1 FISCAL FACT Jun No. 434 A Comparison of the Tax Burden on Labor in the OECD By Kyle Pomerleau Economist Key Findings Average wage earners in the United States face two major taxes: the individual income tax and the payroll tax (levied on both the employee and the employer). Although a little more than half of a worker s payroll tax burden is paid by his employer, the worker ultimately pays this tax through lower take-home pay. The total tax burden faced by wage earners in the United States is 31.3 percent of their pre-tax earnings, paying $16,658 in taxes in 2013, with $8,196 in individual income taxes and $8,462 in payroll taxes. In the absence of income and payroll taxes and the benefits they provide, the average worker would take home nearly $5,000 in additional annual income for a total of $53,223. The total tax burden faced by average U.S. workers is the 26th highest in the OECD, below the 34 country average of 36 percent. Many OECD countries have high payroll taxes, such as France, which places a payroll tax burden of 38.5 percent on average workers. In some countries, over 50 percent of a worker s total tax burden is paid by their employer.
2 2 Introduction A significant source of tax revenue for most countries comes from taxes on wage income through individual income taxes and payroll taxes. Most industrialized countries have progressive taxes on income, which means higher income individuals are taxed at higher rates than lower income individuals. However, many countries also place a substantial tax burden on average income earners. While these taxes, especially payroll taxes, pay for government programs, it is important to know what the cost of these programs is from the perspective of the average worker. Currently, workers earning an average wage in the United States face two major taxes on their income: the individual income tax and the payroll tax (both the employee side and the employer side). The total burden of these taxes equals 31.3 percent of a worker s income. Although this burden is high, the average across the 34 OECD countries is slightly higher at 35.8 percent. The average OECD tax burden on labor is higher due to higher payroll taxes. In addition, the tax burden on workers with children is lower in most OECD countries than it is for single, childless workers with the same pretax income. Taxation of Wage Income in the United States As indicated previously, there are two major types of taxes that wage earners in the United States pay. First, individual income taxes are levied by the federal, state, and, sometimes, local governments and fund the general operations of government. Second, governments levy payroll taxes on both the employee and the employer, though both are ultimately paid by wage earners. Payroll taxes are meant to fund programs such as Social Security, Medicare, and Unemployment Insurance funds. The Individual Income Tax The most familiar component of wage taxation in the United States is the federal individual income tax. The federal income tax has a progressive rate structure with marginal rates that range from 10 percent on the first $9,075 of taxable income to as high as 39.6 percent on income over $406,750. In 2011, half of all taxpayers fell in the first two brackets, while less than 1 percent of taxpayers paid the top rate. 1 1 According to IRS data for 2011, 50 percent of all taxpayers had adjusted gross income of $34,824 or below. One percent of all taxpayers had income over $388,905. See Kyle Pomerleau, Summary of Latest Federal Income Tax Data, Tax Foundation Fiscal Fact No. 408 (Dec. 18, 2013), summary-latest-federal-income-tax-data.
3 3 Table Taxable Income Brackets and Rates Rate Single Filers Married Joint Filers Head of Household Filers 10% $0 to $9,075 $0 to $18,150 $0 to $12,950 15% $9,076 to $36,900 $18,151 to$73,800 $12,951 to $49,400 25% $36,901 to $89,350 $73,801 to $148,850 $49,401 to $127,550 28% $89,351 to $186,350 $148,851 to $226,850 $127,551 to $206,600 33% $186,351 to $405,100 $226,851 to $405,100 $206,601 to $405,100 35% $405,101 to 406,750 $405,101 to 457,600 $405,101 to $432, % $406,751+ $457,601+ $432,201+ On top of the federal income tax, 41 states (plus the District of Columbia) tax individual income. 2 Local governments in 17 states also levy an individual income tax. 3 Payroll Taxes The United States levies two separate payroll taxes on wage labor. The first tax is a 12.4 percent tax which is used to fund Social Security (Table 2). This tax is levied from the first dollar an individual earns in income up to a cap of $117,000 in This cap is adjusted to wage changes each year. On paper, the tax is paid half by employers and half by employees. Workers in the U.S. will see a Social Security tax of 6.2 percent on their paystub, with the employer remitting the other 6.2 percent on the employee s behalf. The second tax is a 2.9 percent payroll tax to fund Medicare. This tax is also levied from the first dollar of income but has no cap. The tax is also split evenly between employers and employees. An additional 0.9 percent Medicare payroll tax applies to wage income over $200,000 (this cap is not adjusted for inflation). 4 Table 2. Payroll Taxes, 2014 Taxable Earnings Social Security Medicare Total $0 - $117, % 2.9% 15.3% $117,000 - $199,000 0% 2.9% 2.9% $200,000 and over 0% 3.8% 3.8% Source: Social Security Administration (2014). 2 Tax Foundation, Facts and Figures 2014: How Does Your State Compare?, facts-figures-2014-how-does-your-state-compare. 3 Gerald Prante & Austin John, Top Marginal Effective Tax Rates by State and by Source of Income, 2012 Tax Law vs Tax Law (as enacted in ATRA) (Feb. 3, 2013), cfm?abstract_id= Social Security Administration, 2014 Social Security Changes, colafacts2014.html.
4 4 Unemployment Insurance Taxes In addition to the employer-side taxes that fund Medicare and Social Security, there is an additional payroll tax to fund Unemployment Insurance. Unemployment Insurance is a joint federal-state social insurance program that insures workers against an unexpected loss of income due to losing one s job. The tax that funds this program is levied on the employer. The federal unemployment tax is 6 percent on the first $7,000 of payroll. However, states also set UI tax rates to fund their portion of the program. State UI tax rates and bases can vary substantially. The variation is based on how frequently an individual employer s workers receive unemployment benefits. If an employer is likely to hire and fire her employees at a higher than normal rate, the employer will face a higher tax rate. For example, Kentucky taxes the employer for the first $8,000 of a worker s wage at rates between 1 and 10 percent. In contrast, Alaska taxes the first $34,000 in wages at rates between 1 and 5.4 percent. The federal and state rates are not additive, however. Employers can credit 90 percent of their state tax against the federal tax, reducing the federal rate to as low as 0.6 percent. 5 The Economic Incidence of Payroll Taxes Although the employer remits the check for their share of the Social Security, Medicare, and Unemployment Insurance taxes, they are not the ones who ultimately pay. In the face of higher labor costs due to their share of the payroll taxes, employers can either reduce employment or reduce the wages of employees. Research has found that employers choose the latter and reduce their employees wages by the cost of the employer-side payroll tax. 6 In the absence of the employer-side payroll tax, it is likely that workers would be paid more. This also brings up an important point about transparency. It is true that these taxes go toward funding for Social Security, Medicare, and Unemployment Insurance, which are potential benefits for taxpayers in the future. However, due to the structure of these taxes, more than a quarter of an average worker s tax burden does not appear on their paychecks. This hides the true cost of these government programs. Total Tax Burden on Labor Income in the U.S. Every year, the OECD surveys all 34 member nations on their labor tax burden. The OECD calculates this burden by adding together the income tax payment, employee payroll tax payment, and the employer-side payroll tax payment of a worker making the average wage in each country. The OECD then divides it by 5 Joseph Henchman, Unemployment Insurance Taxes: Options for Program Design and Insolvent Trust Funds, Tax Foundation Background Paper No. 61 (Oct. 17, 2011), unemployment-insurance-taxes-options-program-design-and-insolvent-trust-funds. 6 Jonathan Gruber, The Incidence of Payroll Taxation: Evidence from Chile, NBER Working Paper No (Mar. 1995),
5 5 Figure 1. Tax Wedge of a Single, Childless U.S. Worker Earning the Average Wage, 2013 $60,000 50,000 $8,196 Income Tax (15.4%) Employee Payroll Taxes (7%) 40,000 $8,462 30,000 Employer Payroll Taxes (8.9%) 20,000 $36,564 After-Tax Income 10,000 0 U.S. Tax Wedge Source: OECD Taxing Wages the total labor cost of this average worker, or what the worker would have earned in the absence of these three taxes. This is called the average tax wedge on labor income. In 2013, the OECD found that the average worker in the United States paid an effective individual income tax rate of 15.4 percent. 7 U.S. workers making an average wage paid an additional 15.9 percent effective payroll tax rate (7 percent on the employee-side 8 and 8.9 percent on the employer-side). Adding up the total average tax rate of these three taxes, a single worker without children who earned the annual income of $48,486 faced an average tax wedge of 31.3 percent in 2013 (Figure 1). 9 This represents an $8,196 average individual income tax bill and an $8,462 average payroll tax bill for a total average tax bill of about $16,658. In the absence of these three taxes, the average worker would have taken home $53,223. How Does the United States Compare with Other OECD Nations? A total tax burden of 31.3 percent on labor income in the United States appears high, but workers in other industrialized nations face an even higher tax burden. 7 OECD, Taxing Wages 2014 (May 2014), taxing-wages-2014_tax_wages-2014-en. 8 While the employee-side payroll tax is a combined 7.65 percent, the effective tax rate on total labor costs is reduced by percent to account for the reduction in the worker s taxable income. 9 This is the gross income after employer-side payroll taxes. Number derived by multiplying the OECD measure of the U.S. average labor cost of $53,223 by percent.
6 6 Workers Earning an Average Wage Face a Higher Tax Burden in the Other Industrialized Nations Compared to Workers in the United States 60% Source: OECD Taxing Wages Compared to the United States, other countries in the OECD place a relatively high tax burden on average wage earners (Figure 2). The OECD has an average tax wedge on average income earners of 35.8 percent. This is 4.5 percentage points higher than the U.S. tax wedge of 31.3 percent, which ranks as the 26th highest in the OECD. The highest total tax burden on wage income is in Belgium at 55.8 percent, followed by Germany (49.4 percent) and Austria (49.0 percent). The country with the lowest total tax rate on its labor is Chile at 7 percent. New Zealand had the second lowest effective rate at 16.9 followed by Mexico at 19.2 percent. On average, single, childless workers in the OECD face a combined individual income and payroll tax burden of about $2,395 more than workers in the United States. Figure 2. Total Tax Wedge on Single Worker Earning a Nation's Average Wage in OECD, 2013 Belgium Germany Austria Hungary France Italy Finland Sweden Czech Republic Slovenia Greece Portugal Slovak Republic Spain Estonia Turkey Denmark Norway Luxembourg Netherlands OECD Average Poland Iceland Japan United Kingdom United States Canada Australia Ireland Switzerland Korea Israel Mexico New Zealand Chile Payroll Tax Burdens Tend to Be High in the OECD and Make up a Significant Portion of a Worker s Tax Bill As in the United States, payroll taxes in other OECD countries go toward funding social insurance programs. These programs, especially in Europe, tend to cost a significant amount. 10 As a result, most OECD countries high average tax burden on labor is due to high payroll taxes (Figure 3). 10 For instance, Belgium and Germany, the countries with the highest tax burdens on wage earners, spend an equivalent of 30.7 percent and 26.2 percent, respectively, of their GDPs on social welfare. See OECD, OECD StatExtracts, Social Expenditure Aggregated Data, 2013, aspx?datasetcode=socx_agg.
7 7 The average combined (employee and employer) payroll tax rate in the OECD was 22.6 percent in 2013, which was 6.7 percent higher than the U.S s combined rate of 15.9 percent. France had the highest combined payroll tax burden of 38.5 percent. This is followed by Austria and Hungary, both with effective payroll tax rates of 36.6 percent. These three countries payroll tax burdens alone are greater than the total tax burden on laborers in the United States. 60% France Austria Source: OECD Taxing Wages The countries with the lowest combined payroll tax burden were Australia (5.6 percent), Denmark (2.7 percent) and New Zealand (0 percent). New Zealand was the only country in 2013 that doesn t levy a payroll tax on the average worker. It is also interesting to note that even though Denmark has low payroll taxes, they still place a relatively high tax burden on average workers through higher individual income taxes (an effective rate of 36 percent). In 29 of 34 OECD countries, payroll taxes made up half or more of an average single worker s total tax burden in Figure 3. Employer and Employee Effective Payroll Tax Burdens on Average Workers by OECD Country, 2013 Hungary Greece Slovak Republic Belgium Czech Republic Germany Slovenia Italy Poland Sweden Employee Payroll Tax Employer Payroll Tax Individual Income Tax Portugal Spain Turkey Estonia Japan Finland Netherlands OECD Average Luxembourg Norway United Kingdom Canada Korea United States Ireland Israel Switzerland Employer-Side Payroll Taxes Tend to Be Higher than Employee-Side Payroll Taxes Mexico Iceland Chile Australia Denmark New Zealand All countries with payroll taxes, except for Chile and Denmark, split their payroll tax burden between the employee and employer. On average, employer-side taxes tend to be higher across the OECD. The average OECD employee-side payroll tax burden in 2013 was 8.3 percent. Slovenia had the highest employee-side payroll tax in the OECD at 19 percent, followed by Germany (17.1 percent) and Poland (15.3 percent). Average workers in the United States faced an effective rate of 7 percent. The average employer-side payroll tax burden in the OECD is higher (14.3 percent). France, which has the highest overall payroll tax rate, also has the highest effective employer-side payroll tax at 28.7 percent. Estonia and the Czech Republic follow, both with an effective rate of 25.4 percent.
8 8 Employer-side payroll taxes are less transparent than employee-side payroll taxes, as employers remit the check to the government, but employees pay the cost through lower wages. In Nine OECD Countries, Half of the Average Worker s Tax Burden Is Paid by Their Employers For workers in nine OECD countries, half or more of their total tax burden was paid by their employers (Figure 4). For instance, France had an employer-side payroll tax of 28.7 percent, which was the highest employer-side payroll tax in the OECD in This tax was 58 percent of the total tax burden faced by French workers in The country whose workers paid the largest proportion of their total tax bill through their employer payroll taxes was Estonia. Their 25.4 percent employerside payroll tax was 63.6 percent of their total tax burden in In contrast, the 8.9 percent employer-side of the payroll tax in the United States only makes up 28 percent of an average worker s tax burden. France Figure 4. Half of Worker's Tax Burden in Nine OECD Countries Is Paid by Employers Employer-Side Payroll Tax Employee-Side Payroll Tax Individual Income Tax Italy Sweden Czech Republic Greece Slovak Republic Spain Estonia Mexico 0% Share of Total Tax Burden Source: OECD Taxing Wages 2014.
9 9 The Tax Burden of Average Workers in the OECD Varies Based on Family Composition It is also important to point out that the tax burden of average workers varies based on family composition. Most OECD countries provide some tax relief for families with children. Comparing single, childless workers and single-earner families with two children earning the same pretax income illustrates how taxes can differ by family composition throughout the OECD (Figure 5). On average, the tax burden for families (an average of 26.4 percent in 2013) in the OECD is 27.2 percent lower than the tax burden on single, childless workers (an average of 35.8 percent). The United States, with the Child Tax Credit and the personal exemption, reduced the tax burden of families with two children (a rate of 20.3 percent) by 35.1 percent compared to the tax burden on a single, childless worker (a rate of 31.3 percent) in Lower-income workers with children also benefitted more from the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) than lower-income workers without children. New Zealand provided the largest relative reduction of taxes for families with children compared to single childless workers. The total tax burden of a married couple with two children in New Zealand (2.4 percent) was 85 percent lower than the 16.9 percent total tax burden on a single, childless worker in Mexico and Chile were neutral between families with children or without. Greece was the only country that levied a higher total tax burden on families compared to single childless workers. 60% Greece France Belgium Austria Italy Finland Sweden Turkey Spain Hungary Germany Estonia Norway Netherlands Poland Portugal Denmark Slovak Republic United Kingdom Source: OECD Taxing Wages Total Tax Burden on Family with Two Children Japan Slovenia Czech Republic Total Tax Burden on Single Worker with No Children United States Mexico Iceland Korea Canada Israel Australia Luxembourg Switzerland Chile Ireland New Zealand Figure 5. Most OECD Countries Give Tax Relief to Families with Children
10 10 Conclusion Although the United States and most OECD countries are known for having progressive tax systems that tax high-income earners more than low- or moderateincome earners, a large portion of the tax burden still falls on the average worker. Even here in the United States, which has lower tax burdens than most other OECD countries, average workers end up paying nearly one-third of their income in taxes. It is true that governments in the OECD, especially European countries, provide more government programs. However, their workers end up paying a much higher price for them.
11 11 Table 4. Tax Wedge of Average Income Earner by OECD Country, The Tax Foundation is a 501(c)(3) non-partisan, non-profit research institution founded in 1937 to educate the public on tax policy. Based in Washington, D.C., our economic and policy analysis is guided by the principles of sound tax policy: simplicity, neutrality, transparency, and stability Tax Foundation Editor, Donnie Johnson Designer, Dan Carvajal Tax Foundation National Press Building th Street, NW, Suite 420 Washington, DC taxfoundation.org 2013 Social Security Contributions Country Rank Total Tax WedgeIncome Tax Employee Employer Average Labor Costs Belgium % 22.0% 10.8% 23.0% $ 72, Germany % 16.0% 17.1% 16.2% $ 68, Austria % 12.6% 14.0% 22.6% $ 64, Hungary % 12.5% 14.4% 22.2% $ 29, France % 10.4% 9.8% 28.7% $ 61, Italy % 16.3% 7.2% 24.3% $ 52, Finland % 18.4% 6.2% 18.6% $ 57, Sweden % 13.7% 5.3% 23.9% $ 59, Czech Republic % 8.8% 8.2% 25.4% $ 30, Slovenia % 9.4% 19.0% 13.9% $ 34, Greece % 7.1% 12.9% 21.5% $ 40, Portugal % 13.1% 8.9% 19.2% $ 35, Slovak Republic % 7.1% 10.2% 23.8% $ 25, Spain % 12.8% 4.9% 23.0% $ 49, Estonia % 13.0% 1.5% 25.4% $ 28, Turkey % 11.6% 12.9% 14.2% $ 34, Denmark % 35.8% 2.7% 0.0% $ 51, Norway % 18.9% 6.9% 11.5% $ 67, Luxembourg % 15.1% 11.0% 11.0% $ 64, Netherlands % 14.3% 14.2% 8.4% $ 63, Poland % 5.9% 15.3% 14.4% $ 26, Iceland % 25.9% 0.4% 7.1% $ 48, Japan % 6.7% 12.2% 12.8% $ 54, United Kingdom % 13.3% 8.5% 9.8% $ 56, United States % 15.4% 7.0% 8.9% $ 53, Canada % 13.7% 6.6% 10.8% $ 43, Australia % 21.8% 0.0% 5.6% $ 55, Ireland % 13.3% 3.6% 9.7% $ 44, Switzerland % 10.2% 5.9% 5.9% $ 68, Korea % 4.6% 7.5% 9.3% $ 51, Israel % 8.4% 7.5% 4.8% $ 34, Mexico % 7.5% 1.2% 10.5% $ 13, New Zealand % 16.9% 0.0% 0.0% $ 36, Chile % 0.0% 7.0% 0.0% $ 18, OECD Average N/A 35.8% 13.3% 8.3% 14.3% Source: OECD Taxing Wages (2014).
FISCAL FACT July 2015 No. 475 A Comparison of the Tax Burden on Labor in the OECD By Sam Jordan & Kyle Pomerleau Research Assistant Economist Key Findings Average wage earners in the United States face
6 Social Welfare Payments Indicator 6.1 Indicator 6.2 Unemployment Benefits Compared to Earnings (OECD countries) Unemployment Benefits Compared to Earnings in the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom
Gini Coefficient The Gini Coefficient is a measure of income inequality which is based on data relating to household s disposable income. A Gini Coefficient of zero indicates perfect income equality, whereas
Austria Belgium Czech Republic Tax credit of EUR 400 for low pension income up to EUR 17,000; the tax credit is fully phased out once pension income equals EUR 25,000. pension income of maximum EUR 1,901.19.
Expenditure and Outputs in the Irish Health System: A Cross Country Comparison Paul Redmond Overview This document analyzes expenditure and outputs in the Irish health system and compares Ireland to other
OECD Countries Local Government Fiscal Context [DRAFT 1-29-133-31-14] Hal Wolman and Diana Hincapie, George Washington Institute of Public Policy Below we present a contextual overview of local government
Taxing Wages 2014 SPECIAL FEATURE: CHANGES IN STRUCTURAL LABOUR INCOME TAX PROGRESSIVITY OVER THE 2000-12 PERIOD IN OECD MEMBER COUNTRIES This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General
Civil service pension schemes Options for reform World Bank Core Course on Pensions Washington, DC, March, 2014 Agenda Institutional arrangements for public-sector workers pensions Demographic pressures
TOWARDS PUBLIC PROCUREMENT KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Paulo Magina Public Sector Integrity Division 10 th Public Procurement Knowledge Exchange Platform Istanbul, May 2014 The Organization for Economic
Indicator What Proportion of National Wealth Is Spent on Education? In 2008, OECD countries spent 6.1% of their collective GDP on al institutions and this proportion exceeds 7.0% in Chile, Denmark, Iceland,
tember Date of publication: 15 ember 216 Monthly Electricity Statistics TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # HIGHLIGHTS i ORGANISATIONAL AND REGIONAL TABLES OECD Total 1 OECD Americas 2 OECD Asia Oceania 3 OECD Europe
Going for Growth: Structural Surveillance in the OECD OECD World Bank Conference on Innovation and Sustainable Growth in a Globalised World, Paris, 18-19 November 2008 Sven Blondal Sven Blondal, Economics
FISCAL FACT Sept. 2015 No. 479 Details and Analysis of Governor Jeb Bush s Tax Plan By Kyle Pomerleau Economist Key Findings Governor Jeb Bush s tax plan would reform both the individual income tax and
From: Education at a Glance 2012 Highlights Access the complete publication at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag_highlights-2012-en How many students study abroad and where do they go? Please cite this chapter
What Is the Total Public Spending on Education? Indicator On average, OECD countries devote 12.9% of total public expenditure to, but values for individual countries range from less than 10% in the Czech
COUNTRY NOTE Education at a Glance 2012: OECD Indicators Under embargo until 11 September, at 11:00 am Paris time FRANCE Questions can be directed to: Eric Charbonnier (Eric.Charbonnier@oecd.org) Visit
LATVIA S PENSION SYSTEM: CURRENT SITUATION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS Monika Queisser Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, OECD Demographic challenges Major demographic trends in Latvia Declining
Tax reform: Overview Common elements Eliminate tax preferences Lower rates E.g., National Commission Fiscal Responsibility and Reform Individual rates: 8/14/23%; corporate rate: 26% Tax capital gains and
Personal income tax: Entrance and top tax rates, 2014 Content: 1. Entrance tax rates... 2 2. Top tax rates... 6 Source: German Federal Ministry of Finance, Die wichtigsten Steuern im internationalen Vergleich
Indicator On What Resources and Services Is Education Funding Spent? In primary, secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary education combined, current accounts for an average of 92% of total spending in
FISCAL FACT Jan. 2016 No. 493 Details and Analysis of Dr. Ben Carson s Tax Plan By Kyle Pomerleau Director of Federal Projects Key Findings Dr. Ben Carson s tax plan would replace the federal income tax
Health Care in Crisis The Economic Imperative for Health Care Reform James Kvaal and Ben Furnas February 19, 2009 1 Center for American Progress Health Care in Crisis U.S. spends twice as much per capita
Survey on Strategic Human Resource Management in Central Governments of OECD countries (2010) Preliminary Results Paris, 07 November 2011 Cornelia Lercher Main focus: Background and Aim of the Survey Scope
Special Feature: Trends in personal income tax and employee social security contribution schedules TAXING WAGES 211 OECD 212 27 1. Introduction Taxes on labour income including personal income taxes and
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) 1. Size of GDP 2. GDP growth 3. GDP per capita 15 1. Size of GDP 1. Gross Size domestic of GDP product (GDP) is the standard measure of the value of final goods and services
PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY WORKERS Australia Permanent worker: Permanent workers are employees with paid leave entitlements in jobs or work contracts of unlimited duration, including regular workers whose
Facts: Population Facts: Population 6 big nations: > 35 million (Germany, the UK, France, Italy, Spain and Poland). Netherlands: 16 million people. 8 small nations (size of a big city): 8 to 11 million:
International Tax Competitiveness Index 2015 by Kyle Pomerleau Alan Cole PRINCIPLED INSIGHTFUL ENGAGED Tallinn, Estonia Introduction 1 Taxes are a crucial component of a country s international competitiveness.
Public Sector Pensions An Overview Hazel Bateman Centre for Pensions and Superannuation Australian School of Business, UNSW October 2011 Outline Background and stylised facts Public sector pensions across
1 UNITED KINGDOM DEMOGRAPHICS AND MACROECONOMICS Data from 2008 or latest available year. 1. Ratio of over 65-year-olds the labour force. Source: OECD, various sources. COUNTRY PENSION DESIGN STRUCTURE
FISCAL FACT Jan. 2016 No. 498 Details and Analysis of Senator Bernie Sanders s Tax Plan By Alan Cole and Scott Greenberg Economist Analyst Key Findings: Senator Sanders (I-VT) would enact a number of policies
PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE HEALTH CARE IN CANADA Norma Kozhaya, Ph.D Economist, Montreal economic Institute CPBI, Winnipeg June 15, 2007 Possible private contribution Possible private contribution in the health
Corporate dividend and capital gains taxation: A comparison of the United States to other developed nations Prepared for the Alliance for Savings and Investment April 2015 Corporate dividend and capital
Employment by Economic Activity Short Term Indicators of the Labour Market Employment Trends through 2nd Quarter 2013 Department of Statistics Contents Methodological Note 2 Summary of Employment Trends
From: Government at a Glance 2009 Access the complete publication at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264075061-en Delegation in human resource management Please cite this chapter as: OECD (2009), Delegation
International comparisons of obesity prevalence June 2009 International Comparisons of Obesity Prevalence Executive Summary Obesity prevalence among adults and children has been increasing in most developed
Statutory Parental Leave and Childcare Leave: April 2012 These two types of leave are considered together here, though treated separately in the country notes. All EU member states must provide at least
DG TAXUD 95/2010-28 June 2010 Taxation trends in the European Union EU27 tax ratio fell to 39.3% of GDP in 2008 Steady decline in top corporate income tax rate since 2000 The overall tax-to-gdp ratio 1
FISCAL FACT Mar. 2015 No. 458 Estate and Inheritance Taxes around the World By Alan Cole Economist Key Findings The U.S. has the fourth highest estate or inheritance tax rate in the OECD at 40 percent;
Please cite this paper as: Paturot, D., K. Mellbye and B. Brys (2013), Average Personal Income Tax Rate and Tax Wedge Progression in Countries, Taxation Working Papers, No. 15, Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k4c0vhzsq8v-en
OECD Social Policy Division Directorate of Employment, Labour and Social Affairs Definitions and methodology PF2.3: Additional leave entitlements for working parents In addition to leave entitlements around
The U.S Health Care Paradox: How Spending More is Getting Us Less Elizabeth H. Bradley Yale School of Public Health Lauren A. Taylor Harvard Divinity School 1 The paradox Then there's the problem of rising
// BRIEF STATISTICS 2014 // TAXATION IN FINLAND Finland s taxation is subject to decisions by the Finnish Parliament, the European Union and the municipalities of Finland. It is governed by tax legislation,
Culture Change in the Workforce in an Aging America: Are We Making Any Progress? Anne Montgomery Center for Elder Care and Advanced Illness Anne.Montgomery@altarum.org Altarum Institute integrates independent
PUBLIC & PRIVATE HEALTH CARE IN CANADA by Norma Kozhaya, Ph.D. Economist, Montreal Economic Institute before the Canadian Pension & Benefits Institute Winnipeg - June 15, 2007 Possible private contribution
Review of R&D Credit invitation for submissions Review of R&D Credit Invitation for Submissions February 2013 Economic and Fiscal Divisions Department of Finance Government Buildings, Upper Merrion Street,
(Cover page) The Tax Burden of Typical Workers in the EU 28 2014 Edition NEW DIRECTION Page 1 of 17 James Rogers & Cécile Philippe May 2014 New Direction aims to help shift the EU onto a different course
The Tax Burden of Typical Workers in the EU 27 James Rogers Cécile Philippe Institut Économique Molinari, Paris-Bruxelles TABLE OF CONTENTS Objective of the Study 2 Study Interest 2 Main Results 3 Definitions
Rebecca FREEMAN July 2008 OECD Statistics Directorate Division of Structural Economic Statistics LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY INDICATORS COMPARISON OF TWO OECD DATABASES PRODUCTIVITY DIFFERENTIALS & THE BALASSA-SAMUELSON
The Tax Burden of Typical Workers in the EU 28 2016 James Rogers Cécile Philippe Institut Économique Molinari, Paris Bruxelles TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract 2 Background 2 Main Results 3 On average, a respite
Indicator How Many Students Finish Tertiary Education? Based on current patterns of graduation, it is estimated that an average of 46% of today s women and 31% of today s men in OECD countries will complete
ANNUAL HOURS WORKED The series on annual hours actually worked per person in total employment presented in this table for 34 OECD countries are, in principle, consistent with the series retained for the
Marriage rates Definitions and methodology SF3.1: Marriage and divorce rates The crude marriage rate is the number of marriages formed each year as a ratio to 1 000 people. This measure disregards other
Income INTECH Global Income Managed Volatility Fund Australia 0.0066 0.0375 Austria 0.0045 0.0014 Belgium 0.0461 0.0138 Bermuda 0.0000 0.0059 Canada 0.0919 0.0275 Cayman Islands 0.0000 0.0044 China 0.0000
32 nd National Conference on Law & Higher Education Improving the Quality of Student Learning Improving the quality of student learning and the level of degree attainment through common degree requirements
VULNERABILITY OF SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS 2 December 2014 Paris Seminar in Demographic Economics Falilou FALL Senior Economist OECD Economics Department 1 Introduction and outline Social institutions and the
Determining OAS and GIS eligibility for people who come to Canada as adults 2OAS and GIS eligibility Determining OAS and GIS eligibility for people who come to Canada as adults Are you close to age 65,
Insurance corporations and pension funds in OECD countries Massimo COLETTA (Bank of Italy) Belén ZINNI (OECD) UNECE, Expert Group on National Accounts, Geneva - 3 May 2012 Outline Motivations Insurance
Global Environment Facility Meeting for the Fourth Replenishment of the GEF Trust Fund June 9-10, 2005 Washington, D.C. GEF/R.4/5 May 4, 2005 REFERENCE EXCHANGE RATES FOR USE IN THE FOURTH GEF REPLENISHMENT
BULGARIAN TOURISM IN FACTS AND FIGURES (JANUARY DECEMBER 2013) 5.5 % more foreign tourists for the period January December 2013. 6.3 % more foreign tourists for leisure and recreation for the year 2013.
Hungary s labour market indicators continue to improve Employment rate higher again in Hungary According to the latest data, the positive trend regarding growth in the number of people in employment has
4 Distribution of Income and Wealth 53 54 Indicator 4.1 Income per capita in the EU Indicator defined National income (GDP) in per capita (per head of population) terms expressed in Euro and adjusted for
How Much Are Teachers Paid? Indicator The statutory salaries of teachers with at least 15 years of experience average USD 38 914 at the primary level, USD 41 701 at the lower level and USD 43 711 at the
EUROPEAN UNION The 2013 edition of Education at a Glance offers a snapshot of how education and the people who participate in and benefit from it fared during the first years of worst economic crisis in
Parental Leave Policies in 21 Countries: Assessing Generosity and Gender Equality i Parental Leave Policies in 21 Countries: Assessing Generosity and Gender Equality 1 Parental Leave Policies in 21 Countries:
Figure 1 Statutory corporate income tax rates 7 6 1982 2001 5 4 3 2 1 Austria Belgium Canada Finland France UK Germany Greece Ireland Italy Japan Netherlands Notes: For countries using different tax rates,
Taxation of Foreign Income by the U.S. and Other Governments James R. Hines Jr. University of Michigan and UC-Berkeley February 2009 1 American Taxation of Foreign Income. The U.S. practice of taxing foreign
Mike Schussler Economists.co.za for SASBO www.economists.co.za 1 How SA compares on prices. How SA compares on some input costs. How SA compares excluding energy taxes. How SA compares when adjusting for
FISCAL FACT Jan. 2016 No. 496 Details and Analysis of Hillary Clinton s Tax Proposals By Kyle Pomerleau and Michael Schuyler Economist Senior Fellow Key Findings: Hillary Clinton would enact a number of
2: Australia s tax system Overview This chapter surveys Australia s current tax system at both the federal and state levels and how it compares internationally. It considers: how costs imposed by the tax
Health Systems: Type, Coverage and Mechanisms Austria Belgium Bulgaria (2007) Czech Republic Denmark (2007) Estonia (2008). Supplementary private health Complementary voluntary and private health Public
Hong Kong s Health Spending 1989 to 2033 Gabriel M Leung School of Public Health The University of Hong Kong What are Domestic Health Accounts? Methodology used to determine a territory s health expenditure
The Tax Burden of Typical Workers in the EU 28 2015 James Rogers Cécile Philippe Institut Économique Molinari, Paris Bruxelles TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract 2 Background 2 Main Results 3 On average, a respite
97 98 99 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 97 98 99 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 p p FDI IN FIGURES April 213 According to preliminary estimates, global FDI flows have declined in 212 by 14% from 211 to USD 1.4 trillion
Definitions and methodology PF3.2: Enrolment in childcare and pre-schools The organisation of childcare provision differs greatly from country to country (see PF4.1). The enrolment rates presented here
Indicator What Are the Incentives to Invest in Education? On average across 25 OECD countries, the total return (net present value), both private and public, to a man who successfully completes upper secondary
Government at a Glance 2015 Size of public procurement Strategic public procurement E-procurement Central purchasing bodies 135 Size of public procurement Public procurement refers to the purchase by governments
Early Childhood Education and Care Participation in education by three- and four-year-olds tends now to be high, though coverage is a third or less of the age group in several OECD countries. Early childhood
Last updated: 4 September 2015 Reporting practices for domestic and total debt securities While the BIS debt securities statistics are in principle harmonised with the recommendations in the Handbook on
World Consumer Income and Expenditure Patterns 2014 14th edi tion Euromonitor International Ltd. 60-61 Britton Street, EC1M 5UX TableTypeID: 30010; ITtableID: 22914 Income Algeria Income Algeria Income
Types of es Taxes can be roughly categorized as es on income, es on consumption, and es on property Income es Consumption es, corporation Property es Consumption, etc Inheritance, etc Trends in revenue,