Executive Summary Office Allocation

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Executive Summary Office Allocation"

Transcription

1 Executive Summary Office Allocation HEARING DATE: JULY 9, 2015 Date: July 2, 2015 Case No.: OFA Project Address: 250 HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) Zoning: Transbay Downtown Residential (TB-DTR) District (Lot 12; southerly portions of Lots 025 and 027) Public (P) District (northerly portion of Lot 025) Transbay C3 Special Use District (northerly portion of Lot 025) 50/85/550-TB Height and Bulk District Block/Lot: 3781/012, 025, 027 Project Sponsor: MA West, LLC c/o Andrew Junius of Reuben, Junius & Rose LLP One Bush Street, Suite 600 San Francisco, CA Staff Contact: Kevin Guy (415) Recommendation: Approval with Conditions PROJECT DESCRIPTION The request is for the allocation of office square footage under the Annual Office Development Limitation Program, pursuant to Planning Code Sections 320 through 325, in association with a project to construct a new 45-story tower reaching an occupied roof height of approximately 550 feet (with a mechanical roof height of approximately 586 feet, and a screen wall reaching a height of approximately 605 feet), containing approximately 766,745 gross square feet of office uses, 8,642 square feet of groundfloor retail use, and two levels of below-grade parking with 120 stalls in mechanical parking lifts and stackers. The Project will also landscape approximately 18,537 square feet of privately-owned publicly- accessible open space at the northwest and southeast corners of Block 5, in addition to open space at the base of the office tower. An additional 5,368 square feet of supplemental open space will be provided elsewhere within the Transbay Redevelopment Project Area, as required by the Commission on Community Investment and Infrastructure ( CCII ) approvals for the project. The property is located within Zone One of the Transbay Redevelopment Project Area, in which development controls are established by the Transbay Redevelopment Plan as approved by the Planning Commission on December 9, 2004, and January 13, 2005 (specifically the Development Controls and Design Guidelines for the Transbay Redevelopment Project). The Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure reviews development projects in Zone One in terms of land use program, massing and

2 Executive Summary CASE NO OFA Hearing Date: July 9, HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) design, and compliance with the Redevelopment Plan and other applicable regulatory controls. Entitlement authority for approval of projects in Zone One rests with the CCII, rather than the Planning Commission. However, Proposition M (passed by the voters in 1986, and codified as Planning Code Sections ) requires that the Planning Commission consider requests for allocations of office square footage exceeding 50,000 square feet. On June 16, 2015, the CCII reviewed and approved plans for the development of the office tower. a 45- story tower at the property containing approximately 766,745 gross square feet of office space. The CCII found the Project to be in conformity with all applicable land use controls as set forth in the Redevelopment Plan and Design Guidelines, and adopted related environmental findings. SITE DESCRIPTION AND PRESENT USE The Project site is located on Block 5 within Zone One of the Transbay Redevelopment Plan Area. Block 5 is located on the City block bounded by Howard, Beale, Main, and Mission Streets, and is comprised of Assessor s Block 3718, Lot 012 and portions of Lots 025 and 027. The portion of Block 5 that is the site of future office tower is an approximately 26,300 square foot parcel located at the northeast corner of Howard and Beale Streets, approximately 1.5 blocks from the future Transbay Transit Center. Lot 012 (at the northeast corner of Howard and Beale Streets) is currently developed as a publicly-accessible open space that satisfies open space requirements for previously approved projects located at 301 Howard Street and 215 Fremont Street. This lot also contains a small retail use (a hot dog stand) housed within a small Art Deco pavilion. Portions of Block 5 are also being used by the Transbay Joint Powers Authority ( TJPA ) for temporary staging activities in connection with construction of the future Transit Center. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND NEIGHBORHOOD The Project site is located within Zone One of the Transbay Downtown Residential District ( TB-DTR ), which is wholly within the Transbay Redevelopment Project Area. Zone One comprises mostly publicly owned parcels containing infrastructure or underutilized land related to the Transbay Terminal and former Embarcadero Freeway. This district generally extends along the north side of Folsom Street from Spear to Essex Streets, and between Main and Beale Streets to the north side of Howard Street. The Transbay Redevelopment Plan and its companion documents, including the Design for the Development and the Development Controls and Design Guidelines for the Transbay Redevelopment Project, set forth a vision for this area to be developed as a high-density, predominantly residential district within walking distance of the downtown core, transit facilities, and the waterfront. The plan for the district includes: a mix of widely-spaced high-rises, mixed with a street-defining base of low- and mid-rise buildings with ground floor townhouses; a public open space on part of the block bounded by Folsom, Beale, Howard, and Main Streets; ground-floor retail along Folsom Street; and several new alleyways to break up the pattern of larger blocks. The Transit Center is currently under construction, and the main portion of the Center is located approximately 1.5 blocks away at Mission and Fremont Streets. The Transit Center is planned to accommodate local, regional, and national bus service, as well as Caltrain and California High Speed Rail service. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW On April 20, 2004, the Commission of the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco adopted Resolution No , certifying the Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (the Final EIS/EIR ) for the Transbay Redevelopment Project, and on January 25, 2005, adopted Resolution No , adopting findings under the California 2

3 Executive Summary CASE NO OFA Hearing Date: July 9, HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA ), a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program in connection with the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan. The Board of Supervisors and the City Planning Commission adopted similar findings. The Final EIS/EIR expressly contemplated the development of commercial office and hotel uses within the Transbay Redevelopment Project Area, including up to 848,435 square feet of mixed-use office and retail development on the project site. Accordingly, all environmental effects of the Project and office allocation have been considered and analyzed in the prior Final EIS/EIR. Please see attached Environmental Review Note to File, dated June 18, 2015, for further discussion. HEARING NOTIFICATION TYPE REQUIRED PERIOD REQUIRED NOTICE DATE ACTUAL NOTICE DATE ACTUAL PERIOD Classified News Ad None N/A N/A N/A Posted Notice 20 days June 19, 2015 June 19, days Mailed Notice None N/A N/A N/A PUBLIC COMMENT To date, the Department has received no communications in regards to the requested Office Allocation. ISSUES AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Available Office Allocation. There currently exists 2,465,571 square feet of office space available for allocation to projects containing more than 50,000 square feet of office space ( Large Buildings ) during the current Approval Period, which ends October 16, On October 17, 2015 and October 17 of each succeeding year, an additional 875,000 square feet of office space will become available for allocation to buildings of greater than 49,999 square feet of office space. Existing Publicly-Accessible Open Space. Lot 012 (at the northwest corner of Howard and Beale Streets) is currently developed as a publicly-accessible open space that satisfies open space requirements for previously approved projects located at 301 Howard Street and 215 Fremont Street. This lot also contains a retail use (a hot dog stand) housed within a small Art Deco pavilion. The existing open space on Lot 12 would be removed, and would be replaced with a comparable amount (2,635 square feet) of open space elsewhere on Block 5 as part of the project. This open space area would be nested within the larger field of open space required for the Block 5 project itself. Therefore, the open space provided by the project will, in part, continue to satisfy the open space requirements for the 301 Howard Street and 215 Fremont Street projects. The existing small Art Deco pavilion building is considered to be a potential historic resource. As stipulated by the project approvals of the CCII, this pavilion would be temporarily relocated and stored for a period of up to five years, while a permanent location for the pavilion is identified. 3

4 Executive Summary CASE NO OFA Hearing Date: July 9, HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) REQUIRED COMMISSION ACTION In order for the project to proceed, the Commission must approve an allocation of office square footage under the Annual Office Development Limitation Program pursuant to Sections 320 through 325 of the Planning Code. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION The project will add office and retail space that will contribute to the employment base of the City and bolster the viability of the Downtown Core as the center of commerce for the City. The site is currently underutilized, and the addition of ground-floor retail spaces and publiclyaccessibly open spaces will enliven the streetscape. Public transit (including BART, Muni Metro, and the future Transit Center) and retail services are abundant in the area. Employees would be able to walk or utilize transit to commute and satisfy convenience needs without reliance on the private automobile. This pedestrian traffic will activate the sidewalks and open space areas in the vicinity. The tower is designed to contribute to the sculptural form of the skyline anticipated by the Transit Center District Plan, Transbay Redevelopment Plan, and the Rincon Hill Area Plan. The project meets the criteria for allocation of office square footage, as outlined in the draft motion. The project is, on balance, consistent with the Goals, Policies, and Objectives of the General Plan. The land use program and design of the project has been reviewed and approved by OCII staff and the CCII, and conforms with the Transbay Redevelopment Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Approval with Conditions Attachments: Draft Motion Block Book Map Sanborn Map Aerial Photographs Environmental Review Note to File, dated June 18, 2015 CCII Resolution No , dated June 16, 2015 (Schematic Design Approval for Block 5 Project) Project Sponsor Submittal, including: - Letter to Planning Commission from Andrew Junius, dated June 30, Project Plans Final EIS/EIR: Transbay Terminal/Caltrain Downtown Extension/Redevelopment Project - Via link: (Hardcopy will be available at public hearing) 4

5 Executive Summary CASE NO OFA Hearing Date: July 9, HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) Attachment Checklist Executive Summary Draft Motion Environmental Determination Zoning District Map Height & Bulk Map Parcel Map Sanborn Map Aerial Photo Context Photos Site Photos Project sponsor submittal Drawings: Existing Conditions Check for legibility Drawings: Proposed Project Check for legibility 3-D Renderings (new construction or significant addition) Check for legibility Wireless Telecommunications Materials Health Dept. review of RF levels RF Report Community Meeting Notice Housing Documents Inclusionary Affordable Housing Program: Affidavit for Compliance Exhibits above marked with an X are included in this packet Planner's Initials 5

6 Subject to: (Select only if applicable) Inclusionary Housing Childcare Requirement Jobs Housing Linkage Program Downtown Park Fee Public Art Public Open Space First Source Hiring (Admin. Code) Transit Impact Development Fee Other Planning Commission Draft Motion Office Allocation HEARING DATE: JULY 9, 2015 Date: July 2, 2015 Case No.: OFA Project Address: 250 HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) Zoning: Transbay Downtown Residential (TB-DTR) District (Lot 12; southerly portions of Lots 025 and 027) Public (P) District (northerly portion of Lot 025) Transbay C3 Special Use District (northerly portion of Lot 025) 50/85/550-TB Height and Bulk District Block/Lot: 3781/012, 025, 027 Project Sponsor: MA West, LLC c/o Andrew Junius of Reuben, Junius & Rose LLP One Bush Street, Suite 600 San Francisco, CA Staff Contact: Kevin Guy (415) ADOPTING FINDINGS RELATING TO THE APPROVAL OF ALLOCATION OF OFFICE SQUARE FOOTAGE UNDER THE ANNUAL OFFICE DEVELOPMENT LIMITATION PROGRAM PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 320 THROUGH 325 OF THE PLANNING CODE FOR A FOR A PROPOSED PROJECT THAT WOULD CONSTRUCT 45-STORY TOWER, REACHING A ROOF HEIGH OF APPROXIMATELY 550 FEET, (WITH A MECHANICAL ROOF HEIGHT OF APPROXIMATELY 586 FEET, AND A SCREEN WALL REACHING A HEIGHT OF APPROXIMATELY 605 FEET), CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 766,745 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE USE, 8,642 SQUARE FEET OF GROUND-FLOOR RETAIL USE, BELOW-GRADE PARKING, AND APPROXIMATELY 18,537 SQUARE FEET OF PUBLICLY-ACCESSIBLE OPEN SPSACE, LOCATED AT 250 HOWARD AND 195 BEALE STREETS (LOT 012 AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 025 AND 027 OF ASSESSOR S BLOCK 3781) WITHIN THE TB-DTR (TRANSBAY DOWNTOWN RESIDENTIAL) AND P (PUBLIC) ZONING DISTRICTS, TRANSBAY C3 SPECIAL USE DISTRICT, 50/85/55-TB HEIGHT AND BULK DISTRICT, AND WITHIN ZONE ONE OF THE TRANSBAY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AREA, AND ADOPTING FINDINGS UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.

7 Draft Motion Hearing Date: July 9, 2015 CASE NO OFA 250 HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) PREAMBLE On December 9, 2014, MA West LLC (hereinafter "Project Sponsor") filed an application with the Planning Department (hereinafter "Department") for an Office Development Authorization to establish 766,745 gross square feet of office use at 250 Howard and 195 Beale Street. The property is located within Zone One of the Transbay Redevelopment Project Area ( Project Area ), in which development controls are established by the Transbay Redevelopment Plan as approved by the Planning Commission on December 9, 2004, and January 13, 2005, specifically the Development Controls and Design Guidelines ( Design Guidelines ) for the Transbay Redevelopment Project. Development projects in this area are reviewed and approved by the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco, commonly known as the Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure ( OCII ) rather than the Department. On June 16, 2015, at a duly noticed public hearing, the OCII Commission ( CCII ) reviewed and approved plans for the development of a 45-story tower at the property containing approximately 766,745 gross square feet of office space (the Project ). The CCII found the Project to be in conformity with all applicable land use controls as set forth in the Redevelopment Plan and Design Guidelines, and adopted related environmental findings. On April 20, 2004, the Commission of the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco ( Former Agency Commission ) adopted Resolution No , certifying the Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (the Final EIS/EIR ) for the Transbay Redevelopment Project, and on January 25, 2005, adopted Resolution No , adopting findings under the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA ), a Statement of Overriding Considerations and a Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program in connection with the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan. The Board of Supervisors and the City Planning Commission adopted similar findings. The Final EIS/EIR expressly contemplated the development of commercial office and hotel uses within the Transbay Redevelopment Project Area, including up to 848,435 square feet of mixed-use office and retail development on the property. Accordingly, all environmental effects of the Project and office allocation have been considered and analyzed in the prior Final EIS/EIR. On July 9, 2015, the Planning Commission ( Commission ) conducted a duly noticed public hearing at a regularly scheduled meeting on Office Allocation Application No OFA. The Commission has heard and considered the testimony presented to it at the public hearing and has further considered written materials and oral testimony presented on behalf of the applicant, Department staff, and other interested parties. 2

8 Draft Motion Hearing Date: July 9, 2015 CASE NO OFA 250 HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) MOVED, that the Commission hereby approves the Office Allocation requested in Application No OFA for the Project, subject to conditions contained in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by reference, based on the following findings: FINDINGS Having reviewed the materials identified in the recitals above, and having heard all testimony and arguments, this Commission finds, concludes, and determines as follows: 1. The above recitals are accurate and constitute findings of this Commission. 2. Site Description and Present Use. The Project site is located on Block 5 within Zone One of the Transbay Redevelopment Plan Area. Block 5 is located on the City block bounded by Howard, Beale, Main, and Mission Streets, and is comprised of Assessor s Block 3718, Lot 012 and portions of Lots 025 and 027. The portion of Block 5 that is the site of future office tower is an approximately 26,300 square foot parcel located at the northeast corner of Howard and Beale Streets, approximately 1.5 blocks from the future Transbay Transit Center. Lot 012 (at the northeast corner of Howard and Beale Streets) is currently developed as a publiclyaccessible open space that satisfies open space requirements for previously approved projects located at 301 Howard Street and 215 Fremont Street. This lot also contains a small retail use (a hot dog stand) housed within a small Art Deco pavilion. Portions of Block 5 are also being used by the Transbay Joint Powers Authority ( TJPA ) for temporary staging activities in connection with construction of the future Transbay Transit Center. 3. Surrounding Properties and Neighborhood. The Project site is located within Zone One of the Transbay Downtown Residential District ( TB-DTR ), which is wholly within the Transbay Redevelopment Project Area. Zone One comprises mostly publicly owned parcels containing infrastructure or underutilized land related to the Transbay Terminal and former Embarcadero Freeway. This district generally extends along the north side of Folsom Street from Spear to Essex Streets, and between Main and Beale Streets to the north side of Howard Street. The Transbay Redevelopment Plan and its companion documents, including the Design for the Development and the Development Controls and Design Guidelines for the Transbay Redevelopment Project, set forth a vision for this area to be developed as a highdensity, predominantly residential district within walking distance of the downtown core, transit facilities, and the waterfront. The plan for the district includes: a mix of widely-spaced high-rises, mixed with a street-defining base of low- and mid-rise buildings with ground floor townhouses; a public open space on part of the block bounded by Folsom, Beale, Howard, and Main Streets; ground-floor retail along Folsom Street; and several new alleyways to break up the pattern of larger blocks. The Transit Center is currently under construction, and the main portion of the Center is located approximately 1.5 blocks away at Mission and Fremont Streets. The Transit Center is planned to accommodate local, regional, and national bus service, as well as Caltrain and California High Speed Rail service. 4. Proposed Project. The proposal is to construct a new 45-story tower reaching an occupied roof height of approximately 550 feet (with a mechanical roof height of approximately 586 feet, and a screen wall reaching a height of approximately 605 feet), containing approximately 766,745 gross square feet of office uses, 8,642 square feet of ground-floor retail use, and two levels of below-grade parking with 120 stalls in mechanical parking lifts and stackers. The 3

9 Draft Motion Hearing Date: July 9, 2015 CASE NO OFA 250 HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) Project will also landscape approximately 18,537 square feet of privately-owned publiclyaccessible open space at the northwest and southeast corners of Block 5, in addition to open space at the base of the office tower. An additional 5,368 square feet of supplemental open space will be provided elsewhere within the Transbay Redevelopment Project Area, as required by the CCII approvals for the project. The existing open space on Lot 12 would be removed, and would be replaced with a comparable amount (2,635 square feet) of open space elsewhere on Block 5 as part of the project. This open space area would be nested within the larger field of open space required for the Block 5 project itself. Therefore, the open space provided by the project will, in part, continue to satisfy the open space requirements for the 301 Howard Street and 215 Fremont Street projects. The existing small Art Deco "pavilion" building on the property at 195 Beale Street is considered to be a potential historic resource. As stipulated by the project approvals of the CCII, this pavilion would be temporarily relocated and stored for a period of up to five years, while a permanent location for the pavilion is identified. 5. Public Comment. To date, the Planning Department has received no communications regarding the requested Office Allocation. 6. Office Allocation. Section 321 establishes standards for San Francisco s Office Development Annual Limit. In determining if the proposed Project would promote the public welfare, convenience and necessity, the Commission considered the seven criteria established by Code Section 321(b)(3), and finds as follows: I. APPORTIONMENT OF OFFICE SPACE OVER THE COURSE OF THE APPROVAL PERIOD IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN A BALANCE BETWEEN ECONOMIC GROWTH ON THE ONE HAND, AND HOUSING, TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC SERVICES, ON THE OTHER. There currently exists 2,465,571 square feet of office space available for allocation to office buildings of more than 49,999 square feet of office space ( Large Buildings ) during this Approval Period, which ends October 16, On October 17, 2015 and October 17 of each succeeding year, an additional 875,000 square feet of office space will become available for allocation to buildings of greater than 49,999 square feet of office space. The Project would improve the balance between San Francisco s economic growth and its housing supply, by contributing to the affordable housing fund pursuant to Planning Code Section 413. The Project is also subject to the Transportation Impact Development Fee, Child Care In-Lieu Fee, and Downtown Parks Special Fund Fee, all of which will contribute to maintaining a balance between economic growth and housing, transportation and public services. The Project is located in proximity to many public transportation options, including BART and MUNI lines, and will be located approximately 1.5 blocks from the future Transit Center. Therefore, the Project will focus employment growth within an urbanized setting served by abundant regional transit, helping to maintain the balance between economic growth, housing, transportation and public services. 4

10 Draft Motion Hearing Date: July 9, 2015 CASE NO OFA 250 HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) II. THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE OFFICE DEVELOPMENT TO, AND ITS EFFECTS ON, THE OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE GENERAL PLAN. The Project is, on balance, consistent with the General Plan, as outlined in Section 7 below. III. THE QUALITY OF THE DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. The office tower is a 45-story building planned for the corner of Howard and Beale Streets, and designed with distinct connectivity to the immediate context of the development area. With close proximity to the new Transit Center, the Project will create a vibrant and engaging ground floor experience for the large volumes of pedestrians expected in the area in the future. The building will also introduce an outdoor landscaped plaza along Howard Street that will help activate the street level space and will be animated by a series of sculptural seating elements. The massing of the tower satisfies the City s design principles that articulate a base, lower tower, and smaller upper tower. The shape of the building includes a sloping form that is inspired by the strong angular quality of Market Street. The Project also incorporates a series of outdoor terraces that have a visual connectivity to the surrounding context and add substantial depth to the façade. To the northwest, the lower building terraces are situated to face the Transit Center rooftop, while the southeast corner terraces are opened up to visually connect to the Bay Bridge and surrounding views. The tower is designed to contribute to the sculptural form of the skyline anticipated by the Transit Center District Plan, Transbay Redevelopment Plan, and the Rincon Hill Area Plan. The Project s glass façade will be compatible in color and material with that of other contemporary buildings nearby, including the Millennium Tower and the Transbay Tower. The cadence of the curtain wall is in scale and proportion with the neighboring context. Additionally, the building components, specifically the podium and tower elements, respond to adjacent building lines and datums. IV. THE SUITABILITY OF THE PROPOSED OFFICE DEVELOPMENT FOR ITS LOCATION, AND ANY EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED OFFICE DEVELOPMENT SPECIFIC TO THAT LOCATION. a) Use. The Project s proposed office and retail uses are permitted in Zone One and the TB-DTR Zoning District. The site lies across Beale Street from the future Transbay Transit Center and 2 blocks from the Embarcadero Street BART and MUNI station, providing direct access to abundant existing and planned transit, as well as retail goods and services. Numerous office buildings exist within the immediate vicinity of the Project site and the greater Downtown area. The Project furthers the Downtown Plan s goals and objectives of concentrating office uses into a compact Downtown Core. b) Transit Accessibility. The Property is approximately1.5 blocks away from the future Transit Center, and two blocks from the Embarcadero Street BART and MUNI station. Numerous MUNI bus and streetcar lines are within short walking distance of the property providing access to neighborhoods throughout San Francisco. The Ferry Building, serving Marin, the north Bay, and the East Bay, is easily accessible from the property. 5

11 Draft Motion Hearing Date: July 9, 2015 CASE NO OFA 250 HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) c) Open Space Accessibility. The Project will provide significant open space to the public. It will include approximately 18,537 square feet of publicly-accessible open space on parcels located at the northwest and southeast corners of the block, as well as additional open space at the base of the office building. This space will be available to downtown office workers, residents, visitors arriving through the future Transit Center. A portion of this space will serve to satisfy the open space requirements for the 301 Howard Street and 215 Fremont Street projects, which is currently located on Lot 12. By providing open space at three of the block s four corners, the Project will provide much-needed ground floor open space in the increasingly dense Downtown area. d) Urban Design. The Project would replace a surface parking lot and small retail use with a new office tower that includes publicly accessible open space and retail uses at the ground floor. The office tower will be located on one of the high-rise sites contemplated by the Transit Center District Plan and Transbay Redevelopment Plan, contributing to the city s evolving urban form. The Project s overall design will conform to the character of the Downtown area. The manner in which the building is separated into base, upper base, lower tower, and upper towers elements divides the mass of the building into distinct zones. The design and retail uses planned for the base of the tower will provide an active frontage and consistent building presence to anchor the corner of Howard and Beale Streets. Above the 11th floor, the building is set back from the easterly interior property line along the Main Street frontage. This setback provides a distinct break between the massing of the base and the lower tower, and relates the height to the older, low-scaled buildings in the vicinity. Above the 27th floor, the building is substantially set back from the Beale Street frontage, completing the visual division of the building into a distinct tripartite arrangement. In addition, the terraces provided in the southeastern section of the upper tower provide a unique break between the massing of the lower and upper tower portions of the building. Moreover, the immediate vicinity is primarily built out with high rise structures, ranging generally from 250 to 650 feet in height. The Project s rectilinear form will create a silhouette that is harmonious with the building pattern in the area. Because the Project site is flat and surrounded by dense urban development, the Project will have no discernible effect on the relationship between the downtown skyline and natural landforms, nor will it obscure scenic views from public vantage points. e) Seismic Safety. The Project would improve seismic safety, because it would be constructed to meet or exceed the latest seismic standards of the California Building code. V. THE ANTICIPATED USES OF THE PROPOSED OFFICE DEVELOPMENT IN LIGHT OF EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES TO BE PROVIDED, NEEDS OF EXISTING BUSINESSES, AND THE AVAILABLE SUPPLY OF SPACE SUITABLE FOR SUCH ANTICIPATED USES. a) Anticipated Employment Opportunities. The Project would contribute to the employment of economically disadvantaged persons by its participation in San Francisco s First Source Hiring Program ( FSHP ). The Project is expected to create thousands of employment opportunities in San Francisco, including during construction. A large number of employees are expected to occupy the Project s 766,745 gross square feet of office space and 8,642 gross square feet of retail space, from entry-level blue- and white-collar positions to executives and retail management. The Project will also 6

12 Draft Motion Hearing Date: July 9, 2015 CASE NO OFA 250 HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) implement the Small Business Enterprise Policy, and the OCII Construction Workforce Agreement, and the San Francisco Resident Placement and Training Program. b) Needs of Existing Businesses. Recent reports indicate that the commercial vacancy rate in the central business district is below 8 percent, while some submarkets in the City are under 5 percent. With approximately 766,745 gross square feet of new office space, the Project is anticipated to provide for a great variety and number of tenants, thereby better serving the needs of the existing business community. The building s floor plates are flexible and can accommodate both small and large businesses. The Project site is well-served by transit, and is in close proximity to other firms consolidated within the Downtown Core. c) Available Supply of Space Suitable for Such Anticipated Uses. The project will provide office space that is suitable for a variety of office uses and sizes in a Downtown location. The anticipated office uses and tenants will strengthen the City s economy and the City s position as a business hub and regional employment center. VI. THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL BE OWNED OR OCCUPIED BY A SINGLE ENTITY. The Project will incorporate large and flexible floor plans appropriate for tenants of all sizes. However, the anticipated tenant or tenants will be determined at a later date. It is not known whether the Project will be occupied by a single entity. VII. THE USE, IF ANY, OF TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (ʺTDR s ) BY THE PROJECT SPONSOR. The Project is not subject to the TDR requirements of the Planning Code. 7. General Plan Conformity. The Project is, on balance, consistent with the following Objectives and Policies of the General Plan: COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY Objectives and Policies OBJECTIVE 1: MANAGE ECONOMIC GROWTH AND CHANGE TO ENSURE ENHANCEMENT OF THE TOTAL CITY LIVING AND WORKINIG ENVIRONMENT. Policy 1.1: Encourage development which provides substantial net benefits and minimizes undesirable consequences. Discourage development that has substantial undesirable consequences that cannot be mitigated. 7

13 Draft Motion Hearing Date: July 9, 2015 CASE NO OFA 250 HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) Policy 1.2: Assure that all commercial and industrial uses meet minimum, reasonable performance standards. The Project will establish a new office use in an area that allows new office uses as of right. Office uses are consistent with the surrounding neighborhood, and the building s flexible floor plates will meet the existing and long-term needs of businesses in the City s most transit-rich district. The Project will also result in construction and maintenance of a portion of Natoma Street, as well as two publicly-accessible landscaped open spaces on the same block, totaling 18,537 square feet. OBJECTIVE 2: MAINTAIN AND ENHANCE A SOUND AND DIVERSE ECONOMIC BASE AND FISCAL STRUCTURE FOR THE CITY. Policy 2.1: Seek to retain existing commercial and industrial activity and to attract new such activity to the City. The area near the future Transit Center is one of the most desirable areas for business in the Bay Area. The Project will provide flexible spaces for office uses of varying sizes in the City s most transit-rich neighborhood. The new office space will attract additional businesses to the City. OBJECTIVE 3 PROVIDE EXPANDED EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR CITY RESIDENTS, PARTICULARLY THE UNEMPLOYED AND ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED. Policy 3.1 Promote measures designed to increase the number of San Francisco jobs held by San Francisco residents. Policy 3.3 Emphasize job training and retraining programs that will impart skills necessary for participation in the San Francisco labor market. The Project furthers these goals through participation in the City s Small Business Enterprise Policy, the OCII Construction Workforce Agreement, the First Source Hiring Program (as applied to permanent jobs) and the San Francisco Resident Placement and Training Program. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE Objectives and Policies OBJECTIVE 2: DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN A DIVERSIFIED AND BALANCED CITYWIDE SYSTEM OF HIGH QUALITY PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. 8

14 Draft Motion Hearing Date: July 9, 2015 CASE NO OFA 250 HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) Policy 2.1 Provide an adequate total quantity and equitable distribution of public open spaces throughout the City. Policy 2.7 Acquire additional open space for public use. The Project will provide and maintain two separate open spaces, one at the corner of Howard and Main Streets, and one on Beale Street at Mission. It will also provide open space on the office building site, in the form of setbacks from the property line fronting Natoma, Beale, and Howard Streets, and additional supplemental open space elsewhere in the Transbay area. The project will create a total of approximately 24,000 square feet of new publicly-accessible open space. DOWNTOWN PLAN Objectives and Policies OBJECTIVE 2: MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE SAN FRANCISCO S POSITION AS A PRIME LOCATION FOR FINANCIAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, CORPORATE, AND PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY. Policy 2.1: Encourage prime downtown office activities to grow so long as undesirable consequences of growth can be controlled. Policy 2.2: Guide location of office development to maintain a compact downtown core and minimize displacement of other uses. The Project supports these policies by replacing underutilized lots with a high-rise office building capable of housing businesses of all sizes, as well as two privately-owned, publicly-accessible parks at street level totaling approximately 18,537 square feet. The Project is well-served by existing and future transit options, and many employees will be able to walk, bike, or take BART, MUNI, Caltrain, or a regional bus line for commute travel. The Project will also contribute substantially to the City s existing impact fee program, offsetting impacts to existing housing and infrastructure. In addition, the Project will implement the Small Business Enterprise Policy, the OCII Construction Workforce Agreement, the First Source Hiring program (for permanent jobs), and the San Francisco Resident Placement and Training Program, increasing employment opportunities in the Downtown Core for local and economically-disadvantaged individuals. 8. Priority Policy Findings. Section 101.1(b) establishes eight priority planning policies and requires the review of permits for consistency with said policies. The Project complies with these policies, on balance, as follows: 9

15 Draft Motion Hearing Date: July 9, 2015 CASE NO OFA 250 HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) A. That existing neighborhood-serving retail uses be preserved and enhanced and future opportunities for resident employment in and ownership of such businesses be enhanced. The Project would remove a small existing retail use (hot dog stand) from the corner of Howard and Beale. However, the Project would provide approximately 8,642 gross square feet of ground-floor retail spaces, which will provide goods and services to downtown workers and visitors, as well as creating ownership and employment opportunities for San Francisco residents. In addition, the addition of office uses will bring new employees and visitors to the Project site and area, which would strengthen existing neighborhood-serving retail operations and encourage new retail opportunities in the vicinity of the Project site. B. That existing housing and neighborhood character be conserved and protected in order to preserve the cultural and economic diversity of our neighborhoods. The Project will not remove any existing housing. The Project is compatible with the character of the Downtown area, which is generally defined by intense urban development. C. That the City's supply of affordable housing be preserved and enhanced. No housing is removed as a result of the proposal. The Project would promote this policy by contributing to the City s affordable housing supply by complying with the Jobs-Housing Linkage Program in Planning Code Section 413. D. That commuter traffic not impede MUNI transit service or overburden our streets or neighborhood parking. The Project site is situated in the downtown core and is well served by public transit. It is located two blocks from the Embarcadero Street BART and MUNI station, and will be located approximately 1.5 blocks from the future Transit Center, providing convenient local and regional public transit options. The Project will also address the increase in commuters by participating in development impact programs designed to offset the increased demand on the City s public infrastructure. E. That a diverse economic base be maintained by protecting our industrial and service sectors from displacement due to commercial office development, and that future opportunities for resident employment and ownership in these sectors be enhanced. The Project does not eliminate any existing industrial use, and will add approximately 8,642 gross square feet of retail space, which will enhance service sector employment and ownership opportunities. F. That the City achieve the greatest possible preparedness to protect against injury and loss of life in an earthquake. The Project will conform to the structural and seismic requirements of the San Francisco Building Code. 10

16 Draft Motion Hearing Date: July 9, 2015 CASE NO OFA 250 HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) G. That landmarks and historic buildings be preserved. The existing small Art Deco "pavilion" building on the property at 195 Beale Street is considered to be a potential historic resource. As stipulated by the project approvals of the CCII, this pavilion would be temporarily relocated and stored for a period of up to five years, while a permanent location for the pavilion is identified. H. That our parks and open space and their access to sunlight and vistas be protected from development. The Project will increase the amount of privately-owned publicly-accessible open space in this part of the downtown core by approximately 24,000 square feet. The Project would not cast shadows on any properties under the jurisdiction of the Recreation and Park Commission. 9. The Project is consistent with and would promote the general and specific purposes of the Code provided under Section 101.1(b) in that, as designed, the Project would contribute to the character and stability of the neighborhood and would constitute a beneficial development. 10. The Commission hereby finds that granting the Office Allocation in this case will particularly promote the public welfare, convenience and necessity for the reasons set forth above. DECISION That based upon the Record, the submissions by the Applicant, the staff of the Department and other interested parties, the oral testimony presented to this Commission at the public hearings, and all other written materials submitted by all parties, the Commission hereby APPROVES Office Allocation Application No OFA subject to the conditions attached hereto as Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth, in general conformance with the plans stamped Exhibit B and dated July 9, 2015, on file in Case Docket No OFA. APPEAL AND EFFECTIVE DATE OF MOTION: Any aggrieved person may appeal this Section 321 and 322 Office Space Allocation to the Board of Appeals within fifteen (15) days after the date of this Motion. The effective date of this Motion shall be the date of this Motion if not appealed (after the 15- day period has expired) OR the date of the decision of the Board of Appeals if appealed to the Board of Appeals. For further information, please contact the Board of Appeals in person at 1650 Mission Street, Room 304 or call (415) Protest of Fee or Exaction: You may protest any fee or exaction subject to Government Code Section that is imposed as a condition of approval by following the procedures set forth in Government Code Section The protest must satisfy the requirements of Government Code Section 66020(a) and must be filed within 90 days of the date of the first approval or conditional approval of the development referencing the challenged fee or exaction. For purposes of Government Code Section 66020, the date of imposition of the fee shall be the date of the earliest discretionary approval by the City of the subject development. 11

17 Draft Motion Hearing Date: July 9, 2015 CASE NO OFA 250 HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) If the City has not previously given Notice of an earlier discretionary approval of the project, the Planning Commission s adoption of this Motion, Resolution, Discretionary Review Action or the Zoning Administrator s Variance Decision Letter constitutes the approval or conditional approval of the development and the City hereby gives NOTICE that the 90-day protest period under Government Code Section has begun. If the City has already given Notice that the 90-day approval period has begun for the subject development, then this document does not re-commence the 90-day approval period. I hereby certify that the foregoing Motion was ADOPTED by the Planning Commission at its regular meeting on July 9, Jonas P. Ionin Commission Secretary AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ADOPTED: July 9,

18 Draft Motion Hearing Date: July 9, 2015 CASE NO OFA 250 HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) AUTHORIZATION EXHIBIT A This authorization is for an Office Allocation of up to 766,745 gross square feet of office uses, in association with a proposal to construct a new 45-story tower reaching an occupied roof height of approximately 550 feet (with a mechanical roof height of approximately 586 feet, and a screen wall reaching a height of approximately 605 feet), containing approximately 766,745 gross square feet of office uses, 8,642 square feet of ground-floor retail use, two levels of below-grade parking, and publiclyaccessible open space. RECORDATION OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Prior to the issuance of the building permit or commencement of use for the Project the Zoning Administrator shall approve and order the recordation of a Notice in the Official Records of the Recorder of the City and County of San Francisco for the subject property. This Notice shall state that the project is subject to the conditions of approval contained herein and reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on July 9, 2015 under Motion No XXXXXX. PRINTING OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ON PLANS The conditions of approval under the 'Exhibit A' of this Planning Commission Motion No. XXXXXX shall be reproduced on the Index Sheet of construction plans submitted with the site or building permit application for the Project. The Index Sheet of the construction plans shall reference to the Office Allocation authorization and any subsequent amendments or modifications. SEVERABILITY The Project shall comply with all applicable City codes and requirements. If any clause, sentence, section or any part of these conditions of approval is for any reason held to be invalid, such invalidity shall not affect or impair other remaining clauses, sentences, or sections of these conditions. This decision conveys no right to construct, or to receive a building permit. Project Sponsor shall include any subsequent responsible party. Conditions of Approval, Compliance, Monitoring, and Reporting PERFORMANCE Development Timeline - Office. Pursuant to Planning Code Section 321(d) (2), construction of the office development project shall commence within eighteen (18) months of the effective date of this Motion. Failure to begin work within that period or to carry out the development diligently thereafter to completion, shall be grounds to revoke approval of the office development under this office development authorization. For information about compliance, contact Code Enforcement, Planning Department at , 13

19 Draft Motion Hearing Date: July 9, 2015 CASE NO OFA 250 HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) Expiration and Renewal. Should a Building or Site Permit be sought after the 18-month period has lapsed, the project sponsor must seek a renewal of this Authorization by filing an application for an amendment to the original Authorization or a new application for Authorization. Should the project sponsor decline to so file, and decline to withdraw the permit application, the Commission shall conduct a public hearing in order to consider the revocation of the Authorization. Should the Commission not revoke the Authorization following the closure of the public hearing, the Commission shall determine the extension of time for the continued validity of the Authorization. For information about compliance, contact Code Enforcement, Planning Department at , Diligent pursuit. Once a site or Building Permit has been issued, construction must commence within the timeframe required by the Department of Building Inspection and be continued diligently to completion. Failure to do so shall be grounds for the Commission to consider revoking the approval if more than 18 months have passed since this Authorization was approved. For information about compliance, contact Code Enforcement, Planning Department at , Extension. All time limits in the preceding three paragraphs may be extended at the discretion of the Zoning Administrator where implementation of the project is delayed by a public agency, an appeal or a legal challenge and only by the length of time for which such public agency, appeal or challenge has caused delay. For information about compliance, contact Code Enforcement, Planning Department at , Conformity with Current Law. No application for Building Permit, Site Permit, or other entitlement shall be approved unless it complies with all applicable provisions of City Codes in effect at the time of such approval. For information about compliance, contact Code Enforcement, Planning Department at , PROVISIONS Transit Impact Development Fee. Pursuant to Planning Code Section 411, the Project Sponsor shall pay the Transit Impact Development Fee (TIDF) as required by and based on drawings submitted with the Building Permit Application. Prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy, the Project Sponsor shall provide the Planning Director with certification that the fee has been paid. For information about compliance, contact the Case Planner, Planning Department at , Downtown Park Fee - C-3 District. Pursuant to Planning Code Section 412, the Project Sponsor shall pay the Downtown Park Fee. The fee shall be based on drawings of the net addition of gross floor area of office to be constructed as set forth in the building permit and shall be paid prior to the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy. 14

20 Draft Motion Hearing Date: July 9, 2015 CASE NO OFA 250 HOWARD STREET/195 BEALE STREET (TRANSBAY BLOCK 5) For information about compliance, contact the Case Planner, Planning Department at , Jobs Housing Linkage. Pursuant to Planning Code Section 413, the Project Sponsor shall contribute to the Jobs-Housing Linkage Program (JHLP). The calculation shall be based on the net addition of gross square feet of each type of space to be constructed as set forth in the permit plans. The Project Sponsor shall provide evidence that this requirement has been satisfied to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of the first site or building permit by the Department of Building Inspection. For information about compliance, contact the Case Planner, Planning Department at , Childcare Requirements for Office and Hotel Development Projects. Pursuant to Section 414, the Project Sponsor shall pay the in-lieu fee as required. The net addition of gross floor area subject to the fee shall be determined based on drawings submitted with the Building Permit Application. For information about compliance, contact the Case Planner, Planning Department at , Open Space. In addition to the publicly-accessible open space required by the CCII approvals for the Project, a minimum of 2,635 square feet of publicly-accessible open space shall be developed and maintained within Block 3718 in perpetuity in order to satisfy the off-site open space requirements for the previously-approved projects located at 301 Howard Street (approved in 1980 by Planning Commission Motion No. 8769), and 215 Fremont Street (approved in 1998 by Planning Commission Motion No ). The Project Sponsor shall install the public open space plaques consistent with the standards of Planning Code Section 138, including the standard City logo identifying it; the hours open to the public and contact information for building management. The plaques shall be plainly visible from the public sidewalks on Howard, Beale, and Main Streets. Design of the plaques shall utilize the standard templates provided by the Planning Department, as available, and shall be approved by the Department staff prior to installation. For information about compliance, contact the Case Planner, Planning Department at , MONITORING - AFTER ENTITLEMENT Enforcement. Violation of any of the Planning Department conditions of approval contained in this Motion or of any other provisions of Planning Code applicable to this Project shall be subject to the enforcement procedures and administrative penalties set forth under Planning Code Section 176 or Section The Planning Department may also refer the violation complaints to other city departments and agencies for appropriate enforcement action under their jurisdiction. For information about compliance, contact Code Enforcement, Planning Department at , Revocation due to Violation of Conditions. Should implementation of this Project result in complaints from interested property owners, residents, or commercial lessees which are not resolved by the Project Sponsor and found to be in violation of the Planning Code and/or the specific conditions of approval for 15

Executive Summary Zoning Map Amendment HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 4, 2014

Executive Summary Zoning Map Amendment HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 4, 2014 Executive Summary Zoning Map Amendment HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 4, 2014 Date: November 24, 2014 Case No.: 2014.1237Z Project: Zoning Map Clean-Up (1600 Cortland Rezoning) Staff Contact: Diego R Sánchez (415)

More information

Executive Summary Conditional Use HEARING DATE: AUGUST 15, 2013

Executive Summary Conditional Use HEARING DATE: AUGUST 15, 2013 Executive Summary Conditional Use HEARING DATE: AUGUST 15, 2013 Date: August 8, 2013 Case No.: 2013.0211C Project Address: 524 HOWARD STREET Zoning: C-3-0(SD) (Downtown Office, Special Development) District

More information

Executive Summary Conditional Use

Executive Summary Conditional Use Executive Summary Conditional Use HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 25, 202 Date: October, 202 Case No.: 202.0370C Project Address: 27 Market Street Zoning: C 3 G (Downtown General) 20 X/ Height and Bulk District

More information

Minor Accommodation Planning Review Application

Minor Accommodation Planning Review Application City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Tel. (310) 285 1141 Fax. (310) 858 5966 Planning Review Overview: Minor Accommodation Planning Review Application Before

More information

Downtown Core Sub-district

Downtown Core Sub-district 3-10 Land Use Downtown Core Sub-district District development will be most intense and most urban in character in the Downtown Core. The objective is to establish this area as a citywide and regional retail

More information

CITY OF SANTA ROSA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 APPLICANT FILE NUMBER CUP12-042

CITY OF SANTA ROSA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 APPLICANT FILE NUMBER CUP12-042 ITEM NO. 10 CITY OF SANTA ROSA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 PROJECT TITLE Turning Point Residential Treatment Center ADDRESS/LOCATION 440

More information

The Board of Zoning Appeals shall have the duty and power to:

The Board of Zoning Appeals shall have the duty and power to: Section 21-09.03. (a) Establishment and Jurisdiction. The for the City of South Bend, Indiana, is hereby re-established in accordance with Indiana Code 36-7-4-900 et seq. The for the City of South Bend,

More information

ORDINANCE NO. 2009-6 AMENDING THE SAN MATEO MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 7.46 REGARDING MEDICAL MARIJUANA COLLECTIVES REGULATIONS

ORDINANCE NO. 2009-6 AMENDING THE SAN MATEO MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 7.46 REGARDING MEDICAL MARIJUANA COLLECTIVES REGULATIONS ORDINANCE NO. 2009-6 AMENDING THE SAN MATEO MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 7.46 REGARDING MEDICAL MARIJUANA COLLECTIVES REGULATIONS WHEREAS, in 1996, the voters of the State of California approved Proposition

More information

INTRODUCTION TO ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

INTRODUCTION TO ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS INTRODUCTION TO ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS Classification of Zoning Districts Zoning districts in Dorchester County are categorized as Suburban Urban, Suburban Transition, or Rural. These districts are

More information

STAFF REPORT. December 20, 2004. North District Community Council. Director of Community Planning - North

STAFF REPORT. December 20, 2004. North District Community Council. Director of Community Planning - North STAFF REPORT December 20, 2004 To: From: Subject: North District Community Council Director of Community Planning - North Preliminary Report Respecting Revised Application OPA & Rezoning Application 01

More information

Section 801 Driveway Access Onto Public Right-of-Ways

Section 801 Driveway Access Onto Public Right-of-Ways Section 801:00 Section 801 Driveway Access Onto Public Right-of-Ways Section 801:00. Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in this Article, shall have the following meanings, unless the

More information

Executive Summary HEARING DATE: JANUARY 17, 2013

Executive Summary HEARING DATE: JANUARY 17, 2013 Executive Summary HEARING DATE: JANUARY 17, 2013 Date: January 3, 2013 Case No.: 2011.0038 CEKVX! Project Address: 250 4 th STREET Zoning: C-3-S (Downtown Support) SOMA Youth and Family Special Use District

More information

CHAPTER 23 Wireless Communication Facilities

CHAPTER 23 Wireless Communication Facilities CHAPTER 23 Wireless Communication Facilities Section 23.1 Purpose It is the general purpose and intent of this Section to comply with the requirements of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, as

More information

CHECKLIST FOR TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER CO-LOCATION APPLICATIONS. Conditional Use Permit Approved by Board of Supervisors Date of approval:

CHECKLIST FOR TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER CO-LOCATION APPLICATIONS. Conditional Use Permit Approved by Board of Supervisors Date of approval: CHECKLIST FOR TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER CO-LOCATION APPLICATIONS Conditional Use Permit Approved by Board of Supervisors Date of approval: Site Plan Approval: Date of approval: Fees: $4,000 Licensed Co-location

More information

BULLETIN NO. 6. Car-Share Requirements and Guidelines for Car-Share Spaces ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. 1. Car-share Basics PURPOSE: OVERVIEW:

BULLETIN NO. 6. Car-Share Requirements and Guidelines for Car-Share Spaces ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. 1. Car-share Basics PURPOSE: OVERVIEW: Car-Share Requirements and Guidelines for Car-Share Spaces Section 307 of the City Planning Code mandates the Zoning Administrator to issue and adopt such rules, regulations and interpretations as are

More information

Application Package for License for Sidewalk Dining Adjacent to Eating Establishment

Application Package for License for Sidewalk Dining Adjacent to Eating Establishment Application Package for License for Sidewalk Dining Adjacent to Eating Establishment Community & Economic Development Department Planning Division T :: 831.648.3190 F :: 831.648.3184 www.ci.pg.ca.us/cedd

More information

28.0 Development Permit Area #2 (Neighbourhood District)

28.0 Development Permit Area #2 (Neighbourhood District) 28.0 Development Permit Area #2 (Neighbourhood District) Goals and Objectives To provide a guide for infill and new development in the Neighbourhood District. To outline the nature, form and character

More information

4-1 Architectural Design Control 4-1 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONTROL 1

4-1 Architectural Design Control 4-1 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONTROL 1 4-1 Architectural Design Control 4-1 CHAPTER 4 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CONTROL 1 4-1 Purposes of Chapter 4-2 Designations of Architectural Control Districts 4-3 Board of Architectural Review -- Established;

More information

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: 1 DISCUSSION ITEM

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: 1 DISCUSSION ITEM GB3 Office of the President TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: 1 For Meeting of July 21, 2015 DISCUSSION ITEM PRELIMINARY PLANS FUNDING, MISSION BAY EAST CAMPUS PHASE 1 (BLOCK 33) BUILDING,

More information

PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN MASTER PLAN

PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN MASTER PLAN TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Council Planning & Community Development Department PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATION: This report is for

More information

Appendix N: Bicycle Parking Ordinance

Appendix N: Bicycle Parking Ordinance Appendix N: Bicycle Parking Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. #1-13. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 40 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF DAVIS TO ADD ARTICLE 40.25A ESTABLISHING BICYCLE PARKING STANDARDS WHEREAS,

More information

City of Alva, Oklahoma Board of Adjustments Meeting Application. Property Address. Owner Address. Owner Name. Owner Phone Number

City of Alva, Oklahoma Board of Adjustments Meeting Application. Property Address. Owner Address. Owner Name. Owner Phone Number City of Alva, Oklahoma Board of Adjustments Meeting Application (Note that this application must be completed to be considered) Property Address Owner Address Owner Name Owner Phone Number Legal Description

More information

ORDINANCE NO. 447U. Commerce Clause powers gave Congress the authority to enact the Controlled Substances Act, commerce; and

ORDINANCE NO. 447U. Commerce Clause powers gave Congress the authority to enact the Controlled Substances Act, commerce; and ORDINANCE NO. 447U AN URGENCY INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES, STORES, OR CO- OPS IN ANY ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN THE CITY,

More information

TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF NORTH SALEM WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK LOCAL LAW # OF THE YEAR 2012

TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF NORTH SALEM WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK LOCAL LAW # OF THE YEAR 2012 TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF NORTH SALEM WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK LOCAL LAW # OF THE YEAR 2012 CHAPTER 250, ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS - PD-CCRC DISTRICT Section 1. Purpose: The purpose of this Local

More information

Los Angeles Union Station, CA Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment. April 22-23, 2014

Los Angeles Union Station, CA Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment. April 22-23, 2014 Los Angeles Union Station, CA Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment April 22-23, 2014 Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment Through the Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment Tool developed by Global future development

More information

Borough of Glassboro, New Jersey May 2010. Redevelopment Plan for Rehabilitation In the Borough of Glassboro May 2010

Borough of Glassboro, New Jersey May 2010. Redevelopment Plan for Rehabilitation In the Borough of Glassboro May 2010 Borough of Glassboro, New Jersey May 2010 Redevelopment Plan for Rehabilitation In the Borough of Glassboro May 2010 Table of Contents Page Number I. Introduction 3 II. Designation of Area and Plan Development

More information

Items Required to Submit for Specialized Certificate of Occupancy for Operating a Sexually-Oriented Business City of Fort Worth, Texas

Items Required to Submit for Specialized Certificate of Occupancy for Operating a Sexually-Oriented Business City of Fort Worth, Texas Items Required to Submit for Specialized Certificate of Occupancy for Operating a Sexually-Oriented Business City of Fort Worth, Texas Applicant should review Chapter 5, Article 2, Comprehensive Zoning

More information

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: MARCH 6, 2013 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair Fox and Members of the Design Review Committee Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Doris Nguyen, Associate

More information

VISION, DESIGN PRINCIPLES & OVERALL PLANNING STRATEGY

VISION, DESIGN PRINCIPLES & OVERALL PLANNING STRATEGY 3 VISION, DESIGN PRINCIPLES & OVERALL PLANNING STRATEGY The overall planning strategy for the Bank Street CDP is to ensure that future development is undertaken in a coordinated and planned approach, supported

More information

R 1 Design Review Application

R 1 Design Review Application City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Tel. (310) 285 1141 Fax. (310) 858 5966 R 1 Design Review Application Design Review Overview Beverly Hills residential

More information

BLOCK 400 PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT

BLOCK 400 PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT BLOCK 400 PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT Newport Center December 1983 Newport Beach, California Ordinance 88-119 Adopted December 12, 1988 Amendment No. 672 Resolution No. 95-115 Adopted October 9, 1995 Amendment

More information

TOWER ORDINANCE TOWN OF OWLS HEAD

TOWER ORDINANCE TOWN OF OWLS HEAD TOWER ORDINANCE TOWN OF OWLS HEAD Adopted - August 30, 1999 Amended - August 26, 2002 Amended June 1, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Section 1 Title.. 1 Section 2 Authority.. 1 Section 3 Purpose. 1 Section

More information

PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT February 23, 2015. Summary. Background Information PREPARED FOR THE PLAN COMMISSION. Legistar File ID # 36810

PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT February 23, 2015. Summary. Background Information PREPARED FOR THE PLAN COMMISSION. Legistar File ID # 36810 PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT PREPARED FOR THE PLAN COMMISSION Project Address: Application Type: Legistar File ID # 36810 Prepared By: Summary Conditional Use Timothy M. Parks, Planning Division Report

More information

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATION

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATION CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATION OFFICIAL USE ONLY CASE NUMBER: SUBJECT PROPERTY ADDRESS: DATE RECEIVED: ACCEPTED BY: APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS (please

More information

County of San Diego, Planning & Development Services SECOND DWELLING UNIT

County of San Diego, Planning & Development Services SECOND DWELLING UNIT County of San Diego, Planning & Development Services ZONING DIVISION The Zoning Ordinance, Section 6156.x, allows the addition of a second dwelling unit to those properties zoned to allow the Family Residential

More information

Revere Beach Transit-Oriented Development Parcels Revere, Massachusetts. Design and Development Guidelines. Part Two.

Revere Beach Transit-Oriented Development Parcels Revere, Massachusetts. Design and Development Guidelines. Part Two. Revere Beach Transit-Oriented Development Parcels Revere, Massachusetts Design and Development Guidelines Request for Qualifications and Expressions of Interest with Preliminary Development Plans Part

More information

WHEREAS, Santa Monica is a coastal city in a prime location, being bordered by the City of Los Angeles to the north, east and south; and

WHEREAS, Santa Monica is a coastal city in a prime location, being bordered by the City of Los Angeles to the north, east and south; and City Council Meeting / /2013 ORDINANCE NUMBER (CCS) (City Council Series) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA AMENDING SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 9.56.020, 9.56.030,

More information

DRAFT Policy to Guide Discretion on Proposed Relaxations to Minimum Parking Requirements in Commercial Districts City-Wide 2014 June 05

DRAFT Policy to Guide Discretion on Proposed Relaxations to Minimum Parking Requirements in Commercial Districts City-Wide 2014 June 05 PARKING INITIATIVES Attachment I Corridor Program Descriptions Corridor Program Pilot Though the Corridor Program will officially launch in the fall, this summer, The City will pilot the first phase of

More information

SOLAR ENERGY FACILITIES ZONING AMENDMENTS

SOLAR ENERGY FACILITIES ZONING AMENDMENTS SOLAR ENERGY FACILITIES ZONING AMENDMENTS 1. In Section 10, Special Regulations, of the Zoning Bylaw, insert a new Section 10.06, to be entitled Solar Energy Facilities and to read as follows: SECTION

More information

CITY OF ESCONDIDO Planning Division 201 North Broadway Escondido, CA 92025-2798 (760) 839-4671 Fax: (760) 839-4313 ARTS AND CRAFTS SHOW PERMIT

CITY OF ESCONDIDO Planning Division 201 North Broadway Escondido, CA 92025-2798 (760) 839-4671 Fax: (760) 839-4313 ARTS AND CRAFTS SHOW PERMIT CITY OF ESCONDIDO Planning Division 201 North Broadway Escondido, CA 92025-2798 (760) 839-4671 Fax: (760) 839-4313 ARTS AND CRAFTS SHOW PERMIT APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON Name (Print): Address: City, State,

More information

THIS VOLUNTARY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT CONCERNING A DEVELOPMENT OF. entered into this day of, 2014, and executed in triplicate originals

THIS VOLUNTARY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT CONCERNING A DEVELOPMENT OF. entered into this day of, 2014, and executed in triplicate originals VOLUNTARY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BRISTOL, VIRGINIA AND WASHINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA, PURSUANT TO VIRGINIA CODE SECTION 15.2-3400 (November 2014) THIS VOLUNTARY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT CONCERNING

More information

REGULATIONS FOR CELLULAR ANTENNA TOWERS AND CELLULAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES

REGULATIONS FOR CELLULAR ANTENNA TOWERS AND CELLULAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES REGULATIONS FOR CELLULAR ANTENNA TOWERS AND CELLULAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES Joint City-County Planning Commission of Barren County, Kentucky 126 East Public Square City Hall Glasgow, KY 42141 A. PURPOSE:

More information

ORDINANCE NO. 3293 (ZOA-15-500319 - Development Code Update 2015)

ORDINANCE NO. 3293 (ZOA-15-500319 - Development Code Update 2015) ORDINANCE NO. 3293 (ZOA-15-500319 - Development Code Update 2015) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HENDERSON, NEVADA, TO AMEND TITLE 19 - DEVELOPMENT CODE - OF THE HENDERSON MUNICIPAL CODE

More information

CHAPTER 5 - "R1" SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

CHAPTER 5 - R1 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT CHAPTER 5 - "R1" SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Section 5-1. Regulations: The regulations set forth in this chapter, or set forth elsewhere in this ordinance when referred to in this chapter, are the

More information

Article 20. Nonconformities

Article 20. Nonconformities Article 20. Nonconformities 20.1 PURPOSE 20.2 GENERAL STANDARDS OF APPLICABILITY 20.3 NONCONFORMING USE 20.4 NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES 20.5 NONCONFORMING LOTS OF RECORD 20.6 NONCONFORMING SIGNS 20.1 PURPOSE

More information

d. Building permits may only be approved if consistent with the approved development plan and land division for all units with common walls.

d. Building permits may only be approved if consistent with the approved development plan and land division for all units with common walls. Section 20.920.060 Tier 2 Infill Standards. In addition to the Tier 1 standards and incentives, Tier 2 infill parcels and land divisions and the subsequent development on those Tier 2 infill parcels shall

More information

PUBLIC NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (ELDP)

PUBLIC NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (ELDP) Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure (Successor to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency) One South Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94103 415.749.2400 EDWIN M. LEE, Mayor Mara Rosales,

More information

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE 2015-0183 TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APRIL 9, 2015

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE 2015-0183 TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APRIL 9, 2015 AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE 2015-0183 TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APRIL 9, 2015 The Planning and Development Department hereby forwards

More information

LONG-RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN

LONG-RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN LONG-RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN CITY OF MODESTO REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY OCTOBER 2013 Prepared By: KOSMONT COMPANIES 865 S. Figueroa Street, #3500 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 417-3300

More information

Near West Side Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary (Revised) April 2004 City of Milwaukee DCD

Near West Side Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary (Revised) April 2004 City of Milwaukee DCD Near West Side Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary (Revised) April 2004 City of Milwaukee DCD Boundaries The Near West Side Comprehensive Plan covers a broad area immediately west of Milwaukee s downtown.

More information

BEFORE THE PHOENIX PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PHOENIX, STATE OF OREGON

BEFORE THE PHOENIX PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PHOENIX, STATE OF OREGON BEFORE THE PHOENIX PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PHOENIX, STATE OF OREGON In the matter of an application for a ) PLANNING COMMISSION Demolition Permit for a property ) Commonly known as Furry House ) RECOMMENDATION

More information

CHAPTER VIII. HARDSHIP RELIEF

CHAPTER VIII. HARDSHIP RELIEF CHAPTER VIII. HARDSHIP RELIEF 8.00.00. PURPOSE A. The purpose of this Chapter is to provide for the regulation of legally nonconforming structures, lots of record, uses and signs and to specify those circumstances

More information

CITY OF COCOA BEACH P.O. Box 322430 Cocoa Beach, FL 32932-2430 Telephone 321 868-3217 Fax 321 868-3378. Petition for Board of Adjustment

CITY OF COCOA BEACH P.O. Box 322430 Cocoa Beach, FL 32932-2430 Telephone 321 868-3217 Fax 321 868-3378. Petition for Board of Adjustment CITY OF COCOA BEACH P.O. Box 322430 Cocoa Beach, FL 32932-2430 Telephone 321 868-3217 Fax 321 868-3378 www.cityofcocoabeach.com APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE, SPECIAL EXCEPTION, APPEAL Petition for Board of

More information

TOWN OF CARY CONDITIONAL USE ZONING PERMIT. 412 Rutherglen Cary, NC 27511-6437. 412 Rutherglen Cary, NC 27511-6437

TOWN OF CARY CONDITIONAL USE ZONING PERMIT. 412 Rutherglen Cary, NC 27511-6437. 412 Rutherglen Cary, NC 27511-6437 TOWN OF CARY CONDITIONAL USE ZONING PERMIT PETITION: PETITIONER(S): OWNER(S): LOCATION: 01-REZ-16 204 N. Dixon Avenue, Cary, NC PARCEL IDENTIFICATION: 076418218784 REALID: 0031004 AREA: APPROVED ZONING:

More information

DALLAS COUNTY, IOWA CHAPTER 48 SMALL WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS ORDINANCE FOR THE UNINCOPORATED AREA OF DALLAS COUNTY, IOWA

DALLAS COUNTY, IOWA CHAPTER 48 SMALL WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS ORDINANCE FOR THE UNINCOPORATED AREA OF DALLAS COUNTY, IOWA TITLE V PROPERTY AND LAND USE SMALL WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS ORDINANCE FOR THE UNINCOPORATED AREA OF DALLAS COUNTY, IOWA 48.01 INTENT 48.05 APPLICATION REQUIRED 48.02 DEFINITIONS 48.06 APPEALS 48.03

More information

THREE MILE PLAN/URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT

THREE MILE PLAN/URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT THREE MILE PLAN/URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT THIS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT, entered into by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF GUNNISON, COLORADO, a

More information

Presentation: Proposed Plan Amendments

Presentation: Proposed Plan Amendments Epstein s Rehabilitation Plan Presentation: Proposed Plan Amendments MORRISTOWN REDEVELOPMENT ENTITY March 14, 2013 Epstein s Rehabilitation Plan Presentation Part 1: Morristown Planning Division Neighborhood

More information

OBSOLETE PROPERTY REHABILITATION ACT Act 146 of 2000. The People of the State of Michigan enact:

OBSOLETE PROPERTY REHABILITATION ACT Act 146 of 2000. The People of the State of Michigan enact: OBSOLETE PROPERTY REHABILITATION ACT Act 146 of 2000 AN ACT to provide for the establishment of obsolete property rehabilitation districts in certain local governmental units; to provide for the exemption

More information

Policy No.: F-7 CITY OF OLATHE COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT. Date Issued: 12-15-15. Effective Date: 1-1-16. Cancellation Date: 12-31-17

Policy No.: F-7 CITY OF OLATHE COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT. Date Issued: 12-15-15. Effective Date: 1-1-16. Cancellation Date: 12-31-17 CITY OF OLATHE COUNCIL POLICY STATEMENT Policy No.: F-7 Date Issued: 12-15-15 General Scope: Specific Subject: Finance Tax Increment Financing Policy Effective Date: 1-1-16 Cancellation Date: 12-31-17

More information

LONG TERM RENTAL REGISTRATION APPLICATION All sections are required to be completed. Please print, type, or apply through portal.

LONG TERM RENTAL REGISTRATION APPLICATION All sections are required to be completed. Please print, type, or apply through portal. City of Destin Community Development Department Code Enforcement Division City of Destin Annex 4100 Indian Bayou Trail Destin, Florida 32541 Phone (850) 654-1119 Fax (850) 460-2171 Email to: code@cityofdestin.com

More information

NYE COUNTY, NV PAHRUMP REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 15, 2014

NYE COUNTY, NV PAHRUMP REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 15, 2014 NYE COUNTY, NV PAHRUMP REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 15, 2014 Staff Report Agenda Item No. 11 CASE DESCRIPTION(S): LOCATION: APPLICANT(S): For possible action - Bill No. 2014-01:

More information

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT. BOA File No. 3786 1515 West Avenue- Multifamily Building

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT. BOA File No. 3786 1515 West Avenue- Multifamily Building MIAMI BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: DATE: RE: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Thomas R. Mooney, AIC~ Planning Director December 4, 2015 Meeting BOA File No. 3786 1515 West Avenue- Multifamily Building

More information

AVALON PARK WEST (FORMERLY NEW RIVER) PD/MPUD- NARRATIVE FOR DRI RESCISSION, PD SUBAREA AMENDMENT AND MPUD SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION.

AVALON PARK WEST (FORMERLY NEW RIVER) PD/MPUD- NARRATIVE FOR DRI RESCISSION, PD SUBAREA AMENDMENT AND MPUD SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION. AVALON PARK WEST (FORMERLY NEW RIVER) PD/MPUD- NARRATIVE FOR DRI RESCISSION, PD SUBAREA AMENDMENT AND MPUD SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION DRI Rescission On January 7, 1992, the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners

More information

TARRANT COUNTY HISTORIC SITE TAX EXEMPTION POLICY

TARRANT COUNTY HISTORIC SITE TAX EXEMPTION POLICY TARRANT COUNTY HISTORIC SITE TAX EXEMPTION POLICY A. General Purpose and Objectives The purpose of this Policy is to encourage the rehabilitation and restoration of certain historic properties within Tarrant

More information

TOWN OF PITTSFIELD, NEW HAMPSHIRE. RSA 79-E Tax Relief for Renovations

TOWN OF PITTSFIELD, NEW HAMPSHIRE. RSA 79-E Tax Relief for Renovations TOWN OF PITTSFIELD, NEW HAMPSHIRE RSA 79-E Tax Relief for Renovations DOES YOUR DOWNTOWN PITTSFIELD BUILDING NEED RENOVATION but your worried about the potential increase in taxes? In 2008, Pittsfield

More information

Rezoning case no. RZ15-08: Adam Development Properties, LP

Rezoning case no. RZ15-08: Adam Development Properties, LP PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 4, 2015 Rezoning case no. RZ15-08: Adam Development Properties, LP CASE DESCRIPTION: LOCATION: a request to amend the development plan of a previously-approved

More information

JURISDICTION AND PROCEDURES OF THE LANDMARKS PRESERVATION ADVISORY BOARD (LANDMARKS BOARD)

JURISDICTION AND PROCEDURES OF THE LANDMARKS PRESERVATION ADVISORY BOARD (LANDMARKS BOARD) SAN FRANCISCO PRESERVATION BULLETIN NO. 1 JURISDICTION AND PROCEDURES OF THE LANDMARKS PRESERVATION ADVISORY BOARD (LANDMARKS BOARD) LANDMARKS BOARD This summary is designed to clarify for project sponsors

More information

BEACON AVENUE URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT

BEACON AVENUE URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT BEACON AVENUE URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT City of Jersey City Adopted May, 1976 Block and Lot Updates August 6, 2012 Amended September 13, 2012 DIVISION OF CITY PLANNING Beacon Avenue Urban Renewal Project Table

More information

ORDINANCE NO. 15- Page 1

ORDINANCE NO. 15- Page 1 ORDINANCE NO. 15- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GALVESTON, TEXAS, APPROVING A FINANCIAL INCENTIVES PROGRAM FOR HISTORIC PROPERTIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 11.24 OF THE TEXAS PROPERTY TAX CODE; ADOPTING CRITERIA

More information

2229-2245 Kingston Rd Removal of a Holding Provision (H) Application Final Report

2229-2245 Kingston Rd Removal of a Holding Provision (H) Application Final Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 2229-2245 Kingston Rd Removal of a Holding Provision (H) Application Final Report Date: May 29, 2015 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Scarborough Community Council Director,

More information

Request for City Council Committee Action from the Department of Community Planning & Economic Development - CPED

Request for City Council Committee Action from the Department of Community Planning & Economic Development - CPED Request for City Council Committee Action from the Department of Community Planning & Economic Development - CPED Date: March 19,2013 To: Council Member Lisa Goodman, Chair, Community Development Committee

More information

7.0 GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES

7.0 GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES 7.0 GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES The following Goals, Objectives and Policies specific to Housing are organized into broad categories including: 7.1: Housing Availability 7.2: Protection of Existing Neighborhoods

More information

DATE STAMP RECEIVED BY OFFICE OF PLANNING

DATE STAMP RECEIVED BY OFFICE OF PLANNING Applicants must appear in person to file an application. Applications by mail or courier will not be accepted. APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT (SAP) File No.: FOR CELL TOWERS (new or increase

More information

COUNTY OF ELBERT. 18 September, 2014 For the Planning Commission meeting of 25 September, 2014 ELBERT COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

COUNTY OF ELBERT. 18 September, 2014 For the Planning Commission meeting of 25 September, 2014 ELBERT COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNITY & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES OFFICE P.O. BOX 7 215 COMANCHE STREET KIOWA, COLORADO 80117 303-621-3136 FAX: 303-621-3165 COUNTY OF ELBERT 18 September, 2014 For the Planning Commission meeting of 25

More information

DEVLOPMENT APPLICATION PROCEDURES

DEVLOPMENT APPLICATION PROCEDURES DEVLOPMENT APPLICATION PROCEDURES Bylaw No. 2444 and amendments thereto CONSOLIDATED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY This is a consolidation of the bylaws listed below. The amending bylaws have been consolidated

More information

Neighborhood Planning Guide To Zoning

Neighborhood Planning Guide To Zoning City of Austin Neighborhood Planning Guide To Zoning City of Austin Planning & Development Review Department 505 Barton Springs Road One Texas Center Austin, TX 78704 June 2014 DISCLAIMER: This Guide is

More information

Right-of-Way Use Permit Application Instructions

Right-of-Way Use Permit Application Instructions Please type or print clearly. Incomplete applications will not be processed. Typical processing time is 5 business days. 1. Property Address (MANDATORY) Applicant must provide a physical property address

More information

General Application DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:

General Application DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: General Application DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: ADDRESS OF SITE OF PROPOSAL: (if not assigned yet, obtain address from Planning before submitting application) APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: AGENT: ASSESSOR S

More information

Cabarrus County Zoning Ordinance Chapter 14 Nonconformities

Cabarrus County Zoning Ordinance Chapter 14 Nonconformities Chapter 14 Nonconformities Section 14-1 Introduction Understanding nonconformities When zoning ordinances are enacted for the first time or substantially modified, "nonconformities" occur. While passage

More information

SERVICE PLAN FOR METROPOLITAN DISTRICT[S] CITY OF THORNTON, COLORADO. Prepared [NAME OF PERSON OR ENTITY] [ADDRESS] [ADDRESS] [DATE]

SERVICE PLAN FOR METROPOLITAN DISTRICT[S] CITY OF THORNTON, COLORADO. Prepared [NAME OF PERSON OR ENTITY] [ADDRESS] [ADDRESS] [DATE] 2007 Thornton model service plan UPDATED August 2009 SERVICE PLAN FOR METROPOLITAN DISTRICT[S] CITY OF THORNTON, COLORADO Prepared by [NAME OF PERSON OR ENTITY] [ADDRESS] [ADDRESS] [DATE] TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

CITY COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION JOINT STUDY SESSION AGENDA REPORT

CITY COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION JOINT STUDY SESSION AGENDA REPORT CITY COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION JOINT STUDY SESSION AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 ITEM NUMBER: 1 SUBJECT: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ALTERNATIVE FOR THE YEAR 2015-2025 GENERAL PLAN

More information

Agreement # INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF NORTH OGDEN CITY AND WEBER COUNTY

Agreement # INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF NORTH OGDEN CITY AND WEBER COUNTY Agreement # INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF NORTH OGDEN CITY AND WEBER COUNTY THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT is entered into as of this day of, 2015, by and between the REDEVELOPMENT

More information

CITY OF AVENTURA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 19200 W. Country Club Drive Aventura, Florida 33180 (305) 466-8940

CITY OF AVENTURA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 19200 W. Country Club Drive Aventura, Florida 33180 (305) 466-8940 DATE: CITY OF AVENTURA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 19200 W. Country Club Drive Aventura, Florida 33180 (305) 466-8940 PUBLIC HEARING APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL City Code Section 31-73

More information

APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROPOSED USES WITHIN EXISTING BUILDING

APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROPOSED USES WITHIN EXISTING BUILDING APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROPOSED USES WITHIN EXISTING BUILDING City Use Only Planning Division 38250 Sierra Highway Palmdale, CA 93550 (661) 267-5200 planningdiv@cityofpalmdale.org Case

More information

Planning Commission Staff Report

Planning Commission Staff Report 10 Planning Commission Staff Report TO: FROM: THROUGH: PLANNING COMMISSION AMY TEMES, SENIOR PLANNER (480) 503-6729, AMY.TEMES@GILBERTAZ.GOV CATHERINE LORBEER, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER (480) 503-6016 CATHERINE.LORBEER@GILBERTAZ.GOV

More information

ARTICLE V ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT

ARTICLE V ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT SECTION 1. Administration ARTICLE V ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT It shall be the duty of the Town Council to enforce the provisions of this Ordinance and to refuse to issue any permit for any building,

More information

Proposed Planning Incentives to Support the Replacement of Office Space in New Mixed Use Developments Draft Zoning By-law Amendments

Proposed Planning Incentives to Support the Replacement of Office Space in New Mixed Use Developments Draft Zoning By-law Amendments PG12.5 STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Proposed Planning Incentives to Support the Replacement of Office Space in New Mixed Use Developments Draft Zoning By-law Amendments Date: April 18, 2016 To: From: Wards:

More information

FMC/City of San Jose Terms Sheet for Coleman Avenue Purchase. 1. Seller. FMC Corporation, a Delaware corporation

FMC/City of San Jose Terms Sheet for Coleman Avenue Purchase. 1. Seller. FMC Corporation, a Delaware corporation FMC/City of San Jose Terms Sheet for Coleman Avenue Purchase 1. Seller. FMC Corporation, a Delaware corporation 2. Buyer. City of San Jose, a municipal corporation 3. Property. The property consists of

More information

City of Palo Alto (ID # 4924) City Council Staff Report

City of Palo Alto (ID # 4924) City Council Staff Report City of Palo Alto (ID # 4924) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 9/8/2014 Summary Title: $200k PAHC CO Park Rehab Request Title: Approval of a Request From Palo Alto

More information

Madison s Central Business Improvement District (BID) OPERATING PLAN FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2015 2016

Madison s Central Business Improvement District (BID) OPERATING PLAN FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2015 2016 Madison s Central Business Improvement District (BID) OPERATING PLAN FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2015 2016 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 OF THE CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction

More information

M G M S P R I N G F I E L D S I T E P L A N R E V I E W

M G M S P R I N G F I E L D S I T E P L A N R E V I E W M G M S P R I N G F I E L D S I T E P L A N R E V I E W Summary Report: Plan/Design/Development Aspects January 13, 2016 Prepared by: The Chicago Consultants Studio, Inc. MGM SPRINGFIELD SITE PLAN REVIEW

More information

Land Use Element. Introduction 2.3. A Citywide Land Use Policies 2.3. A-1 The Future Land Use Map & the Location of Zones 2.3. A-2 Uses 2.

Land Use Element. Introduction 2.3. A Citywide Land Use Policies 2.3. A-1 The Future Land Use Map & the Location of Zones 2.3. A-2 Uses 2. Seattle s Comprehensive Plan Toward a Sustainable Seattle 2.1 Land Use Element Table of Contents Introduction 2.3 A Citywide Land Use Policies 2.3 A-1 The Future Land Use Map & the Location of Zones 2.3

More information

ARTICLE VIII SECTION 8.1 O-I OFFICE INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT

ARTICLE VIII SECTION 8.1 O-I OFFICE INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT ARTICLE VIII SECTION 8.1 O-I OFFICE INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT 8.1.1. O-I DISTRICT SCOPE AND INTENT. Regulations in this section are the O-I district regulations. Article XIX should be consulted to determine

More information

*** PUBLIC NOTICE ***

*** PUBLIC NOTICE *** *** PUBLIC NOTICE *** UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA BILL RAY CENTER OFFICE BUILDING AND PARKING LOT DISPOSAL PLAN JUNEAU, ALASKA The University of Alaska ( University ) is offering for sale an approximately 22,000

More information

BUSINESS USE PERMIT APPLICATION

BUSINESS USE PERMIT APPLICATION BUSINESS USE PERMIT APPLICATION Instructions and Information for Business Use Permits and Temporary Certificates of Occupancy are included at the end of this application. Planning and Development Services

More information

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION & HERITAGE COMMISSION HISTORIC PRESERVATION INVESTMENT TAX CREDIT REGULATION

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION & HERITAGE COMMISSION HISTORIC PRESERVATION INVESTMENT TAX CREDIT REGULATION STATE OF RHODE ISLAND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION & HERITAGE COMMISSION HISTORIC PRESERVATION INVESTMENT TAX CREDIT REGULATION Adopted by the Historical Preservation & Heritage Commission on October 20, 2008

More information

Prepared by: Samuel Dennis Date prepared: December 21, 2011

Prepared by: Samuel Dennis Date prepared: December 21, 2011 Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Meeting Date: Agenda Item: January 9, 2012 - Planning Commission Public Hearing Tampa: Text Amendment to Public/Semi-Public Land Use

More information

ASPEN HILL Minor Master Plan Amendment

ASPEN HILL Minor Master Plan Amendment ASPEN HILL Minor Master Plan Amendment Agenda Welcome and Introductions (6:30 PM) Staff Presentation (6:40-7:30 PM) Q&A (7:30-8:00 PM) Community Meeting #2 April 1, 2014 Aspen Hill Library Planning Process

More information

BASSETT CREEK VALLEY MASTER PLAN OPEN HOUSE

BASSETT CREEK VALLEY MASTER PLAN OPEN HOUSE BASSETT CREEK VALLEY MASTER PLAN OPEN HOUSE February 23, 2006 PROJECT INTRODUCTION Project Area 230 acres $50 million estimated market value (approximately) 50 acres parkland 100 residences (estimated)

More information

TOWN OF MONSON CERTIFICATIONS-SPECIAL TOWN MEETING MAY 11, 2015

TOWN OF MONSON CERTIFICATIONS-SPECIAL TOWN MEETING MAY 11, 2015 TOWN OF MONSON CERTIFICATIONS-SPECIAL TOWN MEETING MAY 11, 2015 ARTICLE 8: The Town voted by 2/3 vote to amend its Zoning Bylaws by deleting the current Section 6.14 Wireless Communications Facilities

More information