Eric T. Thoele Income Tax Inequalities. Intermediate Macroeconomics EC3100 Rockhurst University. Dr. Gerald Miller 03/31/05
|
|
- Lenard Sims
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Eric T. Thoele Income Tax Inequalities Intermediate Macroeconomics EC3100 Rockhurst University Dr. Gerald Miller 03/31/05
2 Executive Summary 1) The Origin and History - This gives the basic background of the income tax system in America. It explains issues that will enable the reader to understand the drastic changes over the decades in the tax system. This in regards to the drastic inequalities in the tax schedule, the change in the percentage of Americans affected by income tax, and the policy changes in order to support the governmental budget. 2) The Filing Day - This is a brief history of the reason the income tax filing day is actually on April 15 th. This is merely a side piece of interesting information for the reader. 3) The Current Taxing Schedule - This is an explanation of the way that the current income tax system is setup. It explains the different classifications that people can label themselves under and also at which level of income to which they belong. With these two characteristics set, an appropriate, but unequal amount of money can be established as the amount of taxes the individual owes. 4) The Tax Inequality - This is the beginning of the focus of the paper where the true inequalities of the paper come to the surface. The progressive tax is not the fairest tax to all citizens no matter their financial situation. A flat tax would be more equal to all. 5) My Thoughts - This section lays out my proposed plan to make the income tax system free of inequalities, but still able to look out for the well being of its fellow man or woman.
3 The U.S. tax system contains many variations with regard to the amount an individual must pay to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). It is actually possible for someone in a higher tax bracket to pay out less money than someone in a lower tax bracket, which in reality should not be the case. There are so many loop holes and different types of write-offs that individuals can use. And in some instances it is completely unfair, but at the same time legal. The tax system is also setup were the lower parts of the tax bracket actually pay out a lower percentage of earnings than someone in a higher the higher tax brackets. Thus one can see the inequalities in the tax system. It is An inequality is defined as social disparity or the disparity of distribution or opportunity. clear that some individuals are not getting the same opportunity on a percentage scale, but on the other hand individuals in the higher tax brackets have more money and are what we call today, welloff. The Origin and History In order to fully understand these tax inequalities one must begin to look at the beginning of the idea of taxing to raise money to fund the governmental budget. The IRS is the government entity that is in charge of the taxing system in the U.S. The origin of the income tax on individuals is generally cited as the passage of the
4 16 th Amendment, passed by Congress on July 2, 1909 and ratified February 3, 1913; however, its history actually goes back even further. Its roots trace back to the Civil War when President Lincoln and Congress, in 1862, created the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and enacted an income tax to pay war expenses. The first income tax was implemented with a 3 percent tax on incomes between $600 and $10,000 and a 5 percent tax on incomes above $10,000. The income tax was repealed 10 years later. Congress revived the income tax in 1894, but the Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional the following year. In 1913, the first Form 1040 was used. This form is now filled out when one first starts a job and it states how many dependents they are claiming, how much money they want withheld from their paycheck, etc Also in 1913, Congress levied a 1 percent tax on net personal incomes of individuals above $3,000, which is equivalent to about $36,000 in today s terms, with a six percent surtax on incomes of more than $500,000. This figure may seem sensible and worthwhile, but only less than 1 In 1918, some 85 percent of American households paid no income tax at all, and almost 80 percent of federal income tax revenue came from the top one-half of one-percent of households. percent of U.S. citizens actually made enough money in 1913 to reach the first income tax bracket. This is the first difference from the current tax system were nearly every citizen makes enough money to pay income
5 tax. This was clearly unequal and as one can see it has been changed today. In 1918 the First World War was lacking the necessary funds, so the Congress raised the income tax up to seventy-seven percent in some tax brackets. Again, the government did not plan ahead so they took it out on the citizens and increased taxes over a short period of time. This is neither a good strategy nor equal to the different income levels of the U.S. citizens. This would be an overbearing load for the working people of America today, but it really did not even affect them at all back then. During this time, some 85 percent of American households paid no income tax at all, and almost 80 percent of federal income tax revenue came from the top one-half of one-percent of households. Contrary to popular belief these days, the general public saw this as an acceptable means of being taxed. By the middle 1920 s, 75 percent of the overall income tax revenue came from the richest 1 percent of the public. These high rates remained throughout the war, but then dropped back down to twenty-four percent in Such rate fluctuations are not fair to the U.S. citizen that is trying to plan for having children, sending them to college, or preparing for retirement. Instability is unfair. Once again taxes went up. This time it was due to the Revenue Act of 1942 because of The Great Depression, which raised taxes and increased the number of Americans subject to paying income tax. Between the years 1938 and 1948 the number of Americans that actually
6 fell into a paying tax bracket increased ten fold. Thus this act cut the number of exempt low-income citizens in half. The cut off was at $600 there is no reason that any could not still live even a lavish life off a disposable income of $1,260,000 a year. per year, which equates to about $6,300 in today s monetary terms. The rates at the top half of the tax bracket rose dramatically to a near ridiculous percentage. Those individuals making more than $2,000,000 paid out 94 percent of their earnings to the federal income tax. This is one of the largest inequalities in the tax system, which was eventually worked out. Granted it happened nearly 60 years ago, but it was in no way creating an equal tax system in the U.S. One should make note that the value of money has grown by is 950 percent from the middle 1940 s to the present day time. The $600 tax exempt cut off back then equates to $6,300 today, and the $2,000,000 top tax bracket back then would be equivalent to $21,000,000 in today s monetary terms. The percentage is large and nearly ridiculous, but there is no reason that one could not live even a lavish life with a disposable income of $120,000 per year back then, or $1,260,000 today. The Revenue Act of 1942 also created new deductions, so that individuals could write off certain fixed expenses to ease the tax burden that had been increased. Then in 1943 Congress passed the Current Tax Payment Act, which required employers to withhold taxes from employees wages and remit them quarterly. In 1944, Congress passed the Individual Income Tax Act, which created the standard deductions on
7 Form This was the beginning of the individualization of taxing in the U.S. In the 1952 President Truman put forth a plan that reorganized the IRS and replaced the old patronage system with the new career civil services system. This plan also implemented other aspects, which sought to restore public confidence in the system and emphasize service to the taxpayers. During this time in 1952, a worker making $8,000 (about $46,000 in today s dollars) paid about the same effective rate as a millionaire twenty-five years before. This goes to show that the Federal income tax system was never really a fined tuned instrument to create governmental revenue. It has been undergoing a constant process of being refined to be as fair as possible in the government s eyes. The tax system underwent a minimal amount of changes until 1998 when the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act was put into play. This Act restructured the IRS to make it more efficient and had certain departments concentrate only on their field. For the taxpayers, this act established the Taxpayer Advocate Service, which sought to assist with problems that have not been resolved through normal channels. Each state also has at least one local taxpayer advocate who reports directly to the National Taxpayer Advocate. The taxpayers now had an independent voice inside the agency that was on their side and had no real affiliation with the IRS that would tempt them to agree with the IRS over the taxpayers. The Filing Day
8 The day which every American dreads each year is April 15 th. This is the day by which every U.S. citizen must have their tax forms filled out and sent into the IRS for processing. There is an interesting story behind the determination of the filing date being April 15 th. One story revolves around the notion that only the wealthy paid income taxes and they tended to spend their summers vacationing. Thus the government had to collect the taxes from them before they left town, so a time before the summer was hypothesized. March 1 st was the original filing date set by Congress back in 1913, but the date was moved forward to March 15 th 5 years later. This date stayed as the norm until 1954 when the date was again pushed forward to April 15 th. This later date did however serve two purposes it gave the IRS more time to handle the work and, more importantly, more time to hang on to your money before issuing you a refund. The implementation of the withholdings of parts of paychecks enabled the government to use some of the tax money ahead of time. They had more equity for longer periods of time, the money could gain interest for a longer period of time, etc The Current Taxing Schedule Now we jump to the present day in the history of income tax. At this time the income tax system breaks down every citizen into certain groups. These different groups are defined as tax brackets. Individuals are classified under one of four main categories; single, married filling
9 joint or qualifying widow, married filing separately, or head of household. Once the individual has identified themselves under one of the previous categories they then fall into a certain income range from say $29,700 to $71,950 or $150,150 to $326,450. These monetary amounts are in terms of annual income per individual or the couple depending on the first selection. Within each of these brackets an individual must pay out a certain amount of taxes according to set rate, which is usually the maximum amount from the bracket below them and a set percentage of income on anything above that until they reach the next bracket. This is illustrated in Table #1 on the following page. Table #1 Single If taxable income is over-- But not over- - The tax is: $0 $7,300 10% of the amount over $0 $7,300 $29,700 $730 plus 15% of the amount over 7,300 $29,700 $71,950 $71,950 $150,150 $150,150 $326,450 $326,450 no limit $4, plus 25% of the amount over 29,700 $14, plus 28% of the amount over 71,950 $36, plus 33% of the amount over 150,150 $94, plus 35% of the amount over 326,450
10 Married Filing Jointly or Qualifying Widow(er) If taxable income is over-- But not over- - The tax is: $0 $14,600 10% of the amount over $0 $14,600 $59,400 $1, plus 15% of the amount over 14,600 $59,400 $119,950 $8,180 plus 25% of the amount over 59,400 $119,950 $182,800 $182,800 $326,450 $326,450 no limit $23, plus 28% of the amount over 119,950 $40, plus 33% of the amount over 182,800 $88, plus 35% of the amount over 326,450 Married Filing Separately If taxable income is over-- But not over- - The tax is: $0 $7,300 10% of the amount over $0 $7,300 $29,700 $730 plus 15% of the amount over 7,300 $29,700 $59,975 $4,090 plus 25% of the amount over 29,700 $59,975 $91,400 $91,400 $163,225 $163,225 no limit $11, plus 28% of the amount over 59,975 $20, plus 33% of the amount over 91,400 $44, plus 35% of the amount over 163,225 Head of Household If taxable income is over-- But not over- - The tax is: $0 $10,450 10% of the amount over $0 $10,450 $39,800 $1,045 plus 15% of the amount over 10,450 $39,800 $102,800 $5, plus 25% of the amount over 39,800 $102,800 $166,450 $166,450 $326,450 $326,450 no limit $21, plus 28% of the amount over 102,800 $39, plus 33% of the amount over 166,450 $91, plus 35% of the amount over 326,450
11 This chart is the most recent income tax schedule, which is for the 2005 fiscal year. But since 2001, the boundaries for the different tax brackets have been raising at an average of 2.2 percent per year. In the 4th bracket * Estimation Single Begin End 2001 $65, $136, *2002 $67, $140, $68, $143, $70, $146, $71, $150, N/A This is based off the fourth tax bracket working from the bottom up for individuals that file as a single. This tax bracket was chosen for the simple reason that most of the middle class is classified within this particular tax bracket. The classification of single was chosen because it is what the other classifications are based off of. Married filing jointly or qualifying widow(er) is simply double that of filing as single, and married filing separately has the same pay out schedule as single does. The head of household filers pay out a little bit under the average between single filers and married filing jointly or qualifying widow(er). The stipulations for the tax schedules differences will be explain in the next paragraph. There are no real inequalities to be found in the way individuals classify themselves to be put into their respective categories as they have been labeled. The system obviously accounts for the married couple that is filing together, which can easily be seen to be two single filers. As previously stated, single filers pay just half of married joint filers. Individuals that file as head of household do not necessarily take
12 advantage or exploit any inequalities for one particular reason. They are the individuals that provide more than half of the expenses to run a household in a given year. They are given a tax break, because they are already supporting the monetary weight of providing for at least half of all the individuals that they have claimed within their household. The Tax Inequality The real income tax inequality stems from the fact that with each increasing level of tax brackets the percentage rate at which an individual s annual income is taxed grows exponentially. This is type of tax is classified as a progressive income tax, because those who make more, actually pay more in both percentage and dollar amounts. In Table #1 under the Single category, which is our default example, displays the simple guidelines of the income tax schedule. Chart #1 (next page), shows this in a graphical form by which one can truly see the dramatic inequality increase in income tax percentage rates beginning from the lower tax brackets from Table #1. The higher tax brackets show a decreasing rate of the increase of income tax rates.
13 Chart #1 (Data taken from Table #1: Single) Tax Rate Schedules 2005 Annual Income $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Tax Rate My Thoughts This chart graphically displays the exact inequality for which this paper was written about. The beginning of this paper was used to build the mind set and the history of how easily the income tax rates have been changed. Inequalities arose for such reasons as funding world wars or fighting the depression. Such fluctuations in tax rates are not even considered in today s economy, for such jumps in income tax rates would most likely bring the U.S. economy to a stop. Also in those pages was the set up how individuals classify themselves under the income tax schedules with regards to income level and classifications with regards to living situations. I would like to propose the idea of a proportional or a flat tax. This type of tax requires every tax paying individual to give up a certain, consistent percentage of their income to pay to the government for income
14 tax purposes. Every qualifying citizen would pay an equal percentage of their income to the government. This in my opinion is an equal system of income taxation. I believe a twenty-seven percent tax rate would be a fair rate for all individuals that make above $25,400 a year. This would I believe a twenty-seven percent tax rate would be a fair rate for all individuals that make above $25,400 a year. allow for the individuals who earn $25,400 a year to make enough after-tax income to be just above the poverty level. This would give them an after tax income of $20,000, where the poverty level is at $19,000 per year (Miller, Gerald). This clause would be implemented in order to help the less fortunate workers of America; not to create an inequality that I am trying to eliminate. Something is really only an inequality when a situation is unfair. Taxing the person that already lives below the poverty level and makes only $6,000 a year would be unfair to that person and unethical in my mind. Allowing individuals in situations such as that to be taxed would be putting a strain on the U.S. economy. It would push individuals out of their jobs, because it would seem to them that their little amount of money is going straight to the government without a return. Any fair tax system should not drive its own people farther down into poverty in order for it to create revenue. Rather it should help shelter them, if not help them on the road out of poverty.
15 Upon further evaluation, a hole was found in my proposal. There seemed to be no incentive for an individual to earn any more money over $20,000. Once they reached an annual income of $20,001 the 27 percent tax would bring an individual s disposable income down to $14,600. To account for this situation, every individual that makes between $20,000 and $25,400 per year will pay the difference over $20,000 up to $5,400. This would in essence create three different tax brackets but not any inequalities. If taxable income is over- - But not over- - $0 $20,000 Nothing is paid out The tax is: $20,001 $25,400 Pay the difference above $20,000 up to $5,400 $25,401 no limit Pay 27% of the amount of income These brackets do not create inequalities, but instead follow the laws within my train of thought that have been instilled in me. Every individual should be given the right to live a good life and prosper in society. I am merely trying to follow a moral law of equality, which is respectful of every human. Just as the current tax system works, I would use the same categories by which each individual should classify themselves; single, married filing jointly, qualifying widow(er), etc I would however not allow the married filing separately category. This is to prevent a married couple from creating an inequality by cheating the system out of taxes that should be going to the government. Take for example a doctor that makes $500,000 a year and a childcare worker that makes $20,000 a year.
16 The childcare worker could file separately and cheat from paying $5,400 in taxes. There is really no need for a couple to gain $5,400 on top of their $365,000 disposable income in order to have a decent lifestyle. They would already be classified as a wealthy family. I am certain that if these measures were taken, the inequalities in the tax system would be nearly washed away in every possible stand that could be taken on the subject. One last issue to look at is the amount that the revenue from taxes will be decreasing by. I do believe with the carelessness that we throw around the national debt figure, and do nothing about it the U.S. economy will not be hurt that much. The national debt is at $7.78 trillion as of April 27, There have been no plans to pay it back lately and in reality there would little reason to have Treasury Bonds if the government had no need to obtain money. Even then it would be a on and off market when the government would issue bonds and I imagine that the risk would be greater and less appealing to potential buyers. As long as the interest payments to the banks are paid enough not to hurt the banks that help support our economy we will be fine. In addition, government usually finds a way to cut costs and minimize the increasing deficit. Equality had by all, will be upon us shortly.
The President s Agenda for Tax Relief
The President s Agenda for Tax Relief These are the basic ideas that guide my tax policy: lower income taxes for all, with the greatest help for those most in need. Everyone who pays income taxes benefits
More informationTHE BUFFETT RULE: A BASIC PRINCIPLE OF TAX FAIRNESS. The National Economic Council
THE BUFFETT RULE: A BASIC PRINCIPLE OF TAX FAIRNESS The National Economic Council April 2012 The Buffett Rule: A Basic Principle of Tax Fairness The Buffett Rule is the basic principle that no household
More informationExecutive Summary. 204 N. First St., Suite C PO Box 7 Silverton, OR 97381 www.ocpp.org 503-873-1201 fax 503-873-1947
Executive Summary 204 N. First St., Suite C PO Box 7 Silverton, OR 97381 www.ocpp.org 503-873-1201 fax 503-873-1947 On Whose Backs? Tax Distribution, Income Inequality, and Plans for Raising Revenue By
More informationFamily Matters: Pennsylvania s 100% Marginal Income Tax Rate. Gary L. Welton Ph.D.
Family Matters: Pennsylvania s 100% Marginal Income Tax Rate Gary L. Welton Ph.D. According to the National Taxpayers Union, the U.S. Tax Code includes 3,951,104 words. It is more than twice the length
More informationPolicy Focus. The Need for Social Security Reform. Republicans and Democrats increasingly acknowledge that reforming. what you need to know
Policy Focus The Need for Social Security Reform Recipes for Rational Government from the Independent Women s Forum Carrie Lukas, Managing Director, Independent Women s Forum August 2011 Volume 1, Number
More informationTax Research: Understanding Sources of Tax Law (Why my IRC beats your Rev Proc!)
Tax Research: Understanding Sources of Tax Law (Why my IRC beats your Rev Proc!) Understanding Federal Statutes and Legislation Federal statutes provide the foundation of the tax system in the United States.
More informationThe primary purpose of a tax system is to support public goods and services. State and local taxes
Issue Brief UPDATED APRIL 2015 BY WILLIAM CHEN Who Pays Taxes in California? The primary purpose of a tax system is to support public goods and services. State and local taxes are the way that Californians
More informationTexas Payroll Conference
Texas Payroll Conference Garnishments All Others Taunya Fritzsching, CPP Agenda Involuntary Deductions Garnishment Overview Federal Tax Levy State Tax Levy Student Loans Creditor Garnishments Bankruptcy
More informationTHE GRADUATED PERSONAL INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
LEGISLATIVE REVENUE OFFICE State Capitol Building 900 Court St. NE, Room H-197 Salem, Oregon 97301 Research Brief (503) 986-1266 FAX (503) 986-1770 http://www.leg.state.or.us/comm/lro/home.htm Number 3-03
More informationTHE ESTATE TAX: MYTHS AND REALITIES
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org Revised October 11, 2007 THE ESTATE TAX: MYTHS AND REALITIES The estate tax has been
More informationA Fresh Start for the U.S.Tax System
Michael J. Graetz 100 Million Unnecessary Returns: A Fresh Start for the U.S.Tax System Dozens of people showed up at the irs Midtown office in New York City as they faced the deadline on the last day
More informationU.S. Government Receivables and Debt Collection Activities of Federal Agencies
FISCAL YEAR 2013 REPORT TO THE CONGRESS U.S. Government Receivables and Debt Collection Activities of Federal Agencies Department of the Treasury July 2014 department of the treasury washington, dc office
More informationRemarks by Dr. N. Gregory Mankiw Chairman Council of Economic Advisers at the National Bureau of Economic Research Tax Policy and the Economy Meeting
Remarks by Dr. N. Gregory Mankiw Chairman Council of Economic Advisers at the National Bureau of Economic Research Tax Policy and the Economy Meeting National Press Club November 4, 2003 My remarks today
More informationSlide 2. Income Taxes
Slide 1 Taxes Income taxes have been a part of American life since 1909 when the 16 th Amendment to the Constitution was ratified. You can t avoid taxes, so you might as well understand how taxes are structured
More informationINCOME TAXES. Government (public) spending, federal income taxes, state income taxes, marginal vs. average tax rates, tax planning
Grades 9-12 Lesson 9 INCOME TAXES Key concepts: Government (public) spending, federal income taxes, state income taxes, marginal vs. average tax rates, tax planning Summary: This lesson introduces students
More informationTaxing Capital Gains FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: To Build A Better Future For Our Children: WHAT ARE CAPITAL GAINS?
Taxing Capital Gains To Build A Better Future For Our Children: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: WHAT ARE CAPITAL GAINS? Capital gains are profits from the sale of corporate stocks, bonds, investment
More informationOther Deductions from Pay Section 9
Other Deductions from Pay Section 9 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 2 FYI - TOPICS FROM CONTENT OUTLINE... 2 INVOLUNTARY DEDUCTIONS... 2 Tax Levies... 2 Child Support Withholding Orders... 4 Creditor
More informationADMINISTRATION TAX-CUT RHETORIC AND SMALL BUSINESSES. By Joel Friedman
820 First Street, NE, Suite 510, Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org ADMINISTRATION TAX-CUT RHETORIC AND SMALL BUSINESSES By Joel Friedman September 28,
More informationGUIDE TO OHIO S SCHOOL DISTRICT INCOME TAX Prepared by THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION JUNE 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Gui det oohi o s SchoolDi st r i ct I ncometax Updat edjune2013 GUIDE TO OHIO S SCHOOL DISTRICT INCOME TAX Prepared by THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION JUNE 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS General Filing On the
More informationHow To Know If A Health Insurance Tax Is Progressive
Citizens for Tax Justice December 11, 2009 Would the Senate Democrats proposed excise tax on highcost employer-paid health insurance benefits be progressive? Summary Senate Democrats have proposed a new,
More informationUnited States General Accounting Office. Testimony Before the Committee on Finance, United States Senate
GAO United States General Accounting Office Testimony Before the Committee on Finance, United States Senate For Release on Delivery Expected at 10:00 a.m. EST on Thursday March 8, 2001 ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM
More informationEverything You Wanted to Know About the IRS Tax Forms Composition Process But Were Afraid to Ask
Everything You Wanted to Know About the IRS Tax Forms Composition Process But Were Afraid to Ask Session 50 Karen L. Gill Visual Information Specialist Composition and PSD Section Publishing Division Media
More informationIRS Tax Gap: 2001 and 2006 (Billions)
A FairTax Whitepaper Tax Compliance Facts What the federal tax system is costing you besides your taxes! The Tax Gap affects all taxpayers. The Tax Gap is the difference between the amount of tax due and
More informationAn Analysis of SB 535 s Proposed Corporate and Personal Income Tax Capital Gains Tax Cut
Oregon Center for Public Policy 204 North First Street, Suite C P.O. Box 7, Silverton, OR 97381-0007 Telephone: 503.873.1201 Facsimile: 503.873.1947 e-mail: info@ocpp.org www.ocpp.org An Analysis of SB
More informationENSIGN AMENDMENT WOULD UNDERCUT IMMIGRATION BILL GOALS BY IMPOSING UNAFFORDABLE TAX BURDENS ON MANY IMMIGRANTS By Aviva Aron-Dine and John Wancheck
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org Revised September 28, 2007 ENSIGN AMENDMENT WOULD UNDERCUT IMMIGRATION BILL GOALS BY
More informationDetails and Analysis of Dr. Ben Carson s Tax Plan
FISCAL FACT Jan. 2016 No. 493 Details and Analysis of Dr. Ben Carson s Tax Plan By Kyle Pomerleau Director of Federal Projects Key Findings Dr. Ben Carson s tax plan would replace the federal income tax
More informationSocial Security and Taxes
Social Security and Taxes Social Security is a safety net for the middle class and a lifeline for millions more. For more than 60 percent of Americans age 65 and over, it provides over 50 percent of their
More informationLesson Description. Grade Level. Concepts. Objectives. Content Standards
Lesson Description The lead article in the spring 2010 issue of Inside the Vault discusses the redistribution of wealth through taxation. In this lesson, students use different household scenarios to examine
More informationAre Missoula s Property Taxes High?
Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? Page 1 Are Missoula s Property Taxes High? A Report to the Missoula Organization of REALTORS Douglas J Young Professor Emeritus Montana State University Bozeman djyoung@montana.edu
More informationUnit 4: Taxes. Read this unit including websites. You may want to take your own notes.
Taxes Read Chapter 4 in the text. Read Chapter 7 of The Financial Checkup. Read this unit including websites. You may want to take your own notes. Are taxes your favorite topic? They are not the favorite
More informationThe Consequences of Increasing Oregon s Income Tax Deduction for Federal Income Taxes Paid
Oregon Center for Public Policy 204 North First Street, Suite C P.O. Box 7, Silverton, OR 97381-0007 Telephone: 503.873.1201 Facsimile: 503.873.1947 e-mail: info@ocpp.org www.ocpp.org The Consequences
More informationINCOME TAX REFORM. What Does It Mean for Taxpayers?
BRIEFING PAPER INCOME TAX REFORM What Does It Mean for Taxpayers? Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel DECEMBER 2006 UTAH LEGISLATURE HIGHLIGHTS SB 4001, passed in the 2006 4th Special Session,
More informationHow Much Do Americans Pay in Federal Taxes? April 15, 2014
How Much Do Americans Pay in Federal Taxes? April 15, 2014 One of the most hotly debated issues of our time is the fairness of our federal tax system. But too often, discussions are clouded and confused
More informationDivorce Tax Considerations
Divorce Tax Considerations Divorce is a tough process, and one that doesn t end after a court date. Knowing your rights and obligations and understanding tax implications will make the process less difficult.
More informationTo Our Clients and Friends:
To Our Clients and Friends: With the start of school just a few weeks away, we thought it might be a good time to summarize the federal income tax rules that apply to the most common types of financial
More informationCity of Oxford, Ohio. Income Tax Division www.ritaohio.com. Frequently asked questions about Municipal Income Tax
City of Oxford, Ohio Income Tax Division www.ritaohio.com Frequently asked questions about Municipal Income Tax 1 Table of Contents Current Tax Rate for Oxford, Ohio What does the City do with the income
More informationWorcester Business Journal
Worcester Business Journal IRS audits on the rise Written by Joy Child, C.P.A., PFS Monday, 11 December 2006 Agency gets aggressive about closing the "Tax Gap" Many people would rather have a root canal
More informationCrunch or Crucible? Upcoming Changes in the Federal Tax Law A Special Edition Tax Guide for Friends and Alumni of Pomona College
Upcoming Changes in the Federal Tax Law A Special Edition Tax Guide for Friends and Alumni of Pomona College Pomona College, Office of Trusts & Estates, 550 N. College Ave., Claremont, CA 91711 www.pomona.planyourlegacy.org
More informationChapter 1 An Introduction to Taxation and Understanding the Federal Tax Law
Chapter 1 An Introduction to Taxation and Understanding the Federal Tax Law CHAPTER HIGHLIGHTS A proper analysis of the current U.S. tax system begins with an examination of the historical principles that
More informationTestimony of Marilyn Landis,
Testimony of Marilyn Landis, Basic Business Concepts, Inc. On Behalf of The National Small Business Association House Small Business Committee Hearing Reforming the Tax Code to Assist Small Businesses
More informationSocial Security Benefits and the 55.5% Tax Bracket. by Larry Layton CPA
Social Security Benefits and the 55.5% Tax Bracket by Larry Layton CPA Every year there is a lot of press regarding the need for Congress to step in and provide an income adjustment for the Alternative
More informationCollection Activity Administrative Judgments April 2, 2015
Collection Activity Administrative Judgments April 2, 2015 Proposal Administrative judgments would allow the Department of Taxes to garnish wages or levy a bank account (asset attachment) for a delinquent
More informationSmart Tax, Business & Planning Ideas from your Trusted Business Advisor sm
Smart Tax, Business & Planning Ideas from your Trusted Business Advisor sm The Coming Cost of Health Insurance Two new laws the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and the Health Care and
More information"PAY-AS-YOU-GO" Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
"PAY-AS-YOU-GO" [THE RUML PLAN REVISED] A full transcript of an interview by Beardsley Ruml on the CBS "People's Platform," broadcast over the Columbia Broadcasting System coast-to-coast network, Saturday,
More informationTax Foundation taxfoundation_episode_21 Page 1 of 7 Chris Atkins and Arthur Rosen
Tax Foundation taxfoundation_episode_21 Page 1 of 7 Hello. I m Chris Atkins, Staff Attorney at the Tax Foundation. Today s guest is Arthur Rosen. Art is a partner in the New York City office of the law
More informationThe FY 2015 Budget Takes Steps toward Correcting DC s Unbalanced Tax System
DRAFTDRA An Affiliate of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities 820 First Street NE, Suite 460 Washington, DC 20002 (202) 408-1080 Fax (202) 325-8839 www.dcfpi.org Testimony of Jenny Reed, Policy Director
More information- all the money you receive in a year - money from wages, tips, interest you earn, dividends, capital gains, etc.
4D Income Taxes there are 5 different categories Single You must be unmarried at the end of the year. Married filing jointly this is how most married people will file. Married filing separately occasionally,
More informationH.R. 1836 CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PAY-AS-YOU-GO ESTIMATE. Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001.
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PAY-AS-YOU-GO ESTIMATE June 4, 2001 H.R. 1836 Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 As cleared by the Congress on May 26, 2001 SUMMARY The Economic Growth
More informationCato Institute Policy Analysis No. 73: Deductible IRAs Are Best for Workers
Cato Institute Policy Analysis No. 73: Deductible IRAs Are Best for Workers June 3, 1986 Peter J. Ferrara Peter J. Ferrara, a Washington attorney, is author of Social Security: The Inherent Contradiction
More informationSelected Options to Raise Over $100 Billion in 2012 to Fund Health Care Reform (Revenue Impact in Billions of Dollars)
CTJ Citizens for Tax Justice May 21, 2009 Contact: Bob McIntyre (202) 299-1066 x22 Progressive Revenue Options to Fund Health Care Reform Politicians and pundits have lately written or spoken of the difficult
More informationTax Tips for Tax Year 2007 (Issued January 2008)
Topic Tax Tips for Tax Year 2007 (Issued January 2008) Publish Before Tax Tip 1 What s New for 2007? January 31, 2008 Tax Tip 2 Filing Requirements January 31, 2008 Tax Tip 3 Tax Assistance January 31,
More informationAN OVERVIEW OF STATE INCOME TAXES ARKANSAS AND SURROUNDING STATES
AN OVERVIEW OF STATE INCOME TAXES ARKANSAS AND SURROUNDING STATES A current topic of conversation among many who are concerned about economic development in Arkansas is how the State s taxation laws, particularly
More informationTopsy-Turvy State Income Tax Deductions for Federal Income Taxes Turn Tax Fairness on its Head
Topsy-Turvy State Income Tax Deductions for Federal Income Taxes Turn Tax Fairness on its Head Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy March 2011 1616 P Street NW Washington, DC 20036 (202) 299-1066
More informationThe 3.8% Medicare Surtax on Investment Income
Wealth Strategy Report The 3.8% Medicare Surtax on Investment Income OVERVIEW Beginning in 2013, certain investment income will be subject to an additional 3.8% surtax, enacted as part of the Health Care
More informationINCOME TAX. The Income Tax Act. being
1 INCOME TAX c. I-2 The Income Tax Act being Chapter I-2 of The Revised Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1978 (effective February 26, 1979) as amended by The Revised Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1978 (Supplement),
More informationThe GPO predominantly penalizes women educators in California, while the WEP penalizes many individuals who switch careers into public service.
Chair Pomeroy and Members, Social Security has met the social insurance promise to ensure workers will not have to live in old age poverty. This promise needs to be guaranteed for current and future workers.
More informationCurrently, for the very low-income, Medicaid is available for children, parents, and individuals who are disabled, elderly, or pregnant.
0 Currently, for the very low-income, Medicaid is available for children, parents, and individuals who are disabled, elderly, or pregnant. Parents are typically covered at very low income levels, and most
More informationTHE MORTGAGE INTEREST DEDUCTION Frequently Asked Questions
THE MORTGAGE INTEREST DEDUCTION Frequently Asked Questions Prepared by the National Low Income Housing Coalition Updated April 2013 Owning one s home is a strong American value. Most Americans consider
More informationProperty Tax Relief: The $7 Billion Reality
August 2008 Property Tax Relief: The $7 Billion Reality In the spring of 2006, Texas lawmakers passed a massive package of school finance reforms. School tax rates for maintenance and operations were to
More informationPreserving Retirement Assets: An IRA Rollover Review
Preserving Retirement Assets: An IRA Rollover Review How will you replace your income when you retire? What will happen to your standard of living when your income ceases at retirement? Table of Contents
More informationThe Torchlight Tax Guide
The Torchlight Tax Guide by Dave Horwedel, EA Guiding Your Way Through the IRS Labyrinth The purpose of this booklet is to help people on their taxes. It is not written in a ponderous style, and if an
More informationCIRCUIT COURT OF ILLINOIS. Sixth Judicial Circuit Champaign County
Sixth Judicial Circuit Champaign County How to do a Wage Deduction Proceeding If you already have a money judgment against someone, you are the Petitioner. The other party, who owes you the money, is the
More informationScheduled for a Public Hearing. Before the SENATE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE. on April 5, 2001. Prepared by the Staff. of the JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION
OVERVIEW OF PRESENT LAW RELATING TO THE INNOCENT SPOUSE, OFFERS-IN-COMPROMISE, INSTALLMENT AGREEMENT, AND TAXPAYER ADVOCATE PROVISIONS OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE Scheduled for a Public Hearing Before
More informationBIG MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT SMALL BUSINESS AND TAXES By Chye-Ching Huang and James Horney
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org Revised February 2, 2009 BIG MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT SMALL BUSINESS AND TAXES By Chye-Ching
More informationWhat the federal tax system is costing you besides your taxes! Tax Compliance Facts
A FairTax SM White Paper What the federal tax system is costing you besides your taxes! Tax Compliance Facts The Tax Gap affects all taxpayers. The Tax Gap is the difference between the amount of tax due
More informationTax Reform & Tax Relief Package
Tax Reform & Tax Relief Package The New Credit System Summary The new tax reform plan (LD 1495) uses new household credits in place of personal exemptions and standard and itemized deductions. These credits
More informationTax Relief for Low-Income Arkansans
Tax Relief for Low-Income Arkansans What are the options? January 2007 There has been much discussion in this legislative session about how to provide tax relief for low-income families. Two proposals
More informationKURT D. PANOUSES, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 310 Fifth Avenue Indialantic, FL 32903 (321) 729-9455 FAX: (321) 768-2655
KURT D. PANOUSES, P.A. ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 310 Fifth Avenue Indialantic, FL 32903 (321) 729-9455 FAX: (321) 768-2655 Kurt D. Panouses is Board Certified by the Florida Bar as a Specialist in
More informationWASHINGTON TAX UPDATE
WASHINGTON TAX UPDATE OCTOBER 24, 2012 Welcome to Washington Tax Update, where you will find useful information about taxes, including current events in our nation s capital, as well as informed opinions
More informationArticle for Construction Business Owner magazine, 2011 (series of three articles)
Article for Construction Business Owner magazine, 2011 (series of three articles) Series Title: Creating a Culture of Employees Who Think and Act Like Owners Article One Title: The Importance of Educating
More informationFive Flaws of the Current Pension System
The Administration s Savings Accounts Proposals: A Critique Peter Orszag and Gene Sperling November 13, 2003 Five Flaws of the Current Pension System 1. Few People Participate in the Current System Limited
More informationThe Economists Voice
The Economists Voice Volume 2, Issue 1 2005 Article 8 A Special Issue on Social Security Saving Social Security: The Diamond-Orszag Plan Peter A. Diamond Peter R. Orszag Summary Social Security is one
More informationCONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CBO. The Distribution of Household Income and Federal Taxes, 2008 and 2009
CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE Percent 70 The Distribution of Household Income and Federal Taxes, 2008 and 2009 60 50 Before-Tax Income Federal Taxes Top 1 Percent 40 30 20 81st
More informationProceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, August 5-9, 2001
Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, August 5-9, 2001 Sample Design Revisions in the Wake of NAICS and Regulatory Changes Paul B. McMahon, Internal Revenue Service,
More informationTax time and preserving
Tax time and preserving your federal rights Contact GLAD s Legal InfoLine for the most accurate, up-to-date information: www.glad.org/rights 800-455-GLAD Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders This document
More informationIMPACT. Taxpayer implications of an Economic Downturn TAX IMPLICATIONS
TAX IMPLICATIONS IMPACT Taxpayer implications of an Economic Downturn By Joseph LiPari, CPA, M.B.A. As the United States continues to be mired in its worst recession in 80 years, we are all well aware
More informationO.K. PARTY DEBT/SPENDING
DEBT/SPENDING General Overview: The national debt has totaled over 15 trillion dollars and counting. Something needs to be done to put a stop to our nation s outrageous spending. I believe that if we put
More informationFrequently Asked Questions about Taxes and SSA Disability Benefit Programs
Frequently Asked Questions about Taxes and SSA Disability Benefit Programs February 2012 Contributing Authors and Editors: Jim Huston, CPA (Venture Mentors, LLC) and Lucy Miller QUESTION: I have been getting
More informationFrequently Asked Questions about Taxes and SSA Disability Benefit Programs
Frequently Asked Questions about Taxes and SSA Disability Benefit Programs January 2010 QUESTION: I have been getting services from my local Work Incentives Planning and Assistance (WIPA) project can my
More informationINTERACTION OF AUTOMATIC IRAS AND THE RETIREMENT SAVINGS CONTRIBUTIONS CREDIT (SAVER S CREDIT)
INTERACTION OF AUTOMATIC IRAS AND THE RETIREMENT SAVINGS CONTRIBUTIONS CREDIT (SAVER S CREDIT) A Report Prepared for AARP By: Optimal Benefit Strategies, LLC Judy Xanthopoulos, PhD Mary M. Schmitt, Esq.
More informationFrequently Asked Questions (FAQ s) Why is the change being made and why does the employee care?
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ s) Why is the change being made and why does the employee care? The change will improve departmental efficiency and be more productive to the departmental core businesses.
More informationDisability insurance can be
COMMITTED TO YOUR SUCCESS Winter 2011 Make Disability Insurance Less Taxing Disability insurance can be a valuable part of your risk management plan. If you cannot work because of an illness or injury,
More informationUnanticipated Tax Changes in the United States
Unanticipated Tax Changes in the United States Karel Mertens 1,3 and Morten O. Ravn 2,3 Cornell University 1, University College London 2, and the CEPR 3 August 2011 In this appendix, we describe the decomposition
More informationtax planning strategies
tax planning strategies In addition to saving income taxes for the current and future years, effective tax planning can reduce eventual estate taxes, maximize the amount of funds you will have available
More information(c) The statutory provisions for taxation of personal income are contained within Revenue and Taxation Code sections 17001 to 18181 inclusive.
SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FINDINGS (a) Our state Revenue and Taxation Code provides for the taxation of personal income, corporate income and gross receipts or sales price of tangible personal property sold
More informationTax Issues for Domestic Violence Survivors: What Advocates Need To Know
Tax Issues for Domestic Violence Survivors: What Advocates Need To Know Can You Hear Us? If you cannot hear us, please dial in now: Dial 1-866-740-1260 Passcode: 5887610 2 Tax Issues for Domestic Violence
More information! At least 3.1 million women raising children as a single parent, or 36% of all single mothers, will receive no tax benefit from the Bush plan.
March 5, 2001 Women and Children Last: The Bush Tax Cut Plan The President has proposed a tax cut plan that fails to offer any benefits to the lowestincome families, most of whom are headed by women and
More informationTestimony of Utah State Representative Wayne Harper before the Judiciary Committee of the United States House of Representatives on July 24, 2012:
Testimony of Utah State Representative Wayne Harper before the Judiciary Committee of the United States House of Representatives on July 24, 2012: Thank you Chairman Smith, Ranking Member Conyers and Members
More informationFederal Budget in Pictures CUT SPENDING // FIX THE DEBT // REDUCE THE TAX BURDEN$
2015 Federal Budget in Pictures CUT SPENDING // FIX THE DEBT // REDUCE THE TAX BURDEN$ 2015 Federal Budget in Pictures CUT SPENDING // FIX THE DEBT // REDUCE THE TAX BURDEN Thomas A. Roe Institute for
More informationHow Can a Traditional IRA Help Me Save For Retirement?
Learn About IRAs Traditional IRAs How can a Traditional IRA help me save for retirement? Who may contribute, and how much? What is a spousal contribution? What is a SEP Contribution? What is an IRA catch-up
More informationThe Consequences of Increasing Oregon s Income Tax Deduction for Federal Income Taxes Paid
The Consequences of Increasing Oregon s Income Tax Deduction for Federal Income Taxes Paid Prepared By: The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy Washington, DC 20005 www.ctj.org/itep For: Oregon Center
More informationU.S. Government Receivables and Debt Collection Activities of Federal Agencies
FISCAL YEAR 2011 REPORT TO THE CONGRESS U.S. Government Receivables and Debt Collection Activities of Federal Agencies Department of the Treasury June 2012 department of the treasury washington, dc office
More informationBusiness Tax Reform Pros and Cons - A Comparison of Two Sides
Summary of Discussion with John James, Lawyer and former Commissioner of Revenue Civic Caucus 8301 Creekside Circle #920, Bloomington, MN 55437 January 15, 2010 Present: Verne Johnson (Chair); Marianne
More informationThe FairTax treatment of insurance
A FairTax SM White Paper The FairTax treatment of insurance The primary purpose of insurance is to mitigate risk, either on property or people. While life and annuity insurance products have some tax benefits
More informationCongress shows no enthusiasm for
Grading the President s Tax Reform Panel s Plan Laurence J. Kotlikoff Congress shows no enthusiasm for pushing the recommendations of the President s Tax Panel. Indeed, the White House shows no enthusiasm
More informationReducing the Deficit by Increasing Individual Income Tax Rates
Reducing the Deficit by Increasing Individual Income Tax Rates Eric Toder, Jim Nunns, and Joseph Rosenberg March 2012 The authors are all affiliated with the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. Toder is
More informationTestimony of. Lauren Asher Associate Director, Project on Student Debt. Before the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education
Testimony of Lauren Asher Associate Director, Project on Student Debt Before the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education In Response to the October 22, 2007 Notice of Negotiated
More informationPrivate annuity/trust
Deferring Capital Gains Taxes With A Private annuity/trust TM The National Association of Financial and Estate Planning NAFEP, 1999 and 2001 Revision 2 DEFERRAL OF CAPITAL GAINS AND DEPRECIATION RECAPTURE
More informationA series of informational publications designed to educate taxpayers about the tax impact of significant life events. Get Right
A series of informational publications designed to educate taxpayers about the tax impact of significant life events. Get Right Estimated Time: 15 minute video presentation, optional question and answer
More information