A publication of Ebanks, Smith & Carlson, L.L.P

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "A publication of Ebanks, Smith & Carlson, L.L.P. www.esclawyers.com 713.333.4500"

Transcription

1 Volume 4, Issue 2 A publication of Ebanks, Smith & Carlson, L.L.P Texas Supreme Court Limits Specific Jurisdiction Under The Long-Arm Statute? In Moki Mac River Expeditions v. Drugg, the Texas Supreme Court appeared to limit the reach of the Texas Long-Arm Statute for purposes of specific jurisdiction in a Texas court. For a Texas court to exercise specific jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant, there must be a substantial connection between the defendant s contacts with Texas and the operative facts of the litigation. Moki Mac, a Utah corporation, conducted guided trips in Utah and Arizona. Charles and Betsy Drugg, of Dallas, saw a brochure that Moki Mac sent to another Texas resident after that resident made inquiries into its business. The Druggs arranged for their 13-year-old son, Andy, to go on a Moki Mac rafting trip in the Grand Canyon. Both Mrs. Drugg and Continued on pg 2 Texas Supreme Court Holds Asbestosis Damages Legally Insufficient In Borg-Warner Corporation v. Flores, the Texas Supreme Court again clarified the quantum of proof necessary to impose liability for negligence and malice in the context of toxic tort lawsuits. Ortero Flores worked for a number of years grinding brake pads that contained asbestos. As a result of his work history, he claims to have developed asbestos-related health problems. Flores brought suit against several parties that manufactured some of the brake pads involved, including Borg-Warner. After a bifurcated trial, the jury apportioned 37% of the causation to Borg-Warner and 21% each to the other defendants. In addition to awarding compensatory damages, the jury found by clear and convincing evidence that Flores injuries arose from Borg-Warner s malice and awarded exemplary damages against Borg-Warner. The court of appeals affirmed. Continued on pg 4 In This Issue: Pg 1: Texas Supreme Court Limits Specific Jurisdiction Under The Long-Arm Statute? Pg 1: Texas Supreme Court Holds Asbestosis Damages Legally Insufficient Pg 2: Texas Supreme Court To Clarify Dram Shop Act Defenses Pg 3: As Is Clause and Warranty Disclaimers Permissible in Commercial Leases Pg 5-8: Opinions of Note Arbitration Attorneys Fees Civil Rights Expert Witnesses Insurance Policy Construction Medical Malpractice Premises Liability Sanctions Taxation Ebanks, Smith & Carlson, L.L.P McKinney, Suite 2700 Houston, TX

2 Texas Supreme Court To Clarify Dram Shop Act Defenses The Texas Supreme Court granted review in a Dram Shop case to determine the burden of proof required of a defendant who moves for summary judgment under the statute s Safe Harbor Defense. John Parker brought a Dram Shop and premises liability action alleging that he was severely brain damaged as the result of a fight in the parking lot of a Slick Willie s pool hall. He claimed that he and his ex-girlfriend s son, Anthony Griffin, attended the grand opening of Slick Willie s and both were served alcohol after they became obviously intoxicated. Parker claimed that he and Griffin then argued, the manager told Parker to leave, and escorted him to the parking lot. Later, Parker was seen conversing with Griffin, and Griffin subsequently struck Parker who fell, severely injuring his head. Parker sued Slick Willie s under both the Dram Shop Act and under a premises liability theory. The trial court granted Slick Willie s summary judgment. The court of appeals affirmed the summary judgment on the premises liability claim on Dram Shop preemption grounds. The court of appeals, however, held that the trial court improperly granted summary judgment on the Dram Shop claim. The Safe Harbor Defense in the Alcoholic Beverage Code immunizes a commercial provider of alcoholic beverages from liability for its employees provision of alcohol to an intoxicated customer if: (1) the employer requires its employees to attend a commission-approved seller training program; (2) the employee actually attended the training program; and (3) the employer has not directly or indirectly encouraged the employee to violate such law. TEX. ALCO. BEV. CODE ANN (Vernon 2005). The court of appeals held that a provider must prove enforcement of its alcohol policy on a particular occasion to satisfy the third element of the Safe Harbor Defense. It held that Slick Willie s did not conclusively prove that it did not directly or indirectly encourage its employees to serve alcohol to an intoxicated customer. The Supreme Court granted the alcohol provider s petition for review to clarify what the Dram Shop Act means by the employer has not directly or indirectly encouraged the employee to violate such law. The Supreme Court will also determine a collateral issue of whether a commercial alcohol provider is an insurer of its employees actions despite the Alcoholic Beverage Code s language relieving the provider of liability when its employee violates the law , Inc. v. Parker, No (review granted Mar. 12, 2007) (court of appeals opinion at 194 S.W.3d 556). 2 Long-Arm Statute... Continued from pg 1 Andy signed release forms sent by Moki Mac. Andy, unfortunately, fell to his death while hiking on the trip, and the Druggs filed suit alleging wrongful death based on intentional and negligent misrepresentations contained in the brochure and the release Continued on pg 3

3 The Court accepted as true the claim that Andy might not have gone on the trip were it not for Moki Mac s representations about safety. The operative facts of the lawsuit, however, principally concerned the guides conduct on the hiking expedition and whether the guides exercised reasonable care in supervising Andy. The jury could only assess the misrepresentation claims after thoroughly considering the manner in which Moki Mac conducted the hike. Accordingly, the Court ruled that the alleged misrepresentations were not the subject matter of the case, nor related to the operative facts of the negligence action. Whatever connection there...for specific-jurisdiction purposes, purposeful availment has no jurisdictional relevance unless the defendant s liability arises from or relates to the forum contacts. Long-Arm Statute... Continued from pg 2 forms. Moki Mac specially appeared and challenged the Texas court s personal jurisdiction over it. The trial court denied Moki Mac s special appearance, and the court of appeals affirmed. The Supreme Court reviewed the Texas Long-Arm Statute and concluded that the Druggs negligent and intentional misrepresentation claims based on Moki Mac s brochure and release form satisfied the doing-business requirement for jurisdiction under the plain language of the statute. The Court also noted that Moki Mac had minimum contacts with Texas and availed itself of doing business here. But, for specific-jurisdiction purposes, purposeful availment has no jurisdictional relevance unless the defendant s liability arises from or relates to the forum contacts. After reviewing the various standards for determining when liability arises from or relates to a defendant s contacts with Texas, the Court held that there must be a substantial connection between a non-resident s contacts with Texas and the operative facts of the litigation for a trial court to exercise specific jurisdiction. may have been between Moki Mac s promotional material sent to Texas and the operative facts that led to Andy s death in Arizona, the Court stated, we do not believe it is sufficiently direct to meet dueprocess concerns. The Court, therefore, reversed the court of appeals and remanded for that court to consider whether Moki Mac is subject to general jurisdiction in a Texas court based on its systematic contacts with Texas. Moki Mac River Expeditions v. Drugg, 221 S.W.3d 569 (Tex. 2007). As Is Clause and Warranty Disclaimers Permissible in Commercial Leases In Gym-N-I Playgrounds, Inc. v. Snider, the Texas Supreme Court clarified permissible provisions in a commercial lease. The Court also held, for the first time, that a landlord can disclaim the implied warranty of suitability in a commercial lease. A landlord leased a business to two employees who had worked in the building for several years. The lease contained the following language: Tenant accepts the Premises as is. Landlord Continued on pg 4 3

4 makes no other warranties, express or implied, of merchantability, marketability, fitness or suitability for a particular purpose or otherwise, except as set forth herein. Any implied warranties are expressly disclaimed and excluded. The lease also contained a holdover clause. If the tenant remained in the premises, the holdover shall constitute a lease from month-tomonth, under the terms and provisions of this Lease. After the lease expired, the tenants paid rent for several years under the holdover clause until the building was destroyed by fire. The tenants then sued seeking damages for negligence, fraud, DTPA violations, and breach of the implied warranty of suitability. The trial court granted summary judgment for the landlord and the court of appeals affirmed. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the as is clause survived the expiration of the original lease term. The language in the holdover clause, under the terms and provisions of this Lease, meant just that the lease continued to govern the month-to-month tenancy. Thus, the as is clause was in effect when the fire occurred. Moreover, the as is clause negated the causation elements essential to the tenants negligence, negligence per se, gross negligence, DTPA, and fraud claims. Further, The implied warranty of suitability is waived when, as here, the lease expressly disclaims that warranty. the Court addressed for the first t i m e whether a landlord can expressly disclaim an implied warranty of suitability in a commercial lease. It held, as a matter of law: The implied warranty of suitability is waived when, as here, the lease expressly disclaims that warranty. The Court noted that disclaiming a warranty of suitability is supported by public policy, because Texas favors the parties freedom to contract. Thus, the as is clause and the express disclaimer of the implied warranty of suitability in the lease foreclosed the tenants suit. Gym-N-I Playgrounds, Inc. v. Snider, 220 S.W.3d 905 (Tex. 2007). 4 Asbestosis Damages...Continued from pg 1 The Court reversed, noting that, in asbestos cases, a court must determine whether the asbestos in the defendant s product was a substantial factor in bringing about the plaintiff s injuries. The Court noted, One of toxicology s central tenets is that the dose makes the poison. The Court previously recognized that exposure to asbestos, a known carcinogen, is never healthy, but fortunately does not always result in disease. The Court also previously held that epidemiological studies are without evidentiary significance if the injured person cannot show that the exposure or dose levels were comparable to or greater than those in the studies. Here, no epidemiolog- Continued on pg 5 One of toxicology s central tenets is that the dose makes the poison.

5 Asbestosis Damages...Continued from pg 4 ical studies showed that brake mechanics faced at least a double risk of asbestosis. The requirement of more than a doubling of the risk strikes a balance between the needs of our legal system and the limits of science. The Supreme Court held that in analyzing the legal sufficiency of the negligence claim, the court of appeals erred in holding that there was sufficient evidence that the defendants supplied any of the asbestos to which the Plaintiff was exposed. Instead, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant s product was a substantial factor OPINIONS ofn OTE in causing the alleged harm. The Court recognized that this proof need not be reduced to mathematical precision. Rather, defendant-specific evidence relating to the approximate dose to which the plaintiff was exposed, coupled with evidence that the dose was a substantial factor in causing the asbestos-related disease, will suffice. Without this evidence, both the negligence and strict liability claims failed for lack of a substantial-factor causation. Borg-Warner Corp. v. Flores, 2007 WL (Tex. June 8, 2007). Arbitration The Texas Supreme Court granted mandamus and compelled an employment dispute to arbitration because there was no evidence of duress involved in signing an employment contract that contained an arbitration agreement. The employee needed to show that the employer singled out the arbitration provision alone from the other provisions. If not, the claim of duress goes to the agreement generally and must be decided in arbitration. In short, the Supreme Court held the employee presented no evidence that the employer exerted duress on her to agree to the arbitration provision, as distinct from the agreement as a whole. In re RLS Legal Solutions, 221 S.W.3d 629 (Tex. 2007) (orig. proceeding). Attorneys Fees The Texas Supreme Court clarified the rule that a court may award attorneys fees only if necessary to recover on a contract or a statutory claim that allows fees. The Court eliminated the exception that allowed fees incurred solely on separate, but arguably intertwined claims. In this case, the Court noted that the plaintiffs had to defend a counterclaim to the plaintiffs claim for which fees are recoverable. Because their attorney s efforts in that regard were necessary to recover on their initial contract claim, the fees defending the counterclaim were also recoverable. The Supreme Court also held that it would not adopt a rule allowing post-judgment fees to be determined after appeal by a remand to the trial court where the trial court did not enter an award for post-judgment fees in the first place. Varner v. Cardenas, 218 S.W.3d 68 (Tex. 2007) (per curiam). Civil Rights The Fifth Circuit held that material fact issues barred summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds for a correctional officer in a section 1983 action. The court found that fact questions existed as to whether the officer acted in bad faith in Continued on pg 6 5

6 beating a handcuffed prison inmate about his head, shoulders, and back. The record contained testimony reflecting that the handcuffed inmate had been cooperative and non-threatening. Moreover, the correctional officer never alleged that his actions were in response to any misbehavior by the inmate. Thus, the officer was not entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law. Brown v. Lippard, 472 F.3d 384 (5th Cir. 2006). The Fifth Circuit reversed a district court s dismissal of a due process claim based on a state university s alleged deliberate indifference to a risk of injury that it created. The court held that the obligations in the complaint sufficiently stated a due process claim under the state-created danger theory. In so ruling, the panel declined to follow prior panel decisions holding that the Fifth Circuit had never adopted the state-created danger doctrine. Breen v. Texas A & M University, 485 F.3d 325 (5th Cir. 2007). Expert Witnesses A hospital inadvertently produced privileged work-product documents to its expert witness, thus rendering those documents discoverable under the rules of civil procedure. The Texas Supreme Court accepted mandamus review to resolve the tension between the Rules snap-back provision that protects privileged documents and the expert-disclosure requirements. The Court held that the expert disclosure rule governing testifying experts prevails over the snap-back provision, so long as the expert intends to testify at trial despite the inadvertent document production. But, the inadvertent nature of the production preserved the applicable privilege and entitled the hospital to recover the documents upon realizing its mistake, provided the hospital s designated expert did not testify at trial. In re Christus Spohn Hospital Kleberg, 222 S.W.3d 434 (Tex. 2007) (orig. proceeding). Insurance Policy Construction The Fifth Circuit held that a fact issue existed as to whether a barge worker, provided by a labor services company, qualified as a leased worker for an insured barge owner within a CGL insurance policy s employee exclusion. After the worker sued the insured, it sought coverage under its CGL policy. The Fifth Circuit noted that the worker performed duties related to the conduct of the insured s business pursuant to an agreement, as contemplated by the policy s leased worker definition. But, on the other hand, the company provided general liability coverage, salary, workers compensation insurance, and supervision for the worker and also submitted weekly invoices to the insured. In re South Louisiana Sugars Co-op., Inc., 485 F.3d 291 (5th Cir. 2007). Medical Malpractice A psychiatrist sued his doctor for medical malpractice for failure to diagnose diverticulitis and for improperly treating him. The evidence at trial indicated that the psychiatrist did not describe the classic symptoms of diverticulitis to his doctor and failed to inform the doctor of his complete past medical history. The court s charge instructed the jury to assess both the doctor s and the patient s negligence, and the 6 Continued pg 7

7 jury found the patient-psychiatrist to be 51% responsible leading to a take-nothing judgment in favor of the doctor. The court of appeals reversed and remanded for a new trial. The Texas Supreme Court held that the ordinary care standard, modified to instruct jurors to consider a party s actions under the same or similar circumstances, means the jury must consider a physician s training. Because there was some evidence the plaintiff doctor failed to report a critical symptom when he should have, the Court reversed and reinstated the jury s verdict. The Court, however, also held that in most cases an ordinary patient s failure to report the origin of pain will be no evidence of negligence. Jackson v. Axelrad, 221 S.W.3d 650 (Tex. 2007). A mother filed a medical malpractice action on behalf of her son as next friend. The court of appeals held that, even assuming the mother lacked capacity to sue until she was appointed as guardian for the son, the 120-day deadline for a health care liability claimant to file an expert report commenced when the mother originally filed the medical malpractice action as next friend. The deadline did not restart when the mother cured the defect in her capacity to sue by obtaining an appointment as guardian and filed an amended petition in the correct capacity. Intracare Hospital North v. Campbell, 222 S.W.3d 790 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet. h.). The Legislature enacted Chapter 74 of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code to remove unwarranted delay and expense, to accelerate the disposition of non-meritorious cases, and to give hard-and-fast deadlines for serving expert reports. Chapter 74, however, imposes no deadline for filing a motion to dismiss when a plaintiff fails to file and serve an expert report prior to the 120-day deadline. The 21- day deadline in the statute only refers to an objection to the sufficiency of an expert report, not to the fact that an expert report was not served within the mandatory 120- day deadline. Smith v. Hamilton, 2007 WL (Tex. App. Beaumont June 21, 2007, no pet. h.). Premises Liability The Texas Supreme Court held that the plaintiff presented no evidence that a premises condition posed an unreasonable risk of harm, and reversed the court of appeals opinion to the contrary. A customer who fell from a ramp leading into a car dealership claimed that the handrail should have extended the full length of the ramp to protect a four-inch elevation difference at the end of the ramp. The court held, as a matter of law, that there was no unreasonable risk of harm. The portion of the ramp with no handrails met applicable safety standards and was outlined in yellow, a method used to indicate a change in elevation. Moreover, no other customer had been injured on the ramp in the previous ten years. Brinson Ford, Inc. v. Alger, 2007 WL (Tex. June 15, 2007) (per curiam). Sanctions The Texas Supreme Court upheld a sanctions award against an attorney for filing so-called group pleadings, where the plaintiffs alleged identical allegations or claims against several different defendants. The Court held this does Continued pg 8 7

8 not relieve a party from meeting the express requirements of Chapter 10 of the Civil Practice & Remedies Code. Whoever signs a pleading or motion certifies that each claim, each allegation, and each denial is based on the signatory s best knowledge, information, and belief formed after reasonable inquiry. The Court found that the plaintiffs attorney violated Chapter 10 by alleging that each doctor prescribed and administered certain drugs in spite of contrary information in the medical records. The Court, however, could not determine the basis of the $50, sanction under the record and remanded for the trial court to explain the basis of the award. Lowe v. Henry, 212 S.W.3d 609 (Tex. 2007). Taxation A federal appellate court disagreed with a taxpayer s attempt to treat past and future emotional distress as non-taxable income. The taxpayer argued that the damage award compensated her for substantial physical problems cause by emotional distress. The Internal Revenue Code excludes tax on damages received on account of physical injuries or physical sickness. The court held that the award was taxable income because the award compensated the taxpayer only for mental pain and anguish and for injury to her professional reputation, despite the fact that she suffered certain physical manifestations. The court also held that the award constituted gross income under the Internal Revenue Code. Murphy v. Internal Revenue Service, 2007 WL (D.C. Cir. July 3, 2007). Disclaimer This newsletter is distributed by Ebanks, Smith & Carlson, L.L.P. only as an informational source to our clients and our business associates. The articles and summaries in Escript do not constitute professional legal advice and should not be construed as rendering or offering a legal opinion on any particular lawsuit or any specific set of facts. Ebanks, Smith & Carlson, L.L.P., its partners, and its attorneys will assume no liability in connection with its use. 8 Ebanks, Smith & Carlson, L.L.P McKinney, Suite 2700 Houston, TX 77010

MALICIOUS PROSECTION

MALICIOUS PROSECTION MALICIOUS PROSECTION DALE JEFFERSON, Houston Martin, Disiere, Jefferson & Wisdom, L.L.P. State Bar of Texas CAUSES OF ACTION March 30-31, 2006 - Irving April 6-7, 2006 Houston CHAPTER 18 MALICIOUS

More information

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and

More information

A summary and analysis of Borg-Warner is attached.

A summary and analysis of Borg-Warner is attached. According to Andrew Schirrmeister, plaintiffs lawyers specializing in toxic tort litigation are scrambling. On June 8, 2007, in Borg-Warner Corp. v. Flores, 1 the Texas Supreme Court issued a significant

More information

to add a number of affirmative defenses, including an allegation that Henry s claim was barred

to add a number of affirmative defenses, including an allegation that Henry s claim was barred REVERSE and REMAND; and Opinion Filed May 11, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00616-CV DOROTHY HENRY, Appellant V. BASSAM ZAHRA, Appellee On Appeal from the

More information

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No. 05-12-01365-CV

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No. 05-12-01365-CV REVERSE and REMAND; and Opinion Filed April 3, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01365-CV UNITED MEDICAL SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., Appellant V. ANSELL HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS,

More information

Products Liability: Putting a Product on the U.S. Market. Natalia R. Medley Crowell & Moring LLP 14 November 2012

Products Liability: Putting a Product on the U.S. Market. Natalia R. Medley Crowell & Moring LLP 14 November 2012 Products Liability: Putting a Product on the U.S. Market Natalia R. Medley Crowell & Moring LLP 14 November 2012 Overview Regulation of Products» Federal agencies» State laws Product Liability Lawsuits»

More information

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with

More information

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No. 05-14-00894-CV

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No. 05-14-00894-CV Reversed and Remanded and Opinion Filed July 28, 2015 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00894-CV TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION, Appellant V. JOSEPH MCRAE,

More information

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Fourteenth Court of Appeals Affirmed and Opinion filed February 7, 2002. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-00-01144-CV ANTONIO GARCIA, JR., Appellant V. PALESTINE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, n/k/a MEMORIAL MOTHER FRANCES HOSPITAL,

More information

Cardelli Lanfear P.C.

Cardelli Lanfear P.C. Michigan Prepared by Cardelli Lanfear P.C. 322 West Lincoln Royal Oak, MI 48067 Tel: 248.850.2179 Fax: 248.544.1191 1. Introduction History of Tort Reform in Michigan Michigan was one of the first states

More information

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00647-CV ACCELERATED WEALTH, LLC and Accelerated Wealth Group, LLC, Appellants v. LEAD GENERATION AND MARKETING, LLC, Appellee From

More information

THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. By Craig R. White

THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. By Craig R. White THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES By Craig R. White SKEDSVOLD & WHITE, LLC. 1050 Crown Pointe Parkway Suite 710 Atlanta, Georgia 30338 (770)

More information

Reverse and Render in part; Affirm in part; Opinion Filed December 29, 2014. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Reverse and Render in part; Affirm in part; Opinion Filed December 29, 2014. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas Reverse and Render in part; Affirm in part; Opinion Filed December 29, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01546-CV OKLAHOMA SURETY COMPANY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division PUBLISHED UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division IN RE: WILLIAM G. DADE ) Case No. 00-32487 ANN E. DADE ) Chapter 7 Debtors. ) ) ) DEBORAH R. JOHNSON ) Adversary

More information

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00815-CV IN THE ESTATE OF Alvilda Mae AGUILAR From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-PC-2802 Honorable

More information

Arizona State Senate Issue Paper June 22, 2010 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE. Statute of Limitations. Note to Reader: INTRODUCTION

Arizona State Senate Issue Paper June 22, 2010 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE. Statute of Limitations. Note to Reader: INTRODUCTION Arizona State Senate Issue Paper June 22, 2010 Note to Reader: The Senate Research Staff provides nonpartisan, objective legislative research, policy analysis and related assistance to the members of the

More information

trial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations.

trial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations. RESULTS Appellate Court upholds decision that malpractice action barred September 2, 2015 The South Carolina Court of Appeals recently upheld a summary judgment obtained by David Overstreet and Mike McCall

More information

ERISA Causes of Action *

ERISA Causes of Action * 1 ERISA Causes of Action * ERISA authorizes a variety of causes of action to remedy violations of the statute, to enforce the terms of a benefit plan, or to provide other relief to a plan, its participants

More information

OREGON LAW AT-A-GLANCE

OREGON LAW AT-A-GLANCE 1. ASSUMPTION OF THE RISK: This doctrine was abolished in Oregon. ORS 31.620(2). But see Comparative Negligence below. 2. COLLATERAL SOURCE RULE: The Court may deduct from a damages award certain collateral

More information

Personal Injury Law: Minnesota Medical Malpractice

Personal Injury Law: Minnesota Medical Malpractice Personal Injury Law: Minnesota Medical Malpractice Medical Malpractice Terms Statutes of Limitations Minnesota Medical Malpractice Laws Medical malpractice includes many forms of liability producing conduct

More information

2015 IL App (5th) 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT

2015 IL App (5th) 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT NOTICE Decision filed 10/15/15. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2015 IL App (5th 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227

More information

JENNIFER (COLMAN) JACOBI MMG INSURANCE COMPANY. in the Superior Court (Hancock County, Cuddy, J.) in favor of Jennifer (Colman)

JENNIFER (COLMAN) JACOBI MMG INSURANCE COMPANY. in the Superior Court (Hancock County, Cuddy, J.) in favor of Jennifer (Colman) MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2011 ME 56 Docket: Han-10-526 Argued: April 12, 2011 Decided: May 10, 2011 Reporter of Decisions Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, SILVER, MEAD, GORMAN, and JABAR,

More information

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas Opinion issued June 11, 2013. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-12-00636-CV SINHUE TEMPLOS, Appellant V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Appellee On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

More information

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No. 05-12-00543-CV

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No. 05-12-00543-CV REVERSE and REMAND; and Opinion Filed May 28, 2013. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00543-CV BROWN CONSULTING AND ASSOCIATES, INC. AND A LEARNING CENTER JUST FOR ME,

More information

Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative. Proposals Addressing Compensation for Asbestos-Related Harms or Death

Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative. Proposals Addressing Compensation for Asbestos-Related Harms or Death Appendix I: Select Legislative Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative is and Mesothelioma Benefits Act H.R. 6906, 93rd 1973). With respect to claims for benefits filed before December 31, 1974, would authorize

More information

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas Opinion issued April 19, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-15-00361-CV FREDDIE L. WALKER, Appellant V. RISSIE OWENS, PRESIDING OFFICER OF THE TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND

More information

2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013

2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). 2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U Order

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 94-11035. (Summary Calendar) GLEN R. GURLEY and JEAN E. GURLEY, AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY,

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 94-11035. (Summary Calendar) GLEN R. GURLEY and JEAN E. GURLEY, AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 94-11035 (Summary Calendar) GLEN R. GURLEY and JEAN E. GURLEY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal

More information

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals RENDERED: DECEMBER 7, 2012; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED ORDERED PUBLISHED FEBRUARY 8, 2013; 10:00 A.M. Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2011-CA-000990-MR RANDY PEZZAROSSI APPELLANT APPEAL

More information

Alternative Burdens May Come With Alternative Causes

Alternative Burdens May Come With Alternative Causes Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Alternative Burdens May Come With Alternative Causes

More information

Affirm in part; Reverse in part; and Remand. Opinion Filed June 9, 2015. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No.

Affirm in part; Reverse in part; and Remand. Opinion Filed June 9, 2015. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No. Affirm in part; Reverse in part; and Remand. Opinion Filed June 9, 2015. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00481-CV DAVID FUSARO, Appellant V. TRINITY UNIVERSAL INSURANCE

More information

No. 05-11-00700-CV IN THE FOR THE RAY ROBINSON,

No. 05-11-00700-CV IN THE FOR THE RAY ROBINSON, No. 05-11-00700-CV ACCEPTED 225EFJ016616444 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 11 November 30 P8:40 Lisa Matz CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS WELLS FARGO BANK,

More information

The Effect of Product Safety Regulatory Compliance

The Effect of Product Safety Regulatory Compliance PRODUCT LIABILITY Product Liability Litigation The Effect of Product Safety Regulatory Compliance By Kenneth Ross Product liability litigation and product safety regulatory activities in the U.S. and elsewhere

More information

AN OVERVIEW OF DAMAGES IN GEORGIA. By Craig R. White

AN OVERVIEW OF DAMAGES IN GEORGIA. By Craig R. White AN OVERVIEW OF DAMAGES IN GEORGIA By Craig R. White SKEDSVOLD & WHITE, LLC. 1050 Crown Pointe Parkway Suite 710 Atlanta, Georgia 30338 (770) 392-8610 FAX: (770) 392-8620 EMAIL: cwhite@skedsvoldandwhite.com

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 13-0776 444444444444 CHAPMAN CUSTOM HOMES, INC., AND MICHAEL B. DUNCAN, TRUSTEE OF THE M. B. DUNCAN SEPARATE PROPERTY TRUST, PETITIONERS, v. DALLAS PLUMBING

More information

Construction Defect Action Reform Act

Construction Defect Action Reform Act COLORADO REVISED STATUTES Title 13. Courts and Court Procedure Damages Regulation of Actions and Proceedings Article 20. Actions Part 8. Construction Defect Actions for Property Loss and Damage Construction

More information

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS Sources: US Courts : http://www.uscourts.gov/library/glossary.html New York State Unified Court System: http://www.nycourts.gov/lawlibraries/glossary.shtml Acquittal A

More information

Case 2:10-cv-02263-JAR Document 98 Filed 05/04/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 2:10-cv-02263-JAR Document 98 Filed 05/04/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS Case 2:10-cv-02263-JAR Document 98 Filed 05/04/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SANDRA H. DEYA and EDWIN DEYA, individually and as next friends and natural

More information

CIVIL PROCEDURE 101. Presentation by: Judge Emily Peacock, Scott Silverman, Esq. and Loren Beer, Esq.

CIVIL PROCEDURE 101. Presentation by: Judge Emily Peacock, Scott Silverman, Esq. and Loren Beer, Esq. CIVIL PROCEDURE 101 Presentation by: Judge Emily Peacock, Scott Silverman, Esq. and Loren Beer, Esq. The Federal Rules govern the conduct of all civil actions brought in Federal district courts. The Florida

More information

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Fourteenth Court of Appeals Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed August 16, 2001. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-00-00177-CV HENRY P. MASSEY AND ANN A. MASSEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF COURTNEY

More information

FOR PROPERTY LOSS AND DAMAGE 1

FOR PROPERTY LOSS AND DAMAGE 1 13-20-801. Short title Colorado Revised Statutes Title 13; Article 20; Part 8: CONSTRUCTION DEFECT ACTIONS FOR PROPERTY LOSS AND DAMAGE 1 This part 8 shall be known and may be cited as the Construction

More information

2005-C -2496 CHARLES ALBERT AND DENISE ALBERT v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. (Parish of Lafayette)

2005-C -2496 CHARLES ALBERT AND DENISE ALBERT v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. (Parish of Lafayette) FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 0 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 17th day of October, 200, are as follows: PER CURIAM: 2005-C -249 CHARLES ALBERT AND

More information

Amy S. Harris Shareholder

Amy S. Harris Shareholder Shareholder Amy Harris joined Macdonald Devin in 1989 and represents clients in state and federal trial and appellate courts, primarily in insurance defense litigation and insurance coverage. She has served

More information

Alani Golanski, for appellants. Christian H. Gannon, for respondent. A statute requires anyone who brings a lawsuit against

Alani Golanski, for appellants. Christian H. Gannon, for respondent. A statute requires anyone who brings a lawsuit against ================================================================= This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------

More information

Personal injury claim" does not include a claim for compensatory benefits pursuant to worker s compensation or veterans benefits.

Personal injury claim does not include a claim for compensatory benefits pursuant to worker s compensation or veterans benefits. Wisconsin AB 19 (2013) (a) Personal injury claim" means any claim for damages, loss, indemnification, contribution, restitution or other relief, including punitive damages, that is related to bodily injury

More information

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Fourteenth Court of Appeals Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 26, 2009. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-07-00390-CV LEO BORRELL, Appellant V. VITAL WEIGHT CONTROL, INC., D/B/A NEWEIGH, Appellee On Appeal from

More information

Eleventh Court of Appeals

Eleventh Court of Appeals Opinion filed March 14, 2014 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals No. 11-13-00119-CV BRENT BATES BUILDERS, INC. AND BRENT BATES, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellants V. RAHUL MALHOTRA, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A THE MALHOTRA

More information

AN ACT. To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act.

AN ACT. To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act. 3721L.01I AN ACT To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI,

More information

Reed Armstrong Quarterly

Reed Armstrong Quarterly Reed Armstrong Quarterly January 2009 http://www.reedarmstrong.com/default.asp Contributors: William B. Starnes II Tori L. Cox IN THIS ISSUE: Joint and Several Liability The Fault of Settled Tortfeasors

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 1, 2003 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 1, 2003 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 1, 2003 Session FARMERS MUTUAL OF TENNESSEE v. ATHENS INSURANCE AGENCY, CHARLES W. SPURLING and wife, CAROLYN SPURLING Direct Appeal from the

More information

Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE

Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE Chapter 2: CRIMINAL LIABILITY; ELEMENTS OF CRIMES Table of Contents Part 1. GENERAL PRINCIPLES... Section 31. VOLUNTARY CONDUCT (REPEALED)... 3 Section 32. ELEMENTS OF CRIMES

More information

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE GERALD J. BAMBERGER, et al., ) No. ED92319 ) Appellants, ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court vs. ) of St. Louis County ) 08SL-CC01435 CHARLES

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Memorandum and Order

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Memorandum and Order IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CAROSELLA & FERRY, P.C., Plaintiff, v. TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 00-2344 Memorandum and Order YOHN,

More information

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 12650. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the False Claims Act. (b) For purposes of this article: (1) "Claim" includes any

More information

In The NO. 14-00-00122-CV. VARIETY CHILDREN S HOSPITAL, INC. d/b/a Miami Children s Hospital, Appellant

In The NO. 14-00-00122-CV. VARIETY CHILDREN S HOSPITAL, INC. d/b/a Miami Children s Hospital, Appellant Affirmed and Opinion filed October 26, 2000. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-00-00122-CV VARIETY CHILDREN S HOSPITAL, INC. d/b/a Miami Children s Hospital, Appellant V. THE ESTATE OF MEGAN ASHLEY

More information

INVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees

INVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees INTRODUCTION INVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees By: Maureen S. Binetti, Esq. Christopher R. Binetti, Paralegal Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A. When can the investigation which may

More information

!"" July 23, 2009. Ms. Valerie Farwell Ms. Amy Green Mr. Edward Slaughter. Re: Cause No. 2008-15687; Wilhite v. Alcoa.

! July 23, 2009. Ms. Valerie Farwell Ms. Amy Green Mr. Edward Slaughter. Re: Cause No. 2008-15687; Wilhite v. Alcoa. !"" July 23, 2009 "#$#%&$%% Ms. Valerie Farwell Ms. Amy Green Mr. Edward Slaughter Dear Counsel: Re: Cause No. 2008-15687; Wilhite v. Alcoa You will recall that a Motion for Rehearing was filed by the

More information

Terms and Conditions for Tax Services

Terms and Conditions for Tax Services Terms and Conditions for Tax Services In the course of delivering services relating to tax return preparation, tax advisory, and assistance in tax controversy matters, Brady, Martz & Associates, P.C. (we

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 11-0425 444444444444 PETROLEUM SOLUTIONS, INC., PETITIONER, v. BILL HEAD D/B/A BILL HEAD ENTERPRISES AND TITEFLEX CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444

More information

Colorado s Civil Access Pilot Project and the Changing Landscape of Business Litigation

Colorado s Civil Access Pilot Project and the Changing Landscape of Business Litigation Colorado s Civil Access Pilot Project and the Changing Landscape of Business Litigation On January 1, 2012, new rules approved by the Colorado Supreme Court entitled the Civil Access Pilot Project ( CAPP

More information

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS MICHAELA WARD, v. Appellant, LINDA THERET, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PRINCIPAL OF MCKINNEY NORTH HIGH SCHOOL, Appellee. No. 08-08-00143-CV Appeal from

More information

14-05313-16 CAUSE NO. JULIE TORBERT, as next friend of IN THE DISTRICT COURT PHILIP ORMSTON V. DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS

14-05313-16 CAUSE NO. JULIE TORBERT, as next friend of IN THE DISTRICT COURT PHILIP ORMSTON V. DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS 14-05313-16 CAUSE NO. FILED: 7/15/2014 1:32:23 PM SHERRI ADELSTEIN Denton County District Clerk By: Heather Goheen, Deputy JULIE TORBERT, as next friend of IN THE DISTRICT COURT PHILIP ORMSTON Plaintiff

More information

Fracturing" of Legal Malpractice Claims. Nisha P. Byers Jackie S. Cooper Cooper & Scully, P.C. March 7, 2012

Fracturing of Legal Malpractice Claims. Nisha P. Byers Jackie S. Cooper Cooper & Scully, P.C. March 7, 2012 Fracturing" of Legal Malpractice Claims Nisha P. Byers Jackie S. Cooper Cooper & Scully, P.C. March 7, 2012 Clients Claims Against Lawyers Legal malpractice/negligence Breach of fiduciary duty Fraud Breach

More information

Medical Malpractice Reform

Medical Malpractice Reform Medical Malpractice Reform 49 This Act to contains a clause wherein the state legislature asks the state Supreme Court to require a plaintiff filing a medical liability claim to include a certificate of

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1362 James Joyce, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Armstrong Teasdale,

More information

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2008).

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2008). This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2008). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A09-1383 Diane L. Sheehan, Appellant, vs. Robert

More information

CHAPTER 246 HOUSE BILL 2603 AN ACT

CHAPTER 246 HOUSE BILL 2603 AN ACT House Engrossed State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-second Legislature First Regular Session CHAPTER HOUSE BILL 0 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE, CHAPTER, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING ARTICLE

More information

Date: February 16, 2001

Date: February 16, 2001 ,QWHUQDO5HYHQXH6HUYLFH Number: 200121031 Release Date: 5/25/2001 Index No.: 104.03-00 Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224 Person to Contact: Telephone Number: Refer Reply To: CC:ITA:1 PLR-122136-00

More information

Internal Revenue Service

Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service Number: 200924034 Release Date: 6/12/2009 Index Number: 468B.00-00, 468B.04-01, 468B.07-00, 461.00-00, 162.00-00, 172.00-00, 172.01-00, 172.01-05, 172.06-00 -----------------------

More information

In The NO. 14-99-00657-CV. HARRIS COUNTY, Appellant. JOHNNY NASH, Appellee

In The NO. 14-99-00657-CV. HARRIS COUNTY, Appellant. JOHNNY NASH, Appellee Reversed and Rendered Opinion filed May 18, 2000. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-99-00657-CV HARRIS COUNTY, Appellant V. JOHNNY NASH, Appellee On Appeal from the 189 th District Court Harris

More information

Potential legal opinion liability for Ohio business lawyers

Potential legal opinion liability for Ohio business lawyers Potential legal opinion liability for Ohio business lawyers by Phillip M. Callesen and James W. May Lawyers know that one of the biggest risks of practicing law is that a client may sue the lawyer for

More information

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas Opinion issued November 14, 2013 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-13-00236-CV OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, P.A. N/K/A OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES,

More information

THE TEXAS PROMPT PAYMENT OF CLAIMS STATUTE AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE DUTY TO DEFEND

THE TEXAS PROMPT PAYMENT OF CLAIMS STATUTE AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE DUTY TO DEFEND THE TEXAS PROMPT PAYMENT OF CLAIMS STATUTE AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE DUTY TO DEFEND January 8, 2008 THOMPSON COE I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this article is to provide the insurance claims handler

More information

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2013

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2013 MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2013 By: Representative Turner To: Judiciary A HOUSE BILL NO. 529 1 AN ACT TO REQUIRE CLAIMANTS IN ASBESTOS TORT ACTIONS TO MAKE 2 CERTAIN DISCLOSURES PERTAINING

More information

SPECIAL REPORT ON TEXAS WORKERS COMPENSATION BAD-FAITH LITIGATION. Trends in Texas Workers Compensation Bad-Faith Litigation

SPECIAL REPORT ON TEXAS WORKERS COMPENSATION BAD-FAITH LITIGATION. Trends in Texas Workers Compensation Bad-Faith Litigation December 1, 2008 SPECIAL REPORT ON TEXAS WORKERS COMPENSATION BAD-FAITH LITIGATION Trends in Texas Workers Compensation Bad-Faith Litigation In September 2007 MDJW first reported a re-emerging trend of

More information

Reflections on Ethical Issues In the Tripartite Relationship

Reflections on Ethical Issues In the Tripartite Relationship Reflections on Ethical Issues In the Tripartite Relationship [click] By Bruce A. Campbell 1 Introduction In most areas of the practice of law, there are a number of ethical issues that arise on a frequent

More information

HOUSE BILL No. 4917. July 18, 2013, Introduced by Rep. Heise and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

HOUSE BILL No. 4917. July 18, 2013, Introduced by Rep. Heise and referred to the Committee on Judiciary. HOUSE BILL No. HOUSE BILL No. July, 0, Introduced by Rep. Heise and referred to the Committee on Judiciary. A bill to amend PA, entitled "Revised judicature act of," (MCL 00.0 to 00.) by adding chapter

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT MEMPHIS February 24, 2010 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT MEMPHIS February 24, 2010 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT MEMPHIS February 24, 2010 Session STEPHANIE JONES and HOWARD JONES v. RENGA I. VASU, M.D., THE NEUROLOGY CLINIC, and METHODIST LEBONHEUR HOSPITAL Appeal from the

More information

Small Claims: The Process in Detail

Small Claims: The Process in Detail What is a small claims division? Every justice court in Arizona has a small claims division to provide an inexpensive and speedy method for resolving most civil disputes that do not exceed $2,500. All

More information

REVERSE, RENDER, and REMAND; and Opinion Filed August 20, 2013. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No.

REVERSE, RENDER, and REMAND; and Opinion Filed August 20, 2013. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No. REVERSE, RENDER, and REMAND; and Opinion Filed August 20, 2013. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-10-01614-CV W. DAVID HOLLIDAY, Appellant V. GREG WEAVER AND WENDY WEAVER,

More information

NO. 4-09-0753 Filed 6/21/10 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PRESIDING JUSTICE MYERSCOUGH delivered the opinion of

NO. 4-09-0753 Filed 6/21/10 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PRESIDING JUSTICE MYERSCOUGH delivered the opinion of NO. 4-09-0753 Filed 6/21/10 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT CHARLES DALLAS, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. AMEREN CIPS, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee. ) ) ) ) )

More information

workers' compensation benefits under the Washington Industrial Insurance Act (WIIA). Long

workers' compensation benefits under the Washington Industrial Insurance Act (WIIA). Long LED COWIJ QP APPEALS 2013 MAR 19 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHIN AN 8: 39 DIVISION II B ROBERT LONG, deceased, and AILEEN LONG, Petitioner /Beneficiary, No. 43187-4 II - Appellant, V. WASHINGTON

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION JASON LONG, Plaintiff, v. NO. 0:00-CV-000 ABC THE CHABON GROUP, INC., Defendant. DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

More information

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Fourteenth Court of Appeals Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied, Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction, and Opinion filed August 20, 2009. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-08-00925-CV ATLAS GULF-COAST, INC. D/B/A ATLAS

More information

AFFIRM in Part, REVERSE in Part, and REMAND; Opinion Filed June 30, 2015. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

AFFIRM in Part, REVERSE in Part, and REMAND; Opinion Filed June 30, 2015. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas AFFIRM in Part, REVERSE in Part, and REMAND; Opinion Filed June 30, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00255-CV DRUCILLA BAIN, Appellant and Cross-Appellee V. CAPITAL

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 13-0761 444444444444 IN RE NATIONAL LLOYDS INSURANCE COMPANY, RELATOR 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

More information

What Trustees Should Know About Florida s New Attorneys Fee Statute. By David P. Hathaway and David J. Akins. Introduction

What Trustees Should Know About Florida s New Attorneys Fee Statute. By David P. Hathaway and David J. Akins. Introduction What Trustees Should Know About Florida s New Attorneys Fee Statute By David P. Hathaway and David J. Akins Introduction More and more lawsuits are filed in Florida alleging that the trustee of a trust

More information

Civil Suits: The Process

Civil Suits: The Process Jurisdictional Limits The justice courts have exclusive jurisdiction or the authority to hear all civil actions when the amount involved, exclusive of interest, costs and awarded attorney fees when authorized

More information

Navigating the Statute of Limitations in Texas

Navigating the Statute of Limitations in Texas Navigating the Statute of Limitations in Texas Wesley G. Johnson Cooper & Scully, P.C. 900 Jackson Street, Suite 100 Dallas, TX 75202 Telephone: 214-712 712-9500 Telecopy: 214-712 712-9540 Email: Wes.Johnson@CooperScully.com

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Submitted On Briefs November 18, 2009

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Submitted On Briefs November 18, 2009 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Submitted On Briefs November 18, 2009 JOE HENRY MOORE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Tennessee Claims Commission No. 20-101-047 Nancy C. Miller

More information

****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the

****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the ****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal

More information

How Much Protection Does the Oregon Tort Claims Act Really Provide?

How Much Protection Does the Oregon Tort Claims Act Really Provide? How Much Protection Does the Oregon Tort Claims Act Really Provide? Session Materials by Jens Schmidt Harrang Long Gary Rudnick P.C. Oregon Public Risk Manager s Fall Conference October 3, 2013 Salishan

More information

HOUSE BILL No. 1400. Washburne

HOUSE BILL No. 1400. Washburne Introduced Version HOUSE BILL No. 1400 DIGEST OF INTRODUCED BILL Citations Affected: IC 22-3-11-1; IC 34-6-2; IC 34-20-3-2; IC 34-31. Synopsis: Asbestos litigation. Provides special proceedings for asbestos

More information

Case 4:06-cv-00191 Document 12 Filed in TXSD on 05/25/06 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 4:06-cv-00191 Document 12 Filed in TXSD on 05/25/06 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION Case 4:06-cv-00191 Document 12 Filed in TXSD on 05/25/06 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION BARBARA S. QUINN, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-06-00191

More information

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com Form: Plaintiff's original petition-wrongful Death [Name], PLAINTIFF vs. [Name], DEFENDANT [ IN THE [Type of Court] COURT [Court number] PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION 1. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1.1 Plaintiff

More information

WikiLeaks Document Release

WikiLeaks Document Release WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RS20519 ASBESTOS COMPENSATION ACT OF 2000 Henry Cohen, American Law Division Updated April 13, 2000 Abstract. This report

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D November 19, 2009 No. 09-20049 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk DEALER COMPUTER SERVICES

More information

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 585 An Act to amend and reenact 38.2-2206 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 a

More information

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE Filed 3/21/97 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE STACY RUTTENBERG, Plaintiff and Appellant, B092022 (Super. Ct. No. LC025584)

More information