USE OF EXPERT WITNESSES IN CONTESTED CASES BY: JAMES (DUSTY) JOHNSTON GENERAL COUNSEL TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING

Transcription

1 USE OF EXPERT WITNESSES IN CONTESTED CASES BY: JAMES (DUSTY) JOHNSTON GENERAL COUNSEL TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING

2 SCOPE OF PRESENTATION WARNING Although most jurisdic0ons may have similar, or even iden0cal rules of evidence, this presenta0on is rooted in the Texas rule of evidence

3 TEXAS RULE OF EVIDENCE RULE 702 TESTIMONY OF EXPERTS If scien0fic, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or educa0on may tes0fy thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise

4 FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 702 Tes0mony by Expert Witnesses A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or educa0on may tes0fy in the form of an opinion or otherwise if: A. the expert s scien0fic, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; B. the tes0mony is based on sufficient facts or data; C. the tes0mony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and D. the expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case.

5 RELEVANCY OF EXPERT TESTIMONY QUALIFICATIONS TEST Knowledge, skill, experience, training and educa0on KNOWLEDGE TEST Scien0fic, technical or other specialized knowledge Expert cannot offer an opinion based on a discipline that lacks reliability (e.g. Astrology) HELPFULNESS TEST Assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or determine fact issue

6 DAUBERT V. MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS, 509 U.S. 579 (1993) AND ITS PRODIGY The U.S. Supreme court pronounced a standard to be used in all federal courts regarding the admissibility of expert witness tes0mony. Now used and adopted by a majority of jurisdic0ons in the united states

7 DAUBERT PRINCIPLES Judge is gatekeeper and determines admissibility Relevance and reliability Judge must ensure that the expert's tes0mony is "relevant to the task at hand" and that it rests "on a reliable founda0on Judge must find it more likely than not that the expert's methods are reliable as applied to the facts. Scien0fic knowledge must be the product of sound "scien0fic methodology" derived from the scien0fic method

8 DAUBERT PRINCIPLES (Cont.) FACTORS THAT ESTABLISH SCIENTIFIC METHOD Empirical tes0ng: whether the theory or technique can be tested Whether it has been subjected to peer review The known or poten0al error rate The existence and maintenance of standards and controls concerning its opera0on The degree to which the theory and technique is generally accepted by a relevant scien0fic community

9 COMMON EXPERT NEEDS IN CONTESTED CASES Standard of care for RN, LVN or APRN prac0ce Scien;fic results such as toxicology reports/drug tests Medical and psychological evalua;ons Unprofessional conduct (boundary viola0ons, fraud and deceit, drug viola0ons and their nexus to nursing care) Applica0on of board rules and disciplinary policies?

10 STANDARD OF CARE- APPLICABLE TO ALL NURSES AND ALL SCOPES Know and conform to the nursing prac0ce act and rules or regula0ons affec0ng the nurse's current area of nursing prac0ce Implement measures to promote a safe environment for clients and others Know the ra;onale of medica;ons and treatments and shall correctly Accurately and completely report and document Respect the client's right to privacy, and maintain professional boundaries of the nurse- client rela0onship

11 STANDARD OF CARE IN SPECIALTY AREAS Emergency room nursing School nursing Medical surgical floors Intensive care units and pediatric intensive care units Nursing homes Home health and hospice Labor and delivery

12 USE OF IN HOUSE STAFF OR OUTSIDE EXPERT CONSULTANTS

13 EXPERT TESTIMONY FOR STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO ALL SCOPES OF PRACTICE EASIEST TO USE BOARD STAFF NURSES Documenta0on errors or failure to meet facility policies that set minimum standards Be prepared for arguments of witness bias Be prepared for claims of selec0ve prosecu0on Less expensive CONSIDER WHETHER EYE- WITNESSES CAN BE YOUR EXPERTS Director of nursing is ofen a well- qualified professional Charge nurses ofen know the standards and policies Nurse peers should know the standards Don t need a contract

14 EXPERT TESTIMONY IN SPECIALTY NURSING AREAS Do not use staff consultants who do not have experience in specialty area Outside consultants are the best prac0ce Consider eye witnesses (such as don or charge nurse) if they are experts in same field

15 STANDARD OF CARE (ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSING) PHYSICIAN EXPERTS ARE GENERALLY THE BEST PRACTICE Only one standard of care (APRN s do not provide a lower standard of care just because they are professional nurses and not physicians) Experience shows physician experts are more persuasive to the administra0ve law judge PHYSICIANS ARE NOT THE APPROPRIATE EXPERT FOR CRNA PRACTICE APRN EXPERT IN SAME SPECIALTY IS SUITABLE EXPERT Likely less expensive than physician experts CRNA should be used for CRNA prac0ce Be wary of using nurse midwife experts CONSIDER USING LABOR AND DELIVERY RN FOR NURSE MIDWIFE PRACTICE L & D nurses can adequately educate judge on risks and duty to pa0ent(s) in labor L & D nurse documenta0on & monitoring prac0ces should be minimum standard of all nurses

16 ALWAYS USE STAFF APRN IN APRN SCOPE OF PRACTICE CASE Even if APRN is not licensed in same role, popula0on or specialty area Can explain nature of APRN licensure Explain educa0on and cert. Explain what advance prac0ce means based on iden0fied area of specialty Regula0ons authorizing medical management may be hard for ALJ to understand May be able to nexus between viola0ons and appropriate sanc0on

17 LVN OR PN SCOPE OF PRACTICE VIOLATIONS Consider using LVN/PN educator as expert Explain LVN/PN scope of prac0ce Explain LVN/PN educa0on

18 SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE (DRUG SCREENS AND TOXICOLOGY) Every board should find and retain an expert toxicologist (even BSN toxicologist is good) Toxicologist can explain the science and scien0fic method Very versed in applicable literature Can educate the staff and ALJ Can explain metabolites and all known causes for results

19 SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE (DRUG SCREENS AND TOXICOLOGY) Every board should contract with a drug screening company and its expert Laboratory should provide li;ga;on packet Establishes chain of custody Explains theory of tests Explains all techniques the lab uses Explains any peer review of techniques Demonstrates reliability of tests and error rates Lab co. expert is normally very experienced in test and giving tes0mony Lab co. expert can ofen establish necessary founda0on for admission of test results as well explain the validity of test results

20 MEDICAL OR PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATIONS Texas can request forensic evalua0ons and require physical or psychological evalua0ons Neuropsychological evalua0ons Sex offender evalua0ons Chemical dependency evalua0ons Forensic evalua0ons (criminal conduct and unprofessional conduct) Referral ques;on: can respondent prac0ce nursing safely? If evalua0on bad, put expert under contract Psychologists who perform objec;ve tes;ng are best prac0ce Tests includes: Minn. Mul0phasic Personality Inventory (MMPI2), personality assessment inventory (PAI), and Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory (SASSI- 3) Remember: these tests are generally accepted, reliability can established, peer reviewed and subject to standards and controls Physicians are not the best prac0ce for psychological evalua0ons due to lack of objec0ve tes0ng

21 EXPERT TESTIMONY REGARDING UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT Boundary viola0ons, fraudulent or decep0ve behaviors, and/or drug related viola0ons Staff experts are best prac0ce Easier to establish seriousness of these viola0ons Can explain nexus between viola0ons and safe nursing prac0ce Can explain ra0onale for board rules and regula0ons Discuss appropriate sanc0on to protect public and provide safe nursing care Expert psychological evalua0ons may aid in establishing seriousness of viola0on

22 USE OF EXPERTS FOR APPROPRIATE SANCTION RECOMMENDATIONS Wouldn t this type opinion invade the province of the court by providing instruc0ons on the law? Maybe, but it seems to always be allowed and is very helpful to ALJ.

23 USE OF EXPERTS FOR APPROPRIATE SANCTION RECOMMENDATIONS Staff Expert can give vital educa0on on appropriate sanc0on (assuming viola0ons are found) Staff expert normally has years of experience in nurse regula0on Can educate the ALJ on the applica0on of the cited rules Can explain Board s policies Can iden0fy why behavior is breach of rules and regula0ons Can state how the alleged behavior speaks to competency Can explain why recommended sanc0on is appropriate Board policies and precedent Apply disciplinary matrix Is supervision appropriate or is revoca0on recommended

24 USE OF EXPERTS FOR RECOMMENDING APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS May be the most persuasive witness Not needed if board has established highly developed and rigid rules If you have a Florence Nigh;ngale on your staff, failure to at least try to use them is malprac;ce

25 EXPERT WITNESSES: SOME LESSONS LEARNED AT TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING

26 DOCKET NO ; TX.BON V. I.G. CASE OF NON- THERAPEUTIC PRESCRIBING ( PILL MILL ) hlp:// 507/13/ pfd1.pdf Physician expert is best prac0ce (so far) Established the single standard of care for pain management ALJ will side with physician over APRN every 0me Respondent normally cannot find a compe0ng expert Downside: $$$$

27 DOCKET NO ; TX.BON V. I.G. CASE OF NON- THERAPEUTIC PRESCRIBING ( PILL MILL ) Pa0ent care evidence Mul0ple medical records Physician must analyze records Records must be authen0cated Best prac0ce is to scan records Time consuming to review and analyze records for ALJ How many records are enough? (5,10, or 20) Par0es agreed 10 of 26 pa0ent records were representa0ve sample

28 DOCKET NO ; TX.BON V. I.G. CASE OF NON- THERAPEUTIC PRESCRIBING ( PILL MILL ) hlp:// 507/13/ pfd1.pdf Physician expert is best prac0ce (so far) Established the single standard of care for pain management ALJ will side with physician over APRN every 0me Respondent normally cannot find a compe0ng expert Downside: $$$$

29 DOCKET NO ; TX.BON V. I.G. CASE OF NON- THERAPEUTIC PRESCRIBING ( PILL MILL ) Staff s APRN expert tes0mony Staff s expert specialized in women s health Explained APRN licensure in Texas Applicable state regula0ons Explained the pain management rules of medical board and nursing board and their interplay Appropriate sanc0on effec0vely demonstrated Explained that the seriousness of unprofessional conduct at this level implicates all the nurses licenses including RN Poten0al for harm Lack of trustworthiness Poten0al cross over to all prac0ce sevngs

30 DOCKET NO ; TX.BON V. I.G. CASE OF NON- THERAPEUTIC PRESCRIBING ( PILL MILL ) TAKE AWAYS: Use physician to explain single standard of care and breach of standard Use staff expert aprn to explain nurse s duty to adhere to standards and consequences of viola0ons

31 DOCKET NO ; TX. BON V. R.H. CASE OF COMPETING PSYCHOLOGISTS hlp:// pfd1.pdf Alleged sexual misconduct and sex offender evalua0on was requested Results of evalua0on were concerning Charged with lack of fitness due to mental health diagnosis of personality disorder (not otherwise specified) with narcissis0c features BON retained expert, but opinion was effec0vely neutralized at hearing BON expert failed to demonstrate all criteria of DSM met BON expert lost credibility due to her hos0lity, mistrust and anger toward respondent Note: separate evalua0on was needed, just an alack on credibility of requested eval TAKE AWAYS: An emo0onal expert, no maler how jus0fied, loses credibility Don t really need a diagnosis to have concern regarding fitness

32 DOCKET NO ; TX. BON V. K.S.A. POSITIVE DRUG SCREEN hlp:// pfd1.pdf Alleged posi0ve drug screen for fentanyl Respondent presented an anesthesiologist who had concluded from some research that a prescrip0on for Cipro may have resulted in false posi0ve for fentanyl Bon expert was lab director from LabCorp and held a doctoral degree in chemistry Fentanyl tes0ng involves: Ini0al test using enzyme- linked immunologist analysis (Elisa); and if posi0ve 2nd confirma0on test using gas chromatography- mass spectrometry (GC/MS) Moral: not even a physician can trump a Ph.D. Chemist and gas chromatography- mass spectrometry expert

33