3 1 Medical examinations and reports of claimants/plaintiffs on their own behalf 1. The solicitor, when writing to the doctor, should state that he or she is authorised by the client to request the medical report and should provide to the doctor: (a) The client s full name and surname; (b) the full address of the client at the date of the accident; (c) the present surname or address (if different); (d) the client s date of birth; (e) the name of the hospital (if any) and the date of admission. To ensure that the doctor can provide the report as soon as possible, solicitors should provide all of the above information accurately at the time the report is sought. 2. When making an application to the Injuries Board (previously known as the Personal Injuries Assessment Board or PIAB), it is not necessary that the report be in the form of the template prescribed by the Injuries Board. While many doctors find this format helpful and use the template accordingly, others do not wish to do so and it is not necessary to insist that the doctor use this format. 3. When communicating with the doctor or hospital, solicitors should request details of fees due by the client/patient to the doctor(s) or hospital so that these can be included in the claim. The doctor or hospital should give fee details in a separate letter i.e. fee details should not appear in the report sought. However, it should be explained to the doctor or hospital that seeking such details and including them in the claim is not a guarantee that the fees will be recovered, as this is a matter for the court to decide.
4 2 Protocol for direct referral to consultants by solicitors A solicitor has a professional duty to his client and to the court hearing the client s case, to fully present every aspect of the client s claim to the court. This is to ensure that the court is fully aware of all of the relevant details of all personal injuries suffered by the client which are the subject-matter of a claim and what effect these injuries have had on him to date and into the future. This information is crucial in order for the court to do justice between the parties. A medical witness is an expert witness who gives evidence to assist the court in determining the issues in dispute between the parties. There will be occasions when the client s treating doctor (who is often a general practitioner) will not have the expertise of a specialist and will not, by reason of that, be in a position to provide expert specialist evidence to the court. In those circumstances, where the client who has not already been referred to a specialist with the relevant expertise continues to complain of symptoms and sequelae from his injuries, it is in order for a solicitor, having regard to the professional duties already referred to, to advise his client to request his GP to refer him to a consultant who specialises in the relevant area or areas. If a GP is unwilling to make such a referral, the solicitor should then adopt the following procedure: 1. Write to the GP setting out the ongoing symptoms of which the client complains and requesting the GP to refer the client to an appropriate specialist; and 2. Request a response from the GP confirming referral within a period of 21 days and advising the GP that if confirmation of a referral is not received within 21 days, the solicitor intends writing directly to an appropriate consultant. 3. In the event that the GP refuses to confirm a referral to a specialist within 21 days, then the solicitor may write directly to an appropriate consultant requesting an appointment.
5 3 Of plaintiffs on behalf of defendants 1. A Plaintiff is obliged to submit to a medical examination by a doctor on behalf of the Defendant at any stage of proceedings, if requested. Such examinations are usually expressed to be on the usual terms and conditions. For the avoidance of doubt, these usual terms and conditions are:- (a) Such examinations should take place in consultation with the Plaintiff s doctor. The Defendant s solicitor should inform the examining doctor of the identity of the Plaintiff s doctor in the speciality (if any) relevant to the opinion sought. The Plaintiff s solicitor may inform the Plaintiff s doctor of the examination by the Defendant s doctor in advance of that examination. The Defendant s doctor should inform the Plaintiff s doctor either orally or in writing of the examination. In the past, if the Plaintiff s doctor was located within 25 miles of the surgery of the examining doctor, then he/she would endeavour to be physically present at the examination. While this may still be done, it now very rarely occurs in practice and should only be insisted upon where very good reason can be shown. In the event that it does occur, the Defendant or his insurance company should guarantee the Plaintiff s doctor s reasonable costs and expenses. (b) Prior to examination of the Plaintiff by the Defendant s doctor, the Plaintiff s doctor should provide to the Defendant s doctor a summary of the Plaintiff s medical notes relating to the injuries sustained (see paragraph relating to discovery/disclosure of medical records). The Plaintiff s doctor is entitled to charge a reasonable fee for providing this service. (c) It is not reasonable for a Plaintiff s solicitor to insist that the independent medical examination should take place at the rooms or practice of the Plaintiff s doctor unless it is completely inexpedient to do otherwise. (d) During the course of the examination, the Defendant s doctor should not ask any question regarding who was responsible for the accident, nor should the medical report refer to such matters. The doctor can, however, properly ask the client how the accident occurred if that is relevant to establishing the physical cause of the alleged injury. (e) The Defendant or insurance company, as the case may be, is also to be responsible for the reasonable costs and expenses of the Plaintiff s solicitors in co-ordinating the independent medical examination. 2. It is very important to note that the obligation to attend the examination by
6 4 the Defendant s doctor exists only where proceedings have been issued. No such requirement exists for a claimant prior to the issue of proceedings, either before or during the Injuries Board process. Up to this point, submitting to examination is entirely a matter for the claimant. This point was confirmed in the High Court decision of Domican -v- AXA  2 IR 682. Of claimants on behalf of the Injuries Board The Personal Injuries Assessment Board Act 2003 ( the 2003 Act ) sets out the circumstances in which a doctor nominated by PIAB s (now the Injuries Board) own medical panel may examine a claimant. If either the Respondent does not accept that the medical opinion furnished by the Claimant in relation to his/her injuries is correct, or if the assessors otherwise consider it appropriate to do so, then they may arrange a medical examination from a panel of doctors of their choosing. In practical terms, this occurs in the vast majority of cases. While no obligation exists for the Claimant to attend this doctor, Section 25 of the 2003 Act makes clear that there are consequences for failing to do so. Essentially, the assessors will assess the claim on the basis of the information in front of them and will proceed on the basis that, where the Respondent has asked for the examination, he is correct in not accepting the medical opinion furnished by the claimant, or, where the Injuries Board itself requests the examination, they will proceed in the absence of the information that the examination would have garnered. It should further be noted that no provision exists for the Injuries Board to provide expenses upfront for attendance at the examination by the panel doctor although such expenses may be claimed as an expense reasonably and necessarily incurred in accordance with the provisions of Section 44 of the 2003 Act. Such expenses may then be allowed, at the discretion of the Injuries Board, as part of the assessment. Contents of medical reports Whether a doctor writes a report on behalf of a Plaintiff or a Defendant/Insurance Company, the format of the medical report (unless dealing with a medical negligence action) concerning the nature, extent of, and prognosis for a Plaintiff s injury, will be similar. The medical report should, among other things, set out the following basic information:
7 5 a) The date of birth of the Plaintiff; b) The occupation of the Plaintiff (setting out where necessary or desirable the nature of it); c) A brief history of the accident, including the date of the accident; d) Details of the doctor s findings on examination; e) The nature of the treatment received by the Plaintiff for those injuries; f) The results of any X-rays, blood tests or other relevant examinations or investigations; g) Details of the Plaintiff s complaint at the date of the examination; h) Details of all relevant pre- and post-accident history; i) An opinion as to the then condition of the Plaintiff; j) The prognosis (including the likely duration of any symptoms and any additional treatment recommended and the likely effects on the patient s working capacity); k) Details of other doctors to whom the Plaintiff has been referred. Other observations about medical reports Facts relevant to who may or may not have been responsible for the accident should not be included in the report. Questions relating to the issue of negligence/liability should not be asked by the doctor of the Plaintiff during the course of the examination and/or included in the medical report prepared by the doctor. A doctor has a duty to provide a written medical report, sought on behalf of his or her patient within a reasonable time. As to what constitutes a reasonable period of time, guidance can be derived from the Medical Council s Guide to Ethical Conduct and Behaviour (6 th Edition, 2004, paragraph 8.3) which states: Undue delay in furnishing a medical report may amount to professional misconduct if such a delay results in the patient being disadvantaged. The report should be supplied within 2 months of the examination or receipt of a written request, whichever occurs last. As the Statute of Limitations in respect of most personal injury actions will now be a period of two years from the date of the injury, in cases where there is an undue delay in a medical report being provided by a doctor, the solicitor has a duty to draw this to the attention of the doctor so as to endeavour to avoid any prejudice occurring.
8 6 Reports should be factual and true and should not be influenced by the fee or by pressure from anyone to omit some details or to embellish others and strict accuracy must be observed. Reports should focus on the relevant medical issues only. Solicitors must be careful to avoid influencing the contents of a doctor s medical report (or whatever evidence the doctor may give in Court if he or she is called to give evidence). The doctor has a duty to provide his or her independent medical opinion on the matters the subject of the report. However, where there is a manifest error or misunderstanding on the facts in the doctor s report, it is proper for the solicitor to bring this to the attention of the doctor. The implications of the Civil Liability and Courts Act, 2004 Consideration should be given to, in appropriate cases, alerting the doctor to the obligations on the parties to swear a verifying Affidavit attesting to the accuracy of the alleged personal injuries set out in the Personal Injury Summons. In very many cases the allegations of personal injuries that are contained in the Summons will be based mainly, if not entirely, on the contents of the doctor s medical report. The severe sanctions specified in the Act, which could be imposed particularly on a Plaintiff for including inaccurate details of personal injuries in the Summons, make it imperative that the contents of medical reports are as accurate as possible. Disclosure of medical reports Disclosure pursuant to S.I. 391/1998 These Rules apply to High Court actions only (they do not apply to Circuit Court actions) and require compulsory exchange of experts reports by both parties, within specified time limits. A report in this context includes reports of a doctor, including reports in the form of a letter, or written statements from a doctor intended to be called to give evidence in relation to an issue in an action and containing the substance of the evidence which is intended to be given and includes any maps, drawings, photographs, graphs, charts, calculations or other like matter
9 7 referred to in any such report. The meaning of the phrase substance of the evidence which is intended to be given has been the subject of consideration by the Supreme Court in Payne v- Shovlin  1 IR 112 where the Court held that a preliminary report which was explicitly expressed to be not intended for disclosure and to be subject to review/modification of the doctor s opinion whenever other specialist reports were to hand, was nevertheless captured by the Disclosure Rules and had to be disclosed along with the doctor s later final opinion. The following are also deemed to be reports for the purposes of the Disclosure Rules: any report, including a report in the form of a letter, copy statement or copy letter, however made, recorded or retained and any originating document from any such doctor referred to above, the original of which has been concealed, destroyed, lost, mislaid or is not otherwise readily available. The rules for exchange are detailed and solicitors should always consult the text of the relevant statutory instrument before advising on their effect. When in doubt, a doctor should assume that the medical report and his correspondence with the solicitor commissioning the report may be subject to disclosure in some circumstances. Disclosure otherwise than pursuant to S.I. 391/ 1998 In some cases it may be a matter of legal professional judgment as to whether the report or any or all of its contents should be disclosed by a solicitor to his client. In such circumstances the doctor should advise the solicitor at the time of, or prior to, providing his report, of matters that in his opinion should not be disclosed to the client/patient. However, such cases would very much be the exception and a decision not to disclose the contents of the medical report to the client would need to be justified by strong, coherent, clear and logical reasons. No medical report or copy medical report should be provided by the doctor to any third party other than with the consent of the Plaintiff/patient or otherwise as required by law or directed by an Order of the Court. Where the court rules for compulsory disclosure and admission of reports do not apply, it is a matter for the individual professional judgment of the Plaintiff s solicitor in each case whether or not he/she wishes to provide a medical report to the opposing side. If the solicitor decides to do so, he or she should take account of the following matters:
10 8 a) Reports handed over by a solicitor to a solicitor on the opposing side on a Without Prejudice basis are not intended to be shown to the court. Without Prejudice should be written by the solicitor at the top of such reports as well as on the covering letter forwarding the report to ensure that the report is not mistakenly included in a book of bound medical reports presented to the Judge without the Plaintiff s or Defendant s solicitors knowledge. Note, however, that the provisions of Statutory Instrument 391/1998 may require the disclosure of such a report (see below); b) In recent times, a practice has developed whereby reports are handed over and it is then sought to have these reports admitted in evidence without formal proof. Essentially, this means that the report is admitted without the doctor being called to give evidence on the report. It should be borne in mind that the entire contents of the medical report are admitted in those circumstances. Disclosure/discovery of medical records A request for disclosure of a client s medical records often arises in circumstances where the Defendant s solicitor has sought to have the Plaintiff medically assessed by the Defendant s own medical team. The protocol between the Law Society and the Irish Medical Organisation known as examination on the usual terms and conditions referred to previously, did not cover this situation. The position was addressed in the Supreme Court decision in McGrory v- ESB  3 IR 407 from which the following principles can be drawn: 1. The Plaintiff who sues for damages for personal injuries, by implication necessarily waives the right of privacy that he/she would otherwise enjoy in relation to his/her medical condition. 2. The Defendant can seek sight of the relevant medical records prior to the pleadings being closed, regardless of their right to obtain same on discovery subsequently. 3. The court can stay proceedings where the Plaintiff refuses to submit to medical examination or disclose medical records to the Defendant or permit the Defendant to interview his/her treating doctor. 4. The judgment does not alter the position that medical reports that are cov-
11 9 ered by privilege may not be disclosed to the other side. 5. The judgement also does not absolve the solicitor of responsibility to obtain his client s consent to furnish medical records to the Defendant s solicitor. 6. Only medical records relevant to the claim should be furnished and this requirement should be read in conjunction with the provisions of S.I. 311/1999 relating to discovery, setting out the essential criteria of necessity and relevance. Professional negligence claims against doctors and hospitals Similar considerations to those above arise when a doctor is writing a report as an expert in a medical or clinical negligence action. An obvious difference arises in that the doctor may be asked to advise not only on the injury and prognosis but also on whether the treatment or care provided was of a sufficient standard. Given the typical inherent difficulty of such cases, it is critical that the information provided by the solicitor when requesting the report be as comprehensive as possible. When a Plaintiff is being medically examined by a doctor instructed by the Defendant s solicitor, care should be exercised by the Plaintiff s solicitor to warn his client not to answer questions which directly relate to issues of liability as it is inappropriate that questions should be asked or answered during the medical examination which bear directly on the issue of negligence/breach of duty. Issue of subpoenas on medical attendants It is important to be aware of the important function that the medical profession performs in society and, therefore, every effort should be made to accommodate medical practitioners in standby and attendance arrangements. However, there are certain circumstances in which it will not be possible to reach an agreement with respect to attendance in court and on such occasions, in the event that a medical practitioner refuses to attend, or refuses to confirm that he will attend, a subpoena will have to be served. On these occasions, a medical practitioner is entitled to the usual attendance fee as would be payable on taxation.
12 10 Fees (i) General As practitioners will be aware, all previous scales of fees and agreements brokered by the Law Society between the insurance industry and the medical profession have long since ceased to exist due to competition legislation considerations. As a result, the fees charged by different doctors who are members of different medical organisations is a source of continuing difficulty for solicitors. The principles of law governing the payment of these fees are those of principal and agent. This means that if a solicitor writes for a medical report on behalf of a client or requests the attendance of a medical practitioner at court to give evidence on behalf of the client, then the client, not the solicitor, is the person responsible for payment of the fees. The solicitor should not agree otherwise. The fee for the medical report must be a reasonable one reflecting its importance, length, complexity and any other relevant factors. Doctors must, however, take cognisance of their ethical duty to provide such a report at a reasonable cost, taking account of what their colleagues consider to be reasonable and what the Taxing Masters/County Registrars regard as reasonable. In practice, medical practitioners will usually write to the Plaintiff s solicitor stating that a medical report is available upon payment of the prescribed fee. In order to obtain the report, the solicitor will usually pay the prescribed fee and later bill the client for the costs of the report or may make his/her own arrangements with the client for the payment of outlays to discharge any medical report fees. It is not improper for the doctor to seek payment of his medical report fee in advance. If a medical practitioner issues a medical report upon request and later provides a bill for the cost of the report, the solicitor who requested the report should arrange with his or her client for payment for the report to be made within a reasonable time thereafter. The suggested period is 14 days. Some members of the medical profession now require solicitors to provide an undertaking to the effect that the solicitor will be responsible for the doctor s standby and court attendance fees (see below). The Society does not recommend that such undertakings be given and no obligation exists to provide one. However, where such an undertaking is given, the solicitor will be personally liable and failure to honour its terms is prima facie evidence of professional misconduct.
13 11 (ii) Standby Fees Where a doctor agrees to be on standby for court on a given date, this means that if called upon to attend court on that date, he or she will travel to attend court on that date if necessary. In the event that the case may take more than a day or may not be reached on the day it is listed, doctors should be asked to remain on standby until the case has been concluded. In those circumstances, it is essential that a doctor be informed immediately a case has been concluded, whether by settlement or otherwise, in order to ensure that no further unnecessary standby fees are incurred. Such standby arrangements mean that the doctor has to schedule his or her workload to take into account the possibility that it will be necessary to attend court at short notice. In accordance with the current practice of the Taxing Masters, an appropriate availability or standby fee should be payable in such circumstances, as follows: (a) For a court within 5 miles of the doctor s surgery, 25% of the day s usual court attendance fee; (b) For a court more than 5 miles from the doctor s surgery or hospital, 50% of the day s usual court attendance fee. (Exclusive in both cases of reasonable travelling expenses.) It is not required that a solicitor agree to a doctor charging for the cost of a locum where he/she is asked to be on standby as this fee is highly unlikely to be recovered on taxation. However, with the agreement of the client, such an arrangement may be made, on the understanding that the client will be liable for any balance due. (iii) Court Attendance Fees Court attendance fees are the daily fees charged by doctors for attending court to give evidence on behalf of a party. The amount of such fees is a matter for negotiation between the solicitor and doctor in each case. However, the solicitor must inform the client that where an attendance fee is charged which is in excess of what may be recovered on taxation, the client may have to be responsible for any balance due to the doctor. (iv) Responsibility for Treatment Fees Unless the solicitor acting for the Plaintiff expressly undertakes responsibility for the payment of treatment fees (whether out of his or her client s damages or otherwise), the liability for payment of such fees remains with the Plaintiff (i.e. the client/patient who received such treatment from the medical practitioner claiming payment of such fees). The same applies in respect of fees due to a hospital.
14 12 (v) Cost of Medical Reports The full cost of medical reports are often not recoverable either from the Injuries Board or on taxation. The Injuries Board frequently refuses to allow the full cost of some medical reports and often will not allow any costs where multiple reports have been obtained. Equally, while the Taxing Masters will generally allow a certain amount towards each report, it is often not the full amount paid for the report. Therefore, clients need to be made aware that they may be liable for any balance due in those circumstances.
15 13 Frequently asked questions Q: Is there currently a Law Society/medical profession/insurance industry agreed fee scale for medico-legal reports, stand-by, court attendance, provision of medical records? A: No. The Society brokered an agreement between the IIF and the IHCA (the IMO was not party to the arrangement) some years ago but this was abandoned due to Competition legislation considerations. The Society advises that practitioners make enquiries regarding fees in advance of seeking reports etc. Q: What are doctors generally charging for medico-legal reports at present? A: Anecdotal evidence would suggest that a standard report is charged out at Specialist reports (e.g. psychiatric reports) cost more, and highly specialised reports e.g. neurological, Hepatitis C, will cost substantially more again. Q: What can be done about a doctor who delays in producing a report? A: Write to the doctor, quoting the relevant section of the Medical Council s Guide to Ethical Conduct and Behaviour (6 th Edition, 2004, paragraph 8.3) regarding furnishing of medical reports. In certain circumstances, consideration should be given as to whether the client s doctor should be asked to refer the client/patient to another Consultant. Ultimately, it may be necessary to consider whether a complaint should be made to the Medical Council and the doctor advised accordingly. Q: Can the Society liaise with the Medical Council on behalf of a solicitor to resolve complaints informally without the need for a formal complaint being made by the solicitor? A: The Medical Council will only deal with complaints that are lodged through the formal complaints system. Q: Can a doctor insist that a solicitor (rather than a client/patient) pay for a medical report? Is a solicitor duty bound/obliged to pay for the report, given that the solicitor requested the report? A: No. There is no obligation on a solicitor to fund a client s case. A solicitor requesting such a report does so as agent for a disclosed principal. Therefore, liability for the fee rests with the client. However, if a solicitor gives an
16 14 undertaking to be responsible for the fee, then the solicitor is committed to doing so and breach of an undertaking is prima facie evidence of misconduct. Q: Can a doctor insist that a solicitor give an undertaking to pay his stand-by/ court attendance fee? Is there any legal or professional obligation on a solicitor to do so? A: The Society does not approve of the giving of such undertakings (see Practice Note in July/August 2002 Gazette). If a solicitor decides to give an undertaking, breach of it is prima facie evidence of misconduct. Solicitors should also be mindful of their duty to their clients to have all necessary witnesses present at the hearing of the action. Ultimately, although not desirable, it may be necessary for the solicitor to subpoena the doctor if there is any doubt as to whether the doctor will be in attendance. Q: Can the Freedom of Information legislation be used to obtain medical records from a doctor who is tardy in supplying them? A: No. The Freedom of Information provisions apply only to designated public bodies. Q: Can the Freedom of Information legislation be used to obtain a client s medical records from a hospital? A: Yes. The HSE and the voluntary hospitals are designated under the Act. Q: Where a client is involved in an RTA and is treated by a Consultant as a public patient in a public hospital and a medical report is requested from the Consultant, can the Consultant insist that the medico-legal report fee be made payable to him, not the hospital? A: The Society sought clarification from the Dept. of Health on this issue. In its view, a distinction should be made between cases where the Consultant has been responsible for the treatment of a public patient and is asked, for whatever reason, to produce a medical report and those cases where the Consultant has not treated the patient but is asked for an expert opinion. In the former case, the hospital should be paid the fee, in the latter case, the Consultant should retain the fee. The Consultants General Contract is silent on the issue but existing custom and practice holds that all medicolegal work may be regarded as private practice. Therefore, it is a matter for the hospital to decide whether to adopt the view expressed by the Dept. of Health or to accept custom and practice and allow the Consultant to claim the fee.
17 15 Q. Where a hospital seeks an undertaking from a solicitor to (a) include the hospital s costs in a personal injuries claim and (b) discharge the costs from the proceeds of the claim, are solicitors under an obligation to furnish such undertakings? A. The Society does not recommend the giving of undertakings to third parties whilst a claim is still within the PIAB process as, where proceedings have not issued, the solicitor cannot say with certainty that the proceeds of the claim will come into his/her hands. Thereafter, it is a matter for the solicitor to decide in the circumstances of each individual case whether he/she will furnish an undertaking and in what terms he/she is willing to do so. Solicitors may opt to undertake to include the hospital s costs in the claim but may decline to undertake responsibility for the discharge of same from the proceeds of the claim, as the discharge of such costs is a matter between the client/patient and the hospital.
18 16 Notes
19 17 Notes
20 November 2008 Law Society of Ireland Blackhall Place, Dublin 7 Tel: Fax: DX: 79 Dublin Website:
GUIDELINES FOR SOLICITORS DEALING WITH INJURIES BOARD CLAIMS 1 INTRODUCTION When the Personal Injuries Assessment Board (now known as the Injuries Board ) first came into being in 2004 following the passing
PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM GUIDE PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM GUIDE This booklet has been produced by D.J. Synnott Solicitors to give our clients an understanding of the personal injury compensation
GUIDE TO FUNDING YOUR MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CLAIM Because of the expert knowledge and depth of investigation required in order to bring a successful claim, negligence litigation can be expensive. Understandably,
Personal Injury Compensation Guide 2015 Personal Injury Compensation Claim Guide David J. Synnott This booklet has been produced by Synnott Lawline Solicitors to give our clients an understanding of the
EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS Affidavit: After the event litigation insurance: Application notice: Bar Council: Barrister: Basic Charges: Before the Event Legal Expenses Insurance: Bill of costs: Bolam test:
PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM GUIDE PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM GUIDE This booklet has been produced by D.J. Synnott Solicitors to give our clients an understanding of the personal injury compensation
Frequently asked questions Low Value Personal Injury Claims in Road Traffic Accidents Stage 2 Medical Reports Q35. Can insurers question the medical report? A35. The defendant/insurer cannot question the
MODEL DIRECTIONS FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES (2012) - before Master Roberts and Master Cook Introductory note. These are the Model Directions for use in the first Case Management Conference in clinical
New South Wales Motor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Amendment of Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 No 41 2 4 Amendment of other
MAKING A PERSONAL INJURIES CLAIM* GETTING STARTED DO I HAVE A CASE? The first step is to contact one of our experienced personal injuries solicitors and arrange a no obligation consultation. At the initial
PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS FROM 31 JULY 2013 Title Number I INTRODUCTION Definitions Para 1.1 Preamble Para 2.1 Aims Para 3.1 Scope Para 4.1 II GENERAL
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
PERSONAL INJURIES ASSESSMENT BOARD DATA PROTECTION CODE OF PRACTICE ADOPTED ON 9 th January 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1 Introduction...3 2 Glossary...3 3 Types of Personal Data held by Us...3 4 Obligations
http://websvr/textimagecreator (Text image creator to change heading) Pre action protocol for low value personal injury claims in road traffic accidents Contents SECTION I - INTRODUCTION Definitions Paragraph
MOTOR INSURER S BUREAU OF IRELAND COMPENSATION OF UNINSURED ROAD ACCIDENT VICTIMS Agreement dated 29th January 2009 between the Minister for Transport and the Motor Insurers Bureau of Ireland (MIBI) AGREEMENT
Personal Injury Accreditation Scheme Guidance In this guidance you can find: A. An introduction to the Accreditation Scheme B. Who is eligible to apply for membership? C. What types of membership are available?
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
Code of Practice on Data Protection for the Insurance Sector (Approved by the Data Protection Commissioner under Section 13 (2) of the Data Protection Acts, 1988 and 2003) Forward I am very happy to be
Accidents at Work Everything you need to know Falling from ladders, slipping on a wet floor, lifting a heavy item, cutting yourself on a machine. Even in the 21st Century the workplace is still dangerous
MEDICO-LEGAL RELATIONS A RESTATEMENT THE LAW SOCIETY OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND AUSTRALIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (NSW) LIMITED 1 March 2010 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. The role of the legal practitioner 3. The
HIGHLIGHTS AND LOWLIGHTS OF THE EL/PL PORTAL PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS (EMPLOYERS LIABILITY AND PUBLIC LIABILITY) CLAIMS Colin Richmond 11/04/2013 www.zenithchambers.co.uk
PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS Frequently Asked Questions 1. Can I make a claim? If you have been injured because of the fault of someone else, you can claim financial compensation through the courts. The dependants
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND PROTOCOL FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LITIGATION 1. Practitioners are reminded of the need to bear in mind the overriding objective set out at Order 1 rule 1(a)
PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY (EMPLOYERS LIABILITY AND PUBLIC LIABILITY) CLAIMS Contents SECTION I - INTRODUCTION Definitions Paragraph 1.1 Preamble Paragraph 2.1 Aims Paragraph 3.1
PART 1: Relations with Colleagues, Clients, Employers and Code of Ethics INTRODUCTION CODE OF ETHICS Membership of The Institution of Engineers of Ireland (Engineers Ireland) gives you rights and privileges.
Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims Introduction 1. The purpose of this guidance is to assist litigants, those instructing experts and experts to understand best practice in complying
STUDENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES This procedure applies to all cases of misconduct committed after 1 September 2009. Impartial advice about these procedures may be sought from the Student Progress Service,
Blue Care Income Protection Claim Form INCOME PROTECTION CLAIMS In order to alleviate any delay in the processing time of your claim, please ensure the following: The claim form is returned with all fields
Expert evidence A guide for expert witnesses and their clients (Second edition) Addendum, June 2009 1. Introduction 1.1 The second edition of this Guide was published in October 2003, in order to set out
Advice Note An overview of civil proceedings in England Introduction There is no civil code in England; English civil law comprises of essentially legislation by Parliament and decisions by the courts.
CAYMAN ISLANDS Supplement No. 3 published with Extraordinary No. 5, dated 22 January, 2009. THE COMPANIES WINDING UP RULES 2008 AJJ/999999/15644034v1 ORDER 1...12 CITATION, APPLICATION AND COMMENCEMENT...12
Draft Pre Action Protocol for claims for damages for mesothelioma Contents Introduction...2 1. Overview of Protocol General Aim...2 2. Intimation Letter...2 3. Letter of Claim...3 4. Defendant's Response...4
Bar Council response to the Reducing Legal Costs in Clinical Negligence Claims pre-consultation paper 1. This is the response of the General Council of the Bar of England and Wales (the Bar Council) to
APPLICATION CIVIL LITIGATION ASSISTANCE SCHEME CONDITIONS OF ASSISTANCE 1. Applications for funding under the Civil Litigation Assistance Scheme can only be submitted through a private legal practitioner
The 2007 Rehabilitation Code Introduction The aim of this code is to promote the use of rehabilitation and early intervention in the compensation process so that the injured person makes the best and quickest
STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR CLAIMANT EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL AND EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORK TREATED AS ANNEXED TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOLICITOR AND COUNSEL FOR CLAIMANT EMPLOYMENT
Dear Claimant We are sorry to learn of your illness/ injury. In order for us to process the claim, we require the following: 1. Critical Illness Form 2. Attending Physician s Statement 3. Copy of the Life
Mis-Sold Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) Claims Pack Debt Clear Solutions is delighted to enclose an information and application pack that will enable us to reclaim any mis-sold Payment Protection Insurance
Case Studies relating to privilege and solicitors Downloaded from the website of the Data Protection Commissioner on 26 th July, 2011. 6/2001 CASE STUDY 6/01 Legal firm identification of source of personal
Number 31 of 2004 CIVIL LIABILITY AND COURTS ACT 2004 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1 Preliminary and General Section 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation. 3. Orders and regulations. 4. Service
PRACTICE DIRECTION NUMBER 11 OF 2012 SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND SUPERVISED CASE LIST 1. Practice Direction No 6 of 2000 is hereby repealed. 2. This Practice Direction is intended to (a) provide some explanation
Background to and purpose of the Act PERSONAL INSOLVENCY ACT 2012 EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM The Act provides for the reform of personal insolvency law and will introduce the following new non-judicial debt
NHS North Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group HR Policies Managing Discipline Approved by: Quality and Assurance Group Ratification date: May 2013 Review date: May 2016 1 Contents 1 Policy Statement...
Historical version: 18.12.2003 to 5.5.2004 Regulations disallowed South Australia Victims of Crime (Compensation) Regulations 2003 under the Victims of Crime Act 2001 Contents 1 Short title 2 Commencement
Personal Injury Accident Claims 2011 You still need a Solicitor. Subsequent to the passing of the Personal Injuries Assessment Board Act 2003 and the Civil Liability & Courts Act 2004 Brian Morgan wrote
CHAPTER NINE DISPUTES SETTLEMENT ARTICLE 187 Scope of the Chapter The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to the settlement of disputes concerning the interpretation and application of the Treaty, including:
SPORT / VOLUNTARY WORKERS INSURANCE CLAIM FORM The issue or acceptance of this form is not construed as an admission of liability on the part of the Company. Please print clearly. To avoid delays please
Appendix S ATTENDANCE MANAGEMENT POLICY This Policy sets out the Council's expectations of both managers and employees in the management of attendance at work, particularly with regard to sickness absence.
CONTRACTUAL TERMS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS INDEX Adopting the new Contractual Terms Q.1 I want to adopt the New Contractual Terms in their entirety, what do I need to do? Q.2 Who and what is an Authorised
COMMITTEE ON COURT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE REVIEW OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE IN RELATION TO PERSONAL INJURIES LITIGATION THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS FEBRUARY 2003 The executive
Policy and Procedure for Claims Management RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR: COMMUNICATIONS, PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND HUMAN RESOURCES EFFECTIVE FROM: 08/07/10 REVIEW DATE: 01/04/11 To be read in conjunction with: Complaints
IN THE SUBORDINATE COURTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE PRACTICE DIRECTIONS AMENDMENT NO 4 OF 2012 It is hereby notified for general information that, with effect from 22 November 2012, the existing Appendix
Tipp FM Legal Slot 29 th May 2012 Medical Negligence John M. Lynch, Principal Today I will discuss medical negligence following a number of recent high profile cases and inquests. Firstly, what is Medical
SPORTS PERSONAL ACCIDENT AND SICKNESS CLAIM FORM THE ISSUE OF THIS FORM IS NOT AN ADMISSION OF LIABILITY Please Ensure: You fully complete every question before your doctor completes his statement. Failure
THE GENERAL INSURANCE BROKERS CODE OF PRACTICE CONTENTS 1 Introduction Outline of the Code...3 Objectives of the Code...3 Principles of the Code...3 Monitoring of the Code...3 Review and development of
Queensland PERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS ACT 2002 Act No. 24 of 2002 Queensland PERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS ACT 2002 TABLE OF PROVISIONS Section Page CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARY PART 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Short
Conditions of Offer A1 The offer documents comprise the offer form, letter of invitation to offer (if any), these Conditions of Offer and Conditions of Contract (Works & Services), the Working with Queensland
Pre-Action Protocol for Disease and Illness Claims PROTOCOLS Contents 1 Introduction 2 Notes of guidance 2A ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 3 The aims of the protocol 4 The protocol 5 Communication 6 Letter
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND [Court Division] [Title of Case] Directions given by [Name of the Master] On [Date] WHEREAS this action is listed today for review before the Master, NOW
CHANGES AND EXTENSION TO THE PORTAL PROPOSED OR OTHERWISE Chris Rafferty INTRODUCTION The proposed reforms of the RTA Portal Scheme have been few and far between to date, but are nevertheless worthy of
C.M. Haughey Solicitors Compensation Guide www.cmhaugheysolicitors.ie Athena Goddess of Wisdom, Strength and Strategy. When your experience needs our experience About Us C. M. Haughey Solicitors, located
Extending the RTA Portal to Disease claims May 2013 1. Introduction In July 2013 the existing RTA PI protocol will be extended to EL and PL claims. In addition, the value of claims captured by the protocol
Singapore International Commercial Court Practice Directions (Amendment No. 1 of 2016) Part X: Originating Processes and Documents 66A. Timelines for proceedings commenced by Writ of Summons and by Originating
GUIDE TO PERSONAL INJURY/ACCIDENT CLAIMS At Richard Grogan & Associates we have Solicitors with significant experience and expertise who will advise and guide you through all matters relating to bringing
COMPLAINTS ABOUT SOLICITORS How the Law Society of Ireland can help you Law Society of Ireland Complaints About Solicitors 1 The Law Society of Ireland (the Society) is the regulatory body for solicitors.
Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions (a) Discovery Methods. Information is obtainable as provided in these rules through any of the following discovery methods: depositions upon oral examination
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV 2003-485-1921 BETWEEN VERONICA WEIR Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 15 July 2004 Appearances: J Miller & S A
In force as of 15 March 2005 based on decision by the President of NIB ARBITRATION REGULATIONS Contents I. SCOPE OF APPLICATION... 4 1 Purpose of these Regulations... 4 2 Applicability to different staff
CHAPTER 43 ACTIONS OF DAMAGES FOR, OR ARISING FROM, PERSONAL INJURIES Application and interpretation of this Chapter 43.1.-(1) Subject to paragraph (4) and rule 43.1A (actions based on clinical negligence).
Information sheet Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury (Employers Liability and Public Liability) Claims You have received this information sheet as it is likely that your claim will proceed
CHANGES AND EXTENSION TO THE PORTAL PROPOSED OR OTHERWISE By Chris Rafferty & Colin Richmond INTRODUCTION The reforms of the RTA Portal Scheme have been relatively few to date, but are nevertheless worthy
1 PERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS BILL 2002 EXPLANATORY NOTES General Outline Purpose of legislation The main purpose of this Act is to facilitate the ongoing affordability of insurance through appropriate
HEALTH INSURANCE POLICY ABSOLUTE HEALTH TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 What are your policy benefits 2 2 Your premiums 2 > > Premium > > Method of paying premiums > > What happens if you do not pay the premium on
STATUTORY RULES OF NORTHERN IRELAND 1986 No. 193 MENTAL HEALTH The Mental Health Review Tribunal (Northern Ireland) Rules 1986 Made... 25 th June 1986 Coming into operation... 31 st July 1986 To be laid
TRAVEL INSURANCE CLAIM FORM IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ BEFORE YOU COMPLETE THIS FORM 1. Please answer all questions and provide all relevant documentation to avoid delays with your We are unable to process
PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. Be it enacted by the People of the
SENATE BILL 1ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, INTRODUCED BY Joseph Cervantes 1 ENDORSED BY THE COURTS, CORRECTIONS AND JUSTICE COMMITTEE AN ACT RELATING TO CIVIL ACTIONS; CLARIFYING
MANAGING SICKNESS ABSENCE POLICY Policy Devised: March 2013 Adopted on: 5 th December 2013 Review date: December 2014 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 From time to time employees may suffer ill health and it is essential