Credit Rating Agencies
|
|
- Morgan Haynes
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SEC Acts on a Broad Range of Amendments Related to Credit Rating Agencies and the Use of Credit Ratings SUMMARY The SEC has adopted and proposed a number of changes to its rules and forms relating to the use of credit ratings in public offerings, references to ratings in SEC rules and forms, and the oversight of registered credit rating agencies. First, a group of proposed amendments would require issuers to disclose credit ratings and specific, potentially extensive related information when those ratings are used in connection with a registered offering. Registrants would also be required to disclose on Form 8-K any subsequent changes to a previously-disclosed credit rating. Second, the SEC has issued a concept release on whether it should rescind Securities Act Rule 436(g), which currently exempts NRSROs (but not other credit rating agencies) from liability as experts under Section 11 of that Act. Third, the SEC has adopted amendments to remove references to ratings of NRSROs from a few SEC rules and forms, and it has reopened the comment period with respect to similar proposals for other rules and forms. For a discussion of the amendments specifically affecting registered investment companies, see our companion publication, also issued today, titled Use of Credit Ratings Under the Investment Company Act of Finally, the SEC has voted to take action on a number of amendments to its rules governing NRSRO oversight which are intended to increase ratings transparency generally and also to facilitate greater competition in the ratings of structured finance products. The SEC also voted to propose further changes New York Washington, D.C. Los Angeles Palo Alto London Paris Frankfurt Tokyo Hong Kong Beijing Melbourne Sydney
2 that would increase NRSRO reporting and disclosure requirements, with a principal focus on perceived conflicts of interest. BACKGROUND The SEC has incorporated the term nationally recognized statistical rating organization ( NRSRO ) into various rules and forms for over 30 years, beginning with amendments to its broker-dealer net capital rule in Since then, the term NRSRO has been used by the SEC to define eligibility to use various registration statement forms, 2 and in rules that describe the information that must be disclosed by brokerdealers in customer transaction confirmations, 3 provide an exclusion from the definition of investment company for certain structured finance vehicles issuing highly-rated securities, 4 and regulate the types of securities that can be held by money market funds. 5 The term NRSRO is currently used in over 15 SEC rules and forms (excluding those directly related to NRSRO oversight) as well as in a wide range of rules imposed by individual states and self-regulatory organizations. From 1975 through 2006, the SEC used a no-action letter process to recognize credit rating agencies as NRSROs, eventually identifying seven NRSROs through this process. This changed with the enactment of the Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006 (the CRARA ), which defined the term NRSRO and created a voluntary application and registration system for NRSRO recognition. The stated purpose of the CRARA was to improve ratings quality for the protection of investors and in the public interest by fostering accountability, transparency, and competition in the credit rating agency industry. 6 The CRARA granted the SEC rulemaking authority over NRSROs with respect to creating and retaining records, disclosing financial reports, preventing the misuse of material nonpublic information, prohibiting or requiring the management and disclosure of certain conflicts of interest, and prohibiting abusive practices. The SEC adopted initial rules implementing the CRARA in June 2007 and amended those rules in February The amendments primarily required enhanced disclosure of performance measurement statistics and rating methodologies, additional recordkeeping and reporting, and public disclosure of a random sample of 10 percent of the ratings histories of issuer-paid credit ratings. 7 At the same time, the See Exchange Act Rule 15c3-1. See, e.g., Securities Act Forms S-3 and F-3. See Exchange Act Rule 10b-10. See Investment Company Act Rule 3a-7. See Investment Company Act Rule 2a-7. Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006, Pub. L. No , 120 Stat (2006). See Final Rule: Amendments to Rules for Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations, Rel. No (February 2, 2009). -2-
3 SEC proposed and reproposed additional rule amendments relating to conflicts of interest and the public disclosure of ratings histories for all outstanding issuer-paid ratings. Additional regulatory and legislative proposals regarding credit rating agency oversight have recently been submitted by a number of proponents. The SEC itself has proposed other NRSRO rule amendments that have not been adopted, and the SEC Office of the Inspector General recently released a report containing a number of suggestions for improving NRSRO oversight. 8 Additionally, Senator Jack Reed (D-RI), Representative Paul Kanjorski (D-PA), Senator Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) and the Obama Administration each have submitted to Congress separate credit rating agency reform legislative proposals, which overlap in a number of areas. 9 REGISTRATION STATEMENT DISCLOSURES REGARDING CREDIT RATINGS The SEC has proposed to impose certain disclosure requirements on issuers in registered securities offerings, including those by closed-end funds, when credit ratings are used in connection with the sale of those securities. 10 Use of a credit rating for this purpose would include any reference to a rating in oral or written selling efforts by an offering participant. Currently, Item 10(c) of Regulation S-K permits, but does not require, registrants to disclose in registration statements and periodic reports the credit ratings assigned to classes of debt securities, convertible debt securities and preferred stock. The proposed rule would add a new paragraph (g) to Item 202 of Regulation S-K to instead require certain disclosures when a registrant uses a credit rating in connection with a registered offering. In brief, the amendments would require such issuers to describe in their registration statements: the credit rating itself, along with information regarding its scope and any material limitations of the credit rating, as well as any related matters covered by the rating (e.g., non-credit payment risks); the identity of the person who paid for the credit rating, and whether the rating agency or its affiliates provided other services to the registrant or its affiliates over a specified period of time (as well as any related fees); and any final ratings not used by a registrant, as well as whether any preliminary ratings were obtained from rating agencies in a practice known as ratings shopping See The SEC s Role Regarding and Oversight of Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs), Report No. 458 (August 27, 2009), available at See the Rating Accountability and Transparency Enhancement Act of 2009, S. 1073, 111th Cong. (2009) ( RATE Act ) (proposed by Sen. Reed); Accountability and Transparency in Rating Agencies Act, H.R. 3890, 111th Cong. (2009) ( Kanjorski Proposal ) (introduced by Rep. Kanjorski and passed by the House Financial Services Committee); Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2009, Committee Print, 111th Cong. (2009) ( Dodd Proposal ) (introduced by Sen. Dodd); Subtitle C Improvements to the Regulation of of Title IX Additional Improvements to Financial Markets Regulation, available at titleix_subtc.pdf ( Obama Administration Proposal ). Proposed Rule: Credit Ratings Disclosure, Rel. No (October 7, 2009). -3-
4 An issuer would be required to disclose on a current report on Form 8-K, within four business days, any subsequent changes to the ratings required to be disclosed as described above. 11 Any material impact of such a ratings change (for example, effects on terms of debt instruments, covenant compliance or collateral posting requirements) would also need to be disclosed in the issuer s periodic reports. Comments on the proposed rule are due by December 14, A. TRIGGER FOR REQUIRED DISCLOSURE The proposed disclosure requirements apply in a broad range of circumstances: when the registrant, any selling security holder, any underwriter, or any member of a selling group in a registered offering uses a credit rating... from a credit rating agency [including but not limited to an NRSRO]... with respect to the registrant or a class of securities issued by the registrant, in connection with a registered offering. In addition, if a credit rating is used in connection with a Rule 144A offering or other private placement and the privately-offered securities are exchanged shortly thereafter for substantially identical registered securities (i.e., an Exxon Capital or A/B exchange offer), the rating would need to be disclosed in the exchange-offer registration statement even if the rating is not otherwise used in connection with that registered offering. The rule would not limit the use of ratings in Rule 144A offerings that are not followed by such an exchange offer. However, the proposed disclosure requirements would not apply to unsolicited ratings that are not used in connection with a registered offering. The disclosure requirements also would not apply when the only reference to a credit rating (in an SEC filing) relates to changes to a credit rating, liquidity of the registrant, the cost of funds of a registrant or the terms of agreements that refer to credit ratings, as long as the credit rating is not otherwise used in connection with a registered offering (presumably including with respect to any selling efforts). For example, the SEC would not consider the disclosure requirements to be triggered by the mention of a rating in a risk factor that discussed the risk of failure to maintain a specified rating and the potential impact to the issuer that could result from a change in that rating. The disclosure requirements would also not be triggered by a reference to a rating in the MD&A liquidity discussion, such as where ratings determine compliance with debt covenants, interest or dividend rates, or potential support to variable interest entities. Nevertheless, since the release indicates that the SEC would consider a credit rating to be used in connection with a registered offering if referred to in any oral or written selling efforts by covered persons, it would appear that as a practical matter issuers would have to comply with these requirements whenever a rating has been issued. We believe that the adoption of the rule as proposed would enhance the relative attractiveness of Rule 144A offerings of rated securities, 11 Although the proposed rule would add a new Item 3.04 to Form 8-K to incorporate the required credit rating disclosure, the proposal does not appear to add this Item 3.04 to the list of items included in the safe harbor at General Instruction I.A.3 of Form S-3. Consequently, it would appear that failing to file a timely update to a credit rating on Form 8-K could cause an issuer to lose its eligibility to use Form S
5 especially after recent amendments to Rule 144 in that permit unlimited unregistered resales of privately placed securities within as little as 6 months following issuance. B. REQUIRED INITIAL DISCLOSURE Once the trigger described above is met, the credit rating disclosure proposed by the amendments would be required in registration statements filed under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, including on Form 10 and Form 20-F. Disclosure would also be required in registration statements filed by closed-end funds on Form N-2 under the Securities Act and the Investment Company Act. 13 The disclosure would include information about the scope of the rating and any material limitations, certain conflicts of interest, and any ratings shopping practices. 1. General Information About the Scope and Limitations of the Rating Specifically, the proposed amendments would require disclosure of the following general information about the credit rating: The identity of the relevant credit rating agency and whether it is an NRSRO; The credit rating assigned and the date on which it was assigned; The relative rank of the credit rating within the rating agency s classification system, and the rating agency s definition or description of the applicable ratings category; All material scope limitations of the rating, and how any contingencies related to the securities are or are not reflected in the rating; For example, a registrant would need to disclose if the credit rating takes into account less than the promised return on a security (e.g., with respect to residual interests, if the credit rating only represents an evaluation of the probability that the nominal fixed obligation will be paid, without evaluating the residual cash flow); Any published designation reflecting the results of any other evaluation performed by the credit rating agency in connection with the rating, along with an explanation of the designation s meaning and relative rank; For example, such a designation could cover an evaluation of prepayment speeds, interest-rate sensitivity, or volatility; Any material differences between the terms of the securities as assumed or considered by the credit rating agency in rating the securities and (i) the minimum obligations of the security specified by the governing instruments; and (ii) the terms of the securities as used in any marketing or selling efforts; For example, disclosure would be required if the yield assumption used to rate the security differs from the expected yield that is disclosed to investors; and For further details, see our prior memorandum titled Private Offering Reform: SEC Publishes Text of Rule 144 and Rule 145 Revisions, published on December 12, Specifically, Item 10.6 of Form N-2, which currently requires certain disclosures if a registrant discloses an NRSRO rating in its prospectus, would be revised to instead require the same disclosure requirements contained in proposed Item 202(g) of Regulation S-K. -5-
6 A statement informing investors that a credit rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold securities; that it may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning credit rating agency; that each credit rating is applicable only to the specific class of securities to which it applies; and that investors should perform their own evaluation as to whether an investment in the security is appropriate. Where a preliminary prospectus includes information about any credit rating used in connection with a registered offering, including any initial ratings assigned, the proposed amendments would require the registrant to convey to the purchaser any change to that rating (or any different rating) that becomes available before effectiveness. If any such rating changes are made while offers or sales are being made, the registrant would also be required to disclose the changes in a post-effective amendment or a supplement to the prospectus, unless the changes have been disclosed in a document incorporated by reference into a registration statement on Form S-3. The proposing release explains that in connection with a Rule 415 shelf offering conducted on a delayed basis, the final rating could be disclosed in a prospectus supplement or a free writing prospectus, such as a term sheet, if the disclosure was also included in the registration statement (including through disclosure in a prospectus supplement that becomes a part of the registration statement pursuant to Rule 430B). 2. Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest In addition to the general information described above, the proposed amendments to Item 202(g) of Regulation S-K would also require certain disclosures designed to address potential conflicts of interest. Specifically, the registrant would be required to disclose the identity of the person that compensates the credit rating agency for providing the rating. Additionally, if the credit rating agency or its affiliates has provided other non-rating services to the registrant or its affiliates, the disclosure must include a description of such services along with the aggregate fees paid for the non-rating services provided during the registrant s last completed fiscal year and any subsequent interim period up to the filing date. If such non-rating services have been provided, the registrant must also disclose the fee paid for the credit rating that is required to be disclosed. Although the proposal would not require general disclosure of fees paid for the credit rating unless such non-rating services have been provided, the SEC is requesting comment on whether fee information should be disclosed in all circumstances. These requirements could be potentially significant to financial services firms that offer structured products and other users of rating agency services that offer rated securities in registered offerings. 3. Disclosure of Preliminary and Other Final Ratings Proposed Item 202(g) of Regulation S-K would also require certain disclosures regarding the practice of ratings shopping, which involves a registrant soliciting preliminary credit ratings from one or more rating agencies before deciding which agency to engage. 14 If the trigger described above is met and a 14 Provisions focused on ratings shopping were also included in the legislative reform proposals from the Obama Administration and Rep. Kanjorski. The SEC has noted that the practice of ratings -6-
7 registrant is required to disclose a credit rating, the proposal would also require the registrant to disclose all preliminary ratings of the same class of securities obtained from credit rating agencies other than the agency providing the final rating. 15 Similarly, the registrant would also be required to disclose any final credit rating that it obtained but did not use. The proposing release notes that the SEC intends a broad reading of the phrase preliminary credit rating. Specifically, the proposed instructions to Item 202(g) of Regulation S-K provide that the term would include any rating that is not published, any range of ratings, any oral or other indications of a potential rating or range of ratings and all other preliminary indications of a rating. This would include ratings on a particular structure of a security even if not tied to a specific registrant or group of assets. For example, with respect to asset-backed securities, a preliminary rating would also include an indication of a rating with respect to a structure in which the specific pool assets or originators were not yet identified, if the registrant utilizes that structure. The proposal would also require disclosure of a preliminary rating even if there have been changes to the security. For these purposes, a preliminary or final credit rating would be deemed to be obtained by the registrant if it is solicited by or on behalf of the registrant from a credit rating agency. Thus, a rating solicited by an underwriter, deal sponsor or depositor, or any other person involved in structuring a deal would be presumed to be solicited on behalf of the registrant. When a preliminary rating or unused final rating is required to be disclosed, the proposal would require disclosure of substantially the same general information required for final ratings as described above (e.g., the scope of the rating and its material limitations). However, the proposing release notes that registrants would be entitled to rely on Securities Act Rule 409 to omit disclosure if such information cannot be obtained without unreasonable effort or expense. C. REQUIRED SUBSEQUENT DISCLOSURE IN EXCHANGE ACT REPORTS The SEC is also proposing amendments to its Exchange Act rules and forms to require registrants to disclose subsequent changes to a previously-disclosed credit rating. Specifically, once a registrant (including a closed-end fund) receives a notice or other communication from a credit rating agency that the agency has made a final decision to change or withdraw such a rating, the registrant would be required to file a report on Form 8-K within four business days. The required report would include the date the registrant received the notice or communication, the name of the credit rating agency and 15 shopping could lead to ratings inflation, with issuers obtaining preliminary ratings from multiple NRSROs before hiring the NRSRO proposing to provide the highest rating. The proposal would not require disclosure of preliminary ratings obtained from the credit rating agency that issues the final rating. However, Exchange Act Rule 17g-5 prohibits an NRSRO from, among other things, issuing or maintaining a rating when it or its affiliate has made recommendations with respect to the structure of the security. -7-
8 whether it is an NRSRO, and the nature of the credit rating agency s decision. Similar disclosure would be required from foreign private issuers on an annual basis in their reports on Form 20-F. This ongoing disclosure requirement would only apply to credit ratings that are initially required to be disclosed under the proposed rules once they become effective, and would not apply to any previouslyobtained ratings. Additionally, the proposing release notes that under the current rules, a registrant would be required to disclose in its periodic reports any material impact of a change in a previously-disclosed rating. CONCEPT RELEASE ON REMOVING THE EXEMPTION FOR NRSROS FROM LIABILITY UNDER SECTION 11 OF THE SECURITIES ACT The SEC has issued a concept release seeking comment on whether it should propose to rescind Securities Act Rule 436(g). 16 The rule effectively shields NRSROs from liability as experts under Section 11 of the Securities Act for material misstatements or omissions with respect to credit ratings included in a registration statement. Section 7 of the Securities Act requires a registrant to file with the registration statement the written consent of certain experts who are named as having prepared or certified any part of the registration statement, or [are] named as having prepared or certified a report or valuation for use in connection with the registration statement. Rule 436(g) currently provides that a rating issued by an NRSRO with respect to a class of debt securities, convertible debt securities, or preferred stock will not be considered part of the registration statement prepared or certified by a person within the meaning of sections 7 and 11 of the Securities Act. Because of this rule, a registrant is not required to file the consent of an NRSRO with a registration statement, and the NRSRO avoids potential exposure to liability as an expert. Notably, the current Rule 436(g) exemption applies only to NRSROs; other credit rating agencies must submit consents as exhibits to the registration statement, thereby rendering them subject to Section 11 liability as experts, although we believe this happens very infrequently in practice. The concept release notes that if Rule 436(g) was rescinded, NRSROs would be treated as other credit rating agencies for the purposes of Securities Act liability if their credit ratings are disclosed in registration statements. To address practical and timing concerns with respect to the filing of the required consents, the SEC has suggested a framework for such filings. For example, an offering registered on Form S-1 would likely require a consent that would need to be filed prior to effectiveness. With respect to shelf offerings made in reliance on Securities Act Rule 415, the consent filing procedures would depend on whether the applicable rating is specific to the issuer, program or class of securities, or individual issuance. Issuer- 16 Concept Release on Possible Rescission of Rule 436(g) Under the Securities Act of 1933, Rel. No (October 7, 2009) -8-
9 specific ratings would be disclosed in the prospectus that is part of the registration statement, and the consent would be filed before effectiveness. In the case of an issuer-based rating or a program-based rating (such as a medium-term note facility), only a new or changed rating issued by the rating agency after the date of the last consent, or a change in any other information as to which the agency is an expert, would require a new consent. In the case of an issuance-specific rating, a new consent would be required for each issuance. The rescission of Rule 436(g), when combined with the SEC s proposal to require disclosure by registrants of credit ratings used in connection with a registered offering, could significantly increase the exposure of NRSROs to liability under Section 11 of the Securities Act, lead to significant practical changes in the manner in which credit ratings are used in connection with registered offerings, or both. The SEC acknowledges in the concept release a concern that NRSROs, which currently issue the vast majority of credit ratings, might be unwilling to give their consent and take on expert liability under Section 11 of the Securities Act. In addition, any proposed imposition of securities law liability on NRSROs with respect to their credit ratings might well encounter challenges based on First Amendment concerns, as it has been argued that certain ratings reports constitute statements about matters of public concern and should thus be afforded heightened First Amendment protection. 17 Comments on the concept release are due by December 14, REFERENCES TO NRSRO CREDIT RATINGS IN SEC RULES AND FORMS Citing an intent to address concerns that references to NRSRO ratings in Commission rules may have contributed to an undue reliance on those ratings by market participants, the SEC has adopted amendments that would eliminate a number of such references. 18 In addition, the SEC has reopened the comment period for similar proposals with respect to other rules and forms. 19 The adopted amendments became effective on November 12, 2009, and comments on the proposed amendments are due by December 8, Amendments specifically affecting registered investment companies are discussed in See, e.g., In re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISA Litigation, 511 F.Supp.2d 742, 825 (S.D. Tex. 2005) (holding in part that nationally published reports about a Top Fortune 500 company s creditworthiness were matters of public concern and thus afforded heightened First Amendment protection). Final Rule: References to Ratings of Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations, Rel. No (October 5, 2009). These amendments, along with others, were originally proposed in July See Proposed Rule: References to Ratings of Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations, Rel. No (July 1, 2008); Proposed Rule: Security Ratings, Rel. No (July 1, 2008); Proposed Rule: References to Ratings of Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations, Rel. No. IC (July 1, 2008). Proposed Rule: References to Ratings of Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations, Rel. No (October 5, 2009). -9-
10 our companion publication, also issued today, titled Use of Credit Ratings Under the Investment Company Act of A. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS 1. Exchange Act Regulation M Regulation M is designed to prohibit certain activities in connection with a securities offering that could artificially influence the market for the offered security. Currently, these rules include exceptions for distributions of nonconvertible debt securities, nonconvertible preferred securities, and asset-backed securities, provided that such securities are rated investment grade by at least one NRSRO. The SEC has proposed to replace the NRSRO investment grade standard with other bright-line alternatives. Specifically, the proposed exception for distributions of non-convertible debt and preferred securities would require that the issuer (i) qualify as a well known seasoned issuer ( WKSI ) pursuant to Securities Act Rule 405 and (ii) have issued, in the prior three years, at least $1 billion aggregate principal amount of registered nonconvertible securities, other than common equity, in primary offerings for cash. 20 With respect to asset-backed securities, the proposed exception would require the offer and sale of the security to be registered using Form S-3, in order to except asset-backed securities that are approximately the equivalent quality of securities currently excepted using the investment grade standard. 2. Securities Act Rule 415 and Related Forms Rule 415, the shelf registration rule, provides eligibility criteria for issuers who wish to conduct primary securities offerings on a delayed or continuous basis. Currently, an offering of non-convertible debt securities, asset-backed securities, or mortgage-related securities (a subset of asset-backed securities) may be registered on Form S-3 or Form F-3 if the securities receive certain minimum NRSRO ratings, regardless of the issuer s public equity float. 21 The proposed amendments would replace these credit rating thresholds with alternative requirements This latter requirement is derived from paragraph (1)(i)(B)(1) of the Rule 405 definition of WKSI, which permits an issuer to qualify as a WKSI if (among other things) it has met this $1 billion offering threshold over the past three years. Alternatively, pursuant to paragraph (1)(i)(A) of the definition of WKSI, an issuer may qualify as a WKSI by (among other things) having a market value of equity of at least $700 million. Under the proposed amendments, an issuer that has qualified as a WKSI by meeting the $700 million market value of equity threshold may not necessarily qualify for the Regulation M exception for distributions of non-convertible debt and preferred securities. To qualify for the Regulation M exception, such an issuer would also need to have met the $1 billion offering threshold. WKSIs may use Form S-3 to register shelf offerings of certain securities that do not meet these rating thresholds. -10-
11 With respect to offerings of non-convertible debt on Form S-3 or Form F-3, a registrant would instead be required to have issued $1 billion of non-convertible securities (other than common equity) in registered primary offerings for cash during the previous three-year period, which is also one of the requirements proposed for the exception to the prohibitions of Regulation M. This change could preclude the use of shelf registration for highly rated but smaller or infrequent issuers, placing them at a potential disadvantage. The credit rating requirements for shelf offerings of asset-backed securities, including mortgage-related securities, would be replaced with requirements that initial and subsequent resales of the offerings be made in minimum denominations of $250,000 and that initial sales be made only to qualified institutional buyers as defined in Securities Act Rule 144A. In addition to reopening the comment period, the SEC has noted that it is currently engaged in a broad review of its regulation of asset-backed securities, and that this review includes an evaluation of alternatives to the credit ratings requirements other than those currently proposed. 3. Investment Company Act Rule 3a-7 Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act provides an exclusion from the definition of investment company for structured finance vehicles if, among other conditions, securities offered to the general public by issuers relying on the rule are rated in one of the four highest ratings categories by at least one NRSRO. An exception to this rating requirement exists for certain securities sold to accredited investors (as defined in Securities Act Regulation D) and qualified institutional buyers, provided that the issuer and underwriters use reasonable care to ensure that all sales and resales are in fact made to such persons. The proposed amendments would remove the above-mentioned references to credit ratings by eliminating entirely the exclusion for structured finance vehicles that offer securities to retail investors. As a result, all structured financings relying on the exclusion in Rule 3a-7 could only be sold or resold to accredited investors and qualified institutional buyers. The proposed amendments also would remove references to NRSRO ratings in two other areas of Rule 3a-7 and replace them with subjective standards. First, paragraph (a)(3) of the rule permits an issuer relying on the rule s exclusion to acquire additional eligible assets or dispose of assets if, among other conditions, the acquisition or disposition would not result in a downgrade to the rating of the issuer s outstanding fixed-income securities. The proposed amendments would replace this condition with a requirement that the issuer have procedures in place to ensure that the acquisition or disposition does not adversely affect the full and timely payment of the outstanding fixed-income securities. Second, paragraph (a)(4) of the rule requires an issuer of certain securities to ensure that the cash flows from the underlying asset pool are periodically deposited in a segregated account consistent with the rating of the outstanding fixed-income securities. The proposed amendments would change this -11-
12 safekeeping provision to require instead that the cash flows be deposited in a segregated account consistent with the full and timely payment of the outstanding fixed income securities. The replacement of bright-line tests based on ratings with the less precise standards articulated in the proposed amendments may raise potential concerns about the ability of some structured finance issuers to comply with Rule 3a-7 on an ongoing basis. Non-compliance with the rule could render an issuer an unregistered investment company, with significant adverse consequences. 22 In the absence of additional guidance, Rule 3a-7 could become a less attractive way to avoid investment company status even for issuers that are willing to exclude retail investors from their offerings. As discussed above, the SEC is also generally reviewing its regulation of asset-backed securities, which may affect the exemptions provided by Rule 3a Exchange Act Rule 10b-10 Rule 10b-10, the broker-dealer transaction confirmation rule, generally requires broker-dealers that effect transactions in certain securities to provide their customers with written notification of certain transaction terms at or before completion of each transaction. With respect to transactions in debt securities (other than government securities), paragraph (a)(8) of Rule 10b-10 requires each such confirmation to include a disclosure if the security is not rated by an NRSRO. The proposed amendments would delete this disclosure requirement; however, the SEC noted that broker-dealers could still voluntarily disclose such information. 5. Investment Advisers Act Rule 206(3)-3T Section 206(3) of the Investment Advisers Act generally prohibits an investment adviser, directly or indirectly acting as principal, knowingly to sell to or purchase from a client any security, without providing a written disclosure to the client and obtaining consent. Rule 206(3)-3T provides an exception from these transaction-specific disclosure and consent requirements for investment advisers that also are registered as broker-dealers, provided certain conditions are met. This exception is available with respect to client transactions where the adviser or its affiliate is the issuer or an underwriter of the security only if the security is a non-convertible debt security that is rated by at least two NRSROs in one of the four highest rating categories. The proposed amendment would replace the NRSRO rating requirement with subjective credit risk and liquidity standards. Specifically, the adviser would be required to make an independent determination that the security is subject to no greater than moderate credit risk and that it is sufficiently liquid that it can be sold at or near its carrying value within a reasonably short period of time. 22 For example, Section 7 of the Investment Company Act generally prohibits the offer, sale, or purchase of securities by an unregistered investment company. Pursuant to Section 47, any contract made in violation of the Investment Company Act may be unenforceable or subject to rescission. -12-
13 Rule 206(3)-3T is set to expire at the end of this year. The SEC has also stated that it intends to consider taking separate, broader action on Rule 206(3)-3T. 6. Exchange Act Rule 15c3-1 Under Rule 15c3-1, the net capital rule, broker-dealers must take a capital charge (or haircut ) against certain types of securities in calculating their net capital. The current rule permits a lower haircut to be taken against certain investment grade rated securities. To qualify for the lower haircut, commercial paper must be rated in one of the three highest rating categories by at least two NRSROs, while nonconvertible debt securities and preferred stock must be rated in one of the four highest rating categories by at least two NRSROs. The SEC has proposed replacing the NRSRO rating standard with two subjective standards for credit risk and liquidity risk. To qualify for the reduced haircut, the proposal would require commercial paper to be subject to a minimal amount of credit risk and have sufficient liquidity such that it can be sold at or near its carrying value almost immediately. Nonconvertible debt and preferred stock would have to be subject to no greater than moderate credit risk and have sufficient liquidity such that it can be sold at or near its carrying value within a reasonably short period of time. In the original July 2008 proposing release, the SEC stated that it expects to take the view that the NRSRO rating thresholds reflected in the current rule would satisfy the new subjective rating standards, although NRSRO ratings would no longer be the only means of qualifying for the reduced haircut. However, in its current request for additional comments, the SEC asks whether it should require additional analysis beyond the NRSRO ratings if broker-dealers continue to rely on those ratings for purposes of satisfying the rule s requirements. The proposal also would remove the authorization to rely on NRSRO ratings for the purposes of determining counterparty credit risk pursuant to Appendices E and F to Rule 15c3-1. Consequently, a broker-dealer or OTC derivatives dealer that wished to use an alternative net capital deduction calculation approach set forth in these Appendices would be required to request SEC approval to determine credit risk weights based on internal calculations. B. ADOPTED AMENDMENTS The adopted amendments remove the distinction between investment grade and non-investment grade corporate debt securities in certain Exchange Act forms and rules relating to Alternative Trading Systems ( ATS ) and pilot trading systems. Under Rule 3a1-1, the SEC may require an ATS to register as a national securities exchange if it represents at least 40% of the average daily trading volume ( ADTV ) in one of eight enumerated classes of securities, or if it represents at least 50% of the ADTV in any single security and at least 5% of the ADTV in any class of securities. Two of the eight classes of securities for purposes of this rule are -13-
14 investment grade corporate debt securities and non-investment grade debt securities. 23 The amendments remove the distinction in Rule 3a1-1 between these two classes of securities, instead replacing them with a single class of corporate debt securities. The SEC made the same change to Regulation ATS. Prior to the amendments, the distinction between investment grade and non-investment grade corporate debt securities was primarily recognized in two aspects of Regulation ATS. These aspects of the regulation impose fair access requirements and capacity, integrity and security standards on any ATS that meets specified ADTV thresholds with respect to certain classes of securities. The adopted amendments also combine these two debt categories with respect to certain trading volume reporting obligations on Form ATS-R and Form PILOT. 24 AMENDMENTS THAT THE SEC HAS VOTED TO ADOPT AND PROPOSE WITH RESPECT TO NRSRO OVERSIGHT On September 17, 2009, the SEC voted to adopt and propose certain amendments to its regulations governing the oversight of NRSROs. The official releases have not yet been published; consequently, the analysis below is based on other information previously published by the SEC. 25 A. AMENDMENTS EXPECTED TO BE ADOPTED 1. Disclosure of Ratings Histories of All Ratings Exchange Act Rule 17g-2 contains recordkeeping and disclosure requirements applicable to NRSROs. The amendments to Rule 17g-2(d) are expected to require each NRSRO to publicly disclose complete ratings action histories (including upgrades, downgrades, affirmations and withdrawals) for all outstanding ratings initially made by the NRSRO as of June 26, To help minimize the adverse revenue impact from providing ratings histories to the public free of charge, the amendments will allow NRSROs to make the disclosures within one year after the action is taken for ratings that are paid for by the obligor being rated or by the issuer, underwriter, or sponsor of the security being rated ( issuer-paid ratings). For subscriber-paid ratings, the permissible delay period will be extended to two years. The disclosures must be made in an online, searchable format. The stated purpose of the disclosure requirement is to provide market participants a broad set of data which they can then analyze in order to assess the accuracy of the ratings issued by NRSROs. Similar An investment grade corporate debt security is a security that, among other things, has been rated in one of the four highest ratings categories by at least one NRSRO. The adopting release notes that in over nine years since Rule 19b-5 and Form PILOT were adopted, no SRO has ever established a pilot trading system pursuant to Rule 19b-5 to trade corporate debt securities. See e.g., Fact Sheet: Strengthening Oversight of Open Meeting of the Securities and Exchange Commission (Sept. 17, 2009), available at
15 disclosure requirements applicable to all outstanding ratings were initially proposed by the SEC in June However, largely in response to serious business concerns raised by commenters, the SEC in February 2009 instead chose to adopt a narrower disclosure requirement and seek further comment on the issue. The February 2009 amendments to Rule 17g-2(d) required each NRSRO to publicly disclose on its website complete ratings action histories for 10% of outstanding issuer-paid ratings only. Such disclosures, which could be made on a 6-month lagged basis, were required for each ratings class in which the NRSRO had made at least 500 issuer-paid ratings. 26 The amendments expected to be adopted will expand the substantive disclosure requirement to all ratings. 2. Disclosures Related to Structured-Finance Ratings Paid for by Arrangers Exchange Act Rule 17g-5 describes certain conflicts of interest that must be disclosed and managed and other conflicts of interest that are prohibited entirely. The expected amendments to Rule 17g-5 will likely add to the list of conflicts that must be disclosed and managed the act of issuing or maintaining a credit rating for certain structured finance products that are paid for by the issuer, sponsor, or underwriter (hereinafter arranger ) of the product. Additionally, the amendments are expected to require an NRSRO that is hired by an arranger to perform a structured finance credit rating to disclose to other NRSROs the relevant transaction; this would be accomplished by the hired NRSRO listing each such transaction on a password-protected website that it maintains. The hired NRSRO also must obtain a reasonably reliable representation from the arranger that the arranger will provide other NRSROs with the same information provided to the hired NRSRO; 27 similarly, the arranger would fulfill this requirement by posting the information on a password-protected website that the arranger itself maintains. Access to these websites would only be granted to competing NRSROs that annually certify to the SEC that they are using the information solely for the purpose of determining credit ratings, and that they will rate a certain percentage of the products for which they obtain information (the percentage originally proposed was 10%). These procedures are intended by the SEC to encourage the provision of competing ratings for structured finance products. To further enable issuers to provide to NRSROs access to product-related information as described above, the SEC has also voted to adopt an amendment to Regulation FD providing that such disclosures do not violate the regulation, even if the NRSROs do not freely publicize their credit ratings The NRSRO ratings classes are (i) financial institutions, brokers or dealers; (ii) insurance companies; (iii) corporate issuers; (iv) issuers of asset-backed securities; and (v) issuers of government securities, municipal securities or foreign government securities. The original proposing release noted that it would not be reasonable for the hired NRSRO to rely on such a representation if it were aware that the arranger had breached prior representations a number of times. -15-
16 B. AMENDMENTS EXPECTED TO BE PROPOSED 1. Additional Disclosures on Form NRSRO Regarding Potential Conflicts of Interest The SEC has voted to propose two amendments to its rules and forms to address the perceived conflict of interest associated with the influence that certain large customers may have on the substance of credit ratings issued by NRSROs. The SEC has voted to propose to amend Form NRSRO, the application form used by credit rating agencies seeking NRSRO designation, to require additional information regarding potential conflicts of interest related to certain large customers. Applicants would be required to disclose the percentage of their net revenue attributable to the 20 largest users of the agency s credit rating services. Additionally, applicants would be required to disclose the percentage of their net revenue attributable to services and products not related to credit ratings. Additionally, the SEC has voted to propose to require each NRSRO to publish on its website annually a consolidated report that contains specific information about each person who paid for a credit rating. The report would include the percentage of net revenue earned by the NRSRO for providing products and services, other than credit rating services, to each such person. The report would also include the relative standing of the person (top 10%, top 25%, top 50%, bottom 50%, or bottom 25%) with respect to the total amount of net revenue attributable to that person. The NRSRO would be required to include the website address of the report whenever it publishes a credit rating in a report, press release, announcement, or website. These types of perceived conflicts have been the focus of attention by the SEC and lawmakers in other recent rulemaking actions and legislative proposals. For example, amendments to the conflict-of-interest rules adopted in February 2009 prohibit NRSROs from issuing or maintaining a rating where the fee paid for the rating was negotiated, discussed, or arranged by a person with responsibility for participating in the determination of credit ratings or the development or approval of rating methodologies. 28 Another amendment adopted by the SEC in February 2009 prohibits NRSROs from issuing or maintaining a rating if an affiliate of the NRSRO has provided certain structuring advice to the issuer. 29 In fact, credit rating agency reform legislation proposed by the Obama Administration would entirely prohibit NRSROs or their affiliates from providing to issuers any consulting services unrelated to a specific credit rating issuance. 30 That legislation would also require each credit rating report to contain a disclosure regarding the number of ratings the NRSRO has provided to the obligor or its affiliates in the preceding two years and the gross amount of fees billed to those entities during that time See Exchange Act Rule 17g-5(c)(6). See Exchange Act Rule 17g-5(c)(5). See Obama Administration Proposal, supra note
17 2. Compliance Review Reports Section 15E(j) of the Exchange Act requires each NRSRO to designate a compliance officer responsible for ensuring compliance with the NRSRO s policies and procedures and with all applicable laws and regulations. Separately, Rule 17g-3 describes certain reports that each NRSRO must furnish annually to the SEC. The SEC has voted to propose to amend the reporting requirements to include a report describing the NRSRO s compliance reviews for the most recently ended fiscal year, similar to provisions in legislative proposals from Senator Reed, Representative Kanjorski and Senator Dodd. 31 The annual compliance report would include an outline of the steps taken to administer the NRSRO s policies and procedures and to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Additionally, the report would describe any material compliance issues identified by the compliance officer as well as any steps taken to remedy those issues. The report would also list every person within the NRSRO who was advised of those compliance issues. * * * Copyright Sullivan & Cromwell LLP See RATE Act, Kanjorski Proposal and Dodd Proposal, supra note
18 ABOUT SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP Sullivan & Cromwell LLP is a global law firm that advises on major domestic and cross-border M&A, finance and corporate transactions, significant litigation and corporate investigations, and complex regulatory, tax and estate planning matters. Founded in 1879, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP has more than 700 lawyers on four continents, with four offices in the U.S., including its headquarters in New York, three offices in Europe, two in Australia and three in Asia. CONTACTING SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP This publication is provided by Sullivan & Cromwell LLP as a service to clients and colleagues. The information contained in this publication should not be construed as legal advice. Questions regarding the matters discussed in this publication may be directed to any of our lawyers listed below, or to any other Sullivan & Cromwell LLP lawyer with whom you have consulted in the past on similar matters. If you have not received this publication directly from us, you may obtain a copy of any past or future related publications from Jennifer Rish ( ; rishj@sullcrom.com) or Alison Alifano ( ; alifanoa@sullcrom.com) in our New York office. CONTACTS New York Robert E. Buckholz, Jr buckholzr@sullcrom.com David B. Harms harmsd@sullcrom.com Frederick Wertheim wertheimf@sullcrom.com Washington, D.C. Eric J. Kadel, Jr kadelej@sullcrom.com Robert S. Risoleo risoleor@sullcrom.com DC_LAN01:
The Impact of the Dodd-Frank Act s Credit Rating Agency Reform on Public Companies
Volume 24 Number 9, September 2010 The Impact of the Dodd-Frank Act s Credit Rating Agency Reform on Public Companies The Dodd-Frank Act not only imposes a new regulatory regime on credit rating agencies,
More informationReport on Review of Reliance on Credit Ratings
Report on Review of Reliance on Credit Ratings As Required by Section 939A(c) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act This is a Report by the Staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
More informationModel Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement Guidance Notes
Model Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement Guidance Notes [4(2) Program; Guaranteed] The Bond Market Association ( the Association ) is publishing a guaranteed form of Model Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement
More informationSEC Votes To Adopt Securities Act Rule Reform and Shell Company Regulations; Considers Matters Remanded by Court of Appeals
Home Previous Page SEC Votes To Adopt Securities Act Rule Reform and Shell Company Regulations; Considers Matters Remanded by Court of Appeals FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 2005-99 Washington, D.C., July 1, 2005
More informationDECEMBER 8, 2010 FINANCIAL MARKETS UPDATE. SEC Proposes Rules Exempting Certain Private Fund Advisers from Investment Adviser Registration.
December 8, 2010 FINANCIAL MARKETS UPDATE SEC Proposes Rules Exempting Certain Private Fund Advisers from Investment Adviser Registration The Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC ) has published
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT BLOCK TRADE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT BLOCK TRADE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Block Trades and Distributions What is a block trade? Many people use the term block trade colloquially. Technically, a block trade is
More informationRegistered Adviser Custody Rules
SEC Adopts Final Rules and Issues Guidance to Safeguard the Custody of Client Assets by Investment Advisers SUMMARY The SEC has adopted and published amendments to Rule 206(4)-2 under the Investment Advisers
More informationF R E Q U E N T L Y A S K E D Q U E S T I O N S A B O U T P I P E S
F R E Q U E N T L Y A S K E D Q U E S T I O N S A B O U T P I P E S Understanding PIPEs What are PIPEs? A PIPE (Private Investment in Public Equity) refers to any private placement of securities of an
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM S-4 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 OMB APPROVAL OMB Number: 3235-0324 Expires: May 31, 2017 Estimated average burden hours per response.. 4,099.6 FORM S-4 REGISTRATION
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM S-3 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
OMB APPROVAL OMB Number: 3235-0073 Expires: October 31, 2014 Estimated average burden hours per response...... 472.49 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM S-3 REGISTRATION
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT REGULATION S
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT REGULATION S Understanding Regulation S What is Regulation S? Regulation S provides an exclusion from the Section 5 registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933,
More informationThe Federal Reserve s Final Rule on Merchant Banking and Revised Capital Proposal for Investment Activities
MEMORANDUM May 4, 2001 RE: The Federal Reserve s Final Rule on Merchant Banking and Revised Capital Proposal for Investment Activities The Federal Reserve Board (the FRB ) has taken two important steps
More informationDodd-Frank Act Changes Affecting Private Fund Managers and Other Investment Advisers By Adam Gale and Garrett Lynam
Dodd-Frank Act Changes Affecting Private Fund Managers and Other Investment Advisers By Adam Gale and Garrett Lynam I. Introduction The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ( Dodd-Frank
More informationo The filing and timing requirements are summarized on Exhibit A. Other Securities Law Issues
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP CHECKPOINTS: THE CONSEQUENCES OF CROSSING VARIOUS OWNERSHIP THRESHOLDS WHEN INVESTING B. JEFFERY BELL * This memorandum outlines certain considerations associated with the acquisition
More informationAsset-Backed Securities and Companies in Mortgage-Related Businesses under the Investment Company Act
Asset-Backed Securities and Companies in Mortgage-Related Businesses under the Investment SEC Issues Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Amend Rule 3a-7 under the Investment and Concept Release on
More informationSecurities Regulation - Statutes Quinn - Fall 2004
I. Securities Act of 1933: A. 2 p. 2 (definition section) 1. Subsection (a)(1) says that the term security means any note, stock, treasury stock investment contract put, call option, or privilege entered
More informationAn Investment Company Director s Guide to. Oversight of. Codes of Ethics. and. Personal Investing INVESTMENT COMPANY INSTITUTE
An Investment Company Director s Guide to Oversight of Codes of Ethics and Personal Investing INVESTMENT COMPANY INSTITUTE An Investment Company Director s Guide to Oversight of Codes of Ethics and Personal
More informationBroker-Dealer Audit and Reporting Updates
PCAOB Report and New SEC Rules Address Audit, Financial Reporting, Internal Control and Risk Management Issues Relating to Broker-Dealers These Developments May Be Relevant for Audit Committees of Public
More informationpersist after the IPO may expose the company to stockholder litigation, SEC enforcement action, and criminal prosecution. 8
10:5 INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS persist after the IPO may expose the company to stockholder litigation, SEC enforcement action, and criminal prosecution. 8 10:5 Impact of the JOBS Act 10:5.1 Overview On
More informationNY2 711869. Securities Act Exemptions/ Private Placements December 2012
NY2 711869 Securities Act Exemptions/ Private Placements December 2012 Securities Act of 1933 Registration Framework 5 - Must register all transactions absent an exemption from the registration requirements
More informationHouse Financial Services Draft OTC Derivatives Legislative Proposal
House Financial Services Draft OTC Derivatives Legislative Proposal House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank Releases Discussion Draft of the Over-the-Counter Derivatives Markets Act of 2009, on
More informationSEC Adopts Rules to Implement the Private Fund Investment Advisers Registration Act
SEC Adopts Rules to Implement the Private Fund Investment Advisers Registration Act Jason E. Brown and Joel A. Wattenbarger of Ropes & Gray LLP On June 22, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission
More informationDue Diligence in Regulation D Offerings
FINRA Provides Guidance on the Obligation of Broker-Dealers to Conduct Reasonable Investigations in Regulation D Offerings SUMMARY FINRA has published a regulatory notice providing guidance to broker-dealers
More informationA Basic Overview of Securities Regulation in British Columbia
SECURITIES FOR JUNIOR LAWYERS AND LEGAL SUPPORT STAFF PAPER 1.1 A Basic Overview of Securities Regulation in British Columbia These materials were prepared by Dwight D. Dee of Miller Thomson LLP, Vancouver,
More informationSecurities Update. SEC Proposes New Rules for Asset-Backed Securities. Securities Act Registration. Definition of Asset-Backed Security.
Securities Update SEC Proposes New Rules for Asset-Backed Securities May 21, 2004 On May 3, 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed a massive set of rules for asset-backed securities ( ABS
More informationPrivate Placements in Mergers and Acquisitions
THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Continuing Legal Education Regulation D Offerings and Private Placements March 14-16, 2013 Private Placements in Mergers and Acquisitions by Robert B. Robbins Pillsbury Winthrop
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K OMB APPROVAL OMB Number: 3235-0063 Expires: March 31, 2018 Estimated average burden hours per response.... 1,998.78 A.
More informationRaising EB-5 Capital: Key Securities Laws Considerations and a Compliance Roadmap
Raising EB-5 Capital: Key Securities Laws Considerations and a Compliance Roadmap Mariza E. McKee, Robert J. Ahrenholz and Robert B. Keim, Kutak Rock LLP, with Practical Law Labor & Employment A Practice
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT RIGHTS OFFERINGS
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT RIGHTS OFFERINGS Background What is a rights offering? A rights offering typically provides an issuer s existing shareholders the opportunity to purchase a pro rata portion
More information5.1.2 OSC Rule 48-501 Trading during Distributions, Formal Bids and Share Exchange Transactions and Companion Policy 48-501CP to OSC Rule 48-501
5.1.2 OSC Rule 48-501 Trading during Distributions, Formal Bids and Share Exchange Transactions and Companion Policy 48-501CP to OSC Rule 48-501 Ontario Securities Commission Rule 48-501 Trading during
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT RULE 10b - 18 AND STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAMS
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT RULE 10b - 18 AND STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAMS The Regulation What is Rule 10b-18? Rule 10b-18 provides an issuer (and its affiliated purchasers ) with a non-exclusive safe
More informationF R E Q U E N T L Y A S K E D Q U E S T I O N S A B O U T R U L E 1 4 4 A N D R U L E 1 4 5
F R E Q U E N T L Y A S K E D Q U E S T I O N S A B O U T R U L E 1 4 4 A N D R U L E 1 4 5 Understanding Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933 What is Rule 144? Rule 144 permits public resales of
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K OMB APPROVAL OMB Number: 3235-0063 Expires: December 31, 2014 Estimated average burden hours per response.... 1,998.65
More informationArticles. SEC Adopts Rules to Allow Crowdfunding Beginning May 16, 2016. Alan Bickerstaff, Jeff C. Dodd and Ted Gilman December 2, 2015
SEC Adopts Rules to Allow Crowdfunding Beginning May 16, 2016 Alan Bickerstaff, Jeff C. Dodd and Ted Gilman December 2, 2015 Over two years after proposing rules, the Securities and Exchange Commission
More informationAlert Memo. SEC Proposes Revisions to Remove Credit Ratings from Regulation M, Broker-Dealer Net Capital Rule, Other Exchange Act Rules
Alert Memo MAY 9, 2011 SEC Proposes Revisions to Remove Credit Ratings from Regulation M, Broker-Dealer Net Capital Rule, Other Exchange Act Rules In the third of a series of related rule proposals required
More informationFORM S-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM S-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OMB APPROVAL OMB Number: 3235-0065 Expires: March 31, 2018 Estimated
More informationJumpstart Our Business Startups ( JOBS ) Act
Jumpstart Our Business Startups ( JOBS ) Act An Overview July 2012 General The JOBS Act liberalizes the federal securities laws in a variety of ways discussed in the following slides. As issuers and market
More informationFS Regulatory Brief SEC Proposes Amendments to Broker- Dealer Financial Reporting Rule
SEC Proposes Amendments to Broker- Dealer Financial Reporting Rule Amendments call for brokerdealers assertion of compliance with the Financial Responsibility Rules, new reviews by independent auditors,
More informationA Guide to Crowdfunding for Companies Seeking to Raise Capital
A Guide to Crowdfunding for Companies Seeking to Raise Capital A publication of the Securities Law Practice mefiifmp=kfwbo LLP June 2012 On April 5, 2012, President Obama signed into law the Jumpstart
More informationImportant Information about Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated Important Information about Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) Baird has prepared this document to help you understand the characteristics and risks associated with
More informationDivision of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581 Telephone: (202) 418-6700 Facsimile: (202) 418-5528 gbarnett@cftc.gov Division of Swap Dealer
More informationJarus Wealth Advisors LLC
Jarus Wealth Advisors LLC Firm Brochure - Form ADV Part 2A This brochure provides information about the qualifications and business practices of Jarus Wealth Advisors LLC. If you have any questions about
More informationPURCHASE OF CERTAIN DEBT SECURITIES BY BUSINESS AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES RELYING ON AN INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT EXEMPTION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 17 CFR Part 270 Release No. IC-30268; File No. S7-07-11 RIN 3235-AL02 PURCHASE OF CERTAIN DEBT SECURITIES BY BUSINESS AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES RELYING ON
More informationCredit Rating Agencies
Capital Markets Credit Rating Agencies The Dodd-Frank Act includes reforms that address credit rating agencies and the credit ratings they provide. The Act seeks to impose corporate governance guidelines,
More informationMUNICIPAL ADVISOR RULE HOW IT AFFECTS LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
MUNICIPAL ADVISOR RULE HOW IT AFFECTS LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Article by Joy A. Howard Dated May 1, 2014 On February 28, 2014, the executive board of the Government Finance Officers Association ( GFOA ) approved
More informationDiscretionary Investment Management Agreement Vulcan Investments LLC 2100SouthBridge Pkwy Suite 650, Birmingham AL, 35209 1. Scope of Engagement a)
Discretionary Investment Management Agreement This investment management agreement (the Agreement ) is, made this day of, 20 Between the undersigned party, Client(s) whose mailing address is. (Hereinafter
More informationMEMORANDUM. The Officers and Directors of the Company. Publicity Before and After Filing an IPO Registration Statement
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: The Officers and Directors of the Company Fenwick & West LLP DATE: December 15, 2011 RE: Publicity Before and After Filing an IPO Registration Statement United States federal securities
More informationIRS Issues Final FATCA Regulations
IRS Issues Final FATCA Regulations The United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has issued long-awaited final regulations (the Final Regulations) under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) AUDITING STANDARD No. 17. PCAOB Release No. 2013-008 October 10, 2013
1666 K Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 207-9100 Facsimile: (202) 862-8430 www.pcaobus.org AUDITING STANDARD No. 17 AUDITING SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ACCOMPANYING AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
More informationF R E Q U E N T L Y A S K E D Q U E S T I O N S A B O U T P I P E S
F R E Q U E N T L Y A S K E D Q U E S T I O N S A B O U T P I P E S Understanding PIPEs What are PIPEs? A PIPE (Private Investment in Public Equity) refers to any private placement of securities of an
More informationFSI BRIEFING April 5, 2010 Harmonizing the Regulation & Supervision of Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers
FSI BRIEFING April 5, 2010 Harmonizing the Regulation & Supervision of Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers Introduction On June 17, 2009, the Obama Administration released its plan for reforming the
More informationSTANDING ADVISORY GROUP MEETING
1666 K Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 207-9100 Facsimile: (202)862-8430 www.pcaobus.org STANDING ADVISORY GROUP MEETING BROKER-DEALER AUDIT CONSIDERATIONS JULY 15, 2010 Introduction
More informationSUMMARY PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
DIVERSIFIED ASSETS PORTFOLIO SUMMARY PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT NORTHERN INSTITUTIONAL FUNDS DIVERSIFIED ASSETS PORTFOLIO SHARES SUPPLEMENT DATED MAY 27, 2016 TO SUMMARY PROSPECTUS DATED APRIL 1, 2016 The Summary
More informationSTAFF GUIDANCE FOR AUDITORS OF SEC-REGISTERED BROKERS AND DEALERS JUNE 26, 2014
1666 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 207-9100 Facsimile: (202) 862-8430 www.pcaobus.org STAFF GUIDANCE FOR AUDITORS OF SEC-REGISTERED BROKERS AND DEALERS JUNE 26, 2014 This publication
More informationUnison Advisors LLC. The date of this brochure is March 29, 2012.
Unison Advisors LLC 2032 Belmont Road NW, #619 Washington, DC 20009 T 646 290 7697 F 646 290 5477 www.unisonadvisors.com The date of this brochure is March 29, 2012. This brochure provides information
More informationExempt Market Dealers 101
Ontario Securities Commission Exempt Market Dealers 101 April 2014 Sandra Blake, Senior Legal Counsel, Dealer Team Maria Carelli, Senior Accountant, Dealer Team Karin Hui, Accountant, Dealer Team Disclaimer
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT FORM 8- K
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT FORM 8- K General Description and Summary of 8-K Items What is Form 8-K? Form 8-K is the form on which public companies report, on a current basis, the occurrence of significant
More informationSEC ADOPTS NEW REQUIREMENTS FOR ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP AUDITING CLIENTS
CLIENT MEMORANDUM SEC ADOPTS NEW REQUIREMENTS FOR ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP AUDITING CLIENTS On March 18, 2002, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC ) issued a release and a companion order (the Exchange
More informationPART I GENERAL. Chapter 1. General provisions. Section 1. General scope of application of the Act
1(49) Unofficial translation Amendments up to 258/2013 included 746/2012 Issued in Helsinki on 14 December 2012 Securities Markets Act Pursuant to the decision of Parliament, the following is enacted:
More informationSWAP DEALER AND SECURITY-BASED SWAP DEALER DEFINED
CLIENT MEMORANDUM SWAP DEALER AND SECURITY-BASED SWAP DEALER DEFINED The Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission jointly adopted final rules 1 under Title VII of the
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUERS
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUERS General What is a foreign issuer? The federal securities laws define a foreign issuer as any issuer that is a foreign government, a foreign national
More informationExchange-Traded Fund RiverFront Dynamic Unconstrained Income ETF RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF
Regulatory Bulletin RB-16-86 To: Subject: ETP HOLDERS RIVERFRONT DYNAMIC UNCONSTRAINED INCOME ETF RIVERFRONT DYNAMIC CORE INCOME ETF Compliance and supervisory personnel should note that, among other things,
More informationUnited States of America Takeover Guide
United States of America Takeover Guide Contact Richard Hall Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP rhall@cravath.com Contents Page INTRODUCTION 1 TENDER OFFERS VERSUS MERGERS 1 IN THE BEGINNING 2 REGULATION OF TENDER
More informationCorporate Finance Alert
Corporate Finance Alert Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP April 2012 If you have any questions regarding the matters discussed in this memorandum, please contact one of the attorneys listed on page
More informationNew York City Council Passes Bill Banning Use of Credit Checks in Employment Decisions
New York City Council Passes Bill Banning Use of Credit Checks in Employment Decisions Amendment to the New York City Human Rights Law Makes It an Unlawful Discriminatory Practice for Most Employers to
More informationThe SEC s New Large Trader Reporting Rule
The SEC s New Large Trader Reporting Rule November 3, 2011 SUMMARY With its recent adoption of Rule 13h-1 (the Rule ) and Form 13H pursuant to Section 13(h) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
More informationCredit Ratings Disclosure (File No. S7-24-09)
Ms. Elizabeth M. Murphy Secretary U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549-1090 Re: Credit Ratings Disclosure (File No. S7-24-09) Dear Ms. Murphy: The Investment
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT MEDIUM- TERM NOTE PROGRAMS
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT MEDIUM- TERM NOTE PROGRAMS Understanding Medium-Term Note Programs What are medium-term note programs? Medium-term note ( MTN ) programs enable companies to offer debt
More informationNON-TRADITIONAL OFFERING STRUCTURES: PIPES, EQUITY LINES AND SPACS. by David M. Calhoun Partner, Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP
NON-TRADITIONAL OFFERING STRUCTURES: PIPES, EQUITY LINES AND SPACS by David M. Calhoun Partner, Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP Overview of PIPEs and Equity Lines of Credit PIPEs, an acronym for Private
More informationIMPORTANT ARTICLE UPDATE: To read the updated 2013 version of this article, please click here.
TO READ AN UPDATED VERSION OF THIS ARTICLE, PLEASE CLICK HERE. IMPORTANT ARTICLE UPDATE: To read the updated 2013 version of this article, please click here. What Late SEC Filers Need to Know In the wake
More informationDISCRETIONARY INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
DISCRETIONARY INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT AGREEMENT, made this day of, 20 between the undersigned party, (hereinafter referred to as the Client ), and Walkner Condon Financial Advisors LLC, a registered
More informationEmployee Benefits & Investment Management Update
Employee Benefits & Investment Management Update Department of Labor Revises Investment Advice Definition May 2015 On April 14, 2015, the Department of Labor (Department) released a long-awaited proposed
More informationRestructuring Debt Securities: Options and Legal Considerations
Restructuring Debt Securities: Options and Legal Considerations November 2008 Introduction While the current economic slowdown and credit crunch have limited refinancing options for companies that have
More informationLetters for Underwriters and Certain Other Requesting Parties
Letters for Underwriters 2341 AU Section 634 Letters for Underwriters and Certain Other Requesting Parties (Supersedes SAS No. 49.) Source: SAS No. 72; SAS No. 76; SAS No. 86. See section 9634 for interpretations
More informationF R E Q U E N T L Y A S K E D Q U E S T I O N S A B O U T R U L E 1 4 4 A E Q U I T Y O F F E R I N G S
F R E Q U E N T L Y A S K E D Q U E S T I O N S A B O U T R U L E 1 4 4 A E Q U I T Y O F F E R I N G S These FAQs relate specifically to Rule 144A equity offerings. Please refer to our Frequently Asked
More informationSECURITIES RULES FOR PRIVATE EQUITY FINANCINGS
SECURITIES RULES FOR PRIVATE EQUITY FINANCINGS Timothy M. Sullivan Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP 222 North LaSalle Street Suite 300 Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 704-3852 tsullivan@hinshawlaw.com October 14, 2010
More informationCROWDFUNDING WHAT IS CROWDFUNDING?
CROWDFUNDING PBI Business Lawyers Institute 5 November 2015 G. Philip Rutledge, Partner Bybel Rutledge LLP, Lemoyne, PA 17043 rutledge@bybelrutledge.com WHAT IS CROWDFUNDING? Much over used term to describe
More informationBackground Information on the Funds
Information Circular 08-023 Date: October 29, 2008 Re: SPDR Series Trust BATS Exchange, Inc. ( BATS ) commenced operating as a national securities exchange for trading non- BATS listed securities on October
More informationPROSPECTUS. Aflac Incorporated Worldwide Headquarters 1932 Wynnton Road Columbus, Georgia 31999 1.800.227.4756-706.596.3589
PROSPECTUS Aflac Incorporated Worldwide Headquarters 1932 Wynnton Road Columbus, Georgia 31999 1.800.227.4756-706.596.3589 AFL Stock Plan A Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan We are offering
More information34,000,000 Shares Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund V, Inc. Common Stock
Prospectus Supplement to Prospectus dated May 29, 2007 34,000,000 Shares Puerto Rico Fixed Income Fund V, Inc. Common Stock This Prospectus Supplement relates to the issuance by Puerto Rico Fixed Income
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT BLOCK TRADE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT BLOCK TRADE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Block Trades and Distributions What is a block trade? Many people use the term block trade colloquially. Technically, a block trade is
More informationHKAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements 1
HKAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements 1 Nelson Lam 1. Scope of HKAS 27 Hong Kong Accounting Standard (HKAS) 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements shall be applied in the preparation
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM 4 STATEMENT OF CHANGES OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM 4 STATEMENT OF CHANGES OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES The Commission is authorized to solicit the information required
More informationPROSPECTUS August 15, 2011 INTRICON CORPORATION. Summary of the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
PROSPECTUS August 15, 2011 INTRICON CORPORATION Summary of the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan This document constitutes part of a prospectus covering securities that have been registered under the Securities
More informationMarch 28, 2011. Ms. Elizabeth M. Murphy Secretary Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC 20549-1090
Ms. Elizabeth M. Murphy Secretary Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC 20549-1090 Regarding: Security Ratings, File No. S7-18-08 Dear Ms. Murphy: The Mortgage Bankers Association
More information2 This Standard shall be applied by all entities that are investors with joint control of, or significant influence over, an investee.
International Accounting Standard 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures Objective 1 The objective of this Standard is to prescribe the accounting for investments in associates and to set out
More informationREPORTING OF PROXY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER MATTERS. SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission is proposing rule and form
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 17 CFR Parts 240, 249, 270, and 274 [Release Nos. 34-63123; IC-29463; File No. S7-30-10] RIN 3235-AK67 REPORTING OF PROXY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER MATTERS
More informationsec valuation and liquidity guidance for registered investment companies
sec valuation and liquidity guidance for registered investment companies compendium volume 1 SEC Valuation and Liquidity Guidance for Registered Investment Companies SEC Valuation and Liquidity Guidance
More informationSEC Requests for Comment on Money Market Fund Reform Proposal
Skadden Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP & Affiliates SEC Requests for Comment on Money Market Fund Reform Proposal Comment requests that may be of particular interest to issuers of short-term
More informationRecent research indicates that approximately 80 percent of investors in the United
Requirements Pertaining to the Electronic Delivery of Required Documents Vol. 14, No. 5 May 2007 By Sara E. Emley and Margo H.K. Tank Recent research indicates that approximately 80 percent of investors
More informationRule 15a-6: Safe Harbor for Unregistered Foreign Broker-Dealers
Rule 15a-6: Safe Harbor for Unregistered Foreign Broker-Dealers Presented at the ALI/ABA Course of Study: Broker-Dealer Regulation January 8-9, 2004 Washington, D.C. January 8-2004 Written By: Andrew M.
More informationSEC Regulation of Crowdfunding Intermediaries Under Title III of the JOBS Act
SEC Regulation of Crowdfunding Intermediaries Under Title III of the JOBS Act By Thomas V. Powers potentially lucrative new market for brokers and A broker-like intermediaries will commence after January
More informationADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act
ADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act July 21, 2010 ADVISERS TO PRIVATE INVESTMENT FUNDS On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Act). The
More informationReport on the Review of the Definition of Accredited Investor
Report on the Review of the Definition of Accredited Investor This is a report by the staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Commission has expressed no view regarding the analysis,
More informationPENNY STOCK RISK DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT
PENNY STOCK RISK DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT (From Schedule 15G*) Pursuant to SEC Rule 15g-2 of the Securities Enforcement remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990. IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON PENNY STOCKS This
More informationA Quick Guide To The JOBS Act
David M. Lynn and Anna T. Pinedo, Morrison & Foerster LLP Although characterized in the press as principally addressing the needs of small and micro-cap companies, provisions in the JOBS Act are applicable
More informationNOTICE TO INVESTORS: THE NOTES ARE SIGNIFICANTLY RISKIER THAN CONVENTIONAL DEBT INSTRUMENTS.
PRICING SUPPLEMENT Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2) Registration Statement No. 333-171806 Dated May 22, 2013 Royal Bank of Canada Airbag Autocallable Yield Optimization Notes $6,732,000 Notes Linked to
More informationJanuary 5, 2010. To Our Clients and Friends:
HOW THE SEC S NEW CUSTODY REQUIREMENTS CHANGE THE GROUND RULES FOR REGISTERED INVESTMENT ADVISERS January 5, 2010 To Our Clients and Friends: As 2009 closed, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
More informationFORM ADV Uniform Application for Investment Adviser Registration Part II - Page 1
OMB APPROVAL OMB Number: 3235-0049 February 28, 2011 Expires: Estimated Average burden Hours per response...4.07 Uniform Application for Investment Adviser Registration Part II - Page 1 Name of Investment
More informationU.S. Securities Law Briefing United States Adopts Major Changes to Securities Offering Rules under JOBS Act
March 2012 U.S. Securities Law Briefing United States Adopts Major Changes to Securities Offering Rules under JOBS Act The U.S. Congress yesterday approved the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the
More information