Colorado Bar Journal 2011.
|
|
- Harvey Shields
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Colorado Bar Journal , August, Pg. 85. New Colorado Rules on Retention of Client Files The Colorado Lawyer August 2011 Vol. 40, No. 8 [Page 85] Articles Professional Conduct and Legal Ethics New Colorado Rules on Retention of Client Files by Michael A. Kirtland, John M. Lebsack Professional Conduct and Legal Ethics articles are sponsoredby the CBA Ethics Committee. Articles published here do not necessarily reflect the legal interpretation of the Committee. Coordinating Editor Stephen G. Masciocchi, Denver, of Holland and Hart LLP-(303) , smasciocchi@hollandhart.com About the Authors Michael A. Kirtland is a member of Kirtland and Seal LLC, Colorado Springs, where he practices estate planning and elder law-mak@kirtlandseal.com. John M. Lebsack is a shareholder of White and Steele, P.C., where he specializes in appeals and insurance litigation-jlebsack@wsteele.com. This article describes the new Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct with regard to client file retention and retention of client property, and considers some of the unanswered issues related to the rule changes. The Colorado Supreme Court recently adopted changes to the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct (Rules or Colorado Rules) dealing with a lawyer's duty to maintain files and records. Effective February 10, 2011, the Court enacted Rule 1.16A, a new rule concerning retention of client files. The Court also made small but important changes to existing Rule 1.15 concerning safekeeping property.(fn1) Although Colorado has long had a rule governing retention of a lawyer's accounting records and other specific types of documents, the Court for the first time adopted a rule concerning retention of client files in general.(fn2) Nothing in the new rule supersedes any other file retention requirements imposedby court rules, court orders, statutes, or regulations.(fn3) With the new rule, Colorado joins the small number of states with a formal rule of ethics governing client file retention.(fn4) Over the years, the Colorado Bar Association Ethics Committee (Committee) often received questions about how long a lawyer must keep client files. Until this new rule, there were no answers to these questions. The Committee typically advised lawyers that this issue should be addressed in a written engagement agreement and in a law firm's written policies. The Committee recommended a policy concerning file retention,(fn5) leaving the decision to the lawyer's "good professional discretion and common sense."(fn6) The American Bar Association Model Rules of Professional Conduct do not address the question of how long lawyers must retain client files.(fn7) The Restatement of the Law Governing Lawyers provides only the general guidance that lawyers should keep client files "while there is a reasonable likelihood that the client will need the documents" but "may destroy documents that are outdated or no longer of consequence."(fn8) The new Colorado Rule 1.16A supersedes those general recommendationsby imposing specific time limits and requirements. The new rule thus provides needed clarity to a topic of importance to Colorado lawyers, particularly those in private practice. File Retention in Civil Matters The new rule specifies when lawyers in private practice(fn9) may destroy client files involving civil matters. Lawyers who work as in-house counsel for a corporation or other entity are not subject to the rule, under the rationale that the file is under the control of the entity, not the lawyer.(fn10) The rule addresses file destruction in several scenarios-with notice to the client, without notice to the client, and pursuant to the client's specific request. Civil lawyers in private practice are now permitted to destroy client files without notice to the client after the expiration of ten years from the termination of representation in a matter, subject to two conditions: first, there are no pending or threatened legal proceedings known to the lawyer; and second, the file destruction is not contrary to an agreement with the client.(fn11) The rule does not define "termination of the representation." In some matters, that date may not be clear. For example, when a lawyer has represented a client on a variety of small matters intermittently over the course of years, it is not clear whether the ten years run from the end of the first matter or the last. On the other hand, some types of civil matters end on a specific date, which leaves little potential for misunderstanding between lawyer and client that the lawyer's work is done. One example is the final judgment in a civil action. To avoid misunderstandings
2 with the client about whether the matter has terminated, the safer course (although not an ethical requirement) is for the lawyer to send the client a written message that the lawyer's representation is finished.(fn12) As an alternative to file destruction without notice to the client, the lawyer may give written notice to the client that the lawyer intends to destroy the file. The notice must give a date certain when the file will be destroyed. The date must be at least thirty days after the notice. File destruction with notice has the same two conditions as destruction without notice: the lawyer must be unaware of pending or threatened legal proceedings relating to the matter, and the destruction must not be contrary to an agreement with the client.(fn13) To provide the notice, the lawyer must make reasonable efforts to locate the client; if the lawyer cannot find the client, the lawyer may send the notice to the client's last known address.(fn14) A lawyer may comply with the notice requirementby adopting a written file retention policy and providing notice of that policy in a fee agreement.(fn15) Colorado does not require a written fee agreement, just written confirmation of the basis or rate of the fee when the lawyer has not regularly represented the client. The new file retention rule does not require that notice of the lawyer's file retention policy must include a statement of the entire policy, but if a lawyer intends to use the option of providing notice of the file retention policy in the fee agreement, a safe practice would be to include a statement of the entire policy. The new rule requires that the written file retention policy be "consistent" with the rule,(fn16) but the rule and comments do not elaborate on that requirement. If the lawyer seeks to use the option of complying with the notice requirementby adopting a written policy and then including notice of that policy in the fee agreement, there apparently is no need for any subsequent notice of the lawyer's intent to destroy the file. In other words, the rule permits notice of the file destruction policy in a fee agreement at the outset of the representation, without the need to provide any subsequent notice of the intent to destroy the file. This option presents a risk for the lawyer. The risk is that the client is not focused on a topic like file destruction at the start of a case and, as a result, pays little attention to that portion of the fee agreement. If a long time passes until the end of the case, the client may have forgotten about the file retention policy altogether. Without additional notice of the lawyer's plan to destroy the file-as a reminder of what was in the fee agreement at the outset of the representation-the lawyer faces the risk that the client may be surprised and unhappy to learn the lawyer destroyed the file. A safer procedure, if the fee agreement contains notice of the file retention policy, is to send a reminder of that policy at the conclusion of the representation, giving the client the opportunity to prevent destruction of the file. This is optional-the rule does not require a second notice. Where the representation terminates, the new rule does not change the requirements of existing rules with respect to surrendering client papers and property to which the client is entitled.(fn17) Limits on Following Client Instructions The new rule explains when the lawyer may (and may not) destroy a file in a civil matter at the client's request. A civil lawyer in private practice may destroy the file if the client authorizes the destruction in a writing signedby the client, and there are no pending or threatened legal proceedings known to the lawyer.(fn18) In other words, if the lawyer is aware of pending or threatened legal proceedings, the lawyer cannot destroy the file even if the client requests. The new rule permits the lawyer to keep a copy of a file destroyedby client request.(fn19) Instead of destroying the file, the lawyer may simply deliver it to the client.(fn20) This does not require the client's consent; under the rule, the lawyer may deliver the file to the client even though the client does not want it. Because delivery may occur when the lawyer withdraws from an ongoing matter, in this situation there is no requirement that the lawyer be unaware of pending or threatened legal proceedings relating to the matter. File Retention in Criminal Matters In criminal cases, separate retention periods apply. In contrast to the rule for civil matters, which applies only to lawyers in private practice, there is no such restriction for criminal cases. The new record retention rule applies to all lawyers handling criminal cases, regardless of whether they are in private practice. The provisions governing criminal case files anticipate the potential for lengthy criminal appeals, which may last for many years after the criminal trial and sentencing. If the criminal matter resulted in a conviction and the sentence was death, life imprisonment without parole, or an indeterminate sentence including any sentence under the Colorado Sex Offender Lifetime Supervision Act of 1998, the lawyer must retain the file for the life of the client.(fn21) For any other felony conviction or sentence, the retention period depends on whether the sentence was appealed. If it was appealed, the minimum retention period is eight years; if it was not appealed, the minimum retention period is five years.(fn22) The rule does not specify the retention period for matters involving misdemeanor convictions or acquittals. The Client's File Under a Comment to new Rule 1.16A, the client's file consists of "those things, such as papers and electronic data, relating to a matter that the lawyer would usually maintain in the ordinary course of practice."(fn23) This definition of "client files" leaves room for differing interpretations. It is not clear what things "the lawyer
3 would usually maintain" or whether the standard is subjective or objective. The rule refers to "the lawyer" and not "a lawyer," suggesting that the test is not what other lawyers in the same field generally do, but what the specific lawyer's office policy is. That reading carries risks, however, so the safer practice is to maintain items that most lawyers in the same field would maintain in the client file. A Comment explains that the new rule is not intended to require lawyers to preserve documents they normally discard, such as multiple copies or drafts.(fn24) Methods of File Storage The new rule does not mandate any particular method of file storage, and it permits the lawyer to maintain or convert the file to electronic format for storage as long as the lawyer can produce a paper version if necessary.(fn25) If more than one lawyer in a firm worked on a matter, they all do not need to keep a copy of the file; a single file is adequate.(fn26) All partners in a law firm, or those with comparable managerial authority, have a duty to make sure the firm complies with the new record retention rule.(fn27) Holding Property In addition to adopting an entirely new rule on file retention, the Supreme Court modified existing Rule 1.15 governing a lawyer's duties when safekeeping property of others. Where the attorney is holding property of a client-as distinct from the lawyer's own file on the client's matter-a separate rule applies.(fn28) Effective February 10, 2011, the Supreme Court modified the definition of "property" to refer generally to: jewelry and other valuables entrusted to the lawyerby the client, as well as documents having intrinsic value or directly affecting valuable rights, such as securities, negotiable instruments, deeds, and wills.(fn29) The Court also made a corresponding change in new Rule 1.16A governing the lawyer's duty to retain such documents. Comment [1] to the new rule clarifies that lawyers must safeguard client property, including "documents having intrinsic value or directly affecting valuable rights, such as securities, negotiable instruments, deeds and wills."(fn30) The list in the new comment is not exhaustive, so there may be other documents in the client file that have intrinsic value such that the lawyer must retain those documents notwithstanding the lack of a specific reference to them. Duties on Dissolutions and Departures The Court also changed the requirements in the event of dissolution of a law firm or departure of a lawyer or lawyers from the firm. The rule change places the burden on all lawyers in the firm to make arrangements for maintenance and disposition of the client files and records.(fn31) The prior rule simply stated that one of the lawyers in the firm was responsible for maintenance of the records. The new rule makes all lawyers responsible for such care and maintenance. The Court did not change the requirement to retain all records of receipts and disbursements from trust accounts and other bank accounts. Thus, a lawyer still must keep COLTAF records for seven years, including information identifying individual client accounts within the COLTAF account.(fn32) Even if the lawyer may destroy the client file earlier, the seven-year requirement still applies to trust account and other financial records. The records may be kept in paper or electronic form; however, the lawyer must be able to reproduce the electronic record on paper if necessary.(fn33) Unresolved Areas Although the new rule provides needed clarity regarding the lawyer's duty to maintain client files, some areas remain unresolved. One such area is the requirement not to destroy files known to the lawyer to be related to a "pending or threatened proceeding." The rules define "known" as denoting "actual knowledge of the fact in question," but "knowledge may be inferred from circumstances."(fn34) Knowledge of "pending" matters is a more straightforward question than knowledge of "threatened" matters. One interpretation of knowledge of "threatened" matters is that it refers to a lawyer's knowledge that someone (either the client or a third person) is considering whether to begin legal proceedings related to the matter. However, there is a distinction between a threat of a legal proceeding and the potential for legal proceeding. The rule uses the term "threatened" (which implies a subjective standard) instead of a term like "reasonably anticipated" (objective standard). That suggests the rule does not prohibit file destruction if there is only a potential for future proceedings, not an actual threat of such proceedings. Nonetheless, a careful lawyer should consider whether circumstances require keeping a file even if the rule permits its destruction. Furthermore, it is easy to imagine scenarios where the threat occurred so long ago that there is no longer any practical need to keep the file (for example if the statute of limitations has expired). The lawyer must exercise judgment in deciding when a threat is so old that the file may be destroyed, despite the lawyer's knowledge of the threat. The lawyer should, in other words, determine whether the threat is still a realistic possibility; if the statute of limitations has demonstrably expired on all potential claims, there is no viable threat of legal proceedings. Another uncertain area is the rule's effect on lawyers or firms with offices in Colorado and elsewhere. What if more than one office of the firm worked on the matter-in Colorado and in another state-and parts of the file reside at both offices? A similar issue could arise if a Colorado lawyer works on a matter with co-counsel from another state. Under what circumstances is it safe for the
4 Colorado lawyer to authorize the destruction of files stored in another state that relate to a matter that was handled at least in part in Colorado? The lawyers in all affected offices should consider the file retention rules, if any, of the states where those offices are located. The prudent course, although not requiredby the new Colorado rule, would be to follow the longest retention requirement of the states in question, and apply that period to all parts of the file in all offices. Finally, new Rule 1.16A does not specify how to destroy the file. There is no express requirement to shred the file. Whether the file needs to be shredded depends on the lawyer's duty to maintain confidentiality of information relating to the representation of the client. The need to shred also may depend on the nature of the documents. For example, a lawyer would be well-advised to shred copies of medical records and tax returns, but might not need to shred copies of newspaper articles. Conclusion With the adoption of these rule changes, Colorado lawyers have much clearer guidance on when they may destroy files. In civil matters, private practice lawyers have the benefit of clear deadlines marking when they may destroy a file-with thirty days' notice to the client, or without notice if the matter ended more than ten years ago. The new rule draws a balance between the lawyer's desire to destroy files that are unneeded and the client's right to access to files that may be needed for pending or threatened proceedings. In criminal matters, lawyers have clear time limits depending on the nature of a felony conviction and the sentence. Colorado lawyers now have specific ethical rules on which to base their file retention policies. Footnotes: 1. The rule changes appeared at 40 The Colorado Lawyer 98 (April 2011). 2. Colo. RPC 1.15(a), (j), and (k) require financial records, such as certain bank statements, to be maintained for seven years. As explained in Comment [3] to the new Colo. RPC 1.16A, the lawyer still must keep contingent fee agreements for six years, the originals of e-filed documents for two years, and notice of the use of servicesby suspended or disbarred lawyers for two years. If a document is subject to more than one retention period, the lawyer should apply the longest period. 3. Colo. RPC 1.16A(e). 4. More than a dozen states have adopted rules on file retention. See /services/ethicsearch/ materials_on_client_file_retention.html (summary of those rules, as well as ethics opinions and articles on this topic). 5. See Micklewright, "Understanding File Retention: Developing an Ethical Policy and Plan-Part I," 30 The Colorado Lawyer 147 (Oct. 2001); Micklewright, "Understanding File Retention: Developing an Ethical Policy and Plan-Part II," 30 The Colorado Lawyer 77 (Nov. 2001). 6. Truhlar and de Raismes, "Coping with the Paper Avalanche: A Survey on the Disposition of Client Files," 16 The Colorado Lawyer 1787 (Oct. 1987). CBA Formal Ethics Op. 104 recommended that lawyers review that article for guidance in how long to retain client files after termination of the representation. The article suggested the following guideline for determining how long to keep client files: "A lawyer should use good professional discretion and common sense in determining the length of time for retention or disposition of a file." Id. at The American Bar Association (ABA) Ethics Committee issued two opinions on file retention. In 1977, the Committee adopted a general guideline: "We cannot say that there is a specific time during which a lawyer must preserve all files and beyond which he is free to destroy all files. Good common sense should provide answers to most questions that arise." ABA Standing Comm. on Ethics and Professional Responsibility Informal Op (March 14, 1977). In 1992, the Committee issued an opinion on the duty of sole practitioners to develop a plan for appropriate file storage after their death. ABA Standing Comm. on Ethics and Professional Responsibility Formal Op (Dec. 7, 1992). 8. Restatement of the Law Governing Lawyers 46, cmt. b (2000). 9. Colo. RPC 1.16A(a). The rules do not define "private practice." Presumably, the term refers to nongovernmental lawyers who work in a "firm" or "law firm" as defined in Colo. RPC 1.0(c). See, e.g., Colo. RPC 1.11(d)(2)(i). 10. Colo. RPC 1.16A, cmt. [2]. 11. Colo. RPC 1.16A(a)(2)(b). 12. The rules define a "written" communication as one with a tangible or electronic record. Colo. RPC 1.0(n). 13. Colo. RPC 1.16A(a)(2). 14. Colo. RPC 1.16A, cmt. [5]. 14. Colo. RPC 1.16(d). 16. Id. 17. Id.; Colo. RPC 1.16A, cmt. [4].
5 18. Colo. RPC 1.16A(a)(1) and cmt. [5]. See Colo. RPC 1.0(n) for the definitions of "writing" and "signed." 19. Colo. RPC 1.16A, cmt. [5]. 20. Colo. RPC 1.16A(a)(1). 21. Colo. RPC 1.16A(c)(1). 22. Colo. RPC 1.16A(c)(2) and (3). 23. Colo. RPC 1.16A, cmt. [1]. 24. Id. 25. Id. 26. Id. 27. Id. 28. Colo. RPC Colo. RPC 1.15, cmt. [1]. 30. Colo. RPC 1.16A, cmt. [1]. 31. Colo. RPC 1.15(l). 32. Colo. RPC 1.15(j). 33. Colo. RPC 1.16, cmt. [2]. 34. Colo. RPC 1.0(f).
Pennsylvania Bar Association Legal. Ethics and Professional Responsibility. Formal Opinion 99-120. Retention of Client Files
Pennsylvania Bar Association Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Formal Opinion 99-120 Retention of Client Files The Pennsylvania Bar Association Committee-on Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
More informationLouisiana State Bar Association Rules of Professional Conduct Committee
Louisiana State Bar Association Rules of Professional Conduct Committee 1 January 4, 2006 Client File Retention There is no comprehensive rule on retaining closed client files. The rule relating to safekeeping
More informationTALKING TRASH RECYCLED (AGAIN): Guidelines for Retention and Destruction of Client Files. By Constance V. Vecchione, Bar Counsel
TALKING TRASH RECYCLED (AGAIN): Guidelines for Retention and Destruction of Client Files By Constance V. Vecchione, Bar Counsel In 2001, bar counsel posted an article on this website entitled Talking Trash
More informationClient Trust Accounts - A Lawyer's Responsibility
Virgin Islands Trust Account Handbook Published as a public service by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel 1 1 This Handbook serves as a practical guide for making trust account decisions. However, it is
More informationFor many attorneys, the words consumer protection do not
Reproduced by permission. 2014 Colorado Bar Association 43 The Colorado Lawyer 39 (October 2014). All rights reserved. ANTITRUST AND CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW Clients Rights During Transitions Between Attorneys
More informationGuidelines for Development of a File Retention and Destruction Policy for Missouri Law Firms
Guidelines for Development of a File Retention and Destruction Policy for Missouri Law Firms WARNING AND DISCLAIMER These Client File Retention and Destruction Guidelines are intended for general informational
More informationThe Basic Steps to Ethically Closing a Law Practice
The Basic Steps to Ethically Closing a Law Practice There are many different reasons why a law practice closes, some are planned, e.g., retirement, merging firms, or entering public office, and others
More informationEthics Opinion 000210
Ethics Opinion 000210 FACTS: Attorney B successfully represented to conclusion a sophisticated client in a criminal matter, but was paid only a small portion of the substantial bill incurred. Following
More informationISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion
ISBA Professional Conduct Advisory Opinion Opinion No. 14-01 May 2014 Subject: Digest: Client Funds and Property; Fees and Expenses A lawyer may accept payment for earned services and expenses by credit
More informationRule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state;
Rule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. 1. Application of rule. (a) This rule applies to: (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state; (2) All actions or proceedings
More informationRule 82.1 Who May Appear as Counsel; Who May Appear Pro Se
Rule 82.1 Who May Appear as Counsel; Who May Appear Pro Se Only members of the bar of this Court may appear as counsel in civil cases. Only individuals who are parties in civil cases may represent themselves.
More information: : before this court (the Court Annexed Mediation Program ); and
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In re: ADOPTION OF PROCEDURES GOVERNING : MEDIATION OF MATTERS AND THE
More informationTORT AND INSURANCE LAW REPORTER. Informal Discovery Interviews Between Defense Attorneys and Plaintiff's Treating Physicians
This article originally appeared in The Colorado Lawyer, Vol. 25, No. 26, June 1996. by Jeffrey R. Pilkington TORT AND INSURANCE LAW REPORTER Informal Discovery Interviews Between Defense Attorneys and
More informationThe Civil Litigator. Proposed Magistrate Rules: Crucial to Civil Litigators. Richard P. Holme
Originally published in The Colorado Lawyer, Vol. 28, No. 8, August 1999. The Civil Litigator Proposed Magistrate Rules: Crucial to Civil Litigators Richard P. Holme Under newly proposed rules for state
More informationThe State Bar of California
The State Bar of California New Rule 3-410 (Disclosure of Professional Liability Insurance) of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of California FAQs 1) Q: What is the new insurance disclosure
More informationIssues Involving the Unauthorized Practice of Law Colorado Bar Association Paralegal Committee September 17, 2008
Issues Involving the Unauthorized Practice of Law Colorado Bar Association Paralegal Committee September 17, 2008 James C. Coyle, Deputy Regulation Counsel Colorado Supreme Court Office of Attorney Regulation
More information*Rule 1.4(a) *Rule 1.16(a) *Rule 1.16(a)(2) *Rule 1.16(b) *Rule 3.3 *DR7-102(A)(4) *DR7-102(A)(6)
NEW HAMPSHIRE BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Committee Formal Opinion 1993-94/7 Candor to Tribunal: Use of Questionable Evidence In Criminal Defense January 27, 1994 RULE REFERENCES: *Rule 1.2 *Rule 1.2(a) *Rule
More informationNebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 94-1
Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 94-1 SINCE THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY IS A NEWLY DESIGNATED ENTITY WHICH, BY STATUTE, PURPORTS TO AFFORD LIMITED LIABILITY TO ITS MEMBERS, AND RECOGNIZING
More informationTRUST ACCOUNT RULES & BEST PRACTICES THE MISSOURI BAR ANNUAL MEETING SUNRISE CLE THURSDAY, OCTOBER 8, 2015 7:20 8:20 A.M.
TRUST ACCOUNT RULES & BEST PRACTICES THE MISSOURI BAR ANNUAL MEETING SUNRISE CLE THURSDAY, OCTOBER 8, 2015 7:20 8:20 A.M. Speakers: Sam S. Phillips, Deputy Chief Disciplinary Counsel, Jefferson City Melinda
More informationMARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE TITLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS CHAPTER 100 APPLICABILITY AND CITATION
TITLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS CHAPTER 100 APPLICABILITY AND CITATION AMEND Rule 1-101 (q) to add collaborative law processes to the applicability of Title 17, as follows: Rule 1-101. APPLICABILITY... (q)
More informationUPDATES TO ETHICAL ISSUES FOR TRUST AND ESTATE LAWYERS New and Revised Rules of Professional Conduct on the Way (We think!)
34th Annual Trust and Estate Conference - USC Gould School of Law UPDATES TO ETHICAL ISSUES FOR TRUST AND ESTATE LAWYERS New and Revised Rules of Professional Conduct on the Way (We think!) INTRODUCTION
More informationCrimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 No 7
New South Wales Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 No 7 Contents Part 1 Part 2 Preliminary Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Objects of Act 2 4 Definitions 2 5 Definitions of serious sex offence
More information^^^^ A S S O C I AT I ON
?^}^1 OHIO STATE BAR ^^^^ A S S O C I AT I ON EST I880 OSBA Informal Advisory Opinion 2011-02 December 2, 2011 Re: Request for Informal Advisory Opinion You have requested the opinion of the Ohio State
More informationCHAPTER 20. FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM 20-1. PREAMBLE. The purpose of this chapter is to set forth a definition that must be met in order to
1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 CHAPTER 20. FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM 20-1. PREAMBLE Rule 20-1.1.
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CIVIL MEDIATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CIVIL MEDIATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES 1. Description. The Superior Court of California, County of Orange (Court), offers a voluntary civil mediation program for
More informationOPINION 2014-2 Issued August 8, 2014. Imputation of Conflicts in a Part-Time County Prosecutor s Law Firm
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES & DISCIPLINE 65 SOUTH FRONT STREET, 5 TH FLOOR, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-3431 Telephone: 614.387.9370 Fax: 614.387.9379 www.supremecourt.ohio.gov DAVID E. TSCHANTZ CHAIR
More informationCHAPTER 20. FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM 20-1. PREAMBLE RULE 20-1.1 PURPOSE
CHAPTER 20. FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM 20-1. PREAMBLE RULE 20-1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter is to set forth a definition that must be met in order to use the title paralegal, to establish
More informationHOUSTON LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE, INC. APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP
HOUSTON LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE, INC. APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP The Houston Lawyer Referral Service, Inc. (HLRS) is a non-profit corporation sponsored by the Houston Bar Association, Houston Young Lawyers
More informationWhen It s Time to Say Goodbye: Selling a Law Practice / Closing a Law Practice
When It s Time to Say Goodbye: Selling a Law Practice / Closing a Law Practice I. Acknowledgments. Thomas Nolan, Esq. Virginia Wills, Trusts & Estates PLC Charlottesville, Virginia nolan@vawills.com April
More informationReflections on Ethical Issues In the Tripartite Relationship
Reflections on Ethical Issues In the Tripartite Relationship [click] By Bruce A. Campbell 1 Introduction In most areas of the practice of law, there are a number of ethical issues that arise on a frequent
More informationSOUTH EASTERN SCHOOL DISTRICT
No. 800 SECTION: OPERATIONS SOUTH EASTERN SCHOOL DISTRICT TITLE: RECORDS RETENTION AND MANAGEMENT ADOPTED: April 18, 2013 REVISED: 800. RECORDS RETENTION AND MANAGEMENT 1. Purpose It shall be the policy
More informationAttorneys convicted of crimes.
Rule 214. Attorneys convicted of crimes. (a) An attorney convicted of a [serious] crime shall report the fact of such conviction within 20 days to the [Secretary of the Board] Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
More informationOVERVIEW OF STATE LAWS THAT BAN DISCRIMINATION BY EMPLOYERS
OVERVIEW OF STATE LAWS THAT BAN DISCRIMINATION BY EMPLOYERS As states consider passing laws that prohibit employment discrimination against people with criminal records, it may be helpful to examine how
More informationSTANDARD 3.5 ON ASSISTANCE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS
STANDARD 3.5 ON ASSISTANCE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS STANDARD In appropriate circumstances, a provider may offer pro se litigants assistance or limited representation at various stages of proceedings. COMMENTARY
More informationHOUSE BILL No. 2172. AN ACT concerning nurse aide trainees; criminal background checks.
Session of HOUSE BILL No. By Representative Whipple - 0 0 AN ACT concerning nurse aide trainees; criminal background checks. Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Kansas: Section. (a) A sponsor
More informationSelling/Closing a Medical Practice
Selling/Closing a Medical Practice This publication is a snapshot of South Carolina laws, regulations and best practices as of July 2009. The material presented is likely to evolve and change from year
More informationOutsourcing Legal Research and Writing Projects
Outsourcing Legal Research and Writing Projects by Lisa Solomon 6 Why Outsource Your Legal Research and Writing Projects Lawyers outsource legal research and writing projects for a variety of reasons.
More informationAN ACT. The goals of the alcohol and drug treatment divisions created under this Chapter include the following:
ENROLLED Regular Session, 1997 HOUSE BILL NO. 2412 BY REPRESENTATIVE JACK SMITH AN ACT To enact Chapter 33 of Title 13 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950, comprised of R.S. 13:5301 through 5304,
More informationPART IV GEORGIA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA Atlanta March 21, 2014 The Honorable Supreme Court met pursuant to adjournment. The following order was passed: The Court having considered the 2012-2 First Amended Motion to Amend
More informationBENTON COUNTY OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENSE
BENTON COUNTY OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENSE REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS JUVENILE DEFENSE CONTRACTS Summary Application deadline is March 25, 2016 but Benton County reserves the right to review and evaluate applications
More informationComparison of Newly Adopted Arizona Rules of Professional Conduct with ABA Model Rules
Comparison of Newly Adopted Arizona Rules of Professional Conduct with ABA Model Rules ARIZONA New rules as adopted by Arizona Supreme Court to be effective 12/1/03. Rules 1.13, 5.5 and 8.5 as amended
More informationHOUSTON LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE, INC. RULES OF MEMBERSHIP
HOUSTON LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE, INC. RULES OF MEMBERSHIP The Houston Lawyer Referral Service, Inc. (HLRS) is a non-profit corporation sponsored by the Houston Bar Association, Houston Young Lawyers Association,
More informationCalifornia Judges Association OPINION NO. 56. (Issued: August 29, 2006)
California Judges Association OPINION NO. 56 (Issued: August 29, 2006) ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS WHEN A JUDGE OR A MEMBER OF A JUDGE S FAMILY HAS BEEN ARRESTED OR IS BEING PROSECUTED FOR CRIMINAL ACTIVITY
More informationUPL ADVISORY OPINION UPL 04-03 (December 2004) Non-lawyer In-house Employee Legal Services
UPL ADVISORY OPINION UPL 04-03 (December 2004) Non-lawyer In-house Employee Legal Services This is an Advisory Opinion regarding Rule 31 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona and Arizona Code of
More informationCALIFORNIA CODES GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 68150-68153
CALIFORNIA CODES GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 68150-68153 68150. (a) Trial court records may be created, maintained, and preserved in any form or forms of communication or representation, including paper, optical,
More informationA. Rights to the Client File
Pennsylvania Bar Association Committee on Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Formal Opinion 2007-100 Client Files Rights of Access, Possession and Copying, Along with Retention Considerations
More informationMASON COUNTY INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS SUPERIOR AND JUVENILE COURT
MASON COUNTY INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS SUPERIOR AND JUVENILE COURT Ordinance No. ~~q- 09:> WHEREAS, the Washington Legislature mated in RCW 10.101.030 that counties adopt stards for the delivery of public
More informationLIMITED SCOPE REPRESENTATION
LIMITED SCOPE REPRESENTATION Section _.1 What is Limit Scope Representation Section _.2 Scope of Representation Rule 4-1.2(c) Section _.3 Communication Rule 4-1.2(e) Section _.4 Appearance and Withdrawal
More informationETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN ALTERNATIVE FEE AGREEMENTS FOR THE DEFENSE LAWYER
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN ALTERNATIVE FEE AGREEMENTS FOR THE DEFENSE LAWYER BRIAN P. VOKE CAMPBELL CAMPBELL & EDWARDS ONE CONSTITUTION PLAZA BOSTON, MA 02129 (617) 241-3000 bvoke@campbell-trial-lawyers.com
More informationNew Illinois Ethics Rules on Lawyers Reporting Up Responsibilities
New Illinois Ethics Rules on Lawyers Reporting Up Responsibilities August 13, 2009 Boston Brussels Chicago Düsseldorf Houston London Los Angeles Miami Milan Munich New York Orange County Rome San Diego
More informationCONTRACT FOR LEGAL SERVICES
! Parties:! THIS AGREEMENT is made on the day of, 2012, in Plano, Collin, Texas, between ("Client"), and Reeves Law Firm, P.C. ("Attorney"):! In consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, the
More informationLouisiana State Bar Association Rules of Professional Conduct Committee
Louisiana State Bar Association Rules of Professional Conduct Committee 1 April 4, 2005 Lawyer Retirement - Ethical Requirements to Client A lawyer leaving the practice and closing his office should notify
More informationOpinion #177. Advancing Litigation Costs Through Lines of Credit
Opinion #177. Advancing Litigation Costs Through Lines of Credit Issued by the Professional Ethics Commission Date Issued: December 14, 2001 Facts and Question An attorney has requested an opinion on whether
More informationHow to Avoid Abandoned Records: Guidelines on the Treatment of Personal Health Information, in the Event of a Change in Practice
Information and Privacy Commissioner / Ontario How to Avoid Abandoned Records: Guidelines on the Treatment of Personal Health Information, in the Event of a Change in Practice Ann Cavoukian, Ph.D. Commissioner
More informationCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND
33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND PART I. (A) No attorney will be assigned to defend any indigent person in a criminal case unless his or her name appears on one of the approved trial counsel lists
More informationTOPICS OF INTEREST TO LAWYERS
TOPICS OF INTEREST TO LAWYERS Legal Fees Advanced fees Flat fees Retainers Disbursing advanced fees (when held in trust) Combined payment of earned and unearned fees Advances for costs Credit card payments
More informationNew York County Lawyers Association Professional Ethics Committee. Formal Opinion 748. March 10, 2015
New York County Lawyers Association Professional Ethics Committee Formal Opinion 748 March 10, 2015 TOPIC: The ethical implications of attorney profiles on LinkedIn DIGEST: Attorneys may maintain profiles
More informationAssume that the following clause was included in the retainer agreement between SK Firm LLP and the Corporation (the Relieving Clause ):
ETHICAL SCENARIO #3 I. FACT PATTERN A Saskatchewan law firm ( SK Firm LLP ) acts on behalf of an out of province (e.g. national) corporation (the Corporation ). SK Firm LLP s role has been solely to file
More informationConstruction Defect Action Reform Act
COLORADO REVISED STATUTES Title 13. Courts and Court Procedure Damages Regulation of Actions and Proceedings Article 20. Actions Part 8. Construction Defect Actions for Property Loss and Damage Construction
More information[New] Standard 1. Compensation. Standard 2. Duties and Responsibilities of Counsel. Standard 3. Caseload Limits and Types of Cases
STANDARDS FOR INDIGENT DEFENSE [New] Preamble The Washington Supreme Court adopts the following Standards to address certain basic elements of public defense practice related to the effective assistance
More informationAMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDING COMMITTEE ON ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Formal Opinion 92-369 December 7, 1992 Disposition of Deceased Sole Practitioners Client Files and Property To fulfill
More informationETHICS OPINION 2010 02. Retention, Storage, Ownership, Production and Destruction of Client Files
ETHICS OPINION 2010 02 Retention, Storage, Ownership, Production and Destruction of Client Files Introduction Formal Opinions 1986 02, 1993 10, 1994 01 are the most recent pronouncements of a lawyer s
More informationPROFESSIONAL COUNSELSM
PROFESSIONAL COUNSELSM ADVICE AND INSIGHT INTO THE PRACTICE OF LAW Lawyers Toolkit 3.0: A Guide to Managing the Attorney-Client Relationship A CNA PROFESSIONAL COUNSEL GUIDE FOR LAWYERS AND LAW FIRMS The
More informationSuccession Planning Handbook for Iowa Lawyers
Succession Planning Handbook for Iowa Lawyers Office of Professional Regulation Protecting the Interests of Your Clients in the Event of Your Disability or Death Office of Professional Regulation Judicial
More informationFOR PROPERTY LOSS AND DAMAGE 1
13-20-801. Short title Colorado Revised Statutes Title 13; Article 20; Part 8: CONSTRUCTION DEFECT ACTIONS FOR PROPERTY LOSS AND DAMAGE 1 This part 8 shall be known and may be cited as the Construction
More informationMAINE HANDBOOK FOR WITHDRAWAL FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW. A Publication of the Maine Board of Overseers of the Bar. Published November 2009
MAINE HANDBOOK FOR WITHDRAWAL FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW A Publication of the Maine Board of Overseers of the Bar Published November 2009 1 Maine Handbook for Withdrawal from the Practice of Law Table of
More informationChapter 153. Violations and Fines 2013 EDITION. Related Laws Page 571 (2013 Edition)
Chapter 153 2013 EDITION Violations and Fines VIOLATIONS (Generally) 153.005 Definitions 153.008 Violations described 153.012 Violation categories 153.015 Unclassified and specific fine violations 153.018
More informationA Model Electronic File Policy For The Law Office (With Form)
Published by American Law Institute-American Bar Association Continuing Professional Education six times a year A Model Electronic File Policy For The Law Office (With Form) A Model Electronic File Policy
More informationNEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS No. 13-03
NEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS No. 13-03 A SALE OF A LAW PRACTICE BY A LAWYER OR LAW FIRM TO AN EXISTING ASSOCIATE EMPLOYEE OR OWNER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A SALE FOR PURPOSES OF NEB. CT. R.
More informationARTICLE 1.1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
ARTICLE 1.1. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 1. Parole Board 220 IAC 1.1-1-1 Parole board membership (Repealed) Sec. 1. (Repealed by Parole Board; filed Jun 15, 1987, 2:45 pm: 10 IR 2496) 220 IAC 1.1-1-2 Definitions
More informationWHERE THERE S A WILL, THERE S A... DUTY?: A CLOSER LOOK AT THE SAFEKEEPING OF CLIENTS ORIGINAL ESTATE PLANNING DOCUMENTS. Jennifer A.
WHERE THERE S A WILL, THERE S A... DUTY?: A CLOSER LOOK AT THE SAFEKEEPING OF CLIENTS ORIGINAL ESTATE PLANNING DOCUMENTS Jennifer A. Kosteva Before the ink has dried on their newly executed wills, clients
More informationDOMESTIC VIOLENCE PENALTIES UNDER COLORADO LAW Fact/Discussion Sheet
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PENALTIES UNDER COLORADO LAW Fact/Discussion Sheet If you are convicted of a domestic violence charge, the penalties can be onerous. The following penalties assume a misdemeanor conviction.
More informationGUIDE TO CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS IN EMPLOYMENT
GUIDE TO CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS IN EMPLOYMENT Philadelphia LawWorks, a project of Philadelphia VIP, contributes to Philadelphia s economic development by ensuring that homeowners, nonprofits and small
More informationKENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-290 Issued: September 1984
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-290 Issued: September 1984 This opinion was decided under the Code of Professional Responsibility, which was in effect from 1971 to 1990. Lawyers should consult
More informationORANGE COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION. Formal Opinion 2011-01 (Collaborative Family Law)
ORANGE COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION Formal Opinion 2011-01 (Collaborative Family Law) Issue: Can a family lawyer enter into a collaborative law agreement consistent with her ethical duties, notwithstanding the
More informationThe Role of Defense Counsel in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims
The Role of Defense Counsel in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims I. Every criminal defense lawyer will, at sometime or another, be challenged as ineffective it comes with the territory. It is natural
More informationAPPENDIX A. Rule 1.15 SAFEKEEPING PROPERTY. Definitions. As used in this rule, the terms below shall have the following meaning:
APPENDIX A Rule 1.15 SAFEKEEPING PROPERTY Definitions. As used in this rule, the terms below shall have the following meaning: IOLTA account means a pooled interest- or dividend-bearing trust account benefiting
More informationFirst Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE SPONSORSHIP
First Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED LLS NO. 1-0.01 Michael Dohr x SENATE BILL 1-1 SENATE SPONSORSHIP Lambert, Lundberg (None), HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Senate Committees
More informationThe Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization
Reproduced by permission. 2012 Colorado Bar Association, 41 The Colorado Lawyer 87 (September 2012). All rights reserved. TAX LAW The Estate Tax Clawback: Fact or Fiction by Steven M. Weiser For the first
More informationDISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO. Court Address: 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO Court Address: 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 Plaintiff: JOHN GLEASON, in his official capacity as Supreme Court Attorney Regulation Counsel vs.
More informationNew York Court of Appeals Announces New Rules Governing Practice in New York by Attorneys Not Admitted in the State
New York Court of Appeals Announces New Rules Governing Practice in New York by Attorneys Not Provisions Permit Temporary Practice by Non-New York Attorneys and Registration of Non-U.S. Lawyers as In-House
More informationMARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE TITLE 19 - ATTORNEYS CHAPTER 200 - ADMISSION TO THE BAR. Rule 15.1. SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FOR MILITARY SPOUSE ATTORNEYS
MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE TITLE 19 - ATTORNEYS CHAPTER 200 - ADMISSION TO THE BAR ADD new Rule 15.1, as follows: Rule 15.1. SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FOR MILITARY SPOUSE ATTORNEYS (a) Definition As used
More informationMISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM
MISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM Discipline System Clients have a right to expect a high level of professional service from their lawyer. In Missouri, lawyers follow a code of ethics known as the Rules
More informationTitle 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE
Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE Chapter 51: SENTENCES OF IMPRISONMENT Table of Contents Part 3.... Section 1251. IMPRISONMENT FOR MURDER... 3 Section 1252. IMPRISONMENT FOR CRIMES OTHER THAN MURDER...
More informationWhat to do when a lawyer dies:
What to do when a lawyer dies: Sounds like a line from a lawyer joke, but it s not. There are some serious considerations. Being mindful that the lawyer may have assumed the responsibility for thousands
More informationMay 2015 Vol. 44, No. 5 Page 45. Articles Family Law Preservation of Social Media Evidence in a Family Law Context
May 2015 Vol. 44, No. 5 Page 45 Articles Family Law Preservation of Social Media Evidence in a Family Law Context by Kevin C. Massaro, Taylor P. Statfeld Family Law articles are sponsored by the CBA Family
More informationDATE ENGAGEMENT LETTER
DATE CLIENT Via Hand Delivery RE: ENGAGEMENT LETTER Dear CLIENT: 1. REPRESENTATION: This document confirms our representation of you in your domestic law case. Our legal representation will relate to all
More informationBASIC CRIMINAL LAW. Joe Bodiford. Overview of a criminal case Presented by: Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer
BASIC CRIMINAL LAW Overview of a criminal case Presented by: Joe Bodiford Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer www.floridacriminaldefense.com www.blawgger.com THE FLORIDA CRIMINAL PROCESS Source: http://www.fsu.edu/~crimdo/cj-flowchart.html
More informationNebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 07-04
Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 07-04 AN ATTORNEY MAY UNDERTAKE EMPLOYMENT AS A STAFF ATTORNEY FOR THE STANDING CHAPTER 13 BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE IF THE ATTORNEY IS PROPERLY SCREENED FROM
More informationWASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICES FOR CLIENT FILE RETENTION AND MANAGEMENT Prepared by Law Office Management Assistance Program (LOMAP) and Professional Responsibility Counsel March
More informationA Reminder: Avoiding and Surviving Attorney Ethics Complaints in Texas*
A Reminder: Avoiding and Surviving Attorney Ethics Complaints in Texas* A. THE BASICS FOR AVOIDING A GRIEVANCE Grievance claims in Texas have risen at a rate directly correlated to attorney growth. In
More informationAdministrative Policy 05 Case Management for Certificate-based Matters
Case Management for Certificate-based Matters Takes effect on: December 7, 2015 Previous Policy: 2014 Rules Purpose: To set out protocols and guidelines for case management and billing for regular certificate
More information2011: The Year in Ethics and Bar Discipline. By Constance V. Vecchione, Bar Counsel January 2012
2011: The Year in Ethics and Bar Discipline By Constance V. Vecchione, Bar Counsel January 2012 In this article, the Office of Bar Counsel takes a second look at key developments in ethics and bar discipline
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COLORADO CRIMINAL DEFENSE BAR, a Colorado non-profit corporation; COLORADO CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM COALITION, a Colorado
More informationState of New Jersey OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY. DWISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PO Box 085 TRENTON, NJ 08625-0085
CHRIS CHRISTIE Governor KIM GUADAGNO Lieutenant Governor State of New Jersey OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY DWISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PO Box 085 TRENTON, NJ 08625-0085
More informationM.R. 3140 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
M.R. 3140 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS Order entered July 1, 2011. (Deleted material is struck through and new material is underscored.) Effective September 1, 2011, Rule 1.15 of the Illinois
More informationYour Guide to Bail Bonds in Colorado
Your Guide to Bail Bonds in Colorado 1. WHAT IS BAIL? Your Guide to Bail Bonds in Colorado A joint publication of Colorado Division of Insurance 1560 Broadway, Suite 850 Denver, CO 80202 303-894-7499 1-800-930-3745
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CV 2011-016442 10/27/2011 HONORABLE DEAN M. FINK
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court *** Electronically Filed *** 10/28/2011 8:00 AM HONORABLE DEAN M. FINK CLERK OF THE COURT S. Brown Deputy STATE OF ARIZONA, et al. THOMAS C HORNE MARY JO FOSTER v. COLLEEN
More informationPresentation to the Bankruptcy Section of the Minnesota State Bar Association
Chapter 7 Trustees Ethical Considerations David P. Leibowitz Lakelaw 420 W. Clayton Street Waukegan, IL 60085 847 249 9100 dleibowitz@lakelaw.com Presentation to the Bankruptcy Section of the Minnesota
More informationA Lawyer s Guide to Records Management Issues
A Lawyer s Guide to Records Management Issues Important Considerations When Establishing a Workable File Retention and Destruction Policy It s Chubb. Or it s Chance. 2005 Chubb & Son, a division of Federal
More information