STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER AJIT PAI APPROVING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART
|
|
- Edwina Briggs
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER AJIT PAI APPROVING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART Re: Misuse of Internet Protocol (IP) Captioned Telephone Service, CG Docket No ; Telecommunications Relay Services for Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, CG Docket No Stein s Law holds that if something cannot go on forever, it will stop. Herbert Stein, the law s progenitor, suggested that an unsustainable trend would end of its own accord. In the context of federally sponsored programs, however, an agency may be compelled by circumstance to make it stop. This is such a case. Let s start with the basics. Internet Protocol Captioned Telephone Service (IP CTS) is an Internet-based service intended to enable people who are deaf or hard of hearing to use a computer, tablet, or similar device, rather than a specialized captioned telephone, to make captioned telephone calls. 1 IP CTS is a superb example of how the transition to IP-based infrastructure and services can help make available... without discrimination... communication service to all Americans. 2 Under our rules, eligible providers of IP CTS service may receive compensation from the federal government s Interstate Telecommunications Relay Service Fund (Fund). 3 The Fund also compensates eligible providers of other telecommunications relay services that are invaluable to Americans with hearing or speech disabilities, such as Video Relay Service (VRS) and Internet Protocol Relay (IP Relay). The problem is that compensation for IP CTS service in particular has been growing at an unsustainable rate since the service s creation. As the chart below reflects, 4 funding for IP CTS has increased by more than 75% every six months, and has more than doubled each year. At this pace, IP CTS compensation will reach a half-billion dollars per year within the next 18 months and surpass VRS as the largest program within the Fund shortly thereafter. We have reached the point at which necessity, not discretion, impels reform. 1 See FCC Consumer Guide, IP Captioned Telephone Service at 2 (2013), available at U.S.C See Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities; Internet-based Captioned Telephone Service, CG Docket No , Declaratory Ruling, 22 FCC Rcd 379 (2007); 47 C.F.R Compiled from the monthly reports of the Fund Administrator. See Rolka Loube Saltzer Associates LLC, Interstate TRS Fund Reports,
2 $80,000,000 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 IP CTS Compensation Per Half-Year Why? Because federal law gives us no other option. The Anti-Deficiency Act prohibits federal officials from authorizing spending that we cannot cover with collected funds. 5 In other words, we cannot simply issue IOUs and hope to collect the money later. If the Fund comes up short, all the relay programs it supports will be cut off. That possibility depriving Americans with a hearing or speech disability of the ability to communicate that most of us just take for granted is unthinkable. This is why I took seriously the alert from the Chairman s Office about a month ago that a recent and dramatic spike in reimbursement requests 6 related to IP CTS threatened to exhaust the Fund and required immediate action. We have at our disposal three options for protecting the Fund: cutting payments to IP CTS providers, increasing the contributions that all of us pay into the Fund, or addressing the loopholes in our regulations that have allowed this dramatic growth to occur. For any of these options to work before the Fund is exhausted, the Commission must act without the full notice-and-comment process contemplated by the Administrative Procedure Act. 7 But only one of them protects the service provided to existing IP CTS users while shielding all American consumers from paying for unnecessary spending. Today s order partly pursues that third option and attempts to close some of the loopholes in our regulations and I accordingly approve that part of the order. Here are two important points of agreement. First, growth in the IP CTS program is dramatically greater than expected. The budgeting process for the Interstate TRS Fund follows a yearly cycle, from one July to the next, and the amount collected from telecommunications and VoIP providers is established based on projected demand for each year. For the funding year, the Administrator projected that IP CTS demand would double and therefore proposed collecting $128 million to pay the costs of that program. 8 For the first half of that funding year, however, the Administrator has already paid out $70 million 9 (more than half of the year s budget); in other words, the IP CTS program will likely cost more than budgeted even if it stops growing 5 See 31 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1)(A). 6 Order at para See 5 U.S.C. 553(b) (requiring notice before an agency adopts rules except when the agency for good cause finds (and incorporates the finding and a brief statement of reasons therefor in the rules issued) that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest ). 8 Rolka Loube Saltzer Associates LLC, Interstate Telecommunications Relay Services Fund Payment Formula and Fund Size Estimate, Exh. 2 (Apr. 30, 2012), 9 Rolka Loube Saltzer Associates LLC, Interstate TRS Fund Performance Status Report: December 2012,
3 in the last six months of the funding year. And if the growth rate continues (if, in other words, we were to take no action today at all) the IP CTS program may cost $ million for the second half of the funding year. 10 The order therefore appropriately fixes the FCC s gaze on the need for swift reform. Second, the order rightly curtails certain marketing practices that have unduly burdened the Fund. One IP CTS provider hands out $50 gift cards to anyone who signs a friend up for the service 11 and pays audiologists for referrals, even though the latter practice is condemned by the American Academy of Audiology s Code of Ethics. 12 Other providers hand out equipment that display captions whenever the phone is used by default, 13 meaning the IP CTS provider gets compensated even when someone in the household without a hearing disability uses the device (unless that user takes the affirmative step of turning captions off). Marketing practices like these create incentives and opportunities for the misuse of IP CTS they permit or even encourage those without hearing loss to get IP CTS equipment and use the service. The order appropriately targets these practices, banning referral fees and requiring IP CTS providers to reconfigure equipment to default to the captions-off setting. These requirements will, I hope, help curtail the growth of the Fund without hindering service to existing consumers, and I trust the Bureau will hold any limited waivers of these requirements to the exacting standard normally required for a waiver of the Commission s rules. 14 So far, so good. Unfortunately, the order does not do all that really needs to be done to curtail waste, fraud, and abuse. In particular, the current order (unlike an earlier version, which I had approved) does not close a loophole in our regulation of IP CTS one might argue, the loophole which is that there are no safeguards to ensure that the money spent by the Fund actually serves the intended beneficiaries of the program and is not wasted. None. In other words, virtually anyone who wants IP CTS can get it, even if they do not need it. The bill for providing IP CTS services to these customers, moreover, ultimately is picked up by American consumers. Indeed, as the order recognizes, an IP CTS customer who has no hearing disability at all might sign up for the service in order to get a free transcription of what the other party to a call is saying, to aid in multi-tasking around the house, or even to get a free phone. 15 This is not how federal funds should be spent, especially when such spending jeopardizes funding for relay services to those who do in fact have a disability. Although the order does a good job identifying the problem of the lack of standards, it simply does not do enough to solve it. The solution adopted here requires IP CTS providers to collect varying 10 The $108 million figure assumes the growth in the number of minutes of use of IP CTS continues at the same rate it did from June 2012 through November 2012 and excludes prior period adjustments; the $159 million figure assumes the growth in monthly expenditures for IP CTS continues at the same rate it did from June 2012 through December 2012, which includes prior period adjustments. See id. 11 Order at note Id. at para Id. at para. 27 & note See 47 C.F.R. 1.3; NetworkIP v. FCC, 548 F.3d 116, 127 (D.C. Cir. 2008) ( [B]efore the FCC can invoke its good cause exception, it both must explain why deviation better serves the public interest, and articulate the nature of the special circumstances to prevent discriminatory application and to put future parties on notice as to its operation, [Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir.1990)]. The reason for this two-part test flows from the principle that an agency must adhere to its own rules and regulations, and [a]d hoc departures from those rules, even to achieve laudable aims, cannot be sanctioned, for therein lie the seeds of destruction of the orderliness and predictability which are the hallmarks of lawful administrative action. Reuters Ltd. v. FCC, 781 F.2d 946, (D.C. Cir.1986). ). 15 Order at para. 20.
4 certifications from users, but the standards are so lax as to be little more than pushing paper; this watereddown requirement gives me serious doubt that the IP CTS cost curve will bend downward anytime soon. For a few reasons related to this point, I respectfully dissent in part. First, the order declines to tie eligibility for IP CTS to any objective standard. It does not, for example, require that an individual s hearing loss must be severe (>70 db HL) or profound (>90 db HL), as some states require for the distribution of captioned-telephone service devices. 16 Nor does it require that the hearing loss of an individual be at least moderate (>40 db HL), as recommended by one prominent audiologist. 17 Nor does it require that less expensive alternatives, such as a highly amplified phone, be insufficient to meet the consumer s need. Rather, the order adopts an amorphous standard under which hearing loss must be determined by a third party to be sufficient to necessitate access to IP CTS a standard almost entirely in the eye of the beholder. Some audiologists may certify that all their patients meet the standard, even those with minimal hearing loss. Others may refuse to certify a patient because they don t believe IP CTS is necessitated, even if it really is the best option. Without some objective standard, I have little hope that this certification will have any meaning. 18 Second, the order exempts an entire class of users from having to obtain a third-party certification at all. If a consumer pays at least $75 for IP CTS equipment, he or she does not have to obtain any certification from a trained professional to be eligible for free IP TCS service; instead, he or she may selfcertify. This despite the fact that the order acknowledges elsewhere that a consumer may purchase an IP CTS device for reasons (such as free transcription) unrelated to the statutory purpose of providing individuals with hearing disability functionally equivalent telephone service. 19 Third, the order does not require that either third-party certifications or self-certifications be signed under penalty of perjury. Common in many federal programs, including the Commission s own Lifeline program, 20 that reasonable step deters fraud and makes clear to signers the consequences of a false certification. Absent that requirement, certifications are either meaningless (because there are no consequences for falsehood) or needlessly misleading (because there are undisclosed consequences for falsehood, including perhaps wire or mail fraud). Finally, the interim rules for certification and eligibility are clearly targeted at the practices of one provider Sorenson, which provides free equipment to users but the problems the Fund faces today are attributable to industry-wide practices. Indeed, although the order suggests that the recent marketing practices of Sorenson have caused the unexpected growth this year, the IP CTS program has been growing at a rapid clip year after year. And the lack of eligibility requirements applies equally to all IP CTS providers, not just Sorenson. Indeed, no provider today can certify that each and every one of its customers is eligible for IP CTS service, even under the relaxed standards the order adopts. 16 Id. at para. 45. * * * 17 Id. at para. 46 (recommendation of Dr. Ingrid McBride, Director of Audiology for the Department of Speech and Hearing Science of Arizona State University). 18 The need for an objective standard is heightened by the fact that any number of individuals across disparate disciplines, including educators and social workers, may vouch that the individual meets the (again) amorphous qualified-to-evaluate-an-individual s-hearing-loss standard. See id. at para Critically, there is no evidence that the program s substantial growth only has been among users who do not pay for IP CTS equipment. Indeed, the program s growth predates the offering of free equipment. Accordingly, it does not make sense for our third-party certification requirement to target only those who receive free equipment. All who sign up for IP CTS should be required to obtain certification from a qualified professional before receiving free service. 20 See 47 U.S.C (d)(3).
5 Telecommunications relay services such as IP CTS are vital to many Americans with disabilities. We must ensure that every dollar that leaves the Interstate TRS Fund to deliver such services is spent appropriately. And we must do so now, given the unsustainable demands IP CTS is placing on the Fund and Americans general expectation that the government will adopt appropriate safeguards against waste, fraud, and abuse in federal programs. Today s order appropriately identifies the problem and takes some steps toward solving it, but it does not adopt the eligibility standards that will supply Fund-supported IP CTS only to those in need. Accordingly, I approve in part and dissent in part.
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 COMMENTS OF THE NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF THE RATEPAYER ADVOCATE
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Telecommunications Relay Services and ) Speech-to-Speech Services for ) CG Docket No. 03-123 Individuals with Hearing
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Misuse of Internet Protocol (IP Captioned Telephone Service Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services
More informationPUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554
PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 DA 15-274 Released:
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Requests for Review of Decisions of the Universal Service Administrator by Kodiak Area Native Files Nos. RHCP 11193, et
More informationHow To Review A School District'S Decision To Cancel A Maintenance Contract For A School System
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Requests for Review of Decisions of the Universal Service Administrator by Chicago Public Schools File No. SLD-288954
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington D.C. 20544
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington D.C. 20544 Ameren Missouri Petition for Declaratory ) Ruling Pursuant to Section 1.2(a) of ) WC Docket No. 13-307 the Commission's Rules ) OPPOSITION
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matters of ) ) Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet ) GN Docket No. 14-28 ) Preserving the Open Internet ) GN Docket No.
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. Petition for Forbearance from 47 U.S.C. 214(e(1(A Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF INQUIRY. Adopted: June 8, 2010 Released: June 28, 2010
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Structure and Practices of the Video Relay Service Program ) ) ) ) ) CG Docket No. 10-51 NOTICE OF INQUIRY Adopted:
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) Rules and Regulations Implementing ) CG Docket No. 02-278 the Telephone Consumer Protection ) Act of 1991 ) Comments
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) In the Matter of ) ) Petition for Declaratory Ruling of ) American Electric Power Service ) Corporation et al. Regarding the ) Rate
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DECLARATORY RULING
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Westfax, Inc. Petition for Consideration and Clarification Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer
More informationSTATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION PETITION. filing, and respectfully requests that the Commission determine and establish the charge and
STATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Illinois Telecommunications Access ) Corporation ) ) No. 11- Petition for annual line charge ) determination pursuant to 83 Ill. ) Adm. Code 755.500. ) PETITION
More informationIn the Matter of ) ) ) ) Consumer Information and Disclosure ) CG Docket No. 09-158. Truth-in-Billing and Billing Format ) CG Docket No.
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Empowering Consumers to Prevent and Detect Billing for Unauthorized Charges ( Cramming CG Docket No. 11-116 Consumer Information
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 ) In the Matter of ) ) Request for Review by ) WC Docket No. 06-122 MeetingOne.com Corp. of Decision of ) Universal Service Administrator
More informationPUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554
PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 DA 15-326 Released: March
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Implementing a Nationwide, Broadband, Interoperable Public Safety Network in the 700 MHz Band Development of Operational,
More informationTHE PRESIDENT S BUDGET AND THE MEDICARE TRIGGER by James Horney and Richard Kogan
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org Revised February 15, 2008 THE PRESIDENT S BUDGET AND THE MEDICARE TRIGGER by James Horney
More informationDeveloped by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Developed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Every year millions of dollars are improperly spent because of fraud, waste, and abuse. It affects everyone. Including YOU. This training will
More informationUS Telecom Industry - A Case Study in Service Decisions
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Ensuring Customer Premises Equipment Backup Power for Continuity of Communications Technology Transitions Policies and
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Closed Captioning of Video Programming: Telecommunications for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Inc. Petition for Rulemaking
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Vermont Telephone Company Petition for Declaratory Ruling Whether Voice Over Internet Protocol Services Are Entitled
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) In the Matter of ) ) Preserving the Open Internet ) ) Broadband Industry Practices ) ) REPLY COMMENTS I. Introduction. The American
More informationPresented by Scott Thompson, Jay Ireland, Maria Browne, John Seiver, Jill Valenstein, and Jim Tomlinson October 23, 2013
Current Legal Issues Affecting Broadband Infrastructure Deployment Presented by Scott Thompson, Jay Ireland, Maria Browne, John Seiver, Jill Valenstein, and Jim Tomlinson October 23, 2013 Introduction
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER. Adopted: February 20, 2013 Released: February 20, 2013
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Rules and Policies Regarding Calling Number Identification Service Caller ID Petition of Chevrah Hatzalah Volunteer
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by United Talmudical Academy File No. SLD-105791
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Carriage of Digital Television Broadcast Signals: Amendment to Part 76 of the Commission s Rules CS Docket No. 98-120
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPORT AND ORDER
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matters of IP-Enabled Services Implementation of Sections 255 and 251(a)(2) of The Communications Act of 1934, as Enacted by The
More informationCORPORATE COMPLIANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES DRA NOTICE POLICY (CPL-007) Last Revision Date: September 9, 2014
CORPORATE COMPLIANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES DRA NOTICE POLICY (CPL-007) Last Revision Date: September 9, 2014 Original Date: March 5, 2013 OMNICARE DRA NOTICE POLICY CPL-007 (SEPTEMBER 2014) I. PURPOSE
More informationHope In-Home Care CODE OF CONDUCT AND ETHICS
Hope In-Home Care CODE OF CONDUCT AND ETHICS September 2014 Table of Contents A MESSAGE FROM OUR DIRECTOR... 3 INTRODUCTION TO THE CODE OF CONDUCT AND ETHICS... 4 ELEMENT 1: QUALITY OF CARE... 5 ELEMENT
More informationFraud Waste and Abuse Training First Tier, Downstream and Related Entities. ONECare by Care1st Health Plan Arizona, Inc. (HMO) Revised: 10/2009
Fraud Waste and Abuse Training First Tier, Downstream and Related Entities ONECare by Care1st Health Plan Arizona, Inc. (HMO) Revised: 10/2009 Overview Purpose Care1st/ ONECare Compliance Program Definitions
More informationBefore the PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN Madison Wisconsin
Before the PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN Madison Wisconsin Investigation of Voice over ) Case No. 5-TI-2071 Internet Protocol in Wisconsin ) Public Comments of Communications Workers of America
More informationQuestions for the Record from Chairman John Thune To Mr. Scott Bergmann
Questions for the Record from Chairman John Thune To Mr. Scott Bergmann Question 1. Based on studies submitted by the FCC, the GAO Report concluded that many lowincome households would choose to subscribe
More informationRegulatory Reclassification of Broadband Internet Access Service is the Unsurprising Result of ISPs Inexplicable Challenges to FCC Authority
Regulatory Reclassification of Broadband Internet Access Service is the Unsurprising Result of ISPs Inexplicable Challenges to FCC Authority An Open Internet has long been a bipartisan goal in the United
More informationANNUAL REPORT ON PROGRESS OF MEETING WAIVED REQUIREMENTS
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Telecommunications Relay Services And Speech-to- ) Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and ) CG Docket
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 8:15-CR-244-T-23AEP PLEA AGREEMENT
Case 8:15-cr-00244-SDM-AEP Document 3 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CASE NO. 8:15-CR-244-T-23AEP
More informationThe following presentation was based on the
Fraud Waste and Abuse Presentation The following presentation was based on the Medicare Parts C & D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training and General Compliance Training developed by the Centers for Medicare
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DECLARATORY RULING
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 Request of ACA International for Clarification
More informationFAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT 15 U.S.C. 1692 et.seq.
FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT 15 U.S.C. 1692 et.seq. Lori E. Brown lbrown@gallaghersharp.com I. OVERVIEW OF THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT ( FDCPA ) A. Purpose of the FDCPA 1. The FDCPA is
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Rules and Regulations Implementing the ) CG Docket No. 02-278 Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 ) ) REPLY
More informationBefore the OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Washington, D.C. ) ) ) COMMENTS OF DISH NETWORK L.L.C.
Before the OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Washington, D.C. Notice of Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to OMB for Review And Approval ) ) ) OMB Control No. 3060-0761 To: Nicholas Fraser
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 12-13381 Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00281-RBD-JBT-1.
Case: 12-13381 Date Filed: 05/29/2013 Page: 1 of 12 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 12-13381 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00281-RBD-JBT-1
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER. Adopted: December 5, 2002 Released: December 6, 2002
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrative Company by Nassau County Board of Cooperative
More informationThe Long-Term Telephone Number & Regulation Meeting
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/22/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-15253, and on FDsys.gov 6712-01 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
More informationMemo. Professional Accounts, LLC. Corporate Compliance Program
Professional Accounts, LLC Memo To: All Employees and Vendors From: Lee Frans, Executive Director Date: April 2, 2012 Re: Corporate Compliance Program Our mission as an organization has been to deliver
More informationACOs: Fraud & Abuse Waivers and Analysis
ACOs: Fraud & Abuse Waivers and Analysis Robert G. Homchick and Sarah Fallows Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP I. Introduction The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) fosters the development
More informationHIPAA Privacy Rule Primer for the College or University Administrator
HIPAA Privacy Rule Primer for the College or University Administrator On August 14, 2002, the Department of Health and Human Services ( HHS ) issued final medical privacy regulations (the Privacy Rule
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matters of ) ) Federal-State Joint Board ) CC Docket No. 96-45 On Universal Service ) ) Access Charge Reform ) CC Docket No. 96-262
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Jurisdictional Separations Reform ) and Referral to the Federal-State ) CC Docket No. 80-286 Joint Board ) ) Communications
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN LENNETT GENSEL, Plaintiff, -vs- Case No. 13-C-1196 PERFORMANT TECHNOLOGIES, Inc., Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER On January 28, 2015, the Court
More informationCREDIT COUNSELING REQUIREMENT
CREDIT COUNSELING REQUIREMENT In order to file bankruptcy, an individual must receive from an approved nonprofit budget and credit counseling agency... an individual or group briefing... that outlines
More informationREPLY COMMENTS OF THE STAFF OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION(1)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580 Before the Copyright Office, Library of Congress Washington, D. C. In re Satellite Carrier Compulsory License; Definition of Unserved
More informationHow and When to Disclose and Refund Overpayments
How and When to Disclose and Refund Overpayments Darrell D. Zurovec American Health Lawyers Association Long Term Care and the Law February 25 27, 2013 Medicare and Medicaid providers and suppliers have
More informationRe: REG 130266 11, Additional Requirements for Charitable Hospitals, Proposed Rule
Sarah Hall Ingram Commissioner IRS Tax Exempt & Government Entities Division Internal Revenue Service P.O. Box 7604 Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 Re: REG 130266 11, Additional Requirements
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Implementation of Section 224 of the Act ) WC Docket No. 07-245 ) A National Broadband Plan for Our Future ) GN Docket
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER. Adopted: October 22, 2013 Released: October 22, 2013
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism A National Broadband Plan for Our Future ORDER CC Docket No.
More informationUnder section 1128A(a)(5) of the Social Security Act (the Act), enacted as part of
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL SPECIAL ADVISORY BULLETIN OFFERING GIFTS AND OTHER INDUCEMENTS TO BENEFICIARIES August 2002 Introduction Under section 1128A(a)(5) of the Social Security Act (the Act), enacted
More informationInnoCaption TM Service Terms of Use
PRIOR TO USING THE INNOCAPTION SERVICE YOU MUST REVIEW AND AGREE TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS SERVICE AGREEMENT ( AGREEMENT ) BY COMPLETING YOUR REGISTRATION ( SIGN UP ) FOR INNOCAPTION SERVICE.
More informationPetition for Clarification Cost Allocation
E-Rate Management Professionals Association Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism CC Docket No.
More informationRIGHTS OF DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING PEOPLE IN MEDICAL SETTINGS
RIGHTS OF DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING PEOPLE IN MEDICAL SETTINGS PLEASE NOTE: For information in alternative formats or a language different than English, contact the Disability Rights Network at 800-692-
More informationAddendum StartPage: 0
Control Number : 39717 Item Number : 29 Addendum StartPage: 0 PROJECT NO. 39717 cz * s; ^^1^,jA lt RULEMAKING PROCEEDING PUBLIC UTILITY COMNIISj^; RELATED TO VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL (VoIP) OF TEXAS
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) AT&T Petition for Declaratory ) WC Docket No. 02-361 Ruling that AT&T s Phone-to-Phone ) IP Telephony Services are
More informationLAKE COUNTY BOARD OF DD/DEEPWOOD BOARD POLICY I. SUBJECT: FALSE CLAIMS PREVENTION AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION
File: E-11 LAKE COUNTY BOARD OF DD/DEEPWOOD BOARD POLICY Reviewed and Adopted by the Board: Date: February 28, 2011 Signature on file Elfriede Roman, Superintendent I. SUBJECT: FALSE CLAIMS PREVENTION
More informationMEDICAID COMPLIANCE POLICY
6232 MEDICAID COMPLIANCE POLICY It is the policy of the Board of Education that all school district s practices regarding Medicaid claims for services be in compliance with all applicable federal and state
More informationU.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL 1730 M Street, N.W., Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20036-4505. November 25, 2014
U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL 1730 M Street, N.W., Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20036-4505 The Special Counsel The White House Washington, D.C. 20500 Re: OSC File No. DI-12-3069 Dear Mr. President: Pursuant
More informationRIGHTS OF DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING PEOPLE AT WORK
RIGHTS OF DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING PEOPLE AT WORK PLEASE NOTE: For information in alternative formats or a language different than English, contact the Disability Rights Network at 800-692- 7443, extension.
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking on the Commission s Own Motion to Require Interconnected Voice Over Internet Protocol Service Providers to
More informationPrivacy Year in Review: Privacy and VoIP Technology
Privacy Year in Review: Privacy and VoIP Technology JOHN B. MORRIS, JR. ABSTRACT Voice over internet protocol ( VoIP ) technology is increasingly being used throughout the nation. VoIP technology provides
More informationPromoting Competition in the Provision of Cable Television Service A Discussion Paper Submitted on behalf of FairPoint Communications May 2009
Promoting Competition in the Provision of Cable Television Service A Discussion Paper Submitted on behalf of FairPoint Communications May 2009 In 2008, the Maine legislature passed LD 2133, An Act To Amend
More informationFraud Waste and Abuse Training First Tier, Downstream and Related Entities
Fraud Waste and Abuse Training First Tier, Downstream and Related Entities Revised: 04/2010 OVERVIEW Centene Corporation Purpose Bridgeway Compliance Program Definitions of Fraud Waste & Abuse Laws and
More informationEvergreen Solar, Inc. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Evergreen Solar, Inc. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics A MESSAGE FROM THE BOARD At Evergreen Solar, Inc. (the Company or Evergreen Solar ), we believe that conducting business ethically is critical
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 58 Article 49 1
Article 49. Determination of Jurisdiction Over Providers of Health Care Benefits; Regulation of Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements. 58-49-1. Purposes. The purposes of this section and G.S. 58-49-5
More informationJune 12, 2013 Mortgagee Letter 2013-20
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON, DC 20410-8000 ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR HOUSING- FEDERAL HOUSING COMMISSIONER June 12, 2013 Mortgagee Letter 2013-20 To All Approved Mortgagees
More informationProgram Integrity (PI) for Network Providers
Program Integrity (PI) for Network Providers Purpose of Program Integrity Quality providers o Improved outcomes for consumers o Reduced oversight for provider o Confidence in network for LME-MCOs Financial
More informationCan RIA Help Participants with Rollovers
May 2013 Can RIA Help Participants with Rollovers by Fred Reish, Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP Note: The bulletin you are reading is part of a series provided as a service to the Designees and Members of
More information132 FERC 61,064 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION AND GRANTING LIMITED WAIVER
132 FERC 61,064 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Jon Wellinghoff, Chairman; Marc Spitzer, Philip D. Moeller, John R. Norris, and Cheryl A. LaFleur. Arizona
More informationBAL Making Eligibility Determinations Under The Federal Erroneous Retirement Coverage Correction Act (FERCCA) Attachment 3
BAL Making Eligibility Determinations Under The Federal Erroneous Retirement Coverage Correction Act (FERCCA) Attachment 3 FERCCA Out-of-Pocket (OOP) Guidelines TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.Page 2 Guidelines
More informationLegal Alert: FCC Imposes Additional USF Contribution Obligations on Interconnected VoIP Providers, Increases Wireless Safe Harbor
Legal Alert: FCC Imposes Additional USF Contribution Obligations on Interconnected VoIP Providers, Increases Wireless Safe Harbor July 7, 2006 On June 27, 2006, the Federal Communications Commission (
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 COMMENTS OF JOHN STAURULAKIS, INC.
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of High-Cost Universal Service Support Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service WC Docket No. 05-337 CC Docket No.
More informationConsumer Collection Agencies
Sec. 36a-809 page 1 (12-08) TABLE OF CONTENTS Consumer Collection Agencies Repealed.......................... 36a-809-1 36a-809-5 Definitions................................ 36a-809-6 Books and records...........................
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Expansion of Online Public File Requirements: Campaign Legal Center, Common Cause and Sunlight Foundation Petition for
More informationFraud, Waste and Abuse Training
Fraud, Waste and Abuse Training 1 Why Do I Need Training? Every year millions of dollars are improperly spent because of fraud, waste and abuse. It affects everyone, Including YOU. This training will help
More informationFederal Agencies Delay Nondiscrimination Requirements for Insured Group Health Plans under the Affordable Care Act
This email contains graphics - please enable images in your email client to display completely. January / February 2011 Newsletter In this Issue Nondiscrimination Requirements Delayed State Minimum Wage
More information2013 Medicare. Part D Fraud, Training. First Tier, Downstream and Related Entities
2013 Medicare Advantage and Part D Fraud, Waste and Abuse Waste, Training First Tier, Downstream and Related Entities February, 2013 Training Objectives 1 Why is Fraud, Waste, and Abuse (FWA) Training
More informationA Landowner s Know Your Rights and Options Manual
A Landowner s Know Your Rights and Options Manual Regarding Proposed Surveys and Pipeline Placement on Your Property by Natural Gas Companies or Their Agents 1 Prepared by Citizens Preserving Floyd County
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Lifeline and Link Up Reform and ) WC Docket No. 11-42 Modernization ) ) Telecommunications Carriers Eligible for
More informationSouth Carolina s Statutory Whistleblower Protections. A Review for SC Qui Tam Attorneys, SC Whistleblower Lawyers & SC Fraud Law Firms
South Carolina s Statutory Whistleblower Protections A Review for SC Qui Tam Attorneys, SC Whistleblower Lawyers & SC Fraud Law Firms South Carolina whistleblowers who are employed by a South Carolina
More informationCARDMEMBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CARDMEMBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Part 1 of 2: Agreement About this Agreement Part 1 and 2 together make your Cardmember Agreement and Disclosure Statement ( Agreement ) and govern your Credit
More informationDespite A Very High Income, Chapter 7 Debtor s May Succeed. Pamela Frederick, J.D. Candidate 2016
Despite A Very High Income, Chapter 7 Debtor s May Succeed 2015 Volume VII No. 9 Despite A Very High Income, Chapter 7 Debtor s May Succeed Pamela Frederick, J.D. Candidate 2016 Cite as: Despite A Very
More informationGAO MEDICARE. Implementation of Financial Incentive Programs under Federal Fraud and Abuse Laws. Report to Congressional Requesters
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters March 2012 MEDICARE Implementation of Financial Incentive Programs under Federal Fraud and Abuse Laws GAO-12-355 March
More informationBest Interest Contract/PTE 84-24 Comparison
Best Interest Contract/PTE 84-24 Comparison General Conditions Relief Provided Full BIC (IRAs) BIC for ERISA Plans BIC for Level Fee Fiduciaries PTE 84-24 Requires the following: 1. The transaction be
More informationSAMPLE INSURANCE BROKER SERVICE AGREEMENT
SAMPLE INSURANCE BROKER SERVICE AGREEMENT (For Use By Insurance Brokers in Preparing Service Agreements for Clients Whose 401(k) Plans Are Funded by John Hancock Group Annuity Contracts or, With Respect
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Julie Brill Maureen K. Ohlhausen Joshua D. Wright Terrell McSweeny ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 132 3088 COMMISSIONERS: Edith Ramirez, Chairwoman Julie Brill Maureen K. Ohlhausen Joshua D. Wright Terrell McSweeny In the Matter of PaymentsMD,
More informationWhat do I do if I inherited money in Iran? What do I do if I inherited property in Iran?
اطلاعات فارسی در ا خرين صفحه Although seemingly a difficult task, managing an inheritance in Iran can be done and done legally. With the right knowledge and a proactive approach you can successfully transfer
More informationANNUAL REPORT OF THE LIFELINE TELEPHONE PROGRAM 2012
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE LIFELINE TELEPHONE PROGRAM 2012 FILED IN COMPLIANCE WITH 30 V.S.A. 218 (c)(5) AND INCLUDING THE VERMONT TELECOMMUNICATIONS RELAY SERVICE AND THE LINK UP VERMONT PROGRAM March 1, 2013
More informationBefore The FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554
Before The FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) CenturyLink s Petition for Forbearance ) WC Docket No. 14-9 Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 160(c) from ) Dominant Carrier
More informationInterpretype Video Remote Interpreting (VRI) Subscription Service White Paper September 2010
Interpretype Video Remote Interpreting (VRI) Subscription Service White Paper September 2010 Overview: Interpretype Video Remote Interpreting (VRI) Subscription Service is a revolutionary method of scheduling,
More informationRe: Open Internet Order Remand Proceeding, GN Docket No. 14-28
WALTER B. MCCORMICK, JR. President and Chief Executive Officer The Honorable Tom Wheeler The Honorable Mignon Clyburn The Honorable Ajit Pai The Honorable Jessica Rosenworcel The Honorable Michael O Rielly
More informationClient Update FCC Both Eases and Tightens TCPA Rules
1 Client Update FCC Both Eases and Tightens TCPA Rules NEW YORK Matthew L. Biben mlbiben@debevoise.com Courtney M. Dankworth cmdankworth@debevoise.com Steven S. Michaels ssmichaels@debevoise.com Harriet
More informationAmy K. Fehn. I. Overview of Accountable Care Organizations and the Medicare Shared Savings Program
IMPLEMENTING COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS FOR ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATIONS Amy K. Fehn I. Overview of Accountable Care Organizations and the Medicare Shared Savings Program The Medicare Shared Savings Program
More information