The HARBOUR Report North America Press Release MANUFACTURING COMPANY BY COMPANY PLANT BY PLANT. Harbour News.

Transcription

1 The HARBOUR Report 2007 North America Press Release MANUFACTURING COMPANY BY COMPANY PLANT BY PLANT Contents 1 Harbour News 2 Industry Overview 3 Performance Data 4 Conclusions 1

2 2006 Headlines Toyota leads the six largest competitors in total manufacturing productivity (assembly, stamping, engine and transmission), using labor hours per vehicle. GM captures 3 of 4 Best Plant awards. Honda leads the six largest companies in vehicle assembly productivity with hours per vehicle. The gap among the six major North America automakers continues to narrow. The correlation between quality and productivity continues to strengthen. Improved labor productivity allows money to be redirected to make future vehicles more appealing. Flexibility through more competitive agreements is beginning to pay off, but more must be done. GM and Ford buyouts partially offset volume losses, and will have a bigger impact in Fewer plants are producing more vehicles and a wider variety of models supported by flexibility and productivity gains throughout the industry. North American Market Share Car / Truck Volume 1989 & 2006 Truck Volume Car Volume N.A. Market Share Percentages 14% % % % % 24% % % % % % 15% % 51% 29% 71% 39% 61% 33% 67% 67% 59% 41% 100% 0% 59% 41% 76% 24% 56% 44% 72% 28% 58% 42% 33% 2

3 Capacity Utilization Range 148% 138% 100% 124% 98% 91% 88% 77% 93% 93% 77% 108% 103% 95% 79% 51% 52% 64% 27% North American Pre-Tax Profit Per Vehicle $2,069 $1,581 $1,575 $1,214 $1,368 $1,266 $701 $226 ($50) ($1,072) ($1,436) Percent Change from % 13% -20% -581% 43% ($5,234) -787% DCX / Ford / GM - data based on calendar year Honda / Nissan / Toyota - data based on fiscal year Currency Conversions: 108 Yen / Euro 3

4 Vehicle Assembly MANUFACTURING COMPANY BY COMPANY PLANT BY PLANT The Hours Per Vehicle (HPV) Measure Hours worked by all plant personnel Salary Direct Hourly Indirect Hourly All units produced 4

5 History of Vehicle Assembly - HPV Hours Per Vehicle: Body, Paint, Trim, Chassis, and Final Assembly Percent Change from % 2.5% 1.2% -3.3% 1.4% -8.3%* GM excludes Medium Duty plants. Honda and Toyota data include partial reporting of North American plants. * Nissan data estimated by Harbour with publicly available data 2006 Company Assembly Labor Productivity Hours Per Vehicle (HPV) HPV % % = Percent change % -1.8% 6.1% % 1.3% % % Companies not ranked due to partial reporting of plants. 1.4% -3.3% %* Industry Average Industry Average includes all companies. GM excludes Medium Duty. * Nissan data estimated by Harbour from publicly available data 5

6 Top Ten Vehicle Assembly Plants Oshawa #2 Oshawa #1 Kansas City #1 CAMI Fairfax Alliston#1 and ELP NUMMI Car Allure, Grand Prix, LaCrosse Impala, Monte Carlo Escape, Mariner, Tribute Equinox, Torrent, XL-7 Aura, Malibu Civic, CSX, CR-V, Element Corolla, Vibe *Hours Per Vehicle Chicago Lordstown Georgetown #2 Five Hundred, Freestyle, Montego Cobalt, G5, Pursuit Camry, Hybrid Camry, Solara * Ford Atlanta (15.24) not included due to plant idling in October 2006 Plant Segment Ranking Top 3 Spring Hill Compact Non-Premium Conventional ION ELP/Alliston #1 NUMMI Car Civic Corolla, Vibe Atlanta Midsize Non-Premium Conventional Taurus Oshawa #2 Allure, Grand Prix, LaCrosse Fairfax Windsor Aura, Malibu Midsize Non-Premium Van Caravan, Town & Country St. Louis S. TMMI East Caravan, Cargo Van Town & Country Sienna

7 Compact Non-Premium CUV Plant Segment Ranking Top 3 CAMI CAMI ELP Torrent Equinox, XL-7 CR-V Chicago Midsize Non-Premium CUV Freestyle Ramos Arizpe Windsor Rendezvous Pacifica Midsize Non-Premium Pickup NUMMI Truck Shreveport Twin Cities Tacoma Canyon, Colorado, I-Series B-Series, Ranger Plant Segment Ranking Top 3 Midsize Non-Premium Utility Jefferson N. Toledo North Grand Cherokee Nitro Moraine Ascender, Envoy, Rainier Large Non-Premium Pickup Fort Wayne Kansas City #2 Norfolk Sierra, Silverado F-Series F-Series Large Non-Premium Utility Arlington Suburban, Tahoe, Yukon, Yukon XL Newark Janesville Durango Suburban, Tahoe, Yukon, Yukon XL

8 Stamping MANUFACTURING COMPANY BY COMPANY PLANT BY PLANT Stamping Index Methodology Parts Per Labor Hour Parts Per Line 20% 10% 10% Operating Hours Per Die Change 40% 20% Parts Per Hour Average Die Changeover Time 8

9 Stamping - Top Ten Plants Marysville Georgetown Cambridge East Liberty Princeton West NUMMI Toluca Silao Dearborn Belvidere Stamping Measures By Company 764 Parts Per Hour (PPH) Percent Change from % 7% % -3% -16%

10 Engine MANUFACTURING COMPANY BY COMPANY PLANT BY PLANT Engine Productivity Hours Per Engine Percent Change from % % 4.3% -2.3% 2.0%

11 Top Ten Engine Plants - Hours per Engine Spring Hill West Virginia 2.0L L4 L850 Turbo; 2.2, 2.4L L4 L L I4, 3.3L V Dundee - GEMA 1.8, 2.0, 2.4L I Georgetown 2.4L L4, 2.4L L4 Hybrid, 3.5L V Flint South Lima Flint North Tonawanda 4.2L I6 3.0 V6 3.8L V6 2.2L L4 L850; 2.8, 2.9L I4; 3.5, 3.7L I5; 3.5, 3.9 HVV Anna Mack Avenue II 1.8L L4 CNG; 1.8L L4; 2.0, 2.3, 2.4L L4; 3.0, 3.2, 3.5, 3.7L V6 3.7L V Romulus Saltillo St. Catharines Mack Ave. I Romeo Windsor 8 Cyl OHV 8 Cyl OHC Engine Segment Comparisons - Top Lima Flint North Kenosha Flint South West Virginia Mack Ave. II West Virginia 6 Cyl OHV 6 Cyl OHC 4 Cyl OHC Georgetown Spring Hill *Gasoline engines only 11

12 Transmission MANUFACTURING COMPANY BY COMPANY PLANT BY PLANT Top 5 Transmission Plants - HPT Top 5 Plants Toledo 4L60E, 4L65E, 4L70E RWD 4-speed 2.54 Indiana #2 W5A580 RWD 5-speed 2.80 Ramos Arizpe 4L60E, 4L65E RWD 4-speed 3.36 Kokomo 42RLE RWD 4-speed, A604 FWD 4-speed, RWD Heavy Duty 3.36 Livonia 4R75W RWD 4-speed, 6R RWD 6-speed

13 Transmission Segment Comparisons Top 3 FWD Kokomo Van Dyke Windsor Toledo Kokomo Indiana #2 RWD North American History - Total Hours Per Unit Percent Change from % 2.4% 2.5% 2.7% (5.3%)* (1.8%) GM excludes Medium Duty. Honda and Toyota data includes partial reporting of North American plants. * Nissan data estimated by Harbour with publicly available data 13