SUMMARY. White finger disease; Rheumatoid arthritis; Disablement (vibrations) (tools).
|
|
- Jonah Gordon
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1242/99 White finger disease; Rheumatoid arthritis; Disablement (vibrations) (tools). The worker was a jackleg driller until 1976 and then a hoist man until he retired in The worker appealed a decision of the Appeals Officer denying entitlement for hand-arm vibration syndrome. The medical evidence was uncertain as to whether the worker was suffering from hand-arm vibration syndrome or rheumatoid arthritis. In either case, the worker's condition was related to work with vibratory tools. The appeal was allowed. [5 pages] DECIDED BY: Sajtos DATE: 04/12/2000 NUMBER OF PAGES: [5 pages] ACT: WCA CROSS-REFERENCE: Decision No. 1242/99I
2 2000 ONWSIAT 3399 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1242/99 [1] Tribunal Vice-Chair E. J. Sajtos heard this appeal in Sudbury on July 5, THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS [2] The worker appeals the decision of Appeals Officer S. Cavaric, dated December 23, That decision concluded that the worker was not entitled to benefits for hand/arm vibration syndrome. [3] The worker appeared and was represented by Mr. Hamilton, Officer of the Worker Adviser. The employer was notified but chose not to participate. [4] Subsequent to the proceeding of July 5, 1999, the Vice-Chair in Decision Number 1242/99I requested that the worker be assessed by a vascular surgeon. The Tribunal received a report from this physician dated May 2, THE RECORD [5] The Vice-Chair considered as evidence the Case Record, two addenda and correspondence with attachments dated May 6, 1999, June 28, 1999 and December 5, Post-hearing, the Vice-Chair received two addenda. [6] The worker testified under oath. The worker s representative provided written submissions. THE ISSUES [7] The Vice-Chair must determine whether the worker is entitled to benefits for a hand/arm condition. THE REASONS (i) Background [8] The worker was employed for twelve years as a mine jackleg driller until In 1976, he attended Sault College for two years and then worked as a hoist man until he retired in [9] The worker was assessed by a rheumatologist Dr. Piper in August 1977, who stated that the worker had rheumatoid arthritis, however, there was also a possibility of chondrocalcinos possibly secondary to hemochromatosis and sarcoidosis. Dr. Long, MBBS, FRCS made the first diagnosis of white hand syndrome on December 7, [10] Dr. Field, MB, FRCSC, in a report dated August 21, 1978 was of the view that the worker had a clinical picture of rheumatoid arthritis combined with sed. Rate elevation to 51.
3 Page: 2 Decision No. 1242/99 Dr. Field indicated that the worker did not have vibration induced white finger syndrome rather, his cold sensitivity was due to collagen disease. [11] In 1978, the Board s Unit Medical Adviser, Dr. Burton noted that the worker s drilling exposure was adequate to support a finding of vibration induced white finger disease. In addition, the worker had developed symptoms in 1974, which were compatible with his employment. However, due to Dr. Field s diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, the Board physician recommended that the claim be rejected. [12] Dr. Long, in a report of September 4, 1990 indicated that the worker was having increased problems with his hands and his fingers, which turned white in the summer. Dr. McMillan MB, CH.B confirmed the worker s increased symptoms in February [13] On December 9, 1994, Dr. Pelmear, a vascular surgeon, first tested the worker for vibration induced white finger disease. The doctor concluded that the worker had significant exposure to HAV and was suffering from hand/arm vibration syndrome. He was found to have a mild stage I vascular impairment in his left hand and mild to moderate stage I vascular impairment in his right hand. [14] In a Board memorandum dated August 26, 1997, a Unit Medical Adviser provided the following opinion: (ii) The present information on file does not confirm a diagnosis of vibration induced vascular disease of the hands. There are abnormal serological tests highly suggestive of some type of collagen disease. It is known that secondary Raynaulds is common and occasionally presenting symptoms with collagen disease. There has been a suggestion of rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma, lupus etc but the clinical report confirming either one, is not on file. The neurological tests carried out by Dr. Pelmear in 1994 do not suggest any digit sensory neuropathy, consistent with vibration exposure in the hands. The nerve conduction was reported as being normal. Tribunal Assessor [15] Dr. Maggisano, a vascular surgeon from the Sunnybrook Health Science Centre provided the Tribunal with a report dated May 2, The Assessor noted that he reviewed the case record materials and clinically examined the worker with a dabbler evaluation on May 2, [16] The doctor indicated that the worker s symptoms began in 1972 and they consisted of white discoloration in his hands on cold exposure with associated pain in the fingers. The worker was unable to continue ice fishing or participate in activities in the cold. The symptoms are now better then they were in the 1970 s. However, on minimal cold exposure, the worker s fingers become white and have associated pain. [17] Dr. Maggisano stated that the worker had extensive symptoms related to arthritis in most of his joints and that he had total knee arthroplasties in 1991 and bilateral total hip replacements in Upon physical examination, the physician was of the opinion that the worker had a small degree of vaso motor disturbance in the digital arteries of both his hands and feet.
4 Page: 3 Decision No. 1242/99 [18] The doctor noted that the issue before the Tribunal related to whether the worker s symptoms were attributable to a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, or whether he had hand/arm vibration syndrome. In providing his opinion, the physician reasoned as follows: In my opinion, the worker definitely suffers from rheumatoid arthritis, which has been conclusively proven by the fact that he has a positive latex fixation test, which is pathognomic for rheumatoid arthritis. In fact, the reason for his knee and hip arthroplasties relates to this condition. The issue, however, of his hands becoming white and being afflicted with paresthesias and pain is a bit more difficult to attribute entirely to the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. There is no doubt that rheumatoid arthritis can be associated with Raynaud s phenomenon, but patients with rheumatoid arthritis may also have no symptoms of Raynauds and hence the dilemma. It has been categorically shown that the worker has had significant exposure to vibrating tools to cause hand/arm vibration syndrome and hence we are left to resolve what effect, if any, this exposure has had on his current symptomatology. Currently there are no objective tests available that can distinguish between the Raynaud s phenomenon seen in rheumatoid arthritis, compared to that seen in hand/arm vibration syndrome. Since that is the case, it is my feeling that one has to give the worker the benefit of the doubt and assume that the hands symptomatology that the worker is describing is either secondary to hand/arm vibration syndrome, or at least is related to his rheumatoid arthritis and has been aggravated by his extensive exposure to jack leg and plugger vibrating injuries. At this point and time, the degree of involvement is no different then what he was diagnosed by Dr. Pelmear in I would agree that he has mild stage one vascular involvement in both hands, and similarly stage one SN involvement in both hands. The confusion that has evolved in the worker s case since 1977 is unfortunate but, to be fair to the medical profession, there was little known about hand/arm vibration syndrome in those former years, and it has only been in the last five to ten years that knowledge in this condition has advanced so that we can now make these assertions. (iii) The Vice-Chair s Reasons [19] The Vice-Chair must determine whether the worker s employment aggravated or caused his rheumatoid arthritis and or his hand/arm vibration syndrome. [20] The worker s representative, Mr. Hamilton, submitted that the benefit of the doubt ought to be given to the worker in this case. The representative argued that the Tribunal Assessor, Dr. Maggisano was of the view that the worker s condition was caused or aggravated by his employment as a jackleg driller. [21] The Vice-Chair notes the comment made by the Tribunal assessor that little was known about hand/arm vibration syndrome in 1977 when the worker first complained of symptoms. In addition, the worker lived in a northern community and he did not have access to appropriate testing until December At that time, Dr. Pelmear, who did the vascular testing, confirmed that the worker had hand/arm vibration syndrome. Previously, the worker had been diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis and possible chondrocalcinosis or sarcoidosis. [22] The Vice-Chair notes that two vascular surgeons, Dr. Pelmear and Dr. Maggisano have now assessed the worker. Dr. Pelmear was of the opinion that the worker has hand/arm vibration syndrome. The Tribunal assessor stated that his current hand symptomatology is either
5 Page: 4 Decision No. 1242/99 secondary to hand/arm vibration syndrome or at least is related to his rheumatoid arthritis and has been aggravated by his extensive exposure to jack leg and plugger vibrating injuries. [23] The Board physician, Dr. Burton, in his memorandum of 1978 confirmed that the worker had adequate employment exposure to vibratory tools to support entitlement for vibration induced white finger disease and the development of his symptoms were also consistent with his employment. [24] Based on a balance of possibilities, the Vice-Chair is satisfied that the work place exposure was a significant contributing factor to his current hand symptoms and as such entitlement to benefits is granted. THE DECISION [25] The worker s appeal is allowed. The Board is directed to determine the duration and the quantum of benefits that flow from this decision subject to the usual rights of appeal. DATED: December 4, 2000 SIGNED: E.J. Sajtos
FD: FD: DT:D DN:81/87 STY: PANEL:O'Neil; Lankin; Jago DDATE:241287 TYPE:A ACT: DECON:81/87L CCON: SCON: BDG:Claims Adjudication Branch Procedures
FD: FD: DT:D DN:81/87 STY: PANEL:O'Neil; Lankin; Jago DDATE:241287 TYPE:A ACT: DECON:81/87L CCON: SCON: BDG:Claims Adjudication Branch Procedures Manual, document no. 33-13-09; Claims Services Division
More informationSUMMARY. Carpal tunnel syndrome; Permanent impairment [NEL] (rating schedule) (AMA Guides) (functional impairment).
SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1033/98 Carpal tunnel syndrome; Permanent impairment [NEL] (rating schedule) (AMA Guides) (functional impairment). The worker was a stope miner for four years beginning in 1987. In
More informationSUMMARY DECISION NO. 70/98. Delay (treatment); Kienbock's disease.
SUMMARY DECISION NO. 70/98 Delay (treatment); Kienbock's disease. A construction worker injured his wrist while moving a plank on September 25, 1991. He continued working and did not seek medical treatment
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1602/11
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1602/11 BEFORE: M. M. Cohen: Vice-Chair HEARING: August 16, 2011 at Toronto Written DATE OF DECISION: August 23, 2011 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2011
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
2001 ONWSIAT 2499 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 398 01 [1] This appeal was heard in Toronto on February 16, 2001 by Tribunal Vice-Chair E.J. Sajtos. THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
2001 ONWSIAT 1893 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 193/00 [1] This appeal was heard in Toronto on September 22, 2000, by Tribunal Vice-Chair N. McCombie. THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS
More informationNOTEWORTHY DECISION SUMMARY. Decision: WCAT-2004-02435-RB Panel: Beatrice Anderson Decision Date: May 10, 2004
NOTEWORTHY DECISION SUMMARY Decision: WCAT-2004-02435-RB Panel: Beatrice Anderson Decision Date: May 10, 2004 Referrals to Board of Issue for Determination - Completion of Appeals after Referral - Section
More informationSUMMARY DECISION NO. 163/93. Recurrences (compensable injury); Second accident; Intervening causes; Apportionment (pensions).
SUMMARY DECISION NO. 163/93 Recurrences (compensable injury); Second accident; Intervening causes; Apportionment (pensions). The worker suffered a back injury in 1985. The employer appealed a decision
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
2004 ONWSIAT 737 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1960/03 [1] This written appeal was considered in Toronto on March 31, 2004, by Tribunal Vice-Chair E.J. Sajtos. THE APPEAL
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1119/09
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1119/09 BEFORE: T. Mitchinson: Vice-Chair HEARING: June 3, 2009 at Sudbury Oral DATE OF DECISION: June 8, 2009 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2009 ONWSIAT
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1708/15
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1708/15 BEFORE: E. Kosmidis : Vice-Chair E. Tracey : Member Representative of Employers C. Salama : Member Representative of Workers HEARING:
More informationInformation for patients. Raynaud s Phenomenon. Sheffield Vascular Institute. Northern General Hospital
Information for patients Raynaud s Phenomenon Sheffield Vascular Institute Northern General Hospital You have been diagnosed as having Raynaud's phenomenon or a similar condition. This leaflet explains
More informationRaynaud s phenomenon, Scleroderma and associated disorders
Patient information Raynaud s phenomenon, Scleroderma and associated disorders Vascular Surgery Surgical Division PIF 202/V5 What is Raynaud s phenomenon? Raynaud s phenomenon is a condition where the
More informationSUMMARY DECISION NO. 1387/99. Pensions (lump sum) (calculation) (discount rate).
SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1387/99 Pensions (lump sum) (calculation) (discount rate). The worker suffered a back injury in 1989 for which he was granted a 10% pension in 1990. The worker requested payment as
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION SARAH DREILING ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 65,956 HAYS MEDICAL CENTER ) Respondent ) AND ) ) ROYAL & SUNALLIANCE ) Insurance
More informationWORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL
WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1025/94 This appeal was heard in Toronto on December 5, 1994, by a Tribunal Panel consisting of: R.E. Hartman : Vice-Chair, G.M. Nipshagen: Member representative
More informationDECISION NO. 920/90. Foot deformities (spinal stenosis) - Rheumatoid arthritis.
DECISION NO. 920/90 Foot deformities (spinal stenosis) - Rheumatoid arthritis. The worker suffered a low back injury in 1973. He was awarded a 15% pension that was ultimately increased to 60%. The compensable
More informationHow To Decide If A Worker Is Entitled To Benefits For The Extraction Of Teeth
SUMMARY DECISION NO. 303/99 Health care (dental aid); Board Directives and Guidelines (health care) (dental aid) (abutment teeth). The worker was struck in the face, suffering a cracked tooth and damage
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1047/14
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1047/14 BEFORE: C. M. MacAdam: Vice-Chair HEARING: June 3, 2014 at Toronto Written DATE OF DECISION: June 18, 2014 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2014 ONWSIAT
More informationIs the Worker entitled to medical aid in the form of blood pressure or cholesterol medication?
1 CLAIM HISTORY AND APPEAL PROCEEDINGS: The Worker suffered workplace back injuries in 1981, 1982 and 1984. A discectomy was performed in 1986, and a two-level fusion and nerve root decompression was performed
More informationHealth surveillance for Hand-arm vibration syndrome
Health surveillance for Hand-arm vibration syndrome What is health surveillance? Health surveillance is about having procedures to detect work-related ill health at an early stage and acting on the results.
More informationWorkplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division
Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division WHSCRD Case No: 13252-11 WHSCC Claim No.(s): 604016, 611050, 672511 705910, 721783, 731715, 753775, 784014, 831110 Decision Number: 14189 Marlene
More informationHand Arm Vibration. OHSI 10 Issue 2 - October 2006. 1 Purpose and scope. 2 Definitions
Hand Arm Vibration OHSI 10 Issue 2 - October 2006 1 Purpose and scope...1 2 Definitions... 1 3 Principles... 2 4 Responsibilities...3 4.1 First line manager...3 4.2 Employee... 3 4.3 Occupational health
More informationWorkplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division
Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division WHSCRD Case No: WHSCC Claim No: Decision Number: 15171 Gordon Murphy Review Commissioner The Review Proceedings 1. The hearing of the review application
More informationWork with vibrating machines Health hazards:
Work with vibrating machines Health hazards: Hand-arm vibration syndrome Vibration-related upper extremity disorders Work-related musculoskeletal disorders Stress-related health effects Noise-related hearing
More informationSUMMARY DECISION NO. 143/97. Suitable employment.
SUMMARY DECISION NO. 143/97 Suitable employment. The worker slipped and fell in January 1992, injuring her low back and hip. She was awarded a 28% NEL award for her low back condition. The worker appealed
More informationNOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL
NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Worker) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: N/A (Employer) and The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL
More informationGUIDANCE AND PROCEDURE FOR HAND ARM VIBRATION
Department of Human Resources GUIDANCE AND PROCEDURE FOR HAND ARM VIBRATION 1.0 What is Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS)? Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS) is a widespread industrial disease. The Health
More informationWORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD APPEAL TRIBUNAL. [Personal information] CASE I.D. #[personal information]
WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: [personal information] CASE I.D. #[personal information] PLAINTIFF AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DEFENDANT DECISION #41 [Personal
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
2005 ONWSIAT 469 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1300/04 [1] This appeal was considered in Toronto on August 3, 2004, by Tribunal Vice-Chair M. Crystal. THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2115/14
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2115/14 BEFORE: C. M. MacAdam : Vice-Chair S. T. Sahay : Member Representative of Employers K. Hoskin : Member Representative of Workers HEARING:
More informationSUMMARY DECISION NO. 248/97. Continuing entitlement.
SUMMARY DECISION NO. 248/97 Continuing entitlement. The worker slipped and fell backwards in October 1991. The worker appealed a decision of the Hearings Officer denying entitlement for organic neck and
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BARBARA SHEREE HUTSON ) Claimant ) ) VS. ) Docket No. 1,035,700 ) CUSTOM CAMPERS, INC. ) Self-Insured Respondent ) ORDER Claimant
More informationOn April 6, 2004, a Board Hearing Officer confirmed the Case Manager s findings.
1 CLAIM HISTORY AND APPEAL PROCEEDINGS: The Worker was employed in a coal mine operation from 1978 until 2001, primarily as a long wall electrician. He was also a member of the mine rescue team (a Drägerman
More informationWORKCOVER DIVISION Case No. A12596889 --- S GARNETT LATROBE VALLEY REASONS FOR DECISION ---
!Undefined Bookmark, I IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF VICTORIA AT LATROBE VALLEY WORKCOVER DIVISION Case No. A12596889 LEE ANNE SHEARS Plaintiff v STATE OF VICTORIA Defendant --- MAGISTRATE: S GARNETT WHERE
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2289/08
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2289/08 BEFORE: M. Crystal: Vice-Chair HEARING: October 31, 2008 at Toronto Written case DATE OF DECISION: October 31, 2008 NEUTRAL CITATION:
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2444/06
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2444/06 BEFORE: M. Crystal: Vice-Chair HEARING: December 4, 2006 at Toronto Written case DATE OF DECISION: December 5, 2006 NEUTRAL CITATION:
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1985/14
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1985/14 BEFORE: A.G. Baker : Vice-Chair E. Tracey : Member Representative of Employers C. Salama : Member Representative of Workers HEARING:
More informationNOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL
NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Worker) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: [X] (Employer) and The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL
More informationSUMMARY DECISION NO. 1007/99. Accident (occurrence).
SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1007/99 Accident (occurrence). The worker appealed a decision of the Appeals Resolution Officer denying entitlement for low back disability. The worker experienced the onset of back
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NUMBER F205928 DOUGLAS EUGENE WHIPKEY, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT XPRESS BOATS, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NUMBER F205928 DOUGLAS EUGENE WHIPKEY, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT XPRESS BOATS, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO., INSURANCE CARRIER RESPONDENT
More informationSUMMARY DECISION NO. 413/98. Fasciitis (plantar); Cashier.
SUMMARY DECISION NO. 413/98 Fasciitis (plantar); Cashier. A supermarket cashier appealed a decision of the Appeals Officer denying entitlement for plantar fasciitis. The causes of plantar fasciitis are
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2515/11
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2515/11 BEFORE: R. McClellan : Vice-Chair M. Christie : Member Representative of Employers A. Signoroni : Member Representative of Workers HEARING:
More informationWorkplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division
Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division WHSCRD Case No: 13277-12 WHSCC Claim No: 633272 Decision Number: 14132 Lloyd Piercey Review Commissioner The Review Proceedings 1. The review took
More informationUnited States Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board DECISION AND ORDER
United States Department of Labor J.S., Appellant and DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, Seattle, WA, Employer Appearances: Appellant, pro se Office of Solicitor, for the Director
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1574/99R2
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1574/99R2 BEFORE: E.J. Smith: Vice-Chair M. Christie: Member Representative of Employers D. Broadbent: Member Representative of Workers HEARING:
More informationDECISION NO. 1708/10
B. Kalvin WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1708/10 BEFORE: B. Kalvin : Vice-Chair HEARING: September 9, 2010 at Toronto Oral DATE OF DECISION: September 15, 2010 NEUTRAL CITATION:
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1617/14
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1617/14 BEFORE: T. Mitchinson: Vice-Chair HEARING: August 29, 2014 at Sudbury Oral DATE OF DECISION: September 4, 2014 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2014
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE December 14, 2000 Session
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE December 14, 2000 Session PHILIPS CONSUMER ELECTRONICS COMPANY v. KATHY A. JENNINGS Direct Appeal from the Circuit
More informationA Hidden Challenge in WORKERS COMPENSATION
Published by the Public Risk Management Association www.primacentral.org A Hidden Challenge in WORKERS COMPENSATION APRIL 2015 A Hidden Challenge in WORKERS COMPENSATION By Dr. John Robinton 2 PUBLIC RISK
More informationAPPENDIX F INTERJURISDICTIONAL RESEARCH
Ontario Scheduled Presumption: Bursitis, listed in Schedule 3, of the Ontario Workers Compensation Act, entry number 18 Description of Disease Bursitis Process Any process involving constant or prolonged
More informationDECISION NUMBER 749 / 94 SUMMARY
DECISION NUMBER 749 / 94 SUMMARY The worker suffered a whiplash injury in a compensable motor vehicle accident in May 1991. The worker appealed a decision of the Hearings Officer denying entitlement when
More informationRaynaud s Disease. What is Raynaud s Disease? Raynaud s disease is also sometimes known as Raynaud s phenomenon or Raynaud s syndrome.
Raynaud s Disease Introduction Raynaud s disease is a rare disorder of the blood vessels. It usually affects the fingers and toes. This disorder causes the blood vessels to narrow which turns the affected
More informationJohn Coronis v. Granger Northern Inc. (April 27, 2010) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
John Coronis v. Granger Northern Inc. (April 27, 2010) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR John Coronis Opinion No. 16-10WC v. By: Sal Spinosa, Esq. Hearing Officer Granger Northern, Inc. ATTORNEYS: For:
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION DALE L. STILWELL ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) BOEING COMPANY and ) Docket Nos. 253,800 CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY ) & 1,031,180 Respondents
More informationIn the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO KATHY WACKER and BRYAN No. ED99789 WACKER, Appeal from the Circuit Court Appellants, of Cape Girardeau County vs. Hon. William L. Syler ST.
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 376/08
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 376/08 BEFORE: A. Morris: Vice-Chair HEARING: February 7, 2008 at Toronto Oral DATE OF DECISION: June 9, 2008 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2008 ONWSIAT
More informationWorkplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division
Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division WHSCRD Case No: 14152-06 WHSCC Claim No: 606499 and 791748 Decision Number: 14147 Lloyd Piercey Review Commissioner The Review Proceedings 1. The
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2395/13
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2395/13 BEFORE: A.G. Baker: Vice-Chair HEARING: December 27, 2013 at Toronto Written DATE OF DECISION: May 9, 2014 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2014 ONWSIAT
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1894/06
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1894/06 BEFORE: R. Nairn : Vice-Chair HEARING: September 25, 2006 at Windsor Oral DATE OF DECISION: October 16, 2006 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2006
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Workers Compensation Board
Commonwealth of Kentucky Workers Compensation Board OPINION ENTERED: March 25, 2014 CLAIM NO. 201166969 REBECCA MAHAN PETITIONER VS. APPEAL FROM HON. R. SCOTT BORDERS, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE PROFESSIONAL
More informationMarilyn Townsend ATTORNEY AT LAW
Admitted to practice in WI, D.C., MD, GA Marilyn Townsend ATTORNEY AT LAW 122 WEST WASHINGTON AVENUE MADISON, WISCONSIN 53703 Phone (608) 255-5111 Fax (608) 255-3358 Excerpts from Letter to Client on Fibromyalgia
More informationWCB claims. WCB claim process. Worker suffers an injury/occupational disease. Report to first aid/supervisor.
Section 4 WCB claims WCB claim process Worker suffers an injury/occupational disease. Worker reports to doctor. Physician s first report is sent to WCB. (Form 8). Report to first aid/supervisor. Injured
More informationDo I need a physician referral? Yes, we see patients on referral from a health care provider.
FAQS FOR OFFICE POLICIES How do I get an appointment? New appointments are made by physician referral only. Your referring health care provided will call for the appointment for you. What do I need to
More informationNOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL
NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [*] (Worker) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: Otis Canada Inc. (Employer) and The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia
More informationWORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL. EMPLOYER CASE ID #[personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND WORKER DECISION #114
WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: EMPLOYER CASE ID #[personal information] AND: APPELLANT WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT AND: WORKER EMPLOYEE DECISION #114 Appellant
More informationSUMMARY DECISION NO. 1076/98I. Waiver (right to compensation) (settlement).
SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1076/98I Waiver (right to compensation) (settlement). The worker and employer both appealed decisions of the Board regarding ongoing benefits and VR services. After following grievance
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION GEORGIA R. KATZ ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 1,068,293 USD 229 ) Self-Insured Respondent ) ORDER STATEMENT OF THE CASE Claimant
More informationDECISION 13088. Keith G. Barry Review Commissioner
WORKPLACE HEALTH, SAFETY & COMPENSATION REVIEW DIVISION 6 Mt. Carson Ave., Dorset Building Mt. Pearl, NL A1N 3K4 DECISION 13088 Keith G. Barry Review Commissioner May 2013 WORKPLACE HEALTH, SAFETY & COMPENSATION
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKER S COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET # 97-0468 OPINION
DOROTHY KRAUSE, PLAINTIFF, 1999 ACO #207 S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKER S COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET # 97-0468 MEDICAL EVALUATIONS SPECIALISTS AND ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS.
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION DONALD BRYAN SMITHHISLER Claimant VS. LIFE CARE CENTERS AMERICA, INC. Respondent Docket No. 1,014,349 AND OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE
More informationDECISION 13080. Lloyd Piercey. Review Commissioner
WORKPLACE HEALTH, SAFETY & COMPENSATION REVIEW DIVISION 6 Mt. Carson Ave., Dorset Building Mt. Pearl, NL A1N 3K4 DECISION 13080 Lloyd Piercey Review Commissioner May 2013 WORKPLACE HEALTH, SAFETY & COMPENSATION
More informationHow To Get A Spinal Cord Stimulator
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION MICHAEL L. McDONALD Claimant VS. FIBERGLASS SYSTEMS, LP Respondent Docket No. 1,003,977 AND PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INS. CO. Insurance
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1525/07
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1525/07 BEFORE: HEARING: M. Crystal: Vice-Chair June 29, 2007 at Toronto Oral hearing DATE OF DECISION: July 3, 2007 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2007
More informationFD: ACN=1004 ACC=R FD: DT:D DN: 609/87 STY:PANEL: Thomas; Robillard; Jago DDATE:23/07/87 ACT: 40(3) [old 41(2)], 40(2)(b) [old 41(1)(b)] KEYW:
FD: ACN=1004 ACC=R FD: DT:D DN: 609/87 STY:PANEL: Thomas; Robillard; Jago DDATE:23/07/87 ACT: 40(3) [old 41(2)], 40(2)(b) [old 41(1)(b)] KEYW: Temporary partial disability (level of benefits); Availability
More informationRegistration Criteria. Constance-Lethbridge Rehabilitation Centre
Registration Criteria Constance-Lethbridge Rehabilitation Centre General Registration Criteria GENERAL REGISTRATION CRITERIA 1 In order to be registered to the Constance-Lethbridge Rehabilitation Centre,
More informationAddress: Orthopaedic Specialty Clinics located at First Clinic, Etoile Center, King Road, North of Jeddah. Tel: 02-6922298, Fax: 02-6925387.
Orthopaedic Specialty Clinics Group Practice Group Practice: is the practice of health care by an association of medical professionals who share premises and other resources. Our Orthopaedic Group Practice
More informationUnited States Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board DECISION AND ORDER
United States Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board P.L., Appellant and U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, Santa Clarita, CA, Employer Appearances: Richard Heavey, Esq., for the appellant
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral
More informationL. R. v. Fletcher Allen Health Care (January 4, 2007) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
L. R. v. Fletcher Allen Health Care (January 4, 2007) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR L. R. Opinion No. 57-06WC By: Margaret A. Mangan v. Hearing Officer Fletcher Allen Health Care For: Patricia Moulton
More informationNOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL
NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [*] (Worker) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL DECISION Representatives:
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 193/14
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 193/14 BEFORE: C. M. MacAdam : Vice-Chair J. Blogg : Member Representative of Employers A. Grande : Member Representative of Workers HEARING:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON August 27, 2012 Session
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON August 27, 2012 Session BILLY HILL v. HUTCHERSON METALS, INC. ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Dyer County
More informationFD: FD: DT:D DN: 675/93 STY: PANEL: Newman; M. Cook; Chapman DDATE:080494 ACT: KEYW: Delay (onset of symptoms); Heart condition (traumatic).
FD: FD: DT:D DN: 675/93 STY: PANEL: Newman; M. Cook; Chapman DDATE:080494 ACT: KEYW: Delay (onset of symptoms); Heart condition (traumatic). SUM: The worker's arm was caught in a conveyor belt and was
More informationDisease/Illness. GUIDE TO REPETITIVE STRAIN INJURIES Repetitive Strain Injuries/Work Related Limb Disorders. Help it hurts! How does it happen?
GUIDE TO REPETITIVE STRAIN INJURIES Repetitive Strain Injuries/Work Related Limb Disorders Help it hurts! What is it? There are loads of different phrases used to describe pain and symptoms arising from
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION GARRETT QUINT ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 208,451 VANDEE STUCCO ) Respondent ) AND ) ) AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL ) INSURANCE COMPANY
More informationHealth and Safety Resources Caution to Users
Health and Safety Resources Caution to Users Many of the resources in this archive were originally prepared by WSN s predecessor organizations for use by industry clients. While much of the information
More informationDiagnostic Criteria and Staging of Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome in the United Kingdom
Industrial Health 2005, 43, 527 534 Original Article Diagnostic Criteria and Staging of Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome in the United Kingdom Kenneth L. McGEOCH 1*, Ian J. LAWSON 2, Frank BURKE 3, George PROUD
More informationWORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1015/94
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1015/94 This appeal was heard by conference call between Toronto and Thunder Bay on December 1, 1994, by a Tribunal Panel consisting of: J.P. Moore:
More informationHEALTH RISKS FROM HAND-ARM VIBRATION
HEALTH RISKS FROM HAND-ARM VIBRATION ADVICE FOR EMPLOYERS YOU SHOULD READ THIS LEAFLET IF YOUR BUSINESS INVOLVES REGULAR AND FREQUENT USE OF: hand-held powered tools; hand-guided powered equipment; hand-fed
More informationDETERMINATION IN TERMS OF SECTION 30M OF THE PENSION FUNDS ACT OF 1956
IN THE TRIBUNAL OF THE PENSION FUNDS ADJUDICATOR In the complaint between: M D Mthembu CASE NO.:PFA/KZN/499/00 Complainant and Iscor Limited Iscor Employees Provident Fund First respondent Second respondent
More informationDECISION NO. 94/91. Exposure (asbestos).
DECISION NO. 94/91 Exposure (asbestos). The worker appealed a decision of the Hearings Officer denying entitlement for asbestosis which the worker related to exposure to asbestos when the building in which
More informationWorkers Compensation Law Update April 2012
Workers Compensation Law Update April 2012 Sean C. Pierce Carr Allison Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama Maxim Healthcare Servs. v. Freeman, 2012 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 91 (Ala. Civ. App. April 13, 2012)
More informationThis booklet can also be provided in large print on request. Please call 01865 738126. Spinal Stenosis. The Oxford Spine Unit
This booklet can also be provided in large print on request. Please call 01865 738126 Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre NHS Trust NHS Spinal Team Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre Windmill Road Headington Oxford OX3
More informationDisability Evaluation Under Social Security
Disability Evaluation Under Social Security *14.09 Inflammatory arthritis. As described in 14.00D6. With: A. Persistent inflammation or persistent deformity of: 1. One or more major peripheral weight-bearing
More informationWorkplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division
Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division WHSCRD Case No: 14275-11 WHSCC Claim No: 837491 Decision Number: 15034 Marlene A. Hickey Chief Review Commissioner The Review Proceedings 1. The
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION MARY JANE WAGGONER ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 1,001,815 THE BOEING COMPANY ) Respondent ) AND ) ) INSURANCE COMPANY ) STATE
More information