Case 2:05-cv-02717-JDB-tmp Document 41 Filed 07/12/2006 Page 1 of 15



Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) )

Case 1:09-cv Document 1 Filed 12/10/09 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:10-cv JAP -DEA Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII. Case No.: CV-06-00~CK-LEK

Case4:13-cv DMR Document1 Filed12/11/13 Page1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 1:12-cv RLV-AJB Document 1 Filed 05/14/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv ESH Document 1 Filed 12/09/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2016 Page 1 of 8 UNTIED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims

Plaintiffs, Defendants. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, Rebecca Weston, hereby accepts the Offer of

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORIGIA-~~T ~:J,-~T,>cURT SAVANNAH DIVISION j Ga. NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 1:13-cv Doc #1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION 2Dub APR - 3 PI: 41 COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSENT DECREE. Introduction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:10-cv JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION COMPLAINT. Plaintiff United States of America ( United States"), alleges:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:10-cv NBF Document 1 Filed 09/17/10 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Woman From Being Fired From A Prison

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No: Defendants, Steven Lecy and the City of Minneapolis, through their

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Windmill Inns of America, d/b/a Windmill Inn of Ashland, Defendant.

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 07/11/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

CASE 0:12-cv RHK-SER Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case4:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

Case: 4:15-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 09/10/15 Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DISTRICT

S tj M M ONS UNION LEAGUE CLUB, PI ai nti ff Demands a Trial by Jury. Index No. Plaintiff, TO THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANT:

Case 3:12-cv G Document 7 Filed 03/06/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 56 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF DALLAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 3:14-cv AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

v. CASE NO.: VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH REQUEST FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

JOHN MURRAY ( Murray ), for his Complaint in this action against Defendant, Crystex Composites LLC ( Crystex ), alleges as follows:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSENT DECREE. Introduction

Broadband Graphics - infringement of Patent Law and Procedure

Plaintiff, : X. Nature of the Action. 1. This is an action for breach of a settlement agreement, retaliation

Case 3:14-cv RNC Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

) Verified c-o-m-p-la-in-t- --;o~~&"-a~a~e~a6d4 0. Plaintiff, ) Demand for Jury Trial. Defendants. ) Over $25, ~)

GUIDANCE ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT FOR ALL EMPLOYERS IN NEW YORK STATE

virtue of Title VIII of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 806 of the Corporate and

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Southern Division) v. * Civil Action No.: * * * * ooo0ooo * * * * COMPLAINT

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO HOSPITAL AUTHORITY,

Case 1:12-cv BEL Document 1 Filed 02/15/12 Page 1 of 6. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Northern Division)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case: 1:15-cv DAP Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/29/15 1 of 15. PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. CHELSEA WARNE, by and through her next friend, MENDA WARNE, Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 5:14-cv OLG Document 9 Filed 07/31/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No.: 15-cv-157 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/16 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 New Mexico

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. No. CIV RLP/DJS

Case 2:14-cv CW-BCW Document 62 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:13-cv JS-AKT Document 1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.

THE GEORGIA NON-PROFIT AND LAWS PREVENTING DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. MARIA GODINEZ, an individual,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Civil No (JRT/HB) INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

4:15-cv RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

MARC D. LAVIK, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : C.A. No. PC 11- : DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, : DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, : STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, : COMPLAINT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

9:10-cv MBS Date Filed 07/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA INTRODUCTION

How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California

Case 1:16-cv CBA-PK Document 1 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Transcription:

Case 2:05-cv-02717-JDB-tmp Document 41 Filed 07/12/2006 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-2717 B P and DONNELL ADDISON, KAREN ALEXANDER, EDDIE ANDERSON, KEITH CLARK, BILLY HERRING, KENDRICK HUNT, ROY OLIVER, AND FRED WIGGINS, Intervening Plaintiffs, v. TRI-STATE PLUMBING, HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING CONTRACTORS, INC., JURY TRIAL DEMAND and UNITED ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBERS, PIPEFITTERS, and SPRINKLERFITTERS, PLUMBERS LOCAL UNION NO. 17, and UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN and APPRENTICES OF THE PLUMBING and PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY of the UNITED STATES and CANADA Defendants. INTERVENORS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq. (Title VII, and Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. 1981, and 42 U.S.C. 1985(3 to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of race, sex, and retaliation for opposing practices made unlawful by Title VII and by the XII and XIV

Case 2:05-cv-02717-JDB-tmp Document 41 Filed 07/12/2006 Page 2 of 15 Amendments to the United States Constitution, and to provide appropriate relief to African American employees and union members. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant Tri-State Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning Contractors, Inc., Defendant United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO ( United Association, and Defendant United Association of Plumbers, Pipefitters, and Sprinklerfitters, Plumbers, Local Union No. 17 ( Local 17, an affiliated and/or chartered local with the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada (collectively Defendant Unions subjected African American employees and union members to unlawful discrimination because of their race and to unlawful retaliation for opposing practices made unlawful by Title VII and 42 U.S.C. 1981 and 1985(3, and that Defendant Employer subjected a female employee to unlawful discrimination because of her sex. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 451, 1331, 1337, 1343 and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Sections 706(f(1 and (3 of Title VII and Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. 1981 and 1985(3. 2. The unlawful employment practices alleged below were and are now being committed within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Western Division. PARTIES 3. Plaintiff, Donnell Addison, ( Addison is an African-American male who, at all relevant times, was employed by Defendant Tri-State Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning Contractors, Inc., ( Defendant Employer and/or Tri-State and is a Member of Defendant 2

Case 2:05-cv-02717-JDB-tmp Document 41 Filed 07/12/2006 Page 3 of 15 United Association of Plumbers, Pipefitters and Sprinklerfitters, Plumber and Local 17 ( Defendant Unions. He resides at 577 Haynes Street, Memphis, Tennessee 38111. 4. Plaintiff, Karen Alexander, is an African-American female who, at all relevant times, was employed by Defendant Tri-State Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning Contractors, Inc., ( Defendant Employer and/or Tri-State and is a Member of Defendant United Association of Plumbers, Pipefitters and Sprinklerfitters, Plumbers and Local Union 17 ( Defendant Unions. She resides at 664 Regent Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38106. 5. Plaintiff, Eddie Anderson, is an African-American male who, at all relevant times, was employed by Defendant Tri-State Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning Contractors, Inc., ( Defendant Employer and/or Tri-State and is a Member of Defendant United Association of Plumbers, Pipefitters and Sprinklerfitters, Plumber s Union and Local 17 ( Defendant Unions. He resides at 428 Parkdale Drive, Memphis, Tennessee 38109. 6. Plaintiff, Keith Clark, is an African-American male who, at all relevant times, was employed by Defendant Tri-State Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning Contractors, Inc., ( Defendant Employer and/or Tri-State and is a Member of Defendant United Association of Plumbers, Pipefitters and Sprinklerfitters, Plumber s Union and Local 17 ( Defendant Unions. He resides at 261 Ayer, Apartment 5, Memphis Tennessee 38105. 7. Plaintiff, Billy Herring, is an African-American male who, at all relevant times, was employed by Defendant Tri-State Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning Contractors, Inc., ( Defendant Employer and/or Tri-State and is a Member of Defendant United Association of Plumbers, Pipefitters and Sprinklerfitters, Plumber s Union and Local 17 ( Defendant Unions. He resides at 3412 Windy Hollow Circle, Memphis, Tennessee 38118. 8. Plaintiff, Kendrick Hunt, is an African-American male who, at all relevant times, 3

Case 2:05-cv-02717-JDB-tmp Document 41 Filed 07/12/2006 Page 4 of 15 was employed by Defendant Tri-State Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning Contractors, Inc., ( Defendant Employer and/or Tri-State and is a Member of Defendant United Association of Plumbers, Pipefitters and Sprinklerfitters, Plumber s Union and Local 17 ( Defendant Unions. He resides at 2777 Treasure Island East, Memphis, Tennessee 38115. 9. Plaintiff, Roy Oliver, is an African-American male who, at all relevant times, was employed by Defendant Tri-State Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning Contractors, Inc., ( Defendant Employer and/or Tri-State and is a Member of Defendant United Association of Plumbers, Pipefitters and Sprinklerfitters, Plumber s Union and Local 17 ( Defendant Unions. He resides at 1952 Goodhaven Drive, Memphis, Tennessee 38116. 10. Plaintiff, Fred Wiggins, is an African-American male who, at all relevant times, was employed by Defendant Tri-State Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning Contractors, Inc., ( Defendant Employer and/or Tri-State and is a Member of Defendant United Association of Plumbers, Pipefitters and Sprinklerfitters, Plumber s Union and Local 17 ( Defendant Unions. He resides at 1319 Bugsby Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38127. 11. At all relevant times, Defendant Tri-State Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning Contractors, Inc., (Defendant Employer has continuously been a Tennessee corporation doing business in the state of Tennessee and the city of Memphis, and has continuously had at least fifteen employees. 12. At all relevant times Defendant Employer has continuously been an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Sections 701(b, (g and (h of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e(b, (g and (h. 13. At all relevant times, Defendants United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, and 4

Case 2:05-cv-02717-JDB-tmp Document 41 Filed 07/12/2006 Page 5 of 15 Defendant Local 17, an affiliated and/or chartered Local with the United Association have continuously been an association of participating employees which deals with employers concerning terms and conditions of employment, have continuously had at least fifteen members, and have continuously maintained a hiring hall or hiring office which procures employees for an employer or procures for employees opportunities to work for an employer. At all relevant times, Defendant Unions have been a recognized collective bargaining representative for employees of Defendant Employer. 14. At all relevant times, Defendant Unions have continuously been labor organizations engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Sections 701(d and (e of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e(d and (e. STATEMENT OF CLAIMS 15. More than thirty days prior to the institution of this lawsuit, Donnell Addison, Karen Alexander, Eddie Anderson, Keith Clark, Billy Herring, Kendrick Hunt, Roy Oliver and Frederick Wiggins filed charges with the Commission alleging violations of Title VII by Defendant Employer and Defendant Local 17. All conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been fulfilled. Upon information and/or belief, the United Association was aware of said Charges of Discrimination and worked with Local 17 in formulating a response to the EEOC. 16. Since at least approximately September 24, 2003, Defendant Employer has continually engaged in unlawful employment practices in violation of Sections 703(a of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2(a and 42 U.S.C. 1981 and 1985(3. 17. The unlawful employment practices involved discriminating against Donnell Addison, Karen Alexander, Eddie Anderson, Keith Clark, Billy Herring, Kendrick Hunt, Roy 5

Case 2:05-cv-02717-JDB-tmp Document 41 Filed 07/12/2006 Page 6 of 15 Oliver and Frederick Wiggins, African American plumbers, apprentice plumbers and laborers, because of their race, by subjecting them to racial harassment. 18. These African American employees were subjected to racially derogatory comments, racially derogatory graffiti, and other unwelcome conduct based on race at the FedEx Forum work site. 19. Their supervisors were aware of this unwelcome racial conduct, but failed to take prompt and effective action to end it. 20. The unwelcome racial conduct was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of the victims' employment and create an abusive working environment. 21. The unlawful employment practices also involved discriminating against Donnell Addison, Karen Alexander, Eddie Anderson, Keith Clark, Billy Herring, Kendrick Hunt, Roy Oliver and Frederick Wiggins, because of their race, by subjecting them to different terms and conditions of employment at the FedEx Forum work site and other jobs within the relevant time period. 22. These African American employees were assigned to less desirable job tasks because of their race, while similarly situated White employees were assigned to more desirable job tasks. 23. The unlawful employment practices also involved discriminating against Donnell Addison, Eddie Anderson, Keith Clark, Billy Herring, Kendrick Hunt, Roy Oliver and Frederick Wiggins, because of their race, by denying them the opportunity to work overtime at the FedEx Forum work site because of their race while allowing similarly situated White employees to work overtime. 24. The unlawful employment practices also involved discriminating against Karen 6

Case 2:05-cv-02717-JDB-tmp Document 41 Filed 07/12/2006 Page 7 of 15 Alexander, a female laborer, by denying her the opportunity to work overtime at the FedEx Forum work site, because of her sex and race, while similarly situated male employees were allowed to work overtime. 25. Since at least approximately September 24, 2003, Defendant Employer has also engaged in unlawful employment practices in violation of Sections 704(a of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-3(a and 42 U.S.C. 1981 and 1985(3. 26. The unlawful employment practices involved ending the employment of Donnell Addison, Karen Alexander, Eddie Anderson, Keith Clark, Billy Herring, Kendrick Hunt, Roy Oliver and Frederick Wiggins in retaliation for their opposition to practices made unlawful by Title VII and 42 U.S.C. 1981. 27. After these employees complained about practices made unlawful by Title VII, and Defendant Employer became aware of their complaints, Defendant Employer ended their employment while allowing similarly situated and less qualified employees who had not opposed practices made unlawful by Title VII to work. 28. Since at least approximately May 17, 2004, Defendant Unions have continually engaged in unlawful employment practices in violation of Sections 703(a of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2(a. 29. The unlawful employment practices involved discriminating against Donnell Addison, Eddie Anderson, Keith Clark, Billy Herring, Kendrick Hunt, Roy Oliver and Frederick Wiggins, African American union members, by failing to represent them because of their race. Upon information and/or belief, Defendant United Association, which sufficiently controlled the operations of Local 17, was aware of said practices and failed to prevent and/or protect Plaintiffs from the discriminatory conduct in spite of its obligations under federal antidiscrimination laws 7

Case 2:05-cv-02717-JDB-tmp Document 41 Filed 07/12/2006 Page 8 of 15 and its own constitution. Upon information and/or belief, Defendant United Association was aware of the racial demographics of the Memphis-Shelby County area, was aware of the underrepresentation of African-American members in Defendant Local 17, was aware that some or all of Plaintiffs were treated differently with respect to apprenticeship training, and was aware that African-American union members and applicants for membership were the victims of disparate treatment at the hands of Local 17 officers and/or agents, yet demonstrated a studied ambivalence toward the illegal conduct. Local 17 and the United Association allowed and encouraged traveling members from other locals to work through Local 17 despite the fact that the Intervening Plaintiffs were told that there was no work for them. These traveling members were mostly non-minorities. Upon information and belief, the United Association knew of the existence of travelers working through Local 17 and that the Intervening Plaintiffs, and those similarly situated to them, were unemployed. Consequently, and in addition thereto, upon information and/or belief, the United Association encouraged, ratified, authorized conducted, and/or condoned the discriminatory course of conduct of Local 17 by and through its officers and/or agents. 30. Certain of the African American union members complained to Defendant Local 17 personnel about racial discrimination by Defendant Employer at the FedEx Forum work site, but Defendant Unions did not initiate and pursue effective corrective action to end the unlawful discrimination. Further, Employer was notified by Defendant Unions of the Plaintiffs complaints and Plaintiffs were threatened with termination. The Defendants acted in concert in the instant case, as well as in other instances to violate the Plaintiffs rights under statute and the Constitution to be free of discrimination or retaliation because of their race. 31. The unlawful employment practices also involved denying job referrals to 8

Case 2:05-cv-02717-JDB-tmp Document 41 Filed 07/12/2006 Page 9 of 15 Donnell Addison, Eddie Anderson, Kendrick Hunt and Frederick Wiggins, African American union members, because of their race, while White union members who were less entitled to referral were referred. 32. Since at least approximately May 17, 2004, Defendant Unions and Defendant Employer have also engaged in unlawful employment practices in violation of Sections 704(a of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-3(a and 42 U.S.C. 1981 and 1985(3. The unlawful employment practices also involved denying job referrals to Donnell Addison, Eddie Anderson, Kendrick Hunt and Frederick Wiggins, African American union members, in retaliation for their opposition to practices made unlawful by Title VII, while others who had not opposed unlawful employment practices, and who were less entitled to referral, were referred. 33. The effect of the practices complained of in paragraphs 9 through 26 above has been to deprive Donnell Addison, Karen Alexander, Eddie Anderson, Keith Clark, Billy Herring, Kendrick Hunt, Roy Oliver and Frederick Wiggins of equal employment opportunities and otherwise adversely affect their status as employees and union members because of their race, their opposition to practices made unlawful by Title VII, and Ms. Alexander's sex. 34. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraphs 9 through 32 above were intentional. 35. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraphs 9 through 32 above were done with malice and/or with reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of Donnell Addison, Karen Alexander, Eddie Anderson, Keith Clark, Billy Herring, Kendrick Hunt, Roy Oliver and Frederick Wiggins. 9

Case 2:05-cv-02717-JDB-tmp Document 41 Filed 07/12/2006 Page 10 of 15 CAUSES OF ACTION COUNT I - 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq. (Title VII 36. Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate as if pled herein verbatim paragraphs one (1 through thirty-five (35. 37. Defendant Employer engaged in an ongoing manner of discrimination against Plaintiffs because of their race and Ms. Alexander s gender. Specifically, Defendant Employer treated Plaintiffs differently from similarly situated employees who are not African American by assigning them to less desirable job tasks, denying them the opportunity to work overtime, and failing to stop racial harassment including racially derogatory comments, graffiti and other unwelcome conduct while working at the FedEx Forum work site. Plaintiffs further allege that Defendant Employer terminated their employment in retaliation for complaints made unlawful by Title VII. 38. Defendant Local 17 engaged in unlawful employment practices against Plaintiffs because of their race by failing to represent them after complaints of discrimination were made against Defendant Employer, failing to initiate and pursue effective corrective action to end the discrimination, and denying job referrals. 39. Plaintiffs aver that the reason for this disparate treatment by Defendant Employer and Defendant Local 17 was because of their race and Ms. Alexander s gender, which is a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e, et seq. COUNT II - 42 U.S.C. 1981 40. Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate as if herein plead verbatim, paragraphs one (1 through thirty-nine (39. 10

Case 2:05-cv-02717-JDB-tmp Document 41 Filed 07/12/2006 Page 11 of 15 41. Defendant Employer and Defendant Unions are in violation of 42 U.S.C. 1981 for refusing to contract with the Plaintiffs because of their race. Defendant Employer and Defendant Unions also failed to grant the Plaintiffs the same benefits and privileges to contract with them as they extended to White employees and members. Finally, Defendant Employer and Defendant Unions retaliated against the Plaintiffs for exercising their rights under Title VII and Section 1981. Therefore, Plaintiffs are entitled to equitable relief, compensatory damages and punitive damages. COUNT III- 42 U.S.C. 1985(3 42. Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate as if herein plead verbatim, paragraphs one (1 through forty-one (41. 43. Defendant Employer and Defendant Unions are in violation of 42 U.S.C. 1985(3 by conspiring to discriminate against the Plaintiffs because of their race, thereby depriving them of their Equal Protection rights and their rights under the Privileges and Immunities clause of the United States Constitution. Therefore, Plaintiffs are entitled to equitable relief, compensatory damages and punitive damages. PRAYER FOR RELIEF Therefore, the Commission respectfully requests that this Court: A. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant Employer and its officers, successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in any employment practice which discriminates against employees because of their race, sex, or opposition to practices made unlawful by Title VII; 11

Case 2:05-cv-02717-JDB-tmp Document 41 Filed 07/12/2006 Page 12 of 15 B. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant Unions and their respective officers, successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with them, from engaging in any employment practice which discriminates against employees because of their race or opposition to practices made unlawful by Title VII; C. Order Defendant Employer to institute and carry out policies, practices, and programs which provide equal employment opportunities for African American employees, female employees, and employees who oppose practices made unlawful by Title VII, and which eradicate the effects of Defendant Employer s unlawful employment practices described in paragraphs 9 through 27 above; D. Order Defendant Unions to institute and carry out policies, practices, and programs which provide equal employment opportunities for African American employees and employees who oppose practices made unlawful by Title VII, and which eradicate the effects of Defendant Unions unlawful employment practices described in paragraphs 28 through 32 above; E. Order Defendant Employer to make whole Donnell Addison, Karen Alexander, Eddie Anderson, Keith Clark, Billy Herring, Kendrick Hunt, Roy Oliver and Frederick Wiggins by providing appropriate back pay with prejudgment interest, in amounts to be determined at trial, and other affirmative relief necessary to eradicate the effects of Defendant s unlawful employment practices, including but not limited to rightful-place reinstatement; F. Order Defendant Unions to make whole Donnell Addison, Eddie Anderson, Keith Clark, Billy Herring, Kendrick Hunt, Roy Oliver and Frederick Wiggins by providing appropriate back pay with prejudgment interest, in amounts to be determined at trial, and other affirmative relief necessary to eradicate the effects of Defendants unlawful employment 12

Case 2:05-cv-02717-JDB-tmp Document 41 Filed 07/12/2006 Page 13 of 15 practices; G. Order Defendant Employer to make whole Donnell Addison, Karen Alexander, Eddie Anderson, Keith Clark, Billy Herring, Kendrick Hunt, Roy Oliver and Frederick Wiggins by providing compensation for past and future pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices, in amounts to be determined at trial; H. Order Defendant Unions to make whole Donnell Addison, Eddie Anderson, Keith Clark, Billy Herring, Kendrick Hunt, Roy Oliver and Frederick Wiggins by providing compensation for past and future pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices, in amounts to be determined at trial; I. Order Defendant Employer to make whole Donnell Addison, Karen Alexander, Eddie Anderson, Keith Clark, Billy Herring, Kendrick Hunt, Roy Oliver and Frederick Wiggins by providing compensation for nonpecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices, including emotional and psychological pain and suffering, in amounts to be determined at trial; J. Order Defendant Unions to make whole Donnell Addison, Eddie Anderson, Keith Clark, Billy Herring, Kendrick Hunt, Roy Oliver and Frederick Wiggins by providing compensation for nonpecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices, including emotional and psychological pain and suffering, in amounts to be determined at trial; K. Order Defendant Employer to pay Donnell Addison, Karen Alexander, Eddie Anderson, Keith Clark, Billy Herring, Kendrick Hunt, Roy Oliver and Frederick Wiggins punitive damages for its malicious and/or reckless conduct, in amounts to be determined at trial; L. Order Defendant Unions to pay Donnell Addison, Eddie Anderson, Keith Clark, Billy Herring, Kendrick Hunt, Roy Oliver and Frederick Wiggins punitive damages for its 13

Case 2:05-cv-02717-JDB-tmp Document 41 Filed 07/12/2006 Page 14 of 15 malicious and/or reckless conduct, in amounts to be determined at trial; M. Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper in the public interest; and N. Award the Plaintiffs attorneys fees and expenses and their other costs of this action. JURY TRIAL DEMAND The Plaintiffs request a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by its complaint. Respectfully submitted, EVANS & PETREE PC s/ Michael R. Marshall Michael R. Marshall #15225 Caren B. Nichol #16093 1000 Ridgeway Loop Road Suite 200 Memphis, Tennessee 38120 Phone: (901 525-6781 mmarshall@evanspetree.com s/ Kevin H. Sharp Kevin H. Sharp #16287 Drescher & Sharp, P.C. 1720 West End Ave. Suite 300 Nashville, Tennessee 37203 Phone: (615 425-7111 ksharp@dsattorneys.com 14

Case 2:05-cv-02717-JDB-tmp Document 41 Filed 07/12/2006 Page 15 of 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon: Carson L. Owen, EEOC 1407 Union Ave, Ste. 621 Memphis, Tennessee 38104 Deborah Godwin, Esq. Timothy P. Taylor, Esq. Morgan Keegan Tower 50 N. Front Street Suite 800 Memphis, Tennessee 38103 David A. Velander, Esq. 105 South Sherrin Ave. Louisville, KY 40207 Craig M. Beard, Esq. 88 Union Ave. 14 th Floor Memphis, Tennessee 38103 Nicholas R. Femia 4748 Wisconsin Ave. N.W. Washington, D.C. 20016 via CM/ECF, July 12, 2006. s/michael R. Marshall 15