1 Insurance for In-House Counsel April 2014 Kevin Stolworthy, Esq. / Conor Flynn, Esq. / Matthew Stafford, Esq.
2 Commercial General Liability Insurance ( CGL insurance ) Purpose of CGL Insurance CGL insurance is intended to protect a purchaser of an insurance policy from the risks of liabilities imposed by lawsuits and similar claims. See, e.g., Benchmark Ins. Co. v. Sparks, 254 P.3d 617, 620 (Nev. 2011) ( An insurance policy is a contract between a policyholder and an insurer in which the policyholder agrees to pay premiums in exchange for financial protection from foreseeable, yet unpreventable, events. ) CGL insurance often protects companies from third-party claims by paying the reasonable costs of defense and by paying judgments or settlements. CGL insurance is critical to risk management of a business.
3 CGL Insurance Basics Types of CGL Coverage Provided Are Specific To Each Policy The type of commercial general liability insurance varies from policy to policy. The duties undertaken by the insured and the insurer are defined by the terms of the policy itself. CGL insurance often protects against bodily injury or property damage that occurs on your premises or as a result of your business operations. CGL insurance also often protects against bodily injury or property damage that occurs away from your premises but that is caused by your products or completed work.
4 The Duty to Defend Under Nevada law, "[a]n insurance company's duty to defend and/or indemnify its insured arises from the provisions of the insurance policy." Allstate Ins. Co. v. Sanders, 495 F.Supp.2d 1104, 1106 (D. Nev. 2007). (citation omitted). "The insurer must defend any lawsuit brought against its insured which potentially seeks damages within the coverage of the policy." Id. (citation omitted) (emphasis added). [T]he duty to defend is broader than the duty to indemnify. Benchmark Ins. Co. v. Sparks, 254 P.3d 617, (Nev. 2011). [A]s a general rule, an insurer s duty to defend is triggered whenever the potential for indemnification arises, and it continues until this potential for indemnification ceases. Id. Because the duties undertaken by an insurer are dictated by the terms of its contract with the policyholder... an insurer is free to contractually limit these duties that is, to contract its way around this general rule. Id.
5 The Duty to Defend (Cont.) "An insurance policy is to be judged from the perspective of one not trained in the law or insurance, with the terms of the contract viewed in their plain, ordinary and popular sense." Allstate Ins. Co., 495 F.Supp.2d at 1106 (citations omitted). "Any attempt to restrict insurance coverage must be done explicitly." Id. (citation omitted). "In particular, an insurer wishing to restrict the coverage of a policy should employ language which clearly and distinctly communicates to the insured the nature of the limitation." Id. (citation omitted); see also Powell v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 127 Nev. 14, 252 P.3d 668, 672 (2011) (noting that "[b]ecause the insurer is the one to draft the policy, an ambiguity in that policy will be interpreted against the insurer.")
6 The Duty to Indemnify An insured purchases an insurance policy often in the hopes of being indemnified by an insurance carrier for claims the insured is deemed liable. Courts have noted that the duty to indemnify is separate and distinct from the duty to defend. See, e.g., Allstate Ins. Co., 495 F.Supp.2d at 1106; Utica Nat ; Ins. Co. of Texas v. Am. Indem. Co., 141 S.W.3d 198, 203 (Tex. 2004). The duty to indemnify is not as broadly construed as the duty to defend. The duty to indemnify only arises if it is established that the insured s damages are actually covered by the terms of the policy. In other words, an insurer must indemnify its insured only if liability is found for conduct that actually falls within the scope of the policy.
7 Occurrence vs. Claims-Made Policy An occurrence-based policy provides broader coverage but at a greater cost to the insured than a claims-made policy. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Williams, 279 P.3d 174, 176 (Nev. 2012). Under an occurrence policy, it is irrelevant whether the resulting claim is brought against the insured during or after the policy period as long as the injury-causing event happens during the policy period. Id. Thus, as an example, if an injury causing event happens in 2003, but the claim (often a lawsuit) is not made until 2014, the CGL Policy in effect during 2003 will often be implicated. This is true even if the 2003 policy has not been renewed and/or the business has not purchased insurance after 2003.
8 Occurrence vs. Claims-Made Policy (Cont.) By contrast, the event that invokes coverage under a claims made policy is transmittal of notice of the claim during the policy period to the insurance carrier. Id. (alterations omitted). However, there are several different types of claims-made policies, many of which (such as claims made and reported policies which require the claim to be both made and reported to the insurer during the policy period, but also that the claims arose out of wrongful acts that take place during the policy period. Therefore, utilizing the hypothetical from the prior slide, if an injury causing event happens in 2003, but the claim is not made until 2014, the claims made policy for 2014 may not be triggered because the wrongful act took place in 2003, which was prior to the 2014 policy period.
9 What is an Occurrence? Occurrence Definitions Judge Pro noted in a fairly recent decision that Nevada, like the majority of jurisdictions, employs the cause test to determine what constitutes an occurrence within the meaning of a per occurrence clause in an insurance policy. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. National Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Case No. 11-cv PMP-RJJ (D.Nev. Sept. 26, 2012) (citing Bish v. Guar. Nat l Ins. Co., 848 P.2d 1057, 1058 (Nev. 1993). Under the cause test, the number of occurrences is determined by referring to the cause or the causes of the damage, rather than to the number of individual injuries or claims. Id. Thus, as long as the injuries stem from one proximate cause there is a single occurrence. Id. (alterations omitted). Conversely, where each injury results from an independent cause, there are a series of occurrences. Id.
10 What is an Occurrence? (Cont.) Faulty Workmanship in and of itself is not an accident, and thus likely not an occurrence. Big-D Const. Corp. v. Take It For Granite Too, 917 F.Supp.2d 1096, 1108 (D. Nev. 2013). However, an unexpected happening caused by faulty workmanship could be an occurrence. Id. Costs incurred to prevent future occurrences that may cause damage to property or life may be considered property damage as well. Id. at 1109.
11 Common Exclusions/Limits of Liability in CGL Policies Worker s Compensation Contractual Liability Professional Liability Directors and Officers Liability Pollution Liability Other Insurance Damage to Your Work Damage to Your Product Prior Loss Additional Insured
12 Deductibles, SIR s, Retained Limits Deductibles, Self-Insured Retentions (SIR s), and Retained Limits provisions are all mechanisms by which the insured is required to bear responsibility for a loss. Deductible The amount the insured is required to pay as part of a covered loss. A deductible is typically paid by the insured once the claim is actually paid. The Insured is typically not responsible for up front payment of attorneys fees and costs. SIR The amount of the SIR in a policy typically refers to the portion of loss that is not covered by the policy. The insured is typically responsible for defending against claims brought within the SIR. Therefore, the insured is often responsible for payment of attorneys fees and costs until the SIR has been satisfied. Retained Limits A Retained Limits provision is often interchangeably used with an SIR provision.
13 Deductibles, SIR s, Retained Limits (Cont.) Vons Companies, Inc. v. United States Fire Ins. Co., 78 Cal.App.4th 52 (2000) This case is famous for permitting proceeds paid by a thirdparty, including a co-insurer, to satisfy a deductible or SIR under a policy.
14 Importance of Timely Reporting Claims All claims, including potential claims, should be timely reported in order to reduce the risk of an insurance carrier rejecting defense and/or coverage. Policies will often have a provision indicating the manner in which notice of a claim must be provided. It is highly recommended that a policy be reviewed for notice requirements
15 Importance of Timely Reporting Claims Notice Under Occurrence Policies Claims under an occurrence policy are usually required to be provided as soon as practicable or as soon as reasonably possible. Notice-Prejudice Rule The Nevada Supreme Court has adopted the notice-prejudice rule, which provides as follows: In order for an insurer to deny coverage of a claim based on the insured party s late notice of that claim, the insurer must show (1) that the notice was late and (2) that it has been prejudiced by the late notice. LVMPD v. Coregis Insurance Company, 256 P.3d 958, 965 (Nev. 2011). Prejudice exists where the delay materially impairs an insurer s ability to contest its liability to an insured or the liability of the insured to a third party. Id. Notice Under Claims-Made Policies The Nevada Supreme Court has indicated that [b]ecause the reporting of a claim to the insurer during the policy period is one of the essential terms of a claims-made policy, a failure to give timely notice should be less excusable under a claims-made policy that it would be under an occurrence policy. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wisconsin, Inc., 279 P.3d at 178 n. 4. Notice of Circumstances/Awareness Provision Claims-made policies will often provide coverage for claims made after the policy period if notice of a potential claim is provided during the policy period.
16 Conflict-Free Defense Nevada Follows Majority Rule For Joint Representation of Insured and Insurer With respect to the relationship between an insurer and counsel the insurer retains to defend its insured, the majority rule is that counsel represents both the insurer and the insured in the absence of a conflict. Nevada Yellow Cab Corp v. Eighth Judicial District Court, 123 Nev. 44, 50, 152 P.3d 737, 741 (2007). This rule requires that the primary client remains the insured, but counsel in this situation has duties to the insurer as well. Id. Joint representation is permissible as long as any conflict remains speculative.
17 Conflict-Free Defense (Cont.) What is the obligation of an Insurer to an Insured When A Conflict Arises? An example of a potential conflict would be an attorney who previously retained by the insurer to defend a policyholder who then subsequently sues the insurer for bad faith. Should the Insurer Be Required to Appoint (and pay for) Independent Counsel (often referred to as Cumis counsel following the decision in San Diego Navy Fed. Credit Union v. Cumis Ins. Soc., Inc. 162 Cal.App.3d 358, 364 (1984))? These Are Currently Open Questions Under Nevada Law
18 Conflict-Free Defense (Cont.) In Hansen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Case No. 2:10-cv MMD-NJK (D. Nev. Nov. 19, 2013), Judge Du certified the following question to the Nevada Supreme Court: Does Nevada law require an insurer to provide independent counsel for its insured when a conflict of interest arises between the insurer and the insured?
19 Bad-Faith Issues (Unfair Claims Practices Act) NRS 686A.310 Unfair practices in settling claims; liability of insurer for damages. 1. Engaging in any of the following activities is considered to be an unfair practice: (a) Misrepresenting to insureds or claimants pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions relating to any coverage at issue. (b) Failing to acknowledge and act reasonably promptly upon communications with respect to claims arising under insurance policies. (c) Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation and processing of claims arising under insurance policies. (d) Failing to affirm or deny coverage of claims within a reasonable time after proof of loss requirements have been completed and submitted by the insured. (e) Failing to effectuate prompt, fair and equitable settlements of claims in which liability of the insurer has become reasonably clear. (f) Compelling insureds to institute litigation to recover amounts due under an insurance policy by offering substantially less than the amounts ultimately recovered in actions brought by such insureds, when the insureds have made claims for amounts reasonably similar to the amounts ultimately recovered. (g) Attempting to settle a claim by an insured for less than the amount to which a reasonable person would have believed he or she was entitled by reference to written or printed advertising material accompanying or made part of an application. (h) Attempting to settle claims on the basis of an application which was altered without notice to, or knowledge or consent of, the insured, or the representative, agent or broker of the insured. (i) Failing, upon payment of a claim, to inform insureds or beneficiaries of the coverage under which payment is made. (j) Making known to insureds or claimants a practice of the insurer of appealing from arbitration awards in favor of insureds or claimants for the purpose of compelling them to accept settlements or compromises less than the amount awarded in arbitration. (k) Delaying the investigation or payment of claims by requiring an insured or a claimant, or the physician of either, to submit a preliminary claim report, and then requiring the subsequent submission of formal proof of loss forms, both of which submissions contain substantially the same information. (l) Failing to settle claims promptly, where liability has become reasonably clear, under one portion of the insurance policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions of the insurance policy coverage. (m) Failing to comply with the provisions of NRS 687B.310 to 687B.390, inclusive, or 687B.410. (n) Failing to provide promptly to an insured a reasonable explanation of the basis in the insurance policy, with respect to the facts of the insured s claim and the applicable law, for the denial of the claim or for an offer to settle or compromise the claim. (o) Advising an insured or claimant not to seek legal counsel. (p) Misleading an insured or claimant concerning any applicable statute of limitations.
20 Bad Faith Issues (Duty to Settle, Policy Limits Demands, Failure to Defend) Many jurisdictions recognize that insurers have a duty to settle and negotiate claims in good faith pursuant to the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. A reasonable policy limits demand can unlock the policy limits. Carriers can often be liable for bad-faith for failing to provide a defense.
21 Directors & Officers Liability Insurance ( D&O Insurance ) Side A Coverage Provides insurance to the corporation s directors and officers when the company can not indemnify the individuals. Side B Coverage Provides insurance to the company when it is required by law or legally permitted to indemnify the insured individuals. Side C Coverage Provides broad form entity coverage in circumstances where a claim is made against the company and the individuals
22 Typically claims-made policies D&O Insurance (Cont.) Policies can vary significantly Duty to Advance Defense Costs and Right to Select Counsel of The Insured s Choosing D&O Policies often contain a Duty to Advance Defense Costs provision as opposed to a Duty to Defend provision. Under a Duty to Advance Defense Costs provision, an Insured often has the right to select its own counsel, subject to the approval of the insurance carrier. The insurance carrier is responsible for payment of Defense Costs.
23 D&O Insurance (Insured Capacity) D&O insurance typically does not protect against actions that are not undertaken by a director or officer in an insured capacity. For example, work performed by a director or officer in a personal capacity, such as acting as a shareholder, investor, or serving as an officer or director of another company is typically not covered. Claims arising out of work performed by an In-House attorney may not be covered if the work does not pertain to the attorney s role as an officer or director of a company.
24 CONCLUSION Thank you for attending.
25 Contact Kevin Stolworthy, Esq Conor Flynn, Esq Matthew Stafford, Esq
BAD FAITH IN WASHINGTON By Steve Jensen,, and An insurer s bad faith can give rise to two related causes of action under Washington law: 1) a cause of action for bad faith sounding in tort, and 2) a cause
Insurance TYPES OF POLICIES There are as many types of insurance policies as there are risks. During a disaster people may draw upon health, property and casualty and life insurance. These types of policies
Sterling Education Seminar Liability Insurance: How Insurance is Written and Why You Need to Know Alexandrea L. Isaac Hartford, CT Sept. 20, 2011 The Insurance Contract Contract between the insurance company
MARYLAND CLAIM SETTLEMENT LAWS AND REGULATIONS LAWS: SUBTITLE 3. UNFAIR CLAIM SETTLEMENT PRACTICES 27-301. Intent and effect of subtitle. (a) Intent of subtitle.- The intent of this subtitle is to provide
Insurance Coverage Issues for Products Manufactured by Foreign Companies James S. Carter August 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION...1 II. COVERAGE PROVISIONS...1 A. Duty to Defend...1 B. Duty
LC 0 Regular Session // (TSB/ps) D R A F T SUMMARY Provides that insurer that has duty to defend insured against claim has fiduciary duty toward insured if insurer does defend against claim. Provides that
Tiara Condominium: The Demise of the Economic Loss Rule in Construction Defect Litigation and Impact on the Property Damage Requirement in a General Liability Policy By Heather Howell Wright, Bradley Arant
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA. v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY et al Doc. 324 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA EVANSVILLE DIVISION NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE
TENDERING CLAIMS UNDER YOUR CGL INSURANCE POLICY By Nick M. Campbell, Esq. GREEN & CAMPBELL, LLP Please note that this article is only intended to provide some general educational information regarding
Case 3:07-cv-01180-TEM Document 56 Filed 04/27/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION JAMES E. TOMLINSON and DARLENE TOMLINSON, his wife, v. Plaintiffs,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. No. 4:01 CV 726 DDN VENETIAN TERRAZZO, INC., Defendant. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT Pursuant
General Insurance Conditions (GIC) Clinical Trials in Human Research Edition 2014 Translation For information only. The original wording is binding. General Insurance Conditions, clinical trials Edition
Discovery in Bad Faith Insurance Claims: State of the Law, Successful Strategies Teleconference Program Wednesday, March 29, 2006 Topic III A. Who is suing? Does it matter? 1. Whether suit is brought by
Personal Property Title Insurance (PPT-1) Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given to the Company under this Policy must be given to the Company at the address
California Senate Bill 474 Impact on Owners & Contractors Beginning January 1, 2013, project owners, general contractors ( GC ), construction managers ( CM ) and any lower tier contractor who employs subcontractors
PUBLIC ENTITY RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY MEMORANDUM OF WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY COVERAGE FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2015 TO JUNE 30, 2016 EFFECTIVE: JULY 1, 2015 PUBLIC ENTITY RISK MANAGEMENT
VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 585 An Act to amend and reenact 38.2-2206 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 a
Caught in the Middle: What to Do When Conflicts Arise Between Policyholders and Insurers Robert A. Shults Jacob A. DeLeon McFall, Sherwood & Breitbeil, P.C. Houston, Texas Within the tripartite relationship,
Case: 09-20311 Document: 00511062202 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/25/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D March 25, 2010 Charles
Filed 5/16/13; pub. order 6/12/13 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (El Dorado) ---- STEVE SCHAEFER, Plaintiff and Respondent, C068229 (Super.
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC02-152 KEVIN M. STEELE, Petitioner, vs. SUSAN B. KINSEY and UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL,
United States Workers Compensation/Indemnification Overview January 18, 2012 Jill Kirila firstname.lastname@example.org Kevin Hess email@example.com 36 Offices in 17 Countries Workers Compensation
Subrogation Options for Consideration A Bill Clarifying a Workers Compensation Insurer s Subrogation Interest in Third-Party Claims Whereas, subrogation is a device of equity which is designed to compel
CIZEK HOMES v. COLUMBIA NAT. INS. CO. 361 Cite as 22 Neb. App. 361 require perfection of a parent when deciding whether termination of parental rights is appropriate. We conclude that there is insufficient
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA ELOURDE COLIN, Appellant, v. CASE NO.: CVA1 09-16 Lower Court Case No.: 2008-CC-7009-O PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2006). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A07-0446 American Family Mutual Insurance Company,
2:08-cv-12533-DPH-PJK Doc # 67 Filed 03/26/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 2147 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, v. Plaintiff, MICHIGAN CATASTROPHIC
Recent Developments in Insurance Coverage Disputes Exclusions Gone Awry: Misinterpretations of the Contractual Liability and Faulty Workmanship Exclusions Pose a Threat to the Construction Industry Jeffrey
-1- -2- -3- -4- -5- INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPER EXTENSION AGREEMENTS 1.1 The developer shall obtain and keep in force during the term of the contract, Commercial General Liability insurance policies
TEXAS UNFAIR CLAIMS STATUTES AND REGULATIONS 541.060. UNFAIR SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. (a) It is an unfair method of competition or an unfair or deceptive act or practice in the business of insurance to engage
Case 8:13-cv-00295-EAK-TGW Document 145 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID 5551 SUMMIT CONTRACTORS, INC., Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION v. CASE NO. 8:13-CV-295-T-17TGW
Querrey Harrow When Results Count. SM www.querrey.com Copyright 2005 Querrey & Harrow, Ltd. All Rights Reserved. ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE By Bruce H. Schoumacher Architects
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS NO. 13-1006 IN RE ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, RELATOR ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS PER CURIAM Rafael Zuniga sued San Diego Tortilla (SDT) for personal injuries and then added
HARVEY KRUSE, P.C. BAD FAITH Prepared By: Michael F. Schmidt P25213 HARVEY KRUSE, P.C. 1050 Wilshire Drive, Suite 320 Troy, MI 48084 (248) 649-7800 Fax (248) 649-2316 A. INTRODUCTION Subject to specific
COMMERCIAL EXCESS LIABILITY POLICY DECLARATIONS Policy No. Renewal 1. NAMED INSURED AND MAILING ADDRESS 2. POLICY PERIOD From To 12:01 A.M. standard time at your mailing address shown above. : 3. LIMITS
Property Insurance By: Michael S. Sherman Chuhak & Tecson P.C. Chicago Extra-Contractual Damages Against Insurers: What is the Statute of Limitations? Background The Illinois Legislature has provided a
Rules of Department of Insurance, Financial Institutions and Professional Registration Chapter 1 Improper or Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Title Page 20 CSR 100-1.010 Definitions...3 20 CSR 100-1.020
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CAROSELLA & FERRY, P.C., Plaintiff, v. TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 00-2344 Memorandum and Order YOHN,
EXPLORING THE SELF-INSURED - INSURER RELATIONSHIP I. INTRODUCTION By: Jay Barry Harris and Hema Patel Mehta Fineman Krekstein & Harris, P.C. 30 S. 17 th Street, Suite 1800 Philadelphia, PA 19103 215-893-9300
Updated July 2015 REVISITING DIRECTOR AND OFFICER INDEMNIFICATION: PROVISIONS IN THE NEW D.C. NONPROFIT ACT 1. Initial Considerations The District of Columbia has recently modernized its statute dealing
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 18, Number 1 (18.1.29) Insurance Law By: Gregory G. Vacala and Allison H. McJunkin Rusin
Page 1 Section 7.01 Agreement to Insure ARTICLE 7. INSURANCE The Contractor shall not commence performing services under this Agreement unless and until all insurance required by this Article is in effect,
NOTICE Decision filed 01/23/14. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2014 IL App (5th) 120588-U NO. 5-12-0588
Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 0 Fall 2013 Case Summaries Anderson Brothers, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. Katelyn J. Hepburn University of Montana School of Law, firstname.lastname@example.org
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 06-3601 J.E. Jones Construction Co.; The Jones Company Custom Homes, Inc., Now known as REJ Custom Homes, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. Appeal from
2 Summary of California Law (10th), Insurance I. INTRODUCTION A. Generally. 1. [ 1] In General. 2. [ 2] Commentary and Practice Works. 3. [ 3] Classes of Insurance. 4. [ 4] Insurer's Rights of Subrogation,
JOINT PURSUIT OF RECOVERY WITH AN INSURED: ISSUES FOR THE SUBROGATING CARRIER TO CONSIDER By: Barrett Kiernan The subrogation claim of an insurance carrier does not always include all the damages incurred
Comparing and Maximizing Performance Bond and Commercial General Liability Protections Frank L. Pohl, Esq. and James C. Washburn, Esq. Often when acting as the prime on a construction project, the design
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Allocating Defense Costs Among Multiple Insurers and Between Covered and Uncovered Claims Methods of Allocation Among Insurers and Allocation to
TITLE 13 CHAPTER 12 PART 3 INSURANCE MOTOR VEHICLE INSURANCE UNINSURED AND UNKNOWN MOTORISTS COVERAGE 220.127.116.11 ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Public Regulation Commission Insurance Division. [7/1/97; 18.104.22.168
WHAT IS IT, HOW TO DEAL WITH IT, AND WHERE IS IT GOING? Moderator: Paul H. Leonard Policyholders view: Andrew M. Weiner Insurers view: Wallace C. Magathan, III First Party Hull Claims Third Party Passenger
October 7, 2009 AGENT NOT LIABLE FOR NOT OBTAINING UM/UIM COVERAGE EQUAL TO LIABILITY LIMITS Last Thursday, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Houston considered an insurance agent s duties to an insured
THE RIGHT TO INDEPENDENT COUNSEL Julie A. Shehane Cooper & Scully, P.C. 900 Jackson Street, Suite 100 Telephone: 214-712 712-9546 Telecopy: 214-712 712-9540 Email: Julie.Shehane@cooperscully.com 2015 This
Article 4. North Carolina Self-Insurance Security Association. 97-130. Definitions. As used in this Article: (1) "Association" means the North Carolina Self-Insurance Security Association established by
Powerine II Significant Insurance Coverage Implications for Administrative Cleanup Costs by Stewart S. Harrison Insurance Recovery Environmental Litigation In welcome news to umbrella policyholders, the
13-20-801. Short title Colorado Revised Statutes Title 13; Article 20; Part 8: CONSTRUCTION DEFECT ACTIONS FOR PROPERTY LOSS AND DAMAGE 1 This part 8 shall be known and may be cited as the Construction
Filed 2/11/15 Estate of Thomson CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified
2008 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-27-2008 Henkel Corp v. Hartford Accident Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-4856 Follow
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC02-152 KEVIN M. STEELE, Petitioner, vs. SUSAN B. KINSEY and UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents. On Review from the Second District Court of Appeal, Case
Christine K. Noma Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP March 2014 You just discovered that the commercial or industrial property that you own is polluted. This discovery may have occurred during the negotiations
Required Insurance Language for PRF Construction Contracts When working with legal counsel to affect a construction contract for new construction or for build-outs the Purdue Risk Management Department
Medical Malpractice REVIEW REQUIREMENTS REFERENCE COMMENTS FORMS Applications REFERENCE COMMENTS Fee, filing 33-6-34 The Filing Fee is $50.00 per Form filing and applies on a per company basis. WVIL All
MONTANA SELF INSURERS ASSOCIATION Executive Director Bob Worthington Board of Directors Rick Clark Plum Creek Timber Co Tim Fitzpatrick MT Schools Group Donna Haeder NorthWestern Corp Marv Jordan MT Contractors
1 of 8 6/25/2008 3:39 PM BULLETIN 96-7 FREQUENT PROBLEMS FOUND IN FILINGS Property and Casualty Lines Over the years we have found that insurance companies consistently fail to make their forms and filings
What You Should Know About General Agreements of Indemnity and Why You Should Know It Summary When a contractor (for purposes of this discussion, contractor includes subcontractor) first seeks surety credit,
The Solution for General Partnership Liability Coverage Part In consideration of the payment of the premium and subject to the General Terms and Conditions, the Insurer and the Insureds agree as follows:
Filed: 12-19-08 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT WESTPORT INSURANCE Appeal from the Circuit Court CORPORATION, of McHenry County. Plaintiff and Counterdefendant-Appellee, v. No. 04--MR--53
AGREEMENT FOR FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING CONSULTATION SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made as of December 1, 2003, by and between the San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority, a body corporate and politic
Agents E&O Standard of Care Project Survey Maryland To gain a deeper understanding of the differing agent duties and standard of care by state, the Big I Professional Liability Program and Swiss Re Corporate
Policy Number: RLI Insurance Company Peoria, Illinois 61615 A Stock Insurance Company Personal Umbrella Liability Policy STATE OF NEW YORK AMENDATORY ENDORSEMENT In accordance with the laws and regulations
COLORADO REVISED STATUTES Title 13. Courts and Court Procedure Damages Regulation of Actions and Proceedings Article 20. Actions Part 8. Construction Defect Actions for Property Loss and Damage Construction
INDEX B non-conforming tender, 284 boiler and machinery insurance, performance bond 241 default by the obligee, 288 coverage, 243 failure to notify, 289 definition of the accident, 245 material variation
FOSTER PARENT LIABILITY PROGRAM I. THE PROGRAM The following provisions set forth the exclusive terms and conditions of the State of New Jersey's Foster Parent Liability Program (hereinafter referred to
Case 3:12-cv-00341 Document 30 Filed in TXSD on 03/31/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION PAC-VAN, INC., Plaintiff, VS. CHS, INC. D/B/A CHS COOPERATIVES,
This article first appeared in the October 2010 issue of The Corporate Counselor. Insurance Coverage In Consumer Class Actions John W. McGuinness and Justin F. Lavella The business world is an increasingly
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORP. Jeffrey A. Sandell, Arizona State Bar No. 020658 E-mail: email@example.com Bob J. Rogers, Texas State Bar No. 17163400 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org 1601 Bryan St., 15th Floor
IN THE WORKERS COMPENSATION COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2015 MTWCC 13 WCC No. 2015-3545 CAR WERKS, LLC Petitioner vs. UNINSURED EMPLOYERS FUND Respondent/Third Party Petitioner vs. JAMES E. GAWRONSKI
COMMERCIAL EXCESS LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM Each section in this Coverage Form may contain exclusions, limitations or restrictions of coverage. Please read the entire Coverage Form carefully to determine
In consideration of payment of the premium and subject to the Declarations, General Terms and Conditions, limitations, conditions, provisions and other terms of this Policy, the Company and the Insureds
Case: 11-20469 Document: 00511904997 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/29/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D June 29, 2012 Lyle
2015 IL App (1st 140790-U THIRD DIVISION March 25, 2015 No. 1-14-0790 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances
SCHALLER, J. The plaintiffs 2 appeal from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendant, Insurance Company of Greater New York, in this declaratory judgment action concerning a dispute about the defendant
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION ACE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, et al, NOVEMBER TERM, 2010 Plaintiff, No. 02290 v. R & Q REINSURANCE
Filed 1/9/02; pub. order 1/28/02 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE ISRAEL P. CHAMBI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THE REGENTS OF