Why are Derivative Warrants More Expensive than Options? An Empirical Study


 Claude Craig
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Why are Derivative Warrants More Expensive than Options? An Empirical Study Gang Li and Chu Zhang This version: May, 2009 Li, Hong Kong Baptist University (HKBU), Kowloon Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong and Zhang, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST), Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong. We would like to thank Du Du, George Jiang, Nengjiu Ju, Ming Liu, Sophie Ni, Qian Sun, Yexiao Xu, seminar participants at 2008 China International Conference in Finance and Universities of Fudan, HKBU, HKUST, Macau, and Xiamen, and especially the anonymous referee for helpful comments on earlier versions of the paper. Chu Zhang acknowledges financial support from HKUST research project competition grant, RPC06/07.BM28. All remaining errors are ours.
2 Why are Derivative Warrants More Expensive than Options? An Empirical Study Abstract Derivative warrants typically have higher prices than do otherwise identical options. Using data from the Hong Kong market during , we show that the price difference reflects the liquidity premium of derivative warrants over options. Newly issued derivative warrants are much more liquid than are options with similar terms. As a result, longterm derivative warrants are preferred by traders who trade frequently. In spite of their higher prices, shortterm returns on longterm derivative warrants are, in fact, higher than the hypothetical shortterm returns on options. The differences in price and liquidity measures decline as the contracts get closer to maturity.
3 I. Introduction The call and put derivative warrants traded in many markets are like usual call and put options traded in the US and elsewhere, except that they can be issued (i.e., sold short) only by certain financial institutions approved by regulators. It has been observed that derivative warrants tend to be priced higher than otherwise identical options. This phenomenon, which is in violation of the law of one price, a central theme in financial economics, is the focus of the current paper. Our objective is to understand what causes derivative warrants and options with identical payoffs to have different prices and how they can coexist in the market. The main thrust of our investigation is the difference in liquidity between derivative warrants and options. The effect of liquidity on asset pricing has received considerable attention in the literature in recent years. In their seminal work, Amihud and Mendelson (1986) provide a theoretical argument that illiquidity caused by higher bidask spreads leads to price discounts and higher expected returns. There are many empirical studies on primitive assets confirming this theory. 1 On the liquidity effects on derivative assets, recent works include Jarrow and Potter (2008), Cetin, Jarrow, Protter, and Warachka (2006), Garleanu, Pedersen, and Poteshman (2007) and Deuskar, Gupta, and Subrahmanyam (2008). What makes derivatives, and especially options, special is that derivatives are in zero net supply. As buyers require price discounts on illiquid derivatives, sellers require price premiums. Whether illiquid derivatives carry a price discount or a price premium, as Deuskar at el. (2008) argue, depends on whether the marginal trader is a buyer or a seller, on the risk appetite of the marginal trader, on the extent to which the 1 Amihud and Mendelson (1989) and Brennan and Subrahmanyam (1996) find that illiquid stocks are traded at lower prices and have higher expected returns when other factors are controlled. Amihud and Mendelson (1991) find that the less liquid Treasury notes have lower prices and higher yieldstomaturity. Silber (1991) find that restricted stocks which are prohibited to trade in the open market are sold at an average discount of 33.75%. Chan, Hong, and Subrahmanyam (2006) find that a higher premium on American Depositary Receipts (ADR) is associated with higher ADR liquidity and lower home share liquidity. 1
4 derivative cannot be replicated by primitive assets, and on the nature of the illiquidity. As liquidity is a broad concept with many dimensions, it is possible that some notions of illiquidity cause price discounts on derivative assets while other notions of illiquidity lead to price premiums. Brenner, Eldor, and Hauser (2001) find that nontradable options are priced at a mean discount of 18% to 21% of the exchangetraded synthetic options with the same payoff and conclude that this form of illiquidity has an negative effect on derivative prices. On the other hand, some derivatives are demanded by investors for hedging and speculation, but there are few sellers around. Because of stochastic volatility, jumps, discrete rebalancing, transaction costs, and illiquidity of the underlying assets, derivatives cannot be replicated without costs. The buying pressure combined with illiquidity in this situation leads to price premiums. Deusker et al. (2008) document substantial price premiums on overthecounter interest rate caps and floors as dealers need to cover costs in hedging their short positions. A similar phenomenon documented by Bollen and Whaley (2004) is the overpricing of outofthemoney S&P 500 index put options which are bought by investors for hedging potential losses in large stocks, with few sellers. We investigate the difference in prices of derivative warrants and options written on the Hang Seng Index (HSI) in the Hong Kong market. The Hong Kong derivative warrants market is the largest in the world in terms of trading volume. 2 There is an advantage of our study of the liquidity effects on derivative prices over the existing studies. Unlike most other studies that involve inferring the price of the otherwise identical liquid asset for a given illiquid asset, both derivative warrants and options are traded in the market and their prices are directly observed. In addition, a variety of liquidity measures for both types of derivatives can be easily constructed. We use a matched sample of derivative warrants and options so that other factors affecting derivative prices, but unrelated to liquidity, are controlled. The quantitative relationship between the price difference and 2 Derivative warrants are traded in Germany, Switzerland, Italy, Britain, Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore, Korea and some other countries under different names. Derivative warrant is the term used in Hong Kong. 2
5 liquidity differences can be more easily examined. Our empirical results show that by the standard measures of liquidity, including bidask spread, trading volume, turnover ratio, contract size and the Amihud (2002) measure, longterm derivative warrants are much more liquid than are options. These results suggest that the overpricing of derivative warrants is explained by the liquidity differences between derivative warrants and options. The fact that derivative warrants are traded at higher prices than are options indicates that the illiquidity in these dimensions entails price discounts, consistent with Brenner et al. s (2001) findings. The results presented in this paper are also consistent with Deuskar et al. s (2008) argument regarding liquidity and price premiums/discounts. Since this is not the focus of the paper, we defer further discussions to the last section. The results on turnover ratios imply that about a half of the derivative warrants have a holding period of less than two weeks, and about 20% have a holding period of less than one day. On the contrary, about 80% of options contracts have a holding period of longer than one month. Derivative warrants are more frequently traded than are options. We further investigate the returns on derivative warrants and options for different holding periods, using ask prices for initial buying and bid prices for later selling. It turns out that shortterm holding period returns on derivative warrants are mostly higher than those on the corresponding options, although derivative warrants are bought at higher prices. As the holding period gets longer, the return difference between derivative warrants and the corresponding options becomes narrower. Eventually, the returns on options are higher than those of derivative warrants. These results are a manifestation of the clientele effect, proposed by Amihud and Mendelson (1986), that investors with different holding periods maximize the aftertransactioncost expected returns, which leads to a phenomenon, in equilibrium, that the assets with larger bidask spreads are held by investors with longer holding periods. Our work is also related to Chan and Pinder (2000) who study the derivative warrants market in Australia and find overpricing of derivative warrants relative to options. They 3
6 show that the trading volume of derivative warrants relative to that of options can explain some of the overpricing among other variables such as daystomaturity, the presence of market makers in the options market, and the identity of warrants issuers. We account for the overpricing of derivative warrants with a full range of liquidity measures. We also go one step further to analyze the holding period returns on derivative warrants and options. Our results indicate more clearly that two assets with identical cash flows but with different prices can coexist in the market if the transaction costs are different and that the more liquid derivative warrants market caters to the shortterm trading needs of investors. There are other studies of derivative warrants, especially on the Hong Kong market, but they are unrelated to warrant overpricing. 3 The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the Hong Kong derivative warrants and options markets. Section 3 describes the data. Section 4 provides evidence of overpricing of derivative warrants relative to options and presents the main results on overpricing and liquidity. Section 5 compares holding period returns on derivative warrants and options. Section 6 concludes the paper. II. The Derivative Warrants and Options Markets in Hong Kong Trading of derivative warrants and options in Hong Kong is conducted in the Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Limited (HKEx), which is divided into the Securities Market and the Derivatives Market. The Securities Market is also known as the Stock Exchange. For historic reasons, stocks and derivative warrants are traded on the Stock Exchange. The Derivatives Market is further divided into the Futures Exchange and the Stock Options 3 Duan and Yan (1999) use a semiparametric approach to pricing derivative warrants that substantially improves upon the BlackScholes model. Several papers in the literature focus on the effect of the introduction of derivative warrants on the price and trading volume of the underlying securities, for example, Chan and Wei (2001), Chen and Wu (2001) and Draper, Mak, and Tang (2001). A recent paper by Chow, Li, and Liu (2007) examines the trading records of market makers in the Hong Kong derivative warrants market to understand their inventory management. 4
7 Exchange. Index futures and index options, among others, are traded on the Futures Exchange, while options on individual stocks are traded on the Stock Options Exchange. There are two types of warrants listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange: equity warrants and derivative warrants. Equity warrants, issued by the underlying company itself, entitle holders to purchase equity securities from the underlying company at a predetermined price. Derivative call warrants are similar to equity warrants except that they are issued by a third party, usually a financial institution. Derivative put warrants, also issued by a third party, entitle holders to sell equity securities of an underlying company at a predetermined price to the issuer. In Hong Kong, trading of equity warrants started in 1977, while trading of derivative warrants started in In recent years, the bulk of the warrants traded on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange are derivative warrants. The underlying assets of the derivative warrants are mostly bluechip stocks. Other underlying assets include stock indexes, baskets of stocks, and some commodities. All the derivative warrants are of European style. The issuers of derivative warrants are typically largeand mediumsized financial institutions. Several major European and Australian banks, such as Societe Generale, KBC, Deutsche Bank, BNP Paribas, and Macquarie Bank, are among the most active issuers. Each underlying asset may have multiple issuers who compete with each other to offer popular contract specifications, lower prices and better liquidity. Options trading in Hong Kong started in March Initially, only options written on the HSI were introduced. Trading of options on individual stocks started in September The index options are of European style and settled by cash, while the stock options are of American style with physical delivery of the underlying assets upon exercise. The contract specifications of the options are set by the exchange. A system of market makers has been implemented whereby a handful of market makers is involved. At the end of 2007, there were 18 market makers in the Futures Exchange and about 30 market makers in the Stock Options Exchange. The market makers are required to provide liquidity to 5
8 the trading system. The requirements are not stringent, however. For options expiring in the nearest three months with nearthemoney strikes, market makers are required to provide continuous quotes, while for all others, they only need to respond to requests for quotes. Panels A and B of Figure 1 plot the total trading volume of derivative warrants and options in terms of billions of Hong Kong dollars (HKD) over the period The derivative warrants have gained much popularity over time with their trading volume increasing from about 7 billion HKD per month in 2002 to 397 billion HKD per month in By the end of 2006, the Hong Kong derivative warrants market had become the largest derivative warrants market in the world in terms of trading volume and it accounted for onethird of the total trading volume on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. The trading volume of options in Hong Kong grew at a moderate pace from about 1.04 billion HKD per month in 2002 to 14.2 billion HKD per month in 2007, which pales in comparison to the trading volume of derivative warrants. Figure 1 here The rapid growth of the derivative warrants market in Hong Kong owes much to certain regulatory changes made in late Before these changes, issuers were required to place at least 85% of a derivative warrants issue with more than 100 investors on the issue date (or more than 50 investors if the size of the warrant issue was small). This exerted substantial pressure on the issuers. The 2001 rule repealed that requirement so that issuers could sell an entire issue gradually over time. The 2001 rule also required that each issuer appoint a liquidity provider to input bid and ask prices in the trading system, either continuously or on request. The new rules improved the liquidity of the derivative warrants market substantially. Another factor that contributes to the relative liquidity of derivative warrants over options is their minimum trading size. Set by the exchange, a round lot of options 6
9 on stocks is the same as that of underlying stocks. However, a round lot of derivative warrants, determined by the issuer, is typically only onetenth of that of underlying stocks. This facilitates speculative trading by many small investors. There is much anecdotal evidence that options and derivative warrants have different clienteles. In a survey conducted by the HKEx, 50.7% of respondents revealed that they used the HSI options for pure trading, 37.4% for hedging, and 12% for arbitrage. Among the investors, only 24% were local and overseas retail investors and the remaining were either market makers, proprietary traders, or local and overseas institutional investors. In the derivative warrants market, most traders are individual investors and they tend to hold warrants for only short periods. A survey conducted in 2006 by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission revealed that 86.8% of the respondents traded derivative warrants for shortterm gains and only 0.4% of the respondents used derivative warrants for longterm investments. It should be noted that issuers of derivative warrants in Hong Kong are not required to hold the underlying assets, thus it is possible that derivative warrants may not be covered. On the other hand, options in Hong Kong are settled by the Hong Kong Futures Exchange Clearing Corporation and a margin is required for short positions. As a result, derivative warrants have higher credit risk than do options, therefore, other things being equal, derivative warrants should be traded at lower prices than options are traded. We show in Section 4.A, however, that derivative warrants tend to have higher prices than do options. III. Data Description A. Price Data We focus on derivative warrants and options written on the HSI in this paper. A comparison between derivative warrants and options on the index is clean as they are both 7
10 of European style and cashsettled. The HSI is the benchmark index in the Hong Kong stock market and the derivatives written on it are the most liquid ones. For the rest of the paper, we will refer to derivative warrants on the HSI as just warrants because the underlying is an index and there is no confusion. The data on warrants and options on the HSI are obtained from the HKEx. The warrants data include daily closing bid and ask prices, trading share volume, dollar volume, and other contract specifications such as maturity and strike price. The HKEx requires liquidity providers to disseminate the number of shares bought or sold, the average buying and selling prices, and the amount of warrants outstanding on a daily basis. Such information is available from the HKEx website. The options data include daily closing bid and ask prices, trading volume, open interest, maturity and strike price of the options. The HSI level is from Datastream. We use two samples of warrants and options matched with the same maturity and strike price. One sample, named TQ, consists of daily closing quotes with positive trading volume for warrants. In about onethird of this sample, the daily trading volume of options is zero. The other sample, named TT, consists of daily closing quotes with positive trading volumes for both warrants and options. Unless otherwise stated, all the results below are based on the TT sample. The sample period is from July 15, 2002 to December 31, Before this starting date, data on options are not available. There are many missing closing bid and ask quotes for the option data provided by the HKEx. We use the intraday option bid and ask quotes as supplements. 4 Panels C and D of Figure 1 plot the trading volume of warrants and options on the HSI during the sample period. The total trading volume of the warrants on the HSI increased from about 2.65 billion HKD per month in 2002 to about 81 billion HKD per month in However, the trading volume of the options on the HSI experienced only a moderate increase from about 0.75 billion HKD per month in 2002 to about 10 billion HKD per month in As we saw earlier for the whole market, the growth of the 4 We select the quote that is the closest to 4:00 pm, no earlier than 3:45 pm, and no later than 4:15 pm, because the warrants market is closed at 4:00 pm. 8
11 warrants on the HSI has been much faster than that of the options on the HSI. We denote the value of the HSI on business day t as H(t) and the strike price of a warrant or an option as K. Let p b w(t, κ, m) and p a w(t, κ, m) be the closing bid and ask prices, respectively, of a warrant (either a call or a put) on day t with moneyness, κ = 1 K/H(t) for a call and κ = K/H(t) 1 for a put, and maturity, m, measured by the number of days. Similarly, let p b o(t, κ, m) and p a o(t, κ, m) be the bid and ask closing prices, respectively, of the option (either a call or a put) on day t with moneyness, κ, and maturity, m. Warrants with the same (κ, m) issued by different issuers are treated as separate observations, but matched with the same option. For simplicity, the dependence of κ on t is suppressed unless it is necessary. We divide the entire matched sample into several groups according to moneyness and maturity. Moneyness is divided into the groups of κ 0.03 (outofthemoney, OTM), 0.03 < κ 0.03 (atthemoney, ATM) and κ > 0.03 (inthemoney, ITM). Maturity is divided into the groups of short term (ST) with m 60 days, medium term (MT) with 60 < m 120 days and long term (LT) with m > 120 days. If there are less than eight pairs of matched warrants and options within a group in a week, we regard the week as a missing week for that group. Table 1 shows the weekly average number of matched pairs of warrants and options and the nonmissing weeks in each of moneyness and maturity groups. There are about 235 matched pairs of warrants and options each week on average and the majority of the groups have more than 160 nonmissing weeks in the sample. The average of bidask average price of warrants, P w = 100(p a w + p b w)/2h, and of options, P o = 100(p a o + p b o)/2h, of various moneynessmaturity groups are reported in Table 1. The reason for normalizing by H is to make the price data comparable across time, as the values of the HSI and the values of derivatives written on it contain an upward trend. Defined this way, the prices of warrants or options are expressed in terms of the percentage of the HSI level. In all the groups, the prices of warrants are higher than those of options, and the overpricing is the highest for the LT groups. 9
12 Table 1 here B. Liquidity Variables We employ a number of variables to measure the liquidity of warrants and options contracts. We focus on liquidity, rather than liquidity risk, in this paper. The former refers to the tradability of a security without adverse market impact, while the latter refers to the unpredictable changes in liquidity over time as well as their relationship with marketwide liquidity factors. The liquidity measures we examine include the bidask spread, the trading volume, the Amihud illiquidity measure, the turnover ratio, the contract size and the percentage of trading by liquidity providers. Among the liquidity measures, the bidask spread is based on quotes, while the other measures are based on transactions. Each variable measures one aspect of liquidity. The bidask spread is widely used in the literature. Table 1 reports the average bidask spread for warrants, S w = 100(p a w p b w)/h, and for options, S o = 100(p a o p b o)/h, in each moneynessmaturity group. Similar to the price measure, the bidask spread is expressed in the percentage of the HSI level. The bidask spreads of warrants are generally decreasing with maturity. However, they generally increase with maturity for options. The second measure we consider is trading volume. We report in Table 1 the group average of V w /1000H and V o /1000H, where V w and V o are the daily dollar trading volumes for warrant and option contracts, respectively. Similarly, we normalize the dollar volume by the HSI level to adjust for the upward trend. Warrants are much more actively traded than are options in most of the groups. The trading volume is distributed differently across maturity groups for the warrants and the options. Most of trading volume of the warrants is concentrated in the MT and LT groups. Options, however, have the largest volume in the ATMST group. A popular measure of illiquidity is the Amihud (2002) measure, which has been used 10
13 in numerous studies. The measure is based on Kyle s (1985) λ, the response of prices to order flow. The Amihud illiquidity measure, A(t, κ t, m), is defined as (1) A(t, κ t, m) = i= 5 R(t + i, κ t+i, m i) V (t + i, κ t+i, m i)/1000, where R(t, κ t, m) is the daily absolute percentage return on a contract with (κ t, m) on day t. The Amihud measure is defined only for observations with positive trading volumes. We winsorize the measure at 2 for both the warrants and options, which roughly corresponds to the 99th percentile of the distribution. Table 1 shows that the Amihud measure is in general lower for the warrants than for the options for the MT and LT groups, but higher for the ST groups. Across moneyness, the OTM warrants and options have a higher Amihud measure than the ITM counterparts have. The trading in the warrants market is more active than that in the options market as evidenced by the difference in the daily dollar trading volumes between the two markets. Alternatively, we can measure the trading activity in each market by the turnover ratio, the frequency of a share changing hands, within a given period. The reciprocal of the turnover ratio is usually interpreted as the average holding period by investors. warrants and options, however, some modifications are needed because the outstanding amount changes over time, unlike the case of stocks and bonds. The turnover ratio of a warrant contract, T w (t, κ, m), is defined as (2) T w (t, κ, m) = [U w(t, κ t, m) N w (t, κ t, m)] 1[U L 2 w(t, κ t, m) N w (t, κ t, m)], O w (t 1, κ t 1, m + 1) where U w (t, κ t, m) is the trading volume of the warrant with (κ t, m) on day t expressed by the number of shares, U L w(t, κ t, m) is the number of the warrants with (κ t, m) on day t traded by the liquidity provider, O w (t, κ t, m) is the outstanding amount of the warrant with (κ t, m) on day t, and N w (t, κ t, m) = max[o w (t, κ t, m) O w (t 1, κ t 1, m + 1), 0] is the new issues of the warrants. The new issues are subtracted because the turnover ratio is defined for existing contracts. Half of the trading by liquidity providers is subtracted 11 For
14 to avoid double counting. 5 This definition assumes that liquidity traders always trade to provide liquidity to customers and never trade for themselves. Liquidity providers do trade for themselves sometimes, but we do not have the data to distinguish between the trades by liquidity providers for themselves and those for customers. The above definition may, therefore, underestimate the actual turnover ratio. The turnover ratio for an option contract, T o (t, κ, m), is defined as (3) T o (t, κ, m) = U o(t, κ t, m) N o (t, κ t, m), O o (t 1, κ t 1, m + 1) where U o (t, κ t, m) is the trading volume in contracts of the option with (κ t, m) on day t, O o (t, κ t, m) is the outstanding amount of the option with (κ t, m) on day t, and N o (t, κ t, m) = max[o o (t, κ t, m) O o (t 1, κ t 1, m + 1), 0] is the number of new contracts with the same terms. Like the definition of turnover ratio for warrants, N o (t, κ t, m) is subtracted to exclude the new option contracts in calculating the turnover ratio. However, we do not have the information on the amount of trading by option market makers. We assume that all the trades are between customers and, therefore, the turnover ratio of options defined this way may overestimate the actual turnover ratio. Table 1 reports the group average of T w and T o. The turnover ratio of the warrants tends to decrease as the maturity decreases, while the turnover ratio of the options tends to increase as the maturity decreases. In the MT and LT groups, the turnover ratio of the warrants is many times higher than that of the options. The turnover ratio in the ATM groups of warrants tends to be higher than that of the ITM and OTM groups. For the options, the ATM and OTM groups have a higher turnover ratio than the ITM groups. 6 These turnover ratios imply roughly that the average holding period of the warrants is between one day to one week and that the average holding period of the options is 5 A direct trade between two customers is counted just once. A trade between two customers through a liquidity provider is counted twice in U w and U L w. 6 Turnover ratios are highly positively skewed. For the warrants, the median of turnover ratios for the ATM are 0.23, 0.42 and 1.65 for the ST, MT and LT group, respectively, and they are higher than the ITM and OTM groups. For the options sample, the ATMST group has the highest median turnover ratio of
15 about one month. Recall that the turnover ratio of the warrants may be underestimated, while the turnover ratio of the options may be overestimated. The actual situation may therefore be more extreme than what we describe here. The next measure we consider is the contract size, which is the number of underlying assets for one round lot of warrants, or one contract of options. The contract size matters because there is a large number of small, individual investors in terms of personal wealth who trade derivative warrants for increasing leverage. They can participate in the market only when they can afford to buy the minimum amount. A small contract size facilitates these trades. Let C w and C o denote the contract size for warrants and options, respectively. Table 1 shows that the average contract size for the warrants is about 2.4 HSI, while one contract of options always corresponds to 50 HSI. The minimum dollar amount for buying warrants is typically below five thousand HKD, which makes the warrants market accessible to small, individual investors. The options contracts, however, typically cost tens of thousands of HKD. In fact, 45.4 percent of warrants transactions have actual trading sizes below 50 HSI, and 24.8 percent are below 25 HSI. The trading volume of warrants with actual trading sizes below 25 HSI exceeds the entire trading volume of options on HSI in the TT sample. In this sense, the warrants market plays an indispensable role for small individual investors. The percentage of warrant trading by liquidity providers is calculated as the share volume traded by liquidity providers divided by the total share volume for a warrant contract on a day on which the total trading volume is positive, L w = Uw/U L w. The higher the value, the more actively liquidity providers supply liquidity to the market by quoting the best bid and ask prices. In general, liquidity providers supply liquidity quite actively. The average L w for the entire sample is 67.67%. Table 1 shows that, for the LT warrants, about 90% of trading involves liquidity providers. Across moneyness, liquidity providers trade the ITM warrants more actively than they trade the OTM warrants. There is no data on what percentage market makers of options trade. Therefore, L o is 13
16 unavailable. Panel A of Table 2 reports the correlations among price, P, maturity, m, moneyness, κ, and the liquidity measures. Since V and T are positively skewed, we define Ṽ = log(v/h+ 1) and T = log(t +1), which are also used in the regression analysis in the next section. We put a negative sign in front of S, C and A to define all the measures as liquidity measures. The upper triangle is for the TQ sample with a positive trading volume of warrants, but possibly no trading of options. A for the TQ sample is undefined. The lower triangle is for the TT sample with positive trading volumes of both warrants and options. The correlations reported are the timeseries averages of the weekly crosssectional correlations. The results show that the price is positively correlated with maturity and, especially, with moneyness. The liquidity measures are positively related to m and κ, except for S. All the liquidity measures are moderately, positively related. The highest pair is C and L. This is because all warrants have low values of C and high values of L, and options are the opposite. Comparatively, the correlations of A with other liquidity measures are lower. The magnitudes of the correlations across the two samples are comparable. Panel B of Table 2 reports the correlations among the price difference, D P, maturity, m, moneyness, κ, and the liquidity differences between the matched warrants and options pairs. The price difference is highly correlated with maturity, but not so with moneyness. The correlations between liquidity differences are mostly lower than the correlation between liquidity measures in Panel A. Table 2 here IV. Overpricing and Liquidity A. Overpricing In this subsection, we document the overpricing of warrants relative to options. Let Pw a = 100p a w/h, Pw b = 100p b w/h, Po a = 100p a o/h, and Po b = 100p b o/h. Panel A of Table 14
17 3 reports the proportion of the observations for which the warrant price is greater than the matched option price, where the price is set as the bid, ask, or bidask average. Most warrants are traded at higher prices than are their options counterparts. The proportions for P w > P o are above 80%, except for the ITMST group. The proportion is higher for the LT groups than for the ST groups and higher for the OTM groups than for the ITM groups. The patterns in the proportions of Pw a > Po a and of Pw b > Po b are similar. The case of Pw b > Po a is an arbitrage opportunity for those who can sell the warrant, buy the matched option, and keep the position to maturity. The proportions of Pw b > Po a for the LT groups are almost as high as those for P w > P o. While individual investors cannot sell warrants short, why don t they sell what they already own and buy the matched options? In addition, why don t warrant issuers sell more overpriced warrants and hedge their positions with the matched options? These are the questions that make the overpricing phenomenon nontrivial. We will return to these questions in the following sections. For completeness, the proportions of Pw a > Po b are also reported. These proportions are virtually 100%, meaning that profitable opportunities for buying warrants, selling the matched options, and holding them to maturity are rare, although these actions are feasible for individual investors. Such contracts are mainly concentrated in the ITMST group. Table 3 here Panel B of Table 3 reports the timeseries averages of the crosssectional average price differences for each moneynessmaturity group, with their tratios. The average price differences, P w P o, Pw a Po a, and Pw b Po b, are all significantly greater than zero, except for the ITMST group for Pw b Po b. Overall, call warrants are more overpriced than put warrants. When the transaction costs are taken into account, the averages of Pw b Po a are much smaller in magnitude and the significance is also reduced. In particular, overpricing tends to become insignificant, or even reversed, in the ST groups. For completeness and comparisons, the averages of Pw a Po b are also included. 15
18 B. Liquidity Differences In this subsection, we present the evidence that the liquidity measures are also different between the warrants and the matched options. In Panel A of Table 4, we report the proportion of which the liquidity (illiquidity) measure of a warrant is greater (less) than that of the matched option. For the LT and MT groups, the proportion is higher than 50% for all the liquidity measures. Only for the OTMST group is the proportion substantially less than 50% for S w < S o, V w > V o and T w > T o. The results also show that all warrants have smaller minimum contract sizes than do options. Table 4 here Panel B of Table 4 reports the timeseries average of the crosssectional average liquidity measure differences for each moneynessmaturity group, with their tratios. Negative signs are put in front of the illiquidity measures. For (V w V o )/1000H, T w T o and (C w C o ), the differences in the liquidity measures are positive for all the moneynessmaturity groups, and the majority of them are significant. For the other two liquidity measures, (S w S o ) and (A w A o ), the differences for the MT and LT groups are mostly positive and significant, but some of the differences for the ST groups are negative. C. AnalysisofVariance In standard options pricing theory, warrants/options prices normalized by the price of the underlying asset depend on their moneyness, maturity, the stochastic volatility of the underlying asset, and the other state variables that govern the evolution of the price of the underlying asset. The central theme of this paper is that warrants/options prices also depend on their liquidity. To establish the dependence of the warrants/options prices on liquidity, we need to separate the effects of other variables. As we see in Table 2, both prices and liquidity measures are correlated with the maturity. It is important to remove 16
19 the maturity effect to avoid finding potential spurious relationships. To deal with this, we pool the matched warrants and options pairs together and run the following regression, (4) P = b1 + b 2 κ + b 3 m + b 4 σ + P, where P is P w or P o and σ is the stochastic volatility of the HSI estimated with daily returns on the HSI from 1998 to 2007 using the socalled GJRGARCH model of Glosten, Jagannathan, and Runkle (1993). The regression is run for each moneynessmaturity group using pooled crosssection and timeseries data. While the true relationship of warrants/options prices with moneyness, maturity, and stochastic volatility may be nonlinear, estimating a linear relationship within a moneynessmaturity group reduces the error of linear approximation. 7 The residual, P, mainly captures omitted liquidity effects, the approximation error from the linear term of the stochastic volatility, and other omitted state variables. We investigate the relationship between P and liquidity measures in the following subsections. In this subsection, we further characterize the overpricing of warrants relative to options by conducting an analysisofvariance for the normalized price unexplained by moneyness, maturity and stochastic volatility. Panel A of Table 5 reports the mean of P for the warrants and the options separately. The means of price residuals for warrants are all positive, while the means of price residuals for options are all negative. The differences in means between the warrants and options reflect the betweentype variation in the price residuals, P. Panel A also shows that the overpricing of warrants is the largest for the LT groups. Panel B of Table 5 reports the standard deviation of P for the warrants and the options separately and combined. The total variation of the combined sample is larger than that of separate warrants sample or separate options sample for most of the groups. The standard deviations of Pw and of P o indicate the withintype variation of P. For some LT groups, the variation of the combined sample is about two times as large as that of the separate samples. The last 7 As a robustness check, we also regress P on κ, m and σ nonparametrically across all the moneynessmaturity groups to obtain the price residuals P. The results are quantitatively similar. 17
20 part of Panel B in Table 5 reports the standard deviation of the price residual difference P w P o, which is the same as the price difference, P w P o, because warrants and options are matched pairs. The variation in the price residual difference is considerably smaller than that in the combined price residual sample, but it is nontrivial. In the next two subsections, we ask why warrants are more expensive than options and why some warrants are more overpriced than other warrants. Table 5 here D. Why are Warrants More Expensive than Options? In this subsection, we use regression analysis to quantify the overpricing of warrants relative to the options as contributed by the liquidity difference between the warrants and the options. We run regressions of the price residuals obtained in the last subsection on various measures of liquidity, (5) P = β1 + β 2 ( S) + β 3 ( C) + β 4 Ṽ + β 5 T + β6 L + β 7 ( A) + ε. We run the regressions with each liquidity measure separately, with all the liquidity measures together except for L, and with all the liquidity measures together where L for an option is arguably set to zero. We run the regressions for the TQ sample, in which A is undefined when there is no trading volume for options, and for the TT sample. The crosssectional regressions are run for each moneynessmaturity group in each week. The slope coefficients are averaged across groups first and then averaged across weeks. The results are reported in Table 6. For each regression, the first row shows the coefficient estimates. The second row shows the coefficient estimates multiplied by the standard deviation of the corresponding independent variable, so that the number measures the change in the dependant variable for one standard deviation change in the independent variables. The third row reports the tstatistics of the coefficient adjusted for 10week lags in the autocorrelations using the Newey and West (1987) procedure. In Panel A 18
Interest Rate Options
Interest Rate Options A discussion of how investors can help control interest rate exposure and make the most of the interest rate market. The Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) is the world s largest
More informationYao Zheng University of New Orleans. Eric Osmer University of New Orleans
ABSTRACT The pricing of China Region ETFs  an empirical analysis Yao Zheng University of New Orleans Eric Osmer University of New Orleans Using a sample of exchangetraded funds (ETFs) that focus on investing
More informationLiquidity in U.S. Treasury spot and futures markets
Liquidity in U.S. Treasury spot and futures markets Michael Fleming and Asani Sarkar* Federal Reserve Bank of New York 33 Liberty Street New York, NY 10045 (212) 7206372 (Fleming) (212) 7208943 (Sarkar)
More informationINTRODUCTION TO OPTIONS MARKETS QUESTIONS
INTRODUCTION TO OPTIONS MARKETS QUESTIONS 1. What is the difference between a put option and a call option? 2. What is the difference between an American option and a European option? 3. Why does an option
More informationGeneral Forex Glossary
General Forex Glossary A ADR American Depository Receipt Arbitrage The simultaneous buying and selling of a security at two different prices in two different markets, with the aim of creating profits without
More informationThe Drivers and Pricing of Liquidity in Interest Rate Option Markets
The Drivers and Pricing of Liquidity in Interest Rate Option Markets PRACHI DEUSKAR 1 ANURAG GUPTA 2 MARTI G. SUBRAHMANYAM 3 November 2005 1 Department of Finance, Leonard N. Stern School of Business,
More informationBlack Scholes Merton Approach To Modelling Financial Derivatives Prices Tomas Sinkariovas 0802869. Words: 3441
Black Scholes Merton Approach To Modelling Financial Derivatives Prices Tomas Sinkariovas 0802869 Words: 3441 1 1. Introduction In this paper I present Black, Scholes (1973) and Merton (1973) (BSM) general
More informationUnderlying (S) The asset, which the option buyer has the right to buy or sell. Notation: S or S t = S(t)
INTRODUCTION TO OPTIONS Readings: Hull, Chapters 8, 9, and 10 Part I. Options Basics Options Lexicon Options Payoffs (Payoff diagrams) Calls and Puts as two halves of a forward contract: the PutCallForward
More informationChapter 15 OPTIONS ON MONEY MARKET FUTURES
Page 218 The information in this chapter was last updated in 1993. Since the money market evolves very rapidly, recent developments may have superseded some of the content of this chapter. Chapter 15 OPTIONS
More information9 Questions Every Australian Investor Should Ask Before Investing in an Exchange Traded Fund (ETF)
SPDR ETFs 9 Questions Every Australian Investor Should Ask Before Investing in an Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) 1. What is an ETF? 2. What kinds of ETFs are available? 3. How do ETFs differ from other investment
More informationFX Derivatives Terminology. Education Module: 5. Dated July 2002. FX Derivatives Terminology
Education Module: 5 Dated July 2002 Foreign Exchange Options Option Markets and Terminology A American Options American Options are options that are exercisable for early value at any time during the term
More informationImplied Volatility Skews in the Foreign Exchange Market. Empirical Evidence from JPY and GBP: 19972002
Implied Volatility Skews in the Foreign Exchange Market Empirical Evidence from JPY and GBP: 19972002 The Leonard N. Stern School of Business Glucksman Institute for Research in Securities Markets Faculty
More informationNine Questions Every ETF Investor Should Ask Before Investing
Nine Questions Every ETF Investor Should Ask Before Investing UnderstandETFs.org Copyright 2012 by the Investment Company Institute. All rights reserved. ICI permits use of this publication in any way,
More informationTrading in Treasury Bond Futures Contracts and Bonds in Australia
Trading in Treasury Bond Futures Contracts and Bonds in Australia Belinda Cheung* Treasury bond futures are a key financial product in Australia, with turnover in Treasury bond futures contracts significantly
More informationOption Market Activity *
Option Market Activity * Josef Lakonishok University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign and National Bureau of Economic Research Inmoo Lee Korea University and National University of Singapore Neil D. Pearson
More informationIntroduction, Forwards and Futures
Introduction, Forwards and Futures Liuren Wu Zicklin School of Business, Baruch College Fall, 2007 (Hull chapters: 1,2,3,5) Liuren Wu Introduction, Forwards & Futures Option Pricing, Fall, 2007 1 / 35
More informationw w w.c a t l e y l a k e m a n.c o m 0 2 0 7 0 4 3 0 1 0 0
A ADRStyle: for a derivative on an underlying denominated in one currency, where the derivative is denominated in a different currency, payments are exchanged using a floating foreignexchange rate. The
More informationJanuary 2011 Supplement to Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options The February 1994 version of the booklet entitled Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options (the Booklet ) is amended
More informationOption Theory Basics
Option Basics What is an Option? Option Theory Basics An option is a traded security that is a derivative product. By derivative product we mean that it is a product whose value is based upon, or derived
More informationwww.optionseducation.org OIC Options on ETFs
www.optionseducation.org Options on ETFs 1 The Options Industry Council For the sake of simplicity, the examples that follow do not take into consideration commissions and other transaction fees, tax considerations,
More information4. ANNEXURE 3 : PART 3  FOREIGN EXCHANGE POSITION RISK
Annexure 3 (PRR)  Part 3, Clause 18  Foreign Exchange Position Risk Amount 4 ANNEXURE 3 : PART 3  FOREIGN EXCHANGE POSITION RISK (a) CLAUSE 18  FOREIGN EXCHANGE POSITION RISK AMOUNT (i) Rule PART 3
More information11 Option. Payoffs and Option Strategies. Answers to Questions and Problems
11 Option Payoffs and Option Strategies Answers to Questions and Problems 1. Consider a call option with an exercise price of $80 and a cost of $5. Graph the profits and losses at expiration for various
More informationRisk Explanation for ExchangeTraded Derivatives
Risk Explanation for ExchangeTraded Derivatives The below risk explanation is provided pursuant to Hong Kong regulatory requirements relating to trading in exchangetraded derivatives by those of our
More informationAnswers to Concepts in Review
Answers to Concepts in Review 1. Puts and calls are negotiable options issued in bearer form that allow the holder to sell (put) or buy (call) a stipulated amount of a specific security/financial asset,
More informationFundamentals of Futures and Options (a summary)
Fundamentals of Futures and Options (a summary) Roger G. Clarke, Harindra de Silva, CFA, and Steven Thorley, CFA Published 2013 by the Research Foundation of CFA Institute Summary prepared by Roger G.
More informationCopyright 2009 by National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE) Exchange Plaza, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai 400 051 INDIA
Copyright 2009 by National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE) Exchange Plaza, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai 400 051 INDIA All content included in this book, such as text, graphics, logos,
More informationHedging of Currency Option in Trading Market
International Journal of Economic and Management Strategy. ISSN 22783636 Volume 3, Number 1 (2013), pp. 16 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/jems.htm Hedging of Currency Option
More informationBASKET A collection of securities. The underlying securities within an ETF are often collectively referred to as a basket
Glossary: The ETF Portfolio Challenge Glossary is designed to help familiarize our participants with concepts and terminology closely associated with Exchange Traded Products. For more educational offerings,
More informationThe Effects of Investor Sentiment on Speculative Trading and Prices of Stock. and Index Options
The Effects of Investor Sentiment on Speculative Trading and Prices of Stock and Index Options Michael Lemmon and Sophie X. Ni December 2008 Lemmon is at the University of Utah, email: michael.lemmon@business.utah.edu.
More informationInvesco Great Wall Fund Management Co. Shenzhen: June 14, 2008
: A Stern School of Business New York University Invesco Great Wall Fund Management Co. Shenzhen: June 14, 2008 Outline 1 2 3 4 5 6 se notes review the principles underlying option pricing and some of
More informationStudy on the Volatility Smile of EUR/USD Currency Options and Trading Strategies
Prof. Joseph Fung, FDS Study on the Volatility Smile of EUR/USD Currency Options and Trading Strategies BY CHEN Duyi 11050098 Finance Concentration LI Ronggang 11050527 Finance Concentration An Honors
More informationOPTIONS EDUCATION GLOBAL
OPTIONS EDUCATION GLOBAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction What are FX Options? Trading 101 ITM, ATM and OTM Options Trading Strategies Glossary Contact Information 3 5 6 8 9 10 16 HIGH RISK WARNING: Before
More informationLiquidity of Corporate Bonds
Liquidity of Corporate Bonds Jack Bao, Jun Pan and Jiang Wang MIT October 21, 2008 The QGroup Autumn Meeting Liquidity and Corporate Bonds In comparison, low levels of trading in corporate bond market
More informationFINANCIAL ENGINEERING CLUB TRADING 101
FINANCIAL ENGINEERING CLUB TRADING 101 WHAT IS TRADING TRADING/INVESTING is the act of putting capital to use, by either buying or selling securities, for the purpose of gaining profits. Buy low, sell
More informationEXECUTE SUCCESS. {at work}
EXECUTE SUCCESS TM {at work} VIX T H E C B O E V O L A T I L I T Y I N D E X 1 W H AT I S V I X & W H AT D O E S I T M E A S U R E? T H E I N D U S T R Y S TA N D A R D I N V O L AT I L I T Y MEASUREMENT
More informationIntroduction to Futures Contracts
Introduction to Futures Contracts September 2010 PREPARED BY Eric Przybylinski Research Analyst Gregory J. Leonberger, FSA Director of Research Abstract Futures contracts are widely utilized throughout
More informationSession IX: Lecturer: Dr. Jose Olmo. Module: Economics of Financial Markets. MSc. Financial Economics
Session IX: Stock Options: Properties, Mechanics and Valuation Lecturer: Dr. Jose Olmo Module: Economics of Financial Markets MSc. Financial Economics Department of Economics, City University, London Stock
More informationBinary options. Giampaolo Gabbi
Binary options Giampaolo Gabbi Definition In finance, a binary option is a type of option where the payoff is either some fixed amount of some asset or nothing at all. The two main types of binary options
More informationMARGIN FOREIGN EXCHANGE AND FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPTIONS
CLIENT SERVICE AGREEMENT Halifax New Zealand Limited Client Service Agreement Product Disclosure Statement for MARGIN FOREIGN EXCHANGE AND FOREIGN EXCHANGE OPTIONS Halifax New Zealand Limited Financial
More informationXIV. Additional risk information on forward transactions in CFDs
XIV. Additional risk information on forward transactions in CFDs The following information is given in addition to the general risks associated with forward transactions. Please read the following information
More informationDerivative Products Features and Risk Disclosures
Derivative Products Features and Risk Disclosures Table of Content Warrants... 3 Callable Bull/Bear Contracts (CBBC)... 5 Exchange Traded Fund (ETF)... 7 Listed equity linked instruments (ELI/ELN)... 9
More informationNonMarketability and OneDay Selling Lockup
NonMarketability and OneDay Selling Lockup Jiangze Bian University of International Business and Economics jiangzebian@uibe.edu.cn Tie Su University of Miami tie@miami.edu Jun Wang Baruch College, City
More informationExchange Traded Funds
LPL FINANCIAL RESEARCH Exchange Traded Funds February 16, 2012 What They Are, What Sets Them Apart, and What to Consider When Choosing Them Overview 1. What is an ETF? 2. What Sets Them Apart? 3. How Are
More informationThe Rapid Growth of the Stock Options Market in Hong Kong Research Department, Supervision of Markets Division 1 November 2007
The Rapid Growth of the Stock Options Market in Hong Kong Research Department, Supervision of Markets Division 1 November 2007 Summary 1. The stock options market in Hong Kong has grown significantly in
More informationTHE EFFECTS OF STOCK LENDING ON SECURITY PRICES: AN EXPERIMENT
THE EFFECTS OF STOCK LENDING ON SECURITY PRICES: AN EXPERIMENT Steve Kaplan Toby Moskowitz Berk Sensoy November, 2011 MOTIVATION: WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF SHORT SELLING ON SECURITY PRICES? Does shorting make
More informationHow Much Does It Cost To Short Sale A Stock Index? *
How Much Does It Cost To Short Sale A Stock Index? * 1. Introduction In a comprehensive study of the borrowing/lending market for stocks, D Avolio (2002) showed that constituents of the S&P 500 are almost
More information9 Questions Every ETF Investor Should Ask Before Investing
9 Questions Every ETF Investor Should Ask Before Investing 1. What is an ETF? 2. What kinds of ETFs are available? 3. How do ETFs differ from other investment products like mutual funds, closedend funds,
More informationINFORMATION CIRCULAR: ALPS ETF TRUST
INFORMATION CIRCULAR: ALPS ETF TRUST TO: FROM: Head Traders, Technical Contacts, Compliance Officers, Heads of ETF Trading, Structured Products Traders Nasdaq / BX / PHLX Listing Qualifications Department
More informationVALUATION IN DERIVATIVES MARKETS
VALUATION IN DERIVATIVES MARKETS September 2005 Rawle Parris ABN AMRO Property Derivatives What is a Derivative? A contract that specifies the rights and obligations between two parties to receive or deliver
More informationHeterogeneous Beliefs and The Optionimplied Volatility Smile
Heterogeneous Beliefs and The Optionimplied Volatility Smile Geoffrey C. Friesen University of NebraskaLincoln gfriesen2@unl.edu (402) 4722334 Yi Zhang* Prairie View A&M University yizhang@pvamu.edu
More informationIntroduction. Part IV: Option Fundamentals. Derivatives & Risk Management. The Nature of Derivatives. Definitions. Options. Main themes Options
Derivatives & Risk Management Main themes Options option pricing (microstructure & investments) hedging & real options (corporate) This & next weeks lectures Introduction Part IV: Option Fundamentals»
More informationOptions: Definitions, Payoffs, & Replications
Options: Definitions, s, & Replications Liuren Wu Zicklin School of Business, Baruch College Options Markets Liuren Wu (Baruch) s Options Markets 1 / 34 Definitions and terminologies An option gives the
More informationFrequently asked questions. Hong Kong listed warrant and CBBC market
(Last updated: 8 April 2016) Frequently asked questions Hong Kong listed warrant and CBBC market Introduction These FAQs are intended to give you a better understanding of derivative warrants ( warrants
More informationBonds and Yield to Maturity
Bonds and Yield to Maturity Bonds A bond is a debt instrument requiring the issuer to repay to the lender/investor the amount borrowed (par or face value) plus interest over a specified period of time.
More informationOPTION MARKET OVERREACTION TO STOCK PRICE CHANGES
Vol. 1, Issue 2, p. 112129, Dec. 212 ISSN 2357394 OPTION MARKET OVERREACTION TO STOCK PRICE CHANGES Eric Gettleman 1, Brandon Julio, Ph.D. 2, Elizabeth A. Risik, Ph.D. 3 1 Chesapeake Partners 2 London
More informationThere are two types of options  calls and puts.
Options on Single Stock Futures Overview Options on single Stock Futures An SSF option is, very simply, an instrument that conveys to its holder the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell an SSF
More informationInternet Appendix to. Why does the Option to Stock Volume Ratio Predict Stock Returns? Li Ge, TseChun Lin, and Neil D. Pearson.
Internet Appendix to Why does the Option to Stock Volume Ratio Predict Stock Returns? Li Ge, TseChun Lin, and Neil D. Pearson August 9, 2015 This Internet Appendix provides additional empirical results
More informationBuying Call or Long Call. Unlimited Profit Potential
Options Basis 1 An Investor can use options to achieve a number of different things depending on the strategy the investor employs. Novice option traders will be allowed to buy calls and puts, to anticipate
More informationNote on New Products in F&O Segment. 2. Options Contracts with Longer Life/Tenure. 6. Exchangetraded Currency (Foreign Exchange) F&O Contracts
Note on New Products in F&O Segment Contents 1. Mini Contracts in Equity Indices 2. Options Contracts with Longer Life/Tenure 3. Volatility Index and F&O Contracts 4. Options on Futures 5. Bond Index and
More informationNATURE AND SPECIFIC RISKS OF THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
NATURE AND SPECIFIC RISKS OF THE MAIN FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The present section is intended to communicate to you, in accordance with the Directive, general information on the characteristics of the main
More informationCHAPTER 22: FUTURES MARKETS
CHAPTER 22: FUTURES MARKETS PROBLEM SETS 1. There is little hedging or speculative demand for cement futures, since cement prices are fairly stable and predictable. The trading activity necessary to support
More informationSwing Trade Warrior Chapter 1. Introduction to swing trading and how to understand and use options How does Swing Trading Work? The idea behind swing trading is to capitalize on short term moves of stocks
More informationOverlapping ETF: Pair trading between two gold stocks
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Overlapping ETF: Pair trading between two gold stocks Peter N Bell and Brian Lui and Alex Brekke University of Victoria 1. April 2012 Online at http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/39534/
More informationName Graph Description Payoff Profit Comments. commodity at some point in the future at a prespecified. commodity at some point
Name Graph Description Payoff Profit Comments Long Commitment to purchase commodity at some point in the future at a prespecified price S T  F S T F No premium Asset price contingency: Always Maximum
More informationThe term structure of equity option implied volatility
The term structure of equity option implied volatility Christopher S. Jones Tong Wang Marshall School of Business Marshall School of Business University of Southern California University of Southern California
More informationRisks involved with futures trading
Appendix 1: Risks involved with futures trading Before executing any futures transaction, the client should obtain information on the risks involved. Note in particular the risks summarized in the following
More informationHedging Illiquid FX Options: An Empirical Analysis of Alternative Hedging Strategies
Hedging Illiquid FX Options: An Empirical Analysis of Alternative Hedging Strategies Drazen Pesjak Supervised by A.A. Tsvetkov 1, D. Posthuma 2 and S.A. Borovkova 3 MSc. Thesis Finance HONOURS TRACK Quantitative
More informationOption pricing. Module 3
Course #: Title Module 3 Option pricing Topic 1: Intrinsic value and time value... 3 Intrinsic value... 3 Inthemoney, outofthemoney, atthemoney... 3 Time value... 4 Topic 2: What affects an option's
More informationLiquidity and the Development of Robust Corporate Bond Markets
Liquidity and the Development of Robust Corporate Bond Markets Marti G. Subrahmanyam Stern School of Business New York University For presentation at the CAMRI Executive Roundtable Luncheon Talk National
More informationTrading of Listed Equity Derivatives in Hong Kong, the UK and US Research Department, Supervision of Markets Division 1 June 2006
Trading of Listed Equity Derivatives in Hong Kong, the UK and US Research Department, Supervision of Markets Division 1 June 2006 Summary 1. Following an earlier study comparing the trading of HSI stocks
More informationINVESTMENT DICTIONARY
INVESTMENT DICTIONARY Annual Report An annual report is a document that offers information about the company s activities and operations and contains financial details, cash flow statement, profit and
More informationAnswers to Concepts in Review
Answers to Concepts in Review 1. (a) In the money market, shortterm securities such as CDs, Tbills, and banker s acceptances are traded. Longterm securities such as stocks and bonds are traded in the
More informationRISK DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECURITY FUTURES CONTRACTS
RISK DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECURITY FUTURES CONTRACTS This disclosure statement discusses the characteristics and risks of standardized security futures contracts traded on regulated U.S. exchanges.
More informationSG TURBOS GEARED EXPOSURE TO AN UNDERLYING WITH A KNOCKOUT FEATURE
SG TURBOS GEARED EXPOSURE TO AN UNDERLYING WITH A KNOCKOUT FEATURE Turbos are products suitable for UK sophisticated retail and professional investors who have a good understanding of the underlying market
More informationUNDERSTANDING INDEX OPTIONS
UNDERSTANDING INDEX OPTIONS The Options Industry Council (OIC) is an industry cooperative created to educate the investing public and brokers about the benefits and risks of exchangetraded options. Options
More informationComparing Eminis and ETFs
STOCK INDEXES Comparing Eminis and ETFs SEPTEMBER 15, 2012 John W. Labuszewski Managing Director Research & Product Development 3124667469 jlab@cmegroup.com CME Group Emini stock index futures and
More informationGlossary of Common Derivatives Terms
DRAFT: 10/03/07 Glossary of Common Derivatives Terms American Depository Receipts (ADRs). ADRs are receipts issued by a U.S. bank or trust company evidencing its ownership of underlying foreign securities.
More informationUnderstanding Leveraged Exchange Traded Funds AN EXPLORATION OF THE RISKS & BENEFITS
Understanding Leveraged Exchange Traded Funds AN EXPLORATION OF THE RISKS & BENEFITS Direxion Shares Leveraged ExchangeTraded Funds (ETFs) are daily funds that provide 200% or 300% leverage and the ability
More informationPOLICY STATEMENT Q22
POLICY STATEMENT Q22 DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT FOR COMMODITY FUTURES CONTRACTS, FOR OPTIONS TRADED ON A RECOGNIZED MARKET AND FOR EXCHANGETRADED COMMODITY FUTURES OPTIONS 1. In the case of commodity futures
More informationOPTIONS MARKETS AND VALUATIONS (CHAPTERS 16 & 17)
OPTIONS MARKETS AND VALUATIONS (CHAPTERS 16 & 17) WHAT ARE OPTIONS? Derivative securities whose values are derived from the values of the underlying securities. Stock options quotations from WSJ. A call
More informationEURODOLLAR FUTURES PRICING. Robert T. Daigler. Florida International University. and. Visiting Scholar. Graduate School of Business
EURODOLLAR FUTURES PRICING Robert T. Daigler Florida International University and Visiting Scholar Graduate School of Business Stanford University 199091 Jumiaty Nurawan Jakarta, Indonesia The Financial
More informationRené Garcia Professor of finance
Liquidity Risk: What is it? How to Measure it? René Garcia Professor of finance EDHEC Business School, CIRANO Cirano, Montreal, January 7, 2009 The financial and economic environment We are living through
More informationFIN40008 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS SPRING 2008. Options
FIN40008 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS SPRING 2008 Options These notes describe the payoffs to European and American put and call options the socalled plain vanilla options. We consider the payoffs to these
More informationUNDERSTANDING EQUITY OPTIONS
UNDERSTANDING EQUITY OPTIONS The Options Industry Council (OIC) is a nonprofit association created to educate the investing public and brokers about the benefits and risks of exchangetraded options.
More informationEXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS AND INDEX ANALYSIS: VOLATILITY AND OPTIONS
EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS AND INDEX ANALYSIS: VOLATILITY AND OPTIONS Stoyu I. Ivanov, University of Nebraska  Lincoln Yi Zhang 1, Prairie View A&M University Abstract Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) track their
More informationOctober 2003 UNDERSTANDING STOCK OPTIONS
October 2003 UNDERSTANDING STOCK OPTIONS Table of Contents Introduction 3 Benefits of ExchangeTraded Options 5 Orderly, Efficient, and Liquid Markets Flexibility Leverage Limited Risk for Buyer Guaranteed
More informationIntroduction to Equity Derivatives on Nasdaq Dubai NOT TO BE DISTRIUTED TO THIRD PARTIES WITHOUT NASDAQ DUBAI S WRITTEN CONSENT
Introduction to Equity Derivatives on Nasdaq Dubai NOT TO BE DISTRIUTED TO THIRD PARTIES WITHOUT NASDAQ DUBAI S WRITTEN CONSENT CONTENTS An Exchange with Credentials (Page 3) Introduction to Derivatives»
More informationResearch Paper No. 44: How shortselling activity affects liquidity of the Hong Kong stock market. 17 April 2009
Research Paper No. 44: How shortselling activity affects liquidity of the Hong Kong stock market 17 April 2009 Executive Summary 1. In October 2008, the SFC issued a research paper entitled Short Selling
More informationLEAPS LONGTERM EQUITY ANTICIPATION SECURITIES
LEAPS LONGTERM EQUITY ANTICIPATION SECURITIES The Options Industry Council (OIC) is a nonprofit association created to educate the investing public and brokers about the benefits and risks of exchangetraded
More informationWhat Determines Early Exercise of Employee Stock Options?
What Determines Early Exercise of Employee Stock Options? Summary Report of Honours Research Project Tristan Boyd Supervised by Professor Philip Brown and Dr Alex Szimayer University of Western Australia
More informationSwiss Risk Disclosure  Characteristics and Risks of Options
This is a sample form and will not submit any information. Swiss Risk Disclosure for Options Print Swiss Risk Disclosure  Characteristics and Risks of Options 1. Characteristics 1.1 Definitions 1.1.1
More informationThe Bond Market: Where the Customers Still Have No Yachts
Fall 11 The Bond Market: Where the Customers Still Have No Yachts Quantifying the markup paid by retail investors in the bond market. Darrin DeCosta Robert W. Del Vicario Matthew J. Patterson www.bulletshares.com
More informationBUSM 411: Derivatives and Fixed Income
BUSM 411: Derivatives and Fixed Income 2. Forwards, Options, and Hedging This lecture covers the basic derivatives contracts: forwards (and futures), and call and put options. These basic contracts are
More informationVolatility as an indicator of Supply and Demand for the Option. the price of a stock expressed as a decimal or percentage.
Option Greeks  Evaluating Option Price Sensitivity to: Price Changes to the Stock Time to Expiration Alterations in Interest Rates Volatility as an indicator of Supply and Demand for the Option Different
More informationChapter 5. The Foreign Exchange Market. Foreign Exchange Markets: Learning Objectives. Foreign Exchange Markets. Foreign Exchange Markets
Chapter 5 The Foreign Exchange Market Foreign Exchange Markets: Learning Objectives Examine the functions performed by the foreign exchange (FOREX) market, its participants, size, geographic and currency
More informationDerivative Users Traders of derivatives can be categorized as hedgers, speculators, or arbitrageurs.
OPTIONS THEORY Introduction The Financial Manager must be knowledgeable about derivatives in order to manage the price risk inherent in financial transactions. Price risk refers to the possibility of loss
More informationFrequently Asked Questions on Derivatives Trading At NSE
Frequently Asked Questions on Derivatives Trading At NSE NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIA LIMITED QUESTIONS & ANSWERS 1. What are derivatives? Derivatives, such as futures or options, are financial contracts
More informationExchange Traded Contracts for Difference: Design, Pricing and Effects
Exchange Traded Contracts for Difference: Design, Pricing and Effects Christine Brown, Jonathan Dark Department of Finance, The University of Melbourne & Kevin Davis Department of Finance, The University
More informationUnderstanding Derivatives: Markets and Infrastructure
01 thecounter Understanding Derivatives: Markets and Infrastructure Derivatives Overview Richard Heckinger, vice president and senior policy advisor, fi nancial markets, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago,
More informationA Primer on Valuing Common Stock per IRS 409A and the Impact of Topic 820 (Formerly FAS 157)
A Primer on Valuing Common Stock per IRS 409A and the Impact of Topic 820 (Formerly FAS 157) By Stanley Jay Feldman, Ph.D. Chairman and Chief Valuation Officer Axiom Valuation Solutions May 2010 201 Edgewater
More information