Restricting supplemental insurance services
|
|
- Francine Fox
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Restricting supplemental insurance services Country: Israel Partner Institute: The Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem Survey no: (10)2007 Author(s): Gross, Revital and Shuli Brammli-Greenberg Health Policy Issues: Role Private Sector, Funding / Pooling, Benefit Basket Current Process Stages Idea Pilot Policy Paper Legislation Implementation Evaluation Change 1. Abstract The proposed legislation restricts inclusion of life saving and life extending medications in the Sick Funds' Supplemental Insurance programs, retrieving prior approval granted by the Ministry of Health in the last two years. The purpose of this policy is to restrict growth of the national expenditure on health and increase equality in the public health system. It will also benefit commercial health insurance companies who will have no competition from Sick Funds in this market. 2. Purpose of health policy or idea National Health Insurance Law allows sick funds to offer supplementary insurance Since legislation of the National Health Insurance (NHI) Law sick funds (SF) were allowed to offer supplemental insurance for additional services alongside providing the services in the mandatory benefits package. Each sick fund offers a standard supplemental insurance package in return for a premium that varies by age group only regardless of personal risk. Supplemental insurance includes services not covered by NHI (e.g. dental care, alternative medicine); enhanced coverage of NHI services (e.g. more physiotherapy treatments, more cardiac rehabilitation); alternatives to the services provided through the public system (e.g. private surgery, consultation with private specialists). Since 1998 sick funds are obligated to acept all applicants regardless of health status. Any change in the supplemental programs has to receive prior approval of the Ministry of Health (MOH). Expansion of supplementary insurance in 2004: life saving/extending medications Between the MOH approved sick funds' requests to expand coverage of supplemental insurance programs to include "life saving" and "life extending" medications that are not included in the mandatory benefits package. Maccabi covers all medications approved for use but not included in the mandatory NHI basket of services; Clalit and Meuchedet cover only cancer medications. These benefits were added as a separate optional layer of the supplemental insurance, which is purchased for an additional premium. (The additional layer includes several new services but medications is the most visible and attractive service included in this layer). The fourth SF, Leumit, contracted with a commercial insurance company to provide the additional layer of insurance, under private insurance terms (i.e. premiums related to personal risk and medical underwriting). 2007: Exclusion of life saving/extending medications from supplementary insurance? - 1 -
2 The recent proposed policy stipulates that sick funds are not allowed to include "life saving" or "life extending" medications in their supplemental insurance programs. These can now be included only in private insurance policies offered by commercial insurance companies. Thus, sick funds have to change their new supplemental insurance programs (i.e. the new layer) and reduce the premiums accordingly. The stated purpose of the policy is to safeguard the public system by reducing inequality among sick fund members who do or do not have supplemental insurance. Another purpose is to decrease the growth of the national expenditure on health and encourage more transfers between sick funds. In addition, the legislation is expected to reduce SFs possible conflict of interests, arising from their management of the mandatory benefits as well as the supplemental benefits for members who purchase private insurance. Finally, an insurance program that includes all new medications (without prioritizing for cost/benefit value) is percieved as not efficient in use of scarce resources. Main objectives Restrict coverage of life saving and life extending medications in supplemental insurance programs in order to promote equality in the public health system and restrict the growth of the national expenditure on health. Type of incentives This restriction provides an incentive for the public system to pressure for increasing the health budget so as to provide adequate funds for adding important life saving and life extending medications to the mandatory benefits package. It also strengthens the competition between SFs on improving the services in the mandatory basket of services rather than competing on enhancement of the supplemental basket. Groups affected Public - 80% have supplemental insurance. Commercial policies have higher premiums and medical underwriting. Therefore lower access expected for the poor, elderly and ill, Sick funds will have more difficulty to market the new layer of supplemental insurance, as coverage of these medications was the most attractive service included in the new layer. This is a setback to their entrepreneur activities, Private health insurance companies have less competition and will find it easier to market their product - private health insurance with coverage for these medications 3. Characteristics of this policy Degree of Innovation traditional innovative Degree of Controversy consensual highly controversial Structural or Systemic Impact marginal fundamental Public Visibility very low very high Transferability strongly system-dependent system-neutral Innovation - Innovative in Israel. in the past if the MOH approved changes in supplementary insurance (SI) programs this was not retracted later. Not allowing life saving/extending services in the SI programs is also a new policy in Israel (never explicitly stated before). Controversy - very high, as described below. Systemic impact - changes the content of approved SI programs; changes the market power of SFs and commercial insurance companies
3 Visibility - high, many reports in the media and pubic forums. Transferability - rather system neutral as such regulations could be adopted by other systems with SI programs. However, the specific structure of the SI programs is unique to Israel. 4. Political and economic background This policy was included in an agreement between the Minister of Finance and the Minister of Health (from August, 2007). It was then included in the "budget reconciliation act" of 2008 which is an addendum to the budget act, proposed by the Ministry of Finance. The policy is a measure to strengthen the public health system and to curtail the growth in the national expenditure on health. 5. Purpose and process analysis Idea Pilot Policy Paper Legislation Implementation Evaluation Change Origins of health policy idea Concern that supplementary insurance creates inequality Since the enactment of the National Health Insurance (NHI) law, the clause allowing sick funds to offer supplemental insurance (SI) has been under debate, and has been the subject of several policy reforms (Gross & Brammli- Greenberg, 2004). SI in fact integrates private insurance into the public system since it is provided by SFs and enables those with SI to receive improved services from the same public providers (SFs) who provide the mandatory services under NHI. Over the years, the main concern of policy makers has been the inequality this creates in the public system between those who do or do not have SI and can thus get additional services from their SF. The issue of including life saving and life extending medications in the SI benefits basket has been the subject of many debates (Parliament committee of labor welfare and health, 2007; National Institute for Health Policy and Health Services Research Eighth Dead Sea Conference, 2007). The main arguments for including life saving/extending medicationsin SI are: Improves access to important services that cannot be provided through the mandatory basket, given the limited health budget. Increases overall equality since SI is relatively inexpensive such that many can afford to buy it. Also SFs are not allowed to reject applicants or limit eligibility so SI is accessible to patients at risk of needing to use the services. In contrast, commercial insurance is expensive and the elderly and ill may be entirely rejected or their eligibility limited. Increases the value of SI to its purchasers (value for money). The main arguments against including these medications are: Leads to inequality between SF members that do or do not have SI Adding these medications will bind members to their SFs because of the relatively long waiting periods required - 3 -
4 for eligibility to receive this service (24 months). Providing this "outlet" will weaken public pressure on the MOF to update the medications in the mandatory NHI basket of services. Prioritization of new medications: life saving/extending medications not included in mandatory benefit basket The idea of including coverage of life saving/extending medications in the SI programs relates to the Israeli mechanism developed for prioritizing new medications and technologies to be added yearly to the mandatory basket of services. Israel has a structured process for updating the medication list in the mandatory basket, based on recommendations of an multi-disciplinary expert committee appointed by the Minister of Health (Shani et al. 2000, Shemer et al ). This priority setting process includes rating of a list of new medications each year. Those receiving highest rates are selected to be added to the benefits package. The rating is needed since the MOF allocates limited additional funds for this purpose (between 0.5% - 1.5% of the total cost of the mandatory basket), and therefore only some of the new medications can be added. This explicit rationing process implies that some medications approved for use in Israel and rated highly by the expert committee, are not included in the basket and thus are available only for private purchase (or throught private insurance policies). Each year as the committee publishes it's recommendations, there is a lively public debate with extensive media coverage, and advocacy group activities to include additional medications in the mandatory basket of services. Sick funds fill in the gap: supplemental insurance for life saving/extending medications The sick funds have identified this perceived need, and have seen the potential profits of offering coverage of life saving and life extending medications in their SI programs. Adding this coverage imitates, and thus competes, with commercial health insurance policies which include it. SFs have a large base of insurees and therefore are able to offer similar benefits with lower premiums (large collective insurance with cross subsidies between age groups), and consequently pose a competitive threat to commercial insurance companies. In 2004 the Meuchedet SF added a new layer to its SI program which included coverage for life saving and life extending medications for cancer patients. This was offered as a separate layer to be purchased for and additional premium. In 2007 Clalit SF (insuring over 50% of the population) offered a similar additional layer as well, covering these medications for all conditions (not only cancer patients). In 2007 Maccabi SF (insuring 25% of the population) also added this coverage to its program and raised the fees, with automatic inclusion of all holders of the policy. The last SF (Leumit) did not extend its SI program but contracted with an insurance company to provide commercial policies at reduced prices to their members. The MOH has approved these new developments of the SI programs as well as a raise in premiums to cover the additional benefits. We should note that the new layer is offered to all SF members; SFs are not allowed to reject applicants or limit their coverage because of pre existing conditions. Eligibility for the new medications begins after a 24 month waiting period. Premiums are community rated (defined by age regardless of personal health status). Supplementary insurance for life saving/extending medications challenged by various stakeholders However, this development has been challenged by many stakeholders in the health care system (see analysis below) and debated in the Parliamentary labor, welfare & health committee. On this topic a coalition emerged between the MOF and some officials in the MOH who influenced the Minister of Health (while other MOH officials opposed this move). In August 2007 the Minister of Finance and the Minister of Health signed an agreement for the years which includes (among other items) a yearly budgetary increase for adding new medications to the mandatory basket of services, and at the same time prohibits the SFs to include life saving and life extending medications in their SI programs. This provision is also included in the 2008 budget reconciliation act. If approved by parliament this provision will go into effect in Following a transition period, the SFs will have to change their policies (e.g. delete this provision from their SI programs and lower premiums, or contract with an insurance company - 4 -
5 to provide this coverage for their members). Initiators of idea/main actors Government Providers Civil Society Private Sector or Industry Others Approach of idea The approach of the idea is described as: new: Stakeholder positions Ministry of Finance The budget divisionstrongly supportedthis policy and pressured the Minister of Finance to accept it and cancel the permission previously granted to the SFs. The main arguments raised are: Including life saving/extending medicatons restricts competition; for new SI purchasers, eligibility for medications is dependent on a waiting period of 24 months therefore it might restrict transfer between funds (people will be wary of losing their eligibility without alternative coverage). Including these medications in the SI blurs the distinction between the public mandatory basket of services and private insurance and there is a concern of conflict of interest of SFs responsible for both. If SFs include all new medications in their SI, the national expenditure on health will rise, since there will not be a prioritization process. The insurance comptroller also supports this policy. His main argument is that there should be a clear distinction between the public system (services provided by the SFs under NHI) and private insurance for services not covered by NHI. These, in his opinion, should be provided by private insurance companies and other private providers. Note that the insurance comptrollers office has objected in the past to the general policy of allowing SFs to provide SI. Ministry of Health The official position of the MOH is support of this new policy, retracting the approvals given a year ago to all SFs to expand their SI programs to include life saving/extending medications. The Minister of Health endorsed this policy as part of an agreement with the Minister of Finance which includes a yearly allocation of 350 million NIS for 3 years to update the mandatory NHI basket of services. However, senior officials in the MOH are divided regarding this issue. The head of the Economics and Health Insurance Divisionsupports the new policy and advocated for it over time. The main argument he presents is that inclusion of life saving/extending medications in the SI programs leads to greater inequality. Inequality is expected to increase because the premiums will increase over time and those of low socio-economic status (SES) will consequently not be able to afford it and drop out. Inequality will be more prominent because SI services have copayments which will be relatively high for these medications and consequently deter poor patients from using their eligibility. Another argument he presents is that this policy will also harm the priority setting process for adding medications to the mandatory basket of services which will result in less efficient use of resources in the system and an increase of the national expenditure on health (because all medications will be accessible to many patients, and they will be over-used). Finally, he argues that inclusion of these medications in the SI - 5 -
6 programs will lessen the pressure on the MOF to allocate funds for updating the mandatory NHI basket of services, and undermine the ministries efforts to negotiate a permanent update rate for this purpose. The head of the division supervising the SFs and the SI programs is strongly opposed to the new policy. He had approved, a year ago, the extension of the SI programs to include life-saving/extending medications as well as other medications not included in the mandatory NHI basket of services. The main arguments he presents are: According to the NHI law SFs may cover through SI any service that is not included in the mandatory basket of services including medications. Based on past experience with update of the mandatory basket, even when medications were not included in the SI programs, there were years when no budget was allocated for updating the basket. Furthermore, the additional budget is usually significantly lower than needed to include all the medications that received high rates by the priority setting committee, and were recommended for inclusion by this committee. Since 80% of the population have SI, including medications in the SI basket will better answer the medical needs of the population. He also argues that this policy does not contradict the effort to establish a permanent rate of update for the mandatory NHI basket of services. Finally, he notes that commercial insurance is not an option for those who are ill (because of underwriting and exceptions). Sick funds The three sick funds that have extended their SI programs to include new life saving/extending medicationsstrongly oppose the new policy. They object to the process in which the MOH allowed them to extend their SI programs and then retracted this permission. They argue that the reason is that the government gave in to pressures of commercial insurance companies who wanted to safeguard their market share, compromising the interests of consumers. They also say that the "inequality" argument is misleasding. It is more equitable if 80% of the population (holding SI) has access to these medications than if only the very rich who can afford private insurance or out-of pocket payments can get them. They argue that if equality is a top concern, the government should subsidize SI premiums for the low SES population (even just the part that covers the new medications). Also, the SFs could slightly raise the premiums and thus cross-subsidize SI for those who can't afford it. Finally, they argue that the MOF tricked the MOH, and the addition of 350 million NIS is not real ("smoke screen"), because at the same time they reduced the SFs budget in other items by 500 million NIS. Furthermore, the agreement is only for 3 years and after that the MOF may not approve additional funds for updating the mandatory NHI. Leumit SF, who did not extend its SI program supports the new policy. Their main argument is that this extension increases inequality between SF members who do or do not have SI. Their position is that all life saving/extending medications should be included in the mandatory NHI basket of services, and that the health budget should be increased at a permanent annual rate that covers these new medications. Commercial insurance companies They support the new policy. It is obvious that it improves their competitive power and maintains their market share. It may also contribute to their ability to market a new product "medication insurance" that includes coverage only for medications not in the mandatory NHI basket. Their formal argument is that the SFs did not price this item correctly and therefore a deficit in their SI budgets can be expected or a need for a sharp increase in the premiums. They say that similar to long-term care insurance, SFs with no actuarial reserves cannot insure against the catastrophic risk of needing life saving/extending medication. Pharmaceuatical companies They oppose the new restrictions since they prefer that these expensive medications will be available to many patients increasing the demand for their products even when they are not included in the mandatory basket. At the same time they are concerned that if they are added to the SI programs, the SFs will be able to negotiate low prices given their strong market power
7 Israel Medical Association They support the new policy. They agree with the MOH and MOF that including life saving/extending medications in the SI increases inequality between patients who do or do not have SI. They are also concerned that if SFs are allowed to offer medications in their SI programs the MOF and the SFs would have a weaker incentive to add them to the mandatory basic basket. Consumer organizations They oppose the new policy arguing that SI provides access to these medications to the majority of patients. If the new policy will be approved, only the rich will be able to purchase commercial insurance or buy out of pocket medications. Furthermore, those who have a chronic or severe illness already are rejected by commercial insurance companies or are excluded from coverage for their illness, while all are eligible for SI. Nevertheless, they strongly advocate that the NHI law includes a significant permanent yearly update of the mandatory NHI basket (about 2% of the total health budget) that wil enable to include all important life saving/extending medications. Actors and positions Description of actors and their positions Government Ministry of Finance very supportive strongly opposed MOH economic and health insurance very supportive strongly opposed division Ministry of Health Division overseeing very supportive strongly opposed Sick Funds and Supplemental Insurance Minister of Health very supportive strongly opposed Providers Maccabi, Meuchedet and Clalit Sick very supportive strongly opposed Funds Leumit Sick Fund very supportive strongly opposed Civil Society Consumer organizations very supportive strongly opposed Private Sector or Industry Commercial insurance companies very supportive strongly opposed Pharmaceutical companies very supportive strongly opposed Others Israel Medical Association very supportive strongly opposed Influences in policy making and legislation Yes, the proposal to restrict sick funds from including life saving/extending medications in their supplemental insurance programs is part of the 2008 budget reconciliation bill (which includes many structural changes) and is approved in parliament together with the annual budget act. The legislation of this item will be part of the wider legislation of these acts (which is approved as a whole). Therefore the stakeholders who oppose this policy (sick funds in particular) are trying to influence the MOF to take this item out of the budget reconciliation bill. They are also lobbying among Parliament members against including this item in the budget reconciliation bill. Legislative outcome pending - 7 -
8 Actors and influence Description of actors and their influence Government Ministry of Finance very strong none MOH economic and health insurance very strong none division Ministry of Health Division overseeing very strong none Sick Funds and Supplemental Insurance Minister of Health very strong none Providers Maccabi, Meuchedet and Clalit Sick very strong none Funds Leumit Sick Fund very strong none Civil Society Consumer organizations very strong none Private Sector or Industry Commercial insurance companies very strong none Pharmaceutical companies very strong none Others Israel Medical Association very strong none Positions and Influences at a glance - 8 -
9 Adoption and implementation If this legislation is approved, the Sick Funds will need to change their SI programs and reduce the premiums. They will need to notify members of this change, and give them the option to opt out of the program. The SFs will also have to terminate agreements they have with insurance companies who were co-insurers for this item. The SFs with the MOH will need to address the problem of SF members who are already receiving life saving/extending medications through the SI program, and whose entitlement will be terminated once the change in the SI programs goes into effect. Review mechanisms n/a 6. Expected outcome Costs - SI premiums and expenses will be reduced; Commercial insurance and out of pocket payments will grow; therefore it is uncertain what will be the total effect. The purchasing power of Israel in the global medication market will decrease because SFs had power to negotiate low prices with pharmaceutical companies and to import new medications to Israel. This may have cross effects on other medications as well and consequently the national health expenditure may increase. Quality - The impact on quality depends on the medical neccessity of the medications. Overall there will be less access to new life saving and life extending medications since those of low and medium income (who can afford SI but not commercial insurance) will not have access to these medications. Furthermore, those with chronic or severe illness will not be eligible for commercial insurance coverage and may be adversely affected. Satisfaction - Public satisfaction is expected to decrease since many have purchased the additional layer of SI because it included these medications. Equity - More equity in access to SF services among SF members - none will have access to these medications through their SF. However, less equity overall since only the high socio-economic groups can afford commercial insurance or out of pocket purchase of these medications. Supplemental insurance ownership is quite comprehensive (80% of residents have SI), but only some have purchased the new layer which includes the additional medications. About 10% of Clalit members (this program is new in the market), about a third of Meuchedet members, and about 80% of Maccabi members (given the automatic inclusion of SI members). Furthermore, commercial insurance premiums for the ill and elderly are very expensive and some are rejected. Thus, many who need this insurance do not have access to it. It is important to note that SI is regulated and SFs must accept all applicants; premiums are based on community rating by age alone. Quality of Health Care Services marginal fundamental Level of Equity system less equitable system more equitable Cost Efficiency very low very high Quality - depends on the neccessity of the medications for the patients. Equity - increases among insurees in the same SF who do or do not have SI. However, if the mandatory NHI basket is not adequately updated, overall access to necessary medications is expected to decrease. Before, all members who purchased the policy had access to the new medications and now only those with a high socio-economic status who can afford them privately will have access
10 Efficiency - If patients have access to all life saving/extending medications there is a concern of unnecessary overuse. Also, patients may use medications with low QUALY values which is also not efficient. On the other hand, some of these medications may be efficient if they prevent need for other more costly services (such as hospitalization), or if they significantly improve quality of life and enable the patient to function normally. 7. References Sources of Information Gross, R. and S. Brammli-Greenberg. "Evaluating the Effect of Regulatory Prohibitions against Risk Selection by Health Status on Supplemental Insurance Ownership in Israel." Social Science & Medicine 58(9) Brammli-Greenberg, S. and R. Gross. "The private insurance health care market: development since implementation of the National Health Insurance law". In Bennun, G. (ed.). Ten Years of National Health Insurance in Israel. The Israel National Institute for health policy and health services research (Hebrew). Brammli-Greenberg, S and R. Gross. The Private Insurance Market in Israel, Research report RR , JDC-Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem (Hebrew with English abstract). Brammli-Greenberg, S and R. Gross. Supplemental and Commercial Health Insurance, 1998: Changes in Policy, Financing, and Consumer Behavior. Research Report: RR , JDC-Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem (Hebrew with English abstract). Gross, R and S. Brammli. "Alternatives for the Organization of the Supplemental and Commercial Health Insurance Market in Israel following the Enactment of the National Health Insurance Law". Social Security Journal of Welfare and Social Security Studies (in Hebrew) Gross, R. and S. Brammli. Supplemental and Commercial Health Insurance in Israel Research Report: RR , JDC-Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem (Hebrew with English abstract) Ministry of Finance. Economic considerations in managing supplemental insurance programs. Presentation at the ADIF conference on health insurance, September 4, Parliament committee of labor, welfare and health. Protocol 188. March 13, Parliament committee of labor, welfare and health. Protocol 258. July 10, State of Israel. Budget Reconciliation Bill. Draft, August Personal communications and media publications. August -September, 2007 Shani, S, Siebzehner, MI, Luxenburg, O, and J. Shemer. "Setting priorities for the adoption of health technologies on a national level - the Israeli experience." Health Policy Shemer J, Abadi-Korek I and A. Seifan. "Medical technology management: bridging the gap between theory and practice." Israel Medical Association Journal 7(4) Chairperson Prof. Leon Epstein Inequality in the health system. National institute for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Fourth Dead Sea Conference. July Chairperson: Prof. Jacob Glazer. The HMOs' Corporate Governance Boundaries and Baskets of Services. National institute for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Eighth Dead Sea Conference. May
11 Author/s and/or contributors to this survey Gross, Revital and Shuli Brammli-Greenberg Suggested citation for this online article Gross, Revital and Shuli Brammli-Greenberg. "Restricting supplemental insurance services". Health Policy Monitor, October Available at -
Update on the Integrated Hospital-Community EMR
Update on the Integrated Hospital-Community EMR Country: Israel Partner Institute: The Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem Survey no: (12) 2008 Author(s): Nirel, Nurit and Revital Gross Health Policy
More informationPrivate Health Insurance: more products
Private Health Insurance: more products Country: Australia Partner Institute: Centre for Health, Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology, Sydney Survey no: (8)2006 Author(s):
More informationPublic insurance for dental care for chidren
Public insurance for dental care for chidren Country: Israel Partner Institute: The Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem Survey no: (16)2010 Author(s): Nir Kaidar, Tuvia Horev and Bruce Rosen Health
More informationHealth financing reform idea: health fund
Health financing reform idea: health fund Country: Germany Partner Institute: Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh Survey no: (7)2006 Author(s): Melanie Zimmermann, reviewers: Reinhard Busse, Sophia Schlette
More informationRisk equalizing schemes - the next chapter
Risk equalizing schemes - the next chapter Country: Slovenia Partner Institute: Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana Survey no: (7)2006 Author(s): Tit Albreht Health Policy
More informationMandatory deductible in basic health insurance
Mandatory deductible in basic health insurance Country: Netherlands Partner Institute: University of Maastricht, Department of Health Organization, Policy and Economics (BEOZ) Survey no: (11)2008 Author(s):
More informationPrivate health insurance policies in Israel: a report on the 2012 Dead Sea Conference
Bin Nun Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 2013, 2:25 Israel Journal of Health Policy Research MEETING REPORT Open Access Private health insurance policies in Israel: a report on the 2012 Dead Sea
More informationImplementing work accident and illness insurance
Implementing work accident and illness insurance Country: Estonia Partner Institute: PRAXIS Center for Policy Studies, Tallinn Survey no: (10)2007 Author(s): Agris Koppel, Ain Aaviksoo Health Policy Issues:
More informationUniversal Dental Health Scheme
Universal Dental Health Scheme Country: Australia Partner Institute: Centre for Health, Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology, Sydney Survey no: (13) 2009 Author(s): Gallego,
More informationAccess to dental care in Australia
Access to dental care in Australia Country: Australia Partner Institute: Centre for Health, Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology, Sydney Survey no: (5)2005 Author(s): Marion
More informationHealth & the economic crisis: the Australian case
Health & the economic crisis: the Australian case Country: Australia Partner Institute: Centre for Health, Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology, Sydney Survey no: (14) 2009
More informationNew health insurance system
New health insurance system Country: Netherlands Partner Institute: Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam Survey no: (4)2004 Author(s): Jos Holland and André den Exter,
More informationElectronic prescriptions and patient records
Electronic prescriptions and patient records Country: Finland Partner Institute: National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki Survey no: (9)2007 Author(s): Lauri Vuorenkoski, STAKES Health
More informationMore changes to private health insurance Australia
More changes to private health insurance Australia Country: Australia Partner Institute: Centre for Health, Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology, Sydney Survey no: (12) 2008
More information2. The stable patient case - in case when the circumstances of their health condition are neither sudden nor urgent (causing emergency).
Criteria to choose patients from waiting lists Country: Poland Partner Institute: Institute of Public Health, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow Survey no: (6)2005 Author(s): Iwona Kowalska
More informationHospital-community electronic medical record
Hospital-community electronic medical record Country: Israel Partner Institute: The Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem Survey no: (6)2005 Author(s): Nirel Nurit, Rosen Bruce, Gross Revital Myers-JDC-Brookdale
More informationHow To Sell Medibank Private
Sale of Medibank Private Country: Australia Partner Institute: Centre for Health, Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology, Sydney Survey no: (8)2006 Author(s): Marion Haas Health
More informationSmoking cessation in Leumit Health Fund
Smoking cessation in Leumit Health Fund Country: Israel Partner Institute: The Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem Survey no: (13) 2009 Author(s): Kitai E., Vardy D., Margalit A., Brami J., Matz E.,
More informationGeneric substitution of prescription drugs
Generic substitution of prescription drugs Country: Finland Partner Institute: National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki Survey no: (2)2003 Author(s): Ilmo Keskimäki and Lauri Vuorenkoski
More informationSupplemental Insurance Plans Offered by the Health Plans: Analysis and Comparison of Baskets of Services in 2006
Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute Smokler Center for Health Policy Research Knesset Research and Information Center Supplemental Insurance Plans Offered by the Health Plans: Analysis and Comparison of Baskets
More informationIndependent treatment centers in the Netherlands
Independent treatment centers in the Netherlands Country: Netherlands Partner Institute: University of Maastricht, Department of Health Organization, Policy and Economics (BEOZ) Survey no: (11)2008 Author(s):
More informationMunicipal co-payment for health care services
Municipal co-payment for health care services Country: Denmark Partner Institute: University of Southern Denmark, Odense Survey no: (10)2007 Author(s): Ankjær-Jensen, Anni and Terkel Christiansen Health
More informationProgram of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly
Program of AllInclusive Care for the Elderly Country: USA Partner Institute: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management Survey no: (13) 2009 Author(s):
More informationAccountable Care Organizations and Health Reform
Accountable Care Organizations and Health Reform Country: USA Partner Institute: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management Survey no: (16)2010 Author(s):
More informationPre-existing condition coverage post-health reform
Pre-existing condition coverage post-health reform Country: USA Partner Institute: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management Survey no: (16)2010 Author(s):
More informationPerformance Payment for Family Physicians
Performance Payment for Family Physicians Country: Estonia Partner Institute: PRAXIS Center for Policy Studies, Tallinn Survey no: (6)2005 Author(s): Ain Aaviksoo Health Policy Issues: Remuneration / Payment
More informationBANK OF ISRAEL Office of the Spokesperson and Economic Information. Press Release
BANK OF ISRAEL Office of the Spokesperson and Economic Information Press Release March 24, 2015 Excerpt from the "Bank of Israel Annual Report for 2014" to be published soon: The Flow of Funds in National
More informationMandatory Private Health Insurance as Supplementary Financing
Chapter 12 SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCING OPTION (5) MANDATORY PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE Mandatory Private Health Insurance as Supplementary Financing 12.1 Mandatory private health insurance is where private health
More informationHealth reform - one year after implementation
Health reform one year after implementation Country: Netherlands Survey no: (9)2007 Reported by: University of Maastricht, Department of Health Organization, Policy and Economics (BEOZ) Health Policy Issues:
More informationPrivate Health Insurance Options in Egypt Discussion with EISA Chairman and senior staff
Private Health Insurance Options in Egypt Discussion with EISA Chairman and senior staff Ibrahim Shehata April 27, 2006 Background Health expenditure is dominated by household direct out-ofpocket payments
More informationElectronic medical records
Electronic medical records Country: France Partner Institute: Institut de Recherche et Documentation en Economie de la Santé (IRDES), Paris Survey no: (8)2006 Author(s): Chantal Cases, Philippe Le Fur
More informationThe Denia Project: Concession for integrated HC
The Denia Project: Concession for integrated HC Country: Spain Partner Institute: Centre de Recerca en Economia i Salut (CRES), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona Survey no: (6)2005 Author(s): Dr. Fidel
More informationSenate-Passed Bill (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act H.R. 3590)**
Prevention and Screening Services Cost-sharing Eliminates cost sharing requirements for requirements for all preventive services (including prevention and colorectal cancer screening) that have a screening
More informationNew guidelines on aesthetic treatment
New guidelines on aesthetic treatment Country: Singapore Partner Institute: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, National University of Singapore Survey no: (12) 2008 Author(s): Lim Meng Kin Health
More informationPublic and private health insurance: where to mark to boundaries? June 16, 2009 Kranjska Gora, Slovenia Valérie Paris - OECD
Public and private health insurance: where to mark to boundaries? June 16, 2009 Kranjska Gora, Slovenia Valérie Paris - OECD 1 Outline of the presentation Respective roles of public and private funding
More informationHealth Human Resources & Foreign Medical Graduates
Health Human Resources & Foreign Medical Graduates Country: Canada Partner Institute: Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton Survey no: (15) 2010 Author(s): Michel
More informationBackground Briefing. Hungary s Healthcare System
Background Briefing Hungary s Healthcare System By Shannon C. Ferguson and Ben Irvine (2003) In the aftermath of communist rule, Hungary transformed its healthcare system from centralised Semashko state
More informationPresentations by panellists were followed by a dialogue with members of the Council. These discussions are hereunder summarized.
Panel Discussion on Universal Health Coverage at the Center of Sustainable Development: Contributions of Sciences, Technology and Innovations to Health Systems Strengthening Geneva, 3 July 2013 On 3 July
More information3. The first stage public consultation conducted from March to June 2008 aimed at consulting the public on
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Government published the Healthcare Reform Consultation Document Your Health, Your Life (the Consultation Document ) on 13 March 2008 to initiate the public consultation on healthcare
More informationHaim Bitterman. Chief Physician
Haim Bitterman Chief Physician 1850 Otto von Bismarck (1815-1898) 1850 The German tradition of welfare programs began in Prussia and Saxony as early as the 1840s Named after the Prussian chancellor Otto
More informationChapter 11 SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCING OPTION (4) VOLUNTARY PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE. Voluntary Private Health Insurance as Supplementary Financing
Chapter 11 SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCING OPTION (4) VOLUNTARY PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE Voluntary Private Health Insurance as Supplementary Financing 11.1 Voluntary private health insurance includes both employer
More informationHow To Get A New Bronwell Drug Plan
Questions and Answers New Brunswick Drug Plan December 10, 2013 1) What is the New Brunswick Drug Plan? The New Brunswick Drug Plan is a prescription drug insurance plan that provides drug coverage for
More informationNational Disability Authority Submission
National Disability Authority Submission Universal Health Insurance The National Disability Authority, the independent statutory advisory body on disability policy and practice, welcomes the opportunity
More informationMedical Insurance for the Poor: impact on access and affordability of health services in Georgia
Medical Insurance for the Poor: impact on access and affordability of health services in Georgia The health care in Georgia is currently affordable for very rich and very poor Key informant Key Messages:
More informationIntroduction of a national health insurance scheme
International Social Security Association Meeting of Directors of Social Security Organizations in the English-speaking Caribbean Tortola, British Virgin Islands, 4-6 July 2005 Introduction of a national
More informationSubmission to the Health Information Authority (HIA) on Minimum Benefits Regulations in the Irish Private Health Insurance Market
Submission to the Health Information Authority (HIA) on Minimum Benefits Regulations in the Irish Private Health Insurance Market September 2010 IMO Submission to the Health Information Authority (HIA)
More informationKey words: primary care, gatekeeper, coordination of care, self-referrals, health policy
Primary Care Physicians in Israel: Self-Perception of Their Role in the Healthcare System and Policy Makers' and Patients' Perception of Them as Gatekeepers Hava Tabenkin MD MSc LLB 1, Revital Gross 2,
More informationOpting Out of Mandatory Health Insurance In Latin American Countries. Implications for Policy and Decision Making in Russian Federation
Opting Out of Mandatory Health Insurance In Latin American Countries Implications for Policy and Decision Making in Russian Federation Hernan Fuenzalida March 2003 Health, Nutrition and Population (HNP)
More informationRecycling Unused Cancer Drugs
Recycling Unused Cancer Drugs Country: USA Partner Institute: Department of Behavioral Science and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University Survey no: (13) 2009 Author(s): Elena
More informationSupplemental Insurance Plans: Developments in the Service Packages a Decade after Implementation of the National Health Insurance Law
Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute Smokler Center for Health Policy Research The Knesset Research and Information Center Supplemental Insurance Plans: Developments in the Service Packages a Decade after Implementation
More informationRegulatory Reform in EU accession countries: Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment system Croatian case
Regulatory Reform in EU accession countries: Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment system Croatian case Version: February 2008 By: Vedran Antoljak, Managing Director vedran.antoljak@senseconsulting.eu
More informationThe Role of a Public Health Insurance Plan in a Competitive Market Lessons from International Experience. Timothy Stoltzfus Jost
The Role of a Public Health Insurance Plan in a Competitive Market Lessons from International Experience Timothy Stoltzfus Jost All developed countries have both public and private health insurance plans,
More informationMYTHS ABOUT SINGLE PAYER COMING TO VERMONT. For information on myths about single payer in general, please click here.
MYTHS ABOUT SINGLE PAYER COMING TO VERMONT For information on myths about single payer in general, please click here. MYTH 1: Physicians will leave the state if we enact single payer. This is the claim
More informationResponse to the New Brunswick Government Consultation on a Prescription Drug Plan for Uninsured New Brunswickers
Response to the New Brunswick Government Consultation on a Prescription Drug Plan for Uninsured New Brunswickers Brief submitted by The New Brunswick Nurses Union April 2012 Background The New Brunswick
More informationThe Society of Actuaries in Ireland
The Society of Actuaries in Ireland Briefing Statement on Insurance provisions in the Disability Bill 2004 Introduction The Disability Bill published in September 2004 provides for certain restrictions
More information407-767-8554 Fax 407-767-9121
Florida Consumers Notice of Rights Health Insurance, F.S.C.A.I, F.S.C.A.I., FL 32832, FL 32703 Introduction The Office of the Insurance Consumer Advocate has created this guide to inform consumers of some
More informationUHI Explained. Frequently asked questions on the proposed new model of Universal Health Insurance
UHI Explained Frequently asked questions on the proposed new model of Universal Health Insurance Overview of Universal Health Insurance What kind of health system does Ireland currently have? At the moment
More informationSUBMISSION TO THE SENATE INQUIRY INTO OUT-OF- POCKET COSTS IN AUSTRALIAN HEALTHCARE. Prepared by National Policy Office
SUBMISSION TO THE SENATE INQUIRY INTO OUT-OF- POCKET COSTS IN AUSTRALIAN HEALTHCARE Prepared by National Policy Office May 2014 COTA Australia Authorised by: Ian Yates AM Chief Executive iyates@cota.org.au
More informationIdea Pilot Policy Paper Legislation Implementation Evaluation Change
Medical Indemnity Country: Australia Partner Institute: Centre for Health, Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology, Sydney Survey no: (1)2003 Author(s): Marion Haas Health Policy
More informationBenchmarking hospital productivity
Benchmarking hospital productivity Country: Finland Partner Institute: National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki Survey no: (7)2006 Author(s): Miika Linna Health Policy Issues: System Organisation/
More informationTESTIMONY. on the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission s (MedPAC) June Report to the Congress
520 Eighth Avenue, North Wing, 3rd Floor New York, NY 10018 212.869.3850/Fax: 212.869.3532 TESTIMONY on the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission s (MedPAC) June Report to the Congress to the United States
More informationHEALTH CARE REFORM DOCUMENT FROM THE WEBSITE OF BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH DAKOTA
HEALTH CARE REFORM DOCUMENT FROM THE WEBSITE OF BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH DAKOTA Frequently Asked Questions I ve heard the federal government launched a new website called Healthcare.gov. How can
More informationA Model for Mental Health Integration
A Model for Mental Health Integration Country: USA Partner Institute: Department of Behavioral Science and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University Survey no: (14) 2009 Author(s):
More informationMor Institute for Medical Data Ltd
Public/Private Mix in the Provision of Health Services: The Tension Between Greater Care Co-ordination Across Providers, Increased Competition and Freedom of Choice Orit Jacobson Mor Institute for Medical
More informationHealth. Government of New Brunswick Questions and Answers. Page 1 of 8
Page 1 of 8 Health Government of New Brunswick Questions and Answers 1) What is the New Brunswick Drug Plan? 2) The government s platform committed to a catastrophic drug plan. Is this the same thing?
More informationKiwiSaver: New Zealand s New Subsidized Retirement Savings Plans
NOTES KiwiSaver: New Zealand s New Subsidized Retirement Savings Plans by Barbara E. Kritzer The author is with the Division of Program Studies, Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics, Office of
More informationHow To Reform The Guardianship Regulation In New South Wales
Ms Diane Robinson President Guardianship Tribunal 2A Rowntree, Locked Bag 9, BALMAIN NSW 2041 Wednesday 21 April, 2010 Dear Ms Robinson, Re: Remaking of the Guardianship Regulation 2005 The Disability
More informationHealth Reform and the AAP: What the New Law Means for Children and Pediatricians
Health Reform and the AAP: What the New Law Means for Children and Pediatricians Throughout the health reform process, the American Academy of Pediatrics has focused on three fundamental priorities for
More informationAppendix 4.2. Aids to the Consumer in Buying Health Insurance
Appendix 4.2 Aids to the Consumer in Buying Health Insurance Background 1. Health Insurance in Israel Health insurance in Israel is composed of several layers, divided on the basis of service providers
More informationBARACK OBAMA S PLAN FOR A HEALTHY AMERICA:
BARACK OBAMA S PLAN FOR A HEALTHY AMERICA: Lowering health care costs and ensuring affordable, high-quality health care for all The U.S. spends $2 trillion on health care every year, and offers the best
More informationThinking of introducing social health insurance? Ten questions
Thinking of introducing social health insurance? Ten questions Ole Doetinchem, Guy Carrin and David Evans World Health Report (2010) Background Paper, 26 HEALTH SYSTEMS FINANCING The path to universal
More informationfinding the balance between public and private health the example of australia
finding the balance between public and private health the example of australia By Zoe McKenzie, Senior Researcher This note provides an overview of the principal elements of Australia s public health system,
More informationSwe den Structure, delive ry, administration He althcare Financing Me chanisms and Health Expenditures Quality of Bene fits, C hoice, Access
Sweden Single payer, universal healthcare system, with 21 county councils as the primary payer (reimburser) Administration of healthcare plan is decentralized in the hands of the county councils Central
More informationSingle Payer Systems: Equity in Access to Care
Single Payer Systems: Equity in Access to Care Lynn A. Blewett University of Minnesota, School of Public Health The True Workings of Single Payer Systems: Lessons or Warnings for U.S. Reform Journal of
More informationCLHIA Submission to the New Brunswick Advisory Committee on Health Benefits Concerning Developing a Drug Plan for Uninsured New Brunswickers
CLHIA Submission to the New Brunswick Advisory Committee on Health Benefits Concerning Developing a Drug Plan for Uninsured New Brunswickers 1 Queen Street East Suite 1700 Toronto, Ontario M5C 2X9 1, rue
More informationDecree On National Health Insurance Fund. Government issued Decree: Chapter I General Provisions
Government Lao People s Democratic Republic Peace Independence Democracy Unity Prosperity ------------------ No.../ GO Vientiane Capital, date./ Decree On National Health Insurance Fund - Pursuant to Law
More informationArizona Health Care Cost Containment System Issue Paper on High-Risk Pools
Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Issue Paper on High-Risk Pools Prepared by: T. Scott Bentley, A.S.A. Associate Actuary David F. Ogden, F.S.A. Consulting Actuary August 27, 2001 Arizona Health
More informationSUBMISSION TO THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION COMMISSION ON THE FUTURE OF LEGAL SERVICES
SUBMISSION TO THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION COMMISSION ON THE FUTURE OF LEGAL SERVICES 1. INTRODUCTION Slater and Gordon is pleased to provide a submission to the American Bar Association s Commission on
More informationPolicy Brief Public-Private-Partnerships in the Health Sector
Policy Brief Public-Private-Partnerships in the Health Sector Exploring Opportunities for CHAG (Final Version) Christian Health Association Ghana July 2013 1 Content Introduction... 3 1. Understanding
More informationSummary of the Major Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act
Summary of the Major Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Updated 10/22/10 On March 23, 2010, President Barack Obama signed into law comprehensive health care reform legislation,
More informationSubmission to the Private Health Insurance
Submission to the Private Health Insurance Consultations 2015-16 The AMA welcomes the opportunity to provide a submission to the Private Health Insurance Consultations 2015-16. The Review will no doubt
More informationState Pharmacy Assistance Programs vs. Medicare Prescription Drug Plans:
State Pharmacy Assistance Programs vs. Medicare Prescription Drug Plans: How Do They Contain Rising Costs? By Sarah Goodell, Jack Hoadley, Ellen O Brien, and Claudia Williams* October 2005 This policy
More informationWhat the Health Care Reform Bill Means to Employers
What the Health Care Reform Bill Means to Employers No doubt you have heard the news that on Tuesday, March 23, 2010, President Obama signed into law sweeping health care overhaul legislation. This followed
More informationWhat can China learn from Hungarian healthcare reform?
Student Research Projects/Outputs No.031 What can China learn from Hungarian healthcare reform? Stephanie XU MBA 2009 China Europe International Business School 699, Hong Feng Road Pudong, Shanghai People
More informationNorth Carolina Medicaid for Children/SCHIP Eligibility Expansion
North Carolina Medicaid for Children/SCHIP Eligibility Expansion Summary On July 31, 2007, Governor Mike Easley signed into law NC Kids Care. NC Kids Care is a new publicly subsidized insurance program
More informationConsensus Principles for Health Care Delivery
Consensus Principles for Health Care Delivery TABLE OF CONTENTS Consensus Principle for Healthcare Delivery... 3 Responsibilities of Various Parties to the Health Care System... 4 Individuals and Families...
More informationImproved Medicare for All
Improved Medicare for All Quality, Guaranteed National Health Insurance by HEALTHCARE-NOW! Single-Payer Healthcare or Improved Medicare for All! The United States is the only country in the developed world
More informationAnswers For Families And Small Business
http://healthreform.gov/about/answers.html Answers For Families And Small Business Q: What is the small business tax credit and how do I know if I am eligible? A: Effective January 1, 2010, tax credits
More informationPhase 1: confusion FINANCE PRIVATE PUBLIC PUBLIC PRIVATE FINANCE DELIVERY DELIVERY
Bruce Rosen Ronni Gamzu Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute Israel Ministry of Health Phase 1: confusion PRIVATE DELIVERY FINANCE PUBLIC PUBLIC DELIVERY PRIVATE FINANCE Phase 2: separation The publicprivate
More informationUPDATE BY: DR. FRANCIS RUNUMI AG.DHS(P&D)
UPDATE BY: DR. FRANCIS RUNUMI AG.DHS(P&D) 1 Introduction Draft Bill Highlights Challenges Next Steps 2 Introduction Health care delivery is affected by: 1. High population growth rate (3.4%) 2. Changing
More informationAPHA Response to the Draft Report (Sept 2014) The Competition Policy Review - 2014. Australian Private Hospitals Association ABN 82 008 623 809
APHA Response to the Draft Report (Sept 2014) The Competition Policy Review - 2014 Australian Private Hospitals Association ABN 82 008 623 809 Executive Summary The Australian Private Hospitals Association
More informationHow To Improve Health Care In California
The Expert Patient Programme in Catalonia Country: Spain Partner Institute: University of Barcelona Survey no: (16)2010 Author(s): María González Ortega Health Policy Issues: System Organisation/ Integration
More informationImproved Medicare for All
Take Action: Get Involved! The most important action you can take is to sign up for Healthcare-NOW! s email list, so you can stay connected with the movement and get updates on organizing efforts near
More informationA Comparison Between the Harvard Proposal and Other Health Care Financing Models
RP14/98-99 A Comparison Between the Harvard Proposal and 28 July 1999 Prepared by Ms Eva LIU Ms S.Y. YUE Research and Library Services Division Legislative Council Secretariat 5th Floor, Citibank Tower,
More informationWE RE HERE TO HELP YOU TRANSITION TO THE NEW HEALTH BENEFIT EXCHANGE
HEALTH CARE REFORM: INFORMATION VERMONTERS NEED TO KNOW The Federal Affordable Care Act means new health insurance products, new rules and new systems for purchasing plans beginning in 2013. Blue Cross
More informationTHE CAPITAL MARKETS INSURANCE AND SAVINGS DIVISION Annual Report JERUSALEM, DECEMBER 2013
THE CAPITAL MARKETS INSURANCE AND SAVINGS DIVISION Annual Report 2012 JERUSALEM, DECEMBER 2013 Annual Report 2 2012 Ministry Of Finance The Capital Markets Insurance And Savings Division PREFACE Table
More information