Model State Plan(CSBG) CSBG Cover Page (SF-424M)

Transcription

1 Model State Plan(CSBG) CSBG Cover Page (SF-424M) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) COVER PAGE Form Approved OMB No: Expires:08/31/2016 * 1.a. Type of Submission: Application Plan Other (2 Year) * 1.b. Frequency: Annual Other (2 Year) * 1.c. Consolidated Application/Plan/Funding Request? Explanation: * 1.d. Version: Initial Resubmission Revision Update 2. Date Received: State Use Only: 3. Applicant Identifier: 4a. Federal Entity Identifier: 5. Date Received By State: 4b. Federal Award Identifier: 6. State Application Identifier: 7. APPLICANT INFORMATION * a. Legal Name: State of Georgia CSBG Program * b. Employer/Taxpayer Identification Number (EIN/TIN): A1 * c. Organizational DUNS: * d. Address: * Street 1: 2 Peachtree Street Suite Street 2: * City: Atlanta County: * State: Ga Province: * Country: United States * Zip / Postal Code: e. Organizational Unit: Department Name: Division Name: Division of Family and Children Services f. Name and contact information of person to be contacted on matters involving this application: Prefix: Suffix: * Telephone Number: (404) * First Name: Joycelyn Title: Program Director Fax Number Middle Name: Organizational Affiliation: * Joycelyn.Fowler@dhs.ga.gov * Last Name: Fowler * 8a. TYPE OF APPLICANT: A: State Government b. Additional Description: * 9. Name of Federal Agency: Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 10. CFDA Numbers and Titles Community Services Block Grant CFDA Title: 11. Descriptive Title of Applicant's Project Community Services Block Grant 12. Areas Affected by Funding: Ga. - ALL 13. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF: * a. Applicant 5 Attach an additional list of Program/Project Congressional Districts if needed. b. Program/Project: Ga. - ALL 14. FUNDING PERIOD: 15. ESTIMATED FUNDING: a. Start Date: b. End Date: * a. Federal ($): $0 * 16. IS SUBMISSION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE UNDER EXECUTIVE ORDER PROCESS? b. Match ($): $0

2 a. This submission was made available to the State under the Executive Order Process for Review on : b. Program is subject to E.O but has not been selected by State for review. c. Program is not covered by E.O * 17. Is The Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? YES NO Explanation: 18. By signing this application, I certify (1) to the statements contained in the list of certifications** and (2) that the statements herein are true, complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also provide the required assurances** and agree to comply with any resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. (U.S. Code, Title 218, Section 1001) **I Agree ** The list of certifications and assurances, or an internet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or agency specific instructions. 18a. Typed or Printed Name and Title of Authorized Certifying Official 18c. Telephone (area code, number and extension) 18d. Address 18b. Signature of Authorized Certifying Official 18e. Date Report Submitted (Month, Day, Year) Attach supporting documents as specified in agency instructions.

3 Section 1: CSBG Lead Agency, CSBG Authorized Official, CSBG Point of Contact, and Official State Designation Letter U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Form Approved OMB No: Expires:08/31/2016 SECTION 1 CSBG Lead Agency, CSBG Authorized Official, CSBG Point of Contact, and Official State Designation Letter 1.1. Provide the following information in relation to the lead agency designated to administer CSBG in the State, as required by Section 676(a) of the CSBG Act. The following information should mirror the information provided on the Application for Federal Assistance, SF-424M. 1.1a. Lead agency Georgia Division of Family and Children Services (DFCS) 1.1b. Cabinet or administrative department of this lead agency [Check one option and narrative where applicable] Community Services Department Human Services Department Social Services Department Governor's Office Community Affairs Department Other, describe Georgia Division of Family and Children Services  contractual and financial functions are housed in the Department of Human Services 1.1c. Division, bureau, or office of the CSBG authorized official Georgia Division of Family and Children Services 1.1d. Authorized official of lead agency Bobby Cagle, Director  Georgia Division of Family and Children Services 1.1e. Street Address 2 Peachtree Street, Suite f. City Atlanta 1.1g. StateGA 1.1h. Zip i. Telephone number and extension ( 404 ) ext j. Fax number: ( 404 ) k. address Bobby.Cagle@dhs.ga.gov 1.1l. Lead agency website Provide the following information in relation to the designated State CSBG point ofcontact 1.2a. Agency name Division of Family and Children Services 1.2b. Name of the point of contact Joycelyn Fowler, Director - LIHEAP and CSBG Programs 1.2c. Street address 2 Peachtree Street, Suite d. City Atlanta 1.2e. StateGA 1.2f. Zip g. Point of contact telephone number ( 404 ) ext h. Fax number ( 404 ) i. Point of contact address Joycelyn.Fowler@dhs.ga.gov 1.2j. Point of contact agency website Designation Letter: Attach the State's official CSBG designation letter. If either the governor or designated agency has changed, update the letter accordingly.

4 Section 2: State Legislation and Regulation U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) SECTION 2 State Legislation and Regulation Form Approved OMB No: Expires:08/31/ CSBG State Legislation: Does the State have a statute authorizing CSBG? Yes No 2.2. CSBG State Regulation: Does the State have regulations for CSBG? Yes No 2.3. If yes was selected in item 2.1 and/or 2.2, attach a copy (or copies) of legislation and/or regulations or provide a hyperlink(s), as appropriate State Authority: Select a response for each question about the State statute and/or regulations authorizing CSBG: 2.4a. Did the State legislature enact authorizing legislation, or amendments to an existing authorizing statute, last year? Yes No 2.4b. Did the State establish or amend regulations for CSBG last year? Yes No 2.4c. Does the State statutory or regulatory authority designate the bureau, division, or office in the State government that is to be the State administering agency? Yes No

5 Section 3: State Plan Development and Statewide Goals U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) SECTION 3 State Plan Development and Statewide Goals Form Approved OMB No: Expires:08/31/ CSBG Lead Agency Mission and Responsibilities: Briefly describe the mission and responsibilities of the State agency that serves as the CSBG Lead Agency. To strengthen GeorgiaÂs families  supporting their self-sufficiency and helping them protect their vulnerable children and adults by being a resource to their families, not a substitute State Plan Goals: Describe the State's CSBG-specific goals for State administration of CSBG under this State Plan. (Note: This item is associated with State Accountability Measure 1Sa(i) and may pre-populate the State's Annual Report form.) The Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) is administered through a contractual agreement with a statewide network of twenty (20) non-profit community action agencies and four (4) county governments designated as eligible entities. Goal 1: To ensure that the programs are administered in accordance and compliance with the CSBG Act, Federal and State regulations, statues, policies and procedures to facilitate the increase in the numbers of low income individuals becoming self-sufficient. Goal 2: To consistently improve the efficiency of the State officeâs administration of CSBG business matters to include timely execution of contracts and distribution of funds to the eligible entities according to the standards. Goal 3: To ensure that state office has access to information entered into Easy Track, the eligible entities automated system for client progress and agency performance to be able to validate the improvement in data collection and quarterly reporting. Goal 4: In accordance with IM-138, to communicate and partner with the state association and eligible entities on the state plan, organizational standards, their implementation, expectations, and needs to meet program goals. Goal 5: In accordance with IM -138, to evaluate the performance of the eligible entities through agency review activities, that all review results are distributed to the eligible entity in a manner that complies with the accountability measures, and to provide technical assistance for any agency that falls below 100% compliance. Goal 6: To develop viable partnerships or collaborations with state departments, agencies, and organizations for the purpose of creating conduits for the access to state resources Goal 7: To assist the state association in its goal of ensuring the state has a roster of ROMA certified trainers State Plan Development: Indicate the information and input the State accessed to develop this State Plan. 3.3a. Analysis of [Check all that apply and narrative where applicable] State Performance Indicators and/or National Performance Indicators (NPIs) U.S. Census data State performance management data (e.g., accountability measures, ACSI survey information, and/or other information from annual reports) Other data [describe] Eligible entity community needs assessments Eligible entity plans Other information from eligible entities (e.g., State required reports) [describe] 3.3b. Consultation with [Check all that apply and narrative where applicable] Eligible entities (e.g. meetings, conferences, webinars; not including the public hearing) State community action association and regional CSBG T&TA providers State partners and/or stakeholders (describe) National organizations(describe) Federal Office of Community Services Other(describe) 3.4. Eligible Entity Involvement 3.4a. Describe the specific steps the State took in developing the State Plan to involve the eligible entities. (Note: This information is associated with State Accountability Measures 1Sa(ii) and may pre-populate the State's annual report form) The State CSBG Program implemented the Advisory Committee Meetings in FFY The purpose of these meetings was to offer an opportunity for the State Office, State Association and CAAs an opportunity to communicate face to face on policy, procedure, regulations, processes, concerns, changes, new initiatives, and programs. The state plan draft was sent to GCAA (state association) on for their review prior to the May Advisory Committee meeting. It was sent to the CAAs on for their review prior to the May Advisory Committee meeting. The state dedicated four hours of the April Advisory Committee meeting to the discuss the state plan with the network. At that time the state office provided information and accepted comments and suggestions on the state plan, accountability measures, ROMA Next Generation, and programmatic changes, as well as discussed updates to the state plan, state policy manual, and procedures that will affect how business is conducted at the local level and the State level. In addition the state entertained comments and suggestions pertaining to the CSBG program implementation. 3.4b. Performance Management Adjustment: If this is the first year filling out the automated State Plan, skip the following question. How has the State adjusted State Plan development procedures under this State Plan, as compared to past plans, in order 1) to encourage eligible entity participation and

6 2) to ensure the State Plan reflects input from eligible entities? Any adjustment should be based on the State's analysis of past performance in these areas, and should consider feedback from eligible entities, OCS, and other sources, such as the public hearing. If the State is not making any adjustments, provide further detail. (Note: This information is associated with State Accountability Measures 1Sb(i) and (ii) and may pre-populate the State's annual report form) The state was rated harshly in the ACSI (42) as not providing enough time for eligible entities to review the plan. In an effort to correct this issue, the state moved to an earlier discussion period with the eligible entities and allowed the state association to review the plan prior to presenting and discussing it with the network. The state program has also developed a state plan task force made of the sate office, the state association, and representatives from select CAAs to consult on the the CSBG state plan and ROMA Next Generation as it relates to the plan. To ensure that all the eligible entities had an opportunity to review and comment on the plan, all were sent the plan prior to our May Advisory Committee meeting to give them time to thoroughly review the plan and determine if they had questions or issues. It also gave them an opportunity to speak among themselves to come up with suggestions or comments. If this is the first year filling out the automated State Plan, skip the following question Eligible Entity Overall Satisfaction: Provide the State's target for eligible entity Overall Satisfaction during the performance period: 70 (Note: Item 3.5 is associated with State Accountability Measure 8S and may pre-populate the State's annual report form)

7 Section 4: CSBG Hearing Requirements U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) SECTION 4 CSBG Hearing Requirements Form Approved OMB No: Expires:08/31/ Public Inspection: Describe how the State made this State Plan, or revision(s) to the State Plan, available for public inspection, as required under Section 676(e)(2) of the Act. A Public Hearing to review the plan for use of CSBG funds was Public Notice/Hearing: Describe how the State ensured there was sufficient time and statewide distribution of notice of the public hearing(s) to allow the public to comment on the State Plan, as required under Section 676(a)(2)(B) of the CSBG Act. The hearing was advertised on the Division of Family and Children Services website, our state associations website (GCAA) and. A summary of CSBG services was made available at the public hearing. The draft state plan was posted on the website for any interested part to review. Copies of the draft plan were disseminated for review to the twenty-four CSBG eligible entities Public and Legislative Hearings: Specify the date(s) and location(s) of the public and legislative hearing(s) held by the designated lead agency for this State Plan, as required undersection 676(a)(2)(B) and Section 676(a)(3) of the Act. (If the State has not held a public hearing in the prior fiscal year and/or a legislative hearing in the last three years, provide further detail under Item 4.4.). Date Location 1 2 Peachtree Street, Suite , Atlanta, Ga Public 2 1/22/2015 Georgia General Assembly Legislative Type of Hearing [Select an option] 4.4. Attach supporting or a hyperlink for the public and legislative hearings. documentation Legislative Hearing Announcement attached

8 Section 5: CSBG Eligible Entities U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) SECTION 5 CSBG Eligible Entities Form Approved OMB No: Expires:08/31/ CSBG Eligible Entities: In the table below, list each eligible entity in the State, and indicate public or private, the type(s) of entity, and the geographical area served by the entity. (This table should include every CSBG Eligible Entity to which the State plans to allocate 90 percent funds, as indicated in the table in item 7.2. Do not include entities that only receive remainder/discretionary funds from the State or tribes/tribal organizations that receive direct funding from OCS under Section 677 of the CSBG Act.) Types of Entities include, Limited Purpose Agency, Local Government Agency, Migrant or Seasonal Farmworker Organization, Tribe or Tribal Organization, and Other # CSBG Eligible Entity Public or Nonprofit Type of Agency [choose all that apply] Geographical Area Served by county (Provide all counties) Brief Description of "Other" 1 Area Committee to Improve Opportunities Now, Inc. (ACTION) Nonprofit Barrow, Clarke, Elbert, Greene. Jackson, Madison, Morgan, Oconee Oglethorpe, Walton 2 Central Savannah River Area Economic Opportunity Authority, Inc. (CSRA) Nonprofit Burke, Columbia, Emanuel, Glascock, Jefferson, Jenkins, Lincoln, McDuffie, Richmond, Screven, Taliaferro, Warren, Wilkes 3 Clayton County Community Services Authority, Inc. Nonprofit Clayton, Fayette 4 Coastal Georgia Area Community Action Authority, Inc. Nonprofit Bryan, Camden, Glynn, Liberty, McIntosh 5 Coastal Plain Area Community Action Authority, Inc. Nonprofit Ben Hill, Berrien, Brooks, Cook, Echols, Irwin, Lanier, Lowndes, Tift, Turner 6 Community Action for Improvement, Inc. (CAFI) Nonprofit Carroll, Coweta, Heard, Meriwether, Troup 7 Concerted Services, Inc. Nonprofit Appling, Atkinson, Bacon, Brantley, Bulloch, Candler, Charlton, Clinch, Coffee, Effingham, Evans, Jeff Davis, Long, Pierce, Tattnall, Toombs, Ware, Wayne 8 EOA Savannah  Chatham County, Inc. Nonprofit Chatham 9 Enrichment Services Program, Inc. (ESP) Nonprofit Chattahoochee, Clay, Harris, Muscogee, Quitman, Randolph, Stewart, Talbot 10 Fulton-Atlanta Community Action Authority, Inc. (FACAA) Nonprofit Fulton 11 Heart of Georgia CAC, Inc. Nonprofit Bleckley, Dodge, Laurens, Montgomery, Pulaski, Telfair, Treutlen, Wheeler, Wilcox 12 Macon-Bibb County Economic Opportunity Council, Inc. Nonprofit Bibb 13 Middle Georgia CAC, Inc. Nonprofit Butts, Crawford, Houston, Jones, Lamar, Monroe, Peach, Pike, Twiggs, Upson, Spalding 14 Ninth District Opportunity, Inc. Nonprofit Banks, Barrow, Dawson, Forsyth, Franklin, Habersham, Hall, Hart, Lumpkin, Rabun, Stephens, Towns, Union, White 15 North Georgia Community Action, Inc. Nonprofit Catoosa, Chattooga, Cherokee, Dade, Fannin, Gilmer, Murray, Pickens, Walker, Whitfield 16 Overview Nonprofit Baldwin, Greene, Hancock, Jasper, Johnson, Morgan, Putnam, Washington, Wilkinson 17 Partnership for Community Action, Inc. Nonprofit DeKalb, Gwinnett, Newton, Rockdale, Walton

9 18 Southwest Georgia CAC, Inc. Nonprofit 19 Tallatoona CAP, Inc. Nonprofit 20 West Central Georgia CAC, Inc Nonprofit Cobb County Board of Commissioners Henry County Board of Commissioners Newton County Board of Commissioners Spalding County Board of Commissioners 5.2 Total number of CSBG eligible entities 24 Public Local Government Agency Cobb Public Local Government Agency Henry Public Local Government Agency Newton Public Local Government Agency Spalding Baker, Calhoun, Colquitt, Decatur, Dougherty, Early, Grady, Lee, Miller, Mitchell, Seminole, Terrell, Thomas, Worth Bartow, Douglas, Floyd, Gordon, Haralson, Paulding, Polk Crisp, Dooley, Macon, Marion, Schley, Sumter, Taylor, Webster 5.3 Changes to Eligible Entities List: Has the list of eligible entities under item 5.1 changed since the State's last State Plan submission? Yes No If yes, please briefly describe the changes.

10 Section 6: Organizational Standards for Eligible Entities U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) SECTION 6 Organizational Standards for Eligible Entities Form Approved OMB No: Expires:08/31/2016 Note: Reference IM 138, State Establishment of Organizational Standards for CSBG Eligible Entities, for more information on Organizational Standards. Click HERE for IM Choice of Standards: Check the box that applies. If using alternative standards a) attach the complete list of alternative organizational standards, b) describe the reasons for using alternative standards, and c) describe how the standards are at least as rigorous as the COE-developed standards. The State will use the CSBG Organizational Standards Center of Excellence (COE) organizational standards (as described in IM 138) The State will use an alternative set of organizational standards 6.2. If the State is using the COE-developed organizational standards, does the State propose making a minor modification to the standards, as described in IM 138? Yes No 6.2a. If yes was selected in item 6.2, describe the State's proposed minor modification to the COE-developed organizational standards, and provide a rationale. 6.3 How will/has the State officially adopt(ed) organizational standards for eligible entities in the State in a manner consistent with the State's administrative procedures act? If "Other" is selected, provide a timeline and additional information, as necessary. [Check all that apply and narrative where applicable] Regulation Policy Contracts with eligible entities Other, describe: 6.4. How will the State assess eligible entities against organizational standards, as described in IM 138?[Check all that apply.] Peer-to-peer review (with validation by the State or State-authorized third party) Self-assessment (with validation by the State or State-authorized third party) Self-assessment/peer review with State risk analysis State-authorized third party validation Regular, on-site CSBG monitoring Other 6.4a. Describe the assessment process. As the State has elected to use the CSBG Organizational Standards Center of Excellence Standards, each eligible entity has been informed of their need to complete an annual automated self-assessment in Easy Track to denote the agencyâs prowess in accordance with the organizational standards. The automated system will tabulate the percentage of compliance based on the eligible entities response. The State office, or an additional third party reviewer selected by the state, will review the assessment completed by each eligible entity and may compare the assessment with documentation on hand or requested. In areas whereby the eligible entity may be found to be less than 100% compliant, the State office will confer with the eligible entity to determine a course of action and/or assistance to meet the goal. As a part of the quarterly eligible entity meetings, a significant portion of the CSBG discussion will be directed toward the CSBG Organizational Standards. Attendees include the State office, all eligible entities, state association, and any invited guest that may assist in meeting the goal. The State, in its efforts to improve communications with itâs State association and eligible entities, proposes to develop a communications tool to inform and reiterate expectations according to the Organizational Standards and to generate discussions, outside of our quarterly meetings, between the state office, the association and the eligible entities. In addition, through the support of the State office to the association in its goal of ensuring Georgia has a roster of certified ROMA trainers, we anticipate good guidance in the standards as well improvement in meeting performance goals. In the State of Georgia, CSBG programs may receive an on-site monitoring visit at any time, with, or without notice during the contract period but no less than once every three (3) years. Additional visits may include activities such as:  Providing consultation on programmatic issues  Providing technical assistance, as needed  Providing training, as requested  Attendance at least one Board meeting or state association Quarterly Board Meeting  Other reviews as appropriate Each eligible entity will be monitored to ensure compliance with CSBG program requirements via a monthly review of expenditure and programmatic reports. Additional information may be requested for the purpose of conducting a desk review of eligible entity activities Will the State make exceptions in applying the organizational standards for any eligible entities due to special circumstances or organizational characteristics, as described in IM 138 Yes No 6.5a. If yes was selected in item 6.5, list which eligible entities the State will exempt from meeting organizational standards, and provide a description and a justification for each exemption. If this is the first year filling out the automated State Plan, skip the following question Performance Target: What percentage of eligible entities in the State does the State expect will meet all the State-adopted organizational standards in the next year? (Provide as a percentage) 70%

11 Note: This information is associated with State Accountability Measures 6Sa and may prepopulate the State's annual report form.

12 Section 7: State Use of Funds U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) SECTION 7 State Use of Funds Form Approved OMB No: Expires:08/31/2016 Eligible Entity Allocation (90 Percent Funds) [ Section 675C(a) of the CSBG Act] 7.1. Formula: Select the method (formula) that best describes the current practice for allocating CSBG funds to eligible entities. Historic Base + Formula Formula Alone Formula with Variables Hold Harmless + Formula Other, describe 7.1a. Does the State statutory or regulatory authority specify the terms or formula for allocating the 90 percent funds among eligible entities? Yes No 7.2. Planned Allocation: Specify the planned allocation of 90 percent funds to eligible entities, as described under Section 675C(a) of the CSBG Act. The estimated allocations may be in dollars or percentages. For each eligible entity receiving funds, provide the Funding Amount in either dollars (columns 2 and 4) or percentage (columns 3 and 5) for the fiscal years covered by this plan. 1 2 CSBG Eligible Entity Area Committee to Improve Opportunities Now, Inc. (ACTION) Central Savannah River Area Economic Opportunity Authority, Inc. (CSRA) Planned CSBG 90 Percent Funds Year One Funding Amount $ Year One Funding Amount % Year Two Funding Amount $ Year Two Funding Amount % $777, % $0 0.00% $950, % $0 0.00% 3 Clayton County Community Services Authority, Inc. $549, % $0 0.00% 4 Coastal Georgia Area Community Action Authority, Inc. $369, % $0 0.00% 5 Coastal Plain Area Community Action Authority, Inc. $565, % $0 0.00% 6 Community Action for Improvement, Inc. (CAFI) $513, % $0 0.00% 7 Concerted Services, Inc. $863, % $0 0.00% 8 EOA Savannah  Chatham County, Inc. $468, % $0 0.00% 9 Enrichment Services Program, Inc. (ESP) $471, % $0 0.00% 10 Fulton-Atlanta Community Action Authority, Inc. (FACAA) $1,513, % $0 0.00% 11 Heart of Georgia CAC, Inc. $312, % $0 0.00% 12 Macon-Bibb County Economic Opportunity Council, Inc. $369, % $0 0.00% 13 Middle Georgia CAC, Inc. $507, % $0 0.00% 14 Ninth District Opportunity, Inc. $834, % $0 0.00% 15 North Georgia Community Action, Inc. $800, % $0 0.00% 16 Overview $295, % $0 0.00% 17 Partnership for Community Action, Inc. $2,076, % $0 0.00% 18 Southwest Georgia CAC, Inc. $918, % $0 0.00% 19 Tallatoona CAP, Inc. $816, % $0 0.00% 20 West Central Georgia CAC, Inc $290, % $0 0.00% 21 Cobb County Board of Commissioners $676, % $0 0.00% 22 Henry County Board of Commissioners $191, % $0 0.00% 23 Newton County Board of Commissioners $148, % $0 0.00% 24 Spalding County Board of Commissioners $143, % $0 0.00% Total $15,426, % $0 0.00%

13 7.3. Distribution Process: Describe the specific steps in the State's process for distributing 90 percent funds to the eligible entities and include the number of days each step is expected to take; include information about State legislative approval or other types of administrative approval (such as approval by a board or commission). CSBG funds are distributed to all 24 eligible entities based on an existing formula previously adopted by Georgia DFCS and a committee of representatives of CSBG eligible entities. Currently no State legislative approval is required. The formula is as follows: 65% of the base allocation is allotted to each eligible entity 35% multiplied by the individual/family poverty rate of the service area. Eligible entities that have funds remaining for a fiscal year may request to carry-over funds to a succeeding fiscal year. Eligible entities must submit a program plan showing how they intend to expend the funds and the state approves and amends the current fiscal year contract to allow the entity to utilize the funds. Generally, carryover funds are distributed back to the agency providing that the carryover amount does not exceed 20% of the allocation. Fund Allocation Estimated Timeline Summary  Projected budget is developed based on current year  2 months Projected budget goes to the legislature for approval and comment  2 months Budget Codes are created  4-6 months (cannot begin the process until we receive these) Projected allocations determined and submitted to leadership for review  3 weeks Projected allocations and contract request provided to the eligible entities - 3 weeks Boards vote on projected budget  2 months Contracts are submitted, which includes projected budget amounts and Project Application Plan (Service Plan)  2 months Contracts reviewed, corrected, docs retrieved, business integrity checks, and packet uploaded onto shared drive for retrieval  3 months Requisitions are created  2 months Contracts are developed and final signature of the eligible entity is obtained  3 months Carryover amounts requested and submitted  2 months Process Carryover amendment for disbursement  3 weeks Contract goes back to the Office of Contracts and Procurement for state certification and execution  2 weeks A copy of the executed contract goes to the entity and the program  3 weeks Contract payment form, advance payment request, purchase order, and contract forms are submitted to accounts payable for processing  min. 2 weeks Advance funds are released to CAA  min. 2 weeks Funds are available for reimbursement  min. 2 weeks For Carryover amendment - contract payment form, purchase order, and contract forms are submitted to accounts payable for processing  min. 2 weeks Carryover amount released to CAAs  min. 2 weeks 7.4. Distribution Timeframe: Does the State plan to make funds available to eligible entities no later than 30 calendar days after OCS distributes the Federal award? Yes No 7.4a. If no, describe State procedures to ensure funds are made available to eligible entities consistently and without interruption. Note: Item 7.4 is associated with State Accountability Measure 2Sa and may prepopulate the State's annual report form. If this is the first year filling out the automated State Plan, skip the following question Performance Management Adjustment: How is the State improving grant and/or contract administration procedures under this State Plan as compared to past plans? Any improvements should be based on analysis of past performance, and should consider feedback from eligible entities, OCS, and other sources, such as the public hearing. If the State is not making any improvements, provide further detail. Note: This information is associated with State Accountability Measure 2Sb and may prepopulate the State's annual report form. Based on the results of the ACSI, our eligible entities have expressed their concerns with the state's administrative arm's understanding of the urgency and mandate to deliver contracts and funding expeditiously. In an attempt to address their concern, the program has met with the Budget, Contracts, and Accounts Payable departments to ensure that they are aware of the need to execute contracts prior to the beginning of the FFY, to disburse funds within 30 days of the federal award, and to pay expenditures within the contractual time frames. We have put a review system in place to facilitate the on time submissions of expenditure and programmatic reports from all CAAs, which includes a potential finding should they continuously neglect to submit reports on time. Administrative Funds [ Section 675C(b)(2) of the CSBG Act] 7.6. What amount of State CSBG funds does the State plan to allocate for administrative activities, under this State plan? The estimate may be in dollars or a percentage 5 $ % 7.7. How many State staff positions will be funded in whole or in part with CSBG funds under this State Plan? How many State Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) will be funded with CSBG funds under this State Plan? Does the State have remainder/discretionary funds? Yes No Remainder/Discretionary Funds [ Section 675C(b) of the CSBG Act] If yes was selected, describe how the State plans to use remainder/discretionary funds in the table below. Note: This response will link to thecorresponding assurance, Item For each allowable use of remainder funds in the table below (rows a through h), enter the State's planned level of funding, if any, either in dollars or percentage, and provide a brief description. Activities funded under row a, training and technical assistance, do not require a description, as that is provided under section 8 of this State plan. Activities funded under rows b and c, are described under section 9, State Linkages and Communication, but a State may enter additional information in this table as well. The State must describe "innovative programs/activities by eligible entities or other neighborhood groups," under row f, even if the State does not allocate discretionary funds to this activity. This activity is required by section 676(b)(2) of the CSBG Act, assurance 14.2 If a funded activity fits under more than one category in the table, allocate the funds among the categories. For example, if the State provides funds under a contract with the State Community Action association to provide training and technical assistance to eligible entities and to create a statewide data system, the funds for that contract should be allocated appropriately between row a and row c. If allocation is not possible, the State may allocate the funds to the main category with which the activity is associated. Note: This information is associated with State Accountability Measures 3Sa and may pre-populate the State's annual report form Use of Remainder/Discretionary Funds(See Section 675C(b)(1) of the CSBG Act) Remainder/Discretionary Fund Uses a. Training/technical assistance to eligible entities b. Coordination of State-operated programs and/or local programs Year One Planned $ Year One Planned % Year Two Planned $ Year Two Planned % $38, % $ % $38, % $ % Brief description of services/activities CAAs submit a proposal for innovative projects, communication, or for outreach needs. Discretionary funds are made available as requested based on proposal approval. The areas covered are specified in the proposal for funding. Consideration is given to new programs and are awarded on a first come first served basis. The state will consider the use of discretionary funds tp improve communication and coordination between the CAAs and the state

14 c. Statewide coordination and communication among eligible entities d. Analysis of distribution of CSBG funds to determine if targeting greatest need $77, % $ % $ % $ % N/A e. Asset-building programs $ % $ % N/A f. Innovative programs/activities by eligible entities or other neighborhood groups $617, % $ % g. State charity tax credits $ % $ % N/A h. Other activities, specify in column 6 $ % $ % N/A Total $771, % $ % office (i.e. systems improvements, website development, document drop box, etc.). In addition, CAAs or the state association may submit a proposal to address communication, or outreach needs. Discretionary funds are made available as requested based on proposal approval. The areas covered are specified in the proposal for funding. Consideration is given to new initiatives and funds are awarded on a first come first served basis. Discretionary funds are made available as requested based on proposal approval. The areas covered are specified in the proposal for funding. CAAs submit a proposal for innovative projects, communication, or for outreach needs. Training and/or technical assistance is also funded for the associationâs annual conference to provide training for all CAAs that contract with CSBG. All are considered for funding as requested. The State Department considers use of discretionary funds for some of the following purposes: ÂEligible entities may submit proposals for innovative programs that partner with local community institutions and request special funding. The proposals are reviewed and approved by the CSBG Unit staff. ÂEligible entities may request funds for emergency situations such as disaster assistance. ÂCapacity building activities for the Georgia Community Action Association ÂOther activities, as appropriate, may be funded if they comply with the purposes of the CSBG program. The following are examples of use of the discretionary funds: 1. CSBG Disaster Relief When disaster strikes, eligible entities receive funding to provide relief to their service delivery area through group or categorical eligibility criteria. 2. CSBG Health Initiative Solicitations of new community health initiatives proposals that target health issues in low income communities are awarded through a competitive process. 3. CSBG Innovative Program Grant The CSBG Innovative Grant is awarded to eligible entities that propose a program to address a specific need in their community that will support well-being or self-sufficiency. Several entities may be awarded in a fiscal year depending on the amount of funds available. Grants are dispersed on a first come first serve basis. At least 60% of the funds used to support the nominated program must be CSBG funds. Eligible entities may apply as often as they like. Entities awarded the grant may re-apply the following year. However, they must show progressive work in addressing the issue stated in the proposal. Grant award decisions remain at the discretion of the state. Selection is based on the criteria set forth in the application/proposal What types of organizations, if any, does the State plan to work with (by grant or contract using remainder/discretionary funds) to carry out some or all of the activities in table 7.9.[Check all that apply and narrative where applicable] CSBG eligible entities (if checked, include the expected number of CSBG eligible entities to receive funds) 5 Other community-based organizations State Community Action association Regional CSBG technical assistance provider(s) National technical assistance provider(s) Individual consultant(s) Tribes and Tribal Organizations Other None (the State will carry out activities directly) Note: This response will link to the corresponding CSBG assurance, item If this is the first year filling out the automated State Plan, skip the following question Performance Management Adjustment: How is the State adjusting the use of remainder/discretionary funds under this State Plan as compared to past plans? Any adjustment should be based on the State's analysis of past performance, and should consider feedback from eligible entities, OCS, and other sources, such as the public hearing. If the State is not making any adjustments, provide further detail. Note: This information is associated with State Accountability Measures 3Sb, and may pre-populate the State's annual report form. The state will continue to use the discretionary funds for innovative projects, technical assistance, and improved communication initiatives. That state recognized its need to

15 suggest or offer opportunities for eligible entities to link with additional programs in this ares. The state is considering the use of a consultant to advise on how to connect the CSBG program and eligible entities with other established efforts and organizations for the purpose of collaboration.

16 Section 8: State Training and Technical Assistance U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) SECTION 8 State Training and Technical Assistance Form Approved OMB No: Expires:08/31/ Describe the State's plan for delivering CSBG-funded training and technical assistance to eligible entities under this State Plan by completing the table below. Add a row for each activity: indicate the timeframe; whether it is training, technical assistance or both; and the topic. (CSBG funding used for this activity is referenced under item 7.9(a), Remainder/Discretionary Funds.) Note: This information is associated withstate Accountability Measure 3Scand may pre-populate the State's annual report form. Training and Technical Assistance Fiscal Year (Y) Quarter (Q) / Timeframe Training, Technical Assistance, or Both Topic 1 FY1-Q4 Training Governance/Tripartite Boards 2 FY1-Q3 Training Organizational Standards - General 3 FY2-Q4 Training Other 4 FY1-Q3 Training ROMA 5 FY1-Q4 Training Standards for eligible entities with unmet standards on TAPs and QIPs Brief Description of ''Other'' The use of Discretionary Funds and what constitutes an innovative program 8.1a. The planned budget for the training and technical assistance plan (as indicated in the Remainder/Discretionary Funds table in item 7.9) $771,302 If this is the implementation year for organizational standards, skip the following question Does the State have in place Technical Assistance Plans (TAPs) or Quality Improvement Plans (QIPs) for all eligible entities with unmet organizational standards that could be used if appropriate? Yes No Note: This information is associated withstate Accountability Measure 6Sb.QIPs are described in Section 678C(a)(4) of the CSBG Act. If the State, according to their corrective action procedures, does not plan to put a QIP in place for an eligible entity with one or more unmet organizational standards, the State should put a TAP in place to support the entity in meeting the standard(s). Upon the completion of compliance reviews, the state will determine if any findings warrant a QIP and if the QIP will need to require Training and Technical Assistance (T&TA). The CAAs are given the opportunity to submit their plans for improvement via their QIP. The state reviews the QIP and determines if it will be accepted as is, or if there is a need for additional training. If there is a need for training, the state will add the stipulation of T&TA to the QIP. In order to ensure that the needs of the CAA are addressed, the state will coordinate the necessary training for the CAA and they will be facilitated by the state office from resources of state, from the state association, or via resources from national organizations at the cost of the state through the use of discretionary funds. Annually, at the state association conference, the state will sponsor/offer at least one training session in an area needing attention as identified by compliance reviews, changes in regulation, or changes in processes. CAAs may also request Training and Technical Assistance at any time throughout the program year Indicate the types of organizations through which the State plans to provide training and/or technical assistance as described in item 8.1, and briefly describe their involvement [Check all that applies and narrative where applicable] CSBG eligible entities (if checked, provide the expected number of CSBG eligible entities to receive funds) Other community-based organizations State Community Action association Regional CSBG technical assistance provider(s) National technical assistance provider(s) Individual consultant(s) Tribes and Tribal Organizations Other If this is the first year filling out the automated State Plan, skip the following question Performance Management Adjustment: How is the State adjusting the training and technical assistance plan under this State Plan as compared to past plans? Any adjustment should be based on the State's analysis of past performance, and should consider feedback from eligible entities, OCS, and other sources, such as the public hearing. If the State is not making any adjustments, provide further detail. Note: This information is associated withstate Accountability Measures 3Sdmay pre-populate the State's annual report form The state is taking advantage of State Eligible Entity Training and Technical Assistance Services (SEETAS) offered by the Office of Community Services. The state program has recognized the need to improve in this area. It has reached out to its state association to determine the needs of the network where possible training and technical assistance may be warranted. The program has also developed a state system that interfaces with the CAAs reporting system to be bale to identify T and TA needs.

17 Section 9: State Linkages and Communication U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) SECTION 9 State Linkages and Communication Form Approved OMB No: Expires:08/31/2016 Note: This section describes activities that the State may support with CSBG remainder/discretionary funds, described under Section 675C(b)(1) of the CSBG Act. The State may indicate planned use of remainder/discretionary funds for linkage/communication activities in Section 7, State Use of Funds, items 7.9(b) and (c). 9.1 State Linkages and Coordination at the State Level: Describe the linkages and coordination at the State level that the State plans to create or maintain to ensure increased access to CSBG services to low-income people and communities under this State Plan and avoid duplication of services (as required by the assurance under Section 676(b)(5) ). Describe or attach additional information as needed. [Check all that apply and narrative where applicable] Note: This response will link to the corresponding CSBG assurance, item In addition, this item is associated with State Accountability Measure 7Sa andmay pre-populate the State's annual report form. State Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) office State Weatherization office State Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) office State Head Start office State public health office State education department State Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) agency State budget office Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) State child welfare office State housing office Other [Click paper clip to attach file] 9.2. State Linkages and Coordination at the Local Level: Describe the linkages and coordination at the local level that the State and eligible entities plan to create or maintain to ensure increased access to CSBG services to low-income people and communities and avoid duplication of services, as described under Section 675C(b)(B) and as required by assurance undersections 676(b)(5) of the CSBG Act. Attach additional information as needed. Note: This response will link to the corresponding CSBG assurances, items 14.5 and The State Administering Agency encourages collaboration with other agencies. One example is coordination to ensure that families who receive Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), Social Security Income (SSI), SNAP, and Medicaid are automatically eligible for CSBG services. The State Administering Agency works with eligible entities to establish linkages when delivering services to victims of natural disasters. Group eligibility is used in this area. Agencies sometimes provide staff to assist in providing services and emergency relief to victims. The State CSBG Program will continue to encourage and coordinate linkages between CSBG eligible entities and other community service agencies and local governments to ensure that gaps in services are filled. Eligible entities recognize the importance of interagency planning, coordination of services, and community organization. CSBG agencies solicit volunteers, and private donations, form partnerships with the private sector as well as local governments to reduce the causes of poverty. CSBG funds continue to be used to enhance administrative functions in local CSBG Programs. [Click paper clip to attach file] 9.3. Eligible Entity Linkages and Coordination 9.3a State Assurance of Eligible Entity Linkages and Coordination: Describe how the State will assure that the eligible entities will coordinate and establish linkages to assure the effective delivery of and coordination of CSBG services to low-income people and communities and avoid duplication of services (as required by the assurance under Section 676(b)(5) ). [Attach additional information as needed.] Note: This response will link to the corresponding CSBG assurance, item The State of Georgia will continue to encourage, coordinate, and facilitate linkages between CSBG eligible entities and other community service agencies and local governments to ensure the effective delivery of services. Agencies are reminded and informed via the CSBG annual training and via the notification for monitoring review that linkages with other entities will be examined. When we conduct monitoring reviews, we review data in the client file as well as in the reporting system pertaining to the linkages to ensure that the gaps in services and referrals for such, are being provided. [Click paper clip to attach file] 9.3b State Assurance of Eligible Entity Linkages to Fill Service Gaps: Describe how the eligible entities will develop linkages to fill identified gaps in the services, through the provision of information, referrals, case management, and follow-up consultations, according to the assurance under Section 676(b)(3)(B) of the CSBG Act. Note: This response will link to the corresponding CSBG assurance, item 14.3b. Linkages between CSBG eligible entities and other community service agencies and local governments ensure that gaps in services are filled. CSBG agencies solicit volunteers, and private donations, form partnerships with the private sector as well as local governments to reduce the causes of poverty. Through sub-contracts and Memorandums of Understanding (MOU), eligible entities will continue to coordinate services with agencies within their service delivery areas. Eligible entities also contract with the State of Georgia to provide other programs to assist the low-income population to become self-sufficient. Community Action Agencies and County Government entities maintain a good relationship with the State Administering Agency, therefore being considered for other grants and contracts to aid in the provision of services to the low-income population.

18 9.4. Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Employment and Training Activities: Does the State intend to include CSBG employment and training activities as part of a WIOA Combined State Plan, as allowed under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (as required by the assurance under Section 676(b)(5) of the CSBG Act)? Yes No Note: This response will link to the corresponding CSBG assurance, item a If the State selected "yes"under item 9.4, provide the CSBG-specific information included in the State's WIOA Combined Plan. This information includes a description of how the State and the eligible entities will coordinate the provision of employment and training activities through statewide and local WIOA workforce development systems. This information may also include examples of innovative employment and training programs and activities conducted by community action agencies or other neighborhood-based organizations as part of a community antipoverty strategy. 9.4b. If the State selected "no" under item 9.4, describe the coordination of employment and training activities, as defined in Section 3 of WIOA, by the State and by eligible entities providing activities through the WIOA system. State and the eligible entities will coordinate the provision of employment and training activities in the State and in communities with entities providing activities through statewide and local workforce investment systems under the Workforce Investment Act. Eligible entities participate on local Workforce Investment Boards Emergency Energy Crisis Intervention: Describe how the State will assure, where appropriate, that emergency energy crisis intervention programs under title XXVI (relating to Low-Income Home Energy Assistance) are conducted in each community in the State, as required by the assurance under Section 676(b)(6) of the CSBG Act). Note: This response will link to the corresponding CSBG assurance, item Funds made available through this grant or allotment will be used to ensure coordination between antipoverty programs in each community in the State, and ensure, where appropriate, that emergency energy crisis intervention programs (relating to low-income home energy assistance) are conducted. CSBG eligible entities operate emergency energy crisis intervention programs. The State Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program in the same office along with the CSBG program State Assurance: Faith-based Organizations, Charitable Groups, Community Organizations: Describe how the State will assure local eligible entities will coordinate and form partnerships with other organizations, including faith-based organizations, charitable groups, and community organizations, according to the State's assurance undersection 676(b)(9) of the CSBG Act. Note: this response will link to the corresponding assurance, item State and eligible entities will, to the maximum extent possible, coordinate programs with, and form partnerships with, other organizations serving low-income residents of the communities and members of the groups served by the State, including religious organizations, charitable groups, and community organizations. The State CSBG and LIHEAP Programs are members of the stateâs Faith Based Community effort. [Click paper clip to attach file] 9.7 Coordination of Eligible Entity 90 Percent Funds with Public/Private Resources: Describe how the eligible entities will coordinate CSBG 90 percent funds with other public and private resources, according to the assurance undersection 676(b)(3)(C) of the CSBG Act. Note: this response will link to the corresponding assurance, item 14.3c. Through sub-contracts and Memorandums of Understanding (MOU), eligible entities will continue to coordinate services with agencies within their service delivery areas. Eligible entities also contract with the State of Georgia to provide other programs to assist the low-income population to become self-sufficient. Community Action Agencies and County Government entities maintain a good relationship with the State Administering Agency, therefore being considered for other grants and contracts to aid in the provision of services to the low-income population Coordination among Eligible Entities and State Community Action Association: Describe State activities for supporting coordination among the eligible entities and the State Community Action Association. Georgia DFCS will collaborate with eligible entities via GCAA to address the implementation of the organizational standards, the expectation to meet 100% of these standards, the identification of and the necessity for T/TA to meet the standards. Training and Technical Assistance is provided by the state at quarterly board meetings hen requested, and annually at the state GCAA conference. The state entity will work in association with GCAA to ensure that eligible entities have access to ROMA certification training for the purpose of having ROMA trainers in the State of Georgia. The state also works in conjunction with the state association to coordinate the Advisory Committee Workgroup. 9.9 Communication with Eligible Entities and the State Community Action Association: In the table below, describe the State's plan for communicating with eligible entities, the State Community Action Association, and other partners under this State Plan. Include communication about annual hearings and legislative hearings, as described under Section 4, CSBG Hearing Requirements. Communication Plan Topic Expected Frequency Format Brief Description of ''Other'' 1 Hearings Annually Meetings/Presentation 2 State Plan Informational Annually Meetings/Presentation 3 Policy Changes Other As needed 4 Contract Development Annually Meetings/Presentation 5 Contract Training Annually Meetings/Presentation 6 Scheduled Forums Quarterly Meetings/Presentation Advisory Committee Meetings Feedback to Eligible Entities and State Community Action Association: Describe how the State will provide feedback to local entities and State Community Action Associations regarding performance on State Accountability Measures. Note: This information is associated with State Accountability Measure 5S(iii). The measure indicates feedback should be provided within 60 calendar days of the State getting feedback from OCS. The state will provide a performance report to the eligible entities within 60 calendar days of the State receiving feedback from OCS. If this is the first year filling out the automated State Plan, skip the following question Performance Management Adjustment: How is the State adjusting the Communication Plan in this State Plan as compared to past plans? Any adjustment should be based on the State's analysis of past performance, and should consider feedback from eligible entities, OCS, and other sources, such as the public hearing. If the State is not making any adjustments, provide further detail. Note: This information is associated with State Accountability Measures 7Sb; this response may pre-populate the State's annual report form.

19 After conferring with our state association and considering comments received at our last Advisory Committee meeting, the state has implemented an improved communications strategy. The state will meet with the state association once a quarter to inform the association of any issues, upcoming deadlines, or new processes. The state will then place the information provided, or obtained, in a quarterly newsletter to be sent to the state association first and then the network. The Advisory Committee meeting will be used as another avenue for communication with the network and provides an opportunity for discussion on CSBG matters.

20 Section 10: Monitoring, Corrective Action, and Fiscal Controls U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration for Children and Families Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) SECTION 10 Monitoring, Corrective Action, and Fiscal Controls Form Approved OMB No: Expires:08/31/2016 Monitoring of Eligible Entities ( Section 678B(a) of the Act ) Specify the proposed schedule for planned monitoring visits - including full on-site reviews; on-site reviews of newly designated entities; follow-up reviews - including return visits to entities that failed to meet State goals, standards, and requirements; and other reviews as appropriate. This is an estimated schedule to assist States in planning. States may indicate "no review" for entities the State does not plan to monitor in the performance period. For States that have a monitoring approach that does not fit within the table parameters, attach the State's proposed monitoring schedule Note: This information is associated with State Accountability Measure 4Sa(i) ; this response may pre-populate the State's annual report form. CSBG Eligible Entity Review Type Target Date Area Committee to Improve Opportunities Now, Inc. (ACTION) Central Savannah River Area Economic Opportunity Authority, Inc. (CSRA) Clayton County Community Services Authority, Inc. Coastal Georgia Area Community Action Authority, Inc. Coastal Plain Area Community Action Authority, Inc. Community Action for Improvement, Inc. (CAFI) Date of Last Full Onsite Review (if applicable) Other FY1 Q4 02/09/2015 Other FY1 Q2 01/26/2015 Other FY1 Q2 07/20/2015 Full onsite FY1 Q2 06/10/2013 Other FY1 Q2 08/20/2012 Full onsite FY1 Q2 07/16/ Concerted Services, Inc. Other FY1 Q3 10/15/ EOA Savannah  Chatham County, Inc. Other FY1 Q3 08/06/ Enrichment Services Program, Inc. (ESP) Other FY1 Q3 04/30/ Fulton-Atlanta Community Action Authority, Inc. (FACAA) Full onsite FY1 Q2 01/20/ Heart of Georgia CAC, Inc. Full onsite FY1 Q3 11/05/ Macon-Bibb County Economic Opportunity Council, Inc. Other FY1 Q3 08/05/ Middle Georgia CAC, Inc. Full onsite FY1 Q3 10/01/ Ninth District Opportunity, Inc. Other FY1 Q2 11/27/ North Georgia Community Action, Inc. Full onsite 05/14/ Overview Full onsite FY1 Q3 04/09/ Partnership for Community Action, Inc. Full onsite FY1 Q2 10/20/ Southwest Georgia CAC, Inc. Other FY1 Q4 06/04/ Tallatoona CAP, Inc. Other FY1 Q2 05/04/ West Central Georgia CAC, Inc Full onsite FY1 Q2 04/03/ Cobb County Board of Commissioners Other FY1 Q4 05/26/ Henry County Board of Commissioners Full onsite FY1 Q4 03/12/ Newton County Board of Commissioners Other FY1 Q4 06/03/2015 Brief Description of "Other" Desk Review  request submission of fiscal and programmatic documents for review Desk Review  request submission of fiscal and programmatic documents for review Desk Review  request submission of fiscal and programmatic documents for review Upcoming Onsite Review - 9/1/2015 -Desk Review  request submission of fiscal and programmatic documents for review Upcoming Onsite Review - 10/12/2015 -Desk Review  request submission of fiscal and programmatic documents for review Upcoming Onsite Review - 10/26/ Desk Review  request submission of fiscal and programmatic documents for review Desk Review  request submission of fiscal and programmatic documents for review Desk Review  request submission of fiscal and programmatic documents for review Desk Review  request submission of fiscal and programmatic documents for review Upcoming Onsite Review - 9/28/2015 -Desk Review  request submission of fiscal and programmatic documents for review Desk Review  request submission of fiscal and programmatic documents for review Desk Review  request submission of fiscal and programmatic documents for review Desk Review  request submission of fiscal and programmatic documents for review