TAMUS HR/Payroll System Selection Evaluation Process
|
|
- Archibald Harrington
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Texas A&M University System Revised 9/19/2014 Version 1.0
2 Contents 1 - Objectives Deliverables Evaluation Team Team Member Responsibilities Team Composition Team Members Process Overview Detailed Process Description Evaluation Criteria/Scoring Mapping of RFP Section 4 responses to scoring criteria Weighting for Detailed Requirements responses Scoring for Short-list Evaluation Schedule and Activities Related Documents Change History... 9 The Texas A&M University System Page i 9/19/2014
3 1 - Objectives The purpose of this document is to define a structured process to be followed in evaluating proposals submitted in response to the TAMUS RFP for the acquisition of HR/Payroll software. The Evaluation Team may elect to modify selected details of this plan during the evaluation process based on the System s best interest. The objectives of the evaluation process are to: Determine the HR/Payroll software that best satisfies the requirements specified in the RFP. Ensure that the interests of all TAMUS system member institutions/agencies are considered. Conduct a fair and objective assessment of all interested vendors. 2 - Deliverables As a result of the evaluation procedures described in this guide, the Evaluation Team will deliver the following: 1. Vendor Short-list Report This report will identify the top two or three responders who will be asked to provide software demonstrations and participate in site visits and reference checks. It should include a ranked list of all responders who were included in the short-list evaluation along with the final scoring matrix. 2. Presentation to the HR Advisory Group - The Evaluation Team, or selected members, will present the Short-list to the HR Advisory group along with the scoring results and supporting documentation. 3. Final Evaluation Report This report will document the final recommendations that result from the evaluation process. It will summarize the content of the proposals, key points differentiating each, and the scoring each achieved related to the specifications outlined in the RFP. It is anticipated that this document will identify the preferred Responder, the main reasons for selecting the Responder, and will recommend that negotiations begin. 4. Presentation to the HR Advisory Group The Evaluation Team, or selected members, will present the RFP Evaluation Report, including Evaluation Team recommendations to the HR Advisory Group. 5. Presentation to the Steering Committee The Evaluation Team, or selected members, will present the RFP Evaluation Report, including Evaluation Team recommendations to the Steering Committee. 3 - Evaluation Team 3.0 Team Member Responsibilities 1. Each Evaluation Team member should play an active role in the evaluation process, attend Evaluation Team meetings and review each Responder s proposal independently and without bias. 2. During the RFP evaluation process, the TAMUS Procurement Director is the ONLY person authorized to release results or communicate with the Responders. All requests for further information or clarification must be forwarded to the TAMUS Procurement Director Jeff Zimmermann at JZimmermann@tamus.edu. 3. Evaluators must take all reasonable steps to safeguard pertinent evaluation data. Materials should be locked or put away in the office. If portions are taken off-site, they should be treated as confidential data and kept secure at all times. 4. During the evaluation, all proposals and corresponding information are to be considered confidential data and shall be treated in accordance with relevant data practice laws. 5. Team members should not discuss evaluation results with anyone except as part of the evaluation. 6. Evaluation Team members will be required to sign the Texas A&M System Proposal Evaluation Non-Disclosure Statement. While serving as an Evaluation Team member, all possible perceived or actual conflicts of interest or any other perceived or actual irregularities shall be promptly disclosed in writing to the Procurement Director and project manager. 7. It is important that the full expertise and knowledge of System subject matter experts is allowed to enter the evaluation if needed, so evaluators are allowed to ask questions or seek input from subject matter experts within the TAMU System during The Texas A&M University System Page 1 Revised 9/5/2014
4 the evaluation. Vendor responses or sections of the proposals may be shared during these sessions, but each subject matter expert consulted must first sign the Texas A&M System Proposal Evaluation Non-Disclosure Statement. 8. Evaluation Team members must remember that, upon conclusion of the evaluation process and negotiations, all comments, scores, notes, etc. will become part of the public record, so all of these records must be properly maintained. 9. Team member are expected to maintain the integrity of the RFP process beyond reproach. 3.1 Team Composition The team will have representation with expertise in HR, Payroll, Faculty Administration, Finance and IT. In order to keep the team to a workable size, not all system members will have direct representation on the team, but deliverables from each phase of the project will be reviewed by the full system-wide HR Advisory Committee in order to receive input from that group. 3.2 Team Members Name Title System member Mark Schulz (Chairman) IT Enterprise Architect System Offices Gary Barnes Assoc. V.P. For Finance and Controller TAMU Teresa Bass Comptroller System Offices Dr. Michael Benedik Dean Of Faculties & Associate Provost TAMU Joe Corn Director of Payroll and Benefits Ag Programs Barbara Corvey Chief Human Resources Officer TAMU Commerce Debra Cortinas Director Of Human Resources TAMU Corpus Christi Danny Grimes Director of Payroll TAMU Randy Guillot Manager, B/P/P Operations Center System Offices Lallah Howard Assoc. V.P., Fiscal Affairs & Comptroller TAMU Kingsville Carol Manthei Principal Software Developer System Offices Rayellen Milburn Senior Associate Vice Pres & Controller HSC Damon Slaydon Director, Human Resources TEES DeAnna White Assistant Director Of Human Resources TAMU Also participating in the process will be Mitt Salvaggio of Information Services Group (ISG). ISG consultants helped with the requirements definition and creation of the RFP. Mitt s role in the evaluation will be as an advisor only. He has assisted many public sector clients in similar projects and will be able to guide the team on process, provide input on best practices and help interpret vendor responses as needed. He will not have a vote in any team decisions or assigning vendor scores. The Texas A&M University System Page 2 Revised 9/5/2014
5 4-4.0 Process Overview The evaluation process will have three phases. Phase 1 Minimum Standards Review The Advantiv project manager will forward all response information and reports for vendors whose submissions are complete. Incomplete submissions will not be included in the evaluation process. The TAMUS Procurement Director will review the responses for minimal standards compliance. All vendor responses that pass that review will be forwarded to the Evaluation Team for the next phase of evaluation. Phase 2 Short-list Decision The Evaluation Team will be provided all vendor responses to the main RFP entered in Decision Director. Responses to the Detailed Requirements portion of the RFP will be reviewed and weighted by subject-area as listed in Section 5.1 and the resulting reports and detailed responses will be provided to the Evaluation Team for review. The Evaluation Team will review all submitted proposals and reports and score each vendor response using mapping and weighting described in section 5. The result of Phase 2 is a short-list of vendors to be invited for software demonstrations and included in reference checks and site visits. Results of the phase 2 evaluation will be presented to the HR Advisory Committee for review and input. After that presentation, the Evaluation Team will make any needed adjustments and finalize the short-list. The short-listed vendors will be provided a notification letter inviting them to demonstrate their software solution, provide references and arrange site visits. Phase 3 Finalist Decision Following software demonstrations, reference checks and site visits, Best and Final Offers (BAFOs) will be requested from short-listed vendors, giving them an opportunity to amend selected portions of their proposals. After receipt of the short-listed vendors BAFO responses, the Evaluation Team will complete its scoring, and the Evaluation Report will be presented to the HR Advisory Committee. After receiving Advisory Committee input, the Evaluation Team will make any final adjustments to the report and present its recommendation and report to the Steering Committee who will make the final decision. 4.1 Detailed Process Description 1. Evaluation Team Orientation Session This is the initial training/planning session for the Evaluation Team. The objective of this planning session will be to ensure that all team members are aware of their roles and responsibilities, and the process to be followed in evaluating proposals received. The team will review the evaluation process and discuss/consider any changes. All team members shall sign and submit a Texas A&M System Proposal Evaluation Non-Disclosure Statement. 2. RFP Closing/Reporting The RFP will automatically close in Decision Director on September 30, The Advantiv project manager will forward all response information and reports for vendors whose submissions are complete. Incomplete submissions will not be included in the evaluation process. 3. Minimal Standard Review Each proposal will be reviewed by the TAMUS Procurement Director to ensure that all minimal standard proposal requirements have been met. Proposals failing to meet one or more of these requirements may be eliminated from further consideration. The Texas A&M University System Page 3 Revised 9/5/2014
6 4. Proposal Reporting Advantiv will provide all vendor responses from Appendix A Section 4 to the project manager who will distribute them to the team members. Responses to the Detailed Requirements entered in DD2 will be scored and weighted as listed in section 5.1. Summary reports along with a spreadsheet showing all responses will be provided to the team. 5. Proposals Review The Evaluation Team shall review the proposals and determine if any clarifications are required. Requests for clarification shall be submitted to the Procurement Director. Each Evaluator will conduct their review and come to the short-list workshop ready to discuss the responses. Each evaluator may, at their discretion, utilize subject matter experts to assist in their respective evaluations. Subject matter experts consulted for this evaluation will also be required to sign the Texas A&M System Proposal Evaluation Non-Disclosure Statement. 6. Short-list Workshop After reviewing the proposals and reports, the Evaluation Team members will meet for a short-list workshop to discuss their individual evaluations, score the responses and produce the Vendor Short-list Report. The workshop will be facilitated by the ISG consultant. All scores will be assigned by consensus of the team members after discussion of vendor responses. The first step will be a discussion of the Company Qualifications from which the team will assign a pass/fail score for each responder. All responders receiving a pass score on the Company Qualifications will be reviewed and scored on the remaining evaluation criteria: Software fit, Software toolset, Services (hosting, pre-implementation), Architecture/Strategic Direction, and Cost. Scores for each listed evaluation criteria will be decided by the team based on the responses to the questions in Appendix A, Section 4 which have been mapped to the criteria listed above. Mapping, scoring and weighting of responses for the short-list workshop are detailed in Sections 5. The Software fit score will be based on information from the reports and responses to the detailed requirements in DD2. The final task of the workshop is to identify which members will: Be presenters to the HR Advisory and Steering Committees (2-3), Conduct reference checks (3 4 member sub-committee), and Go on site visits (2-3 member sub-committee). 7. Presentation of Short-list results to HR Advisory Committee A meeting of the full HR Advisory Committee will be held to present results of the short-list workshop and receive feedback. The Vendor Short-list Report will be distributed to the HR Advisory Committee at least one day prior to the meeting. Selected members of the Evaluation Team will lead the discussion, review the scores, and answer any questions presented by the Committee. A scribe will record significant feedback for later discussion by the Evaluation Team. 8. Short-list final meeting The Evaluation Team will meet again to consider adjustments to the short-list scoring based on feedback from the HR Advisory Committee. This meeting will result in the final short-list of vendors to be invited for software demonstrations and included in reference checks and site visits. The Texas A&M University System Page 4 Revised 9/5/2014
7 9. Selection of Short-list The Steering Team shall be briefed on the team s evaluation and the TAMUS Procurement Director will notify shortlisted Responders of their selection. The schedule of software demonstrations will be determined at this time by the TAMUS Procurement Director. 10. Short-listed Responder Notification Letters The Procurement Director will prepare and distribute individual notification letters. Each letter will notify Responders as to their status in the evaluation to the selected short-listed vendors that will include: The date, time and location of the software demonstrations A request for site visit recommendations Each short-listed vendor will also receive the following information exactly two-weeks prior to their first scheduled software demonstration: Demonstration instructions as may be appropriate for the conduct of the session Demonstration agenda and scripts 11. Software Demonstrations The short-listed vendors shall demonstrate their proposed software solution(s) to the Evaluation Team, SMEs, members of the HR Advisory Committee and other stakeholders. The sessions will be conducted in accordance with the Vendor Demonstration Scripts. The full set of demonstration scripts will be presented at the TAMU campus in College Station. A sub-set of the scripts will be presented at TAMU-Commerce and TAMU-Kingsville. The College Station demonstrations may be attended via web-meeting, but advance registration for that option will be required. 12. Software Demonstrations Scoring Evaluation Team members will be expected to attend all software demonstrations related to their area of expertise. They will be provided with a Software Demonstration Evaluation Worksheet on which to record their observations. Their participation and rating for all other demonstrations is encouraged, but not required. All other demonstration attendees will be asked to sign-in with their address when they attend a demonstration. Surveys will be sent to all attendees to collect their feedback on what they observed. Surveys will be less detailed than the Software Demonstration Evaluation Worksheet completed by Evaluation Team members, but will ask whether they attended demonstrations from all finalists. Survey results and individual team member demonstration evaluations will be presented to the full Evaluation Team at the Finalist Recommendation Workshop. Survey responses and team member evaluations will only be considered from individuals who attended specific sessions by both finalists. 13. References Check The References Sub-committee will review the references delivered with the proposal, decide which references to call and make calls to verify the information. A Draft Reference Interview Form has been provided for the team to review and modify as the Sub-committee deems appropriate. The final form will be completed during the call, and may be provided to the interviewee prior to the call if desired. The References Sub-committee will meet as a group and make the calls using a speakerphone or conference call line so that all team members participate in each interview. The Subcommittee will present their findings to the full Evaluation Team at the Finalist Recommendation Workshop. 14. Site visits The Site-visit Sub-committee will consider which sites to visit from those recommended by the vendor. They will visit 1 or 2 locations per finalist to gather information about the software and company. At least one visit for each should be to an institution of higher education currently running the software. A second visit to company headquarters or hosting-site could also be done. All Sub-committee members should attend the same site-visits and the equivalent type of visit for each finalist. For example, the team members who visit an institution of higher education for one The Texas A&M University System Page 5 Revised 9/5/2014
8 finalist should also visit a higher education institution for the other finalist. The Sub-committee will present their findings to the full Evaluation Team at the Finalist Recommendation Workshop. 15. Best and Final Offer Letters Distributed If requested by the Evaluation Team, the Procurement Director will prepare and distribute Best and Final Offer letters to selected Responders. The Procurement Director will receive the Best and Final Offers by a pre-determined due date and distribute them to the Evaluation Team. 16. Finalist Recommendation Workshop After software demonstrations, reference checks, and site visits are complete, and BAFO responses have been received, the Evaluation Team will meet for the Finalist Recommendation Workshop to discuss the results of those activities, determine their final decision-making criteria, and produce the Final Evaluation Report. The workshop will be facilitated by the ISG consultant. All decisions will be made by consensus of the team members after reports from sub-committees and individual team members. Scores assigned from the short-list workshop will be considered and may be adjusted based on information learned from the subsequent activities and BAFO responses. The team will agree on an outline for the Final Evaluation Report. Designated Evaluation Team members, with the help of the ISG consultant, will complete that report and prepare materials for presentation to the HR Advisory Committee. 17. Presentation of Finalist Recommendation to HR Advisory Committee A meeting of the full HR Advisory Committee will be held to present the finalist recommendation and receive feedback. The Final Evaluation Report will be distributed to the HR Advisory Committee at least one day prior to the meeting. Selected members of the Evaluation Team will lead the discussion and answer any questions presented by the Committee. A scribe will record significant feedback for later discussion by the Evaluation Team. 18. Finalist Recommendation wrap-up meeting The Evaluation Team will meet again to consider adjustments to the finalist recommendation based on feedback from the HR Advisory Committee. 19. Presentation to the Steering Committee A meeting of the Steering Committee will be held to present the finalist recommendation and answer questions. The Final Evaluation Report will be distributed to the Steering Committee one week prior to the meeting. Selected members of the Evaluation Team will lead the discussion and answer any questions presented by the Committee. The Steering Committee will make the final decision on the HR/Payroll Software vendor for TAMUS. 20. Notification Letters The Procurement Director will prepare and distribute the award notification letters to all Responders. Evaluation Team members will return all proposal evaluation materials plus any written notes from the evaluation process to the Procurement Director, who shall keep materials as required for public records needs. The Texas A&M University System Page 6 Revised 9/5/2014
9 5 - Evaluation Criteria/Scoring 5.0 Mapping of RFP Section 4 responses to scoring criteria Responses to Appendix A Section 4 Questions will apply to the Scoring criteria as follows: Scoring criteria Company Qualifications Architecture/Strategic Direction Software Fit Software Toolset Services Cost Section 4 Question Company Profile Information Strategic Direction User Community and Development Partnership Application Architecture Security Application Program Integration (API) Data Management Capabilities Business Intelligence and Data Warehousing Financial Management and Other Functionality Labor Distribution and Time and Effort Certification Key Differentiators Detailed Requirements responses from DD2 reports Proposed Business Software Applications Technology Support Products Software Licensing Integrated Tools, Software adaptability, Business Rules and Automated Workflow Self-Service Capabilities Mobile Devices Global Payment and Tax Support Accessibility Desktop Software Maintenance System Integration Software Upgrades Hosting Services Pricing 5.1 Weighting for Detailed Requirements responses Functional area weight Payroll 5 IT and General 5 Position Control 4 Benefits 4 Time tracking 4 Leave Tracking 4 Faculty Administration 3 HR Administration 3 Applicant Tracking 2 On-boarding/Off-boarding 2 Research Time and Effort 1 Compensation 1 Performance/Talent Management 1 Learning Mgmt/Employee Training 1 The Texas A&M University System Page 7 Revised 9/5/2014
10 5.2 Scoring for Short-list Scoring criteria Possible points Responder.. Company Qualifications pass/fail Architecture/Strategic Direction 30 Software Functional Fit 20 Software Toolset 10 Services 20 Cost 20 Total Evaluation Schedule and Activities The evaluation schedule is summarized in the Table below. This schedule is subject to change based on the final working schedule for the Evaluation Team. Date Sept. 25, 2014 Oct. 7 Oct. 7 - Oct. 15 Oct. 16 ( Oct. 17 if needed) Oct. 22 Nov. 10 Nov. 17 Dec. 1 Dec. 11 Week of Jan. 5, 2015 Jan. 5 Jan. 16 Jan. 22 (Jan. 23 if needed) Jan. 28 Feb. 11 Description of Event Evaluation Team Orientation Team receives RFP responses and reports Individual team members review all RFP materials Short-list Workshop Short-list Presentation to HR Advisory Committee and follow-up team meeting College Station Vendor Software Demonstrations Regional University Vendor Software Demonstrations Reference Checks Site Visits Finalist Recommendation Workshop Present finalist recommendation to HR Advisory Committee and follow-up team meeting Present finalist recommendation to Steering Committee The Texas A&M University System Page 8 Revised 9/5/2014
11 7 - Related Documents Texas A&M System Proposal Evaluation Non-Disclosure Statement A signed copy of this form will be required from every Team member of Subject matter expert who reviews Vendor responses or sections of the proposals. Vendor Reference Questionnaire This questionnaire will be used during telephone conference calls to Responder references. Vendor Demonstration Scripts These scripts document the key functionality that will be presented and evaluated during the demonstration process. The demonstration scripts, along with an agenda for the presentations and criteria for the vendor presentation segment, will be distributed to all short-listed vendors. Software Demonstration Evaluation Worksheet Based on the demonstration scripts, this worksheet will provide Evaluation Team members convenient format for recording their observations during vendor presentations/demonstrations. Use of this form is optional for the Evaluation Team member, but if used, it must be retained and turned in to the Procurement Director when the evaluation process is complete. Software Demonstration Survey All demonstration attendees will be sent this survey asking for their input. It will short (10-12 questions) and ask for feedback of a more general nature than the Software Demonstration Evaluation Worksheet. Short-list Evaluation Report This report will provide a ranked listing of all responders with supporting information from which the short-list will be selected. Final Evaluation Report This report will document the final recommendations that result from the evaluation process along with details of the bases of the recommendation. 8 Change History Ver Date Who What 1.0 9/19/2014 Carol Manthei Initial version for review by Evaluation Team The Texas A&M University System Page 9 Revised 9/5/2014
Request for Proposal HQC2012-11-16. Evaluation of Saskatchewan s Lean Health Care Transformation: Phase 1
Request for Proposal HQC2012-11-16 Evaluation of Saskatchewan s Lean Health Care Transformation: Phase 1 Issued: November 16, 2012 Table of Contents 1 Statement of Purpose... 3 2 About HQC... 4 3 Proposal
More informationBAM! Change is Coming Managing Change for Project Success
BAM! Change is Coming Managing Change for Project Success Texas A&M AgriLife Employee Development Symposium January 7, 2015 Leslie W. Lenser Executive Director, Program and Project Management 1 Topics
More informationRequest for Proposals IT INFRASTRUCTURE MODERNIZATION
Request for Proposals IT INFRASTRUCTURE MODERNIZATION Deadline to Submit Questions for Response: March 25, 2015 by 4:00 pm Deadline for Proposal Submissions: March 27, 2015 by 4:00 pm REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
More informationTexas Real Estate Commission Contract Management Procedures
Texas Real Estate Commission Contract Management Procedures The Texas Real Estate Commission s (TREC) has established contract management procedures that are in compliance with the State of Texas Contract
More informationConsultant Selection Policy for Building Infrastructure Consulting Services (Effective April 1, 2007)
Consultant Selection Policy for Building Infrastructure Consulting Services (Effective April 1, 2007) 1.0 SCOPE This policy applies to the procurement of consulting services contracted directly by the
More informationREQUESTS FOR PROPOSAL RFP TGF-16-017. Title: Professional Services for the Implementation of the Board Governance Performance Assessment Framework
REQUESTS FOR PROPOSAL RFP TGF-16-017 Title: Professional Services for the Implementation of the Board Governance Performance Assessment Framework Issue Date: March, 9th 2016 RFP Submission Date: March,
More informationPurchasing and Contracts Request for Proposal Procedure
Purchasing and Contracts Request for Proposal Procedure F.P.02.PR.3 Request for Proposal Procedures..2 F.P.02.PR.3.1 Commitment to Supplier Diversity...2 F.P.02.PR.3.2 Process Overview... 2 F.P.02.PR.3.3
More informationREQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST 4887 EOI NETWORK BACKUP/EMAIL ARCHIVING
4887 EOI REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST 4887 EOI NETWORK BACKUP/EMAIL ARCHIVING Expressions of Interest will be received at the Information Counter, Main Floor, Richmond City Hall, addressed to the
More informationGREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATED BOARD OF DIRECTORS CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES. Amended: December 9, 2014
GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATED BOARD OF DIRECTORS CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES Amended: December 9, 2014 Introduction The Board of Directors (the Board ) of Great Plains Energy Incorporated (the Company
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES Appointment to the New Jersey Building Authority Capital Budget Modeling and Advisory Services State Fiscal Years 2016, 2017 and 2018 Issued by the
More informationEnterprise Scheduler Rev. 0 Bid #24078582. Scope of Work
Scope of Work I. Scope of Solicitation II. Instructions to Offerors III. Scope of Work / Specifications IV. Terms and Conditions - Special V. Appendices to Scope of Work (if required) VI. Bidding Schedule
More informationRequest for Proposal. Study: Site Plan Approval Process in Ontario. This Request for Proposal Closes at 16:00:00 EST on Monday, November 5, 2012
Request for Proposal Study: Site Plan Approval Process in Ontario This Request for Proposal Closes at 16:00:00 EST on Monday, November 5, 2012 Issued: October 24, 2012 Table of Contents A GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
More informationLOS ANGELES COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL JULY 10, 2014
LOS ANGELES COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL JULY 10, 2014 SEEKING: EXECUTIVE SEARCH SERVICES FOR PRINCIPAL INVESTMENT OFFICER POSITION Contact Person: John Nogales Director
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS For Creative Services: TV/Radio Commercials
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS For Creative Services: TV/Radio Commercials The Nebraska State College System (NSCS) PO Box 94605 1115 K Street, Suite 102 Lincoln NE, 68509-4605 Release Date: Friday, October 22,
More informationHiring Procedures and Guidelines
Hiring Procedures and Guidelines 33.99.01.R0.01 Employment Practices Updated 10/06/2014 A Guide for Hiring This document is provided to be a guide for the hiring process. The document, tools referenced,
More informationChapter 15. Competitive Negotiation: Evaluating Proposals
Chapter 15. Competitive Negotiation: Evaluating Proposals Summary This chapter describes the steps to be taken in order to properly evaluate each proposal received in response to an RFP. Essential Information
More informationTHE GAP, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES (As of February 1, 2015)
THE GAP, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES (As of February 1, 2015) The board has developed corporate governance practices to help fulfill its responsibility to the shareholders. These practices are
More informationSeptember 19, 2005. Mr. Edward Cox Chairman State University Construction Fund State University Plaza Albany, New York 12201
ALAN G. HEVESI COMPTROLLER 110 STATE STREET ALBANY, NEW YORK 12236 STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER September 19, 2005 Mr. Edward Cox Chairman State University Construction Fund State
More informationFederal Reserve System Secure Payments Task Force
2015 Federal Reserve System. Materials are not to be used without Federal Reserve consent. Federal Reserve System Secure Payments Task Force Teleconference June 4, 2015 Secure Payments Task Force Anti-Trust
More informationAURYN RESOURCES INC. BOARD GUIDELINES
AURYN RESOURCES INC. BOARD GUIDELINES 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The board of directors (the Board ) of Auryn Resources Inc. (the Company ) believes a principal objective of the Company is to generate acceptable
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PAYROLL SERVICES AUGUST 21, 2015
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PAYROLL SERVICES AUGUST 21, 2015-1 - Table of Contents 1. Summary... 3 2. Proposal Guidelines and Requirements... 3 3. Contract Terms... 3 4. Purpose and Objectives... 4 5. Timeline...
More informationRULES AND PROCEDURES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE 64103 (REVISED NOVEMBER 16, 2004)
RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE 64103 (REVISED NOVEMBER 16, 2004) In accordance with Ordinance 64102 the following Rules and Procedures
More informationDouglas County, Nevada Request for Qualifications Douglas County Public Works Asset Management Plan
Douglas County, Nevada Request for Qualifications Douglas County Public Works Asset Management Plan Douglas County, Nevada ( County ) is soliciting Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) from qualified firms
More informationHRMS - HRMS Charter - AI.18. Project Charter Human Resource Management System (HRMS) Replacement - Implementation Project Number: 2209.
Project Charter Human Resource Management System (HRMS) Replacement - Implementation Project Number: 2209 Final Version: 1.0 Date: June 5, 2012 Distribution List: Name Dan Guimond MaryAnn Kempe Heather
More informationRequest for Proposal (RFP): Online Learning Module Ethical, Professional and Legal Responsibilities for Registered Psychiatric Nurses
Regulating psychiatric nurses to ensure safe and ethical care May 8, 2015 Request for Proposal (RFP): Online Learning Module Ethical, Professional and Legal Responsibilities for Registered Psychiatric
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS For Creative Services: TV/Radio Commercials. The Nebraska State College System (NSCS) 1327 H Street Suite 200 Lincoln NE, 68508
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS For Creative Services: TV/Radio Commercials The Nebraska State College System (NSCS) 1327 H Street Suite 200 Lincoln NE, 68508 Release Date: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 Deadline
More informationAmendment 3: HRIS/Payroll only
0. December 8, 2014 N O T I C E O F R E Q U E S T F O R P R O P O S A L S GENERAL CONDITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Services Amendment 3: HRIS/Payroll only
More informationSTATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION RFP # 201205322 PAYROLL SERVICES FOR TEMPORARY RESOURCES
STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION RFP # 201205322 PAYROLL SERVICES FOR TEMPORARY RESOURCES RFP Coordinator: Jeff Mao, Learning Technology Policy Director Department of Education 23 State House Station
More informationRequest for Proposal Environmental Management Software
Request for Proposal Date Issued: November 4, 2010 Due Date: December 1, 2010 @ 2:00:00 p.m. (local time), Contact Information: Jeff Yanew Planning & Engineering Telephone: (780) 418-6615 Fax: (780) 458-1974
More informationSTT ENVIRO CORP. (the Company ) CHARTER OF THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND NOMINATING COMMITTEE. As amended by the Board of Directors on May 10, 2012
STT ENVIRO CORP. (the Company ) CHARTER OF THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND NOMINATING COMMITTEE PURPOSE AND SCOPE As amended by the Board of Directors on May 10, 2012 The primary function of the Committee
More informationProcess Validation Workshops. Overview Session
Process Validation Workshops Overview Session 2 Session Objectives: Prepare staff for participating in a Process Validation Workshop Clarify the Purpose of Process Validation Workshops Clarify Expected
More informationRequest for Proposal (RFP) K3311 Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS)
1. SCHEDULE EVENT Request for Proposal (RFP) K3311 Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS) DATES & TIME Issue Solicitation April 27, 2015 Question & Answer Period April 27 May 4, 2015 Complaint Period Begins
More informationForm names which are bolded can be found on the Liaison Resources page (http://www.tamhsc.edu/payroll-hr/liaisons.html).
Hiring Process Guide Form names which are bolded can be found on the Liaison Resources page (http://www.tamhsc.edu/payroll-hr/liaisons.html). This document is provided to assist hiring managers through
More informationRequest for Service. Business and Technical Consulting Services Senior Business Analyst OntarioMD EMR Physician Dashboard
Request for Service Business and Technical Consulting Services Senior Business Analyst OntarioMD EMR Physician Dashboard RFS Number: 2015-11 Issued: October 29, 2015 Closing Date: November 12, 2015 at
More informationGTA Board of Directors September 4, 2014
GTA Board of Directors September 4, 2014 Our Strategic Vision Our Mission A transparent, integrated enterprise where technology decisions are made with the citizen in mind To provide technology leadership
More informationResource Planning (ERP)
ELEVATING OUR PROFESSIONALISM Enterprise 48 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE MAY 17-20, 2015 ORLANDO, FLORIDA Resource Planning (ERP) Don t get Rattled! By Roman Martinez, MPA, CPPO, CPPB WHAT IS AN ERP? Enterprise
More informationSANTANDER CONSUMER USA HOLDINGS INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA HOLDINGS INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES Good governance, ethical conduct, accountability and transparency are essential to the success of a public company. The Board of Directors
More informationRequest for Information. for a. Human Resources Information Services (HRIS) System
Request for Information for a Human Resources Information Services (HRIS) System Nov 2012 1 Purpose of this document The purpose of this RFI is to identify preferred Submitters with the experience and
More informationA project management consultancy
A project management consultancy is a professional consulting firm with knowledge and experience in the specialized area of assisting organizations to improve their practice of project, program and/or
More informationLOOKSMART, LTD. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES
LOOKSMART, LTD. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES As ratified on 10/18/10 The board has developed corporate governance practices to help fulfill its responsibility to the shareholders. These practices are
More informationMicrosoft Enterprise Agreement Renewal and Software License Management Services
CITY OF COQUITLAM REQUEST FOR INFORMATION AND QUALIFICATIONS RFIQ No. 14-02-04 Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Renewal and Software License Management Services Submissions will be received on or before
More informationSelection and Hiring Manual
Selection and Hiring Manual Lassen Community College Accepted by Academic Senate May 22, 2012 Accepted by Consultation Council May 30, 2012 Accepted by the Governing Board July 10, 2012 1 Lassen Community
More informationGovernance Guidelines
Governance Guidelines Board of Trustees Policy Original release: October 2004 Current release: January 2014 Purpose The following guidelines ( Governance Guidelines or Guidelines ) are intended to assist
More informationAppointing a primary school principal
Contents Preparation and planning... 1 Role description and person specification...1 Appointment committee s role...1 Important aspects of appointment process...2 The process... 2 Advertising and receiving
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS For. Kelowna and Vernon Hospitals Project
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS For The Kelowna and Vernon Hospitals Project VOLUME 2 of 4 Instructions to Proponents Closing Time: Delivery Address: 3:00 pm (local time) Thursday, March 6,2008 Kelowna and Vernon
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES. (Adopted as of June 2, 2014)
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES (Adopted as of June 2, 2014) The following corporate governance guidelines have been approved and adopted by the Board of Directors (the Board ) of Arista Networks, Inc.
More informationThe Anatomy of an RFP Relocation Services. Yvonne Bosson, CRP, GMS www.ybosson.com bosson@ybosson.com 214.499.0237
The Anatomy of an RFP Relocation Services Yvonne Bosson, CRP, GMS www.ybosson.com bosson@ybosson.com 214.499.0237 Agenda Definitions Pre-Work Development Launch Supplier Evaluation Supplier Selection Award
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FINANCIAL ADVISOR SERVICES FOR COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 62
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FINANCIAL ADVISOR SERVICES FOR COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 62 Submit proposals or inquiries to: Community Consolidated School District 62 Attention: Susan Shepard 777 E.
More informationHACC Central Pennsylvania s Community College Harrisburg, PA. Request for Proposal RFP13-08. For. Integrated Marketing Communications Services
HACC Central Pennsylvania s Community College Harrisburg, PA Request for Proposal RFP13-08 For Integrated Marketing Communications Services Issued: Feb. 22, 2013 Deadline for Questions: Response to Questions:
More informationPerformance Audit Concurrent Review: ERP Pre-Solicitation
Performance Audit Concurrent Review: ERP Pre-Solicitation April 2002 City Auditor s Office City of Kansas City, Missouri 24-2001 April 10, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: We conducted
More informationAgenda Cover Memorandum
Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: September 22, 2014 Meeting Type: COW (Committee of the Whole) City Council Budget Workshop Item Title: Authorize the City Manager to post an RFQ and Job Posting for
More information*Human Resources Analyst
Page 1 of 5 MONTEREY PENINSULA COLLEGE invites applications for the position of: *Human Resources Analyst SALARY: $4,311.00 - $5,518.00 Monthly OPENING DATE: 08/19/15 CLOSING DATE: Continuous DESCRIPTION:
More informationCORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING Request for Proposals Moderated Online Focus Groups and Data Analysis
CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING Request for Proposals Moderated Online Focus Groups and Data Analysis I. OVERVIEW The Corporation for Public Broadcasting ( CPB ) is seeking proposals to conduct moderated
More informationTransport for London. INVITATION TO TENDER FOR BRIDGE DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES ITT REF: TfL/90711 PUBLICATION DATE: 13 FEBRUARY 2013
Transport for London INVITATION TO TENDER FOR BRIDGE DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES ITT REF: TfL/90711 PUBLICATION DATE: 13 FEBRUARY 2013 Invitation to Tender TfL/90711 Bridge Design Consultancy Services
More informationREQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST 4643 EOI
4643 EOI REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST 4643 EOI 4643 EOI - FUNCTIONAL CONSULTANT TO LEAD THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PURCHASE REQUISITION MODULE IN THE PEOPLESOFT 9.0 FINANCIALS AND SUPPLY CHAIN PRODUCT.
More informationElectronic Medical Record (EMR) Request for Proposal (RFP)
Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Request for Proposal (RFP) SAMPLE Proposal Due: [INSERT DESIRED DUE DATE] Table of Contents SECTION 1 RFP INFORMATION... 2 I. Introduction... 2 A. Purpose and Background...
More informationRFP Milestones, Instructions, and Information
This Request for Proposal is being issued by the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA). LCRA is a conservation and reclamation district of the State of Texas created pursuant to Article XVI, Section 59,
More informationRequest for Proposal. 4261P PeopleSoft HCM Functional Consulting Services
Request for Proposal 4261P PeopleSoft HCM Functional Consulting Services 1. Introduction The City of Richmond proposes to engage the services of a PeopleSoft Human Capital Management System functional
More informationFlorida State College at Jacksonville
Florida State College at Jacksonville ITN # 2014-01 Evaluation and Purchase of ERP Solution Florida State College at Jacksonville Invitation to Negotiate January 30, 2014 Solicitation Number: # 2014-01
More informationCity of Kenmore, Washington
City of Kenmore, Washington Financial Management Software System Request for Proposals Issued: November 2, 2015 Date Due: December 4, 2015 Time Due: 5:00 p.m. Pacific Standard Time Page 1 of 10 1. Introduction
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Subject: Due Date/Time: Submit To: Financial Management & Utility Billing Software March 28, 201412:00 pm Eastern Standard Time Chris Wilson Village of Beverly Hills 18500 W
More informationAdministrative Assistant II. Essential Task Rating Results
Administrative Assistant II Essential Task Rating Results 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Update and maintain the Administrator s work schedule by entering appointments into the system database (e.g.,
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES (as amended and restated on January 20, 2014)
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES (as amended and restated on January 20, 2014) The Board of Directors (the Board or individually Director ) of Symantec Corporation (the Company ) represents the interests
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Village of Pemberton Website Design & Hosting
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Village of Pemberton Website Design & Hosting Introduction Pemberton is one of the most desirable communities in BC and home to family farms, adventurous outdoor activities and stunning
More informationINTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES The Board of Directors (the Board ) of Intuitive Surgical, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company ), has adopted the following Corporate Governance
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RFP ISSUE DATE: September 26 th, 2001 TITLE: RFP NUMBER: San José State University Website Redesign F-WR00001181-AL PURCHASING OFFICE CONTACT: DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL: Alex Lebedeff, Mary
More informationHuman Resource Management System UCIST May, 2010
Human Resource Management System UCIST May, 2010 Dave Mason & Pam Fluttert Sandra Hurlburt Agenda Introduction Focus of HR Systems Work Recruitment Project Q&A Key Business Processes Recruitment, Hiring,
More informationCity of Rolling Meadows
City of Rolling Meadows REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Consulting Services for an Enterprise Resource Planning System including project management, needs assessment, RFP development, vendor selection and ERP implementation
More informationRequest for Proposals DATA CENTER RENOVATION
Request for Proposals DATA CENTER RENOVATION Deadline to Submit Questions for Response: August 1, 2014 by 4:00 pm Deadline for Proposal Submissions: August 15, 2014 by 4:00 pm REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR
More informationRiverside Community College District Administrative No. 7120c. AP 7120c FULL-TIME FACULTY RECRUITMENT AND HIRING
Riverside Community College District Administrative No. 7120c Procedure Human Resources AP 7120c FULL-TIME FACULTY RECRUITMENT AND HIRING Reference: Accreditation Standard IV B.1.j. All full-time faculty
More informationThe State of Oregon. Department of Procurement Services Issues the Following
The State of Oregon Department of Procurement Services Issues the Following Request for Information (RFI) # DASPS-2346-15 For The Oregon Enterprise-wide Human Resource Information System Project Single
More informationJanuary 29, 2015 1. Role of the Board of Directors ( The Board ) and Director Responsibilities 2. Selection of Chairman 3.
January 29, 2015 1. Role of the Board of Directors ( The Board ) and Director Responsibilities The role of the Board is to oversee the management of the Corporation and to represent the interests of all
More informationMINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SASKBUILDS SASKATCHEWAN JOINT-USE SCHOOLS PROJECT PROJECT #2
June 5, 2015 MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SASKBUILDS SASKATCHEWAN JOINT-USE SCHOOLS PROJECT PROJECT #2 FINAL REPORT OF THE FAIRNESS ADVISOR ON THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS: RFP STAGE TO: STEERING COMMITTEE, SASKATCHEWAN
More informationJuly 2013 Report No. 13-042
John Keel, CPA State Auditor An Audit Report on Selected State Contracts at the Texas Education Agency Report No. 13-042 An Audit Report on Selected State Contracts at the Texas Education Agency Overall
More informationEMC CORPORATION. Corporate Governance Guidelines
EMC CORPORATION Corporate Governance Guidelines The following Corporate Governance Guidelines (the Guidelines ) have been adopted by the Board of Directors (the Board ) of EMC Corporation (the Company
More informationRequest for Expressions of Interest 3805EOI Consulting Services - Microsoft Productivity Specialist
Request for Expressions of Interest 3805EOI Consulting Services - Microsoft Productivity Specialist 1. Introduction 1.1. The City of Richmond invites Expressions of Interest ( EOI ) from interested parties
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS BOND COUNSEL SERVICES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING RFP # 16-018. Santa Ana Housing Authority
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS BOND COUNSEL SERVICES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING RFP # 16-018 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 Judson Brown Housing Division Manager (714) 667-2241 Office JBrown@santa-ana.org
More informationSTAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Procurement Authorization - Program Management Services for SAP- ERP Implementation Program Date: June 22, 2015 To: From: TTC Board Chief Executive Officer Summary The purpose
More informationCONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA PREAMBLE
CONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA This Constitution is intended to be consistent with Florida law, the University Constitution and the regulations of the University of Florida Board
More informationAdopted as of February _18_, 2014
THE OPEN DATA CENTER ALLIANCE, INC. ANTITRUST POLICY (Version 2) Adopted as of February _18_, 2014 The Open Data Center Alliance, Inc. (the ODCA ) intends to conduct its affairs in compliance with the
More informationOPERATING GUIDELINES FOR THE ADVANCEMENT IN RANK (AIR) PROCESS
OPERATING GUIDELINES FOR THE ADVANCEMENT IN RANK (AIR) PROCESS Human Resources Responsibilities Fall Semester Responsibilities: 1. Within the first month of fall semester, Human Resources (HR) will develop
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES Appointment to the State of New Jersey Rating Agency Presentation Review/Analysis Summer 2016 Issued by the State of New Jersey Treasurer s Office
More informationWebsite and Integrated Database Management System REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
Website and Integrated Database Management System REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL February 10, 2016 RFP Issue Date: Feb. 10, 2016 RFP Questions & Enquires Closing Date: Feb. 26, 2016 RFP CLOSING DATE & TIME: 4:00pm
More informationHow To Find A Vendor For Parcc, Inc.
1 Cover Page Date: January 28, 2015 Customer Name: Parcc, Inc. Vendor Name: 2 Section 1: Background, Purpose, and Scope Parcc, Inc. is a separate education policy nonprofit organization. Parcc, Inc. is
More informationHACC Central Pennsylvania s Community College Harrisburg, PA. Request for Proposal RFP14-04. For Website Content Development HACC
HACC Central Pennsylvania s Community College Harrisburg, PA Request for Proposal RFP14-04 For Website Content Development HACC Issued: Feb. 24, 2014 Deadline for Questions: Response to Questions: PROPOSAL
More informationHealth Informatics Service Accreditation Manual. Assessment Process. May 2013, Version 1
Health Informatics Service Accreditation Manual Assessment Process May 2013, Version 1 Contents 1. Contacts... 2 2. Introduction... 3 3. Assessment principles... 6 4. Assessment outcome... 7 5. Planning
More informationInfrastructure Technical Support Services. Request for Proposal
Infrastructure Technical Support Services Request for Proposal 15 May 2015 ISAAC reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, with or without cause, and accept proposals that it considers most favourable
More informationKINDER MORGAN MANAGEMENT, LLC (the "Company") CHARTER OF THE NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
KINDER MORGAN MANAGEMENT, LLC (the "Company") CHARTER OF THE NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE I. Introduction The Company is a Delaware limited liability company whose listed shares are registered under
More informationRequest for Proposals for Microsoft Project Server 2013 Implementation
Request for Proposals for Microsoft Project Server 2013 Implementation SOLICITATION SA005797 DUE APRIL 2, 2015 @ 11:00 A.M. Gary R. Cavin, CIO Deliver Proposals To: City of Columbus Purchasing Office 77
More informationIT Governance. Brandeis University Library & Technology Services. Committees... 2 One steering committee and three subcommittees are created.
Brandeis University Library & Technology Services IT Governance Spring 2013 The term IT Governance refers to any campus-wide decision-making system used to set technology policy; such systems are common
More informationGuidelines for Professional Services Contracting
Guidelines for Professional Services Contracting Updated: January 2009 The Philadelphia International Airport (Airport) has established a selection process to be followed for entering into contracts for
More informationFunctions of the Clerk s s Office
Agenda Welcome and Introductions What is Being Procured? ITN Scope and Anticipated Timeline Vendor Qualifications ITN Structure Reply Response & Evaluation Vendor Oral Presentations Questions Vendor Conference
More informationContra Costa Community College District Human Resources Procedure 1010.06 HIRING OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATORS
Contra Costa Community College District Human Resources Procedure 1010.06 HIRING OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATORS This procedure shall apply to the selection of contract administrators within the Contra Costa
More informationCal State Online Request for Proposals for Online Course and Program Delivery Services
Cal State Online Request for Proposals for Online Course and Program Delivery Services Cal State Online invites proposals from firms presently engaged in the business of providing comprehensive online
More informationINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES A GUIDE TO SUCCESSFUL SOFTWARE ACQUISITION
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES A GUIDE TO SUCCESSFUL SOFTWARE ACQUISITION The ITS Project Office has prepared this set of guidelines to help staff and faculty navigate the HSU software acquisition process.
More informationSeptember 2014 Report No. 15-001
John Keel, CPA State Auditor An Audit Report on Selected Contracts at the Texas Facilities Commission Report No. 15-001 An Audit Report on Selected Contracts at the Texas Facilities Commission Overall
More informationHUMAN RESOURCES Chapter 7. Recruitment & Hiring Procedure AP 7120
References: Education Code Section 87100 et seq.; 87400 and 88003; Title 5 Section 53000 et seq.; I. GENERAL INFORMATION Policy and Procedure #7120 address the district s recruitment and hiring of all
More informationRequest for Proposals Evaluation Guide
Request for Proposals Evaluation Guide Introduction The purpose of this publication is to assist State and local education agencies in defining the evaluation process for a Request for Proposal (RFP).
More informationAP Recruit Online Training for Search Committee and Approvers 2014-2015AY
AP Recruit Online Training for Search Committee and Approvers 2014-2015AY Academic Personnel Office and Office of Faculty and Staff Affirmative Action July 2014 Instructions 1. Please complete the AP Recruit
More information