ACOs: Fraud & Abuse Waivers and Analysis
|
|
- Gwendoline Andrews
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ACOs: Fraud & Abuse Waivers and Analysis Robert G. Homchick and Sarah Fallows Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP I. Introduction The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) fosters the development of new patient care models designed to improve the coordination, quality and efficiency of health care services to Medicare and Medicaid patients. Section 3022 of the ACA mandates the creation of the Medicare Shared Savings Program, which allows qualified groups of providers to earn a share of the savings generated as a result of reducing the overall cost of providing care to an assigned population of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. To participate in the Shared Savings Program, providers band together to form Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). To facilitate the establishment of ACOs, Section 3022(f) of the ACA grants the Secretary of Health and Human Services the authority to waive certain provisions of the fraud and abuse laws under the Social Security Act or other provisions of the Medicare law (herein ACO waivers ). The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published the final ACO regulations on November 2, 2011 (ACO Final Rule). At the same time, CMS and HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) published an Interim Final Rule with Comment (IFC) establishing waivers of the Stark law, the anti-kickback statute, and certain provisions of the civil money penalty law (CMP), including the so called Gainsharing CMP and the prohibition on inducements to beneficiaries. 1 The IFC establishes five separate waivers that, when considered in the aggregate, permit ACOs significantly more latitude than the waivers as initially proposed by CMS and OIG. 2 As the IFC states: These five waivers provide flexibility for ACOs and their constituent parts to pursue a wide array of activities, including start up and operating activities, that further the purposes of the Shared Savings Program. 3 The design of the ACO waivers is premised on the expectation of both CMS and OIG that the risks of fraud and abuse, such as overutilization, inappropriate utilization and underutilization, will be mitigated in the first instance by the design of the Shared Savings Program. 4 1 The IFC was published in the Federal Register at 76 Fed. Reg (November 2, 2011). Because the IFC addresses a range of regulations affecting several statutes, CMS and OIG elected not to publish formal regulation text. The IFC can be located in the Federal Register and on the CMS and OIG websites. 2 On April 7, 2011 CMS and OIG jointly published a notice with comment period describing proposed ACO waivers and other waiver design considerations (ACO Proposed Waiver Notice). 76 Fed. Reg (April 7, 2011) Fed. Reg. at Fed. Reg. at
2 The specific waivers set forth in the IFC include: An ACO pre-participation waiver that applies to ACO-related start-up arrangements; An ACO participation waiver that applies during the period of when the entity is actively participating in the Shared Savings Program and for a limited time thereafter; A shared savings distribution waiver; A compliance with Physician Self-Referral Law waiver; and A patient incentive waiver for in kind incentives offered by ACOs to beneficiaries to encourage preventive care and compliance with treatment regimens. The last two waivers were included in the ACO Proposed Waiver Notice released by CMS and OIG in Under the IFC, the fraud and abuse waivers are contingent on formal approval by the ACO governing body as well as transparency or disclosure requirements. The waivers, however, are self-executing: there is no required government review or approval. The IFC went into effect on November 2, It is important to note that these waivers apply to ACOs participating or seeking to participate in the Shared Savings Program. ACOs also operate outside of the Shared Savings Program, using the accountable care model for commercially insured patient populations. Fraud and abuse analysis of commercial ACO arrangements are discussed in Section V below. II. Applicable Fraud and Abuse Laws Section 3022(f) of the ACA grants the Secretary the authority to waive those requirements of Sections 1128A and B and Title XVIII of the Social Security Act as may be required to carry out the Shared Savings Program provisions. These provisions include: Gainsharing CMP or the Civil Money Penalty Law Prohibition on Payments to Reduce or Limit Care, 42 U.S.C. 1320a 7a(b). A hospital or critical access hospital may not knowingly make a payment, directly or indirectly to a physician as an inducement to reduce or limit services provided to a Medicare or Medicaid beneficiary under the direct care of the physician. Beneficiary Inducement CMP or the Civil Money Penalty Law Prohibition on Inducements to Beneficiaries, 42 U.S.C. 1320a 7a(a)(5). Persons may not provide remuneration to a Medicare or Medicaid beneficiary where the person knows or should know that the remuneration is likely to influence the beneficiary to order or receive a service from a particular provider, practitioner or supplier where the item may be covered in whole or in part under the Medicare or Medicaid program Fed. Reg (April 7, 2011). 2
3 The Stark Law, 42 U.S.C. 1395nn. A physician may not refer Medicare patients for certain designated health services to an entity with which the physician or an immediate family member has a financial relationship, unless an exception applies. An entity receiving a prohibited referral may not bill the Medicare program for the resulting items and services. The Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. 1320a 7b(b)(1) and (2). Persons may not knowingly offer or receive, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, any remuneration to induce or influence the furnishing, arrangement, purchase, leasing, or ordering of items or services for which payment may be made in whole or in part under a federal health care program. Prohibitions Against Charging or Collecting More Than the Medicare Allowable, 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a)(2). Assignment occurs when a beneficiary asks that a Medicare payment be made directly to the provider. If a provider accepts assignment, Medicare will directly pay the fee schedule amount for the services, and the beneficiary will be responsible for paying the coinsurance and any remaining deductible. Collectively, the fee schedule payment and coinsurance/deductible are referred to as the allowed amount. By accepting assignment, the provider agrees to accept the allowed amount as payment in full for the services. III. The Establishment, Scope and Application of the Waivers Secretary Determination. The IFC reflects the determination by the Secretary, based on public comment and the Department s own analysis, that it is necessary to waive certain provisions of the Stark law, the Federal anti-kickback statute, the Gainsharing CMP and the Beneficiary Inducements CMP to carry out the Shared Savings Program. 6 This finding was the necessary predicate to the establishment of the waivers. Scope of Waivers. The waivers set forth in the IFC are promulgated pursuant to the specific authority granted the Secretary under the ACA and apply only to the Shared Savings Program and participating ACOs. The ACA includes separate authority for Secretary to waive fraud and abuse laws for other demonstration projects and pilot programs. The agencies will issue separate guidance addressing waivers under other programs. In addition, the ACO waivers only apply to the specific laws identified in the IFC (i.e. Stark, anti-kickback and CMPs) and not to any other provision of State or Federal law, including the Internal Revenue Code. 7 Uniform Application. The waivers apply uniformly to all ACOs, ACO participants and ACO provider/suppliers. Arrangements that do not fit within a waiver have no special protection and will be evaluated on a case by case basis Fed. Reg. at Id Fed. Reg. at 67994,
4 Automatic Application. The waivers apply automatically if the conditions are satisfied. There is no need (or process) for participants in the Shared Savings Program to apply for an individualized waiver. 9 Joint Issuance. In a noteworthy display of interagency cooperation, CMS and OIG jointly established the waivers under the IFC thereby adopting a coordinated approach to the waivers of the fraud and abuse laws under the Shared Savings Program. Because the waivers address several different laws and are subject to modification, the Secretary elected not to publish the waivers in the Code of Federal Regulations to better ensure that the waivers are consistent over time. 10 Coordination with ACO Final Rule. The IFC is drafted to coordinate with the provisions of the ACO Final Rule. For purposes of the IFC, the terms ACO, ACO participants, ACO providers/suppliers and participation agreement have the meanings ascribed to them in the ACO Final Rule. 11 Purposes of the Shared Savings Program. Four of the ACO Waivers include a requirement that the arrangement in question or the use of certain funds be reasonably related to the purposes of the Shared Savings Program. That phase is broadly defined in the IFC to include promoting accountability for the quality and cost of overall care for the Medicare patient population, managing and coordinating such care, promoting evidence based medicine and patient engagement and encouraging investment in infrastructure and redesigned care processes. 12 The arrangement must be related to the Shared Savings Program but they may involve care for both Medicare and non-medicare patients. The arrangement need only be reasonably related to one of the enumerated purposes of the Shared Savings Program. The IFC warns, however, that not every arrangement will pass muster as reasonably related to the purposes of the Shared Savings Program. For example, we do not believe that a per-referral payment (such as, expressly paying a specialist $500 for every referral generated...) would be reasonably related to the purposes of the Shared Savings Program. 13 Governing Body Determinations. Several of the waivers require the governing body of the ACO to make formal determinations most often a determination that the arrangement is reasonably related to the purposes of the Shared Savings Program. The waivers require that the governing body make a contemporaneous written record of the basis for its determination and that the written records be preserved for ten (10) years. These determinations are intended to make the ACO s governing body an intermediary responsible, in the first instance, for ensuring that all protected arrangements are in furtherance of ACO purposes and are not isolated arrangements furthering the individual financial or business interests of ACO participants or ACO providers/suppliers Fed. Reg. at Id. 11 More specifically, 42 CFR ; 42 CFR Fed. Reg. at (definition of purposes of Shared Savings Program ); 76 Fed. Reg. at (related commentary) Fed. Reg. at Fed. Reg. at
5 Documentation of Governing Body Determinations. The documentation of arrangements eligible for waiver protection must include the following: (a) a description of the arrangement, including the parties, the date, the purpose and the financial or economic terms; and (b) the manner of the governing body s authorization of the arrangement and the basis for the determination that the arrangement is reasonably related to the purposes of the Shared Savings Program. The IFC refers to the need for an audit trail of contemporaneous documentation. 15 Transparency. The IFC requires that a description of the arrangements subject to the waiver to be publicly disclosed at a time and in a place and manner established in guidance issued by the Secretary. 16 The goals of this transparency requirement include the deterrence of criminal or fraudulent conduct, making information about the arrangements more available to all parties involved and the government and creating an incentive for the ACO to exercise due diligence to ensure that the arrangements are consistent with the ACO s mission. 17 IV. The Five Waivers The IFC establishes five separate waivers addressing different circumstances or aspects of the formation and operations of an ACO. An arrangement need only fit within one waiver to be protected but in some cases an arrangement may satisfy the criteria of more than one waiver. A. ACO Pre-participation Waiver 18 The Stark law, anti-kickback statute and Gainsharing CMP are waived with respect to start up arrangements that pre-date an ACO s participation agreement, provided: 1. The arrangement is under taken by the parties acting with the good faith intent to develop an ACO that will participate in the Shared Savings Program starting in a particular year (Target Year) and to submit an application to participate in that year. The parties to the arrangement must include at least one ACO participant of the type eligible to form an ACO. 2. The parties must take diligent steps to develop an ACO that would participate in the Shared Savings Program in the Target Year. 3. ACO s governing body must make a bona fide determination that the arrangement is reasonably related to the purposes of the Shared Savings Program Written documentation of the arrangement, the governing body s determination and description of the diligent steps taken to develop the ACO are created contemporaneously and retained by the ACO for at least ten (10) years Fed. Reg. at Fed. Reg. at 68000, Fed. Reg. at Fed. Reg. at The IFC includes an illustrative, non-exhaustive list of arrangements that constitute start up arrangements for purposes of the Pre-participation Waiver. 76 Fed. Reg. at
6 5. A description of the arrangement is publicly disclosed at a time and in a manner established in guidance to be issued by the Secretary. The required public disclosure, however, will not include the financial or economic terms of the arrangement. It is noteworthy that under the Pre-participation Waiver, the parties to the arrangement may not include drug and device manufacturers, distributors, durable medical equipment suppliers or home health suppliers. 20 The agencies noted that these entities have historically posed a heightened risk of program abuse. In the context of the Pre-participation Waiver, ACO participant and ACO providers/suppliers should refer to individuals or entities that would qualify under the ACO Final Rule definitions and would be on the ACO s list of providers/suppliers but for the fact that the required list has not yet been submitted to CMS. If the ACO fails to submit an application for participation for the Target Year, it must submit a statement describing the reasons why it was unable to submit the application to the Secretary on or before the last available application due date for the Target Year. For arrangements that meet all the requirements of the Pre-participation Waiver, the waiver period starts on either (a) November 2, 2011 for Target Year 2012; or (b) one (1) year preceding an application due date for a Target Year of 2013 or later. The waiver period ends: For ACOs that submit an application by the application date for the Target Year and enter into a participation agreement, the start date of that agreement; For ACOs that submit an application that is denied, the date of the denial notice, except for arrangement that qualified for the waiver before the date of the denial notice, in which case the waiver period ends six (6) months after the date of the denial notice. For ACOs that fail to submit an application by the due date, on the earlier of the application due date or the date the ACO submits the statement of reasons for failing to submit an application. However, an ACO that is unable to submit an application but can demonstrate a likelihood of successfully developing an ACO that would be eligible to participate in the next available year may apply for an extension of the waiver. The determination whether to grant the extension will be within the sole discretion of the Secretary. An ACO may use the Pre-participation Waiver only one time Fed. Reg. at
7 B. ACO Participation Waiver 21 The Stark law, anti-kickback statute and Gainsharing CMP are waived with respect to any arrangement of an ACO, one or more of its ACO participants or ACO providers/suppliers, or any combination thereof, provided: 1. The ACO has entered into a participation agreement and remains in good standing under the Shared Savings Program. 2. The ACO meets the governance, leadership and management requirements of an ACO The ACO s governing body has made a bona fide determination that the arrangement is reasonably related to the purposes of the Shared Savings Program. 4. The arrangement, the governing body s determination and related matters are contemporaneously documented and that documentation is retained by the ACO for at least ten (10) years. 5. A description of the arrangement is publicly disclosed at a time and in a manner established in guidance to be issued by the Secretary. For arrangements that meet all the requirements of the Participation Waiver, the waiver period will start on the date of the participation agreement and will end six (6) months following the earlier of the expiration of the participation agreement, including any renewals, or the date on which the ACO has voluntarily terminated the participation agreement. However, if CMS terminates the participation agreement the waiver period will end on the date of the termination notice. C. Shared Savings Distribution Waiver 23 The Stark law, anti-kickback statute and Gainsharing CMP are waived with respect to distributions of shared savings earned by an ACO, provided: 1. The ACO has entered into a participation agreement and remains in good standing under the Shared Savings Program. Program. 2. The shared savings are earned by the ACO pursuant to the Shared Savings 3. The shared savings are earned by the ACO during the term of its participation agreement, even if the distribution or use of the shared savings occurs after expiration of the agreement Fed. Reg. at 68000, CFR ; 42 CFR Fed. Reg. at
8 4. The shared savings are either: (1) distributed among ACO participants, ACO providers/suppliers or individuals or entities that were ACO participants or ACO providers/suppliers during the year in which the shared savings were earned; or (2) used for activities that are reasonably related to the purposes of the Shared Savings Program. The Shared Savings Distribution Waiver is very flexible but it is not without limits. For example, the Waiver does not protect distributions of savings to referring physicians who are outside of the ACO, unless those physicians are being compensated for activities reasonably related to the Shared Savings Program. 5. With respect to the Gainsharing CMP waiver, the shared savings distributions made directly or indirectly from a hospital to a physician may not be knowingly made to reduce or limit medically necessary care to patients under the direct care of the physician. The IFC clarifies that payments to encourage best practices or compliance with clinical protocols are not prohibited by this provision. Thus, encouraging a physician to use a particular cost effective therapy in lieu of a more expensive alternative is permissible. It is less than clear, however, whether the waiver would extend to distributions of shared savings designed to encourage a physician to consider not treating certain conditions based on the lack of medical evidence that available treatments are effective. Hopefully, the agencies will give ACOs this latitude. The Shared Savings Distribution Waiver does not protect the distribution of shared savings earned by an ACO under programs sponsored by commercial health plans. The IFC acknowledges that ACOs participating in the Shared Savings Program may receive performance based payments from commercial plans that are tied to activities consistent with the Shared Savings Program. Nonetheless, the agencies were not persuaded that a specific waiver for such payments is necessary. The IFC notes that commercial health plan programs may not implicate the fraud and abuse laws and that the Stark law risk sharing exception 24 may well provide protection for many of the shared savings arrangements. 25 D. Compliance with the Physician Self-Referral (Stark) Law Waiver 26 The Gainsharing CMP and the anti-kickback statute are waived with respect to any financial relationship among the ACO, its ACO participants, and its ACO providers/suppliers that implicates the Stark law, provided: 1. The ACO has entered into a participation agreement and remains in good standing under the Shared Savings Program. 2. The financial relationship is reasonably related to the purposes of the Shared Savings Program CFR (n) Fed. Reg. at Fed. Reg. at
9 law. 3. The financial relationship fully complies within an exception to the Stark For arrangements that meet all the requirements of the Compliance with Stark Law Waiver, the waiver period will start on the date of the participation agreement and with end on the earlier of the expiration of the participation agreement, including any renewals or the date on which the participation agreement terminates. The willingness of the agencies to use the Stark law exceptions as a basis for waiving anti-kickback and Gainsharing CMP liability is a departure from the usual position of CMS and OIG that the anti-kickback statute, the Stark law, and the civil monetary penalty law are completely different statutes that must be separately analyzed. The IFC explains that the agencies were willing to take this step because of the specific safeguards of the Shared Savings Program and their desire to ease the burdens on entities establishing and operating ACOs. 27 E. Waiver for Patient Incentives 28 The Beneficiary Inducement CMP and the anti-kickback statute are waived with respect to items or services provided by an ACO, its ACO participants, or its ACO providers/suppliers to beneficiaries for free or below fair market value provided: 1. The ACO has entered into a participation agreement and remains in good standing under the Shared Savings Program. 2. There is a reasonable connection between the items or services and the medical care of the beneficiary. This requirement is intended to protect against the risk that ACOs might use extravagant incentives to steer beneficiaries The items or services are in kind (no cash or cash equivalent payments). 4. The items and services (a) are preventive care items or services, or (b) advance one or more of the following goals: (i) adherence to a treatment regime; (ii) adherence to a drug regime; (iii) adherence to a follow-up plan of care; (iv) management of a chronic disease or condition. The Waiver for Patient Incentives will not protect financial incentives, such as the waiving or reducing patient copayments or deductibles. The IFC also notes that the ACO Final Rule prohibits ACOs, ACO participants and ACO providers/suppliers and other individuals performing functions or services related to ACO activities from providing any gifts or other remuneration to beneficiaries to induce the beneficiaries to receive services from providers affiliated with the ACO Fed. Reg. at Fed. Reg. at Fed. Reg. at CFR (a)(1). 9
10 The Waiver for Patient Incentives does not protect the provision of free or below fair market value items or services by manufacturers or other vendors to beneficiaries, the ACO, ACO participants or ACO providers/suppliers. The Waiver for Patient Incentives does protect ACOs that give beneficiaries items or services obtained from manufacturers at discounted rates, but does not cover the discount arrangement between the ACO and the manufacturer. 31 For arrangements that meet all the requirements of the Waiver for Patient Incentives, the waiver period will start on the date of the participation agreement and will end on the earlier of the expiration of the term of the participation agreement, including any renewals, or the date the participation agreement terminates. Beneficiaries, however, may keep items received before the termination of the participation agreement and may receive the remainder of any service initiated before the termination of the participation agreement. V. Fraud & Abuse Analysis of Commercial ACO Arrangements A. Medicare Shared Savings Program Waivers As noted above in the discussion of the Shared Savings Distribution Waiver, CMS and OIG expressed in the IFC that shared savings or similar performance-based payments received by an ACO from a commercial plan do not necessarily implicate the fraud and abuse laws. 32 The agencies still declined, however, to extend protection under the Shared Savings Distribution Waiver to the distribution of shared savings earned through commercial ACO arrangements. 33 Without waiver protection, commercial ACOs must be mindful of the pitfalls of the Gainsharing CMP, Stark law and anti-kickback statute. The good news for commercial ACOs that also participate in the Medicare Shared Savings Program is that the ACO Participation Waiver may provide some protection for incentives or other arrangements targeting the ACO s commercial patients. 34 CMS and OIG recognize that such arrangements have the potential to be reasonably related to the purposes of the Shared Savings Program 35 and share the aims of promoting accountability for the quality, cost, and overall care for a Medicare patient population, managing and coordinating care for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries through an ACO, and encouraging investment in infrastructure and redesigned care processes for high quality and efficient service delivery for patients, including Medicare beneficiaries. 36 B. Stark Regarding the Stark law 37 specifically, the IFC notes that many commercial ACO arrangements are, or can be, structured to fit within the Stark law exception for risk-sharing Fed. Reg. at Fed. Reg. at Id. 34 Id Fed. Reg. at Id U.S.C. 1395nn. 10
11 arrangements or other exceptions. 38 The exception for risk-sharing arrangements was designed to protect compensation arrangements between a physician and a managed care organization (MCO) or independent physicians association (IPA), so long as: the compensation is paid pursuant to a risk-sharing arrangement (including, but not limited to, withholds, bonuses, and risk pools); the compensation is for services provided to enrollees of a health plan (as those terms are defined for purposes of the anti-kickback law safe harbors); and the arrangement does not violate the anti-kickback law or any federal or state law or regulation governing billing or claims submission. 39 The exception for risk-sharing arrangements is meant to cover all risk-sharing compensation paid to physicians by an entity downstream of any type of health plan, insurance company, HMO, or IPA, provided the arrangement relates to enrollees and meets the conditions set forth in the exception. All downstream entities are included, and CMS purposefully declined to define the term managed care organization so as to create a broad exception with maximum flexibility. 40 Commercial ACOs may also need to look to other Stark exceptions to address some of the financial relationships involving physician participants or members. Often the Stark analysis of such arrangements will focus on whether an indirect compensation arrangement has been created and, if so, whether the arrangement can be structured to fit within the indirect compensation arrangement exception. C. CMP Laws The Gainsharing CMP 41 and the Beneficiary Inducement CMP 42 specifically target Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. Therefore, in the commercial ACO context it is entirely possible that either of these statutes will be implicated because government program patients will not be included in the ACO patient population. The analysis, however, is complicated by a couple of factors. First, if the incentives in the commercial ACO are designed or implemented in a manner such that they have a spillover effect on government program beneficiaries, CMP liability may be possible. The assessment of the risk based on a spillover effect theory will necessarily be fact specific. Second, some of the commercial ACO patients could have Medicare or Medicaid secondary coverage. For better or worse, it is not clear the extent to which Medicare secondary coverage might trigger CMP exposure and there is little case law or other guidance on this issue. To the extent that a health plan is involved in the commercial ACO, both CMP laws are even less likely to be triggered. In the case of the Gainsharing CMP it should be possible for the Fed. Reg. at CFR (n) Fed. Reg. at (March 26, 2004) U.S.C. 1320a 7a(b) U.S.C. 1320a 7a(a)(5). 11
12 commercial ACO to structure any payments to physicians that might be construed as having the effect of reducing or limiting care such that these payments would be made by or at the direction of the insurer and not the hospital ACO participants. The commercial ACO should also be able to structure incentives to ACO patients who are enrollees of the commercial health plan affiliated with the ACO in a manner that would not implicate the Beneficiary Inducement CMP. D. Anti-kickback Statute Like the CMP laws, the federal anti-kickback statute 43 is focused on federal health care program patients and payments from the federal programs. The anti-kickback statute also requires that the government must prove that a party s actions are knowing and willful in order to establish a violation. Therefore, under most circumstances, the anti-kickback risks in a commercial ACO context should be low provided the commercial ACO is not being used for nefarious purposes such as intentionally channeling funds to a referral source in exchange for the referral of items of services to be paid for by a federal health care benefit program. E. State Laws In all stages of formation and operation, commercial ACO arrangements must also be analyzed in light of the state fraud and abuse laws. A majority of states have laws regarding false claims, kickbacks and physician self-referral. These state statutes often differ from their federal counterparts and should be separately analyzed by qualified legal counsel U.S.C. 1320a 7b(b)(1) and (2). 12
Fraud & Abuse Waivers Under the Medicare Shared Savings Program
Fraud & Abuse Waivers Under the Medicare Shared Savings Program Robert G. Homchick Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP I. Introduction The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) fosters the development
More informationFraud and Abuse Considerations for Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs)
Fraud and Abuse Considerations for Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) By: Chris Rossman, Foley & Lardner LLP, Detroit, Michigan 1. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ( CMS ) and the Office
More informationAmy K. Fehn. I. Overview of Accountable Care Organizations and the Medicare Shared Savings Program
IMPLEMENTING COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS FOR ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATIONS Amy K. Fehn I. Overview of Accountable Care Organizations and the Medicare Shared Savings Program The Medicare Shared Savings Program
More informationDepartment of Health and Human Services. No. 209 October 29, 2015. Part III
Vol. 80 Thursday, No. 209 October 29, 2015 Part III Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 42 CFR Chapter IV Office of Inspector General 42 CFR Chapter V Medicare
More informationIn early April, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued
April 26, 2011 If you have any questions regarding the matters discussed in this memorandum, please contact the following attorneys or call your regular Skadden contact. John T. Bentivoglio 202.371.7560
More informationHCCA 2013 COMPLIANCE INSTITUTE ANTI-KICKBACK STATUTE 101 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON
UW MEDICINE HCAA 2013 Compliance Institute HCCA 2013 COMPLIANCE INSTITUTE ANTI-KICKBACK STATUTE 101 April 23, 2013 Robert S. Brown Senior Compliance Specialist UW Medicine Compliance SEATTLE, WASHINGTON
More informationCornerstone Health Care, P.A.
Cornerstone Health Care, P.A. Medicare Shared Savings Program ACO Compliance NAACOS July 2013 Agenda 1. Background 2. Compliance Requirements & Purpose 3. Cornerstone s experience 4. Q&A 2 Cornerstone
More informationCMS-1345-NC2: Waiver Designs in Connection With the Medicare Shared Savings Program and the Innovation Center
Submitted Electronically Donald Berwick, M.D., M.P.P. Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Room 445-G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building 200 Independence
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 42 CFR Chapter IV Office of Inspector General 42 CFR Chapter V [CMS-1439-IFC] RIN 0938-AR30 Medicare Program; Final Waivers
More informationAccountable Care Organizations
Building a Healthy ACO Compliance Program HCCA 2014 Compliance Institute Mary C. Malone, Esq. Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, P.C. Disclaimer: The content of this presentation does not constitute legal
More informationRE: File Code CMS-1345-NC2 Medicare Program Waiver Designs in Connection with the Medicare Shared Savings Program and Innovation Center
Donald Berwick, M.D., M.P.P. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Attention: CMS-1345-NC2 Room 445-G Hubert H. Humphrey Building 200 Independence Ave. S.W.
More informationOHIO HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION 2015 Annual Meeting. Accountable Care Organizations Comprehensive Integration Strategy
OHIO HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION 2015 Annual Meeting Accountable Care Organizations Comprehensive Integration Strategy ACO Development Market Conditions Increasing Economic pressures Consumerism Regulatory scrutiny
More informationDiscovering a Potential Overpayment: An Law, and Medicare Reimbursement Considerations
Discovering a Potential Overpayment: An Overview of the False Claims Act, Stark Law, and Medicare Reimbursement Considerations, Stockholder, Reid & Riege, P.C., Stockholder, Reid & Riege, P.C. Outline
More informationWhy Worry? Fraud and Abuse Risks for Managed Care Organizations. Overview
Why Worry? Fraud and Abuse Risks for Managed Care Organizations Stephen K. Warch Shareholder, Nilan Johnson Lewis Overview Risks Created by Incentives Offered by Health Plans and Providers o Prohibition
More informationLegal Waivers under the Medicare Shared Savings Program: An Overview of the Options
Legal Waivers under the Medicare Shared Savings Program: An Overview of the Options Robert G. Homchick Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Arthur N. Lerner Crowell & Moring LLP Shared Savings Program: ACOs Medicare
More informationLegal Issues to Consider When Creating a Health Care Business Model
Legal Issues to Consider When Creating a Health Care Business Model Connie A. Raffa, J.D., LL.M. Business practices considered standard in other industries may in the health care industry be considered
More informationAccountable Care Organizations Multiple Comment Periods
Accountable Care Organizations Multiple Comment Periods Proposed Waivers CMS and OIG CMS and HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) jointly issued a notice with comment period outlining proposals for waivers
More informationCLINICALLY INTEGRATED NETWORKS: BUSINESS AND LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
CLINICALLY INTEGRATED NETWORKS: BUSINESS AND LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS Claire Turcotte, Esquire, Bricker & Eckler LLP Jim Yanci, MS MT (ASCP), Dixon Hughes Goodman Agenda BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS How Fast are
More informationFraud and Abuse Primer. Stark Law The Anti-Kickback Statute False Claims Act
Fraud and Abuse Primer Stark Law The Anti-Kickback Statute False Claims Act Stark Act 42 U.S.C. 1395nn The Stark II Act prohibits a physician from making a Referral to an entity; for the furnishing of
More informationLegal & Policy Issues Related to ACO Formation by Independent Physician Groups
Legal & Policy Issues Related to ACO Formation by Independent Physician Groups Troy Barsky Arthur Lerner Crowell & Moring LLP America s Health Insurance Plans ACO Summit May 15, 2013 Background Government
More informationUnder section 1128A(a)(5) of the Social Security Act (the Act), enacted as part of
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL SPECIAL ADVISORY BULLETIN OFFERING GIFTS AND OTHER INDUCEMENTS TO BENEFICIARIES August 2002 Introduction Under section 1128A(a)(5) of the Social Security Act (the Act), enacted
More informationNew Safe Harbors and Stark Exceptions for Electronic Prescribing and Electronic Health Records Arrangements
New Safe Harbors and Stark Exceptions for Electronic Prescribing and Electronic Health Records Arrangements November 15, 2006 Steve Nash and Sara Hill, Holme Roberts & Owen LLP Agenda Introduction Background
More informationAccountable Care Organizations
Building a Healthy ACO Compliance Program: Good Help ACO s Experience in Building Healthy Communities While Leveraging Existing Resources to Establish a Healthy and Effective ACO Compliance Program. Mary
More informationThe Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act and Healthcare Reform: Implications for Compliance Initiatives and Fraud Investigations
The Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act and Healthcare Reform: Implications for Compliance Initiatives and Fraud Investigations Presented by: Robert Threlkeld, Esq. Holly Pierson, Esq. Paul F. Danello,
More informationCMS Mandated Training for Providers, First Tier, Downstream and Related Entities
CMS Mandated Training for Providers, First Tier, Downstream and Related Entities I. INTRODUCTION It is the practice of Midwest Health Plan (MHP) to conduct its business with the highest degree of ethics
More informationGAO MEDICARE. Implementation of Financial Incentive Programs under Federal Fraud and Abuse Laws. Report to Congressional Requesters
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters March 2012 MEDICARE Implementation of Financial Incentive Programs under Federal Fraud and Abuse Laws GAO-12-355 March
More informationStatement of the Association of American Medical Colleges on Legal Issues Related to Accountable Care Organizations and Healthcare Innovation Zones
Statement of the Association of American Medical Colleges on Legal Issues Related to Accountable Care Organizations and Healthcare Innovation Zones Public Workshop hosted by the FTC, CMS, HHS OIG October
More informationUnderstanding Health Reform s
Compliance 101: Understanding Health Reform s New Compliance Requirements Uri Bilek Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP Does your organization have a designated Compliance Officer? a. Yes b. No c. Don't
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Anti-Kickback Statute and Stark Law Compliance in Managed Care Contracts Navigating Safe Harbors and Physician Incentive Plan Rules, Limiting Civil
More informationSome Laws Affecting Healthcare Transactions. Kim C. Stanger (10-15)
Some Laws Affecting Healthcare Transactions Kim C. Stanger (10-15) This presentation is similar to any other legal education materials designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics.
More informationCMS Publishes Final Stark Law Regulations
11/20/2015 CMS Publishes Final Stark Law Regulations By Karl Thallner and Nicole Aiken, Reed Smith LLP On October 30, 2015, as part of a larger final rule revising the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS)
More informationRules of the Engagement: Compliance, Legalities and Ethics in Audiology Today. 2011 AAA Convention Chicago, IL
Rules of the Engagement: Compliance, Legalities and Ethics in Audiology Today 2011 AAA Convention Chicago, IL 1. Ignorance is NOT a defense 2. Rules, regulations, guidance and laws do not have to be interpreted
More informationA Roadmap for New Physicians. Avoiding Medicare and Medicaid Fraud and Abuse
A Roadmap for New Physicians Avoiding Medicare and Medicaid Fraud and Abuse Introduction This tutorial is intended to assist new physicians in understanding how to comply with Federal laws that combat
More informationACO Fraud and Abuse Provisions
MAY 6 2011 ACO Fraud and Abuse Provisions BY BRIAN P. DUNPHY AND ELLYN L. STERNFIELD On March 31, 2011, a little over a year after the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), as amended by
More informationThe Stark Law Opportunities to Address Barriers to Clinical Integration January 29, 2016
The Stark Law Opportunities to Address Barriers to Clinical Integration There are several rules governing compensation relationships between hospitals, physicians and other caregivers, including the Anti-kickback
More informationStructuring Physician Recruitment Arrangements in Accordance with the Stark II/Phase II Interim Final Rule
Structuring Physician Recruitment Arrangements in Accordance with the Stark II/Phase II Interim Final Rule Stacey A. Tovino satovino@central.uh.edu June 25, 2004 On March 26, 2004, the Centers for Medicare
More informationCompliance: What Every Reference Lab Representative Should Know By Peter Francis
Compliance: What Every Reference Lab Representative Should Know By Peter Francis 04-10 Following the hiring of a sales representative, one of the first duties of any clinical or anatomical pathology lab
More informationHealth Law Section Spring Conference May 7, 2013 Scott S. Bell. parsonsbehle.com
ANTI-KICKBACK STATUTE AND STARK LAW UPDATE Health Law Section Spring Conference May 7, 2013 Scott S. Bell parsonsbehle.com Anti-Kickback Statute Don t pay for referrals! 2 Anti-Kickback Statute Prohibits
More informationUPDATED. Special Advisory Bulletin on the Effect of Exclusion from Participation in Federal Health Care Programs
UPDATED Special Advisory Bulletin on the Effect of Exclusion from Participation in Federal Health Care Programs Issued May 8, 2013 Updated Special Advisory Bulletin on the Effect of Exclusion from Participation
More informationTouchstone Health Training Guide: Fraud, Waste and Abuse Prevention
Touchstone Health Training Guide: Fraud, Waste and Abuse Prevention About the Training Guide Touchstone is providing this Fraud, Waste and Abuse Prevention Training Guide as a resource for meeting Centers
More informationSTARK AND ANTI-KICKBACK PROTECTION FOR E-PRESCRIBING AND ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS
STARK AND ANTI-KICKBACK PROTECTION FOR E-PRESCRIBING AND ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS Andrew B. Wachler, Esq. Adrienne Dresevic, Esq. Wachler & Associates, P.C. Royal Oak, Michigan On October 11, 2005, in
More informationA Closer Look at the Final ACO Rule
A Closer Look at the Final ACO Rule October 2011 For more information, please contact: On October 20th, the federal government released a final rule and other companion releases relating to Accountable
More informationFederal Health Care Fraud & Abuse, Compliance and Program Integrity
Federal Health Care Fraud & Abuse, Compliance and Program Integrity Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111-148 ( PPACA ) Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, Pub.
More informationStark Law Basics for Health Care Providers
Stark Law Basics for Health Care Providers Today s Webcast will begin promptly at Noon FOLLOW STEPTOE & JOHNSON ON TWITTER: Follow @Steptoe_Johnson ALSO FIND US ON http://www.linkedin.com/companies/216795
More informationTo: All Vendors, Agents and Contractors of Hutchinson Regional Medical Center
To: All Vendors, Agents and Contractors of Hutchinson Regional Medical Center From: Corporate Compliance Department Re: Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 Dear Vendor/Agent/Contractor: Under the Deficit Reduction
More informationPhysician Integration Models: ACOs as the Latest and Greatest? David T. Lewis david.lewis@lpnt.net LifePoint Hospitals, Inc.
Physician Integration Models: ACOs as the Latest and Greatest? David T. Lewis david.lewis@lpnt.net LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. Brentwood, TN Kim Harvey Looney kim.looney@wallerlaw.com Waller Lansden Dortch
More informationOIG Open Letter Regarding the Self-Disclosure Protocol: Further Refinements
2009 American Health Lawyers Association April 17, 2009 Vol. VII Issue 15 OIG Open Letter Regarding the Self-Disclosure Protocol: Further Refinements By Ritu Kaur Singh, Frank E. Sheeder III, and Gerald
More informationIntroduction to the Anti-Kickback Statute
www.bakerdaniels.com Introduction to the Anti-Kickback Statute and Stark Law October 24, 2011 Isaac M. Willett Baker & Daniels LLP Federal Anti-Kickback Statute Prohibits the offering, paying soliciting
More informationFalse Claims Act CMP212
False Claims Act CMP212 Colorado Access is committed to a culture of compliance in which its employees, providers, contractors, and consultants are educated and knowledgeable about their role in reporting
More informationCompliance and Program Integrity Melanie Bicigo, CHC, CEBS mlbicigo@uphp.com 906-225-7749
Compliance and Program Integrity Melanie Bicigo, CHC, CEBS mlbicigo@uphp.com 906-225-7749 Define compliance and compliance program requirements Communicate Upper Peninsula Health Plan (UPHP) compliance
More informationFRAUD AND ABUSE CONCERNS FOR ELECTRONIC PRESCRIBING AND ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS
FRAUD AND ABUSE CONCERNS FOR ELECTRONIC PRESCRIBING AND ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS Presented by: Peter M Hoffman, Esq Garfunkel, Wild & Travis, PC (516) 393-2268 phoffman@gwtlawcom 1 THE FEDERAL ANTI-KICKBACK
More informationThe Impact of the PPACA on Fraud and Abuse Issues
The Impact of the PPACA on Fraud and Abuse Issues American Bar Association May 5, 2010 Kirk Ogrosky, Arnold & Porter LLP Lisa M. Ohrin, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP Donald H. Romano, Arent Fox LLP The Patient
More informationPREVENTING FRAUD, ABUSE, & WASTE: A Primer for Physical Therapists
PREVENTING FRAUD, ABUSE, & WASTE: A Primer for Physical Therapists Available at: http://www.apta.org/integrity 2014 American Physical Therapy Association. All rights reserved. All reproduction or redistribution
More informationBAPTIST PHYSICIAN ALLIANCE ACO AGREEMENT for MEDICARE SHARED SAVINGS PROGRAM PARTICIPATION
BAPTIST PHYSICIAN ALLIANCE ACO AGREEMENT for MEDICARE SHARED SAVINGS PROGRAM PARTICIPATION ( Physician Practice ) hereby agrees to become a Participant in the Medicare Shared Savings Program ( MSSP ) pursuant
More informationStark, False Claims and Anti- Kickback Laws: Easy Ways to Stay Compliant with the Big Three in Healthcare
Stark, False Claims and Anti- Kickback Laws: Easy Ways to Stay Compliant with the Big Three in Healthcare In health care, we are blessed with an abundance of rules, policies, standards and laws. In Health
More informationAccountable Care Organizations: The Final Rule
Accountable Care Organizations: The Final Rule October 27, 2011 2011 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP 10.27.11 101799002 v4 Overview Background Final Rule Highlights Structure and Formation of ACOs Quality
More informationFraud, Waste, and Abuse
These training materials are divided into three topics to meet the responsibilities stated on the previous pages: Fraud, Waste, Compliance Program Standards of Conduct Although the information contained
More informationQuestions On Charges For The Uninsured. Q1: Can a hospital waive collection of charges to an indigent, uninsured individual?
2/17/04 2:11 pm Questions On Charges For The Uninsured Q1: Can a hospital waive collection of charges to an indigent, uninsured individual? A1: Yes. Nothing in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
More informationLMHS COMPLIANCE ORIENTATION Physicians and Midlevel Providers. Avoiding Medicare and Medicaid Fraud & Abuse
LMHS COMPLIANCE ORIENTATION Physicians and Midlevel Providers Avoiding Medicare and Medicaid Fraud & Abuse Revised 06/03/2014 LMHS COMPLIANCE PROGRAM 6/30/2014 2 Chief Compliance Officer Catherine A. Kahle,
More informationG-2. Report. Compliance. An ambitious health reform subtitle, Transforming the Health
G-2 Kimberly Scott, Managing Editor, kscott@ioma.com Carrie Valiant is a senior member of the health care and life sciences practice of the national law firm, EpsteinBeckerGreen, practicing in its Washington,
More informationAppleCare. 2013 General Compliance Training
AppleCare 2013 General Compliance Training Goals After completing this course, you will understand: The Principles of Ethics and Integrity and the Compliance Plan How to report a suspected or detected
More informationCMS Releases Proposed Rule Governing Accountable Care Organizations
CMS Releases Proposed Rule Governing Accountable Care Organizations Health Care Organizations Face Complex Strategic Decisions Authors: Robert D. Belfort Paul M. Campbell Susan R. Ingargiola Stephanie
More informationCOMMENTARY. HHS Announces Next Generation ACO Model of Payment and Care Delivery. Potential Participants. Focus of the Next Gen ACO Model
April 2015 COMMENTARY HHS Announces Next Generation ACO Model of Payment and Care Delivery On March 10, 2015, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ( HHS ) announced the Next Generation Accountable
More informationMedicare Fraud, Waste and Abuse (FWA) Compliance Training. ICE Approved: 11/13/09
Medicare Fraud, Waste and Abuse (FWA) Compliance Training ICE Approved: 11/13/09 1 CMS Requirements The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) requires annual fraud, waste, and abuse training
More informationDETAILED SUMMARY--MEDCIARE SHARED SAVINGS/ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATION (ACO) PROGRAM
1 DETAILED SUMMARY--MEDCIARE SHARED SAVINGS/ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATION (ACO) PROGRAM Definition of ACO General Concept An ACO refers to a group of physician and other healthcare providers and suppliers
More informationFederal and State Laws Relating to Referrals
POLICY: Federal and State Laws Relating to Referrals DATE: June 24, 2008 PAGES: 1 of 5 INTRODUCTION POLICY The process of referring patients to health care providers has been the subject of significant
More information2015 Fraud, Waste & Abuse Prevention
Quality Independent Physicians, LLC Awareness Training 2015 Fraud, Waste & Abuse Prevention Fraud, Waste and Abuse (FWA) Training Objectives After completing this training you should be able to: Recognize
More informationFraud, Waste and Abuse Prevention Training
Fraud, Waste and Abuse Prevention Training The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requires annual fraud, waste and abuse training for organizations providing health services to MA or Medicare
More informationSee page 16. Thomas A. Vallas
Compliance TODAY July 2014 a publication of the health care compliance association www.hcca-info.org What s the key to successfully merging two large hospital systems? an interview with Michael R. Holper
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 58 Article 68 1
Article 68. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability. 58-68-1 through 58-68-20: Repealed by Session Laws 1997-259, s. 1(a). Part A. Group Market Reforms. Subpart 1. Portability, Access, and Renewability
More informationThursday, October 10, 2013 POTENTIAL BARRIERS TO HOSPITAL SUBSIDIES FOR HEALTH INSURANCE FOR THOSE IN NEED
Thursday, October 10, 2013 POTENTIAL BARRIERS TO HOSPITAL SUBSIDIES FOR HEALTH INSURANCE FOR THOSE IN NEED AT A GLANCE The Issue: A number of hospitals and health systems have inquired about whether it
More informationFRAUD AND ABUSE (SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS)
FRAUD AND ABUSE (SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS) (Information compiled from the Democratic Policy Committee (DPC) Report on The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education
More informationReedSmith. CMS and the OIG Extend Protections for Electronic Health Record Donations. Client Alert. Life Sciences Health Industry Group
The business of relationships. SM SM Client Alert Life Sciences Health Industry Group CMS and the OIG Extend Protections for Electronic Health Record Donations Written by Robert J. Hill, Susan A. Edwards
More informationBeneficiary Inducements in an Evolving Market: Assessing the Risks, Understanding the Benefits and Drawing the Lines
Beneficiary Inducements in an Evolving Market: Assessing the Risks, Understanding the Benefits and Drawing the Lines A Publication of the American Health Lawyers Association Public Interest Committee American
More informationCompliance Training for Medicare Programs Version 1.0 2/22/2013
Compliance Training for Medicare Programs Version 1.0 2/22/2013 Independence Blue Cross is an independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association. 1 The Compliance Program Setting standards
More informationApplication & Implementation of ACO Waivers and Ongoing Compliance Issues
Application & Implementation of ACO Waivers and Ongoing Compliance Issues Presenter Todd A. Zigrang MBA, MHA, FACHE, ASA HEALTH CAPITAL CONSULTANTS Thursday, August 13, 2015 1:30 p.m. Hilton St. Louis,
More informationCorporate Compliance
Upstate University Hospital Institutional Compliance Program Physician Orientation 2014 1 Corporate Compliance Upstate University Hospital and the Faculty Practice Plans have active institutional (corporate)
More informationLegal Issues for Accountable Care Organizations
Legal Issues for Accountable Care Organizations Health Care Reform Strategies Bruce Merlin Fried, Esq. ACO Summit June 7, 2010 ACOs in PPACA The Basics Section 3022 of the Protection and Affordable Care
More informationThe following presentation was based on the
Fraud Waste and Abuse Presentation The following presentation was based on the Medicare Parts C & D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training and General Compliance Training developed by the Centers for Medicare
More information11 Key Concepts from the Stark Law
11 Key Concepts from the Stark Law Scott Becker, Partner 312.750.6016 sbecker@mcguirewoods.com Ji Hye Kim, Associate 312.849.8222 jkim@mcguirewoods.com Jessica L. Smith, Associate 312.849.3687 jsmith@mcguirewoods.com
More informationAccountable Care Organization. Medicare Shared Savings Program. Compliance Plan
Accountable Care Organization Participating In The Medicare Shared Savings Program Compliance Plan 2014 Corporate Location: 3190 Fairview Park Drive Falls Church, VA 22042 ARTICLE I INTRODUCTION This Compliance
More informationNorth Carolina Statutes Health Insurance Portability and Accountability PART A. GROUP MARKET REFORMS
North Carolina Statutes Health Insurance Portability and Accountability PART A. GROUP MARKET REFORMS SUBPART 1. PORTABILITY, ACCESS, AND RENEWABILITY REQUIREMENTS 58-68-25. Definitions; excepted benefits;
More informationHealth Care Law Update
www.pepperlaw.com May 2009 Strange and Getting Stranger: OIG s New Changes to the Self-Disclosure Protocol In its March 24, 2009 Open Letter, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the U.S. Department
More informationMedicare Advantage and Part D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training. October 2010
Medicare Advantage and Part D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training October 2010 Introduction 2008: United States spent $2.3 trillion on health care. Federal fiscal year 2010: Medicare expected to cover an
More informationUSC Office of Compliance
PURPOSE This policy complies with requirements under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 and other federal and state fraud and abuse laws. It provides guidance on activities that could result in incidents
More informationNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS. Briefing Paper on the Proposed Medicare Shared Savings Program
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS Briefing Paper on the Proposed Medicare Shared Savings Program The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recently issued a proposed rule to implement
More informationFrequently Used Health Care Laws
Frequently Used Health Care Laws In the following section, a select few of the frequently used health care laws will be briefly defined. Of the frequently used health care laws, there are some laws that
More informationWhat is the Meaning of Meaningful Use? How to Decode the Opportunities and Risks in Health Information Technology
What is the Meaning of Meaningful Use? How to Decode the Opportunities and Risks in Health Information Technology Rick Rifenbark and Leeann Habte1 To achieve greater efficiencies in health care, enhanced
More information1 st Tier & Downstream Training Focus
Colorado Access Advantage (HMO) Medicare Advantage Part D Fraud, Waste and Abuse Compliance Training 2010 Introduction 2 The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requires annual fraud, waste
More informationI. Policy Purpose. II. Policy Statement. III. Policy Definitions: RESPONSIBILITY:
POLICY NAME: POLICY SPONSOR: FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE COMPLIANCE OFFICER RESPONSIBILITY: EFFECTIVE DATE: REVIEW/ REVISED DATE: I. Policy Purpose The purpose of this policy is to outline the requirements
More informationPROPOSED MEDICARE SHARED SAVINGS (ACO) PROGRAM RULES
PROPOSED MEDICARE SHARED SAVINGS (ACO) PROGRAM RULES The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and other affected agencies released their notice of proposed rulemaking/request for comment for
More informationFraud and Abuse Laws. Kim C. Stanger (1/16)
Fraud and Abuse Laws Kim C. Stanger (1/16) This presentation is similar to any other legal education materials designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made as
More informationAVOIDING FRAUD AND ABUSE
AVOIDING FRAUD AND ABUSE Responsibility, Protection, Prevention Presented by: www.thehealthlawfirm.com Main Office: 1101 Douglas Avenue Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 Phone: (407) 331-6620 Fax: (407) 331-3030
More information2012-2013 MEDICARE COMPLIANCE TRAINING EMPLOYEES & FDR S. 2012 Revised
2012-2013 MEDICARE COMPLIANCE TRAINING EMPLOYEES & FDR S 2012 Revised 1 Introduction CMS Requirements As of January 1, 2011, Federal Regulations require that Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs) and
More informationFIRST TIER, DOWNSTREAM AND RELATED ENTITIES (FDR) ANNUAL TRAINING
FIRST TIER, DOWNSTREAM AND RELATED ENTITIES (FDR) ANNUAL TRAINING The Compliance Team appreciates your attention and cooperation during this CMS mandated annual training! DEFINITIONS ADVANTAGE utilizes
More informationCOMMENTARY. CMS Makes Changes to the Stark Law: Addressing Payment Reform, Reducing Burden, and Facilitating Compliance
DECEMBER 2015 COMMENTARY CMS Makes Changes to the Stark Law: Addressing Payment Reform, Reducing Burden, and Facilitating Compliance On November 16, 2015, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
More informationAccountable Care Organizations and Provider Integration Under Health Care Reform. Sarah Swank 202.326.5003 seswank@ober.com
Accountable Care Organizations and Provider Integration Under Health Care Reform Sarah Swank 202.326.5003 seswank@ober.com February 26, 2014 Overview Affordable Care Act and ACOs Trends in Integration
More informationSociety of Corporate Compliance and Ethics
Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics 8 th Annual Conference for Effective Compliance Systems in Higher Education We Are Special!! The Special Need for Contract Management for the Health Sciences
More informationFederal Register / Vol. 68, No. 86 / Monday, May 5, 2003 / Notices 23731
Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 86 / Monday, May 5, 2003 / Notices 23731 Dated: April 18, 2003. Elizabeth M. Duke, Administrator. [FR Doc. 03 10934 Filed 5 2 03; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4165 15 P DEPARTMENT
More informationHow State Law Issues May Affect ACOs
13 How State Law Issues May Affect ACOs Michael F. Schaff Alyson M. Leone Grace D. Mack Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A. 1 13.1 Introduction With the arrival of federal health care reform, the heatlth
More information