January 18, 2011. Darrel W. Staat, President South Carolina Technical College System 111 Executive Center Drive Columbia, South Carolina 29210



Similar documents
July 26, The Honorable Jenny A. Horne Member, House of Representatives I 07 S. Main Street Summerville, South Carolina 29483

February 3, Marvin C. Jones, Esquire Jasper County Attorney Post Office Box 420 Ridgeland, South Carolina Dear Mr.

June 25, Thus, you request an opinion of this Office on the following issues:

March 20, The Honorable Michael A. Pitts Representative, District C Blatt Building Columbia, SC Dear Representative Pitts:

154 [92 Op. Att y COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES. November 7, 2007

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Index No.: Number: Release Date: 6/11/1999. CC:DOM:FI&P:1 - PLR March 11, 1999 LEGEND:

Home Rule Handbook. For County Government Supplement File With the 2013 Home Rule Handbook. Published by South Carolina Association of Counties

February 24, Buford S. Mabry, Jr., Chief Counsel SC Department of Natural Resources P. 0. Box 167 Columbia, South Carolina

October 14, Law/ Analysis

August 2, Mark Keel, Chief State Law Enforcement Division Post Office Box Columbia, South Carolina

VOLUME NO. 51 OPINION NO. 11

October 10, The Honorable Leon Joe Howard SC House of Representatives District No Barhamville Road Columbia, SC 29204

February 5, 2015 SYLLABUS:

August 25, Dear Mr. Trimboli:

98 [89 Op. Att y EDUCATION. April 28, 2004

Fund = Corporation = Act A = Act B =

COUNTIES. January 24, 2000

The State of South Carolina OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. October 20, 1997

January 15, Mark W. Tollison, Esquire Greenville County Attorney 301 University Ridge, Suite 2400 Greenville, South Carolina

See Op. Att y Gen. 59a-3 (Jan. 18, 1968) (citing Minn. Stat ). 6

49 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 2

Motorcycle Safety Nstruction Program - A Good Deal?

STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF LAW

AN OVERVIEW OF ARKANSAS TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT LAW. Tax increment financing districts, otherwise known as "redevelopment" or "TIF"

STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE December 19, Opinion No.

Political Consultant Form Requirements for Campaign Finance

January 8, 1997 OPINION NO Michael F. Hogan, Ph.D., Director Department of Mental Health 30 East Broad Street Columbus, Ohio

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 211th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 27, 2004

ATTACHMENT D CHARTER SCHOOLS IN MICHIGAN

CHAPTER Senate Bill No A

COUNTY OF COOK. Characteristics of the Position

LETTER OPINION 2012-L-06. May 25, 2012

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia

ARKANSAS FIDELITY BOND TRUST FUND STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL AND SCHOOL DISTRICT BLANKET DISHONESTY BOND Policy No. FBTF12

Videoconferencing Under the Open Meetings Act. Does the Open Meetings Act (Act) allow a city council to hold a meeting by videoconference call?

The State of South Carolina OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

January 2, Counties and County Officers County Treasurer County Treasurer; Deputy Treasurers; Budget; Limitation of Personnel Action

SELF-INSURED FIDELITY BOND PROGRAM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

TO: Mike Kadas, Mayor; City Council; Janet Stevens, Chief Administrative Officer; Department/Division Heads

U.S. Department of Labor

September 12, Opinion No. GA-l 079

South Carolina s Statutory Whistleblower Protections. A Review for SC Qui Tam Attorneys, SC Whistleblower Lawyers & SC Fraud Law Firms

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1445

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

4:15-cv RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

Liability of Volunteer Directors of Nonprofit Corporations (10/02)

Videoconferencing Under the Open Meetings Act. Does the Open Meetings Act (Act) allow a city council to hold a meeting by videoconference call?

ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED BILLS TO REFORM THE WORKERS COMPENSATION SYSTEM

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

Ohio Legislative Service Commission

COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA

June 15, 1951 OPINION NO. 1859

The State of South Carolina OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. July 25, 1996

January 21, Counties and County Officers County Treasurer Deputy Treasurers, Duties; Compensation for State and County Duties

Gen. 115] 115 CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT. May 27, 2004

TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL State of California EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General :

Kansas Statutes - Insurance Laws CHAPTER 40-- INSURANCE Article RISK RETENTION AND PURCHASING GROUPS

April 5, Law/ Analysis

KEN PAXTON ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS. August 14, 2015

Guide to Electronic Disbursement Controls for Payroll Purposes D C A. Community AFFAIRS. State of New Jersey Jon S.

Senate Bill No. 38 Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security

The Board of Education contributes to the Oklahoma Teachers' Retirement System, as required by law and its negotiated agreements.

Title 24-A: MAINE INSURANCE CODE

Supreme Court of Florida

American Payroll Association

Governmental Entity Collection Programs Guide Setoff Debt and Government Entity Accounts Receivable (GEAR) SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

South Carolina Department of Insurance 300 Arbor Lake Drive, Suite 1200 Columbia, South Carolina 29223

TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL State of California. BILL LOCKYER Attorney General : : : : : : : : : : :

LEGISLATURE OF NEBRASKA ONE HUNDRED FOURTH LEGISLATURE FIRST SESSION LEGISLATIVE BILL 16

Examples of Exempted Entities Exempted from Exactly What Varies

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY CIVIL DIVISION

LFN The New Jersey First Act Residency Requirements for Public Employees. October 21, 2011

What Cities Need to Know to Administer Municipal Hotel Occupancy Taxes

How To Know If A Municipal Accountant Is A \"Local Government Officer\" Or A \"Government Employee\" In New Jersey

1320 DUTIES OF SCHOOL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR/ BOARD SECRETARY. 1. A valid certificate as a School Business Administrator.

August 3, Law/Analysis

How To Decide If A Letter From A City Manager Can Be Released To The Public

IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR OKLAHOMA t~jvih. Cu u NTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA JUi~ t 6 2Ul4 PETITION

(Merit System Board, decided February 25, 2004)

To: Leroy Gilbertson January 23, 2001 Director, Arizona State Retirement System Re: Employer Early Retirement Program Benefits. Question Presented

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE April 16, Opinion No.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1987 SESSION CHAPTER 310 SENATE BILL 310

Court of Claims. House Transportation and Justice Subcommittee. Jamie L. Doskocil, Senior Budget Analyst Legislative Service Commission

July 28, This opinion of the Attorney General is issued in response to your request. QUESTION

SENATE, No. 806 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 214th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2010 SESSION

SC REVENUE RULING # Applies to all periods open under the statute. All previous documents and any oral directives in conflict herewith.

WHEREAS, the Division has determined that evidence exists to support the following SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE MATTER OF:

Office of the Prosecuting Attorney of Lewis County, West Virginia

December 1, 1999 Interpretive Letter #874 December USC 92. Re: Insurance Agency Activities in New York Under 12 U.S.C. 92

Federal Housing Finance Board

Local Government Ethics Law. Opinions of the Office of the Attorney General

S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE January 10, Opinion No.

VOLUME NO. 51 OPINION NO. 13

Police Officers and Pre-Discipline Hearings

September 18, 1998 FIRST QUESTION PRESENTED ANSWER GIVEN SECOND QUESTION PRESENTED ANSWER GIVEN THIRD QUESTION PRESENTED ANSWER GIVEN DISCUSSION

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

PERSONAL INCOME TAX BULLETIN

HUDSON RIVER-BLACK RIVER REGULATING DISTRICT ELIGIBILITY FOR HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE. Report 2008-S-51 OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK STATE COMPTROLLER

Transcription:

ALAN WILSON A TIORNEY GENERAL Darrel W. Staat, President South Carolina Technical College System 111 Executive Center Drive Columbia, South Carolina 29210 Dear : We received your request for an opinion of this Office concerning "payroll withholdings for deductions other than the standard deductions currently provided for within current legislation.'' In your letter, you provided the following information: At present, our System Office, state agency H-59, payroll is processed through the Office of The Comptroller General and our withholdings/deductions guidelines are governed by their policies/procedures. However, the SC Technical College System's sixteen Technical Colleges do not process their payroll through the Comptroller General and several of the colleges have requested implementation for additional, optional payroll withholdings as requested by employees. The SC Technical Colleges operate within the policies of the state, but since their payroll is not processed through The Office of the Comptroller General, we are seeking clarity on this issue. Law/ Analysis The Legislature created South Carolina's Technical College System through the enactment of the provisions contained in chapter 53 of title 59. These provisions include statutes creating the State Board for Technical and Comprehensive Education as well as individual state-supported technical institutions and the area commissions that govern those institutions. Therefore, we recognize individual technical colleges as creatures of statute. Our Supreme Court concluded on numerous occasions that creatures of statute only possess "those powers which are specifically delineated" by the Legislature. City of Columbia v. Board of Health and Environmental Control, 292 S.C. 199, 202, 355 S.E.2d 536, 538 (1987). See also, Lexington Law Firm v. South Carolina Dept. of Consumer Affairs, 382 S.C. 580, 585, 677 S.E.2d 591, 594 (2009); S.C. Coastal REMBERT c. DF.NNIS BUil.DINO POST OFFICE Box 11549 COLUMBIA, SC 29211-1549 TELEPHONE 803-734-3970 FACSIMILE 803-253-6283

) Page2 Conservation League v. South Carolina Dep't of Health and Envtl. Control, 363 S.C. 67, 74, 610 S.E.2d 482, 485 (2005). Accordingly, the Legislature must provide technical colleges with the authority to make deductions from their employees' wages. This conclusion is further supported by several prior opinions issued by this Office. This Office has not dealt specifically with state-supported technical colleges making deductions from their employees' wages. However, in several opinions, this Office concluded that various State agencies and political subdivisions must have specific authority to take deductions from State employee wages. In a 1979 opinion, we addressed whether or not school districts may take deductions from. employee wages forthe purposes of"paying association dues, union dues, charitable contributions, credit union payments, etc., on behalf of the employee." Op. S.C. Atty. Gen., June 27, 1979. We stated: The General Assembly has authorized by statute certain deductions from the salaries of public employees. See 8-11-79, 8-11-80, 8-11-90, 9-1-1020, 9-3-510, 9-15-10, Code, supra. With regard to the School District of Greenville County, the General Assembly has enacted statutes permitting the District to make payroll deductions for annuity contracts and insurance contracts for the benefit of its employees. Act No. 906, 1968 Acts and Joint Resolutions; Act No. 994, 1970 Acts and Joint Resolutions. However, no specific authorization was found relating to the deductions noted in your question, and it does not appear that the authorization can be implied by necessity from the general powers of school districts. 59-19-10 et seq., Code, supra. Id. We came to a similar conclusion in an opinion issued in 1981 when we found the Department of Mental Health was not statutorily authorized to may payroll deductions for State Employee Association dues. Op. S.C. Atty. Gen., August 19, 1981. In 1980, we addressed whether the Comptroller General may take deductions from State employee wages for contributions to a particular charity. Op. S.C. Atty. Gen., August 29, 1980. We noted that although State Personnel Regulations allow solicitations by charitable organizations, these regulations do not "include authorization for deduction of contributions from the State employees' payroll, which may be permitted only by statute." Id. In numerous other opinions, this Office similarly concluded that payroll deductions require statutory authorization. See Op. S.C. Atty. Gen. June 27, 2002 (finding a public service district could not make deductions from employees' wages for association membership dues because such a deduction was not authorized by statute); June 21, 1988 (determining that payroll deductions for property and casualty insurance are not permitted

I Page 3 because no statutory authority exists); January 4, 1982 (concluding that payroll deductions for Individual Retirement Accounts are not permitted due to lack of statutory authorization). Accordingly, to answer your question, we do not believe that deductions can be taken from a State employee's wages absent express authorization by the Legislature. According to section 59-53-20 of the South Carolina Code (2004), [a]ll personnel employed in the institutions and programs within the jurisdiction and control of the State Board for Technical and Comprehensive Education are designated state employees whether paid in whole or in part by state funds and are subject to the regulations, guidelines, and policies of the State Board for Technical and Comprehensive Education, the Budget and Control Board, and the state personnel system. This provision establishes that, like the employees discussed in our prior opinions, employees of state-supported technical colleges are State employees. Therefore, we are of the opinion that the Legislature must authorize any deductions taken from their pay. As you mentioned in your letter, several sections in the South Carolina Code discuss various deductions that the Comptroller General is authorized to make from the salaries of public officers and employees. These provisions are located in chapter 11 of title 8 of the South Carolina Code. Section 8-11-33 of the South Carolina Code (Supp. 2009) permits the Comptroller General to withhold from a State employee's wages ifthe State is required to by federal law or in the case of an overpayment. This provision specifies that it applies to payroll processed by the Office of the Comptroller General. In your letter, you indicated that the technical colleges process their own payroll. Therefore, we believe that this provision would not apply to technical colleges. Section 8-11-80 of the South Carolina Code (1986) allows the Comptroller General to make deductions from State employees' wages for group life, hospital, and other insurance. While this provision refers to the Comptroller General as having the authority to make these deductions, in a 1981 opinion, this Office interpreted section 8-11-80 as authorizing State employees of agencies that process their own payroll to make these deductions as well. Op. S.C. Atty. Gen., November4, 1981. Therefore, we believe technical colleges have authority to make deductions from their employees' pay for group life, health, and other insurance as specified under section 8-11-80. Section 8-11-83 of the South Carolina Code addresses deductions for State Employees' Association dues. This provision states that not only is the Comptroller General authorized, but "all other state agencies," may make deductions on behalf of their employees to pay membership dues

I Page4 for the South Carolina State Employees' Association, presuming that the employee requests such a deduction. S.C. Code Ann. 8-11-83. We believe this provision allows technical colleges to take these deductions. Section 8-11-90 of the South Carolina Code ( 1986) allows the Comptroller General, "or any state department, institution, or agency of the state" to make deductions from employees' pay for federal taxes. Therefore, this provision allows technical colleges to make deductions for federal taxes. Section 8-11-91 of the South Carolina Code (1986) permits deductions for charitable contributions. This provision states: The Comptroller General shall, and the governing body of any school district may, upon written authorization by any officer or employee, deduct from the salary or wages of any such officer or employee contributions to be paid over to eligible nonprofit charitable organizations, or groups of such organizations, in the manner prescribed by 8-11-92 through 8-11-97. Chief finance officers of state agencies and institutions maintaining payroll accounts separate from the office of the Comptroller General likewise shall make deductions from the salaries and wages of their officers and employees for such contributions. Like section 8-11-90, section 8-11-91 specifically permits chief finance officers of state agencies, in addition to the Comptroller General, to make deductions from State employee wages for charitable contributions. Thus, we are of the opinion that this provision permits technical colleges to take deductions from employee wages for charitable contributions. Lastly, section 8-11-98 of the South Carolina Code (1986) allows "[t]he Comptroller General or any official ofa political subdivision of the State which is authorized to disburse funds in payment of salaries or wages of public officers or employees shall, upon written authorization, deduct from the salary or wages of such officer or employee the amounts authorized for payment to any lawfully chartered credit union." Because section 8-11-98 also allows officials of political subdivisions in addition to the Comptroller General to make these deductions, we believe that this provision permits technical colleges to make deductions from employees' wages for payments to credit unions. Conclusion State-supported technical colleges are creatures of statute and thus, only possess those powers given to them by the Legislature. Therefore, technical colleges may only take deductions from employees' wages as provided for by the Legislature. Chapter 11 of title 8 of the South

Page 5,11 ):,,, ' :... Carolina Code specifies deductions that State agencies and other governmental bodies may make from State employees' wages. As we discussed above, we believe that most of these apply to technical colleges. REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: v{l= ~r Cy~~Y M. Umng Assistant Attorney General Deputy Attorney General