SSD Old System vs HDD New

Similar documents
Hard Disk Drive vs. Kingston SSDNow V+ 200 Series 240GB: Comparative Test

HP Z Turbo Drive PCIe SSD

Server: Performance Benchmark. Memory channels, frequency and performance

ALIENWARE X51 PERFORMANCE COMPARISON: SAMSUNG SSD VS. TRADITIONAL HARD DRIVE

Desktop PC Buying Guide

Embedded Operating Systems in a Point of Sale Environment. White Paper

Intel Solid- State Drive Data Center P3700 Series NVMe Hybrid Storage Performance

AP ENPS ANYWHERE. Hardware and software requirements

Several tips on how to choose a suitable computer

Intel Solid-State Drives Increase Productivity of Product Design and Simulation

Full Drive Encryption with Samsung Solid State Drives

CPU. Motherboard RAM. Power Supply. Storage. Optical Drives

Introducing Intel Small Business Advantage

Understanding the Performance of an X User Environment

Accelerating Server Storage Performance on Lenovo ThinkServer

of MME Consulting, Inc.

NV-DIMM: Fastest Tier in Your Storage Strategy

Scaling from Datacenter to Client

DIABLO TECHNOLOGIES MEMORY CHANNEL STORAGE AND VMWARE VIRTUAL SAN : VDI ACCELERATION

Tested product: Auslogics BoostSpeed

Several tips on how to choose a suitable computer

Overhead and Performance Impact when Using Full Drive Encryption with HP ProtectTools and SSD

The Time Is Now. for Platform Refresh

Anti-Virus Comparative - Performance Test (AV Products) May 2014

Performance Test Report: Novell iprint Appliance 1.1

SSDs tend to be more rugged than hard drives with respect to shock and vibration because SSDs have no moving parts.

How NAND Flash Threatens DRAM

The Performance of 2 and 4 HyperDrive4 units in RAID0

FDE Performance Comparison. Hardware Versus Software Full Drive Encryption

A+ Practical Applications Solution Key

Computer Specifications and Technical Notes for Educator Biofeedback System

Intel X58 Express Chipset

How to choose a suitable computer

Evaluation Report: Supporting Microsoft Exchange on the Lenovo S3200 Hybrid Array

Samsung Portable SSD. Branded Product Marketing Team, Memory Business

How To Test For Performance On A 64 Bit Computer (64 Bit)

Minimum Software and Hardware Requirements

Anti-Virus Comparative

Evaluation Report: Accelerating SQL Server Database Performance with the Lenovo Storage S3200 SAN Array

Workstation Virtualization Software Review. Matthew Smith. Office of Science, Faculty and Student Team (FaST) Big Bend Community College

Maximizing Your Server Memory and Storage Investments with Windows Server 2012 R2

Verizon Security Scan Powered by McAfee. Installation Guide for Home Users

What is PC Matic?...4. System Requirements...4. Launching PC Matic.5. How to Purchase a PC Matic Subscription..6. Additional Installations.

PROTECTION SERVICE FOR BUSINESS WELCOME TO THE BUSINESS OF FREEDOM

Performance Brief: MegaRAID SAS 9265/9285 Series

Configuring ThinkServer RAID 100 on the TS140 and TS440

Amadeus SAS Specialists Prove Fusion iomemory a Superior Analysis Accelerator

Windows Imaging and Deployment Software Comparison

PC computer configurations & Windows optimizations (Updated November 2012)

Optimizing SQL Server Storage Performance with the PowerEdge R720

The Impact of Disk Fragmentation on Servers. By David Chernicoff

Analysis of VDI Storage Performance During Bootstorm

I3: Maximizing Packet Capture Performance. Andrew Brown

SOFTWARE UNIT 1 PART B C O M P U T E R T E C H N O L O G Y ( S 1 O B J A N D O B J 3-2)

Intel Xeon Processor E Product Family

A+ Guide to Software: Managing, Maintaining, and Troubleshooting, 5e. Chapter 3 Installing Windows

SSDs tend to be more rugged than hard drives with respect to shock and vibration because SSDs have no moving parts.

Upgrading to Windows 8.1 A Guide for Windows 7 Users Version 1.2

farmerswife Contents Hourline Display Lists 1.1 Server Application 1.2 Client Application farmerswife.com

Fusionstor NAS Enterprise Server and Microsoft Windows Storage Server 2003 competitive performance comparison

Remote Desktop Services

QuickSpecs. HP Z Turbo Drive

Samsung Magician v.4.5 Introduction and Installation Guide

StarWind iscsi SAN: Configuring Global Deduplication May 2012

Maximizing SQL Server Virtualization Performance

EEcoMark v2. An overview of BAPCo EEcoMark v2. Oct

Small Business Endpoint Protection Performance Benchmarks

Charter Business Desktop Security Administrator's Guide

THE AMD MISSION 2 AN INTRODUCTION TO AMD NOVEMBER 2014

HP 128 GB Solid State Drive (SSD) *Not available in all regions.

AMD Processor Performance. AMD Phenom II Processors Discrete Platform Benchmarks December 2008

Avigilon Control Center Server User Guide

Avigilon Control Center 5 System Integration Guide. for Software House C Cure 9000

Q & A From Hitachi Data Systems WebTech Presentation:

VDI Without Compromise with SimpliVity OmniStack and VMware Horizon View

Benefits of Intel Matrix Storage Technology

WHITE PAPER 1

256-bit AES HARDWARE ENCRYPTED SOLID STATE DRIVES

DELL. Virtual Desktop Infrastructure Study END-TO-END COMPUTING. Dell Enterprise Solutions Engineering

Transcription:

SSD technology enjoys many advantages over traditional spinning disk / s. No moving parts makes it more rugged, more resistant to shock and vibration but performance is undoubtedly the biggest benefit SSD technology brings to computing. The recent advances in CPU technology are impressive but in that same time advances in performance have been relatively flat. Users typically experience performance in a system via latency or lack thereof. That is to say, if a system takes a long time to boot and the various applications take a long time to launch the system is said to be slow. At Kingston we understand how data flows in a system, The is the main culprit in this case, the quicker a system can get data into RAM for the CPU to use the faster the system will be and SSD technology makes this possible. Our theory was that we could take an older model system with an older / slower chipset and CPU and make it as fast or faster than a new system using the latest CPU technology but still using a. To test this we tested two notebooks, the specs are below Lenovo T43s (June 212) Intel Core i5 332M 2.6 GHz 4GB DDR3 166 Tester 1 Hitachi 32GB SATA 3.Gbps 72RPM Tester 2 Hitachi 5GB SATA 6.Gbps 72RPM Windows 7 x64 Lenovo T41 (January 21) Intel Core i5 56M 2.66GHz 4GB DDR3 166 Kingston KC3 24GB SSD SATA 6.Gbps Windows 7 x64 * The KC3 is a SATA 3. SSD capable of delivering over 5MB/s bandwidth, the Lenovo T41 notebook is using a SATA 2. limiting drive performance to 3MB/s. Both systems were installed with a fresh copy of Windows 7 with all the latest patches and updates and the latest device drivers from Lenovo s website were used to configure the system. To test performance we did the following Recorded boot times of each system Ran a batch file to open 5 files spanning multiple apps and recorded the time to open them Used Microsoft Security Essentials to run a full system scan comprising of over 3, files and recorded total time to complete the scan Ran the PCMark 7 Comprehensive system test to compare total performance of each system. PCMark 7 by Futuremark puts the test system through a series of workloads spanning digital media content creation, gaming, productivity, computation and storage. This popular benchmark will test CPU, RAM, Video and Storage and the faster the system finishes the workloads the higher the scores. See below for the test results. 2

Boot Times The older Lenovo T41 with a SSD booted to desktop in less than half the time as the current generation laptop. Also bear in mind this was after a fresh install with a clean OS and registry. We would expect the hard drive based system would further slow down over time as apps are installed and various services enabled on the system. The SSD based system would undergo the same changes but with no moving parts on the SSD and much faster random access than a we would expect the boot time delta to increase even further as the systems age. Windows 7 Boot Time 12 12 1 8 115 6 77 4 4 2 2 26 26 T41 T41 with with KC3 KC3 6Gbps 6GB/s SSD SSD T43s T43s with with 6Gbps 6GB/s 72 72 RPM RPM T43s T43s with with 3Gbps 3GB/s 72 72 RPM RPM Seconds to Boot (lower is is beder) 3

Application Launching We ve all clicked on an icon to launch a program and watched that familiar hourglass icon come up while waiting for the application to start. The latency we experience is caused by waiting on the to deliver the instructions for the program and files into RAM so the CPU can process it. To test this we wrote a script that would tell the system to open up 5 files simultaneously made up of the following Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF and JPG. The files ranged in size from 15KB to 51MB and we used a stopwatch to time how long it took each system to open up all 5 files and the applications that run them. As you can see below the older system with an older processor and SSD completed our application launch test in less than half the time as the newer system. Applica-on Launch Time Applica-on Launch Time 6 6 5 5 58 58 4 4 39 39 3 3 2 2 1 1 19 19 T41 with KC3 6GB/s SSD T43s with 6GB/s 72 RPM T43s with 3GB/s 72 RPM T41 with KC3 6Gbps SSD T43s with 6Gbps 72 RPM T43s with 3Gbps 72 RPM Seconds to to Open (lower is beder) is befer) 4

Microsoft Security Essential Scan Microsoft Security Essentials provides real-time protection for your home or small business PC that guards against viruses, spyware, and other malicious software. Security software of this kind, while absolutely necessary, can take up valuable system resources while running. A full system scan in particular can take quite a while so the faster it can be completed the quicker the user can return to using their system. A full system scan is quite disk intensive and a slower can really impede this process. In our test below both systems underwent a full system scan made up of over 7, files. Once again the older technology Lenovo T41 notebook with a SSD completed the test in just sixteen minutes, a full sixteen minutes faster than the Lenovo T43 with a. Microso- Security Essen5als (Full System Scan) Scan) 35 35 3 3 25 25 2 2 15 15 16 32 35 1 1 5 5 T41 T41 with KC3 6GB/s 6Gbps SSD T43s with 6GB/s 6Gbps 72 RPM T43s with 3Gbps 3GB/s 72 RPM RPM Minutes to to complete scan (lower is beeer) is beger) 5

PCMark 7 PCMark from Futuremark is a publicly available benchmark and is widely used by various technology publications and the reviewer industry as a means of objectively measuring overall system performance. Along with overall performance this benchmark allows the user to individually test the performance metrics of the CPU, RAM, Video and Storage in a system. During the benchmark the system is put through various workloads including managing and creation of digital media content, processing of photos and videos, typical office applications, gaming and a computations test. The faster the system is able to complete all the workloads the higher the overall score. Looking at the results below we see that overall system performance increased by an impressive 36%. Of all the tests we ran this by far was the most impressive. Essentially we were able to take an older generation notebook, upgrade it with a SSD, and have it significantly outperform a notebook built with today s CPU and technology. PCMark 7 Overall Performance 3 25 2 2969 2419 15 1 1493 5 T41 with KC3 6Gbps 6GB/s SSD T43s with 6Gbps 3GB/s 72 RPM T43s with 3Gbps 6GB/s 72 RPM Index Score (higher is befer) beeer) See next page for the scores from the individual PCMark 7 Suites. 6

Productivity Suite This workload represents typical consumer / office applications. Multiple page web browsing, malware scanning, word processing and opening multiple applications are all performed in this workload. In this test the SSD based system was over 235% faster than the newer notebook using a. Entertainment Suite The entertainment workload measures system performance specific to CPU and GPU intensive applications such as transcoding and gaming. In addition there is a storage component of this suite that enabled the SSD system to edge out the faster CPU and better graphics processor in the Lenovo T43. Creativity Suite The Creativity workload measures system performance while creating, editing and storing photos and videos. Fast sequential and random storage is needed in this workload and the SSD Based Lenovo T41 won this benchmark by a 43% margin. 16 16 Index Scores (higher is be;er) Index Scores (higher is be;er) 14 14 12 12 1 1 8 6 4 2 8 6 4 2 15414 15414 6182 612 6182 612 668 668 4859 4859 4739 4739 4495 4495 4471 4471 4183 4183 T41 with KC3 6Gbps SSD T41 with KC3 6GB/s SSD T43s with 6Gbps 72 RPM T43s with 6GB/s 72 RPM T43s with 3Gbps 72 RPM T43s with 3GB/s 72 RPM Produc.vity Entertainment Crea.vity Produc.vity Entertainment Crea.vity 7

Conclusion Performance is the primary benefit SSD technology brings to computing. With superior sequential and random speeds, a SSD will improve the performance of any system both old and new. In this specific test we sought to prove that by upgrading an older system with a SSD we could in fact improve its performance equal to or greater than a newer laptop using the hard drive it came with. The tests we conducted proved that to be true. The SSD based system booted faster, opened up applications quicker and in a test of overall system performance outperformed the newer system using a by an impressive 36%. This improvement in overall system performance is equivalent to a processor upgrade which is not very feasible with most notebook systems. We queried our corporate customers on why they upgrade their notebooks to a newer platform and by far the most given answer was lack of performance. Customers, both consumer and corporate, that are considering upgrading their notebooks to gain performance should instead upgrade their existing notebooks with a SSD. SSDs are by far most significant performance upgrade for old and new notebook computers. Workloads The workloads we ran represented a typical employee s use of office applications, word processing, internet browsing, creation and managing of digital media such as pictures, movies and music. Such workloads depend on the performance of Storage, DRAM and CPU. Note that solely CPU and GPU intensive applications such as 3D Rendering and PC Gaming were not used for this benchmark. In those specific workloads it is our belief that the newer system with the most current CPU and GPU would be faster, however we believe that such workloads would most likely occur on a high performance desktop or workstation. 214 Kingston Technology Corporation, 176 Newhope Street, Fountain Valley, CA 9278 USA All rights reserved. All trademarks and registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Printed in the USA MKP-34.1 8