1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV BETWEEN VERONICA WEIR Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 15 July 2004 Appearances: J Miller & S A Thistoll for Appellant A Barnett for Respondent Judgment: 18 August 2004 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF MILLER J 1. On 24 May 2002, the respondent ( ACC ) completed an individual rehabilitation plan ( IRP ) for the appellant, Mrs Veronica Weir. The IRP was prepared under s.75 of the Injury Prevention, Rehabilitation, and Compensation Act 2001 ( the Act ). 2. The IRP provided for an outcome, being return to work or work readiness. 3. Mrs Weir says that ACC s decision to provide for return to work in the IRP is reviewable under s.134 of the Act, which allows Mrs Weir to apply to an ACC-appointed reviewer for a review of any of its decisions on the claim. ACC contends that inclusion of a work readiness goal in the IRP is an administrative step having nothing to do with Mrs Weir s entitlements under the Act, and accordingly is not reviewable. 4. A reviewer agreed with ACC, as did Judge Middleton on appeal to the District Court. Leave was granted to appeal to this Court on a question of law under s.162 of the Act. Factual background 5. Mrs Weir suffers chronic pain as a result of a medical misadventure suffered ten years ago. It is common ground that she has cover under the Act for this injury, in respect of which she is in receipt of weekly earnings compensation. 6. Until 2002, her rehabilitation focused on social rehabilitation. An IRP prepared under the Accident Insurance Act 1998 in 2000 established a goal of regaining independence in everyday activities. 7. In May 2002, however, Mrs Weir s case manager at ACC initiated an IRP the goal of which was return to work or work readiness. It provided that this outcome was to be achieved by 30 June Mrs Weir and her case manager signed the IRP.
2 8. The IRP also provided for specific interventions. The case manager was to obtain an update from Mrs Weir s general practitioner. Mrs Weir was to increase her exercise by commencing a regular walking programme. Lastly, the case manager and Mrs Weir were to meet before 30 June to review these reports and make further plans. 9. The IRP contained the following rehabilitation declaration: I understand that the ACC will: meet my rehabilitation needs in accordance with the Injury Prevention, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2001 (the Act) provide rehabilitation to help me lead as normal a life as possible in view of my personal injury help me where possible to meet the objectives of this plan I accept that I have to take personal responsibility for my rehabilitation, and I will actively participate in this rehabilitation plan that has been developed with ACC. I acknowledge that this plan: identifies my entitlements, needs and suitable rehabilitation services is binding once I have signed it and it has been accepted by ACC. However, I realise that the plan may change by negotiated agreement in the future, and this will be recorded with further signatures. My Case Manager has provided information explaining the relevant sections of the Act, my review rights and Privacy Legislation. This was discussed with me during the preparation of this plan. I understand that if I unreasonably refuse or fail to agree or comply with this plan, ACC may decline to provide entitlements. 10. Although the IRP provided that the outcome was to be achieved by 30 June, it is clear that the case manager intended only that progress would be reviewed by that date. The case manager acknowledged at the time that the goal of return to work or work readiness was a long-term goal. I add that a further IRP was signed in August 2002, and that IRP is not in issue. 11. On 14 August 2002 Mrs Weir applied for review of the IRP under s.134 of the Act. Mrs Weir did so because she takes issue with ACC s change of focus from regaining independence to gaining capacity for work. The reviewer dismissed the application in a decision dated 3 October Mrs Weir appealed to the District Court, and her appeal was dismissed in a decision dated 27 March The Judge held that ACC had not made a reviewable decision by agreeing, with Mrs Weir, to the IRP of May To put this decision in context it is necessary to outline a number of the Act s provisions. The legislation (a) Entitlement to weekly compensation 12. A claimant who has cover under the Act and who lodges a claim for weekly compensation is entitled under s.100 to receive it if ACC determines that she is incapacitated, in the sense that she is unable because of her personal injury to engage in employment in which she was employed when she suffered the injury, and she qualified as an earner at the time she was
3 incapacitated. Under s.102, ACC may review the claimant s incapacity from time to time. In doing so it must consider an assessment by a registered medical practitioner and may obtain any professional, technical, specialised or other advice from any person it considers appropriate. (b) Vocational rehabilitation as both entitlement and obligation 13. Rehabilitation appears in s.69 as the first in a list of entitlements that include various forms of compensation. But rehabilitation differs from other entitlements. The Act s purpose statement provides that where injuries occur, rehabilitation is to be ACC s primary focus, with fair compensation being paid during rehabilitation. And rehabilitation is intended to remove the need for compensation. It is accordingly both an entitlement and an obligation. Section 70 of the Act provides: A claimant who has suffered personal injury for which he or she has cover (a) is entitled to be provided by the Corporation with rehabilitation, to the extent provided by this Act, to assist in restoring the claimant's health, independence, and participation to the maximum extent practicable; but (b) is responsible for his or her own rehabilitation to the extent practicable having regard to the consequences of his or her personal injury. 14. In the case of a claimant in receipt of weekly compensation, ACC is liable under s.85 to provide vocational rehabilitation, to the extent provided by the Act, whether or not she applied for it, and the claimant must co-operate or risk loss of compensation. Section 72 requires the claimant to co-operate with ACC in the preparation of an IRP, and s.117 allows ACC to suspend or decline compensation if the claimant fails to agree to an IRP or comply with it. [c] Obligation to prepare IRP 15. Although ACC is liable to provide rehabilitation, the content of its obligation in any given case depends on whether the claimant needs rehabilitation and, if so, in what form. Rehabilitation : (a) means a process of active change and support with the goal of restoring, to the extent provided under section 70, a claimant's health, independence, and participation; and (b) comprises treatment, social rehabilitation, and vocational rehabilitation 16. Section 75 of the Act requires that ACC must, within 13 weeks after accepting a claim for cover, determine whether the claimant is likely to need social or vocational rehabilitation after the 13 weeks have ended. If so, it must prepare an IRP in consultation with the claimant. IRP: (a) means a plan under section 75 that provides for a claimant to receive rehabilitation that will assist in accordance with section 70 in restoring the claimant's health, independence, and participation to the maximum practicable extent 17. ACC may include provision for treatment in the IRP. After an IRP is agreed, ACC is liable to provide the claimant with rehabilitation in accordance with the IRP and schedule 1 of the Act, but only to the extent that ACC has specified which services it will provide under the
4 plan; section 76(4). (d) IRP must reflect assessment of claimant s vocational rehabilitation needs 18. In preparing an IRP, ACC is obliged under s.77 to assess the claimant s need for rehabilitation having regard to the purposes of social and vocational rehabilitation. The purpose of vocational rehabilitation is set out in s.80. (1) The purpose of vocational rehabilitation is to help a claimant to, as appropriate, (a) maintain employment; or (b) obtain employment; or regain or acquire vocational independence. (2) Without limiting subsection (1), the provision of vocational rehabilitation includes the provision of activities for the purpose of maintaining or obtaining employment that is (a) suitable for the claimant; and (b) appropriate for the claimant's levels of training and experience. 19. Section 77(2) provides that: An individual rehabilitation plan must (a) identify the claimant's needs for rehabilitation; and (b) identify the assessments to be done; and identify services appropriate to those needs, whether or not the Corporation is liable to provide any or all of those services; and (d) specify which of the services identified under paragraph that the Corporation will provide, pay for, or contribute to. 20. For the purposes of identifying the claimant s needs for vocational rehabilitation, ACC is required to comply with ss of the Act unless the claimant s needs are solely related to maintaining employment. Section 89 provides for an initial occupational assessment to identify the types of work that may be appropriate for the claimant, and an initial medical assessment to determine whether the types of work identified by the occupational assessor are likely to be medically sustainable for the claimant. 21. An assessor whom ACC considers has qualifications and experience appropriate to any particular case must undertake the occupational assessment. The assessor is required to take into account information provided by the Corporation and the claimant, discuss with the claimant all of the types of work that are available in New Zealand and suitable for her, and consider any comments that she makes about those types of work. 22. The medical assessor must be a registered medical practitioner who holds vocational registration under the Medical Practitioners Act 1995 and who also has an interest, and proven work experience, in disability management in the workplace or occupational rehabilitation. The medical assessor must also have at least five years experience in general practice and possess certain other qualifications. 23. The Act accordingly envisages that the initial occupational assessment and initial medical assessment will inform ACC s assessment of the claimant s vocational rehabilitation needs for the purposes of the IRP prepared under s.75 and s.77.
5 24. Although ACC is obliged to assess the claimant s needs using occupational and medical assessments, it has a discretion whether to provide vocational rehabilitation and, if so, in what form. Its discretion is controlled by sections 86 and 87. (e) Review of ACC decisions 25. The Act provides for review of ACC decisions by an ACC-appointed reviewer, who is required to act independently, with a right of appeal to the District Court. Section 134(1) of the Act provides: A claimant may apply to the Corporation for a review of (a) any of its decisions on the claim: (b) any delay in processing the claim for entitlement that the claimant believes is an unreasonable delay: any of its decisions under the Code on a complaint by the claimant. 26. A decision includes all or any of the following decisions by ACC: (a) a decision whether or not a claimant has cover: (b) a decision about the classification of the personal injury a claimant has suffered (for example, a work-related personal injury or a motor vehicle injury): a decision whether or not the Corporation will provide any entitlements to a claimant: (d) a decision about which entitlements the Corporation will provide to a claimant: (e) a decision about the level of any entitlements to be provided: (f) a decision relating to the levy payable by a particular levy payer: (g) a decision made under the Code about a claimant's complaint 27. This definition is enlarged upon by Clause 9 of Schedule 1. That schedule sets out a process for providing information to a claimant about rehabilitation and the process of developing an IRP, and securing the claimant s agreement to the IRP. Clause 8 provides that if, after a reasonable time, a claimant declines to agree to the IRP, ACC may advise the claimant that it is finalised and the IRP is then to be regarded as if the claimant had agreed to it. When the IRP is agreed or finalised, ACC must implement it. Clause 9 of schedule 1 provides: (1) For the purposes of Part 5 of this Act, the Corporation makes a decision when (a) the claimant agrees to an [IRP]; or (b) the Corporation advises the claimant that [an IRP] has been finalised. (2) The fact that a claimant has agreed to [an IRP] does not affect his or her rights to make a review application under Part 5 of this Act with respect to the [IRP]. 28. The right of review of s.134(1)(a) relates to any of ACC s decisions on the claim. Claim means a claim under s.48, which provides: A person who wishes to claim under this Act must lodge a claim with the Corporation for (a) cover for his or her personal injury; or (b) cover, and a specified entitlement, for his or her personal injury; or a specified entitlement for his or her personal injury, once the Corporation has accepted the person has cover for the personal injury. Questions
6 29. In granting leave to appeal under s.162 of the Act, Judge Cadenhead determined that two questions of law arose: The first issue is whether Clause 9 itself confers a discrete right of review, independent of sections 134 and 48 of the Act. In short, may there be a right of review concerning an individual rehabilitation plan even if no entitlements are in issue. The second issue is whether or not the purposes set out in the individual rehabilitation plan affected any entitlements previously conferred upon the appellant, and whether or not the stated purposes contravened sections 86 and 87 of the Act. Issue 1: Whether IRP is reviewable 30. Judge Middleton held that an IRP, although a decision in terms of clause 9 of schedule 1, is not a decision on the claim for the purposes of s.134(1)(a). The learned Judge reasoned that a claim for the purposes of s.48 of the Act refers to a claim for cover or for a specified entitlement. An IRP does not in itself provide any entitlements. Accordingly, it is not a decision on the claim, and Mrs Weir was not entitled to apply for review. (a) Submissions 31. Mr Barnett essentially adopted the Judge s reasoning. He also emphasised that the IRP s stated outcome of return to work or work readiness in this case was a long-term goal. Mrs Weir was not at risk of losing her weekly compensation entitlement unless she became fit to return to her pre-accident employment or she achieved vocational independence, as determined under the statutory process in s of the Act. Any such decision would be reviewable. 32. Further, Mr Barnett contended that the Act must be administered in a way which does not result in a right of review for every administrative decision made by ACC. He conceded that a decision to provide or deny an entitlement that is recorded in an IRP is reviewable but submitted that the IRP itself is not. If the IRP can be reviewed, administration of the Act would become moribund. 33. For Mrs Weir, Mr Miller submitted that clause 9 of schedule 1 defines an IRP as a decision for the purposes of the Act, and it would not do so unless rights attached to it. He emphasised that rehabilitation is of central importance, and that an IRP may have consequences for a claimant long before a decision is made to withdraw weekly compensation. Claimants have learned to be wary of case managers bearing gifts in the form of offers of rehabilitation. ACC s decision to impose a goal of return to work or work readiness is likely to be the first step on a path that would lead to Mrs Weir being deprived of compensation, either because she was deemed under s.86 to be capable of some sort of work or because ACC might conclude that her inability to work was the product of some other cause. In the latter case, ACC might deem the claimant to be suited to work which was manifestly impossible - the legless tapdancer phenomenon referred to in Kenyon v ACC (Wellington High Court, AP 258/00, 19 December 2001, Fisher J). He pointed to the provisions of the Act that force a claimant to co-operate in the preparation of an IRP, and the consequences if the claimant fails to do so. He emphasised the effective power these
7 provisions give a case manager over the individual claimant. (b) Discussion 34. There was no dispute that an IRP is deemed to be a decision made by ACC at the point when the claimant agrees to it or ACC advises her that the IRP has been finalised pursuant to clauses 8 and 9 of schedule 1. The question is whether it is a decision on the claim for purposes of s Judge Middleton held that the claim referred to in s.134 is that described in s.48. His reasoning focused on the fact that the claim under s.48, in the case of a person who has cover, must be for an entitlement. He held that this IRP did not provide for any entitlement. 36. However, the introductory words of s.48 make it clear that a claim is lodged by a person who wishes to claim under the Act for cover or a specified entitlement. In this case, Mrs Weir lodged a claim for cover and weekly compensation, which is an entitlement under ss.69 and 100. The claimant defines what it is that is sought. Mrs Weir claimed weekly compensation as envisaged by s.100, which speaks of a claimant who has cover and lodges a claim for weekly compensation. The IRP was not a claim. Rather, the IRP was a decision made in the context of Mrs Weir s continuing claim for cover and weekly compensation. It may eventually lead to the entitlement being removed following Mrs Weir s successful rehabilitation, and it will of course lead to rehabilitation being undertaken in the meantime. 37. Plainly Mrs Weir s claim was lodged some years before the IRP was prepared. However, s.102 allows ACC to revisit a claimant s incapacity from time to time, and ss.78 and 88 envisage that an IRP will be updated, and vocational rehabilitation modified, periodically. Section 134(1)(a) allows a claimant to apply for a review of any of ACC s decisions on the claim. The section envisages a number of decisions on a single claim. 38. It follows that it is immaterial that the IRP in this case did not itself provide for the grant or loss of any specific entitlement. Mr Barnett contended that the IRP was only a preliminary step, in that it simply provided for a goal. However, the IRP was by definition a decision, whatever its content, and it did not stand in isolation. Rather, it related to Mrs Weir s claim for weekly compensation. In any event, Mrs Weir was entitled to regard the change in the goal as significant, in that it signalled a decision by ACC to prepare her for loss of compensation and to undertake vocational rehabilitation in the meantime. Indeed, it began that process by providing for a walking programme. 39. It is not necessary to deal with Mr Miller s alternative argument that the IRP was a claim for purposes of s.48 because it deals by definition with rehabilitation, which is an entitlement. 40. In answer to Mr Barnett s point that this decision would open up ACC s administration to constant review, several points may be made. The first is that an IRP is not simply an administrative process. The statute prescribes it, and it is of central importance to the
8 statutory goal of rehabilitation. Statutory obligations surround it. Second, it remains the case that only decisions, as defined in s.6 and clause 9 of schedule 1, are reviewable. Third, it is impossible to overlook the fact that an IRP is expressly defined as a decision in clause 9, which does not distinguish between IRP s that provide for or remove entitlements and those that do not. 41. I have considered decisions made under the 1998 Act: O Donnell v Accident Compensation Corporation (Wellington District Court, 139/2002, 22 May 2002, Judge Willy), Howard v Accident Compensation Corporation (Christchurch District Court, 267/2002, 26 September 2002, Judge Beattie). I have not found them helpful. As Mr Miller pointed out, cl.9 in Schedule 1 to the 2001 Act is in different terms to cl.34 in the 1998 Act, which preserved the right of review in respect of entitlements provided in the IRP notwithstanding the claimant s agreement to the IRP. Conclusion 42. I conclude that the IRP in this case is reviewable, not because there is an independent right of review in clause 9 but because it was a decision on the claim for the purposes of s.134(1)(a). The claim referred to is that lodged by Mrs Weir under s.48 for an entitlement in the form of weekly compensation. Issue 2: Whether IRP complied with ss.86 and As explained in argument, the second issue identified by Judge Cadenhead is directed to the question whether the IRP contravened the Act s provisions dealing with the process for preparing an IRP. Sections 86 and 87 require ACC, when considering vocational rehabilitation, to have regard to considerations including whether the claimant is fit for her original work, or for other work that may utilise her skills, and the appropriateness of any given rehabilitation. [/b](a) Submissions 44. Mr Miller contended that ACC was not entitled to prepare an IRP providing for a change in goal without first undertaking occupational and medical assessments under ss The change in goal is a significant step in itself, and will lead in time to loss of compensation. 45. Mr Barnett responded that the IRP provided for no specific interventions but only for a goal. The occupational and medical assessments provided for in ss89-96 will be undertaken at the appropriate time, and Mrs Weir does not risk losing her compensation until then. Any decision by ACC to terminate compensation will be reviewable. (b) Discussion 46. The process followed in this case was appropriate to an IRP in that Mrs Weir s case manager used the ACC form, which contains the declaration referred to in paragraph 9 above, and procured Mrs Weir s consent to the IRP. I have no doubt that it was intended to be an IRP, to which Mrs Weir was to make a commitment.
9 47. However, there was no attempt to comply with s.77, which requires ACC to assess the claimant s needs for rehabilitation when preparing an IRP. With respect to vocational rehabilitation, an assessment must be made under ss Where an IRP has previously been prepared, ACC s obligation is to update it under s.78 to reflect the outcome of assessments done and progress made under the plan. I record that the case was not presented to me on the basis that ACC was merely updating a previous IRP and therefore did not have to undertake a formal assessment. Although IRP s had been prepared in the past, it appears that no formal vocational assessment had been done, because the goal had been one of regaining independence. Conclusion 48. I conclude that the IRP in this case did not comply with the Act, in that the goal of return to work or work readiness was adopted without benefit of any formal assessment under s.77. I accept that ACC would have arranged vocational rehabilitation before terminating weekly compensation, but the Act envisages that ACC must assess a claimant s needs for rehabilitation at the time the IRP is prepared. No such assessment was undertaken. [b]decision 49. I answer the questions stated by Judge Cadenhead as follows: a) Question 1: the IRP in this case was a decision on the claim for purposes of s.134(1)(a), and was reviewable under s.134. b) Question 2: the IRP in this case did not comply with the Act, in that the goal of return to work or work readiness was adopted without any assessment of the claimant s needs for rehabilitation under s.77. Such assessment should have been undertaken when the IRP was prepared. I answer this question on the assumption that ACC had not previously undertaken a vocational rehabilitation assessment under s.77 and ss Delivered at 8.30 am this 18th day of August F Miller J Solicitors: John Miller Law, Wellington for Appellant Broadmore Barnett, Wellington for Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV-2010-485-001331 UNDER the Accident Compensation Act 2001 BETWEEN AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Appellant DOMINIQUE VANDY Respondent Hearing:
4315 Government Gazette OF THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES Number 125 Tuesday, 8 October 2013 Published under authority by the Department of Premier and Cabinet SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT Guidelines for Work Capacity
audit guidelines injury management practices guidelines to understanding the audit standards for the injury management section of the acc partnership programme ACC2465 Printed September 2006 These guidelines
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 13/33469 (1) REPORTABLE: YES / NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED... DATE...
Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation 3 ANALYSIS Title 4. Assessors I. Short Title and commencement 2. Definition of "medical misadventure" 5. Power to borrow, etc. 3. Claims 6. Validations An Act to
2002/390 Rights) Notice 2002 Pursuant to section 44 of the Compensation Act 2001, the Minister for ACC gives the following notice. Contents 1 Title Schedule 2 Code of ACC Claimants Rights Code of ACC Claimants
HARDY MYERS Attorney General PETER D. SHEPHERD Deputy Attorney General DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE GENERAL COUNSEL DIVISION John Shilts, Administrator Workers Compensation Division Labor & Industries Building
New South Wales Motor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Amendment of Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 No 41 2 4 Amendment of other
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA395/2014  NZCA 552 BETWEEN DIANE HAWKE Appellant ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent AND ACCLAIM OTAGO INC Applicant Intervener Hearing: 3 November
Workers guide to workers compensation Guide www.worksafe.nt.gov.au Disclaimer This publication contains information regarding workers rehabilitation and compensation. It includes some of your obligations
ACC AUDIT GUIDELINES - INJURY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Guidelines to understanding the audit standards for the Injury Management Section of the ACC Partnership Programme Please note: There is a separate guideline
Review No. Claim No Application for Review by Mr Wayne Chapman A Decision made under the Accident Compensation Act 2001 ( the Act ) Held at Date of hearing Reviewer Present Penrose. 8 August 2011. Concluded
PRINCIPAL FAMILY COURT JUDGE S CHAMBERS FAMILY COURT PRACTICE NOTE LAWYER FOR THE CHILD: SELECTION, APPOINTMENT AND OTHER MATTERS 1 BACKGROUND 1.1 The terms of this Practice Note have been settled in consultation
Province of Alberta MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter M-22 Current as of April 1, 2015 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s
Historical version: 18.12.2003 to 5.5.2004 Regulations disallowed South Australia Victims of Crime (Compensation) Regulations 2003 under the Victims of Crime Act 2001 Contents 1 Short title 2 Commencement
1 HEARING AID SALES AND SERVICE c. H-2.01 The Hearing Aid Sales and Service Act being Chapter H-2.01 of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2001 (effective March 10, 2006) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan,
1 WORKCOVER QUEENSLAND AMENDMENT BILL 2002 EXPLANATORY NOTES GENERAL OUTLINE Objectives of the legislation To provide for miscellaneous amendments to the WorkCover Queensland Act 1996. Reason for the Bill
PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS FROM 31 JULY 2013 Title Number I INTRODUCTION Definitions Para 1.1 Preamble Para 2.1 Aims Para 3.1 Scope Para 4.1 II GENERAL
Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 5 th Floor, Park Plaza
WCAT Decision Number: WCAT-2015-02919 WCAT Decision Date: September 23, 2015 Panel: Joanne Kembel, Vice Chair Introduction  This is a referral to the chair of the (WCAT) under section 251 of the Workers
Frequ quentl tly asked questio tions Low Value Personal Injury Claims in Road Traffic Accidents Stage 1 General Q1. When will the Rules be drafted and ready? A1. The Civil Procedure Rule Committee approved
New South Wales Workers Compensation Amendment (Transitional) Regulation 2012 under the Workers Compensation Act 1987 Her Excellency the Governor, with the advice of the Executive Council, has made the
No 656 New South Wales Workers Compensation Amendment (Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulation under the Workers Compensation Act 1987 and Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 Her
8 October 2013 SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT 4385 Additional Reports or Documents Please list and provide copies of all further information, reports and documents in support of this application for review................
Conditions of Offer A1 The offer documents comprise the offer form, letter of invitation to offer (if any), these Conditions of Offer and Conditions of Contract (Works & Services), the Working with Queensland
23 JUNE 2011 WORKERS COMPENSATION BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES for APPROVED INSURERS and SELF INSURERS in the Northern Territory Workers Compensation NT WorkSafe is the administrative arm of the Work Health
1 PRIVATE VOCATIONAL SCHOOLS REGULATION, 1995 c. P-26.2 The Private Vocational Schools Regulation Act, 1995 being Chapter P-26.2 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1995 (effective December 15, 1995) as amended
Accident Compensation Amendment Bill (Divided from the Health and Safety Reform Bill) Government Bill As reported from the committee of the whole House This Bill was formerly part of the Health and Safety
MODEL LAW ON MOTOR VEHICLE INSPECTION BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS AND SELF INSPECTORS Section 1. Definitions.-- As used in this act, the term: (1) "Contractor" means any person, corporation, or partnership
1 AMBULANCE c. A-18.1 The Ambulance Act being Chapter A-18.1 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1986 (effective July 1, 1989), as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1988-89, c.35 and 42; 1989-90, c.54;
BENEFITS COMPARISON BETWEEN RAF SCHEME AND THE PROPOSED RABS Difference between RAF Scheme & RABS For purposes of the comparison, the current Road Accident Fund Act, No. 56 of 1996 (as amended on 1 August
Version: 21.11.2015 South Australia Building Work Contractors Act 1995 An Act to regulate building work contractors and the supervision of building work; and for other purposes. Contents Part 1 Preliminary
!Undefined Bookmark, I IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF VICTORIA AT MELBOURNE WORKCOVER DIVISION Case No. E12850768 CHERYL ANN COWIE Plaintiff v ELYNWOOD PTY LTD Defendant --- MAGISTRATE: S GARNETT WHERE HELD:
Costs Payable in Personal Injury Claims under the Various Legislative Regimes by Paul Garrett I was asked to deliver a paper in relation to costs which are payable under the various regimes where claimants
REFERENCE: Workers Compensation Act, RSA 2000, Sections 1(1)(f), 54, 56, 63, 89, and 137.1 POLICY: When a work-related injury results in compensable work restrictions that impair a worker s employability
February 20, 1978 ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 78-81 Mr. Fletcher Bell Commissioner of Insurance Kansas Insurance Department 1st Floor - State Office Building Topeka, Kansas 66612 Re: Motor Vehicles--Insurance--Rights
SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Webber v. Boutilier, 2016 NSSC 5 Date: 20160105 Docket: Hfx No. 241129 Registry: Halifax Between: Cindy June Webber v. Plaintiff Arthur Boutilier and Dartmouth Central
IN THE MATTER OF THE INSURANCE ACT, R.S.O. 1990 c. I.8, as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION ACT, S.O. 1991, c.17, as amended BETWEEN: AND IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION WAWANESA MUTUAL INSURANCE
Nebraska Workers Compensation Court Information Sheet: Rights & Obligations under the Nebraska Workers Compensation Law NEBRASKA WORKERS COMPENSATION COURT OFFICIAL SEAL What is workers compensation? Workers
Accident Compensation Amendment Act 2015 Public Act 2015 No 71 Date of assent 4 September 2015 Commencement see section 2 Contents Page 1 Title 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Principal Act 2 4 New section 5A inserted
Province of Alberta VICTIMS RESTITUTION AND COMPENSATION Statutes of Alberta, Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 7 th Floor,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5669 OF 2012 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.9516 of 2010) The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS Siby George
Employers guide to workers compensation Guide www.worksafe.nt.gov.au Disclaimer This publication contains information regarding workers rehabilitation and compensation. It includes some of your obligations
Provisions) Act 2000 Public Act 2000 No 5 Date of assent 25 March 2000 Commencement see section 2 Contents I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 Title Commencement Purpose Interpretation Removal of competition for
THIRD SUPPLEMENT TO THE GIBRALTAR GAZETTE No. 4,167 of 7th May, 2015 B. 13/15 Clause PRIVATE TRUST COMPANIES BILL 2015 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation. 3. Registration of Private Trust
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA ROAD ACCIDENT FUND (TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS) BILL (As amended by the Portfolio Committee on Transport (National Assembly)) (The English text is the offıcial text of the Bill) (MINISTER
Neutral Citation Number:  EWCA Civ 415 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM BRISTOL COUNTY COURT (HIS HONOUR JUDGE DENYER QC) A2/2014/0127 Royal Courts of Justice Strand London,
ARTYUR ROBll,lSQN ~ HEDDERWlCKS UBfW~Y Accident Compensation (Common Law and Benefits) Bill As Sent Print EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM Clause 1 Clause 2 Clause 3 Clause 4 sets out the purpose of the Bill. provides
1 Questions and answers for employers 17 October 2012 Return to work 1. What are employers return to work obligations? Employers have an obligation to provide suitable employment (where reasonably practicable)
IN THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COURT AT SUVA APPELLATE JURISDICTION CASE NUMBER: ERCA NO. 09 OF 2012 BETWEEN: AUTOMART LIMITED APPELLANT AND: WAQA ROKOTUINASAU RESPONDENT Appearances: Ms. Drova for the Appellant.
YOUTH DRUG DETOXIFICATION 1 The Youth Drug Detoxification and Stabilization Act being Chapter Y-1.1* of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2005 (effective April 1, 2006) as amended by The Statutes of Saskatchewan,
Motor Accident tification Form (MANF) As prescribed under section 84(2)(a) of the Road Transport (Third-Party Insurance) Act 2008 For Compulsory Third-Party (CTP) Insurance Claims in the Australian Capital
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA ROAD ACCIDENT FUND (TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS) BILL (As amended by the Portfolio Committee on Transport (National Assembly)) (The English text is the offıcial text of the Bill) (MINISTER
Bill No. 18/11. Work Injury Compensation (Amendment) Bill Read the first time on 17th October 11. A BILL intituled An Act to amend the Work Injury Compensation Act (Chapter 34 of the 09 Revised Edition).
New South Wales Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 No 22 Status information Currency of version Current version for 31 January 2011 to date (generated 21 February 2011 at 10:02). Legislation
Mr Chris White A/Chief Executive Officer WorkCover WA 2 Bedbrook Place Shenton Park WA 6009 31 July 2014 Dear Mr White WORKCOVER WA REVIEW OF THE WORKERS COMPENSATION AND INJURY MANAGEMENT ACT 1981 FINAL
Number 46 of 2003 PERSONAL INJURIES ASSESSMENT BOARD ACT 2003 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1 Preliminary and General Section 1. Short title. 2. Commencement. 3. Civil actions to which Act applies. 4. Interpretation.
Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal 108th Session Judgment No. 2862 THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, Considering the complaint
Queensland PERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS ACT 2002 Act No. 24 of 2002 Queensland PERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS ACT 2002 TABLE OF PROVISIONS Section Page CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARY PART 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Short
Janis Veldwyk At the end of the workshop participants should: Be more familiar with the Workplace Injury Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2013 Know Employer and employee obligations with relation to
www.costsbarrister.co.uk NIHL and success fees Andrew Hogan Barrister at law 1 On 13 th March 2015 at 4pm, Mr Justice Phillips handed down judgment in conjoined cases, Dalton and others.v.british Telecommunications
Disability Act 2006 A guide for disability service providers ii Disabilty Act 2006 A guide for disability service providers Published by the Victorian Government Department of Human Services, Melbourne,
A BILL FROM YOUR LEGAL PRACTITIONER WHAT TO DO IF YOU THINK IT S TOO MUCH Western Australia Legal Profession Complaints Committee NOTE: THIS FACT SHEET APPLIES TO: ALL INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN PRIOR TO 1 MARCH
Discussion Paper Concerning the Cap on Pain and Suffering Awards for Minor Injuries Office of the Superintendent of Insurance January, 2010 Introduction The Province of Nova Scotia regulates automobile
CERM2513.46 NEGOTIATING FRAMEWORK NEGOTIATED DISTRIBUTION SERVICES 1 July 2015 Contents 1. National Electricity Rules... 3 2. Negotiated Distribution Services... 3 3. Application of this Negotiating Framework...
CHAPTER 267 AN ACT concerning third party administrators of health benefits plans and third party billing services and supplementing Title 17B of the New Jersey Statutes. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and
A.B. ASSEMBLY BILL NO. COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE AND LABOR MARCH, 0 Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor SUMMARY Revises provisions governing workers compensation. (BDR -) FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local
Vocational Independence: outcomes for ACC claimants A follow up study of 160 claimants who have been deemed vocationally independent by ACC and case law analysis of the vocational independence process.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
04-05 PART I REFERENCE : Workers' Compensation Act, 1981 (as amended), Sections 1(1)(d), 49,51,57, and 83 When a work-related injury results in compensable work restrictions that impair a worker's employability
BETWEEN: TRACY SCHUTT Applicant and ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA Insurer DECISION ON A PRELIMINARY ISSUE Before: Heard: Appearances: Joyce Miller Written submissions from both parties were received
..... - CIS/3066/1998 DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER 1. This is an appeal, brought by the claimant with the leave of a Commissioner, against a decision of the Plymouth social security appeal tribunal dated
Willis & Ainsworth Ltd Terms and Conditions 1. DEFINITIONS "The Company" means Willis and Ainsworth Ltd (company number 7563552) "the Customer" means the party with whom the Company contracts; "Contract"
Accident Compensation (Financial Responsibility and Government Bill Explanatory note This Bill has 2 broad objectives: General policy statement to improve the framework for determining how ACC s levied
LAWYERS New South Wales & Victoria Transport Accident Commission (TAC) Claims FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS What is a transport accident? A transport accident is an incident directly caused by a motor car
Background to and purpose of the Act PERSONAL INSOLVENCY ACT 2012 EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM The Act provides for the reform of personal insolvency law and will introduce the following new non-judicial debt
1 ELECTRONIC INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS c. E-7.22 The Electronic Information and Documents Act, 2000 being Chapter E-7.22 of The Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2000 (effective November 1, 2000) as amended by
Legal Costs, Cost Agreements, Disclosure & Billing under the The Legal Profession Uniform Law NSW Law Society Seminar John Fleming Solicitor (Legal Costs Unit) Law Society of NSW Tel: (02) 9926 0373 Email:
SOUTH AUSTRALIA CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION REGULATIONS, 1987 REGULATIONS UNDER THE CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION ACT, 1978 Criminal Injuries Compensation Regulations, 1987 being No. 294 of 1987: Gaz.
General Insurance Conditions (GIC) Clinical Trials in Human Research Edition 2014 Translation For information only. The original wording is binding. General Insurance Conditions, clinical trials Edition
CHAPTER 11 APPEALS AND DISPUTES In this Chapter look for... 11. General 11.1 Deleted 11.2 Administrative Appeals 11.3 Disputes 11.4 Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) 11. General. The Virginia Public