SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1387/99. Pensions (lump sum) (calculation) (discount rate).

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1387/99. Pensions (lump sum) (calculation) (discount rate)."

Transcription

1 SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1387/99 Pensions (lump sum) (calculation) (discount rate). The worker suffered a back injury in 1989 for which he was granted a 10% pension in The worker requested payment as a lump sum in 1993 but the Board found that there was a possibility of deterioration of his condition. He requested the lump sum payment again in The Board granted the lump sum payment but based the payment on the 6% Friedland tables in use since 1995 rather than the 4% Devitts' tables that were in use in The worker appealed. The Board treated the 1997 request as a new application. However, the Vice-Chair found that the case came within the Board's criteria for use of the 4% Devitts' table since the request was made prior to January 1995, subsequently appealed and then allowed. The appeal was allowed. [7 pages] DECIDED BY: Gehrke DATE: 25/10/99 ACT: WCA

2 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1387/99 [1] This appeal was heard in Sudbury on July 20, 1999, by Tribunal Vice-Chair L. Gehrke. THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS [2] The worker appeals the decision of E. Mroczek, Appeals Officer, dated November 17,1997. That decision concluded that the worker s lump sum settlement ought to be calculated using the Devitts table percentage rate which was in effect in [3] The worker appeared and was represented by Mr. E. Abitbol, a consultant. The employer was notified of this appeal but chose not to participate. THE EVIDENCE [4] The material in the Case Record prepared by the Tribunal Counsel Office (Exhibit #1) was considered. In addition, I considered Addendum No. 1 containing policy provided by the Board (Exhibit #2) and submissions by the worker representative (Exhibit #3). [5] Oral evidence was heard from the worker. Submissions were made by Mr. Abitbol. THE ISSUES [6] The issue in this appeal is quite a narrow one. It is whether, in calculating the worker s lump sum award, which was requested in 1993 but not granted until 1997, the Board should apply the pre-january 1, % CPI (Devitts) table. The Appeals Officer s decision without a hearing based on the written materials on file, stated the following reasons for deciding not to apply the 4% Devitts table were stated as follows: In this case, it is felt that [the worker] when asked to provide information concerning his lump sum request in 1993, chose not to respond. The subsequent request for lump sum settlement in 1997 granted him his request on the basis of information provided in In view of this, the appeals officer finds that the matter was again pursued by [the worker] in 1997 and that the lump sum granted and processed in 1997 was correctly calculated and processed. Consequently, the appeal is denied. THE REASONS (i) Background [7] The following history, which constitute findings of fact by me, is taken from the file record contained in the exhibits to this appeal. [8] In May of 1990, the worker was granted a ten percent permanent disability award reflecting a permanent impairment resulting from a compensable injury to his left shoulder which he

3 Page: 2 Decision No. 1387/99 suffered on March 31, By letter dated March 1, 1993, the worker requested a lump sum payment of this award. He stated in his letter: I wish to have my claim turned over to a cash settlement if at all possible due to financial difficulty [9] The Board denied the worker s request for a commutation by letter dated March 24, In this letter, the Board s Senior Benefits Adjudicator informed the worker that his request did not meet the requirements of Board policy under section 42(4) of the Act for commutation of pensions of 10% or less, based on the Unit Medical Advisor s advice that there might be further deterioration in his condition. The Board then considered the worker s request under subsection 27(1) of the Act, stating that a commutation request purely for financial reasons would not meet the requirements of that section. The Board s letter then invited the worker: If you feel that your request meets the criteria and conditions outlined in this letter, then by all means provide a written submission to your claim file. [10] The Board eventually granted the worker s commutation request on March 18, 1997, after the worker s representative, who had recently been retained, wrote to the Board on February 17, 1997, objecting to and asking for a review of the decision to deny a lump sum pension by the Senior Benefits Adjudicator s March 24, 1993 letter. Mr. Abitbol s letter reviewed the materials in the Board file and argued that the Senior Benefits Adjudicator failed to acquire any further information on the issue of whether the pension commuted would not be to the advantage of the worker and simply relied on the possible deterioration as a bar to section 45(4) entitlement. The entitlement of section 45(4) is a judgement as to whether the commutation is to the advantage of the worker or not. Given the worker was employed and, in my submissions, notwithstanding, and in my view, not having of great significance, that his condition would deteriorate or not, his commutation should have been previously allowed. That is what we are objecting to. Mr. Abitbol requested that the lump sum award if allowed, be made retroactive to the denial of March 23, [11] On March 18, 1997, the Senior Benefits Adjudicator wrote to the worker, pursuant to Mr. Abitbol s letter, informing him that his lump sum award had been granted. However, the Board, in calculating the amount of the lump sum award, used the post-january 1, % Friedland tables, rather than the pre-january 1, % CPI (Devitts) table. This is the issue in this appeal. (ii) Law and Policy [12] Since the compensable injury which is the basis of this appeal occurred in 1989, the pre-1989 Workers Compensation Act (WCA) applies to this appeal. Subsection 45(4) of that Act provides: (4) Where the impairment of the earning capacity of the worker does not exceed 10 per cent of the worker's earning capacity and the worker does not elect to receive compensation by a weekly or other periodic payment, the Board shall, unless the Board decides that it would not be to the advantage of the worker to do so, direct that such lump sum as may be considered to be the equivalent of the periodic payment shall be paid to the worker. [13] Section 148 of the pre-1989 WCA provides in part:

4 Page: 3 Decision No. 1387/99 148(1) On the 1st day of January in each year, an indexing factor shall be determined, based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for Canada for all items, for the twelve month period ending the 31st day of October of the previous year, as published by Statistics Canada. [14] Thus, at the time of the worker s injury, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) was used to calculate the indexing factor adjustment for benefits awarded under the WCA. Effective January 1, 1995, section 148 of the WCA was amended to provide for adjustments to benefits under the WCA using a new indexing factor, which is frequently referred to as the Friedland formula. The amended section 148 provides in part: 148(1) On January 1 in each year, an indexing factor shall be determined using the formula, Indexing factor = [3/4 x A] - 1 in which "A" is the amount of the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for Canada for all items, for the 12- month period ending October 31 of the previous year, as published by Statistics Canada. The indexing factor shall be not less than 0 per cent and not greater than 4 per cent. (1.1) Subject to subsection (1.2), the indexing factor described in subsection (1) applies with respect to the calculation of all compensation payable under this Act. (1.2) The indexing factor described in subsection (1.3) applies with respect to the calculation of the following: Compensation under section 35 for survivors and dependants. Compensation for survivors and dependants under section 36 of the pre-1985 Act, as continued under section 145. Compensation for survivors and dependants under section 36 of the pre-1989 Act, as continued under section 146. Permanent disability benefits under subsection 43(1) of the pre-1985 Act, as continued under section 145, but only if the impairment of the earning capacity of the worker is 100 per cent of the worker's earning capacity. Permanent disability benefits under subsection 45(1) of the pre-1989 Act, as continued under section 146, but only if the impairment of the earning capacity of the worker is 100 per cent of the worker's earning capacity. All compensation payable to a worker whose permanent partial disability benefits are increased under subsection 147(14). [15] On January 1, 1998, the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997 (WSIA) came into effect. The WSIA provides that the WCA continues to apply to pre-1998 injuries. As well, certain provisions of the WSIA are applicable to this appeal. In particular, sections 112 and 126 require the Tribunal to apply Board policy in determining appeals where the hearing commenced January 1, 1998 or later. [16] The Board s General Counsel has confirmed by letter to the Tribunal dated August 4, 1998: With regards to the issue of which Devitt s Table is used for the calculation of the commutation of a permanent disability award which occurred during the transitional period, there is no SPECIFIC Board policy. However, the Board s practice can be found in a March 24, 1995 memorandum entitled Commutation Requests Prior to [17] The March 24, 1995 memorandum referred to by General Counsel states:

5 Page: 4 Decision No. 1387/99 (iii) With the implementation of Bill 165 and the introduction of the Friedland tables, an issue was raised regarding commutations. A worker who requests a commutation prior to January 1, 1995 but who does not have the award paid until after January 1, 1995 effectively loses a substantial amount of money due to the difference in the 4% CPI tables and the 6% Friedland tables. After meeting with Benefits Policy, it has been decided that if the commutation request was granted prior to January 1, 1995 we must commute the award using the 4% CPI tables. As well, if a worker requests a commutation prior to January 1, 1995 which is denied, subsequently appealed, then allowed, we must commute on the 4% CPI tables. [emphasis added] Findings and Conclusions [18] I have allowed this appeal for the following reasons. I have find that the worker requested a lump sum award of his pension on March 1, 1993, and that the Board denied that request by its letter dated March 24, The worker then appealed from that decision through his representative s letter of February 1997, and the Board reversed its 1993 decision, granting a lump sum award in March The Board practice, set out in the March 1995 memorandum, states that in such circumstances, the Board must commute on the 4% CPI tables. Further, such a result is consistent with the provisions of the WCA which were in effect at the time of the worker s request for a lump sum award in Finally, I note that subsection 45(4) of the WCA, which sets out the worker s entitlement to a lump sum award, provides that the Board shall pay pensions of ten percent or less as a lump sum unless the Board decides that this is not to the advantage of the worker. Thus, the Board was required to pay the worker a lump sum, if the conditions of subsection 45(4) were met, and this entitlement was not dependent upon the worker requesting it. [19] The Board s March 1993 letter set out two reasons for denying the worker s request for lump sum payment of his 10% pension. First, the Board s medical advisor was of the opinion that it was possible that the worker s condition might deteriorate and therefore entitlement was denied to a lump sum award under subsection 45(4) in accordance with the Board s policy, which stated that where there is a possibility of deterioration, a lump sum award would not be to the worker s advantage. Second, it denied entitlement under subsection 27(1) of the WCA, the more general commutation section, because the worker s request was purely for financial reasons and therefore did not meet the policy requirement that the commutation be likely to reduce the effects of the disability, and also did not fit within the category of a financial situation producing a disability. The letter then invited the worker to make a written submission to your claim file, if he felt that his request met the criteria and conditions outlined in the letter. [20] In my view, the Board s March 1993 letter communicated to the worker its decision to deny the worker s March 1, 1993 written request for a lump sum payment of his 10% pension. This denial remained in effect until the worker s representative wrote objecting to this decision, in February 1997, and the Board reversed its previous decision. The chain of events is that the worker requested a commutation in March 1993 and his request was denied in March In 1997 he objected to the decision to deny his request and his request was subsequently granted.

6 Page: 5 Decision No. 1387/99 [21] The Board s practice, set out in the memorandum of March 24, 1995, which I have quoted above, provides that the 4% CPI (Devitts) table applies where the request was made prior to January 1, 1995, denied, subsequently appealed and then allowed. That in my view is precisely what happened in this case. Therefore, I conclude that the 4% CPI (Devitts) table applies in the circumstances of this case, within the terms of the Board s policy. [22] This result is also consistent with section 45(4) and 148 of the pre-1989 Act, which was in effect at the time of the worker s injury and also at the time of his request for a lump sum award. The Board has in this case applied the amended section 148 formula (the Friedland formula ), which came into effect on January 1, 1995 under the amendments to section 148, more than two years after the worker requested the lump sum award and nearly five years after he was awarded the ten percent pension which is the basis of the lump sum award in March [23] The Board s Senior Benefits Adjudicator wrote to Mr. Abitbol on May 29, 1997 stating that since there was no adverse decision in 1993, the 4% Devitt s table does not come into play. With respect, I disagree. In my view, the Board s March 24, 1993 letter denied by its words and by its effect the worker s request for a lump sum or commutation, for specific reasons which were set out in that letter. [24] The Appeals Officer placed great weight on the fact that the Board was asked to provide further information and worker chose not to respond to the Board s March 1993 letter. The Appeals Officer concluded that the matter was again pursued in In other words, the Appeals Officer interpreted the March 1997 letter of Mr. Abitbol as a new request, rather than as an objection to the March 1993 decision of the Board. With respect, I disagree with the Appeals Officer s characterization of Mr. Abitbol s March 1997 letter. The words of that letter quite clearly object to and request a review of the March 1993 decision, for the reason that the March 1993 decision was faulty in its reasoning. It is not a new request. I construe the action taken by the worker s representative in February 1997 as effectively an appeal from the decision taken in March 1993 not to grant a lump sum award to the worker. [25] Further, I do not read the Board s March 1993 letter as asking the worker for more information. The Board did not ask the worker to provide any specific information. Rather, the Senior Benefits Adjudicator informed the worker that he might respond to the Board s decision by written submission to his file, if he felt that his request met the Board s criteria. In other words, if the worker wanted a review of that decision, he could make a written submission stating his reasons. [26] The worker s hand-written note requesting the lump sum payment in March 1993 is evidence to me that the worker was not accustomed to making written submissions on policy and legal issues. I do not take his silence following the March 1993 decision letter from the Board as a choice not to respond. In 1997, the worker did respond, through his representative, who filed a written objection to the decision contained in the March 1993 letter. [27] Thus, since the worker requested a lump sum payment of his pension award and the Board denied the worker s request before January 1, 1995, and since the worker appealed from that decision and his appeal was allowed, I conclude that it is within the intent of the Board s March 24, 1995 policy or practice memorandum, that the 4% CPI table be applied in this case.

7 Page: 6 Decision No. 1387/99 THE DECISION [28] The appeal is allowed. DATED: October 25, 1999 SIGNED: L. Gehrke

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1076/98I. Waiver (right to compensation) (settlement).

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1076/98I. Waiver (right to compensation) (settlement). SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1076/98I Waiver (right to compensation) (settlement). The worker and employer both appealed decisions of the Board regarding ongoing benefits and VR services. After following grievance

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL 2004 ONWSIAT 737 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1960/03 [1] This written appeal was considered in Toronto on March 31, 2004, by Tribunal Vice-Chair E.J. Sajtos. THE APPEAL

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2444/06

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2444/06 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2444/06 BEFORE: M. Crystal: Vice-Chair HEARING: December 4, 2006 at Toronto Written case DATE OF DECISION: December 5, 2006 NEUTRAL CITATION:

More information

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1015/94

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1015/94 WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1015/94 This appeal was heard by conference call between Toronto and Thunder Bay on December 1, 1994, by a Tribunal Panel consisting of: J.P. Moore:

More information

SUMMARY. Earnings basis (seasonal employment); Earnings basis (period of unemployment).

SUMMARY. Earnings basis (seasonal employment); Earnings basis (period of unemployment). SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1731/99 Earnings basis (seasonal employment); Earnings basis (period of unemployment). The worker appealed a decision of the Appeals Officer regarding the earnings basis for calculation

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL 2001 ONWSIAT 2499 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 398 01 [1] This appeal was heard in Toronto on February 16, 2001 by Tribunal Vice-Chair E.J. Sajtos. THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Deceased Worker) Participant entitled to respond to this appeal: The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL DECISION

More information

NOTEWORTHY DECISION SUMMARY. Decision: WCAT-2005-02255-RB Panel: Rob Kyle Decision Date: April 29, 2005

NOTEWORTHY DECISION SUMMARY. Decision: WCAT-2005-02255-RB Panel: Rob Kyle Decision Date: April 29, 2005 NOTEWORTHY DECISION SUMMARY Decision: WCAT-2005-02255-RB Panel: Rob Kyle Decision Date: April 29, 2005 Is Worker Occupation a Factor to Consider when Calculating Functional Impairment Permanent Disability

More information

SUMMARY. DECIDED BY: Sajtos; Anderson; Young DATE: 24/03/99 ACT: WCA BOARD DIRECTIVES AND GUIDELINES: Operational Policy Manual, Document No.

SUMMARY. DECIDED BY: Sajtos; Anderson; Young DATE: 24/03/99 ACT: WCA BOARD DIRECTIVES AND GUIDELINES: Operational Policy Manual, Document No. SUMMARY DECISION NO. 303/99 Health care (dental aid); Board Directives and Guidelines (health care) (dental aid) (abutment teeth). The worker was struck in the face, suffering a cracked tooth and damage

More information

Noteworthy Decision Summary. Decision: WCAT-2015-00701 Panel: Susan Marten Decision Date: February 27, 2015

Noteworthy Decision Summary. Decision: WCAT-2015-00701 Panel: Susan Marten Decision Date: February 27, 2015 Noteworthy Decision Summary Decision: WCAT-2015-00701 Panel: Susan Marten Decision Date: February 27, 2015 Payment of Interest - Policy item #50.00 of the Rehabilitation Services and Claims Manual, Volume

More information

WORKERS' COMPENSATION BENEFITS Claims Between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 1997

WORKERS' COMPENSATION BENEFITS Claims Between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 1997 WORKERS' COMPENSATION BENEFITS Claims Between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 1997 The following information relates to workers injured on the job between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 1997. Accidents

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1025/94 This appeal was heard in Toronto on December 5, 1994, by a Tribunal Panel consisting of: R.E. Hartman : Vice-Chair, G.M. Nipshagen: Member representative

More information

Decision Number: WCAT-2015-02919

Decision Number: WCAT-2015-02919 WCAT Decision Number: WCAT-2015-02919 WCAT Decision Date: September 23, 2015 Panel: Joanne Kembel, Vice Chair Introduction [1] This is a referral to the chair of the (WCAT) under section 251 of the Workers

More information

INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA

INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA WORKERS COMPENSATION INFORMATION FOR THE INJURED WORKER Phoenix Office: Industrial Commission of Arizona 800 W. Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007-2922 Claims Phone:

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2529/07E

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2529/07E WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2529/07E BEFORE: U. Ferdinand: Vice-Chair HEARING: November 5, 2007 Written DATE OF DECISION: December 11, 2007 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2007 ONWSIAT

More information

Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Amendment Act (No. 2) 1999

Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Amendment Act (No. 2) 1999 Western Australia Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Amendment Act (No. 2) 1999 No. 33 of 1999 An Act to amend the Workers Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 1981 and for related purposes. [Assented

More information

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 143/97. Suitable employment.

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 143/97. Suitable employment. SUMMARY DECISION NO. 143/97 Suitable employment. The worker slipped and fell in January 1992, injuring her low back and hip. She was awarded a 28% NEL award for her low back condition. The worker appealed

More information

MARCH 9, 2015. Referred to Committee on Commerce, Labor and Energy. SUMMARY Makes various changes relating to workers compensation.

MARCH 9, 2015. Referred to Committee on Commerce, Labor and Energy. SUMMARY Makes various changes relating to workers compensation. S.B. SENATE BILL NO. COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, LABOR AND ENERGY MARCH, 0 Referred to Committee on Commerce, Labor and Energy SUMMARY Makes various changes relating to workers compensation. (BDR -) FISCAL

More information

DECISION NO. 4/92. Commutation (vehicle purchase).

DECISION NO. 4/92. Commutation (vehicle purchase). DECISION NO. 4/92 Commutation (vehicle purchase). The worker was awarded a 15% pension for an upper back condition resulting from his employment as a security guard. He had previously received a partial

More information

FD: ACN=1004 ACC=R FD: DT:D DN: 609/87 STY:PANEL: Thomas; Robillard; Jago DDATE:23/07/87 ACT: 40(3) [old 41(2)], 40(2)(b) [old 41(1)(b)] KEYW:

FD: ACN=1004 ACC=R FD: DT:D DN: 609/87 STY:PANEL: Thomas; Robillard; Jago DDATE:23/07/87 ACT: 40(3) [old 41(2)], 40(2)(b) [old 41(1)(b)] KEYW: FD: ACN=1004 ACC=R FD: DT:D DN: 609/87 STY:PANEL: Thomas; Robillard; Jago DDATE:23/07/87 ACT: 40(3) [old 41(2)], 40(2)(b) [old 41(1)(b)] KEYW: Temporary partial disability (level of benefits); Availability

More information

Workers Compensation Amendment (Transitional) Regulation 2012

Workers Compensation Amendment (Transitional) Regulation 2012 New South Wales Workers Compensation Amendment (Transitional) Regulation 2012 under the Workers Compensation Act 1987 Her Excellency the Governor, with the advice of the Executive Council, has made the

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1599/15

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1599/15 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1599/15 BEFORE: S. Peckover: Vice-Chair HEARING: August 7, 2015 at Toronto Written DATE OF DECISION: August 10, 2015 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2015

More information

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 70/98. Delay (treatment); Kienbock's disease.

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 70/98. Delay (treatment); Kienbock's disease. SUMMARY DECISION NO. 70/98 Delay (treatment); Kienbock's disease. A construction worker injured his wrist while moving a plank on September 25, 1991. He continued working and did not seek medical treatment

More information

NOTE: THIS IS A SECOND CORRECTED OPINION/ORDER. THE BOLDED CORRECTION IS AN ADDITION TO FOOTNOTE #1.

NOTE: THIS IS A SECOND CORRECTED OPINION/ORDER. THE BOLDED CORRECTION IS AN ADDITION TO FOOTNOTE #1. NOTE: THIS IS A SECOND CORRECTED OPINION/ORDER. THE BOLDED CORRECTION IS AN ADDITION TO FOOTNOTE #1. BRUCE M. MCDANIEL, PLAINTIFF, 2001ACO # 27 S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKER'S COMPENSATION APPELLATE

More information

Number 38 of 2013. Social Welfare and Pensions Act 2013

Number 38 of 2013. Social Welfare and Pensions Act 2013 Number 38 of 2013 Social Welfare and Pensions Act 2013 Number 38 of 2013 SOCIAL WELFARE AND PENSIONS ACT 2013 CONTENTS PART 1 PRELIMINARY AND GENERAL Section 1. Short title, construction, collective citations

More information

The Retained Firefighters Pension Settlement Introduction of the new modified pension arrangements

The Retained Firefighters Pension Settlement Introduction of the new modified pension arrangements Employee Information Leaflet The Retained Firefighters Pension Settlement Introduction of the new modified pension arrangements APRIL 2014 This information leaflet sets out the pension benefits on offer

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2395/13

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2395/13 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2395/13 BEFORE: A.G. Baker: Vice-Chair HEARING: December 27, 2013 at Toronto Written DATE OF DECISION: May 9, 2014 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2014 ONWSIAT

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL 2001 ONWSIAT 1893 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 193/00 [1] This appeal was heard in Toronto on September 22, 2000, by Tribunal Vice-Chair N. McCombie. THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS

More information

SOCIAL SECURITY TRIBUNAL DECISION General Division Employment Insurance

SOCIAL SECURITY TRIBUNAL DECISION General Division Employment Insurance Citation: M. M. v. Canada Employment Insurance Commission, 2014 SSTGDEI 7 Appeal No: GE-13-1775 BETWEEN: M. M. Appellant Claimant and Canada Employment Insurance Commission Respondent SOCIAL SECURITY TRIBUNAL

More information

The Workers Compensation Act (the Act) provides that certain benefits may be paid as an annuity. These include:

The Workers Compensation Act (the Act) provides that certain benefits may be paid as an annuity. These include: Section Policy 40 44.100.20 Section Title: Benefits Administration Other Entitlements Subject: Annuities Effective Date: January 1, 2006 GENERAL INFORMATION The Workers Compensation Act (the Act) provides

More information

Disability Retirement Guide Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi

Disability Retirement Guide Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi Disability Retirement Guide Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi Disability retirement benefits available through the Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi (PERS) provide you

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F410959 C BEAN TRANSPORT, SELF INSURED COMPENSATION MANAGERS, TPA

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F410959 C BEAN TRANSPORT, SELF INSURED COMPENSATION MANAGERS, TPA BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F410959 MICHAEL LEE C BEAN TRANSPORT, SELF INSURED COMPENSATION MANAGERS, TPA CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED MARCH 19, 2007

More information

Social Security (Employment Injuries Insurance) EMPLOYMENT INJURIES (QUESTIONS AND APPEALS) REGULATIONS

Social Security (Employment Injuries Insurance) EMPLOYMENT INJURIES (QUESTIONS AND APPEALS) REGULATIONS Social Security (Employment Injuries Insurance) Regulations made under s.50. 1952-10 EMPLOYMENT INJURIES (QUESTIONS AND APPEALS) () 18.10.1954 Amending enactments Relevant current provisions Commencement

More information

Consultation Document. Retained Firefighters pension settlement: A consultation to provide access to a modified pension scheme in Wales

Consultation Document. Retained Firefighters pension settlement: A consultation to provide access to a modified pension scheme in Wales Number: WG19518 Welsh Government Consultation Document Retained Firefighters pension settlement: A consultation to provide access to a modified pension scheme in Wales Date of issue: 23 August 2013 Action

More information

ADDENDUM TO THE RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN DECLARATION OF TRUST ESTABLISHING A LOCKED-IN RETIREMENT ACCOUNT. Saskatchewan (LIRA)

ADDENDUM TO THE RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN DECLARATION OF TRUST ESTABLISHING A LOCKED-IN RETIREMENT ACCOUNT. Saskatchewan (LIRA) ADDENDUM TO THE RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN DECLARATION OF TRUST ESTABLISHING A LOCKED-IN RETIREMENT ACCOUNT Saskatchewan (LIRA) 1. What the Words Mean: Please remember that in this Addendum, I, me and my

More information

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 1043. September Term, 2006 ATRELLE T. THOMAS GIANT FOOD, LLC, ET AL.

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 1043. September Term, 2006 ATRELLE T. THOMAS GIANT FOOD, LLC, ET AL. REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1043 September Term, 2006 ATRELLE T. THOMAS v. GIANT FOOD, LLC, ET AL. Eyler, Deborah S., Woodward, McAuliffe, John F. (Ret'd, Specially Assigned),

More information

On April 6, 2004, a Board Hearing Officer confirmed the Case Manager s findings.

On April 6, 2004, a Board Hearing Officer confirmed the Case Manager s findings. 1 CLAIM HISTORY AND APPEAL PROCEEDINGS: The Worker was employed in a coal mine operation from 1978 until 2001, primarily as a long wall electrician. He was also a member of the mine rescue team (a Drägerman

More information

Review of Section 38 (Benefits), Workers Compensation Act

Review of Section 38 (Benefits), Workers Compensation Act Legislative Review of Workers Compensation Review of Section 38 (Benefits), Workers Compensation Act Discussion Paper May 2015 Discussion Paper May 2015 Published by: Province of New Brunswick P.O. Box

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1119/09

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1119/09 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1119/09 BEFORE: T. Mitchinson: Vice-Chair HEARING: June 3, 2009 at Sudbury Oral DATE OF DECISION: June 8, 2009 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2009 ONWSIAT

More information

Knoff v. Joe Knoff Illuminating (July 12, 2005) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Knoff v. Joe Knoff Illuminating (July 12, 2005) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Knoff v. Joe Knoff Illuminating (July 12, 2005) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Joe Knoff ) Opinion No. 39-05WC ) v. ) By: Margaret A. Mangan ) Hearing Officer Joe Knoff Illuminating ) ) For: Patricica

More information

Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division

Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division WHSCRD Case No: 14275-11 WHSCC Claim No: 837491 Decision Number: 15034 Marlene A. Hickey Chief Review Commissioner The Review Proceedings 1. The

More information

SETTLEMENT DISCLOSURE NOTICE

SETTLEMENT DISCLOSURE NOTICE SETTLEMENT DISCLOSURE NOTICE Final Settlement of a Statutory Accident Benefits Claim Bill 164 (For accidents between January 1, 1994 and October 31, 1996) NOTICE AND CAUTION Your insurer is required to

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION ABEL ZEPEDA ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 264,962 BILL DAVIS ROOFING and ) ADAME AND ASSOCIATES OF KC, LLP ) Respondents ) AND

More information

Locked-in Retirement Income Requirements

Locked-in Retirement Income Requirements Government of Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Government Services Consumer and Corporate Affairs Financial Services Regulation Division DIRECTIVE NO. 17 Issued under the Pension Benefits Act, 1997,

More information

STATE OF NEW MEXICO WORKERS COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION. WCA No.: PETITION FOR LUMP SUM PAYMENT RETURN TO WORK

STATE OF NEW MEXICO WORKERS COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION. WCA No.: PETITION FOR LUMP SUM PAYMENT RETURN TO WORK ,, and, WCA No.: PETITION FOR LUMP SUM PAYMENT RETURN TO WORK This form should be used for lump sums after return to work for 6 months, earning at least 80% of the pre-injury wage pursuant to 52-5-12(B).

More information

Case No. JUDGE. b. The Injured Worker s date of birth is. c. The accident or occupational exposure occurred when (describe activities)

Case No. JUDGE. b. The Injured Worker s date of birth is. c. The accident or occupational exposure occurred when (describe activities) Name Bar # Law Firm Address Phone # Fax # Attorney for, Petitioner, vs., Respondents. COMMUTATION AGREEMENT Case No. JUDGE STIPULATED FACTS 1. Industrial Accident or Occupational Disease a. On, 20, or

More information

Effective Date: Applies to accidents on or after January 1, 1992

Effective Date: Applies to accidents on or after January 1, 1992 Section Policy 40 44.100.20 Section Title: Benefits Administration Other Entitlements Subject: Annuities Effective Date: Applies to accidents on or after January 1, 1992 GENERAL INFORMATION The Workers

More information

HOW TO FILE A DISABILITY CLAIM (For Benefits Provided Pursuant to an Employer Provided Benefit Plan)

HOW TO FILE A DISABILITY CLAIM (For Benefits Provided Pursuant to an Employer Provided Benefit Plan) HOW TO FILE A DISABILITY CLAIM (For Benefits Provided Pursuant to an Employer Provided Benefit Plan) If you have Short Term Disability and/or Long Term Disability coverage by virtue of your employment,

More information

Noteworthy Decision Summary. Decision: WCAT Panel: Herb Morton Decision Date: November 22, 2004

Noteworthy Decision Summary. Decision: WCAT Panel: Herb Morton Decision Date: November 22, 2004 Noteworthy Decision Summary Decision: WCAT-2004-06118 Panel: Herb Morton Decision Date: November 22, 2004 Varying a Decision to the Detriment of Appellant - Scope of Decision Issue not Raised by Appeal

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Worker) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: [X] (Employer) and Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL DECISION

More information

Unlocking Pension Money

Unlocking Pension Money An information bulletin regarding the unlocking of pensions pursuant to The Pension Benefits Act, 1992. fcaa.gov.sk.ca Page 2 [This page was left blank intentionally] Introduction Section 29 of The Pension

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Worker) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL DECISION Representative:

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION KENNETH L. HARGETT ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 173,294 W. A. DUNBAR ) Respondent ) AND ) ) CNA INSURANCE COMPANY ) Insurance

More information

An Introduction to Work Injury Damages

An Introduction to Work Injury Damages An Introduction to Work Injury Damages 2010 Edition Author: Christopher Michael Accredited Specialist Blue: Black: Pantone 540C Edwards Michael Lawyers An Introduction to Work Injury Damages 2010 Edition

More information

SUMMARY. Negligence (duty of care) (occupational health and safety); Negligence (worker); Transfer of costs.

SUMMARY. Negligence (duty of care) (occupational health and safety); Negligence (worker); Transfer of costs. SUMMARY DECISION NO. 710/94 Negligence (duty of care) (occupational health and safety); Negligence (worker); Transfer of costs. The accident employer appealed a decision which refused the accident employer's

More information

AN ACT RELATING TO WORKERS' COMPENSATION; INCREASING BENEFITS; REMOVING FILING FEES; AMENDING AND REPEALING SECTIONS OF THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT.

AN ACT RELATING TO WORKERS' COMPENSATION; INCREASING BENEFITS; REMOVING FILING FEES; AMENDING AND REPEALING SECTIONS OF THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT. AN ACT RELATING TO WORKERS' COMPENSATION; INCREASING BENEFITS; REMOVING FILING FEES; AMENDING AND REPEALING SECTIONS OF THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW

More information

INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA

INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA WORKERS COMPENSATION INFORMATION FOR THE INJURED WORKER Phoenix Office: Industrial Commission of Arizona 800 W. Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007-2922 Claims Phone:

More information

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION BEFORE THE APPEALS BOARD FOR THE KANSAS DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION EVANGELINA GRAJEDA ) Claimant ) VS. ) ) Docket No. 1,013,096 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES ) Respondent ) AND ) ) BANKERS STANDARD INSURANCE

More information

WikiLeaks Document Release

WikiLeaks Document Release WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RS20519 ASBESTOS COMPENSATION ACT OF 2000 Henry Cohen, American Law Division Updated April 13, 2000 Abstract. This report

More information

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Applicant: [*] Respondents: [*] et al and The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia SECTION 29 APPLICATION - PRELIMINARY DECISION Representatives:

More information

Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division

Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division WHSCRD Case No: 14152-06 WHSCC Claim No: 606499 and 791748 Decision Number: 14147 Lloyd Piercey Review Commissioner The Review Proceedings 1. The

More information

WORKERS GUIDE YUKON WORKERS COMPENSATION HEALTH AND SAFETY BOARD. working together WITH YUKON WORKERS AND EMPLOYERS

WORKERS GUIDE YUKON WORKERS COMPENSATION HEALTH AND SAFETY BOARD. working together WITH YUKON WORKERS AND EMPLOYERS WORKERS GUIDE YUKON WORKERS COMPENSATION HEALTH AND SAFETY BOARD working together WITH YUKON WORKERS AND EMPLOYERS workers compensation WORKERS COMPENSATION Workers compensation is an employer-funded insurance

More information

Disability Benefits Plan

Disability Benefits Plan MONTGOMERY COUNTY Disability Benefits Plan Summary Plan Description January 2014 Contents Introduction... 3 Eligibility... 3 Definition of Disability... 3 Initial Disability... 3 Temporary Disability...

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL 2005 ONWSIAT 469 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1300/04 [1] This appeal was considered in Toronto on August 3, 2004, by Tribunal Vice-Chair M. Crystal. THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS

More information

STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. Directive: 393.01

STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. Directive: 393.01 STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Directive: 393.01 Subject: Inmate Workers Compensation Effective Date: June 15, 1994 Review and Re-Issue Date: Supersedes: NEW APA Rule

More information

Workers' Compensation Act, 1981 (as amended), Sections 1(1)(d), 49,51,57, and 83

Workers' Compensation Act, 1981 (as amended), Sections 1(1)(d), 49,51,57, and 83 04-05 PART I REFERENCE : Workers' Compensation Act, 1981 (as amended), Sections 1(1)(d), 49,51,57, and 83 When a work-related injury results in compensable work restrictions that impair a worker's employability

More information

IT IS A PLEASURE TO APPEAR AT YOUR SUBCOMMITTEE ONCE AGAIN TO PROVIDE AN UPDATE FROM A LEGION PERSPECTIVE ON THE NEW VETERANS CHARTER (NVC).

IT IS A PLEASURE TO APPEAR AT YOUR SUBCOMMITTEE ONCE AGAIN TO PROVIDE AN UPDATE FROM A LEGION PERSPECTIVE ON THE NEW VETERANS CHARTER (NVC). IT IS A PLEASURE TO APPEAR AT YOUR SUBCOMMITTEE ONCE AGAIN TO PROVIDE AN UPDATE FROM A LEGION PERSPECTIVE ON THE NEW VETERANS CHARTER (NVC). SOME OF OUR COMMENTS WILL DEAL WITH PROGRAMS AND POLICIES THAT

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F306117 JOHNNY L. BROWN, EMPLOYEE LITTLE ROCK CRATE & BASKET COMPANY, EMPLOYER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F306117 JOHNNY L. BROWN, EMPLOYEE LITTLE ROCK CRATE & BASKET COMPANY, EMPLOYER BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F306117 JOHNNY L. BROWN, EMPLOYEE LITTLE ROCK CRATE & BASKET COMPANY, EMPLOYER AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, INSURANCE CARRIER and AIG CLAIM

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA ELIZABETH J. SWARTZ, Administratrix of the Estate of JOHN P. SWARTZ, Petitioner v. No. 2254 C.D. 1999 ARGUED April 12, 2000 WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD

More information

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 106

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 106 DECISION NO. 106 IN THE MATTER OF an action commenced in the Supreme Court of Ontario, as Action No. 50-85; AND IN THE MATTER OF an application pursuant to Section 15 of the Workers' Compensation Act,

More information

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 303/95R. Reconsideration (consideration of evidence).

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 303/95R. Reconsideration (consideration of evidence). SUMMARY DECISION NO. 303/95R Reconsideration (consideration of evidence). The worker's application to reconsider Decision No. 303/95 was denied. The hearing panel considered the evidence and reached its

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: [PERSONAL INFORMATION] CASE ID #[PERSONAL INFORMATION] APPELLANT AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT DECISION #200 Appellant

More information

Northwest Territories and Nunavut 06.03

Northwest Territories and Nunavut 06.03 POLICY STATEMENT The Workers Safety and Compensation Commission (WSCC) provides monthly pension payments to workers with a permanent disability resulting from a work-related injury or disease. In the case

More information

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL 2005 ONWSIAT 1489 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 627/05 [1] This appeal was heard in Ottawa on April 1, 2005, by a Tribunal Panel consisting of: B. Alexander: Vice-Chair,

More information

(15-05-02)(Total and Permanent Disability Termination Sharlene A. Andoe Newark School District - # 66)

(15-05-02)(Total and Permanent Disability Termination Sharlene A. Andoe Newark School District - # 66) MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Trustees TAB 7 FROM: Benefit Review Committee DATE: May 21, 2015 SUBJECT: Report of the Benefit Review Committee Meeting on May 21, 2015 The Regular Meeting of the Benefit Review

More information

Automobile Injury Compensation Appeal Commission

Automobile Injury Compensation Appeal Commission Automobile Injury Compensation Appeal Commission IN THE MATTER OF an Appeal by [the Appellant] AICAC File No.: AC-11-010 and AC-11-077 PANEL: APPEARANCES: Ms Laura Diamond, Chairperson Ms Linda Newton

More information

Benefits Guide. Information for the Injured Worker

Benefits Guide. Information for the Injured Worker Benefits Guide Information for the Injured Worker The purpose of this benefits guide is to help you learn what to expect if you ever need workers compensation benefits. Recovering from a work injury can

More information

THE FIRTH V SUTTON DECISIONS

THE FIRTH V SUTTON DECISIONS THE FIRTH V SUTTON DECISIONS Introduction In professional negligence proceedings against a solicitor, the court s aim is to determine what amount of money would put the plaintiff in the position he would

More information

Your Rights Under the Missouri Workers Compensation Law

Your Rights Under the Missouri Workers Compensation Law Your Rights Under the Missouri Workers Compensation Law All states have workers compensation laws. The Missouri Workers Compensation Law is contained in Chapter 287 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri.

More information

2013 Nuts & Bolts Seminar Coralville

2013 Nuts & Bolts Seminar Coralville 2013 Nuts & Bolts Seminar Coralville LITIGATION TRACK Work Comp 101 2:30 pm.-3:30 p.m. Presented by Tim Semelroth RSH Legal 425 Second Street SE, Suite 1140 Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 Phone: 319-365-9200

More information

First and current law: 1965 (social security fund), with amendments.

First and current law: 1965 (social security fund), with amendments. Page 1 of 6 Social Security Programs Throughout the World: Africa, 2009 You are here: Social Security Online > Research, Statistics, & Policy Analysis > Program Descriptions > Social Security Programs

More information

Have you or someone you know suffered a personal injury? TIPS TO MAXIMIZE COMPENSATION

Have you or someone you know suffered a personal injury? TIPS TO MAXIMIZE COMPENSATION Have you or someone you know suffered a personal injury? TIPS TO MAXIMIZE COMPENSATION If you have suffered a personal injury it is important to consider all potential sources of compensation. A personal

More information

DECISION NO. 1708/10

DECISION NO. 1708/10 B. Kalvin WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1708/10 BEFORE: B. Kalvin : Vice-Chair HEARING: September 9, 2010 at Toronto Oral DATE OF DECISION: September 15, 2010 NEUTRAL CITATION:

More information

Employment Injuries and Occupational Diseases: Benefits (Permanent Incapacity) a), 2005

Employment Injuries and Occupational Diseases: Benefits (Permanent Incapacity) a), 2005 Austria Belgium 20% (50% for pupils and students). Accident insurance fund. Review at any time possible in the first two years; thereafter at intervals of at least 1 year. No minimum level. Employment

More information

STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS

STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS NORTH CAROLINA TRIAL JUDGES BENCH BOOK, SUPERIOR COURT, VOL. 2 (Civil), Structured Settlements, at pp. 4-7 (3d ed.) (Institute of Government 1999) A. THE APPROVAL HEARING 1. Plaintiff

More information

General Information on Representing Yourself in a Workers Compensation Case

General Information on Representing Yourself in a Workers Compensation Case General Information on Representing Yourself in a Workers Compensation Case Idaho Industrial Commission PO Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720-0041 Telephone: (208) 334-6000 Fax: (208) 332-7558 www.iic.idaho.gov

More information

COMMUTATION INSTRUCTIONS

COMMUTATION INSTRUCTIONS COMMUTATION INSTRUCTIONS The following examples illustrate various methods of commuting permanent disability and life pension benefits. Examples A, B and C apply to permanent disability and utilize Table

More information

Provided By AdvisorNet Benefits Workers Compensation Employee Benefits

Provided By AdvisorNet Benefits Workers Compensation Employee Benefits Provided By AdvisorNet Workers Compensation Employee Minnesota s workers compensation laws determine the benefits available to employees who are injured in the course and scope of employment. An injury

More information

ILARS POLICY Funding of applications by injured workers to pursue claims for compensation

ILARS POLICY Funding of applications by injured workers to pursue claims for compensation ILARS POLICY Funding of applications by injured workers to pursue claims for compensation Introduction This WIRO Policy sets out the circumstances in which the Independent Legal Assistance and Review Service

More information

Victims of Crime; Victims of Change: Transition and Discretion in Crime Victim Assistance Legislation in British Columbia

Victims of Crime; Victims of Change: Transition and Discretion in Crime Victim Assistance Legislation in British Columbia Victims of Crime; Victims of Change: Transition and Discretion in Crime Victim Assistance Legislation in British Columbia Special Report No. 30, May 2007 to the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia

More information

A - 3 Plan deduction indicates membership in 1&2..( 24 5$6

A - 3 Plan deduction indicates membership in 1&2..( 24 5$6 ! " #$%&' ( First, an important note from our lawyers. This booklet is intended only as a guide and does not establish any legal rights. It is intended as a summary of the benefits provided at the time

More information

Stacey Colson v. Town of Randolph (June 4, 2010) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. Patricia Moulton Powden Commissioner

Stacey Colson v. Town of Randolph (June 4, 2010) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. Patricia Moulton Powden Commissioner Stacey Colson v. Town of Randolph (June 4, 2010) STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Stacey Colson Opinion No. 20-10WC v. By: Phyllis Phillips, Esq. Hearing Officer Town of Randolph ATTORNEYS: For: Patricia

More information