CONTRACTOR LAW & INSURANCE COVERAGE ISSUES IN MASSACHUSETTS

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "CONTRACTOR LAW & INSURANCE COVERAGE ISSUES IN MASSACHUSETTS"

Transcription

1 CONTRACTOR LAW & INSURANCE COVERAGE ISSUES IN MASSACHUSETTS I. BODILY INJURY Workers Compensation Workers compensation insurance is mandatory for employers in Massachusetts. See M.G.L. c Workers compensation is provides an exclusive remedy for an employee injured during the course of his or her employment and further protects negligent co-workers from liability in tort. M.G.L. c. 152, 24. Employers that fail to maintain workers compensation coverage, in violation of the law, become strictly liable in tort for any personal injuries sustained by employees. M.G.L. c. 152, 66. Employers that engage in willful misconduct can become liable for double compensation; in the case of such a finding, the workers compensation carrier must pay the double benefits to the injured employee, and may then seek to recover the additional payments from the employer. M.G.L. c. 152, 28. General Contractors are statutorily responsible for providing worker s compensation benefits for uninsured subcontractors. M.G.L. c. 152, 18. Accordingly, General Contractors often require that subcontractors provide them with certificates of insurance as proof that such coverage has been purchased. See Comm. v. Gall, 789 N.E. 2d 586 (Mass. App. Ct. 2003). Indemnity A subcontractor cannot be required to indemnify a contractor or any party for injury to person or damage to property not caused by that subcontractor. M.G.L. c. 149, 29C. This statute does not prohibit contractual indemnity Heifetz Rose LLP 175 Highland Avenue, Suite 407 Needham, MA Telephone: (617) Facsimile: (617)

2 arrangements in which the subcontractor aggress to assume the indemnity obligations for the entire liability, where both the subcontractor and the general contractor or owner are negligent. Henson v. New Boston Garden Group, 667 N.E. 2d 907 (Mass. App. Ct. 1996). Wrongful Death A suit for damages for wrongful death is permitted by M.G.L. c.229, 2. Only the legal representative - the executor or administrator of the estate - may bring an action for recovery of damages. M.G.L. c Damages for wrongful death are specified by statute. The estate is entitled to recover fair monetary value of the decedent to the persons entitled to receive the damages recovered, including, but not limited to, compensation for the loss of the reasonably expected net income, services, protection, care, assistance, society, companionship, comfort, guidance, counsel, and advice of the decedent to the persons entitled to the damages recovered. M.G.L. c. 229, 2; Davis v. Walent, 16 Mass. App. Ct. 83 (1983). In addition to the fair monetary value of the decedent and reasonable funeral and burial expenses, the estate may recover for the conscious pain and suffering of the decedent before death. M.G.L. c. 229, 6; Keyes v. Construction Service, Inc., 340 Mass. 633 (1960). Finally, punitive damages (in an amount not less than $5,000) are available in wrongful death actions, where it is proven that the decedent's death was caused by the malicious, willful, wanton or reckless conduct of the defendant or by the gross negligence of the defendant. M.G.L. c. 229, 2. Duty to Provide A Safe Workplace General Contractor A general contractor has a duty to provide a safe workplace under the State Building Code. 454 CMR 10.03(1)(a). Corsetti v. Stone Co., 396 Mass. 1, 9 (1985); St. Germaine v. Pendergast, 411 Mass. 615, (1992); see also 780 CMR , , and A violation of the State Building Code, as alleged and if proven, is some evidence of 2

3 negligence, but it is not dispositive on the issue. St. Germaine, 411 Mass. at 621. Owner An owner also has a duty to provide a safe workplace under the state building code. 454 C.M.R (1)(b). An owner or occupant of property, generally, owes a duty of reasonable care to all persons on the property. Dilaveris v. W. T. Rich Co., 39 Mass. App. Ct. 115, rev. granted, 421 Mass (1995). An owner can be civilly liable for damages for failure to comply with the above provisions of the State Building Code. M.G.L. c This liability, however, does not attach to residential homes. Repucci v. Exchange Realty Co., 321 Mass. 571 (1949). Employer An employer has the same duty to provide a safe workplace under the state building code. 454 C.M.R (1)(b) If an employer retains a right to control, including a right to initiate and maintain safety measures, that employer must exercise such control with reasonable care for the safety of others. Corsetti v. Stone Company, 396 Mass. 1 (1985). An employer of an independent subcontractor owes a duty to exercise reasonable care for the protection of others, and may be liable for its own negligence in connection with the work to be done insofar as it in fact gave directions for the work, furnished equipment for the work, or retained control over any part of the work. Id. at Evidence of such a duty may be found in the general contract or in the contract with the subcontractor. Dilaveris, 39 Mass. App. Ct. at 117. Indemnity Indemnity provisions in construction contracts are void in accordance with M.G.L. c C only when the injury is not caused by the subcontractor or its employees. Collins v. Kiewet Construction Co., 40 Mass.App.Ct. 796, 799 (1996). 3

4 The statute does not preclude full indemnification when an indivisible injury is caused by the negligence concurrently attributable both to the indemnitee, and by the terms of the indemnity agreement, to the indemnitor. Id. II. PROPERTY DAMAGE Implied Warranties New Construction Adopting the reasoning of many jurisdictions, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts has formally recognized a cause of action against a builder for an implied breach of habitability. Albrecht v. Clifford, 436 Mass. 706 (2002). The purpose of this law is to protect a purchaser of a new home from latent defects that create substantial questions of safety and habitability. In general, a home that is unsafe because it deviates from fundamental aspects of the applicable building codes, or is structurally unsound, or fails to keep out the elements because of defects of construction would breach the implied warranty. In the Albrecht case, the Court declined to state whether a second or subsequent purchaser could state a claim for breach of this implied warranty against the builder within the applicable statute of limitations. The implied warranty is independent and collateral to the covenant to convey, and survives the passing of title to and taking possession of the real estate. It cannot be waived or disclaimed, because to permit the disclaimer of a warranty protecting a purchaser from the consequences of latent defects would defeat the very purpose of the warranty. The implied warranty does not apply to the purchase or sale of unfinished homes, where the parties may choose to waive or disclaim all warranties. In addition, the implied warranty does not make the builder an insurer against any and all defects in a home, impose on the builder an obligation to deliver a perfect house, or protect against mere defects in workmanship, minor or procedural violations of the applicable building codes, or defects that are trivial or aesthetic. It is not intended to affect a buyer's ability to inspect a house before purchase, to condition the purchase 4

5 on a satisfactory inspection result, or to negotiate additional express warranties. To establish a cause of action for breach of the implied warranty of habitability a plaintiff will have to demonstrate that (1) he purchased a new house from the defendantbuilder-vendor; (2) the house contained a latent defect; (3) the defect manifested itself only after its purchase; (4) the defect was caused by the builder's improper design, material, or workmanship; and (5) the defect created a substantial question of safety or made the house unfit for human habitation. The claim must be brought within the three-year statute of limitations and the six- year statute of repose set forth in M.G. L. c. 260, 2B. Construction Contracts (generally) There is an implied warranty in construction contracts to do a workmanlike job and to use reasonable skill. George v. Goldman, 333 Mass. 496 (1956). Indemnity Any provision in a contract for construction reconstruction [or] alteration on any building or structure or any real property which requires a subcontractor to indemnify any party for injury or damage to property not caused by the subcontractor or its employees, agents, or sub-contractors, shall be void. Brown v. Koch Membrane Systems, Mass. App. Div. 210 (2001), citing M.G.L. c. 149, 29C. Validity of indemnity under M.G.L. c. 149, 29C depends on specific language of a provision and not on facts or the degree of fault. Bjorkman v. Suffolk Construction Co., 679 N.E. 2d 559 (1997). Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Generally Unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce are unlawful. M.G.L. c. 93A, 2. Chapter 93A provides a remedy for any consumer or person engaged in trade or commerce who suffers a real or personal loss on an account of another person engaged in trade or commerce, if that loss results from an unfair method of competition or is a 5

6 deceptive act or practice. A person or entity injured as a result of such unfair trade practice may bring an action in an appropriate court for damages. There are two types of claims under chapter 93A. Consumers have the right to bring claims under M.G.L. c. 93A, 9. Persons or entities engaged in trade or commerce may also bring 93A claims, but under section 11 of the statute. There are significant differences between the two statutes, including the steps necessary to assert claims, the standard of proving a violation, and the amount of damages awarded. To claim a violation of section 9, a consumer must send a formal demand letter to the respondent. At least thirty days prior to the filing of an action, a written demand for relief, identifying the claimant and reasonably describing the unfair or deceptive act or practice relied upon and the injury suffered, shall be mailed or delivered to any prospective respondent. Any person receiving such a demand for relief who, within thirty days of the mailing or delivery of the demand for relief, makes a written tender of settlement which is rejected by the claimant may, in any subsequent action, file the written tender and an affidavit concerning its rejection and thereby limit any recovery to the relief tendered if the court finds that the relief tendered was reasonable in relation to the injury actually suffered by the petitioner. In all other cases, if the court finds for the petitioner, recovery shall be in the amount of actual damages or twenty-five dollars, whichever is greater; or up to three but not less than two times such amount if the court finds that the use or employment of the act or practice was a willful or knowing violation of said section two or that the refusal to grant relief upon demand was made in bad faith with knowledge or reason to know that the act or practice complained of violated said section two. For the purposes of this chapter, the amount of actual damages to be multiplied by the court shall be the amount of the judgment on all claims arising out of the same and underlying transaction or occurrence, regardless of the existence or nonexistence of insurance coverage available in payment of the claim. In addition, the court may award such 6

7 other equitable relief, including an injunction, as it deems to be necessary and proper. Finally, if the court finds in any action commenced under section 9 that there has been a violation of section 2, the petitioner shall, in addition to other relief provided for by section 9 and irrespective of the amount in controversy, be awarded reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in connection with the action. The Court shall, however, deny recovery of attorney's fees and costs incurred after the rejection of a reasonable written offer of settlement made within thirty days of the mailing or delivery of the written demand for relief required. The mailing of this formal demand is a prerequisite to any action under section 9 of chapter 93A. Entrialgo v. Twin City Dodge, Inc., 368 Mass. 812 (1975); Spilios v. Cohen, 38 Mass. App. Ct. 338 (1995). In a section 11, business to business case, there is no requirement of a written demand for relief. The burden of proof, however, is higher in a section 11 case than in a section 9 case. To establish a section 11 violation, the plaintiff must prove that that the conduct of the defendant "attain(s) a level of rascality that would raise an eyebrow of someone inured to the rough and tumble world of commerce." Lewings, Trustee v. Forbes & Wallace, Inc., 8 Mass. App. Ct. 498 (1979). Plaintiff must prove that the conduct constituted immoral, unethical, oppressive, or unscrupulous behavior that would cause substantial injury to consumers, competitors, or other business people. P.M.P. Associates, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co., 366 Mass. 593 (1975). Damages in a section 11 case are very similar to those in a section 9 case, with one notable exception: if the court finds for the petitioner, recovery shall be in the amount of actual damages; or up to three, but not less than two, times such amount if the court finds that the use or employment of the method of competition or the act or practice was a willful or knowing violation of said section two. This differs from section 9, where the Court is empowered to award nominal damages of $25 where there are no actual damages. Accordingly, a plaintiff must prove damages in a section 11 case in order to recover attorney s fees and costs; a section 9 7

8 plaintiff, by contrast, only needs to prove the unfair and deceptive act or practice. The amount of actual damages to be multiplied by the court in a section 11 case shall be the amount of the judgment on all claims arising out of the same and underlying transaction or occurrence regardless of the existence or nonexistence of insurance coverage available in payment of the claim. In addition, the court may award such other equitable relief, including an injunction, as it deems to be necessary and proper. The respondent may tender with his answer in any such action a written offer of settlement for single damages. If such tender or settlement is rejected by the petitioner, and if the court finds that the relief tendered was reasonable in relation to the injury actually suffered by the petitioner, then the court shall not award more than single damages. If the court finds, in any action under section 11, that there has been a violation of section 2, the petitioner shall, in addition to other relief provided for by this section and irrespective of the amount in controversy, be awarded reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in said action. In order to bring an action under either section 9 or section 11 of chapter 93A, the alleged violation must have occurred primarily or substantially within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Unfair Methods of Competition and Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices in the Business of Insurance Massachusetts has enacted an entire statute to address the issue of unfair trade practices in the business of insurance. See M.G.L. c. 176D, 1 et seq. Although the statute creates no private cause of action in favor of private litigants, Pariseau v. Albany Intern. Corp., 822 F. Supp. 843 (D. Mass. 1993), private actions for violations of chapter 176D nay be made through a claim under chapter 93A. See G.L. c. 93A, 9(1). Much of chapter 176D is regulatory in nature. From the consumer standpoint, the most common claims under chapter 176D arise under section 3(9), which addresses unfair claim settlement practices. Subsection (f) of this 8

9 statute provides that it is an unfair claim settlement practice (and therefore a violation of M.G.L. c. 93A) for insurers to fail to effectuate prompt, fair and equitable settlements of claims in which liability has become reasonably clear. The ramifications of an insurer s violation of this statute can be substantial. If a consumer (i.e., M.G.L. c. 93A, 9 claimant) successfully proves that an insurer violated this statute, he or she would be entitled to actual damages. In this context, actual damages usually represents the lost use of the funds, from the date when the insurer should have made an offer until the date when payment is actually made (typically following a settlement or a judgment against the insured), plus reasonable attorney s fees and costs. Yeagle v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 42 Mass. App. Ct. 650 (1997). If the Court, however, finds that the insurer s use of unfair claims settlement practices was willful or knowing, the measure of damages changes drastically. In that instance, the underlying judgment, and not lost use, becomes the baseline measure of damages. The Court will start with the judgment amount, double or treble it, and then add reasonable attorney s fees and costs. See Clegg v. Butler, 424 Mass. 413, 423 (1997). III. DAMAGES Economic Losses Purely economic losses are unrecoverable in tort and strict liability actions in the absence of personal injury or property damage. FMR Corp. v. Boston Edison Co., 415 Mass. 393, 395 (1993). See Garweth Corp. v. Boston Edison Co., 415 Mass. 303, 305 (1993); Bay State-Spray & Provincetown S.S., Inc. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 404 Mass. 103, 107 (1989). However, where the pecuniary losses sustained by a plaintiff result from physical harm to property proximately caused by a defendant's alleged negligence, such plaintiff has a right to recovery. See Priority Finishing Corp. v. LAL Constr. Co., 40 Mass. App. Ct. 719, 721 (1996); Newlin v. New England Tel. & Tel. Co., 316 Mass. 234, 237 (1944). 9

10 Offer of Settlement Rule 68 of the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a party may make an offer of judgment. The Rule provides that the party receiving the offer may serve an acceptance within ten (10) days. If this Offer of Judgment is rejected or if no response is served within ten days, the offer will be deemed to have been withdrawn. If the Judgment, exclusive of interest from the date of this Offer, obtained by the plaintiff against the party making the offer is not more favorable than the amount offered in the Offer of Judgment, the plaintiff becomes liable for costs incurred by the defendant after the making of this offer. Frivolous Claims By statute in Massachusetts, the Superior Court is empowered to hold a hearing and to make a separate and distinct finding that all or substantially all of the Plaintiff s claims in this matter were wholly insubstantial, frivolous, and not advanced in good faith. The statute provides that: Upon motion of any party in any civil action in which a finding, verdict, decision, award, order or judgment has been made by a judge or justice or by a jury, auditor, master or other finder of fact, the court may determine, after a hearing, as a separate and distinct finding, that all or substantially all of the claims, defenses, setoffs or counterclaims, whether of a factual, legal or mixed nature, made by any party who was represented by counsel during most or all of the proceeding, were wholly insubstantial, frivolous and not advanced in good faith. The court shall include in such finding the specific facts and reasons on which the finding is based. If such a finding is made with respect to a party's claims, the court shall award to each party against whom such claims were asserted an amount representing the reasonable counsel fees and other costs and expenses incurred in defending against such claims. M.G.L. c. 231, 6F. 10

11 This statutory provision ameliorates the consequences of the so-called American rule, which denies a prevailing party recovery of legal fees incurred in litigation, and instead serves to discourage insubstantial and frivolous actions. Masterpiece Kitchen & Bath v. Gordon, 425 Mass. 325 (1997); see also Miaskiewicz v. Le Tourneau, 12 Mass. App. Ct. 880 (1981). Once a defendant establishes that a Complaint lacks merit and obtains a dismissal, she may proceed to avail herself of remedies afforded by Rule 11 and this statute, which may include costs, damages, and attorney's fees. U.S. Funding, Inc. v. Bank of Boston Corp., 28 Mass. App. Ct. 404 (1990). Pre-judgment Interest Massachusetts provides the right to pre-judgment interest. In tort actions, where a verdict is rendered, a finding made, or an order for judgment made for pecuniary damages for personal injuries to the plaintiff or for consequential damages, or for damage to property, there shall be added by the clerk of court to the amount of damages interest thereon at the rate of twelve per cent (12%) per year from the date of commencement of the action M.G.L. c. 231, 6B. In actions based on contracts, upon finding judgment for money damages, the clerk of the court will add interest at a rate of twelve percent (12%) per year from the date of the breach. M.G.L. c C. The right to pre-judgment interest in contract actions extends to claims under construction-subcontractor contracts. J.C. Higgins Co., Inc. v. Bond Bros., Inc., 791 N.E. 2d 367 (Mass. App. Ct. 2003). Pre-Judgment interest is designed to make the Plaintiff whole for money lost during the time it was owed. See Connecticut Valley Sanitary Waste Disposal, Inc. v. Zielinski, 763 N.E. 2d 1080 (Mass. 2002). See also Fontaine v. Ebtec Corp., 613 N.E. 2d 881 (Mass. 1993). Post-judgment Interest Every judgment bears post-judgment interest. This interest is calculated at the same rate per year as provided for prejudgment interest in the judgment. M.G.L. c. 235, 8. 11

12 Post-judgment interest is calculated on the amount of the entire judgment, because failure to do so would result in inadequate damages, as the cost of delay in receiving money would not be recognized. City Coal Company of Springfield, Inc. v. Noonan, 424 Mass. 693 (1997). Punitive Damages Punitive damages are not allowed in Massachusetts unless specifically authorized by statute. The wrongful death statute allows for punitive damages, where the death resulted from the malicious, willful, wanton or reckless conduct of the defendant or by gross negligence. Punitive damages are also allowed in certain claims based on unlawful discrimination. As previously discussed, chapter 93A provides a type of punitive damage, in the form of doubling or trebling the underlying judgment, plus an award of reasonable attorney s fees and costs. See discussion of Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices. Joint and Several In determining the pro rata shares of tortfeasors in the entire liability, their relative degrees of fault shall not be considered. M.G.L. c. 231B, 2. This is often referred to as the one percent rule, because in a joint tortfeasor situation, if one tortfeasor is 99% liable and the other only 1% liable, they must both contribute to the award on a pro rata basis. In addition, the Plaintiff can elect to recover the full award against any liable Defendant. This presents practical problems where the least culpable Defendant is the only party with insurance or the ability to satisfy the judgment. When a release is given in good faith to one of two or more persons liable in tort for the same injury: (a) (b) It does not discharge any of the other tortfeasors from liability for the injury, but it does reduce the claim against the others to the extent of any amount stipulated by the release, or in the amount of the consideration paid for it, whichever is the greater; and It discharges the tortfeasor to whom it is given from all liability for contribution to any other tortfeasor. 12

13 M.G.L. c. 231B, 4; Noyes v. Raymond, 28 Mass. App. Ct. 186 (1990). Comparative Negligence Comparative Negligence divides damages among all negligent parties, based upon each party s degree of fault. Plaintiff s comparative negligence over 50% precludes recovery, up to which point it reduces recovery on a pro rata basis. M.G.L. c. 231, 85. The defense of assumption of risk has been abolished in all actions. The burden of alleging and proving negligence which serves to diminish a plaintiff's damages or bar recovery under this section is upon the person who seeks to establish such negligence. The plaintiff shall be presumed to have been in the exercise of due care. IV. LIMITATIONS ON ACTIONS Statute of Limitations Actions of Contract to Recover for Personal Injury 3 years. M.G.L. c A. Actions in Tort 3 years. M.G.L. c A. Breach of Contract 6 years. M.G.L. c Breach of Contract for Sale 4 years. M.G.L. c

14 Statute of Repose The statute of repose for design professionals is 6 years. M.G.L. c B. The statute bars claims against design professionals made more than six years following the substantial completion of [an] improvement [to real property] and the taking of possession for occupancy by the owner. The statue is applicable to any professional who performs specialized acts of expertise for design and construction used to make improvements on pieces of real property. Fine v. Huygens, DiMella,, Shaffer, & Associates, 783 N.E.2d 842,846 (2003). The statute was enacted by the legislature in order to limit the liability of architects, engineers, and all those involved with the design and construction of real property. Klein v. Catalano, 386 Mass. 701 (1982). V. COVERAGE ISSUES Interpretation of the Insurance Contract Duty to Defend and Duty to Indemnify Under Massachusetts law, the interpretation of an insurance contract is not a question of fact for the jury. Jefferson Ins. Co. of New York v. City of Holyoke, 23 Mass. App. Ct. 472, 475 (1987). Rather, the responsibility of construing the language of an insurance contract is a question of law for the court. Save-Mor Supermarkets, Inc. v. Skelly-Detective Serv., Inc., 359 Mass. 221, 226 (1971). Massachusetts courts approach any question of policy construction with the basic premise that an insurance policy is a contract and is to be construed, in the first instance, like any other written contract. Id. at 226. Thus, the court s dominant purpose is to attempt to determine the intent of the parties by examining the language of the policy, read as a whole. Falmouth Nat l Bank v. Ticor Title Ins. Co., 920 F. 2d 1058, 1061 (1st Cir. 1990). An insurer s duty to defend against a liability claim is determined by the allegations in the Complaint. Fessenden Sch., Inc. v. American Mut. Liab. Ins. Co., 289 Mass. 124, 130 (1935). The duty to defend arises when the facts alleged in the complaint, or known (or readily knowable) by the insurer, place liability within the coverage of the policy. Terrio v. McDonough; Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 16 Mass. App. Ct. 163, 167 (1983). 14

15 The duty to defend is broader than the duty to indemnify. W.R. Grace Co. v. Maryland Cas. Co., 33 Mass. App. Ct. 358, 364 (1992). If the allegations embodied in the Complaint are reasonably susceptible of an interpretation that they state a claim covered by the policy, the insurer must undertake the defense. Continental Cas. Co. v. Gilbane Bldg. Co., 391 Mass. 143, 146 (1984). An insurer has no obligation to defend, however, when the allegations of a complaint describe with precision conduct which the insurance policy expressly excludes from coverage. Terio, 16 Mass. App. Ct. at 168. Where the allegations in the complaint lie expressly outside the policy coverage and its purpose, the insurer may even be relieved of the duty to investigate. Timpson v. Transamerica Insurance Co., 41 Mass. App. Ct. 344, 350 (1996). An insurer must indemnify its insured when a judgment within its policy coverage is rendered against the insured. The duty to defend is antecedent to, and independent of, the duty to indemnify. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 406 Mass. 7, 10, 545 N.E.2d 1156 (1989). Trigger In Massachusetts, trigger of coverage is both a contract question and a question of law. Trigger rulings should be derived from the operative language of the policy, as opposed to the judicial gloss placed on similar language in analogous cases. United Technologies Corp. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 1993 WL (Mass. Sup. Court). Occurrence The term occurrence is typically defined as an accident... which results in bodily injury or property damage neither expected nor intended from the standpoint of the insured. Under Massachusetts law, the term accident is to be given its ordinary meaning, which is usually an event occurring by chance or unintentionally. Smartfoods v. Northbrook Prop. & Cas., 35 Mass. App. Ct. 239 (1993). Breach of Contract Many general liability policies exclude coverage for contractual liability. Coverage for contractual liability is available only where the agreement is an insured contract, as defined by the policy, or where the insured would face that liability in the absence of the contract. 15

16 Property Damage Work Product Exclusions The burden of showing that the property was damaged within the coverage of the policy is on the insured. The general rule is that the event giving rise to coverage under an occurrence-based policy is the happening of the actual property damage, and not the causative act. In other words, the time of the occurrence of an accident within the meaning of an indemnity policy is not the time the wrongful act was committed, but the time when the complaining party was actually damaged. Trustees of Tufts University vs. Commercial Union Insurance Co., 616 N.E.2d 68 (Mass. 1993). Coverage for faulty workmanship is usually not available under the commercial general liability form. See, e.g., Commerce Ins. Co. v. Betty Caplette Builders, 420 Mass. 87, (1995); Donovan v. Commercial Union Insurance Company, 44 Mass. App. Ct. 596, (1998). Our Supreme Judicial Court has reasoned contractors are able to purchase builder s risk policies or performance bonds to protect against damage to their product. The Court has distinguished this type of coverage from comprehensive general liability insurance, which insures against another form of risk in the insured-contractor s line of work, i.e., injury to people and damage to other property caused by a faulty product or work. Caplette, 420 Mass. at 93. The injury to products exclusion is meant to deny coverage in situations where the insured or its subcontractor has caused damage to the product, work, property or structure. The purpose of this exclusion is to prevent the insured from using its product liability coverage as a form of property insurance, to cover the cost of repairing or replacing its own defective products or work. Id. at (citing 2 R. LONG, LIABILITY INSURANCE 11.09(2) (1993)). The Massachusetts Appeals Court has noted that commercial general liability policies should not serve as a guaranty of the quality and suitability of the insured s products: these risks are of a kind that the insured may be expected to bear itself, including risks which relate to the repair or replacement of faulty work. Sterilite Corp. v. Continental Cas. Co., 17 Mass. App. Ct. 316 (1983). Where the contractor s faulty workmanship damages the very property which had to be replaced, there is no coverage under the 16

17 commercial general liability policy. Donovan v. Commercial Union Insurance Company, 44 Mass. App. Ct. 596, 600 (1998). Massachusetts Courts have also affirmed the denial of coverage under the "impaired property" exclusion. The Appeals Court has stated that the effect of the impaired property exclusion is to bar coverage for loss of use claims (1) when the loss was caused by the insured's faulty workmanship; and (2) when there has been no injury to the property aside from the incorporation of the insured's faulty work itself. Dorchester Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. First Kostas Corporation, 49 Mass. App. Ct. 651, 654 (2000). Additional Insured Issues The naming of an additional insured does not extend the nature of the substantive coverage originally given by the policy, but merely gives to other persons the same protection afforded to the principal insured. Wyner v. North Am. Specialty Ins. Co., 78 F.3d 752 (1st Cir. 1996); Turnpike Authority v. Perini Corp., 349 Mass. 448 (1965). Certificates of Insurance A liability insurer for construction contractors is assumed to understand the critical role of certificates of insurance in obtaining public contracts. The furnishing of such certificates, verifying the existence of coverage, is a necessary part of servicing such insurance. O Connell v. Reliance Ins. Co., 50 Mass. App. Ct. 334, 336 (2000). Late Notice An insurance company shall not deny insurance coverage to an insured because of failure of an insured to seasonably notify an insurance company of an occurrence, incident, claim or of a suit founded upon an occurrence, incident or claim, which may give rise to liability insured against unless the insurance company has been prejudiced thereby. M.G.L. c. 175, 112. Other Insurance In Mission Ins. Co. v. United States Fire Ins. Co., 401 Mass. 492 (1988), the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts discussed three types of "other insurance" clauses: pro rata, escape, and excess. Pro rata clauses provide that if other insurance is available to the insured, the policy containing the pro rata clause will contribute to the loss in the proportion that its policy limit bears to the total limit of all available policies. Escape clauses provide that, if there is 17

18 other insurance available to the insured, the policy containing the escape clause will pay no benefits. Excess clauses provide that, if there is other insurance available to the insured, the policy containing the excess clause will pay no benefits until such other insurance is exhausted. See generally 8A J.A. APPLEMAN, INSURANCE LAW AND PRACTICE 4906, at (rev. ed. 1981). The Court noted that the majority of courts have embraced a humanistic rule of construction -- insurance clauses that conflict are to be reconciled and interpreted upon the determination of the sense and meaning of the terms the parties used. This approach generally has resulted in giving excess clauses preference to escape and pro rata clauses and declaring mutual repugnancy where either excess or escape clauses appear in both policies. Id. at 496. The Mission Insurance decision further noted that, when mutual repugnancy occurs, each insurer should be "required to contribute to the loss, for to give effect to both clauses would result in no coverage for the insured." Mission Insurance, 401 Mass. at 496 n.4. In that particular case, which involved a conflict between two excess clauses, the Court concluded that that repugnancy existed, and that the insurers had to contribute equally to the loss. Id. at 499. Heifetz Rose LLP 175 Highland Avenue, Suite 407 Needham, MA Telephone: (617) Facsimile: (617)

Construction Defect Action Reform Act

Construction Defect Action Reform Act COLORADO REVISED STATUTES Title 13. Courts and Court Procedure Damages Regulation of Actions and Proceedings Article 20. Actions Part 8. Construction Defect Actions for Property Loss and Damage Construction

More information

FOR PROPERTY LOSS AND DAMAGE 1

FOR PROPERTY LOSS AND DAMAGE 1 13-20-801. Short title Colorado Revised Statutes Title 13; Article 20; Part 8: CONSTRUCTION DEFECT ACTIONS FOR PROPERTY LOSS AND DAMAGE 1 This part 8 shall be known and may be cited as the Construction

More information

Claims College School of Construction LEVEL 1

Claims College School of Construction LEVEL 1 Claims College School of Construction LEVEL 1 Construction Defect Liability Theories and Defenses Objectives At the end of this course, you will be able to: Describe the theories of liability and defenses

More information

California Senate Bill 474 Impact on Owners & Contractors

California Senate Bill 474 Impact on Owners & Contractors California Senate Bill 474 Impact on Owners & Contractors Beginning January 1, 2013, project owners, general contractors ( GC ), construction managers ( CM ) and any lower tier contractor who employs subcontractors

More information

California Civil Code 2782.05

California Civil Code 2782.05 California Civil Code 2782.05 (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), provisions, clauses, covenants, and agreements contained in, collateral to, or affecting any construction contract and amendments

More information

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and

More information

CONNECTICUT I. MECHANICS LIEN BASICS

CONNECTICUT I. MECHANICS LIEN BASICS I. MECHANICS LIEN BASICS CONNECTICUT Information compiled by: William S. Wilson, II, Esq. Alfred A. DiVincentis, Esq. Wendy J. Borawski, Esq. HALLORAN & SAGE LLP One Goodwin Square 225 Asylum Street Hartford,

More information

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 HOUSE DRH11149-TG-5 (12/01) Short Title: Tort Reform Act of 2011. (Public)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 HOUSE DRH11149-TG-5 (12/01) Short Title: Tort Reform Act of 2011. (Public) H GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION HOUSE DRH-TG- (/01) D Short Title: Tort Reform Act of. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: Representatives Blust and Daughtry (Primary Sponsors). 1 A BILL TO BE

More information

A&E Briefings. Indemnification Clauses: Uninsurable Contractual Liability. Structuring risk management solutions

A&E Briefings. Indemnification Clauses: Uninsurable Contractual Liability. Structuring risk management solutions A&E Briefings Structuring risk management solutions Spring 2012 Indemnification Clauses: Uninsurable Contractual Liability J. Kent Holland, J.D. ConstructionRisk, LLC Professional consultants are judged

More information

Kentucky Department of Education Version of Document A312 2010

Kentucky Department of Education Version of Document A312 2010 Kentucky Department of Education Version of Document A312 2010 Performance Bond CONTRACTOR: (Name, legal status and address) SURETY: (Name, legal status and principal place of business) OWNER: (Name, legal

More information

NEW MEXICO SELF-INSURERS' FUND WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY PLAN

NEW MEXICO SELF-INSURERS' FUND WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY PLAN NEW MEXICO SELF-INSURERS' FUND WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY PLAN In return for the payment of the premium and subject to all terms of this Policy, we agree with you as follows. GENERAL

More information

Liquor. (Occurrence Form)

Liquor. (Occurrence Form) Liquor LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY (Occurrence Form) 95A Turnpike Road Westborough, MA 01581 (508) 366-1140 THIS POLICY JACKET WITH THE Liquor LIABILITY POLICY FORM, DECLARATIONS PAGE AND ENDORSEMENTS,

More information

Title XLV TORTS. Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE. View Entire Chapter

Title XLV TORTS. Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE. View Entire Chapter Title XLV TORTS Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE View Entire Chapter 768.28 Waiver of sovereign immunity in tort actions; recovery limits; limitation on attorney fees; statute of limitations; exclusions; indemnification;

More information

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with

More information

Liability of Volunteer Directors of Nonprofit Corporations (10/02)

Liability of Volunteer Directors of Nonprofit Corporations (10/02) Liability of Volunteer Directors of Nonprofit Corporations (10/02) This memorandum addresses the California and federal law protections that exist to shield volunteer directors of nonprofit corporations

More information

THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. By Craig R. White

THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. By Craig R. White THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES By Craig R. White SKEDSVOLD & WHITE, LLC. 1050 Crown Pointe Parkway Suite 710 Atlanta, Georgia 30338 (770)

More information

HARVEY KRUSE, P.C. BAD FAITH

HARVEY KRUSE, P.C. BAD FAITH HARVEY KRUSE, P.C. BAD FAITH Prepared By: Michael F. Schmidt P25213 HARVEY KRUSE, P.C. 1050 Wilshire Drive, Suite 320 Troy, MI 48084 (248) 649-7800 Fax (248) 649-2316 A. INTRODUCTION Subject to specific

More information

Insurance for In-House Counsel. April 2014 Kevin Stolworthy, Esq. / Conor Flynn, Esq. / Matthew Stafford, Esq.

Insurance for In-House Counsel. April 2014 Kevin Stolworthy, Esq. / Conor Flynn, Esq. / Matthew Stafford, Esq. Insurance for In-House Counsel April 2014 Kevin Stolworthy, Esq. / Conor Flynn, Esq. / Matthew Stafford, Esq. Commercial General Liability Insurance ( CGL insurance ) Purpose of CGL Insurance CGL insurance

More information

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 585 An Act to amend and reenact 38.2-2206 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 a

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. No. 4:01 CV 726 DDN VENETIAN TERRAZZO, INC., Defendant. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT Pursuant

More information

HOLD HARMLESS, INDEMNITY, SUBROGATION AND ADDITIONAL INSURED INSURANCE IN TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTS

HOLD HARMLESS, INDEMNITY, SUBROGATION AND ADDITIONAL INSURED INSURANCE IN TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTS HOLD HARMLESS, INDEMNITY, SUBROGATION AND ADDITIONAL INSURED INSURANCE IN TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTS By James W. Bryan Nexsen Pruet P.L.L.C. Greensboro, North Carolina 336-373-1600 jbryan@nexsenpruet.com

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. v. : No. 3:00CV0459(RNC) RULING AND ORDER. This case presents the question whether an employer s

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. v. : No. 3:00CV0459(RNC) RULING AND ORDER. This case presents the question whether an employer s UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT RELIANCE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO., : Plaintiff, : v. : No. 3:00CV0459(RNC) JONATHON VITALE, LYNN VITALE : and RAVIZZA BROTHERS, INC., Defendants. : RULING

More information

BAD FAITH LAW IN INDIANA

BAD FAITH LAW IN INDIANA BAD FAITH LAW IN INDIANA CINCINNATI, OH COLUMBUS, OH DETROIT, MI FT. MITCHELL, KY ORLANDO, FL SARASOTA, FL www.smithrolfes.com 2012 I. OVERVIEW OF INDIANA BAD FAITH LAW Indiana recognizes a common-law

More information

Civil Suits: The Process

Civil Suits: The Process Jurisdictional Limits The justice courts have exclusive jurisdiction or the authority to hear all civil actions when the amount involved, exclusive of interest, costs and awarded attorney fees when authorized

More information

RESPONDING TO CHAPTER 93A DEMAND LETTERS IN PERSONAL INJURY CASES. Holly M. Polglase and Kevin P. Polansky Hermes, Netburn, O Connor & Spearing, P.C.

RESPONDING TO CHAPTER 93A DEMAND LETTERS IN PERSONAL INJURY CASES. Holly M. Polglase and Kevin P. Polansky Hermes, Netburn, O Connor & Spearing, P.C. RESPONDING TO CHAPTER 93A DEMAND LETTERS IN PERSONAL INJURY CASES Holly M. Polglase and Kevin P. Polansky Hermes, Netburn, O Connor & Spearing, P.C. In Massachusetts, manufacturers, distributors, suppliers

More information

Professional Practice 544

Professional Practice 544 February 15, 2016 Professional Practice 544 Tort Law and Insurance Michael J. Hanahan Schiff Hardin LLP 233 S. Wacker, Ste. 6600 Chicago, IL 60606 312-258-5701 mhanahan@schiffhardin.com Schiff Hardin LLP.

More information

COMMENTARY. California s New Subcontractor Defense Regime for Non-Residential Projects: Creating Order or Chaos?

COMMENTARY. California s New Subcontractor Defense Regime for Non-Residential Projects: Creating Order or Chaos? May 2013 JONES DAY COMMENTARY California s New Subcontractor Defense Regime for Non-Residential Projects: Creating Order or Chaos? As explained in a recent Commentary (available at http://www.jonesday.com/navigating_treacherous_

More information

Cardelli Lanfear P.C.

Cardelli Lanfear P.C. Michigan Prepared by Cardelli Lanfear P.C. 322 West Lincoln Royal Oak, MI 48067 Tel: 248.850.2179 Fax: 248.544.1191 1. Introduction History of Tort Reform in Michigan Michigan was one of the first states

More information

ENFIELD PIZZA PALACE, INC., ET AL. v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF GREATER NEW YORK (AC 19268)

ENFIELD PIZZA PALACE, INC., ET AL. v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF GREATER NEW YORK (AC 19268) SCHALLER, J. The plaintiffs 2 appeal from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendant, Insurance Company of Greater New York, in this declaratory judgment action concerning a dispute about the defendant

More information

TEXAS UNFAIR CLAIMS STATUTES AND REGULATIONS

TEXAS UNFAIR CLAIMS STATUTES AND REGULATIONS TEXAS UNFAIR CLAIMS STATUTES AND REGULATIONS 541.060. UNFAIR SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. (a) It is an unfair method of competition or an unfair or deceptive act or practice in the business of insurance to engage

More information

ERISA Causes of Action *

ERISA Causes of Action * 1 ERISA Causes of Action * ERISA authorizes a variety of causes of action to remedy violations of the statute, to enforce the terms of a benefit plan, or to provide other relief to a plan, its participants

More information

SURETY. and Title: (Any additional signatures appear on the last page of this Performance Bond.)

SURETY. and Title: (Any additional signatures appear on the last page of this Performance Bond.) Performance Bond Document A312 2010 CONTRACTOR: (Name, legal status and address) SURETY: (Name, legal status and principal place of business) OWNER: (Name, legal status and address) CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 1, 2003 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 1, 2003 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 1, 2003 Session FARMERS MUTUAL OF TENNESSEE v. ATHENS INSURANCE AGENCY, CHARLES W. SPURLING and wife, CAROLYN SPURLING Direct Appeal from the

More information

PUBLIC ENTITY RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY MEMORANDUM OF WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY COVERAGE

PUBLIC ENTITY RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY MEMORANDUM OF WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY COVERAGE PUBLIC ENTITY RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY MEMORANDUM OF WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY COVERAGE FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2015 TO JUNE 30, 2016 EFFECTIVE: JULY 1, 2015 PUBLIC ENTITY RISK MANAGEMENT

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY

WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY WC 00 00 00 A (Ed. 4-92) WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY PLEASE READ THE POLICY CAREFULLY. QUICK REFERENCE BEGINNING ON PAGE INFORMATION PAGE GENERAL SECTION... 2 A. The Policy...

More information

Case: 1:10-cv-08146 Document #: 27 Filed: 06/29/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:342

Case: 1:10-cv-08146 Document #: 27 Filed: 06/29/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:342 Case: 1:10-cv-08146 Document #: 27 Filed: 06/29/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:342 TKK USA INC., f/k/a The Thermos Company, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Plaintiff,

More information

Employers Liability and Insurance Coverage in the Construction Industry

Employers Liability and Insurance Coverage in the Construction Industry Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 18, Number 1 (18.1.29) Insurance Law By: Gregory G. Vacala and Allison H. McJunkin Rusin

More information

AIA Document A312 - Electronic Format. Performance Bond

AIA Document A312 - Electronic Format. Performance Bond AIA Document A312 - Electronic Format Performance Bond THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES: CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED WITH RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION. AUTHENTICATION

More information

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts. PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 19, 2009. It is intended for information and reference purposes only.

More information

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS )SS:

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS )SS: STATE OF OHIO IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SS: CUYAHOGA COUNTY CASE NO. CV-484139 THE OAKWOOD CLUB Plaintiff vs. OPINION AND ORDER KINNEY GOLF COURSE DESIGN, ET AL Defendants MICHAEL J. RUSSO, JUDGE: This

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 93A Article 2 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 93A Article 2 1 Article 2. Real Estate Education and Recovery Fund. 93A-16. Real Estate Education and Recovery Fund created; payment to fund; management. (a) There is hereby created a special fund to be known as the "Real

More information

Personal Property Title Insurance Owner s Policy (PPT-1)

Personal Property Title Insurance Owner s Policy (PPT-1) Personal Property Title Insurance (PPT-1) Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given to the Company under this Policy must be given to the Company at the address

More information

Case 2:14-cv-00170-TS Document 45 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

Case 2:14-cv-00170-TS Document 45 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH Case 2:14-cv-00170-TS Document 45 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation, and

More information

To determine whether or not an injury arises out of the maintenance or use of a motor vehicle:

To determine whether or not an injury arises out of the maintenance or use of a motor vehicle: What are No-Fault benefits? "No-fault benefits" are also often referred to as "Personal Injury Protection benefits or "PIP Benefits" for short. No Fault refers to insurance coverage provided by your own

More information

2015 IL App (5th) 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT

2015 IL App (5th) 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT NOTICE Decision filed 10/15/15. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2015 IL App (5th 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227

More information

WHAT IS IT, HOW TO DEAL WITH IT, AND WHERE IS IT GOING?

WHAT IS IT, HOW TO DEAL WITH IT, AND WHERE IS IT GOING? WHAT IS IT, HOW TO DEAL WITH IT, AND WHERE IS IT GOING? Moderator: Paul H. Leonard Policyholders view: Andrew M. Weiner Insurers view: Wallace C. Magathan, III First Party Hull Claims Third Party Passenger

More information

Risk-Shifting Agreements In Construction Contracts: Why Insurance May Not Work The Way It Used To

Risk-Shifting Agreements In Construction Contracts: Why Insurance May Not Work The Way It Used To Risk-Shifting Agreements In Construction Contracts: Why Insurance May Not Work The Way It Used To David S. White The newer additional-insured clause might leave the owner and subcontractor without the

More information

Compliance & Foreclosure

Compliance & Foreclosure Compliance & Foreclosure June 19th, 2015 Hilton Hotel, Dedham, MA Erika J. Hoover, Esq. Compliance Counsel Life of a foreclosure default to post sale Pre-foreclosure compliance issues Obsolete mortgages

More information

WORKERS CO MPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY

WORKERS CO MPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY WORKERS CO MPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY ABCDEFGHIJ In return for the payment of the premium and subject to all terms of this policy, we agree with you as follows: GENERAL SECTION

More information

Indemnity Clauses. Just boilerplate, right?

Indemnity Clauses. Just boilerplate, right? Indemnity Clauses Just boilerplate, right? Indemnity The obligation resting on one person to make good any loss or damage another has incurred or may incur by acting at his request or for his benefit,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING MYSPINE, PS, a Washington professional services corporation; BODY RECOVERY CLINIC LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company; and YAROSLAV KUTSY, Plaintiffs,

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY

WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY In return for the payment of the premium and subject to all terms of this policy, we agree with you as follows: General Section A. The Policy

More information

In the Indiana Supreme Court

In the Indiana Supreme Court ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT Robert S. O Dell Carmel, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE W. F. Conour Jeffrey A. Hammond Timothy F. Devereux Indianapolis, Indiana In the Indiana Supreme Court No. 29S02-0908-CV-378

More information

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

TERMS AND CONDITIONS TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Definitions. Buyer means the person, corporation or other entity purchasing Products from Seller. Products means all goods and materials to be provided pursuant to this Sales Acknowledgment.

More information

Introduction to Directors and Offi cers Liability Insurance

Introduction to Directors and Offi cers Liability Insurance CHAPTER 1 Martin J. O Leary Introduction to Directors and Offi cers Liability Insurance The following is a brief, general overview of coverage afforded under the Directors and Officers Liability Insurance

More information

Decisions of the Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decisions of the Nebraska Court of Appeals CIZEK HOMES v. COLUMBIA NAT. INS. CO. 361 Cite as 22 Neb. App. 361 require perfection of a parent when deciding whether termination of parental rights is appropriate. We conclude that there is insufficient

More information

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 12650. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the False Claims Act. (b) For purposes of this article: (1) "Claim" includes any

More information

HAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL. Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i

HAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL. Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i HAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i Section 672B-1 Definitions 672B-2 Administration of chapter 672B-3 Design claim conciliation

More information

SLOANE AND WALSH, LLP FALL LAW UPDATE 2012

SLOANE AND WALSH, LLP FALL LAW UPDATE 2012 BAD FAITH UPDATE: MASSACHUSETTS Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court determines underlying judgment is measure of damages for excess insurer s bad faith. Rhodes v. AIG Domestic Claims, Inc., 461 MA 486

More information

IN COURT OF APPEALS. DECISION DATED AND FILED July 16, 2015. Appeal No. 2014AP157 DISTRICT IV DENNIS D. DUFOUR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT,

IN COURT OF APPEALS. DECISION DATED AND FILED July 16, 2015. Appeal No. 2014AP157 DISTRICT IV DENNIS D. DUFOUR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT, COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 16, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the

More information

THE TEXAS PROMPT PAYMENT OF CLAIMS STATUTE AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE DUTY TO DEFEND

THE TEXAS PROMPT PAYMENT OF CLAIMS STATUTE AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE DUTY TO DEFEND THE TEXAS PROMPT PAYMENT OF CLAIMS STATUTE AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE DUTY TO DEFEND January 8, 2008 THOMPSON COE I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this article is to provide the insurance claims handler

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 28A Article 19 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 28A Article 19 1 Article 19. Claims Against the Estate. 28A-19-1. Manner of presentation of claims. (a) A claim against a decedent's estate must be in writing and state the amount or item claimed, or other relief sought,

More information

REVISITING DIRECTOR AND OFFICER INDEMNIFICATION: PROVISIONS IN THE NEW D.C. NONPROFIT ACT

REVISITING DIRECTOR AND OFFICER INDEMNIFICATION: PROVISIONS IN THE NEW D.C. NONPROFIT ACT Updated July 2015 REVISITING DIRECTOR AND OFFICER INDEMNIFICATION: PROVISIONS IN THE NEW D.C. NONPROFIT ACT 1. Initial Considerations The District of Columbia has recently modernized its statute dealing

More information

Errors and Omissions Insurance. 1.0 Introduction and Definition

Errors and Omissions Insurance. 1.0 Introduction and Definition Errors and Omissions Insurance 1.0 Introduction and Definition 1.1 Under the terms of this policy the word employee means any trustee of the Board of Education, any employee of the Hicksville Board of

More information

UNINSURED/UNDERINSURED MOTORIST CLAIMS AFTER BRAINARD. By C. Brooks Schuelke. Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP th

UNINSURED/UNDERINSURED MOTORIST CLAIMS AFTER BRAINARD. By C. Brooks Schuelke. Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP th UNINSURED/UNDERINSURED MOTORIST CLAIMS AFTER BRAINARD By C. Brooks Schuelke Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP th 1717 W. 6 Street, Ste. 375 Austin, Texas 78703 (512)476-4944 www.civtrial.com brooks@civtrial.com

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION If you were injured or provided treatment for an injury and filed a claim under your Allstate Med Pay coverage, and were compensated in an amount

More information

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings. SMALL CLAIMS RULES Rule 501. Scope and Purpose (a) How Known and Cited. These rules for the small claims division for the county court are additions to C.R.C.P. and shall be known and cited as the Colorado

More information

AIA Document A310 TM 2010

AIA Document A310 TM 2010 AIA Document A310 TM 2010 Bid Bond CONTRACTOR: OWNER: «Lane County» «125 East Eighth Avenue BOND AMOUNT: $ PROJECT: (Name, location or address, and Project number, if any) «Lane County Adult Corrections

More information

1 (5) The state and its agencies and subdivisions shall be liable for tort claims in the

1 (5) The state and its agencies and subdivisions shall be liable for tort claims in the 768.28 Waiver of sovereign immunity in tort actions; recovery limits; limitation on attorney fees; statute of limitations; exclusions; indemnification; risk management programs. (1) In accordance with

More information

28. Time is of the essence in this Lease and in each and all of its provisions.

28. Time is of the essence in this Lease and in each and all of its provisions. COMMERCIAL VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT LEASE AGREEMENT Please print and fax to: 281-842-9345 Stutes Enterprise Systems, Inc. ("Lessor"), located at 1426 Sens Rd #5, LaPorte, Texas 77571, leases to, ("Lessee"), located

More information

No. 04-3753 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. 427 F.3d 1048; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22999

No. 04-3753 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. 427 F.3d 1048; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22999 RONALD WARRUM, in his capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of JOSEPH F. SAYYAH, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 04-3753 UNITED STATES COURT

More information

Insurance Coverage Issues for Products Manufactured by Foreign Companies

Insurance Coverage Issues for Products Manufactured by Foreign Companies Insurance Coverage Issues for Products Manufactured by Foreign Companies James S. Carter August 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION...1 II. COVERAGE PROVISIONS...1 A. Duty to Defend...1 B. Duty

More information

NEW YORK NY GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW 5-1701 5-1709 TITLE 17 STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT PROTECTION ACT

NEW YORK NY GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW 5-1701 5-1709 TITLE 17 STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT PROTECTION ACT NEW YORK NY GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW 5-1701 5-1709 TITLE 17 STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT PROTECTION ACT 5-1701. Definitions. For purposes of this title: a. "Annuity issuer" means an insurer that has issued an

More information

The Solution for General Partnership Liability Coverage Part

The Solution for General Partnership Liability Coverage Part The Solution for General Partnership Liability Coverage Part In consideration of the payment of the premium and subject to the General Terms and Conditions, the Insurer and the Insureds agree as follows:

More information

THE STATE OF FLORIDA...

THE STATE OF FLORIDA... TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE STATE OF FLORIDA... 2 A. FREQUENTLY CITED FLORIDA STATUTES... 2 1. General Considerations in Insurance Claim Management... 2 2. Insurance Fraud... 5 3. Automobile Insurance...

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 5 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 5 1 Article 5. Limitations, Other than Real Property. 1-46. Periods prescribed. The periods prescribed for the commencement of actions, other than for the recovery of real property, are as set forth in this

More information

Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Massachusetts

Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Massachusetts Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Massachusetts Massachusetts has a relatively good state whistleblower law: Scoring 64 out of a possible 100 points; and Ranking 11 th out of 51 (50 states and the

More information

FORC QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF INSURANCE LAW AND REGULATION

FORC QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF INSURANCE LAW AND REGULATION The plaintiff in Schmidt filed suit against her employer, Personalized Audio Visual, Inc. ("PAV") and PAV s president, Dennis Smith ("Smith"). 684 A.2d at 68. Her Complaint alleged several causes of action

More information

2016 IL App (1st) 133918-U. No. 1-13-3918 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT

2016 IL App (1st) 133918-U. No. 1-13-3918 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT 2016 IL App (1st) 133918-U No. 1-13-3918 SIXTH DIVISION May 6, 2016 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances

More information

Bond Form Commentary and Comparison

Bond Form Commentary and Comparison Bond Form Commentary and Comparison AIA Document A310 2010, Bid Bond, and AIA Document A312 2010, Performance Bond and Payment Bond INTRODUCTION Since the first publication of The Standard Form of Bond

More information

Residential Lease. Form 11-5. Basic Terms. Date: Landlord: Landlord s Address: Tenant: Tenant s Address: Premises. Street address/suite:

Residential Lease. Form 11-5. Basic Terms. Date: Landlord: Landlord s Address: Tenant: Tenant s Address: Premises. Street address/suite: Basic Terms Date: Landlord: Landlord s Address: Tenant: Tenant s Address: Premises Street address/suite: City, state, zip: Monthly Rent: Include or attach any additional necessary legal description. Term

More information

By Heather Howell Wright, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, LLP. (Published July 24, 2013 in Insurance Coverage, by the ABA Section Of Litigation)

By Heather Howell Wright, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, LLP. (Published July 24, 2013 in Insurance Coverage, by the ABA Section Of Litigation) Tiara Condominium: The Demise of the Economic Loss Rule in Construction Defect Litigation and Impact on the Property Damage Requirement in a General Liability Policy By Heather Howell Wright, Bradley Arant

More information

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com Form: Plaintiff's original petition-wrongful Death [Name], PLAINTIFF vs. [Name], DEFENDANT [ IN THE [Type of Court] COURT [Court number] PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION 1. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1.1 Plaintiff

More information

Reed Armstrong Quarterly

Reed Armstrong Quarterly Reed Armstrong Quarterly January 2009 http://www.reedarmstrong.com/default.asp Contributors: William B. Starnes II Tori L. Cox IN THIS ISSUE: Joint and Several Liability The Fault of Settled Tortfeasors

More information

A. For the consideration agreed below to be paid to Contractor by City, Contractor shall provide

A. For the consideration agreed below to be paid to Contractor by City, Contractor shall provide STATE OF TEXAS CONTRACT FOR SERVICES COUNTY OF DALLAS THIS CONTRACT is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF DALLAS, a Texas municipal corporation, located in Dallas County, Texas (hereinafter

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. Ludwig. J. July 9, 2010

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. Ludwig. J. July 9, 2010 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KATHLEEN M. KELLY : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : No. 09-1641 NATIONAL LIABILITY & FIRE : INSURANCE COMPANY : MEMORANDUM Ludwig. J.

More information

LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001

LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001 1 LAW REFORM (CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2001 EXPLANATORY NOTES GENERAL OUTLINE OBJECTIVES OF THE LEGISLATION The purpose of this Bill is to address the impact of the decision of the High

More information

NURSING HOME CARE ACT INTRODUCTION. The Nursing Home Care Act, 210 ILCS 45/1, et seq., was adopted amid concern over

NURSING HOME CARE ACT INTRODUCTION. The Nursing Home Care Act, 210 ILCS 45/1, et seq., was adopted amid concern over NURSING HOME CARE ACT INTRODUCTION The Nursing Home Care Act, 210 ILCS 45/1, et seq., was adopted amid concern over reports of inadequate, improper and degrading treatment of patients in nursing homes.

More information

BAD FAITH INSTRUCTIONS Introduction

BAD FAITH INSTRUCTIONS Introduction BAD FAITH INSTRUCTIONS Introduction These instructions are not materially changed from RAJI (CIVIL) 4th. The duty of good faith and fair dealing is implied in every contract. Rawlings v. Apodaca, 151 Ariz.

More information

North Carolina Interlocal Risk Management Agency (NCIRMA) Workers Compensation and Employers Liability Insurance Policy

North Carolina Interlocal Risk Management Agency (NCIRMA) Workers Compensation and Employers Liability Insurance Policy North Carolina Interlocal Risk Management Agency (NCIRMA) Workers Compensation and Employers Liability Insurance Policy WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY QUICK REFERENCE Beginning

More information

BAD FAITH IN WASHINGTON

BAD FAITH IN WASHINGTON BAD FAITH IN WASHINGTON By Steve Jensen,, and An insurer s bad faith can give rise to two related causes of action under Washington law: 1) a cause of action for bad faith sounding in tort, and 2) a cause

More information

CALIFORNIA Strict Indemnity Language. CALIFORNIA Intermediate Indemnity Language

CALIFORNIA Strict Indemnity Language. CALIFORNIA Intermediate Indemnity Language CALIFORNIA Strict Indemnity Language Contractor (Indemnitor) shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Authority, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers from and against any and all liability,

More information

Construction Defect Coverage Recap For 1st Quarter

Construction Defect Coverage Recap For 1st Quarter Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Construction Defect Coverage Recap For 1st Quarter

More information

AIA Document A312 TM 1984

AIA Document A312 TM 1984 Performance Bond AIA Document A312 TM 1984 CONTRACTOR (Name and Address): H. B. Barnard, General Corporation 53 West Jackson Boulevard Suite 235 OWNER (Name and Address): The Chicago Society of Alpha Delta

More information

Case 6:12-cv-00914-RBD-TBS Document 136 Filed 07/16/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID 4525

Case 6:12-cv-00914-RBD-TBS Document 136 Filed 07/16/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID 4525 Case 6:12-cv-00914-RBD-TBS Document 136 Filed 07/16/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID 4525 TROVILLION CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, INC.; and CASA JARDIN CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE

More information

In the Indiana Supreme Court

In the Indiana Supreme Court ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT Randal M. Klezmer Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Steve Carter Attorney General of Indiana Frances H. Barrow Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana In the Indiana

More information

2012 IL App (1st) 112728-U. No. 1-11-2728

2012 IL App (1st) 112728-U. No. 1-11-2728 2012 IL App (1st 112728-U FIRST DIVISION November 5, 2012 No. 1-11-2728 Notice: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances

More information

TITLE XXV CHOCTAW TORTS CLAIM ACT IMMUNITY OF TRIBE AND TRIBAL EMPLOYEES ACTING IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY FROM SUIT; EXEMPTIONS; LIMITATIONS;

TITLE XXV CHOCTAW TORTS CLAIM ACT IMMUNITY OF TRIBE AND TRIBAL EMPLOYEES ACTING IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY FROM SUIT; EXEMPTIONS; LIMITATIONS; TITLE XXV CHOCTAW TORTS CLAIM ACT IMMUNITY OF TRIBE AND TRIBAL EMPLOYEES ACTING IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY FROM SUIT; EXEMPTIONS; LIMITATIONS; WAIVERS 1 CHAPTER 1. CHOCTAW TORTS CLAIM ACT... 3 25-1-1 Definitions...

More information