arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 14 Nov 2012

Transcription

1 Jets in heavy ion collisions with ALAS Martin Spousta (for the ALAS Collaboration) Columbia University in the city of New York, Charles University in Prague arxiv:.3334v [hep-ex] 4 Nov Abstract he energy loss of high-p partons provides insight into the transport properties of the medium created in relativistic heavy ion collisions. Evidence for this energy loss was first experimentally established through observation of high-p hadron suppression at RHIC. More recently, measurements of fully reconstructed jets have been performed at the LHC. In this summary the latest experimental results from the ALAS collaboration on jet suppression are presented. In particular the jet suppression in inclusive jet yields, path length dependence of the jet suppression, photon-jet and Z -jet correlations, heavy flavor suppression, and jet fragmentation are discussed. hese results establish qualitative features of the jet quenching mechanism as experimental fact and provide constraints on models of jet energy loss.. Introduction Collisions of lead ions at Large Hadron Collider (LHC) are expected to create a strongly interacting matter in which quarks and gluons are locally deconfined. Jets produced in hard scattering are expected to be modified due to the energy loss of outgoing parton traversing the hot QCD medium. his effect is commonly referred to as a jet quenching. Jets therefore represent an important tool for studying both the properties of the deconfined matter and the parton energy loss []. In this paper we will provide a status report on jet measurements performed using the and Pb+Pb data at s NN =.76 evcollected by the ALAS detector []. he first evidence of the jet quenching at LHC has been observed in the measurement of the di-jet asymmetry [3]. In central heavy ion collisions an excess of events with large di-jet asymmetry has been observed when compared to p+p or Pb+Pb Monte Carlo (MC) reference. his asymmetry has been accompanied by a balance in azimuth, that is jets in the di-jet system remain back-to-back despite to a sizable modification of their energy. his measurement is an observation measurement and by itself it is insufficient to provide detailed information about the parton energy loss. o gain more information we need to ask more detailed questions: We need to know how does the modification of the inclusive jet spectra depend on the jet p, jet size, or direction of the jet with respect to the reaction plane. We also need to know whether the suppression depends on the flavor of the initial parton. Last but not least we should learn how is the internal structure of jets modified. hese questions will be addressed in the sections 4-7. Section summarizes the event selection and centrality definition, section 3 discusses the jet reconstruction performance. A list of members of the ALAS Collaboration and acknowledgements can be found at the end of this issue. Preprint submitted to Nuclear Physics A November 5,

2 . Event selection and centrality definition Analyses presented in this summary use or LHC heavy ion runs, colliding nuclei at s NN =.76 ev. he run collected approximately 7 µb whereas run collected.4 nb. Minimum bias Pb+Pb collisions were identified using measurements from the zerodegree calorimeters (ZDCs) and the minimum-bias trigger scintillator (MBS) counters. In the offline analysis, events were required to have a primary vertex reconstructed from charged particle tracks with p > 5 MeV. he data-taking used only the minimum bias trigger whereas the in the run, events were selected for recording using a combination of the minimum bias trigger and high-level trigger (HL). he HL triggered on jets, high-p photons, electrons, and muons. he centrality of each heavy ion collision is determined using the sum of the transverse energy in all cells in the forward calorimeter (3. < η < 4.9), at the electromagnetic scale. he average number of nucleon-nucleon collisions, N coll, and the average number of participating nucleons, N part, were calculated using the standard MC Glauber model [4]. 3. Jet reconstruction performance Jets discussed in this summary has been reconstructed at the calorimeter level using the anti-k algorithm [5]. he elliptic flow modulated underlying event contribution to the reconstructed jets has been subtracted on the event-by-event basis. All the discussed measurements have been corrected to the particle level by unfolding procedures such that they can be directly compared to theoretical models. o evaluate the combined performance of the ALAS detector and the jet reconstruction procedures the MC PYHIA [7] di-jet events were embedded into HIJING [8] minimum bias events. he reference PYHIA jets were reconstructed using the PYHIA final-state particles by the anti-k algorithm with different radius parameters of R =.,.3,.4, and.5. Separately, the presence and approximate kinematics of HIJING-generated jets were obtained by running R =.4 anti-k reconstruction on final-state HIJING particles having p > 4 GeV. o prevent the overlap of PYHIA and HIJING jets from distorting the jet performance evaluated relative to PYHIA jets, all PYHIA jets within R = η + φ =.8 of a p > GeV HIJING jet were excluded from the analysis. o eliminate jets originating from the underlying event fluctuations ( UE-jets ) the calorimeter jets were required to match a jet reconstructed from inner detector tracks or an electromagnetic cluster 3. PYHIA jets passing the HIJING-jet exclusion were matched to the closest reconstructed jet of the same R value within R =.. he resulting matched jets were used to evaluate the jet energy resolution (JER) and the jet energy scale (JES). he jet reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of jets for which a matching reconstructed jet is found. he efficiency was evaluated both prior to (ε) and following (ε ) UE-jet rejection described above. Figure shows a summary of the jet reconstruction performance for anti-k R =. and R =.4 jets. he ZDCs are located symmetrically at z = ±4 m from the interaction point and cover η > 8.3. In Pb+Pb collisions the ZDCs primarily measure spectator neutrons, that is neutrons from the incident nuclei that do not interact hadronically. he MBS measures charged particles over. < η < Inner detector track jets were reconstructed by the anti-k R =.4 algorithm from tracks with p > 4 GeV and were required to have p > 7 GeV. Electromagnetic clusters were reconstructed from cells in the electromagnetic calorimeter and were required to have p > 7 GeV.

3 σ [ E ]/E or E /E ALAS simulation.4 anti-k t R =.4.3 σ [ E ]/E σ [ E ]/E + fit, -% + fit, 6-8% σ [ E ]/E. E /E, -% E /E, 6-8% or. /E E ALAS simulation.4 anti-k t R =..3 σ [ E ]/E σ [ E ]/E + fit, -% + fit, 6-8%. E /E, -% E /E, 6-8%. Efficiency ε, -% ε, 6-8% ε', -% ε', 6-8% Efficiency ε, -% ε, 6-8% ε', -% ε', 6-8% [GeV] E [GeV] E Figure : Results of MC evaluation of jet reconstruction performance in -% and 6-8% collisions as a function of jet E for R =. (left) and R =.4 (right) jets [6]. op: jet energy resolution σ[ (E )]/E and jet energy scale closure E /E. Solid curve show the parametrization of the JER as described in the text. Bottom: Efficiencies, ε and ε, for reconstructing jets before and after application of UE-jet removal, respectively. he JER was characterized by σ[ (E )]/E, where σ[ (E )] is the standard deviation of the E = E reco E distribution. he JES closure was evaluated from the mean fractional energy shift, E /E. he JER was found to be well described by a quadrature sum of three terms, σ[ (E )]/E = a/ E b/e c, () where a and c represent the usual sampling and constant contributions to calorimeter resolution. he term containing b describes the contribution of the underlying event fluctuations to the JER. his contribution can be independently evaluated by measuring the transverse energy fluctuations in the minimum bias events. his has been done in the fluctuation analysis reported in Ref. [9]. A good consistency between the results of the fluctuation analysis and the parametrization of the JER has been achieved. Simultaneously, a good agreement between the fluctuations in the data and HIJING has been observed. he jet reconstruction efficiency decreases with decreasing jet E for E 5 GeV. he decrease starts at larger E and decreases more rapidly for larger jet radii and in more central collisions. An independent check of the basic performance has been done by using PYHIA jets embedded directly to the minimum bias data. he reconstruction efficiency was found to differ between central and peripheral collisions by less then 5% on the rise of the efficiency curve for R =.4 jets and the agreement in the JES was found to be better then a % between central and peripheral collisions. More details about the jet reconstruction procedures as well as the jet performance can be found in Ref. [6]. 3

4 R CP ALAS.5 R =.4 anti-k t Pb+Pb s =.76 ev NN - L dt = 7 µb % 3-4 % - %. /R CP R R CP Pb+Pb L dt =.76 ev s NN - = 7 µb ALAS - % R =.3 R =.4 R = % Figure : Left: Jet R CP values as a function of jet p for R =.4 anti-k jets in two bins of collisions centrality. Right: Ratios of jet R CP values between R =.3,.4, and.5 jets and R =. jets as a function of p in the -% centrality bin. In both panels, the error bars show statistical uncertainties, shaded boxes indicate partially correlated systematic errors. he lines indicate systematic errors that are fully correlated between different p bins [6]. 4. Inclusive jet suppression he first step beyond the original asymmetry measurement is to measure the suppression in the inclusive jet yields. o quantify the suppression we introduce the jet R CP, defined as a fraction of per-event normalized jet yield, ˆN, measured in a given centrality bin to the per-event normalized jet yield measured in the 6-8% most peripheral collisions, that is R cent CP = (/Rcent coll )( ˆN cent / ˆN 6 8 ), () where R cent coll is the central-to-peripheral ratio of number of binary collisions. he jet R CP has been measured for six centrality bins, cent {-%, -%, -3%, 3-4%, 4-5%, 5-6%}. he resulting jet R CP evaluated as a function of jet p for -% central and 5-6% peripheral collisions is presented in the left panel of Figure. One can see that the jet R CP in the most central collision does not exhibit any strong dependence on the jet p. A suppression by a factor of two of inclusive jet yields in -% central with respect to 6-8% peripheral collisions can be observed. he dependence of the jet suppression on the jet size is summarized in the right panel of Figure in terms of the ratio of R CP values between R =.3,.4, and.5 jets and R =. jets, R CP R /R CP., as a function of p for the -% centrality bin. his result indicates a significant dependence of R CP on the jet radius. For p < GeV the R CP R /R CP. values for both R =.4 and R =.5 differ from one beyond the statistical and systematic uncertainties. his deviation persists well beyond GeV and is also present in -% centrality bin. However, the direct comparisons of R CP between different jet radii at low p should be treated with care as the same jets measured using smaller radii will tend to appear in lower p bins than when measured with a larger radius. Further details on the inclusive jet suppression can be found in Ref. [6]. 4

5 R φ. 5 - % - % - 3% Not reviewed, for internal circulation only R φ ALAS preliminary R =. anti-k t 3-4% % π/8 < φ < π/4 π/4 < φ < 3π/8 3π/8 < φ < π/ 5 5 Pb+Pb L 5-6% =.76 ev s NN - dt =.4 nb 5 5 Figure Figure 3: Azimuthal 8: R φ as dependence a functionof ofthe p jet forsuppression three bins of measured φ evaluated in terms relative of R φ to the as a function < φ < of π/8 jetbin p forthe three bins of the different angle to centrality the ellipticbins flowincluded event plan, in this φ analysis., evaluated Error relative bars show to thestatistical < φ < uncertainties, π/8. Error shaded bars show boxes statistical uncertainties, indicateshaded systematic boxesuncertainties. indicate systematic uncertainties []. References o get more insight into the dependence of the jet suppression on the path length the original parton[] would A. Majumder have traversed and M. Van trough Leeuwen, the medium he heorythe andvariation Phenomenology of inclusive of Perturbative jet yields QCDasBaseda function of azimuthal Jet Quenching, angle, φ Prog., withpart. respect Nucl. Phys. to thea66 elliptic () flow 4 9, event arxiv:.6. plane was measured. his variation can be quantified using the ratio of jet yield in one φ bin i to another j, R φ, defined by [] ALAS Collaboration, Observation of a Centrality-Dependent Dijet Asymmetry in Lead-Lead Collisions at s NN =.76 ev with the ALAS Detector at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5 () 533, arxiv:.68. d Y(p, φ) N(p,φ) φ= φ [3] CMS Collaboration, R φ Observation = i dp dφ φ= φ and studies of jet = i Y(p quenching in PbPb collisions at s NN =.76, φ) d ev., Phys. Rev. C 84 () 496,.957. φ= φ N(p (3),φ) j dp dφ φ= φ j where[4] thealas jet yield Collaboration, Y(p, φ) Measurement is measuredofin thefour jet radius φ and transverse momentum dependence of inclusive jet suppression in lead-lead collisions at bins spanning equidistantly the range < φ < π/. he resulting R s NN =.76 ev with the ALAS detector, arxiv: φ distributions plotted as a function of jet p are shown in Figure 3. A clear reduction of the jet yield with increasing φ is observed. For example, in the -3% centrality [5] M. bin, Gyulassy, jets produced I. Vitev, and in the X. Wang, direction Highperpendicular p azimuthal asymmetry to the elliptic in non-central flow event A+A at plane RHIC, (3π/8 < φ < π/) Phys. are Rev. suppressed Lett. 86 () by , 5% witharxiv:nucl-th/9 respect to jets produced[nucl-th]. in the direction of the elliptic flow plane [6] PHENIX ( < Collaboration, φ < π/8). S. Adler Another et al., way A Detailed to quantify Study of the High-p azimuthal Neutral Pion dependence Suppressionof the jet suppression andisazimuthal to measure Anisotropy the elliptic in Au+Au flow Collisions parameter at sof NN jets, = -GeV, v jet jet. he Phys. vrev. was C76 found (7) to decrease with increasing 3494, centrality nucl-ex/67. and to have a characteristic centrality dependence known from elliptic flow measurements [7] PHENIX Collaboration, of single particles A. Adare et[]. al., Azimuthal he v jet anisotropy of neutral pion production in Au+Au collisions at reaches its maximum of.4.5 in mid-central collisions (N part s= NN = GeV: ) Path-length for jets with dependence p = 45 of jet quenching 6 GeV. and More the details role of on the azimuthalinitial dependence geometry, of Phys. inclusive Rev. Lett. jet5 suppression () 43, canarxiv: be found in Ref. []. [8] ALAS Collaboration, Measurement of the pseudorapidity and transverse momentum dependence 5. Photon-jet of the elliptic and Zflow -jet ofcorrelations charged particles in lead-lead collisions at s NN =.76 ev with the ALAS detector, Phys. Lett. B77 () , arxiv:8.68. he fact that the measured jet suppression at LHC is not an effect of initial state modifications was proven by the measurement of inclusive yields of prompt photons [] and inclusive yields 3 of W ±, Z vector bosons [3, 4] which do not exhibit any suppression in central heavy ion collisions. Since photons and vector bosons are insensitive to the colored medium they can provide means to calibrate the expected energy of quenched jet in a photon-jet system or in a Z -jet system. he quenching of the jet in the photon-jet sample can be quantified by measuring 5

6 the jet to photon energy ratio, x Jγ = p jet /p γ. he left panel of Figure 4 shows the integrated per-photon jet yield, R Jγ, evaluated as a function of the number of participants for data and MC. A clear suppression of the jet yield is seen in central compared to peripheral collisions. he measurement is performed for two different jet sizes, R =. and R =.3 providing the same result within the systematic uncertainties. Qualitatively the same result has been obtained also from the Z -jet correlation measurements in which the Z have been identified from the e + e and µ + µ decays. he same trend in the evolution of the jet suppression as a function of centrality has been observed despite to the limited statistics of less then forty Z -jet events. hese results provide a starting point for precision measurements of the jet quenching which will be allowed by future high luminosity heavy ion runs at LHC. More details on γ-jet correlations are provided in Ref. [5], details on Z -jet correlations are provided in Ref. [6]. 6. Heavy flavor suppression o access the difference between the jet suppression of heavy quarks and light quarks the semi-leptonic decays of open heavy flavor hadrons into muons has been measured. he measurement was performed over the muon transverse momentum range 4 < p < 4 GeV. Over this p range, muon production results predominantly from a combination of charm and bottom quark semi-leptonic decays. he differential yield of muons in a given centrality and p bin was compared to that in a peripheral bin through the central-to-peripheral ratio, R CP. he right panel of Figure 4 shows a comparison of the muon R CP as a function of centrality for four different p intervals. One can see a smooth decrease in the R CP with increasing centrality. he suppression does not change with the muon p while the size of the suppression changes by nearly a factor of two between the most central and the most peripheral bins. A similar size of suppression between the yields of muons from semi-leptonic heavy quark decays and inclusive jet yields together with the R CP of muons being rather flat a as a function of p suggests no dramatic difference between the light and heavy quark response to the medium. More details on the heavy flavor suppression are provided in Ref. [7]. 7. Jet fragmentation One of the tools that allow precise comparison between the data and and theoretical models of jet quenching is the measurement of jet fragmentation. he key question to address is how are the parton showers modified by the medium. o provide an experimental answer to this question we measure the p spectra of charged particles inside jets, D(p ), and the jet fragmentation function, D(z), defined as D(p ) D(z) N ch (p ) N jet ε p (4) N ch (z) N jet ε z (5) where N jet represents the total number of measured jets in the given centrality bin, N ch (p ) and N ch (z) represent the number of measured charged particles within R =.4 of the jets in given bins of p and z, respectively, and ε represents the MC-evaluated p and pseudorapidity dependent reconstruction efficiency. he fragmentation variable, z, is defined as a ratio of charged 6

7 August, : DRAF 9 Not reviewed, for internal circulation only R Jγ.5 R=. Data R=. PYHIA+Data ALAS Preliminary - Pb+Pb L int =.3 nb s NN =.76 ev 3 4 N part R Jγ Muon R CP R=.3 Data L dt = 7 µb R=.3 PYHIA+Data.4 ALAS Preliminary 4 < p < 5 6 < p < 7 -GeV Pb+Pb L int =.3 nb. 8 < p < 9 GeV s NN =.76 ev < p < 4 GeV N part <N part > Figure 9: he integrated yield of jetsfigure per photon 8: Muon R Jγ calculated R CP as a function as a function of N part of jet calculated radius (R according =. andto Eq. for different bins in muon p Figure 4: Left: he integrated yield of jets per photon, R..3, from left to right), and for each he radius error as bars a function show combined Jγ, calculated as a function of number of participating nucleons, of N part. he statistical kinematic and systematic cuts here are uncertainties. photon he sets of points for the different N part. he kinematic 6 < p γ cuts are: photon < 9 GeV, ηγ <.3, pjet > p 5 bins 6 GeV, are < ηjet successively p γ < 9 <. and displaced GeV, η γ φ Jγ > by < 7π/8. N.3, part he= p jet error 6 forbars clarity > 5 represent ofgev, presentation. η jet <.. he azimuthal distance statistical between errors, jet while and photon the grey bands is required indicateto thebe systematic φ Jγ uncertainties. > 7π/8. he PYHIA+Data error bars represent results, withstatistical errors, while the gray bands indicate kinematics, the systematic selected withuncertainties a reconstructed [5], tight, isolated [6]. photon Right: and Muon efficiency-corrected R differ appreciably from measurements of single CP as a function are shownof N hadron suppression at the part calculated for different LHC at comparable transverse bins inas muon open symbols. p. he sets of points momenta for the[,,43]. differenthe p single binshadron are successively R CP reported by displaced CMS [] in bythe N -5% part centrality = 6 for binclarity relativeof to presentation. he error bars represent thecombined 5-9% centrality statistical interval andis systematic a factor of approximately uncertainties two [7]. smaller than the -% muon R CP value reported here, while that in the 5-% centrality bin is lower by about 5%. he single hadron R CP is 577. Systematic uncertainties also observed to vary much more rapidly with p than the muon R CP shown in Fig. 6. Interpretation 578 Several sources of systematic uncertainty of this have difference been estimated may beby complicated varying several by the aspects indirect of the relationship analysis, between the transverse momentum of particle 579 including momentum photon selection to and thejetmomentum performance: observed particle of associated and the parentjet, partonz for = both p the trk /p hadrons jet and cos the R, muons. where Nonetheless, R the is clear the difference between semi-leptonic muon and charged hadron suppression at the LHC should be contrasted distance 58 between Photon tightthe cuts: he jet definition axis and with ofthe tight a situation cuts charged hasatbeen RHIC varied, particle. where and the the experimental entire heanalysis underlying data re-run do not fromevent contribution to the indicate such a difference []. 58 D(z) and start D(pto finish, reevaluating all corrections. PHENIX his has has reported a small a effect semi-leptonic on x Jγ and electron R Jγ but R induces a 6- ) distributions is determined on the jet-by-jet basis AA for and p > subtracted 4 GeV in the -% fromcentrality the measured bin of 58 9% negative shift in σ Jγ, and a large.3 ± shift.(stat) for the ± most.4(syst) peripheral []. events SAR (from has reported reducing similar the already results for R AA(p ) []. he RHIC semileptonic electron results show more suppression than the measurements reported here, while the natural 583 distributions. low statistics in this Jetcentrality fragmentation interval). has been measured for three different jet radius parameters, R =.4, 584.3, Photon and non-tight. providing cuts: In order expectation to quantitatively assesswould the sensitivity be thatthe to the suppression same choiceresult. ofwould non-tight be he greater cuts, ratio which in Pb+Pb of central collisions at tothe 6-8% LHC due tope- ripheral collisions of D(p definition has been changed from ) distributions, R the 585 provide the background eventshigher for theinitial analysis, energy thedensities non-tight [44]. 586 four reversed conditions to two (using just F side and D(p w s,3). ), and D(z) distributions, R D(z), is calculated. he his has a negligible effect on x Jγ and R D(p 587 ) and R Jγ Rbut D(z) induces has a -3% been upward measured shift in σ Jγ. for six centrality bins, -%, -%, -3%, 3-4%, 8 Conclusions 4-5%, 588 and 5-6%. he resulting distributions for R =.4 jets and -% centrality bin are 589 plotted in Figure 5. he ratios show a reduction of fragment yield in all centrality bins relative 59 to the 6-8% bin at intermediate z values,.5 z. and an enhancement in fragment 59 yield 59 for z.5. No significant modification is seen in D(z) or D(p ) distributions at high p 593 or z. he reduction in the yield at intermediate z decreases gradually from central to peripheral 594 Pb+Pb =.76 ev s NN η <.5 Isolation criteria: o test the sensitivity to the isolation energy cut, it has been reduced from 6 GeV to 5 GeV. his has a -% his negative note shift has presented on x Jγ andalas R Jγ andmeasurements a -3% positiveofshift muon in σproduction Jγ. and suppression in s =.76 ev Pb+Pb collisions in a transverse momentum range dominated by heavy flavor decays, 4 < p < 4 GeV, Photon purity: he photon purity and over for the standard pseudo-rapidity analysisrange selection η < has.5. beenhe increased fraction andof prompt muons was estimated using decreased by an amount given by template the standard fits todeviation the distribution of the estimates of a quantity givencapable Section 8.3, of distinguishing in each statistically between signal and centrality interval. his raises and background. lowers x Jγ he by -% p in the direction of the shift, has negligible spectra of signal muons were evaluated in five centrality bins: -%, -%, effect on R Jγ, and changes σ Jγ by -4%, -9% in4-6%, the direction and 6-8%. of the shift, heindicating centralitythat dependence the background of muon production was characterized using and signal have different slopes. the central-to-peripheral ratio, R CP, calculated using the 6-8% centrality bin as a peripheral reference. he results for R CP indicate a factor of about.5 suppression in the yield of muons in the most central ALAS Preliminary collisions. More details on the jet fragmentation measurement is provided in Ref. [8]. he picture of the jet fragmentation at high-p is consistent with both the inclusive jet suppression and suppression of single charged particles reported in Ref. [9]. he charged particle 4 R CP achieves a value of.6, that is a similar value as the R CP of inclusive jets. Since the R CP of inclusive jets is rather flat as a function jet p and since all the measured charged particles at high-p should be also measured in jets we can expect no significant modification of yields of high-p fragments between central and peripheral collisions. his is indeed seen in the measurement of the jet fragmentation. 8. Summary We have presented results of the measurement of inclusive jet suppression, azimuthal dependence of jet suppression, jet suppression in γ-jet and Z -jet system, suppression of heavy flavor, and jet fragmentation. We find that the inclusive jet yields are suppressed by approximately a factor of two in central compared to peripheral collisions. his suppression has only a weak 7

8 R D(z) ALAS Preliminary.6 Pb+Pb s NN =.76 ev -.5 L int =.4 nb anti-k R=.4.4 jet p > GeV.3 -%/6-8% z ) R D(p ALAS Preliminary.6 Pb+Pb s NN =.76 ev -.5 L int =.4 nb anti-k R=.4.4 jet p > GeV.3 -%/6-8% Figure 5: Left: Ratio of fragmentation functions, R D(z). Right: Ratio of p spectra of charged particles inside jets, R D(p ). Both R D(z) and R D(p ) are ratios of -% central to 6-8% peripheral events evaluated for R =.4 anti-k jets. he error bars on the data points show statistical uncertainties, the shaded bands indicate systematic uncertainties that are uncorrelated or partially correlated between points. he solid lines indicate systematic uncertainties that are % correlated between points [8]. dependence on the jet p. A significant dependence of the jet suppression on the jet size is seen with increasing jet radius the suppression is weaker. he jet suppression depends on the direction of the jet with respect to elliptic flow event plane. A maximal difference of 5% in the jet yields for jets produced in plane compared to jets produced perpendicular to the elliptic flow plane is observed. he jet suppression is also observed in γ-jet and Z -jet systems. he measurement of semi-leptonic decays of open heavy flavor hadrons to muons suggests a similar suppression of heavy quark jets and light quark jets. he jet fragmentation function and momentum spectra of charged particles produced inside jets are modified in central compared to peripheral collisions. he yield of low-z fragments is enhanced whereas the yield of intermediate z fragments is suppressed. No sizable difference of high-z fragments is seen. References [] A. Majumder, M. Van Leeuwen, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. A66 () 4 9. [] ALAS Collaboration, JINS 3 (8) S83. [3] ALAS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5 () 533. [4] B. Alver, M. Baker, C. Loizides, P. Steinberg, arxiv: [5] M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, G. Soyez, JHEP 4 (8) 63. [6] ALAS Collaboration, arxiv: [7]. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, P. Z. Skands, JHEP 5 (6) 6. [8] X.-N. Wang, M. Gyulassy, Phys. Rev. D44 (99) [9] ALAS Collaboration, ALAS-CONF--45. [] ALAS Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B77 () [] ALAS Collaboration, ALAS-CONF--6. [] ALAS Collaboration, ALAS-CONF--5. [3] ALAS Collaboration, ALAS-CONF--78. [4] ALAS Collaboration, ALAS-CONF--5. [5] ALAS Collaboration, ALAS-CONF--. [6] ALAS Collaboration, ALAS-CONF--9. [7] ALAS Collaboration, ALAS-CONF--5. [8] ALAS Collaboration, ALAS-CONF--5. [9] ALAS Collaboration, ALAS-CONF--. 8