U.S. Economic Indicators Report Featuring: The Payments Top 5



Similar documents
All Things Payments & EMV. /

Emerging Trends in the Payment Ecosystem: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly DAN KRAMER

Preparing for EMV chip card acceptance

The Impact of Emerging Payment Technologies on Retail and Hospitality Businesses. National Computer Corporation

Payments Transformation - EMV comes to the US

We believe First Data is well positioned to take advantage of all of these trends given the breadth of our solutions and our global operating

Friday, June 5, :15 p.m.

What Merchants Need to Know About EMV

OpenEdge Research & Development Group April 2015

What is EMV? What is different?

Understand the Business Impact of EMV Chip Cards

EMV and Small Merchants:

toast EMV in 2015: How Restaurants Can Prepare for the New Chip-and-Pin Standard

CANADA VS THE USA - THE CONTRAST AND LESSONS FOR MOBILE PAYMENTS

welcome to liber8:payment

An Insightful Analysis Report on APPLE,INC

Secure Payments Framework Workgroup

EMV and Restaurants What you need to know! November 19, 2014

EMV and Restaurants: What you need to know. Mike English. October Executive Director, Product Development Heartland Payment Systems

Android pay. Frequently asked questions

Apple Pay & The New Environment for Mobile Payment Apps

EMV FAQs. Contact us at: Visit us online: VancoPayments.com

THE ROAD TO U.S. EMV MIGRATION Information and Strategies to Help Your Institution Make the Change

The Adoption of EMV Technology in the U.S. By Dave Ewald Global Industry Sales Consultant Datacard Group

THE FIVE Ws OF EMV BY DAVE EWALD GLOBAL EMV CONSULTANT AND MANAGER DATACARD GROUP

U.S. Smart Card Migration: Stripe to EMV Claudia Swendseid, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Terry Dooley, SHAZAM Kristine Oberg, Elavon

A RE T HE U.S. CHIP RULES ENOUGH?

EESTEL. Association of European Experts in E-Transactions Systems. Apple iphone 6, Apple Pay, What else? EESTEL White Paper.

Contactless Payments. Björn Salomon-Sörensen, Account Director - Swedbank November 11, 2015

Payment Methods. The cost of doing business. Michelle Powell - BASYS Processing, Inc.

Inside the Mobile Wallet: What It Means for Merchants and Card Issuers

Best practices for choosing and integrating a mobile payments platform. A GlobalOnePay White Paper

Twelve Transformational Digital Retail Technologies Explained (Part 1)

Apple Pay. Will it transform in-store and in-app payments in the UK? Will it transform in-store & in-app payments in the UK?

Credit card: permits consumers to purchase items while deferring payment

EMV in Hotels Observations and Considerations

2015 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results Acquisition of TransFirst

Card Network Update Chip (EMV) Acceptance in the United States At-A-Glance

Heartland Secure. By: Michael English. A Heartland Payment Systems White Paper Executive Director, Product Development

Dates VISA MasterCard Discover American Express. support EMV. International ATM liability shift 2

THE FUTURE OF MERCHANT ACQUIRING:

Introductions 1 min 4

Mobile Near-Field Communications (NFC) Payments

Visa Recommended Practices for EMV Chip Implementation in the U.S.

SETUP GUIDE. Thank you for your purchase of Hamilton products! In this handy guide, you will discover: ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS SETUP HOW IT WORKS

The Merchant and EMV: What You Need to Know to Prepare for the Magstripe to EMV Transition

Special Report: Trends in Mobile Payment April 2015

Apple Pay. Frequently Asked Questions UK

Payments simplified. 1

Apple Pay. Frequently Asked Questions UK Launch

E-Commerce payment trends. Petr Polak Senior Sales Manager Czech Republic and Slovakia

Mobile Payment: The next step of secure payment VDI / VDE-Colloquium. Hans-Jörg Frey Senior Product Manager May 16th, 2013

Latest and Future development of Mobile Payment in Hong Kong

INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY

EMV Chip and PIN. Improving the Security of Federal Financial Transactions. Ian W. Macoy, AAP August 17, 2015

EMV and Chip Cards Key Information On What This Is, How It Works and What It Means

U.S. Bank. U.S. Bank Chip Card FAQs for Program Administrators. In this guide you will find: Explaining Chip Card Technology (EMV)

PAYMENTS INNOVATION ON STEROIDS

Credit vs. Debit: The Network Perspective

FUTURE PROOF TERMINAL QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE. Review this Quick Reference Guide to. learn how to run a sale, settle your batch

Heartland Payment Systems Inc. April 11, 2014

EMV's Role in reducing Payment Risks: a Multi-Layered Approach

As Mobile Payment Takes Off, Who Will Cash In?

Flexible and secure. acceo tender retail. payment solution. tender-retail.acceo.com

EMV EMV TABLE OF CONTENTS

Euronet s Contactless Solution

EMV FAQs for developers

2011 Merchant Processing Pricing Benchmark Study

PAYMENTS ARE CHANGING, BUT HOW PREPARED ARE RETAIL BANKS?

Q Financial Highlights. October 16, 2013

American Express Contactless Payments

The Canadian Migration to EMV. Prepared By:

Bringing Mobile Payments to Market for an International Retailer

PayLeap Guide. One Stop

The Mobile Wallet. Why It s A Corporate Priority And How To Overcome Three Common Challenges Of Making Mobile Payments Mainstream

Payment Technology Deep Dive. October 13, :00 am 8:50 am

KEEPING PACE WITH MOBILE PAYMENT

Guide to Payment Processing

Fiscal Service EMV Education Series EMV-Compliant Point-of-Sale Card Acceptance for Federal Agencies. Fiscal Service / Vantiv July 27, 2015

World-wide trends in innovation on the acquiring side

PCI and EMV Compliance Checkup

Transcription:

Q3 2014 23 rd Edition This report is a compilation and analysis of US data. Its intent is to provide a deeper understanding of the Payments Industry and therefore, the ability for ETA members to better assess their position in the current economic climate. This is the 23 rd edition of the quarterly released report. The views expressed are those of ETA/TSG and are subject to change. They are shared for educational purposes only. The information is based upon information we consider reliable, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. This report is a member benefit provided to the ETA s 500+ worldwide member companies. U.S. Economic Indicators Report Featuring: The Payments Top 5 Copyright 2014. Electronic Transactions Association/The Strawhecker Group. All Rights Reserved.

INTRODUCTION: The Payments Top 5 Facts: So far, through September, over 75M records have been exposed in 2014, due to a total of 568 breaches according to research from the Identity Theft Resource Center. While this number will continue to grow, this year s most visible breach to date, Home Depot, follows on the heels of last year s Target debacle. Target had over 40M credit/debit cards stolen from a two week period during the 2013 holiday shopping season, while Home Depot, breached between April and September 2014, estimates 56M cards were stolen making it the largest retail card breach on record. The aftermath for Target has been a sales drop-off, stock slump, the stepping down of CEO Steinhafel, and current breach costs of nearly $150M. Home Depot s breach, though larger, expects less pain than Target due to how quickly they announced the breach and the time of year that it occurred (just past the home improvement season). Other recent breaches to note: Jimmy Johns (216 stores), Goodwill (330 stores), UPS (51 stores), SuperValu (over 200 stores), P.F. Chang s (33 restaurants), and Michaels (31 stores). Opinion: Clearly cybercriminals are getting more creative this year, the problem is retailers (and their security infrastructure) are slow to keep up. While a new data breach is popping up weekly, EMV (discussed below) is seeing a rise in awareness with both merchants and consumers. The recent high profile data breaches have turned the public eye towards the payments industry, particularly merchant acquiring companies. To combat, acquirers must educate merchants, encourage PCI compliance, complete a risk analysis, manage passwords, ensure POS security, and prepare a basic incident response plan. Facts: At the end of September, it was announced that PayPal would be splitting away from ebay, creating two separate publicly traded companies. According to both parties, this will allow for them to take advantage of new opportunities to grow. ebay s Marketplaces contributed to over 30% of PayPal s annual revenues, and while last year s Marketplaces had $9.9B in revenue (higher than PayPal s $7.2B), PayPal s annual revenue growth outpaced Marketplaces. The spin-off is expected to be completed in the second half of 2015. ebay s CEO John Donahoe will step down and Devin Wenig will take his place. American Express executive, Daniel Schulman, will take the helm at PayPal. Opinion: PayPal splitting from ebay is a smart move, this allows the entities to each take advantage of more potential opportunities presented to them from the ever-changing payments ecosystem. Also, PayPal will now be able to compete more aggressively with disruptive startups, as well as bigger companies such as Apple. This spinoff will also provide PayPal with wide media coverage as Apple and other industry players have seen significant coverage in recent months. The question that comes up is, will PayPal become a buyer of payments companies in the market, or will PayPal become a purchase target? ebay on the other hand will see slower growth without PayPal as it continues to face competition from Amazon, Google, and Alibaba. 2

INTRODUCTION: The Payments Top 5 Facts: Apple finally announced their foray into payments in September via Apple Pay. Apple Pay is a contactless payment technology utilized through the NFC chips within Apple Watch and iphone 6, allowing for one touch pay with Touch ID. Consumers can add itunes card data, or take a picture of a new card to add, which is then stored in Apple s Passbook. A unique Device Account Number is assigned, encrypted and securely stored in the devices Secure Element instead of using your actual credit/debit cards numbers actual card data is never shared with merchants. Apple Pay will roll out later in October at 220,000 stores in the U.S. by merchants such as BabiesRUs, Bloomingdale s, Disney, Macy s McDonald's, Nike, Panera, Petco, Staples, Subway, and Walgreens. Apple also has in-app partners such as Groupon, OpenTable, and Target. Opinion: This action by Apple, just behind the major announcement of Amazon entering the payments space in August, brings two of the largest technology heavyweights squarely into the merchant payments arena. Apple s entry is consumer-centric while Amazon s is merchant accepting focused. Also, Apple s step into the payments space was well planned and structured to bring the right relationships together; e.g., 800 million potential users from itunes, major merchants (online and offline) to introduce the initiative, and card network/bank partnerships. Finally, more consumers are aware of the idea of mobile payments and more merchants have means of accepting those payments now than before. This is especially true from the merchant perspective given the upcoming EMV liability shift (Oct. 15) - it will be less of a hurdle to only have to upgrade terminals once for both EMV and NFC acceptance. NFC has been in the market for many years with little adoption from consumers and may now get a jump start from Apple s influence. Facts: In August, Amazon announced their competitor to Square s dongle, called Amazon Local Register. Local Register accepts credit/debit cards with mobile phones or tablets using Amazon s dongle. It is compatible with all major card brands and usable on Fire OS, Android, and ios. To undercut Square, Amazon is offering a 1.75% swipe fee until Jan. 2016, which will then increase to 2.5%. The service provides next-day deposits or the ability to spend at Amazon within minutes. Square on the other hand is continuing to define who they are, recently raising $150M on a $6B valuation. Their marketplace started accepting Bitcoin, they pulled their Wallet and launched Order to allow another way to order food, added online appointment booking, the ability to offer cash advances, and new tools to provide analytics to small businesses. Square also acquired food delivery service, Caviar. Opinion: More than two-thirds of the 27M small businesses in the U.S. do not currently accept credit/debit penetration of these mostly sole proprietor, non-accepting micro-merchants is still low. Square has made a dent as over 3M businesses are now using Square as of February 2013, however Square is likely not cannibalizing the SME market from traditional merchant acquirers; most of their merchant base is a merchant sub-set (micro-merchants) that was not pursued by much of the merchant acquiring industry. Amazon is looking to make waves as they undercut both Square and PayPal. With rumors of a cash crunch at Square, this will place further pressure on the company. Who will win out with the micro-merchants? Amazon might have the easier path to success as they have two advantages over Square: a built-in distribution channel and other products to sell beyond payments related services (i.e. office supplies) to these micro-merchants. 2

INTRODUCTION: The Payments Top 5 Facts: EMV, also known as Chip and PIN or Chip and Signature, is a global standard smart-chip technology named after its original creators, Europay International, MasterCard and Visa. Payment instruments such as cards and smartphones are embedded with an encrypted chip that stores and protects cardholder data. EMVenabled devices read data stored in the chip to determine the validity of the card, providing increased fraud protection. All non-petroleum merchants must be able to accept a presented EMV card as of October 2015 or face being held liable for any subsequent counterfeit fraud committed with that card, thus the liability shift. Opinion: Mag-stripe cards aren t going away soon. While the U.S. is the last major market to migrate to EMV, all regions of the world are still in migration status with varying levels of EMV Chip cards (contact & contactless) and varying levels of EMV equipped POS. The best equipped market is Europe, the worst is the U.S. where an estimated 5% or less of merchants are equipped with an EMV ready terminal. Until all cards and all POS terminals migrate to EMV, cards will continue to be issued with both chip and stripe. Considering U.S. history of migrations to PCI Compliance and acceptance of other technologies, it is doubtful that there will be significant migration by the October 2015 liability shift in the U.S. The Payments Top 5 has a significant impact on payments value because of media coverage and Wall Street. The following pages provide additional insight into Payments Indicators affecting the industry. Table of Contents Payments Companies Vs. S&P 500 Page 5 Attrition Summary Page 6 Gross Profit Value Index (GPVI) Page 7 Acquisition Multiples Page 8 Relative Attractiveness of Merchant Verticals Page 9 2

Payments Indicators: Payments Companies Vs. S&P 500 The chart below displays the performance of a $100 investment in an index of selected payments companies which represent the TSG Payments Index - this index is calculated on a value weighted basis using market capitalization and is compared to the S&P 500 which is also calculated using the same methodology. A $100 investment in the TSGPX in Q1 2007 would now be valued at $286, as compared to $138 if invested in the S&P 500. VS. TSGPX S&P 500 +14.7% CAGR $286 $138 +3.8% CAGR The chart above displays the performance of $100 investment in an index of the following listed companies which represent the TSG Payments Index - this index is calculated on a value weighted basis using market capitalization and is compared to the S&P 500 which is also calculated using the same methodology. This analysis does not include affects of re-invested dividends. While some of the companies listed in TSG s Payments Index do not meet the requirements to be a S&P 500 listed company (S&P listed companies have a market cap of at least $3 billion), the S&P 500 served to be the best comparable index to TSG s Payments Index since it is one of the most commonly used benchmarks for the overall U.S. stock market. In fact, many consider it to be the definition of the market. The companies included in TSG s Payments Index met the criteria that at least 50% of their revenues were produced from electronic payments products or services. Ingenico and Gemalto have been removed due to inclusion of NetSpend and Cardtronics as well as their being traded on non-us exchanges. As of Q4 2011 Fundtech has been removed due to an acquisition and Tier Technologies name has been changed to Official Payments. Vantiv was added to the index as of Q1 2012. 3PEA International was added in Q1 2013. LML Payment Solutions and Transaction Network Services were removed as of Q1 2013 due to acquisition. *Calculated using closing data through September 25, 2014. 5

Payments Indicators: Attrition Summary The balance between merchant attrition and growth is the key to portfolio management and profitability. The charts below show the current market rates of both attrition and growth. For example, the left chart shows that the market rate for account attrition was -24% in Q2 2014, meaning that 24% of the merchants left the collective TSG portfolio during that period. However, new sales led to a 26% increase in the size of the portfolio, netting out for a final growth rate of 1.9% during Q2. Average Q2 2014 Attrition & Growth Account Attrition & Growth Volume Attrition & Growth Net Revenue Attrition & Growth 100% 101.9% -24.4% 26.3% 100% -11.3% 2.1% 18.4% 109.3% 100% 106.6% -15.4% 5.1% 16.9% Beginning Attrited New Ending Beginning Attrited Chg in Ret New Ending Beginning Attrited Chg in Ret New Ending Attrition and growth definitions: Attrited Account: An account is considered attrited if net revenue in the current period is $0.00 and was $0.00 in the same period of the prior year Account Attrition: Total attrited accounts in given period divided by total portfolio active accounts from same period of the prior year Volume Gross Attrition: Total volume of attrited accounts from given period of prior year divided by total portfolio volume from same period of the prior year Change in Ret Acct Volume: Annual volume change/growth of retained (non-attrited) accounts for given period divided by total portfolio volume from same period of the prior year Volume Net Attrition: Sum of volume gross attrition and change in retained account volume divided by total portfolio volume from same period of the prior year Net Revenue Gross Attrition: Total net revenue of attrited accounts from given period of prior year divided by total portfolio net revenue from same period of the prior year Change in Ret Acct Net Revenue: Annual net revenue change/growth of retained (non-attrited) accounts for given period divided by total portfolio net revenue from same period of the prior year Net Revenue Net Attrition: Sum of net revenue gross attrition and change in retained account net revenue divided by total portfolio net revenue from same period of the prior year *Numbers may not sum due to rounding Source: TSG Merchant level database of 2.2 million merchants 6

Payments Indicators: Gross Profit Value Index (GPVI) Using TSG s market leading valuation expertise combined with data from its proprietary merchant database, TSG has created an index representing the overall movement in the value of the collective TSG merchant portfolio of 2.2 million merchants. This index is titled the GPVI (GPVI = Gross Profit Value Index) and its purpose is to display changes in the collective value indicators, giving a picture of the U.S. merchant acquiring market s value-change. 1.00 MPPS GPVI Growth Bridge The Growth Bridge below is a visual representation of different levers and their impact on the final change in value. Starting at 1.0 (Q4 11) and working to the right will result in a final value of 1.24 (or 24%). +0.07 +0.06 +0.02 0.00 +0.01-0.05 +0.13 1.24 Beginning GPVI Active Accounts (Base) Annual Vol/Acct (Base) Net Revenue Rate (Base) Percentage of Residuals Paid Out Volume Gross Attrition Rate Retained Acct Volume Growth Rate New Account Production Q4 2011 Q4 2013 Ending GPVI DETAILS OF GPVI CALCULATION TSG created this index, the GPVI, by valuing the future gross profit generated from the TSG portfolio on a quarterly basis and has indexed this value to 1 beginning in Q4 2011. The following bullet points will illustrate the primary assumptions/methodologies that were used to derive the portfolio values by which the GPVI is calculated. Model industry accepted discounted cash flow pro forma model which derives unlevered after tax gross profit as the determinant of cash flow Valuation Date(s) each index is calculated using the value at the end of the given quarter Base Accounts the base accounts are valued as a separate portfolio using financial metrics specific to their recent trailing twelve months performance at the end of the given quarter New Accounts new accounts are valued as a separate new account portfolio using financial metrics specific to their recent trailing twelve months performance as well as metrics from the base accounts recent trailing twelve months performance where appropriate Total Portfolio the value of the total portfolio is simply the sum of the base accounts and the new accounts, this value is then used to calculate the index NOTE: It is important to note that the values derived are not a complete measure of the business value as a whole as operating and sales expenses are not considered in the discounted cash flows. There are factors outside these metrics that influence value, such as quality of merchant, merchant base, and associated risk. 7 Numbers may not sum due to rounding All values represent a change in the identified metric

Annual Sales Volume - $Billions Payments Indicators: Acquisition Multiples This bell curve reviews 90 payments acquisitions from 2000 2014, which include portfolio or merchant portfolio book of merchants, and enterprise which is a portfolio plus sales channels, and/or technology and management. Portfolio AVERAGE: 2.77x Enterprise AVERAGE: 3.57x Timeframe: 2000 2014 Data Set: 90 Transactions Purchase Prices: $300K - $30B Red Plots = Portfolios 95% of multiples ranged from 0.57x to 6.0x.05% < 0.57x 68% of multiples ranged from 1.00x to 5.6x.05% > 6.0x $300bil 16% < 1.00x AVERAGE: 3.3x 16% > 5.6x $150bil $50bil - 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 Source: TSG internal records *Net Revenue = Gross Revenue + Other Income Cost of the Transactions Low Multiple Characteristics No sales channel included in sale Stagnant or declining growth High account attrition ( > 30% per year) Inconsistent net revenue margin Rapidly decreasing net revenue margins Over reliance on non-transaction fees to create revenue No merchant account portability Right of First Refusal No differentiated sales strategy High losses ( > 2bps) Little or no profitability Few cost synergies to buyer Net Revenue Multiple (Annual) High Multiple Characteristics Sales channel included in sale Technology that provides competitive advantage Solid sales growth ( > 10% per year) Low account attrition ( < 20% per year) Consistent net revenue margin Strong management team Ease of merchant account portability Sustainable strategy or market niche Low losses (< 1bp) Good profitability (> 25% RONR) Good cost synergies to buyer 8

Total Net Revenue % Payments Indicators: Relative Attractiveness of Merchant Verticals The chart below shows the relative attractiveness of merchant verticals. Those with high profitability and low attrition (upper right quadrant) are the most attractive this includes Education & Non-Profits, Healthcare, Services, and Construction. The chart below contains only merchants sized between $100k and $250k in annual card sales in order to normalize for merchant size. Tier $100k to $250k 1 : Industry Vertical Total Net Revenue by Net Revenue Net Attrition (TTM Q4 2013) 1.450% 1.400% -9.1% Most Attractive Quadrant 1.350% 1.300% Petroleum Retail Education and Non- Profits Construction 1.250% 1.200% Grocery Home Manufacturing Bus/ Personal Health Entertain. 1.212% 1.150% 1.100% 1.050% Least Attractive Quadrant Eating & Hospitality Auto/ Boat Transport. 1.000% -20% -18% -16% -14% -12% -10% -8% -6% -4% -2% 0% 1 Tier $100k-$250k - A group of merchants, each with annual sales volume between $100,000 and $250,000 2 Total Net Revenue Total gross revenue charged to merchant less total cost of sales divided by total volume 3 Net Revenue Net Attrition Sum of net revenue gross attrition and change in retained account net revenue divided by total SIC code s net revenue from same period of the prior year Sources: TSG Database of 2.2 Million U.S. Merchants Wholesale Wholesale Net Revenue Net Attrition % 9

About ETA The Electronic Transactions Association (ETA) is an international trade association representing companies who offer electronic transaction processing products and services. The purpose of ETA is to influence, monitor and help shape the merchant acquiring industry by providing leadership through education, advocacy and the exchange of information. ETA's membership spans the breadth of the payments industry, from financial institutions to transaction processors to independent sales organizations (ISOs) and equipment suppliers. More than 500 companies worldwide are members of ETA. Please visit www.electran.org for more information. About TSG The Strawhecker Group (TSG) is a management consulting company focused on the electronic payments industry. TSG s Service Groups Payments Strategy - Payments Strategy encompasses the full spectrum of advisory services within the Payments Industry. The depth of these services is built on deep industry knowledge - the Partners and Associates of the firm have an average of over 20 years of industry experience. With clients from card issuers to merchant acquirers, TSG has the experience and expertise to provide real-time strategies. Transaction Advisory - Whether buying or selling, seeking investment funding, or planning your company s exit strategy, TSG s experience can be critical to achieving success. TSG has performed more than 100 Payments Company Valuation and/or Business Assessments in the past three years - ranging in value from $1 million to $1 billion. TSG Metrics - TSG Metrics, the strategic research and analysis division of TSG, provides the Payments Industry with highly focused research and industry-wide studies. TSG Metrics takes data, boils it down to information, transforms it to knowledge and presents it to provide wisdom to its client partners. TSG s Unparalleled Experience TSG consists of Industry leaders with extensive experience leading teams through explosive growth periods, mergers and acquisitions, and international and domestic expansion within the Payments Industry. Both Partners and Associates of the firm have held key senior management positions at leading industry companies including First Data / First Data International, Visa Inc., MasterCard, TSYS, Humboldt Merchant Services, WorldPay, Heartland Payment Systems, Cardservice International, ipayment, Alliance Data, RapidAdvance, Accenture Consulting, Redwood Merchant Services, Chase Paymentech, as well as other leading financial institutions and Payments companies. TSG s Influence Shapes the Payments Industry Over the last three years, TSG has completed over 400 projects for more than 200 different clients including financial institutions, merchant acquirers, card issuers, card associations, technology providers, ISOs, processing companies and the investment community. Additionally, the firm and its Associates sit on several industry committees whose focuses range from emerging product development to governmental regulation advisement. Other recent TSG reports and analysis include (Click for more information): The Top 10 Ways Acquirers Can Block the Breach TSG Analysis: Global Acquisition of PayPros What Benefits Me By Paying a Credit Card Swipe Fee TSG Mobile Payments Infographic ETA/TSG Q1 2014 Economic Indicators Report For more information, contact TSG at info@thestrawgroup.com Subscribe to TSG's NewsFilter * PaymentsPulse.com * Follow TSG on Twitter * Follow TSG on LinkedIn * TheStrawGroup.com 10