Audit Report. Performance Indicator Audit: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims
|
|
|
- Gillian Ferguson
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Audit Report Performance Indicator Audit: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims A January 2015
2 MEMORANDUM Date: January 30, 2015 Refer To: To: From: The Commissioner Inspector General Subject: Performance Indicator Audit: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims (A ) The attached final report presents the results of our audit. Our objective was to assess the Social Security Administration s performance indicator, Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims. Specifically, we 1. documented the sources of data collected to report on the specified performance indicator; 2. identified and tested critical controls (both electronic data processing and manual) of systems from which the specified performance data were gathered; 3. tested the adequacy, accuracy, reasonableness, completeness, and consistency of the underlying data for the performance indicator; and 4. recalculated the value reported for the performance indicator to verify its accuracy. If you wish to discuss the final report, please call me or have your staff contact Steven L. Schaeffer, Assistant Inspector General for Audit, at (410) Attachment Patrick P. O Carroll, Jr.
3 Performance Indicator Audit: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims A January 2015 Office of Audit Report Summary Objectives To assess the Social Security Administration s (SSA) performance indicator (PI), Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims. Specifically, we (1) documented the sources of data that were collected to report on the specified PI; (2) identified and tested critical controls (both electronic data processing and manual) of systems from which the performance data were gathered; (3) tested the adequacy, accuracy, reasonableness, completeness, and consistency of the underlying data for the specified PI; and (4) recalculated the reported value for the PI to verify its accuracy. Background Federal agencies are required to establish PIs that assess the relevant outputs, service levels, and outcomes of each program activity. We reviewed the performance reporting in SSA s Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 Agency Financial Report (AFR) for its PI, Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims. In FY 2013, the average wait time for initial disability claims was 107 days. Findings Underlying data used to report SSA s FY 2013 PI, Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims, were adequate, accurate, reasonable, complete, and consistent; and we were able to recalculate the performance reported for the PI using data provided by SSA. Our assessment of the PI did not identify any significant exceptions related to the accuracy of presentation or disclosure of the information related to the PI in SSA s AFR or to the PI s meaningfulness. However, during our evaluation of the effectiveness of the control environment over the business process, we found claims representatives did not always ask the applicants all of the questions SSA policy requires to verify identity. By not asking all of the required identity questions, there is an increased risk of an individual using another person s identity to file a fraudulent claim to obtain benefits. Recommendation We recommend SSA remind field office employees to follow SSA s policy and procedures when verifying an applicant s identity. SSA agreed with our recommendation.
4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Objective...1 Background...1 Results of Review...2 Verifying Applicant Identity...3 Conclusions...4 Recommendation...4 Agency Comments...4 Appendix A Scope and Methodology... A-1 Appendix B Initial Disability Claims Flowchart... B-1 Appendix C Initial Disability Claims Narrative... C-1 Appendix D Agency Comments... D-1 Appendix E Major Contributors... E-1 PIA: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims (A )
5 ABBREVIATIONS AFR C.F.R. DDS DI FY Agency Financial Report Code of Federal Regulations Disability Determination Services Disability Insurance Fiscal Year GPRA Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 GPRAMA GPRA Modernization Act of 2010 MSSICS NDDSS OIG PI POMS Pub. L. No. SSA SSACCS SSI U.S.C. Modernized Supplemental Security Income Claims System National Disability Determination Service System Office of the Inspector General Performance Indicator Program Operations Manual System Public Law Number Social Security Administration Social Security Administration Claim Control System Supplemental Security Income United States Code PIA: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims (A )
6 OBJECTIVE Our objective was to assess the Social Security Administration s (SSA) performance indicator (PI), Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims. Specifically, we 1. documented the sources of data collected to report on the specified PI; 2. identified and tested critical controls (both electronic data processing and manual) of systems from which the specified performance data were gathered; 3. tested the adequacy, accuracy, reasonableness, completeness, and consistency of the underlying data for the PI; and 4. recalculated the value reported for the PI to verify its accuracy. BACKGROUND The Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) 1 sought to improve the Government s internal management, as well as program effectiveness and accountability, by promoting a focus on results, service quality, and customer satisfaction. 2 GPRA requires that Federal agencies establish PIs that assess the relevant outputs, service levels, and outcomes of each program activity. GPRA also calls for a description of the means employed to verify and validate the measurements reported on program performance. 3 In January 2011, the President signed the Government Performance and Results Act Modernization Act of 2010 (GPRAMA) to update the Government s performance management framework by retaining and amplifying some aspects of GPRA. 4 GPRAMA builds on lessons agencies have learned in setting goals and reporting performance. GPRAMA also emphasizes priority-setting, cross-organizational collaboration to achieve shared goals, and the use and analysis of goals and measurement to improve outcomes. 5 It encourages Federal agencies to establish a balanced, realistic set of PIs to measure progress toward each performance goal. 6 We reviewed the performance reporting in SSA s Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 Agency Financial Report (AFR) for its PI, Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims. In FY 2013, 1 Pub. L. No , 107 Stat. 285 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 5 U.S.C., 31 U.S.C., and 39 U.S.C.). 2 Id. at 2(b)(3) and (6) U.S.C. 1115(b)(6) and (8) (2011). 4 Pub. L. No , 124 Stat (2011). 5 Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-11, (2013) pt U.S.C. 1115(b)(6). PIA: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims (A ) 1
7 the target number of days was 109, and the actual number of days was 107 (see Table 1). 7 See Appendix A for the scope and methodology of this review. Table 1: FY 2013 PI Performance PI Target Days Actual Days Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims SSA provides Disability Insurance (DI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefit payments to eligible individuals under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. 8 The DI program provides income for eligible workers with qualifying disabilities and eligible members of their families before those workers reach retirement age. The SSI program provides a minimum level of income to financially needy individuals who are aged, blind, or disabled. The PI is the combined average wait time for initial disability claims for the DI and SSI programs. For initial DI claims, the wait time starts the date the claim is received and ends at the final clearance date. For initial SSI claims, the wait time begins at the later of the (1) eligibility date, (2) application date, or (3) date the claim is filed and ends at the earliest of the (1) date paid or denied, (2) processing date, or (3) initial decision date. During the claims process, information flows through several of SSA s systems (see Appendix B for a flowchart and Appendix C for a narrative of the process). To arrive at the average wait time for initial disability claims reported in the AFR, SSA divides the total number of days it takes to complete all initial disability claims requiring a medical determination by the total number of initial disability claims requiring a medical determination that are completed during the FY (see Figure 1). Figure 1: PI Calculation Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims = Total Number of Elapsed Days for All Initial Disability Claims Requiring a Medical Determination Total Number of Initial Disability Claims Requiring a Medical Determination RESULTS OF REVIEW We identified and tested the internal controls of systems from which the performance data were derived. We were able to recalculate the PI and found it was accurately reported in SSA s AFR 7 SSA s FY 2013, Agency Financial Report, p Social Security Act and ; 42 U.S.C and f. PIA: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims (A ) 2
8 for FY We found the underlying data SSA used to report the PI were adequate, reasonable, complete, and consistent. Our assessment of the PI did not identify any significant exceptions related to the accuracy of presentation or disclosure of the information related to the PI in the AFR or to the PI s meaningfulness. However, during our evaluation of the effectiveness of the control environment over the business process, we found SSA did not always follow its policy and procedures for properly verifying an applicant s identity. Verifying Applicant Identity As part of our review, we evaluated the effectiveness of the control environment over the business process to ensure claims were only being taken from valid applicants and therefore appropriately counted in the calculation for the average wait time. To accomplish this, we observed claims representatives conducting initial disability claim interviews both in-person and via telephone to ensure SSA was following its policy and procedures for determining an applicant s identity. 10 We observed 66 initial disability claim interviews at 11 field offices nationwide and found claims representatives did not always ask the applicants all of the questions required by SSA policy and procedures to verify identity. According to SSA policy, each applicant must be asked six open-ended questions during the interview to confirm their identity: 1. What is your name? 2. What is your Social Security number? 3. What is your date of birth? 4. What is your father s name? 5. What is your mother s maiden name? 6. What is your place of birth? 11 We found 45 (68 percent) of the 66 applicants were not asked all 6 of the identity verification questions. Further, nine (14 percent) applicants were not asked three or more of the questions. The top three questions not asked of applicants were father s name (61 percent), mother s maiden name (30 percent), and place of birth (18 percent). Because not all of the required identity questions were asked, there is an increased risk of an individual filing a fraudulent claim to obtain benefits using the identity of another person. 9 SSA, Agency Financial Report, December 2013, p See Appendix A for the scope and methodology of this review. 11 SSA, POMS, GN A.2.a (Jan. 28, 2014). PIA: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims (A ) 3
9 CONCLUSIONS Underlying data used to report the PI were adequate, accurate, reasonable, complete, and consistent; and we were able to recalculate the performance reported for the PI using data provided by SSA. Our assessment of the PI did not identify any significant exceptions related to the accuracy of presentation or disclosure of the information related to the PI in the AFR or to the PI s meaningfulness. However, during our evaluation of the effectiveness of the control environment over the business process, we found claims representatives did not always ask the applicants all of the questions SSA policy requires to verify identity. Because not all of the required identity questions were asked, there is an increased risk of an individual using the identity of another person to file a fraudulent claim to obtain benefits. RECOMMENDATION We recommend SSA remind field office employees to follow SSA s policy and procedures when verifying an applicant s identity. AGENCY COMMENTS SSA agreed with our recommendation. The Agency s comments are included in Appendix D. PIA: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims (A ) 4
10 APPENDICES PIA: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims (A )
11 Appendix A SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY We obtained an understanding of the Social Security Administration s (SSA) business processes related to the performance indicator (PI), Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims. Our understanding was obtained through research and obtaining information and various documents from SSA. Through inquiry, observation, and other substantive testing, we performed the following. Reviewed the Annual Performance Plan for Fiscal Year 2014 and Revised Final Performance Plan for Fiscal Year 2013 to obtain an understanding of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 PIs. Reviewed the SSA s FY 2013 Agency Financial Report (AFR) to identify the PI s target and actual days. Reviewed prior Office of the Inspector General reports, Government Accountability Office reports, and SSA reports and documents related to the PI and information systems. Reviewed applicable laws, regulations, and SSA policy. Flowcharted the process (see Appendix B). Documented the sources of data collected to report on the PI. Observed 66 initial disability claim interviews conducted by claims representatives 46 in-person and 20 via telephone at 11 field offices nationwide to determine whether claims representatives were following SSA s policy and procedures for verifying applicant s identity. Identified and tested key controls related to manual or basic computerized processes. Determined the adequacy, accuracy, reasonableness, completeness, and consistency of the underlying data that support the PI as reported in SSA s AFR for FY Recalculated the PI for FY 2013 and compared it to the number reported in the AFR to verify its accuracy. We conducted the fieldwork for this review from March to October 2014 in Kansas City, Missouri, and SSA field offices nationwide. We tested the data obtained for our review and determined them to be sufficiently reliable to meet our objectives. We conducted this performance audit in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. PIA: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims (A ) A-1
12 Appendix B INITIAL DISABILITY CLAIMS FLOWCHART PIA: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims (A ) B-1
13 PIA: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims (A ) B-2
14 Appendix C INITIAL DISABILITY CLAIMS NARRATIVE To determine eligibility for Disability Insurance (DI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI), applicants must first file a claim with the Social Security Administration (SSA). This is typically accomplished through an appointment in 1 of SSA s approximately 1,300 field offices, through the SSA telephone network, or via SSA s Internet claim application. For in-person and telephone claims, a claims representative first determines the applicants non-medical eligibility. 1 The claims representative then obtains basic medical information from the individual concerning the disability, medical treatments, and treating sources (for example, a doctor s office). 2 The claims representative inputs the applicant s information into the Modernized Claims System for DI claims or the Modernized SSI Claims System for SSI claims. This establishes the claim s application and/or protective filing date. The claims then go to the State disability determination services (DDS) offices where adjudicators review medical information and decide to allow or deny benefits. The State DDS offices input the case decisions into the National DDS System. When determinations are made for DI claims, SSA personnel update the corresponding Modernized Claims System records, and Modernized Claims System updates the Workload Management System through an automated interface. Claims data are maintained in SSA s Case Control System (SSACCS) for the few claims that cannot be processed through the Modernized Claims System. 3 After the award or denial has been processed, both Workload Management System and SSACCS transfer claims data to the Title II Operational Data Store. The data are then supplied to the Social Security Unified Measurement System Work Measurement Data Warehouse, where the DI processing times are calculated and stored. When determinations are made for SSI claims, SSA personnel update the Supplemental Security Record, and claims data are forwarded to the SSI Exception Control System. The data are then sent to the Social Security Unified Measurement System, and the SSI processing times are calculated and stored in the SSI Operational Data Store. SSA extracts the processing time data for DI and SSI and calculates the combined initial disability claims processing time using its DENVision National Processing Time Tracker. The combined processing time is reported in SSA s Annual Financial Report under the PI, Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims. 1 In the SSI program, an example of establishing non-medical eligibility is determining an individual s income and resources. See 20 C.F.R (c) and (d). In the DI program, an example of establishing non-medical eligibility is determining whether the individual is fully insured. See 20 C.F.R and For internet claims, applicants provide information via the internet claim website. SSA will not contact an Internet-claim applicant unless a discrepancy or issue cannot be resolved any other way. SSA, POMS, GN (May 22, 2014). 3 SSA is phasing out SSACCS. However, the system was still operational during our audit period. PIA: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims (A ) C-1
15 Appendix D AGENCY COMMENTS SOCIAL SECURITY MEMORANDUM Date: January 14, 2015 Refer To: S1J-3 To: From: Patrick P. O Carroll, Jr. Inspector General Frank Cristaudo /s/ Executive Counselor to the Commissioner Subject: Office of the Inspector General Draft Report, Performance Indicator Audit: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims (A )--INFORMATION Thank you for the opportunity to review the draft report. Please see our attached comments. Please let me know if we can be of further assistance. You may direct staff inquiries to Gary S. Hatcher at (410) Attachment PIA: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims (A ) D-1
16 COMMENTS ON THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL DRAFT REPORT, Performance Indicator Audit: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims (A ) Recommendation 1 Remind field office employees to follow SSA s policy and procedures when verifying an applicant s identity. Response We agree. We will assess our instructions to determine whether we should clarify our basic identification procedures. We will issue any necessary clarifying instructions by April PIA: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims (A ) D-2
17 Appendix E MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS Mark Bailey, Director, Kansas City Audit Division Shannon Agee, Audit Manager Katherine Muller, Senior Auditor Carol Cockrell, Program Analyst PIA: Minimize Average Wait Time for Initial Disability Claims (A ) E-1
18 MISSION By conducting independent and objective audits, evaluations, and investigations, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) inspires public confidence in the integrity and security of the Social Security Administration s (SSA) programs and operations and protects them against fraud, waste, and abuse. We provide timely, useful, and reliable information and advice to Administration officials, Congress, and the public. CONNECT WITH US The OIG Website ( gives you access to a wealth of information about OIG. On our Website, you can report fraud as well as find the following. OIG news audit reports investigative summaries Semiannual Reports to Congress fraud advisories press releases congressional testimony an interactive blog, Beyond The Numbers where we welcome your comments In addition, we provide these avenues of communication through our social media channels. Watch us on YouTube Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Subscribe to our RSS feeds or updates OBTAIN COPIES OF AUDIT REPORTS To obtain copies of our reports, visit our Website at For notification of newly released reports, sign up for e-updates at REPORT FRAUD, WASTE, AND ABUSE To report fraud, waste, and abuse, contact the Office of the Inspector General via Website: Mail: FAX: Telephone: TTY: Social Security Fraud Hotline P.O. Box Baltimore, Maryland from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time for the deaf or hard of hearing
Audit Report. MDRC Contract Close Out on Contract Number SS00-06-60075
Audit Report MDRC Contract Close Out on Contract Number SS00-06-60075 A-15-13-13101 April 2014 MEMORANDUM Date: April 3, 2014 Refer To: To: From: The Commissioner Inspector General Subject: MDRC Contract
Informational Report. Tax Compliance for Social Security Administration Employees
Informational Report Tax Compliance for Social Security Administration Employees A-03-15-25004 July 2015 MEMORANDUM Date: July 23, 2015 Refer To: To: From: The Commissioner Inspector General Subject: Tax
Audit Report. The Social Security Administration s Management of Electronic Message Records
Audit Report The Social Security Administration s Management of Electronic Message Records A-14-15-25025 February 2016 MEMORANDUM Date: February 19, 2016 Refer To: To: From: The Commissioner Inspector
Audit Report. Mobile Device Security
Audit Report Mobile Device Security A-14-14-14051 September 2014 MEMORANDUM Date: September 26, 2014 Refer To: To: From: The Commissioner Inspector General Subject: Mobile Device Security (A-14-14-14051)
OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTOR SECURITY OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION S HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE 12 CREDENTIALS June 2012 A-14-11-11106
Congressional Response Report. The Social Security Administration s Anti-fraud Training
Congressional Response Report The Social Security Administration s Anti-fraud Training A-01-16-50035 September 2015 September 22, 2015 The Honorable Sam Johnson Chairman, Subcommittee on Social Security
Overview of Key Performance Indicators, Goals and Results
Overview of Key Performance Indicators, Goals and Results FY 2006 Overview of Performance In January 2006, the Social Security Administration () published its Agency Strategic Plan (ASP) for fiscal years
SOCIAL SECURITY. July 19, 2004
SOCIAL SECURITY July 19, 2004 The Honorable E. Clay Shaw, Jr. Chairman, Subcommittee on Social Security Committee on Ways and Means House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Mr. Shaw: Thank
OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION IMPROPERLY TITLED BANK ACCOUNTS FOR BENEFICIARIES WITH REPRESENTATIVE PAYEES
OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION IMPROPERLY TITLED BANK ACCOUNTS FOR BENEFICIARIES WITH REPRESENTATIVE PAYEES March 2011 A-01-09-19055 AUDIT REPORT Mis s ion By conducting
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION Fiscal Year 2015 Statutory Review of Restrictions on Directly Contacting Taxpayers July 7, 2015 Reference Number: 2015-30-061 This report has cleared the
Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Tracking and Monitoring of Potentially Fraudulent Petitions and Applications for Family-Based Immigration Benefits OIG-13-97 June 2013 Washington, DC 20528 / www.oig.dhs.gov
How To Audit A Federal Contractor
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION Contractor Employees Have August 30, 2013 Reference Number: 2013-10-082 This report has cleared the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration disclosure
Audit Report. Payments Deposited into Bank Accounts After Beneficiaries Are Deceased
Audit Report Payments Deposited into Bank Accounts After Beneficiaries Are Deceased A-02-13-13052 March 2015 MEMORANDUM Date: March 11, 2015 Refer To: To: From: The Commissioner Inspector General Subject:
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION The Office of Disclosure Continued to Improve Compliance With the Freedom of Information Act Requirements August 29, 2008 Reference Number: 2008-30-164
EPA Needs to Improve Security Planning and Remediation of Identified Weaknesses in Systems Used to Protect Human Health and the Environment
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Information Technology EPA Needs to Improve Security Planning and Remediation of Identified Weaknesses in Systems Used to Protect Human
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION Revenue Officers Took Appropriate Levy Actions but Face Challenges and Delays Bringing Taxpayers Into Compliance November 21, 2011 Reference Number: 2012-30-007
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION Fiscal Year 2015 Statutory Review of Compliance With Legal Guidelines When Issuing Levies June 18, 2015 Reference Number: 2015-30-058 This report has cleared
April 2004. Reference Number: 2004-40-088
Information Is Needed to Determine the Effect the Wage and Investment Division Research Program Has on Improving Customer Service and Voluntary Compliance April 2004 Reference Number: 2004-40-088 This
The Transportation Security Administration Does Not Properly Manage Its Airport Screening Equipment Maintenance Program
The Transportation Security Administration Does Not Properly Manage Its Airport Screening Equipment Maintenance Program May 6, 2015 OIG-15-86 HIGHLIGHTS The Transportation Security Administration Does
AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERNAL CONTROL, AND COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS
AUDITOR S REPORTS The Honorable Carolyn W. Colvin Acting Commissioner November 10, 2014 The Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990 (CFO) (Pub. L. No. 101-576), as amended, requires that the Social Security
Audit Report. Effects of the Senior Attorney Adjudicator Program on Hearing Workloads
Audit Report Effects of the Senior Attorney Adjudicator Program on Hearing Workloads A-12-13-23002 June 2013 MEMORANDUM Date: June 28, 2013 Refer To: To: From: The Commissioner Inspector General Subject:
Department of Homeland Security
FEMA Public Assistance Grant Funds Awarded to South Florida Water Management District Under Hurricane Charley DA-12-23 August 2012 Washington, DC 20528 / www.oig.dhs.gov AUG 2 7 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR: agement
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION Improved Toll-Free Telephone Services Should Make It Easier for Taxpayers to Obtain Assistance During a Correspondence Audit August 17, 2012 Reference
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION Identity Protection Personal Identification Numbers Are Not Provided to All Eligible Taxpayers September 24, 2014 Reference Number: 2014-40-086 This report
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION Affordable Care Act: Tracking of Health Insurance Reform Implementation Fund Costs Could Be Improved September 18, 2013 Reference Number: 2013-13-115 This
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION Office of Inspections and Evaluations The Internal Revenue Service Needs to Set Meaningful Time Limits for Most Reasonable Accommodation for December 2,
4191-02-U SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. [Docket No: SSA-2016-0002] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Request and Comment Request
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/08/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-02353, and on FDsys.gov 4191-02-U SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
SEP f 1 2006. Nationwide Review of Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities' Compliance With Medicare's Transfer Regulation (A-04-04-00008)
{42 + STRVLVICEI DEPARTMENT E %*~UV,~~ OF HE&WH & HUMAN SERVICES Office of Inspector General SEP f 1 2006 Washington, D.C. 20201 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mark B. McClellan, M.D., Ph.D. Administrator Centers
Controls Over EPA s Compass Financial System Need to Be Improved
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Controls Over EPA s Compass Financial System Need to Be Improved Report No. 13-P-0359 August 23, 2013 Scan this mobile code to learn more
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION Direct Debit Installment Agreement Procedures Addressing Taxpayer Defaults Can Be Improved February 5, 2016 Reference Number: 2016-30-011 This report has
Final Evaluation Report
U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE OF EVALUATIONS AND INSPECTIONS Final Evaluation Report EVALUATION OF THE U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT S OVERSIGHT OF THE
REVIEW OF NASA S INTERNAL CONTROLS FOR AWARDS WITH SMALL BUSINESSES
FEBRUARY 28, 2013 AUDIT REPORT OFFICE OF AUDITS REVIEW OF NASA S INTERNAL CONTROLS FOR AWARDS WITH SMALL BUSINESSES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL National Aeronautics and Space Administration REPORT NO.
DoD Methodologies to Identify Improper Payments in the Military Health Benefits and Commercial Pay Programs Need Improvement
Report No. DODIG-2015-068 I nspec tor Ge ne ral U.S. Department of Defense JA N UA RY 1 4, 2 0 1 5 DoD Methodologies to Identify Improper Payments in the Military Health Benefits and Commercial Pay Programs
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION Procedures Need to Be Updated to Ensure Proper Determinations of Tax Relief for Taxpayers Affected by Disasters February 16, 2012 Reference Number: 2012-40-015
GOVERNANCE: Enhanced Controls Needed To Avoid Duplicate Payments
GOVERNANCE: Enhanced Controls Needed To Avoid Duplicate Payments Audit Report OIG-A-2013-018 September 20, 2013 NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION Office of Inspector General REPORT HIGHLIGHTS Why
PROCUREMENT. Actions Needed to Enhance Training and Certification Requirements for Contracting Officer Representatives OIG-12-3
PROCUREMENT Actions Needed to Enhance Training and Certification Requirements for Contracting Officer Representatives OIG-12-3 Office of Inspector General U.S. Government Accountability Office Report Highlights
Solution for Enterprise Asset. Management. System Vehicle Maintenance Facility Data. Management. Advisory Report. Report Number DR-MA-15-004
Solution for Enterprise Asset Management System Vehicle Maintenance Facility Data Management Advisory Report Report Number DR-MA-15-004 September 18, 2015 Highlights This management advisory discusses
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS COLLEGE'S ADMINISTRATION OF TITLE IV STUDENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS COLLEGE'S ADMINISTRATION OF TITLE IV STUDENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS FINAL AUDIT REPORT Control Number: ED-OIG/A06-A0003 March 2001 Our mission is to promote the efficient
perform cost settlements to ensure that future final payments for school-based services are based on actual costs.
Page 2 Kerry Weems perform cost settlements to ensure that future final payments for school-based services are based on actual costs. In written comments on our draft report, the State agency concurred
The Environmental Careers Organization Reported Outlays for Five EPA Cooperative Agreements
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Attestation Report Catalyst for Improving the Environment The Environmental Careers Organization Reported Outlays for Five EPA Cooperative Agreements Report No. 2007-4-00065
Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General. Audit of Application Controls for FEMA's Individual Assistance Payment Application
Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General Audit of Application Controls for FEMA's Individual Assistance Payment Application OIG-09-104 September 2009 Table of Contents Objectives,
Congressional Response Report. The Social Security Administration s Disability Case Processing System
Congressional Response Report The Social Security Administration s Disability Case Processing System A-14-15-15016 November 2014 November 13, 2014 The Honorable Sam Johnson Chairman, Subcommittee on Social
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION
TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION The Internal Revenue Service September 14, 2010 Reference Number: 2010-10-115 This report has cleared the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration
Review of U.S. Coast Guard's FY 2014 Drug Control Performance Summary Report
Review of U.S. Coast Guard's FY 2014 Drug Control Performance Summary Report January 26, 2015 OIG-15-27 HIGHLIGHTS Review of U.S. Coast Guard s FY 2014 Drug Control Performance Summary Report January 26,
ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS. Fiscal Year 2013 Expenditure Plan Lacks Key Information Needed to Inform Future Funding Decisions
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional July 2014 ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS Fiscal Year 2013 Expenditure Plan Lacks Key Information Needed to Inform Future Funding Decisions
SOFTWARE LICENSES. DOD s Plan to Collect Inventory Data Meets Statutory Requirements
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional July 2014 SOFTWARE LICENSES DOD s Plan to Collect Inventory Data Meets Statutory Requirements GAO-14-625 July 2014 SOFTWARE LICENSES
Fiscal Year 2014 Work Plan
Federal Election Commission Office of Inspector General Fiscal Year 2014 Work Plan Lynne A. McFarland Inspector General TABLE OF CONTENTS A Message from the Inspector General--------------------------------------------
DoD Needs an Effective Process to Identify Cloud Computing Service Contracts
Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2016-038 DECEMBER 28, 2015 DoD Needs an Effective Process to Identify Cloud Computing Service Contracts INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY
Review of Medicaid Upper-Payment-Limit Requirements for Kansas Nursing Facility Reimbursement (A-07-03-02672)
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Office of Inspector General '%..,- Washington, D.C. 20201 TO: Mark B. McClellan, M.D., Ph.D. Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services FROM: Daniel R.
Department of Homeland Security
DHS Home-to-Work Transportation OIG-14-21 December 2013 OFFJCE OF lnspec."'or GENERAL Wrtshingwtl. 0(' 20:52K :' www.oii-t.db:i.go\' MEMORANDUM FOR: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Rafael Borras Under Secretary
GAO. TAX DEBT COLLECTION Measuring Taxpayer Opinions Regarding Private Collection Agencies
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Testimony Before the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives For Release on Delivery Expected at 10:00 a.m. EDT Wednesday, May 23, 2007
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL. Audit Report. Evaluation of the Railroad Retirement Board Medicare Contractor s Information Security
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Audit Report Evaluation of the Railroad Retirement Board Medicare Contractor s Information Security Report No. 08-04 September 26, 2008 RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD INTRODUCTION
The United States Secret Service Has Adequate Oversight and Management of its Acquisitions (Revised)
The United States Secret Service Has Adequate Oversight and Management of its Acquisitions (Revised) February 10, 2015 OIG-15-21 HIGHLIGHTS The United States Secret Service Has Adequate Oversight and Management
U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL FINAL REPORT USE OF APPROPRIATED FUNDS TO SETTLE A CLAIM
U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL FINAL REPORT USE OF APPROPRIATED FUNDS TO SETTLE A CLAIM EVALUATION REPORT NO. I-EV-EAC-01-10 SEPTEMBER 2010 U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
Nelson R. Bregon, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development. James D. McKay Regional Inspector General for Audit, 4AGA
Issue Date July 26, 2006 Audit Report Number 2006-AT-1014 TO: Nelson R. Bregon, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development FROM: James D. McKay Regional Inspector General
