State & Local Tax Alert

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "State & Local Tax Alert"

Transcription

1 State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Minnesota Tax Court Denies Use of Multistate Tax Compact s Equally-Weighted Three-Factor Apportionment Formula Election On June 19, the Minnesota Tax Court granted the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue s motion for summary judgment and denied a taxpayer s election to use the equallyweighted three-factor apportionment formula provided in the Multistate Tax Compact. 1 Minnesota adopted the Compact in 1983, but in 1987, Minnesota specifically repealed Articles III and IV, which provide for the equally-weighted three-factor apportionment formula election and the standard apportionment provisions contained in the Compact. Background Kimberly-Clark and its subsidiaries are part of a unitary group that manufactures consumer products that are used around the world. Kimberly-Clark timely filed its Minnesota corporate franchise tax returns for the tax years. Between 1989 and 2009, Kimberly-Clark apportioned its income to Minnesota using the required three-factor apportionment formula with sales weighed more heavily, pursuant to Minnesota statute. 2 In 2013, Kimberly-Clark amended its returns for the tax years and elected to utilize the equally-weighted three-factor property, payroll, and sales apportionment formula as provided under Articles III and IV of the Compact as it existed in Minnesota law prior to 1987, and requested a refund in the total amount of $1,205,749 in tax, plus interest. Minnesota adopted the Compact in 1983, codifying the terms of the Compact in Minn. Stat. Sec Under Articles III and IV of the Compact, taxpayers are provided with the option to elect the use of an equally-weighted three-factor payroll, property, and sales factor apportionment formula, as well as the standard apportionment provisions contained in the Compact. In 1987, Minnesota amended its version of the Compact, repealing Articles III and IV. 3 At that time, the apportionment formula applicable for purposes of the Minnesota corporation income tax required weighting the sales factor at 70 percent, with the property and payroll factors each weighted at 15 percent. Between the 2007 and 2014 tax years, Minnesota phased in the use of single sales factor apportionment. 4 In 2013, Minnesota repealed the Compact in its entirety. Release date July 2, 2015 States Minnesota Issue/Topic Corporation Income Tax Contact details Dan Bartholet T E Dale Busacker T E Bill Lunka T E Caroline Balfour T E Jamie C. Yesnowitz Washington, DC T E Chuck Jones Chicago T E Lori Stolly Cincinnati T E 1 Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Comm r of Revenue, Minnesota Tax Court, File No R, June 19, MINN. STAT , subd See Act of May 28, 1987, ch. 268, art. 1, 74, 1987 MINN. LAWS 1039, , Id. at 75, 127, 1987 MINN. LAWS 1039, ,

2 Grant Thornton LLP - 2 The Commissioner denied Kimberly-Clark s refund claims, and Kimberly-Clark timely appealed to the Minnesota Tax Court. No issues of material fact were in dispute, only issues in application of the law. As such, the Commissioner and Kimberly-Clark both filed for summary judgment. Kimberly-Clark took the position that Minnesota may not unilaterally repeal Articles III and IV of the Compact as this action violated the Federal Compact Clause, the Contract Clause contained in the U.S. and Minnesota Constitutions, and was an invalid unilateral modification of the Compact. It was Kimberly-Clark s position that under the Compact as adopted by Minnesota, if Minnesota did not want to comply with the provisions of the Compact, it was required to enact a statute to repeal the Compact in full. 5 Although Articles III and IV of the Compact were repealed in 1987, it was Kimberly-Clark s position that because Minnesota did not repeal the Compact in full until 2013, Minnesota remained bound to allow taxpayers the election to use the provisions of Articles III and IV for tax periods prior to the 2013 repeal date. The Department argued that since Articles III and IV of the Compact were repealed in 1987, taxpayers were no longer allowed to make the election to utilize an equally-weighted three factor apportionment formula. Additionally, under a provision contained in the Minnesota Constitution, [t]he power of taxation shall never be surrendered, suspended or contracted away and therefore, Minnesota could not surrender its power to tax under the Constitution. 6 The Department also relied on the U.S. Supreme Court s decision in U.S. Steel Corporation in which the Supreme Court held that Compact member states retain the freedom to adopt or reject rules and regulations of the Commission. 7 The Department rejected Kimberly-Clark s claim for refund and took the position that Minnesota has the freedom to repeal provisions contained in the Compact. The case was heard before all three judges of the Minnesota Tax Court. Application of Compact Clause Based on its application of the law, the Tax Court granted the Commissioner s motion for summary judgment. Summary judgment is proper when there are no genuine issues of material fact shown through the pleadings and the record in the case. 8 Because the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, the Court determined there were no issues of material fact. In evaluating Minnesota s repeal of Articles III and IV of the Compact, the Tax Court first looked at the Compact Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Compact Clause states: No State shall, without the Consent of Congress enter into any agreement or compact with another State. 9 The clause s literal interpretation was rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court, which held that the, application of the Compact Clause is limited to agreements that are directed to the formation of any combination tending to the increase of political power in the States, which may encroach upon or interfere with the just supremacy of the 5 MINN. STAT , Article X(2) (1983 Supp.). 6 See MINN. CONST. art X, 1. 7 See U.S. Steel Corp. v. Multistate Tax Commission, 434 U.S. 452, 473 (1978). 8 Minn. R. Civ. P U.S. CONST. art. I, 10, cl. 3.

3 Grant Thornton LLP - 3 United States. 10 Since Congress was not required to approve the Multistate Tax Compact, the Tax Court said that the Compact is to be construed as state law. The Tax Court looked at the interpretation of the Compact as a statute versus a contract. Statutes are interpreted to, ascertain and effectuate the intention of the legislature. 11 Alternatively, contracts are interpreted to ascertain and enforce the intent of the parties. 12 The Tax Court stated that it assumed that the Compact created binding obligations for Minnesota because it was a contract, rejecting the Commissioner s claim that the Compact is a model law with only advisory effect. Application of Unmistakability Doctrine Considering the Compact as a contract, the Tax Court then considered the application of the unmistakability doctrine in order to determine whether the state s sovereign powers were constricted by the contract. Under the unmistakability doctrine, sovereign powers remain intact unless surrendered in unmistakable terms. 13 The Court stated that there was a clear-statement requirement to satisfy the unmistakable doctrine test because [s]tates rarely relinquish their sovereign powers, so when they do we would expect a clear indication of such devolution. 14 The Tax Court rejected Kimberly-Clark s argument that the unmistakability doctrine does not apply to the Compact. In fact, the Tax Court agreed with the notion that interstate compacts actually exemplify implementation of the unmistakability doctrine. The Tax Court also rejected Kimberly-Clark s position that the Compact contained language prohibiting Minnesota from separately repealing Articles III and IV without repealing the entire Compact. The Tax Court pointed to Article IX of the Compact, dealing with arbitration, as a section of the Compact that in contrast to Articles III and IV, had specific language binding states to that section. As a result, the Tax Court held that because there was no language in the Compact as adopted by Minnesota stating that the specific provisions of Articles III and IV of the Compact could not be altered or repealed, Minnesota retained the power to repeal the provisions of Articles III and IV without repealing the Compact in its entirety. The Tax Court also considered whether the withdrawal provisions contained in Article X(2) of the Compact satisfied the unmistakability doctrine and would require the state to repeal the Compact in whole. The Tax Court determined that while the withdrawal provision provided guidance on how a state could withdraw from the entire Compact, this provision did not explicitly provide that a state was surrendering its sovereignty with regards to making changes to the Compact. Historical Treatment of States Repealing Provisions of Compact Additionally, the Tax Court examined the history of the Compact and determined that the Compact drafters would not have intended to relinquish state sovereign authority and contract away the states taxing powers, as the drafters were state tax officials and attorney generals. This was the case even though the general purpose of the Compact was an 10 U.S. Steel, 434 U.S. at MINN. STAT (2014). 12 Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord s Inc., 764 N.W.2d 359, 364 (Minn. 2009). 13 See generally United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839 (1996). 14 Tarrant Regional Water Dist. v. Herrmann, 133 S. Ct. 2120, 2133 (2013).

4 Grant Thornton LLP - 4 increase in state uniformity and a reduction in the risk of Congressional intervention in this area. In the Tax Court s view, the history surrounding the states course of performance under the Compact, which allowed for significant departures from Articles III and IV of the Compact by states without requiring full withdrawal from the Compact, also supported the notion that state sovereign authority was not surrendered. 15 The Tax Court also noted that, when Minnesota adopted the Compact in 1983, the state did not consider itself bound to enact the Model Act version of the Compact. When Minnesota enacted the Compact in 1983, the nonbusiness income portions of the Compact were clearly omitted. The Tax Court concluded that this action manifested the Minnesota legislature s understanding that member States were free to adopt or alter the Compact s allocation and apportionment provisions as they saw fit. The Tax Court concluded that Kimberly-Clark did not carry its burden to prove that the repeal of Articles III and IV of the Compact in 1987 was unconstitutional and therefore granted the Commissioner s motion for summary judgment. 16 Assuming that Kimberly- Clark will appeal this decision by the Tax Court, their appeal will be made directly to the Minnesota Supreme Court. Commentary Taxpayers have brought similar cases in California, Oregon, Texas and Michigan asserting their right to make an election under the provisions of Article III of the Compact to use the equally-weighted three-factor apportionment formula. Interestingly, the Tax Court briefly addressed the Michigan litigation, focusing on the Michigan Supreme Court s dissenting opinion which stated that the Compact created no contractual obligation to adhere to Articles III and IV of the Compact. 17 The Tax Court noted that since the Michigan Supreme Court determined that Michigan had not repealed the Compact when its decision was issued, and because the Compact s election provision was in effect during the year at issue in the litigation, the majority had no reason to analyze whether the Compact contractually obligated the state not to alter Articles III and IV of the Compact. However, the history of the Compact in Minnesota presents different factual issues from the cases that are being litigated in these other states because, back in 1987, Minnesota repealed Articles III and IV of the Compact which contained the provision allowing taxpayers to elect to use the equally-weighted three-factor apportionment formula. As a 15 As an example, the Tax Court cited to Florida s repeal of Articles III and IV of the Compact only five years after joining as a founding member of the Compact, yet Florida continued to be treated as a member of the Compact. The Tax Court also pointed to Minnesota s continuing treatment as a member to the Compact after the 1987 repeal of Articles III and IV. 16 While all three justices of the Tax Court found in favor of the Department, the Chief Justice concurred specially to state her disagreement with section III of the Tax Court s decision. The Chief Justice pointed to mischaracterizations of the taxpayer s position as stated in the taxpayer s actual submissions to the Tax Court. 17 International Business Machines Corp. v. Department of Treasury, 852 N.W.2d 865 (Mich. 2014), reh g denied, 855 N.W.2d 512 (2014). Note that following Michigan s subsequent enactment of legislation that retroactively repealed the Michigan statutes adopting the Compact effective January 1, 2008, the Michigan Court of Claims denied the taxpayer s election to use the equally-weighted threefactor apportionment formula provided in the Compact. International Business Machines Corp. v. Department of Treasury, Michigan Court of Claims, No MT, April 28, 2015.

5 Grant Thornton LLP - 5 result, Kimberly-Clark had a difficult and heavy burden to convince the Tax Court that it needed to restore the provisions of Articles III and IV which had been repealed in This decision by the Tax Court represents a significant victory for the state because the attorney for the state had advised the Tax Court that a decision against the state would require the state to potentially pay $700 million in refunds to similarly situated taxpayers who would file amended returns electing the use of the equally-weighted three-factor apportionment formula. The Tax Court did not reference this statement in its opinion. The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not intended and should not be construed as legal, accounting or tax advice or opinion provided by Grant Thornton LLP to the reader. This material may not be applicable to or suitable for specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of nontax and other tax factors. Contact Grant Thornton LLP or other tax professionals prior to taking any action based upon this information. Grant Thornton LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. No part of this document may be reproduced, retransmitted or otherwise redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, re-keying or using any information storage and retrieval system without written permission from Grant Thornton LLP. This document supports the marketing of professional services by Grant Thornton LLP. It is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. Persons interested in the subject of this document should contact Grant Thornton or their tax advisor to discuss the potential application of this subject matter to their particular facts and circumstances. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed.

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Michigan Enacts Legislation Designed to Eliminate Multistate Tax Compact Apportionment Election Refunds Allowed

More information

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Maryland Tax Court Holds Intangible Holding Company Had Corporate Income Tax Nexus The Maryland Tax Court has held

More information

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Texas Appeals Court Denies Use of Compact s Three-Factor Formula As Revised Texas Franchise Tax Is Not Considered

More information

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP New Jersey Tax Court Allows Taxpayer to Revise Federal Adjusted Basis for Corporation Business Tax Purposes The

More information

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Idaho Supreme Court Addresses Cost of Performance Application On October 29, the Idaho Supreme Court upheld a district

More information

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Illinois Enacts Legislation to Create Independent Tax Tribunal On August 28, Illinois Governor Pat Quinn approved

More information

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Minnesota Tax Court Holds Merchandisers Create Corporate Income Tax Nexus for Out-of-State Distributor The Minnesota

More information

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP South Carolina Holds Electric Utility Company Is Manufacturer, Gross Proceeds Not Includable in Sales Denominator

More information

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Release date October 19, 2011 New Jersey Throwout Rule Litigation and Potential Issues In Whirlpool Properties,

More information

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Texas ALJ Holds Software Delivered to Texas Is Taxable Use On July 2, 2015, a Texas Comptroller Administrative

More information

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Rhode Island Adopts Combined Reporting, Single Sales Factor Apportionment and Market-Based Sourcing Rhode Island

More information

Tax Management. Allocation/Apportionment

Tax Management. Allocation/Apportionment Tax Management Weekly State Tax Report Reproduced with permission from Tax Management Weekly State Tax Report, 2014 WSTR 50, 12/12/2014. Copyright 2014 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033)

More information

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP GT Perspective on the Marketplace Fairness Act The Marketplace Fairness Act (MFA), currently under consideration

More information

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP New Mexico Supreme Court Holds Online Retailer Has Substantial Nexus for Gross Receipts Tax Due to In-State Retailer

More information

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Michigan Court of Appeals Holds Certain Cloud Computing Not Subject to Use Tax On October 27, 2015, the Michigan

More information

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP U.S. Bankruptcy Court Rules Imposition of Oregon Corporate Excise Tax on Out-of-State Holding Company Was Unconstitutional

More information

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Utah District Court Clarifies Scope of Discretionary Authority Provision as Applied to Transfer Pricing Issues

More information

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Release date State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP New York Tax Tribunal Holds State Could Not Force Combined Reporting with One of Taxpayer s Subsidiaries

More information

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Texas Comptroller Amends Revised Texas Franchise Tax Cost of Goods Sold Rule On June 5, the Texas Comptroller of

More information

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Delaware Enacts Legislation Adopting Single Sales Factor Apportionment On January 27, 2016, Delaware Governor Jack

More information

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Louisiana Enacts Income and Franchise Tax Changes Which May Require Taxpayer Action by June 30, 2015 On June 19,

More information

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Release date May 16, 2011 States California California Enacts Voluntary Compliance Initiative, Expands Tax Shelter

More information

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Major Nexus Developments of 2010 Examined; States Follow Trend of Adopting Bright-Line Nexus Standards During 2010,

More information

S206587 SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. 2012 CA S. Ct. Briefs 6587; 2012 CA S. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 1829. November 13, 2012

S206587 SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. 2012 CA S. Ct. Briefs 6587; 2012 CA S. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 1829. November 13, 2012 THE GILLETTE COMPANY & SUBSIDIARIES, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, AN AGENCY OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Respondent. S206587 SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2012

More information

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Texas Comptroller Rules on Electricity Transmission and Distribution Cost Inclusion in COGS Deduction On March

More information

MTC THREE-FACTOR ELECTION IN CALIFORNIA, MICHIGAN, AND TEXAS

MTC THREE-FACTOR ELECTION IN CALIFORNIA, MICHIGAN, AND TEXAS MTC THREE-FACTOR ELECTION IN CALIFORNIA, MICHIGAN, AND TEXAS Giles Sutton, Jamie C. Yesnowitz, Chuck Jones, Terry Conley, Terry Gaul, and Ralph Ourlian* of Grant Thornton LLP look at whether the business

More information

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Nevada Enacts Budget Bill Including New Commerce Tax On June 9, 2015, Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval signed legislation

More information

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP San Francisco Voters Approve New Gross Receipts Tax On November 6, San Francisco voters approved Measure E, which

More information

STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. February 10, 2014

STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. February 10, 2014 STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Lisa Pister Court Administrator Minnesota Tax Court 245 Minnesota Judicial Center 25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155 February

More information

State Tax Return. Minnesota Taxpayers Lose the Battle and Win the War Section 338(h)(10) Gain Held Nonbusiness Income by Minnesota Tax Court

State Tax Return. Minnesota Taxpayers Lose the Battle and Win the War Section 338(h)(10) Gain Held Nonbusiness Income by Minnesota Tax Court June 2006 Volume 13 Number 6 State Tax Return Minnesota Taxpayers Lose the Battle and Win the War Section 338(h)(10) Gain Held Nonbusiness Income by Minnesota Tax Court Matt Cristy (404) 581-8257 Atlanta

More information

Co-Chairs, NCSL Executive Committee Task Force on State and Local Taxation

Co-Chairs, NCSL Executive Committee Task Force on State and Local Taxation August 11, 2013 Dear Legislator, Bruce W. Starr Senator Or egon Presid ent, NCSL Thomas W. Wright Chief of Staff to Speak er Alaska Staff Chair, NCSL William T. P ound Executive Dir ector On behalf of

More information

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-14-00197-CV Graphic Packaging Corporation, Appellant v. Glen Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of The State of Texas; and Ken Paxton, Attorney

More information

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Louisiana Enacts Three-Period Tax Amnesty Program Louisiana has enacted a tax amnesty program that will be held

More information

Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States No. 15-1442 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States THE GILLETTE COMPANY, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC., AND SIGMA-ALDRICH, INC., v. Petitioners, CALIFORNIA

More information

Joe Huddleston, LL.D. Executive Director. 2012 North Eastern States Tax Officials Association Conference

Joe Huddleston, LL.D. Executive Director. 2012 North Eastern States Tax Officials Association Conference Joe Huddleston, LL.D. Executive Director 2012 North Eastern States Tax Officials Association Conference 2 Multistate Tax Commission An intergovernmental state tax agency established in 1967 by states adopting

More information

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP North Carolina Enacts Significant Income, Franchise and Sales Tax Legislation, Contingent Upon Further Legislative

More information

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP President Obama Signs Legislation Making Internet Tax Freedom Act Permanent On February 24, 2016, President Barack

More information

Performance Marketing Ass n, Inc. v. Hamer, Illinois Supreme Court, No. 114496, October 18, 2013

Performance Marketing Ass n, Inc. v. Hamer, Illinois Supreme Court, No. 114496, October 18, 2013 October 2013 Illinois Provisions of Click-Through Nexus Law Held Void The Illinois Supreme Court held that the definition provisions in Public Act 96-1544 (H.B. 3659), Laws 2011, the sales tax click-through

More information

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP

State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Texas Comptroller Issues Letter Ruling Discussing Sales Tax Treatment of Various Internet and Cloud Computing Services

More information

State and local tax update for law firms. Baker Tilly refers to Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP,

State and local tax update for law firms. Baker Tilly refers to Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, State and local tax update for law firms Baker Tilly refers to Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, an independently owned and managed member of Baker Tilly International. 2010 Baker Tilly Virchow Krause,

More information

NO. CV 11 6010197 JEFFERSON ALLEN, EVITA ALLEN : SUPERIOR COURT. v. : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF : NEW BRITAIN

NO. CV 11 6010197 JEFFERSON ALLEN, EVITA ALLEN : SUPERIOR COURT. v. : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF : NEW BRITAIN NO. CV 11 6010197 JEFFERSON ALLEN, EVITA ALLEN : SUPERIOR COURT : TAX SESSION v. : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF : NEW BRITAIN KEVIN SULLIVAN, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE SERVICES : APRIL 29, 2015 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

More information

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-1189 Rudolph Cooper, Relator, vs. Minnesota Department

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, LABOR & ECONOMIC GROWTH MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL David L. Goding, Petitioner, MTT Docket Nos. 368819 and 370995 Assessment Nos. P551396 and Q511298 v Case Type: Income

More information

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING 08-08 WARNING

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING 08-08 WARNING TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING 08-08 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation of

More information

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012).

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012). This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A13-0824 In re: Life Insurance Policy No. 1642947-2,

More information

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida No. SC04-110 AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE [December 2, 2004] PER CURIAM. The Florida Bar s Workers Compensation Rules Committee has filed its

More information

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-1884. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jolene Kay Coleman, Appellant.

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-1884. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jolene Kay Coleman, Appellant. STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-1884 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jolene Kay Coleman, Appellant. Filed January 3, 2012 Affirmed Kalitowski, Judge Hennepin County District Court File No.

More information

In The Supreme Court of the United States

In The Supreme Court of the United States No. 22O141, Original ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF TEXAS, v. Plaintiff, STATE OF NEW MEXICO and STATE OF COLORADO,

More information

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-354. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners, Respondent, vs. Curtis L. Cich, D.C., et al., Appellants.

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-354. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners, Respondent, vs. Curtis L. Cich, D.C., et al., Appellants. STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-354 Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners, Respondent, vs. Curtis L. Cich, D.C., et al., Appellants. Filed September 14, 2010 Affirmed in part and reversed

More information

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No. 2216. 214th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Senator LORETTA WEINBERG District 37 (Bergen)

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No. 2216. 214th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Senator LORETTA WEINBERG District 37 (Bergen) SENATE, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED AUGUST, 0 Sponsored by: Senator LORETTA WEINBERG District (Bergen) SYNOPSIS Enters New Jersey in Nurse Multistate Licensure Compact. CURRENT VERSION

More information

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012).

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012). This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A12-2155 Marvin Orlando Johnson, petitioner, Appellant,

More information

FAQ: Golden parachute payments under Section 280G

FAQ: Golden parachute payments under Section 280G FAQ: Golden parachute payments under Section 280G Companies that are planning for a merger or acquisition have various issues to consider as they prepare for the transaction, one of the issues being golden

More information

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012).

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012). This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A13-2000 Tylor John Neuman, petitioner, Respondent,

More information

VOLUME NO. 51 OPINION NO. 11

VOLUME NO. 51 OPINION NO. 11 VOLUME NO. 51 OPINION NO. 11 CONTRACTS - When alteration is permissible; COUNTIES - Group health plans; payments to employees in lieu of participation; COUNTY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES - Group health plans;

More information

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-1982 Steven T. Meister, M. D., et al., Appellants,

More information

STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION by TERRY GODDARD ATTORNEY GENERAL September 6, 2006 No. I06-003 (R06-024) Re: Amending Contracts of Certain School Employees to

More information

Income/Franchise: Maryland: Tax Court Finds Companies Have Nexus Based on Enterprise Dependency with In-State Affiliates

Income/Franchise: Maryland: Tax Court Finds Companies Have Nexus Based on Enterprise Dependency with In-State Affiliates Multistate Tax State Tax Matters July 31, 2015 In this issue: Maryland: Tax Court Finds Companies Have Nexus Based on Enterprise Dependency with In-State Affiliates... 1 New York City: Department of Finance

More information

The Court further held that the tax is inherently discriminatory and operates as a tariff.

The Court further held that the tax is inherently discriminatory and operates as a tariff. from State and Local Tax Services US Supreme Court - Failure to provide a credit against Maryland s local portion of personal income tax for out-of-state income taxes paid is unconstitutional May 21, 2015

More information

HP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act

HP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. Be it enacted by the People of the

More information

State Tax Treatment of Federally Disregarded Entities: Michigan's Kmart Saga

State Tax Treatment of Federally Disregarded Entities: Michigan's Kmart Saga Journal of Multistate Taxation and Incentives Volume 20, Number 5, August 2010 Department: S CORPORATIONS, PARTNERSHIPS, AND LLCs State Tax Treatment of Federally Disregarded Entities: Michigan's Kmart

More information

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2010).

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2010). This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2010). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-1742 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Nicholas

More information

7.3 PREHEARING CONFERENCES AND SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES

7.3 PREHEARING CONFERENCES AND SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES 7.3 PREHEARING CONFERENCES AND SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES 7.3.1 Prehearing Conferences A contested case is commenced when the notice of and order for hearing or other authorized pleading is served by the agency.

More information

Overview of State Taxation The Multistate Tax Commission

Overview of State Taxation The Multistate Tax Commission Overview of State Taxation The Multistate Tax Commission Joe Huddleston, LL.D. Executive Director, Multistate Tax Commission 2014 Arizona Tax Conference October 8-10, 2014 Tucson, Arizona Background &

More information

March 30, 1999. No. 8267

March 30, 1999. No. 8267 March 30, 1999 No. 8267 This opinion is issued in response to a question from Jon Yunker, Director, Oregon Department of Administrative Services, concerning the state personal income tax treatment of private

More information

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO Filed 8/27/14 Tesser Ruttenberg etc. v. Forever Entertainment CA2/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying

More information

COST Pacific Northwest Regional State Tax Meeting What s Shaking in California

COST Pacific Northwest Regional State Tax Meeting What s Shaking in California COST Pacific Northwest Regional State Tax Meeting What s Shaking in California Council on State Taxation 17 November 2015 Polling Question What s shaking most in your (work) world with regard to the franchise

More information

# $There is substantial authority for the tax

# $There is substantial authority for the tax !" If there is substantial authority for a position taken on a tax return, neither the taxpayer nor the tax preparer will be subject to the penalty for underreporting income even if the IRS successfully

More information

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP U.S. District Court Finds Delaware Unclaimed Property Audit Procedures Unconstitutional On June 28, 2016, the United

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS THOMSON REUTERS INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED May 13, 2014 v No. 313825 Court of Claims DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, LC No. 11-000091-MT Defendant-Appellee. Before:

More information

Case 1:07-cv-00320-JFM Document 38 Filed 07/24/08 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 1:07-cv-00320-JFM Document 38 Filed 07/24/08 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Case 1:07-cv-00320-JFM Document 38 Filed 07/24/08 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL * OF BALTIMORE, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * Civil No. JFM

More information

TIP on Tax: How cloud computing providers can weather the on-going tax storm

TIP on Tax: How cloud computing providers can weather the on-going tax storm TIP on Tax: How cloud computing providers can weather the on-going tax storm By Joel Waterfield, Director, State and Local Tax Services and Steve Skiba, Director, State and Local Tax Services As cloud

More information

Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States No. 14-1422 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States THE FIRST MARBLEHEAD CORPORATION AND GATE HOLDINGS, INC., Petitioners, v. MASSACHUSETTS COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ

More information

No. 110,315 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL DIVISION, Appellee.

No. 110,315 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL DIVISION, Appellee. No. 110,315 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS KITE'S BAR & GRILL, INC., d/b/a KITE'S GRILLE & BAR, Appellant, v. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL DIVISION, Appellee.

More information

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2006).

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2006). This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2006). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A07-1486 In the Matter of the Removal of the Franklin

More information

IRS Appeals Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes

IRS Appeals Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes IRS Appeals Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes Steven Diamond Principal Tax Controversy Group, Ernst & Young LLP Kathleen Lampignano - Appeals Team Case Leader Houston IRS Appeals May 10, 2013 Notice

More information

State Tax Return. Go Crazy, Folks... But Not Too Crazy: 1 California Court Ponders Remedy For Macy's Victory Over San Francisco

State Tax Return. Go Crazy, Folks... But Not Too Crazy: 1 California Court Ponders Remedy For Macy's Victory Over San Francisco November 2006 Volume 13 Number 11 State Tax Return Go Crazy, Folks... But Not Too Crazy: 1 California Court Ponders Remedy For Macy's Victory Over San Francisco Rachel Wilson Dallas (214) 969-5050 A taxpayer

More information

State + Local Tax. Practice Description

State + Local Tax. Practice Description State + Local Tax PRACTICE GROUP CHAIR Craig B. Fields 250 West 55 th Street New York, New York 10019 (212) 468-8193 cfields@mofo.com Morrison & Foerster is the first large law firm in the country to build

More information

Tax Research: Understanding Sources of Tax Law (Why my IRC beats your Rev Proc!)

Tax Research: Understanding Sources of Tax Law (Why my IRC beats your Rev Proc!) Tax Research: Understanding Sources of Tax Law (Why my IRC beats your Rev Proc!) Understanding Federal Statutes and Legislation Federal statutes provide the foundation of the tax system in the United States.

More information

State Tax Return. Josie Lowman Atlanta (404) 581-8703

State Tax Return. Josie Lowman Atlanta (404) 581-8703 October 2007 Volume 14 Number 10 State Tax Return Trick or Treat? The New Michigan Business Tax Rachel Wilson Dallas (214) 969-5050 Josie Lowman Atlanta (404) 581-8703 In July 2007, the Michigan Governor

More information

SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA En Banc

SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA En Banc SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA En Banc CITY OF PEORIA, a municipal ) Arizona Supreme Court corporation; and CITY OF PHOENIX, ) No. CV-10-0218-PR a municipal corporation, ) ) Court of Appeals Plaintiffs/Defendants/

More information

Minnesota False Claims Act

Minnesota False Claims Act Minnesota False Claims Act (Minn. Stat. 15C.01 to.16) i 15C.01 DEFINITIONS Subdivision 1. Scope. --For purposes of this chapter, the terms in this section have the meanings given them. Subd. 2. Claim.

More information

Legal Updates & News. California s LLC Tax: Current Litigation and Retroactive Legislation March 2007 by Peter B. Kanter.

Legal Updates & News. California s LLC Tax: Current Litigation and Retroactive Legislation March 2007 by Peter B. Kanter. Legal Updates & News Legal Updates California s LLC Tax: Current Litigation and Retroactive Legislation March 2007 by Peter B. Kanter Related Practices: State and Local Tax Section 17942 of California

More information

Cable Franchising Update: Detroit v Comcast

Cable Franchising Update: Detroit v Comcast Cable Franchising Update: Detroit v Comcast By John W. Pestle & Tim Lundgren for The Michigan Municipal League May 16, 2013 Important Notice: This presentation has been prepared by Varnum LLP for informational

More information

Attorney Fees. Prepared by Whitney L. Teel, Esq. The type of fees payable in a workers compensation case depends upon the type of benefit recovered.

Attorney Fees. Prepared by Whitney L. Teel, Esq. The type of fees payable in a workers compensation case depends upon the type of benefit recovered. Attorney Fees Prepared by Whitney L. Teel, Esq. I. Types of Fees The type of fees payable in a workers compensation case depends upon the type of benefit recovered. A. Recovery of Monetary Compensation:

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MATTHEW PRICHARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; IBM LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, Defendants-Appellees.

More information

State & Local Tax Alert

State & Local Tax Alert State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP U.S. District Court Finds Puerto Rico Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax Scheme Unconstitutional The United States

More information

STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION by TERRY GODDARD ATTORNEY GENERAL No. I03-009 (R03-016) Re: Arizona Board of Nursing Jurisdiction over Licensees Who Practice Exclusively

More information

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A13-1388. Court of Appeals Stras, J. vs. Filed: October 7, 2015 Office of Appellate Courts Integrity Advance, LLC,

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A13-1388. Court of Appeals Stras, J. vs. Filed: October 7, 2015 Office of Appellate Courts Integrity Advance, LLC, STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A13-1388 Court of Appeals Stras, J. State of Minnesota by its Attorney General, Lori Swanson, Respondent, vs. Filed: October 7, 2015 Office of Appellate Courts Integrity

More information

Bruce Fort Counsel, Multistate Tax Commission

Bruce Fort Counsel, Multistate Tax Commission Bruce Fort Counsel, Multistate Tax Commission Western States Association of Tax Administrators Annual Conference October 6-9, 2013 Salt Lake City, Utah 2 Multistate Tax Commission An intergovernmental

More information

Avoiding Tax Surprises In Trust And Estate Litigation: Transfer Tax Aspects Of Settlements

Avoiding Tax Surprises In Trust And Estate Litigation: Transfer Tax Aspects Of Settlements Avoiding Tax Surprises In Trust And Estate Litigation: Transfer Tax Aspects Of Settlements Julie K. Kwon A. Introduction 1. Parties negotiating the resolution of their disputes regarding interests in trusts

More information

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2008).

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2008). This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2008). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A09-1771 James Corriveau, Appellant, vs. Washington

More information

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A13-1302. Court of Appeals Anderson, J.

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A13-1302. Court of Appeals Anderson, J. STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A13-1302 Court of Appeals Anderson, J. Robert Meeker, et al., Respondents, vs. Filed: April 8, 2015 Office of Appellate Courts IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company,

More information

Attachment F State Agencies

Attachment F State Agencies Attachment F State Agencies Addendum for State-Specific Requirements General These states have statutes which may supersede the franchise agreement in your relationship with Us including the areas of termination

More information

BEFORE THE HEARING OFFICER OF THE TAXATION AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO DECISION AND ORDER

BEFORE THE HEARING OFFICER OF THE TAXATION AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO DECISION AND ORDER BEFORE THE HEARING OFFICER OF THE TAXATION AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO IN THE MATTER OF THE PROTEST OF CHARLES L. FORKNER NO. 98-32 ID. NO. 02-327122-00 1, PROTEST TO ASSESSMENT NO.

More information

The above-captioned matter came before the undersigned Judge of District Court

The above-captioned matter came before the undersigned Judge of District Court Filed in Fourth Judicial District Court 10/10/2013 11:41:09 AM Hennepin County Civil, MN STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Timberton Condominium Association,

More information

Forum Shopping and Limitations on Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction

Forum Shopping and Limitations on Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction Forum Shopping and Limitations on Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction John D. Snethen Section Chief, Tax Litigation Office of the Attorney General of Indiana 1 Bankruptcy Background What is Forum Shopping? Taxpayer

More information

2012 IL App (5th) 100579-U NO. 5-10-0579 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT

2012 IL App (5th) 100579-U NO. 5-10-0579 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT NOTICE Decision filed 05/03/12. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2012 IL App (5th) 100579-U NO. 5-10-0579

More information

Determining What s Unitary: Combined Filing Requirements and Options

Determining What s Unitary: Combined Filing Requirements and Options NAVIGATING STATE TAXATION IN A GLOBAL BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT Determining What s Unitary: Combined Filing Requirements and Options Peter Leonardis AIG Alysse McLoughlin McDermott Will & Emery LLP David Vistica

More information

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING #01-15 WARNING

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING #01-15 WARNING TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING #01-15 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation of

More information

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14-1176 A14-1177. 110 Wyman, LLC, et al., Appellants (A14-1176),

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14-1176 A14-1177. 110 Wyman, LLC, et al., Appellants (A14-1176), STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14-1176 A14-1177 110 Wyman, LLC, et al., Appellants (A14-1176), Ruby Red Dentata, LLC, et al., Appellants (A14-1177), vs. City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, Respondent.

More information