1 No ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States OTIS McDONALD, et al., v. Petitioners, CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, et al., On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Seventh Circuit Respondents. BRIEF FOR ENGLISH/EARLY AMERICAN HISTORIANS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS ROBERT A. GOODIN* FRANCINE T. RADFORD GOODIN, MACBRIDE, SQUERI, DAY & LAMPREY, LLP 505 Sansome Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, California (415) Attorneys for Amici Curiae *Counsel of Record ================================================================ COCKLE LAW BRIEF PRINTING CO. (800) OR CALL COLLECT (402)
2 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS... i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... iii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT... 1 ARGUMENT... 5 I. THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD REEXAMINE PRIOR FINDINGS IN LIGHT OF SOUNDER SCHOLARSHIP WHEN INTERPRETING RIGHTS IN THE CONSTITUTION... 5 II. THE ALLOWANCE OF A RIGHT TO HAVE ARMS SET FORTH IN THE 1689 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS WAS THE PRECURSOR TO THE SECOND AMENDMENT... 6 A. Heller Recognized This Historical Fact and Its Critical Importance to Interpreting the Second Amendment... 6 B. The Meaning of the Terms Self- Defense and Self-Preservation in the Time Period Leading Up to the English Bill of Rights... 8 C. The History of the Declaration of Rights Demonstrates the Nature of the Right Granted by the Second Amendment... 13
3 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Continued Page 1. Political and Historical Background of the Declaration of Rights James II s Employment of Catholic Lieutenants Led to the Codification of the Parliamentary Allowance to Have Arms to Defend the Nation and Exercise the Right of Self- Preservation III. BLACKSTONE S ARTICULATION OF THE RIGHT TO HAVE ARMS AND THE RIGHTS OF SELF-PRESERVATION AND RESISTANCE WAS CONSISTENT WITH THE USAGE DISCUSSED ABOVE IN CONNECTION WITH THE ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS IV. THE FOUNDERS UNDERSTANDING OF THE RIGHT TO HAVE ARMS AND THE RIGHT OF SELF-PRESERVATION WAS THE SAME AS THAT OF THEIR ENGLISH PREDECESSORS V. THE SECOND AMENDMENT WAS DRAFTED IN THE SPIRIT OF THE DECLARATION OF RIGHTS HAVE ARMS PROVISION CONCLUSION... 41
4 iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993)... 3, 5 District of Columbia v. Heller, 128 S.Ct (2008)... passim Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968)... 2, 6 Employment Div. v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990)... 5 Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252 (1886) Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649 (1944)... 3, 5 South Carolina v. Gathers, 490 U.S. 805 (1989)... 3, 5 United States Term Limits v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995)... 3, 5 CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITIES English Bill of Rights, 1 W. & M. 2, c. 2 (1688) (Eng.) U.S. Const. amend. II... passim U.S. Const. amend. XIV... 2, 6 U.S. Const. art. I, U.S. Const. art. I, 3, cl LAWS AND STATUTES A SUPPLEMENT TO THE ACT ENTITLED, AN ACT TO REGULATE AND DISCIPLINE THE MILITIA OF THIS STATE, 30 (Md. 1799)... 39
5 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Continued Page ACT OF FEB. 20, 1787, ch. 9, 1787 MASS. LAWS ACTS AND ORDINANCES OF THE INTERREGNUM, (1911) AN ACT FOR ESTABLISHING A MILITIA WITHIN THIS STATE, 6 (Del. 1782) MILITIA ACT OF 1662, 13 & 14 Car. 2, c. 3 (1662) (Eng.)... passim Militia Act of 1757, 30 GEO. 2, c. 25 (1757) (Eng.)... 22, 36, STATUTES AT LARGE OF VIRGINIA (1823) OTHER AUTHORITIES 1 AMERICAN ARCHIVES: DOCUMENTS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, , FOURTH SERIES (Peter Force ed., ) AMERICAN ARCHIVES: DOCUMENTS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, , FOURTH SERIES (Peter Force ed., ) AMERICAN ARCHIVES: DOCUMENTS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, , FOURTH SERIES (Peter Force ed., )... 32, 37 5 AMERICAN ARCHIVES: DOCUMENTS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, , FOURTH SERIES (Peter Force ed., )... 36, 37, 39 6 AMERICAN ARCHIVES: DOCUMENTS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION, , FOURTH SERIES (Peter Force ed., )... 32, 36, 37
6 v TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Continued Page 1 AMERICAN ELOQUENCE: A COLLECTION OF SPEECHES AND ADDRESSES BY THE MOST EMINENT ORATORS OF AMERICA (1859) ANCHITELL GREY, DEBATES OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS (1769) ANCHITELL GREY, DEBATES ON THE HOUSE OF COMMONS (1769) AT A MEETING OF THE FREEHOLDERS AND OTHER INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF BOSTON, LEGALLY QUALIFIED AND WARN D IN PUBLIC TOWN MEETING ASSEMBLED (1768) BARON VON STEUBEN, REGULATIONS FOR THE ORDER AND DISCIPLINE OF THE TROOPS OF THE UNITED STATES (Joseph Riling ed., 1966) CALENDAR OF STATE PAPERS, Domestic Series of the Reign of William III, (1969) COLIN NICHOLSON, THE INFAMOUS GOVERNOR : FRANCIS BERNARD AND THE ORIGINS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION (2001) CREATING THE BILL OF RIGHTS: THE DOCU- MENTARY RECORD FROM THE FIRST FEDERAL CONGRESS (Helen Veit ed., 1991)... 36
7 vi TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Continued Page David T. Konig, The Second Amendment: A Missing Transatlantic Context for the Historical Meaning of the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms, 22 LAW & HIST. REV. 119 (2004) David T. Konig, Why the Second Amendment Has a Preamble: Original Public Meaning and the Political Culture of Written Constitutions in Revolutionary America, 56 UCLA L. REV (2009)... 7 DECLARATION OF THE CAUSES AND NECESSITY FOR TAKING UP ARMS (1775)... 3, 36, 37 Editorial, Boston, March 17, New York Journal, Apr. 13, ENGLISH DEFENDERS OF AMERICAN FREEDOM (P. Smith ed., 1972) FRANCIS PLOWDEN, THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN & IRELAND (1802) GILBERT BURNET, AN ENQUIRY INTO THE MEASURES OF SUBMISSION TO THE SUPREAM AUTHORITY (1688) HISTORICAL COLLECTIONS OF PRIVATE PASSAGES OF STATE (1721) HOUSE OF COMMONS JOUR. (1802) HOUSE OF COMMONS JOUR. (1802)... 19, 21 HUGO GROTIUS, THE RIGHTS OF WAR AND PEACE (1608)... 9
8 vii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Continued Page J.G.A. POCOCK, THE MACHIAVELLIAN MOMENT: FLORENTINE POLITICAL THOUGHT AND THE ATLANTIC REPUBLICAN TRADITION (2003)... 8 J.R. WESTERN, THE ENGLISH MILITIA IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY (1965) JAMES HOWELL, AN INQUISITION AFTER BLOOD (1649) JEAN LOUIS DE LOLME, THE CONSTITUTION OF ENGLAND, OR, AN ACCOUNT OF THE ENGLISH GOVERNMENT (1775) JOHN LOCKE, THE SECOND TREATISE OF GOV- ERNMENT (1690) JOHN SADLER, RIGHTS OF THE KINGDOM (1682) JOHN TRENCHARD, AN ARGUMENT SHEWING, THAT A STANDING ARMY IS INCONSISTENT WITH A FREE GOVERNMENT (1697) JOYCE LEE MALCOLM, TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS: THE ORIGINS OF AN ANGLO-AMERICAN RIGHT (1994)... 7, 14, 25 1 LETTERS OF THE DELEGATES TO CONGRESS, (Paul H. Smith ed., ) LETTERS OF THE DELEGATES TO CONGRESS, (Paul H. Smith ed., ) LETTERS OF THE DELEGATES TO CONGRESS, (Paul H. Smith ed., )... 33, 34 LOIS G. SCHWOERER, NO STANDING ARMIES!: THE ANTIARMY IDEOLOGY IN SEVENTEENTH- CENTURY ENGLAND (1974)... 8
9 viii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Continued Page LOIS G. SCHWOERER, THE DECLARATION OF RIGHTS, 1689 (1981)... 7, 17, 19, 20 Lois G. Schwoerer, To Hold and Bear Arms: The English Perspective, 76 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 27 (2000) PAMPHLETS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION (Bernard Bailyn ed., 1965) Patrick J. Charles, Arms for Their Defence?: An Historical, Legal, and Textual Analysis of the English Right to Have Arms and Whether the Second Amendment Should Be Incorporated in McDonald v. City of Chicago, 57 No. 3 CLEV. ST. L. REV. 351 (2009)... passim Patrick J. Charles, The Right of Self- Preservation and Resistance: A True Legal and Historical Understanding of the Anglo- American Right to Arms, 2010 CARDOZO L. REV. DE NOVO 18 (2010)... 9, 13, 15 PATRICK J. CHARLES, THE SECOND AMENDMENT: THE INTENT AND ITS INTERPRETATION BY THE STATES AND THE SUPREME COURT (2009)... 38, 39, 40 Paul Finkelman, A Well Regulated Militia: The Second Amendment in Historical Perspective, 76 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 195 (2000) PAULINE MAIER, AMERICAN SCRIPTURE (1998)... 34, 36 RESISTANCE NO REBELLION (1775)... 28
10 ix TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Continued Page ROBERT FERGUSON, A BRIEF JUSTIFICATION OF THE PRINCE OF ORANGE S DESCENT INTO ENGLAND (1689) ROBERT J. SPITZER, GUN CONTROL: A DOCU- MENTARY AND REFERENCE GUIDE (2009) RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE RHODE-ISLAND ARMY (1775) SAMUEL JOHNSON, REMARKS UPON DR. SHERLOCK S BOOK (1689) SAMUEL WILLIAMS, A DISCOURSE ON THE LOVE OF OUR COUNTRY (1775) Saul Cornell, St. George Tucker s Lecture Notes, the Second Amendment, and the Originalist Methodology, 103 NW. U.L. REV. 406 (2009) STEPHEN MARSHALL, A PLEA FOR DEFENSIVE ARMES... 9 STEPHEN P. HALBROOK, THE FOUNDERS SECOND AMENDMENT: ORIGINS OF THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS (2008) Steven J. Heyman, Natural Rights and the Second Amendment, 76 CHI.-KENT L. REV. (2000)... 11, 26 THE CAUSE OF GOD, AND OF THESE NATIONS (1658) THE CHARTER GRANTED BY THEIR MAJESTIES KING WILLIAM AND QUEEN MARY, TO THE IN- HABITANTS OF THE PROVINCE OF THE MASSA- CHUSETTS BAY IN NEW ENGLAND (1759)... 30
11 x TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Continued Page THE HISTORY OF SELF-DEFENCE IN REQUITAL TO THE HISTORY OF PASSIVE OBEDIENCE (1689)... 12, 13 THE LEVELLER (1658)... 14, 15 THE WRITINGS OF SAMUEL ADAMS (1968) THOMAS PAINE, THE CRISIS: NUMBER XIV (1775) TIM HARRIS, REVOLUTION: THE GREAT CRISIS OF THE BRITISH MONARCHY, (2006) WILLIAM BLACKSTONE, COMMENTARIES ON THE LAWS OF ENGLAND (1765)... 25, 26, 27, 35 4 WILLIAM BLACKSTONE, COMMENTARIES ON THE LAWS OF ENGLAND (1769)... 24, 27 3 WILLIAM COBBETT, THE PARLIAMENTARY HIS- TORY OF ENGLAND (1806) WILLIAM COBBETT, THE PARLIAMENTARY HISTORY OF ENGLAND (1808)... 17, 18, 20 5 WILLIAM COBBETT, THE PARLIAMENTARY HIS- TORY OF ENGLAND (1809)... 20, WILLIAM COBBETT, THE PARLIAMENTARY HIS- TORY OF ENGLAND (1813) WILLIAM DENTON, JUS REGIMINIS (1689) WILLIAM PRYNNE, A VINDICATION OF PSALME (1642)... 9 WILLIAM PRYNNE, THE THIRD PART OF THE SOVERAIGNE POWER OF PARLIAMENTS AND KINGDOMES (1643)... 9
12 1 INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE 1 Amici Curiae are scholars and professional historians whose collective expertise covers the following areas: the history of Stuart England, the Restoration, the 1689 Glorious Revolution, the American Revolution, the Early Republic, American legal history, American Constitutional history, and Anglo-American history. Each has earned one or more advanced degrees in history, political science and/or law. The depth of knowledge they bring to the Court s inquiry in this case is reflected in the biographical information provided in the accompanying Appendix. Amici Curiae have an interest in the Court having a well-informed and accurate understanding of the Anglo-American tradition to have arms from which the Second Amendment originated SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT The ultimate question in this case is whether the Second Amendment is a right that is deeply rooted in 1 No counsel for a party authored this brief in whole or in part, and no counsel or party made a monetary contribution intended to fund the preparation or submission of this brief. No person other than amici curiae, or their counsel, made a monetary contribution to its preparation or submission. The parties have received at least 7 days written notice from amici pursuant to the blanket consents on file herein.
13 2 this Nation s history and tradition and necessary to the Anglo-American conception of ordered liberty that we have inherited such that it applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment s Due Process Clause. Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 149 (1968). In District of Columbia v. Heller, 128 S.Ct. 2783, (2008), the Court examined the English Declaration of Rights of 1689, correctly finding that the right to have arms in Article VII is the basis of the right enshrined in the Second Amendment. The Court also correctly recognized that the Second Amendment right to bear arms was an individual right to have and use arms for self preservation and defense as in its English predecessor. However, contrary to discredited scholarship upon which Heller relied, the right to have arms embodied in the English Declaration of Rights did not intend to protect an individual s right to possess, own, or use arms for private purposes such as to defend a home against burglars (what, in modern times, we mean when we use the term self-defense ). Rather, it referred to a right to possess arms in defense of the realm. Accordingly, the right to own or use arms for private purposes is not a right deeply rooted in our nation s tradition, and should not be incorporated as against the states by the Fourteenth Amendment. The have arms provision in the English Declaration of Rights, which was later codified as the Bill of Rights, provided two protections to the individual. First, the right to have arms gave certain persons
14 3 (qualified Protestants) the right to possess arms to take part in defending the realm against enemies within (i.e., Catholics) as well as foreign invaders. Second, the grant of a right to have arms was a compromise of a dispute over control of the militia that gave Parliament concurrent power (with the sovereign) over arming the landed gentry. It allowed Parliament to invoke its right of self-preservation and resistance should the sovereign usurp the laws, liberties, estates, and Protestant religion of the nation. The Court throughout its history has freely exercised its power to reexamine the [historical] basis of constitutional decisions. Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649, (1944). See also Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, (1993); United States Term Limits v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779, (1995). That the Heller decision is recent only weighs in favor of quick action by the Court to correct its error of historical interpretation. South Carolina v. Gathers, 490 U.S. 805, 825 (1989) (Scalia, J., dissenting) (overruled by Payne v. Tenn., 501 U.S. 808 (1991)). As set forth below, reconstructing the historical meaning of the right to have arms deserves better than Petitioners selective reading and mischaracterization of Blackstone s reference to the natural right of resistance and self-preservation, the 1768 Boston Town Council s militia resolve, and the grievance against Thomas Gage expressed in the Declaration of the Causes and Necessity for Taking Up
15 4 Arms. In order to understand what the right to have arms meant to the Founders, we must examine Parliament s purpose in codifying the right to have arms, and review the political protection this right afforded, as well as what Blackstone and St. George Tucker meant by the natural right of resistance and self-preservation, based on contemporaneous use of those terms. The evidence compiled by scholars discussed herein shows that the Second Amendment gave individual United States citizens the right to take part in the militia to defend their political liberties and to restore their Constitution should, as Blackstone wrote, the sanctions of society and laws [be] found insufficient to restrain the violence of oppression. It is this right of self-preservation and resistance that the Boston Town Council invoked in 1768 and the American colonies exercised when they rebelled against England. Nothing in this brief challenges the fact that eighteenth-century Americans valued the concept of a well-armed citizenry. Nor do the English and Early American Historians express a view here on policy or the wisdom of state laws concerning gun ownership or use of guns for defense of the home. Amici simply urge that the Court base its decision on a wellinformed study of historical facts, which demonstrates that armed self-defense of the home by individuals acting for private interests was not the right enshrined in the Second Amendment
16 5 ARGUMENT I. THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD RE- EXAMINE PRIOR FINDINGS IN LIGHT OF SOUNDER SCHOLARSHIP WHEN IN- TERPRETING RIGHTS IN THE CONSTI- TUTION The Court has in the past reexamined the historical underpinnings of its rulings where appropriate. See, e.g., United States Term Limits v. Thornton, 514 U.S (1995) (examining historical analysis in prior decision and considering new scholarship bearing upon the interpretation of U.S. Const. art. I, 2, art. I, 3, cl. 7 (Qualifications Clauses)). In Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 575 (1993), Justice Souter s concurrence recommended that the Court reconsider the rule of Employment Div. v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 874 (1990), based on recent scholarship raising serious questions about the Smith rule s consonance with the original understanding and purpose of the Free Exercise Clause. Such reconsideration does not conflict with principles of stare decisis. Id. Moreover, that the Heller decision is recent weighs in favor of such an undertaking, as the opinion has not yet acquired the stature that accompanies age. See South Carolina v. Gathers, 490 U.S. 825 (noting that the respect accorded prior decisions increases, rather than decreases, with their antiquity, as the society adjusts itself to their existence, and the surrounding law becomes premised upon their validity. The freshness of error not only deprives it of the respect to
17 6 which long-established practice is entitled, but also counsels that the opportunity of correction be seized at once, before state and federal laws and practices have been adjusted to embody it. ). In this case, the Court is called upon to examine the Anglo-American tradition of the right enshrined in the Second Amendment in order to determine whether that right is fundamental to the American scheme of justice and hence, incorporated under the Due Process Clause to the states. Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968). The Court should undertake its examination of the origins of the Second Amendment afresh in order to properly decide the question presented here. II. THE ALLOWANCE OF A RIGHT TO HAVE ARMS SET FORTH IN THE 1689 DECLA- RATION OF RIGHTS WAS THE PRE- CURSOR TO THE SECOND AMENDMENT A. Heller Recognized This Historical Fact and Its Critical Importance to Interpreting the Second Amendment Heller correctly found that the English right to have arms was an expression of the same right that has long been understood to be the predecessor to our Second Amendment. Heller, 128 S.Ct. at The Court also correctly noted the historical reality that the Second Amendment was not intended to lay down a novel principl[e], but rather codified a right
18 7 inherited from our English Ancestors [.] Id. at Moreover, the Court s ultimate conclusion that this was an individual right that related to defensive purposes was not, strictly speaking, inaccurate. Where the Court erred was by interpreting the quoted terms in a manner divorced from their historical context, reading individual to mean private, defence to mean defense against harm by private individuals acting for private purposes and equating self-preservation with the modern usage of the term self-defense. In doing so, the Court relied heavily on the scholarship of Joyce Lee Malcolm. 2 The overwhelming consensus among leading English historians, however, is that Malcolm s work is flawed on this point. 3 The origins of the Second Amendment in the English right to have arms demonstrate that this right of self-preservation/self-defense gives individuals the right to collectively defend their public interests against organized assault or tyranny, not only in case of a foreign invasion, but, in 1689, in the event of a Catholic plot to overthrow English Protestants. Moreover, the right of self-preservation 2 JOYCE LEE MALCOLM, TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS: THE ORIGINS OF AN ANGLO-AMERICAN RIGHT (1994). 3 See, e.g., LOIS G. SCHWOERER, THE DECLARATION OF RIGHTS, 1689, at (1981); Lois G. Schwoerer, To Hold and Bear Arms: The English Perspective, 76 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 27 (2000); TIM HARRIS, REVOLUTION: THE GREAT CRISIS OF THE BRITISH MONARCHY, , at 343 (2006); David T. Konig, Why the Second Amendment Has a Preamble: Original Public Meaning and the Political Culture of Written Constitutions in Revolutionary America, 56 UCLA L. REV (2009).
19 8 was to be exercised not by individuals acting privately or independently, but as a militia organized by their elected representatives, whether Parliament, the Boston Town Council, or otherwise. B. The Meaning of the Terms Self- Defense and Self-Preservation in the Time Period Leading Up to the English Bill of Rights The doctrines of self-defense and selfpreservation referenced in the debates leading to the 1689 Declaration of Rights surfaced earlier in the 1642 English Civil War, 4 during which the King and Parliament struggled over the division of governmental power, especially with respect to control over the militia. 5 The interest at stake, however, was not protection of the bodily self that we think of when we use these terms today. Rather, the self referred to by these speakers was the public self the collection of rights that lay at the heart of an Englishman s identity, which were intended to be protected by his elected representatives in Parliament. (Thus, the word people was also frequently used interchangeably with Parliament. ) Following 4 J.G.A. POCOCK, THE MACHIAVELLIAN MOMENT: FLORENTINE POLITICAL THOUGHT AND THE ATLANTIC REPUBLICAN TRADITION (2003). 5 LOIS G. SCHWOERER, NO STANDING ARMIES!: THE ANTIARMY IDEOLOGY IN SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLAND (1974).
20 9 the work of Hugo Grotius ( ), 6 numerous political pamphlets of that era show that selfpreservation referred to the philosophical principle that the people are entitled to use force (and arms if necessary) to restore their rights should the sovereign violate the laws, liberties, religion, and estates of the realm. 7 For instance, in A Vindication of Psalme , William Prynne defended Parliament s exercise of what he referred to as the right of self-preservation because it is more unlawfull for Kings to plunder and make War upon their Subject[s] by way of offence, then for the Subjects to take up Armes against Kings in such cases by way of defence. 8 Similarly, in a 1643 pamphlet entitled A Plea for Defensive Armes, Stephen Marshall addressed 6 HUGO GROTIUS, Of War Made by Subjects Against their Superiors, THE RIGHTS OF WAR AND PEACE (1608). 7 For further discussion see Patrick J. Charles, The Right of Self-Preservation and Resistance: A True Legal and Historical Understanding of the Anglo-American Right to Arms, 2010 CARDOZO L. REV. DE NOVO 18, (2010). 8 WILLIAM PRYNNE, A VINDICATION OF PSALME , at 1 (1642). In 1643, Prynne made a similar statement when he explained that Parliament must defend their owne and the Subjects Liberties, persons, privileges, [etc.] against his Majesties offensive Armies which invade them. WILLIAM PRYNNE, THE THIRD PART OF THE SOVERAIGNE POWER OF PARLIAMENTS AND KINGDOMES 4 (1643). The power to engage in such rebellion was agreeable to the very Law of nature and reason, and, therefore, Prynne explained it was lawfull to take up Armes for their Defence when it was needful. Id.
21 10 whether a people, especially the representative body of a State, may (after all humble Remonstrances) defend themselves against the unlawfull violence of the Supr[eme] Magistrate... Endeavoring... to deprive them of their lawfull Liberties. 9 Marshall knew, of course, that the existing law of the realm gave the power to array the militia to the sovereign. However, he argued that Parliament could lawfully array the militia to take up these Defensive arms for the benefit of preservation[.] 10 Another tract entitled The Cause of God and of these Nations described the removal of Charles I from the throne as an [a]ction for self-preservation because the King had forfeited the security we might have laid upon him[.] 11 Use of the rhetoric of self-preservation and defense of themselves in this fashion was not limited to the pamphleteers. During the papist scare of 1643 members of Parliament repeatedly cited selfpreservation as justification for Parliament to call upon the county militias. For instance, Warwickshire s militia was arrayed in the mutual Preservation and Defence of themselves, and the Peace of the said Cities and Counties from all Rapine, Plundering, and Spoiling of said Papists, and ill-affected Persons. In this case, Parliament appealed to those that might 9 STEPHEN MARSHALL, A PLEA FOR DEFENSIVE ARMES, at 3 (1643) Id. at THE CAUSE OF GOD, AND OF THESE NATIONS 3 (1658).
22 11 murmur and complain about being arrayed. Such qualified subjects were reminded that the array was required of them for their own Preservation, as well as for the publick Safety. 12 During the Glorious Revolution of , which laid the foundation for modern parliamentary democracy, the right of self-preservation was again invoked. Thus, Gilbert Burnet s 1688 political tract addressed whether it was Lawful or Necessary for Subjects, to Defend their Religion, Lives, and Liberties. 13 Invoking the right of self-preservation, Burnet asserted that the common principles of all Religion bind the people to preserve themselves and their rights. 14 In another political pamphlet, Robert Ferguson supported Parliament s exercise of the political right of self-preservation, holding that right to be superior to the 1662 Militia Act s prohibition against the taking up of arms against the sovereign. 15 Similar to what John Locke penned in The Second Treatise of Government, 16 Samuel Johnson 12 5 HISTORICAL COLLECTIONS OF PRIVATE PASSAGES OF STATE (1721). 13 GILBERT BURNET, AN ENQUIRY INTO THE MEASURES OF SUBMISSION TO THE SUPREAM AUTHORITY 2 (1688) Id. ROBERT FERGUSON, A BRIEF JUSTIFICATION OF THE PRINCE OF ORANGE S DESCENT INTO ENGLAND (1689). 16 JOHN LOCKE, THE SECOND TREATISE OF GOVERNMENT , 220 (1690). See also Steven J. Heyman, Natural Rights and (Continued on following page)
23 12 argued that Everyman has the Right of Self- Preservation, as [e]ntire under the Civil Government, as he had in a state of Nature when government engages in acts of Illegal Violence... and armed with no manner of Authority at all[.] 17 William Denton wrote of his belief that the people are only bound to submit to such Laws as may preserve themselves in Peace, and Godliness, and from unjust Violence, and Oppression[.] 18 However, if Kings Tyrannize over the People, Denton argued the people may exercise the right of self-preservation because such acts are against the Law of Nature, and consequently against the Law of God; for... all acts of Tyranny are Oppression, and sinful Justice, and therefore cannot be from God. 19 The term self-defence was used in the same sense: principled rebellion of the people against tyranny. In 1649 James Howell described Parliament s rebellion against Charles I as selfdefense. 20 In a 1689 tract entitled The History of Self- Defence in Requital to the History of Passive Obedience, an anonymous writer asserted that Subjects [may] lawfully defend themselves against the Second Amendment, 76 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 237, (2000). 17 SAMUEL JOHNSON, REMARKS UPON DR. SHERLOCK S BOOK 54 (1689). 18 WILLIAM DENTON, JUS REGIMINIS 47 (1689) Id. JAMES HOWELL, AN INQUISITION AFTER BLOOD 4-5 (1649).
24 13 the Encroachments of Princes upon their Laws and Liberties. 21 The author sums up the principle of lawful rebellion by stating: [Until there are] better Arguments for Nonresistance than we have yet seen, we must take the Liberty to say, that in order to the preserving of our Lives against a Tyrant that would take them away, we may as warrantably make use of Self-Defense[.] 22 C. The History of the Declaration of Rights Demonstrates the Nature of the Right Granted by the Second Amendment 1. Political and Historical Background of the Declaration of Rights Article VII of the Declaration of Rights provides That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law. To interpret this provision, one must first understand the forces behind it. Joyce Lee Malcolm argued in the work relied upon in Heller that popular dissatisfaction with the game laws, coupled with the Stuart monarchy s widespread disarmament of Protestants, led Parliament to draft a 21 THE HISTORY OF SELF-DEFENCE IN REQUITAL TO THE HISTORY OF PASSIVE OBEDIENCE 22 (1689). 22 Id. at 30. For additional examples, see Charles, The Right of Self-Preservation, supra, at
25 14 provision that ensured Protestants a right to have arms for private self-defense. 23 Amici, based on a wealth of scholarship, disagree with Malcolm s conclusions. 24 Contrary to Malcolm s view, the have arms provision was the result of a political dispute over whether ultimate control over the militia 25 the fighting force composed of qualified subjects of the realm resided with the sovereign, or in Parliament. Immediately prior to the 1662 Militia Act, Parliament, not the sovereign, held control over militia. The prevailing view, as reflected in a 1658 tract entitled The Leveller was that it was prudent and safe for the People to be masters of their own Arms, and to be commanded in the use of them by a part of themselves, (that is their Parliaments) whose interest is the same with theirs. 26 (Notably, people were masters of their own arms if they were 23 MALCOLM, supra, at See supra note 3 and generally Patrick J. Charles, Arms for Their Defence?: An Historical, Legal, and Textual Analysis of the English Right to Have Arms and Whether the Second Amendment Should Be Incorporated in McDonald v. City of Chicago, 57 No. 3 CLEV. ST. L. REV. 351 (2009). 25 In his treatise entitled AN ARGUMENT SHEWING, THAT A STANDING ARMY IS INCONSISTENT WITH A FREE GOVERNMENT 4 (1697), John Trenchard describes the militia as consisting of the same persons as have the property, which is consistent with the militia statutes of the realm that required members to hold property. 26 THE LEVELLER 9 (1658).
State of Nature v. Government Overview In this lesson, students will discuss what they think life would be like in a state of nature and examine reasons why there is a need for government. They will explore
Non-fiction: Colonization and Revolutionary War The Declaration of Independence Colonization and Revolutionary War The Declaration of Independence During the years right before the Revolutionary War, more
Causes of the American Revolution SS4H4: The students will explain the causes, events and the results of the American Revolution. The Taxation Acts The King of England started taxing the colonists in the
Causes of the Revolution War Test (Do not write on this Test) 1) Which group supported Patrick Henry, a famous American colonist who said, Give me liberty or give me death? a) Loyalist b) Patriots c) Tories
No Taxation Without Representation!! Actions that led to the Revolutionary War Raising Taxes The French and Indian War had caused the British to be in a great deal of debt. They decided to keep a standing
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Immigration & Naturalization Service 100 Typical Questions 1. WHAT ARE THE COLORS OF OUR FLAG? 2. HOW MANY STARS ARE THERE IN OUR FLAG? 3. WHAT COLOR ARE THE STARS ON OUR FLAG? 4.
Page 9 Chapter 3 Government in England and the Colonies T he governments in America today are similar in many ways to the governments of the thirteen colonies. In the original "New England" each town was
Lesson Plan Central Historical Question: Why did the Founders write the? Materials: Copies of Two Historians Interpretations Copies of Declaration Preamble worksheet Copies of Declaration of Independece
Causes of the American Revolution SWBAT Explain the causes of the American Revolution Do Now The Townshend Act fixed taxes on which item: A.Tea B. Glass C. Lead D.All of the Above The Albany Conference
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION Bill of Rights in Action 20:2 Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu, and Rousseau on Government Starting in the 1600s, European philosophers began debating the question of who should
Copyright 2014 Edmentum - All rights reserved. AP US History Blizzard Bag 2014-2015 Era of American Revolution 1. Lord Cornwallis did which of the following? A. He organized French assistance. B. He commanded
Article I Legislative Branch 1. The job of the legislative branch is to Make laws Name Period Federal Constitution Study Guide 2. The legislative branch is divided into two parts or two houses which are
YesWeScan: The FEDERAL CASES Case No. 7,052. [1 Woods, 85.] 1 INSURANCE CO. V. NEW ORLEANS. Circuit Court, D. Louisiana. Nov. Term, 1870. FOREIGN CORPORATIONS TAXATION FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO CONSTITUTION
Language in the news Parsing the right to bear arms: The linguistics of the Second Amendment Dennis Baron it turns out that language means exactly what you want it to mean... The Second Amendment to the
Test - Social Studies Grade 8 Unit 03: American Revolution 2013-2014 A. I 1. In 1776, thirteen colonies in North America did which of the following? A. established the United States of America B. ratified
Domestic Violence Intervention Act CHAPTER 29 OF THE ACTS OF 2001 as amended by 2002, c. 30, s. 2; 2015, c. 6, ss. 6-14 2016 Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of Nova Scotia Published by Authority
Warm up: Using your notes from last class and the posters you created answer the following question: Were the American colonists justified in rebelling against British rule? Ideas of the Revolution Natural
CONVENIENT FICTIONS: A COMPARISON AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF HOBBES AND LOCKE S SOCIAL CONTRACT THEORIES STEPHEN OLYNYK Abstract The social contract theory is the theoretical foundation that underlies all
AP EUROPEAN HISTORY 2008 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B) Question 7 Compare and contrast the political ideas of Hobbes and Locke. 9 8 Points Thesis clearly compares and contrasts the political ideas of Hobbes
LESSON OVERVIEW BILL OF RIGHTS: YOU MEAN I VE GOT RIGHTS? GOAL TIME NUTSHELL CONCEPTS Students will be introduced to the rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights and other important constitutional amendments.
CHAPTER FOUR: REVOLUTIONARY AMERICA: CHANGE AND TRANSFORMATION, 1764 1783 READING AND STUDY GUIDE I. Tightening the Reins of Empire A. Taxation without Representation B. The Stamp Act Crisis C. An Assault
Central Historical Question: How did Americans react to Shays rebellion? Materials: PowerPoint on Articles of Confederation Copies of Textbook Excerpt on Copies of Thomas Jefferson Letter Copies of Guiding
APEH Review Western European Governments in the 17 th Century The English Civil War & Restoration The Glorious Revolution The Dutch Republic Cardinals Richelieu & Mazarin in France England in the 17 th
Alexander Hamilton Background Information: Alexander Hamilton was born in the British West Indies in 1755, the son of James Hamilton and Rachel Lavine, who were not yet married. Hamilton s father abandoned
The following are sample U.S. History and Government Questions that may be asked during the Naturalization Exam. Typical Questions 1. What are the colors of our flag? 2. What do the stars on the flag mean?
CK Lesson #1 Free Enterprise Constitution Signed: September, 1787 Advantages of Free Enterprise 1. You choose what you do. 2. is always needed for success. 3. Personal is an important privilege of free
Basic Timeline 1781 Articles of Confederation 1776 Declaration of Independence 1861-1865 Civil War 1787 U.S. Constitution 1865-1877 Reconstruction Historical Context: The Revolution The American Revolution
Lesson 1: The Constitution and Governance OVERVIEW In this lesson, students explore constitutional government. First, students read and discuss an introductory reading about the origin and principles of
A PETITION for Enforcement of the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States To: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States of America WHEREAS: 1. The Second Amendment to the U.S.
With Sovereign Reverence Thomas Jefferson Quotes on Religious Liberty Thomas Jefferson is considered one of the greatest champions of religious liberty in American history. He often wrote of its importance
Articles Was the Constitution Illegally Adopted? Michael P. Farris1* Abstract: This article analyzes the claim that the Constitution was illegally ratified in 1788. This claim is founded on the premise
McCulloch v. Maryland 1819 Appellant: James William McCulloch Appellee: State of Maryland Appellant s Claim: That a Maryland state tax imposed on the Bank of the United States was unconstitutional interference
MARTIN O'MALLEY, Governor Ch. 504 Chapter 504 (Senate Bill 422) AN ACT concerning Criminal Procedure Office of the Public Defender Representation Criminal Defendants Citations and Appearances FOR the purpose
What kind of democracy? Pure democracy Greeks Republican in form NOT Republican Party representative White Males only landowning Left door open to non-landowning later States Drafting of State Constitutions
THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN CYPRUS A. GENERAL (i) Historical background The island of Cyprus in the northeastern part of the Mediterranean lies forty miles away from Asia Minor, sixty miles away from
Courts in the Community Colorado Judicial Branch Office of the State Court Administrator Lesson: Objective: Activities: Outcomes: Colorado and U.S. Constitutions Students understand similarities and differences
No. 12-52 In The Supreme Court of the United States DAN S CITY USED CARS, INC., D/B/A DAN S CITY AUTO BODY, v. Petitioner, ROBERT PELKEY, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire
***CURRENT NATURALIZATION TEST*** Sample U.S. History and Government Questions for the Current Naturalization Test USCIS will begin administering a redesigned (new) naturalization test on October 1, 2008.
The Causes of the American Revolution I. Effects of the French & Indian War (Seven Years' War) A. Proclamation of 1763 1. War ends with the signing of the Treaty of Paris. 2. Boundary drawn. American colonists
Sample Test: Colonialism and Foundations of America Use the following map and your knowledge of Social Studies to answer question 1. 1. What key activity does this map depict? A Middle Passage B Trans-Saharan
Problems After the War War increased tensions between British & the Colonists. 1. England becomes more involved in the running of the colonies. 2. Proclamation Line of 1763 3. Standing Army 4. How to pay
THE SECOND AMENDMENT AND GUN CONTROL Erwin Chemerinsky * The second amendment case decided this term was District of Columbia v. Heller. 1 Thirty-two years ago the District of Columbia adopted a law prohibiting
1 What are the colors of our flag? Red, white, and blue 2 What do the stars on the flag mean? One for each state 3 How many stars are there on our flag? There are 50 stars on our flag. 4 What color are
The American Colonies Declare Independence Copy the notes in red. Write the notes in blue in your own words. The words in black are for your information. As taken from: mrkash.com/activities/independence.ppt
The Loyalists were colonists who stayed loyal to Britain and King George III during the American Revolution. They were against American independence. There were about 500,000 Loyalists when the American
RELIGION IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS BACKGROUND RELIGIOUS LIBERTY IN AMERICA & OUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS Since its founding in 1913, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has been guided by its mandate of combating bigotry,
NAME: Global History III Enlightenment Two Views of the Social Contract In the 1600s, two English thinkers, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, set forth ideas that were to become key to the Enlightenment. Both
Mr. Long Anderson High School Cincinnati, Ohio THE ROAD TO REVOLUTION 1756-1775 A4W 10.9.17 TWO REVOLUTIONARY AMERICA 4 ROAD TO REVOLUTION, 1754-1775 (Ch 4) A. Relationship with Britain B. The French and
Teacher s Name: Employee Number: School: Social Studies Lesson Plan- SS.5.C.3.5 Identify the fundamental rights of all citizens as enumerated in the Bill of Rights. 1. Title: The Bill of Rights - Fifth
Consent, Obligation, and the Social Contract: John Locke John Locke (1632-1704) Major English philosopher of the early modern period. Exponent of empiricism (later given its perhaps most radical formulation
American Revolution Must-Knows Visual Review Clearly Great Britain (and other countries like France and Spain) believed in the idea of setting up colonies to benefit economically from them. Question #1
Welcome to the Department of Defense Constitution Day Knowing what is in the U.S. Constitution and why the Constitution is relevant to us today is fundamental to our being able to defend it. As federal
HISTORY OF THE CRIMINAL LAW IN NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR Now it is a terrible business to mark a man out for the vengeance of men. But it is a thing to which a man can grow accustomed, as he can to other
Cite as: 577 U. S. (2016) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES V. L. v. E. L., ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA PER CURIAM. No. 15 648 Decided March 7, 2016 A Georgia
Background on the First Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND IN RE APPLICATION OF THE : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO : Misc. No. 01-189 (Magistrate Judge Bredar) 18 U.S.C. 2703(d)
OUTLINE Chapter 6 The Revolution Within This chapter covers the same time period as the previous chapter, but it focuses on how the American Revolution became more than a movement to separate from Britain.
Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 5 th Floor, Park Plaza
Freedom and Equality: American Principles at Odds? (Grade 6-8) Purpose of the Lesson: This lesson will use close reading of documentary selections and class discussion to analyze the concepts of freedom
The Road to Change From the Declaration of Independence to the Constitution From the Declaration of Independence to the Constitution 1776: Colonists sign the Declaration of Independence 1783: Colonists
1965 Alabama Literacy Test 1. Which of the following is a right guaranteed by the Bill of Rights? Public Education Employment Trial by Jury Voting 2. The federal census of population is taken every five
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA STATE OF ARIZONA EX REL. WILLIAM G. MONTGOMERY, MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE HARRIETT CHAVEZ, JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE
The American Revolution, 1763-1783 [excerpt] The American Revolution, 1763-1783 [excerpt] By Pauline Maier This essay excerpt is provided courtesy of the Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History. INDEPENDENCE
U.S. Constitution: Context and Content Teaching American History Institute: Leadership in America Chad Montrie, University of Massachusetts Lowell From Colonies to States Following declarations of independence
Province of Alberta Statutes of Alberta, Current as of June 1, 2013 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 7 th Floor, Park Plaza 10611-98 Avenue Edmonton, AB
Benjamin Franklin 1) History affords us many instances of the ruin of states, by the prosecution of measures ill suited to the temper and genius of their people. The ordaining of laws in favor of one part
Principles in Collision: Labor Union rights v. Employee civil Rights Barry Winograd Arbitrator and mediator in Oakland, California Member of the National Academy of Arbitrators Adjunct faculty of the law
1 2 3 4 5 6 Imperial Breakdown 1763 1774 The Crisis of Imperial Authority What new challenges did the British government face in North America after 1763? Republican Ideology and Colonial Protest How did
A Stock Insurance Company, herein called the Company PUBLIC ENTITY POLICY LAW ENFORCEMENT LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM OCCURRENCE COVERAGE Various provisions in this policy restrict coverage. Please read the
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 31843 OLEN LEADER, v. Petitioner-Appellant, LARRY D. REINER, Trial Court Administrator, Fourth Judicial District Court; and DARLA WILLIAMSON, Administrative
BILL OF RIGHTS Lesson Plan GRADES 6-8 BILL OF RIGHTS GRADES 6-8 About this Lesson This lesson, which includes a pre-lesson and several postlesson ideas, is intended to be used in conjunction with the National
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal
FOR PUBLICATION IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS 1 COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, Plaintiff, v. AMBROSIO T. OGUMORO, Defendant. DPS CASE NO. 0-00
1 Creating a New Nation Overview: At the end of the Revolutionary War, the new nation was faced with another extremely difficult task creating a single, unified country out of a loose association of states,
Unofficial translation MARTIAL LAW, B.E. 2457 (1914) Preamble Phrabat Somdet Phra Paramintharamaha Vajiravudh Phra Mongkut Klao Chaoyuhua is graciously pleased to proclaim that the powers of the military
Name: American Revolution 1. The Tea Act was passed by British Parliament. It said that... a. colonists in America were not allowed to drink tea b. colonists in America must produce more tea for Britain
champions OF FREEDOM C R I T I C A L E N G A G E M E N T Q U E S T I O N What Founding documents influenced the First Amendment? O V E R V I E W James Madison said the Constitution was the work of many
BILL OF RIGHTS  An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown Whereas the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons assembled at Westminster, lawfully,