Nicholas L. Scott Assistant Linn County Attorney.
|
|
- Janis Fletcher
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Nicholas L. Scott Assistant Linn County Attorney
2 NAS Forensics and Iowa Courts I. Iowa Expert Testimony II. III. Cases citing NAS Forensics Report Discussion / Questions Prognosticating NAS influence in Iowa Courts
3 I. Iowa Expert Testimony
4 IA Rule of Evidence Testimony by Experts If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.
5 Court as Gatekeeper Court is committed to a liberal view on the admissibility of expert testimony. Leaf v. Goodyear Tire, 590 N.W.2d 525, 532 (1999). Judicial role increasing difficult and complex we encourage a more expansive judicial gatekeeping function in difficult scientific cases. Ranes v. Adams Lab, 778 N.W.2d 677, 686 (Iowa 2010).
6 Court s threshold questions 1. Will the evidence assist the trier of fact? Is expert testimony relevant? See R relevance defined Is there a sufficiently developed and reliable body of scientific, technical or specialized knowledge that exists? - (if not reliable then the evidence will not assist trier of fact. Johnson, 570 N.W.2d 633, 637 (Iowa 1997). 2. Does the expert have sufficient qualifications? (Balancing Rule still applies: probative value substantially outweighed by prejudicial affects)
7 1. sufficiently developed and reliable body of scientific knowledge Old Frye Test General acceptance in scientific field in which it belonged 1980 Iowa Supreme Court concerned about newly developed areas of scientific evidence
8 1. sufficiently developed and reliable body of scientific knowledge State v. Hall, 297 N.W.2d 80, 85 (Iowa 1980) blood splatter- flight characteristics admissible (not complex) Ad Hoc reliability test: (1) Professor MacDonell's considerable experience and his status as the leading expert in the field; (2) the existence of national training programs; (3) the existence of national and state organizations for experts in the field; (4) the offering of courses on the subject in several major schools; (5) use by police departments throughout the country in their day-to-day operations; (6) the holding of annual seminars; and (7) the existence of specialized publications.
9 1. sufficiently developed and reliable body of scientific knowledge Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 509 U.S. 579 (1993) Guiding factors enumerated 1. The knowledge can be tested 2. Subjected to peer review or publication 3. It has a known or potential rate of error 4. Generally accepted within the relevant scientific community Focus solely on principles and methodology, not on the conclusions generated.
10 1. sufficiently developed and reliable body of scientific knowledge Leaf v. Goodyear, 590 N.W.2d 525 (Iowa 1999) Daubert useful and instructive on scientific evidence Iowa relies on it s own body of law (State v. Hall) not going to mandate replacement with Daubert whether the case is scientific or technical in nature Court encourages use of Daubert if complex scientific evidence is to be admitted
11 1. sufficiently developed and reliable body of scientific knowledge Ranes v. Adams Labs., 778 N.W.2d 677 (Iowa 2010) Ad hoc Hall is general approach for reliability of technical or specialized knowledge (including general medical issues) Not as complex Foundational showing is lower Difficult scientific cases the court must engage in more expansive judicial gatekeeping function Apply Daubert
12 2. Does the expert have sufficient qualifications? The qualifications of an expert witness must be carefully scrutinized by the court to guard against a psuedolearned person or charlatan who may give erroneous testimony or opinions without a sound foundation. Ranes at 686. Court has broad discretion. No specific certification or degree requirements.
13 Lay of the Land Historically Admissible: eye witness id problems, battered women s syndrome, trained dog reactions to controlled substances; vehicle speed, handwriting, HGN test, firearm characteristics, fingerprint identification, drug-dealer profile*. See Iowa Practice Series Vol. 7 Evidence at 5.702:2 Inadmissible: comment on credibility of another witness; polygraphs *cf. Malcolm Gladwell 2007 article Dangerous Minds regarding serial killer profiling at
14 II. Cases citing NAS Forensics Report
15 Procedural Mechanics How to challenge expert testimony? Couple possibilities: 1. Motion in Limine 2. Motion for Rule Hearing
16 Procedural Mechanics Motion in Limine Iowa Rules of Crim. Pro. 2.11(2)(g) and (4) Filed no later than 9 days before trial BUT...
17 Quad City Bank v. Kircher 786 NW2d 519 (Iowa App. 2010) Limine used to secure protective order against prejudicial questions and statements. Provide little time for other party to resist and less time for the Court to consider the matter. See also Comm. V. Gambora discussed later Expert Witness challenges should use not a Motion in Limine.
18 Procedural Mechanics Rule 5.104(a) Questions of admissibility generally. Preliminary questions concerning the qualification of a person to be a witness, the existence of a privilege, or the admissibility of evidence shall be determined by the court
19 CASES citing NAS report NO IOWA CASES.
20 FEDERAL CASES Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 129 S.Ct (2009) Drug trafficking Mass Statute: Certificates of Analysis admissible Lab Report: The substance was found to contain: Cocaine
21 Melendez-Diaz cont. At the time of trial, petitioner did not know what tests the analysts performed, whether those tests were routine, and whether interpreting their results required the exercise of judgment or the use of skills that the analysts may not have possessed. While we still do not know the precise tests used by the analysts, we are told that the laboratories use methodology recommended by the Scientific Working Group for the Analysis of Seized Drugs, At least some of that methodology requires the exercise of judgment and presents a risk of error that might be explored on cross-examination.
22 Melendez-Diaz cont. Court cites NAS forensics report as well as numerous other reports regarding lab malfeasance. Fact that could have subpoenaed lab analyst as a witness is unpersuasive. Confrontation Clause: there may be better ways to test the evidence but confrontation is one that is guaranteed in the Constitution Cf. Iowa Code 691.2
23 US v. Willock 696 F.Supp.2d 536 (D. Maryland 2010) Cartridge casings found at 2 crime scenes in Baltimore, MD Sgt. Ensor concluded they matched and were discharged from same gun Court cites studies and NAS calling into question toolmark identification s status as science a complete restriction on the characterization of certainty was warranted
24 US v. Rose 672 F.Supp.2d 723 (D.Maryland 2010). Attempted carjacking resulted in death. Latent fingerprint identification using ACE-V. NAS report identified need for add l published peer reviewed studies and setting national standards NAS quoted Huber paper that found no available scientific evidence of the validity of the ACE-V method
25 US v. Rose cont. Report itself did not conclude that fingerprint evidence was unreliable such as to render it inadmissible Indeed, Judge Harry Edwards, who co-chaired the project, made it clear that nothing in the Report was intended to answer the question whether forensic evidence in a particular case is admissible under applicable law. erroneous identifications ranging from zero to.4% to a high of only 3% as to one set of more difficult latents.
26 US v. Rose cont. ACE-V methodology is generally accepted in relevant scientific community Low incident of erroneous misidentifications Sufficiently reliable under 702 for use in this case.
27 State v. Lopez-Martinez 2010 WL (Kan.App. 2010) FACTS: Victim bites rapist 1980 KS Supreme Court case bite mark identification = admissible cites New York Times article about a 1999 study 63% rate in misidentifications No indication KS S.Ct. is going to depart thus follow 1980 case
28 State v. Lopez-Martinez cont. Concurring opinion 1980 was 30 years ago = long time for science Cites NAS *d+espite the inherent weaknesses involved in bite mark comparison, it is reasonable to assume that the process can reliably exclude suspects. The expert in the case testified properly when he stated the bite mark could not be from Isabel and that it was possible the mark was made by B.W.
29 State v. Ward 694 S.E.2d 738 (N.Carol. 2010) Facts: CI buys prescript. Drugs. Police seize coke, amphetamine, hydrocodone, Ritalin, Xanax, Valium etc. etc. charged with felony. NAS report Forensic scientists sometimes face pressure to sacrifice methodology for expedience. P. xx. Hard-working and conscientious people in the forensic science community, but under resourcing lab scientists limits their ability to do their best work. P. 24.
30 State v. Ward cont. Lab Expert Seasoned = understatement 34 years at State Bureau of Investigation 24 years as chemist at SBI Testified in over 500 cases
31 State v. Ward cont. Lab Methodology chemically tested only half of pills seized Why not chemically test all pills? When asked why he performed only a visual inspection with Micromedex literature on some of the tablets and a chemical analysis on others, Special Agent Allcox focused his response on concerns for maximizing time and resources: *W+e have limited resources and we have to weed out-we have to analyze the most important items... [W]e don't have the resources to analyze everything that's submitted.
32 State v. Ward cont. Trial court allowed lab s testimony as to all the pills NC SCt found an abuse of discretion finding visual examination was sufficiently reliable. The State cites decisions from other jurisdictions that appear to allow the type of visual inspection process at issue for identifying controlled substances. [citations from LA, MT, and WI courts omitted] To the extent these cases support the State's argument, we find them unpersuasive to our holding.
33 State v. Ward cont. Trial court allowed lab s testimony as to all the pills; SCt found an abuse of discretion finding visual examination was sufficiently reliable. The State cites decisions from other jurisdictions that appear to allow the type of visual inspection process at issue for identifying controlled substances. [citations from LA, MT, and WI courts omitted] To the extent these cases support the State's argument, we find them unpersuasive to our holding.
34 State v. Edwards 2010 WL (NC App. 2010) Drug trafficking case. Heroin was tested. filed a motion to suppress challenging the drug testing random sampling technique used to determine the controlled substance was heroin and the weight of the heroin. Court stated there was no authority to sustain a motion to suppress based on the unreliability of the evidence. Trial court made preliminary determination of admissibility and questions concerning the random sampling procedure employed went to the weight of the testimony rather than admissibility.
35 State v. Edwards cont. wanted to cross exam expert and ask is NAS recommendations had been implemented in her lab. Trial court found it to be irrelevant and was not allowed to do so. Appellate Court: *I+t is doubtful that a general report challenging industry methodology would have changed the outcome at trial. Accordingly, Defendant s argument is without merit.
36 Johnston v. State 27 So.3d 11 (Fla. 2010) PCR on death penalty case involving fingerprint and shoeprint evidence. Court: NAS report did not constitute newly discovered evidence Majority of studies cited were published prior to PCR Nothing in report rendered forensic techniques used in s case unreliable.
37 Facts: Comm. v. Gambora 933 N.E.2d 50 (Mass. 2010) Robbery of family owned hotel, mother/wife shot and killed in front of her family for $450 by intruder and who were high on heroin Police find shoe print and fingerprint Fingerprint evidence used ACE-V methodology Also find shoe that matches print
38 Comm. v. Gambora cont. challenges fingerprint analysis citing NAS report Doesn t challenge shoe print??? attorney asked fingerprint expert about disparity b/t DNA experts 1/100 billion as opposed to fingerprint matches or doesn t match Further pointed out that errors have been made in the past.
39 Gambora cont. Court cites prior Mass. S.Ct. case Patterson where a trial judge denied a motion to exclude fingerprint evidence after a 5 day hearing and finding it met the Daubert test. argued general acceptance in the fingerprint examiner community can t provide basis of admissibility where the entire discipline of the community is challenged. Court- NAS acknowledges fingerprints are unique; however, uniqueness does not guarantee prints from 2 people might not be sufficiently similar to cause confusion. NAS= more research into error rates and similarities required.
40 Gambora cont. Fact v. opinion Fingerprint experts should testify that their OPINION is that the prints match and not testify that it is a FACT or that there is absolute certainty. ACE-V methodology doesn t create infallibility FN22 nothing in this opinion should be read to suggest that the existence fo the NAS Report alone will require the conduct of Daubert hearings as to the general reliability of expert opinions concerning fingerprint identifications.
41 III. Discussion / Questions Prognosticating NAS influence in Iowa Courts
THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY SPEAKS: The NAS Report: A Year Later. Robert Epstein Assistant Federal Defender Defender Association of Philadelphia
THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY SPEAKS: The NAS Report: A Year Later Robert Epstein Assistant Federal Defender Defender Association of Philadelphia THE BAD: UNITED STATES V. ROSE, 672 F.Supp.2d 723 (D. Md.
More informationIntroduction to Forensic Science. So what is Forensic Science? Major Contributors. Chapter 1: Intro to FS
Introduction to Forensic Science Chapter 1: Intro to FS So what is? In its broadest definition, forensic science is the application of science to criminal and civil laws. We will put emphasize on the applications
More informationTYPES OF EXPERTS. Psychological/Psychiatric Experts are used to determine the mental health of the parties and/or children.
WORKING WITH EXPERTS IN FAMILY COURT by J. Benjamin Stevens and Jenny R. Stevens The Stevens Firm, P.A. Family Law Center 349 E. Main Street, Suite 200, Spartanburg, SC 29302 www.scfamilylaw.com :: (864)
More informationNATIONAL COMMISSION ON FORENSIC SCIENCE. Testimony Using the Term Reasonable Scientific Certainty
Subcommittee NATIONAL COMMISSION ON FORENSIC SCIENCE Testimony Using the Term Reasonable Scientific Certainty Reporting and Testimony Type of Work Product Views Document Statement of the Issue It is the
More informationSTATE OF ARIZONA ex rel. WILLIAM G. MONTGOMERY, Maricopa County Attorney, Petitioner/Appellee,
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE STATE OF ARIZONA ex rel. WILLIAM G. MONTGOMERY, Maricopa County Attorney, Petitioner/Appellee, v. THE HONORABLE RONALD KARP, Justice of the Peace Pro Tempore,
More informationSTATEMENT OF PAUL C. GIANNELLI
STATEMENT OF PAUL C. GIANNELLI WEATHERHEAD PROFESSOR OF LAW CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE HEARING ON THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES REPORT:
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CR2011-142736-001 DT 10/03/2012 JUDGE PRO TEM PHEMONIA L. MILLER
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court *** Filed *** 10/08/2012 8:00 AM JUDGE PRO TEM PHEMONIA L. MILLER CLERK OF THE COURT J. Kosaka Deputy STATE OF ARIZONA TIFFANY LEIGH BRADY v. ALDA DAMARY GONZALES PRADO
More informationNATIONAL COMMISSION ON FORENSIC SCIENCE
NATIONAL COMMISSION ON FORENSIC SCIENCE Testimony using the term Reasonable Scientific Certainty Type of Work Product: Views Document by Subcommittee on Reporting and Testimony Statement of the Issue:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:11-cv-02026-SCJ Document 118 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION EDWARD BRANDON NOE, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION No. 1:11-cv-02026-SCJ
More informationCase 2:11-cv-02714-JAR Document 247 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 2:11-cv-02714-JAR Document 247 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ) BOARDWALK APARTMENTS, L.C., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 11-2714-JAR-KMH
More informationAttorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Sandra Lynn Reno, Misc. Docket AG No. 5, September Term, 2013
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Sandra Lynn Reno, Misc. Docket AG No. 5, September Term, 2013 ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE MARYLAND LAWYERS RULE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT 8.4 Court of Appeals denied
More informationConfrontation and the Expert Witness. State Public Defender Conference November 9, 2012
Confrontation and the Expert Witness State Public Defender Conference November 9, 2012 The Big Question On what kind of information can an expert opinion be based? admissible facts and data? No problem
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MICHELLE BOWERS, Petitioner, v. Case No. 2D08-3251 STATE OF FLORIDA,
More informationOverview of the NAS Report on Forensic Science in the U.S.
Overview of the NAS Report on Forensic Science in the U.S. Forensic Science in Iowa: Impact of the National Academy of Sciences Report October 29, 2010 Brian Farrell Overview Issues with forensic science
More informationHow To Understand Forensic Science
Forensic Science Lesson 1: CSI Basics What is Forensic Science? Forensic Science is the application of science to law. Locard s Exchange Principle states that with contact between two items there will
More informationQUALIFICATIONS, PRESENTATION AND CHALLENGES TO EXPERT TESTIMONY-DAUBERT (i.e. is a DFPS caseworker an expert) PRESENTED TO:
QUALIFICATIONS, PRESENTATION AND CHALLENGES TO EXPERT TESTIMONY-DAUBERT (i.e. is a DFPS caseworker an expert) PRESENTED TO: 6TH ANNUAL: ADJUSTING THE BAR: THE DEFINITIVE AD LITEM SEMINAR IN DFPS CASES
More informationData Mining Minnesota Murder Victim s Cell Phone Reveals. Smoking Gun Evidence
Data Mining Minnesota Murder Victim s Cell Phone Reveals Smoking Gun Evidence State v. Ferguson, 804 N.W.2d 586 (Minn. 2011) Introduction Television programs routinely show attorneys and investigators
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: MAY 2, 2014; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2012-CA-000371-MR GREGORY JERMAIN LANGLEY APPELLANT APPEAL FROM HENDERSON CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE
More informationDISCOVERY FROM EXPERT WITNESSES 1
DISCOVERY FROM EXPERT WITNESSES 1 Discovery from retained and even involved experts can be difficult and the process frustrating. Some basic understanding of what is discoverable and what is not from experts
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Case 6:09-cv-01968-PCF-KRS Document 222 Filed 06/29/11 Page 1 of 13 PageID 3127 VOTER VERIFIED, INC., Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION -vs- Case No. 6:09-cv-1968-Orl-19KRS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KEVIN D. TALLEY, Defendant-Below No. 172, 2003 Appellant, v. Cr. ID No. 0108005719 STATE OF DELAWARE, Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware,
More informationThe NAS Report: Developments, Lessons, and Resources. Steven D. Benjamin Benjamin & DesPortes, PC Richmond, VA
The NAS Report: Developments, Lessons, and Resources Steven D. Benjamin Benjamin & DesPortes, PC Richmond, VA The Problem Conclusions and terms Scientific examination Individualized match Zero % Error
More informationThe National Criminal Justice Trial Competition Co-Sponsored By American Bar Association and The John Marshall Law School
The National Criminal Justice Trial Competition Co-Sponsored By American Bar Association and The John Marshall Law School 2016 QUESTIONS SUBMITTED WITH ANSWERS A 2016 Casefile (revised), exhibit 3 (a-e)
More informationAPPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: STEVEN D. EBERT, Judge. Affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 28, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in
More informationHow To Run A Forensic Lab
Joint Appropriations Subcommittee on Justice and Public Safety Wilmington Police Department February 26, 2013 Forensic Services Bethany P. Pridgen, Forensic Lab Manager Latent Prints Firearms (Test Firing
More informationAdmissibility of Social Science Evidence in Law
Admissibility of Social Science Evidence in Law Comparative Law and Social Science 2012 Summer Institute of International and Comparative Law Paris, France Professor Valerie Hans, Cornell Law School Adversary
More informationIntroduction to Forensic Science and the Law. FBI Building Washington, DC
FBI Building Washington, DC 1 Objectives You will understand: How crime labs in the United States are organized and what services they provide. The growth and development of forensic science through history.
More informationCase 1:12-cv-00580-RC Document 200 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 12582 ** NOT PRINTED FOR PUBLICATION **
Case 1:12-cv-00580-RC Document 200 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 12582 ** NOT PRINTED FOR PUBLICATION ** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION AFFINITY
More informationDefendant brought a Motion to Suppress the DNA Testing Results or in the alternative,
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN COUNTY ` DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT STATE OF MINNESOTA, Plaintiff, vs. JIMMIE DALE JACKSON, File No: 04085182 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant. Defendant
More informationHow To Admit Blood Alcohol Test Results
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JAMES C. BABER, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. : : : Case No. : : : 96,010 DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA FOURTH
More informationLitigating the Products Liability Case: Discovery
www.goldbergsegalla.com NEW YORK PENNSYLVANIA CONNECTICUT NEW JERSEY UNITED KINGDOM Litigating the Products Liability Case: Discovery New York State Bar Association Buffalo, NY October 22, 2013 Presenter
More informationForensic Science: Crime Scene Basics. T. Trimpe 2006 http://sciencespot.net
Forensic Science: Crime Scene Basics T. Trimpe 2006 http://sciencespot.net Crime Scene Vocabulary CRIME SCENE: Any physical location in which a crime has occurred or is suspected of having occurred. PRIMARY
More informationThe NAS Report and Foundations of Good Science
The NAS Report and Foundations of Good Science March 29, 2012 NACDL/Innocence Network Kansas City, MO Andrea Roth, UC Berkeley School of Law aroth@law.berkeley.edu Goals for the Next Hour Learn what the
More informationCriminal Law. Month Content Skills August. Define the term jurisprudence. Introduction to law. What is law? Explain several reasons for having laws.
Criminal Law Month Content Skills August Introduction to law Define the term jurisprudence. What is law? Explain several reasons for having laws. Discuss the relationship between laws and values. Give
More informationWhat are the Effects of the Daubert Decision on Fingerprint Identification?
What are the Effects of the Daubert Decision on Fingerprint Identification? William Leo, CLPE Los Angeles Sheriff s Department Introduction Fingerprint identification has enjoyed a long history of judicial
More informationDecided: May 11, 2015. S15A0308. McLEAN v. THE STATE. Peter McLean was tried by a DeKalb County jury and convicted of the
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: May 11, 2015 S15A0308. McLEAN v. THE STATE. BLACKWELL, Justice. Peter McLean was tried by a DeKalb County jury and convicted of the murder of LaTonya Jones, an
More informationIN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR WOODBURY COUNTY. WRITTEN PLEA OF GUILTY AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS (OWI First Offense)
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR WOODBURY COUNTY THE STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff, vs. Defendant. CRIMINAL NO. WRITTEN PLEA OF GUILTY AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS (OWI First Offense) COMES NOW the above-named Defendant
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-CP-00221-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-CP-00221-COA FREDDIE LEE MARTIN A/K/A FREDDIE L. MARTIN APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/08/2013 TRIAL JUDGE:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ORLANDO INGRAM, No. 460, 2014 Defendant Below, Appellant, Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware in v. and for Kent County STATE OF DELAWARE,
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: June 18, 2015 104790 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GREGORY LEE,
More informationCase 4:04-cv-03221 Document 50 Filed in TXSD on 08/03/05 Page 1 of 10
Case 4:04-cv-03221 Document 50 Filed in TXSD on 08/03/05 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION EDGAR COELLO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL
More informationFINAL ORDER REVERSING TRIAL COURT. Appellant, Joseph Pabon (herein Appellant ), appeals the Orange County Court s
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA APPELLATE CASE NO: 2011-AP-32 LOWER COURT CASE NO: 48-2010-MM-12557 JOSEPH PABON, vs. Appellant, STATE OF FLORIDA,
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 16, 2001 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 16, 2001 Session STEVE EDWARD HOUSTON v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Giles County No. 9082 Robert L. Jones,
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A13-1698 Brian Jeffrey Serber, petitioner, Respondent,
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MARVIN HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D13-4741 [May 27, 2015] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial
More informationNo. 42,124-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered June 20, 2007. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C.Cr.P. No. 42,124-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * STATE
More informationExpert Witnesses in Water Court. Colorado s New Rules Governing Expert Witness in Water Court
Expert Witnesses in Water Court Colorado s New Rules Governing Expert Witness in Water Court Standards for Admissability of Expert Testimony Colo. Rules of Evidence Rule 702: Testimony by Experts If scientific,
More informationILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES CLASS SPECIFICATION FORENSIC SCIENTIST SERIES
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES CLASS SPECIFICATION FORENSIC SCIENTIST SERIES CLASS TITLE POSITION CODE EFFECTIVE FORENSIC SCIENTIST TRAINEE 15897 5/1/10 FORENSIC SCIENTIST I 15891 5/1/10
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No. 40135 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 40135 STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JUAN L. JUAREZ, Defendant-Appellant. 2013 Opinion No. 60 Filed: November 12, 2013 Stephen W. Kenyon,
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 72,591 DONNIE GENE CRAIG, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. PER CURIAM. [September 5, 19911 Craig appeals his conviction for first-degree murder and sentence of death. We have jurisdiction.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 6/21/16 P. v. Archuleta CA2/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified
More informationEXPERT TESTIMONY IN CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE CASES
EXPERT TESTIMONY IN CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE CASES Mark Montgomery PO Box 161 Durham, North Carolina 27702 (919) 680-6249 mark.montgomery@mindspring.com I. HEARSAY FROM THE COMPLAINANT UNDER THE "MEDICAL TREATMENT"
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2003-KA-01700-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2003-KA-01700-COA TOMMY BANKS A/K/A TOMMY EARL BANKS (HARRY) APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT: 5/27/2003 TRIAL
More informationTHE CROSS-EXAMINATION OF EXPERT WITNESSES. Carmen D. Caruso
Carmen D. Caruso INTRODUCTION The cross-examination of expert witnesses involves all of the rules of cross-examination discussed thus far. For example, if you can impeach an expert with a prior inconsistent
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW 2011-19 HOUSE BILL 27
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW 2011-19 HOUSE BILL 27 AN ACT TO (1) CREATE THE NORTH CAROLINA FORENSIC SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD, (2) ENCOURAGE EFFORTS TO ELIMINATE SOURCES OF
More informationAppendix 5C Training Memo Use of Expert Witnesses in Domestic Violence Cases 1
Appendix 5C Training Memo Use of Expert Witnesses in Domestic Violence Cases 1 Introduction The widespread myths surrounding domestic violence lead to a focus on the behavior of the victim rather than
More informationHow To Prove That A Man Was Shot In The Head
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana CYNTHIA. L. PLOUGHE Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: BRADLEY A. JOHNSON Dove & Johnson
More informationSo How Should I Deal With My Opponent s Expert Witness Report? Cross Examining Experts and Arguing Daubert Issues. Johnine Barnes, Esq.
So How Should I Deal With My Opponent s Expert Witness Report? Cross Examining Experts and Arguing Daubert Issues I. Summary of the Issues Johnine Barnes, Esq. A. The focus on this presentation is to heighten
More informationConfrontation in Domestic Violence Litigation: What Every New Attorney Should Know about the Necessity of Victim Participation
Confrontation in Domestic Violence Litigation: What Every New Attorney Should Know about the Necessity of Victim Participation By: Michael D. Dean i Those experienced in domestic violence litigation are
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14-0553 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Darrell
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, v. NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION Plaintiff-Respondent, JOHN K. OLIVERI, Defendant-Appellant. CIANCIA, J.A.D. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ALBERT J. BOUTIN, III. Argued: October 14, 2015 Opinion Issued: March 8, 2016
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme
More informationCOURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiffs : CASE NO. 2012 CVA 01052
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO FRANKLIN MILLER, et al., : Plaintiffs : CASE NO. 2012 CVA 01052 vs. : Judge McBride H&G NURSING HOMES, INC., et al., : DECISION/ENTRY Defendants : Slater & Zurz,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO ELAINE WILLIAMS and GEORGE W. REYNOLDS, vs. Plaintiffs-Appellants, STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee,
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. For defendant-appellant: : : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION : MAY 25, 2006
[Cite as State v. Ellington, 2006-Ohio-2595.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No. 86803 STATE OF OHIO JOURNAL ENTRY Plaintiff-Appellee AND vs. OPINION DAVID ELLINGTON, JR.
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A13-2263 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Greer
More informationN.W.2d. Petition for further review from the Court of Appeals,
88 285 NEBRASKA REPORTS Neb. Ct. R. 3-310(P) and 3-323(B) of the disciplinary rules within 60 days after an order imposing costs and expenses, if any, is entered by this court. Judgment of suspension.
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: DECEMBER 31, 2008; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2007-CA-000917-MR AND NO. 2007-CA-002088-MR BRYAN P. VINCENT APPELLANT APPEAL FROM MUHLENBERG CIRCUIT
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-1884. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jolene Kay Coleman, Appellant.
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-1884 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jolene Kay Coleman, Appellant. Filed January 3, 2012 Affirmed Kalitowski, Judge Hennepin County District Court File No.
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-0415 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Shannon
More informationState of Wisconsin: Circuit Court: Milwaukee County. v. Case No. 2009CF001131. Defendant s Postconviction Motion Pursuant to Sec. 809.30, Stats.
State of Wisconsin: Circuit Court: Milwaukee County State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2009CF001131 Matthew Laughrin, Defendant. Defendant s Postconviction Motion Pursuant to Sec. 809.30, Stats.
More informationBECOMING AN EXPERT WITNESS & DEVELOPING YOUR CURRICULUM VITA OR RÉSUMÉ 1
BECOMING AN EXPERT WITNESS & DEVELOPING YOUR CURRICULUM VITA OR RÉSUMÉ 1 Materials by Hallie Bongar White & Jane Larrington I. RULES OF EVIDENCE Most courts have written rules governing the admissibility
More informationFILED December 8, 2015 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate Court, IL
NOTICE This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2015 IL App (4th 130903-U NO. 4-13-0903
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: AUGUST 7, 2009; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2008-CA-001465-MR LAMONT ROBERTS APPELLANT APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE MARTIN
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 14-3137 United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Lacresia Joy White lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant Appeal
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2010).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2010). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-2057 David Johnson, petitioner, Appellant, vs.
More informationTHE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, GUILLERMO E. COONEY, Appellant. No. 2 CA-CR 2012-0061 Filed November 8, 2013
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. GUILLERMO E. COONEY, Appellant. No. 2 CA-CR 2012-0061 Filed November 8, 2013 Appeal from the Superior Court in Pima County
More informationHow To Become A Forensic Scientist
A c a r e e r i n By Hall Dillon Blood spatters, spent shell casings, and forged signatures are the nuts and bolts of forensic science. Studying the messy details of crime, forensic scientists help identify
More informationA Federal Criminal Case Timeline
A Federal Criminal Case Timeline The following timeline is a very broad overview of the progress of a federal felony case. Many variables can change the speed or course of the case, including settlement
More informationDISTRICT II. You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order:
OFFICE OF THE CLERK WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS 110 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 215 P.O. BOX 1688 MADISON, WISCONSIN 53701-1688 Telephone (608) 266-1880 TTY: (800) 947-3529 Facsimile (608) 267-0640 Web Site:
More information**************************************** I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND.
STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O clock M CLERK, DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, vs. STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY
More informationA MURDER SCENE EXCEPTION TO THE 4TH AMENDMENT WARRANT REQUIREMENT?
A MURDER SCENE EXCEPTION TO THE 4TH AMENDMENT WARRANT REQUIREMENT? Bryan R. Lemons Senior Legal Instructor It is firmly ingrained in our system of law that searches conducted outside the judicial process,
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 1009015961 ) GIOVANNI FERRANTE, ) Defendant. ) Submitted: June 25, 2012 Decided:
More informationOPINION Richard B. Klein DATE: June 14, 2001. Plaintiff, Patricia Daniels, filed this lawsuit on behalf of
PATRICIA DANIELS, p/n/g of : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY RODERICK STERLING, a minor : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : TRIAL DIVISION v. : June Term, 1996 : HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA : NO. 2450 COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC :
More informationSTATE OF ARIZONA ex rel. WILLIAM G. MONTGOMERY, Maricopa County Attorney, Petitioner,
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE STATE OF ARIZONA ex rel. WILLIAM G. MONTGOMERY, Maricopa County Attorney, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE PHILIP ROGERS, Pro Tem Justice of the Peace of the SOUTH
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral
More informationQ:\wwwroot\NESL\lawrev\Vol36\36-3\04 Brian Holmgren.doc Printed On 1/7/2003: The Expert Witness. Brian Holmgren
Q:\wwwroot\NESL\lawrev\Vol36\36-3\04 Brian Holmgren.doc Printed On 1/7/2003: The Expert Witness Brian Holmgren There were three professionals who were debating the oldest profession in the world: a surgeon,
More informationS12F1507. RYMUZA v. RYMUZA. On January 13, 2012, the trial court entered a final judgment in the divorce
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: November 19, 2012 S12F1507. RYMUZA v. RYMUZA. NAHMIAS, Justice. On January 13, 2012, the trial court entered a final judgment in the divorce action filed by appellee
More informationForensic Science : Course Syllabus Forensic Science : Secrets of the Dead
Forensic Science : Course Syllabus Forensic Science : Secrets of the Dead COURSE DESCRIPTION: Fingerprints. Blood spatter. DNA analysis. The world of law enforcement is increasingly making use of the techniques
More informationAPPLICATION FOR CRIMINAL LAW PANELS. State Bar number: Telephone: Fax: Full time SF office address: Mailing address (if different):
APPLICATION F CRIMINAL LAW PANELS Lawyer Referral and Information Service 301 Battery Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 477-2374 Fax: (415) 477-2389 URL: http://www.sfbar.org Name:
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MIAMI COUNTY, OHIO. v. : T.C. NO. 2007 TRC 2065
[Cite as State v. Swartz, 2009-Ohio-902.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MIAMI COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellant : C.A. CASE NO. 2008 CA 31 v. : T.C. NO. 2007 TRC 2065 ROBERT W. SWARTZ : (Criminal
More informationEvent Data Recorders and Their Role in. Automobile Accident Litigation
Event Data Recorders and Their Role in Automobile Accident Litigation by Jason A. Koch jkoch@jlolaw.com 8519 Eagle Point Boulevard, Suite 100 Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042-8624 (651) 290-6500 I. Event Data
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: DONALD J. FREW Fort Wayne, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: GREGORY F. ZOELLER Attorney General of Indiana CYNTHIA L. PLOUGHE Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis,
More informationNO. COA11-480 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 7 February 2012. 1. Motor Vehicles driving while impaired sufficient evidence
NO. COA11-480 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 7 February 2012 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. Union County No. 10 CRS 738 DOUGLAS ELMER REEVES 1. Motor Vehicles driving while impaired sufficient evidence
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. v. : CRIMINAL NO. 96-00407 O R D E R
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : v. : CRIMINAL NO. 96-00407 BYRON C. MITCHELL : O R D E R AND NOW, this day of, 2000, upon consideration
More informationIllinois Family Violence Coordinating Councils
Illinois Family Violence Coordinating Councils Domestic Violence Court System Self-Assessment July 2006 The purpose of the self-assessment is to empower local domestic violence court systems by providing
More informationTO: THE COURT AND COUNSEL FOR THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF XXXXXX DISTRICT COURT XXXXXX Judicial District State of Minnesota, vs. [Defendant] Plaintiff, Defendant. DEFENDANT'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR A FRYE- MACK HEARING
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY EDWARD A. JEREJIAN BERGEN COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER JUDGE HACKENSACK, NJ 07601 Telephone: (201) 527-2610 Fax Number: (201) 371-1109 Joseph M. Mark Counsellor at Law 200 John Street
More informationSummary of Qualifications: Education: Professional Experience: Kenneth R. Moses
Summary of Qualifications: Kenneth Moses has over forty years of experience in forensic evidence. He established the Crime Scene Investigations Unit of the San Francisco Crime Laboratory in 1983 and was
More informationNO. 4-10-0818 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
NOTICE This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2012 IL App (4th 100818-U Filed 1/10/12
More information