solvency II Group April 17th 2012 Peter Taylor ORSA for - the Dummies heart of Solvency II Institute of Risk Management Solvency II Group April 17th 2012 Peter
ERM-2: Introduction to Economic Capital Modeling
ERM-2: Introduction to Economic Capital Modeling 2011 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar, Las Vegas, NV A presentation by François Morin September 15, 2011 2011 Towers Watson. All rights reserved. INTRODUCTION
CEIOPS-DOC-70/10 29 January 2010. (former Consultation Paper 74)
CEIOPS-DOC-70/10 29 January 2010 CEIOPS Advice for Level 2 Implementing Measures on Solvency II: SCR STANDARD FORMULA Article 111(d) Correlations (former Consultation Paper 74) CEIOPS e.v. Westhafenplatz
Feedback on the 2012 thematic review of technical provisions
Feedback on the 2012 thematic review of technical provisions Introduction Background In late 2012 the FSA published a question bank 1 on Solvency II (SII) technical provisions for completion by general
Solvency II in practice. Speaker: Tim O Hanrahan Deputy Head, Insurance, Central Bank of Ireland 16 March 2016
1 Solvency II in practice Speaker: Tim O Hanrahan Deputy Head, Insurance, Central Bank of Ireland 16 March 2016 1 Recap on Solvency II Regulatory Framework under Solvency II Pillar I - Capital Pillar II
VALUATION OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES FOR SOLVENCY PURPOSES IN LONG TERM INSURANCE DRAFT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TS14-01(D)
VALUATION OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES FOR SOLVENCY PURPOSES IN LONG TERM INSURANCE DRAFT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TS14-01(D) This paper is issued by the Insurance and Pensions Authority ( the IPA ), the regulatory
How To Calculate Multi-Year Horizon Risk Capital For Non-Life Insurance Risk
The Multi-Year Non-Life Insurance Risk Dorothea Diers, Martin Eling, Christian Kraus und Marc Linde Preprint Series: 2011-11 Fakultät für Mathematik und Wirtschaftswissenschaften UNIVERSITÄT ULM The Multi-Year
Towards the strengthening and moderinsation of insurance and surety regulation
Non-Life Insurance Technical Provisions i Towards the strengthening and moderinsation of insurance and surety regulation XXI International Seminar on Insurance and Surety, November 2010, Mexico City Olaf
Financial Condition Reporting Recalibration Project
Financial Condition Reporting for South African Short Term Insurers Recalibration Project December 2009 December 2009 Contents 1 Executive Summary... 1 1. Introduction... 1 2. Results... 1 3. Conclusion...
Considerations on the Discount Rate in the Cost of Capital method for the Risk Margin
Considerations on the Discount Rate in the Cost of Capital method for the Risk Margin Hans Waszink MSc. AAG MBA WaszinkActuarial Advisory ASTIN The Hague 2013 [email protected] Introduction What this
Runoff of the Claims Reserving Uncertainty in Non-Life Insurance: A Case Study
1 Runoff of the Claims Reserving Uncertainty in Non-Life Insurance: A Case Study Mario V. Wüthrich Abstract: The market-consistent value of insurance liabilities consists of the best-estimate prediction
THE MULTI-YEAR NON-LIFE INSURANCE RISK
THE MULTI-YEAR NON-LIFE INSURANCE RISK MARTIN ELING DOROTHEA DIERS MARC LINDE CHRISTIAN KRAUS WORKING PAPERS ON RISK MANAGEMENT AND INSURANCE NO. 96 EDITED BY HATO SCHMEISER CHAIR FOR RISK MANAGEMENT AND
CEIOPS-DOC-33/09. (former CP 39) October 2009
CEIOPS-DOC-33/09 CEIOPS Advice for Level 2 Implementing Measures on Solvency II: Technical provisions Article 86 a Actuarial and statistical methodologies to calculate the best estimate (former CP 39)
Fourth study of the Solvency II standard approach
Solvency Consulting Knowledge Series Your contacts Kathleen Ehrlich Tel.: +49 (89) 38 91-27 77 E-mail: [email protected] Dr. Rolf Stölting Tel.: +49 (89) 38 91-52 28 E-mail: [email protected]
Guidance for the Development of a Models-Based Solvency Framework for Canadian Life Insurance Companies
Guidance for the Development of a Models-Based Solvency Framework for Canadian Life Insurance Companies January 2010 Background The MCCSR Advisory Committee was established to develop proposals for a new
Insurance Groups under Solvency II
Insurance Groups under Solvency II November 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 2 2. Defining an insurance group... 2 3. Cases of application of group supervision... 6 4. The scope of group supervision...
Solvency II. Solvency II implemented on 1 January 2016. Why replace Solvency I? To which insurance companies does the new framework apply?
Solvency II A new framework for prudential supervision of insurance companies 1 Solvency II implemented on 1 January 2016. 1 January 2016 marks the introduction of Solvency II, a new framework for the
The Next Generation of the Minimum Capital Test - A Canadian Regulatory Capital Framework
CIA Annual General Meeting The Next Generation of the Minimum Capital Test - A Canadian Regulatory Capital Framework June 21, 2013 Judith Roberge, Director, Capital Division Chris Townsend, Managing Director,
SOLVENCY II GENERAL INSURANCE
SOLVENCY II GENERAL INSURANCE 1 Solvency II 1.1 Background to development of Solvency II During the development of Solvency II key objectives were maintained: to increase the level of harmonisation of
Least Squares Monte Carlo for fast and robust capital projections
Least Squares Monte Carlo for fast and robust capital projections 5 February 2013 INTRODUCTION Reliable capital projections are necessary for management purposes. For an insurer operating in the Solvency
Case Study Modeling Longevity Risk for Solvency II
Case Study Modeling Longevity Risk for Solvency II September 8, 2012 Longevity 8 Conference Waterloo, Ontario Presented by Stuart Silverman Principal & Consulting Actuary Background SOLVENCY II New Minimum
Solvency II: Hot topics for life insurers from the latest draft level 2 and level 3 measures. Jim Murphy Andrew Kay
Solvency II: Hot topics for life insurers from the latest draft level 2 and level 3 measures Jim Murphy Andrew Kay Solvency II Framework slide 2 Pillar 1 Solvency II Framework Pillar 2 Pillar 3 Measurement
Preparing for Solvency II Theoretical and Practical Issues in Building Internal Economic Capital Models Using Nested Stochastic Projections
Preparing for Solvency II Theoretical and Practical Issues in Building Internal Economic Capital Models Using Nested Stochastic Projections m i l l i m a n i n c. January 2006 Prepared by: Ed Morgan, Marc
Solvency Standard for Captive Insurers Transacting Non-life Insurance Business 2014
Solvency Standard for Captive Insurers Transacting Non-life Insurance Business 2014 Prudential Supervision Department Issued: December 2014 2 1. Introduction 1.1. Authority 1. This solvency standard is
CONSULTATION PAPER P003-20
CONSULTATION PAPER P003-20 20 Re ramework Insur PREFACE The Risk-Based Capital ( RBC ) framework for insurance companies was first introduced in Singapore in 2004. It adopts a risk-focused approach to
SA QIS3 Key changes and challenges The end is in sight
SA QIS3 Key changes and challenges The end is in sight December 2013 Contents Introduction 1 Balance sheet 2 Assets and liabilities other than technical provisions 3 Technical provisions 4 Segmentation
Stochastic Analysis of Long-Term Multiple-Decrement Contracts
Stochastic Analysis of Long-Term Multiple-Decrement Contracts Matthew Clark, FSA, MAAA, and Chad Runchey, FSA, MAAA Ernst & Young LLP Published in the July 2008 issue of the Actuarial Practice Forum Copyright
Central Bank of Ireland Guidelines on Preparing for Solvency II Pre-application for Internal Models
2013 Central Bank of Ireland Guidelines on Preparing for Solvency II Pre-application for Internal Models 1 Contents 1 Context... 1 2 General... 2 3 Guidelines on Pre-application for Internal Models...
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS
Standard No. 13 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS STANDARD ON ASSET-LIABILITY MANAGEMENT OCTOBER 2006 This document was prepared by the Solvency and Actuarial Issues Subcommittee in consultation
GN47: Stochastic Modelling of Economic Risks in Life Insurance
GN47: Stochastic Modelling of Economic Risks in Life Insurance Classification Recommended Practice MEMBERS ARE REMINDED THAT THEY MUST ALWAYS COMPLY WITH THE PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT STANDARDS (PCS) AND THAT
Capital requirements for health insurance under Solvency II
Capital requirements for health insurance under Solvency II Medical Expense Insurance: Actuarial Aspects and Solvency Afternoon Seminar at the AG Insurance Chair in Health Insurance, KU Leuven 25 April
Premium Liabilities. Melissa Yan
Premium Liabilities Melissa Yan Short definition Introduction Liabilities arising from the insurer s unexpired risk at the balance date Regulatory reporting since July 2002 Determine minimum capital requirement
List of critical errors in internal models of insurance undertakings
List of critical errors in internal models of insurance undertakings Warsaw, 7 April 2015 Contents Contents... 2 Introduction... 3 USE TEST... 5 Critical error 1... 5 Critical error 2 (effective 1 January
SUMMARY OF SCHEME AND INDEPENDENT EXPERT'S REPORT. Proposed transfer of the insurance business of Cardrow Insurance Limited to Tenecom Limited
SUMMARY OF SCHEME AND INDEPENDENT EXPERT'S REPORT Proposed transfer of the insurance business of Cardrow Insurance Limited to Tenecom Limited PART I: SUMMARY OF THE TERMS OF THE SCHEME 1. OVERVIEW 1.1.
Solvency II and Predictive Analytics in LTC and Beyond HOW U.S. COMPANIES CAN IMPROVE ERM BY USING ADVANCED
Solvency II and Predictive Analytics in LTC and Beyond HOW U.S. COMPANIES CAN IMPROVE ERM BY USING ADVANCED TECHNIQUES DEVELOPED FOR SOLVENCY II AND EMERGING PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS METHODS H o w a r d Z
Projection of the With-Profits Balance Sheet under ICA+ John Lim (KPMG) & Richard Taylor (AEGON) 11 November 2013
Projection of the With-Profits Balance Sheet under ICA+ John Lim (KPMG) & Richard Taylor (AEGON) 11 November 2013 Introduction Projecting the with-profits business explicitly is already carried out by
Aviva Insurance Limited
Annual FSA Insurance Returns for the ended st December (Appendices 9.1, 9.2, 9.5, 9.6) Produced using BestESP Services - UK Year ended st December Contents Page Appendix 9.1 Form 1 Statement of solvency
