Patent Litigation in Germany An Introduction (I)
|
|
- Milton Townsend
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Patent Litigation in Germany An Introduction (I) By Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar, Dr. jur. Carl-Richard Haarmann Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar Senior Partner, Boehmert & Boehmert, Munich, and Honorary Professor for Intellectual Property Law, University of Bremen, Germany Dr. jur. Carl-Richard Haarmann Attorney at Law, admitted at the European Trade Mark Office, Partner, Munich germany is one of the leading entry points into the European Union market, as well as being the largest marketplace in the European Union. Accordingly, Germany is the busiest and most attractive jurisdiction for an efficient patent enforcement strategy in Europe. However, the German legal system is, in some respects, different from the legal systems of many other European states and the United States, providing a unique set of circumstances for those wishing to litigate in Germany. This article seeks to help readers betters understand the procedural technicalities in German patent proceedings, a vital underpinning to any successful pleading before a German court. I. The Courts The Lower Courts Patent infringement actions fall under the exclusive jurisdiction a civil court. Consequently, filing a complaint in the civil courts is the standard method of asserting patent rights in the German legal system. The first instance hearing will be heard by one of the twelve District Courts ( Landgerichte ). Each District Court has at least one specialized patent dispute chamber ( Kammer für Patentstreitsachen ). Each chamber is composed of three judges especially trained to handle patent infringement cases. Although these judges generally do not have a technical background, many deal exclusively with patent and utility model infringement and accordingly have vast experience and technical insight. The District Courts situated in Düsseldorf and Mannheim are particularly experienced in patent infringement matters, and handle over two-thirds of the 1,400 or so first instance cases heard in Germany each year. JUVE Rechtsmarkt 04/10, 79. Decisions of the District Courts may be appealed to the second instance Higher Regional Courts ( Oberlandesgerichte ), which has concentrated IP litigation in its specialized Senate. Similar to the District Courts, three judges with legal training handle the cases in the Senate for Patent Disputes ( Patentsenat ) of the Higher Regional Courts. In principle, the Higher Regional Court handles only legal issues, but new facts in patent cases may also be, and generally are, considered at the discretion of the court. The Federal Court of Justice From the Higher Regional Courts, a further appeal may be made to the Federal Court of Justice ( Bundesgerichtshof ). Located in Karlsruhe, this is the court of last resort for both nullity and patent infringement proceedings. The court is subdivided into twenty-five senates and each case is handled by five judges. Patent appeal matters are heard by the 10th Senate of the Federal Court of Justice, the members specialize in handling intellectual property issues and are recruited from patent infringement chambers and senates of District and Appeal courts as well as the Federal Patent Court. The Federal Court of Justice, as far as patent dispute matters are concerned, only decides on points of law previously based on the facts established in the lower appellate court. Accordingly, no new facts are admitted, and writs and oral proceedings focus only on the disputed features. If sufficient relevant factual material has been collected by the previous proceedings, the Federal Court of Justice will render its judgement following 68
2 oral proceedings. The duration of the procedure, from filing the appeal to the oral proceedings, is typically 18 months to 24 months. In addition, the court may order expert opinions or scientific tests prior to the oral hearing which will add additional writs to the four to six writs typically exchanged between the parties. Federal Court of Justice patent infringement cases hearings comprise only a legal review. The decisions of the Federal Court of Justice can be unconditionally enforced without a security deposit. In most cases, only a general decision awarding damage claims can be made, with the specific amount of damage claims to be determined only following full disclosure of information. However, if the factual basis for the judgement is deemed insufficient, the Federal Court of Justice will refer the case back down to the Higher Regional Court for further proceedings to obtain further evidence. On the other hand, a nullity appeal before the Federal Court of Justice is a full review of the case both factual and legal. Judgment is rendered at the end of the oral hearing and sent for registry in the patent register if the judgment has amended or invalidated the contested patent claim(s). Furthermore, this judgment is final and effective immediately with no possibility or appeal or dissenting opinions. There are three possible outcomes: The patent remains unchanged, it is maintained with amended and limited claims, or declared invalid (which would happen under the European Patent Convention (EPC), i.e. European patents, as far as the German designation of the European patent is concerned). Written grounds are delivered two to three months following the judgment. The Federal Patent Court In patents cases, the Federal Patent Court has exclusively jurisdiction to handle nullity actions. Based in Munich, the Court handles cases by Senates with special technical focuses. Each Senate is composed of five judges, of which two have legal training and three are technically trained, with the presiding judge always being one with legal training. Unlike infringement proceedings, appeals against the decisions of the Federal Patent Court in nullity proceedings can be made directly to the Federal Court of Justice. However, in cases where the defendant has initiated an opposition or nullity suit which has been appealed to Federal Court of Justice, the latter will not render a decision on the infringement issue before a final decision on the validity of the patent has been reached. Counsel Any German attorney-at-law who has been admitted to the Bar ( Rechtsanwalt ) may represent a party in a District Court or Court of Appeals patent infringement proceeding. In addition to the attorney at law, a patent attorney may also be present in order to assist the lawyer in technical issues. However, patent infringement proceedings typically require parallel representation of each party by both a lawyer and a patent attorney, while nullity proceedings, as a matter of law, necessitate only representation by a patent attorney for each party. In-house lawyers may not represent their employer companies. Further, one criteria which is particular to the second level appeal proceedings in an infringement case at Federal Court of Justice is that the attorney at law representing each party in these proceedings must be an attorney who has been exclusively admitted to the Bar at the Federal Court of Justice. II. Bifurcation of Infringement and Validity Proceedings A fundamental feature of the German legal system is that patent infringement and validity proceedings are bifurcated that is, the patent infringement action and an action on validity are heard in separate instances and by two different, specialised courts. As stated above, validity proceedings for the German designation of a European patent or German national patent are heard exclusively by the Federal Patent Court ( Bundespatentgericht ) in Munich; appeals from these proceedings are heard by the Federal Court of Justice. On the other hand, civil courts have jurisdiction over infringement proceedings, and first instance appeals are made to the Regional Courts of Appeal. Second instance appeals are heard by the Federal Court of Justice which is the court of last resort for both infringement and validity proceedings despite the bifurcated proceedings. However, as a consequence of the separation of proceedings in Germany, a validity defence in infringement proceedings as such is only possible insofar as, if a separate attack against the validity of the patent in dispute (by opposition or nullity action) has been made, parties may motion the infringement court to stay the infringement procedure until the "A fundamental feature of the German legal system is that patent infringement and validity proceedings are bifurcated - that is, the patent infringement action and an action on validity are heard in separate instances and by two different, specialised courts." opposition/nullity procedure has reached a first instance decision on the validity of the patent in dispute, or even has come to a final decision. German infringement courts are obliged by law to assume the validity of the patent, and cannot hear validity arguments raised by the defendant in the infringement proceedings or in claim interpretation. Moreover, the court will typically not grant a preliminary injunction in preliminary proceedings if the defendant has initiated nullity proceedings or otherwise argued that the patent in question has doubtful validity. 1-2/2013 China IP 69
3 Further, the action cannot be dismissed based on a lack of validity of the plaintiff s patent. Thus, a defendant wishing to contest the validity of the plaintiff s patent must file a separate opposition or nullity action. In view of such pending opposition or nullity actions and a request by the defendant, the civil court can in principle render a decision to stay the infringement proceedings after the initial oral proceedings until a resolution has been reached. In practice, this rarely occurs, with fewer than ten percent of cases stayed in view of a pending nullity action. Of these cases, the general rule has been that the decision to stay infringement proceedings only occurs if the defendant introduces a new evidence which is clearly novel, which would definitively resolve the dispute and which was not previously considered during examination of the patent in question. This differs from the case of staying of infringement action in the appeal state, during which appeals in infringement proceedings are often stayed until the decision on a parallel opposition or nullity suit is final. III. Infringement Proceedings Pre-Trial Phase Patent protection in Germany is conferred from the publication of the grant of a German national patent (Section 58 (1) PatG), as well as from the grant of an European Patent for which German designation has been confirmed (Art. 97 (4) EPC). If a patent rights proprietor feels that his rights have been compromised, he may directly file an infringement action with the court, or serve a notice and warning to cease infringement letter on the suspected infringer before filing the writ of claims. One peculiarity of German Civil Procedural Law dictates that if the patent proprietor files an infringement action without notifying the infringer and the infringer immediately acknowledges the patent rights, the patent proprietor must bear the costs of the proceeding. These include the court fees, as well as the attorney fees of both parties. Thus, direct filing without a prior warning letter bears a degree of cost risk in Germany which, in principle, encourages the warning letter as a common practice. This warning letter is typically comprised of a short, non-detailed or technical explanation of the patent which has allegedly been infringed, a request to sign a cease and desist declaration as well as requests for "German Infringement courts are obliged by law to assume the validity of the patent, and cannot hear validity arguments raised by the defendant in the infringement proceedings or in claim interpretation." the disclosure of information, destruction of infringing items, payment of damages and compensation or cost reimbursement. After receipt of the letter, the two parties may enter into negotiations to resolve the issue. However, the lack of a sufficient response would suffice for the plaintiff the file a writ of claims without having to bear the costs of the proceedings. On the other hand, the practice of approaching an alleged infringer before initiating court proceedings brings its own risks. Faced with an accusation by the patent proprietor, the alleged infringer may initiate an action in another court in a European country, often where court proceedings are known to be quite slow, for a declaration of non-infringement involving the same parties and subject matter of litigation. Snidely termed the Italian Torpedo, after proceedings in Italian courts which, were formerly notoriously lengthy, this line of defence prevents a quick infringement proceeding and decision because Art. 27 (1) European Directive 44/2001 prevents the patent proprietor from continuing proceedings as long as the Torpedo Court remains undecided about its competence in the matter at hand, a process which can take up to seven years. However, the court selected as the place to launch the torpedo must have a clear relationship with the territory of the relevant member state. Otherwise there is a clear lack of jurisdiction and the declaration of noninfringement will be inadmissible and incapable of preventing a later patent infringement proceeding in Germany. Therefore, a patent right owner must first consider the likelihood of an infringer resorting to the Torpedo defence before serving a cease and desist letter. If it is likely, then the proprietor should directly file an action with the appropriate civil court and send the warning letter immediately after. In the alternative, the right owner should send the warning letter immediately before filing the civil action in order to avoid the cost risks of immediate acknowledgement. Selecting a Court Under German law, a civil court has jurisdiction over the physical location of where the infringement took place, including where there were offers concerning infringing products, as well as at the business seat of the defendant. Because offers for sale over the internet fall under these criteria, German law allows the plaintiffs in industries which are affected by offers via internet sale to effectually pick any of the available forums in which to plead their case. Once selected and having received the writ of claims, the court will serve the defendant with the writ of claims. Time frames and procedures will vary, however in the court of Düsseldorf, in many cases the first oral hearing takes place approximately four to six weeks after the claim has been served. Formalities and procedural issues compose the bulk of this oral hearing terms for filing defence as well as counterarguments (Replik) and the second defence (Duplik) are set in this initial oral hearing, and the date for main oral proceedings is fixed. In other courts, preliminary written proceedings substitute 70
4 for these first oral hearings, and the date for main oral proceedings is typically only fixed after the defence writ. The Writ of Claims A writ of claims ( complaint ) in Germany filed by the plaintiff typically begins with a short introduction of the parties, as well as a descriptive introduction of the invention, patent claims, and prior art. A claim analysis is conducted after this section, followed by a description of the allegedly infringing embodiment or process as well as a comparison of the claim with the allegedly infringing embodiment or process. The Defence and Subsequent Exchange of Writs In response to the writ of claim, the defendant will file a complete defence writ responding to the plaintiff s accusations. Failing to do so implies the immediate risk of the court rendering a judgement by default. After receipt of this defence writ, the plaintiff will file additional arguments in support of his infringement claim, as well as comments on the defendant s defence arguments. The defendant will then have the option to file a second defence writ in response to the plaintiff s additional arguments. In most cases no further writs are admitted after this second defence writ. The German legal system is very strict on timelines for writs the terms for filing writs are clearly fixed by the court, and requests for extensions are rarely granted. Prior to the Oral Hearing All facts and evidence must be presented in writing prior to oral hearing. Parties must concentrate their arguments on the main topics of disagreement. Often, only one or two features of the relevant claim are disputed. The plaintiff must demonstrate that all features of the relevant claim of the patent in dispute are realized by the defendant s item or process. The defendant must show that at least one feature is not realized. Additionally, the procedure for gathering evidence is another aspect which differs in the German legal system. No depositions are allowed into evidence, and each party must present all evidence in support of its claims and statements, as well as on the disputed facts, in the form of exhibits sent to the court. The court does not investigate facts autonomously, but completely relies on the facts and evidence presented by the parties. Parties may name witnesses, but witness statements are rarely given much weight by the court, there is no cross examination process, and witness statements are rarely sworn in. In addition, parties may present expert opinions and test results, but a court typically does not order expert testimony unless the two parties present contradictory expert statements (in Düsseldorf this occurs in less than 10% of the cases). On technical issues, the court typically relies on its own depth of technical insight and experience to render its decision. A consequence of the lack of court autonomous investigations is that the burden of proof is on the patent proprietor to verify that an alleged infringer has unlawfully exploited his patent by manufacturing, offering for sale, leasing, importing and exporting, or using the product or process claimed in the patent. This entails two parts proprietor must submit facts and evidence supporting that the invention as understood from the teachings of the claim has been used, as well as the details of the infringement in case the alleged infringer refutes the alleged infringement as such. For method or process patents, however, the burden is on the alleged infringer to prove that a new product which is suspected to be produced by a patented process was, in fact, not manufactured using the patented method. Oral Hearings and Enforcement of First Instance Infringement Judgements To commence, the presiding judge gives a short introduction of the case which focuses on the features of the patent disputed between the parties. In addition, the presiding judge follows with the court s preliminary opinion based on the parties writs, and then the parties may comment on the issues in dispute. The attorney at law usually takes the leading role in the pleading. However, there is no extensive pleading; the pleading is typically focused on key issues and directed by the court. Typically, in cases of normal complexity, the duration of the oral proceedings ( trial ) does not exceed one hour, with 1-2 hours generally considered as sufficient for more complex cases. Following the parties pleading, the court will render a decision. If witnesses need to be heard or an expert opinion is required by the court appointed expert, a new oral hearing will be summoned. Parties will once again have the opportunity to file writs and comment on the results of the oral proceedings, comment on the statements of the court expert, etc. The court can also decide to stay proceedings in view of pending nullity actions. However, this is rarely done. Over 90% of the time, the Düsseldorf and the Mannheim court will render a judgment within a few days, or a maximum of about four weeks, after oral hearing, and finally the written grounds will be issued a few weeks after that at the latest. This ensuing judgement is then formally served to both parties. If the Court finds patent infringement in the first instance, judgement is declared to be preliminarily enforceable. This means that the plaintiff can enforce the cease and desist order after making an initial, substantial security deposit. However, if the judgement is later lifted in an appeal, the plaintiff must pay damage compensation to the defendant for wrongfully enforcing the first instance judgement. Moreover, the defendant may rely on the plaintiff s security deposit for covering his damage compensation claims. Appeal of First Instance Judgement As initially stated, the losing party may file an appeal to the Court of Appeals ( Oberlandesgericht ). The appellate deadline is one month after the first instance judgment has been served. In this appeal, both factual and legal appeal grounds are admissible. However, there is a restriction on the introduction of new facts which were not available during first instance. If grounds are not available at the end 1-2/2013 China IP 71
5 of one month after the first instance judgement has been served, the maximum, non-extendable term during which the appeal may be filed is 6 months after judgement. However, a formal appeal without grounds is possible. Grounds of appeal are due one month after the expiration of the appellate deadline. This one month term is extendable. After the losing party has filed the appeal, the Court of Appeals will review and re-evaluate all facts and legal opinions of the first instance court. Usually, there are four writs exchanged between the parties, with terms set by the appellate court. An oral hearing is held twelve months after the appeal. Oral Proceedings and the Judgement in Appeals The proceedings are very similar to the first instance in that only disputed features are discussed, witnesses are rarely heard, and expert opinions are rarely obtained. If opposition or nullity actions are pending at the time of oral proceedings the appeal court will in most cases stay the infringement case until after oral proceedings, provided that the court finds infringement. At this stage a stay of proceedings is much more likely to be obtained by the defendant, since the plaintiff, having obtained a favourable judgement in the first instance and being able to preliminarily enforce this judgement, is now in a sufficiently secured position, so that a final decision regarding the validity of the patent can be awaited without depriving the plaintiff of his right to enforce a granted patent. After the oral hearing, and if the infringement case is not being stayed in view of pending opposition or nullity action, judgement is rendered. The court can fully or partially confirm the first instance decision or overrule the civil court and reverse its judgement. An appeal judgement may be enforced without security deposit, even if a further appeal should be filed. Further Appeal to Federal Court of Justice A further appeal against the judgement of the court of appeals can be filed with the Federal Court of Justice ( Bundesgerichtshof ) only if the court of appeals grants express permission. This only happens if the case is of principal importance or if the appeal judgement is not in line with existing case law of the Federal Court of Justice. In the majority of cases the judgement rendered by the court of appeals is final. If a further appeal is admitted in the appeal judgement and indeed filed by the losing party, no new facts and evidence can be presented, the Federal Court of Justice will solely concentrate on a legal review of the case. If this court should find an insufficient factual basis for rendering a decision the case will be transferred back to the court of appeals. Otherwise the Federal Court of Justice will render a final judgement which cannot be appealed. 72
Patent Litigation. Quick Guide to Proceedings in Germany HEUKING KÜHN LÜER WOJTEK
Patent Litigation Quick Guide to Proceedings in Germany HEUKING KÜHN LÜER WOJTEK Table of Contents I. Advantages of litigating in Germany 3 II. Patent Litigation System 4 III. Infringement and Nullity
More informationIP-Litigation in Germany. German and European Patent, Trademark and Design Attorneys Lawyers
IP-Litigation in Germany German and European Patent, Trademark and Design Attorneys Lawyers What is a litigation team in Germany? In contrast to litigation procedures in certain jurisdictions, in particular
More informationPatent Litigation in Europe - Presence and Future
Patent Litigation in Europe - Presence and Future Innovation Support Training Program (ISTP) Module 2 / November 27, 2006 Christian W. Appelt German and European Patent and Trademark Attorney Patent Litigation
More informationPatents in Europe 2013/2014
In association with Unitary patent and Unified Patent Court: the proposed framework Rainer K Kuhnen Patents in Europe 2013/2014 Helping business compete in the global economy Unitary patent and Unified
More informationPatents in Europe 2015/2016
In association with The proposed structure of the Unified Patent Court system in Europe Rainer K Kuhnen, KUHNEN & WACKER Intellectual Property Law Firm Patents in Europe 2015/2016 Helping business compete
More informationLigitation process in Denmark 1. Litigation process in Denmark. A brief summary of the procedures and workings of the litigation process in Denmark.
Ligitation process in Denmark 1 Litigation process in Denmark A brief summary of the procedures and workings of the litigation process in Denmark. Litigation process in Denmark 2 Content Who will handle
More informationDesign Protection in Europe
Design Protection in Europe www.bardehle.com 2 Content 5 Requirements for design protection in Europe 5 Overlap of design law and other IP rights 6 Design law in Germany and international design law 6
More informationCIVIL TRIAL RULES. of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS. Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS. Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...
CIVIL TRIAL RULES of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS Addendum to Local Rules Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...2 Rule 1.11 Annual Calendar...3
More informationInspections and Access to Evidence in
Inspections and Access to Evidence in Patent Litigation 10 th Annual Conference on Intellectual Property Law & Policy at Fordham IP Law Institute April, 12 th 2012, New York by Dr. Klaus Grabinski Judge
More informationGLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS
GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS Sources: US Courts : http://www.uscourts.gov/library/glossary.html New York State Unified Court System: http://www.nycourts.gov/lawlibraries/glossary.shtml Acquittal A
More informationSingapore International Commercial Court Practice Directions (Amendment No. 1 of 2016) Part X: Originating Processes and Documents
Singapore International Commercial Court Practice Directions (Amendment No. 1 of 2016) Part X: Originating Processes and Documents 66A. Timelines for proceedings commenced by Writ of Summons and by Originating
More informationA guide to patent litigation
A guide to patent litigation Spain Freshfields Freshfields Bruckhaus Bruckhaus Deringer Deringer llp llp A guide to patent litigation in Spain a Spanish patent proceedings provide options and tools for
More informationExecutive summary and overview of the national report for Denmark
Executive summary and overview of the national report for Denmark Section I Summary of findings There is no special legislation concerning damages for breach of EC or national competition law in Denmark,
More informationBylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association. Enacted November 18, 2015
Bylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association Enacted November 18, 2015 Preamble and Purpose 1.) Background. Under Rule V, Section 5 of the
More informationIP Litigation in Europe and in Germany
& P A R T N E R P A T E N T A T T O R N E Y S D Ü S S E L D O R F M U N I C H IP Litigation in Europe and in Germany Dr. Dirk Schulz Outline - Patent litigation in Europe - German patent litigation system
More informationCase 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA HOWARD L. HOWELL, Lead Plaintiff, ELLISA PANCOE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others
More informationThe trademark lawyer as brand manager
The trademark lawyer as brand manager This text first appeared in the IAM magazine supplement Brands in the Boardroom 2005 May 2005 For further information please visit www.iam-magazine.com Feature The
More informationv. Civil Action No. 10-865-LPS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE GIAN BIOLOGICS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 10-865-LPS BIOMET INC. and BIOMET BIOLOGICS, LLC, Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER At Wilmington
More informationNorway Advokatfirmaet Grette
This text first appeared in the IAM magazine supplement Patents in Europe 2008 April 2008 Norway By Amund Brede Svendsen and Svein Ruud Johansen, Advokatfirmaet Grette, Oslo 1. What options are open to
More informationProf. Dr. Harald Jatzke Judge at the Supreme Tax Court, Munich. Selected Procedural Issues
Prof. Dr. Harald Jatzke Judge at the Supreme Tax Court, Munich Selected Procedural Issues I. Recusal of a judge from a case II. Opinion process III. Expert evidence IV. Sanctions (refusal to admit comments
More informationStrategies for Worldwide Patent Litigation. Moderator: John R. Thomas Panelists: Trevor M. Cook, Jamison E. Lynch, Mark D. Selwyn
Strategies for Worldwide Patent Litigation Moderator: John R. Thomas Panelists: Trevor M. Cook, Jamison E. Lynch, Mark D. Selwyn Global IP Litigation Strategy: Why Is It Important? Trend toward globalization
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE In the Matter of a ) Uniform Pretrial Order ) ) Administrative Order 3AO-03-04 (Amended) UNIFORM PRETRIAL ORDER In order
More informationPersonal Injury Litigation
Personal Injury Litigation The Anatomy of a New York Personal Injury Lawsuit An ebook by Stuart DiMartini, Esq. 1325 Sixth Avenue, 27 th Floor New York, NY 10019 212-5181532 dimartinilaw.com Introduction
More informationTEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PART V - RULES OF PRACTICE IN JUSTICE COURTS Adopted by the Supreme Court of Texas Justice Court, Pct 1 1 of 24 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. GENERAL... 6 RULE 523. DISTRICT
More informationRULE 63 DIVORCE AND FAMILY LAW
RULE 63 DIVORCE AND FAMILY LAW Definitions (1) In this rule, Application claim for relief includes a child support order, a spousal support order, a custody order, a property order, and corollary relief
More informationHow To Process A Small Claims Case In Anarizonia
What is a small claims division? Every justice court in Arizona has a small claims division to provide an inexpensive and speedy method for resolving most civil disputes that do not exceed $2,500. All
More informationA Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients
A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients by: Jennifer Loeb Clark Wilson LLP tel. 604.891.7766 jrl@cwilson.com Edited by: Larry Munn Clark Wilson LLP
More informationYearbook. Building IP value in the 21st century. Beyond the unitary patent: nothing new under the sun?
Beyond the unitary patent: nothing new under the sun? Anna Barlocci and Mathieu de Rooij, ZBM Patents & Trademarks Yearbook 2015 Building IP value in the 21st century 12 13 14 ZBM Patents & Trademarks
More informationRULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES
LOCAL RULES FOR FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI [Renumbered and codified by order of the Supreme Court effective May 18, 2006; amended effective April 23, 2009.] RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES
More informationRULES OFTHE COURT OF ARBITRATION IN MATTERS CONCERNING INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES AT THE POLISH CHAMBER OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
RULES OFTHE COURT OF ARBITRATION IN MATTERS CONCERNING INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES AT THE POLISH CHAMBER OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS The following provisions constitute the Rules Court of
More informationPresent Situation of IP Disputes in Japan
Present Situation of IP Disputes in Japan Feb 19, 2014 Chief Judge Toshiaki Iimura 1 1 IP High Court established -Apr.1.2005- l Appeal cases related to patent rights etc. from district courts nationwide
More informationWHEN ARE SECURITIES CLASS ACTIONS DISMISSED, WHEN DO THEY SETTLE, AND FOR HOW MUCH? PART II
PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY UNDERWRITING SOCIETY J March As part of our education mission, the PLUS Foundation supports research important to professional liability at seven top insurance universities across
More informationJUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961
JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961 SMALL CLAIMS INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING ***EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,
More informationU.S. Litigation (Strategic Preparations and Statistics)
U.S. Litigation (Strategic Preparations and Statistics) Thomas K. Scherer Federal and State Court, ITC actions Considerations of speed and remedies involved Eastern District of Texas Considerations of
More informationLegal FAQ: Introduction to Patent Litigation
Legal FAQ: Introduction to Patent Litigation by charlene m. morrow and dargaye churnet 1. Who enforces a patent? The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office grants a patent. Contrary to popular belief, a patent
More informationATTORNEY-CLIENT CONTRACT. The Firm has agreed to represent you in a case involving.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT CONTRACT The Undersigned, sometimes referred to as Client and Peterson Law Group, sometimes hereinafter referred to as Firm hereby enter into the following contract and agreement regarding
More informationAdvice Note. An overview of civil proceedings in England. Introduction
Advice Note An overview of civil proceedings in England Introduction There is no civil code in England; English civil law comprises of essentially legislation by Parliament and decisions by the courts.
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. L- IN RE: MIDDLESEX ASBESTOS LITIGATION CIVIL ACTION ASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. L- IN RE: MIDDLESEX ASBESTOS LITIGATION CIVIL ACTION ASBESTOS LITIGATION GENERAL ORDER I. COMPLAINTS A. All complaints must: 1. Include
More informationGlobal Guide to Competition Litigation Poland
Global Guide to Competition Litigation Poland 2012 Table of Contents Availability of private enforcement in respect of competition law infringements and jurisdiction... 1 Conduct of proceedings and costs...
More informationSMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.
SMALL CLAIMS RULES Rule 501. Scope and Purpose (a) How Known and Cited. These rules for the small claims division for the county court are additions to C.R.C.P. and shall be known and cited as the Colorado
More informationCase4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION
Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION STANDING ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANDIS A. WESTMORE (Revised
More informationINFORMATION FOR FILING AND DEFENDING A CIVIL CASE IN JUSTICE COURT
PINAL COUNTY Apache Junction Justice Court Eloy Justice Court Superior/Kearny Justice Court Maricopa/Stanfield Justice Court JUSTICE COURTS Casa Grande Justice Court Florence/Coolidge Justice Court Mammoth/San
More informationCase 2:10-cv-00802-CW Document 90 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 2:10-cv-00802-CW Document 90 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION MURIELLE MOLIERE, Plaintiff, v. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE, et al., Defendants.
More informationIf you have been sued as a defendant in a civil case...keep reading.
If you have been sued as a defendant in a civil case...keep reading. Court procedures can be complex. This brochure was developed to help Ohioans who are considering representing themselves in court. It
More information7.3 PREHEARING CONFERENCES AND SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES
7.3 PREHEARING CONFERENCES AND SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES 7.3.1 Prehearing Conferences A contested case is commenced when the notice of and order for hearing or other authorized pleading is served by the agency.
More informationARBITRATION RULES OF THE COURT OF ARBITRATION AT THE POLISH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
ARBITRATION RULES OF THE COURT OF ARBITRATION AT THE POLISH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Chapter I Introductory provisions 1 Court of Arbitration 1. The Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce (the
More informationHON. GEORGE E. PATAKI, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, et al.,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------X JOHN DOE, RICHARD ROE, AND SAMUEL POE, individually and on behalf of all other persons
More informationRules of the Court of Arbitration. of the Central Securities Depository of Poland (KDPW) I. General provisions
Rules of the Court of Arbitration of the Central Securities Depository of Poland (KDPW) I. General provisions 1. Jurisdiction and organisation of the Court of Arbitration of the Central Securities Depository
More informationSPECIAL CIVIL A GUIDE TO THE COURT
NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY SPECIAL CIVIL A GUIDE TO THE COURT Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division Special Civil Part Special Civil A Guide to the Court page 1 Special Civil is a court of limited jurisdiction
More informationDebt collection in Russia
By Andrey Zelenin, Lidings Law Firm Debt collection in Russia Foreign companies doing business in Russia generally have several main options of dispute resolution to choose: (i) international commercial
More informationRule 60A - Child and Adult Protection
Rule 60A - Child and Adult Protection Scope of Rule 60A 60A.01(1) This Rule is divided into four parts and it provides procedure for each of the following: (c) (d) protection of a child, and other purposes,
More informationControlling costs in patent litigation Received (in revised form): 12 th April 2010
Intellectual Property Management Controlling costs in patent litigation Received (in revised form): 12 th April 2010 Catherine Rajwani is an intellectual property lawyer and a registered patent attorney.
More informationRULES OF THE GEORGIAN SECURITIES CENTRAL SECURITIES DEPOSITORY ON SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES
Approved: by the General Meeting of Georgian Securities Central Depository October 25, 1999 RULES OF THE GEORGIAN SECURITIES CENTRAL SECURITIES DEPOSITORY ON SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES TBILISI 1999 Introduction
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN The following provisions apply to civil cases filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana that are not exempt from filing
More informationDESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS
DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS This pamphlet has been provided to help you better understand the federal
More informationA Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal
A Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal Presented by the Office of the Richmond County District Attorney Acting District Attorney Daniel L. Master, Jr. 130 Stuyvesant
More informationA Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process
A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process Office of Victims Services California Attorney General s Office A Victim s Guide to the Capital Case Process Office of Victims Services California Attorney
More informationInternational Patent Litigation and Jurisdiction. Study of Hypothetical Question 1 Under the Hague Draft Convention and Japanese Laws
International Patent Litigation and Jurisdiction Study of Hypothetical Question 1 Under the Hague Draft Convention and Japanese Laws Yoshio Kumakura Attorney at Law Nakamura & Partners 1 The 1999 Draft
More informationRULE 39 OFFER TO SETTLE
RULE 39 OFFER TO SETTLE Definitions (1) In this rule: Where available "defendant" includes "respondent"; "double costs" means double the fees allowed under Rule 60(2) and includes the disbursements allowed
More informationThe Court of Protection Rules 2007
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2007 No. 1744 (L. 12) MENTAL CAPACITY, ENGLAND AND WALES The Court of Protection Rules 2007 Made - - - - - 25th June 2007 Laid before Parliament 4th July 2007 Coming into force -
More informationRule 82.1 Who May Appear as Counsel; Who May Appear Pro Se
Rule 82.1 Who May Appear as Counsel; Who May Appear Pro Se Only members of the bar of this Court may appear as counsel in civil cases. Only individuals who are parties in civil cases may represent themselves.
More informationThe Foundation of the International Association of Defense Counsel SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION PROCEDURES: A REFERENCE GUIDE
Responses submitted by: Name: Roddy Bourke Law Firm/Company: McCann FitzGerald Location: Dublin, Ireland 1. Would your jurisdiction be described as a common law or civil code jurisdiction? The Republic
More informationAn Enhanced European Patent System
An Enhanced European Patent System The Select Committee The Preparatory Committee An Enhanced European Patent System In December 2012 the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament agreed
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Hoover v. Hi Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc. Case No. EDCV 13 00097 JGB (OPx) If you purchased a product manufactured by Hi Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc., called Nasal Ease
More informationSELECT SERVICES FLAT FEE REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT page 1 of 8
Utah Family Law, LC Tel. No. 801-466-9277 E-mail: eric@divorceutah.com Attorney Eric K. Johnson - Attorney Russell W. Hartvigsen Mail: 2666 South 2000 East, Suite 101 Salt Lake City Utah 84109 REMEMBER:
More informationWhat Trustees Should Know About Florida s New Attorneys Fee Statute. By David P. Hathaway and David J. Akins. Introduction
What Trustees Should Know About Florida s New Attorneys Fee Statute By David P. Hathaway and David J. Akins Introduction More and more lawsuits are filed in Florida alleging that the trustee of a trust
More informationCase3:12-cv-05980-CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12
Case:-cv-00-CRB Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 0 IN RE HP SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: All Actions MASTER
More informationRule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state;
Rule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. 1. Application of rule. (a) This rule applies to: (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state; (2) All actions or proceedings
More informationThe revival of crossborder
The revival of crossborder injunctions The European Court of Justice recently breathed new life into the phenomenon of cross-border injunctions a cost-effective tool originally developed by the Dutch courts
More informationINTRODUCTION TO SMALL CLAIMS COURT TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION TO SMALL CLAIMS COURT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TO SUE OR NOT TO SUE? HOW TO FILE A SMALL CLAIMS CASE WHERE TO FILE FILING FEE NOTICE TO THE DEFENDANT COUNTERCLAIMS PREPARING FOR TRIAL
More informationGeneral District Courts
General District Courts To Understand Your Visit to Court You Should Know: It is the courts wish that you know your rights and duties. We want every person who comes here to receive fair treatment in accordance
More informationCase: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365
Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CAPITAL ONE TELEPHONE CONSUMER
More informationThe Circuit Court. Judges and Clerks. Jurisdiction
The Circuit Court The circuit court is the trial court of general jurisdiction in Virginia, and the court has authority to try a full range of both civil and criminal cases. Civil cases involve disputes
More informationCase 1:14-cv-13477-FDS Document 64 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:14-cv-13477-FDS Document 64 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS RICHARD MEYER and KATHLEEN LEONE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS PART FIVE - LAW DIVISION AMENDED COURT RULES RULE 1. MEDIATION IN MALPRACTICE CASES In order to alleviate the burden to the parties
More informationGUIDELINES FOR ATTORNEYS TAXATION OF COURT COSTS IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
GUIDELINES FOR ATTORNEYS TAXATION OF COURT COSTS IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO The purpose of these guidelines is to explain the standard and customary practices of the Clerk s Office of the United
More informationRULES FOR RESOLUTION OF.PL DOMAIN NAME DISPUTES OF THE COURT OF ARBITRATION AT THE POLISH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
RULES FOR RESOLUTION OF.PL DOMAIN NAME DISPUTES OF THE COURT OF ARBITRATION AT THE POLISH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Chapter I Introductory provisions 1 Application of Rules 1. Disputes over infringement of rights
More informationSENATE BILL 1486 AN ACT
Senate Engrossed State of Arizona Senate Forty-fifth Legislature First Regular Session 0 SENATE BILL AN ACT AMENDING SECTION -, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, AS AMENDED BY LAWS 00, CHAPTER, SECTION ; AMENDING
More informationComputing and Extending Time; Time. The following rules apply in
AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Rule 6. Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers (a) Computing Time. The following rules apply in computing any time period specified in these
More informationOSCAR ROBERTSON, et al., 70 Civ. 1526 (RLC) Plaintiffs,
NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT OFFICE OF THE CLERK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------X OSCAR ROBERTSON, et al., 70 Civ. 1526 (RLC) Plaintiffs,
More informationCreditor Lawsuits Handbook
Creditor Lawsuits Handbook In Magisterial District Court A Handbook for people dealing with creditor lawsuits, including information on such suits and common defenses. Revised July 2009 Introduction This
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
More informationAny civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS 36.405.
CHAPTER 13 Arbitration 13.010 APPLICATION OF CHAPTER (1) This UTCR chapter applies to arbitration under ORS 36.400 to 36.425 and Acts amendatory thereof but, except as therein provided, does not apply
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBRA R. JOYNER, Appellant, CASE NO.: 2012-CV-000003-A-O Lower Case No.: 2010-CC-010676-O v. ONE THOUSAND OAKS, INC.,
More informationRules of Procedure ( Rules ) of the Unified Patent Court
18 th draft of 1 st July 2015 Rules of Procedure ( Rules ) of the Unified Patent Court Preliminary set of provisions for the Status 1. First draft dated 29 May 2009 discussed in expert meetings on 5 June
More informationNotice of Class Action Lawsuit and Proposed Settlement. You May be Entitled to Receive a Settlement Payment.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Notice of Class Action Lawsuit and Proposed Settlement. You May be Entitled to Receive a Settlement Payment. A federal court authorized this
More informationCivil Suits: The Process
Jurisdictional Limits The justice courts have exclusive jurisdiction or the authority to hear all civil actions when the amount involved, exclusive of interest, costs and awarded attorney fees when authorized
More informationEfficient alternative dispute resolution (ADR) for intellectual property disputes
13.1 Efficient alternative dispute resolution (ADR) for intellectual property disputes More and more rights holders are recognizing the benefits of using private neutral mechanisms that allow parties to
More informationJUDICIAL BRANCH MEMORANDUM. Re: New Hampshire Superior Court Civil Rules Effective October 1, 2013
JUDICIAL BRANCH MEMORANDUM To: Attorneys; Legal Assistants; Litigants From: Patricia A. Lenz, Superior Court Administrator Julie W. Howard, Strafford Superior Court Clerk Date: Updated December 16, 2013
More informationWhat to Expect In Your Lawsuit
What to Expect In Your Lawsuit A lawsuit is a marathon not a sprint. Stewart R. Albertson. There is a saying that the wheels of justice move slowly. That is as true today as when it was initially stated.
More informationPreliminary Study on the Expert Evidence System under PRC Civil Procedure
Llinks Banking Law Bulletin May 2010 Preliminary Study on the Expert Evidence System under PRC Civil Procedure By Charles Qin and Tomy Xia In judicial practice, a party to a case which involves a highly
More informationReports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the
****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal
More informationFACT SHEET FOR JUDGE SAM SPARKS
FACT SHEET FOR JUDGE SAM SPARKS CIVIL CASES Contacting the Court 1. Who should be contacted regarding scheduling matters? Contact Linda Mizell, Judicial Assistant, at (512) 916-5230, and/or the law clerk
More informationSubchapter 7.200 Court of Appeals
in material prejudice to a party, the court shall specifically identify the agency s conclusions of law that are being reversed. Subchapter 7.200 Court of Appeals Rule 7.201 Organization and Operation
More informationSmall Claims Court Information provided by Oregon State Bar http://www.osbar.org/public/legalinfo/1061_smallclaims.htm
Community Alliance of Tenants Tenant Education Information is for general information purposes only, and is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney Small Claims Court Information provided by Oregon
More informationTable of Contents CLAUDIA MILBRADT 1 ANETTE GARTNER 3
Table of Contents 1. Introduction CLAUDIA MILBRADT 1 2. The European Patent with Unitary Effect and its Enforcement ANETTE GARTNER 3 2.1 Background 4 2.1.1 The European Patent: A "Bundle" of National Patents
More informationNo. 1-10-0602 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
SECOND DIVISION May 31, 2011 No. 1-10-0602 Notice: This order was filed under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under
More information19:13-2.1 Who may file
CHAPTER 13 SCOPE OF NEGOTIATIONS PROCEEDINGS Authority N.J.S.A. 34:13A-5.4d, 34:13A-11 and 34:13A-27. SOURCE AND EFFECTIVE DATE R.2011 d.238, effective August 11, 2011. See: 43 N.J.R. 1189(a), 43 N.J.R.
More informationAppeal Bonds, Sureties, and Stays
Appeal Bonds, Sureties, and Stays Appellate Lawyers Association April 22, 2009 Brad Elward Peoria Office The Effect of a Judgment A judgment is immediately subject to enforcement and collection. Illinois
More informationCIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE GARNISHMENT CHAPTER 77
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE GARNISHMENT CHAPTER 77 77.01 Right to writ of garnishment.--every person or entity who has sued to recover a debt or has recovered judgment in any court against any person
More information