GOAL SETTING and PERFORMANCE REVIEW Form

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "GOAL SETTING and PERFORMANCE REVIEW Form"

Transcription

1 GOAL SETTING and PERFORMANCE REVIEW Form (For RANK and FILE) (Rating Period) (Name) (Position) PART 1 QUANTITATIVE GOALS (60%) INSTRUCTIONS This part is for setting and evaluating the performance of your subordinate (rank and file) for his/her quantitative performance during the rating period under consideration. Please use pen with permanent ink when accomplishing this form GOAL SETTING: In setting goals, the subordinate and his/her superior must agree at the beginning of every year on the specific DELIVERABLES which are supportive of the goal of his/her assigned department. It should include all expectations and deliverables as per employee s position description in specific, measurable, attainable, realistic and time bound manner. The superior must sub-allocate the sixty percentage (60%) weight allocated for Quantitative Goals based on the priority given for each deliverable. The superior is given the authority to determine which among the deliverables of the subordinate should be given importance. Assigned weight for each deliverable may vary depending on its importance but the total assigned weight should not exceed the 60% weight allocated for Quantitative Goals. RATING OF PERFORMANCE: In rating your subordinate, indicate a score within the scale of Zero (0) to Ten (10) that most objectively represents his/her level of performance. When answering within a scale of 0-10, as when determining the rating for your official s performance, please be guided by the following definitions: Achieved 81% to 100% of his target or deliverable Achieved 61% to 80% of his target or deliverable Achieved 41% to 60% of his target or deliverable Achieved 21% to 40% of his target or deliverable Achieved 0% to 20% of his target or deliverable. All ratings should be supported by reports based on the official s actual performance, otherwise a rate of Zero (0) will be given instead. In Goal Setting, it is important that the subordinate and superior discuss the targets/deliverables and explain whatever is expected of him/her. Likewise, during the performance evaluation the superior should allow the subordinate to explain any gasps in terms of accomplishments. After the discussion, both should sign this rating form. An unsigned form will be returned as it signifies that there is no agreement in the set goals. Submit the accomplished and signed rating form to HR on or before the deadline set forth by BMHI policy. COMPUTATION OF TOTAL WEIGHTED SCORE: In determining the score of your subordinate, the following procedures shall be observed. 1. The 60% weight assigned to quantitative performance (part 1) will be allocated based on the importance or to the priority given for each goal/target/deliverable of the official. The total allocated weights must exactly be 60%. 2. For each goal/target/deliverable, rate the level of performance/achievement of the official using the scale 1 to 10 as defined above. The rate given for each goal/target/deliverable should be based on the actual reports of accomplishments submitted to and verified by the superior. 3. Determine the ed for each target/deliverable by multiplying the with the assigned ed Rate. 4. To get the Total ed, just add up all the ed of all the target/deliverables. 1

2 GOAL No. 1 _ = ed GOAL No. 2 _ = ed GOAL No. 3 _ = ed GOAL No. 4 _ = ed Total ed (highest is 6 pts.) Prepared by: Employee s Name & Signature Approved by: Dept. Head Name & Signature Superior s Name & Signature Noted by: General Manager 2

3 PART 2 QUALITATIVE PERFORMANCE IN AN OFFICE ENVIRONMENT (40%) INSTRUCTIONS This part is for evaluating the qualitative performance of your subordinate (manager/supervisor) during the rating period under consideration. RATING OF PERFORMANCE: In rating your subordinate, indicate a score within the scale of Zero (0) to Ten (10) that most objectively represents his/her level of performance. When answering within a scale of 0-10, as when determining the rating for your official s performance, please be guided by the following definitions: OUTSTANDING. Performance falls within top 5 10 % of employees at his/her level. The official exceeded the acceptable standard by at least 50%. This rating represents an extraordinary level of performance/achievement. The excellence of his/her performance/achievement and contributions is evident and acknowledged when compared with those of other officials in the company/unit ECEEDS JOB REQUIREMENTS. Performance falls within top 15% of the employees at his/her level. The official exceeded the acceptable standard by at least 25 % but fell short of what is considered an outstanding performance/achievement. His high level of performance/achievement and numerous contributions are evident and acknowledged when compared with those of other officials in the department MEETS JOB REQUIREMENTS. Consistently meets expectations. The official met acceptable standard of performance/achievement required for the position/level NEEDS IMPROVEMENT. Needs development in current position. Overall performance/achievement is somewhat lower than expected for the current position/level. The official s performance/accomplishment fell short of his targets by 25% or he failed to meet the standard requirements of the duties of his position. Performance of this level can stand improvement UNSATISFACTORY. Performance is clearly below what is expected at current position/level. A subordinate is given this rating if he failed to meet the acceptable standard by more than 25% or if he failed to meet even the minimum requirements of the duties of his position/level, and there is no evidence to show that he can improve his performance. This rating can be a ground for separation from the service. When given rating of or 0 2.0, please include an explanation for such rating to be rendered valid. It is important that you discuss the performance assessment with your subordinate to allow him/her to explain any gap in terms of accomplishments. After the discussion, both of you and the subordinate official should sign this rating form. An unsigned rating form will be subject of an investigation and will weigh both the rater and the rate. COMPUTATION OF OVER-ALL WEIGHTED SCORE: In determining the score of your official, the following procedures shall be observed. 1. The 40% weight assigned to qualitative performance (part 2) is distributed as follows: Performance Competence - 20% 1. Communications 2. Job Knowledge 3. Judgment 4. Problem Solving 5. Quality 6. Planning and Organization 7. Innovativeness Other Dimensions/ Competence - 20% 1. Timeliness, Dependability and Consistency 2. Punctuality, Attendance, Office Discipline, Conduct Behavior/ Safety and Health Observance 3. Interpersonal Skills and Teamwork 4. Potential, Initiative and Flexibility 5. Resource Utilization Total - 40% ==== 2. For each criterion under each Level of Competence, rate the level of performance/achievement of the official using the scale 0 to 10 as defined above. 3. After assigning a score to each criterion, add up the scores of all the criteria under each Level of Competence. 4. Get the Average by dividing the Total with the number of criteria in each Level of Competence (6 for Performance Competence and 5 Other Dimensions/Competence). 5. Determine the ed of each Level of Competence by multiplying the Average with the assigned ed Rate (20% for Performance Competence and 20% for Other Dimensions/Competence) 6. To get the Total Weighed, just add up all the ed for each Level of Competence. 3

4 I. PERFORMANCE COMPETENCIES (20%) 1. Communications, meaning, the ability to express ideas and thoughts verbally and in written form, exhibits good listening and comprehension skills, uses appropriate communication methods, and keeps others adequately informed. 2. Job Knowledge, meaning, being competent in required job skills and knowledge, exhibits ability to learn and apply new skills, keeps abreast of current developments, displays understanding of how job relates to others, uses resources effectively, and works with minimal supervision. 3. Judgment, meaning, the willingness to make right decisions, exhibits sound and accurate judgment, ability to support and explain reasoning for decisions, includes appropriate people in decision-making process, and makes timely decisions. 4. Problem Solving, meaning, the ability to identify problems in a timely manner, gathers and analyzes information skillfully, develops alternative solutions, resolves problems in early stages, and works well in group problem-solving situations. 5. Quality, meaning, the ability to demonstrate accuracy and thoroughness, displays commitment to excellence, looks for ways to improve and promote quality, applies feedback to improve performance, and monitors own works to ensure quality. 6. Planning and Organization, meaning, the ability to plan and prioritize activities, assigns work properly, sets appropriate work standards, establishes monitoring system, streamlines office operations and isolates, defines and seeks solution to problem areas. 7. Innovativeness, meaning the ability to initiate and implement new or improved policies/programs/projects/activities other than those already identified and pursued by his office and to take risks in program implementation as well as employees imaginative/creative solutions to work related situations. Total (Sum of items 1 to 7 above) Average (Total / 7) Average = ed Note/Explanation (on very high or very low rating): II. OTHER COMPETENCIES (20%) 1. Timeliness, Dependability and Consistency, meaning, the awareness of the reasonable time limit given in a particular task; the ability to produce quality work within a reasonable time and the successful completion of a number of work within a given time with minimal supervision; the ability to be responsible, and steadfast to handle difficult and pressured challenges. 2. Punctuality, Attendance, Office Discipline, Conduct Behavior/Safety and Health Observance, meaning, the ability to be regularly present and punctual in office attendance; attitude towards and concern for the time lost from work; observes break periods; the ability to comply with policies on attendance and punctuality and compliance with office rules and regulations and department/office norms; compliance with company policies regarding norms of conduct; honest, trustworthy including care of company property, health and safety. 4

5 3. Interpersonal Skills and Teamwork, meaning, the ability to work well with others and maintain a wholesome work environment; to get things done with people and to keep information lines open at all levels; the ability to coordinate own works with others, to seek and welcome the opinion of others, to value working relationships; it also refers to how well he/she maintains cordial relationships with supervisors, peers, officers, staff and client/visitors. 4. Potential, Initiative and Flexibility, meaning, the capacity to undertake more responsibilities over and beyond the normal load; the ability to fulfill intervening tasks/assignments; develop ideas and techniques without being told and successfully apply them to jobs that deviate from the routine; the ability to determine the needs of the workplace and readily take on the task of seeing to these needs. 5. Resource Utilization, meaning, the ability effectively use and ensure proper maintenance of allotted funds, materials, supplies, equipment, tools and other facilities available to accomplish the job. Total (Sum of items 1 to 5 above) Average (Total / 5) Average = ed Total ed (highest is 4 pts.) Note/Explanation (on very high or very low rating): OVER-ALL WEIGHTED SCORE** PART 1 & 2 (highest is 10 pts.) ** Total ed PART 1 + Total ed PART 2 = Over-all ed IMPORTANT NOTE: When all ratings are gathered, the organization will conduct a normalization process. This means that it will plot the frequency of the various ratings (or scores). The chart is expected to follow the normal or bell curve, i.e. a few getting top ratings, then the bulk gets average ratings, and a few getting low ratings. If the resulting chart is skewed or leaning in either direction, Raters will be asked to review their scores. RATEE s Remarks: Was the appraisal fair/objective? Do you agree with the rating you received? Please elaborate. RATER s Remarks: Do you have any comments or recommendations? RATEE s Name & Signature Date _ RATER s Name & Signature Date 5

6 PART 3 TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT NEEDS 1. In what areas do you think should your subordinate improve? What are his/her problems in these areas? 2. If the problems/cited above can be solved through training, which training courses would improve your subordinate s work effectiveness? Values Leadership Interpersonal skills Administrative Support Systems and Procedures Managerial Competency Enhancement Program such as: Project Management Productivity Management Public Relations Planning and Forecasting Policy Formulation Analysis and Implementation Management Information system Administrative Discipline Technical Courses related to the Office s Mandate Others (please specify) 6

ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES

ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES DATE: Name: Position: Department: Annual Performance Review COPY MUST BE RETURNED TO HR FOR FILE Part 1: of General Performance

More information

CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013

CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013 CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013 Name: Position: Anniversary Date in Position: Department: Supervisor: Appraisal Period: from to PURPOSE Communication about performance between

More information

Writing Performance Objectives for Job Components: A Brief Tutorial

Writing Performance Objectives for Job Components: A Brief Tutorial Writing Performance Objectives for Job Components: A Brief Tutorial Under the State of Missouri s PERforM employee appraisal system, each employee must have at least one (1) performance objective for each

More information

NEEDHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS Needham, Massachusetts 02492-2692 EVALUATION PROCESS: NURSES

NEEDHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS Needham, Massachusetts 02492-2692 EVALUATION PROCESS: NURSES NEEDHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS Needham, Massachusetts 02492-2692 EVALUATION PROCESS: NURSES INTRODUCTION The evaluation process focuses on ten standards that are consistent with the the guidelines set forth by

More information

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Name Social Security No Job Title Organizational Unit State Employment Date Current Job

More information

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM NON-BARGAINING UNIT, NON-MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM NON-BARGAINING UNIT, NON-MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL Employee Name: Position Title: Department: Supervisor Name: Date of Review: For Period: To At the beginning of each performance cycle, employee and supervisor review key responsibilities (from the job

More information

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Mission Statement: There is hereby established a University at Pueblo, to be known as Colorado State University Pueblo, which shall be

More information

Performance Management Handbook. City of American Canyon

Performance Management Handbook. City of American Canyon Performance Management Handbook City of American Canyon 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Background on performance management City Core competencies Performance management model Development of the Core

More information

CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM Name Date Department Evaluation Period Job Title Evaluator Annual Probationary Special (Explain) Performance I. SELF-ASSESSMENT In what areas do I excel

More information

2015 Performance Appraisal Template Samples

2015 Performance Appraisal Template Samples 2015 Performance Appraisal Template Samples Human Resources Peer Networking Benchmarks 13 Examples of Performance Appraisals submitted by MAPP members Including Core Competencies and Helpful Phrases 2015

More information

Performance Appraisal Review for Exempt Employees

Performance Appraisal Review for Exempt Employees Client Company Performance Appraisal Review for Exempt Employees Employee Name Department Title Date Started Current Position Date of Review Current Supervisor Instructions Review employee s performance

More information

WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE

WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT A CONTRACT BETWEEN EMPLOYEES AND WINTHROP UNIVERSITY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS DOCUMENT DOES

More information

Performance Appraisal

Performance Appraisal PURPOSE Performance Appraisal 90-day Evaluation 180-day Evaluation Annual Evaluation The purpose of any performance appraisal program is employee development. The value of performance appraisal is in the

More information

San Jose/Evergreen Community College District Administrator Performance Appraisal Forms

San Jose/Evergreen Community College District Administrator Performance Appraisal Forms San Jose/Evergreen Community College District Administrator Performance Appraisal Forms Philosophy and Policy In accordance with Education Code Section 87663, the policy on evaluation of administrators

More information

SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL OF VANCOUVER ISLAND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL OF VANCOUVER ISLAND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL OF VANCOUVER ISLAND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW NAME: PROGRAM: POSITION: REVIEW PERIOD: Introduction As part of the annual employee performance evaluation and review process,

More information

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff and Service Personnel Employee s Name (Last, First, MI): Position Title: Department: Period Covered: From: To: Type of Report: Probationary

More information

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Part-Time non-benefited staff only)

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Part-Time non-benefited staff only) EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Part-Time non-benefited staff only) Employee Name: Name: Position Title: Position Title: EKU ID No.: Review Period: / / through / / Department: Review Date: / / *This form

More information

Date Started Current Position. Instructions

Date Started Current Position. Instructions Client Company Performance Appraisal Review for Non-Exempt Employees Employee Name Title of Review Department Started Current Position Current Supervisor Instructions Review employee s performance for

More information

Performance Appraisal System to Improve Construction Productivity paper submitted to International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications

Performance Appraisal System to Improve Construction Productivity paper submitted to International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 11, November 2013 1 Performance Appraisal System to Improve Construction Productivity paper submitted to International Journal

More information

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Blinn College is the premier two-year college in Texas for those seeking educational excellence in academic programs, technical education, and workforce development. We expect excellence and we encourage

More information

Staff Performance Evaluation

Staff Performance Evaluation Staff Performance Evaluation This form, and any attachment, becomes part of the employee's official personnel file. Employee Name: Position Title: UIN: Department: Review Type: Annual Job At Risk Probationary

More information

CITY OF ROGUE RIVER EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

CITY OF ROGUE RIVER EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW CITY OF ROGUE RIVER EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW Name: Evaluation Period To/From: Position: Evaluator: Department: Salary Range/Step: Reason for Appraisal: Completion of Probationary Period Special Review

More information

Oregon University System

Oregon University System Oregon University System COMPLETING A PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL For Employees in Classified Information Technology Positions Represented by the Oregon Public Employees Union Instructions for Supervisors INTRODUCTION

More information

The Bureau of Public Service System PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

The Bureau of Public Service System PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM The Bureau of Public Service System PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM GENERAL INFORMATION In accordance with Public Service System Rules and Regulations Part 9.1 The performance evaluation system is designed

More information

Employee Performance Review. Reference Guide

Employee Performance Review. Reference Guide Employee Performance Review Reference Guide Oklahoma Baptist University Office of Human Resources March 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Why Review?... 1 The Ratings... 1 Managerial Elements... 1 Leadership...

More information

RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHAPTER 60L-35 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHAPTER 60L-35 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM 60L-35.001 Scope and Purpose 60L-35.002 Definitions 60L-35.003 Minimum Requirements 60L-35.004 Career Service 60L-35.005 Selected Exempt Service 60L-35.006 Transitional Provision (Repealed) 60L-35.001

More information

Sample Performance Appraisal

Sample Performance Appraisal Sample Performance Appraisal Employee Name: Employee Job Title: Review Period Start: Review Period End: Hire Date: Location: Supervisor: Appraisal Date: General Information The purpose of the review is

More information

Colorado Department of Human Services Performance Management Program Implementation Plan

Colorado Department of Human Services Performance Management Program Implementation Plan Colorado Department of Human Services Performance Management Program Implementation Plan Approved by Department of Personnel and Administration on October 2014 I. INTRODUCTION COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN

More information

Staff Performance Evaluation Training. Office of Human Resources October 2014

Staff Performance Evaluation Training. Office of Human Resources October 2014 Staff Performance Evaluation Training Office of Human Resources October 2014 Documents Suggestion: Have copies of the following documents available during this presentation Core Competencies Staff Self-Evaluation

More information

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL (Non-Exempt)

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL (Non-Exempt) PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL (Non-Exempt) ****************************************************** Name Department: Job Title Appraisal Period JOB KNOWLEDGE Consider overall knowledge, constructive and creative

More information

Employee s Name: Susan Jones. Title: Administrative Officer. Supervisor: Marcia Meadows. Date: April 2, 200x

Employee s Name: Susan Jones. Title: Administrative Officer. Supervisor: Marcia Meadows. Date: April 2, 200x Employee s Name: Susan Jones Title: Administrative Officer Descriptive Performance Review Form Job Definition Supervisor: Marcia Meadows Date: April 2, 200x 1. Attach a current position description; if

More information

DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees

DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees PART I PURPOSE DePauw University s performance appraisal process is based upon the belief that employees are our most critical resource,

More information

The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) Performance Management Program Updated - April, 2009

The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) Performance Management Program Updated - April, 2009 The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) Performance Management Program Updated - April, 2009 Background This document provides details of the Department of Regulatory Agencies Performance

More information

LOCAL HEALTH DIRECTOR INTERVIEW QUESTIONS TEMPLATE (Suggested Questions for Personal or Telephone Interviews - Rating Criteria Follows)

LOCAL HEALTH DIRECTOR INTERVIEW QUESTIONS TEMPLATE (Suggested Questions for Personal or Telephone Interviews - Rating Criteria Follows) Template Developed December, 2006 LOCAL HEALTH DIRECTOR INTERVIEW QUESTIONS TEMPLATE (Suggested Questions for Personal or Telephone Interviews - Rating Criteria Follows) 1. Describe your experience in

More information

Part One: Review of Performance Elements Rating Scale

Part One: Review of Performance Elements Rating Scale Employee Name Employee ID Number Job Title Department Reviewing Supervisor Review Period Period Supervised by Reviewing Supervisor Period Employee in this Job Part One: Review of Performance Elements Rating

More information

Employee Performance Appraisal Form

Employee Performance Appraisal Form Employee Performance Appraisal Form Employee Name: Job Title: Department: Performance Review Period: From: JANUARY 1, 2013 To: DECEMBER 31, 2013 Written By: Title: Department: PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Complete

More information

DALLAS COUNTY NON-EXEMPT PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

DALLAS COUNTY NON-EXEMPT PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION DALLAS COUNTY Purpose: The following evaluation form is designed to measure the performance of non-exempt employees during the period of review, and provide an opportunity for the employee and supervisor

More information

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH, FOUNDATION EMPLOYEE PLANNING & PERFORMANCE REVIEW

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH, FOUNDATION EMPLOYEE PLANNING & PERFORMANCE REVIEW TYPE OF APPRAISAL Employee Name First Annual Second Additional Supervisor/Manager Name Appraisal Review Period: Classification Month/Year Month/Year From to Department Date of Appraisal Complete the following

More information

Exempt Performance Reviews. Date Approved: June 23, 2008 Last Edited: June 3, 2014

Exempt Performance Reviews. Date Approved: June 23, 2008 Last Edited: June 3, 2014 Page: 1 Policy The performance review process is a formal communication which is an integral part of performance management and is tied to compensation. All exempt and management employees will have an

More information

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Review 1/20/2012 EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Employee Seniority Supervisor(s) Position Title Department Job Skills & Knowledge: Demonstrates professional skills and knowledge of the responsibilities

More information

Amherst College Office of Human Resources PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROCESS GUIDE

Amherst College Office of Human Resources PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROCESS GUIDE Amherst College Office of Human Resources PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROCESS GUIDE March 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction........................................................... 3 Preparing for the Performance

More information

Example: Box Elder District Classified Employee Evaluation and Improvement Report

Example: Box Elder District Classified Employee Evaluation and Improvement Report Classified Employee Performance Evaluation and Improvement Report has developed this performance evaluation process as a way to encourage workers and their supervisors to talk about issues in the workplace.

More information

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR NONFACULTY EMPLOYEES BANNER EMPLOYEE ID NUMBER:

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR NONFACULTY EMPLOYEES BANNER EMPLOYEE ID NUMBER: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR NONFACULTY EMPLOYEES NAME: POSITION TITLE: DEPARTMENT/OFFICE: EVALUATED BY BANNER EMPLOYEE ID NUMBER: BANNER POSITION NUMBER: REVIEW DATE: Supervisor ID: INSTRUCTIONS:

More information

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT BOARD PROCEDURE Approval Date 2010 Review Date 2015 Contact Person/Department Human Resources Administrator Replacing All previous policies Page 1 of 12 Identification HR-4540 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR

More information

Ratings Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Improvement Needed

Ratings Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Improvement Needed The staff appraisal process is an on-going communications process that begins with the identification of performance goals by the supervisor in the fall. During the spring semester, a formal appraisal

More information

Utica College Performance Review Form for LEADERSHIP

Utica College Performance Review Form for LEADERSHIP Utica College Performance Review Form for LEADERSHIP EMPLOYEE NAME: DEPARTMENT: HIRE DATE: / / SUPERVISOR*: JOB TITLE: REVIEW PERIOD: *Supervisor is the person delivering the review From To INSTRUCTIONS

More information

EMPLOYEE EVALUATION WORKSHEET

EMPLOYEE EVALUATION WORKSHEET EMPLOYEE EVALUATION WORKSHEET In preparation of completing the Final Appraisal Form with the Supervisor, the Employee should evaluate and review his/her own previous performance using this worksheet as

More information

Administrative Support Professionals Competency Framework. The Centre for Learning and Development

Administrative Support Professionals Competency Framework. The Centre for Learning and Development Administrative Support Professionals Competency Framework The Centre for Learning and Development Table of Contents 01. Acknowledgements...3 02. Introduction...4 03. Background...5 04. Competency Assessment

More information

Performance Evaluation Guide for Classified Staff Employees. Classified Staff Performance Evaluation Program

Performance Evaluation Guide for Classified Staff Employees. Classified Staff Performance Evaluation Program Performance Evaluation Guide for Classified Staff Employees Classified Staff Performance Evaluation Program June 2011 Performance Evaluation Guide for Classifed Staff Employees TABLE OF CONTENTS Preamble...

More information

Utica College Performance Review Form

Utica College Performance Review Form Utica College Performance Review Form EMPLOYEE NAME: DEPARTMENT: HIRE DATE: / / SUPERVISOR*: JOB TITLE: REVIEW PERIOD: From To *Supervisor is the person delivering the review INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING

More information

EMPLOYEE INFORMATION

EMPLOYEE INFORMATION EMPLOYEE INFORMATION Date Last Name MI First Name Position/Title Current Pay Grade Department/Division or Section Original Hire Date Performance Review Period Date Appointed to Current Position From: Supervisor

More information

ADAMS STATE UNIVERSITY Performance Evaluation Process Performance Evaluation

ADAMS STATE UNIVERSITY Performance Evaluation Process Performance Evaluation ADAMS STATE UNIVERSITY Performance Evaluation Process Performance Evaluation (For performance planning, performance progress reviews and final performance evaluations) I. Identification Section: Employee

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF EVALUATION FORM

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF EVALUATION FORM ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF EVALUATION FORM OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES A MEMBER OF THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Name of Employee: Position Title: Department: _ of Employment Into Current Position: TYPE OF EVALUATION

More information

Initial Review 6 month Review Annual Other. Immediate Supervisor: Position Title: DRAFT

Initial Review 6 month Review Annual Other. Immediate Supervisor: Position Title: DRAFT Last Name First M. Title Department Employee Performance Appraisal Form Employee ID TKL Work Phone Initial Review 6 month Review Annual Other Immediate Supervisor: Position Title: Department: Appraisal

More information

Performance Appraisal and it s Effectiveness in Modern Business Scenarios

Performance Appraisal and it s Effectiveness in Modern Business Scenarios Performance Appraisal and it s Effectiveness in Modern Business Scenarios Punam Singh* *Assistant Professor, Department of Social Work, Sardar Patel University, Vallabh Vidhyanagar, Anand, Gujarat, INDIA.

More information

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM Name: Job Title: Date: Department: Type of Appraisal: Annual Probationary Self Evaluation Appraisal Period: From: To: Instructions: Please carefully review the employee

More information

PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW GENERAL INFORMATION PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW Form Applies to AFSCME, NURSES, POLICE & PHYSICIANS TYPE REPORT INTERIM PROBATIONARY ANNUAL EMPLOYEE NAME JOB

More information

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROFESSIONAL STUDENT SERVICES PERSONNEL (PSSP)

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROFESSIONAL STUDENT SERVICES PERSONNEL (PSSP) BOARD PROCEDURE Approval Date 2015 Review Date 2020 Contact Person/Department Human Resources Administrator Replacing All previous procedures Page 1 of 20 Identification HR 4525 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROFESSIONAL

More information

The following presentation will review the new performance appraisal process for staff and administrators and explain how merit pay can be achieved

The following presentation will review the new performance appraisal process for staff and administrators and explain how merit pay can be achieved The following presentation will review the new performance appraisal process for staff and administrators and explain how merit pay can be achieved through performance. 1 Let s first discuss merit pay.

More information

Employee Self-Evaluation Form

Employee Self-Evaluation Form Employee Self-Evaluation Form Employee Name: Job Title: Department: Performance Review Period: From: JANUARY 1, 2013 To: DECEMBER 31, 2013 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Complete each performance area described

More information

Cherokee Town and Country Club Front Desk Receptionist. Administrative Employee Performance Evaluation Form

Cherokee Town and Country Club Front Desk Receptionist. Administrative Employee Performance Evaluation Form Appendix S Cherokee Town and Country Club, Performance Evaluation Cherokee Town and Country Club Employee Name Hire Date Job Title Supervisor Department 90 Day Other Annual Date of Review Review Period

More information

Tips for Filling out the Performance Planning and Appraisal Form (PPAF):

Tips for Filling out the Performance Planning and Appraisal Form (PPAF): Tips for Filling out the Performance Planning and Appraisal Form (PPAF): The form used in the Performance Planning and Performance Appraisal processes is entitled the Performance Planning and Appraisal

More information

Performance Review (Non-Exempt Employees)

Performance Review (Non-Exempt Employees) Performance Review (Non-Exempt Employees) Name: Department: Campus ID Number: Title: Review Period: - Job Description Review: I. Essential Job Requirements: (Consider employee s knowledge of duties, responsibilities

More information

TOWN OF NEEDHAM PUBLIC WORKS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION POLICY #419

TOWN OF NEEDHAM PUBLIC WORKS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION POLICY #419 TOWN OF NEEDHAM PUBLIC WORKS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION POLICY #419 I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE The Purpose of this policy is to outline the Town's Public Works performance evaluation program, including the use of

More information

NOT APPLICABLE (N/A): Reviewer has no direct knowledge of employee's behavior in this area. Job Knowledge Score: / 5.0

NOT APPLICABLE (N/A): Reviewer has no direct knowledge of employee's behavior in this area. Job Knowledge Score: / 5.0 Manager Performance Appraisal Appraisal Score Overall Score: / 5.0 Employee Information Name: Manager Name: Job Title: Department: Hire Date: Rating Scale Definition (5) EXCEPTIONAL: Consistently exceeds

More information

FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT APPENDIX C FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM Philosophy and Policy The performance of all Foothill-De Anza Community College District administrators

More information

Writing and Conducting Successful Performance Appraisals. Guidelines for Managers and Supervisors

Writing and Conducting Successful Performance Appraisals. Guidelines for Managers and Supervisors Writing and Conducting Successful Performance Appraisals Guidelines for Managers and Supervisors Performance reviews are like compasses They give your exact position and provide direction Office of Human

More information

Department of Administrative Services

Department of Administrative Services Department of Administrative Services Facilities Division PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDE (Revised 04/08) GUIDE TO PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS A. OBJECTIVES OF EMPLOYEE EVALUATION...3 B. EVALUATION

More information

Bloomfield College Staff Employee Performance Review 2014-15

Bloomfield College Staff Employee Performance Review 2014-15 Bloomfield College Staff Employee Performance Review 2014-15 Employee Name: Position: Evaluator: Department: Date of Evaluation: Date of Hire: 1. Summary of departmental mission and customer service philosophy:

More information

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW GUIDELINES

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW GUIDELINES EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW GUIDELINES DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES SPRING 2014 Employee Performance Review Guidelines The performance review process helps individual employees and organizations throughout

More information

Performance Management. Fitting the Pieces of Success Together

Performance Management. Fitting the Pieces of Success Together Performance Management Fitting the Pieces of Success Together Session Overview: Current performance review process Documentation Ratings Determining the overall rating New Performance plan document Review

More information

ADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDELINES

ADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDELINES ADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDELINES The Performance Appraisal Process at Madison College is designed to accomplish the following objectives: Encourage meaningful communication between the employee

More information

PART II GUIDE TO CONDUCTING A SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BEFORE

PART II GUIDE TO CONDUCTING A SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BEFORE LANGSTON U NIVERSITY Performance Management System Clerical, Craft, Maintenance, Technical, and Service Employees Use for Employees Who Do Not Supervise Others PART I Langston University s performance

More information

APPENDIX TOWN OF MONTAGUE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM GUIDELINES

APPENDIX TOWN OF MONTAGUE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM GUIDELINES Performance Appraisal Review APPENDIX TOWN OF MONTAGUE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM GUIDELINES I. INTRODUCTION A. WHAT IS PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL? Performance appraisal is a process of assessing a person

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY 2014-2015

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY 2014-2015 ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY 2014-2015 Employee Last Name Employee First Name Employee ID Department Position Title Supervisor Name Review Date Self-Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation

More information

COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Revised October 1, 2008

COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Revised October 1, 2008 COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Revised October 1, 2008 I. HISTORY Since 1945, classified employees of the State of Colorado have been paid under a grade and step system where salaries

More information

IACBE Advancing Academic Quality in Business Education Worldwide

IACBE Advancing Academic Quality in Business Education Worldwide IACBE Advancing Academic Quality in Business Education Worldwide Example of a Supervisor of Internship Rubric International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education 11374 Strang Line Road Lenexa, Kansas

More information

COLORADO DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN STATE OF COLORADO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF TRANSPORTATION JANUARY 2016

COLORADO DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN STATE OF COLORADO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF TRANSPORTATION JANUARY 2016 STATE OF COLORADO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN JANUARY 2016 Approved by Department of Personnel and Administration

More information

C A R L E T O N U N I V E R S I T Y POSITION DESCRIPTION OFFICER USE ONLY. 2. Position No: 298271

C A R L E T O N U N I V E R S I T Y POSITION DESCRIPTION OFFICER USE ONLY. 2. Position No: 298271 C A R L E T O N U N I V E R S I T Y POSITION DESCRIPTION PART A Employee Name: Title of Immediate Supervisor: Manager, Office of the Vice-Provost and Associate Vice-President (Academic) Position Title:

More information

Employee Development Plan

Employee Development Plan Form A Employee Development Plan Fiscal Year: EMPLOYEE NAME: TIME IN CURRENT POSITION: DEPARTMENT: This section should be completed by the supervisor and employee as part of the final performance evaluation

More information

Sample Internship Forms

Sample Internship Forms Sample Internship Forms Contents STUDENT INTERNSHIPS APPLICATION FORM... 2 STUDENT INTERN WORK SCHEDULE/REPORT... 3 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT (Student)... 5 STUDENT INTERNSHIP PROGRAM... 7 QUARTERLY STUDENT

More information

Administrative Instruction

Administrative Instruction Administrative Instruction Date: To: From: 26 July 2011 All UNOPS Personnel Pierre Moreau-Peron, Director, HRPG J 1-r AI Reference: Subject: AUHRPG/2011/04 Performance Management and Appraisal for staff

More information

Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority. Performance Evaluation System Guide

Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority. Performance Evaluation System Guide Table of Contents Performance Evaluation System - Overview... 5 Performance Evaluation System... 5 Performance Evaluation Frequency... 5 Performance Evaluation System - Roles... 7 Tips for Supervisors

More information

POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES Human Resource Management Division PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES Human Resource Management Division PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES Human Resource Management Division PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM Pursuant to the provisions of Rule IX of the Omnibus Rules Implementing Book V of Executive Order

More information

Boston University. 2015 Performance Evaluation Program. Administrative Employees Exempt and Non-Exempt

Boston University. 2015 Performance Evaluation Program. Administrative Employees Exempt and Non-Exempt Boston University 2015 Performance Evaluation Program Administrative Employees Exempt and Non-Exempt (excludes staff covered by Collective Bargaining Agreements and Certain Contracts) October 2015 TABLE

More information

Performance Evaluation Form: Part-Time & Seasonal Employees

Performance Evaluation Form: Part-Time & Seasonal Employees Performance Evaluation Form: Part-Time & Seasonal Employees Employee Name: Review Position: Supervisor: Type Performance Review: Annual Review Other Review Period From: To: INTRODUCTION The performance

More information

Salaried Performance Appraisal 1870 South Boulder Avenue Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119.5423 www.mhat.org

Salaried Performance Appraisal 1870 South Boulder Avenue Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119.5423 www.mhat.org Salaried Performance Appraisal 1870 South Boulder Avenue Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119.5423 www.mhat.org Employee Name Job Title Hire Date Evaluation Date Department Supervisor Annual Review 90 day Review Review

More information

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE PAGE: 1 of 17 TITLE: EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (EPMS) (REVIEW DATE OPTION) POLICY REFERENCE NUMBER: 8-4-100 DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITY: Human Resource Services DATE OF LAST REVISION: May 13,

More information

Performance Evaluation

Performance Evaluation Competency Exceptional Above Meets Partially Meets Overview of Ratings TRANSFORMATIVE work. In addition to exceeding performance goals, the organization (department, unit or program) is fundamentally better

More information

MILLSAPS COLLEGE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff

MILLSAPS COLLEGE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff MILLSAPS COLLEGE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff EMPLOYEE NAME: JOB TITLE: DEPARTMENT: PERIOD OF EVALUATION: FROM: TO: TIME IN CURRENT POSITION: TIME WITH THE COLLEGE:

More information

Performance Evaluation Program. for Classified Staff Employees

Performance Evaluation Program. for Classified Staff Employees Performance Evaluation Program for Classified Staff Employees Revised July 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Prior to Meeting with Your Supervisor......3 Initial Supervisor/Employee Meeting to Establish Evaluation

More information

2016 Annual Performance Review Leadership Form. Job Title: Supervisor Name:

2016 Annual Performance Review Leadership Form. Job Title: Supervisor Name: 2016 Annual Performance Review Leadership Form Employee Name: Employee ID: Job Title: Supervisor Name: Last Appraisal Date: Department: Evaluation Type: Annual Other RATING SCALE: Outstanding Consistently

More information

University of Mississippi Medical Center Employee Performance Review Form. Employee Position Title: Employee Job Code: Employee Grade:

University of Mississippi Medical Center Employee Performance Review Form. Employee Position Title: Employee Job Code: Employee Grade: University of Mississippi Medical Center Employee Performance Review Form Employee Name: Employee Number: Employee Position Title: Employee Job Code: Employee Grade: Department Name: Today s : Supervisor

More information

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLICY

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLICY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLICY Introduction: How to Use This Tool Employee performance appraisals are usually completed at least once per year in almost every organization. Performance appraisals

More information

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR SUPERVISORY/MANAGERIAL EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #:

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR SUPERVISORY/MANAGERIAL EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #: GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR SUPERVISORY/MANAGERIAL EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #: JOB TITLE: REVIEWED BY: UNIT: DATE OF REVIEW: REVIEW

More information

Core Leadership Competencies

Core Leadership Competencies Core Leadership Competencies The following guidance further clarifies the distinctions between levels of performance for the 8 core competencies outlined in Element 1 of all DHS SES performance plans.

More information

Maricopa County Community College District. Management, Administrative, and Technology (MAT) Performance Appraisal and Evaluation Summary Form

Maricopa County Community College District. Management, Administrative, and Technology (MAT) Performance Appraisal and Evaluation Summary Form 110703 v. 22 ( 2003 Maricopa Community College District) 1 of 6 Maricopa County Community College District Management, Administrative, and Technology (MAT) Performance Appraisal and Evaluation Summary

More information

Cleveland State Community College. Classified Employee Performance Review

Cleveland State Community College. Classified Employee Performance Review Name: Review Period: Job Title: Reviewer: Note: Place a mark in the appropriate space which describes the performance of the person named, as determined by this appraisal. Use the following codes and definitions.

More information

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR NON-SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #:

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR NON-SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #: GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR NON-SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #: JOB TITLE: REVIEWED BY: UNIT: DATE OF REVIEW: REVIEW PERIOD:

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE MEMORANDUM No. 92 Rev. 1. SUBJECT: Guidelines for the Performance Evaluation System

ADMINISTRATIVE MEMORANDUM No. 92 Rev. 1. SUBJECT: Guidelines for the Performance Evaluation System ADMINISTRATIVE MEMORANDUM No. 92 Rev. 1 SUBJECT: Guidelines for the Performance Evaluation System I. BACKGROUND Article 39 of the General Standards, entitled "Work Performance Evaluation," states: Staff

More information